Adverse Events in Hospitalized Pediatric Patients

Inequities in Inpatient Pediatric Patient Safety Events by Category

OBJECTIVES

Few studies have analyzed potential inequities in both pediatric patient safety events (PSEs) and adverse events (AEs) - PSEs leading to harm - nor in PSEs by event type. We sought to examine potential inequities in rates of pediatric PSEs overall, by severity, and by category based on race and ethnicity, insurance payor, and language as measured using voluntary incident reports (IRs).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of pediatric hospitalizations between January 19, 2012 through December 31, 2019 at a US urban, tertiary care children's hospital. Analyzing 85 458 hospitalizations, we compared PSEs overall, by severity, and by event category by race and ethnicity, insurance payor, and language using incident rate ratios (IRRs).

RESULTS

In models controlling for covariates, we found that hospitalizations of Latinx (IRR 1.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-1.29), non-Latinx Black/African American (IRR 1.17, 95% CI 1.01-1.34), publicly insured (IRR 1.10, 95% CI 1.02-1.20), and nonprivately/nonpublicly insured (IRR 1.12, 95% CI 1.02-1.23) children had higher rates of PSEs compared with reference groups, but the association between language and PSEs was not significant. There were similar patterns among AEs, although only the association between hospitalizations of Latinx patients and AEs was significant. Medication, fluid, or blood and lines or tubes PSEs drove many inequities.

CONCLUSIONS

We found inequities in PSEs as recorded by IRs, suggesting differences in care related to race, ethnicity, and payor. Limitations include analysis of a single center, that event categories are unique to the institution analyzed, and the voluntary nature of IRs.

Development and Evaluation of Ontogeny Functions of the Major UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase Enzymes to Underwrite Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling in Pediatric Populations

Uridine 5'-diphospho-glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs) demonstrate variable expression in the pediatric population. Thus, understanding of age-dependent maturation of UGTs is critical for accurate pediatric pharmacokinetics (PK) prediction of drugs that are susceptible for glucuronidation. Ontogeny functions of major UGTs have been previously developed and reported. However, those ontogeny functions are based on in vitro data (i.e., enzyme abundance, in vitro substrate activity, and so on) and therefore, may not translate to in vivo maturation of UGTs in the clinical setting. This report describes meta-analysis of the literature to develop and compare ontogeny functions for 8 primary UGTs (UGT1A1, UGT1A4, UGT1A6, UGT1A9, UGT2B7, UGT2B10, UGT2B15, and UGT2B17) based on published in vitro and in vivo studies. Once integrated with physiologically based pharmacokinetics modeling models, in vivo activity-based ontogeny functions demonstrated somewhat greater prediction accuracy (mean squared error, MSE: 0.05) compared to in vitro activity (MSE: 0.104) and in vitro abundance-based ontogeny functions (MSE: 0.129).

Trust of inpatient physicians among parents of children with medical complexity: a qualitative study

Background

Trust is a foundation of the therapeutic relationship and is associated with important patient outcomes. Building trust between parents of children with medical complexity (CMC) and physicians during inpatient care is complicated by lack of relational continuity, cumulative (sometimes negative) parent experiences and the need to adjust roles and expectations to accommodate parental expertise. This study's objective was to describe how parents of CMC conceptualize trust with physicians within the pediatric inpatient setting and to provide recommendations for building trust in these relationships.

Methods

Interviews with 16 parents of CMC were completed and analyzed using interpretive description methodology.

Results

The research team identified one overarching meta theme regarding factors that influence trust development: situational awareness is needed to inform personalized care of children and families. There were also six major themes: (1) ensuring that the focus is on the child and family, (2) respecting both parent and physician expertise, (3) collaborating effectively, (4) maintaining a flow of communication, (5) acknowledging the impact of personal attributes, and (6) recognizing issues related to the healthcare system.

Discussion

Many elements that facilitated trust development were also components of patient- and family-centered care. Parents in this study approached trust with inpatient physicians as something that needs to be earned and reciprocated. To gain the trust of parents of CMC, inpatient physicians should personalize medical care to address the needs of each child and should explore the perceptions, expertise, and previous experiences of their parents.

Facilitating choice when engaging young people with disabilities: reflections from co-researcher training

BACKGROUND

A collaborative approach is critical in inclusive research and should incorporate taking time to build relationships with co-researchers based on trust and shared understanding. Involvement can often be seen as tokenistic and in order to avoid this, it is important to provide opportunities for people to exercise choice throughout the research process.

MAIN BODY

The current paper outlines learnings from a co-researcher training process for young people with disabilities to identify the ways in which meaningful choice can be facilitated with this group. While conducting training of co-researchers in topics such as research methods, we were continuously led by the group with regards to the directions that the sessions took and promoted problem solving with the group to accommodate the unique needs of all members. The overall aim of a wider project was to develop research capacity in a group of young people with disabilities through co-researcher training and this paper will report on learnings from this work with regards to how we sought to provide opportunities for the co-researchers to exercise choice within research projects. Feedback from the group of young people highlighted the variety of needs and expectations that must be accommodated in such a process and therefore, allowing them to dictate the extent and manner of their engagement is key. Young people with disabilities are a heterogeneous group and therefore, some methodologies and ways of working required adaptation in order to facilitate meaningful choice and engagement for all.

CONCLUSION

Providing meaningful opportunities for demonstrating their choices, in relation to elements of research projects, is a critical component of facilitating a rights-based approach when conducting co-research and requires researchers to cede some level of control over the research process to co-researchers. This can be difficult to achieve in practice and researchers must continuously reflect on their own practice and be willing to change and adapt throughout the process.

What's the CATCH? A Participatory Learning Model for Case Review Rounds to Support a Culture of Safety and Quality Improvement in Pediatric Hospital Medicine

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of a new model, Case Analysis and Translation to Care in Hospital (CATCH), for the review of pediatric inpatient cases when an adverse event or "close call" had occurred.

STUDY DESIGN

The curricular intervention consisted of an introductory podcast/workshop, mentorship of presenters, and monthly CATCH rounds over 16 months. The study was conducted with 22 pediatricians at a single tertiary care center. Intervention assessment occurred using participant surveys at multiple intervals: pre/post the intervention, presenter experience (post), physicians involved and mentors experience (post), and after each CATCH session. Paired t-tests and thematic analysis were used to analyze data. Time required to support the CATCH process was used to assess feasibility.

RESULTS

Our overall experience and data revealed a strong preference for the CATCH model, high levels of engagement and satisfaction with CATCH sessions, and positive presenter as well as physicians-involved and mentor experiences. Participants reported that the CATCH model is feasible, engages physicians, promotes a safe learning environment, facilitates awareness of tools for case analysis, and provides opportunities to create "CATCH of the Day" recommendations to support translation of learning to clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS

The CATCH model has significant potential to strengthen clinical case rounds in pediatric hospital medicine. Future research is needed to assess the effectiveness of the model at additional sites and across medical specialities.

Hospital and Patient Characteristics Associated with Neonatal Blood Stream Infection in Inpatient Care: Insights from the 2019 HCUP KID Database

BACKGROUND

This study explores the associations between pediatric adverse events (PAEs) and both hospital and patient characteristics within the inpatient hospital setting, specifically focusing on Neonatal Blood Stream Infection (NBSI) as defined by pediatric quality indicators (PDIs) from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). This research aims to answer questions regarding the relationship between hospital characteristics and patient demographics with the occurrence of NBSI.

METHODS

This study utilized discharge data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Kids' Inpatient Databases (KID) for the year 2019. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression models were employed to analyze patient-level encounters of NBSIs. The analysis examined various factors including hospital size, location, and teaching status, as well as patient-specific variables such as gender, age, race, service lines, payment sources, and major operating room procedures.

