Consensus on the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa - Brazilian Society of Dermatology

Efficacy of spironolactone in treating hidradenitis suppurativa in women of childbearing age: a single-center retrospective analysis

Background

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic skin disease characterized by recurrent nodules that affect areas with a high density of apocrine sweat glands, such as the axillae and groin. Androgens are implicated in the pathophysiology of HS. Therefore, spironolactone, an antiandrogen therapy, is recommended. However, data on its use in women of childbearing age are limited, especially since its antiandrogenic effects may affect menstruation, fertility, and pubertal development.

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of spironolactone in the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa in women of childbearing age and to identify factors associated with treatment response.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on female patients aged 12 to 50 with HS treated with spironolactone at Michigan Medicine dermatology clinics from 2000 to 2021. The patients' demographic data, HS characteristics, and spironolactone responses were examined. Statistical assessments were performed to determine the efficacy indicators.

Results

Of the 157 patients reviewed, 31 showed an improvement in treatment. Variables such as axillary involvement, previous treatment failures, and use of intralesional steroids were linked to a lack of improvement in spironolactone. Through adjusted multiple logistic regression analysis, a significant association was observed between improvement status and Hurley stage 3 (odds ratio = 0.15 [95% CI: 0.02-0.79], P = .036), suggesting that patients with Hurley stage 3 were 85% less likely to exhibit improvement in spironolactone therapy.

Limitations

The study's retrospective nature and reliance on single-center data can limit generalizability. The sample size is limited and therefore affects the study's statistical power.

Conclusion

Thus, spironolactone may offer therapeutic benefits for HS in women of childbearing age. However, patients with severe disease (Hurley stage 3) had reduced response rates. Further prospective studies are recommended to validate these findings and determine the most suitable patient profile for spironolactone therapy for HS.

Targeted therapy for immune mediated skin diseases. What should a dermatologist know?

BACKGROUND

Molecularly targeted therapies, such as monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and Janus Kinase inhibitors (JAKis), have emerged as essential tools in the treatment of dermatological diseases. These therapies modulate the immune system through specific signaling pathways, providing effective alternatives to traditional systemic immunosuppressive agents. This review aims to provide an updated summary of targeted immune therapies for inflammatory skin diseases, considering their pathophysiology, efficacy, dosage, and safety profiles.

METHODS

The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A systematic search was conducted on PubMed over the past 10 years, focusing on randomized clinical trials, case reports, and case series related to targeted immune therapies in dermatology. Eligibility criteria were applied, and data were extracted from each study, including citation data, study design, and results.

RESULTS

We identified 1360 non-duplicate articles with the initial search strategy. Title and abstract review excluded 1150, while a full-text review excluded an additional 50 articles. The review included 143 studies published between 2012 and 2022, highlighting 39 drugs currently under investigation or in use for managing inflammatory skin diseases.

STUDY LIMITATIONS

The heterogeneity of summarized information limits this review. Some recommendations originated from data from clinical trials, while others relied on retrospective analyses and small case series. Recommendations will likely be updated as new results emerge.

CONCLUSION

Targeted therapies have revolutionized the treatment of chronic skin diseases, offering new options for patients unresponsive to standard treatments. Paradoxical reactions are rarely observed. Further studies are needed to fully understand the mechanisms and nature of these therapies. Overall, targeted immune therapies in dermatology represent a promising development, significantly improving the quality of life for patients with chronic inflammatory skin diseases.

Doppler ultrasound protocol for patients with hidradenitis suppurativa

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory disease that leads to the formation of nodules, abscesses and fistulas, with the formation of scars and fibrosis, causing significant impairment in patient quality of life. The diagnosis is clinical, using scores to classify the severity of the condition; currently the most recommended classification is the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Scoring System (IHS4). Doppler ultrasound has been used to complement the clinical evaluation of patients with HS. It is possible to observe subclinical lesions that change the staging, the severity of the case, and its treatment, either clinical or surgical. Correct treatment is essential to minimize the consequences of this disease for the patient.

OBJECTIVE

To establish an outpatient protocol for the use of Doppler ultrasound in the care of patients with HS.

METHODS

A narrative review of the literature was carried out on the use of Doppler ultrasound in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa; a referring protocol and technique orientations for imaging assessment in HS were created.

RESULTS

Recommendation to perform ultrasound evaluation of symptomatic areas eight weeks after using antibiotics and four, 12, and 24 weeks after starting immunobiologicals; apply SOS-HS ultrasound severity classification.

