Models to predict changes in serum IGF1 and body composition in response to GH replacement therapy in GH-deficient adults

Impact of long-acting growth hormone replacement therapy in adult growth hormone deficiency: Comparison between adolescent, adult, and elderly patients

The predominant features of the adult growth hormone deficiency (GHD) syndrome may vary between patients of different age and age of onset of GHD. Evidence from clinical trials and long-term observational studies has informed our ability to understand the unique considerations regarding risks and benefits of daily growth hormone replacement therapy (GHRT) and specific dosing and monitoring strategies for these patient subgroups. High rates of nonadherence with daily GHRT presents a challenge to achieving optimal treatment outcomes and long-acting growth hormone (LAGH) formulations have been developed with the promise of improving treatment adherence resulting in improved therapeutic outcomes. While existing data from short-term studies have demonstrated noninferiority of efficacy and safety of LAGH compared to daily GHRT, long-term studies are needed to assess the full spectrum of outcomes of interest and long-term safety considerations specific to patients in adolescence, adulthood and the elderly GHD population. Since each LAGH formulation has a unique pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profile optimal dosing and monitoring strategies will need to be developed to allow for the provision of individualized patient treatment.

Individual sensitivity to growth hormone replacement in adults

The metabolic actions of growth hormone (GH) last a lifetime and involve several physiological functions associated with the control of body composition, energy metabolism, water regulation, immune response, cardiovascular performance, physical and mental work. Adult patients with GH deficiency (GHD) present a constellation of clinical findings, which include increased total and visceral body fat, low bone and muscle mass, reduced muscle strength, impaired anaerobic physical capacity, unfavorable cardiovascular profile, and poor quality of life. Recombinant human GH (rhGH) therapy has been proved to reverse or improve many abnormalities associated with GHD in adult life, but the therapeutic response is highly variable among patients and influenced by multiple factors, which are the main focus of this narrative review. Given the individual sensitivity of adult GHD patients to rhGH replacement, dose regimens evolved from weight-based to individualized dose-titration strategies, which improved efficacy and reduced the frequency of adverse events. Individual tailoring and maintenance doses of rhGH are mainly influenced by age, age at GHD onset, sex, body mass index, baseline GH status, quality of life and other pituitary hormone replacements. In addition, genetic background and poor adherence due to patient or product-related factors might play a role in the responsiveness to rhGH therapy. There have been attempts to develop predictive mathematical models to distinguish good and poor responders to rhGH therapy, but thus far none of them have been prospectively tested and validated in a large cohort of adult GHD individuals.

Adult growth hormone deficiency: clinical advances and approaches to improve adherence

Introduction: There have been significant clinical advances in the understanding of the diagnosis and benefits of long-term recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) replacement in adults with GH deficiency (GHD) since its approval in 1996 by the United States Food and Drug Administration.Areas covered: We searched PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE and PsychInfo databases between January 2000 and June 2019 for published studies evaluating adults with GHD. We reviewed the data of the oral macimorelin test compared to the GHRH plus arginine and the insulin tolerance tests that led to its approval by the United States FDA and European Medicines Agency for adult diagnostic testing. We summarize the clinical advances of long-term benefits of rhGH therapy and the potential effects of GH receptor polymorphisms on individual treatment responsiveness. We identify that non-adherence and discontinuation rates are high and recommend strategies to support patients to improve adherence. We also provide an overview of several long-acting GH (LAGH) preparations currently under development and their potential role in improving treatment adherence.Expert opinion: This article summarizes recent clinical advances in rhGH replacement therapy, the biological and molecular aspects that may influence rhGH action, and offers practical strategies to enhance adherence in adults with GHD.

