1
|
She H, Liu Z, Xu Z, Zhang H, Wu J, Wang X, Cheng F, Charlesworth D, Qian W. Insights into spinach domestication from genome sequences of two wild spinach progenitors, Spinacia turkestanica and Spinacia tetrandra. THE NEW PHYTOLOGIST 2024; 243:477-494. [PMID: 38715078 DOI: 10.1111/nph.19799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Abstract
Cultivated spinach (Spinacia oleracea) is a dioecious species. We report high-quality genome sequences for its two closest wild relatives, Spinacia turkestanica and Spinacia tetrandra, which are also dioecious, and are used to study the genetics of spinach domestication. Using a combination of genomic approaches, we assembled genomes of both these species and analyzed them in comparison with the previously assembled S. oleracea genome. These species diverged c. 6.3 million years ago (Ma), while cultivated spinach split from S. turkestanica 0.8 Ma. In all three species, all six chromosomes include very large gene-poor, repeat-rich regions, which, in S. oleracea, are pericentromeric regions with very low recombination rates in both male and female genetic maps. We describe population genomic evidence that the similar regions in the wild species also recombine rarely. We characterized 282 structural variants (SVs) that have been selected during domestication. These regions include genes associated with leaf margin type and flowering time. We also describe evidence that the downy mildew resistance loci of cultivated spinach are derived from introgression from both wild spinach species. Collectively, this study reveals the genome architecture of spinach assemblies and highlights the importance of SVs during the domestication of cultivated spinach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongbing She
- State Key Laboratory of Vegetable Biobreeding, Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China
| | - Zhiyuan Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Vegetable Biobreeding, Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China
| | - Zhaosheng Xu
- State Key Laboratory of Vegetable Biobreeding, Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China
| | - Helong Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Vegetable Biobreeding, Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China
| | - Jian Wu
- State Key Laboratory of Vegetable Biobreeding, Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China
| | - Xiaowu Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Vegetable Biobreeding, Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China
| | - Feng Cheng
- State Key Laboratory of Vegetable Biobreeding, Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China
| | - Deborah Charlesworth
- Institute of Ecology and Evolution, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Charlotte Auerbach Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3FL, UK
| | - Wei Qian
- State Key Laboratory of Vegetable Biobreeding, Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Morgan AP, Payseur BA. Genetic background affects the strength of crossover interference in house mice. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.05.28.596233. [PMID: 38854148 PMCID: PMC11160618 DOI: 10.1101/2024.05.28.596233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2024]
Abstract
Meiotic recombination is required for faithful chromosome segregation in most sexually reproducing organisms and shapes the distribution of genetic variation in populations. Both the overall rate and the spatial distribution of crossovers vary within and between species. Adjacent crossovers on the same chromosome tend to be spaced more evenly than expected at random, a phenomenon known as crossover interference. Although interference has been observed in many taxa, the factors that influence the strength of interference are not well understood. We used house mice (Mus musculus), a well-established model system for understanding recombination, to study the effects of genetics and age on recombination rate and interference in the male germline. We analyzed crossover positions in 503 progeny from reciprocal F1 hybrids between inbred strains representing the three major subspecies of house mice. Consistent with previous studies, autosomal alleles from M. m. musculus tend to increase recombination rate, while inheriting a M. m. musculus X chromosome decreases recombination rate. Old males transmit an average of 0.6 more crossovers per meiosis (5.0%) than young males, though the effect varies across genetic backgrounds. We show that the strength of crossover interference depends on genotype, providing a rare demonstration that interference evolves over short timescales. Differences between reciprocal F1s suggest that X-linked factors modulate the strength of interference. Our findings motivate additional comparisons of interference among recently diverged species and further examination of the role of paternal age in determining the number and positioning of crossovers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew P Morgan