STUDY LIMITATIONS

The review did not cover all literature on ultrasound and HS; no systematic review was carried out, but rather a narrative one.

CONCLUSIONS

The correct assessment of patients staging must be carried out using dermatological ultrasound to avoid progression to scars and fibrosis, which compromise patients quality of life.

Access to dermatologic care and provider impact on hidradenitis suppurativa care: global survey insights

Background

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is an understudied disease, and current HS studies have focused on participants already connected to dermatologic care.

Objective

We surveyed participants in online HS support communities to gain a comprehensive understanding of how provider type impacts HS disease management and the issues individuals with HS face when accessing care.

Methods

From June 13 to June 30, 2021, we administered an anonymous cross-sectional online survey to HS Facebook support group participants who had a self-confirmed diagnosis of HS. Survey items assessed respondent demographics, primary HS provider, and barriers to HS care and pain management. Descriptive analyses are presented.

Results

The survey was viewed 5,168 times and 1,040 surveys met eligibility criteria (20.1%). Survey participants were 97% female and 72% White. Seventy-two percentage resided in the United States and 22% in Europe. Forty-seven percentage reported having a dermatologist as their primary HS provider, 38% reported a nondermatologist, and 15% reported no HS provider. We found that Asian race, full-time employment, private health insurance, and urban setting were each associated with higher rates of having a dermatologist as a primary HS provider. However, 43.7% of those with a dermatologist reported biologic use, as compared with 14.5% with nondermatologist HS providers. Our cohort was notably more severely impacted by comorbid diseases; 55.9% of our cohort had anxiety, 53.6% had depression, and 50.7% had obesity. Overall, 74.2% of our cohort reported experiencing stigma while accessing care for their HS.

Limitations

Participant recruitment via social media platform facilitates recruitment of individuals across the spectrum of healthcare access, but may introduce selection bias and favor well-resourced areas. Self-reported data may be subject to recall bias.

Conclusion

Our study provides unique insights into the characteristics and experiences of individuals with HS across the spectrum of health care access.

Comparative efficacy and therapeutic positioning of biologics in hidradenitis suppurativa: A systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomised trials

Background Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a challenging inflammatory skin condition. Recently, many different biologics have been tested for HS, but the paucity of head-to-head comparative trials makes it difficult to determine the real value of each biological intervention. We aimed to determine the relative efficacy among biologics in treating moderate-to-severe HS throughout a network meta-analysis (NMA) and, to identify which pathogenetic pathways may be the most appropriate to target. Methods We comprehensively identified studies in 3 databases and clinicaltrials.gov. The eligibility criteria included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) reporting data on the efficacy of moderate-to-severe HS. Results The NMA comprised 13 studies comprising 14 interventions on 2,748 participants in the network. The NMA showed the odds of achieving the clinical response were significantly superior with adalimumab (RR: 0.37, 95% CI = 0.06-0.63), adalimumab QW (RR: 0.63, 95% CI = 0.43-0.87), MAB1p (RR: 1.33, 95% CI = 0.03-3.12), secukinumab (RR: 0.25, 95% CI = 0.11-0.47) and secukinumabQ2W (RR: 0.24, 95% CI = 0.1-0.46) compared to placebo. Conclusion Based on the NMA, inhibiting tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-a with adalimumab appears to be the best strategy, followed by the blockade of IL--17 with secukinumab. Data for bimekizumab and CJM112 are promising. Infliximab has inconsistent clinical response, and more data are necessary to confirm this molecule as a potential third-line therapy in HS. The blockade of IL-23 and CD5a pathways is not relevant, or at least the current evidence is insufficient to recommend further investigation of guselkumab, risankizumab, and vilobelimab in phase III trials.

Hidradenitis Suppurativa in Children and Adolescents: An Update on Pharmacologic Treatment Options

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, recurrent, inflammatory skin condition that manifests as painful, deep-seated, inflamed nodules and abscesses in the axillary, groin, perianal, perineal, and inframammary regions. The associated pain, malodour, and disfigurement contribute to its profound negative impact on psychosocial spheres and overall quality of life in affected individuals. Although the symptoms of HS classically begin in the second or third decade of life, HS affects children and adolescents as well. Despite this, there are limited pediatric data on treatment, which are largely based on expert opinion, extrapolation of efficacy data in adults with HS, and safety information from medication use in other pediatric diseases. On this basis, there exist several pharmacological modalities in the treatment of children and adolescents with HS including topical therapies, systemic therapies, and biologics. The goals of this review article are to: (1) review the efficacy of different pharmacological treatment modalities in children and adolescents with HS, and (2) review the safety and monitoring considerations of the different treatment options in children and adolescents with HS.

