Modification of an Established Pediatric Asthma Pathway Improves Evidence-Based, Efficient Care

Simultaneously implementing pathways for improving asthma, pneumonia, and bronchiolitis care for hospitalized children: Protocol for a hybrid effectiveness-implementation, cluster-randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Asthma, pneumonia, and bronchiolitis are the top causes of childhood hospitalization in the United States, leading to over 350,000 hospitalizations and ≈$2 billion in costs annually. The majority of these hospitalizations occur in general/community hospitals. Poor guideline adoption by clinicians contributes to poor health outcomes for children hospitalized with these illnesses, including longer recovery time/hospital stay, higher rates of intensive care unit transfer, and increased risk of hospital readmission. A prior single-center study at a children's hospital tested a multicondition clinical pathway intervention (simultaneous implementation of multiple pathways for multiple pediatric conditions) and demonstrated improved clinician guideline adherence and patient health outcomes. This intervention has not yet been studied in community hospitals, which face unique implementation barriers.

OBJECTIVE

To study the implementation and effectiveness of a multicondition pathway intervention for children hospitalized with asthma, pneumonia, or bronchiolitis in community hospitals.

METHODS

We will conduct a pragmatic, hybrid effectiveness-implementation, cluster-randomized trial in community hospitals around the United States (1:1 randomization to intervention vs. wait-list control). Our primary outcome will be the adoption of two to three evidence-based practices for each condition over a sustained period of 2 years. Secondary outcomes include hospital length of stay, ICU transfer, and readmission.

DISCUSSION

This hybrid trial will lead to a comprehensive understanding of how to pragmatically and sustainably implement a multicondition pathway intervention in community hospitals and an assessment of its effects. Enrollment began in July 2022 and is projected to be completed in September 2024. Primary analysis completion is anticipated in March 2025, with reporting of results following.

Decreasing ICU and Hospital Length of Stay through a Standardized Respiratory Therapist-driven Electronic Clinical Care Pathway for Status Asthmaticus

Introduction

Status asthmaticus (SA) is a cause of many pediatric hospitalizations. This study sought to evaluate how a standardized asthma care pathway (ACP) in the electronic medical record impacted the length of stay (LOS).

Methods

An interdisciplinary team internally validated a standardized respiratory score for patients admitted with SA to a 25-bed pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) at a tertiary children's hospital. The respiratory score determined weaning schedules for albuterol and steroid therapies. In addition, pharmacy and information technology staff developed an electronic ACP within our electronic medical record system using best practice alerts. These best practice alerts informed staff to initiate the pathway, wean/escalate treatment, transition to oral steroids, transfer level of care, and complete discharge education. The PICU, stepdown ICU (SD ICU), and acute care units implemented the clinical pathway. Pre- and postintervention metrics were assessed using process control charts and compared using Welch's t tests with a significance level of 0.05.

Results

Nine hundred two consecutive patients were analyzed (598 preintervention, 304 postintervention). Order set utilization significantly increased from 68% to 97% (P < 0.001), PICU LOS decreased from 38.4 to 31.1 hours (P = 0.013), and stepdown ICU LOS decreased from 25.7 to 20.9 hours (P = 0.01). Hospital LOS decreased from 59.5 to 50.7 hours (P = 0.003), with cost savings of $1,215,088 for the patient cohort.

Conclusions

Implementing a standardized respiratory therapist-driven ACP for children with SA led to significantly increased order set utilization and decreased ICU and hospital LOS. Leveraging information technology and standardized pathways may improve care quality, outcomes, and costs for other common diagnoses.

Barriers and Facilitators of High-Efficiency Clinical Pathway Implementation in Community Hospitals

BACKGROUND

An intervention that involved simultaneously implementing clinical pathways for multiple conditions was tested at a tertiary children's hospital and it improved care quality. We are conducting a randomized trial to evaluate this multicondition pathway intervention in community hospitals. Our objectives in this qualitative study were to prospectively (1) identify implementation barriers and (2) map barriers to facilitators using an established implementation science framework.

METHODS

We recruited participants via site leaders from hospitals enrolled in the trial. We designed an interview guide using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and conducted individual interviews. Analysis was done using constant comparative methods. Anticipated barriers were mapped to facilitators using the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behavior Framework.

