1
|
De Virgilio Suglia C, Stefanizzi P, Graziano G, Moscara L, Delle Fontane A, Minelli M, Tafuri S. Efficacy of vaccination during pregnancy in reducing the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in infants younger than 12 months. Puglia (Italy), 2021-23. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2024; 20:2403831. [PMID: 39288786 PMCID: PMC11409503 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2403831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2024] [Revised: 09/03/2024] [Accepted: 09/10/2024] [Indexed: 09/19/2024] Open
Abstract
This retrospective cohort study evaluated the effectiveness of maternal vaccination against COVID-19 in reducing the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in infants younger than 12 months. The study, conducted at the "Policlinico" University Hospital of Bari, included 3346 newborns and their mothers. The study explored the degree of protection offered by maternal vaccination depending on the timing, type, and trimester of vaccination, also taking into account the mother's history of infection. We compared the incidence rate of infection between children of vaccinated and unvaccinated mothers; the values were 10.2% and 18.1%, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant. The overall effectiveness of the vaccine against the infection was 45%. Further analysis revealed increasing efficacy as the doses of vaccine administered to the mother increased and in case of a previous history of maternal infection. Dual immune stimulation (vaccination and natural infection) was 83% effective in preventing infection among newborns. The multivariable models confirmed the protective effect of vaccination with all types of vaccines used. The analysis of infection's incidence in newborns revealed an interesting temporal trend, with increasing incidence with time, suggesting a possible correlation with the persistence of maternal antibodies or with the gradual weaning. The results on the protective capacity of vaccines are in line with the global literature. Strengths of study include sample size, robust methodology, and multivariate analyses. Institutions could intensify awareness campaigns to encourage both pregnant women and all those who would like to become pregnant to receive SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Pasquale Stefanizzi
- Hygiene Unit - Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| | - Giusy Graziano
- Hygiene Unit - Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| | - Lorenza Moscara
- Hygiene Unit - Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| | - Arianna Delle Fontane
- Hygiene Unit - Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| | - Martina Minelli
- Hygiene Unit - Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| | - Silvio Tafuri
- Hygiene Unit - Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
O’Leary ST, Campbell JD, Ardura MI, Bryant KA, Caserta MT, Espinosa C, Frenck RW, Healy CM, John CC, Kourtis AP, Milstone A, Myers A, Pannaraj P, Ratner AJ, Bryant KA, Hofstetter AM, Chaparro JD, Michel JJ, Kimberlin DW, Banerjee R, Barnett ED, Lynfield R, Sawyer MH, Barton-Forbes M, Cardemil CV, Farizo KM, Kafer LM, Moore D, Okeke C, Prestel C, Patel M, Starke JR, Thompson J, Torres JP, Wharton M, Woods CR, Gibbs G. Recommendations for Prevention and Control of Influenza in Children, 2024-2025: Technical Report. Pediatrics 2024; 154:e2024068508. [PMID: 39183667 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2024-068508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2024] [Revised: 07/26/2024] [Accepted: 07/26/2024] [Indexed: 08/27/2024] Open
Abstract
This technical report accompanies the recommendations of the American Academy of Pediatrics for the routine use of influenza vaccine and antiviral medications in the prevention and treatment of influenza in children during the 2024 to 2025 season. The rationale for the American Academy of Pediatrics recommendation for annual influenza vaccination of all children without medical contraindications starting at 6 months of age is provided. Influenza vaccination is an important strategy for protecting children and the broader community against influenza. This technical report summarizes recent influenza seasons, morbidity and mortality in children, vaccine effectiveness, and vaccination coverage and provides detailed guidance on vaccine storage, administration, and implementation. The report also provides a brief background on inactivated (nonlive) and live attenuated influenza vaccines, available vaccines for the 2024-2025 influenza season, vaccination during pregnancy and breastfeeding, diagnostic testing for influenza, and antiviral medications for treatment and chemoprophylaxis. Strategies to promote vaccine uptake are emphasized.
Collapse
|
3
|
Fell DB, Russell M, Fung SG, Swayze S, Chung H, Buchan SA, Roda W, Smolarchuk C, Wilson K, Crowcroft NS, Schwartz KL, Gubbay JB, McGeer AJ, Smieja M, Richardson DC, Katz K, Zahariadis G, Campigotto A, Mubareka S, McNally JD, Karnauchow T, Zelyas N, Svenson LW, Kwong JC. Effectiveness of Influenza Vaccination During Pregnancy Against Laboratory-Confirmed Seasonal Influenza Among Infants Under 6 Months of Age in Ontario, Canada. J Infect Dis 2024; 230:e80-e92. [PMID: 39052720 PMCID: PMC11272077 DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiad539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Revised: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Randomized trials conducted in low- and middle-income settings demonstrated efficacy of influenza vaccination during pregnancy against influenza infection among infants <6 months of age. However, vaccine effectiveness (VE) estimates from settings with different population characteristics and influenza seasonality remain limited. METHODS We conducted a test-negative study in Ontario, Canada. All influenza virus tests among infants <6 months from 2010 to 2019 were identified and linked with health databases to ascertain information on maternal-infant dyads. VE was estimated from the odds ratio for influenza vaccination during pregnancy among cases versus controls, computed using logistic regression with adjustment for potential confounders. RESULTS Among 23 806 infants tested for influenza, 1783 (7.5%) were positive and 1708 (7.2%) were born to mothers vaccinated against influenza during pregnancy. VE against laboratory-confirmed infant influenza infection was 64% (95% confidence interval [CI], 50%-74%). VE was similar by trimester of vaccination (first/second, 66% [95% CI, 40%-80%]; third, 63% [95% CI, 46%-74%]), infant age at testing (0 to <2 months, 63% [95% CI, 46%-75%]; 2 to <6 months, 64% [95% CI, 36%-79%]), and gestational age at birth (≥37 weeks, 64% [95% CI, 50%-75%]; < 37 weeks, 61% [95% CI, 4%-86%]). VE against influenza hospitalization was 67% (95% CI, 50%-78%). CONCLUSIONS Influenza vaccination during pregnancy offers effective protection to infants <6 months, for whom vaccines are not currently available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deshayne B Fell
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Research Institute, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Populations and Public Health, ICES, Toronto and Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Margaret Russell
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Stephen G Fung
- Research Institute, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sarah Swayze
- Populations and Public Health, ICES, Toronto and Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hannah Chung
- Populations and Public Health, ICES, Toronto and Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sarah A Buchan
- Populations and Public Health, ICES, Toronto and Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Health Protection, Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Centre for Vaccine Preventable Diseases, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Weston Roda
- Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Christa Smolarchuk
- Analytics and Performance Reporting Branch, Health Standards, Quality and Performance Division, Alberta Health, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Kumanan Wilson
- Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Natasha S Crowcroft
- Department of Immunization, Vaccines, and Biologicals, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Kevin L Schwartz
- Populations and Public Health, ICES, Toronto and Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Health Protection, Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jonathan B Gubbay
- Health Protection, Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Allison J McGeer
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Microbiology, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marek Smieja
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - David C Richardson
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, William Osler Health System, Brampton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, William Osler Health System, Brampton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kevin Katz
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Infection Prevention and Control, North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Shared Hospital Laboratory, North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - George Zahariadis
- Newfoundland and Labrador Public Health Laboratory, St John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
| | - Aaron Campigotto
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Microbiology, Department of Paediatric Laboratory Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Samira Mubareka
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathobiology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - J Dayre McNally
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Timothy Karnauchow
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nathan Zelyas
- Alberta Public Health Laboratory, Alberta Precision Laboratories, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Lawrence W Svenson
- Analytics and Performance Reporting Branch, Health Standards, Quality and Performance Division, Alberta Health, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- Division of Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jeffrey C Kwong
- Populations and Public Health, ICES, Toronto and Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Health Protection, Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Oppong AY, Young BC, Wang CF. Severe Influenza in Pregnancy: Neonatal Implications. Neoreviews 2024; 25:e295-e298. [PMID: 38688886 DOI: 10.1542/neo.25-5-e295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/02/2024]
|
5
|
Kristinsdottir I, Haraldsson A, Thors V. Influenza vaccination in pregnant women in Iceland 2010-2020 and the burden of influenza in pregnant women and their infants. Vaccine 2024; 42:2051-2058. [PMID: 38413277 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.02.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Revised: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Influenza vaccinations are recommended in pregnancy to protect both the pregnant woman and the unborn baby. The aim of this study was to assess the influenza vaccine uptake among pregnant women in Iceland in ten influenza seasons and to estimate the influenza disease burden on pregnant women and their infants. METHODS This was a retrospective, descriptive study on influenza vaccine uptake among pregnant women and the burden of influenza and influenza-like illness (ILI) among pregnant women and their infants in ten influenza seasons. All women attending a 20-week ultrasound at Landspitali University Hospital in Reykjavik in August-April each influenza season 2010-2020 were included in the study. Data on influenza vaccinations and influenza/ILI diagnoses was collected from central national databases. RESULTS The influenza vaccine uptake increased from 6.2 % in 2011-2012 to 37.5 % in 2019-2020. The incidence rate of influenza/ILI among pregnant women ranged from 5.5 to 22.1/1000 person-years. The estimated vaccine effectiveness in the ten influenza seasons was 34-100 %. The incidence rate of influenza/ILI among infants < 12 months of age was 0-13.4/1000 person-years. Influenza vaccinations in pregnancy are protective against influenza/ILI in pregnant women (IRR 0.36, 95 % CI 0.22-0.58), infants in the season of vaccination (IRR 0.40, 95 % CI 0.17-0.97) and probably for infants < 6 months of age (IRR 0.51, 95 % CI 0.22-1.21). CONCLUSIONS Influenza vaccine coverage in pregnancy is suboptimal. Influenza vaccinations in pregnancy provide significant protection against influenza/ILI for pregnant women and infants in the season of vaccination. Initiatives to improve maternal vaccination coverage are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iris Kristinsdottir
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Iceland; Children's Hospital Iceland, Landspitali University Hospital, Iceland
| | - Asgeir Haraldsson
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Iceland; Children's Hospital Iceland, Landspitali University Hospital, Iceland
| | - Valtyr Thors
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Iceland; Children's Hospital Iceland, Landspitali University Hospital, Iceland.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bednarek A, Laskowska M. Vaccination Guidelines for Pregnant Women: Addressing COVID-19 and the Omicron Variant. Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e942799. [PMID: 38229424 PMCID: PMC10802082 DOI: 10.12659/msm.942799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Vaccinations are an essential element of public health programs around the world, which have a major impact on morbidity, mortality, and costs of the health care system. In recent years, with a better understanding of the effectiveness and safety of vaccinations, many recommendations have been developed for administering vaccines to adults. Countless physiological changes occur during pregnancy, including those affecting the immune system. Pregnant women are at increased risk of developing infections and resulting complications. According to research, vaccines are immunogenic and safe for pregnant women. Pregnancy is not an absolute contraindication to vaccination. After administration of vaccines to pregnant women, the concentration of antibodies increases, which can be transferred to the child in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy and provide protection in the first months of life. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), guidelines of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG) unanimously recommend vaccination of pregnant women if a safe vaccine is available and there is a risk of exposure of the woman to a disease that threatens herself or her developing baby. In everyday clinical practice, medical professionals should provide their patients with the necessary information on vaccinations, which may contribute to greater awareness and implementation of vaccinations. This article aims to review current global recommendations for the vaccination of pregnant and breastfeeding women, including against the Omicron variants of SARS-CoV-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Bednarek
- Department of Health Promotion, Chair of Nursing Development, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
| | - Marzena Laskowska
- Department of Obstetrics and Perinatology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dallmeyer LK, Schüz ML, Fragkou PC, Omony J, Krumbein H, Dimopoulou D, Dimopoulou K, Skevaki C. Epidemiology of respiratory viruses among children during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Infect Dis 2024; 138:10-18. [PMID: 37951460 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2023.10.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Revised: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This meta-analysis aimed to assess the prevalence of respiratory viruses among children under the special conditions of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS Five databases were systematically searched to assess the pooled prevalence of various respiratory viruses in different age groups, regions, seasons, and in patients with and without confirmed SARS-CoV-2 coinfection. Moreover, we looked at the virus distribution in the first and second half of the pandemic and countries with distinct economic status. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were followed, and the systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022379297). RESULTS Enterovirus/rhinovirus and human respiratory syncytial virus (HRSV) were the most prevalent pathogens among children. The prevalence of HRSV increased in the second half of the pandemic. The prevailing viruses vary according to the SARS-CoV-2-coinfection status, season, region, and country´s economic status. CONCLUSION This meta-analysis shows the epidemiology of respiratory viruses other than SARS-CoV-2 in children aged 0 to 12 years during the COVID-19 pandemic. Because major events, such as a pandemic, can alter epidemiology patterns, it is important to know them to improve health education measures, develop vaccines and medicines for vulnerable groups, as a guide for prevention strategies, and help with clinical decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonie K Dallmeyer
- Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Centre (UGMLC), Philipps University of Marburg, German Centre for LUNG Research (DZL), Marburg, Germany
| | - Marit L Schüz
- Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Centre (UGMLC), Philipps University of Marburg, German Centre for LUNG Research (DZL), Marburg, Germany
| | - Paraskevi C Fragkou
- First Department of Critical Care Medicine & Pulmonary Services, Evangelismos General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) Study Group for Respiratory Viruses (ESGREV)
| | - Jimmy Omony
- Institute for Asthma and Allergy Prevention (IAP), Helmholtz Zentrum Munich, German Research Centre for Environmental Health (GmbH), Munich, Germany
| | - Hanna Krumbein
- Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Centre (UGMLC), Philipps University of Marburg, German Centre for LUNG Research (DZL), Marburg, Germany
| | - Dimitra Dimopoulou
- European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) Study Group for Respiratory Viruses (ESGREV); Second Department of Pediatrics, "Aghia Sophia" Children´s Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Chrysanthi Skevaki
- Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Centre (UGMLC), Philipps University of Marburg, German Centre for LUNG Research (DZL), Marburg, Germany; European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) Study Group for Respiratory Viruses (ESGREV).
