Cortical Ripples during NREM Sleep and Waking in Humans

Motifs of human hippocampal and cortical high frequency oscillations structure processing and memory of naturalistic stimuli

The discrete events of our narrative experience are organized by the neural substrate that underlies episodic memory. This narrative process is segmented into discrete units by event boundaries. This permits a replay process that acts to consolidate each event into a narrative memory. High frequency oscillations (HFOs) are a potential mechanism for synchronizing neural activity during these processes. Here, we use intracranial recordings from participants viewing and freely recalling a naturalistic stimulus. We show that hippocampal HFOs increase following event boundaries and that coincident hippocampal-cortical HFOs (co-HFOs) occur in cortical regions previously shown to underlie event segmentation (inferior parietal, precuneus, lateral occipital, inferior frontal cortices). We also show that event-specific patterns of co-HFOs that occur during event viewing re-occur following the subsequent three event boundaries (in decaying fashion) and also during recall. This is consistent with models that support replay as a mechanism for memory consolidation. Hence, HFOs may coordinate activity across brain regions serving widespread event segmentation, encode naturalistic memory, and bind representations to assemble memory of a coherent, continuous experience.

Binding of cortical functional modules by synchronous high-frequency oscillations

Whether high-frequency phase-locked oscillations facilitate integration ('binding') of information across widespread cortical areas is controversial. Here we show with intracranial electroencephalography that cortico-cortical co-ripples (~100-ms-long ~90 Hz oscillations) increase during reading and semantic decisions, at the times and co-locations when and where binding should occur. Fusiform wordform areas co-ripple with virtually all language areas, maximally from 200 to 400 ms post-word-onset. Semantically specified target words evoke strong co-rippling between wordform, semantic, executive and response areas from 400 to 800 ms, with increased co-rippling between semantic, executive and response areas prior to correct responses. Co-ripples were phase-locked at zero lag over long distances (>12 cm), especially when many areas were co-rippling. General co-activation, indexed by non-oscillatory high gamma, was mainly confined to early latencies in fusiform and earlier visual areas, preceding co-ripples. These findings suggest that widespread synchronous co-ripples may assist the integration of multiple cortical areas for sustained periods during cognition.

Coordinated NREM sleep oscillations among hippocampal subfields modulate synaptic plasticity in humans

The integration of hippocampal oscillations during non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep is crucial for memory consolidation. However, how cardinal sleep oscillations bind across various subfields of the human hippocampus to promote information transfer and synaptic plasticity remains unclear. Using human intracranial recordings from 25 epilepsy patients, we find that hippocampal subfields, including DG/CA3, CA1, and SUB, all exhibit significant delta and spindle power during NREM sleep. The DG/CA3 displays strong coupling between delta and ripple oscillations with all the other hippocampal subfields. In contrast, the regions of CA1 and SUB exhibit more precise coordination, characterized by event-level triple coupling between delta, spindle, and ripple oscillations. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the synaptic plasticity within the hippocampal circuit, as indexed by delta-wave slope, is linearly modulated by spindle power. In contrast, ripples act as a binary switch that triggers a sudden increase in delta-wave slope. Overall, these results suggest that different subfields of the hippocampus regulate one another through diverse layers of sleep oscillation synchronization, collectively facilitating information processing and synaptic plasticity during NREM sleep.

High frequency oscillations in human memory and cognition: a neurophysiological substrate of engrams?

Despite advances in understanding the cellular and molecular processes underlying memory and cognition, and recent successful modulation of cognitive performance in brain disorders, the neurophysiological mechanisms remain underexplored. High frequency oscillations beyond the classic electroencephalogram spectrum have emerged as a potential neural correlate of fundamental cognitive processes. High frequency oscillations are detected in the human mesial temporal lobe and neocortical intracranial recordings spanning gamma/epsilon (60-150 Hz), ripple (80-250 Hz) and higher frequency ranges. Separate from other non-oscillatory activities, these brief electrophysiological oscillations of distinct duration, frequency and amplitude are thought to be generated by coordinated spiking of neuronal ensembles within volumes as small as a single cortical column. Although the exact origins, mechanisms and physiological roles in health and disease remain elusive, they have been associated with human memory consolidation and cognitive processing. Recent studies suggest their involvement in encoding and recall of episodic memory with a possible role in the formation and reactivation of memory traces. High frequency oscillations are detected during encoding, throughout maintenance, and right before recall of remembered items, meeting a basic definition for an engram activity. The temporal coordination of high frequency oscillations reactivated across cortical and subcortical neural networks is ideally suited for integrating multimodal memory representations, which can be replayed and consolidated during states of wakefulness and sleep. High frequency oscillations have been shown to reflect coordinated bursts of neuronal assembly firing and offer a promising substrate for tracking and modulation of the hypothetical electrophysiological engram.