RESULTS

The results indicate that Public and Private not-for-profit hospitals showed significantly lower odds of experiencing NBSIs when compared to Private investor-owned hospitals, as did smaller, rural, and nonteaching hospitals when compared to large hospitals. Additionally, individual factors such as gender, age, race, service lines, payment sources, and types of major operating room procedures were found to have varying levels of significance in relation to NBSI.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides important insights into PAEs within the inpatient hospital setting, particularly focusing on NBSIs within the PDI framework. The findings highlight critical areas for the development of evidence-based interventions and guidelines, which are essential for clinicians and policymakers. Ultimately, this study contributes to the understanding and improvement of pediatric patient safety by emphasizing the necessity for targeted strategies to mitigate the risk of NBSI.

Balancing pediatric device utility and harm: navigating the challenges for safer healthcare

This article discusses the challenges in balancing the utility and harm associated with pediatric medical devices. Takashima et al. explored the prevalence and complications of invasive devices across three Australian pediatric tertiary hospitals and reported a high prevalence of complications, particularly with vascular access devices. We also highlight the need to pay attention to the use of these devices, particularly intravenous catheters, and the importance of a culture of patient safety in healthcare systems. We emphasize the need for a nuanced approach that carefully weighs the benefits against potential risks and encourages collaboration among stakeholders to establish robust regulatory frameworks and prioritize the safety and well-being of pediatric patients. Finally, we conclude by advocating the involvement of parents and families in gathering information about hospital safety incidents and fostering a culture of safety that supports reporting, flexibility, and learning. IMPACT: Reporting adverse events and their consequences is essential in the strategy to prevent them, allowing comparison with national or international standards, and identifying indicators to optimize and harbor the possibility of determining improvement measures that pursue a multifactorial approach and are cost-effective. Our comment advocates limiting the prevalence of medical invasive devices and their consequences by reviewing their epidemiology. Although advancements in medical technology have undoubtedly improved the diagnostic and therapeutic possibilities, the delicate balance between device utility and potential harm necessitates careful consideration.

Standardisation of intravenous infusion therapy for paediatrics: big challenges for the little patients

BACKGROUND

Worldwide organisations advocate standardising the management of intravenous drugs as an essential strategy to increase safety in paediatric healthcare settings. Intravenous administration is a route associated with some potential complications. Many adverse events are related to the use of intravenous medications, and the great variability in their handling and preparation represents an added risk that jeopardises the safety of children.

PURPOSE

To standardise the dilutions of intravenous drugs most commonly administered to Spanish hospitalised paediatric and neonatal patients.

METHODS

The process leading to the standardisation of concentrations was undertaken following a two-round modified Delphi procedure. The consensus included the most common drugs administered by continuous or intermittent intravenous infusion to hospitalised and/or critically ill paediatric patients.

RESULTS

For paediatric patients, the proposal included a total of 102 drugs (45 continuous infusion and 59 intermittent infusion), with 192 concentrations to be standardised. The final consensus included 101 drugs (99%), of which 44 were continuous infusion and 59 intermittent infusion; 160 concentrations were standardised (72.7%). For neonates, the initial proposal included 80 drugs (38 continuous infusion and 43 intermittent infusion), with 189 concentrations to be standardised. The final consensus included 80 drugs (100%), of which 38 were continuous infusion and 43 were intermittent infusion; 120 concentrations were standardised (49.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

This proposal showed that standardisation is a feasible approach that can be reached by other healthcare institutions. It can be used in other centres and contribute in the future to unifying paediatric clinical practice.

Moderate and severe adverse events in pediatrics: characteristics of incidents reported during the COVID-19 pandemic

OBJECTIVE

To verify the characteristics of safety incident reports resulting in moderate and severe harm to pediatric patients in two hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHOD

Cross-sectional study conducted in two hospitals in southern Brazil. The sample consisted of 137 notifications from March 2020 to August 2021. The data were collected through the electronic records of the institutions' notification systems and analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics.

RESULTS

The most prevalent incidents were related to clinical processes or procedures (41.6%), affecting slightly more females (49.6%) and infants (39.4%). The majority of incidents (48.2%) occurred in inpatient units. The event sector (p=0.001) and the shift (p=0.011) showed statistically significant associations in both hospitals.

CONCLUSION

The characteristics of the notifications are similar between the institutions surveyed, with a low number of moderate and severe incidents.

Adverse Events in Pediatric Inpatients: The Japan Adverse Event Study

OBJECTIVES

Adverse events (AEs) represent an important cause of morbidity and mortality for pediatric inpatients; however, reports on their epidemiology in pediatrics, especially outside Western countries, are scarce. We investigated the incidence and nature of AEs in pediatric inpatients in Japan.

METHODS

Trained pediatrician and pediatric nurses reviewed all medical documents of 1126 pediatric inpatients in 2 tertiary care teaching hospitals in Japan, and potential incidents were collected with patients' characteristics. Age was categorized into 6 groups (neonates, infants, preschoolers, school-aged children, teenagers, and over-aged pediatric patients), and medical care when potential incidents occurred was classified into drug, operation, procedure/examinations, nursing, management, and judgment. Physician reviewers independently evaluated all collected incidents into AEs, potential AEs, medical errors, and exclusions and assessed their severity and preventability.

RESULTS

A total of 1126 patients with 12,624 patient-days were enrolled, and 953 AEs, with an incidence of 76 (95% confidence interval, 71-80) per 1000 patient-days, were identified. Preventable AEs accounted for 23% (218/953) of AEs. The incidence of AEs tended to decrease with increasing age. The proportion of AEs that were preventable was highest in neonates (40%), and this proportion decreased as children aged. Both judgment and management-related AEs were considered preventable AEs, and judgment-related AEs were more severe AEs than no-judgment-related AEs; 43% were life-threatening.

CONCLUSIONS

Adverse events were common in Japanese pediatric inpatients, and their preventability and severity varied considerably by age category and medical care. Further investigation is needed to address which strategies might most improve pediatric patient safety.

Disparities in Patient Safety Voluntary Event Reporting: A Scoping Review

Voluntary event reporting (VER) systems underestimate the incidence of safety events and often capture only serious events. A limited amount of data is collected through these systems, and they may be inadequate to characterize disparities in reported safety events. We conducted a scoping review of the literature to summarize the state of the evidence as it relates to differences in safety events and safety event reporting by age, gender, and race. Using a broad-based query, a systematic search for published, peer-reviewed literature that discusses patient safety event reporting and differences by age, gender, race, and socioeconomic status was conducted. Based on modified Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, 283 studies underwent title and abstract review, yielding 56 studies for full text review. After full text review, 23 studies were carefully reviewed individually, grouped thematically, and summarized to highlight the most pertinent findings. The studies reviewed yielded important insights, particularly with regard to race, gender, and the ways events are identified. Patients from minoritized groups may be less likely to have events reported and more likely to suffer serious events. Some studies found differences in rates of reporting safety events for female vs. male providers. The rate of VER is consistently lower than the rate of events identified through identified using automated detection. The current literature describing VER data shows disparities by race, language, age, and gender for patients and providers. Further research and systematic change are needed to specifically study these disparities to guide health care institutions on ways to mitigate bias and deliver more equitable care.

Incidence of Hospital-Acquired Conditions During Pediatric Clinical Research Inpatient Hospitalizations: A Matched Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

In this matched cohort study using data from pediatric hospitals, we compared the incidence of hospital-acquired conditions (HACs) during clinical research hospitalizations to nonresearch hospitalizations.