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kilada S, French N, Perkins E, Hungerford D. Pregnant women's attitudes and behaviours towards antenatal vaccination against Influenza and COVID-19 in the Liverpool City Region, United Kingdom: Cross-sectional survey. Vaccine X 2023; 15:100387. [PMID: 37753114 PMCID: PMC10518603 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2023.100387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2022] [Revised: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives Influenza poses a serious health risk to pregnant women and their babies. Despite this risk, influenza vaccine uptake in pregnant women in the UK is less than 50%. Little is known about how COVID-19 affects pregnant women, but its management may affect attitudes and behaviours towards vaccination in pregnancy. The study objectives were to establish attitudes and knowledge of pregnant women towards influenza disease and influenza vaccination and to compare these to attitudes and knowledge about COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccination. Design A cross-sectional survey was conducted using an online questionnaire distributed through local advertisement and social media outlets. Information was sought on attitudes and knowledge of influenza and COVID-19 and their respective vaccines. Participants and setting Pregnant women residing in Liverpool City Region, UK. Results Of the 237 respondents, 73.8% reported receiving an influenza vaccine. Over half (56.5%) perceived themselves to be at risk from influenza, 70.5% believed that if they got influenza, their baby would get ill, and 64.6% believed getting influenza could hurt their baby, 60.3% believed that the influenza vaccine would prevent their baby from getting ill, and 70.8% believed it would protect their baby. Only 32.9% of respondents stated they would receive the COVID-19 vaccine if it were available to them. However, 80.2% stated they would receive a COVID-19 vaccine if they were not pregnant. Most of the women stated that they would accept a vaccine if recommended to them by healthcare professionals. Conclusions Acceptance of the influenza and COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy seems to be more related to the safety of the baby rather than the mother. Women perceived their child to be more at risk than themselves. Information about influenza and COVID-19 vaccine safety as well as healthcare provider recommendations play an important role in vaccine uptake in pregnant women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha Kilada
- Department of Clinical Infection Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Infection, Veterinary & Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Neil French
- Department of Clinical Infection Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Infection, Veterinary & Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- Centre for Global Vaccine Research, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Elizabeth Perkins
- Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Dan Hungerford
- Department of Clinical Infection Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Infection, Veterinary & Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- Centre for Global Vaccine Research, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
O’Leary ST, Campbell JD, Ardura MI, Banerjee R, Bryant KA, Caserta MT, Frenck RW, Gerber JS, John CC, Kourtis AP, Myers A, Pannaraj P, Ratner AJ, Shah SS, Bryant KA, Hofstetter AM, Chaparro JD, Michel JJ, Kimberlin DW, Barnett ED, Lynfield R, Sawyer MH, Bernstein HH, Cardemil CV, Farizo KM, Kafer LM, Kim D, López Medina E, Moore D, Panagiotakopoulos L, Romero JR, Sauvé L, Starke JR, Thompson J, Wharton M, Woods CR, Frantz JM, Gibbs G. Recommendations for Prevention and Control of Influenza in Children, 2023-2024. Pediatrics 2023; 152:e2023063773. [PMID: 37641884 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2023-063773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023] Open
Abstract
This technical report accompanies the recommendations of the American Academy of Pediatrics for the routine use of influenza vaccine and antiviral medications in the prevention and treatment of influenza in children during the 2023-2024 season. The rationale for the American Academy of Pediatrics recommendation for annual influenza vaccination of all children without medical contraindications starting at 6 months of age is provided. Influenza vaccination is an important strategy for protecting children and the broader community against influenza. This technical report summarizes recent influenza seasons, morbidity and mortality in children, vaccine effectiveness, and vaccination coverage, and provides detailed guidance on vaccine storage, administration, and implementation. The report also provides a brief background on inactivated and live-attenuated influenza vaccines, available vaccines this season, vaccination during pregnancy and breastfeeding, diagnostic testing for influenza, and antiviral medications for treatment and chemoprophylaxis. Strategies to promote vaccine uptake are emphasized.
Collapse
|
10
|
Wolfe DM, Fell D, Garritty C, Hamel C, Butler C, Hersi M, Ahmadzai N, Rice DB, Esmaeilisaraji L, Michaud A, Soobiah C, Ghassemi M, Khan PA, Sinilaite A, Skidmore B, Tricco AC, Moher D, Hutton B. Safety of influenza vaccination during pregnancy: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e066182. [PMID: 37673449 PMCID: PMC10496691 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We conducted a systematic review to evaluate associations between influenza vaccination during pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes and maternal non-obstetric serious adverse events (SAEs), taking into consideration confounding and temporal biases. METHODS Electronic databases (Ovid MEDLINE ALL, Embase Classic+Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were searched to June 2021 for observational studies assessing associations between influenza vaccination during pregnancy and maternal non-obstetric SAEs and adverse birth outcomes, including preterm birth, spontaneous abortion, stillbirth, small-for-gestational-age birth and congenital anomalies. Studies of live attenuated vaccines, single-arm cohort studies and abstract-only publications were excluded. Records were screened using a liberal accelerated approach initially, followed by a dual independent approach for full-text screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessment. Pairwise meta-analyses were conducted, where two or more studies met methodological criteria for inclusion. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach was used to assess evidence certainty. RESULTS Of 9443 records screened, 63 studies were included. Twenty-nine studies (24 cohort and 5 case-control) evaluated seasonal influenza vaccination (trivalent and/or quadrivalent) versus no vaccination and were the focus of our prioritised syntheses; 34 studies of pandemic vaccines (2009 A/H1N1 and others), combinations of pandemic and seasonal vaccines, and seasonal versus seasonal vaccines were also reviewed. Control for confounding and temporal biases was inconsistent across studies, limiting pooling of data. Meta-analyses for preterm birth, spontaneous abortion and small-for-gestational-age birth demonstrated no significant associations with seasonal influenza vaccination. Immortal time bias was observed in a sensitivity analysis of meta-analysing risk-based preterm birth data. In descriptive summaries for stillbirth, congenital anomalies and maternal non-obstetric SAEs, no significant association with increased risk was found in any studies. All evidence was of very low certainty. CONCLUSIONS Evidence of very low certainty suggests that seasonal influenza vaccination during pregnancy is not associated with adverse birth outcomes or maternal non-obstetric SAEs. Appropriate control of confounding and temporal biases in future studies would improve the evidence base.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dianna M Wolfe
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Deshayne Fell
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Chantelle Garritty
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Candyce Hamel
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Claire Butler
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mona Hersi
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nadera Ahmadzai
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Danielle B Rice
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Psychiatry, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Leila Esmaeilisaraji
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alan Michaud
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Charlene Soobiah
- Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marco Ghassemi
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Paul A Khan
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Angela Sinilaite
- Centre for Immunization Readiness, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Becky Skidmore
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrea C Tricco
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Epidemiology Division & Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - David Moher
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Brian Hutton
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Yuan H, Zhang C, Maung ENT, Fan S, Shi Z, Liao F, Wang S, Jin Y, Chen L, Wang L. Epidemiological characteristics and risk factors of obstetric infection after the Universal Two-Child Policy in North China: a 5-year retrospective study based on 268,311 cases. BMC Infect Dis 2022; 22:878. [PMID: 36418982 PMCID: PMC9682668 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-022-07714-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Obstetrical infection is one of the causes of maternal death and a difficult problem for many clinicians. Changes in the demographic and obstetric background of pregnant women following the Universal Two-Child Policy may have an impact on some fertility phenomena. And with the increase in the number of deliveries, the limited medical resources become more scarce. How will China's health system quickly adapt to the growing needs and expectations for maternal health and ensure the provision of qualified and accessible medical services? In addition, what social support measures should be provided to reduce preventable obstetric complications? Given the relatively low per capita share of medical resources in China, how should China deal with the impact of the Universal Two-Child Policy? Therefore, more studies based on the change of fertility policy are needed. We try to analyze the epidemiological characteristics and risk factors of obstetric infection before and after the Universal Two-Child Policy, with a view to providing reference for the prevention and control of obstetric infection in regions after the change of fertility policy, and also hope to make corresponding contributions to the solution of the above problems through relevant studies. METHODS The subjects of the survey were 268,311 pregnant women from Hebei Province Maternal Near Miss Surveillance System (HBMNMSS) of Hebei Women and Children's Health Center from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2017. We analyzed the region, time and population distribution characteristics of obstetric infection, compared the epidemiological factors of obstetric infection before and after the Universal Two-Child Policy, and analyzed the relevant risk factors of obstetric infection. RESULTS The incidence of obstetric infection increased nearly twice after the Universal Two-Child Policy. The incidence of obstetric infection was highest in Chengde (1.9%), a city with a northward geographical distribution, Baoding (1.6%), Cangzhou (1.5%) followed; The higher the hospital grade, the higher the incidence; The incidence of obstetric infections in hospitals at all levels has increased; The age of onset before the Universal Two-Child Policy was (27.82 ± 5.047) years old, and the age after the Universal Two-Child Policy was (28.97 ± 4.880) years old; The incidence of obstetric infections is higher in winter. The rate of abortion-related infection (increased from 0.61 to 1.65%) and the rate of pregnant women with high school education (increased from 0.35 to 0.74%) increased significantly. The results of multivariate Logistic regression analysis after the Universal Two-Child Policy showed that anemia (OR = 1.249, 95%CI: 1.071-1.458), chronic hypertension (OR = 1.934, 95%CI: 1.375-2.722), mild preeclampsia (OR = 2.103, 95%CI: 1.323-3.344) and severe preeclampsia (OR = 2.228, 95%CI: 1.703-2.916) were independent risk factors for obstetric infection. Gestational age ≥ 37 weeks was a protective factor. CONCLUSION After the Universal Two-Child Policy, the prevention and control of obstetric infections should be strengthened, especially for abortion-related infections and elderly maternal with obstetric complications and complication in high-grade hospitals in winter. Educational background is also one of the factors that should be considered in the prevention of obstetric sensation. Prolonging gestational age is helpful to reduce the incidence of obstetric infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huiqing Yuan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, 050051, China
- Graduate School of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050071, China
| | - Cui Zhang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, 050051, China
| | - Ei Ni Tar Maung
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 52 Meihua East Road, Zhuhai, 519000, Guangdong, China
| | - Songli Fan
- Hebei Women and Children's Health Center, Shijiazhuang, 050000, China
| | - Zijia Shi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, 050051, China
- Graduate School of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050071, China
| | - Fang Liao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, 050051, China
- Graduate School of North China University of Technology, Tangshan, 063000, China
| | - Shuo Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, 050051, China
- Graduate School of North China University of Technology, Tangshan, 063000, China
| | - Ying Jin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, 050051, China
| | - Le Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 52 Meihua East Road, Zhuhai, 519000, Guangdong, China.