Hypnotic treatment improves sleep architecture and EEG disruptions and rescues memory deficits in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome

Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is associated with disrupted cognition and sleep abnormalities. Sleep loss negatively impacts cognitive function, and one untested possibility is that disrupted cognition in FXS is exacerbated by abnormal sleep. We tested whether ML297, a hypnotic acting on G-protein-activated inward-rectifying potassium (GIRK) channels, could reverse sleep phenotypes and disrupted memory in Fmr1-/y mice. Fmr1-/y mice exhibit reduced non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep and fragmented NREM architecture, altered sleep electroencephalogram (EEG) oscillations, and reduced EEG coherence between cortical areas; these are partially reversed following ML297 administration. Treatment following contextual fear or spatial learning restores disrupted memory consolidation in Fmr1-/y mice. During memory recall, Fmr1-/y mice show an altered balance of activity among hippocampal principal neurons vs. parvalbumin-expressing interneurons; this is partially reversed by ML297. Because sleep disruption could impact neurophysiological phenotypes in FXS, augmenting sleep may improve disrupted cognition in this disorder.

Coupled sleep rhythms for memory consolidation

How do passing moments turn into lasting memories? Sheltered from external tasks and distractions, sleep constitutes an optimal state for the brain to reprocess and consolidate previous experiences. Recent work suggests that consolidation is governed by the intricate interaction of slow oscillations (SOs), spindles, and ripples - electrophysiological sleep rhythms that orchestrate neuronal processing and communication within and across memory circuits. This review describes how sequential SO-spindle-ripple coupling provides a temporally and spatially fine-tuned mechanism to selectively strengthen target memories across hippocampal and cortical networks. Coupled sleep rhythms might be harnessed not only to enhance overnight memory retention, but also to combat memory decline associated with healthy ageing and neurodegenerative diseases.

Scalp and hippocampal sleep correlates of memory function in drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy

Seminal animal studies demonstrated the role of sleep oscillations such as cortical slow waves, thalamocortical spindles, and hippocampal ripples in memory consolidation. In humans, whether ripples are involved in sleep-related memory processes is less clear. Here, we explored the interactions between sleep oscillations (measured as traits) and general episodic memory abilities in 26 adults with drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy who performed scalp-intracranial electroencephalographic recordings and neuropsychological testing, including two analogous hippocampal-dependent verbal and nonverbal memory tasks. We explored the relationships between hemispheric scalp (spindles, slow waves) and hippocampal physiological and pathological oscillations (spindles, slow waves, ripples, and epileptic spikes) and material-specific memory function. To differentiate physiological from pathological ripples, we used multiple unbiased data-driven clustering approaches. At the individual level, we found material-specific cerebral lateralization effects (left-verbal memory, right-nonverbal memory) for all scalp spindles (rs > 0.51, ps < 0.01) and fast spindles (rs > 0.61, ps < 0.002). Hippocampal epileptic spikes and short pathological ripples, but not physiological oscillations, were negatively (rs > -0.59, ps < 0.01) associated with verbal learning and retention scores, with left lateralizing and antero-posterior effects. However, data-driven clustering failed to separate the ripple events into defined clusters. Correlation analyses with the resulting clusters revealed no meaningful or significant associations with the memory scores. Our results corroborate the role of scalp spindles in memory processes in patients with drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy. Yet, physiological and pathological ripples were not separable when using data-driven clustering, and thus our findings do not provide support for a role of sleep ripples as trait-like characteristics of general memory abilities in epilepsy.

Pathological neurons generate ripples at the UP-DOWN transition disrupting information transfer

OBJECTIVE

To confirm and investigate why pathological high-frequency oscillations (pHFOs), including ripples (80-200 Hz) and fast ripples (200-600 Hz), are generated during the UP-DOWN transition of the slow wave and if information transmission mediated by ripple temporal coupling is disrupted in the seizure-onset zone (SOZ).

