Pioglitazone (AD-4833) ameliorates insulin resistance in patients with NIDDM. AD-4833 Glucose Clamp Study Group, Japan

Long-Term Pioglitazone Treatment Has No Significant Impact on Microglial Activation and Tau Pathology in P301S Mice

Neuroinflammation is one disease hallmark on the road to neurodegeneration in primary tauopathies. Thus, immunomodulation might be a suitable treatment strategy to delay or even prevent the occurrence of symptoms and thus relieve the burden for patients and caregivers. In recent years, the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) has received increasing attention as it is immediately involved in the regulation of the immune system and can be targeted by the anti-diabetic drug pioglitazone. Previous studies have shown significant immunomodulation in amyloid-β (Aβ) mouse models by pioglitazone. In this study, we performed long-term treatment over six months in P301S mice as a tauopathy model with either pioglitazone or placebo. We performed serial 18 kDa translocator protein positron-emission-tomography (TSPO-PET) imaging and terminal immunohistochemistry to assess microglial activation during treatment. Tau pathology was quantified via immunohistochemistry at the end of the study. Long-term pioglitazone treatment had no significant effect on TSPO-PET, immunohistochemistry read-outs of microglial activation, or tau pathology levels in P301S mice. Thus, we conclude that pioglitazone modifies the time course of Aβ-dependent microglial activation, but does not significantly modulate microglial activation in response to tau pathology.

Type 2 diabetes subgroups and potential medication strategies in relation to effects on insulin resistance and beta-cell function: A step toward personalised diabetes treatment?

Background

Type 2 diabetes is a syndrome defined by hyperglycaemia that is the result of various degrees of pancreatic β-cell failure and reduced insulin sensitivity. Although diabetes can be caused by multiple metabolic dysfunctions, most patients are defined as having either type 1 or type 2 diabetes. Recently, Ahlqvist and colleagues proposed a new method of classifying patients with adult-onset diabetes, considering the heterogenous metabolic phenotype of the disease. This new classification system could be useful for more personalised treatment based on the underlying metabolic disruption of the disease, although to date no prospective intervention studies have generated data to support such a claim.

Scope of Review

In this review, we first provide a short overview of the phenotype and pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes and discuss the current and new classification systems. We then review the effects of different anti-diabetic medication classes on insulin sensitivity and β-cell function and discuss future treatment strategies based on the subgroups proposed by Ahlqvist et al.

Major Conclusions

The proposed novel type 2 diabetes subgroups provide an interesting concept that could lead to a better understanding of the pathophysiology of the broad group of type 2 diabetes, paving the way for personalised treatment choices based on understanding the root cause of the disease. We conclude that the novel subgroups of adult-onset diabetes would benefit from anti-diabetic medications that take into account the main pathophysiology of the disease and thereby prevent end-organ damage. However, we are only beginning to address the personalised treatment of type 2 diabetes, and studies investigating the effects of current and novel drugs in subgroups with different metabolic phenotypes are needed to develop personalised treatment of the syndrome

•

Novel subgroups of type 2 diabetes provide a concept that could lead to a better understanding of its pathophysiology.

•

Treatment strategies would benefit from anti-diabetic medications that influence the main pathophysiology of diabetes.

•

Here, we review different anti-diabetic medications classes affecting insulin sensitivity and β-cell function.

•

We suggest that future treatment strategies could benefit by taking into account subgroups provided by Ahlqvist et al.

Thiazolidinedione-induced effects beyond glycaemic control

The thiazolidinediones exert their insulin sensitising effect by binding to the nuclear receptors (transcription factors) peroxisome proliferator activated receptor (PPAR) γ and, to varying degrees, to PPARα. Several different genes are activated by thiazolidinediones, many of which contribute to the increase in insulin sensitivity (eg. an increase in glucose uptake and utilisation, a decrease in gluconeogenesis and in insulin-antagonistic cytokines, such as tumour necrosis factor α). Activation of other genes indirectly reduces insulin resistance by, for example, increasing free fatty acid (FFA) uptake and oxidation resulting in lower circulating FFA levels. The action of thiazolidinediones at PPARγ is generally responsible for their insulin sensitising effects while action at PPARα contributes to their lipid lowering effects. Therefore, the relative affinities of the different thiazolidinediones for PPARγ and PPARα will also lead to a different spectrum of actions for each agent.

Pioglitazone reduces atherogenic dense low density lipoprotein (LDL) particles in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Aim The new oral antidiabetic agent pioglitazone improves insulin sensitivity and glycaemic control, lowers triglycerides and increases high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol in type 2 diabetes. The effect of pioglitazone on low density lipoprotein (LDL) subfractions is investigated, herein.

Methods The effect of pioglitazone monotherapy (45 mg o.d. for six months) on LDL subfractions was observed in 30 patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes (HbA1C ≥ 7.5% and < 11.5% and triglycerides ≥ 150 mg/dL). The distribution of LDL subfractions was determined by equilibrium density gradient ultracentrifugation before and during treatment.

Results HbA1C (9.5% before and 7.4% on treatment, p<0.001), triglycerides (-135 mg/dL [-32.2%], p=0.002) and apo B in LDL-6 (the most dense LDL subfraction) decreased significantly. The mean diameter of LDL particles increased (19.5 nm before and 19.8 nm on treatment, p=0.005), while the mean LDL density decreased significantly (from 1.0394 kg/L to 1.0381 kg/L on treatment; p=0.033). HDL increased from 36.3 mg/dL to 44.2 mg/dL (+ 21.6%, p<0.001). Total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol did not change significantly.

Conclusions The results confirm that pioglitazone improves glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. In addition, pioglitazone reduced the proportion of atherogenic dense LDL. The effects of pioglitazone on lipoprotein metabolism may translate into a reduced risk for atherosclerotic complications in type 2 diabetes.

PPAR-γ receptor agonists-a review of their role in diabetic management in Trinidad and Tobago

The PPAR-γ receptor agonists, as a relatively new and perhaps still not very widely used class of antidiabetic agent in the Caribbean and particularly the Trinidadian context, possess pharmacologic properties that certainly have been shown to have impact on many of the inflammatory, metabolic, biochemical and structural macrovascular aberrations that occur in the type 2 diabetic. Activation of PPAR(gamma) nuclear receptors regulates the transcription of insulin-responsive genes involved in the control of glucose production, transport, and utilization. PPAR(gamma)-responsive genes also participate in the regulation of fatty acid metabolism, an important contributory pathogenic factor in this subset of patients. The unique mode of action of this class of therapeutic agent addresses a range of anomalies occurring at the cellular and sub-cellular level that are injurious to the diabetic. My aim in addressing the issue of the potential impact of PPAR-γ receptor agonists on cardiovascular disease (CVD) morbidity and mortality in the diabetic, is first, to seek to enhance both an awareness of, and greater familiarity among our own physicians, with this class of drug, and secondly, to effect a timely review of the recent literature as it relates to the tremendous possibilities for the potential clinical gains that might accrue from their use, in so far as this may serve to ameliorate the ravages of the CVD disease that all too tragically attends the type 2 diabetic, and more specifically those with the insulin resistance syndrome. (Mol Cell Biochem 263: 189-210, 2004).

