Influence of Diabetes Mellitus on the Endovascular Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

Five Year Post-Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Aneurysm Sac Evolution in the GREAT Registry: an Insight in Diabetics Using Propensity Matched Controls

OBJECTIVE

To assess differences in the five year abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) sac regression rate after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in patients with and without diabetes mellitus (DM).

METHODS

An international prospective registry (Europe, USA, Brazil, Australia, and New Zealand) of patients treated with the GORE EXCLUDER endograft. All scheduled EVARs for infrarenal AAA between 2014 and 2016 with complete five year imaging follow up were included. Emergency procedures, ancillary proximal procedures, and inflammatory and infectious aetiologies were excluded. Descriptive and inferential statistics, and Cox proportional hazards survival models were used. A control group of patients without DM with similar age and comorbidities was selected using propensity scores, matched in a 1:2 scheme.

RESULTS

A total of 2 888 patients (86.1% male; mean age 73.5 ± 8 years) was included, of whom 545 (18.9%) had DM. Patients with DM had higher rates of hypertension (89.2% vs. 78.4%), dyslipidaemia (76.0% vs. 60.7%), coronary artery disease (52.3% vs. 37.9%), and chronic renal impairment (20.9% vs. 14.0%) (all p < .001). The mean pre-procedural AAA diameter was 58.1 ± 10 mm. Five years post-EVAR, the type 1A endoleak rate was 1.1% (0.6% DM vs. 1.2% non-DM), the endograft related re-intervention rate was 7.3% (6.2% vs. 7.6%), the major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) rate was 1.4% (1.1% vs. 1.5%), and aortic related mortality rate was 1.0% (0.6% vs. 1.2%), without statistically significant differences between groups. The overall five year mortality rate was higher in diabetics (36.3% vs. 30.5%; hazard ratio [HR] 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07 - 1.58; p = .001). No statistically significant differences were found in sac regression rate (≥ 5 mm) between diabetics and non-diabetics 70.0% vs. 73.1%; HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.75-1.04; p = .131. These differences remained statistically non-significant after excluding patients performed out of instructions for use (p = .61) and patients with types 1, 2 or 3 endoleaks (p = .39).

CONCLUSION

The paradoxical relationship between DM and AAA does not appear to result in differences in post-EVAR sac regression rates. However, even when controlling for other comorbidities, patients with DM undergoing EVAR may have a higher five year mortality rate.

Protection of diabetes in aortic abdominal aneurysm: Are antidiabetics the real effectors?

Aortic aneurysms, including abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs), is the second most prevalent aortic disease and represents an important cause of death worldwide. AAA is a permanent dilation of the aorta on its infrarenal portion, pathologically associated with oxidative stress, proteolysis, vascular smooth muscle cell loss, immune-inflammation, and extracellular matrix remodeling and degradation. Most epidemiological studies have shown a potential protective role of diabetes mellitus (DM) on the prevalence and incidence of AAA. The effect of DM on AAA might be explained mainly by two factors: hyperglycemia [or other DM-related factors such as insulin resistance (IR)] and/or by the effect of prescribed DM drugs, which may have a direct or indirect effect on the formation and progression of AAAs. However, recent studies further support that the protective role of DM in AAA may be attributable to antidiabetic therapies (i.e.: metformin or SGLT-2 inhibitors). This review summarizes current literature on the relationship between DM and the incidence, progression, and rupture of AAAs, and discusses the potential cellular and molecular pathways that may be involved in its vascular effects. Besides, we provide a summary of current antidiabetic therapies which use could be beneficial for AAA.