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Bret A Payseur
- Laboratory of Genetics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Charlesworth D, Qiu S, Bergero R, Gardner J, Keegan K, Yong L, Hastings A, Konczal M. Has recombination changed during the recent evolution of the guppy Y chromosome? Genetics 2024; 226:iyad198. [PMID: 37956094 DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyad198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Revised: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Genome sequencing and genetic mapping of molecular markers have demonstrated nearly complete Y-linkage across much of the guppy (Poecilia reticulata) XY chromosome pair. Predominant Y-linkage of factors controlling visible male-specific coloration traits also suggested that these polymorphisms are sexually antagonistic (SA). However, occasional exchanges with the X are detected, and recombination patterns also appear to differ between natural guppy populations, suggesting ongoing evolution of recombination suppression under selection created by partially sex-linked SA polymorphisms. We used molecular markers to directly estimate genetic maps in sires from 4 guppy populations. The maps are very similar, suggesting that their crossover patterns have not recently changed. Our maps are consistent with population genomic results showing that variants within the terminal 5 Mb of the 26.5 Mb sex chromosome, chromosome 12, are most clearly associated with the maleness factor, albeit incompletely. We also confirmed occasional crossovers proximal to the male-determining region, defining a second, rarely recombining, pseudo-autosomal region, PAR2. This fish species may therefore have no completely male-specific region (MSY) more extensive than the male-determining factor. The positions of the few crossover events suggest a location for the male-determining factor within a physically small repetitive region. A sex-reversed XX male had few crossovers in PAR2, suggesting that this region's low crossover rate depends on the phenotypic, not the genetic, sex. Thus, rare individuals whose phenotypic and genetic sexes differ, and/or occasional PAR2 crossovers in males can explain the failure to detect fully Y-linked variants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah Charlesworth
- School of Biological Sciences, Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Edinburgh, Charlotte Auerbach Road, Edinburgh EH9 3LF, UK
| | - Suo Qiu
- School of Biological Sciences, Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Edinburgh, Charlotte Auerbach Road, Edinburgh EH9 3LF, UK
| | - Roberta Bergero
- Scottish Rural Agricultural College, Peter Wilson Building, King's Buildings, W Mains Rd, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UK
| | - Jim Gardner
- School of Biological Sciences, Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Edinburgh, Charlotte Auerbach Road, Edinburgh EH9 3LF, UK
| | - Karen Keegan
- School of Biological Sciences, Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Edinburgh, Charlotte Auerbach Road, Edinburgh EH9 3LF, UK
| | - Lengxob Yong
- Centre for Ecology and Conservation, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Penryn TR10 9FE, UK
- South Carolina Department of Natural Resources, Marine Resources Research Institute, P.O. Box 12559 Charleston, SC 29422-2559, USA
| | - Abigail Hastings
- School of Biological Sciences, Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Edinburgh, Charlotte Auerbach Road, Edinburgh EH9 3LF, UK
| | - Mateusz Konczal
- Evolutionary Biology Group, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, 60-614 Poznań, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hunnicutt KE, Callahan C, Keeble S, Moore EC, Good JM, Larson EL. Different complex regulatory phenotypes underlie hybrid male sterility in divergent rodent crosses. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.10.30.564782. [PMID: 37961317 PMCID: PMC10634954 DOI: 10.1101/2023.10.30.564782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2023]
Abstract