Pharmacokinetics of pioglitazone after multiple oral dose administration in horses

Pioglitazone is a thiazolidinedione class of antidiabetic agent with proven efficacy in increasing insulin sensitivity in humans with noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, a syndrome of insulin resistance sharing similarities with equine metabolic syndrome. The purpose of this study was to determine the pharmacokinetics of pioglitazone in adult horses following multiple oral dose administration. Pioglitazone hydrochloride (1 mg/kg) was administered orally for 11 doses at 24-h intervals, and plasma samples were collected. Initially, a pilot study was performed using one horse; and thereafter the drug was administered to six horses. Samples were analyzed by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry, and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using noncompartmental modeling. The maximum plasma concentration was 509.1 ± 413.5 ng/mL achieved at 1.88 ± 1.39 h following oral administration of the first dose, and 448.1 ± 303.5 ng/mL achieved at 2.83 ± 1.81 h (mean ± SD) following the eleventh dose. Apparent elimination half-life was 9.94 ± 4.57 and 9.63 ± 5.33 h after the first and eleventh dose, respectively. This study showed that in healthy horses, pioglitazone administered at a daily oral dose of 1 mg/kg results in plasma concentrations and total drug exposure approximating, but slightly below, those considered therapeutic in humans.

Efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of insulin sensitizers as add-on therapy in metabolic syndrome in patients with secondary sulfonylurea failure: A comparative study

OBJECTIVES

Prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MS) is ~25% and it is currently becoming prevalent in children also. India is estimated to have the maximum number of patients of MS in the world. As insulin resistance is an integral part of MS and the rate of secondary sulfonylurea failure (SSUF) is also high, the present study was planned to evaluate the effects of insulin sensitizers as add-on therapy in MS with SSUF.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An open-label, prospective, randomized study was conducted on 200 patients of MS with SSUF, included according to ATP III criteria, after dividing them into two groups. Group I patients were given pioglitazone 30 mg/day while group II patients were given metformin 1,000 mg/day as add-on therapy to the sulfonylurea already prescribed.

RESULTS

Fall in fasting blood glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin and serum triglycerides was higher with metformin, but rise in high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol was higher with pioglitazone. Only metformin caused a significant reduction in body mass index. Significant reduction in waist circumference, systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure was not seen with any therapy. Incremental cost-effective ratio was almost six-times higher with pioglitazone.

CONCLUSION

Among insulin sensitizers, metformin has more favorable, persistent and multifacet effects in MS with SSUF. Studies of longer duration are required for calculating reduction in the mortality and morbidity.

Markers of glycemic control and insulin resistance in non-diabetic patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Hypopnea Syndrome: does adherence to CPAP treatment improve glycemic control?

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Obstructive Sleep Apnea Hypopnea Syndrome (OSAHS) is associated with glucose dysmetabolism and insulin resistance, therefore the amelioration of breathing disturbances during sleep can allegedly modify the levels of markers of glucose regulation and insulin resistance, such as glycated hemoglobin, fasting glucose, insulin and HOMA(IR). The aim of this study was to explore the association between these parameters and sleep characteristics in non-diabetic OSAHS patients, as well as the effect of 6 months CPAP therapy on these markers, according to adherence to CPAP treatment.

METHODS

Euglycemic patients (n=56; mean age+/-SD: 46.07+/-10.67 years) with newly diagnosed OSAHS were included. Glycated hemoglobin, fasting glucose, insulin levels and HOMA(IR) were estimated at baseline and 6 months after CPAP application. According to CPAP adherence, patients were classified as follows: group 1 (mean CPAP use 4 h/night), group 2 (mean CPAP use < 4 h/night) and group 3 (refused CPAP treatment), and comparisons of levels of the examined parameters were performed.

RESULTS

At baseline, average SpO(2) during sleep was negatively correlated with insulin levels and HOMA(IR) while minimum SpO(2) during sleep was also negatively correlated with insulin levels. After 6 months, only group 1 patients demonstrated a significant decrease in glycated hemoglobin (p=0.004) accompanied by a decrease in hs-CRP levels (p=0.002). No other statistically significant change was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Nighttime hypoxia can affect fasting insulin levels in non-diabetic OSAHS patients. Good adherence to long-term CPAP treatment can significantly reduce HbA(1C) levels, but has no effect on markers of insulin resistance.

Pioglitazone and sulfonylureas: effectively treating type 2 diabetes

Type 2 diabetes is characterised by a gradual decline in glycaemic control and progression from oral glucose-lowering monotherapy to combination therapy and exogenous insulin therapy. Functional decline of the insulin-secreting beta-cells is largely responsible for the deterioration in glycaemic control. Preservation of beta-cell functionality, in addition to maintaining glycaemic control and reducing insulin resistance, is now regarded as a key target for long-term management strategies. Early, aggressive intervention with combination therapy is emerging as a valid approach to optimise long-term outcomes and combining agents with differing modes of action and secondary effect profiles should prove valuable. Sulfonylureas and thiazolidinediones exert their glucose-lowering effect through differing mechanisms of action - the sulfonylureas by stimulating insulin secretion, whereas the thiazolidinediones are insulin sensitisers. Both agents offer excellent improvements in glycaemic control when given as monotherapy or in combination. The thiazolidinediones protect beta-cell structural and functional integrity and functionality and complement the sulfonylureas by inducing and maintaining improvements in insulin resistance, the abnormal lipid profile associated with type 2 diabetes and other cardiovascular risk factors. Thus, there is a strong rationale to support the addition of thiazolidinediones to sulfonylureas as a treatment option for type 2 diabetes. This combination may be particularly effective in the early stages of the disease when beta-cell function is at its highest, allowing maximal benefit to be obtained from the insulin secretion-promoting abilities of the sulfonylureas and the beta-cell-protective effects of the thiazolidinediones.

Effect of pioglitazone and its combination with statins in coronary artery disease patients with hyperinsulinemia

The objective of the study was to demonstrate the effect of pioglitazone and pioglitazone in combination with statin on East Indian patients with hyperinsulinemia and hyperlipidemia. It was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study with a parallel-group design comprising 83 patients. Patients of either sex with cardiac complications, including hyperlipidemia and (or) diabetes mellitus with or without hyperinsulinemia, were enrolled. Patients over 70 years of age, with renal or hepatic failure, or with severe diabetes mellitus (total glucose >400 mg/dL) were excluded from the study. Enrolled patients were randomly assigned to 4 groups that received placebo, pioglitazone, atorvastatin, or both. Blood samples were collected before and after treatment for analysis of serum glucose, insulin, lipid profile, apolipoprotein (apo) A1, apo B, and fibrinogen. Data were compared with that of patients with normal insulin or hyperinsulinemia. The patients with hyperinsulinemia receiving only pioglitazone showed a significant decrease in insulin levels compared with those with normal insulin levels. These patients also showed a significant increase in HDL levels. However, no significant change was observed in patients treated with both atorvastatin and pioglitazone. Pioglitazone was also found to increase significantly the apo A1 levels in patients with hyperinsulinemia, but there was no significant increase in patients given both atorvastatin and pioglitazone. Our data suggests that pioglitazone should be given preferably to the patients with hyperinsulinemia and statin should not be coadministered.

