Obstructive Sleep Apnea with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease among Medicare Beneficiaries

Assessment of Chronic Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure

Undiagnosed chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure may be encountered during the evaluation of sleep-related breathing disorders at the sleep clinic. This article reviews the mechanism of chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure and the systematic approach to the assessment of specific sleep disorders associated with nocturnal hypoventilation encountered in clinical practice.

Intermittent Versus Sustained Hypoxemia from Sleep-disordered Breathing: Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Lung Disease and High Altitude

In a variety of physiologic and pathologic states, people may experience both chronic sustained hypoxemia and intermittent hypoxemia ("combined" or "overlap" hypoxemia). In general, hypoxemia in such instances predicts a variety of maladaptive outcomes, including excess cardiovascular disease or mortality. However, hypoxemia may be one of the myriad phenotypic effects in such states, making it difficult to ascertain whether adverse outcomes are primarily driven by hypoxemia, and if so, whether these effects are due to intermittent versus sustained hypoxemia.

Does Obstructive Sleep Apnea Lead to Progression of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) have important bidirectional relationships that influence the pathophysiology of each disorder. The slim hyperinflated "pink puffer" phenotype of COPD protects against OSA, whereas the heavier "blue bloater" phenotype predisposes to OSA by fluid retention. OSA may aggravate COPD by promoting airway inflammation. COPD-OSA overlap patients have lower quality of life and are at higher risk of cardiovascular comorbidity than either disorder alone due to greater nocturnal oxygen desaturation and sympathetic activation. Management of OSA with positive airway pressure improves COPD outcomes that include lower exacerbation rates compared to untreated patients.

Prevalence and clinical characteristics of sleep disorders in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Sleep disorders, including obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), restless leg syndrome (RLS) and insomnia, are present in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with varied prevalence. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate prevalence of OSA, RLS and insomnia in patients with COPD and summarize their clinical characteristics.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus for eligible articles reporting the prevalence of OSA, RLS, and insomnia in COPD patients. The Newcastle‒Ottawa scale was applied for quality assessment. Odds ratios or mean differences with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were applied for the overall prevalence calculation and clinical characteristics assessment. Sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis and meta-regression were conducted to evaluate the heterogeneity of the results.

RESULTS

Sixty articles reporting the prevalence of sleep disorders in patients with COPD were included, and the prevalence of OSA, RLS, and insomnia reached 29.1 %(95%CI 27.2%-30.9 %), 21.6 %(95%CI 11.8%-33.3 %) and 29.5 %(95%CI 16.9%-44.0 %), respectively. COPD patients with OSA were characterized by male sex (OR 1.631 95 % CI: 1.231-2.161), obesity(kg/m2) (MD 4.435, 95 % CI 3.218-5.652), higher Epworth Sleepiness Scale (MD: 3.741, 95 % CI: 0.655-6.828, p = 0.018), better pulmonary function (MD 5.66, 95 % CI 3.546-7.774) and higher risks of hypertension (OR 1.933 95 % CI 1.382-2.70) and diabetes (OR 1.898 95 % CI 1.264-2.849). COPD patients with RLS were associated with a higher Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS) score (MD 3.444, 95 % CI 1.880-5.008) and a longer COPD duration(year) (MD: 3.656, 95 % CI: 2.209-5.103). COPD patients with insomnia were characterized by female sex(OR 0.556, 95%CI 0.545,0.567, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that OSA, RLS and insomnia are common in COPD patients with specific clinical characteristics. Further studies are needed to explore the interactions between COPD and sleep disorders.

International Consensus Statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea

BACKGROUND

Evaluation and interpretation of the literature on obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) allows for consolidation and determination of the key factors important for clinical management of the adult OSA patient. Toward this goal, an international collaborative of multidisciplinary experts in sleep apnea evaluation and treatment have produced the International Consensus statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea (ICS:OSA).

METHODS

Using previously defined methodology, focal topics in OSA were assigned as literature review (LR), evidence-based review (EBR), or evidence-based review with recommendations (EBR-R) formats. Each topic incorporated the available and relevant evidence which was summarized and graded on study quality. Each topic and section underwent iterative review and the ICS:OSA was created and reviewed by all authors for consensus.

RESULTS

The ICS:OSA addresses OSA syndrome definitions, pathophysiology, epidemiology, risk factors for disease, screening methods, diagnostic testing types, multiple treatment modalities, and effects of OSA treatment on multiple OSA-associated comorbidities. Specific focus on outcomes with positive airway pressure (PAP) and surgical treatments were evaluated.

CONCLUSION

This review of the literature consolidates the available knowledge and identifies the limitations of the current evidence on OSA. This effort aims to create a resource for OSA evidence-based practice and identify future research needs. Knowledge gaps and research opportunities include improving the metrics of OSA disease, determining the optimal OSA screening paradigms, developing strategies for PAP adherence and longitudinal care, enhancing selection of PAP alternatives and surgery, understanding health risk outcomes, and translating evidence into individualized approaches to therapy.