| | - Li Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 52 Meihua East Road, Zhuhai, 519000, Guangdong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Nunes MC, Walaza S, Meiring S, Zar HJ, Reubenson G, McMorrow M, Tempia S, Rossi L, Itzikowitz R, Bishop K, Mathunjwa A, Wise A, Treurnicht FK, Hellferscee O, Laubscher M, Serafin N, Cutland CL, Madhi SA, Cohen C. Effectiveness of Influenza Vaccination of Pregnant Women for Prevention of Maternal and Early Infant Influenza-Associated Hospitalizations in South Africa: A Prospective Test-Negative Study. Open Forum Infect Dis 2022; 9:ofac552. [PMID: 36447608 PMCID: PMC9697604 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofac552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Influenza vaccination during pregnancy reduces influenza-associated illness in the women and their infants, but effectiveness estimates against influenza-associated hospitalization are limited and lacking from settings with high human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection prevalence. We assessed the effect of maternal vaccination in HIV-uninfected women and women with HIV in preventing influenza-associated hospitalizations in infants and the women. METHODS During 2015-2018, influenza vaccination campaigns targeting pregnant women were augmented at selected antenatal clinics; these were coupled with prospective hospital-based surveillance for acute respiratory or febrile illness in infants aged <6 months and cardiorespiratory illness among pregnant or postpartum women. Vaccine effectiveness (VE) was assessed using a test-negative case-control study. RESULTS Overall, 71 influenza-positive and 371 influenza-negative infants were included in the analysis; mothers of 26.8% of influenza-positive infants were vaccinated during pregnancy compared with 35.6% of influenza-negative infants, corresponding to an adjusted VE (aVE) of 29.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], -33.6% to 62.3%). When limited to vaccine-matched strains, aVE was 65.2% (95% CI, 11.7%-86.3%). For maternal hospitalizations, 56 influenza-positive and 345 influenza-negative women were included in the analysis, with 28.6% of influenza-positive women being vaccinated compared with 38.3% of influenza-negatives, for an aVE of 46.9% (95% CI, -2.8% to 72.5%). Analysis restricted to HIV-uninfected women resulted in 82.8% (95% CI, 40.7%-95.0%) aVE. No significant aVE (-32.5% [95% CI, -208.7% to 43.1%]) was detected among women with HIV. CONCLUSIONS Influenza vaccination during pregnancy prevented influenza-associated hospitalizations among young infants when infected with vaccine strains and among HIV-uninfected women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta C Nunes
- South African Medical Research Council, Faculty of Health Sciences, Vaccines and Infectious Diseases Analytics Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
- Department of Science and Technology/National Research Foundation, Faculty of Health Sciences, South African Research Chair Initiative in Vaccine Preventable Diseases, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Sibongile Walaza
- Centre for Respiratory Diseases and Meningitis, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, Johannesburg, South Africa
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Susan Meiring
- Centre for Respiratory Diseases and Meningitis, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, Johannesburg, South Africa
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
- Division of Public Health Surveillance and Response, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Heather J Zar
- Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, and South African Medical Research Council Unit on Child and Adolescent Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Gary Reubenson
- Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Meredith McMorrow
- Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Stefano Tempia
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
- Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Liza Rossi
- Centre for Respiratory Diseases and Meningitis, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Raphaela Itzikowitz
- Centre for Respiratory Diseases and Meningitis, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Kate Bishop
- Centre for Respiratory Diseases and Meningitis, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Azwifarwi Mathunjwa
- Centre for Respiratory Diseases and Meningitis, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Amy Wise
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Rahima Moosa Mother and Child Hospital, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Florette K Treurnicht
- Centre for Respiratory Diseases and Meningitis, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Orienka Hellferscee
- Centre for Respiratory Diseases and Meningitis, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, Johannesburg, South Africa
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Matt Laubscher
- South African Medical Research Council, Faculty of Health Sciences, Vaccines and Infectious Diseases Analytics Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
- Department of Science and Technology/National Research Foundation, Faculty of Health Sciences, South African Research Chair Initiative in Vaccine Preventable Diseases, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Natali Serafin
- South African Medical Research Council, Faculty of Health Sciences, Vaccines and Infectious Diseases Analytics Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
- Department of Science and Technology/National Research Foundation, Faculty of Health Sciences, South African Research Chair Initiative in Vaccine Preventable Diseases, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Clare L Cutland
- South African Medical Research Council, Faculty of Health Sciences, Vaccines and Infectious Diseases Analytics Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
- Department of Science and Technology/National Research Foundation, Faculty of Health Sciences, South African Research Chair Initiative in Vaccine Preventable Diseases, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
- African Leadership in Vaccinology Expertise, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Shabir A Madhi
- South African Medical Research Council, Faculty of Health Sciences, Vaccines and Infectious Diseases Analytics Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
- Department of Science and Technology/National Research Foundation, Faculty of Health Sciences, South African Research Chair Initiative in Vaccine Preventable Diseases, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
- African Leadership in Vaccinology Expertise, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Cheryl Cohen
- Centre for Respiratory Diseases and Meningitis, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, Johannesburg, South Africa
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
This technical report accompanies the recommendations of the American Academy of Pediatrics for the routine use of influenza vaccine and antiviral medications in the prevention and treatment of influenza in children during the 2022 to 2023 season. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends annual influenza vaccination of all children without medical contraindications starting at 6 months of age. Influenza vaccination is an important strategy for protecting children and the broader community as well as reducing the overall burden of respiratory illnesses when other viruses, including severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2, are cocirculating. This technical report summarizes recent influenza seasons, morbidity and mortality in children, vaccine effectiveness, and vaccination coverage, and provides detailed guidance on storage, administration, and implementation. The report also provides a brief background on inactivated and live attenuated influenza vaccine recommendations, vaccination during pregnancy and breastfeeding, diagnostic testing, and antiviral medications for treatment and chemoprophylaxis. Updated information is provided about the 2021 to 2022 influenza season, influenza immunization rates, the effectiveness of influenza vaccination on hospitalization and mortality, available vaccines, guidance for patients with history of severe allergic reactions to prior influenza vaccinations, and strategies to promote vaccine uptake.
Collapse
|
14
|
Tallarek AC, Hollwitz B, Diemert A. Einmalige Möglichkeit für doppelten Nutzen: Impfungen in der Schwangerschaft. DIE GYNÄKOLOGIE 2022. [PMCID: PMC9411844 DOI: 10.1007/s00129-022-04978-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Impfungen sind eine der größten Errungenschaften zum Schutz der öffentlichen Gesundheit. Impfstoffe, die schwangeren Frauen verabreicht werden, schützen dabei nicht nur die Schwangere selbst, sondern auch das Neugeborene. Schwangere Frauen sind von Infektionen unverhältnismäßig stark beeinträchtigt. Die widersprüchlichen Anforderungen an das mütterliche Immunsystem während der Schwangerschaft, mit dem Ziel, die fetale Immuntoleranz aufrechtzuerhalten, erschweren eine schnelle und effektive Immunantwort gegen Krankheitserreger. Dieser dynamische Zustand der Immunadaptation prädisponiert Schwangere für schwerere Krankheitsverläufe. Durch eine Impfung kann einer Infektion oder einem schweren Krankheitsverlauf vorgebeugt werden. In der Folge sinkt auch das Risiko einer Frühgeburt und anderer schwerer Schwangerschaftskomplikationen, die lebenslange Folgen für Mutter und Kind haben können. Nach der Geburt muss das Neugeborene zunächst ein adaptives Gedächtnis für eine bis dahin unbekannte, antigenreiche Umgebung entwickeln; es ist für Infektionen und die daraus resultierenden Komplikationen besonders vulnerabel. Durch den Transfer maternaler Antikörper über die Plazenta werden Säuglinge geschützt, die zu jung sind, um geimpft zu werden. Beim Stillen setzt sich dies durch die Muttermilch fort. Für die von der Ständigen Impfkommission (STIKO) empfohlenen Impfungen in der Schwangerschaft (Influenza, Pertussis, COVID[„coronavirus disease“]-19), gibt es eindeutige Hinweise aus verschiedenen prospektiven und observationellen Studien, dass sie Mutter und Kind entweder vor einer Infektion oder einem schweren Krankheitsverlauf effektiv schützen. Im Beitrag geben wir einen Überblick über die Impfstrategie rund um die Schwangerschaft und fassen die wissenschaftlichen Daten zur Wirksamkeit der empfohlenen Impfungen zusammen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann-Christin Tallarek
- Klinik für Geburtshilfe und Pränatalmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20251 Hamburg, Deutschland
| | - Bettina Hollwitz
- Klinik für Geburtshilfe und Pränatalmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20251 Hamburg, Deutschland
| | - Anke Diemert
- Klinik für Geburtshilfe und Pränatalmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20251 Hamburg, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hunagund S, Golan Y, Asiodu IV, Prahl M, Gaw SL. Effects of Vaccination Against Influenza, Pertussis, and COVID-19 on Human Milk Antibodies: Current Evidence and Implications for Health Equity. Front Immunol 2022; 13:910383. [PMID: 35903100 PMCID: PMC9314549 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.910383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Human milk contains three antibody classes that confer mucosal immunity to the breastfed infant: secretory IgA (SIgA), secretory IgM (SIgM), and IgG. Influenza and pertussis vaccines administered during pregnancy induce pathogen specific SIgA and IgG responses in human milk that have been shown to protect the breastfed infant from these respiratory illnesses. In addition, mRNA vaccines against the SARS-CoV-2 virus administered during pregnancy and lactation induce anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgA responses in human milk. This review summarizes the immunologic benefits of influenza, pertussis, and COVID-19 vaccines conferred by human milk. Additionally, future research direction in human milk immunity and public health needs to improve lactational support are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soumya Hunagund
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Yarden Golan
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
- Institute for Human Genetics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Ifeyinwa V. Asiodu
- Department of Family Health Care Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Mary Prahl
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
- Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Global Health, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Stephanie L. Gaw
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
- Center for Reproductive Sciences, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kanecki K, Lewtak K, Goryński P, Tyszko P, Bogdan M, Rząd M, Nitsch-Osuch A. Hospitalization of Children Aged <5 Years Due to Influenza: Study Based on the National Hospitalization Registry. CHILDREN (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2022; 9:930. [PMID: 35883914 PMCID: PMC9321516 DOI: 10.3390/children9070930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2022] [Revised: 06/10/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Background: Influenza constitutes a significant health care burden that can be related to an increased morbidity and mortality. The aim of the study is to show up-to-date information on influenza hospitalization cases in Poland in children aged <5 years. Methods: The data used in the study were hospitalization records from 2015−2019, which had been gathered in a Nationwide General Hospital Morbidity Study and made available by the National Institute of Public Health. Results: 8565 records of patients with influenza were subject to analysis. The mean and median age of the patients were 2.2 and 2.1 years, respectively. Influenza hospitalization incidence was estimated at 90 per 100,000 person-years (PY) in children aged <5 years. The number of hospitalization cases was significantly higher in patients living in urban regions than in those living in rural regions (97 vs. 77 per 100,000 PY; p < 0.001). The age of patients living in urban regions was significantly lower than the age of patients living in rural regions (2.2 vs. 2.3 years; p < 0.001). A statistically significant increase in hospitalization was observed. Conclusions: The reported increasing trend in hospitalizations indicates the need to take focused measures. Presented data may be useful in comparative analyses in a European context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krzysztof Kanecki
- Department of Social Medicine and Public Health, Medical University of Warsaw, 3 Oczki Street, 02-007 Warsaw, Poland; (K.K.); (P.T.); (M.B.); (M.R.); (A.N.-O.)
| | - Katarzyna Lewtak
- Department of Social Medicine and Public Health, Medical University of Warsaw, 3 Oczki Street, 02-007 Warsaw, Poland; (K.K.); (P.T.); (M.B.); (M.R.); (A.N.-O.)
| | - Paweł Goryński
- National Institute of Public Health NIH—National Research Institute, 24 Chocimska Street, 00-791 Warsaw, Poland;
| | - Piotr Tyszko
- Department of Social Medicine and Public Health, Medical University of Warsaw, 3 Oczki Street, 02-007 Warsaw, Poland; (K.K.); (P.T.); (M.B.); (M.R.); (A.N.-O.)
- Institute of Rural Health in Lublin, 2 Jaczewskiego Street, 20-090 Lublin, Poland
| | - Magdalena Bogdan
- Department of Social Medicine and Public Health, Medical University of Warsaw, 3 Oczki Street, 02-007 Warsaw, Poland; (K.K.); (P.T.); (M.B.); (M.R.); (A.N.-O.)
| | - Michał Rząd
- Department of Social Medicine and Public Health, Medical University of Warsaw, 3 Oczki Street, 02-007 Warsaw, Poland; (K.K.); (P.T.); (M.B.); (M.R.); (A.N.-O.)
| | - Aneta Nitsch-Osuch
- Department of Social Medicine and Public Health, Medical University of Warsaw, 3 Oczki Street, 02-007 Warsaw, Poland; (K.K.); (P.T.); (M.B.); (M.R.); (A.N.-O.)