Effect of CPAP on insulin resistance and HbA1c in men with obstructive sleep apnoea and type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND

The effects of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) on insulin resistance are not clear. Trials have found conflicting results and no appropriate control groups have been used.

METHODS

Forty-two men with known type 2 diabetes and newly diagnosed OSA (>10 dips/h in oxygen saturation of >4%) were randomised to receive therapeutic (n = 20) or placebo CPAP (n = 22) for 3 months. Baseline tests were performed and repeated after 3 months. The study was double blind.

RESULTS

Results are expressed as mean (SD). CPAP improved the Epworth sleepiness score significantly more in the therapeutic group than in the placebo group (-6.6 (4.5) vs -2.6 (4.9), p = 0.01). The maintenance of wakefulness test improved significantly in the therapeutic group but not in the placebo group (+10.6 (13.9) vs -4.7 (11.8) min, p = 0.001). Glycaemic control and insulin resistance did not significantly change in either the therapeutic or placebo groups: HbA1c (-0.02 (1.5) vs +0.1 (0.7), p = 0.7, 95% CI -0.6% to +0.9%), euglycaemic clamp (M/I: +1.7 (14.1) vs -5.7 (14.8), p = 0.2, 95% CI -1.8 to +0.3 l/kg/min(1000)), HOMA-%S (-1.5 (2.3) vs -1.1 (1.8), p = 0.2, 95% CI -0.3% to +0.08%) and adiponectin (-1.1 (1.2) vs -1.1 (1.3), p = 0.2, 95% CI -0.7 to +0.6 microg/ml). Body mass index, bioimpedance and anthropometric measurements were unchanged. Hours of CPAP use per night were 3.6 (2.8) in the treatment group and 3.3 (3.0) in the placebo group (p = 0.8). There was no correlation between CPAP use and the measures of glycaemic control or insulin resistance.

CONCLUSION

Therapeutic CPAP does not significantly improve measures of glycaemic control or insulin resistance in men with type 2 diabetes and OSA.

Dual PPAR α/γ Agonists: Promises and Pitfalls in Type 2 Diabetes

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a disease of complex pathogenesis and pleiotropic clinical manifestations. The greatest clinical challenge in this disease is the prevention of the long-term complications, many of which involve cardiovascular outcomes. The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) alpha and gamma isoforms of the family of nuclear transcription factors are pharmaceutical targets for therapeutic intervention because they can potentially ameliorate not only the hyperglycemia of diabetes, but also the dyslipidemia that is characteristic of this disorder (low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high triglycerides, small, dense low-density lipoprotein particles). Novel drugs with dual PPAR alpha and gamma activity have been under clinical development for type 2 diabetes, and they have shown promise in early studies with regard to glucose lowering and improved lipid profile when compared with the PPAR-gamma-specific thiazolidinediones. Unfortunately, the dual PPARs available to date have some of the PPAR-gamma-associated side effect profile, including fluid retention and weight gain, which have limited the further clinical development of higher doses that show improved efficacy. This review will briefly summarize our understanding of the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes, the role of the PPAR family of receptors, and the potential for clinical use of this novel emerging class of agents that serve as dual activators of both PPAR-alpha and PPAR-gamma.

Thiazolidinediones, insulin resistance and obesity: Finding a balance

The clinical efficacy of currently available thiazolidinediones (TZDs) in improving glycaemic control and ameliorating several risk factors for cardiovascular disease (linked to their insulin-sensitising actions as well as direct vascular effects) is well established. Treatment-associated weight gain, however, which has been identified as a class effect of the TZDs, is seen in a number of patients. The magnitude of weight gain correlates in part with improved metabolic control, i.e. better responders are more prone to increases in body weight. The cardiovascular risk associated with obesity appears to be depot specific; while peripheral obesity is associated with a low risk of cardiovascular complications, central obesity confers a greater degree of risk. Evidence is reviewed that increases in body weight associated with TZD treatment are associated with neutral effects (or even, decreases) in visceral fat, the adipose depot that is associated with central obesity.

Rational drug design and PPAR agonists

Insulin resistance is a characteristic biological abnormality associated with type 2 diabetes, and is a key component of the metabolic syndrome, a condition in which an altered glucose control is associated with dyslipidemia, hypertension, and obesity. Thiazolidinediones (TZDs), a new class of oral drugs used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, reduce insulin resistance via an action on peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors. Although the current use of TZDs is largely limited to the treatment of patients with diabetes, as recommended in the package insert, it is foreseeable that as the metabolic syndrome becomes a better understood clinical condition their use may be extended to the treatment of this cluster of disorders. The aim of the present article is to review the mechanism of action of TZDs, discuss the rationale for their use in the clinical setting, and provide an update on novel pharmacologic agents that, although not yet available for the treatment of diabetes, are likely to further enrich the repertoire of antidiabetic drugs in the very near future.

Relationship between plasma hANP level and pretibial edema by pioglitazone treatment

Pioglitazone is an insulin-sensitizer with a thiazolidinedione structure. It is used to reduce hyperglycemia and is frequently prescribed to type 2 diabetic patients. However, it causes edema as an adverse effect in some patients. Although the mechanism of edema is unclear, it may bring an increased risk of congestive heart failure. We investigated whether pioglitazone correlates with the level of plasma human atrial natriuretic peptide (hANP), a marker for congestive heart failure. We administered 15 mg/day of pioglitazone for 3 months to 49 patients (34 men and 15 women; mean age: 64+/-12 years) with type 2 diabetes and no history of pretibial edema. Three of the patients complained of pretibial edema during the 3-month period, and their plasma hANP levels were higher than those of the other 46 before and during the treatment. We therefore suspect that pretibial edema appearing after administration of low-doses of pioglitazone coincides with the level of plasma hANP, and that the appearance of pretibial edema may reflect an increase in circulating blood volume induced by pioglitazone.

Thiazolidinediones-benefits on microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes

Type 2 diabetes is associated with serious microvascular complications, such as nephropathy, retinopathy, and neuropathy, which have a significant impact on patients' quality of life, morbidity, and mortality. Type 2 diabetes management strategies to reduce the risk of microvascular complications include treatment of hyperglycaemia, hypertension, and other vascular risk factors. The importance of glycaemic control in reducing the risk of microvascular complications of diabetes is well established. However, many antihyperglycaemic therapies fail to provide adequate glycaemic control and do not prevent complications in the long term. The thiazolidinediones (TZDs) are a class of agents that provide sustained glycaemic control, mediated primarily by reductions in insulin resistance. Evidence reviewed suggests that the TZDs may have the potential to reduce microvascular complications through benefits that go beyond glycaemic control. Insulin resistance underlies a range of metabolic abnormalities, collectively known as the metabolic syndrome (MS), which are cardiovascular (CV) risk factors. Components include visceral obesity, hyperglycaemia, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, low-grade inflammation and microalbuminuria (an early manifestation of target organ damage). Reducing insulin resistance, therefore, has the potential to reduce both microvascular and macrovascular complications.

