1
|
Maximov PY, Fan P, Abderrahman B, Curpan R, Jordan VC. Estrogen Receptor Complex to Trigger or Delay Estrogen-Induced Apoptosis in Long-Term Estrogen Deprived Breast Cancer. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2022; 13:869562. [PMID: 35360069 PMCID: PMC8960923 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.869562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2022] [Accepted: 02/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Antiestrogen therapy of breast cancer has been a "gold standard" of treatment of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer for decades. Resistance to antiestrogen therapy may develop, however, a vulnerability in long-term estrogen deprived (LTED) breast cancer cells was discovered. LTED breast cancer cells may undergo estrogen-induced apoptosis within a week of treatment with estrogen in vitro. This phenomenon has been also validated in vivo and in the clinic. The molecular ER-mediated mechanism of action of estrogen-induced apoptosis was deciphered, however, the relationship between the structure of estrogenic ligands and the activity of the ER in LTED breast cancer cells remained a mystery until recently. In this review we provide an overview of the structure-activity relationship of various estrogens with different chemical structures and the modulation of estrogen-induced apoptosis in LTED breast cancer cells resistant to antihormone therapy. We provide analysis of evidence gathered over more than a decade of structure-activity relationship studies by our group on the role of the change in the conformation of the estrogen receptor and the biological activities of different classes of estrogens and the receptor as well in LTED breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Y. Maximov
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Ping Fan
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Balkees Abderrahman
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Ramona Curpan
- Institute of Chemistry, Romanian Academy, Timisoara, Romania
| | - V. Craig Jordan
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
- *Correspondence: V. Craig Jordan,
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Prentice RL, Aragaki AK, Chlebowski RT, Rossouw JE, Anderson GL, Stefanick ML, Wactawski-Wende J, Kuller LH, Wallace R, Johnson KC, Shadyab AH, Gass M, Manson JE. Randomized Trial Evaluation of the Benefits and Risks of Menopausal Hormone Therapy Among Women 50-59 Years of Age. Am J Epidemiol 2021; 190:365-375. [PMID: 33025002 DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwaa210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2020] [Revised: 09/23/2020] [Accepted: 10/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
The health benefits and risks of menopausal hormone therapy among women aged 50-59 years are examined in the Women's Health Initiative randomized, placebo-controlled trials using long-term follow-up data and a parsimonious statistical model that leverages data from older participants to increase precision. These trials enrolled 27,347 healthy postmenopausal women aged 50-79 years at 40 US clinical centers during 1993-1998, including 10,739 post-hysterectomy participants in a trial of conjugated equine estrogens and 16,608 participants with a uterus in the trial of these estrogens plus medroxyprogesterone acetate. Over a (median) 18-year follow-up period (1993-2016), risk for a global index (defined as the earliest of coronary heart disease, invasive breast cancer, stroke, pulmonary embolism, colorectal cancer, endometrial cancer, hip fracture, and all-cause mortality) was reduced with conjugated equine estrogens with a hazard ratio of 0.82 (95% confidence interval: 0.71, 0.95), and with nominally significant reductions for coronary heart disease, breast cancer, hip fracture, and all-cause mortality. Corresponding global index hazard ratio estimates of 1.06 (95% confidence interval: 0.95, 1.19) were nonsignificant for combined estrogens plus progestin, but increased breast cancer risk and reduced endometrial cancer risk were observed. These results, among women 50-59 years of age, substantially agree with the worldwide observational literature, with the exception of breast cancer for estrogens alone.