Nationwide study in France investigating the impact of diabetes on mortality in patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

The aim of this nationwide study was to analyze the impact of diabetes on post-operative mortality in patients undergoing AAA repair in France. This 10-year retrospective, multicenter study based on the French National electronic health data included patients undergoing AAA repair between 2010 and 2019. In-hospital post-operative mortality was analyzed using Kaplan–Meier curve survival and Log-Rank tests. A multivariate regression analysis was performed to calculate Hazard Ratios. Over 79,935 patients who underwent AAA repair, 61,146 patients (76.5%) had at least one hospital-readmission after the AAA repair, for a mean follow-up of 3.5 ± 2.5 years. Total in-hospital mortality over the 10-year study was 16,986 (21.3%) and 4581 deaths (5.8%) occurred during the first hospital stay for AAA repair. Age over 64 years old, the presence of AAA rupture and hospital readmission at 30-day were predictors of post-operative mortality (AdjHR = 1.59 CI 95% 1.51–1.67; AdjHR = 1.49 CI 95% 1.36–1.62 and AdjHR = 1.92, CI 95% 1.84–2.00). The prevalence of diabetes was significantly lower in ruptured AAA compared to unruptured AAA (14.8% vs 20.9%, P < 0.001 for type 2 diabetes and 2.5% vs 4.0%, P < 0.001 for type 1 diabetes). Type 1 diabetes was significantly associated with post-operative mortality (AdjHR = 1.30 CI 95% 1.20–1.40). For type 2 diabetes, the association was not statistically significant (Adj HR = 0.96, CI 95% 0.92–1.01). Older age, AAA rupture and hospital readmission were associated with deaths that occurred after discharge from the first AAA repair. Type 1 diabetes was identified as a risk factor of post-operative mortality. This study highlights the complex association between diabetes and AAA and should encourage institutions to report long-term follow-up after AAA repair to better understand its impact.

Diabetes and aortic aneurysm: current state of the art

Aortic aneurysm is a life-threatening disease due to the risk of aortic rupture. The only curative treatment available relies on surgical approaches; drug-based therapies are lacking, highlighting an unmet need for clinical practice. Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is frequently associated with atherosclerosis and cardiovascular risk factors including male sex, age, smoking, hypertension, and dyslipidaemia. Thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) is more often linked to genetic disorders of the extracellular matrix and the contractile apparatus but also share similar cardiovascular risk factors. Intriguingly, a large body of evidence points to an inverse association between diabetes and both AAA and TAA. A better understanding of the mechanisms underlying the negative association between diabetes and aortic aneurysm could help the development of innovative diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to tackle the disease. Here, we summarize current knowledge on the relationship between glycaemic parameters, diabetes, and the development of aortic aneurysm. Cellular and molecular pathways that underlie the protective effect of diabetes itself and its treatment are reviewed and discussed, along with their potential implications for clinical translation.

Translational applications of glucose metabolism in abdominal aortic aneurysm

Even though diabetes mellitus is a major risk for cardiovascular events and atherosclerosis-related diseases, it is negatively associated with abdominal aortic aneurysm. The understanding of the mechanisms underlying this negative association could bring new insights to identify prognostic and therapeutic targets. Here we summarize current knowledge of the relationship between glycemic parameters and clinical outcomes of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm. Translational applications of glucose-targeted approaches as well as their potential interest for clinical practice are discussed in this context.

Influence of Pulmonary Status and Diabetes Mellitus on Aortic Neck Dilatation following Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A EUROSTAR Report

Purpose:

To elucidate the association of impaired pulmonary status (IPS) and diabetes mellitus (DM) with clinical outcome and the incidences of aortic neck dilatation and type I endoleak after elective endovascular infrarenal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR).

Methods:

In 164 European institutions participating in the EUROSTAR registry, 6383 patients (5985 men; mean age 72.4±7.6 years) underwent EVAR. Patients were divided into patients without versus with IPS or with/without DM. Clinical assessment and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) were performed at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months and annually thereafter. Cumulative endpoint analysis comprised death, aortic rupture, type I endoleak, endovascular reintervention, and surgical conversion.