Role of insulin secretagogues and insulin sensitizing agents in the prevention of cardiovascular disease in patients who have diabetes

In the absence of clinical trial evidence to compare the secretagogues with sensitizers, it is difficult to make recommendations about which class of drug is more important to prescribe for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in diabetes mellitus. Epidemiologic data supports insulin resistance as a major factor in cardiovascular disease through a variety of mechanisms. Because sensitizers improve insulin sensitivity and correct many of the vascular abnormalities that are associated with insulin resistance, it is tempting to suggest that they may be superior for this purpose. Conversely, meeting the goals that are recommended for glycemia also are important and achieving them may not be always possible with sensitizers, particularly in the later stages of the disease when insulin levels are not high,despite insulin resistance. In such situations,combination therapy may be needed with both types of drugs. No data are available on the cardiovascular effects of such combinations;some retrospective data suggest a possibility of increased events with the combination of sulfonylureas and metformin. Thus, further prospective studies in this area are necessary.

Genetic contributions to glucose intolerance in polycystic ovary syndrome

Women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) are predisposed to develop impaired glucose tolerance and type-2 diabetes mellitus. Genetic factors appear to contribute to the insulin resistance that is characteristic of PCOS as well as to the failure of the pancreatic beta-cell to compensate adequately for this insulin resistance. The cumulative results of studies examining the genetic contribution to both the reproductive and metabolic phenotypes of PCOS are consistent with PCOS as a complex, polygenic disorder. This article reviews the background and recent studies examining the genetic contributions to glucose intolerance in PCOS.

Clinical trial of Cecropia obtusifolia and Marrubium vulgare leaf extracts on blood glucose and serum lipids in type 2 diabetics

Cecropia obtusifolia and Marrubium vulgare have been widely used in Mexican traditional medicine for the control of type 2 diabetes. In order to evaluate the clinical effect produced by the aqueous extract from these species on type 2 non-controlled diabetes mellitus, a total of 43 outpatients were included. Based on the European NIDDM (policy group) criteria, only patients with poor response to the conventional treatment were selected. All patients maintained their medical treatment and also received a prepared infusion of the dry leaves of the plant treatment for 21 days. In a double-blind manner, the patients were randomly grouped as follows: 22 patients were treated with C. obtusifolia and 21 with M. vulgare. The fasting blood glucose values were reduced by 15.25% on patients treated with C. obtusifolia, while cholesterol and triglycerides were decreased by 14.62% and 42.0%, respectively (ANOVA p< 0.02). In the case of patients treated with M. vulgare, the plasma glucose level was reduced by 0.64% and cholesterol and triglycerides by 4.16% and 5.78%, respectively. When the results were compared between groups, significant differences in glucose and cholesterol diminution were found. The obtained results showed that the infusion prepared with the leaves of C. obtusifolia (containing 2.99+/-0.14mg of chlorogenic acid/g of dried plant) produced beneficial effects on carbohydrate and lipid metabolisms when it was administered as an adjunct on patients with type 2 diabetes with poor response to conventional medical treatment.

The prospective pioglitazone clinical trial in macrovascular events (PROactive): can pioglitazone reduce cardiovascular events in diabetes? Study design and baseline characteristics of 5238 patients

OBJECTIVE

The PROspective pioglitAzone Clinical Trial In macroVascular Events (PROactive) assesses the effect of pioglitazone, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonist, with anti-inflammatory and vascular properties, on the secondary prevention of macrovascular events in type 2 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

PROactive is an on-going randomized, double-blind outcome study in patients with type 2 diabetes managed with diet and/or oral blood glucose-lowering drugs (combination of oral agents with insulin is permitted) who have a history of macrovascular disease. Patients are randomized to receive pioglitazone (forced titration from 15 to 30 to 45 mg, depending on tolerability) or placebo in addition to existing therapy. The primary end point is the time from randomization to occurrence of a new macrovascular event or death. Follow-up is estimated to span 4 years.

RESULTS

A total of 5238 patients have been randomized from 19 countries. At entry into the study, patients enrolled are a mean age of 61.8 years, with type 2 diabetes for a mean of 9.5 years; 60.9 and 61.5% are taking metformin or a sulfonylurea, respectively; and 33.6% are using insulin in addition to oral glucose-lowering drugs. The majority of patients are men (66.1%). Patients are required to meet one or more of entry criteria, as follows: >6 months' history of myocardial infarction (46.7%); coronary artery revascularization (30.8%), stroke (18.8%), or acute coronary syndrome for >3 months (13.7%); other evidence of coronary artery disease (48.1%); or peripheral arterial occlusive disease (19.9%). One-half (48.5%) of the patients have two or more of these risk factors. Three-quarters (75.4%) have hypertension, and 58.8% are current or previous smokers.

CONCLUSIONS

The cohort of patients enrolled in PROactive is a typical type 2 diabetic population at high risk of further macrovascular events. The characteristics of this population are ideal for assessing the ability of pioglitazone to reduce the cardiovascular risk of patients with type 2 diabetes.

An increase in insulin sensitivity and basal beta-cell function in diabetic subjects treated with pioglitazone in a placebo-controlled randomized study

AIMS

To investigate the effect of treatment with pioglitazone on beta-cell function and insulin sensitivity in Type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

Thirty subjects with diet-controlled Type 2 diabetes were randomized to 3 months treatment with pioglitazone (n = 19) or placebo (n = 11). All subjects underwent basal sampling for homeostatic model assessment (HOMA), followed by an intravenous glucose tolerance test and hyperglycaemic clamp, followed by an euglycaemic hyperinsulinaemic clamp; at baseline and after treatment.

RESULTS

All results are expressed as mean (sem). Pioglitazone increased basal insulin sensitivity by 24.7% (7.8) HOMA-%S vs. 2.1% (5.9) in the placebo group (P = 0.02). Stimulated insulin sensitivity, M/I, increased in the pioglitazone group compared with placebo: +15.1 (2.8) l kg(-1) min(-1) vs. +3.2 (2.9) l kg(-1) min(-1), respectively (P = 0.009). Pioglitazone increased adiponectin by 39.3 (6.3), ng/ml compared with a decrease of 0.8 (1.3) ng/ml with placebo (P = 0.00004). HOMA-%B increased with pioglitazone, +11.5% (4.8) vs. -2.0% (4.8) with placebo (P = 0.049), but there was no change in stimulated beta-cell function as determined by hyperglycaemic clamps. There was a significant reduction in the proinsulin/insulin ratio in the pioglitazone group, -0.057 (0.02) compared with placebo, +0.004 (0.02) (P = 0.03). There was a significant reduction in HbA(1c) of 0.6% (0.1) in the pioglitazone group compared with placebo (P = 0.003). There was no significant weight gain associated with pioglitazone therapy: +0.7 (sem 0.6) kg vs. +1.1 (sem 0.5) kg in placebo group (P = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

Basal beta-cell function and insulin sensitivity improved following pioglitazone therapy. The improvement in proinsulin to insulin ratio suggests that beta-cells are under less stress.

