Bedside diagnosis of influenzavirus infections in hospitalized children

Diagnostic accuracy of a rapid antigen triple test (SARS-CoV-2, respiratory syncytial virus, and influenza) using anterior nasal swabs versus multiplex RT-PCR in children in an emergency department

BACKGROUND

In children, respiratory infections such as SARS-CoV-2, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), and influenza share similar clinical signs and symptoms. Here we compared the performance of a rapid antigen diagnostic test using a self-collected anterior nasal swab (COVID-VIRO ALL IN TRIPLEX) and multiplex RT-PCR.

METHODS

From October to December 2022, in the emergency pediatrics unit of Orleans Hospital, France, we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of the triplex test.

RESULTS

For the 263 children, sensitivity of the test was 88.9% (95%CI 51.8-99.7), 79.1% (95%CI 64.0-90.0), and 91.6% (95%CI 84.1-96.3), for SARS-CoV-2, RSV, and influenza, respectively. Specificity was 100% for each virus. For RT-PCR with cycle threshold < 32, sensitivity was 100.0% [95%CI 59.0-100.0], 87.2% [95%CI 72.6-95.7] and 92.3% [95%CI 84.896.9] for SARS-CoV-2, RSV, and influenza respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This easy-to-perform triplex test is a considerable advance, allowing clinicians to obtain an accurate diagnosis in most cases of respiratory infection. More data are needed to validate this test in different contexts and across several seasons.

Evaluation of Lateral-Flow Assay for Rapid Detection of Influenza Virus

Background

Influenza virus mainly causes acute respiratory infections in humans. However, the diagnosis of influenza is not accurate based on clinical evidence, as the symptoms of flu are similar to other respiratory virus. The lateral-flow assay is a rapid method to detect influenza virus. But the effectiveness of the technique in detecting flu viruses is unclear. Hence, a meta-analysis would be performed to evaluate the accuracy of LFA in detecting influenza virus.

Methods

Relevant literature was searched out in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases with the keywords "lateral flow assay" and "flu virus". By Meta-DiSc software, pooled sensitivity, pooled specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), summary receiver operating characteristic curve (SROC), and area under the curve (AUC) can be calculated.

Results

This meta-analysis contains 13 studies and 24 data. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of the influenza virus detected by LFA were 0.84 (95% CI: 0.82-0.86) and 0.97 (95% CI: 0.97-0.98), respectively. The pooled values of PLR, NLR, DOR, and SROC were 32.68 (17.16-62.24), 0.17 (0.13-0.24), 334.07 (144.27-773.53), and 0.9877. No publication bias was found.

Conclusions

LFA exhibited high sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing influenza virus. It is a valuable alternative method which can diagnose influenza virus quickly. However, more evidence is required to confirm whether LFA is comparable to traditional methods for detecting the virus.

Accuracy of rapid influenza detection test in diagnosis of influenza A and B viruses in children less than 59 months old

Influenza burden among children is underestimated. Rapid influenza diagnostic tests (RIDTs) may be helpful in the early diagnosis of the disease, but their results should be interpreted cautiously. The aim of our study was to estimate the accuracy of the rapid influenza detection test BD Directigen™ EZ Flu A+B (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Sparks, MD) used among children with influenza-like illness (ILI) consulted in the ambulatory care clinics. A total number of 150 patients were enrolled into the study. The inclusion criteria were: age of the child less than 59 months, presentation of ILI according to CDC definition (fever >37.8 °C, cough, and/or sore throat in the absence of another known cause of illness), and duration of symptoms shorter than 96 h. In all patients two nasal and one pharyngeal swab were obtained and tested by RIDT, RT-PCR, and real time RT-PCR. For or influenza A(H1N1)pdm09, virus sensitivity of RIDT was 62.2 % (95 %CI 53.4-66.5 %), specificity 97.1 % (95 %CI 93.4-99 %), positive predictive value (PPV) 90.3 % (95 %CI 77.5-96.5 %), and negative predictive value (NPV) 85.7 % (95 %CI 82.4-87.3 %). For influenza B, virus sensitivity was 36.8 % (95 %CI 23.3-41.1 %), specificity 99.2 % (95 %CI 97.3-99.9 %), PPV 87.5 % (95 %CI 55.4-97.7 %), and NPV 91.5 % (95 % CI 89.7-92.1 %). We conclude that the RIDT immunoassay is a specific, but moderately sensitive, method in the diagnosis of influenza type A and is of low sensitivity in the diagnosis of influenza B infections in infants and children.

Value of rapid antigen test for pandemic influenza A (H1N1) 2009 in the pediatric emergency department

OBJECTIVE

Pandemic H1N1 influenza is the predominant influenza virus circulating in Turkey in 2009. Because of the clinical manifestations of influenza overlap with those attributable to other common respiratory illnesses of childhood, establishing a diagnosis of influenza requires confirmatory testing. The aim of our study was to define the predictive value of rapid influenza antigen detection test in children presenting to a pediatric emergency care department with influenza-like illness and to compare with clinical signs and symptoms.

METHODS

From October to November 2009, 3646 patients presented with influenza-like illness to the pediatric emergency department. Influenza-like illness is defined as fever with cough or sore throat in the absence of a known cause other than influenza. Enrollment criteria included fever and at least one of the following symptoms: coryza, cough, headache, sore throat, or myalgia. All 322 enrolled patients received a nasal wash for rapid influenza diagnostic tests, and the results were compared with clinical signs.

RESULTS

Rapid influenza detection test result was found positive in 167 (51.9%) of 322 patients. Clinical findings included fever as the presenting complaint (100%), fever (≥38 °C) (93.4%), cough (91.3%), rhinorrhea (66.1%), sore throat (35.1%), vomiting-diarrhea (22.4%), myalgia (20.2%), headache (18%) and shortness of breath (12.1%). There were 211 patients (65.5%) at high risk for the development of complications of pandemic H1N1 influenza A such as chronic lung disease (asthma) (n = 103, 48.8%), age younger than 2 years (n = 78, 37%), and neurologic disease (n = 10, 4.7%). The positivity rate and sensitivity of the test increase up to 70% in patients, who had the high body temperature (≥39 °C). The rapid test achieved the highest sensitivity in patients, who have high fever (≥39 °C), myalgia, vomiting, and diarrhea.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that if the patients have high fever (≥39 °C), myalgia, and vomiting-diarrhea together, the likelihood of rapid antigen test positivity rate increases in patients, who presented with influenza-like illness.

Evaluation study of a portable impedance biosensor for detection of avian influenza virus

Current methods for detection of avian influenza virus (AIV) based on virus culture and RT-PCR are well established, but they are either time consuming or require specialized laboratory facilities and highly trained technicians. A simple, rapid, robust, and reliable test, suitable for use in the field or at the patient's bedside, is urgently needed. In this study, the performance of a newly developed portable impedance biosensor was evaluated by comparison with real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (rRT-PCR) and virus culture for detection of AIV in tracheal and cloacal swab samples collected from experimentally H5N2 AIV infected chickens. The impedance biosensor system was based on a combination of magnetic nanobeads, which were coated with AIV subtype-specific antibody for capture (separation and concentration) of a target virus, and a microfluidic chip with an interdigitated array microelectrode for transfer and detection of target virus, and impedance measurement of the bio-nanobeads and AI virus complexes in a buffer solution. A comparison of results obtained from 59 swab samples using virus culture, impedance biosensor and rRT-PCR methods showed that the impedance biosensor technique was comparable in sensitivity and specificity to rRT-PCR. Detection time for the impedance biosensor is less than 1h.