RESULTS

Participants from 12 hospitals across the United States were interviewed (n = 21). Major themes regarding the multicondition pathway intervention included clinician perceptions, potential benefits, anticipated barriers/challenges, potential facilitators, and necessary resources. We mapped barriers to additional facilitators using the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behavior framework. To address limited time/bandwidth of clinicians, we will provide Maintenance of Certification credits. To address new staff and trainee turnover, we will provide easily accessible educational videos/resources. To address difficulties in changing practice across other hospital units, we will encourage emergency department engagement. To address parental concerns with deimplementation, we will provide guidance on parent counseling.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified several potential barriers and facilitators for implementation of a multicondition clinical pathway intervention in community hospitals. We also illustrate a prospective process for identifying implementation facilitators.

Inpatient albuterol spacing as an indicator of discharge readiness

INTRODUCTION

In children admitted for asthma exacerbation, multiple evidence-based, clinical practice guidelines exist to identify readiness for discharge. At many institutions, weaning of albuterol is part of the discharge process, though presently there is limited evidence to guide best practice. We sought to determine how many children required escalation of care once placed on every 4-h dosing of albuterol.

METHODS

We performed a consecutive case series of pediatric patients between 5 and 18 years of age admitted to a single tertiary care center's pediatric hospitalist service between April 2015 and April 2018 with a discharge diagnosis of asthma. Patients admitted to the intensive care unit (PICU) or a subspecialty service were excluded, as has been done previously. Time between albuterol administrations was tracked. "Treatment escalation" was defined as when a patient required more frequent albuterol more dosing after previously tolerating albuterol doses separated by more than 3.5 h.

RESULTS

A total of 331 patients met inclusion criteria; 136 were female (41.1%), and the average age was 8.8 years. Twenty-six of the 331 patients (7.8%) required escalation of albuterol therapy. Eleven patients returned to the emergency department (ED) following discharge, 2 of which had experienced treatment escalation while admitted.

CONCLUSIONS

Our case series showed that most patients were safe to discharge after spacing albuterol treatments to 4 h, with few returns to the ED and readmissions. Albuterol spacing to every 4 h once appears to be a reasonable discharge criterion, but future studies are needed to determine if this is a safe and efficient.

Drivers of Variation in Diagnosis and Management of Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A Survey of Pediatric Gastroenterologists

BACKGROUND

Widespread variation in the diagnosis and treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) has previously been reported among adult gastroenterologists; however, variation in EoE practice in among pediatric populations is poorly characterized. The study objectives were to describe guideline adherence and understand reasons for variation in EoE practice among pediatric gastroenterologists following publication of the updated 2018 international EoE guidelines.

METHODS

We developed and administered a 28-item survey to pediatric gastroenterologists via an email listserv using the PEDGI Bulletin Board from 03/2019 to 04/2019. The survey was developed using evidence-based review, expert validation, and cognitive interviews. Survey domains included respondent knowledge of and adherence to published guidelines, diagnostic and management approach and rationale, and participant demographics. Analysis included descriptive statistics and tests for association.

RESULTS

A total of 288 pediatric gastroenterologists completed the survey, most of whom practiced in an academic center (73%). More than half (63%) reported knowledge of the 2018 updated guidelines; however, only 52% agreed with them and 50% reported adherence. Respondents who reported not agreeing with updated guidelines cited concerns regarding increasing number of endoscopies (72%), misdiagnosing eosinophilia from reflux (56%), and insufficient data (23%). The most common drivers of decision making with respect to therapy choice were patient/family preference, evidence/guidelines, and symptom burden.

CONCLUSIONS

Many physicians are not adherent to current guidelines for reasons which include lack of knowledge of updated guidelines and concern regarding the strength of the supporting evidence. This study elucidates several areas to enhance education regarding these guidelines to promote widespread adherence.

Pediatric Asthma Exacerbation in Children with Suspected and Confirmed Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): An Observational Study from Saudi Arabia

Background

Most asthma exacerbations are caused by viral respiratory infections such as rhinovirus, coronaviruses, influenza viruses, and many others. While there have been data about the impact of COVID-19 on adult asthma, much remains unknown about the impact of COVID-19 on childhood asthma.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included all pediatric patients aged 2 to 12 years who were admitted to Abha Maternity and Children Hospital for acute asthma exacerbation between June 1, 2020, and May 31, 2021, and underwent testing for SARS-CoV-2 using nasopharyngeal real-time polymerase chain reaction.

