Clinical outcomes associated with bevacizumab-containing treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: the BRiTE observational cohort study

Impact of bevacizumab on clinical outcomes and its comparison with standard chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Advances in targeted therapies have expanded the treatment options for colorectal cancer (CRC), allowing for more tailored and effective approaches to managing the disease. In targeted therapy, Bevacizumab is a commonly prescribed anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody that has a direct anti-vascular impact in cancer patients. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors (VEGFs), especially VEGF-A, are significant agents in promoting tumour angiogenesis.

Objective

To assess the impact of adding Bevacizumab to chemotherapy on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Methodology

Comprehensive searches have been performed on electronic databases such as PubMed, and Google Scholar using the following terms: colorectal cancer, adenocarcinoma, Bevacizumab, chemotherapy, and monoclonal antibody.

Results

In the meta-analysis, 16 out of the 24 included studies were analysed. In the final analysis, incorporating Bevacizumab with chеmothеrapy demonstrated favourable outcomes for OS with a hazard ratio (HR = 0.689,95%CI: 0.51-0.83, I² = 39%, p <0.01) and for PFS with a hazard ratio (HR = 0.77 95% CI: 0.60-0.96, I² = 54%, p < 0.01). The subgroup analysis of PFS, categorised by study dеsign (prospеctivе vs rеtrospеctivе), reveals that the Hazard Ratio (HR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.62-0.97, I² = 21%, p < 0.01) and for OS with a hazard ratio (HR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.52-0.86, I² = 17%, p < 0.01).

Conclusion

Our findings indicate that combining Bevacizumab with chemotherapy enhances clinical outcomes and results in a significant increase in PFS and OS in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Positive outcomes are demonstrated by a substantial 23% increase in PFS and 31% increase in OS in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who undergo Bevacizumab in conjunction with chemotherapy.

Bowel Emergencies in Patients With Cancer

Cancer is the second most common cause of death worldwide. Bowel emergencies in patients with cancer are becoming increasingly more prevalent due to advances in cancer therapy and longer overall patient survival. When these patients present acutely, they are often frail and may have pre-existing co-morbidities. This article discusses the imaging features of bowel emergencies commonly encountered in oncological patients in clinical practice. These include chemotherapy related colitis, neutropenia enterocolitis and typhlitis, toxic megacolon, bowel perforation, malignant bowel obstruction and gastrointestinal haemorrhage. The radiologist plays a key role in identifying these oncological emergencies and guiding further management.

Rectal ulcer associated with lenvatinib 15 years after definitive radiotherapy for prostate cancer: A case report

Lenvatinib is a multi-kinase inhibitor that blocks vascular endothelial growth factor, fibroblast growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor receptors. The present study describes a case of rectal ulceration triggered by lenvatinib treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma 15 years after definitive radiotherapy for prostate cancer. A 58-year-old man underwent definitive external beam radiotherapy and high-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer. A total of 15 years after radiotherapy for prostate cancer, the patient was diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma with multiple metastases. Treatment with 12 mg/day lenvatinib was commenced. A total of 4 months after starting lenvatinib therapy, the patient experienced persistent anal pain with a deep ulceration of the anterior wall of the lower rectum. As the pain did not improve, the patient chose to undergo a colostomy, resulting in the resolution of the anorectal pain. To the best of our knowledge, the present case report is the first to report on lenvatinib-induced rectal ulcers after radiotherapy.

Delayed esophageal anastomotic complication and ramucirumab therapy: A case report