Hybrid incompatibilities are a critical component of species barriers and may arise due to negative interactions between divergent regulatory elements in parental species. We used a comparative approach to identify common themes in the regulatory phenotypes associated with hybrid male sterility in two divergent rodent crosses, dwarf hamsters and house mice. We investigated three potential characteristic regulatory phenotypes in hybrids including the propensity towards over or underexpression relative to parental species, the influence of developmental stage on the extent of misexpression, and the role of the sex chromosomes on misexpression phenotypes. In contrast to near pervasive overexpression in hybrid house mice, we found that misexpression in hybrid dwarf hamsters was dependent on developmental stage. In both house mouse and dwarf hamster hybrids, however, misexpression increased with the progression of spermatogenesis, although to varying extents and with potentially different consequences. In both systems, we detected sex-chromosome specific overexpression in stages of spermatogenesis where inactivated X chromosome expression was expected, but the hybrid overexpression phenotypes were fundamentally different. Importantly, misexpression phenotypes support the presence of multiple histological blocks to spermatogenesis in dwarf hamster hybrids, including a potential role of meiotic stalling early in spermatogenesis. Collectively, we demonstrate that while there are some similarities in hybrid regulatory phenotypes of house mice and dwarf hamsters, there are also clear differences that point towards unique mechanisms underlying hybrid male sterility in each system. Our results highlight the potential of comparative approaches in helping to understand the importance of disrupted gene regulation in speciation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Colin Callahan
- Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, 59812
| | - Sara Keeble
- Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, 59812
| | - Emily C. Moore
- University of Denver, Department of Biological Sciences, Denver, CO, 80208
- Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, 59812
| | - Jeffrey M. Good
- Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, 59812
| | - Erica L. Larson
- University of Denver, Department of Biological Sciences, Denver, CO, 80208
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Warthi G, Faulkner JL, Doja J, Ghanam AR, Gao P, Yang AC, Slivano OJ, Barris CT, Kress TC, Zawieja SD, Griffin SH, Xie X, Ashworth A, Christie CK, Bryant WB, Kumar A, Davis MJ, Long X, Gan L, de Chantemèle EJB, Lyu Q, Miano JM. Generation and Comparative Analysis of an Itga8-CreER T2 Mouse with Preferential Activity in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells. NATURE CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH 2022; 1:1084-1100. [PMID: 36424917 PMCID: PMC9681021 DOI: 10.1038/s44161-022-00162-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
All current smooth muscle cell (SMC) Cre mice similarly recombine floxed alleles in vascular and visceral SMCs. Here, we present an Itga8-CreER T2 knock-in mouse and compare its activity with a Myh11-CreER T2 mouse. Both Cre drivers demonstrate equivalent recombination in vascular SMCs. However, Myh11-CreER T2 mice, but not Itga8-CreER T2 mice, display high activity in visceral SMC-containing tissues such as intestine, show early tamoxifen-independent activity, and produce high levels of CreERT2 protein. Whereas Myh11-CreER T2 -mediated knockout of serum response factor (Srf) causes a lethal intestinal phenotype precluding analysis of the vasculature, loss of Srf with Itga8-CreER T2 (Srf Itga8 ) yields viable mice with no evidence of intestinal pathology. Male and female Srf Itga8 mice exhibit vascular contractile incompetence, and angiotensin II causes elevated blood pressure in wild type, but not Srf Itga8 , male mice. These findings establish the Itga8-CreER T2 mouse as an alternative to existing SMC Cre mice for unfettered phenotyping of vascular SMCs following selective gene loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ganesh Warthi
- Vascular Biology Center, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia 30912
| | - Jessica L. Faulkner
- Department of Physiology, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia 30912
| | - Jaser Doja
- Vascular Biology Center, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia 30912
| | - Amr R. Ghanam
- Vascular Biology Center, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia 30912
| | - Pan Gao
- Vascular Biology Center, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia 30912
| | - Allison C. Yang
- Vascular Biology Center, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia 30912
| | - Orazio J. Slivano
- Vascular Biology Center, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia 30912
| | - Candee T. Barris
- Vascular Biology Center, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia 30912
| | - Taylor C. Kress
- Vascular Biology Center, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia 30912
| | - Scott D. Zawieja
- Medical Pharmacology and Physiology, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, MO 65212
| | - Susan H. Griffin
- Vascular Biology Center, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia 30912
| | - Xiaoling Xie
- Department of Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia 30912
| | - Alan Ashworth
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94158
| | - Christine K. Christie
- Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York 14642
| | - William B. Bryant