Results

Sixty children hospitalized with the diagnosis of asthma were included in the study. Out of these patients, 10 (16.7%) were diagnosed with COVID-19. The enrolled patients were between 2 and 12 years, with a median age of five years (interquartile range, 3.8), and 58% were males (35/60). Cough, shortness of breath, and hypoxia were the most common presenting symptoms and signs. Severe asthma was more prevalent among positive COVID-19 compared with negative COVID-19 patients (60 vs 20%; P= 0.016). In addition, chronic asthma for more than five years was more prevalent among positive COVID-19 than negative COVID-19 patients (60 vs 40%, P= 0.305). Fifty-five percent of the enrolled patients had eosinophilic asthma using a 300cells/μL threshold. None of the children required invasive respiratory support (ventilation through an endotracheal tube or tracheostomy), but 12 patients (21.7%) required respiratory support via high-flow nasal cannula. The total days of hospitalization in either PICU or pediatric general ward did not differ between the two groups. All patients were discharged, and there were no reports of serious morbidity or mortality.

Conclusion

Eosinophilic asthma was the most prevalent asthma phenotype in the study group. Furthermore, there was no difference in the presenting symptoms of an asthma flare-up, laboratory indicators, and hospitalization outcomes (critical care admission and hospital stay) between asthmatics with and without a COVID-19 diagnosis.

Paediatrics: how to manage acute asthma exacerbations

Background

Asthma is the most common chronic disease of childhood and a major source of childhood health burden worldwide. These burdens are particularly marked when children experience characteristic ‘symptom flare-ups’ or acute asthma exacerbations (AAEs). AAE are associated with significant health and economic impacts, including acute Emergency Department visits, occasional hospitalizations, and rarely, death. To treat children with AAE, several medications have been studied and used.

Methods

We conducted a narrative review of the literature with the primary objective of understanding the evidence of their efficacy. We present this efficacy evidence in the context of a general stepwise management pathway for paediatric AAEs. This framework is developed from the combined recommendations of eight established (inter)national paediatric guidelines.

Discussion

Management of paediatric AAE centres around four major care goals: (1) immediate and objective assessment of AAE severity; (2) prompt and effective medical interventions to decrease respiratory distress and improve oxygenation; (3) appropriate disposition of patient; and (4) safe discharge plans. Several medications are currently recommended with varying efficacies, including heliox, systemic corticosteroids, first-line bronchodilators (salbutamol/albuterol), adjunctive bronchodilators (ipratropium bromide, magnesium sulfate) and second-line bronchodilators (aminophylline, i.v. salbutamol, i.v. terbutaline, epinephrine, ketamine). Care of children with AAE is further enhanced using clinical severity scoring, pathway-driven care and after-event discharge planning.

Conclusions

AAEs in children are primarily managed by medications supported by a growing body of literature. Continued efforts to study the efficacy of second-line bronchodilators, integrate AAE management with long-term asthma control and provide fair/equitable care are required.

Utilization and effects of mobile electronic clinical decision support on pediatric asthma care quality in the emergency department and inpatient setting

OBJECTIVE

To determine utilization and impacts of a mobile electronic clinical decision support (mECDS) on pediatric asthma care quality in emergency department and inpatient settings.

METHODS

We conducted an observational study of a mECDS tool that was deployed as part of a multi-dimensional, national quality improvement (QI) project focused on pediatric asthma. We quantified mECDS utilization using cumulative screen views over the study period in the city in which each participating site was located. We determined associations between mECDS utilization and pediatric asthma quality metrics using mixed-effect logistic regression models (adjusted for time, site characteristics, site-level QI project engagement, and patient characteristics).

RESULTS

The tool was offered to clinicians at 75 sites and used on 286 devices; cumulative screen views were 4191. Children's hospitals and sites with greater QI project engagement had higher cumulative mECDS utilization. Cumulative mECDS utilization was associated with significantly reduced odds of hospital admission (OR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.92-0.98) and higher odds of caregiver referral to smoking cessation resources (OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.01-1.16).

DISCUSSION

We linked mECDS utilization to clinical outcomes using a national sample and controlling for important confounders (secular trends, patient case mix, and concomitant QI efforts). We found mECDS utilization was associated with improvements in multiple measures of pediatric asthma care quality.