METHODS

Using Pediatric Health Information System data for inpatient discharges January 2017-June 2022, we matched research hospitalizations (identified by International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, diagnosis code) to nonresearch hospitalizations within hospital on age (±3 y), sex, discharge year (±2), and All Patients Refined Diagnosis Related Groups classification, severity of illness (±1), and risk of mortality (±1). We calculated the incidence (per 1000 discharges) and incidence rate (per 10,000 patient days) of HAC identified by International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, codes and compare research versus nonresearch using logistic and Poisson regression, accounting for matching using generalized estimating equations and adjusting for sociodemographic factors and hospital utilization.

RESULTS

We matched 7000 research hospitalizations to 26,447 nonresearch from 28 hospitals. Median age was 6.0 years (interquartile range, 10.6 y). Median length of stay was 4.0 days (interquartile range, 11.0 days) with longer stays among research hospitalizations ( P < 0.001). Incidence of HAC among research hospitalizations was 13.1 versus 7.2 per 1000 for nonresearch ( P < 0.001) and incidence rate 6.7 versus 4.5 per 10,000 patient days. Adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical factors, research stays had 1.65 times the odds of any HAC (95% confidence interval, 1.27-2.16; P < 0.001) and 1.38 times the incidence rate (95% confidence interval, 1.09-1.75; P = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that pediatric research hospitalizations are more likely to experience HACs compared with nonresearch hospitalizations. These findings have important safety implications for pediatric inpatient clinical research that warrant further study.

Characterization of Pediatric Reports in the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System from 2010-2020: A Cross-Sectional Study

INTRODUCTION

The Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) is a database of adverse event (AE) and medication error reports for drugs and therapeutic biologics. Examining trends of reported individual case safety reports (ICSRs) provides context for evaluating safety concerns.

OBJECTIVE

Characterize pediatric FAERS ICSRs and compare trends (1) to adult reports; (2) within pediatric subgroups.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study examined FAERS ICSRs received between January 1, 2010, through December 31, 2020. Stratified age bands were neonates, infants, younger children, older children, adolescents, and adults. We characterized groups by patient demographic information, suspect products, AEs, and reporter type.

RESULTS

From 2010 to 2020, there were 11,258,995 FAERS ICSRs; 3.1% described pediatric patients. Compared to adults, pediatric ICSRs had higher proportions of all serious outcomes except death. Within pediatric subgroups, neonates had the highest proportions of serious outcomes (96.2%) compared to infants, younger children, older children, and adolescents (79.8%, 67.9%, 59.5%, and 52.7%, respectively). Younger pediatric age groups were more likely to have weight information than older age groups but were less likely to include gender information. The most frequently reported AE was off label use for pediatrics and drug ineffective for adults. Products and AEs reported also differed among pediatric subgroups. Neonates, infants, and adolescents had entirely distinct sets of top five product-event combinations.

CONCLUSION

Pediatric ICSRs represent a minority of FAERS reports but have distinctly different attributes relative to adult ICSRs. Reporting trends also vary within pediatric subgroups, which highlights the need for unique considerations for pediatric safety surveillance.

Association between Electronic Health Record Implementations and Hospital-Acquired Conditions in Pediatric Hospitals

BACKGROUND

Implementing an electronic health record (EHR) is one of the most disruptive operational tasks a health system can undergo. Despite anecdotal reports of adverse events around the time of EHR implementations, there is limited corroborating research, particularly in pediatrics. We utilized data from Solutions for Patient Safety (SPS), a network of 145+ children's hospitals that share data and protocols to reduce harm in pediatric care delivery, to study the impact of EHR implementations on patient safety.

OBJECTIVE

Determine if there is an association between the time immediately surrounding an EHR implementation and hospital-acquired conditions (HACs) rates in pediatrics.

METHODS

A survey of information technology leaders at pediatric institutions identified EHR implementations occurring between 2012 and 2022. This list was cross-referenced with the SPS database to create an anonymized dataset of 27 sites comprising monthly HAC and care bundle compliance rates in the 7 months preceding and succeeding the transition. Six HACs were analyzed: central-line associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI), catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI), adverse drug events, surgical site infections (SSIs), pressure injuries (PIs), and falls, in addition to four associated care bundle compliance rates: CLABSI and CAUTI maintenance bundles, SSI bundle, and PI bundle. To determine if there was a statistically significant association with EHR implementation, the observation period was divided into three eras: "before" (months -7 to -3), "during" (months -2 to +2), and "after" go-live (months +3 to +7). Average monthly HAC and bundle compliance rates were calculated across eras. Paired t-tests were performed to compare rates between the eras.

RESULTS

No statistically significant increase in HAC rates or decrease in bundle compliance rates was observed across the EHR implementation eras.

CONCLUSION

This multisite study detected no significant increase in HACs and no decrease in preventive care bundle compliance in the months surrounding an EHR implementation.

Medication Rounds: A Tool to Promote Medication Safety for Children with Medical Complexity

Children with medical complexity (CMC) often have lengthy medication lists and are at risk of experiencing suboptimal medication management. This tool tutorial describes a novel and pragmatic strategy for the development and implementation of medication rounds, a model that promotes medication safety for hospitalized CMC. An interprofessional group designed and implemented a pharmacy-led medication rounding care model, in which clinicians and pharmacists partner weekly to conduct reviews of all patient medications on a general pediatrics CMC team using a comprehensive checklist. This approach fosters medication safety for hospitalized CMC and could be adapted to other complex inpatient populations.

A Focused Review of Long-Stay Patients and the Ethical Imperative to Provide Inpatient Continuity

Long-stay patients are an impactful, vulnerable, growing group of inpatients in today's (and tomorrow's) tertiary hospitals. They can outlast dozens of clinicians that necessarily rotate on and off clinical service. Yet, care from such rotating clinicians can result in fragmented care due to a lack of continuity that insufficiently meets the needs of these patients and their families. Using long-stay PICU patients as an example, this focused review discusses the impact of prolonged admissions and how our fragmented care can compound this impact. It also argues that it is an ethical imperative to provide a level of continuity of care beyond what is considered standard of care and offers a number of strategies that can provide such continuity.

Incidence and characteristics of adverse events in paediatric inpatient care: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Adverse events (AEs) cause suffering for hospitalised children, a fragile patient group where the delivery of adequate timely care is of great importance.

OBJECTIVE

To report the incidence and characteristics of AEs, in paediatric inpatient care, as detected with the Global Trigger Tool (GTT), the Trigger Tool (TT) or the Harvard Medical Practice Study (HMPS) method.

METHOD

MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and Google Scholar were searched from inception to June 2021, without language restrictions. Studies using manual record review were included if paediatric data were reported separately. We excluded studies reporting: AEs for a specific disease/diagnosis/treatment/procedure, or deceased patients; study protocols with no AE outcomes; conference abstracts, editorials and systematic reviews; clinical incident reports as the primary data source; and studies focusing on specific AEs only. Methodological risk of bias was assessed using a tool based on the Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2. Primary outcome was the percentage of admissions with ≥1 AEs. All statistical analyses were stratified by record review methodology (GTT/TT or HMPS) and by type of population. Meta-analyses, applying random-effects models, were carried out. The variability of the pooled estimates was characterised by 95% prediction intervals (PIs).