Sensitivity and specificity of rapid influenza testing of children in a community setting

Please cite this paper as: Stebbins et al. (2011) Sensitivity and specificity of rapid influenza testing of children in a community setting. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses 5(2), 104–109.

Introduction  Rapid influenza testing (RFT) allows for a rapid point‐of‐care diagnosis of influenza. The Quidel QuickVue^® Influenza A+B test (QuickVue) has a reported manufacturer’s sensitivity and specificity of 73% and 96%, respectively, with nasal swabs. However, investigators have shown sensitivities ranging from 22% to 77% in community settings.

Methods  The QuickVue rapid influenza test was evaluated in a population of elementary (K‐5) school children, using testing in the home, as part of the Pittsburgh Influenza Prevention Project during the 2007–2008 influenza season. The QuickVue test was performed with nasal swab in full accordance with package instructions and compared with the results of nasal swab semi‐quantitative RT‐PCR.

Results  Sensitivity of the QuickVue was found to be 27% in this sample. There was no statistically valid correlation between the semi‐quantitative PCR result and the QuickVue result.

Conclusions  This study is consistent with the low sensitivity of the QuickVue test also reported by others. Viral load, technique, and the use of nasal swabs were examined as contributing factors but were not found to be explanations for this result. Community testing includes patients who are on the lower spectrum of illness which would not be the case in hospital or clinic samples. This suggests that RFT is less sensitive for patients at the lower spectrum of illness, with less severe disease.

Evaluation of a direct test for seasonal influenza in outpatients

OBJECTIVE

To present our experience regarding the use of a rapid diagnostic test for seasonal influenza A and B.

METHODS

We systematically collected and analyzed our data regarding the use of a rapid diagnostic test for seasonal influenza A and B in patients with specific respiratory symptoms that sought medical services, during the time period from 01/01/2009 to 30/05/2009, from a network of physicians (SOS Doctors) who perform house-call visits in the area of Attica, Greece.

RESULTS

From the total of 16,335 house-call visits performed during the evaluated period, 3412 (20.8%) were due to respiratory/influenza symptoms; 197 (5.8%) patients were tested for influenza. From the 184 patients with available data regarding the test result, 97 (52.7%) were positive for influenza. Significantly more oseltamivir and less antibiotic treatment were prescribed to patients with positive test result compared with those with a negative test result. Additionally, the impact of the test in the participating physicians' decision making was obvious, as doctors who used the test systematically prescribed significantly more oseltamivir and less antibiotic treatment compared to the doctors who didn't use the test.

CONCLUSION

The use of a rapid test for seasonal influenza enabled the targeted treatment with oseltamivir, as well as a reduction in antibiotic treatment, in patients found positive for influenza in our clinical setting.

Failure of routine diagnostic methods to detect influenza in hospitalized older adults

OBJECTIVE

To define the utility of using routine diagnostic methods to detect influenza in older, hospitalized adults.

DESIGN

Descriptive study.

SETTING

One academic hospital and 1 community hospital during the 2006-2007 and 2007-2008 influenza seasons. Participants. Hospitalized adults 50 years of age or older.

METHODS

Adults who were 50 years of age or older and hospitalized with symptoms of respiratory illness were enrolled and tested for influenza by use of reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Using RT-PCR as the gold standard, we assessed the performances of rapid antigen tests and conventional influenza culture and the diagnostic use of the clinical definition of influenza-like illness.

RESULTS

Influenza was detected by use of RT-PCR in 26 (11%) of 228 patients enrolled in our study. The sensitivity of the rapid antigen test performed at bedside by research staff members was 19.2% (95% confidence interval, 8.51%-37.9%); the sensitivity of conventional influenza culture was 34.6% (95% confidence interval, 19.4%-53.8%). The ability to detect influenza with both the rapid antigen test and culture was associated with patients with a higher viral load (P=.002 and P=.001, respectively). The ability to diagnose influenza by use of the clinical definition of influenza-like illness had a higher sensitivity (80.8%) but lacked specificity (40.6%).

CONCLUSION

Because rapid antigen testing and viral culture have poor sensitivity (19.2% and 34.6%, respectively), neither testing method is sufficient to use to determine what type of isolation procedures to implement in a hospital setting.

Diagnosis of Novel Pandemic Influenza Virus 2009 H1N1 in Hospitalized Patients

A real-time RT-PCR assay was standardized and evaluated for the detection of the recent pandemic 2009 H1N1 strain that circulated around the world causing colossal loss of human life. We amplified the conserved regions of the hemagglutinin (HA) gene of 438 clinical specimens using real-time RT-PCR assay for rapid identification of pandemic influenza virus. The real-time RT-PCR was optimized and the primers and probes were tested against a panel of known negative and positive controls. RNA isolated from the HeLa cell line served as quality control. The conventional RT-PCR which is an established method of influenza virus diagnosis was compared to real-time RT-PCR. Of 438 clinical specimens tested, 212 specimens were found positive for influenza A virus (SD 46.669) in which 139 specimens were diagnosed positive for the pandemic 2009 H1N1 while 73 were the seasonal influenza viruses. We report that the real-time RT-PCR assay offers both, a high sensitivity and specificity when compared with the traditional identification method. The real-time RT-PCR assay allows rapid identification of the pandemic swine 2009-H1N1 at very low viral loads that are negative by the traditional RT-PCR. This optimized assay can be a very useful tool to assist both epidemiologists and the clinicians.

Influenza testing and antiviral prescribing practices among emergency department clinicians in 9 states during the 2006 to 2007 influenza season

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Influenza causes significant widespread illness each year. Emergency department (ED) clinicians are often first-line providers to evaluate and make treatment decisions for patients presenting with influenza. We sought to better understand ED clinician testing and treatment practices in the Emerging Infections Program Network, a federal, state, and academic collaboration that conducts active surveillance for influenza-associated hospitalizations.

METHODS

During 2007, a survey was administered to ED clinicians who worked in Emerging Infections Program catchment area hospitals' EDs. The survey encompassed the role of the clinician, years since completing clinical training, hospital type, influenza testing practices, and use of antiviral medications during the 2006 to 2007 influenza season. We examined factors associated with influenza testing and antiviral use.

RESULTS

A total of 1,055 ED clinicians from 123 hospitals responded to the survey. A majority of respondents (85.3%; n=887) reported they had tested their patients for influenza during the 2006 to 2007 influenza season (Emerging Infections Program site range: 59.3 to 100%; P<.0001). When asked about antiviral medications, 55.7% (n=576) of respondents stated they had prescribed antiviral medications to some of their patients in 2006 to 2007 (Emerging Infections Program site range 32.9% to 80.3%; P<.0001). A positive association between influenza testing and prescribing antiviral medications was observed. Additionally, the type of hospital, location in which an ED clinician worked, and the number of years since medical training were associated with prescribing antiviral influenza medications.