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abbas‐Hanif A, Rezai H, Ahmed SF, Ahmed A. The impact of COVID-19 on pregnancy and therapeutic drug development. Br J Pharmacol 2022; 179:2108-2120. [PMID: 34085281 PMCID: PMC8239854 DOI: 10.1111/bph.15582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2021] [Revised: 04/03/2021] [Accepted: 04/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Emerging data show that pregnant women with COVID-19 are at significantly higher risk of severe outcomes compared with non-pregnant women of similar age. This review discusses the invaluable insight revealed from vaccine clinical trials in women who were vaccinated and inadvertently became pregnant during the trial period. It further explores a number of clinical avenues in their management and proposes a drug development strategy in line with clinical trials for vaccines and drug treatments for the drug development community. Little is known of the long-term effects of COVID-19 on the mother and the baby. Our hypothesis that COVID-19 predisposes pregnant women to pre-eclampsia or hypertensive disorders during pregnancy is supported by a clinical study, and this may also adversely impact a woman's cardiovascular disease risk later in life. It may also increase a woman's risk of pre-eclampsia in subsequent pregnancy. This is an ever-evolving landscape, and early knowledge for healthcare providers and drug innovators is offered to ensure benefits outweigh the risks. COVID-19 mRNA vaccines appear to generate robust humoral immunity in pregnant and lactating women. This novel approach to vaccination also offers new ways to therapeutically tackle disorders of many unmet medical needs. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed issue on The second wave: are we any closer to efficacious pharmacotherapy for COVID 19? (BJP 75th Anniversary). To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v179.10/issuetoc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allyah Abbas‐Hanif
- Division of Drug DevelopmentMirZyme TherapeuticsBirminghamUK
- Department of CardiologyChelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Homira Rezai
- Division of Drug DevelopmentMirZyme TherapeuticsBirminghamUK
| | | | - Asif Ahmed
- Division of Drug DevelopmentMirZyme TherapeuticsBirminghamUK
- School of Health SciencesUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
McRae JE, Blyth CC, Cheng AC, Quinn HE, Wood NJ, Macartney KK. Risk factors and disease severity in Australian infants aged under 6 months hospitalised with influenza 2011-2019. J Paediatr Child Health 2022; 58:848-855. [PMID: 34927770 DOI: 10.1111/jpc.15857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2021] [Revised: 11/14/2021] [Accepted: 11/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
AIM Infants aged <6 months are vulnerable to severe influenza disease and no vaccine is approved for use in this age group. We aimed to describe the epidemiology, risk factors associated with severe outcomes and management of influenza in Australian infants aged <6 months. METHODS Incident cases aged <6 months of laboratory-confirmed influenza were captured through two national active prospective sentinel hospital-based surveillance systems in Australia from 2011 to 2019, inclusive. Demographic and clinical features, disease risk factors and outcomes (intensive care unit (ICU) admission and length of stay) and oseltamivir use were analysed. The proportion of infant influenza hospitalisations and nosocomial cases among all hospitalisations were also reported. RESULTS Of 680 hospitalised infants aged <6 months, 57.9% were male and 14.5% were Indigenous Australian. Median age was 2.6 months, 19.2% were born premature and 19.0% had a comorbidity, excluding prematurity. Overall, 77.9% had influenza A. Nosocomial cases accounted for 7.8%. ICU admission occurred in 14.7% and oseltamivir was prescribed for 18.8%. Factors associated with ICU admission included age <1 month (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 3.95, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.47-10.60), comorbidity (aOR 7.69, 95% CI: 4.04-14.64) and prematurity (aOR 2.60, 95% CI: 1.40-4.81). The proportion of infants with influenza among all infant hospitalisations ranged 1.0-2.6% in the 2019 influenza season. CONCLUSION Infants aged <6 months, and particularly neonates, experience serious disease from influenza. This data underpins the need for preventative strategies such as maternal immunisation and continued investigation into the possibility of safe and efficacious vaccination prior to 6 months of age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jocelynne E McRae
- National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, Kids Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Discipline of Child and Adolescent Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Christopher C Blyth
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Perth Children's Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,Wesfarmers Centre for Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,Pathwest Laboratory Medicine, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,School of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Allen C Cheng
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Helen E Quinn
- National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, Kids Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Discipline of Child and Adolescent Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nicholas J Wood
- National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, Kids Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Discipline of Child and Adolescent Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kristine K Macartney
- National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, Kids Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Discipline of Child and Adolescent Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Preventing severe influenza in Australian infants: Maternal influenza vaccine effectiveness in the PAEDS-FluCAN networks using the test-negative design. Vaccine 2022; 40:2761-2771. [DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.03.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2021] [Revised: 11/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
20
|
Dang TKNS, Rivero Cabrera R, Yeung KHT, van der Putten IM, Nelson EAS. Feasibility of age- and gestation-based routine universal influenza vaccines schedules for children aged 6 months - 2 years and pregnant women. Vaccine 2021; 39:6754-6761. [PMID: 34674893 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.09.076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2021] [Revised: 09/28/2021] [Accepted: 09/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hong Kong's seasonal influenza schedule follows the World Health Organization's northern hemisphere vaccine composition recommendations but with year-round influenza activity there is the potential to implement routine age- and gestation-based schedules utilising both northern and southern hemisphere vaccines for children aged 6 months to 2 years and for pregnant women. This study assessed the potential feasibility of such schedules. METHODS A literature review was conducted and in-depth interviews with vaccine experts, policy makers and nurses were undertaken. RESULTS The following schedules were proposed and assessed for perceived feasibility: 1) a four-dose schedule in the first two years of life requiring an additional unscheduled clinic visit at 7 months; 2) a three-dose schedule excluding the 4-week booster after the first dose; 3) a two-dose schedule for pregnant women involving a dose at the booking visit and a dose with pertussis vaccine at 7 months gestation; and 4) a one-dose schedule at 7 months gestation. CONCLUSIONS Age- and gestation-based routine influenza vaccination schedules are theoretically feasible for both young children and pregnant women. The three-dose paediatric and one-dose obstetric schedules were assessed in interviews with vaccine experts, policy makers and nurses to be most acceptable. Further clinical studies are required to determine whether such schedules are non-inferior to current seasonal-based schedules in terms of vaccine effectiveness and vaccine uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T K N Sandra Dang
- CAPHRI, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Department of Health Services Research, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - Romén Rivero Cabrera
- CAPHRI, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Department of Health Services Research, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | | | - Ingeborg M van der Putten
- CAPHRI, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Department of Health Services Research, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - E Anthony S Nelson
- Department of Paediatrics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
[Vaccination during pregnancy]. Monatsschr Kinderheilkd 2021; 169:1043-1050. [PMID: 34690367 PMCID: PMC8527443 DOI: 10.1007/s00112-021-01321-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Hintergrund Schwangere, Feten und Säuglinge weisen aufgrund von Besonderheiten ihres Immunsystems eine erhöhte infektionsbedingte Morbidität und Mortalität auf, die durch den Einsatz von Impfungen während der Schwangerschaft reduziert werden kann. Ziel In diesem Beitrag werden die Wirkungsweise, die Evidenz der zu erwartenden Effekte, Kontraindikationen und mögliche Nebenwirkungen von Impfungen in der Schwangerschaft erläutert. Methode Es wurde eine selektive Literaturrecherche unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Empfehlungen der Ständigen Impfkommission am Robert Koch-Institut (STIKO) und einschlägiger Leitlinien durchgeführt. Ergebnisse Impfungen in der Schwangerschaft schützen die werdende Mutter vor schweren Verläufen einzelner Infektionskrankheiten und damit verbundenen Schwangerschaftskomplikationen. Zudem vermitteln sie dem Neugeborenen durch die vertikale Übertragung mütterlicher Antikörper einen passiven Immunschutz vor lebensbedrohlichen Infektionen. Für die Impfung mit inaktivierten Impfstoffen gegen Tetanus, Influenza und Pertussis sind Wirksamkeit und Sicherheit gut belegt. Impfungen mit Lebendvakzinen sind wegen ihres theoretischen Risikos für den Fetus kontraindiziert. Die Datenlage zur Anwendung der Impfstoffe gegen die „coronavirus disease 2019“ (COVID 19) ist noch limitiert. Diskussion Impfungen in der Schwangerschaft zielen auf den direkten Schutz der Schwangeren durch aktive Immunisierung und/oder des Kindes durch natürliche passive Immunisierung. Schwangere sollten von einer indizierten Impfung zum eigenen Schutz und dem des Kindes nicht ausgeschlossen werden. Zusätzliche sinnvolle Maßnahmen zum Schutz der Gesundheit von Mutter und Kind sind die Impfung enger Kontaktpersonen sowie das Schließen relevanter Impflücken junger Erwachsener, insbesondere bei Frauen im gebärfähigen Alter.
Collapse
|
22
|
Bansal A, Trieu MC, Mohn KGI, Cox RJ. Safety, Immunogenicity, Efficacy and Effectiveness of Inactivated Influenza Vaccines in Healthy Pregnant Women and Children Under 5 Years: An Evidence-Based Clinical Review. Front Immunol 2021; 12:744774. [PMID: 34691051 PMCID: PMC8526930 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.744774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Annual influenza vaccination is often recommended for pregnant women and young children to reduce the risk of severe influenza. However, most studies investigating the safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy or effectiveness of influenza vaccines are conducted in healthy adults. In this evidence-based clinical review, we provide an update on the safety profile, immunogenicity, and efficacy/effectiveness of inactivated influenza vaccines (IIVs) in healthy pregnant women and children <5 years old. Six electronic databases were searched until May 27, 2021. We identified 3,731 articles, of which 93 met the eligibility criteria and were included. The IIVs were generally well tolerated in pregnant women and young children, with low frequencies of adverse events following IIV administration; however, continuous vaccine safety monitoring systems are necessary to detect rare adverse events. IIVs generated good antibody responses, and the seroprotection rates after IIVs were moderate to high in pregnant women (range = 65%-96%) and young children (range = 50%-100%), varying between the different influenza types/subtypes and seasons. Studies show vaccine efficacy/effectiveness values of 50%-70% in pregnant women and 20%-90% in young children against lab-confirmed influenza, although the efficacy/effectiveness depended on the study design, host factors, vaccine type, manufacturing practices, and the antigenic match/mismatch between the influenza vaccine strains and the circulating strains. Current evidence suggests that the benefits of IIVs far outweigh the potential risks and that IIVs should be recommended for pregnant women and young children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amit Bansal
- The Influenza Centre, Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Mai-Chi Trieu
- The Influenza Centre, Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Kristin G I Mohn
- The Influenza Centre, Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Rebecca Jane Cox
- The Influenza Centre, Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Microbiology, Haukeland University Hospital, Helse Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
This technical report accompanies the recommendations of the American Academy of Pediatrics for the routine use of the influenza vaccine and antiviral medications in the prevention and treatment of influenza in children during the 2021-2022 season. Influenza vaccination is an important intervention to protect vulnerable populations and reduce the burden of respiratory illnesses during circulation of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, which is expected to continue during this influenza season. In this technical report, we summarize recent influenza seasons, morbidity and mortality in children, vaccine effectiveness, vaccination coverage, and detailed guidance on storage, administration, and implementation. We also provide background on inactivated and live attenuated influenza vaccine recommendations, vaccination during pregnancy and breastfeeding, diagnostic testing, and antiviral medications for treatment and chemoprophylaxis.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use
- Breast Feeding
- Child
- Contraindications, Drug
- Drug Resistance, Viral
- Drug Storage
- Female
- Hospitalization
- Humans
- Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage
- Influenza Vaccines/adverse effects
- Influenza, Human/drug therapy
- Influenza, Human/epidemiology
- Influenza, Human/mortality
- Influenza, Human/prevention & control
- Mass Vaccination
- Risk Factors
- United States/epidemiology
- Vaccines, Attenuated/administration & dosage
- Vaccines, Attenuated/adverse effects
- Vaccines, Inactivated/administration & dosage
- Vaccines, Inactivated/adverse effects
Collapse
|
24
|
Rowe SL, Leder K, Perrett KP, Romero N, Nolan TM, Stephens N, Cowie BC, Cheng AC. Maternal Vaccination and Infant Influenza and Pertussis. Pediatrics 2021; 148:peds.2021-051076. [PMID: 34446538 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2021-051076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Infant influenza and pertussis disease causes considerable morbidity and mortality worldwide. We examined the effectiveness of maternal influenza and pertussis vaccines in preventing these diseases in infants. METHODS This inception cohort study comprised women whose pregnancies ended between September 1, 2015, and December 31, 2017, in Victoria, Australia. Maternal vaccination status was sourced from the Victorian Perinatal Data Collection and linked to 5 data sets to ascertain infant outcomes and vaccination. The primary outcome of interest was laboratory-confirmed influenza or pertussis disease in infants aged <2 months, 2 to <6 months, and <6 months combined. Secondary outcomes included infant hospitalization (emergency presentation or admission) and death. Risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by Poisson regression. Vaccine effectiveness (VE) was estimated as (1 minus the risk ratio) x 100%. RESULTS Among 186 962 pregnant women, 85 830 (45.9%) and 128 060 (68.5%) were vaccinated against influenza and pertussis, respectively. There were 175 and 51 infants with laboratory-confirmed influenza and pertussis disease, respectively. Influenza VE was 56.1% (95% CI, 23.3% to 74.9%) for infants aged <2 months and 35.7% (2.2% to 57.7%) for infants aged 2 to <6 months. Pertussis VE was 80.1% (95% CI, 37.1% to 93.7%) for infants aged <2 months and 31.8% (95% CI, -39.1% to 66.6%) for infants aged 2 to <6 months. CONCLUSIONS Our study provides evidence of the direct effectiveness of maternal influenza and pertussis vaccination in preventing these diseases in infants aged <2 months. The findings strengthen the importance of maternal vaccination to prevent these diseases in infants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacey L Rowe
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia .,Department of Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Karin Leder
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kirsten P Perrett
- Department of Allergy and Immunology, The Royal Children's Hospital; Population Allergy Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute; and Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nicole Romero
- Department of Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Peter Doherty Institute for Immunity and Infection, World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Viral Hepatitis, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Terry M Nolan
- Vaccine and Immunisation Research Group (VIRGo), Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity at The University of Melbourne, and Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nicola Stephens
- Public Health Program, Tasmanian School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Benjamin C Cowie
- Peter Doherty Institute for Immunity and Infection, World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Viral Hepatitis, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Allen C Cheng
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Saini J, Ellingson MK, Beigi RH, MacDonald NE, Top KA, Carroll S, Omer SB. Vaccine package inserts and prescribing habits of obstetricians-gynecologists for maternal vaccination. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2021; 17:3761-3770. [PMID: 34236947 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2021.1942714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite ample evidence of the safety and efficacy of the influenza vaccine and the tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine during pregnancy, two-thirds of pregnant women do not receive these vaccines. Providers have a significant role in increasing prenatal vaccine uptake. It is important to understand how different sources of vaccine prescribing information, such as Food and Drug Administration package inserts, influence provider recommendations. We aimed to examine the role of vaccine package inserts in provider recommendations and perceptions of safety and effectiveness of vaccines during pregnancy. A cross-sectional survey was mailed to a random, weighted sample of American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Fellows living in the United States in March 2019. Providers were asked about their attitudes toward package inserts, and to evaluate sample package insert statements following two different labeling rules. Their evaluations of each rule were then compared. Of the 321 respondents, the majority (90%, 288/321) recommended and/or administered maternal vaccinations. Few respondents (7.8%, 25/321) read package inserts for information regarding vaccination. Respondents were less likely to recommend sample vaccines with Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule-complying inserts (46.1%, 148/321) than vaccines with Pregnancy Category inserts (87.5%, 282/321). Although most providers did not actively utilize vaccine package inserts to inform recommendations, the previous Pregnancy Categories rule was preferred compared to the Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule. Collaborative efforts to update inserts with current clinical practices for pregnancy would be valuable in reducing apprehensiveness around package inserts to generate safer and more cogent recommendations for pregnant women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jannat Saini
- Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Mallory K Ellingson
- Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Richard H Beigi
- UPMC Magee-Women's Hospital, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Noni E MacDonald
- Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Karina A Top
- Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Sarah Carroll
- Immunization, Infectious Disease and Public Health Preparedness, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Saad B Omer
- Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.,Yale Institute for Global Health, New Haven, CT, USA.,Department of Internal Medicine (Infectious Diseases), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Methodologic approaches in studies using real-world data (RWD) to measure pediatric safety and effectiveness of vaccines administered to pregnant women: A scoping review. Vaccine 2021; 39:3814-3824. [PMID: 34090699 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.05.071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2021] [Revised: 05/18/2021] [Accepted: 05/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This scoping review mapped studies using real-world data (RWD) to measure pediatric safety and effectiveness of vaccines administered to pregnant women. INTRODUCTION In the US, two vaccines are recommended for all pregnant women to prevent illness in the infant: inactivated influenza vaccine (recommended since 2004), and the combined tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine (recommended since 2013). This scoping review maps the studies conducted to date that address questions about pediatric safety and effectiveness of vaccines administered during pregnancy and provides a knowledge base for evaluating the use of RWD to study this issue. METHODS The scoping review was conducted following a published protocol. Methods included an electronic search of PubMed and Embase, screening of titles and abstracts by two reviewers, and double extraction of data for summary and synthesis. Studies that reported on pregnant women and the effectiveness or safety outcomes in their infants were included. RESULTS Forty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria of the scoping review protocol using RWD to assess safety or effectiveness of influenza or pertussis vaccinations administered to pregnant women with respect to pregnancy, infant or child outcomes. Detailed information about data sources, linkage of maternal and infant data, and operational definitions for gestational age were largely absent from the majority of studies raising concerns about reproducibility and validity of study findings. CONCLUSIONS A body of literature is available from which to plan and design future studies of vaccination in pregnant women using RWD. This is of intense importance as new vaccines, such as those for COVID-19, become available to the general population via approval or authorization without inclusion of pregnant women in the clinical trials.