Current NCCN guidelines for second-line therapy in recurrent or metastatic esophago-gastric cancers recommend the use of VEGF inhibitors such as ramucirumab. VEGF inhibitors have been shown to be associated with gastrointestinal perforation in clinical trials and late colorectal anastomotic leaks in a few case reports. Here, we present a case of late esophageal anastomotic leak in a patient receiving ramucirumab. Case information was obtained from our institution's electronic medical records. The patient was found to have T4N1M0, poorly differentiated invasive adenocarcinoma and subsequently received neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by hybrid Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy 6 weeks later. He recovered well with no leak or perioperative complications. The patient had disease progression 9 months postoperatively on CT and PET imaging. Sixteen months after surgery he began paclitaxel and ramucirumab and 16 weeks after ramucirumab initiation, he was found to have an esophago-pulmonary fistula in the region of the anastomosis. Biopsies were negative for recurrence at the anastomosis. He died one week later from progressive pneumonia despite stenting. In conclusion, this is the only known report of delayed esophageal anastomotic complication associated with ramucirumab. VEGF inhibitor therapies such as bevacizumab have been associated with late (greater than 3 months postoperative) colorectal anastomotic complications including fistulas and leaks. Risk factors that have been associated are perioperative radiotherapy and history of early postoperative leak. These findings raise concern whether VEGF inhibitor therapy should be used in post-esophagectomy patients with recurrence if these rare but catastrophic events are likely to be terminal.

Real-world outcomes among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated first line with a bevacizumab biosimilar (bevacizumab-awwb)

Background

Bevacizumab-awwb (MVASI®) was the first U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved biosimilar to Avastin® (reference product [RP]) for the treatment of several different types of cancers, including metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), an indication approved based on extrapolation.

Objectives

Evaluate treatment outcomes in mCRC patients who received first-line (1L) bevacizumab-awwb at treatment initiation or as continuing bevacizumab therapy (switched from RP).

Design

A retrospective chart review study.

Methods

Adult patients who had a confirmed diagnosis of mCRC (initial presentation of CRC on or after 01 January 2018) and initiated 1L bevacizumab-awwb between 19 July 2019 and 30 April 2020 were identified from the ConcertAI Oncology Dataset. A chart review was conducted to evaluate patient baseline clinical characteristics and effectiveness and tolerability outcomes during the follow-up. Study measures were reported stratified by prior use of RP: (1) naïve patients and (2) switchers (patients who switched to bevacizumab-awwb from RP without advancing the line of therapy).

Results

At the end of study period, naïve patients (n = 129) had a median 1L progression-free survival (PFS) of 8.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 7.6-9.9] and a 12-month overall survival (OS) probability of 71.4% (95% CI, 61.0-79.5%). Switchers (n = 105) had a median 1L PFS of 14.1 months (95% CI, 12.1-15.8) and a 12-month OS probability of 87.6% (95% CI, 79.1-92.8%). During treatment with bevacizumab-awwb, 20 events of interest (EOIs) were reported in 18 naïve patients (14.0%) and 4 EOIs reported in 4 switchers (3.8%), of which the most commonly reported events were thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events. Most EOIs resulted in emergency department visit and/or treatment hold/discontinuation/switch. None of the EOIs resulted in death.

Conclusion

In this real-world cohort of mCRC patients who were treated 1L with a bevacizumab biosimilar (bevacizumab-awwb), the clinical effectiveness and tolerability data were as expected and consistent with previously published findings from real-world studies of bevacizumab RP in mCRC patients.

Risk of retinal vein occlusion in colorectal cancer patients receiving anti-vascular endothelial growth factors - a population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) treatment has been associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events. Therefore, the use of anti-VEGFs for patients with colorectal cancers (CRC) has raised concerns about the potential risk of retinal vein occlusion (RVO), an ocular disease caused by embolism or venous stasis. This study aims to evaluate the risk of RVO in patients with CRC treated with anti-VEGFs.

METHOD

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Taiwan Cancer Registry and National Health Insurance Database. The study cohort comprised patients newly diagnosed with CRC between 2011 and 2017, who received anti-VEGF treatment. For each patient in the study cohort, a control group comprising four patients newly diagnosed with CRC, but not receiving anti-VEGF treatment, was randomly selected. A washout period of 12 months was implemented to identify new cases. The index date was defined as the date of the first prescription of anti-VEGF drugs. The study outcome was the incidence of RVO, as identified by ICD-9-CM (362.35 and 362.36) or ICD-10-CM codes (H3481 and H3483). Patients were followed from their index date until the occurrence of RVO, death or the end of the study period. Covariates, including patients' age at index date, sex, calendar year of CRC diagnosis, stage of CRC and comorbidities related to RVO, were included. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) with adjustments for all covariates to compare the risk of RVO between the anti-VEGF and control groups.