Impact of Positive Airway Pressure Therapy Adherence on Outcomes in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Rationale: The co-occurrence of obstructive sleep apnea and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, termed overlap syndrome, has a poor prognosis. However, data on positive airway pressure (PAP) treatments and their impact on outcomes and costs are lacking. Objectives: This retrospective observational study investigated the effects of PAP on health outcomes, resource usage, and costs in patients with overlap syndrome. Methods: Deidentified adjudicated claims data for patients with overlap syndrome in the United States were linked to objectively measured PAP user data. Patients were considered adherent to PAP therapy if they met Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services criteria for eight 90-day timeframes from device setup through 2-year follow-up. Propensity score matching was used to create comparable groups of adherent and nonadherent patients. Healthcare resource usage was based on the number of doctor visits, all-cause emergency room visits, all-cause hospitalizations, and PAP equipment and supplies, and proxy costs were obtained. Measurements and Main Results: A total of 6,810 patients were included (mean age, 60.8 yr; 56% female); 2,328 were nonadherent. Compared with the year before therapy, there were significant reductions in the number of emergency room visits, hospitalizations, and severe acute exacerbations during 2 years of PAP therapy in patients who were versus were not adherent (all P < 0.001). This improvement in health status was paralleled by a significant reduction in the associated healthcare costs. Conclusions: PAP usage by patients with overlap syndrome was associated with reduced all-cause hospitalizations and emergency room visits, severe acute exacerbations, and healthcare costs.

Sleep in hospitalized patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: an observational study

STUDY OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the risk of undiagnosed sleep disorders among medical patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) compared with those without COPD.

METHODS

In a prospective cohort study, hospitalized medical ward patients without a known sleep disorder were screened, using validated questionnaires, for sleep disorders, such as obstructive sleep apnea and insomnia. Daily sleep duration and efficiency in the hospital were measured via wrist actigraphy. Participants were classified into two groups: those with a primary or secondary diagnosis of COPD and those without a history of COPD diagnosis. Sleep outcomes were compared by COPD diagnosis.

RESULTS

From March 2010 to July 2015, 572 patients completed questionnaires and underwent wrist actigraphy. On admission, patients with COPD had a greater adjusted risk of obstructive sleep apnea (adjusted odds ratio 1.82, 95% confidence interval 1.12-2.96, P = .015) and clinically significant insomnia (adjusted odds ratio 2.07, 95% confidence interval 1.12-3.83, P = .021); no differences were observed for sleep quality or excess sleepiness on admission. After adjustment, compared with patients without COPD, patients with COPD averaged 34 fewer minutes of nightly sleep (95% confidence interval 4.2-64.0 minutes, P = .026), as well as 22.5% lower odds of normal sleep efficiency while in the hospital (95% confidence interval 3.3%-37.9%, P = .024). No statistically significant differences were observed for in-hospital sleep quality, soundness, or ease of falling asleep.

CONCLUSIONS

Among hospitalized patients in medical wards, those with COPD have higher risk of OSA and insomnia and worse in-hospital sleep quality and quantity compared with those without COPD.

Case-Ascertainment Models to Identify Adults with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Using Health Administrative Data: Internal and External Validation

Background

There is limited evidence on whether obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) can be accurately identified using health administrative data.

Study Design and Methods

We derived and validated a case-ascertainment model to identify OSA using linked provincial health administrative and clinical data from all consecutive adults who underwent a diagnostic sleep study (index date) at two large academic centers (Ontario, Canada) from 2007 to 2017. The presence of moderate/severe OSA (an apnea–hypopnea index≥15) was defined using clinical data. Of 39 candidate health administrative variables considered, 32 were tested. We used classification and regression tree (CART) methods to identify the most parsimonious models via cost-complexity pruning. Identified variables were also used to create parsimonious logistic regression models. All individuals with an estimated probability of 0.5 or greater using the predictive models were classified as having OSA.

Results

The case-ascertainment models were derived and validated internally through bootstrapping on 5099 individuals from one center (33% moderate/severe OSA) and validated externally on 13,486 adults from the other (45% moderate/severe OSA). On the external cohort, parsimonious models demonstrated c-statistics of 0.75–0.81, sensitivities of 59–60%, specificities of 87–88%, positive predictive values of 79%, negative predictive values of 73%, positive likelihood ratios (+LRs) of 4.5–5.0 and –LRs of 0.5. Logistic models performed better than CART models (mean integrated calibration indices of 0.02–0.03 and 0.06–0.12, respectively). The best model included: sex, age, and hypertension at the index date, as well as an outpatient specialty physician visit for OSA, a repeated sleep study, and a positive airway pressure treatment claim within 1 year since the index date.

Interpretation

Among adults who underwent a sleep study, case-ascertainment models for identifying moderate/severe OSA using health administrative data had relatively low sensitivity but high specificity and good discriminative ability. These findings could help study trends and outcomes of OSA individuals using routinely collected health care data.