Navigating the Multidimensional Impact of Living with Hidradenitis Suppurativa: An In-Depth Netnographic Study on Social Media Platforms

INTRODUCTION

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic skin condition causing considerable distress. It impacts mobility, social interaction, and quality of life. In Brazil, there is a notable gap in epidemiological data and patient experiences regarding HS.

METHODS

This study, spanning 2019 to 2022, employed netnography to probe the experiences of Brazilian patients with HS. This approach gleans insights from online interactions, offering a direct view into patients' lives.

RESULTS

Notably, the data illuminated the challenges patients face, such as difficulties in obtaining a diagnosis and the complexities involved in managing a chronic, and often debilitating, condition. Furthermore, patients' experiences with various treatments, encompassing antibiotics, biologic agents, lifestyle alterations, surgical procedures, and alternative remedies, were also examined.

CONCLUSION

By undertaking a longitudinal analysis of patient interactions, the study aimed to offer a richer understanding of HS, from its diagnosis to its treatment. It underscores the necessity for a more patient-centered approach when managing this condition. We hope that this enhanced understanding can facilitate better care for those affected by HS.

Is Exploration of Alternate Immune Pathways Needed in Hidradenitis Suppurativa? A Case of Atopic Dermatitis and Concurrent Hidradenitis Suppurativa Responding to Dupilumab

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is an inflammatory dermatosis associated with overactive T helper 1/T helper 17 (Th1/Th17) cells. HS has been effectively treated with biologic medications; however, many such biologics lack large randomized controlled trials. Only one such biologic, adalimumab, has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of HS. Other such biologics currently being studied for HS downregulate Th1/Th17 inflammatory pathways. We describe a patient with atopic dermatitis (AD) and comorbid HS, both of which improved several months into treatment with dupilumab. Interestingly enough, dupilumab targets Th2-mediated inflammatory skin conditions through the inhibition of IL-4/IL-13 cytokines. While dupilumab is known for its success in treating Th2-mediated inflammation, this presents a paradox as HS is a Th1/Th17 inflammatory condition. This case highlights how the inflammatory process of HS is not fully understood and how biologic pharmacologic interventions need to be further studied to determine their efficacy in treating HS.

Requirements for Brazilian Outpatient Centers of Excellence in Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Consensus Co-Creative Study

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic skin condition. Its complexity and impact on patients highlight the need for multidisciplinary care that can address the physical, psychological, and social aspects. Centers of excellence can ideally provide the necessary infrastructure, resources, and expertise to effectively treat HS. However, there are still no consolidated models of centers of excellence in HS, and establishing their foundations is an intricate research challenge. Purposely, design and co-creation as innovation techniques are helpful approaches to this type of research.

METHODS

In this study, we conducted a co-creation with consensus among HS specialists to propose the criteria and requirements to establish outpatient centers of excellence of HS in Brazil. We followed a linear process with mixed methods in 6 stages.

RESULTS

The process resulted in 10 categories for establishing outpatient centers, including their respective requirements, rationale, and classification. The categories include onboarding and welcoming; infrastructure and procedures; infusion therapy; flows and referrals; staffing; disease management; metrics during diagnosis; metrics during treatment; awareness and advocacy; research and education.

DISCUSSION

The idealized outpatient centers can play a role in the complete multidisciplinary treatment for HS and advancing the science of healthcare services by providing a focus for research, training, and translation of findings into practice.

Hidradenitis suppurativa - biologic therapy and other available treatment options

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic recurrent inflammatory skin disease which is characterized by painful, recurrent nodules and abscesses. The overall prevalence of HS is estimated to be 11 per 100 000 individuals in the United States and 4% of the world's population. Women are three times more affected than men, especially patients between 18 and 29 years. Similarly to acne vulgaris, HS is primarily associated with follicular occlusion, which results from a number of biological processes, including follicular epithelial hyperplasia and hyperkeratinization. There are numerous available treatment options for cutaneous lesions in the course of HS. A combination of conservative therapy and appropriate surgical treatment conducted by an experienced surgeon ensures the best possible clinical outcomes. Presently, biologic therapy is the most effective pharmacological treatment in patients with a moderate-to-severe course of the disease. Numerous ongoing clinical trials provide hope for greater availability of new biologic therapy methods.