CONCLUSION

There is much heterogeneity in clinician-initiated influenza testing and treatment practices. Additional exploration of the role of hospital testing and treatment policies, clinicians' perception of influenza disease, and methods for educating clinicians about new recommendations is needed to better understand ED clinician testing and treatment decisions, especially in an environment of rapidly changing influenza clinical guidelines. Until influenza testing and treatment guidelines are better promulgated, clinicians may continue to test and treat influenza with inconsistency.

Rapid diagnostic testing for seasonal influenza: an evidence-based review and comparison with unaided clinical diagnosis

BACKGROUND

Worldwide, seasonal influenza imposes a considerable health and economic burden. Clinical diagnosis of influenza-like illness (ILI) is complicated by non-specific symptomatology. Rapid flu tests (RFTs) impact treatment decisions and may improve patient care; yet, recommendations for RFT use are broad, and the performance of unaided clinical diagnosis relative to RFTs is unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To determine age-stratified, overall sensitivities and specificities of the widely studied RFT, QuickVue® (Quidel Corporation, San Diego, CA), and clinical diagnosis of ILI by meta-analysis and to seek factors associated with poorer clinical diagnostic discrimination.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted using article selection criteria identifying studies indexed in PubMed/MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and other pertinent sources of studies reporting sensitivity, specificity, and effects of RFTs and clinical diagnosis on decision-making for patients with ILI.

RESULTS

QuickVue's® diagnostic specificity exceeds that of unaided clinical diagnosis by 29-31%. False-positive results occur approximately 8.2 times more frequently by unaided clinical diagnosis than by the RFT alone. These findings were unaffected by seasonal variations in disease prevalence. RFTs reduce diagnostic testing, antibiotic use, and emergency department utilization while increasing antiviral prescription rates. No systematic relationship between the broadness of clinical diagnostic criteria for influenza and diagnostic performance was observed across studies included in this review.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of RFTs improves seasonal influenza diagnostic specificity above that based on unaided clinical diagnosis irrespective of the broadness of clinical diagnostic criteria, and affects clinical decision-making. These results provide an improved framework upon which to diagnose influenza, design future RFT studies, and modify existing recommendations for improved ILI patient management.

Factors affecting QuickVue Influenza A + B rapid test performance in the community setting

Rapid diagnosis of influenza can facilitate timely clinical management. We evaluated the performance of the QuickVue Influenza A + B test (Quidel, San Diego, CA) in a community setting and investigated the factors affecting test sensitivity. We recruited 1008 subjects from 30 outpatient clinics in Hong Kong between February and September 2007. Each subject provided 2 pooled pairs of nose and throat swabs; 1 pair was tested by the QuickVue rapid test on site, and the other pair was sent to a laboratory for reference tests. Among 998 enrolled subjects with valid results, the rapid test had overall sensitivity of 0.68 and specificity of 0.96 compared with viral culture. Sensitivity for both influenza A and B was significantly higher for specimens with viral loads greater than 5 log(10) copies/mL. The QuickVue Influenza A + B test has similar sensitivity in point-of-care community settings to more controlled conditions.

Influenza virus infection and the risk of serious bacterial infections in young febrile infants

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to determine the risk of SBIs in febrile infants with influenza virus infections and compare this risk with that of febrile infants without influenza infections.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a multicenter, prospective, cross-sectional study during 3 consecutive influenza seasons. All febrile infants <or=60 days of age evaluated at any of 5 participating pediatric EDs between October and March of 1998 through 2001 were eligible. We determined influenza virus status by rapid antigen detection. We evaluated infants with blood, urine, cerebrospinal fluid, and stool cultures. Urinary tract infection (UTI) was defined by single-pathogen growth of either >or=5 x 10(4) colony-forming units per mL or >or=10(4) colony-forming units per mL in association with a positive urinalysis. Bacteremia, bacterial meningitis, and bacterial enteritis were defined by growth of a known bacterial pathogen. SBI was defined as any of the 4 above-mentioned bacterial infections.

RESULTS

During the 3-year study period, 1091 infants were enrolled. A total of 844 (77.4%) infants were tested for the influenza virus, of whom 123 (14.3%) tested positive. SBI status was determined in 809 (95.9%) of the 844 infants. Overall, 95 (11.7%) of the 809 infants tested for influenza virus had an SBI. Infants with influenza infections had a significantly lower prevalence of SBI (2.5%) and UTI (2.4%) when compared with infants who tested negative for the influenza virus. Although there were no cases of bacteremia, meningitis, or enteritis in the influenza-positive group, the differences between the 2 groups for these individual infections were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Febrile infants <or=60 days of age with influenza infections are at significantly lower risk of SBIs than febrile infants who are influenza-negative. Nevertheless, the rate of UTI remains appreciable in febrile, influenza-positive infants.

Comparison of the performance of the rapid antigen detection actim Influenza A&B test and RT-PCR in different respiratory specimens

Nowadays, influenza antigen detection test kits are used most frequently to detect influenza A or B virus to establish the diagnosis of influenza rapidly and initiate appropriate therapy. This study was conducted to evaluate the performance of the actim Influenza A&B test (Medix Biochemica). Overall, 473 respiratory specimens were analysed in the actim Influenza A&B test and the results were compared with those from an RT-PCR assay; 461 of these samples originated from paediatric patients aged 7 weeks to 6.5 years either with influenza-related symptoms or from the intensive care unit, and 12 samples originated from adults with underlying lung or haematological diseases. Diagnosis of influenza A or B virus could be established using the actim Influenza A&B test (9/473 samples for influenza A virus and 6/473 for influenza B virus). RT-PCR revealed 23 patients with influenza virus (13/473 for influenza A virus and 10/473 for influenza B virus). The sensitivity and specificity of the actim Influenza A&B test were 65 and 100 % compared with the RT-PCR assay. However, 32 external quality assessment samples containing seven different strains of influenza A subtypes H1N1 and H3N2 and the avian H5N1 were detected correctly by the actim Influenza A&B test. No cross-reactivity to a range of bacterial, fungal and other viral pathogens was observed. In conclusion, the actim Influenza A&B test is reliable for positive results due to its high specificity. Nevertheless, negative results from this test need to be confirmed by a more sensitive assay because of the low sensitivity observed with diagnostic samples.

[Impact of influenza rapid diagnostic tests (IRDT) on the diagnosis of influenza and on the management of influenza in children in ambulatory pediatric setting]

OBJECTIVE

Several studies have highlighted the assets of the influenza rapid diagnostic tests (IRDT) for the emergency department management of febrile children. The objective of this study was to determine in ambulatory pediatric setting impact of IRDT on the management of febrile children during an epidemic, especially on other diagnostic testing performed, antibiotic and antiviral treatments.

METHODS

During an influenza epidemic, 37 paediatricians in three different areas of France included all children presenting fever with respiratory illnesses; they performed IRDT (test QuickVue for Influenza A and B, Quidel). Data collected were antiflu vaccination, previous asthma, symptoms, clinical signs, other diagnostic testing performed, and a follow-up two weeks later.