Results:

Prevalence of IPS was 2733/6383 (43%) and prevalence of DM was 810/6383 (13%). Mean follow-up was 21.1±18.4 months. Thirty-day mortality, AAA rupture, and conversion rates did not differ between patients with versus without IPS and between patients with versus without DM. All-cause and AAA-related mortality, respectively, were significantly higher in patients with IPS compared to patients with normal pulmonary status (31.0% versus 19.0%, p<0.0001 and 6.8% versus 3.3%, p=0.0057) throughout follow-up. In multivariate analysis adjusted for smoking, age, gender, comorbidities, fitness for open repair, co-existing common iliac aneurysm, neck and aneurysm size, arterial angulations, aneurysm classification, endograft oversizing >15%, and type of stent-graft, the presence of IPS was not associated with significantly higher rates of aortic neck dilatation (30.6% versus 38.0%, p>0.05) and did not influence cumulative rates of type I endoleak, endovascular reintervention, or conversion to open surgery (p>0.05). Similarly, the presence of DM did not influence the above-mentioned study endpoints.

Conclusion:

In contrast to observations regarding the natural course of AAAs, impaired pulmonary status does not negatively influence aortic neck dilatation, while the presence of diabetes does not protect from these dismal events after EVAR.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) for gastrointestinal surgery, part 1: pathophysiological considerations

BACKGROUND

The present article has been written to convey concepts of anaesthetic care within the context of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programme, thus aligning the practice of anaesthesia with the care delivered by the surgical team before, during and after surgery.

METHODS

The physiological principles supporting the implementation of the ERAS programmes in patients undergoing major abdominal procedures are reviewed using an updated literature search and discussed by a multidisciplinary group composed of anaesthesiologists and surgeons with the aim to improve perioperative care.

RESULTS

The pathophysiology of some key perioperative elements disturbing the homoeostatic mechanisms such as insulin resistance, ileus and pain is here discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence-based strategies aimed at controlling the disruption of homoeostasis need to be evaluated in the context of ERAS programmes. Anaesthesiologists could, therefore, play a crucial role in facilitating the recovery process.

National trends in incidence and outcomes of abdominal aortic aneurysm among elderly type 2 diabetic and non-diabetic patients in Spain (2003-2012)

BACKGROUND

This study aims to describe trends in the rate of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and use of open surgery repair (OSR) and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in elderly patients with and without type 2 diabetes in Spain, 2003-2012.

METHODS

We select all patients with a discharge of AAA using national hospital discharge data. Discharges were grouped by diabetes status: type 2 diabetes and no diabetes. In both groups OSR and EVAR were identified. The incidence of discharges attributed to AAA were calculated overall and stratified by diabetes status and year. We calculated length of stay (LOHS) and in-hospital mortality (IHM). Use of OSR and EVAR were calculated stratified by diabetes status. Multivariate analysis was adjusted by age, sex, year, smoking habit and comorbidity.

RESULTS

From 2003 to 2012, 115,020 discharges with AAA were identified. The mean age was 74.91 years and 16.7% suffered type 2 diabetes. Rates of discharges due to AAA increased significantly in diabetic patients (50.09 in 2003 to 78.23 cases per 100,000 in 2012) and non diabetic subjects (69.24 to 78.66). The incidences were higher among those without than those with diabetes in all the years studied. The proportion of patients that underwent EVAR increased for both groups of patients and the open repair decreased. After multivariate analysis we found that LOHS and IHM have improved over the study period and diabetic patients had lower IHM than those without diabetes (OR 0.81; 95%CI 0.76-0.85).

CONCLUSIONS

Incidence rates were higher in non-diabetic patients. For diabetic and non diabetic patients the use of EVAR has increased and open repair seems to be decreasing. IHM and LOHS have improved from 2003 to 2012. Patients with diabetes had significantly lower mortality.

Aneurysm global epidemiology study: public health measures can further reduce abdominal aortic aneurysm mortality

BACKGROUND

Contemporary data from Western populations suggest steep declines in abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) mortality; however, international trends are unclear. This study aimed to investigate global AAA mortality trends and to analyze any association with common cardiovascular risk factors.