Treatment of Acne with Isotretinoin Should Be Avoided in Patients with Hidradenitis Suppurativa "Conglobata Phenotype"

BACKGROUND

Acne conglobata (AC) and nodulocystic acne have long been confused clinically, despite the presentation and the response to treatment being different. AC and hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) resemble each other; a subtype of HS called "conglobata phenotype" has recently been reported in a large Dutch cohort. Acne vulgaris and HS are often associated. Isotretinoin is typically ineffective in treating HS and may even aggravate it, but it is often indispensable in treating acne vulgaris.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to assess whether isotretinoin may be used safely in adults with both HS and acne vulgaris and when it might be contraindicated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Belgian HS patients from the European Registry for Hidradenitis Suppurativa Registry (ERHS) reporting a history of severe acne of the face and/or the back, and who have ever used isotretinoin for their acne, were all selected. Patients whose acne worsened on isotretinoin were compared to patients whose acne did not worsen (improvement or no change).

RESULTS

Among the 82 selected patients, 10 (12.2%) report that their acne was aggravated while taking isotretinoin, while 72 (87.8%) report that their acne was not aggravated on isotretinoin. Of the 10 HS patients whose acne worsened with isotretinoin, 9 (90%) were men (p = 0.04) and 8 (80%) were HS "conglobata phenotype" (p < 0.001). In contrast, 47 (65.3%) of the 72 patients whose acne did not worsen on isotretinoin belonged to the HS "regular phenotype" (p = 0.01). On multivariate analysis, the item most strongly associated with poor response to isotretinoin was the HS "conglobata phenotype," followed by body mass index (BMI) (worse response to isotretinoin if BMI >25 kg/m2). Additionally, of 26 patients who received isotretinoin while their HS had already started, only 6 (23.1%) reported isotretinoin effectiveness on their HS.

CONCLUSION

Subject to confirmation by larger studies, our study suggests that isotretinoin should be avoided in the treatment of acne in HS patients with the HS "conglobata phenotype," as it may worsen the acne, likewise being male or having a BMI above 25 seems to increase this risk of a bad therapeutic outcome. Patients with an HS "regular phenotype" appear to be at a reduced risk of isotretinoin treatment worsening their acne.

Systemic Antibiotic Therapy in Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Review on Treatment Landscape and Current Issues

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, recurrent, and inflammatory skin disease characterized by painful, deep-seated, nodules, abscesses, and sinus tracts in sensitive areas of the body, including axillary, inguinal, and anogenital regions. Antibiotics represent the first-line pharmacological treatment of HS because of their anti-inflammatory properties and antimicrobial effects. This narrative review summarizes the most significant current issues on the role of systemic antibiotics in the management of HS, critically analyzing the main limits of their use (antibiotic resistance and toxicity). Although, in the last decades, several cytokines have been implicated in the pathomechanism of HS and the research on the use of novel biologic agents in HS has been intensified, antibiotics remain a valid therapeutic approach. Future challenges regarding antibiotic therapy in HS comprise their use in association with biologics in the management of acute flare or as a bridge therapy to surgery.

Rifampin-moxifloxacin-metronidazole combination therapy for severe Hurley stage 1 hidradenitis suppurativa: prospective short-term trial and 1-year follow-up in 28 consecutive patients

BACKGROUND

Severe Hurley stage 1 hidradenitis suppurativa (HS1) is a difficult-to-treat form of the disease.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and tolerance of the oral combination of rifampin (10 mg/kg once daily)/moxifloxacin (400 mg once daily)/metronidazole (250-500 mg 3 times daily) (RMoM) treatment strategy in patients with severe HS1.

METHODS

Prospective, open-label, noncomparative cohort study in 28 consecutive patients. Nineteen patients were treated for 6 weeks by RMoM, followed by 4 weeks of rifampin/moxifloxacin alone, then by cotrimoxazole after remission. Moxifloxacin was replaced by pristinamycin (1 g 3 times daily) in 9 patients because of contraindications or intolerance. The primary endpoint was a Sartorius score of 0 (clinical remission) at week 12.

RESULTS

The median Sartorius score dropped from 14 to 0 (P = 6 × 10^-6) at week 12, with 75% of patients reaching clinical remission. A low initial Sartorius score was a prognosis factor for clinical remission (P = .049). The main adverse effects were mild gastrointestinal discomfort, mucosal candidiasis, and asthenia. At 1 year of follow-up, the median number of flares dropped from 21/year to 1 (P = 1 × 10^-5).