- Vascular Biology Center, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia 30912
| | - Ajay Kumar
- Vascular Biology Center, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia 30912
| | - Michael J. Davis
- Medical Pharmacology and Physiology, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, MO 65212
| | - Xiaochun Long
- Vascular Biology Center, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia 30912
| | - Lin Gan
- Department of Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia 30912
| | | | - Qing Lyu
- Vascular Biology Center, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia 30912
- Biomedical and Health Institute, Chongqing Institute of Green and Intelligence Technology, Chongqing, China 400714
- Chongqing General Hospital, Chongqing, China 401147
| | - Joseph M. Miano
- Vascular Biology Center, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia 30912
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cabrera Zapata LE, Garcia-Segura LM, Cambiasso MJ, Arevalo MA. Genetics and Epigenetics of the X and Y Chromosomes in the Sexual Differentiation of the Brain. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms232012288. [PMID: 36293143 PMCID: PMC9603441 DOI: 10.3390/ijms232012288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2022] [Revised: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
For many decades to date, neuroendocrinologists have delved into the key contribution of gonadal hormones to the generation of sex differences in the developing brain and the expression of sex-specific physiological and behavioral phenotypes in adulthood. However, it was not until recent years that the role of sex chromosomes in the matter started to be seriously explored and unveiled beyond gonadal determination. Now we know that the divergent evolutionary process suffered by X and Y chromosomes has determined that they now encode mostly dissimilar genetic information and are subject to different epigenetic regulations, characteristics that together contribute to generate sex differences between XX and XY cells/individuals from the zygote throughout life. Here we will review and discuss relevant data showing how particular X- and Y-linked genes and epigenetic mechanisms controlling their expression and inheritance are involved, along with or independently of gonadal hormones, in the generation of sex differences in the brain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas E. Cabrera Zapata
- Instituto de Investigación Médica Mercedes y Martín Ferreyra (INIMEC), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba 5016, Argentina
- Instituto Cajal (IC), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), 28002 Madrid, Spain
| | | | - María Julia Cambiasso
- Instituto de Investigación Médica Mercedes y Martín Ferreyra (INIMEC), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba 5016, Argentina
- Cátedra de Biología Celular, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba 5000, Argentina
- Correspondence: (M.J.C.); (M.A.A.)
| | - Maria Angeles Arevalo
- Instituto Cajal (IC), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), 28002 Madrid, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain
- Correspondence: (M.J.C.); (M.A.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Filatov DA. Recent expansion of the non-recombining sex-linked region on Silene latifolia sex chromosomes. J Evol Biol 2022; 35:1696-1708. [PMID: 35834179 PMCID: PMC10083954 DOI: 10.1111/jeb.14063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Revised: 06/19/2022] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Evolution of a non-recombining sex-specific region on the Y (or W) chromosome (NRY) is a key step in sex chromosome evolution, but how recombination suppression evolves is not well understood. Studies in many different organisms indicated that NRY evolution often involves several expansion steps. Why such NRY expansions occur remains unclear, although it is though that they are likely driven by sexually antagonistic selection. This paper describes a recent NRY expansion due to shift of the pseudoautosomal boundary on the sex chromosomes of a dioecious plant Silene latifolia. The shift resulted in inclusion of at least 16 pseudoautosomal genes into the NRY. This region is pseudoautosomal in closely related Silene dioica and Silene diclinis, indicating that the NRY expansion occurred in S. latifolia after it speciated from the other species ~120 thousand years ago. As S. latifolia and S. dioica actively hybridise across Europe, interspecific gene flow could blur the PAR boundary in these species. The pseudoautosomal genes have significantly elevated genetic diversity (π ~ 3% at synonymous sites), which is consistent with balancing selection maintaining diversity in this region. The recent shift of the PAR boundary in S. latifolia offers an opportunity to study the process of on-going NRY expansion.
