Treating dyslipidemic patients with lipid-modifying and combination therapies

Heparin-induced lipoprotein precipitation apheresis in dyslipidemic patients: A multiparametric assessment

Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis (LA) selectively eliminates lipoproteins containing apolipoprotein B 100 (ApoB100) on patients affected by severe dyslipidemia. In addition to lowering lipids, LA is thought to exert pleiotropic effects altering a number of other compounds associated with atherosclerosis, such as pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines or pro-thrombotic factors. More knowledge needs to be gathered on the effects of LA, and particularly on its ability to modify blood components other than lipids. We performed a multiparametric assessment of the inflammatory, metabolic and proteomic profile changes after Heparin-induced lipoprotein precipitation (H.E.L.P.) apheresis on serum samples from nine dyslipidemic patients evaluating cholesterol and lipoproteins, plasma viscosity and density, metabolites, cytokines, PCSK9 levels and other proteins selectively removed after the treatment. Our results show that H.E.L.P. apheresis is effective in lowering lipoprotein and PCSK9 levels. Although not significantly, complement and inflammation-related proteins are also affected, indicating a possible transient epiphenomenon induced by the extracorporeal procedure.

Oxidative stress as pathogenesis of cardiovascular risk associated with metabolic syndrome

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is characterized by accumulation of visceral fat associated with the clustering of metabolic and pathophysiological cardiovascular risk factors: impaired glucose tolerance, dyslipidemia, and hypertension. Although the definition of MetS is different among countries, visceral obesity is an indispensable component of MetS. A growing body of evidence suggests that increased oxidative stress to adipocytes is central to the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease in MetS. Increased oxidative stress to adipocytes causes dysregulated expression of inflammation-related adipocytokines in MetS, which contributes to obesity-associated vasculopathy and cardiovascular risk primarily through endothelial dysfunction. The purpose of present review is to unravel the mechanistic link between oxidative stress and cardiovascular risk in MetS, focusing on insulin resistance, hypertension, and atherosclerosis. Then, therapeutic opportunities translated from the bench to bedside will be provided to develop novel strategies to cardiovascular risk factors in MetS.

Impact of prior authorization on the use and costs of lipid-lowering medications among Michigan and Indiana dual enrollees in Medicaid and Medicare: results of a longitudinal, population-based study

BACKGROUND

Some Medicaid programs have adopted prior-authorization (PA) policies that require prescribers to request approval from Medicaid before prescribing drugs not included on a preferred drug list.

OBJECTIVE

This study examined the association between PA policies for lipid-lowering agents in Michigan and Indiana and the use and cost of this drug class among dual enrollees in Medicare and Medicaid.

METHODS

Michigan and Indiana claims data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services were assessed. Michigan Medicaid instituted a PA requirement for several lipid-lowering medications in March 2002; Indiana implemented a PA policy for drugs in this class in September 2002. Although the PA policies affected some statins, they predominantly targeted second-line treatments, including bile acid sequestrants, fibrates, and niacins. Individuals aged ≥18 years who were continuously dually enrolled in both Medicare and Medicaid from July 2000 through September 2003 were included in this longitudinal, population-based study, which included a 20-month observation period before the implementation of PA in Michigan and a 12-month follow-up period after the Indiana PA policy was initiated. Interrupted time series analysis was used to examine changes in prescription rates and pharmacy costs for lipid-lowering drugs before and after policy implementation.

RESULTS

A total of 38,684 dual enrollees in Michigan and 29,463 in Indiana were included. Slightly more than half of the cohort were female (Michigan, 53.3% [20,614/38,684]; Indiana, 56.3% [16,595/29,463]); nearly half were aged 45 to 64 years (Michigan, 43.7% [16,921/38,684]; Indiana, 45.2% [13,321/29,463]). Most subjects were white (Michigan, 77.4% [29,957/38,684]; Indiana: 84.9% [25,022/29,463]). The PA policy was associated with an immediate 58% reduction in prescriptions for nonpreferred medications in Michigan and a corresponding increase in prescriptions for preferred agents. However, the PA policy had no apparent effect in Indiana, where there had been little use of nonpreferred medications before the policy was implemented (3.3%). The policies were associated with an immediate reduction of $24,548 in prescription expenditures in Michigan and an immediate reduction of $16,070 in Indiana.