LIMITATIONS

Small, monocentric, noncontrolled study.

CONCLUSIONS

Complete and prolonged remission can be obtained in severe HS1 by using targeted antimicrobial treatments.

Real-World Considerations of Candidacy for Biologics in Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, progressive inflammatory skin disease that is often recalcitrant to multiple treatments. In determining biologic candidacy for patients with HS, we propose a paradigm shift away from Hurley staging and towards consideration of other variables. Biologics represent a long-term treatment option for HS that may serve as a disease-modifying agent. These medications are typically initiated in patients with moderate to severe disease, which, based on inclusion criteria in clinical trials, is often defined as Hurley stage II or III disease, at which point irreversible tissue damage has already occurred. In real-world clinical settings, these considerations include treatments tried and failed, predicted disease trajectory, disease characteristics beyond lesion type, impact of disease on patients' functional status and quality of life, and patient comorbidities, venturing away from the limitations of Hurley stage designations. Future clinical trials may benefit from inclusion of recalcitrant Hurley stage I patients, which may then re-shape treatment guidelines and insurance coverage and improve patient access to biologic treatments.

Biologics and Small Molecule Inhibitors for Treating Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The treatment guidelines for hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) vary among different countries, and several biologics and small molecule inhibitors have been tested for treating moderate-to-severe HS over the past few years. However, treatment guidelines for HS vary among different countries.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to exam the efficacy and serious adverse events (SAEs) of biologics and small-molecule inhibitors in treating moderate-to-severe HS. Binary outcomes were presented as risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

We included 16 RCTs with a total of 2076 participants on nine biologics and three small-molecule inhibitors for treating moderate-to-severe HS, including adalimumab, anakinra, apremilast, avacopan, bimekizumab, CJM112, etanercept, guselkumab, IFX-1, INCB054707, infliximab, and MABp1. The meta-analysis revealed only adalimumab (RR 1.77, 95% CI, 1.44-2.17) and bimekizumab (RR 2.25, 95% CI, 1.03-4.92) achieved significant improvement on hidradenitis suppurativa clinical response (HiSCR), and adalimumab was superior to placebo in achieving dermatology life quality index (DLQI) 0/1 (RR 3.97; 95% CI, 1.70-9.28). No increase in SAEs was found for all included active treatments when compared with placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Adalimumab and bimekizumab are the only two biologics effective in achieving HiSCR with acceptable safety profile, whereas adalimumab is the only biologic effective in achieving DLQI 0/1.

Hidradenitis suppurativa: racial and socioeconomic considerations in management

Studies on hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) have found an increased prevalence of HS in skin of color and lower socioeconomic status patients, although the reasons for these differences are unclear. Demographic and therapeutic studies of HS originate primarily from developed Western countries, and data from low- and medium-income countries (LMIC) remain comparatively limited. In this review paper, we discuss differences in clinical presentation and comorbidities between racial and socioeconomic subpopulations and describe the genetic, biomedical, psychosocial, and ecological factors that may explain the associations between HS and skin of color and socioeconomic status. We highlight biomedical treatment considerations for LMIC including cost effective and less complex treatment strategies. We touch on population-based strategies to address the social determinants of health in HS management and discuss additional challenges arising from the COVID-19 pandemic.

Efficacy and Toxicity of Classical Immunosuppressants, Retinoids and Biologics in Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the apocrine glands characterized by recurrent episodes. Although several therapies exist, none is completely curative. Several immunosuppressives have been studied with encouraging results and targeted approaches. In this review, we highlight the various immunosuppressives used in this condition along with their salient features to enable physicians to choose the correct therapy for their patients. The search of the peer-reviewed literature included clinical trials, scientific reviews, case series, case reports, and guidelines. The literature was identified from electronic databases (MEDLINE and PubMed) through November 2021; additional articles were included from the references of the identified articles.