Short- and long-term responsiveness to low dose growth hormone (GH) in adult GH deficiency: Role of GH receptor polymorphism

In patients with growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD), low doses of recombinant human GH (rhGH) have a similar or better long-term clinical effect than higher doses. Pharmacogenetic studies suggest that GH receptor (GHR) polymorphism only influences some metabolic parameters. Nonetheless, there is no clear scientific evidence proving the effects of lower rhGH dose regimens on metabolic parameters. The aim of our prospective study was to evaluate the effects of GHR polymorphism in adult GHD patients treated with low rhGH dose during short- (6 and 12 months) and long-term (5 years) follow-up. Sixty-nine GHD adult patients were studied, before and during treatment with rhGH, using a standardised low-dose protocol calculated on the basis of body weight (0.01-0.03 mg kg^-1  week^-1 ) and monitored by an insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I plasma assay, as well as anthropometric and metabolic parameters. The GHR genotype (flfl, fld3 or d3d3) was determined from the peripheral blood. d3-GHR carriers showed a more effective short- and long-term response to low rhGH dose with respect to low-density lipoprotein reduction, body composition and blood pressure (homozygous patients only); d3-GHR homozygosity is related to a significant IGF-I increase during short-term follow-up. Regression analysis demonstrated that rhGH dose, age at diagnosis and GHR genotype are the major determinants of IGF-I increase at 6 and 12 months of replacement therapy. The d3d3-GHR genotype may influence some metabolic effects during the short- and long-term follow-up of low rhGH dose and could be an independent determinant of the increase of IGF- I during short-term follow-up.

Effects of growth hormone on thyroid function are mediated by type 2 iodothyronine deiodinase in humans

PURPOSE

Growth hormone (GH) therapy in adults alters thyroid function, and acromegaly often involves thyroid disease. The present study aimed to elucidate roles and mechanisms of GH in regulating thyroid function.

METHODS

We performed two retrospective observational studies, which focused on consecutive patients with severe adult GH deficiency who received recombinant human GH (rhGH) therapy (n = 20) and consecutive patients with acromegaly who underwent transsphenoidal surgery (TSS) (n = 25). In both studies, serum free triiodothyronine (fT3), free thyroxine (fT4), and fT3/fT4 ratio were examined before and after the interventions. We subsequently administered GH to four human cell lines (HepG2, TSA201, MCF7, and HTC/C3) in vitro, and examined changes in mRNA levels of iodothyronine deiodinases (D1, D2, and D3).

RESULTS

Median serum fT3 level significantly increased after rhGH therapy from 2.38 to 2.78 pg/mL (p < 0.001), and fT4 decreased from 1.115 to 1.065 ng/dL (p = 0.081). TSS significantly decreased median serum fT3 from 3.03 to 2.53 pg/mL (p < 0.001), and increased fT4 from 1.230 to 1.370 ng/dL (p < 0.001). In vitro, GH significantly increased D2 expression at the mRNA level in HTC/C3 cells (p < 0.01), as well as D2 protein and its activity.

CONCLUSIONS

GH increased serum fT3 level and decreased serum fT4 level in humans. Our results suggest that its mechanism involves D2 upregulation. Considering this GH effect on thyroid hormone metabolism, data on thyroid function could be useful in the management of GH deficiency and acromegaly.

Update on GH therapy in adults

Over the last three decades, short- and long-term observational studies, clinical trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses have provided relevant information on the efficacy and safety of growth hormone (GH) replacement therapy in adults with GH deficiency (AGHD). The knowledge acquired during this time has been compiled into different guidelines that offer clinicians an evidence-based, practical approach for the management of AGHD. There are, however, still open questions in some key areas in which recommendations are supported by only moderate or weak evidence. In the last recent years, the development of long-acting GH preparations has created new therapeutic possibilities by decreasing injection frequency, improving adherence and thereby potentially maximizing clinical outcomes. The aims of this review are to advance our understanding on the diagnosis and treatment of AGHD and to present an update and future perspectives on the use of long-acting GH preparations.

Predictors of Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I Responses to Growth Hormone Replacement in Young Adults with Growth Hormone Deficiency

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Physiological growth hormone (GH) secretion and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) levels are greater in young compared to older adults. We evaluated IGF-I levels and predictors of IGF-I responses in young adults on GH replacement.