Collapse
|
3
|
Chlebowski RT, Aragaki AK, Anderson GL, Prentice RL. Reply to The Women's Health Initiative; hormone replacement therapy; and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data. Cancer 2020; 127:813-814. [PMID: 33170509 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2020] [Accepted: 08/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Rowan T Chlebowski
- Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California
| | - Aaron K Aragaki
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Garnet L Anderson
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Ross L Prentice
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abderrahman B, Maximov PY, Curpan RF, Hanspal JS, Fan P, Xiong R, Tonetti DA, Thatcher GRJ, Jordan VC. Pharmacology and Molecular Mechanisms of Clinically Relevant Estrogen Estetrol and Estrogen Mimic BMI-135 for the Treatment of Endocrine-Resistant Breast Cancer. Mol Pharmacol 2020; 98:364-381. [PMID: 32788222 PMCID: PMC7491312 DOI: 10.1124/molpharm.120.000054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2020] [Accepted: 07/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Long-term estrogen deprivation (LTED) with tamoxifen (TAM) or aromatase inhibitors leads to endocrine-resistance, whereby physiologic levels of estrogen kill breast cancer (BC). Estrogen therapy is effective in treating patients with advanced BC after resistance to TAM and aromatase inhibitors develops. This therapeutic effect is attributed to estrogen-induced apoptosis via the estrogen receptor (ER). Estrogen therapy can have unpleasant gynecologic and nongynecologic adverse events. Here, we study estetrol (E4) and a model Selective Human ER Partial Agonist (ShERPA) BMI-135. Estetrol and ShERPA TTC-352 are being evaluated in clinical trials. These agents are proposed as safer estrogenic candidates compared with 17β-estradiol (E2) for the treatment of endocrine-resistant BC. Cell viability assays, real-time polymerase chain reaction, luciferase reporter assays, chromatin immunoprecipitation, docking and molecular dynamics simulations, human unfolded protein response (UPR) RT2 PCR profiler arrays, live cell microscopic imaging and analysis, and annexin V staining assays were conducted. Our work was done in eight biologically different human BC cell lines and one human endometrial cancer cell line, and results were compared with full agonists estrone, E2, and estriol, a benchmark partial agonist triphenylethylene bisphenol (BPTPE), and antagonists 4-hydroxytamoxifen and endoxifen. Our study shows the pharmacology of E4 and BMI-135 as less-potent full-estrogen agonists as well as their molecular mechanisms of tumor regression in LTED BC through triggering a rapid UPR and apoptosis. Our work concludes that the use of a full agonist to treat BC is potentially superior to a partial agonist given BPTPE's delayed induction of UPR and apoptosis, with a higher probability of tumor clonal evolution and resistance. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Given the unpleasant gynecologic and nongynecologic adverse effects of estrogen treatment, the development of safer estrogens for endocrine-resistant breast cancer (BC) treatment and hormone replacement therapy remains a priority. The naturally occurring estrogen estetrol and Selective Human Estrogen-Receptor Partial Agonists are being evaluated in endocrine-resistant BC clinical trials. This work provides a comprehensive evaluation of their pharmacology in numerous endocrine-resistant BC models and an endometrial cancer model and their molecular mechanisms of tumor regression through the unfolded protein response and apoptosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Balkees Abderrahman
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (B.A., P.Y.M., J.S.H., P.F., V.C.J.); Coriolan Dragulescu Institute of Chemistry, Romanian Academy, Timisoara, Romania (R.F.C.); and Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois (R.X., D.A.T., G.R.J.T.)
| | - Philipp Y Maximov
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (B.A., P.Y.M., J.S.H., P.F., V.C.J.); Coriolan Dragulescu Institute of Chemistry, Romanian Academy, Timisoara, Romania (R.F.C.); and Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois (R.X., D.A.T., G.R.J.T.)
| | - Ramona F Curpan
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (B.A., P.Y.M., J.S.H., P.F., V.C.J.); Coriolan Dragulescu Institute of Chemistry, Romanian Academy, Timisoara, Romania (R.F.C.); and Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois (R.X., D.A.T., G.R.J.T.)
| | - Jay S Hanspal
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (B.A., P.Y.M., J.S.H., P.F., V.C.J.); Coriolan Dragulescu Institute of Chemistry, Romanian Academy, Timisoara, Romania (R.F.C.); and Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois (R.X., D.A.T., G.R.J.T.)
| | - Ping Fan
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (B.A., P.Y.M., J.S.H., P.F., V.C.J.); Coriolan Dragulescu Institute of Chemistry, Romanian Academy, Timisoara, Romania (R.F.C.); and Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois (R.X., D.A.T., G.R.J.T.)