Collapse
|
27
|
Scatigna M, Appetiti A, Pasanisi M, D'Eugenio S, Fabiani L, Giuliani AR. Experience and attitudes on vaccinations recommended during pregnancy: survey on an Italian sample of women and consultant gynecologists. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2021; 18:1-8. [PMID: 33956557 PMCID: PMC8920149 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2021.1894061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Active immunization in pregnancy is recommended for the influenza and the tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccines. Evidence indicates vaccine effectiveness in preventing influenza-related hospitalizations and pertussis in early infancy. We investigate vaccine uptake in pregnant and non-pregnant women through a sample of young women and consultant gynecologists, along with the potential predisposing and/or enabling factors affecting attitudes to vaccination (knowledge, beliefs, barriers). A cross-sectional study was conducted between June and September 2019, with a sample of 251 women and 14 consultant gynecologists at the Local Health Authority (ASL01) of the Abruzzo Region (Italy), using an anonymous, self-report questionnaire survey. Among the participants, 5.6% of women had received influenza vaccination, 16.4% had received Tdap during pregnancy and only 1.2% had received both vaccines. The assessment of the psychometric attitudinal variables has suggested a more positive willingness to receive Tdap than influenza vaccine among women, as the former is considered more important for the maternal and neonatal health. Health care workers have reported vaccine safety concerns, lack of information, and misconceptions about the need for vaccination as barriers to immunization in pregnant women. The results of this study will contribute to defining the goals and strategies to increase vaccine uptake under the current recommendations, through promoting effective training programs for all health care workers involved (gynecologists, obstetricians, public health physicians).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Scatigna
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Alessandro Appetiti
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | | | - Silvia D'Eugenio
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Leila Fabiani
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Anna Rita Giuliani
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Röbl-Mathieu M, Kunstein A, Liese J, Mertens T, Wojcinski M. Vaccination in Pregnancy. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL 2021; 118:262-268. [PMID: 34114547 PMCID: PMC8287076 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2020] [Revised: 06/24/2020] [Accepted: 11/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vaccination during pregnancy can protect both the expecting mother and the unborn and newborn child from infectious diseases. METHODS This review is based on publications retrieved by a selective literature search on the immunological particularities of infectious diseases affecting pregnant women, unborn children, and neonates, with particular attention to the guidelines of the German Standing Committee on Vaccinations (Ständige Impfkommission, STIKO) and the pertinent guidelines. RESULTS Vaccination during pregnancy protects the expecting mother from a severe course of a number of different infectious diseases. Vaccination with inactivated vaccines against influenza, tetanus, and pertussis is effective, safe, and well tolerated. Women who are pregnant or of child-bearing age should be immunized against tetanus according to the STIKO recommendations. All pregnant women from the second trimester onward should receive an inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine. The immunity acquired after vaccination with an acellular pertussis vaccine is present only for a limited time. In a cohort study involving 72,781 pregnant women, pertussis vaccination during pregnancy was found to yield 91% protection against pertussis for their subsequently born children in the first three months of life. Further types of vaccine can also be given during pregnancy if indicated. Additional reasonable measures to protect the health of mother and child include the vaccination of other persons in close contact as well as the closure of relevant vaccination gaps among young adults, particularly women of child-bearing age. Treating physicians play a crucial role in encouraging vaccine acceptance by their patients. CONCLUSION Maternal immunization is a safe and effective strategy for giving neo - nates passive immune protection against life-threatening infections by the vertical transmission of maternal antibodies until they are able to build up their own adaptive immunity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianne Röbl-Mathieu
- Gynecologist's office, Munich; Member of STIKOGynecologist's office, MunichDepartment of Pediatrics, University Hospital WürzburgInstitute of Virology, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm; Member of STIKOWorking Group Vaccination in Pregnancy, German Professional Association of Gynecologists, Munich
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Chu HY, Newman KL, Englund JA, Cho S, Bull C, Lacombe K, Carlin K, Bulkow LR, Rudolph K, DeByle C, Berner J, Klejka J, Singleton R. Transplacental Respiratory Syncytial Virus and Influenza Virus Antibody Transfer in Alaska Native and Seattle Mother-Infant Pairs. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc 2021; 10:230-236. [PMID: 32369172 PMCID: PMC8023314 DOI: 10.1093/jpids/piaa040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2019] [Accepted: 04/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Alaska Native (AN) infants are at risk for severe disease due to respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and influenza. Maternal immunization protects young infants through transplacental antibody transfer. RSV- and influenza-specific transplacental antibody transfer in mother-infant pairs has not previously been evaluated in the AN population. METHODS Serum samples collected during pregnancy and at birth from AN mother-infant pairs in the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta region (YKD) of Alaska (2000-2011; n = 75) and predominantly white pairs in Seattle, Washington (2014-2016; n = 57), were tested for RSV and influenza antibody using a microneutralization and hemagglutination inhibition assay, respectively, and compared between sites. RESULTS Mean RSV antibody concentrations in pregnant women in YKD and Seattle were similar (log2 RSV antibody 10.6 vs 10.7, P = .86), but cord blood RSV antibody concentrations were significantly lower in infants born to mothers in YKD compared with Seattle (log2 RSV antibody 11.0 vs 12.2, P < .001). Maternal and cord blood influenza antibody concentrations were lower for women and infants in YKD compared with Seattle for all 4 influenza antigens tested (all P < .05). The mean cord to maternal RSV antibody transfer ratio was 1.15 (standard deviation [SD], 0.13) in mother-infant pairs in Seattle compared with 1.04 (SD, 0.08) in YKD. Mean cord blood to maternal antibody transfer ratios for influenza antigens ranged from 1.22 to 1.42 in Seattle and from 1.05 to 1.59 in YKD. CONCLUSIONS Though the transplacental antibody transfer ratio was high (>1.0) for both groups, transfer ratios for RSV antibody were significantly lower in AN mother-infant pairs. Further studies are needed to elucidate the impact of lower transplacental antibody transfer on infant disease risk in rural Alaska.Alaska Native and continental US mother-infant pairs have high transplacental antibody transfer ratios (>1.0) for influenza and respiratory syncytial virus, but anti-respiratory syncytial virus antibody levels are significantly lower in Alaska Native pairs than in those from the continental US.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Y Chu
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Kira L Newman
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Janet A Englund
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Seattle Children’s Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Shari Cho
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Catherine Bull
- Seattle Children’s Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Kirsten Lacombe
- Seattle Children’s Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Kristen Carlin
- Seattle Children’s Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Lisa R Bulkow
- Arctic Investigations Program Centers for Disease Control, Anchorage, Alaska, USA
| | - Karen Rudolph
- Arctic Investigations Program Centers for Disease Control, Anchorage, Alaska, USA
| | - Carolynn DeByle
- Arctic Investigations Program Centers for Disease Control, Anchorage, Alaska, USA
| | - James Berner
- Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium, Anchorage, Alaska, USA
| | - Joseph Klejka
- Yukon Kuskokwim Health Corporation, Bethel, Alaska, USA
| | - Rosalyn Singleton
- Arctic Investigations Program Centers for Disease Control, Anchorage, Alaska, USA
- Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium, Anchorage, Alaska, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Madewell ZJ, Chacón-Fuentes R, Jara J, Mejía-Santos H, Molina IB, Alvis-Estrada JP, Coello-Licona R, Montejo B. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of seasonal influenza vaccination in postpartum women, Honduras. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0246385. [PMID: 33571256 PMCID: PMC7877664 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2020] [Accepted: 01/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Influenza during pregnancy may cause serious neonatal outcomes including stillbirth, fetal distress, preterm birth, congenital abnormalities, and stunted growth. Pregnant women are the highest priority group for seasonal influenza vaccination, but low coverage has been repeatedly reported in this population. Understanding reasons for and for not receiving the seasonal influenza vaccine is needed to design communication strategies to increase vaccination coverage. This study aimed to describe knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of seasonal influenza vaccination among women giving birth in public maternity hospitals in Honduras. Methods From August 20–October 8, 2018, we conducted a cross-sectional KAP survey regarding seasonal influenza vaccinations to a sample of postpartum women who gave birth in maternity hospitals and clinics from the Ministry of Health of Honduras and Honduran Social Security Institute. We reported frequency distributions for demographics, KAP of influenza vaccine, and vaccination coverage. We used logistic regression to analyze unadjusted and adjusted associations between sociodemographic characteristics and influenza vaccination. Results We surveyed 842 postpartum women in 17 healthcare facilities. Of 534 postpartum women with term pregnancy and verified vaccinations, 417 (78.1%; 95% CI: 74.6–81.6%) were vaccinated for influenza. Factors associated with verified influenza vaccination included receipt of vaccination recommendations by a healthcare worker during prenatal check-ups (aOR: 16.46; 95% CI: 9.73–27.85), concurrent chronic disease (aOR: 5.00; 95% CI: 1.25–20.07), and influenza vaccination of other children in the household (aOR: 2.28; 95% CI: 1.19–4.39). The most cited reasons for vaccination were perceived benefits for both mother and infant and easy access. Reasons for non-vaccination were: vaccine was not offered and fear of side effects, harm to the infant, and needles or pain caused by injection. Conclusion Influenza vaccination was well received among postpartum women in Honduras. Increasing clinician recommendations for vaccination and assuring the vaccine is readily available to women during prenatal visits may increase vaccination rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary J. Madewell
- Centro de Estudios en Salud, Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, Guatemala City, Guatemala
- * E-mail:
| | - Rafael Chacón-Fuentes
- Centro de Estudios en Salud, Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, Guatemala City, Guatemala
| | - Jorge Jara
- Centro de Estudios en Salud, Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, Guatemala City, Guatemala
| | - Homer Mejía-Santos
- Unidad de Vigilancia de la Salud, Secretaría de Salud de Honduras, Tegucigalpa, Honduras
| | - Ida-Berenice Molina
- Programa Ampliado de Inmunizaciones, Secretaría de Salud de Honduras, Tegucigalpa, Honduras
| | | | - Rosa Coello-Licona
- Vigilancia Epidemiológica, Instituto Hondureño de Seguridad Social, Tegucigalpa, Honduras
| | - Belinda Montejo
- Vigilancia Epidemiológica, Instituto Hondureño de Seguridad Social, Tegucigalpa, Honduras
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Abu-Raya B, Maertens K. Protection of the Newborn Through Vaccination in Pregnancy. Neoreviews 2021; 22:e25-e39. [PMID: 33386312 DOI: 10.1542/neo.22-1-e25] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Newborns and infants are at risk for severe infections with some pathogens (eg, Bordetella pertussis, influenza, respiratory syncytial virus, group B Streptococcus) during early life. To decrease this window of high susceptibility to some infections during early life and protect young infants, vaccination in pregnancy against some vaccine-preventable diseases (eg, influenza, pertussis, tetanus) has been recommended in an increasing number of countries with notable success. In addition, recent advances have been made in developing vaccines for pregnant women with the aim of reducing the respiratory syncytial virus and group B Streptococcus burden in infancy. In this article, we review the vaccines currently recommended during pregnancy and their benefits to newborns and infants. We also discuss progress made in the development of other vaccines that are expected to be evaluated in pregnant women in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bahaa Abu-Raya
- Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Vaccine Evaluation Center, British Columbia Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Kirsten Maertens
- Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine & Infectious Diseases Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Zerbo O, Ray GT, Zhang L, Goddard K, Fireman B, Adams A, Omer S, Kulldorff M, Klein NP. Individual and Neighborhood Factors Associated With Failure to Vaccinate Against Influenza During Pregnancy. Am J Epidemiol 2020; 189:1379-1388. [PMID: 32735018 PMCID: PMC7604527 DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwaa165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2020] [Revised: 07/27/2020] [Accepted: 07/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Uptake of influenza vaccine among pregnant women remains low. We investigated whether unvaccinated pregnant women were clustered geographically and determined factors associated with failure to vaccinate using spatial and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Pregnant women who were members of Kaiser Permanente Northern California in 2015 or 2016 were included in the study. More than half (53%) of the 77,607 included pregnant women were unvaccinated. Spatial analysis identified 5 clusters with a high prevalence of unvaccinated pregnant women. The proportion of unvaccinated women ranged from 57% to 75% within clusters as compared with 51% outside clusters. In covariate-adjusted analyses, residence in a cluster was associated with a 41% increase in the odds of being unvaccinated (odds ratio (OR) = 1.41, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.36, 1.46). The odds of being unvaccinated were greater for Black women (OR = 1.58, 95% CI: 1.49, 1.69), Hispanic women (OR = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.25), women with subsidized health insurance (OR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.11, 1.24), women with fewer than 5 prenatal-care visits (OR = 1.85, 95% CI: 1.60, 2.16), and neighborhoods with a high deprivation index (fourth quartile vs. first: OR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.07, 1.21). In conclusion, unvaccinated pregnant women were clustered geographically and by key sociodemographic factors. These findings suggest that interventions to increase influenza vaccine coverage among pregnant women are needed, particularly in vulnerable populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ousseny Zerbo
- Correspondence to Dr. Ousseny Zerbo, Kaiser Permanente Northern California Vaccine Study Center, 1 Kaiser Plaza, 16th Floor, Oakland, CA 94612 (e-mail: )
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Giles ML, Cheng AC. Regulatory agencies have a role to play in maintaining consumer confidence in vaccine safety for pregnant women. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2020; 16:2573-2576. [PMID: 32078437 PMCID: PMC7644227 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1718976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2019] [Accepted: 01/15/2020] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle L. Giles
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Allen C. Cheng
- Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Abu-Raya B, Maertens K, Edwards KM, Omer SB, Englund JA, Flanagan KL, Snape MD, Amirthalingam G, Leuridan E, Damme PV, Papaevangelou V, Launay O, Dagan R, Campins M, Cavaliere AF, Frusca T, Guidi S, O'Ryan M, Heininger U, Tan T, Alsuwaidi AR, Safadi MA, Vilca LM, Wanlapakorn N, Madhi SA, Giles ML, Prymula R, Ladhani S, Martinón-Torres F, Tan L, Michelin L, Scambia G, Principi N, Esposito S. Global Perspectives on Immunization During Pregnancy and Priorities for Future Research and Development: An International Consensus Statement. Front Immunol 2020; 11:1282. [PMID: 32670282 PMCID: PMC7326941 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2020] [Accepted: 05/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Immunization during pregnancy has been recommended in an increasing number of countries. The aim of this strategy is to protect pregnant women and infants from severe infectious disease, morbidity and mortality and is currently limited to tetanus, inactivated influenza, and pertussis-containing vaccines. There have been recent advancements in the development of vaccines designed primarily for use in pregnant women (respiratory syncytial virus and group B Streptococcus vaccines). Although there is increasing evidence to support vaccination in pregnancy, important gaps in knowledge still exist and need to be addressed by future studies. This collaborative consensus paper provides a review of the current literature on immunization during pregnancy and highlights the gaps in knowledge and a consensus of priorities for future research initiatives, in order to optimize protection for both the mother and the infant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bahaa Abu-Raya
- Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Kirsten Maertens
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine and Infectious Diseases Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Kathryn M. Edwards
- Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Saad B. Omer
- Department of Internal Medicine (Infectious Diseases), Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Medicine, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Janet A. Englund
- Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children's Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Katie L. Flanagan
- Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Launceston, TAS, Australia
- School of Health and Biomedical Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Immunology and Pathology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Matthew D. Snape
- Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Gayatri Amirthalingam
- Immunisation and Countermeasures Division, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom
| | - Elke Leuridan
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine and Infectious Diseases Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Pierre Van Damme
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine and Infectious Diseases Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Vana Papaevangelou
- Third Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital ATTIKON, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Odile Launay
- Université de Paris, Inserm, CIC 1417, F-CRIN I REIVAC, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Ron Dagan
- The Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - Magda Campins
- Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology Department, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anna Franca Cavaliere
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS-Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Tiziana Frusca
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Sofia Guidi
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS-Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Miguel O'Ryan
- Microbiology and Mycology Program, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Biomedical Sciences and Associate Researcher, Millennium Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Ulrich Heininger
- Pediatric Infectious Diseases, University of Basel Children's Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Tina Tan
- Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Ahmed R. Alsuwaidi
- Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | - Marco. A. Safadi
- Department of Pediatrics, Santa Casa de São Paulo School of Medical Sciences, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Luz M. Vilca
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Buzzi Hospital - ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Nasamon Wanlapakorn
- Center of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Shabir A. Madhi
- Department of Science and Technology/National Research Foundation: Vaccine Preventable Diseases, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
- Medical Research Council: Respiratory and Meningeal Pathogens Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Michelle L. Giles
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Roman Prymula
- School of Medicine Hradec Kralove, Institute of Social Medicine, Charles University Prague, Prague, Czechia
| | - Shamez Ladhani
- Immunisation and Countermeasures Division, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom
| | - Federico Martinón-Torres
- Translational Pediatrics and Infectious Diseases, Pediatrics Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, University of Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Litjen Tan
- Immunization Action Coalition, St. Paul, MN, United States
| | - Lessandra Michelin
- Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology Division, Health Sciences Post Graduation Program, University of Caxias Do Sul, Caxias Do Sul, Brazil
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS-Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Susanna Esposito
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Pediatric Clinic, Pietro Barilla Children's Hospital, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
The effectiveness of influenza vaccination in pregnancy in relation to child health outcomes: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Vaccine 2020; 38:1601-1613. [PMID: 31932138 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.12.056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2019] [Revised: 12/20/2019] [Accepted: 12/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine the effectiveness of influenza vaccination during pregnancy on child health outcomes. DESIGN Systematic review/meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES Clinical Trials.gov, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Medline, Medline in process, PubMed and Web of Science, from 1st January 1996 to 29th June 2018. An updated Medline search was performed 30th June 2018 to 31st October 2019. METHODS Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies reporting health outcomes of infants and children born to women who received inactivated influenza vaccine during pregnancy. The primary outcome was infant laboratory confirmed influenza (LCI). Secondary outcomes included influenza-like illness (ILI), other respiratory illnesses, primary care, clinic visit or hospitalisations due to influenza illness and long-term respiratory childhood outcomes. RESULTS 19 studies were included; 15 observational studies and 4 primary RCTs with an additional 3 papers reporting secondary outcomes of these RCTs. In a random effects meta-analysis of 2 RCTs including 5742 participants, maternal influenza vaccination was associated with an overall reduction of LCI in infants of 34% (95% confidence interval 15-50%). However, there was no effect of maternal influenza vaccination on ILI in infants ≤6 months old. Two RCTs were excluded from the meta-analysis for the outcome of LCI in infants (different controls used). Both of these studies showed a protective effect for infants from LCI, with a vaccine efficacy of up to 70%. Overall observational studies showed an inverse (protective) association between maternal influenza vaccination and infant LCI, hospitalisation and clinic visits due to LCI or ILI in infants and other respiratory illness in infants ≤6 months old. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review supports maternal influenza vaccination as a strategy to reduce LCI and influenza-related hospitalisations in young infants. Communicating these benefits to pregnant women may support their decision to accept influenza vaccination in pregnancy and increase vaccine coverage in pregnant women. REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42018102776.
Collapse
|
36
|
Walker JL, Zhao H, Dabrera G, Andrews N, Thomas SL, Tsang C, Ellis J, Donati M, Pebody RG. Assessment of Effectiveness of Seasonal Influenza Vaccination During Pregnancy in Preventing Influenza Infection in Infants in England, 2013-2014 and 2014-2015. J Infect Dis 2020; 221:16-20. [PMID: 31711165 DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiz310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2019] [Accepted: 06/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Maternal influenza vaccination is increasingly recognized to protect infants from influenza infection in their first 6 months. We used the screening method to estimate vaccine effectiveness (VE) against laboratory-confirmed influenza in infants in England, using newly available uptake data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink pregnancy register, matched on week of birth and region and adjusted for ethnicity. We found VE of 66% (95% confidence interval [CI], 18%-84%) in the 2013-2014 season and 50% (95% CI, 11%-72%) in 2014-2015, with similar VE against influenza-related hospitalization. VE against the dominant circulating influenza strain was higher, at 78% (95% CI, 16%-94%) against H1N1 in 2013-2014, and 60% (95% CI, 16%-81%) against H3N2 in 2014-2015.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jemma L Walker
- Statistics, Modelling and Economics Department, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom.,Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Hongxin Zhao
- National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gavin Dabrera
- National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nick Andrews
- Statistics, Modelling and Economics Department, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah L Thomas
- Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Camille Tsang
- National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom
| | - Joanna Ellis
- National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew Donati
- National Infection Service, Public Health England, Bristol Public Health Laboratory, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Richard G Pebody
- National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Age-Stratified Risk of Critical Illness in Young Children Presenting to the Emergency Department with Suspected Influenza. J Pediatr 2019; 215:132-138.e2. [PMID: 31561954 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.08.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2019] [Revised: 08/17/2019] [Accepted: 08/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the risk of critical illness by age group among young children without a chronic condition presenting to the emergency department (ED) with suspected influenza. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective study of patients aged <2 years presenting to the ED with suspected influenza (defined by diagnostic codes for influenza or influenza-like illness) from 2009 to 2017 in 49 hospitals in the Pediatric Health Information System. Patients with chronic conditions were excluded. The main clinical outcomes were intensive care unit (ICU) admission, ventilatory support, vasopressor administration, and mortality, which were compared independently by age group (<3 months, 3 to <6 months, 6 to <12 months, and 12 to <24 months). To compare outcomes by age, we estimated the prevalence of each outcome by age group after fitting logistic regression models to control for demographic differences between groups. RESULTS A total of 55 986 children were studied. Overall admission and ICU admission rates were 20% and 2%, respectively. After adjustment for demographic variables, infants aged <3 months had higher rates of ICU admission (2.7%; 95% CI, 2.0%-3.3%; P < .001 compared with other age groups) and ventilatory support (2.5%; 95% CI, 1.9%-3.2%; P < .001 compared with other age groups); however, there were no differences in vasopressor administration. The overall case fatality rate was low (0.007%) and thus could not be compared across age groups. CONCLUSIONS Infants aged <3 months with suspected influenza are at greatest risk for critical illness. Although critical illness is uncommon, these findings should be incorporated into acute management decisions, including the need for specified outpatient follow-up or hospitalization, and public health efforts should focus on prevention and disease-modifying interventions in this high-risk population.