RESULTS

We included 32 studies from 44 publications, conducted in 15 countries totalling 33 873 paediatric admissions. The total number of AEs identified was 8577. The most common types of AEs were nosocomial infections (range, 6.8%-59.6%) for the general care population and pulmonary-related (10.5%-36.7%) for intensive care. The reported incidence rates were highly heterogeneous. The PIs for the primary outcome were 3.8%-53.8% and 6.9%-91.6% for GTT/TT studies (general and intensive care population). The equivalent PI was 0.3%-33.7% for HMPS studies (general care). The PIs for preventable AEs were 7.4%-96.2% and 4.5%-98.9% for GTT/TT studies (general and intensive care population) and 10.4%-91.8% for HMPS studies (general care). The quality assessment indicated several methodological concerns regarding the included studies.

CONCLUSION

The reported incidence of AEs is highly variable in paediatric inpatient care research, and it is not possible to estimate a reliable single rate. Poor reporting standards and methodological differences hinder the comparison of study results.

A Customized Triggers Program: A Children's Hospital's Experience in Improving Trigger Usability

BACKGROUND

Despite the growth of patient safety programs across the United States, errors and adverse events remain a source of patient harm. Many hospitals rely on retrospective voluntary reporting systems; however, there are opportunities to improve patient safety using novel tools like trigger programs.

METHODS

Children's National Hospital developed a unique pediatric triggers program that offers customized, near real-time reports of potential safety events. Our team defined a measure to quantify clinical utility of triggers, termed "trigger signal," as the percentage of cases that represent true adverse or near-miss events (numerator) per total triggers activated (denominator). Our key driver diagram focused on unifying the program structure, increasing data analytics, promoting organizational awareness, and supporting multidisciplinary end user engagement. Using the model for improvement, we aimed to double overall trigger signal from 8% to 16% and sustain for 12 months.

RESULTS

The trigger signal increased from 8% to 41% and sustained during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. A balancing measure of time to implement a new trigger decreased. Key interventions to increase trigger signal were change in the program structure, increasing stakeholder engagement, and development of self-service reports for end users.

CONCLUSIONS

Children's National Hospital's triggers program highlights successful evolution of an iterative, customized approach to increase clinical utility that hospitals can implement to impact real-time patient care. This triggers program requires an iterative, customized approach rather than a "1-size-fits-all," static paradigm to add a new dimension to current patient safety programs.

National improvements in resident physician-reported patient safety after limiting first-year resident physicians' extended duration work shifts: a pooled analysis of prospective cohort studies

BACKGROUND

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) enacted a policy in 2011 that restricted first-year resident physicians in the USA to work no more than 16 consecutive hours. This was rescinded in 2017.

METHODS

We conducted a nationwide prospective cohort study of resident physicians for 5 academic years (2002-2007) before and for 3 academic years (2014-2017) after implementation of the 16 hours 2011 ACGME work-hour limit. Our analyses compare trends in resident physician-reported medical errors between the two cohorts to evaluate the impact of this policy change.

RESULTS

14 796 residents provided data describing 78 101 months of direct patient care. After adjustment for potential confounders, the work-hour policy was associated with a 32% reduced risk of resident physician-reported significant medical errors (rate ratio (RR) 0.68; 95% CI 0.64 to 0.72), a 34% reduced risk of reported preventable adverse events (RR 0.66; 95% CI 0.59 to 0.74) and a 63% reduced risk of reported medical errors resulting in patient death (RR 0.37; 95% CI 0.28 to 0.49).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings have broad relevance for those who work in and receive care from academic hospitals in the USA. The decision to lift this work hour policy in 2017 may expose patients to preventable harm.

Outcomes of a “hospital at home” programme for the supervised home recovery of COVID-19 patients in Singapore

Background

The Singapore General Hospital COVID-19 Virtual Ward is a “hospital at home” (HaH) programme for the supervised home recovery of higher-acuity COVID-19 patients from the hospital and the community.

Objective

To describe how an existing HaH programme was redesigned so that COVID-19 patients could be remotely monitored at home and report the outcomes of the first 100 patients in this Virtual Ward.

Methods

Patients received an admission package comprising instructions and equipment for home monitoring, and uploaded their parameters into a clinical dashboard via a secure messaging app. Medical staff conducted video or telephone consultations daily. Patients were discharged according to time-based criteria, although some required SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing, which were conducted at home by a third-party medical provider. De-identified data of the first 100 patients were analysed by demographic details, indication for enrolment into the Virtual Ward, and the need for subsequent inpatient readmission.

Results

Of the first 100 patients admitted into the Virtual Ward, 58 were female, mean age was 63.1 years old (23–95 years), and 76 were fully vaccinated. There were 77 hospital referrals and 23 community referrals. The number of days of inpatient hospitalisation avoided was 717 days (average of 7.9 days per patient). Three hospital referrals (3.9%) were readmitted, while seven community referrals (30.4%) required subsequent hospitalisation.

Conclusion

The Virtual Ward programme demonstrates that selected COVID-19 patient can safely recover at home with remote medical support and monitoring, thereby expanding hospital capacity.

Global Assessment of Pediatric Patient Safety Tool for identifying safety incidents in pediatric patients

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the Global Assessment of Pediatric Patient Safety (GAPPS) in order to identify patient safety incidents with patient harm or adverse events (AEs).

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional, retrospective study of 240 records of hospitalized patients of both genders under 18 years of age, systematically and randomly selecting 10 charts of patients that meet the GAPPS criteria every 15 days from the 4,041 records of 2017.

RESULTS

The prevalence of AEs was 12.5%, i.e., detected in 30 out of 240 medical records. In total, 53 AEs and 63 harm were recorded, of which 53 (84.1%) were temporary and 43 AE (68.2%) were definitely or probably preventable. The presence of at least one trigger in a medical chart revealed 13 times greater chance of the occurrence of an AE, with sensitivity index of 48.5%, specificity of 100%, and accuracy of 86.5%.

CONCLUSION

GAPPS was effective in detecting patient safety incidents with harm or AE.

DrugCentral 2023 extends human clinical data and integrates veterinary drugs

DrugCentral monitors new drug approvals and standardizes drug information. The current update contains 285 drugs (131 for human use). New additions include: (i) the integration of veterinary drugs (154 for animal use only), (ii) the addition of 66 documented off-label uses and iii) the identification of adverse drug events from pharmacovigilance data for pediatric and geriatric patients. Additional enhancements include chemical substructure searching using SMILES and 'Target Cards' based on UniProt accession codes. Statistics of interests include the following: (i) 60% of the covered drugs are on-market drugs with expired patent and exclusivity coverage, 17% are off-market, and 23% are on-market drugs with active patents and exclusivity coverage; (ii) 59% of the drugs are oral, 33% are parenteral and 18% topical, at the level of the active ingredients; (iii) only 3% of all drugs are for animal use only; however, 61% of the veterinary drugs are also approved for human use; (iv) dogs, cats and horses are by far the most represented target species for veterinary drugs; (v) the physicochemical property profile of animal drugs is very similar to that of human drugs. Use cases include azaperone, the only sedative approved for swine, and ruxolitinib, a Janus kinase inhibitor.

Reported clinical incidents of children with intellectual disability: A qualitative analysis

AIM

To qualitatively explore reported clinical incidents of children with intellectual disability aged 0 to 18 years.

METHOD

A secondary qualitative evaluation using latent content analysis was used on retrospective hospital incident management reporting data (1st January-31st December 2017) on 1367 admissions for 1018 randomly selected patients admitted to two tertiary children's hospitals in New South Wales, Australia. Sex and age at admission in children with and without intellectual disability: 83 (43.7%) versus 507 (43.1%) females and 107 (56.3%) versus 670 (56.9%) males, p=0.875; median age 3 years (0-18y) versus 4 years (0-18y), p=0.122. Of these, 44 patient safety incident reports for children with intellectual disability (sex, SD, and range) and 167 incident reports for children without intellectual disability (sex, SD, and range) were found and analysed.