DESIGN

From the KIMS database, 310 young adults (age 15-26 years) with severe GH deficiency related to childhood-onset disease and commenced on 'adult GH replacement' were identified. 'IGF-I responses' were estimated from first-year increments in IGF-I standard deviation scores (SDS) and adjusted for GH dose. Body composition was assessed by bioimpedance in 143 patients.

RESULTS

IGF-I levels increased markedly from baseline to 1 year of replacement (-3.75 ± 1.94 vs. -1.36 ± 1.86 SDS, p < 0.0001), but remained low compared to normative data despite dose titration. In multivariate models, IGF-I responses were positively associated with age [B (SE) SDS/(mg/m2); 0.52 (0.15), p = 0.0007] and BMI SDS [1.06 (0.25), p < 0.0001] and inversely associated with female gender [-4.45 (0.79), p < 0.0001] and baseline IGF-I SDS [-1.44 (0.20), p < 0.0001]. IGF-I responses were positively associated with first-year increases in lean body mass (r = 0.19, p = 0.003) and haemoglobin A1c (r = 0.15, p = 0.031).

CONCLUSIONS

Low IGF-I levels in young adults on treatment may reflect suboptimal GH replacement. Identification of predictors for IGF-I responses could lead to a more appropriate replacement strategy. Association between IGF-I responses and lean body mass suggests that maintaining age-appropriate IGF-I levels is important during therapy.

Management of GH treatment in adult GH deficiency

Growth hormone (GH) replacement therapy in adults with GH deficiency is still a challenge for the clinical endocrinologist and its implementation has still numerous difficulties and uncertainties. The decision to treat GH deficient adults requires a thoughtful and individualized evaluation of risks and benefits. Benefits have been found in body composition, bone health, cardiovascular risk factors, and quality of life. However, evidences for a reduction in cardiovascular events and mortality are still lacking, and treatment costs remain high. It is advisable to start treatment with low doses of GH, the goals being an appropriate clinical response, an avoidance of side effects, and IGF-I levels in the age-adjusted reference range. Although treatment appears to be overall safe, certain areas continue to require long-term surveillance, such as risks of glucose intolerance, pituitary/hypothalamic tumor recurrence, and cancer.

Is insulin-like growth factor-I a good marker for treatment adherence in growth hormone deficiency in adulthood?

OBJECTIVE

There is a paucity of studies on adherence to growth hormone treatment in growth hormone deficient (GHD) adults. Therefore, this study reports on adherence to GH-replacement therapy in adults with GHD, with a special focus on the course and potential predictors of nonadherence.

DESIGN

Retrospective single-centre cohort study.

PATIENTS

From the local patient database, 179 suitable patients with GHD were identified.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome was adherence assessed by calculating the percentage of available prescription data in comparison with recommended GH dosages over a mean follow-up period of 92·4 months. Patients were categorized into five adherence categories ranging from <20% to >80%.

RESULTS

Mean overall adherence was 74·0%, with 52·9% of patients falling into the adherence group of >80% and 8·8% of <20%. There was a significant drop in adherence (9·8%) between the first and second years of treatment (P < 0·001). Patients with childhood-onset GHD were significantly less adherent to GH treatment than patients with adult-onset GHD (62·0% vs 77·0%, P = 0·012); however, this finding was no longer significant after including age as a covariate. Frequency of IGF-1 levels lying outside the age- and sex-specific reference range was not a good indicator for adherence.

CONCLUSION

Although overall adherence was relatively high in our study sample, there is a significant amount of patients who should be regarded as nonadherent. This applies in particular to younger patients. Treating physicians should be aware of the fact that IGF-1 levels do not seem to be a good indicator for adherence.

Prediction of therapy response in acromegalic patients under pegvisomant therapy within the German ACROSTUDY cohort

PURPOSE

This study aimed at investigating predicting factors for therapy response under growth hormone receptor antagonist therapy with a focus on subjective and patient-oriented measures.