The metabolic syndrome in children and adolescents

The metabolic syndrome was recently defined by the Adult Treatment Panel III. Despite a lack of uniform definition of the syndrome in pediatrics, recent studies have shown that the syndrome develops during childhood and is highly prevalent among overweight children and adolescents. The hypothesized central role of insulin resistance and obesity as a common underlying feature of the metabolic syndrome also appears to be already manifested in childhood. In view of the current obesity epidemic in children and adolescents, there is a vital need to provide adequate guidelines for the definition of the metabolic syndrome in pediatrics and for the development of screening and treatment strategies. This article focuses on the above issues, as well as on the impact of the syndrome on two major disease outcomes, type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

Long-term glycaemic control with pioglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes

Patients with type 2 diabetes have dual defects: insulin resistance and beta-cell dysfunction. Thiazolidinediones (TZDs), a new class of oral drugs used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, reduce insulin resistance via an action on peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors. There is also growing evidence that TZDs may preserve beta-cell function. Pioglitazone is a TZD that provides appropriate monotherapy or combination treatment for patients with type 2 diabetes. Studies of up to 32-week duration have shown that pioglitazone significantly reduces HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose when used alone or in combination with another glucose-lowering agent. Four recently published 52-week clinical trials, involving over 3700 patients with type 2 diabetes, show that pioglitazone is an effective long-term treatment, both as monotherapy and in combination with metformin or sulphonylurea. As well as maintaining glycaemic control over the long term, pioglitazone also confers benefits in terms of improvements in fasting insulin, lipid parameters, C-peptide and 32,33-split proinsulin (independent predictors of cardiovascular risk) and hypoglycaemia compared with other monotherapies or combination therapies. It is well tolerated, with a low incidence of adverse events. These long-term data support the concept that pioglitazone should be used earlier in the treatment of type 2 diabetes, either as monotherapy or as add-on therapy.

Pioglitazone reduces atherogenic dense LDL particles in nondiabetic patients with arterial hypertension: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVE

The oral antidiabetic agent pioglitazone improves insulin sensitivity and glycemic control and appears to lower atherogenic dense LDL in type 2 diabetes. Insulin resistance may occur frequently in nondiabetic patients with hypertension. This study is the first to report the effect of pioglitazone on LDL subfractions in normolipidemic, nondiabetic patients with arterial hypertension.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We performed a monocentric, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group comparison of 45 mg pioglitazone (n = 26) and a placebo (n = 28), each given once daily for 16 weeks. Fifty-four moderately hypertensive patients (LDL cholesterol, 2.8 +/- 0.8 mmol/l; HDL cholesterol, 1.1 +/- 0.3 mmol/l; triglycerides, 1.4 mmol/l (median; range 0.5-7.1) were studied at baseline and on treatment.

RESULTS

At baseline, dense LDLs were elevated (apolipoprotein [apo]B in LDL-5 plus LDL-6 >250 mg/l) in 63% of all patients. Sixteen weeks of treatment with pioglitazone did not significantly change triglycerides, total, LDL, and HDL cholesterol. However, pioglitazone reduced dense LDLs by 22% (P = 0.024). The mean diameter of LDL particles increased from 19.83 +/- 0.30 to 20.13 +/- 0.33 nm (P < 0.001 vs. placebo), whereas the mean LDL density decreased from 1.0384 +/- 0.0024 to 1.0371 +/- 0.0024 kg/l (P = 0.005 vs. placebo). The effect of pioglitazone on LDL size and density was independent of fasting triglycerides and HDL cholesterol at baseline and of changes in fasting triglycerides and HDL cholesterol.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of atherogenic dense LDL in nondiabetic, hypertensive patients is similar to patients with type 2 diabetes. Pioglitazone significantly reduces dense LDL independent from fasting triglycerides and HDL cholesterol. The antiatherogenic potential of pioglitazone may thus be greater than that expected from its effects on triglycerides, LDL, and HDL cholesterol alone.

Management of diabetes mellitus and insulin resistance in patients with cardiovascular disease

Patients with diabetes have a greatly increased relative risk of developing cardiovascular disease when compared with patients without diabetes. Much of this risk is related to insulin resistance and is associated with both traditional and nontraditional cardiovascular risk factors. Therapy for diabetes must address these risk factors in an attempt to prevent and adequately treat cardiovascular disease. Pharmacologic therapy directed toward dyslipidemia and hypertension has a beneficial effect on risk factors and has been shown to decrease cardiovascular events. The effects of insulin and oral hypoglycemic agents on insulin resistance are variable, and their direct effect on cardiovascular disease is less clear. Metformin is the only oral hypoglycemic agent shown to decrease cardiovascular events independent of glycemia. The thiazolidinediones directly improve insulin resistance, decrease plasma insulin concentration, and have the potential to decrease the risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes. A number of studies have demonstrated that the thiazolidinediones produce changes in several cardiovascular risk factors associated with the insulin resistance syndrome, including lowering blood pressure, correcting diabetic dyslipidemia, improving fibrinolysis, and decreasing carotid artery intima-medial thickness. These agents bind a newly described class of receptors, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors, which may have implications for atherosclerosis. Although these drugs increase low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, they induce a favorable change in the LDL particle size and susceptibility to oxidation. Long-term clinical trials are being conducted to determine the effect that thiazolidinediones have on cardiovascular events in individuals with type 2 diabetes.

Current therapeutic options in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a practical approach

The incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) in the United States continues to grow rapidly, paralleling the overweight and obesity epidemic. For many years the only therapeutic options for type 2 DM were sulfonylureas and insulin. However, over the last 9 years there has been an explosion of new and exciting agents approved for the treatment of type 2 DM. Some of the treatments target insulin deficiency and others insulin resistance, the hallmarks of the disease. Other drugs delay the intestinal absorption of carbohydrate. Recently several combination agents have been released. With these new drugs has come an overwhelming mountain of information, making it difficult for the busy clinician to know how best to manage the ever-increasing portion of patients with type 2 DM. New questions have arisen: Which agent to start as first line? How much of this drug to use before adding something else? How long for this drug to reach full effect? Which agent to add second? Should a patient uncontrolled on dual therapy begin insulin or start a third oral agent? If insulin therapy is started, what should become of the patient's oral agents? How best to explain the patient's weight gain on therapy? These are not easy questions and no review can fully detail all the therapeutic combinations possible. Instead, the practical approach of reviewing the agents in terms of their mechanism of action and critically comparing their dosing, effect and cost, is undertaken herein. Also addressed is the possible niche some newer classes of agents and combination drugs may or may not hold in the management of type 2 DM. The decision of using insulin versus a third oral agent will be looked at from the standpoint of where the patient is on dual therapy in relation to the hemoglobin A1c goal. In this way it is hoped that some clarity will be brought to the dizzying array of information that both the physician and patient have to deal with in regard to the management of this prevalent and serious disease.