| | - Rui Xiong
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (B.A., P.Y.M., J.S.H., P.F., V.C.J.); Coriolan Dragulescu Institute of Chemistry, Romanian Academy, Timisoara, Romania (R.F.C.); and Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois (R.X., D.A.T., G.R.J.T.)
| | - Debra A Tonetti
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (B.A., P.Y.M., J.S.H., P.F., V.C.J.); Coriolan Dragulescu Institute of Chemistry, Romanian Academy, Timisoara, Romania (R.F.C.); and Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois (R.X., D.A.T., G.R.J.T.)
| | - Gregory R J Thatcher
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (B.A., P.Y.M., J.S.H., P.F., V.C.J.); Coriolan Dragulescu Institute of Chemistry, Romanian Academy, Timisoara, Romania (R.F.C.); and Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois (R.X., D.A.T., G.R.J.T.)
| | - V Craig Jordan
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (B.A., P.Y.M., J.S.H., P.F., V.C.J.); Coriolan Dragulescu Institute of Chemistry, Romanian Academy, Timisoara, Romania (R.F.C.); and Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois (R.X., D.A.T., G.R.J.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chlebowski RT, Anderson GL, Aragaki AK, Manson JE, Stefanick ML, Pan K, Barrington W, Kuller LH, Simon MS, Lane D, Johnson KC, Rohan TE, Gass MLS, Cauley JA, Paskett ED, Sattari M, Prentice RL. Association of Menopausal Hormone Therapy With Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality During Long-term Follow-up of the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA 2020; 324:369-380. [PMID: 32721007 PMCID: PMC7388026 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.9482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 201] [Impact Index Per Article: 50.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The influence of menopausal hormone therapy on breast cancer remains unsettled with discordant findings from observational studies and randomized clinical trials. OBJECTIVE To assess the association of prior randomized use of estrogen plus progestin or prior randomized use of estrogen alone with breast cancer incidence and mortality in the Women's Health Initiative clinical trials. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Long-term follow-up of 2 placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials that involved 27 347 postmenopausal women aged 50 through 79 years with no prior breast cancer and negative baseline screening mammogram. Women were enrolled at 40 US centers from 1993 to 1998 with follow-up through December 31, 2017. INTERVENTIONS In the trial involving 16 608 women with a uterus, 8506 were randomized to receive 0.625 mg/d of conjugated equine estrogen (CEE) plus 2.5 mg/d of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) and 8102, placebo. In the trial involving 10 739 women with prior hysterectomy, 5310 were randomized to receive 0.625 mg/d of CEE alone and 5429, placebo. The CEE-plus-MPA trial was stopped in 2002 after 5.6 years' median intervention duration, and the CEE-only trial was stopped in 2004 after 7.2 years' median intervention duration. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was breast cancer incidence (protocol prespecified primary monitoring outcome for harm) and secondary outcomes were deaths from breast cancer and deaths after breast cancer. RESULTS Among 27 347 postmenopausal women who were randomized in both trials (baseline mean [SD] age, 63.4 years [7.2 years]), after more than 20 years of median cumulative follow-up, mortality information was available for more than 98%. CEE alone compared with placebo among 10 739 women with a prior hysterectomy was associated with statistically significantly lower breast cancer incidence with 238 cases (annualized rate, 0.30%) vs 296 cases (annualized rate, 0.37%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.78; 95% CI, 0.65-0.93; P = .005) and was associated with statistically significantly lower breast cancer mortality with 30 deaths (annualized mortality rate, 0.031%) vs 46 deaths (annualized mortality rate, 0.046%; HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.37-0.97; P = .04). In contrast, CEE plus MPA compared with placebo among 16 608 women with a uterus was associated with statistically significantly higher breast cancer incidence with 584 cases (annualized rate, 0.45%) vs 447 cases (annualized rate, 0.36%; HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.13-1.45; P < .001) and no significant difference in breast cancer mortality with 71 deaths (annualized mortality rate, 0.045%) vs 53 deaths (annualized mortality rate, 0.035%; HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 0.94-1.95; P= .11). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this long-term follow-up study of 2 randomized trials, prior randomized use of CEE alone, compared with placebo, among women who had a previous hysterectomy, was significantly associated with lower breast cancer incidence and lower breast cancer mortality, whereas prior randomized use of CEE plus MPA, compared with placebo, among women who had an intact uterus, was significantly associated with a higher breast cancer incidence but no significant difference in breast cancer mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rowan T. Chlebowski
- Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California
| | - Garnet L. Anderson
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Division of Public Health Sciences, Seattle, Washington
| | - Aaron K. Aragaki
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Division of Public Health Sciences, Seattle, Washington
| | - JoAnn E. Manson