CONCLUSION

mECDS has the potential to overcome barriers to dissemination and improve care on a broad scale. Important areas of future work include improving mECDS uptake/utilization, linking clinicians' mECDS usage to clinical practice, and studying mECDS's impacts on other common pediatric conditions.

Implementation strategies in emergency management of children: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Implementation strategies are vital for the uptake of evidence to improve health, healthcare delivery, and decision-making. Medical or mental emergencies may be life-threatening, especially in children, due to their unique physiological needs when presenting in the emergency departments (EDs). Thus, practice change in EDs attending to children requires evidence-informed considerations regarding the best approaches to implementing research evidence. We aimed to identify and map the characteristics of implementation strategies used in the emergency management of children.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review using Arksey and O'Malley's framework. We searched four databases [Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Cochrane Central (Wiley) and CINAHL (Ebsco)] from inception to May 2019, for implementation studies in children (≤21 years) in emergency settings. Two pairs of reviewers independently selected studies for inclusion and extracted the data. We performed a descriptive analysis of the included studies.

RESULTS

We included 87 studies from a total of 9,607 retrieved citations. Most of the studies were before and after study design (n = 68, 61%) conducted in North America (n = 63, 70%); less than one-tenth of the included studies (n = 7, 8%) were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). About one-third of the included studies used a single strategy to improve the uptake of research evidence. Dissemination strategies were more commonly utilized (n = 77, 89%) compared to other implementation strategies; process (n = 47, 54%), integration (n = 49, 56%), and capacity building and scale-up strategies (n = 13, 15%). Studies that adopted capacity building and scale-up as part of the strategies were most effective (100%) compared to dissemination (90%), process (88%) and integration (85%).

CONCLUSIONS

Studies on implementation strategies in emergency management of children have mostly been non-randomized studies. This review suggests that 'dissemination' is the most common strategy used, and 'capacity building and scale-up' are the most effective strategies. Higher-quality evidence from randomized-controlled trials is needed to accurately assess the effectiveness of implementation strategies in emergency management of children.

Obesity and Corticosteroid Dosing Guideline Adherence in Children Hospitalized With Asthma

OBJECTIVES

Drug dosing recommendations for children with obesity remain limited. This may lead to variability in medication dosing among children with obesity. Therefore, our objective was to determine differences in the prevalence of guideline-nonadherent systemic corticosteroid orders by weight category in children hospitalized for asthma.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cross-sectional study of children aged 2 to 17 years hospitalized with asthma and prescribed systemic corticosteroids between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2017, using the Cerner Health Facts deidentified database. Weight categories ranging from underweight to class III obesity were defined on the basis of BMI percentiles by using CDC guidelines. Corticosteroid orders were categorized as guideline adherent or nonadherent on the basis of total body weight-based dosing guidelines from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. χ² test and multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine differences in guideline adherence between weight categories.

RESULTS

We identified 21 488 children prescribed systemic corticosteroids during asthma hospitalizations. Most (54.2%) had a healthy weight, and 23.8% had obesity. Almost one-quarter received guideline-nonadherent orders (22.2%), with increasing prevalence among higher weight categories (19.4% of healthy weight children versus 36.0% of those with class III obesity; P < .001). After controlling for demographic and clinical covariates, weight category remained significantly associated with receiving a guideline-nonadherent order (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of guideline-nonadherent corticosteroid orders for children hospitalized with asthma increases linearly with weight category, disproportionately affecting children with severe obesity. Standardization of drug dosing guidelines for children with obesity may help reduce variability in drug doses prescribed that may increase risk of harm.