Effects of thiazolidinediones on cardiovascular risk factors

The thiazolidinediones are the insulin sensitizers used in the management of Type 2 diabetes mellitus. These drugs can potentially decrease the risk of cardiovascular disease by correcting the different components of the insulin resistance syndrome.

The pharmacokinetics of pioglitazone in patients with impaired renal function

AIMS

To evaluate the effect of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics and safety of pioglitazone and its metabolites M-III and M-IV with impaired renal function and normal renal function.

METHODS

In a phase-I, open-label, parallel-group study, six healthy subjects with normal renal function (creatinine clearance> 80 ml min-1), nine patients with moderate renal impairment (creatinine clearance 30-60 ml min-1) and 12 patients with severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance < 30 ml min-1) received single and multiple oral doses of pioglitazone 45 mg. The serum pharmacokinetic profiles of pioglitazone and its metabolites M-III and M-IV were assessed for the first and last dose administered (day 1 and day 12, respectively).

RESULTS

Pharmacokinetic data revealed no significant accumulation of pioglitazone or its metabolites M-III and M-IV in patients with renal impairment. There was no significant difference in the pharmacokinetic profile of pioglitazone in subjects with normal and with moderately impaired renal function. After single oral doses, mean area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) values were decreased in patients with severe renal impairment compared with healthy subjects with normal renal function for pioglitazone (13 476 vs 17 387, P = 0.371; -23%; confidence interval (CI) -57, 38), M-III metabolite (13 394 vs 15 071, P = 0.841; -11%; CI -74, 194) and M-IV metabolite (27 991 vs 49 856, P = 0.006; -44%; CI -62, -17). After repeated oral doses of pioglitazone, mean AUC values (microg.h l-1) were decreased in patients with severe renal impairment compared with healthy subjects with normal renal function for pioglitazone (8744 vs 14,565, P = 0.004; -40%; CI -57, -16), M-III (3991 vs 7,289, P = 0.0009; -45%; CI -60, -25) and M-IV (21 080 vs 25 706, P = 0.181; -18%; CI 39, 10). The tolerability and safety profile of pioglitazone was comparable between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Pioglitazone was well tolerated in patients with varying degrees of renal impairment. Although mean serum concentrations of pioglitazone and its metabolites are increased in patients with severe renal impairment, adjustment of starting and maintenance doses in these patients is probably unwarranted.

Clinical effect of combination therapy of pioglitazone and an alpha-glucosidase inhibitor

This study evaluated the efficacy of adding pioglitazone 30 mg to the therapy of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus whose glycaemic control was poor on an alpha-glucosidase inhibitor (alpha-GI) alone or in combination with a sulphonylurea (SU). The patients (n = 20) had a HbA(1c) level between 7.0 and 12.0% and the fasting plasma glucose was 7.8 mmol/l or higher. They were treated with 30 mg pioglitazone once daily for 16 weeks. The decrease in HbA(1c) at week 16 of treatment was 0.8% (7.8% at baseline dropping to 7.1% at week 16; p < or = 0.01). An increase in leptin was observed 4 weeks after starting the post-study period (p < or = 0.05). Tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and body fat percentage did not show any significant alterations. Correlations between the decrease in HbA1c at week 16 and characteristic variables of patients were examined. A correlation with leptin (p = -0.5632, p < or = 0.05) levels was found. Five patients experienced adverse drug reactions, such as oedema, hypoglycaemia and increased creatine phosphokinase (CK), all of which were mild in severity. The addition of pioglitazone in diabetics whose glycaemic control was poor on a alpha-GI alone or with a alpha-GI and SU combination resulted in a significant decrease in HbA1c, and the treatment was well-tolerated. Our findings also suggest that leptin levels could be useful for assessing responders to pioglitazone.

Metabolic and additional vascular effects of thiazolidinediones

Several cardiovascular risk factors (dyslipidaemia, hypertension, glucose intolerance, hypercoagulability, obesity, hyperinsulinaemia and low-grade inflammation) cluster in the insulin resistance syndrome. Treatment of these individual risk factors reduces cardiovascular complications. However, targeting the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of the insulin resistance syndrome is a more rational treatment strategy to further improve cardiovascular outcome. Our understanding of the so-called cardiovascular dysmetabolic syndrome has been improved by the discovery of nuclear peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs). PPARs are ligand-activated transcription factors belonging to the nuclear receptor superfamily. As transcription factors, PPARs regulate the expression of numerous genes and affect glycaemic control, lipid metabolism, vascular tone and inflammation. Activation of the subtype PPAR-gamma improves insulin sensitivity. Expression of PPAR-gamma is present in several cell types involved in the process of atherosclerosis. Thus, modulation of PPAR-gamma activity is an interesting therapeutic approach to reduce cardiovascular events. Thiazolidinediones are PPAR-gamma agonists and constitute a new class of pharmacological agents for the treatment of type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. Two such compounds are currently available for clinical use: rosiglitazone and pioglitazone. Thiazolidinediones improve insulin sensitivity and glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. In addition, improvement in endothelial function, a decrease in inflammatory conditions, a decrease in plasma levels of free fatty acids and lower blood pressure have been observed, which may have important beneficial effects on the vasculature. Several questions remain to be answered about PPAR-gamma agonists, particularly with respect to the role of PPAR-gamma in vascular pathophysiology. More needs to be known about the adverse effects of thiazolidinediones, such as hepatotoxicity, increased low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and increased oedema. The paradox of adipocyte differentiation with weight gain concurring with the insulin-sensitising effect of thiazolidinediones is not completely understood. The decrease in blood pressure induced by thiazolidinedione treatment seems incompatible with an increase in the plasma volume, and the discrepancy between the stimulation of the expression of CD36 and the antiatherogenic effects of the thiazolidinediones also needs further explanation. Long-term clinical trials of thiazolidinediones with cardiovascular endpoints are currently in progress. In conclusion, studying the effects of thiazolidinediones may shed more light on the mechanisms involved in the insulin resistance syndrome. Furthermore, thiazolidinediones could have specific, direct effects on processes involved in the development of vascular abnormalities.