CONCLUSIONS

The PA policy was associated with substantially lower use of nonpreferred lipid-lowering drugs in Michigan, offset by increases in the use of preferred medications, but there was less change in Indiana. Data limitations did not permit the evaluation of the impact of policy-induced switching on clinical outcomes such as cholesterol levels. The monetary benefit of PA policies for lipid-lowering agents should be weighed against administrative costs and the burden on patients and health care providers.

Statins are effective in treating dyslipidemia among psychiatric patients using second-generation antipsychotic agents

Statins are widely used in the treatment of patients having high levels of serum total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). However, there is little documentation on the ability of statins to treat dyslipidemia induced by second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) and if so, to what extent. A goal of the present study was to evaluate these aspects among psychotic inpatients who were prescribed SGAs in a typical clinical setting. The study sample consisted of 28 psychotic male forensic psychiatric inpatients (mean age 44 years). All had sGA medication for their psychotic symptoms. secondary causes of dyslipidemia were excluded and statin therapy was initiated, according to the established guidelines. The change in TC, LDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and triglycerides (TG) levels were evaluated retrospectively and analysed by the Wilcoxon signed Ranks test. The lowering effectivity of statin treatment was 36% for TC, 49% for LDL-C and 29% for TG. Most of the patients (84%) achieved a target value for LDL-C of <3.0 mmol/L, and 54% achieved target value of <2.6 mmol/L, while HDL-C remained unchanged. These results were achieved with a low or moderate dose of statin during a period of 1 month. The effect of statins in lowering of TC, LDL-C and TG among dyslipidemic psychiatric patients that were treated with sGA was similar to the effectiveness of statin therapy in other clinical trial settings, and should be used when they are indicated.

Efficacy and tolerability of ezetimibe 10 mg/day coadministered with statins in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia who do not achieve target LDL-C while on statin monotherapy: A Canadian, multicentre, prospective study--the Ezetrol Add-On Study

BACKGROUND

For patients who have above-target low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels while on statin monotherapy, coadministration of a cholesterol absorption inhibitor with the statin may decrease serum LDL-C levels and improve overall lipid profiles.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of ezetimibe 10 mg/day coadministered with a statin in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia who have higher than recommended LDL-C levels while on statin monotherapy.

METHODS

A six-week, prospective, multicentre study of eligible patients who had above-target LDL-C levels while on monotherapy with any statin, regardless of dose, for a minimum of four weeks. All patients were treated for six weeks with 10 mg ezetimibe daily coadministered with their current statins.

RESULTS

A total of 1141 patients were screened, 953 (83.5%) fulfilled the study inclusion criteria and 837 (87.8%) completed the study. Reasons for withdrawal included: lost to follow-up (50 patients [5.2%]); protocol violations (45 patients [4.7%]); adverse events (19 patients [2.0%]); and withdrawal of consent (two patients [0.2%]). After six weeks of treatment, statistically significant (P = 0.001) mean reductions were observed in LDL-C (30.05%), total cholesterol (20.84%), triglycerides (10.16%), apolipoprotein B (19.84%) and the total cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (19.88%). At six weeks, 674 patients (80.5%) achieved target LDL-C levels. Fifty predominantly mild, nonserious adverse events related to ezetimibe were reported by 32 patients (3.4%). Frequently reported adverse events included constipation (n = 7 [0.7% of patients]), diarrhea (n = 4 [0.4%]) and dizziness (n = 4 [0.4%]).

CONCLUSION

Ezetimibe coadministered with statins is effective in reducing LDL-C in patients who do not attain target LDL-C levels while on statin monotherapy.