METHODS

Observational, multicenter nested-cohort study including 271 selected patients with the diagnosis of acromegaly and a minimum of one-year follow-up period within the German ACROSTUDY cohort (total cohort: n = 514). Outcome measures were the change of the biomarker IGF-1 (IGF-1 change and IGF-1 normalisation) between baseline and after 1 year of pegvisomant therapy (12 ± 6 months). Main predictors were patient-assessed subjective measures according to the Patient-Assessed Acromegaly Symptom Questionnaire (PASQ) in conjugation with age, gender, BMI, max. dosage of pegvisomant at follow-up and IGF-1 before the start of pegvisomant therapy.

RESULTS

The mean age of the study population was 51.2 (13.9) years and the mean BMI was 29.5 (5.1) kg/m(2). In adjusted analyses, none of the individual perceived health (PASQ) scores, but age, BMI and IGF-1 at baseline were predictive for an IGF-1 decrease after 1 year of pegvisomant therapy and BMI and IGF-1, but equally none of the PASQ items, were predicting IGF-1 normalisation.

CONCLUSIONS

Age, BMI and baseline IGF-1 but not subjective perceived health measures predict therapy response under second line medical therapy with pegvisomant.

Proposal of a clinical response score and predictors of clinical response to 2 years of GH replacement therapy in adult GH deficiency

OBJECTIVE

There is no single clinical marker to reliably assess the clinical response to growth hormone replacement therapy (GHRT) in adults with growth hormone deficiency (GHD). The objective of this study was to propose a clinical response score to GHRT in adult GHD and to establish clinical factors that predict clinical response.

DESIGN

This was a prospective observational cohort study from the international KIMS database (Pfizer International Metabolic Database).

METHODS

We included 3612 adult patients with GHD for proposing the response score and 844 patients for assessing predictors of response. We propose a clinical response score based on changes in total cholesterol, waist circumference and QoL-AGHDA quality of life measurements after 2 years of GHRT. A score point was added for each quintile of change in each variable, resulting in a sum score ranging from 3 to 15. For clinical response at 2 years, we analysed predictors at baseline and after 6 months using logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

In a baseline prediction model, IGF1, QoL-AGHDA, total cholesterol and waist circumference predicted response, with worse baseline parameters being associated with a favourable response (AUC 0.736). In a combined baseline and 6-month prediction model, baseline QoL-AGHDA, total cholesterol and waist circumference, and 6-month change in waist circumference were significant predictors of response (AUC 0.815).

CONCLUSIONS

A simple clinical response score might be helpful in evaluating the success of GHRT. The baseline prediction model may aid in the decision to initiate GHRT and the combined prediction model may be helpful in the decision to continue GHRT.

SNPs within the GH-signaling pathway are associated with the early IGF1 response to GH replacement therapy in GHD adults

OBJECTIVE

GH-deficient (GHD) adults have reduced serum concentrations of IGF1. GH replacement therapy increases serum IGF1 concentrations, but the interindividual variation in treatment response is large and likely influenced by genetic factors. This study was designed to test the hypothesis that single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes within the GH signaling pathway influence the serum IGF1 response to GH replacement.

DESIGN AND METHODS

A total of 313 consecutive GHD adults (58.1% men; mean age 49.7 years) were studied before and after 1 week, 6 months, and 1 year of GH treatment. GH dose was individually titrated to normalize serum IGF1 levels. Six SNPs in the GH receptor (GHR) and the GH signaling pathway (JAK2, STAT5B, SOCS2, and PIK3CB) genes were selected for genotyping. The GHR exon 3-deleted/full-length (d3/fl) polymorphism was analyzed using tagSNP rs6873545.