RESULTS

Ten themes were synthesized from the data and represented the groups with and without intellectual disability. Children with intellectual disability had a significantly higher proportion of care issues identified by their parents. They also had higher rates of multiple reported clinical incidents per admission compared to children without intellectual disability.

INTERPRETATION

Mechanisms to advocate and raise patient safety issues for children with intellectual disability are needed. Partnerships with parents and training of staff in reporting clinical incidents for this population would enhance the embedding of reasonable adaptations into incident management systems for ongoing monitoring and improvement.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

Children with intellectual disability experienced multiple patient safety incidents per admission compared to children without intellectual disability. Children with intellectual disability had significantly increased rates of parent-identified incidents. Issues with medication, communication, delays in diagnosis and treatment, and identification of deterioration were noted.

How safe are paediatric emergency departments? A national prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Despite the high number of children treated in emergency departments, patient safety risks in this setting are not well quantified. Our objective was to estimate the risk and type of adverse events, as well as their preventability and severity, for children treated in a paediatric emergency department.

METHODS

Our prospective, multicentre cohort study enrolled children presenting for care during one of 168 8-hour study shifts across nine paediatric emergency departments. Our primary outcome was an adverse event within 21 days of enrolment which was related to care provided at the enrolment visit. We identified 'flagged outcomes' (such as hospital visits, worsening symptoms) through structured telephone interviews with patients and families over the 21 days following enrolment. We screened admitted patients' health records with a validated trigger tool. For patients with flags or triggers, three reviewers independently determined whether an adverse event occurred.

RESULTS

We enrolled 6376 children; 6015 (94%) had follow-up data. Enrolled children had a median age of 4.3 years (IQR 1.6-9.8 years). One hundred and seventy-nine children (3.0%, 95% CI 2.6% to 3.5%) had at least one adverse event. There were 187 adverse events in total; 143 (76.5%, 95% CI 68.9% to 82.7%) were deemed preventable. Management (n=98, 52.4%) and diagnostic issues (n=36, 19.3%) were the most common types of adverse events. Seventy-nine (42.2%) events resulted in a return emergency department visit; 24 (12.8%) resulted in hospital admission; and 3 (1.6%) resulted in transfer to a critical care unit.

CONCLUSION

In this large-scale study, 1 in 33 children treated in a paediatric emergency department experienced an adverse event related to the care they received there. The majority of events were preventable; most were related to management and diagnostic issues. Specific patient populations were at higher risk of adverse events. We identify opportunities for improvement in care.

Disparities in Adverse Event Reporting for Hospitalized Children

OBJECTIVES

Hospitals rely on voluntary event reporting (VER) for adverse event (AE) identification, although it captures fewer events than a trigger tool, such as Global Assessment of Pediatric Patient Safety (GAPPS). Medical providers exhibit bias based on patient weight status, race, and English proficiency. We compared the AE rate identified by VER with that identified using the GAPPS between hospitalized children by weight category, race, and English proficiency.

METHODS

We identified a cohort of patients 2 years to younger than 18 years consecutively discharged from an academic children's hospital between June and October 2018. We collected data on patient weight status from age, sex, height, and weight, race/ethnicity by self-report, and limited English proficiency by record of interpreter use. We reviewed each chart with the GAPPS to identify AEs and reviewed VER entries for each encounter. We calculated an AE rate per 1000 patient-days using each method and compared these using analysis of variance.

RESULTS

We reviewed 834 encounters in 680 subjects; 262 (38.5%) had overweight or obesity, 144 (21.2%) identified as Black, and 112 (16.5%) identified as Hispanic; 82 (9.8%) of encounters involved an interpreter. We identified 288 total AEs, 270 (93.8%) by the GAPPS and 18 (6.3%) by VER. A disparity in AE reporting was found for children with limited English proficiency, with fewer AEs by VER ( P = 0.03) compared with no difference in AEs by GAPPS. No disparities were found by weight category or race.

CONCLUSIONS

Voluntary event reporting may systematically underreport AEs in hospitalized children with limited English proficiency.

HEROIC Trials to Answer Pragmatic Questions for Hospitalized Children

Although the number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published each year involving adult populations is steadily rising, the annual number of RCTs published involving pediatric populations has not changed since 2005. Barriers to the broader utilization of RCTs in pediatrics include a lower prevalence of disease, less available funding, and more complicated regulatory requirements. Although child health researchers have been successful in overcoming these barriers for isolated diseases such as pediatric cancer, common pediatric diseases are underrepresented in RCTs relative to their burden. This article proposes a strategy called High-Efficiency RandOmIzed Controlled (HEROIC) trials to increase RCTs focused on common diseases among hospitalized children. HEROIC trials are multicenter RCTs that pursue the rapid, low-cost accumulation of study participants with minimal burden for individual sites. Five key strategies distinguish HEROIC trials: (1) dispersed low-volume recruitment, in which a large number of sites (50-150 hospitals) enroll a small number of participants per site (2-10 participants per site), (2) incentivizing site leads with authorship, training, education credits, and modest financial support, (3) a focus on pragmatic questions that examine simple, widely used interventions, (4) the use of a single institutional review board, integrated consent, and other efficient solutions to regulatory requirements, and (5) scaling the HEROIC trial strategy to accomplish multiple trials simultaneously. HEROIC trials can boost RCT feasibility and volume to answer fundamental clinical questions and improve care for hospitalized children.

Body Mass Index Category and Adverse Events in Hospitalized Children

OBJECTIVE

To identify associations between patient body mass index (BMI) category and adverse event (AE) rate, severity, and preventability in a cohort of children discharged from an academic children's hospital.

METHODS

We identified patients 2 to 17 years old consecutively discharged between June and October 2018. Patient age, sex, height, and weight were used to categorize patients as having underweight, normal weight, overweight, or obesity. We used the Global Assessment of Pediatrics Patient Safety trigger tool to identify AEs, which were scored for harm and preventability. The primary outcome was the rate of AEs; these were compared with Poisson regression. We used multivariable logistic regression to model event preventability.

RESULTS

We reviewed 834 encounters in 680 subjects; 51 (7.5%) had underweight, 367 (54.0%) had normal weight, 112 (16.5%) had overweight, and 150 (22.1%) had obesity. Our cohort experienced 270 AEs, with an overall rate of 69.7 (61.8-78.5) AEs per 1000 patient-days: 67.7 (46.4-98.7) in underweight, 70.0 (59.4-82.4) in normal weight, 58.6 (42.5-79.7) in overweight, and 80.4 (62.5-103.6) in obesity, P = .46. No associations were seen between BMI category and AE severity. Children with obesity had an increased rate of preventable AEs (P < .01), but this association did not persist in the multivariable model.

CONCLUSIONS

In this single-center study, we did not find associations between BMI category and rate, severity, or preventability of AEs.

The Child With Severe Chronic Illness in the ICU: A Concise Review

OBJECTIVES

Children with severe chronic illness are a prevalent, impactful, vulnerable group in PICUs, whose needs are insufficiently met by transitory care models and a narrow focus on acute care needs. Thus, we sought to provide a concise synthetic review of published literature relevant to them and a compilation of strategies to address their distinctive needs.

DATA SOURCES

English language articles were identified in MEDLINE using a variety of phrases related to children with chronic conditions, prolonged admissions, resource utilization, mortality, morbidity, continuity of care, palliative care, and other critical care topics. Bibliographies were also reviewed.