Review of methods and study designs of evaluations related to clinical pathways

Objective The HealthPathways program is an online information portal that helps clinicians provide consistent and integrated patient care within a local health system through localised pathways for diagnosis, treatment and management of various health conditions. These pathways are consistent with the definition of clinical pathways. Evaluations of HealthPathways programs have thus far focused primarily on website utilisation and clinical users' experience and satisfaction, with limited evidence on changes to patient outcomes. This lack motivated a literature review of the effects of clinical pathways on patient and economic outcomes to inform a subsequent HealthPathways evaluation. Methods A systematic review was performed to summarise the analytical methods, study designs and results of studies evaluating clinical pathways with an economic outcome component published between 1 January 2000 and 31 August 2017 in four academic literature databases. Results Fifty-five relevant articles were identified for inclusion in this review. The practical pre-post study design with retrospective baseline data extraction and prospective intervention data collection was most commonly used in the evaluations identified. Straightforward statistical methods for comparing outcomes, such as the t-test or χ2 test, were frequently used. Only four of the 55 articles performed a cost-effectiveness analysis. Clinical pathways were generally associated with improved patient outcomes and positive economic outcomes in hospital settings. Conclusions Clinical pathways evaluations commonly use pragmatic study designs, straightforward statistical tests and cost-consequence analyses. More HealthPathways program evaluations focused on patient and economic outcomes, clinical pathway evaluations in a primary care setting and cost-effectiveness analyses of clinical pathways are needed. What is known about the topic? HealthPathways is a web-based program that originated from Canterbury, New Zealand, and has seen uptake elsewhere in New Zealand, Australia and the UK. The HealthPathways program aims to assist the provision of consistent and integrated health services through dedicated, localised pathways for various health conditions specific to the health region. Evaluations of HealthPathways program focused on patient and economic outcomes have been limited. What does this paper add? This review synthesises the academic literature of clinical pathways evaluations in order to inform a subsequent HealthPathways evaluation. The focus of the synthesis was on the analytical methods and study designs used in the previous evaluations. The previous clinical pathway evaluations have been pragmatic in nature with relatively straightforward study designs and analysis. What are the implications for practitioners? There is a need for more economic and patient outcome evaluations for HealthPathways programs. More sophisticated statistical analyses and economic evaluations could add value to these evaluations, where appropriate and taking into consideration the data limitations.

Use of interrupted time series methods in the evaluation of health system quality improvement interventions: a methodological systematic review

BACKGROUND

When randomisation is not possible, interrupted time series (ITS) design has increasingly been advocated as a more robust design to evaluating health system quality improvement (QI) interventions given its ability to control for common biases in healthcare QI. However, there is a potential risk of producing misleading results when this rather robust design is not used appropriately. We performed a methodological systematic review of the literature to investigate the extent to which the use of ITS has followed best practice standards and recommendations in the evaluation of QI interventions.

METHODS

We searched multiple databases from inception to June 2018 to identify QI intervention studies that were evaluated using ITS. There was no restriction on date, language and participants. Data were synthesised narratively using appropriate descriptive statistics. The risk of bias for ITS studies was assessed using the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care standard criteria. The systematic review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42018094427).

RESULTS

Of 4061 potential studies and 2028 unique records screened for inclusion, 120 eligible studies assessed eight QI strategies and were from 25 countries. Most studies were published since 2010 (86.7%), reported data using monthly interval (71.4%), used ITS without a control (81%) and modelled data using segmented regression (62.5%). Autocorrelation was considered in 55% of studies, seasonality in 20.8% and non-stationarity in 8.3%. Only 49.2% of studies specified the ITS impact model. The risk of bias was high or very high in 72.5% of included studies and did not change significantly over time.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of ITS in the evaluation of health system QI interventions has increased considerably over the past decade. However, variations in methodological considerations and reporting of ITS in QI remain a concern, warranting a need to develop and reinforce formal reporting guidelines to improve its application in the evaluation of health system QI interventions.

Pathways to Improve Pediatric Asthma Care: A Multisite, National Study of Emergency Department Asthma Pathway Implementation

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effects of pediatric asthma pathway implementation in a diverse, national sample of emergency departments (EDs).

STUDY DESIGN

In this quality improvement study, a national sample of EDs were provided pathways to tailor to local needs. Implementation strategies included local champions, external facilitators/mentors, educational seminars, and audit and feedback. Outcomes included systemic corticosteroid administration within 60 minutes (primary), assessment of severity at ED triage, chest radiograph use, hospital admission or transfer for higher level of care, and ED length of stay (balancing). Each month, EDs reviewed all charts (to a maximum of 20) of children ages 2-17 years with a primary diagnosis of asthma. Analyses were done using multilevel regression models with an interrupted time-series approach, adjusting for patient characteristics.

RESULTS

We enrolled 83 EDs (37 in children's hospitals, 46 in community hospitals) and 61 (73%) completed the study (n = 22 963 visits). Pathway implementation was associated with significantly increased odds of systemic corticosteroid administration within 60 minutes of arrival (aOR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.02-1.55), increased odds of severity assessment at triage (aOR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.22-2.90), and decreased rate of change in odds of hospital admission/transfer (aOR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.95-0.99). Pathway implementation was not associated with chest radiograph use or ED length of stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Pathway implementation was associated with improved quality of care for children with asthma in a diverse, national group of EDs.

