Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of ceftaroline fosamil

New Antimicrobials for Gram-Positive Sustained Infections: A Comprehensive Guide for Clinicians

Antibiotic resistance is a public health problem with increasingly alarming data being reported. Gram-positive bacteria are among the protagonists of severe nosocomial and community infections. The objective of this review is to conduct an extensive examination of emerging treatments for Gram-positive infections including ceftobiprole, ceftaroline, dalbavancin, oritavancin, omadacycline, tedizolid, and delafloxacin. From a methodological standpoint, a comprehensive analysis on clinical trials, molecular structure, mechanism of action, microbiological targeting, clinical use, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic features, and potential for therapeutic drug monitoring will be addressed. Each antibiotic paragraph is divided into specialized microbiological, clinical, and pharmacological sections, including detailed and appropriate tables. A better understanding of the latest promising advances in the field of therapeutic options could lead to the development of a better approach in managing antimicrobial therapy for multidrug-resistant Gram-positive pathogens, which increasingly needs to be better stratified and targeted.

In vitro susceptibility of ceftaroline against clinically important Gram-positive cocci, Haemophilus species and Klebsiella pneumoniae in Taiwan: Results from the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance (ATLAS) in 2012-2018

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Ceftaroline, with a unique activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), was not launched in Taiwan before 2019. The in vitro susceptibility data of ceftaroline against important Taiwanese pathogens are lacking.

METHODS

The in vitro susceptibility of ceftaroline against important pathogens collected from 2012 through 2018 were extracted from the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance program. Broth microdilution method was used to determine the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) to ceftaroline against all isolates.

RESULTS

During the study period, the in vitro data regarding isolates of S. aureus (n = 2049), Staphylococcus epidermidis (n = 185), Streptococcus pneumoniae (n = 334), Streptococcus pyogenes (n = 170), Haemophilus influenzae (n = 75), Haemophilus parainfluenzae (n = 10) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 680) regardless of hospital sites of collection were analyzed. Among the S. aureus isolates studied, 19.4% showed MICs of 1 mg/L to ceftaroline, and 4.4% showed in vitro susceptible-dose dependent to ceftaroline (all MICs, 2 mg/L). Most of other Gram-positive cocci, all H. influenzae and H. parainfluenzae isolates were susceptible to ceftaroline. By contrast, about one-third (35.9%) of K. pneumoniae isolates, irrespective of infection sources, exhibited non-susceptibility to ceftaroline (MIC range, 0.015-256 mg/L; MIC50 and MIC90 values, 0.12 and 256 mg/L, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

From the pharmacodynamic perspectives, the ceftaroline dosage of 600 mg as a 2-h intravenous infusion every 8 h is effective against all S. aureus and other Gram-positive isolates regardless of acquisition sites in Taiwan. Before ceftaroline is prescribed in treatment of the patient with Gram-negative infection, a cautious evaluation about patient's healthcare-associated factor is warranted.

Quantification of Ceftaroline in Human Plasma Using High-Performance Liquid Chromatography with Ultraviolet Detection: Application to Pharmacokinetic Studies

This study was conducted to develop a rapid, simple and reproducible method for the quantification of ceftaroline in plasma samples by high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection (HPLC-UV). Sample processing consisted of methanol precipitation and then, after centrifugation, the supernatant was injected into the HPLC system, working in isocratic mode. Ceftaroline was detected at 238 nm at a short acquisition time (less than 5 min). The calibration curve was linear over the concentration range from 0.25 to 40 µg/mL, and the method appeared to be selective, precise and accurate. Ceftaroline in plasma samples was stable at -80 °C for at least 3 months. The method was successfully applied to characterize the pharmacokinetic profile of ceftaroline in two critically ill patients and to evaluate whether the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target was reached or not with the dose regimen administered.

Antimicrobial Dose Reduction in Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: Myth or Real Need? A Practical Approach for Guiding Dose Optimization of Novel Antibiotics

Acute kidney injury represents a common complication in critically ill patients affected by septic shock and in many cases continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) may be required. In this scenario, antimicrobial dose optimization is highly challenging as the extracorporeal circuit may cause several pharmacokinetic alterations, which add up to volume of distribution and clearance variations resulting from sepsis. Variations in CRRT settings (i.e. modality of solute removal, type of filter material, blood flow rate and effluent flow rate), coupled with the presence of residual and/or recovering renal function, may cause dynamic variations in the clearance of hydrophilic antimicrobials. This means that dose reduction may not always be needed. Nowadays, the lack of pharmacokinetic data for novel antimicrobials during CRRT limits evidence-based dose recommendations for critically ill patients in this setting, thus making available evidence hardly applicable in real-world scenarios. This review aims to summarize the major determinants involved in antimicrobial clearance, and the available pharmacokinetic studies performed during CRRT involving novel antibiotics used for the management of multidrug-resistant Gram-positive and Gram-negative infections (namely ceftolozane–tazobactam, ceftazidime–avibactam, cefiderocol, imipenem–relebactam, meropenem–vaborbactam, ceftaroline, ceftobiprole, dalbavancin, and fosfomycin), providing a practical approach in guiding dose optimization in this special population.