RESULTS

Between December, 2006 and April, 2007, 695 children entered the program. The average age of those children was 4.1 years old (SD 3.4), median 3.2 (0.07-17.5). In 41.6% of the cases, the tests proved positive. Among 13 symptoms of influenza, only five were significantly more present in the group IRDT+: shiver (68.1% versus 57.4%), asthenia (87% versus 79.9%), cough (87.5% versus 70.1%), rhinorrhea (93.4% versus 83.3%), and sleepiness (54.2% versus 43.4%). The number of laboratory tests and radiographs ordered were less frequent in group IRDT+ than in group IRDT-: respectively 0.7% versus 11.6%, and 0.7% versus 8.6% (p<0.0001). IRDT+ group received antibiotics in 7.6% of cases (22 patients, 20 for OMA) and antiviral in 64.7%. IRDT- group received respectively 18.5% antibiotics, and no antiviral (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the difficulty of clinical influenza diagnosis, and suggests the assets of IRDT to diagnose influenza and to improve the management of influenza in ambulatory paediatric setting.

[Impact of rapid influenza test during influenza epidemic in all febrile children less than 6 years old in a pediatric emergency department]

AIM

To determine the impact of rapid influenza test (RIT) on the prescription of additional tests, antibiotics and oseltamivir, and the influence of oseltamivir on clinical signs and parents' day work stoppage.

METHODS

Prospective study in the pediatric emergency department of Nice University Hospital from 29th January 2007 to 3rd March 2007 including children from 1 month to 6 years old with fever greater or equal to 38.5 degrees C for less than 48 h. Virologic research on nasopharyngeal aspiration was: immunofluorescence, cell culture and RIT Quickvue. Clinical informations, additional tests and treatments were registered for each child. An antiviral treatment (oseltamivir) was proposed to children older than 1 year with positive RIT. Evolution at 7 days was evaluated by phone contact.

RESULTS

One hundred and seventy-seven children were included (mean age 24 months, sex-ratio 1.88). The RIT was positive in 42.3% (n=75). Compared with cell culture, the sensibility, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the RIT were, respectively, 95.6, 91.6, 88 and 97%. Clinical signs significantly correlated to influenza were: impairment, rhinitis and acute otitis media. In the RIT positive group, there were significantly less additional tests (13 versus 36) and particularly urinalysis (5 versus 19), and more spreading in the family (p=0.0002). There was not any significant difference concerning hospitalizations, antibiotic prescriptions, or parents' day work stoppage.

CONCLUSION

During influenza epidemic, in a pediatric emergency department, RIT allows a reduction of additional tests in febrile young children, particularly urinalysis.

Development of a lateral flow assay for rapid detection of bovine antibody to Anaplasma marginale

A rapid lateral flow assay for detection of bovine antibody to Anaplasma marginale was developed. The assay used a recombinant peptide of major surface protein 5 as the antigen and a monoclonal antibody specific for bovine IgG(1) conjugated with colloidal gold beads for detection. Serum and anticoagulated blood samples were obtained from cattle in an area where anaplasmosis was endemic. The samples were selected based on positive identification of the organism in blood smears. The unclotted blood samples were used for PCR determination of the presence of A. marginale while the sera were tested by a commercial competitive enzyme immunoassay (CELISA) and by the lateral flow assay (LFA). Similar samples, collected at a Canadian sales barn, were tested by the CELISA and LFA and 10% were tested by PCR for the presence of A. marginale nucleic acid. In addition, stored serum samples from a second endemic area were tested by CELISA and LFA. Of the 114 smear positive samples, all were positive by CELISA and LFA. All samples were also positive by PCR. Samples from Canadian sources (n=524) were negative in the CELISA but 11 sera gave false positive reactions in the LFA. All samples tested were PCR negative. Of 113 samples from herds with anaplasmosis, 53 were positive in the CELISA and 50 were LFA positive.

[Influenza incidence estimated with a rapid diagnostic test in critically ill patients with acute respiratory failure during the 2005 and 2006 winter flu epidemics]

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the incidence of influenza infection with a rapid diagnostic test in patients hospitalized in an intensive care unit (ICU) during the epidemic periods of two consecutive winters (2005-2006).

METHODS

This study tested nasal aspirate of all patients admitted to the ICU for acute respiratory failure during the influenza epidemic period with the QuickVue influenza rapid diagnostic test.

RESULTS

The study included 39 patients: 22 men and 17 women. Their mean age was 69.7+/-13 years, their mean SAPS II score 54+/-21, their mean length of stay 14.7+/-20 days, and 43.5% had been vaccinated against influenza. The mortality rate was 33.3% (n=13). Four patients (10.2%) had a positive QuickVue test and were considered to have influenza associated with their primary diagnosis: pneumococcal pneumonia, haemophilus pneumonia, acute bronchitis, and acute bronchitis with acute cardiogenic edema. These patients were older than those with a negative test (80+/-7 versus 68+/-13 years, p=0.02). Their SAPS II, length of stay and mortality rate did not differ statistically from those with negative results. Chronic heart failure (but not COPD or non-vaccination) was more frequent in these patients (p=0.01).

DISCUSSION

Several published studies report a satisfactory specificity and sensitivity for QuickVue. With this test, we estimated the incidence of influenza in patients hospitalized in our ICU for acute respiratory failure during flu epidemics at around 10%, close to that reported in previous studies.

Influenza and respiratory syncytial virus infections in British Hajj pilgrims

Viral respiratory infections including influenza and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) have been reported during the Hajj among international pilgrims. To help establish the burden of these infections at the Hajj, we set up a study to confirm these diagnoses in symptomatic British pilgrims who attended the 2005 Hajj. UK pilgrims with symptoms of upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) were invited to participate; after taking medical history, nasal swabs were collected for point-of-care testing (PoCT) of influenza and for subsequent PCR analysis for influenza and RSV. Of the 205 patients recruited, 37 (18%) were positive for either influenza or RSV. Influenza A (H3) accounted for 54% (20/37) of the virus-positive samples, followed by RSV 24% (9/37), influenza B 19% (7/37), and influenza A (H1) 3% (1/37). Of the influenza-positive cases, 29% (8/28) had recently had a flu immunisation. Influenza was more common in those who gave a history of contact with a pilgrim with a respiratory illness than those who did not (17 versus 9%). The overall rate of RSV was 4% (9/202). This study confirms that influenza and RSV cause acute respiratory infections in British Hajj pilgrims. Continuing surveillance and a programme of interventions to contain the spread of infection are needed at the Hajj, particularly when the world is preparing for an influenza pandemic.

Value of rapid testing for influenza among Hajj pilgrims

BACKGROUND

Muslim pilgrims going on the Hajj are at risk of influenza. The treatment and prevention of influenza with antiviral drugs depends on rapid diagnosis using a near-patient test such as the QuickVue influenza test. The suitability of this test among pilgrims has not been studied in the past and this study assesses the usefulness of the test for diagnosing influenza among those attending the Hajj.

METHODS

The sensitivity and specificity of the QuickVue test were measured against reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction by undertaking the tests on nasal swab samples from pilgrims.

RESULTS

The sensitivity and specificity of the QuickVue test were 22% and 99%, respectively, and its likelihood ratio for a positive and a negative test were 22 and 0.79 in that order.