Impact of a Standardized Clinical Pathway for Suspected and Confirmed Ileocolic Intussusception

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Introduction:

Clinical pathways for specific diagnoses may improve patient outcomes, decrease resource utilization, and diminish costs. This study examines the impact of a clinical pathway for emergency department (ED) care of suspected and confirmed pediatric ileocolic intussusception.

Methods:

Our multidisciplinary team designed an intussusception clinical pathway and implemented it in a tertiary children’s hospital ED in October 2016. Process measures included the proportion of patients who underwent abdominal radiography, had laboratory studies, received antibiotics, or required admission following reduction of intussusception. The primary outcome measure was the cost per encounter. Balancing measures included unplanned ED visits within 72 hours of discharge. Data analyzed compared 24 months before and 21 months following pathway implementation.

Results:

After pathway implementation, the use of abdominal radiography in patients with suspected intussusception decreased from 50% to 12%. In patients with confirmed intussusception, laboratory studies decreased from 58% to 25%, antibiotic use decreased from 100% to 2%, and hospital admissions decreased from 100% to 12%. The average cost per encounter for confirmed intussusception decreased from $6,724 to $2,975. There was a small increase in unplanned returns to the ED within 72 hours but no increase in readmissions after pathway implementation.

Conclusion:

Implementation of a standardized ED pathway for the management of suspected and confirmed pediatric ileocolic intussusception is associated with a reduction in abdominal radiographs, improved antibiotic stewardship, reduction in laboratory studies, fewer inpatient admissions, and decreased cost, with no compromise in patient safety.

Implementing Pediatric Asthma Pathways in Community Hospitals: A National Qualitative Study

BACKGROUND

Pathways can improve the quality of care and outcomes for children with asthma; however, we know little about how to successfully implement pathways across diverse hospital settings. Prior studies of pathways have focused on determining clinical effectiveness and the majority were conducted in children's hospitals. These approaches have left crucial gaps in our understanding of how to successfully implement pathways in community hospitals, where most of the children with asthma are treated nationally.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to identify the key determinants of successful pediatric asthma pathway implementation in community hospitals.

METHODS

We conducted a qualitative study of healthcare providers that served as project leaders in a national collaborative to improve pediatric asthma care. Data were collected by recording semi-structured discussions between project leaders and external facilitators (EF) from December 2017 to April 2018. Using inductive thematic analysis, we identified the themes that describe the key determinants of pathway implementation.

RESULTS

Project leaders (n = 32) from 18 hospitals participated in this study. The key determinants of pathway implementation in community hospitals included (1) building an implementation infrastructure (eg, forming a team of local champions, modifying clinical workflows, delivering education/skills training), (2) engaging and motivating providers (eg, obtaining project buy-in, facilitating multidisciplinary collaboration, handling conflict), (3) addressing organizational and resource limitations (eg, support for electronic medical record integration), and (4) devising implementation solutions with EFs (eg, potential workflow modifications).

CONCLUSIONS

Our identification of the key determinants of pathway implementation may help guide pediatric quality improvement efforts in community hospitals. EFs may play an important role in successfully implementing pathways in community settings.

Feasible Strategies for Sustaining Guideline Adherence: Cross-sectional Analysis of a National Collaborative

Health care providers' adherence to guidelines declines over time, and feasible strategies for sustaining adherence have not yet been identified. We assessed the long-term feasibility of various strategies for sustaining guideline adherence and described factors influencing their use. We conducted a cross-sectional survey (N = 104) of physician leaders who participated in a national collaborative to improve care of infants with suspected sepsis. Data were collected on long-term use of strategies to promote guideline adherence (use, perceived effectiveness, and barriers to use). Sixty (58%) participants from diverse hospital settings responded. There were significant declines in use of quality improvement and educational strategies, largely driven by lack of time or staff resources and competing priorities. Electronic strategies (eg, order sets) and hospital policies or guidelines were feasible to continue long-term after the collaborative ended and were perceived as effective. Clinicians and healthcare leaders should consider prioritizing these strategies in their efforts to improve care and outcomes for children in hospital settings.