Differentiating members of the thiazolidinedione class: a focus on safety

Troglitazone, rosiglitazone and pioglitazone are members of the thiazolidinedione (TZD) class - antidiabetic agents that have proven efficacy in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes. All three agents are believed to mediate their effects via activation of the gamma isoform of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR gamma). Despite this common mechanism of action, they all have unique chemical structures and receptor-binding affinities, and consequently, in addition to the class effects (probably mediated through PPAR gamma), each TZD has a unique safety profile. Side effects have been categorized as unique to individual TZDs, or common to the class of drug. Of the unique effects, the best characterized is hepatotoxicity, which has been associated specifically with troglitazone to date. Studies with rosiglitazone and pioglitazone indicate that hepatotoxicity is not a class effect. Further differences in the safety profiles of these agents arise because the oxidative metabolism for each agent occurs by distinct cytochrome pathways: troglitazone and pioglitazone involve CYP 3A4 and CYP 2C8 whereas rosiglitazone is principally metabolized by CYP 2C8. CYP 3A4 is involved in the metabolism of over 150 drugs, hence the potential for drug interactions with troglitazone and pioglitazone is much greater than with rosiglitazone. Class effects include edema, slight reductions in hemoglobin and hematocrit (due to hemodilution), weight gain and alterations in plasma lipid profiles. This article considers safety data obtained from both clinical trials and clinical practice as a means of differentiating among troglitazone, rosiglitazone and pioglitazone.

Oral therapies for diabetic hyperglycemia

Many classes of oral antihyperglycemic agents are available for the treatment of type 2 diabetic patients. These classes improve glucose metabolism by different mechanisms, and their effects are additive. Therapy with lifestyle modification and a single oral antihyperglycemic agent infrequently achieves target glycemic goals, and, if it does, the effect is usually not sustained. A more rational approach would seem to be therapy with combinations of drugs with different mechanisms of action. Initial therapy might be with submaximal concentrations of two drugs. As the diabetic abnormalities progress, maximal concentrations of the drugs and addition of other classes of oral agents or insulin may be needed to maintain the target glycemic goal. In choosing combinations of oral antihyperglycemic agents, their effects on the components treatment of type 2 diabetic patients. These classes improve glucose considered, as must the specific effects of the agents on glucose metabolism.

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonist troglitazone protects against nondiabetic glomerulosclerosis in rats

BACKGROUND

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPAR gamma) is a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily of ligand-dependent transcriptional factors with beneficial effects in diabetes mediated by improved insulin sensitivity and lipid metabolism, but potential adverse effects in atherosclerosis by promoting in vitro foam cell formation. We explored whether a PPAR gamma agonist, troglitazone (TGL), affects sclerosis by mechanisms unrelated to insulin and lipid effects in a model of nondiabetic glomerulosclerosis.

METHODS

Adult male Sprague Dawley rats underwent 5/6 nephrectomy and were treated for 12 weeks as follows: control (CONT), no further treatment; triple antihypertensive therapy (TRX); and TGL or TGL + TRX. Functional, morphological, and molecular analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Systolic blood pressure (SBP) was increased in CONT and TGL groups (161 +/- 1 and 160 +/- 3 mm Hg), but not in TGL + TRX and TRX (120 +/- 3 vs. 126 +/- 1 mm Hg, P < 0.0001 vs. non-TRX). Serum triglyceride and cholesterol levels in all groups remained normal except for slightly higher serum cholesterol levels in TRX group. TGL groups had reduced proteinuria, serum creatinine, and glomerulosclerosis versus CONT, in contrast to no significant effect with TRX alone (sclerosis index, 0 to 4+ scale: CONT 1.99 +/- 0.42, TGL 0.85 +/- 0.12, TGL + TRX 0.56 +/- 0.14, TRX 1.30 +/- 0.21; TGL, P < 0.05; TGL + TRX, P = 0.01 vs. CONT). Glomerular cell proliferation, assessed by proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), was decreased after treatment with TGL or TGL + TRX, in parallel with decreases in glomerular p21 mRNA and p27 protein compared with CONT and TRX (PCNA + cells/glomerulus: CONT 2.04 +/- 0.64, TGL 0.84 +/- 0.21, TGL + TRX 0.30 +/- 0.07, TRX 1.38 +/- 0.37; TGL, P < 0.05, TGL + TRX, P < 0.01 vs. CONT). Glomerular plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) immunostaining was decreased in TGL or TGL + TRX groups (0 to 4+ scale, CONT 2.42 +/- 0.32, TGL 1.40 +/- 0.24, TGL + TRX 1.24 +/- 0.17, TRX 2.53 +/- 0.24; TGL or TGL + TRX vs. CONT, P < 0.05), with a parallel decrease in PAI-1 mRNA by in situ hybridization. Glomerular and tubular transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) mRNA expression was decreased with TGL treatment. Glomerular macrophages, present in CONT and TRX rats, did not express PPAR gamma, in contrast to PPAR gamma + macrophages in control carotid artery plaque. PPAR gamma was expressed in resident cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate in vivo that the PPAR gamma ligand TGL ameliorates the progression of glomerulosclerosis in a nondiabetic model. Macrophages show phenotypic diversity in glomerular versus vascular sclerosis, with macrophage PPAR gamma expression in only the latter. PPAR gamma beneficial effects are independent of insulin/glucose effects and are associated with regulation of glomerular cell proliferation, hypertrophy, and decreased PAI-1 and TGF-beta expression.

New oral therapies for type 2 diabetes mellitus: The glitazones or insulin sensitizers

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a growing problem not only in the United States but also across the world. There is now strong evidence that intensive control of blood glucose can significantly reduce and retard the microvascular complications of retinopathy, nephropathy, and neuropathy. Ultimately however, up to 80% of type 2 diabetics die from macrovascular cardiovascular disease. This increased incidence of atherosclerotic disease is intricately associated with insulin resistance, which is a major pathophysiologic abnormality in type 2 diabetes. There is strong evidence that insulin resistance is involved in the development of not only hyperglycemia, but also dyslipidemia, hypertension, hypercoagulation, vasculopathy, and ultimately atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. This cluster of metabolic abnormalities has been termed the insulin resistance or cardiovascular dysmetabolic syndrome. The thiazolidinediones (rosiglitazone and pioglitazone), a new class of oral antidiabetic agents, are "insulin sensitizers" and exert direct effects on the mechanisms of insulin resistance. These effects not only improve insulin sensitivity and glycemic control with reduced insulin requirements, but also have potentially favorable effects on other components of the cardiovascular dysmetabolic syndrome. Long-term studies are needed to determine whether the insulin-sensitizing effects of the glitazones can prevent or delay premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, morbidity, and death.

Enhancing insulin action: from chemical elements to thiazolidinediones

Type 2 diabetes is characterized by two fundamental biological defects: a reduced glucose-dependent insulin secretion and an increased resistance to the action of insulin at the level of various target tissues. While the use of agents to improve the insulin secretory activity of the islets of Langerhans has witnessed the flourishing of several new drugs over the years, a much greater difficulty has been experienced in the search for insulin-sensitizing drugs. The aim of this article is to critically review this topic, and to emphasize the importance of providing alternative strategies for the management of Type 2 diabetes.