CONCLUSION

The QuickVue influenza test using nasal swabs is poorly sensitive for diagnosing influenza among Hajj pilgrims. Given its high specificity and an even higher likelihood ratio for a positive test it may still be a very useful tool for influenza surveillance at the Hajj.

Impact des tests de diagnostic rapide en ville dans la prise en charge des enfants en période de grippe

Several studies in children showed at the paediatric emergency hospital the interest of influenza rapid diagnostic tests (IRDT) in this disease for which the clinical diagnosis is difficult in children. The purpose of this prospective study carried out in ambulatory paediatric setting was to evaluate impact of the IRDT in the assumption of responsibility of children suspected of Influenza infection. Thirty paediatricians (14 without IRDT, 16 with IRDT) included 602 children between 2004 and 2005. The influenza was confirmed by IRDT in 54% of the cases. Among the 13 symptoms or signs recorded, only 4 - chills (61.6 vs 48.4%), cough (89.8 vs 71.1%), rhinorrhea (97.9 vs 86.2%), and anorexia (50.3 vs 34.8%) - were significantly more frequent (P </= 0.01) for patients avec with positive IRDT. However, the difference is not sufficient to be contributive. The paediatricians using IRDT prescribed with positive test more oseltamivir (68.5 vs 1.9%, P < 0.0001). The antibiotic prescription was overall low (9.5% with IRDT vs 3.9% without IRDT, P = 0,008), and primarily when the result of IRDT was negative (15.7% if IRDT(-) vs 4.3% if IRDT(+), P = 0.0003). This study confirms the difficulty of clinical diagnosis, and shows the interest of IRDT for the diagnosis of influenza and consequently to improve the management of influenza in children in ambulatory paediatric setting.

Role of the laboratory in diagnosis of influenza during seasonal epidemics and potential pandemics

Laboratory diagnosis of influenza is critical to its treatment and surveillance. With the emergence of novel and highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses, the role of the laboratory has been further extended to include isolation and subtyping of the virus to monitor its appearance and facilitate appropriate vaccine development. Recent progress in enhancing testing for influenza promises to both improve the management of patients with influenza and decrease associated health care costs. The present review covers the technological characteristics and utilization features of currently available diagnostic tests, the factors that influence the selection of such tests, and the developments that are essential for pandemic preparedness.

Methodologic issues regarding the use of three observational study designs to assess influenza vaccine effectiveness

BACKGROUND

Influenza causes substantial morbidity and annual vaccination is the most important prevention strategy. Accurately measuring vaccine effectiveness (VE) is difficult. The clinical syndrome most closely associated with influenza virus infection, influenza-like illness (ILI), is not specific. In addition, laboratory confirmation is infrequently done, and available rapid diagnostic tests are imperfect. The objective of this study was to estimate the joint impact of rapid diagnostic test sensitivity and specificity on VE for three types of study designs: a cohort study, a traditional case-control study, and a case-control study that used as controls individuals with ILI who tested negative for influenza virus infection.

METHODS

We developed a mathematical model with five input parameters: true VE, attack rates (ARs) of influenza-ILI and non-influenza-ILI and the sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic test.

RESULTS

With imperfect specificity, estimates from all three designs tended to underestimate true VE, but were similar except if fairly extreme inputs were used. Only if test specificity was 95% or more or if influenza attack rates doubled that of background illness did the case-control method slightly overestimate VE. The case-control method usually produced the highest and most accurate estimates, followed by the test-negative design. The bias toward underestimating true VE introduced by low test specificity increased as the AR of influenza- relative to non-influenza-ILI decreases and, to a lesser degree, with lower test sensitivity.

CONCLUSIONS

Demonstration of a high influenza VE using tests with imperfect sensitivity and specificity should provide reassurance that the program has been effective in reducing influenza illnesses, assuming adequate control of confounding factors.

Role of cell culture for virus detection in the age of technology

Viral disease diagnosis has traditionally relied on the isolation of viral pathogens in cell cultures. Although this approach is often slow and requires considerable technical expertise, it has been regarded for decades as the "gold standard" for the laboratory diagnosis of viral disease. With the development of nonculture methods for the rapid detection of viral antigens and/or nucleic acids, the usefulness of viral culture has been questioned. This review describes advances in cell culture-based viral diagnostic products and techniques, including the use of newer cell culture formats, cryopreserved cell cultures, centrifugation-enhanced inoculation, precytopathogenic effect detection, cocultivated cell cultures, and transgenic cell lines. All of these contribute to more efficient and less technically demanding viral detection in cell culture. Although most laboratories combine various culture and nonculture approaches to optimize viral disease diagnosis, virus isolation in cell culture remains a useful approach, especially when a viable isolate is needed, if viable and nonviable virus must be differentiated, when infection is not characteristic of any single virus (i.e., when testing for only one virus is not sufficient), and when available culture-based methods can provide a result in a more timely fashion than molecular methods.

Accuracy and interpretation of rapid influenza tests in children

BACKGROUND

Influenza rapid antigen detection (rapid tests) can provide timely identification of infection and aid in clinical decision-making. Although the interpretation of test results depends on test characteristics and influenza prevalence, this information is limited in routine clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to assess the times at which rapid tests are most predictive of influenza infection.

METHODS

The New Vaccine Surveillance Network enrolled children aged < 5 years who were hospitalized with respiratory symptoms or fever from October 2000 through September 2004. Nasal and throat swabs were obtained, and influenza virus was detected by culture and reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction. Provider-ordered rapid influenza tests were compared with the criterion standard (culture and reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction) to determine their sensitivity and specificity. The New Vaccine Surveillance Network also enrolled children in outpatient settings during the 2002-2003 and 2003-2004 influenza seasons and determined the weekly influenza prevalence among symptomatic children. Trends in weekly predictive values of the rapid tests were estimated over the influenza seasons.

RESULTS

Rapid influenza tests had an overall sensitivity of 63% and specificity of 97%. In 2002-2003, the prevalence of influenza in symptomatic outpatient children peaked at 21% and stayed above 10% for approximately 4 weeks. In contrast, in 2003-2004, influenza prevalence peaked at 60% and remained above 20% for approximately 6 weeks. The positive predictive value of the rapid tests approached 80% when influenza prevalence was > or = 15% but decreased to < 70% when influenza prevalence was < 10%.

CONCLUSIONS

Influenza prevalence varies between and within seasons. On the basis of our estimates, rapid tests are of limited use when prevalence is < 10%. The appropriate interpretation of rapid influenza tests requires local influenza surveillance and timely communication of this information to the practitioners.

Estimating the undetected burden of influenza hospitalizations in children

During the 2004-2005 influenza season two independent influenza surveillance systems operated simultaneously in three United States counties. The New Vaccine Surveillance Network (NVSN) prospectively enrolled children hospitalized for respiratory symptoms/fever and tested them using culture and RT-PCR. The Emerging Infections Program (EIP) and a similar clinical-laboratory surveillance system identified hospitalized children who had positive influenza tests obtained as part of their usual medical care. Using data from these systems, we applied capture-recapture analyses to estimate the burden of influenza related-hospitalizations in children aged<5 years. During the 2004-2005 influenza season the influenza-related hospitalization rate estimated by capture-recapture analysis was 8.6/10,000 children aged<5 years. When compared to this estimate, the sensitivity of the prospective surveillance system was 69% and the sensitivity of the clinical-laboratory based system was 39%. In the face of limited resources and an increasing need for influenza surveillance, capture-recapture analysis provides better estimates than either system alone.

