Memory Retrieval Has a Dynamic Influence on the Maintenance Mechanisms That Are Sensitive to ζ-Inhibitory Peptide (ZIP)

Karim Nader and the unification of memory erasure: PKMζ inhibition and reconsolidation blockade

Karim Nader is rightly celebrated for his seminal studies on memory reconsolidation. This commentary celebrates another related contribution - his work on memory maintenance by the autonomously active PKC isoform, PKMζ. There are two methods for "erasing" previously established long-term memory maintenance: 1) inhibiting PKMζ, and 2) blocking reconsolidation. Prior to Nader's research on PKMζ, these two forms of memory erasure were thought to be fundamentally different. Inhibiting PKMζ in a brain region disrupts memory held in storage. But if the inhibitor is injected into the same region immediately after memory retrieval, the drug has no effect. Conversely, inhibiting protein synthesis immediately after memory retrieval blocks reconsolidation. But protein synthesis inhibitors have no effect on memory held in storage without retrieval. The work of Paolo Virginia Migues, Nader, and colleagues, however, revealed an unexpected link between the mechanisms of memory maintenance by PKMζ and the kinase's regulation of postsynaptic AMPAR trafficking that potentiates synaptic transmission and expresses memory during retrieval. This insight led Matteo Bernabo, Nader, and colleagues to observe that memory retrieval first rapidly degrades PKMζ, and then induces the resynthesis of the kinase to restore maintenance of the retrieved memory. This finding explains why a PKMζ inhibitor such as ZIP, if injected in a brain region storing a memory, does not erase the memory immediately after retrieval - the kinase maintaining the retrieved memory has been degraded but not yet resynthesized. Moreover, Bernabo et al. showed that suppressing the resynthesis of PKMζ after its degradation prevents memory reconsolidation, reproducing the effect of general protein synthesis inhibition. Thus, Nader and colleagues demonstrated PKMζ inhibition and reconsolidation blockade disrupt in different ways the same molecular mechanism of memory maintenance - PKMζ inhibition erases all memories maintained in storage by the kinase; reconsolidation blockade disrupts specific recalled memories maintained by PKMζ by preventing resynthesis of the kinase after its degradation.

PKMζ maintains remote contextual fear memory by inhibiting GluA2-dependent AMPA receptor endocytosis in the prelimbic cortex

Fear memories allow animals to recognize and adequately respond to dangerous situations. The prelimbic cortex (PrL) is a crucial node in the circuitry that encodes contextual fear memory, and its activity is central for fear memory expression over time. However, while PrL has been implicated in contextual fear memory storage, the molecular mechanisms underlying its maintenance remain unclear. Protein kinase M zeta (PKMζ) is a persistently active enzyme which has been shown to maintain many forms of memories by inhibiting the endocytosis of GluA2-containing AMPA receptors. Therefore, we hypothesized that PKMζ action upon GluA2-containing AMPARs could be a mechanism for contextual fear memory maintenance in the PrL. To test this hypothesis, we trained rats in a contextual fear conditioning (CFC) paradigm and administered intra-PrL infusions of the PKMζ inhibitor ZIP, the GluA2-dependent endocytosis inhibitor GluA2_3Y or the inactive peptide GluA2_3Y(s), either two or twenty days after conditioning, and assessed long-term memory retention twenty-four hours later. We found that acute inhibition of GluA2-dependent AMPAR endocytosis in the PrL does not affect recent or remote contextual fear memory maintenance. Also, PKMζ inhibition in the PrL does not impair the maintenance of recent contextual fear memory. However, we found that inhibition of prelimbic PKMζ at a remote time point disrupted contextual fear memory maintenance, and that blocking GluA2-dependent removal of AMPARs prevents this impairment. Our results confirm the central role of PrL in fear memory and identify PKMζ-induced inhibition of GluA2-containing AMPAR endocytosis as a key mechanism governing remote contextual fear memory maintenance.

Memory Destabilization and Reconsolidation Dynamically Regulate the PKMζ Maintenance Mechanism

Useful memory must balance between stability and malleability. This puts effective memory storage at odds with plasticity processes, such as reconsolidation. What becomes of memory maintenance processes during synaptic plasticity is unknown. Here we examined the fate of the memory maintenance protein PKMζ during memory destabilization and reconsolidation in male rats. We found that NMDAR activation and proteasome activity induced a transient reduction in PKMζ protein following retrieval. During reconsolidation, new PKMζ was synthesized to re-store the memory. Failure to synthesize new PKMζ during reconsolidation impaired memory but uninterrupted PKMζ translation was not necessary for maintenance itself. Finally, NMDAR activation was necessary to render memories vulnerable to the amnesic effect of PKMζ-antisense. These findings outline a transient disruption and renewal of the PKMζ memory maintenance mechanism during plasticity. We argue that dynamic changes in PKMζ protein levels can serve as an exemplary model of the molecular changes underlying memory destabilization and reconsolidation.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Maintenance of long-term memory relies on the persistent activity of PKMζ. However, after retrieval, memories can become transiently destabilized and must be reconsolidated within a few hours to persist. During this period of plasticity, what happens to maintenance processes, such as those involving PKMζ, is unknown. Here we describe dynamic changes to PKMζ expression during both destabilization and reconsolidation of auditory fear memory in the amygdala. We show that destabilization induces a NMDAR- and proteasome-dependent loss of synaptic PKMζ and that reconsolidation requires synthesis of new PKMζ. This work provides clear evidence that memory destabilization disrupts ongoing synaptic maintenance processes which are restored during reconsolidation.