RESULTS

After 1 week of GH replacement, homozygotes of the fl-GHR showed a better IGF1 response to GH than carriers of the d3-GHR (P=0.016). Conversely, homozygotes of the minor allele of PIK3CB SNP rs361072 responded better than carriers of the major allele (P=0.025). Compared with baseline, both SNPs were associated with the IGF1 response at 6 months (P=0.041 and P=0.047 respectively), and SNP rs6873545 was further associated with the IGF1 response at 1 year (P=0.041).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that common genetic variants in the GH signaling pathway may be of functional relevance to the response to GH replacement in GHD adults.

Response to GH treatment in adult GH deficiency is predicted by gender, age, and IGF1 SDS but not by stimulated GH-peak

OBJECTIVE

We studied whether the severity of GH deficiency (GHD) defined as i) GH-peak on stimulation tests (insulin tolerance test (ITT), arginine, and glucagon), ii) number of additional pituitary deficits, or iii) baseline IGF1 SDS could impact the response to GH treatment. We further explored whether iv) IGF1 SDS after 24 months of GH replacement or v) ΔIGF1 SDS from baseline to 24 months was related to the phenotypic response to GH treatment. DESIGN, PATIENTS, AND MEASUREMENTS: The patient cohort (n=1752; 50% women) was obtained from KIMS (Pfizer International Metabolic Database). The patients were divided into three groups of approximately equal size (tertiles) according to the stimulated GH-peak values and baseline IGF1 SDS and were studied at baseline, 12, and 24 months of GH therapy.

RESULTS

Lower baseline IGF1 SDS predicted better response in weight, BMI, total cholesterol, and triglycerides, while IGF1 SDS after 24 months was associated with reduction in waist/hip ratio, total cholesterol, and improved quality of life (QoL). Age-correlated negatively with the response in body weight, BMI, waist, IGF1 SDS, and total and LDL-cholesterol. Response in weight and BMI was greater in men than in women, whereas women showed greater improvement in QoL than men. Patients with more severe GHD as assessed by lower GH-peaks and more pituitary hormone deficiencies had a greater increase in IGF1 SDS. The increase in IGF1 SDS was associated with a reduction in waist/hip ratio and an increase in weight, BMI, and triglycerides. There was no correlation with other lipids, blood pressure, or glucose.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that baseline and 24 months, IGF1 and its degree of increase during GH replacement were more important than stimulated peak GH to predict the phenotypic response.

Genotypes associated with lipid metabolism contribute to differences in serum lipid profile of GH-deficient adults before and after GH replacement therapy

OBJECTIVE

GH deficiency (GHD) in adults is associated with an altered serum lipid profile that responds to GH replacement therapy (GHRT). This study evaluated the influence of polymorphisms in genes related to lipid metabolism on serum lipid profile before and after 1 year of GHRT in adults.

DESIGN AND METHODS

In 318 GHD patients, total cholesterol (TC) serum concentrations, LDL-C, HDL-C, and triglycerides (TG) were assessed. Using a candidate gene approach, 20 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were genotyped. GH dose was individually titrated to obtain normal serum IGF1 concentrations.

RESULTS

At baseline, the minor alleles of cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) gene SNPs rs708272 and rs1800775 were associated with higher serum TC and apolipoprotein E (APOE) gene SNP rs7412 with lower TC concentrations; CETP SNPs rs708272, rs1800775, and rs3764261 and apolipoprotein B (APOB) gene SNP rs693 with higher serum HDL-C; APOE SNP rs7412, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARG) gene SNP rs10865710 with lower LDL-C, and CETP SNP rs1800775 with higher LDL-C; and APOE/C1/C4/C2 cluster SNP rs35136575 with lower serum TG. After treatment, APOB SNP rs676210 GG genotype was associated with larger reductions in TC and LDL-C and PPARG SNP rs10865710 CC genotype with greater TC reduction. All associations remained significant when adjusted for age, sex, and BMI.

CONCLUSIONS

In GHD adults, multiple SNPs in genes related to lipid metabolism contributed to individual differences in baseline serum lipid profile. The GH treatment response in TC and LDL-C was influenced by polymorphisms in the APOB and PPARG genes.