RESULTS

We recruited 6285 patients in the anti-VEGF group and 37,250 patients in the control group, with mean ages of 59.49 ± 12.11 and 63.88 ± 13.17 years, respectively. The incidence rates were 1.06 per 1000 person-years for the anti-VEGF group, and 0.63 per 1000 person-years for the controls. There was no statistically significant difference in RVO risk between the anti-VEGF and control groups (HR: 2.21, 95% CI: 0.87-5.61).

CONCLUSION

Our results indicated no association between use of anti-VEGF and occurrence of RVO among CRC patients, although the crude incidence rate of RVO was higher in patients receiving anti-VEGF, compared to control patients. Future study with larger sample size is required to confirm our findings.

Preexisting hypertension and cancer therapy: evidence, pathophysiology, and management recommendation

Cancer is considered one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide. At the same time, hypertension is recognized as one of the most common comorbidities in cancer patients. Antineoplastic therapies, mainly tyrosine kinase and vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors, have been associated with new-onset hypertension by activation of different pathophysiological pathways. However, the role of preexisting hypertension in cancer patients under treatment has not been thoroughly studied. According to this review, preexisting hypertension is an independent risk factor for increased blood pressure during anticancer therapy. Therefore, physicians should recognize hypertension and its phenotypes (i.e., masked hypertension) as an important modifiable risk factor that should be properly managed prior to the initiation of cancer therapy to avoid premature chemotherapy cessation. The development of onco-hypertension will help establish specific guidelines for managing hypertension in cancer patients.

Bevacizumab Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Real-World Clinical Practice

Background and Objectives: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality and morbidity worldwide. Bevacizumab was approved for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) based on favorable benefit-risk assessments from randomized controlled trials, but evidence on its use in the real-world setting is limited. The aim of the current study is to evaluate the outcomes and safety profile of bevacizumab in mCRC in a real-world setting in Romania. Patients and Methods: This was an observational, retrospective, multicentric, cohort study conducted in Romania that included patients with mCRC treated with bevacizumab as part of routine clinical practice. Study endpoints were progression-free survival, overall survival, adverse events, and patterns of bevacizumab use. Results: A total of 554 patients were included in the study between January 2008 and December 2018. A total of 392 patients (71%) received bevacizumab in the first line and 162 patients (29%) in the second line. Bevacizumab was mostly combined with a capecitabine/oxaliplatin chemotherapy regimen (31.6%). The median PFS for patients treated with bevacizumab was 8.4 months (interquartile range [IQR], 4.7-15.1 months) in the first line and 6.6 months (IQR, 3.8-12.3 months) in the second line. The median OS was 17.7 months (IQR, 9.3-30.6 months) in the first line and 13.5 months (IQR, 6.7-25.2 months) in the second line. Primary tumor resection was associated with a longer PFS and OS. The safety profile of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy was similar to other observational studies in mCRC. Conclusions: The safety profile of bevacizumab was generally as expected. Although the PFS was generally similar to that reported in other studies, the OS was shorter, probably due to the less frequent use of bevacizumab after disease progression and the baseline patient characteristics. Patients with mCRC treated with bevacizumab who underwent resection of the primary tumor had a higher OS compared to patients with an unresected primary tumor.

Mortality of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who received elective or emergent operation after exposure to bevacizumab: A nationwide database study

INTRODUCTION

Treatment guidelines for colorectal cancer (CRC) indicate that surgical intervention within 4 weeks or 8 weeks after bevacizumab therapy might increase the risk of postoperative complications and mortality, especially in patients who received emergent operation. Therefore, we aimed to assess the association between different surgical timings, emergent or elective surgery, and the risk of postoperative mortality.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Database and Taiwan Cancer Registry, we identified patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who underwent surgery within 1 year of receiving bevacizumab between January 2010 and December 2017. The primary outcomes were 30-day, 60-day, and in-hospital mortality; the secondary outcomes were hospital stay, 30-day readmission rate, and surgical complications. Multivariate analysis was used to adjust for confounders.