Obstructive sleep apnea and fractures in children and adolescents

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To examine, among girls and boys, associations between site-specific extremity fracture and sleep apnea diagnosis or treatment.

METHODS

A cross-sectional analysis of claims data from 2016-2018 for children aged 2-18. Children with sleep apnea, continuous positive airway pressure, adenotonsillectomy, and fracture were identified using ICD10, CPT and HCPCS codes. We examined sex-stratified associations between site-specific fracture, sleep apnea and sleep apnea treatment.

RESULTS

Among 2,327,104 children, 9,547 (0.41%) had sleep apnea and nearly 61% were treated. Girls with sleep apnea, treated or untreated, had increased odds of lower, but not upper, extremity fracture compared to those without sleep apnea (treated 1.56, 95% CI 1.11, 2.21; untreated OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.09, 2.44). Only boys untreated for sleep apnea had increased odds of lower extremity fracture in comparison to those without a diagnosis of sleep apnea (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.20,2.27). Interestingly, boys treated for sleep apnea but not those untreated, in comparison to boys without sleep apnea, had different (reduced) odds of upper extremity fracture (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.59, 0.95).

CONCLUSIONS

These large datasets provide evidence that both boys and girls with untreated sleep apnea have higher odds of lower extremity fractures. However, treatment for sleep apnea was associated with improved odds of lower extremity fracture only in boys. Upper extremity data were less clear. These data are cross-sectional and cannot show causality, but they suggest that treatment for sleep apnea may lower risk for extremity fractures in boys.

Accuracy of WatchPAT for the Diagnosis of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

The co-existence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), termed the overlap syndrome (OVS), is associated with adverse outcomes that may be reversed with treatment. However, diagnosis is limited by the apparent need for in-laboratory polysomnography (PSG). WatchPAT is a portable diagnostic device that is validated for the diagnosis of OSA that might represent an attractive tool for the diagnosis of OVS.Subjects with established COPD were recruited from a general population. Subjects underwent PSG and simultaneous recording with WatchPAT. Pulmonary function testing and questionnaires were also performed.A total of 36 subjects were recruited and valid data was obtained on 33 (age 63 ± 7, BMI 28 ± 7, 61% male, FEV₁ 56 ± 20% predicted). There was no significant difference in the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) between PSG and WatchPAT (19 ± 20 versus 20 ± 15 events/h; mean difference 2(-2, 5) events/h; p = 0.381). The AHI was not significantly different in rapid eye movement (REM) and non-rapid eye movement (NREM) determined by PSG versus REM and NREM determined by WatchPAT. WatchPAT slightly overestimated total and REM sleep time, and sleep efficiency. The sensitivity of WatchPAT at an AHI cut-off of ≥5, ≥15, and ≥30 events/h for corresponding PSG AHI cut-offs was 95.8, 92.3, and 88.9, respectively; specificity was 55, 65.0, and 95.8, respectively.WatchPAT is able to determine OSA reliably in patients with COPD. The availability of this additional diagnostic modality may lead to improved detection of OVS, which may in turn lead to improved outcomes for a group of COPD patients at high risk of poor outcomes.

Association of Opioid and Benzodiazepine Use with Adverse Respiratory Events in Older Adults with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Rationale: Older adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are at substantially increased risk for medication-related adverse events. Two frequently prescribed classes of drugs that pose a particular risk to this patient group are opioids and benzodiazepines. Research on this topic has yielded conflicting findings.Objectives: The purpose of this study was to examine, among older adults with COPD, whether: 1) independent or concurrent use of opioid and benzodiazepine medications was associated with hospitalizations for respiratory events, and 2) this association was exacerbated by the presence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).Methods: We conducted a case-control study of Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥66 years, who were diagnosed with COPD in 2013, using the 5% national Medicare database. Cases (n = 3,232) were defined as patients hospitalized for a primary COPD-related respiratory diagnosis in 2014 and were matched with up to two control subjects (n = 6,247) on index date, age, sex, socioeconomic status, comorbidity, presence of OSA, COPD medication, and COPD complexity.Results: In comparison to the referent (no opioid or benzodiazepine use), opioid use alone (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.52-1.97), benzodiazepine use alone (aOR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.21-1.66), and concurrent opioid/ benzodiazepine use (aOR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.94-2.77) in the 30 days before the event/index date were all associated with an increased risk of hospitalization for a respiratory condition. Risk of hospitalization was higher with concurrent opioid and benzodiazepine use when compared with use of either medication alone. There was no statistically significant interaction between OSA and either of the drugs, alone or in combination. However, the adverse respiratory effects of concurrent opioid and benzodiazepine use were increased in patients with a high degree of COPD complexity. All of the above findings persisted using exposure windows that extended to 60 and 90 days before the event/index date.Conclusions: Among older adults with COPD, use of opioid and benzodiazepine medications alone or in combination were associated with increased adverse respiratory events. The adverse effects of these medications were not exacerbated in patients with COPD-OSA overlap syndrome. However, the adverse impact of dual opioid and benzodiazepine was greater in patients with high-complexity COPD.