The role of PKMζ in the maintenance of long-term memory: a review

Long-term memories are thought to be stored in neurones and synapses that undergo physical changes, such as long-term potentiation (LTP), and these changes can be maintained for long periods of time. A candidate enzyme for the maintenance of LTP is protein kinase M zeta (PKMζ), a constitutively active protein kinase C isoform that is elevated during LTP and long-term memory maintenance. This paper reviews the evidence and controversies surrounding the role of PKMζ in the maintenance of long-term memory. PKMζ maintains synaptic potentiation by preventing AMPA receptor endocytosis and promoting stabilisation of dendritic spine growth. Inhibition of PKMζ, with zeta-inhibitory peptide (ZIP), can reverse LTP and impair established long-term memories. However, a deficit of memory retrieval cannot be ruled out. Furthermore, ZIP, and in high enough doses the control peptide scrambled ZIP, was recently shown to be neurotoxic, which may explain some of the effects of ZIP on memory impairment. PKMζ knockout mice show normal learning and memory. However, this is likely due to compensation by protein-kinase C iota/lambda (PKCι/λ), which is normally responsible for induction of LTP. It is not clear how, or if, this compensatory mechanism is activated under normal conditions. Future research should utilise inducible PKMζ knockdown in adult rodents to investigate whether PKMζ maintains memory in specific parts of the brain, or if it represents a global memory maintenance molecule. These insights may inform future therapeutic targets for disorders of memory loss.

Considerations for Pairing Cognitive Behavioral Therapies and Non-invasive Brain Stimulation: Ignore at Your Own Risk

Multimodal approaches combining cognitive behavioral therapies (CBT) with non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) hold promise for improving the treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders. As this is a relatively new approach, it is a critical time to identify guiding principles and methodological considerations to enhance research rigor. In the current paper, we argue for a principled approach to CBT and NIBS pairings based on synergistic activation of neural circuits and identify key considerations about CBT that may influence pairing with NIBS. Careful consideration of brain-state interactions and CBT-related nuances will increase the potential for these combinations to be positively synergistic.

Deletion of Stk11 and Fos in mouse BLA projection neurons alters intrinsic excitability and impairs formation of long-term aversive memory

Conditioned taste aversion (CTA) is a form of one-trial learning dependent on basolateral amygdala projection neurons (BLApn). Its underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms remain poorly understood. RNAseq from BLApn identified changes in multiple candidate learning-related transcripts including the expected immediate early gene Fos and Stk11, a master kinase of the AMP-related kinase pathway with important roles in growth, metabolism and development, but not previously implicated in learning. Deletion of Stk11 in BLApn blocked memory prior to training, but not following it and increased neuronal excitability. Conversely, BLApn had reduced excitability following CTA. BLApn knockout of a second learning-related gene, Fos, also increased excitability and impaired learning. Independently increasing BLApn excitability chemogenetically during CTA also impaired memory. STK11 and C-FOS activation were independent of one another. These data suggest key roles for Stk11 and Fos in CTA long-term memory formation, dependent at least partly through convergent action on BLApn intrinsic excitability.

PKMζ Inhibition Disrupts Reconsolidation and Erases Object Recognition Memory

Object recognition memory (ORM) confers the ability to discriminate the familiarity of previously encountered items. Reconsolidation is the process by which reactivated memories become labile and susceptible to modifications. The hippocampus is specifically engaged in reconsolidation to integrate new information into the original ORM through a mechanism involving activation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) signaling and induction of LTP. It is known that BDNF can control LTP maintenance through protein kinase Mζ (PKMζ), an atypical protein kinase C isoform that is thought to sustain memory storage by modulating glutamatergic neurotransmission. However, the potential involvement of PKMζ in ORM reconsolidation has never been studied. Using a novel ORM task combined with pharmacological, biochemical, and electrophysiological tools, we found that hippocampal PKMζ is essential to update ORM through reconsolidation, but not to maintain the inactive recognition memory trace stored over time, in adult male Wistar rats. Our results also indicate that hippocampal PKMζ acts downstream of BDNF and controls AMPAR synaptic insertion to elicit reconsolidation and suggest that blocking PKMζ activity during this process deletes active ORM.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Object recognition memory (ORM) is essential to remember facts and events. Reconsolidation integrates new information into ORM through changes in hippocampal plasticity and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) signaling. In turn, BDNF enhances synaptic efficacy through protein kinase Mζ (PKMζ), which might preserve memory. Here, we present evidence that hippocampal PKMζ acts downstream of BDNF to regulate AMPAR recycling during ORM reconsolidation and show that this kinase is essential to update the reactivated recognition memory trace, but not to consolidate or maintain an inactive ORM. We also demonstrate that the amnesia provoked by disrupting ORM reconsolidation through PKMζ inhibition is due to memory erasure and not to retrieval failure.