The use of extrapolation based on modeling and simulation to support high-dose regimens of ceftaroline fosamil in pediatric patients with complicated skin and soft-tissue infections

A model-informed drug development approach was used to select ceftaroline fosamil high-dose regimens for pediatric patients with complicated skin and soft-tissue infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus with a ceftaroline minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 2 or 4 mg/L. Steady-state ceftaroline concentrations were simulated using a population pharmacokinetics (PK) model for ceftaroline fosamil and ceftaroline including data from 304 pediatric subjects and 944 adults. Probability of target attainment (PTA) for various simulated pediatric high-dose regimens and renal function categories were calculated based on patients achieving 35% fT>MIC (S. aureus PK/pharmacodynamic target for 2-log10 bacterial killing). For extrapolation of efficacy, simulated exposures and PTA were compared to adults with normal renal function receiving high-dose ceftaroline fosamil (600 mg 2-h infusions every 8 h). For safety, predicted ceftaroline exposures were compared with observed pediatric and adult data. Predicted ceftaroline exposures for the approved pediatric high-dose regimens (12, 10, or 8 mg/kg by 2-h infusions every 8 h for patients aged >2 to <18 years with normal/mild, moderate, or severe renal impairment, respectively; 10 mg/kg by 2-h infusions every 8 h for patients aged ≥2 months to <2 years with normal renal function/mild impairment) were well matched to adults with normal renal function. Median predicted maximum concentration at steady state (Cmax,ss ) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve over 24 h at steady state pediatric to adult ratios were 0.907-1.33 and 0.940-1.41, respectively. PTAs (>99% and ≥81% for MICs of 2 and 4 mg/L, respectively) matched or exceeded the adult predictions. Simulated Cmax,ss values were below the maximum observed data in other indications, including a high-dose pediatric pneumonia trial, which reported no adverse events related to high exposure.

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Target Attainment in Adult and Pediatric Patients Following Administration of Ceftaroline Fosamil as a 5-Minute Infusion

The key pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) efficacy index for β-lactam antibiotics is the percentage of time that free drug concentrations exceed the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of bacteria during each dosing interval (fT>MIC). Ceftaroline fosamil, the prodrug of the β-lactam ceftaroline, was initially approved for administration as 60-minute intravenous (IV) infusions. Population PK analyses comparing exposure and PK/PD target attainment for 5-minute and 60-minute IV infusions, described here, have supported ceftaroline fosamil labeling updates to include variable infusion durations of 5 to 60 minutes in adults and children aged ≥2 months. A 2-compartment disposition PK model for ceftaroline fosamil and ceftaroline was used to predict steady-state ceftaroline exposures (maximum plasma concentrations [Cmax,ss ] and area under the plasma concentration-time curve over 24 hours [AUCss,0-24 ]) and probability of target attainment in simulated adult and pediatric patients with various degrees of renal function receiving standard doses of ceftaroline fosamil as 5-minute or 60-minute IV infusions. Across age groups and renal function categories, median ceftaroline AUCss,0-24 values were similar for 5-minute and 60-minute infusions, whereas Cmax,ss was up to 42% higher for 5-minute infusions. Both infusion durations achieved >99% probability of target attainment based on PK/PD targets for Staphylococcus aureus (35% fT>MIC) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (44% fT>MIC) at European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing/Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute MIC breakpoints (1 mg/L and 0.25/0.5 mg/L, respectively). These findings support administration of standard ceftaroline fosamil doses over 5 to 60 minutes for adults and children aged ≥2 months, providing added flexibility to clinicians and patients.

Susceptibility of clinical isolates of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and phenotypic non-extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae to ceftaroline in Taiwan: Results from Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance (ATLAS) in 2012-2018 and Surveillance of Multicentre Antimicrobial Resistance in Taiwan (SMART) in 2018-2019