Collapse
|
8
|
Davies B, Hinch AG, Cebrian-Serrano A, Alghadban S, Becker PW, Biggs D, Hernandez-Pliego P, Preece C, Moralli D, Zhang G, Myers S, Donnelly P. Altering the binding properties of PRDM9 partially restores fertility across the species boundary. Mol Biol Evol 2021; 38:5555-5562. [PMID: 34491357 PMCID: PMC8662609 DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msab269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Sterility or subfertility of male hybrid offspring is commonly observed. This phenomenon contributes to reproductive barriers between the parental populations, an early step in the process of speciation. One frequent cause of such infertility is a failure of proper chromosome pairing during male meiosis. In subspecies of the house mouse, the likelihood of successful chromosome synapsis is improved by the binding of the histone methyltransferase PRDM9 to both chromosome homologues at matching positions. Using genetic manipulation, we altered PRDM9 binding to occur more often at matched sites, and find that chromosome pairing defects can be rescued, not only in an inter-subspecific cross, but also between distinct species. Using different engineered variants, we demonstrate a quantitative link between the degree of matched homologue binding, chromosome synapsis and rescue of fertility in hybrids between Mus musculus and Mus spretus. The resulting partial restoration of fertility reveals additional mechanisms at play that act to lock-in the reproductive isolation between these two species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Davies
- Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, OX3 7BN, UK
| | | | | | - Samy Alghadban
- Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, OX3 7BN, UK
| | - Philipp W Becker
- Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, OX3 7BN, UK
| | - Daniel Biggs
- Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, OX3 7BN, UK
| | | | - Chris Preece
- Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, OX3 7BN, UK
| | - Daniela Moralli
- Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, OX3 7BN, UK
| | - Gang Zhang
- Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, OX3 7BN, UK
| | - Simon Myers
- Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, OX3 7BN, UK.,Dept. of Statistics, University of Oxford, OX1 3LB, UK
| | - Peter Donnelly
- Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, OX3 7BN, UK.,Dept. of Statistics, University of Oxford, OX1 3LB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Charlesworth D, Zhang Y, Bergero R, Graham C, Gardner J, Yong L. Using GC Content to Compare Recombination Patterns on the Sex Chromosomes and Autosomes of the Guppy, Poecilia reticulata, and Its Close Outgroup Species. Mol Biol Evol 2021; 37:3550-3562. [PMID: 32697821 DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msaa187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Genetic and physical mapping of the guppy (Poecilia reticulata) have shown that recombination patterns differ greatly between males and females. Crossover events occur evenly across the chromosomes in females, but in male meiosis they are restricted to the tip furthest from the centromere of each chromosome, creating very high recombination rates per megabase, as in pseudoautosomal regions of mammalian sex chromosomes. We used GC content to indirectly infer recombination patterns on guppy chromosomes, based on evidence that recombination is associated with GC-biased gene conversion, so that genome regions with high recombination rates should be detectable by high GC content. We used intron sequences and third positions of codons to make comparisons between sequences that are matched, as far as possible, and are all probably under weak selection. Almost all guppy chromosomes, including the sex chromosome (LG12), have very high GC values near their assembly ends, suggesting high recombination rates due to strong crossover localization in male meiosis. Our test does not suggest that the guppy XY pair has stronger crossover localization than the autosomes, or than the homologous chromosome in the close relative, the platyfish (Xiphophorus maculatus). We therefore conclude that the guppy XY pair has not recently undergone an evolutionary change to a different recombination pattern, or reduced its crossover rate, but that the guppy evolved Y-linkage due to acquiring a male-determining factor that also conferred the male crossover pattern. We also identify the centromere ends of guppy chromosomes, which were not determined in the genome assembly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah Charlesworth
- Institute of Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Yexin Zhang
- Institute of Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Roberta Bergero
- Institute of Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Chay Graham
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Jim Gardner
- Institute of Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Lengxob Yong
- Centre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Falmouth, Cornwall, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Charlesworth D. When and how do sex-linked regions become sex chromosomes? Evolution 2021; 75:569-581. [PMID: 33592115 DOI: 10.1111/evo.14196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Revised: 02/02/2021] [Accepted: 02/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