What does LTP tell us about the roles of CaMKII and PKMζ in memory?

In “Criteria for identifying the molecular basis of the engram (CaMKII, PKMζ),” Lisman proposes that elucidating the mechanism of LTP maintenance is key to understanding memory storage. He suggests three criteria for a maintenance mechanism to evaluate data on CaMKII and PKMζ as memory storage molecules: necessity, occlusion, and erasure. Here we show that when the criteria are tested, the results reveal important differences between the molecules. Inhibiting PKMζ reverses established, protein synthesis-dependent late-LTP, without affecting early-LTP or baseline synaptic transmission. In contrast, blocking CaMKII has two effects: 1) inhibiting CaMKII activity blocks LTP induction but not maintenance, and 2) disrupting CaMKII interactions with NMDARs in the postsynaptic density (PSD) depresses both early-LTP and basal synaptic transmission equivalently. To identify a maintenance mechanism, we propose a fourth criterion — persistence. PKMζ increases for hours during LTP maintenance in hippocampal slices, and for over a month in specific brain regions during long-term memory storage in conditioned animals. In contrast, increased CaMKII activity lasts only minutes following LTP induction, and CaMKII translocation to the PSD in late-LTP or memory has not been reported. Lastly, do the PKMζ and CaMKII models integrate the many other signaling molecules important for LTP? Activity-dependent PKMζ synthesis is regulated by many of the signaling molecules that induce LTP, including CaMKII, providing a plausible mechanism for new gene expression in the persistent phosphorylation by PKMζ maintaining late-LTP and memory. In contrast, CaMKII autophosphorylation and translocation do not appear to require new protein synthesis. Therefore, the cumulative evidence supports a core role for PKMζ in late-LTP and long-term memory maintenance, and separate roles for CaMKII in LTP induction and for the maintenance of postsynaptic structure and synaptic transmission in a mechanism distinct from late-LTP.

The role of the gustatory cortex in incidental experience-evoked enhancement of later taste learning

The strength of learned associations between pairs of stimuli is affected by multiple factors, the most extensively studied of which is prior experience with the stimuli themselves. In contrast, little data is available regarding how experience with "incidental" stimuli (independent of any conditioning situation) impacts later learning. This lack of research is striking given the importance of incidental experience to survival. We have recently begun to fill this void using conditioned taste aversion (CTA), wherein an animal learns to avoid a taste that has been associated with malaise. We previously demonstrated that incidental exposure to salty and sour tastes (taste preexposure-TPE) enhances aversions learned later to sucrose. Here, we investigate the neurobiology underlying this phenomenon. First, we use immediate early gene (c-Fos) expression to identify gustatory cortex (GC) as a site at which TPE specifically increases the neural activation caused by taste-malaise pairing (i.e., TPE did not change c-Fos induced by either stimulus in isolation). Next, we use site-specific infection with the optical silencer Archaerhodopsin-T to show that GC inactivation during TPE inhibits the expected enhancements of both learning and CTA-related c-Fos expression, a full day later. Thus, we conclude that GC is almost certainly a vital part of the circuit that integrates incidental experience into later associative learning.

Persistent Increases of PKMζ in Sensorimotor Cortex Maintain Procedural Long-Term Memory Storage

Procedural motor learning and memory are accompanied by changes in synaptic plasticity, neural dynamics, and synaptogenesis. Missing is information on the spatiotemporal dynamics of the molecular machinery maintaining these changes. Here we examine whether persistent increases in PKMζ, an atypical protein kinase C (PKC) isoform, store long-term memory for a reaching task in rat sensorimotor cortex that could reveal the sites of procedural memory storage. Specifically, perturbing PKMζ synthesis (via antisense oligodeoxynucleotides) and blocking atypical PKC activity (via zeta inhibitory peptide [ZIP]) in S1/M1 disrupts and erases long-term motor memory maintenance, indicating atypical PKCs and specifically PKMζ store consolidated long-term procedural memories. Immunostaining reveals that PKMζ increases in S1/M1 layers II/III and V as performance improved to an asymptote. After storage for 1 month without reinforcement, the increase in M1 layer V persists without decrement. Thus, the persistent increases in PKMζ that store long-term procedural memory are localized to the descending output layer of the primary motor cortex.

•

Perturbing PKMζ synthesis in S1/M1 slows the formation of skilled motor memory

•

Blocking PKMζ activity specifically erases memories maintained without reinforcement

•

Skilled motor learning induces the increase of PKMζ in S1/M1 layers II/III and V

•

PKMζ sustains the engram for procedural motor memory in M1 layer V