METHODS

We isolated 217 total units from 175.95 intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) contact-hours of synchronized macro- and microelectrode recordings from 6 patients. Sleep slow oscillation (.1-2 Hz) epochs were identified in the iEEG recording. iEEG HFOs that occurred superimposed on the slow wave were transformed to phasors and adjusted by the phase of maximum firing in nearby units (i.e., maximum UP). We tested whether, in the SOZ, HFOs and associated action potentials (APs) occur more often at the UP-DOWN transition. We also examined ripple temporal correlations using cross-correlograms.

RESULTS

At the group level in the SOZ, HFO and HFO-associated AP probability was highest during the UP-DOWN transition of slow wave excitability (p < < .001). In the non-SOZ, HFO and HFO-associated AP was highest during the DOWN-UP transition (p < < .001). At the unit level in the SOZ, 15.6% and 20% of units exhibited more robust firing during ripples (Cohen's d = .11-.83) and fast ripples (d = .36-.90) at the UP-DOWN transition (p < .05 f.d.r. corrected), respectively. By comparison, also in the SOZ, 6.6% (d = .14-.30) and 8.5% (d = .33-.41) of units had significantly less firing during ripples and fast ripples at the UP-DOWN transition, respectively. Additional data shows that ripple and fast ripple temporal correlations, involving global slow waves, between the hippocampus, entorhinal cortex, and parahippocampal gyrus were reduced by >50% in the SOZ compared to the non-SOZ (N = 3).

SIGNIFICANCE

The UP-DOWN transition of slow wave excitability facilitates the activation of pathological neurons to generate pHFOs. Ripple temporal correlations across brain regions may be important in memory consolidation and are disrupted in the SOZ, perhaps by pHFO generation.

Single closed-loop acoustic stimulation targeting memory consolidation suppressed hippocampal ripple and thalamo-cortical spindle activity in mice

Brain rhythms of sleep reflect neuronal activity underlying sleep-associated memory consolidation. The modulation of brain rhythms, such as the sleep slow oscillation (SO), is used both to investigate neurophysiological mechanisms as well as to measure the impact of sleep on presumed functional correlates. Previously, closed-loop acoustic stimulation in humans targeted to the SO Up-state successfully enhanced the slow oscillation rhythm and phase-dependent spindle activity, although effects on memory retention have varied. Here, we aim to disclose relations between stimulation-induced hippocampo-thalamo-cortical activity and retention performance on a hippocampus-dependent object-place recognition task in mice by applying acoustic stimulation at four estimated SO phases compared to sham condition. Across the 3-h retention interval at the beginning of the light phase closed-loop stimulation failed to improve retention significantly over sham. However, retention during SO Up-state stimulation was significantly higher than for another SO phase. At all SO phases, acoustic stimulation was accompanied by a sharp increase in ripple activity followed by about a second-long suppression of hippocampal sharp wave ripple and longer maintained suppression of thalamo-cortical spindle activity. Importantly, dynamics of SO-coupled hippocampal ripple activity distinguished SOUp-state stimulation. Non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep was not impacted by stimulation, yet preREM sleep duration was effected. Results reveal the complex effect of stimulation on the brain dynamics and support the use of closed-loop acoustic stimulation in mice to investigate the inter-regional mechanisms underlying memory consolidation.

Age-Dependent Activation of Pannexin1 Function Contributes to the Development of Epileptogenesis in Autosomal Dominant Sleep-related Hypermotor Epilepsy Model Rats