The attention given to heteromorphism and genetic degeneration of "classical sex chromosomes" (Y chromosomes in XY systems, and the W in ZW systems that were studied first and are best described) has perhaps created the impression that the absence of recombination between sex chromosomes is inevitable. I here argue that continued recombination is often to be expected, that absence of recombination is surprising and demands further study, and that the involvement of selection in reduced recombination is not yet well understood. Despite a long history of investigations of sex chromosome pairs, there is a need for more quantitative approaches to studying sex-linked regions. I describe a scheme to help understand the relationships between different properties of sex-linked regions. Specifically, I focus on their sizes (differentiating between small regions and extensive fully sex-linked ones), the times when they evolved, and their differentiation, and review studies using DNA sequencing in nonmodel organisms that are providing information about the processes causing these properties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah Charlesworth
- Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3JT, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sigmon JS, Blanchard MW, Baric RS, Bell TA, Brennan J, Brockmann GA, Burks AW, Calabrese JM, Caron KM, Cheney RE, Ciavatta D, Conlon F, Darr DB, Faber J, Franklin C, Gershon TR, Gralinski L, Gu B, Gaines CH, Hagan RS, Heimsath EG, Heise MT, Hock P, Ideraabdullah F, Jennette JC, Kafri T, Kashfeen A, Kulis M, Kumar V, Linnertz C, Livraghi-Butrico A, Lloyd KCK, Lutz C, Lynch RM, Magnuson T, Matsushima GK, McMullan R, Miller DR, Mohlke KL, Moy SS, Murphy CEY, Najarian M, O'Brien L, Palmer AA, Philpot BD, Randell SH, Reinholdt L, Ren Y, Rockwood S, Rogala AR, Saraswatula A, Sassetti CM, Schisler JC, Schoenrock SA, Shaw GD, Shorter JR, Smith CM, St Pierre CL, Tarantino LM, Threadgill DW, Valdar W, Vilen BJ, Wardwell K, Whitmire JK, Williams L, Zylka MJ, Ferris MT, McMillan L, Manuel de Villena FP. Content and Performance of the MiniMUGA Genotyping Array: A New Tool To Improve Rigor and Reproducibility in Mouse Research. Genetics 2020; 216:905-930. [PMID: 33067325 PMCID: PMC7768238 DOI: 10.1534/genetics.120.303596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2020] [Accepted: 10/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The laboratory mouse is the most widely used animal model for biomedical research, due in part to its well-annotated genome, wealth of genetic resources, and the ability to precisely manipulate its genome. Despite the importance of genetics for mouse research, genetic quality control (QC) is not standardized, in part due to the lack of cost-effective, informative, and robust platforms. Genotyping arrays are standard tools for mouse research and remain an attractive alternative even in the era of high-throughput whole-genome sequencing. Here, we describe the content and performance of a new iteration of the Mouse Universal Genotyping Array (MUGA), MiniMUGA, an array-based genetic QC platform with over 11,000 probes. In addition to robust discrimination between most classical and wild-derived laboratory strains, MiniMUGA was designed to contain features not available in other platforms: (1) chromosomal sex determination, (2) discrimination between substrains from multiple commercial vendors, (3) diagnostic SNPs for popular laboratory strains, (4) detection of constructs used in genetically engineered mice, and (5) an easy-to-interpret report summarizing these results. In-depth annotation of all probes should facilitate custom analyses by individual researchers. To determine the performance of MiniMUGA, we genotyped 6899 samples from a wide variety of genetic backgrounds. The performance of MiniMUGA compares favorably with three previous iterations of the MUGA family of arrays, both in discrimination capabilities and robustness. We have generated publicly available consensus genotypes for 241 inbred strains including classical, wild-derived, and recombinant inbred lines. Here, we also report the detection of a substantial number of XO and XXY individuals across a variety of sample types, new markers that expand the utility of reduced complexity crosses to genetic backgrounds other than C57BL/6, and the robust detection of 17 genetic constructs. We provide preliminary evidence that the array can be used to identify both partial sex chromosome duplication and mosaicism, and that diagnostic SNPs can be used to determine how long inbred mice have been bred independently from the relevant main stock. We conclude that MiniMUGA is a valuable platform for genetic QC, and an important new tool to increase the rigor and reproducibility of mouse research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Sebastian Sigmon
- Department of Computer Science, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | - Matthew W Blanchard
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
- Mutant Mouse Resource and Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | - Ralph S Baric
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | - Timothy A Bell
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | - Jennifer Brennan
- Mutant Mouse Resource and Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | | | - A Wesley Burks
- Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | - J Mauro Calabrese
- Department of Pharmacology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | - Kathleen M Caron
- Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | - Richard E Cheney
- Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | - Dominic Ciavatta
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | - Frank Conlon
- Department of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | - David B Darr
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | - James Faber
- Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | - Craig Franklin
- Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211
| | - Timothy R Gershon
- Department of Neurology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | - Lisa Gralinski
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | - Bin Gu
- Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | - Christiann H Gaines
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | - Robert S Hagan
- Division of Pulmonary Diseases and Critical Care Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | - Ernest G Heimsath
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
- Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | - Mark T Heise