Collapse
|
38
|
Al-Haddad BJS, Oler E, Armistead B, Elsayed NA, Weinberger DR, Bernier R, Burd I, Kapur R, Jacobsson B, Wang C, Mysorekar I, Rajagopal L, Adams Waldorf KM. The fetal origins of mental illness. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019; 221:549-562. [PMID: 31207234 PMCID: PMC6889013 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 167] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2019] [Revised: 06/07/2019] [Accepted: 06/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The impact of infections and inflammation during pregnancy on the developing fetal brain remains incompletely defined, with important clinical and research gaps. Although the classic infectious TORCH pathogens (ie, Toxoplasma gondii, rubella virus, cytomegalovirus [CMV], herpes simplex virus) are known to be directly teratogenic, emerging evidence suggests that these infections represent the most extreme end of a much larger spectrum of injury. We present the accumulating evidence that prenatal exposure to a wide variety of viral and bacterial infections-or simply inflammation-may subtly alter fetal brain development, leading to neuropsychiatric consequences for the child later in life. The link between influenza infections in pregnant women and an increased risk for development of schizophrenia in their children was first described more than 30 years ago. Since then, evidence suggests that a range of infections during pregnancy may also increase risk for autism spectrum disorder and depression in the child. Subsequent studies in animal models demonstrated that both pregnancy infections and inflammation can result in direct injury to neurons and neural progenitor cells or indirect injury through activation of microglia and astrocytes, which can trigger cytokine production and oxidative stress. Infectious exposures can also alter placental serotonin production, which can perturb neurotransmitter signaling in the developing brain. Clinically, detection of these subtle injuries to the fetal brain is difficult. As the neuropsychiatric impact of perinatal infections or inflammation may not be known for decades after birth, our construct for defining teratogenic infections in pregnancy (eg, TORCH) based on congenital anomalies is insufficient to capture the full adverse impact on the child. We discuss the clinical implications of this body of evidence and how we might place greater emphasis on prevention of prenatal infections. For example, increasing uptake of the seasonal influenza vaccine is a key strategy to reduce perinatal infections and the risk for fetal brain injury. An important research gap exists in understanding how antibiotic therapy during pregnancy affects the fetal inflammatory load and how to avoid inflammation-mediated injury to the fetal brain. In summary, we discuss the current evidence and mechanisms linking infections and inflammation with the increased lifelong risk of neuropsychiatric disorders in the child, and how we might improve prenatal care to protect the fetal brain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Elizabeth Oler
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Blair Armistead
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington Seattle, WA; Center for Global Infectious Disease Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA
| | - Nada A Elsayed
- Integrated Research Center for Fetal Medicine, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Daniel R Weinberger
- Lieber Institute for Brain Development, Departments of Psychiatry, Neurology, Neuroscience, and McKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore, MD
| | - Raphael Bernier
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Irina Burd
- Integrated Research Center for Fetal Medicine, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Raj Kapur
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA
| | - Bo Jacobsson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Science, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Genetics and Bioinformatics, Domain of Health Data and Digitalization, Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Caihong Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Reproductive Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Indira Mysorekar
- Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pathology and Immunology, Center for Reproductive Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Lakshmi Rajagopal
- Center for Innate Immunity and Immune Disease, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Center for Global Infectious Disease Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA
| | - Kristina M Adams Waldorf
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Global Health, Center for Innate Immunity and Immune Disease, Center for Emerging and Reemerging Infectious Diseases, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Chong CY, Yung CF, Gan C, Thio ST, Tan NWH, Tee NWS, Lin C, Lin RTP, Thoon KC. The burden and clinical manifestation of hospitalized influenza among different pediatric age-groups in the tropics. Influenza Other Respir Viruses 2019; 14:46-54. [PMID: 31608598 PMCID: PMC6928028 DOI: 10.1111/irv.12692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2019] [Revised: 09/10/2019] [Accepted: 09/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction In tropical Singapore, influenza occurs all year‐round. This study of influenza‐confirmed hospitalized pediatric patients compared clinical characteristics and complications by age‐group and differences between influenza A and B. Methods This was a retrospective study of pediatric inpatients from January 2013 to December 2014. Patients were grouped into: <6 months, 6 months to <5 years, 5‐ to <10‐year and ≥10 years. Complications were classified into neurologic, pulmonary, and other. We also calculated the incidence of hospitalized influenza cases per 100 000 age‐related population. Results There were a total of 1272 patients with a median age of 37 months. The highest hospitalization rates were in the <6 months age‐group. Majority (75.2%) had no comorbidity; 25.6% had complications: neurologic 11.9%, pulmonary 9.6%, other 4.1%. Patients with other complications were older, male, and had the highest influenza B rates and the longest length of stay. Influenza A comprised 76.9% of cases and had higher complication rates especially neurologic, compared to influenza B. Influenza B patients were older and were more likely to develop other complications. The 6‐month to <5‐year‐age‐group had the highest complication rate (30.6%), especially neurologic. However, ≥10 years old had the highest other complications, ICU/ high‐dependency admissions and influenza B Victoria rates. Conclusions Infants <6 months had the highest hospitalization rates for influenza. The 6‐month to <5‐year‐age‐group had the highest complication rate especially neurologic. Influenza A patients were younger, had higher seizure rates and complications compared to influenza B.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chia-Yin Chong
- Infectious Diseases, Department of Paediatrics, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore.,Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.,Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
| | - Chee-Fu Yung
- Infectious Diseases, Department of Paediatrics, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore.,Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
| | - Cherie Gan
- Singhealth Residency Programme, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Szu-Tien Thio
- Infectious Diseases, Department of Paediatrics, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore
| | - Natalie Woon-Hui Tan
- Infectious Diseases, Department of Paediatrics, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore.,Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.,Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
| | - Nancy Wen-Sim Tee
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.,Department of Laboratory Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Cui Lin
- National Public Health Laboratory, Ministry of Health, Singapore
| | - Raymond Tze-Pin Lin
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.,Department of Laboratory Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore.,National Public Health Laboratory, Ministry of Health, Singapore
| | - Koh-Cheng Thoon
- Infectious Diseases, Department of Paediatrics, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore.,Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.,Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Abstract
This statement updates the recommendations of the American Academy of Pediatrics for the routine use of influenza vaccines and antiviral medications in the prevention and treatment of influenza in children during the 2019-2020 season. The American Academy of Pediatrics continues to recommend routine influenza immunization of all children without medical contraindications, starting at 6 months of age. Any licensed, recommended, age-appropriate vaccine available can be administered, without preference of one product or formulation over another. Antiviral treatment of influenza with any licensed, recommended, age-appropriate influenza antiviral medication continues to be recommended for children with suspected or confirmed influenza, particularly those who are hospitalized, have severe or progressive disease, or have underlying conditions that increase their risk of complications of influenza.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adolescent
- Age Factors
- Antiviral Agents/administration & dosage
- Antiviral Agents/adverse effects
- Breast Feeding
- Cause of Death
- Child
- Child, Hospitalized
- Child, Preschool
- Contraindications
- Disease Progression
- Drug Resistance, Viral
- Egg Hypersensitivity
- Female
- Humans
- Immunocompromised Host
- Infant
- Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/immunology
- Influenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtype/immunology
- Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage
- Influenza Vaccines/adverse effects
- Influenza, Human/complications
- Influenza, Human/drug therapy
- Influenza, Human/epidemiology
- Influenza, Human/prevention & control
- Pediatrics
- Pregnancy
- United States/epidemiology
- Vaccines, Inactivated/administration & dosage
Collapse
|
41
|
Mølgaard-Nielsen D, Fischer TK, Krause TG, Hviid A. Effectiveness of maternal immunization with trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in pregnant women and their infants. J Intern Med 2019; 286:469-480. [PMID: 31259452 DOI: 10.1111/joim.12947] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In randomized trials, it has been found that maternal influenza vaccination reduces influenza infections in both women and their infants. However, these trials have been performed in low-resource settings, and evidence from high-resource settings is limited. METHODS Nested within a register-based cohort of all women giving birth in Denmark between 2010 and 2016 (n = 357 810 births), we conducted two case-control studies using a test-negative design of all pregnant women and their infants, respectively, tested for influenza virus with reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Influenza virus-positive cases were matched (1:1) with influenza virus-negative controls for calendar time and (gestational or infant) age at testing. The effectiveness of maternal immunization with trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine was estimated from the odds ratios of vaccination among cases versus controls using logistic regression with adjustment for potential confounders. RESULTS Among 313 pregnant women positive for influenza virus, 16 (5.1%) were vaccinated; by comparison, 34 (10.9%) pregnant women were vaccinated among 313 matched influenza virus-negative controls. The effectiveness of vaccination against laboratory-confirmed influenza infection in pregnant women was 63.9% [95% confidence interval (CI), 29.1 to 81.6]. Among 460 infants positive for influenza virus, 23 (5.0%) were offspring of women vaccinated during pregnancy; by comparison, 52 (11.3%) infants were the offspring of women vaccinated during pregnancy among 460 matched influenza virus-negative controls. The effectiveness of maternal vaccination against laboratory-confirmed influenza infection in infants younger than 6 months of age was 56.8% (95% CI, 25.0 to 75.1). CONCLUSIONS Seasonal trivalent inactivated influenza vaccination in pregnancy was associated with a statistically significant reduced risk of laboratory-confirmed influenza infections in pregnant women and their infants in a high-resource setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Mølgaard-Nielsen
- From the, Department of Epidemiology Research, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - T K Fischer
- Department of Virus and Microbiological Special diagnostics, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Clinical Institute, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - T G Krause
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Prevention, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - A Hviid
- From the, Department of Epidemiology Research, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Walsh LK, Donelle J, Dodds L, Hawken S, Wilson K, Benchimol EI, Chakraborty P, Guttmann A, Kwong JC, MacDonald NE, Ortiz JR, Sprague AE, Top KA, Walker MC, Wen SW, Fell DB. Health outcomes of young children born to mothers who received 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza vaccination during pregnancy: retrospective cohort study. BMJ 2019; 366:l4151. [PMID: 31292120 PMCID: PMC6614795 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l4151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine whether any association exists between exposure to 2009 pandemic H1N1 (pH1N1) influenza vaccination during pregnancy and negative health outcomes in early childhood. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING Population based birth registry linked with health administrative databases in the province of Ontario, Canada. PARTICIPANTS All live births from November 2009 through October 2010 (n=104 249) were included, and children were followed until 5 years of age to ascertain study outcomes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Rates of immune related (infectious diseases, asthma), non-immune related (neoplasms, sensory disorders), and non-specific morbidity outcomes (urgent or inpatient health services use, pediatric complex chronic conditions) were evaluated from birth to 5 years of age; under-5 childhood mortality was also assessed. Propensity score weighting was used to adjust hazard ratios, incidence rate ratios, and risk ratios for potential confounding. RESULTS Of 104 249 live births, 31 295 (30%) were exposed to pH1N1 influenza vaccination in utero. No significant associations were found with upper or lower respiratory infections, otitis media, any infectious diseases, neoplasms, sensory disorders, urgent and inpatient health services use, pediatric complex chronic conditions, or mortality. A weak association was observed between prenatal pH1N1 vaccination and increased risk of asthma (adjusted hazard ratio 1.05, 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 1.09) and decreased rates of gastrointestinal infections (adjusted incidence rate ratio 0.94, 0.91 to 0.98). These results were unchanged in sensitivity analyses accounting for any potential differential healthcare seeking behavior or access between exposure groups. CONCLUSIONS No associations were observed between exposure to pH1N1 influenza vaccine during pregnancy and most five year pediatric health outcomes. Residual confounding may explain the small associations observed with increased asthma and reduced gastrointestinal infections. These outcomes should be assessed in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura K Walsh
- Better Outcomes Registry & Network, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Steven Hawken
- University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Kumanan Wilson
- University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Eric I Benchimol
- University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO) Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Pranesh Chakraborty
- University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO) Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Astrid Guttmann
- ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jeffrey C Kwong
- ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Public Health Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Justin R Ortiz
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ann E Sprague
- Better Outcomes Registry & Network, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO) Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | | - Mark C Walker
- Better Outcomes Registry & Network, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Shi Wu Wen
- University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Deshayne B Fell