To explore the processes of epileptogenesis/ictogenesis, this study determined the age-dependent development of the functional abnormalities in astroglial transmission associated with pannexin1-hemichannel using a genetic rat model of autosomal dominant sleep-related hypermotor epilepsy (ADSHE) named 'S286L-TG'. Pannexin1 expression in the plasma membrane of primary cultured cortical astrocytes and the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), which is an ADSHE focus region, were determined using capillary immunoblotting. Astroglial D-serine releases induced by artificial high-frequency oscillation (HFO)-evoked stimulation, the removal of extracellular Ca2+, and the P2X7 receptor agonist (BzATP) were determined using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC). The expressions of pannexin1 in the plasma membrane fraction of the OFC in S286L-TG at four weeks old were almost equivalent when compared to the wild type. The pannexin1 expression in the OFC of the wild type non-statistically decreased age-dependently, whereas that in S286L-TG significantly increased age-dependently, resulting in relatively increasing pannexin1 expression from the 7- (at the onset of interictal discharge) and 10-week-old (after the ADSHE seizure onset) S286L-TG compared to the wild type. However, no functional abnormalities of astroglial pannexin1 expression or D-serine release through the pannexin1-hemichannels from the cultured astrocytes of S286L-TG could be detected. Acutely HFO-evoked stimulation, such as physiological ripple burst (200 Hz) and epileptogenic fast ripple burst (500 Hz), frequency-dependently increased both pannexin1 expression in the astroglial plasma membrane and astroglial D-serine release. Neither the selective inhibitors of pannexin1-hemichannel (10PANX) nor connexin43-hemichannel (Gap19) affected astroglial D-serine release during the resting stage, whereas HFO-evoked D-serine release was suppressed by both inhibitors. The inhibitory effect of 10PANX on the ripple burst-evoked D-serine release was more predominant than that of Gap19, whereas fast ripple burst-evoked D-serine release was predominantly suppressed by Gap19 rather than 10PANX. Astroglial D-serine release induced by acute exposure to BzATP was suppressed by 10PANX but not by Gap19. These results suggest that physiological ripple burst during the sleep spindle plays important roles in the organization of some components of cognition in healthy individuals, but conversely, it contributes to the initial development of epileptogenesis/ictogenesis in individuals who have ADSHE vulnerability via activation of the astroglial excitatory transmission associated with pannexin1-hemichannels.

Co-occurring ripple oscillations facilitate neuronal interactions between cortical locations in humans

How the human cortex integrates ("binds") information encoded by spatially distributed neurons remains largely unknown. One hypothesis suggests that synchronous bursts of high-frequency oscillations ("ripples") contribute to binding by facilitating integration of neuronal firing across different cortical locations. While studies have demonstrated that ripples modulate local activity in the cortex, it is not known whether their co-occurrence coordinates neural firing across larger distances. We tested this hypothesis using local field-potentials and single-unit firing from four 96-channel microelectrode arrays in the supragranular cortex of 3 patients. Neurons in co-rippling locations showed increased short-latency co-firing, prediction of each other's firing, and co-participation in neural assemblies. Effects were similar for putative pyramidal and interneurons, during non-rapid eye movement sleep and waking, in temporal and Rolandic cortices, and at distances up to 16 mm (the longest tested). Increased co-prediction during co-ripples was maintained when firing-rate changes were equated, indicating that it was not secondary to non-oscillatory activation. Co-rippling enhanced prediction was strongly modulated by ripple phase, supporting the most common posited mechanism for binding-by-synchrony. Co-ripple enhanced prediction is reciprocal, synergistic with local upstates, and further enhanced when multiple sites co-ripple, supporting re-entrant facilitation. Together, these results support the hypothesis that trans-cortical co-occurring ripples increase the integration of neuronal firing of neurons in different cortical locations and do so in part through phase-modulation rather than unstructured activation.

Artificial sharp-wave-ripples to support memory and counter neurodegeneration

Information processed in our sensory neocortical areas is transported to the hippocampus during memory encoding, and between hippocampus and neocortex during memory consolidation, and retrieval. Short bursts of high-frequency oscillations, so called sharp-wave-ripples, have been proposed as a potential mechanism for this information transfer: They can synchronize neural activity to support the formation of local neural networks to store information, and between distant cortical sites to act as a bridge to transfer information between sensory cortical areas and hippocampus. In neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer's Disease, different neuropathological processes impair normal neural functioning and neural synchronization as well as sharp-wave-ripples, which impairs consolidation and retrieval of information, and compromises memory. Here, we formulate a new hypothesis, that artificially inducing sharp-wave-ripples with noninvasive high-frequency visual stimulation could potentially support memory functioning, as well as target the neuropathological processes underlying neurodegenerative diseases. We also outline key challenges for empirical tests of the hypothesis.