Pioglitazone hydrochloride in combination with metformin in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, placebo-controlled study. The Pioglitazone 027 Study Group

BACKGROUND

Their complimentary mechanisms of action suggest that a combination of pioglitazone hydrochloride and metformin may have clinically beneficial effects in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to assess the efficacy and tolerability of pioglitazone in combination with metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

This was a 16-week, double-blind study with the option of enrollment in a separate open-ended, open-label study. It included patients with poorly controlled diabetes mellitus (glycated hemoglobin [HbA1c] > or =8.0%, fasting C-peptide >1.0 ng/mL) who had been receiving a stable regimen of metformin for > or =30 days. Patients with diabetic retinopathy, nephropathy, or neuropathy; impaired liver or kidney function; or unstable cardiovascular or cerebrovascular conditions were excluded. Patients were randomized to receive once-daily pioglitazone 30 mg + metformin or placebo + metformin. Patients in the open-label extension received pioglitazone 30 mg (with optional titration to 45 mg) + metformin.

RESULTS

Three hundred twenty-eight patients were randomized to treatment (168 pioglitazone + metformin, 160 placebo + metformin), and 249 completed the study. Of these, 154 elected to enter the open-label extension study. Patients' mean age was 56 years; most (84%) were white and slightly more than half (57%) were male. Patients receiving piogli- tazone 30 mg + metformin had statistically significant mean decreases in HbA1c (-0.83%) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels (-37.7 mg/dL) compared with placebo + metformin (P < or = 0.05). Decreases in FPG levels occurred as early as the fourth week of therapy, the first time point at which FPG was measured. The pioglitazone + metformin group had significant mean percentage changes in levels of triglycerides (-18.2%) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (+8.7%) compared with placebo + metformin (P < or = 0.05). Mean percentage increases were noted in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (7.7%, pioglitazone + metformin; 11.9%, placebo + metformin) and total cholesterol (4.1%, pioglitazone + metformin; 1.1%, placebo + metformin), with no significant differences between groups. In the extension study, patients treated with open-label pioglitazone + metformin for 72 weeks had mean changes from baseline of -1.36% in HbA1c and -63.0 mg/dL in FPG. The incidence of adverse events was similar in both groups. Throughout the study, no patient in either treatment group had an alanine aminotransferase (ALT) value > or =3 times the upper limit of normal, a commonly used marker of potential liver damage. Thus, no evidence of drug-induced hepatotoxicity or drug-induced elevations in serum ALT was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, pioglitazone + metformin significantly improved HbA1c and FPG levels, with positive effects on serum lipid levels and no evidence of drug-induced hepatotoxicity. These effects were maintained for >1.5 years, including the open-label extension.

Activation of human peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) subtypes by pioglitazone

Pioglitazone, a thiazolidinedione (TZD) derivative, is an antidiabetic agent that improves hyperglycaemia and hyperlipidaemia in obese and diabetic animals via a reduction in hepatic and peripheral insulin resistance. The TZDs including pioglitazone have been identified as high affinity ligands for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) gamma. The selectivity of pioglitazone for the human PPAR subtypes has not been reported, thus, we investigated the effect of pioglitazone on the human PPAR subtypes. Transient transactivation assay showed that pioglitazone is a selective hPPARgamma1 activator and a weak hPPARalpha activator. Binding assay indicated that the transactivation of hPPARgamma1 or hPPARalpha by pioglitazone is due to direct binding of pioglitazone to each subtype. Furthermore, pioglitazone significantly increased the apoA-I secretion from the human hepatoma cell line HepG2.

Pioglitazone

Pioglitazone is an orally administered insulin sensitising thiazolidinedione agent that has been developed for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Pioglitazone activates the nuclear peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-gamma (PPAR-gamma), which leads to the increased transcription of various proteins regulating glucose and lipid metabolism. These proteins amplify the post-receptor actions of insulin in the liver and peripheral tissues, which leads to improved glycaemic control with no increase in the endogenous secretion of insulin. In placebo-controlled clinical trials, monotherapy with pioglitazone 15 to 45 mg/day has been shown to decrease blood glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The addition of pioglitazone 30 mg/day to preexisting therapy with metformin, or of pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg/day to sulphonylurea, insulin or voglibose therapy, has been shown to decrease HbA1c and fasting blood glucose levels significantly in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus. Pioglitazone has also been associated with improvements in serum lipid profiles in randomised placebo-controlled clinical studies. The drug has been well tolerated by adult patients of all ages in clinical studies. Oedema has been reported with monotherapy, and pooled data have shown hypoglycaemia in 2 to 15% of patients after the addition of pioglitazone to sulphonylurea or insulin treatment. There have been no reports of hepatotoxicity.

Troglitazone and emerging glitazones: new avenues for potential therapeutic benefits beyond glycemic control

Insulin resistance is characterized as one of the major pathogeneses of type 2 diabetes and has been associated with these same cardiovascular risk factors. Troglitazone, rosiglitazone, and pioglitazone are a new class of oral antidiabetic agents which can ameliorate peripheral insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes. There is considerable evidence that trogliterazone may have beneficial effects on cardiovascular and metabolic abnormalities associated with insulin resistance. There is supportive evidence for positive effects of the other glitazones, but they have been less well studied. These potential benefits span effects ranging from molecular events in the arterial wall to amelioration and/or improvement in lipid parameters known to be associated with atherosclerosis.

Rosiglitazone taken once daily provides effective glycaemic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus

AIMS

To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of rosiglitazone as a once daily treatment for Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM).

METHODS

Three hundred and sixty-nine patients with Type 2 DM (mean age 63 years; mean body mass index (BMI) 29.4 kg/m2) were enrolled in a double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study. Patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo or rosiglitazone at doses of 4, 8, or 12 mg daily for 8 weeks.

RESULTS

At 8 weeks, fasting plasma glucose (FPG) decreased significantly in the rosiglitazone 4 mg, 8 mg, and 12 mg groups (-0.9, -2.0 and -1.7 mmol/l; P = 0.0003, < 0.0001, and < 0.0001, respectively) compared with placebo (+0.4 mmol/l). The improvements in FPG were dose ordered for 4 and 8 mg/ day. The 12 mg/day dose produced no additional improvement. There were small decreases in haemoglobin and haematocrit in the rosiglitazone treatment groups. The overall incidence of adverse experiences was similar in all treatment groups, including placebo with no evidence of hypoglycaemia or hepatotoxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Rosiglitazone improves glycaemic control when given once daily to treat Type 2 diabetes mellitus and is well tolerated at doses up to and including 12 mg.

Recent developments in oral hypoglycemic agents

Recent large-scale studies in patients with type 2 diabetes have suggested that improved glycemic control will reduce the incidence and severity of chronic complications. However, it is difficult to maintain the blood glucose levels of diabetic patients within a narrow range. Since insulin resistance and impaired insulin secretion cause hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, both improvement of insulin resistance and compensation for defective insulin secretion are necessary. Recently, the first insulin sensitizer was released, and a short-acting insulinotropic agent, which should be more convenient for strict glycemic control than sulfonylureas, has also been launched. This review focuses on these two new classes of hypoglycemic agents.