Effect of point-of-care influenza testing on management of febrile children

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of point-of-care testing (POCT) for influenza on the physician management of febrile children who are at risk for serious bacterial illness (SBI) on the basis of age and temperature and who are presenting to a pediatric emergency department (ED) during an influenza outbreak.

METHODS

Patients 2-3 months of age with temperature of > or = 38 degrees C and patients 3-24 months of age with temperature of > or = 39 degrees C who were presenting to a pediatric ED during an influenza outbreak were enrolled into a prospective, quasi-randomized, controlled trial. Influenza testing was performed on enrolled patients by either the POCT or the standard-testing (ST) methods. The two groups were compared in terms of laboratory testing, chest radiography, antibiotic use, visit-associated costs, pediatric ED lengths of stay, inpatient admission, and return visits to the pediatric ED. Similar analyses also were performed on the resulting subgroups of patients on the basis of method of testing (POCT or ST) and test result (positive or negative).

RESULTS

Of 767 eligible patients, 700 (91%) completed the study. No significant differences were demonstrated between the POCT and ST groups with respect to laboratory tests ordered, chest radiographs obtained, antibiotic administration, inpatient admission, return visits to the pediatric ED, lengths of stay, or visit-associated costs. In the subgroup analysis, the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for blood culture in influenza test-positive to -negative patients were 0.59 and 0.71 in the POCT and ST groups, respectively (p = 0.088). The adjusted ORs for urine culture in influenza test-positive to -negative patients were 0.46 and 0.67 in the POCT and ST groups, respectively (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

When using a strategy of performing influenza testing on all patients at risk for SBI who presented to a pediatric ED during an influenza outbreak, the method of testing (POCT or ST) did not appear to significantly alter physician management, cost, or length of stay in the pediatric ED. However, if the interaction of the method of testing and the test result (positive or negative) were considered, a positive POCT for influenza was associated with a significant reduction in orders for urinalyses and urine cultures.

The underrecognized burden of influenza in young children

BACKGROUND

The disease burden of influenza infection among children is not well established. We conducted a population-based surveillance of medical visits associated with laboratory-confirmed influenza.

METHODS

Eligible children were younger than five years of age, resided in three U.S. counties, and had a medical visit for an acute respiratory tract infection or fever. Nasal and throat swabs were tested for the influenza virus by viral culture and polymerase-chain-reaction assay. Epidemiologic data were collected from parental surveys and chart reviews. Children who were hospitalized were enrolled prospectively from 2000 through 2004. Population-based rates of hospitalizations associated with influenza were calculated. Children who were seen in selected pediatric clinics and emergency departments during two influenza seasons (2002-2003 and 2003-2004) were systematically enrolled. The rates of visits to clinics and emergency departments associated with influenza were estimated.

RESULTS

The average annual rate of hospitalization associated with influenza was 0.9 per 1000 children. The estimated burden of outpatient visits associated with influenza was 50 clinic visits and 6 emergency department visits per 1000 children during the 2002-2003 season and 95 clinic visits and 27 emergency department visits per 1000 children during the 2003-2004 season. Few children who had laboratory-confirmed influenza were given a diagnosis of influenza by the treating physician in the inpatient (28 percent) or outpatient (17 percent) settings.

CONCLUSIONS

Among young children, outpatient visits associated with influenza were 10 to 250 times as common as hospitalizations. Few influenza infections were recognized clinically.

Field performance and new uses of rapid influenza testing in Thailand

OBJECTIVES

Rapid influenza tests are increasingly used in surveillance systems and for clinical care in Southeast Asia. However, the performance and utility of rapid influenza tests under field conditions in rural Southeast Asia has not been evaluated.

METHODS

In the context of a larger study on the causes of respiratory illness in rural Thailand, we used a rapid test to collect data on influenza burden, seasonality, and cost of illness. We compared the performance of the QuickVue Influenza Test to tissue cell viral culture and reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) among 1092 Thai patients meeting the World Health Organization case definition for influenza-like illness over a 12-month period.

RESULTS

The sensitivity and specificity of the QuickVue test compared to viral culture were 77% and 96%, respectively. Rapid influenza tests were useful to describe the seasonality of influenza, estimate the cost of illness, increase the sensitivity of surveillance, conduct outbreak responses, and guide evaluation of suspected avian influenza virus infections.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite their high cost, rapid influenza diagnostic tests are useful tools for influenza research, surveillance, and outbreak investigations in Southeast Asia.

Estimating influenza hospitalizations among children

Two surveillance systems gave a better estimate of influenza hospitalizations in children <5 years of age than either system alone.

Although influenza causes more hospitalizations and deaths among American children than any other vaccine-preventable disease, deriving accurate population-based estimates of disease impact is challenging. Using 2 independent surveillance systems, we performed a capture-recapture analysis to estimate influenza-associated hospitalizations in children in Davidson County, Tennessee, during the 2003–2004 influenza season. The New Vaccine Surveillance Network (NVSN) enrolled children hospitalized with respiratory symptoms or fever and tested them for influenza. The Tennessee Emerging Infections Program (EIP) identified inpatients with positive influenza diagnostic test results through review of laboratory and infection control logs. The hospitalization rate estimated from the capture-recapture analysis in children <5 years of age was 2.4 per 1,000 (95% confidence interval 1.8–3.8). When NVSN estimates were compared with capture-recapture estimates, NVSN found 84% of community-acquired cases, EIP found 64% of cases in which an influenza rapid test was performed, and the overall sensitivity of NVSN and EIP for influenza hospitalizations was 73% and 38%, respectively.

Commercial Immunoassay Kits for the Detection of Influenza Virus Type A: Evaluation of Their Use with Poultry

Five antigen capture immunoassay test kits, Directigen Flu A (Becton Dickinson), QuickVue Influenza test kit (Quidel), FLU OIA (ThermoBiostar), Zstat Flu (ZymeTx, Inc.) and NOW FLU A Test (Binax) were used to detect avian influenza virus (AIV) in clinical specimens as per manufacturers' protocols. Each kit was shown to be specific for AIV propagated in embryonating chicken eggs (ECE); other respiratory viruses of poultry tested gave negative results. The Directigen Flu A kit proved to be 10-fold more sensitive than the other kits, capable of detecting 10(4.7) mean embryo lethal dose (ELD50)/ml in allantoic fluid; this is more sensitive than the hemagglutination test using chicken erythrocytes. None of the kits proved to be sufficiently sensitive to reliably detect AIV in oropharyngeal and cloacal swabs collected from chickens experimentally infected with AIV subtype H6N2. In two different experiments, individual swabs and pools of five or six swabs were tested. By virus isolation, 39 individual oropharyngeal swabs tested positive for AIV, but Directigen and Flu OIA only detected 2/39 and NOW FLU A 1/39. Zstat and QuickVue did not detect any. Five individual cloacal swabs positive by virus isolation were negative with all five kits. In a second experiment using pools of five swabs, 26 swab pools were positive by virus isolation and 5/26 were positive by Directigen, the only kit to provide any positive results. Five cloacal swab pools were also positive by virus isolation and 1/5 was positive by Directigen; all other test kits were negative. All of these experiments were performed using the H6N2 subtype of AIV. The results are disappointing, as the kits have proven to be insensitive for detecting AIV when compared with the gold standard, virus isolation. This limits their use in diagnostic field investigations. Individual or groups of chickens could be assumed to be positive for AIV if positive by any of the kits, but a negative result with any of the kits would not prove that birds were AIV free.