Pathological neurons generate ripples at the UP-DOWN transition disrupting information transfer

Objective

To confirm and investigate why pathological HFOs (pHFOs), including Ripples [80-200 Hz] and fast ripples [200-600 Hz], are generated during the UP-DOWN transition of the slow wave and if pHFOs interfere with information transmission.

Methods

We isolated 217 total units from 175.95 iEEG contact-hours of synchronized macro- and microelectrode recordings from 6 patients. Sleep slow oscillation (0.1-2 Hz) epochs were identified in the iEEG recording. iEEG HFOs that occurred superimposed on the slow wave were transformed to phasors and adjusted by the phase of maximum firing in nearby units (i.e., maximum UP). We tested whether, in the seizure onset zone (SOZ), HFOs and associated action potentials (AP) occur more often at the UP-DOWN transition. We also examined ripple temporal correlations using cross correlograms.

Results

At the group level in the SOZ, HFO and HFO-associated AP probability was highest during the UP-DOWN transition of slow wave excitability (p<<0.001). In the non-SOZ, HFO and HFO-associated AP was highest during the DOWN-UP transition (p<<0.001). At the unit level in the SOZ, 15.6% and 20% of units exhibited more robust firing during ripples (Cohen's d=0.11-0.83) and fast ripples (d=0.36-0.90) at the UP-DOWN transition (p<0.05 f.d.r corrected), respectively. By comparison, also in the SOZ, 6.6% (d=0.14-0.30) and 8.5% (d=0.33-0.41) of units had significantly less firing during ripples and fast ripples at the UP-DOWN transition, respectively. Additional data shows ripple temporal correlations, involving global slow waves, between the hippocampus, entorhinal cortex, and parahippocampal gyrus were reduced by ~50-80% in the SOZ compared to the non-SOZ (N=3).

Significance

The UP-DOWN transition of slow wave excitability facilitates the activation of pathological neurons to generate pHFOs. The pathological neurons and pHFOs disrupt ripple temporal correlations across brain regions that transfer information and may be important in memory consolidation.

How coupled slow oscillations, spindles and ripples coordinate neuronal processing and communication during human sleep

Learning and plasticity rely on fine-tuned regulation of neuronal circuits during offline periods. An unresolved puzzle is how the sleeping brain, in the absence of external stimulation or conscious effort, coordinates neuronal firing rates (FRs) and communication within and across circuits to support synaptic and systems consolidation. Using intracranial electroencephalography combined with multiunit activity recordings from the human hippocampus and surrounding medial temporal lobe (MTL) areas, we show that, governed by slow oscillation (SO) up-states, sleep spindles set a timeframe for ripples to occur. This sequential coupling leads to a stepwise increase in (1) neuronal FRs, (2) short-latency cross-correlations among local neuronal assemblies and (3) cross-regional MTL interactions. Triggered by SOs and spindles, ripples thus establish optimal conditions for spike-timing-dependent plasticity and systems consolidation. These results unveil how the sequential coupling of specific sleep rhythms orchestrates neuronal processing and communication during human sleep.

An evolutionary conserved division-of-labor between archicortical and neocortical ripples organizes information transfer during sleep

Systems-level memory consolidation during sleep depends on the temporally precise interplay between cardinal sleep oscillations. Specifically, hippocampal ripples constitute a key substrate of the hippocampal-neocortical dialogue underlying memory formation. Recently, it became evident that ripples are not unique to archicortex, but constitute a wide-spread neocortical phenomenon. To date, little is known about the morphological similarities between archi- and neocortical ripples. Moreover, it remains undetermined if neocortical ripples fulfill distinct functional roles. Leveraging intracranial recordings from the human medial temporal lobe (MTL) and neocortex during sleep, our results reveal region-specific functional specializations, albeit a near-uniform morphology. While MTL ripples synchronize the memory network to trigger directional MTL-to-neocortical information flow, neocortical ripples reduce information flow to minimize interference. At the population level, MTL ripples confined population dynamics to a low-dimensional subspace, while neocortical ripples diversified the population response; thus, constituting an effective mechanism to functionally uncouple the MTL-neocortical network. Critically, we replicated the key findings in rodents, where the same division-of-labor between archi- and neocortical ripples was evident. In sum, these results uncover an evolutionary preserved mechanism where the precisely coordinated interplay between MTL and neocortical ripples temporally segregates MTL information transfer from subsequent neocortical processing during sleep.