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Marcia L. Stefanick
- Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Kathy Pan
- Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California
| | - Wendy Barrington
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Lewis H. Kuller
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Michael S. Simon
- Department of Oncology, Karmanos Cancer Institute at Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Dorothy Lane
- Department of Family, Population and Preventive Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York
| | - Karen C. Johnson
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis
| | - Thomas E. Rohan
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Margery L. S. Gass
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Division of Public Health Sciences, Seattle, Washington
| | - Jane A. Cauley
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Maryam Sattari
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Florida Health Internal Medicine, Gainesville
| | - Ross L. Prentice
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Division of Public Health Sciences, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chlebowski RT, Aragaki AK, Anderson GL, Prentice RL. Forty‐year trends in menopausal hormone therapy use and breast cancer incidence among postmenopausal black and white women. Cancer 2020; 126:2956-2964. [DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2019] [Revised: 09/22/2019] [Accepted: 10/21/2019] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Rowan T. Chlebowski
- Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center Torrance California
| | - Aaron K. Aragaki
- Division of Public Health Sciences Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Seattle Washington
| | - Garnet L. Anderson
- Division of Public Health Sciences Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Seattle Washington
| | - Ross L. Prentice
- Division of Public Health Sciences Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Seattle Washington
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Type and timing of menopausal hormone therapy and breast cancer risk: individual participant meta-analysis of the worldwide epidemiological evidence. Lancet 2019; 394:1159-1168. [PMID: 31474332 PMCID: PMC6891893 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(19)31709-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 388] [Impact Index Per Article: 77.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2019] [Revised: 06/12/2019] [Accepted: 06/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Published findings on breast cancer risk associated with different types of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) are inconsistent, with limited information on long-term effects. We bring together the epidemiological evidence, published and unpublished, on these associations, and review the relevant randomised evidence. METHODS Principal analyses used individual participant data from all eligible prospective studies that had sought information on the type and timing of MHT use; the main analyses are of individuals with complete information on this. Studies were identified by searching many formal and informal sources regularly from Jan 1, 1992, to Jan 1, 2018. Current users were included up to 5 years (mean 1·4 years) after last-reported MHT use. Logistic regression yielded adjusted risk ratios (RRs) comparing particular groups of MHT users versus never users. FINDINGS During prospective follow-up, 108 647 postmenopausal women developed breast cancer at mean age 65 years (SD 7); 55 575 (51%) had used MHT. Among women with complete information, mean MHT duration was 10 years (SD 6) in current users and 7 years (SD 6) in past users, and mean age was 50 years (SD 5) at menopause and 50 years (SD 6) at starting MHT. Every MHT type, except vaginal oestrogens, was associated with excess breast cancer risks, which increased steadily with duration of use and were greater for oestrogen-progestagen than oestrogen-only preparations. Among current users, these excess risks were definite even during years 1-4 (oestrogen-progestagen RR 1·60, 95% CI 1·52-1·69; oestrogen-only RR 1·17, 1·10-1·26), and were twice as great during years 5-14 (oestrogen-progestagen RR 2·08, 2·02-2·15; oestrogen-only RR 1·33, 1·28-1·37). The oestrogen-progestagen risks during years 5-14 were greater with daily than with less frequent progestagen use (RR 2·30, 2·21-2·40 vs 1·93, 1·84-2·01; heterogeneity p<0·0001). For a given preparation, the RRs during years 5-14 of current use were much greater for oestrogen-receptor-positive tumours than for oestrogen-receptor-negative tumours, were similar for women starting MHT at ages 40-44, 45-49, 50-54, and 55-59 years, and were attenuated by starting after age 60 years or by adiposity (with little risk from oestrogen-only MHT in women who were obese). After ceasing MHT, some excess risk persisted for more than 10 years; its magnitude depended on the duration of previous use, with little excess following less than 1 year of MHT use. INTERPRETATION If these associations are largely causal, then for women of average weight in developed countries, 5 years of MHT, starting at age 50 years, would increase breast cancer incidence at ages 50-69 years by about one in every 50 users of oestrogen plus daily progestagen preparations; one in every 70 users of oestrogen plus intermittent progestagen preparations; and one in every 200 users of oestrogen-only preparations. The corresponding excesses from 10 years of MHT would be about twice as great. FUNDING Cancer Research UK and the Medical Research Council.