- University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO) Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Koletzko B, Cremer M, Flothkötter M, Graf C, Hauner H, Hellmers C, Kersting M, Krawinkel M, Przyrembel H, Röbl-Mathieu M, Schiffner U, Vetter K, Weißenborn A, Wöckel A. Diet and Lifestyle Before and During Pregnancy - Practical Recommendations of the Germany-wide Healthy Start - Young Family Network. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2018; 78:1262-1282. [PMID: 30655650 PMCID: PMC6294644 DOI: 10.1055/a-0713-1058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2018] [Revised: 08/22/2018] [Accepted: 08/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Diet and exercise before and during pregnancy affect the course of the pregnancy, the child's development and the short- and long-term health of mother and child. The Healthy Start - Young Family Network has updated the recommendations on nutrition in pregnancy that first appeared in 2012 and supplemented them with recommendations on a preconception lifestyle. The recommendations address body weight before conception, weight gain in pregnancy, energy and nutritional requirements and diet (including a vegetarian/vegan diet), the supplements folic acid/folate, iodine, iron and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), protection against food-borne illnesses, physical activity before and during pregnancy, alcohol, smoking, caffeinated drinks, oral and dental hygiene and the use of medicinal products. Preparation for breast-feeding is recommended already during pregnancy. Vaccination recommendations for women planning a pregnancy are also included. These practical recommendations of the Germany-wide Healthy Start - Young Family Network are intended to assist all professional groups that counsel women and couples wishing to have children and during pregnancy with uniform, scientifically-based and practical information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Berthold Koletzko
- Kinderklinik und Kinderpoliklinik, Dr. von Haunersches Kinderspital, LMU – Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München, Germany
- Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kinder- und Jugendheilkunde e. V. (DGKJ), Berlin, Germany
- Mitglied im wissenschaftlichen Beirat des Netzwerks Gesund ins Leben, Bonn, Germany
| | - Monika Cremer
- Netzwerk Gesund ins Leben/Bundeszentrum für Ernährung (BZfE) in der Bundesanstalt für Landwirtschaft und Ernährung (BLE), Bonn, Germany
| | - Maria Flothkötter
- Netzwerk Gesund ins Leben/Bundeszentrum für Ernährung (BZfE) in der Bundesanstalt für Landwirtschaft und Ernährung (BLE), Bonn, Germany
| | - Christine Graf
- Mitglied im wissenschaftlichen Beirat des Netzwerks Gesund ins Leben, Bonn, Germany
- Deutsche Sporthochschule Köln, Köln, Germany
| | - Hans Hauner
- Lehrstuhl für Ernährungsmedizin, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, München, Germany
| | - Claudia Hellmers
- Mitglied im wissenschaftlichen Beirat des Netzwerks Gesund ins Leben, Bonn, Germany
- Hochschule Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany
- Deutsche Gesellschaft für Hebammenwissenschaft e. V. (DGHWi), Münster, Germany
| | - Mathilde Kersting
- Mitglied im wissenschaftlichen Beirat des Netzwerks Gesund ins Leben, Bonn, Germany
- Forschungsdepartment Kinderernährung, Klinik für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, Universitätsklinikum der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Michael Krawinkel
- Mitglied im wissenschaftlichen Beirat des Netzwerks Gesund ins Leben, Bonn, Germany
- Institut für Ernährungswissenschaft, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, Gießen, Germany
- Deutsche Gesellschaft für Ernährung e. V. (DGE), Bonn, Germany
| | - Hildegard Przyrembel
- Mitglied im wissenschaftlichen Beirat des Netzwerks Gesund ins Leben, Bonn, Germany
| | - Marianne Röbl-Mathieu
- Mitglied der Ständigen Impfkommission am Robert Koch-Institut (STIKO), Berlin, Germany
| | - Ulrich Schiffner
- Poliklinik für Zahnerhaltung und Präventive Zahnheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kinderzahnheilkunde e. V. (DGKiZ), Würzburg, Germany
| | - Klaus Vetter
- Mitglied im wissenschaftlichen Beirat des Netzwerks Gesund ins Leben, Bonn, Germany
- Nationale Stillkommission, Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung (BfR), Berlin, Germany
| | - Anke Weißenborn
- Mitglied im wissenschaftlichen Beirat des Netzwerks Gesund ins Leben, Bonn, Germany
- Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung (BfR), Berlin, Germany
| | - Achim Wöckel
- Mitglied im wissenschaftlichen Beirat des Netzwerks Gesund ins Leben, Bonn, Germany
- Frauenklinik und Poliklinik Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Affiliation(s)
- Bonnie Y Kim
- 1 University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Jai J Patel
- 1 University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Russell W Steele
- 1 University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,2 Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Krishnaswamy S, Wallace EM, Buttery J, Giles ML. A study comparing the practice of Australian maternity care providers in relation to maternal immunisation. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2018; 59:408-415. [PMID: 30191552 DOI: 10.1111/ajo.12888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2018] [Accepted: 07/30/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women's decisions regarding vaccination during pregnancy are heavily influenced by maternity care provider (MCP) recommendations. Understanding why MCPs may not recommend vaccination is central to improving vaccination rates. AIMS To examine the knowledge, attitudes and practice of Australian MCPs to maternal vaccination. METHODS We surveyed obstetricians, midwives and general practitioners (GPs) between September and November 2016. Providers were asked about their knowledge and current practice, and about their perceived roles in discussing and administering maternal vaccinations. RESULTS Eight hundred and seventy surveys were completed. Each MCP group believed they had the primary responsibility for discussing vaccinations but all groups perceived GPs as primarily responsible for administering vaccines. More midwives had concerns about safety (21/129, 16%) than obstetricians (9/359, 3%) and GPs (7/326, 2%) (P < 0.001). Overall, 83% of MCPs recommended diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis vaccination (dTpa) and 78% inactivated influenza vaccination (IIV) according to guidelines, with no differences between groups. Overall 77% provided dTpa onsite (GPs 99%, midwives 70%, obstetricians 60%, P < 0.001) and 71% provided IIV (GPs 99%, midwives 48%, obstetricians 54%, P < 0.001). Factors associated with recommending vaccination in accordance with guidelines and providing vaccination onsite were similar across groups: personal history of vaccination, confidence in vaccine knowledge, and awareness of recommendations for and belief in the safety of maternal dTpa. CONCLUSIONS Among MCPs, the rates of recommending and providing maternal vaccination were higher than previously reported. Further improvements might be expected with increased awareness of guidelines, further education around vaccine safety, and by changing perceptions of the role of obstetricians and midwives in providing maternal vaccinations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sushena Krishnaswamy
- The Ritchie Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Infectious Diseases, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Euan M Wallace
- The Ritchie Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.,Safer Care Victoria, Victorian Department of Health and Human Services, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jim Buttery
- The Ritchie Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.,Infection and Immunity, Monash Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.,Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Michelle L Giles
- The Ritchie Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Infectious Diseases, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Madhi SA, Nunes MC. Experience and challenges on influenza and pertussis vaccination in pregnant women. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2018; 14:2183-2188. [PMID: 30024822 PMCID: PMC6183140 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2018.1483810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Young infants contribute to relatively high burden of vaccine-preventable diseases, including infections by influenza virus and Bordetella pertussis. Vaccination of pregnant women can enhance transplacental transfer of protective antibody to the fetus and protect the infant against disease during the first few months of life. Pregnant women are a priority group for seasonal influenza vaccination, due to third-trimester pregnancy being a risk-factor for severe influenza illness. Furthermore, randomized controlled trials confirmed that influenza vaccination during pregnancy confers protection against influenza-confirmed illness in the women, and their infants up to 3 months of age; and is also associated with 20% reduction in all-cause pneumonia among young-infants. Maternal influenza vaccination might also reduce the risk of low-birth weight, preterm births, and stillbirths however, data on this is conflicting. Vaccination of pregnant women with acellular pertussis vaccines reduces pertussis in their young infants by up to 93%. The increase in specific pertussis antibody among the infants born to vaccinated women might, however, interfere with the active pertussis vaccination of the infant following the primary series of vaccines. The clinical implication of this is yet to be ascertained, particularly since immune responses following the booster vaccine are unaffected. Vaccination of pregnant women with inactivated influenza vaccine and acellular pertussis vaccine have been demonstrated to confer protection to their young infants, and warrants consideration for inclusion into public health immunization programs, including in low and middle income countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shabir A Madhi
- a Department of Science and Technology/National Research Foundation: Vaccine Preventable Diseases, Faculty Health Sciences , University of the Witwatersrand , Johannesburg , South Africa.,b Medical Research Council: Respiratory and Meningeal Pathogens Research Unit, Faculty Health Sciences , University of the Witwatersrand , Johannesburg , South Africa
| | - Marta C Nunes
- a Department of Science and Technology/National Research Foundation: Vaccine Preventable Diseases, Faculty Health Sciences , University of the Witwatersrand , Johannesburg , South Africa.,b Medical Research Council: Respiratory and Meningeal Pathogens Research Unit, Faculty Health Sciences , University of the Witwatersrand , Johannesburg , South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Abstract
Several infections have unique consequences or considerations in pregnancy. Some common infections such as urinary tract infections, influenza, sexually transmitted diseases, and vaginitis affect pregnant women differently than the general population, can cause pregnancy complications, and require treatments that are safe in pregnancy. Infections such as hepatitis B and C and human immunodeficiency virus can be transmitted vertically and therefore management focuses on decreasing perinatal transmission. Certain infections can be transmitted in utero and cause congenital infections. Classically, these were grouped together as the TORCH infections, although now several others, including varicella virus, parvovirus, and Zika virus, have also been recognized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Connie Leeper
- Department of Family, Internal, and Rural Medicine, University of Alabama, 850 Peter Bryce Boulevard, Tuscaloosa, AL 35401, USA.
| | - Andrew Lutzkanin
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA 17033, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Nunes MC, Madhi SA. Prevention of influenza-related illness in young infants by maternal vaccination during pregnancy. F1000Res 2018; 7:122. [PMID: 29445450 PMCID: PMC5791002 DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.12473.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The influenza virus circulates yearly and causes global epidemics. Influenza infection affects all age groups and causes mild to severe illness, and young infants are at particular risk for serious disease. The most effective measure to prevent influenza disease is vaccination; however, no vaccine is licensed for use in infants younger than 6 months old. Thus, there is a crucial need for other preventive strategies in this high-risk age group. Influenza vaccination during pregnancy protects both the mothers and the young infants against influenza infection. Vaccination during pregnancy boosts the maternal antibodies and increases the transfer of immunoglobulin G from the mother to the fetus through the placenta, which confers protection against infection in infants too young to be vaccinated. Data from clinical trials and observational studies did not demonstrate adverse effects to the mother, the fetus, or the infant after maternal influenza vaccination. We present the current data on the effectiveness and safety of influenza vaccination during pregnancy in preventing disease in the young infant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta C Nunes
- Medical Research Council, Respiratory and Meningeal Pathogens Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.,Department of Science and Technology/National Research Foundation, Vaccine Preventable Diseases, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Shabir A Madhi
- Medical Research Council, Respiratory and Meningeal Pathogens Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.,Department of Science and Technology/National Research Foundation, Vaccine Preventable Diseases, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Nunes MC, Madhi SA. Influenza vaccination during pregnancy for prevention of influenza confirmed illness in the infants: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2017; 14:758-766. [PMID: 28708952 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2017.1345385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Infants younger than 6 months of age are at particular risk for serious illness from influenza infection. Currently available influenza vaccines are, however, not licensed for use in infants <6 months old. Influenza vaccination during pregnancy elicits robust antibody responses in the women that will protect the infants against influenza infection during the first few months of life. We aimed to determine the impact of influenza vaccination during pregnancy to prevent laboratory-confirmed influenza infection and influenza-associated hospitalisations in infants <6 months old. An electronic search identified all studies assessing the proposed outcomes in infants after administration of influenza vaccine during pregnancy. Two meta-analyses were performed accordingly to studies restricting the evaluation to influenza-associated hospitalisations or not. Four randomized control trials and 3 observational studies reported on the prevention of laboratory-confirmed influenza infection in infants <6 months old. Maternal influenza vaccination was associated with a 48% [95% confidence interval (CI): 33 to 59] reduced risk of infants having laboratory-confirmed influenza infection. Four observational studies reported on the prevention of hospitalizations associated with laboratory-confirmed influenza infection and the pool estimate was 72% (95%CI: 39% to 87%). Receipt of influenza vaccine during pregnancy was associated with decreased risk of laboratory-confirmed influenza infection in the infants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta C Nunes
- a Medical Research Council: Respiratory and Meningeal Pathogens Research Unit , University of the Witwatersrand , Johannesburg , South Africa.,b Department of Science and Technology/National Research Foundation: Vaccine Preventable Diseases , University of the Witwatersrand , Johannesburg , South Africa
| | - Shabir A Madhi
- a Medical Research Council: Respiratory and Meningeal Pathogens Research Unit , University of the Witwatersrand , Johannesburg , South Africa.,b Department of Science and Technology/National Research Foundation: Vaccine Preventable Diseases , University of the Witwatersrand , Johannesburg , South Africa.,c National Institute for Communicable Diseases: A Division of National Health Laboratory Service , Centre for Vaccines and Immunology , Johannesburg , South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Focusing on the implementation of 21st century vaccines for adults. Vaccine 2017; 36:5358-5365. [PMID: 28807604 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.07.100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2017] [Revised: 07/21/2017] [Accepted: 07/26/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Adult immunization is a priority for public health, particularly in countries where an aging population has become increasingly more numerous. Protection against diseases which typically affect adults (like flu, pneumococcal diseases and Herpes zoster), the shift of age of infections which originally affected children (like measles), the decreasing protection with time for infections which need periodical booster doses of vaccines (Tdap), the availability of vaccines which can also impact on adult health (HPV) are only some examples of the importance of implementing targeted vaccination strategies. The possibility to reach high coverage with immunizations that can guarantee a fundamental improvement of health for adults and the elderly can only be achieved through a coordinated effort where all stakeholders, under the coordination of public health, contribute to issue recommendations; create a functioning database for vaccine coverage registration; promote formative courses for healthcare workers and continuous information for the public; increase vaccines uptake among healthcare workers, who need to give the first testimony on the relevance of immunization.
Collapse
|