Real-world safety and effectiveness of adalimumab in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa: 12-week interim analysis of post-marketing surveillance in Japan

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a painful chronic skin disease characterized by abscesses, nodules, and tunnels in the skin. Adalimumab, a monoclonal antibody against tumor necrosis factor‐α, is approved for the treatment of HS in Europe, the USA, and Japan. This multicenter, open‐label, post‐marketing, observational study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03894956) evaluated the safety and effectiveness of adalimumab in routine clinical practice in Japan (March 2019–May 2021). Patients with HS were treated with s.c. doses of adalimumab according to the dosage described in the package insert. The primary end‐point was safety (data cut‐off, December 2020). Secondary end‐points assessed effectiveness, including HS Clinical Response (HiSCR), skin pain, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and C‐reactive protein (CRP). Here, we report 12‐week interim effectiveness results. A total of 84 eligible patients from 65 sites were enrolled; 83 patients were included in this analysis. Mean age was 42.0 years, mean body mass index was 26.9 kg/m², 78.3% of patients were male, 61.4% had Hurley stage III disease, 39.8% had a disease duration ≥10 years, and 7.2% had a family history of HS. The most common affected sites were the axilla (60.2%), buttocks (59.0%), and the inguinal and femoral regions (47.0%). Mean abscess and inflammatory nodule count was 13.0 (standard deviation, 12.0). Among patients with a comorbidity (57.8%), the most common were diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease. No patient reported a serious infection or any safety event of special interest. One patient died from a serious adverse event of cardiac failure unrelated to adalimumab. At week 12, 57.4% of patients achieved HiSCR, and significant reductions from baseline in skin pain, DLQI (both p < 0.0001), and CRP (p = 0.0029) were observed. These results support the administration of adalimumab as a well‐tolerated and effective treatment for Japanese patients with HS in real‐world clinical practice.

The Personal Impact of Daily Wound Care for Hidradenitis Suppurativa

BACKGROUND

Recurring nodules, abscesses, and lesions characterise hidradenitis suppurativa (HS): a chronic, inflammatory skin disorder. Globally the prevalence of HS is estimated to be around 1% of the population. Leakage, pain, and odour from HS wounds require substantial management. Little is known of the personal burdens that routine wound management imposes on the patient.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate how routine HS wound management impacts patients in terms of the time spent changing dressings, the number of dressings required per day, pain experienced during dressing changes, and negative impact on various domains of their personal lives.

METHODS

An anonymous online questionnaire was posted on closed social media patient support groups between April and May 2019. Pearson χ2 test was used to evaluate if Hurley stages influenced the personal impact of wound care routines on patients. Statistical significance was determined as p value <0.05.

RESULTS

In total, 908 people from 28 countries responded. Of these, 81% (n = 734) reported that regular dressing changes negatively impacted on their quality of life. Most patients, 82% (n = 744), experience pain during dressing changes. 16% (n = 142) of patients required five or more dressings daily, and 12% (n = 108) spend over 30 min daily tending to wounds. Patients indicated high levels of dissatisfaction with currently available wound dressings.

CONCLUSION

HS wound management imposes a substantial personal burden on patients. There is a clear unmet need for HS-specific wound dressings and wound care provisions, and a greater awareness of the condition and its impact is needed among clinicians.

Plant Antimicrobial Peptides as Potential Tool for Topic Treatment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Among chronic skin autoinflammatory diseases, Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS) stands out for its chronicity, highly variable condition, and profound impact on the patients' quality of life. HS is characterized by suppurative skin lesions in diverse body areas, including deep-seated painful nodules, abscesses, draining sinus, and bridged scars, among others, with typical topography. To date, HS is considered a refractory disease and medical treatments aim to reduce the incidence, the infection, and the pain of the lesions. For this purpose, different classes of drugs, including anti-inflammatory molecules, antibiotics and biological drugs are being used. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), also called defense peptides, emerge as a new class of therapeutic compounds, with broad-spectrum antimicrobial action, in addition to reports on their anti-inflammatory, healing, and immunomodulating activity. Such peptides are present in prokaryotes and eukaryotes, as part of the innate eukaryotic immune system. It has been proposed that a deregulation in the expression of AMPs in human epithelial tissues of HS patients may be associated with the etiology of this skin disease. In this scenario, plant AMPs stand out for their richness, diversity of types, and broad antimicrobial effects, with potential application for topical systemic use in patients affected by HS.

Clinico-Epidemiological Characteristics of Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Retrospective Cohort Study from a Tertiary Care Centre in Northern India

Background:

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic debilitating disease with a relapsing and remitting course. Due to delay in diagnosis, patients are often referred when the disease is very severe. Management strategies vary across multiple guidelines.

Aims:

The aim of this study was to analyze the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with HS among our outpatient attendees and to study the outcomes of various treatments offered.

Methodology:

This was a retrospective cohort study analyzing case files and photographic records of all patients diagnosed with HS, presenting to our tertiary care institute over 18 months.