Collapse
|
8
|
Jordan VC. The SERM Saga, Something from Nothing: American Cancer Society/SSO Basic Science Lecture. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26:1981-1990. [PMID: 30911948 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07291-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The discovery of nonsteroidal antiestrogens created a new group of medicines looking for an application; however, at the time, cytotoxic chemotherapy was the modality of choice to treat all cancers. Antiestrogens were orphan drugs until 1971, with the passing of the National Cancer Act. This enabled laboratory innovations to aid patient care. METHODS This article traces the strategic application of tamoxifen to treat breast cancer by targeting the estrogen receptor (ER), deploying long-term adjuvant tamoxifen therapy, and becoming the first chemopreventive for any cancer. Laboratory discoveries from the University of Wisconsin Comprehensive Cancer Center (UWCCC) are described that address a broad range of biological issues with tamoxifen. These translated to improvements in clinical care. RESULTS Tamoxifen was studied extensively at UWCCC in the 1980s for the development of acquired resistance to long-term therapy. Additionally, the long-term metabolism of tamoxifen and regulation of growth factors were also studied. A concern with tamoxifen use for chemoprevention was that an antiestrogen would increase bone loss and atherosclerosis. Laboratory studies with tamoxifen and keoxifene (subsequently named raloxifene) demonstrated that 'nonsteroidal antiestrogens' maintained bone density, and this translated into successful clinical trials with tamoxifen at UWCCC. However, tamoxifen also increased endometrial cancer growth; this discovery in the laboratory translated into changes in clinical care. Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) were born at UWCCC. CONCLUSIONS There are now five US FDA-approved SERMs, all with discovery origins at UWCCC. Women's health was revolutionized as SERMs have the ability to treat multiple diseases by switching target sites around a woman's body on or off.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Craig Jordan
- Dallas/Fort Worth Living Legend Chair of Cancer Research, Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
|
10
|
Maximov PY, Abderrahman B, Fanning SW, Sengupta S, Fan P, Curpan RF, Rincon DMQ, Greenland JA, Rajan SS, Greene GL, Jordan VC. Endoxifen, 4-Hydroxytamoxifen and an Estrogenic Derivative Modulate Estrogen Receptor Complex Mediated Apoptosis in Breast Cancer. Mol Pharmacol 2018; 94:812-822. [PMID: 29739819 PMCID: PMC6022805 DOI: 10.1124/mol.117.111385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2017] [Accepted: 05/04/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Estrogen therapy was used to treat advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women for decades until the introduction of tamoxifen. Resistance to long-term estrogen deprivation (LTED) with tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors used as a treatment of breast cancer inevitably occurs, but unexpectedly low-dose estrogen can cause regression of breast cancer and increase disease-free survival in some patients. This therapeutic effect is attributed to estrogen-induced apoptosis in LTED breast cancer. Here, we describe modulation of the estrogen receptor (ER) liganded with antiestrogens (endoxifen and 4-hydroxytamoxifen) and an estrogenic triphenylethylene (TPE), ethoxytriphenylethylene (EtOXTPE), on estrogen-induced apoptosis in LTED breast cancer cells. Our results show that the angular TPE estrogen (EtOXTPE) is able to induce the ER-mediated apoptosis only at a later time compared with planar estradiol in these cells. Using real-time polymerase chain reaction, chromatin immunoprecipitation, western blotting, molecular modeling, and X-ray crystallography techniques, we report novel conformations of the ER complex with an angular estrogen EtOXTPE and endoxifen. We propose that alteration of the conformation of the ER complexes, with changes in coactivator binding, governs estrogen-induced apoptosis through the protein kinase regulated by RNA-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase sensor system to trigger an unfolded protein response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Y Maximov
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (P.Y.M., B.A., P.F., D.M.Q.R., J.A.G., V.C.J.); The Ben May Department for Cancer Research, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois (S.W.F., S.S.R., G.L.G.); Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC (S.S.); and Institute of Chemistry, Romanian Academy, Timisoara, Romania (R.F.C.)