Combination Drug Therapy: A Strategy for Aggressive Lipid Modification

This continuing feature will update readers on recent developments in cardiovascular pharmacotherapy. Cardiovascular disease remains the number one killer in the US, and more clinical outcome trials have been conducted in cardiology than in any other field of medicine. Given this rapidly expanding knowledge base, pharmacists can have a significant impact on prevention and treatment — if they keep current with developments in drug therapy.

Cost-effectiveness of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in the treatment of dyslipidemia and prevention of CHD

The recent completion of several clinical trials of lipid-lowering therapy with 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A inhibitors, or statins, was followed by an update in 2004 concerning the Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines issued by the National Cholesterol Education Program. Within this update, individuals considered at very high risk for coronary heart disease-related events were addressed, wherein the role of an aggressive, intensive lowering of lipid levels to new goals was presented. In achieving target cholesterol levels, the statins collectively represent first-line pharmacotherapeutic strategies, although each of the currently marketed agents differ in relative potency, dose, side effects and cost. As such, research concerning the pharmacoeconomics of lipid-lowering therapy may serve to augment clinical, evidence-based approaches to care. Furthermore, identifying and rectifying suboptimal care within healthcare systems may afford optimal outcomes amongst patients for resources consumed.

PPARalpha agonists stimulate progastrin production in human colorectal carcinoma cells

The three subtypes of peroxisome proliferator activated-receptors (PPARalpha, delta and gamma) control the storage and metabolism of fatty acids. Treatment of rats with the PPARalpha ligand ciprofibrate increases serum gastrin concentrations, and several lines of evidence suggest that non-amidated gastrins act as growth factors for the colonic mucosa. The aim of the present study was to investigate the expression of PPARs and the effect of PPAR ligands on gastrin production and cell proliferation in human colorectal carcinoma (CRC) cell lines. mRNAs for all three PPAR subtypes were detected by PCR in all CRC cell lines tested. The concentrations of progastrin, but not of glycine-extended or amidated gastrin, measured by radioimmunoassay in LIM 1899 conditioned media and cell extracts were significantly increased by treatment with the PPARalpha ligand clofibrate. Similar increases in progastrin were seen following treatment with the PPARalpha ligands ciprofibrate and fenofibrate, but not with bezafibrate, gemfibrozil or Wy 14643. The PPARgamma agonist rosiglitazone had no significant effect on progastrin production. The PPARalpha ligand clofibrate also stimulated proliferation of the LIM 1899 cell line. We conclude that some PPARalpha ligands increase progastrin production by the human CRC cell line LIM 1899, and that clofibrate increases proliferation of LIM 1899 cells. These studies have revealed a relationship between PPARs and gastrin, two regulatory molecules implicated in the pathogenesis of CRC.

Prolonged-Release Nicotinic Acid

Prolonged-release (PR) nicotinic acid (niacin) [Niaspan] is an oral, once-daily formulation of the lipid-modifying drug designed to produce less vasodilatory flushing than crystalline immediate-release (IR) nicotinic acid and less hepatotoxicity than previous sustained-release formulations of nicotinic acid.PR nicotinic acid appears to retain the same level of efficacy as crystalline IR nicotinic acid and be better tolerated than older nicotinic acid formulations. Nicotinic acid has beneficial effects on all traditional blood lipid and lipoprotein fractions and is the most effective agent for increasing high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol (HDL-C) and reducing lipoprotein(a). The effects of PR nicotinic acid are often additive when used in combination with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins), making it a useful addition when lipid goals are not achieved with the usual statin monotherapy or when additional correction of a specific lipid abnormality is required. PR nicotinic acid also slows atherosclerotic progression and even appears to produce regression of atherosclerosis in patients on stable statin therapy. PR nicotinic acid is a logical drug choice for treating atherogenic dyslipidaemia commonly associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus and the metabolic syndrome, and has been shown to be effective in patients with diabetes without adversely affecting glycaemic control in the majority of patients. The incidence of vasodilatory flushing with PR nicotinic acid is lower than with IR nicotinic acid and it decreases substantially over time as tolerance develops. To date, there has been no clinically significant hepatotoxicity observed with PR nicotinic acid. Therefore, once-daily PR nicotinic acid appears to maximise the potential benefits of nicotinic acid, while minimising any historical tolerability or safety concerns.