METHODS AND RESULTS

AAA mortality (1994-2010) using International Classification of Diseases codes were extracted from the World Health Organization mortality database and age standardized. The World Health Organization InfoBase and International Mortality and Smoking Statistics provided risk factor data. Nineteen World Health Organization member states were included (Europe, 14; Australasia, 2; North America, 2; Asia, 1). Regression analysis of temporal trends in cardiovascular risk factors (1946-2010) was done independently for correlations to AAA mortality trends. Global AAA mortality trends show substantial heterogeneity, with the United States and United Kingdom recording the greatest national decline, whereas internationally, male individuals and those <75 years of age demonstrated the greatest reductions. AAA mortality has increased in Hungary, Romania, Austria, and Denmark; therefore, the mortality decline is not universal. A positive linear relationship exists between global trends in systolic blood pressure (P≤0.03), cholesterol (P≤0.03), and smoking prevalence (P≤0.02) in males and females. Body mass index demonstrated a negative linear association with AAA mortality (P≤0.007), whereas fasting blood glucose showed no association.

CONCLUSIONS

AAA mortality has not declined globally, and this study reveals that differences between nations can be explained by variations in traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Declines in smoking prevalence correlate most closely with declines in AAA mortality, and a novel obesity paradox has been identified that requires further investigation. Public health measures could therefore further reduce global AAA mortality, with greatest benefits in the younger age group.

Can Laboratory Tests Predict the Prognosis of Patients after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair? Current Status and Future Directions

The purpose of this study was to determine what laboratory values predict the prognosis of patients after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases were searched. This resulted in 13 relevant articles. Data were pooled, and meta-analyses were performed. A meta-analysis including 5,655 patients showed that preoperative serum creatinine > 1.5 mg/dL was a significant risk indicator for increased 30-day mortality (relative risk 3.0, 95% confidence interval 2.3–4.1, p < .0001). Four other studies showed that other cutoff values of creatinine or glomerular filtration rate can predict mortality and complications following EVAR. One study suggested that reduced preoperative hemoglobin is a risk indicator for reduced long-term survival. Increased serum creatinine, reduced glomerular filtration rate, and reduced hemoglobin are significant and strong predictors of mortality and complications after EVAR. Current evidence remains limited, and further research is needed to determine conclusively additional laboratory values that may predict the outcome of patients following EVAR.

Temporary worsening of renal function after aortic surgery is associated with higher long-term mortality

BACKGROUND

Little is known about acute changes in renal function in the postoperative period and the outcome of patients undergoing major vascular surgery. Specifically, data are scarce for patients in whom renal function temporarily decreases and returns to baseline at 3 days after surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

1,324 patients who underwent elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery in a single center.

PREDICTOR

Renal function (creatinine clearance was measured preoperatively and on days 1, 2, and 3 after surgery. Patients were divided into 3 groups: group 1, improved or unchanged (change in creatinine clearance, +/-10% of function compared with baseline); group 2, temporary worsening (worsening > 10% at day 1 or 2, then complete recovery within 10% of baseline at day 3); and group 3, persistent worsening (>10% decrease compared with baseline).

OUTCOMES & MEASUREMENTS

All-cause mortality.

RESULTS

30-day mortality rates were 1.3%, 5.0%, and 12.6% in groups 1 to 3, respectively. Adjusted for baseline characteristics and postoperative complications, 30-day mortality was the greatest in patients with persistent worsening of renal function (hazard ratio [HR], 7.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.7 to 19.8), followed by those with temporary worsening (HR, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.4 to 9.9). During 6.0 +/- 3.4 years of follow-up, 348 patients (36.5%) died. Risk of late mortality was 1.7 (95% CI, 1.3 to 2.3) in the persistent-worsening group followed by those with temporary worsening (HR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.2 to 1.4).

LIMITATIONS

No steady state was achieved to assess renal function.

CONCLUSION

Although renal function may recover completely after aortic surgery, temporary worsening of renal function was associated with greater long-term mortality.