Comparison of severity of asthma hospitalization between African American and Hispanic children in the Bronx

Objective: There are racial and ethnic disparities in childhood asthma burden and outcomes. Although there have been comparisons between whites and minorities, there are few between minority groups. This study aimed to compare characteristics of asthma hospitalizations in African American and Hispanic children.Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted to compare asthma characteristics between African American and Hispanic children aged 2-18 years hospitalized at an urban, tertiary care hospital for an acute asthma exacerbation. Length of stay (LOS), need for intensive care unit (ICU), and need for additional medications or respiratory support were compared between the groups.Results: Of the 925 children that met the inclusion criteria, 64% were Hispanic and 36% were African American. The groups were similar in age, gender, insurance status, and weight classification. African American children were more likely to have severe persistent asthma (12% vs. 7%, p = .02). They were also more likely to require magnesium sulfate (45% vs. 32%, p < .001) and admission to the ICU from the emergency department (ED) (14% vs. 8%, p = .01), which were independent of asthma severity. There was no significant difference in LOS or other characteristics of hospitalization.Conclusions: African American children hospitalized for asthma have more severe exacerbations compared to Hispanic children, which is independent of their asthma severity. However, this was not associated with longer LOS, which may indicate greater responsiveness to inpatient asthma management. Further investigation is needed to understand the mechanisms underlying asthma and exacerbation severity among minority groups.

Effectiveness of Pediatric Asthma Pathways for Hospitalized Children: A Multicenter, National Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To determine if clinical pathways affect care and outcomes for children hospitalized with asthma using a multicenter study.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective, multicenter cohort study using an administrative database, the Pediatric Health Information System. We evaluated the impact of inpatient pediatric asthma pathways on children age 2-17 years admitted for asthma from 2006 to 2015 in 42 children's hospitals. Date of pathway implementation for each hospital was collected via survey. Using generalized estimating equations with an interrupted time series approach (to account for secular trends), we determined the association of pathway implementation with length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmission, chest radiograph utilization, ipratropium administration >24 hours, and administration of bronchodilators, systemic steroids, and antibiotics. All analyses were risk-adjusted for patient and hospital characteristics.

RESULTS

Clinical pathway implementation was associated with an 8.8% decrease in LOS (95% CI 6.7%-10.9%), 3.1% decrease in hospital costs (95% CI 1.9%-4.3%), increased odds of bronchodilator administration (OR 1.53[1.21-1.95]) and decreased odds of antibiotic administration (OR 0.93[0.87-0.99]) (n = 189 331). We found no associations between pathway implementation and systemic steroid administration, ipratropium administration for >24 hours, chest radiograph utilization, or 30-day readmission.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical pathways can decrease LOS, costs, and unnecessary antibiotic use without increasing rates of readmissions, leading to higher value care.

A Quality Improvement Intervention to Improve Inpatient Pediatric Asthma Controller Accuracy

OBJECTIVES

Our objective was to investigate if a rigorous quality improvement (QI) intervention could increase accuracy of pediatric asthma controller medications on discharge from an inpatient hospitalization.

METHODS

Our interprofessional QI team developed interventions such as improving documentation and creating standardized language to ensure patients were discharged on an appropriate asthma controller medication and improve assessment of asthma symptom control. Each week of 2015-2016, the first 5 patients discharged with status asthmaticus from the pediatric wards were reviewed for documentation of the 6 asthma control questions and accuracy of the discharge controller therapy. Correct discharge medication was defined as being prescribed the age-appropriate medication and dose on the basis of baseline controller therapy, compliance with baseline medication, and responses to asthma control assessment. The weekly proportion of control questions that were accessed and correct controller medications that were prescribed were analyzed by using Nelson rules and interrupted time series.

RESULTS

A total of 240 preintervention and 252 postintervention charts were reviewed. The primary outcome of the median proportion of patients discharged on appropriate controller therapy improved from 60% in preintervention data to 80% in the postintervention period. The process measure of proportion of asthma control questions that were assessed improved from 43% in the preintervention period to 98% by the final months of the intervention period. Both of these changes were statistically significant as per Nelson's rules and interrupted time series analyses (P = .02 and P < .001, respectively, for postintervention break).

CONCLUSIONS

An interdisciplinary QI team successfully improved the accuracy of asthma controller therapy on discharge and the inpatient assessment of asthma control questions.