STUDY SELECTION

Original articles, review articles, and commentaries were considered.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data from relevant articles were reviewed, summarized, and integrated into a narrative synthetic review.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Children with serious chronic conditions are a heterogeneous group who are growing in numbers and complexity, partly due to successes of critical care. Because of their prevalence, prolonged stays, readmissions, and other resource use, they disproportionately impact PICUs. Often more than other patients, critical illness can substantially negatively affect these children and their families, physically and psychosocially. Critical care approaches narrowly focused on acute care and transitory/rotating care models exacerbate these problems and contribute to ineffective communication and information sharing, impaired relationships, subpar and untimely decision-making, patient/family dissatisfaction, and moral distress in providers. Strategies to mitigate these effects and address these patients' distinctive needs include improving continuity and communication, primary and secondary palliative care, and involvement of families. However, there are limited outcome data for most of these strategies and little consensus on which outcomes should be measured.

CONCLUSIONS

The future of pediatric critical care medicine is intertwined with that of children with serious chronic illness. More concerted efforts are needed to address their distinctive needs and study the effectiveness of strategies to do so.

Diagnostic Error in Pediatrics: A Narrative Review

A priority topic for patient safety research is diagnostic errors. However, despite the significant growth in awareness of their unacceptably high incidence and associated harm, a relative paucity of large, high-quality studies of diagnostic error in pediatrics exists. In this narrative review, we present what is known about the incidence and epidemiology of diagnostic error in pediatrics as well as the established research methods for identifying, evaluating, and reducing diagnostic errors, including their strengths and weaknesses. Additionally, we highlight that pediatric diagnostic error remains an area in need of both innovative research and quality improvement efforts to apply learnings from a rapidly growing evidence base. We propose several key research questions aimed at addressing persistent gaps in the pediatric diagnostic error literature that focus on the foundational knowledge needed to inform effective interventions to reduce the incidence of diagnostic errors and their associated harm. Additional research is needed to better establish the epidemiology of diagnostic error in pediatrics, including identifying high-risk clinical scenarios, patient populations, and groups of diagnoses. A critical need exists for validated measures of both diagnostic errors and diagnostic processes that can be adapted for different clinical settings and standardized for use across varying institutions. Pediatric researchers will need to work collaboratively on large-scale, high-quality studies to accomplish the ultimate goal of reducing diagnostic errors and their associated harm in children by addressing these fundamental gaps in knowledge.

Inequities in quality and safety outcomes for hospitalized children with intellectual disability

AIM

To investigate if there are inequities in quality and safety outcomes for children with intellectual disability admitted to two tertiary paediatric hospitals.

METHOD

A cross-sectional study of 1367 admissions for 1018 randomly selected patients admitted for more than 23 hours to one of two tertiary children's hospitals in Sydney, Australia (1st January-31st December 2017). Electronic medical records were manually interrogated to identify children with intellectual disability (including developmental delay). Data extracted included patient demographics, length of stay, number of admissions, and reported clinical incidents.

RESULTS

In total, 12.3% (n=125) of children admitted during the study period had intellectual disability, which represented 13.9% (n=190) of admissions. Sex and age at admission in children with and without intellectual disability were similar: 83 (43.7%) vs 507 (43.1%) females and 107 (56.3%) vs 670 (56.9%) males, p=0.875; median age 3 years (0-18y) vs 4 years (0-18y), p=0.122. Children with intellectual disability had significantly greater median length of stay (100.5h vs 79h, p<0.001) and cost of admission (A$11 596.38 vs A$8497.96) than their peers (p=0.001). Children with intellectual disability had more admissions with at least one incident compared to children without intellectual disability (14.7% vs 9.7%); this was not statistically significant (p=0.06).

INTERPRETATION

Children with intellectual disability experience inequitable quality and safety outcomes in hospital. Engaging children and families in clinical incident reporting may enhance understanding of safety risks for children with intellectual disability in hospital.

Association between professional qualification and adverse events in neonatal and pediatric intensive treatment units

OBJECTIVE

to verify the association between the qualification of nursing professionals and the occurrence of adverse events in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units.

METHOD

Cross-sectional and evaluation study conducted in six intensive care units of five public hospitals in the state of Paraná, Brazil. Data was collected from April/2017 to January/2018 through the use of a questionnaire to be completed by 143 nursing professionals and retrospective analysis of 79 medical records using the Neonatal Trigger Tool and Pediatric Trigger Tool instruments. The prognostic factors were professional training and the existence, or not, of a continuing education service; analysis was performed by logistic regression.

RESULTS

Detected 30 adverse events in 22 medical records analyzed. There was a prevalence of infection (n = 12; 40%) and skin damage (n = 9; 30%). Among the prognostic factors, continuing education was identified as a protective factor against adverse events (p≤0.05).

CONCLUSION

Continuing education was associated with the prevention of adverse events in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units.

Codesigning patient experience measures for and with children and young people with intellectual disability: a study protocol

INTRODUCTION

Children and young people with intellectual disability represent one of the most vulnerable groups in healthcare, yet they remain under-represented in projects to design, develop and/or improve healthcare service delivery. Increasingly, healthcare services are using various codesign and coproduction methodologies to engage children and young people in service delivery improvements.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This study employs an inclusive approach to the study design and execution, including two co-researchers who are young people with intellectual disability on the project team. We will follow an adapted experience-based co-design methodology to enable children and young people with intellectual disability to participate fully in the co-design of a prototype tool for eliciting patient experience data from children and young people with intellectual disability in hospital.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study was granted ethical approval on 1 February 2021 by the Sydney Children's Hospitals Network Human Research Ethics Committee, reference number 2020/ETH02898. Dissemination plan includes publications, doctoral thesis chapter, educational videos. A summary of findings will be shared with all participants and presented at the organisation quality and safety committee.

Management and outcomes of paediatric ileocolic intussusception at a paediatric tertiary care hospital: A retrospective cohort study

Background

Rapid reduction of ileocolic intussusception is important to minimize the compromise in blood flow to the affected bowel segment. This study aimed to quantify the potentially modifiable time between diagnosis and initiation of pneumatic reduction, identify factors associated with delays, and characterize the outcomes of pneumatic reduction in a recent cohort.

Methods

This retrospective observational study occurred at a tertiary care paediatric hospital with a consecutive sample of all children with ileocolic intussusception September 2015 through September 2018. The primary outcome was the time between ultrasound diagnosis of intussusception and the beginning of pneumatic reduction. Independent variables were age of the patient, time of day of arrival, transfer from another facility, and intravenous access prior to ultrasound. Outcomes of pneumatic reduction were expressed as proportions.

Results

There were 103 cases of ileocolic intussusception (among 257,282 visits) during the study period. The median time between diagnostic confirmation and initiation of reduction was 36 minutes. This was shorter for transferred patients and children with intravenous access prior to ultrasound. One perforation was identified at the beginning of reduction, without hemodynamic instability. Six children (5.8%) underwent either open (n=4) or laparoscopic surgery (n=2) for reduction failure.

Conclusion

The median delay between diagnosis and initiation of reduction at this paediatric hospital was short, especially among patients transferred with a suspicion of intussusception and children with intravenous access prior to diagnosis. Complications from pneumatic reduction were infrequent.

Handoff improvement and adverse event reduction programme implementation in paediatric intensive care units in Argentina: a stepped-wedge trial

BACKGROUND

There are only a few studies on handoff quality and adverse events (AEs) rigorously evaluating handoff improvement programmes' effectiveness. None of them have been conducted in low and middle-income countries. We aimed to evaluate the effect of a handoff programme implementation in reducing AE frequency in paediatric intensive care units (PICUs).