QIAamp MinElute virus kit effectively extracts viral nucleic acids from cerebrospinal fluids and nasopharyngeal swabs

Background

Nucleic acid preparation from a variety of clinical specimens requires efficient target recovery and amplification inhibitor removal and is critical for successful molecular diagnosis. The QIAamp MinElute Virus kit (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA) was compared to the two existing methods currently used in our laboratory, IsoQuick (Orca Research Inc., Bothell, WA) for DNA extraction and RNAzol B (Leedo Laboratories Inc., Houston, TX) for RNA extraction, of viral nucleic acids.

Study design

A total of 150 clinical specimens, including cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS), were used to determine the extraction efficiency of the MinElute compared to the other two methods. Nucleic acid recovery, hands-on time, turn-around-time and cost were compared across all kits.

Results

There was complete concordance between the MinElute and IsoQuick/RNAzol kits when herpes simplex virus (HSV), Epstein–Barr virus (EBV), varicella-zoster virus (VZV), influenza A virus or enteroviruses were detected using a colorimetric microtiter plate PCR system. The kits were equivalent in their ability to detect either DNA or RNA with superior ability to recover a high quality and quantity of RNA. With the potential to process larger specimen volumes, the MinElute kit can significantly shorten processing time from 2 h to 50–55 min.

Conclusions

Although relatively high test kit costs were noted, the MinElute kit provides another rapid and user-friendly specimen processing tool in the diagnostic molecular microbiology laboratory.

Detection of influenza virus: traditional approaches and development of biosensors

Influenza is an acute respiratory disease caused by the influenza virus. The disease occurs annually, causing fatality in the elderly and children and billions of dollars loss in business and productivity. Traditional viral detection methods include MDCK cell culture, complement fixation, hemagglutinin-inhibition, and recently RT-PCR. Although effective, these methods generally involve labor-intensive laboratory procedures and often require trained personnel to carry them out. The development of biosensor technologies will enable rapid and specific disease diagnosis on-site so that a clinician can quickly determine whether treatment is needed. This paper reviews traditional viral assays and progress in the biosensor development for influenza virus. Recent advances in single-step direct detection using non-labeling techniques such as surface plasmon resonance, quartz-crystal microbalance, and colorimetric functional polymers are discussed.

Comparison of a new lateral-flow chromatographic membrane immunoassay to viral culture for rapid detection and differentiation of influenza A and B viruses in respiratory specimens

The performance of a new rapid lateral-flow chromatographic membrane immunoassay test kit for detection of influenza virus was evaluated and compared to that of viral culture in respiratory secretions collected from 400 adults and children seen at three large university hospitals during the recent 2003 influenza season. The rapid test provided results in 15 min, with excellent overall performance statistics (sensitivity, 94.4%; specificity, 100%; positive predictive value, 100%; negative predictive value, 97.5%). Both influenza A and B type viruses were reliably detected, with no significant difference in performance statistics noted by influenza virus type or by the center performing the test.

Comparison of the directigen flu A+B membrane enzyme immunoassay with viral culture for rapid detection of influenza A and B viruses in respiratory specimens

The performance of a commercially available, rapid membrane enzyme immunoassay for influenza A and B virus detection was compared to that of viral culture in 4,092 respiratory specimens collected from patients presenting with respiratory symptoms during the 2002-2003 influenza season. The test's overall sensitivity was 43.83%, lower than previously reported but similar for detection of both influenza A and B viruses (42.98 versus 44.76%). However, specificity, 99.74%, was excellent for both influenza A and B viruses (99.82 versus 99.92%). These values make this test a very good confirmatory test when clinical suspicion is high, but a less accurate screening test for large populations.

Influenza virological surveillance in children: the use of the QuickVue rapid diagnostic test

New rapid diagnostic methods are needed to identify influenza infections to improve virological surveillance usually undertaken with conventional time-consuming, complex, and even expensive laboratory methods. Another reason for using a rapid test is to avoid inappropriate therapy, particularly in children, where use of antibiotics inappropriately and high influenza-related rates of hospitalisation are described. During two winter seasons, the performance of the QuickVue Influenza test (QV) was evaluated in children under 14 presenting with influenza like illness, and compared the results with those obtained from sentinel network surveillance using standard protocols for the sample collection and the laboratory analysis by virus culture and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). During the first influenza season (2000/2001), 22 paediatricians collected one nose- and one throat-swab from each of the 586 children 0-6 years old recruited in the study. The QV test was carried out in the physician's office by primary care staff on the nose swab material. When compared with virus culture of the throat swab, the QV test had a sensitivity of 36.5%. In the following 2001/2002-influenza season, the performance of the QV test as a rapid laboratory screening assay was assessed. 342 children aged 0-14 years were enrolled with only one throat swab collected from each patient and sent to the laboratory where the QV, virus culture, and RT-PCR tests were performed. The results showed a better sensitivity (54.5%) of the test in comparison with virus culture and RT-PCR assays. The data indicate that rapid QV testing in the physician office setting, using these easily obtained samples, may be too insensitive to be useful for surveillance and for immediate clinical management of children presenting with influenza-like illness. Nevertheless, the QV test may be a valuable diagnostic tool if used in laboratory, as a rapid screening test.

Surveillance of childhood influenza virus infection: what is the best diagnostic method to use for archival samples?

Despite the clinical importance of influenza virus in pediatric respiratory infections, the optimal set of diagnostic tests to use when conducting studies using archival samples is not clear. In this study, we compared diagnostic tests for influenza virus in 75 children younger than 5 years of age who presented with symptomatic respiratory infection during one of four influenza seasons, had negative viral cultures for other respiratory pathogens, and had both an archival nasal aspirate obtained at the time of illness and serology spanning that influenza season. For all eligible children, we compared the results of viral culture performed at the time of collection with serology and PCR of archival nasal aspirates. Using real-time viral culture as the "gold standard," the test characteristics of PCR of archival nasal aspirates (sensitivity, 82%; specificity, 100%) and serology (sensitivity, 82%; specificity, 87%) were similar. The relatively low sensitivity of PCR of archival nasal samples in this study compared to that of PCR of fresh samples in a previous study suggests that RNA degradation occurred despite storage of the specimens at -70 degrees C. RNA degradation would also explain why only 11 (52%) of 21 archival nasal samples that had positive influenza virus cultures at the time of collection had positive repeat cultures in the summer of 2000. Thus, in archival specimens stored at -70 degrees C, PCR was more sensitive than viral culture. However, testing of fresh specimens had the highest yield in this study. Studies of optimal methods for specimen storage are needed.