Implementation and Improvement of Pediatric Asthma Guideline Improves Hospital-Based Care

BACKGROUND

Standardized pediatric asthma care has been shown to improve measures in specific hospital areas, but to our knowledge, the implementation of an asthma clinical practice guideline (CPG) has not been demonstrated to be associated with improved hospital-wide outcomes. We sought to implement and refine a pediatric asthma CPG to improve outcomes and throughput for the emergency department (ED), inpatient care, and the ICU.

METHODS

An urban, quaternary-care children's hospital developed and implemented an evidence-based, pediatric asthma CPG to standardize care from ED arrival through discharge for all primary diagnosis asthma encounters for patients ≥2 years old without a complex chronic condition. Primary outcomes included ED and inpatient length of stay (LOS), percent ED encounters requiring admission, percent admissions requiring ICU care, and total charges. Balancing measures included the number of asthma discharges between all-cause 30-day readmissions after asthma discharges and asthma relapse within 72 hours. Statistical process control charts were used to monitor and analyze outcomes.

RESULTS

Analyses included 3650 and 3467 encounters 2 years pre- and postimplementation, respectively. Postimplementation, reductions were seen in ED LOS for treat-and-release patients (3.9 hours vs 3.3 hours), hospital LOS (1.5 days vs 1.3 days), ED encounters requiring admission (23.5% vs 18.8%), admissions requiring ICU (23.0% vs 13.2%), and total charges ($4457 vs $3651). Guideline implementation was not associated with changes in balancing measures.

CONCLUSIONS

The hospital-wide standardization of a pediatric asthma CPG across hospital units can safely reduce overall hospital resource intensity by reducing LOS, admissions, ICU services, and charges.

Management of acute asthma exacerbations

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Herein, we review the current guidelines for the management of children with an acute asthma exacerbation. We focus on management in the emergency department, inpatient, and ICU settings.

RECENT FINDINGS

The most recent statistics show that the prevalence of asthma during childhood has decreased in certain demographic subgroups and plateaued in other subgroups. However, acute asthma accounts for significant healthcare expenditures. Although there are few, if any, newer therapeutic agents available for management of acute asthma exacerbations, several reports leveraging quality improvement science have shown significant reductions in costs of care as well as improvements in outcome.

SUMMARY

Asthma is one of the most common chronic conditions in children and the most common reason that children are admitted to the hospital. Nevertheless, the evidence to support specific agents in the management of acute asthma exacerbations is surprisingly limited. The management of acute exacerbations focuses on reversal of bronchospasm, correction of hypoxia, and prevention of relapse and recurrence. Second-tier and third-tier agents are infrequently used outside of the ICU setting. Reducing the variation in treatment is likely to lead to lower costs and better outcomes.

Rising utilization of inpatient pediatric asthma pathways

INTRODUCTION

Clinical pathways are detailed care plans that operationalize evidence-based guidelines into an accessible format for health providers. Their goal is to link evidence to practice to optimize patient outcomes and delivery efficiency. It is unknown to what extent inpatient pediatric asthma pathways are being utilized nationally.

OBJECTIVES

(1) Describe inpatient pediatric asthma pathway design and implementation across a large hospital network. (2) Compare characteristics of hospitals with and without pathways.

METHODS

We conducted a descriptive, cross-sectional, survey study of hospitals in the Pediatric Research in Inpatient Settings Network (75% children's hospitals, 25% community hospitals). Our survey determined if each hospital used a pathway and pathway characteristics (e.g. pathway elements, implementation methods). Hospitals with and without pathways were compared using Chi-square tests (categorical variables) and Student's t-tests (continuous variables).

RESULTS

Surveys were distributed to 3-5 potential participants from each hospital and 302 (74%) participants responded, representing 86% (106/123) of surveyed hospitals. From 2005-2015, the proportion of hospitals utilizing inpatient asthma pathways increased from 27% to 86%. We found variation in pathway elements, implementation strategies, electronic medical record integration, and compliance monitoring across hospitals. Hospitals with pathways had larger inpatient pediatric programs [mean 12.1 versus 6.1 full-time equivalents, p = 0.04] and were more commonly free-standing children's hospitals (52% versus 23%, p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

From 2005-2015, there was a dramatic rise in implementation of inpatient pediatric asthma pathways. We found variation in many aspects of pathway design and implementation. Future studies should determine optimal implementation strategies to better support hospital-level efforts in improving pediatric asthma care and outcomes.