| | - Balkees Abderrahman
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (P.Y.M., B.A., P.F., D.M.Q.R., J.A.G., V.C.J.); The Ben May Department for Cancer Research, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois (S.W.F., S.S.R., G.L.G.); Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC (S.S.); and Institute of Chemistry, Romanian Academy, Timisoara, Romania (R.F.C.)
| | - Sean W Fanning
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (P.Y.M., B.A., P.F., D.M.Q.R., J.A.G., V.C.J.); The Ben May Department for Cancer Research, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois (S.W.F., S.S.R., G.L.G.); Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC (S.S.); and Institute of Chemistry, Romanian Academy, Timisoara, Romania (R.F.C.)
| | - Surojeet Sengupta
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (P.Y.M., B.A., P.F., D.M.Q.R., J.A.G., V.C.J.); The Ben May Department for Cancer Research, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois (S.W.F., S.S.R., G.L.G.); Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC (S.S.); and Institute of Chemistry, Romanian Academy, Timisoara, Romania (R.F.C.)
| | - Ping Fan
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (P.Y.M., B.A., P.F., D.M.Q.R., J.A.G., V.C.J.); The Ben May Department for Cancer Research, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois (S.W.F., S.S.R., G.L.G.); Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC (S.S.); and Institute of Chemistry, Romanian Academy, Timisoara, Romania (R.F.C.)
| | - Ramona F Curpan
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (P.Y.M., B.A., P.F., D.M.Q.R., J.A.G., V.C.J.); The Ben May Department for Cancer Research, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois (S.W.F., S.S.R., G.L.G.); Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC (S.S.); and Institute of Chemistry, Romanian Academy, Timisoara, Romania (R.F.C.)
| | - Daniela Maria Quintana Rincon
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (P.Y.M., B.A., P.F., D.M.Q.R., J.A.G., V.C.J.); The Ben May Department for Cancer Research, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois (S.W.F., S.S.R., G.L.G.); Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC (S.S.); and Institute of Chemistry, Romanian Academy, Timisoara, Romania (R.F.C.)
| | - Jeffery A Greenland
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (P.Y.M., B.A., P.F., D.M.Q.R., J.A.G., V.C.J.); The Ben May Department for Cancer Research, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois (S.W.F., S.S.R., G.L.G.); Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC (S.S.); and Institute of Chemistry, Romanian Academy, Timisoara, Romania (R.F.C.)
| | - Shyamala S Rajan
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (P.Y.M., B.A., P.F., D.M.Q.R., J.A.G., V.C.J.); The Ben May Department for Cancer Research, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois (S.W.F., S.S.R., G.L.G.); Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC (S.S.); and Institute of Chemistry, Romanian Academy, Timisoara, Romania (R.F.C.)
| | - Geoffrey L Greene
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (P.Y.M., B.A., P.F., D.M.Q.R., J.A.G., V.C.J.); The Ben May Department for Cancer Research, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois (S.W.F., S.S.R., G.L.G.); Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC (S.S.); and Institute of Chemistry, Romanian Academy, Timisoara, Romania (R.F.C.)
| | - V Craig Jordan
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (P.Y.M., B.A., P.F., D.M.Q.R., J.A.G., V.C.J.); The Ben May Department for Cancer Research, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois (S.W.F., S.S.R., G.L.G.); Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC (S.S.); and Institute of Chemistry, Romanian Academy, Timisoara, Romania (R.F.C.)
| |
Collapse
|