Results:

A total of 22 patients (10 males and 12 females) of HS were studied with majority having Hurley stage 2 and 3 diseases. The most common site affected was axilla. Overweight and obese patients were 45.4% and 18.1%, respectively. Rifampicin–clindamycin combination or doxycycline was the first line therapy offered. Adalimumab was given in only two patients but could not be continued for long term due to financial issues. Surgery was performed in six patients. Procedures included wide local excision and deroofing which is left to heal by secondary intention. Least number of remissions and most satisfactory improvement was seen with a combination of antibiotics and surgery compared to medical treatment alone.

Limitations:

Retrospective nature and a single center study were the major drawbacks.

Conclusion:

Patients undergoing procedural intervention in addition to pharmacotherapy have best overall outcomes and involvement of a multidisciplinary team plays a key role, however a larger follow-up study is required.

Efficacy of non-surgical monotherapies for hidradenitis suppurativa: a systematic review and network meta-analyses of randomized trials

OBJECTIVE

We determined the relative efficacy of non-surgical monotherapies for hidradenitis suppurativa (HS).

METHODS

Network meta-analyses were conducted to determine treatments' surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) value (i.e., an estimate that ranks efficacy); pairwise comparisons were conducted.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Ten trials were eligible for quantitative analyses; however, all did not have a common endpoint. Outcomes corresponded to pain severity, clinical response, quality of life and abscess count. For pain reduction, infliximab was ranked most efficacious (SUCRA =94%) compared to bermekimab, anakinra and placebo; infliximab reduced pain more significantly (p < 0.05) than anakinra and than placebo. For occurrence of clinical response, bimekizumab had the highest SUCRA (67%) relative to adalimumab, anakinra and placebo; bimekizumab was more efficacious than placebo (p < 0.05). For quality of life in mild HS, Botox had the highest SUCRA (94%) compared to adalimumab and placebo; Botox was more efficacious than placebo (p < 0.05). For reduction in abscess count, oral tetracycline had the highest SUCRA (48%) compared to topical clindamycin and vehicle. Our work-being the first NMA study on non-surgical HS monotherapies-contributes to the comparative effectiveness literature for this condition.

The efficacy and tolerability of tetracyclines and clindamycin plus rifampicin for the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa: Results of a prospective European cohort study

BACKGROUND

Tetracyclines and clindamycin plus rifampicin combination therapy are both considered first-line therapy in current hidradenitis suppurativa guidelines. However, evidence for their efficacy is drawn from small studies, often without validated outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the 12-week efficacy of oral tetracyclines and a combination of clindamycin and rifampicin.

METHODS

A prospective, international cohort study performed between October 2018 and August 2019.

RESULTS

In total, 63.6% of the included 283 patients received oral tetracyclines, and 36.4% were treated with clindamycin and rifampicin. Both groups showed a significant decrease in International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System from baseline (both P < .001). The Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) was achieved in 40.1% and 48.2% of patients, respectively (P = .26). Patient characteristics or disease severity were not associated with the attainment of HiSCR or the minimal clinically important differences for the Dermatology Life Quality Index and pain.

LIMITATIONS

Cohort study. Respectively, 23.9% and 19.4% of patients had to be excluded from the HiSCR analysis for the tetracycline and combination therapy group because of a low abscess and nodule count at baseline.

CONCLUSION

This study shows significant efficacy of both tetracycline treatment and clindamycin and rifampicin combination therapy after 12 weeks in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa. No significant differences in efficacy were observed between the 2 treatments, regardless of disease severity.

Trends in the management of hidradenitis suppurativa in the Middle East region: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, painful, and severely debilitating inflammatory disease that affects apocrine gland-bearing skin. There is no universal consensus on the management of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). Current available guidelines are from western countries, which may be of limited use in other parts of the world. In this study, we aim to identify trends in the management of HS in the Middle East (ME) and its differences with the West.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed to identify all studies in HS management performed by experts in the ME from database inception to June 2020 using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases. Only original articles published in English language were included. Guidelines from western countries were used for comparison.

RESULTS

Fifty-four eligible studies comprising 7649 HS patients from the ME region and nine guidelines from the West were included. No established guidelines were found for the management of HS in the ME. Sex ratio of HS patients in the ME is different in that men reported to be affected at a higher rate than in the West. Different antibiotic regimens were recommended in the ME, and the experts in the ME tend to be more procedure intensive than experts in the West.

CONCLUSIONS

Establishing a guideline for HS management in the ME is recommended to address unique considerations in the countries in this region.