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | - Pablo Hock
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | - Folami Ideraabdullah
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
- Department of Nutrition, Gillings School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | - J Charles Jennette
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | - Tal Kafri
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
- Gene Therapy Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | - Anwica Kashfeen
- Department of Computer Science, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | - Mike Kulis
- Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | - Vivek Kumar
- The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine 04609
| | - Colton Linnertz
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | - Alessandra Livraghi-Butrico
- Marsico Lung Institute/UNC Cystic Fibrosis Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | - K C Kent Lloyd
- Department of Surgery, University of California Davis, Davis, California 95616
- School of Medicine, University of California Davis, California 95616
- Mouse Biology Program, University of California Davis, California 95616
| | | | - Rachel M Lynch
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | - Terry Magnuson
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
- Mutant Mouse Resource and Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | - Glenn K Matsushima
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
- UNC Neuroscience Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | - Rachel McMullan
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | - Darla R Miller
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | - Karen L Mohlke
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | - Sheryl S Moy
- Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
- Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | - Caroline E Y Murphy
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | - Maya Najarian
- Department of Computer Science, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | - Lori O'Brien
- Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | | | - Benjamin D Philpot
- Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
- Marsico Lung Institute/UNC Cystic Fibrosis Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | - Scott H Randell
- Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | | | - Yuyu Ren
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093
| | | | - Allison R Rogala
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
- Division of Comparative Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | - Avani Saraswatula
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | - Christopher M Sassetti
- Department of Microbiology and Physiological Systems, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts 01655
| | - Jonathan C Schisler
- Department of Pharmacology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | - Sarah A Schoenrock
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | - Ginger D Shaw
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | - John R Shorter
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | - Clare M Smith
- Department of Microbiology and Physiological Systems, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts 01655
| | | | - Lisa M Tarantino
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
- Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | - David W Threadgill
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, Texas 77843
| | - William Valdar
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | - Barbara J Vilen
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | | | - Jason K Whitmire
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | - Lucy Williams
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | - Mark J Zylka
- Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | - Martin T Ferris
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | - Leonard McMillan
- Department of Computer Science, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | - Fernando Pardo Manuel de Villena
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
- Mutant Mouse Resource and Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
The Location of the Pseudoautosomal Boundary in Silene latifolia. Genes (Basel) 2020; 11:genes11060610. [PMID: 32486434 PMCID: PMC7348893 DOI: 10.3390/genes11060610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2020] [Revised: 05/25/2020] [Accepted: 05/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Y-chromosomes contain a non-recombining region (NRY), and in many organisms it was shown that the NRY expanded over time. How and why the NRY expands remains unclear. Young sex chromosomes, where NRY expansion occurred recently or is on-going, offer an opportunity to study the causes of this process. Here, we used the plant Silene latifolia, where sex chromosomes evolved ~11 million years ago, to study the location of the boundary between the NRY and the recombining pseudoautosomal region (PAR). The previous work devoted to the NRY/PAR boundary in S. latifolia was based on a handful of genes with locations approximately known from the genetic map. Here, we report the analysis of 86 pseudoautosomal and sex-linked genes adjacent to the S. latifolia NRY/PAR boundary to establish the location of the boundary more precisely. We take advantage of the dense genetic map and polymorphism data from wild populations to identify 20 partially sex-linked genes located in the “fuzzy boundary”, that rarely recombines in male meiosis. Genes proximal to this fuzzy boundary show no evidence of recombination in males, while the genes distal to this partially-sex-linked region are actively recombining in males. Our results provide a more accurate location for the PAR boundary in S. latifolia, which will help to elucidate the causes of PAR boundary shifts leading to NRY expansion over time.
Collapse
|