METHODS

Facility-based, cluster-randomised, stepped-wedge trial in six Argentine PICUs in five hospitals, with >20 admissions per month. The study was conducted from July 2018 to May 2019, and all units at least were involved for 3 months in the control period and 4 months in the intervention period. The intervention comprised a Spanish version of the I-PASS handoff bundle consisting of a written and verbal handoff using mnemonics, an introductory workshop with teamwork training, an advertising campaign, simulation exercises, observation and standardised feedback of handoffs. Medical records (MR) were reviewed using trigger tool methodology to identify AEs (primary outcome). Handoff compliance and duration were evaluated by direct observation.

RESULTS

We reviewed 1465 MRs: 767 in the control period and 698 in the intervention period. We did not observe differences in the rates of preventable AE per 1000 days of hospitalisation (control 60.4 (37.5-97.4) vs intervention 60.4 (33.2-109.9), p=0.99, risk ratio: 1.0 (0.74-1.34)), and no changes in the categories or AE types. We evaluated 841 handoffs: 396 in the control period and 445 in the intervention period. Compliance with all items in the verbal and written handoffs was significantly higher in the intervention group. We observed no difference in the handoff time in both periods (control 35.7 min (29.6-41.8) vs intervention 34.7 min (26.5-42.1); difference 1.43 min (95% CI -2.63 to 5.49, p=0.49)). The providers' perception of improved communication did not change.

CONCLUSIONS

After the implementation of the I-PASS bundle, compliance with handoff items improved. Nevertheless, no differences were observed in the AEs' frequency or the perception of enhanced communication.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03924570.

Developing Tools to Enhance the Adaptive Capacity (Safety II) of Health Care Providers at a Children's Hospital

Current safety efforts in health care use Safety I (find and fix), which has benefits and shortcomings. Safety leaders in multiple industries realize that complex adaptive systems require a new approach-Safety II (proactive safety). Our goal was to develop practical, usable tools to spread Safety II and resilience engineering competencies to clinical frontline staff. Using our prior research and Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles, we developed tools to enhance Safety II competencies that individuals with various backgrounds could understand. Tools address recognizing (Pause to Predict), responding (IDEA), and learning (Feed Forward). These are being taught organizationally in a unit-by-unit sequence. Use of these tools is expected to prompt a shift toward a more proactive mental model of safety that we want our frontline providers to adopt. Coordinating the expertise of bedside clinicians during unprecedented events can safely expand the boundaries of conditions under which we can provide high-quality care by increasing individuals' and subsequently our systems' adaptive capacity. We believe this is the first work describing attempts to operationalize Safety II concepts broadly in a health care organization.

Improving Pediatric Resident Safety Event Reporting Using Quality Improvement Methods

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Safety event reporting systems facilitate identification of system-level targets to improve patient safety. Resident physicians report few safety events despite their role as frontline providers and the frequent occurrence of events. The objective of this study is to increase the number of pediatric resident safety event submissions from <1 to 4 submissions per 14-day period within 12 months.

METHODS

We conducted an iterative quality improvement process with 39 pediatric residents at a children's hospital. Interventions focused on 4 key drivers: user-friendly event submission process, resident buy-in, nonpunitive safety culture, and data transparency. The primary outcome measure of number of pediatric resident event submissions was analyzed by using statistical process control. Balancing measures included time from submission to feedback, duplicate submissions, and nonevent submissions. As a control, the primary outcome measure was monitored for nonpediatric residents during the same period.

RESULTS

The mean number of pediatric resident event submissions increased from 0.9 to 5.7 submissions per 14 days. Impactful interventions included a designated space in the resident workroom to list safety events to submit, monthly project updates, and an interresident competition. There were no duplicate submissions or nonevent submissions in the postintervention period. Time to feedback in the postintervention period had both upward and downward shifts, with >8 consecutive points above and below the baseline period's centerline. The control group showed no sustained change in event submissions.

CONCLUSIONS

Our improvement process was associated with significant increase in pediatric resident safety event submissions without an increase in the number of submissions categorized as duplicates or nonevents.

Viral lower respiratory tract infections-strict admission guidelines for young children can safely reduce admissions

Viral lower respiratory tract infection (VLRTI) is the most common cause of hospital admission among small children in high-income countries. Guidelines to identify children in need of admission are lacking in the literature. In December 2012, our hospital introduced strict guidelines for admission. This study aims to retrospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of the guidelines. We performed a single-center retrospective administrative database search and medical record review. ICD-10 codes identified children < 24 months assessed at the emergency department for VLRTI for a 10-year period. To identify adverse events related to admission guidelines implementation, we reviewed patient records for all those discharged on primary contact followed by readmission within 14 days. During the study period, 3227 children younger than 24 months old were assessed in the ED for VLRTI. The proportion of severe adverse events among children who were discharged on their initial emergency department contact was low both before (0.3%) and after the intervention (0.5%) (p=1.0). Admission rates before vs. after the intervention were for previously healthy children > 90 days 65.3% vs. 53.3% (p<0.001); for healthy children ≤ 90 days 85% vs. 68% (p<0.001); and for high-risk comorbidities 74% vs. 71% (p=0.5).Conclusion: After implementation of admission guidelines for VLRTI, there were few adverse events and a significant reduction in admissions to the hospital from the emergency department. Our admission guidelines may be a safe and helpful tool in the assessment of children with VLRTI. What is Known: • Viral lower respiratory tract infection, including bronchiolitis, is the most common cause of hospitalization for young children in the developed world. Treatment is mainly supportive, and hospitalization should be limited to the cases in need of therapeutic intervention. • Many countries have guidelines for the management of the disease, but the decision on whom to admit for inpatient treatment is often subjective and may vary even between physicians in the same hospital. What is New: • Implementation of admission criteria for viral lower respiratory tract infection may reduce the rate of hospital admissions without increasing adverse events.

Association Between Parent Comfort With English and Adverse Events Among Hospitalized Children

IMPORTANCE

Children of parents expressing limited comfort with English (LCE) or limited English proficiency may be at increased risk of adverse events (harms due to medical care). No prior studies have examined, in a multicenter fashion, the association between language comfort or language proficiency and systematically, actively collected adverse events that include family safety reporting.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between parent LCE and adverse events in a cohort of hospitalized children.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This multicenter prospective cohort study was conducted from December 2014 to January 2017, concurrent with data collection from the Patient and Family Centered I-PASS Study, a clinician-family communication and patient safety intervention study. The study included 1666 Arabic-, Chinese-, English-, and Spanish-speaking parents of general pediatric and subspecialty patients 17 years and younger in the pediatric units of 7 North American hospitals. Data were analyzed from January 2018 to May 2020.

EXPOSURES

Language-comfort data were collected through parent self-reporting. LCE was defined as reporting any language besides English as the language in which parents were most comfortable speaking to physicians or nurses.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was adverse events; the secondary outcome was preventable adverse events. Adverse events were collected using a systematic 2-step methodology. First, clinician abstractors reviewed patient medical records, solicited clinician reports, hospital incident reports, and family safety interviews. Then, review and consensus classification were completed by physician pairs. To examine the association of LCE with adverse events, a multivariable logistic regression was conducted with random intercepts to adjust for clustering by site.

RESULTS

Of 1666 parents providing language-comfort data, 1341 (80.5%) were female, and the mean (SD) age of parents was 35.4 (10.0) years. A total of 147 parents (8.8%) expressed LCE, most of whom (105 [71.4%]) preferred Spanish. Children of parents who expressed LCE had higher odds of having 1 or more adverse events compared with children whose parents expressed comfort with English (26 of 147 [17.7%] vs 146 of 1519 [9.6%]; adjusted odds ratio, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.2-3.7), after adjustment for parent race and education, complex chronic conditions, length of stay, site, and the intervention period. Similarly, children whose parents expressed LCE were more likely to experience 1 or more preventable adverse events (adjusted odds ratio, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.2-4.2).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Hospitalized children of parents expressing LCE were twice as likely to experience harms due to medical care. Targeted strategies are needed to improve communication and safety for this vulnerable group of children.