Influenza

Although most influenza infections are self-limited, few other diseases exert such a huge toll of suffering and economic loss. Despite the importance of influenza, there had been, until recently, little advance in its control since amantadine was licensed almost 40 years ago. During the past decade, evidence has accrued on the protection afforded by inactivated vaccines and the safety and efficacy in children of live influenza-virus vaccines. There have been many new developments in vaccine technology. Moreover, work on viral neuraminidase has led to the licensing of potent selective antiviral drugs, and economic decision modelling provides further justification for annual vaccination and a framework for the use of neuraminidase inhibitors. Progress has also been made on developing near-patient testing for influenza that may assist individual diagnosis or the recognition of widespread virus circulation, and so optimise clinical management. Despite these advances, the occurrence of avian H5N1, H9N2, and H7N7 influenza in human beings and the rapid global spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome are reminders of our vulnerability to an emerging pandemic. The contrast between recent cases of H5N1 infection, associated with high mortality, and the typically mild, self-limiting nature of human infections with avian H7N7 and H9N2 influenza shows the gaps in our understanding of molecular correlates of pathogenicity and underlines the need for continuing international research into pandemic influenza. Improvements in animal and human surveillance, new approaches to vaccination, and increasing use of vaccines and antiviral drugs to combat annual influenza outbreaks are essential to reduce the global toll of pandemic and interpandemic influenza.

Nosocomial influenza in children

Influenza is the most important cause of acute respiratory illness leading to hospitalization among children during community epidemics. This illness can cause extensive nosocomial outbreaks with serious morbidity and mortality among specific groups of children. Paediatric patients with community-acquired influenza and healthcare workers are the main reservoir for the nosocomial spread of the virus. During epidemics in the community, testing for influenza should be requested in all children with compatible symptoms admitted in the hospital, and measures should be introduced for the prevention or early control of an outbreak. Recent advances in the management of influenza include rapid diagnoses based on antigen detection and the identification of the new neuraminidase inhibitors zanamivir and oseltamivir. Annual vaccination against influenza of children with high-risk conditions, their family members and healthcare workers is the principle measure for the prevention of nosocomial outbreaks. Although vaccination against influenza appears to be cost-effective at all ages in terms of prevention of illness, related hospitalizations, deaths, reduction of healthcare costs and productivity loss, vaccination coverage among target groups is limited.

Impact of the rapid diagnosis of influenza on physician decision-making and patient management in the pediatric emergency department: results of a randomized, prospective, controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To determine the impact of the rapid diagnosis of influenza on physician decision-making and patient management, including laboratory tests and radiographs ordered, patient charges associated with these tests, antibiotics/antivirals prescribed, and length of time to patient discharge from the emergency department.

METHODS

Patients aged 2 months to 21 years presenting to an urban children's teaching hospital emergency department were screened for fever and cough, coryza, myalgias, headache, and/or malaise. After obtaining informed consent, patients were randomized to 1 of 2 groups: 1) physician receives (physician aware of) the rapid influenza test result; or 2) physician does not receive (physician unaware of) the result. For patients in the physician aware group, nasopharyngeal swabs were obtained, immediately tested with the FluOIA test for influenza A and B, and the result was placed on the chart before patient evaluation by the attending physician. For the physician unaware group, nasopharyngeal swabs were obtained, stored according to manufacturer's directions, and tested within 24 hours. Results for the physician unaware group were not disclosed to the treating physicians at any time. The 2 resultant influenza-positive groups (aware and unaware) were compared for laboratory and radiograph studies and their associated patient charges, antibiotic/antiviral prescriptions, and length of stay in the emergency department.

RESULTS

A total of 418 patients were enrolled, and 391 completed the study. Of these, 202 tested positive for influenza. Comparison of the 96 influenza-positive patients whose physician was aware of the result with the 106 influenza-positive patients whose physician was unaware of the result revealed significant reductions among the former group in: 1) numbers of complete blood counts, blood cultures, urinalyses, urine cultures, and chest radiographs performed; 2) charges associated with these tests; 3) antibiotics prescribed; and 4) length of stay in the emergency department. The number of influenza-positive patients who received prescriptions for antiviral drugs was significantly higher among those whose physician was aware of the result.

CONCLUSIONS

Physician awareness of a rapid diagnosis of influenza in the pediatric emergency department significantly reduced the number of laboratory tests and radiographs ordered and their associated charges, decreased antibiotic use, increased antiviral use, and decreased length of time to discharge.

Comparison of lateral-flow immunoassay and enzyme immunoassay with viral culture for rapid detection of influenza virus in nasal wash specimens from children

The performance of two commercially available rapid test kits for influenza virus detection was compared to that of viral culture by using 356 nasal wash specimens collected during the 2001 to 2002 influenza season. Overall, the two rapid tests were easy to perform and showed comparable sensitivities (70.4 and 72.2%) and specificities (97.7 and 98.3%); for both test kit groups, most of the specimens that yielded false-negative results were found to be growing influenza B virus.

Rapid diagnostic tests for influenza

In recent years, seven rapid tests for influenza have become commercially available. These tests offer the promise of making rapid influenza diagnosis much more widely available than in the past, when rapid diagnosis could be made only by fluorescent antibody staining, a demanding technique available only in advanced laboratories. Two of the rapid tests have waived status under the Clinical Laboratory Improvements Amendments of 1988. This article describes each of the seven tests and reviews English-language publications that have evaluated the performance of these tests on specimens from children. A discussion of the implications of the tests for clinical decision-making is included.

Influenza diagnosis and treatment in children: a review of studies on clinically useful tests and antiviral treatment for influenza

BACKGROUND

Prompt testing for influenza can help guide clinical management of patients with suspected influenza. Three antiviral medications, amantadine, oseltamivir and zanamivir, are approved for treatment of influenza in children. Rimantadine and ribavirin have also been used.

OBJECTIVES

To review the published evidence on clinically useful diagnostic tests and antiviral treatment for influenza virus infections in children.

METHODS

Studies published from 1966 through September 2002 were reviewed on clinical diagnosis, immunofluorescence and rapid influenza tests and on antiviral treatment of influenza virus infections among pediatric populations.

RESULTS

No studies assessed the accuracy of clinical diagnosis of influenza in children compared with viral culture. Compared with viral culture, direct immunofluorescence antibody and indirect immunofluorescence antibody tests for influenza had fair to moderate median sensitivities and high median specificities, whereas rapid influenza diagnostic tests had moderate median sensitivities and moderately high median specificities. No randomized, placebo-controlled studies were found of amantadine or rimantadine for treatment of influenza A. In a few separate controlled studies, oseltamivir, zanamivir and ribavirin each reduced symptom duration of influenza compared with placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Additional data are needed about the accuracy of clinical diagnosis of influenza in children. Although direct immunofluorescence antibody staining, indirect immunofluorescence antibody staining and rapid tests are moderately to reasonably accurate in detecting influenza virus infections in children, physicians should use clinical judgment and local surveillance data about circulating influenza viruses when interpreting test results. Further controlled studies of the efficacy, adverse effects and emergence of antiviral resistance during treatment of influenza are needed for all of the antiviral drugs.