Pain management in hidradenitis suppurativa and a proposed treatment algorithm

Pain contributes substantially to reduced quality of life in individuals living with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). Although improved understanding of HS pathogenesis and treatment has resulted in improved evidence-based HS management guidelines, comprehensive pain management guidelines have yet to be developed. Few HS-specific data exist to guide pharmacologic analgesia; however, recognizing HS pain as either acute or chronic and predominantly nociceptive (aching and gnawing pain due to tissue damage) versus neuropathic (burning-type pain due to somatosensory nervous system dysfunction) provides a conceptual framework for applying outside pain management practices to HS management. This article incorporates the best available evidence from the HS and pain literature to propose an HS pain algorithm that integrates psychological, pharmacologic, and complementary and alternative treatment modalities.

Hidradenitis suppurativa in pediatric patients

Interest in and research on hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) have increased during the past decade, resulting in expanded knowledge about associated comorbidities and treatment efficacy. Knowledge about pediatric-onset HS is still limited, based on case studies, small case series, and extrapolation from adult studies. With increasing prevalence of childhood obesity, decreasing pubertal age, and increasing awareness of HS, physicians may start encountering younger HS patients. This review presents an updated discussion on the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and associated comorbidities in HS, with a focus on pediatric and adolescent patients. It also suggests recommendations for investigation and treatment based on current evidence.

Hidradenitis Suppurativa: a lesser-known cause of AA amyloidosis

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, disabling skin disease. The estimated prevalence is 1-4 % worldwide. HS is a systemic inflammatory disease and can cause AA amyloidosis. The first report of HS-related amyloidosis dates back to 1966; since then, sporadic cases have been reported. Our work will be the first case series on HS and AA amyloidosis.

CASE SERIES

We report eight HS cases complicated with amyloidosis. Six patients were male. The median age was 44 years, and the median disease duration before the amyloidosis diagnosis was 15.5 years. In a mean follow-up of 18 ± 6 months, we achieved favorable renal responses in four of the eight cases (50 %). All cases had a dermatologic response, with four complete and four partial remissions.

CONCLUSION

HS is a systemic inflammatory disorder that may cause AA amyloidosis. Aggressive treatment of HS may halt the progression of amyloidosis. HIPPOKRATIA 2020, 24(1): 33-37.

The expanding pathways of autoinflammation: a lesson from the first 100 genes related to autoinflammatory manifestations

AutoInflammatory Diseases (AIDs) are a group of innate immune system disorders characterized by sterile inflammation without evidence of pathogenic autoantibodies or auto-reactive T lymphocytes. An expanding spectrum of genes and molecular pathways are associated with AIDs. Inflammasomopathies are secondary to dysregulation of multi-protein complexes, called inflammasomes, leading to an excessive maturation and secretion of IL1β and IL18. Patients present with persistent or recurrent systemic inflammation, abdominal and chest pain, skin rashes and are sensible to IL1 inhibitors. Unfolded proteins response causes a small number of AIDs that we propose to call immuno-proteinopathies, characterized by recurrent fevers and deep tissues inflammation. Other inflammatory conditions can occur in case of abnormalities of actin polymerization and the term of immuno-actinopathies is proposed. Generalized pustular psoriasis is a marker of autoinflammation mainly affecting the keratinocytes. Specific treatment targeting the p40 subunit of IL12 and IL23 or IL-17 are usually effective. Granulomatous inflammation characterizes AIDs related to NOD2 signaling defects. Defects in the ubiquitin-proteasome system cause a group of relopathies and some interferonopathies related to defect of the proteasome function (CANDLE syndrome). Gain of function of proteins regulating the production of type I interferons lead to severe inflammatory conditions, called interferonopathies. The JAK/STAT inhibitors are usually effective in these latter conditions. In conclusions, the identification of the main intracellular pathways involved in rare monogenic AIDs allows not only the proper classification of different conditions, but also highlight a pivotal role of possible novel therapeutic targets for the future.

A Comparison of International Management Guidelines for Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory dermatosis that imparts a significant burden on patients and presents a management challenge for healthcare providers. As attention to this debilitating condition has grown over recent years, our understanding of HS pathogenesis and optimal treatment approaches continues to evolve. Nine HS treatment guidelines developed by various expert organizations have been published, encompassing therapeutic modalities ranging from topical agents to systemic therapies to procedural interventions. These guidelines demonstrate significant overlap in treatment recommendations and have all been published within the last 5 years. Therefore, we aim to compare and synthesize the recommendations of international HS treatment guidelines and to encourage inter-organizational communication for the development of consensus or staggered publication of recommendations for HS management.