The Effect of Blue-Enriched Lighting on Medical Error Rate in a University Hospital ICU

BACKGROUND

Fatigue-related errors that occur during patient care impose a tremendous socioeconomic impact on the health care system. Blue-enriched light has been shown to promote alertness and attention. The present study tested whether blue-enriched light can help to reduce medical errors in a university hospital adult ICU.

METHODS

In this interventional study, a blue-enriched white light emitting diode was used to enhance traditional fluorescent light at the nurse workstation and common areas in the ICU. Medical errors were identified retrospectively using an established two-step surveillance process. Suspected incidents of potential errors detected on nurse chart review were subsequently reviewed by two physicians blinded to lighting conditions, who made final classifications. Error rates were compared between the preintervention fluorescent and postintervention blue-enriched lighting conditions using Poisson regression.

RESULTS

The study included a total of 1,073 ICU admissions, 522 under traditional and 551 under interventional lighting (age range 17-97 years, mean age ± standard deviation 58.5 ± 15.8). No difference was found in overall medical error rate (harmful and non-harmful) pre- vs. postintervention, 45.5 vs. 42.7 per 1,000 patient-days (rate ratio: 0.94, 95% confidence interval = 0.71-1.23, p = 0.64).

CONCLUSION

Interventional lighting did not have an effect on overall medical error rate. The study was likely underpowered to detect the 25% error reduction predicted. Future studies are required that are powered to assess more modest effects for lighting to reduce the risk of fatigue-related medical errors and errors of differing severity.

Characterising the types of paediatric adverse events detected by the global trigger tool – CareTrack Kids

Introduction

A common method of learning about adverse events (AEs) is by reviewing medical records using the global trigger tool (GTT). However, these studies generally report rates of harm. The aim of this study is to characterise paediatric AEs detected by the GTT using descriptive and qualitative approaches.

Methods

Medical records of children aged 0–15 were reviewed for presence of harm using the GTT. Records from 2012–2013 were sampled from hospital inpatients, emergency departments, general practice and specialist paediatric practices in three Australian states. Nurses undertook a review of each record and if an AE was suspected a doctor performed a verification review of a summary created by the nurse. A qualitative content analysis was undertaken on the summary of verified AEs.

Results

A total of 232 AEs were detected from 6,689 records reviewed. Over four-fifths of the AEs (193/232, 83%) resulted in minor harm to the patient. Nearly half (112/232, 48%) related to medication/intravenous (IV) fluids. Of these, 83% (93/112) were adverse drug reactions. Problems with medical devices/equipment were the next most frequent with nearly two-thirds (32/51, 63%) of these related to intravenous devices. Problems associated with clinical processes/procedures comprise one in six AEs (38/232, 16%), of which diagnostic problems (12/38, 32%) and procedural complications (11/38, 29%) were the most frequent.

Conclusion

Adverse drug reactions and issues with IVs are frequently identified AEs reflecting their common use in paediatrics. The qualitative approach taken in this study allowed AE types to be characterised, which is a prerequisite for developing and prioritising improvements in practice.

Association between nursing work conditions and adverse events in neonatal and pediatric Intensive Care Units

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association between intensive nursing staff's work conditions and the occurrence of adverse events in patients.

METHOD

Evaluative documentary study conducted in six public neonatal and pediatric Intensive Care Units from hospitals in Paraná state, from April 2017 to January 2018. The predictive variables concerning staff sizing and work environment were measured through the instruments Nursing Activities Score and Brazilian Nursing Work Index-Revised. The thirty adverse events corresponded to the outcome variable and were detected using the instruments Pediatric and Neonatal Trigger Tool.

RESULTS

Two-hundred and three professionals participated in this research. The nursing staff sizing was verified to be appropriate. Work conditions were favorable and Cronbach's Alpha was 0.90 (IC= 0.87 - 0.92). The most frequently detected events in patients were infection and skin lesion. The statistical analysis of correlation and adverse event occurrence was not significant.

CONCLUSION

Despite the lack of evidence on statistical significance between the variables, the results reveal commitment by the public sector and professionals with patient safety and assistance quality.

Creating equitable healthcare quality and safety for children with intellectual disability in hospital

Children with intellectual disability are susceptible to poor experiences of care and treatment outcomes, and this may compound existing health inequities. Evidence to date indicates three priority areas that must be addressed in order to reduce these inequities in the safety and quality of care for children with intellectual disability. Firstly, we need reliable methods to identify children with intellectual disability so that healthcare organizations understand their needs. Secondly, we need to develop quality metrics that can assess care quality and unwarranted care variation for children with intellectual disability in hospital. Finally, for a comprehensive understanding of the safety and quality of care for these children, and how to improve, it is critical that healthcare organizations partner with parents/carers and enable children with intellectual disability to voice their experiences of care. Children with intellectual disability have higher healthcare utilization than their peers; yet, their voice is rarely sought to optimize the safety and quality of their healthcare experience. Patient experience narratives enhance our understanding of the genesis of adverse events. By addressing these priorities, children with intellectual disability will be identified, and health services will measure and understand the problematic and beneficial variations in care delivery and can then effectively partner with children and their parents/carers to address the inequities in care quality and create safer healthcare.

Use of nursing technologies for safe perioperative pediatric care

OBJECTIVE

To understand the nursing team's perception about the use of technology for safe perioperative pediatric care, through photographs.

METHOD

A qualitative study using the theoretical framework of Nietsche Specific Nursing Technology, with a total of 18 perioperative nursing professionals from a general hospital in southern Brazil. Data collection occurred from June to August 2018, from a semi-structured interview and photograph production. They were analyzed through the Thematic Content Analysis. Approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Santa Catarina.

RESULTS

The Nursing Technologies category used for the safety of the pediatric patient in the perioperative period, with 250 photographs illustrating facts, situations and artifacts considered nursing technologies used in safe care.

CONCLUSIONS

In the team's perception, patient safety involves the use of technologies integrated to perioperative care and structural, physical and input aspects.

A Scoping Review of Nursing Research Priorities in Pediatric Care

PROBLEM

Priority setting for pediatric nursing is important to plan, coordinate and direct future research. The aim of this scoping review was to systematically identify and synthesise the nature, range and extent of published pediatric nursing research priorities.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

English language full text publications focusing generic nursing research priorities for the child or adolescent, indexed in CINAHL, EMBASE, The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, AMED, MEDLINE and PsycINFO and published from 2008 to 2019.

SAMPLE

A total of 789 citations were identified, 44 full text articles were retrieved and assessed for eligibility and eight studies were finally reviewed, quality assessed (CREDES) and synthesised.

RESULTS

All eight studies used a consensus building method to identify research priorities reported by nurses. Six used Delphi technique, one Nominal Group Technique (NGT) and one consensus workshop. CREDES score range was 10-14 of a possible 16. Synthesis of the 234 nursing research priorities generated four themes; evidenced-based practice, pediatric context, child and family-centered care; pediatric nursing, with 14 subthemes.

CONCLUSION

The nursing research priorities reported appear to be still current and important to nurses. There was a focus on acute care, with fewer priorities reflecting areas of child-, school-, or mental- health. Consumer and community priorities have not been reported.

IMPLICATIONS

These nursing research priorities can be used to inform the national or local research agenda, although there is a need to establish priorities from the perspective of all stakeholders and in particular, identify what is important to consumers.