Data on ceftaroline (CPT) susceptibility amongst clinical isolates of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA, n=1284) and phenotypic non-extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing (non-ESBL-P) Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=466), obtained from the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance (ATLAS) programme from 2012 to 2018, and selected MRSA isolates from patients with bloodstream infections (BSIs) (n=95) from the Surveillance of Multicentre Antimicrobial Resistance in Taiwan (SMART) programme from 2018 to 2019 were analysed. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of ATLAS isolates were determined using the broth microdilution method, whereas the MICs of SMART BSI-MRSA isolates were determined using the Etest and MicroScan system. The pharmacokinetic profiles and pharmacodynamic parameters of CPT were applied to explore the optimal dosage against infections caused by Taiwanese MRSA and K. pneumoniae isolates. Approximately 7.1% of ATLAS MRSA isolates were susceptible-dose dependent (S-DD) to CPT, and 19.7% of the non-ESBL-P K. pneumoniae isolates were not susceptible to CPT. Amongst the ATLAS MRSA isolates, the S-DD rates to CPT amongst isolates causing lower respiratory tract infections were 11.9% and 8.5% for isolates from intensive care units (ICUs) and general wards (GWs), and those causing skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) were 20% and 5.3% for isolates from ICUs and GWs, respectively (P=0.015). Of the SSTI MRSA isolates from GWs, 22.7% displayed vancomycin MICs >1 mg/L. Amongst 95 SMART BSI MRSA isolates, 28 (46.7%) isolates exhibited lower CPT MICs by the Etest compared with 60 isolates with CPT MICs of 1-2 mg/L by the MicroScan system. CPT 600 mg as a 2-h intravenous infusion every 8 h is suggested for treatment of infections caused by MRSA and phenotypic non-ESBL-P K. pneumoniae in Taiwan.

A critical review on the clinical pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical trials of ceftaroline

Only a parenteral formulation of ceftaroline is commercially available, and the prodrug, ceftaroline fosamil, is hydrolyzed quickly and completely upon intravenous administration. Ceftaroline is relatively minimally bound to plasma proteins (15-28 %), with a volume of distribution of 30-40 L. Ceftaroline undergoes minimal metabolism and does not appear to be a cytochrome P450 substrate. Its renal clearance (e.g. 4-7 L/h after multiple dosing) approximates glomerular filtration rate, with a terminal half-life of ~2.6 h in healthy subjects. The pharmacokinetics of ceftaroline have been described thoroughly in clinical investigations primarily conducted by the manufacturer. Despite its indications for treating skin and skin structure infections (SSSI) or community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), some studies that contributed data to the final drug labelling were conducted only in healthy volunteers. A significant amount of data have been contributed by the drug maker, and the overall quality of the pharmacodynamics and clinical data, based on our critical analysis provided in this review, is strong. Ceftaroline can be considered as a therapeutic alternative for complicated SSSI and CAP (Pneumonia Outcome Research Team Class III-IV). The current dosing regimen of ceftaroline 600 mg intravenously every 12 h appears sufficient to establish pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships and achieve optimal clinical efficacy. More clinical studies are needed to define the place of ceftaroline in therapy for SSSI, CAP, and other indications such as osteomyelitis, endocarditis, and other types of pneumonia. Moreover, continued development in population modelling incorporating more patient-specific data would allow further analysis to identify intrinsic and extrinsic factors that influence the pharmacokinetics of ceftaroline in humans.

Pharmacokinetics of ceftaroline in normal body weight and obese (classes I, II, and III) healthy adult subjects

The pharmacokinetic profile of ceftaroline has not been well characterized in obese adults. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of ceftaroline in 32 healthy adult volunteers aged 18 to 50 years in the normal, overweight, and obese body size ranges. Subjects were evenly assigned to 1 of 4 groups based on their body mass index (BMI) and total body weight (TBW) (ranges, 22.1 to 63.5 kg/m(2) and 50.1 to 179.5 kg, respectively). Subjects in the lower-TBW groups were matched by age, sex, race/ethnicity, and serum creatinine to the upper-BMI groups. Serial plasma and urine samples were collected over 12 h after the start of the infusion, and the concentrations of ceftaroline fosamil (prodrug), ceftaroline, and ceftaroline M-1 (inactive metabolite) were assayed. Noncompartmental and population pharmacokinetic analyses were used to evaluate the data. The mean plasma ceftaroline maximum concentration and area under the curve were ca. 30% lower in subjects with a BMI of ≥40 kg/m(2) compared to those <30 kg/m(2). A five-compartment pharmacokinetic model with zero-order infusion and first-order elimination optimally described the plasma concentration-time profiles of the prodrug and ceftaroline. Estimated creatinine clearance (eCLCR) and TBW best explained ceftaroline clearance and volume of distribution, respectively. Although lower ceftaroline plasma concentrations were observed in obese subjects, Monte Carlo simulations suggest the probability of target attainment is ≥90% when the MIC is ≤1 μg/ml irrespective of TBW or eCLCR. No dosage adjustment for ceftaroline appears to be necessary based on TBW alone in adults with comparable eCLCR. Confirmation of these findings in infected obese patients is necessary to validate these findings in healthy volunteers. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01648127.).