Optimal lipid modification: the rationale for combination therapy

BACKGROUND

An emphasis on more aggressive lipid-lowering, particularly of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, to improve patient outcomes has led to an increased use of combination lipid-lowering drugs. This strategy, while potentially beneficial, has triggered concerns regarding fears of adverse effects, harmful drug interactions, and patient nonadherence.

OBJECTIVE

To present key data regarding combination lipid-altering therapy including use, rationale, major trials, benefits, potential adverse effects, compliance issues, and limitations.

METHOD

Literature was obtained from MEDLINE (1966 - June 2005) and references from selected articles.

RESULTS

A substantial body of evidence from epidemiological data and clinical trials indicates that aggressive lipid modification, especially low-density lipoprotein reduction, is associated with reduced cardiovascular events. Numerous studies utilizing various combinations of cholesterol-lowering agents including statin/fibrate, statin/niacin, statin/bile acid resin, and statin/ezetimibe have demonstrated significant changes in the lipid profile with acceptable safety. Long-term trials of combination therapy evaluating clinical outcomes or surrogate markers of cardiovascular disease, while limited, are promising.

CONCLUSION

Combining lipid-altering agents results in additional improvements in lipoproteins and has the potential to further reduce cardiovascular events beyond that of monotherapy.

Rosuvastatin: a review of its use in the management of dyslipidemia

Rosuvastatin (Crestor), an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (statin), has a favorable pharmacologic profile, including its selective uptake by hepatic cells, hydrophilic nature, and lack of metabolism by cytochrome p450 (CYP) 3A4 isoenzyme. This last property means that the potential for CYP3A4-mediated drug interactions and, as a consequence, adverse events is low in those requiring concomitant therapy with a statin and agents metabolized by CYP3A4. In a broad spectrum of adult patients with dyslipidemias, oral rosuvastatin 5-40 mg once daily effectively and rapidly improved lipid profiles in several large, randomized, mainly double-blind, multicenter trials of up to 52 weeks' duration. After 12 weeks' treatment, rosuvastatin was significantly (all p < 0.05) more effective at milligram equivalent dosages than atorvastatin, pravastatin, and simvastatin in improving the overall lipid profiles of patients with hypercholesterolemia (intent-to-treat analyses). Moreover, overall a significantly (all p < 0.001) higher proportion of patients achieved National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) III low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) goals with rosuvastatin 10 mg/day than with therapeutic starting dosages of these other statins after 12 weeks' treatment in pooled analyses. Rosuvastatin treatment for up to 52 weeks was generally well tolerated in patients with dyslipidemias in clinical trials. The most commonly reported treatment-related adverse events were myalgia, constipation, asthenia, abdominal pain, and nausea; these were mostly transient and mild. The incidence of proteinuria or microscopic hematuria with rosuvastatin 10 or 20 mg/day was <1% versus <1.5% with rosuvastatin 40 mg/day; these events were mostly transient and not associated with acute or progressive deterioration in renal function at recommended dosages. Importantly, very few patients experienced elevations in serum creatine phosphokinase (CPK) levels of over [corrected] 10-fold the upper limit of normal (0.2-0.4% of patients) or treatment-related myopathy (<or=0.1%) [i.e. muscle aches or weakness plus the same elevated serum CPK levels] at dosages of 5-40 mg/day. In conclusion, rosuvastatin treatment effectively and rapidly improves the lipid profile in patients with a broad spectrum of dyslipidemias. In those with hypercholesterolemia (including high-risk patients), rosuvastatin was more efficacious than and generally as well tolerated as atorvastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin, with significantly more rosuvastatin recipients achieving their NCEP ATP III target LDL-C levels. Thus, rosuvastatin has emerged as a valuable choice for first-line treatment in the management of low- to high-risk patients requiring lipid-lowering drug therapy.