RESULTS

This study included 2,047 patients. In the multivariate analysis, patients who underwent emergent operation and had higher Charlson scores had a significantly higher mortality rate. Patients with a longer interval to surgery, more cycles of bevacizumab treatment, and distal metastectomy had the opposite result. In subgroup analysis, patients who received emergent operation within 28 days had the highest surgical mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The interval to operation among mCRC patients who receive bevacizumab treatment should exceed 4 weeks to avoid additional risk of mortality whether patients receiving elective or emergent operation. Patients who received emergent operation within 28 days of bevcizumab infusion had the highest risk of mortality.

Risk of Thromboembolic Events and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events Following Antivascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy in Patients with Colorectal Cancer

Antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy has been a standard treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. However, the risk of thromboembolic events and cardiovascular events associated with this therapy remains controversial. We assessed whether anti-VEGF therapy increases the risk of thromboembolic events or major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in patients with colorectal cancer based on real-world evidence. This retrospective cohort study was designed using linked 2009-2016 nationwide databases, including the Taiwan Cancer Registry, the National Health Insurance Research Database, and Taiwan's National Death Index. In total, 189,708 patients newly diagnosed as having advanced colorectal cancer from 2009 to 2016 were identified and categorized into the anti-VEGF and comparator groups through age, sex, clinical stage, and diagnosis date (within 180 days) matching. Propensity score matching was further performed to balance the baseline characteristics between the two groups. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to create the cumulative incidence curves of thromboembolic events and MACEs, and log-rank tests were used to compare the differences in Kaplan-Meier curves. Competing hazard ratios (HRs) for thromboembolic events and MACEs were estimated using the Fine-Gray method when considering the competing event of death. Statistical analysis was performed using two-tailed tests with a significance level of 0.05. In total, 4635 patients were included in both the anti-VEGF group and comparator group. The risk of thromboembolic events and MACEs did not differ significantly between the two groups. After propensity score matching, the adjusted HR for MACEs or thromboembolic events was 1.040, which for MACEs was 0.989, and that for thromboembolic events was 1.028. The competing HR for MACEs or thromboembolic events was 0.921, which for MACEs, was 0.862, and that for thromboembolic events was 0.908. In conclusion, patients with advanced colorectal cancer who received anti-VEGF therapy did not exhibit significantly higher risks of thromboembolic events and MACEs than those without anti-VEGF therapy. Our study provides real-world evidence regarding the safety of anti-VEGF therapy in Asian patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

A Non-Interventional Multicenter Study of First-Line Bevacizumab in Combination with Chemotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Lebanon

Purpose

When combined with chemotherapy, bevacizumab improves progression-free survival (PFS) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This observational trial was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of bevacizumab plus first-line chemotherapy in a real-world setting in Lebanon.

Patients and Methods

A non-interventionaL multicenter study of first-LIne AVastin^® (bevacizumab) in combination with chEmotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (LLIVE) is a multicenter, prospective, Lebanon-based, observational study that enrolled mCRC patients who received first-line bevacizumab plus chemotherapy combination. The primary end point of the study was PFS. Secondary endpoints comprised the overall response rate (ORR) and the safety and tolerability of bevacizumab.

Results

A total of 196 patients were enrolled between July 2010 and August 2013. The median duration of follow-up was 11 months. Median duration of bevacizumab treatment was 4 months with FOLFOX being the chiefly chemotherapy regimen used in the first-line setting (26%). Median PFS was 8.22 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 7.005–9.443). The ORR was 50.3% (complete response 7.5%, partial response 42.8%). The most common adverse event encountered was hypertension (28%) followed by epistaxis (4.8%), diarrhea (4%), anemia (4%) and headache (4%). Grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 15.2% of patients.

Conclusion

The trial further substantiated the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab and chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of mCRC patients in Lebanon.

Major adverse cardiovascular events associated with VEGF-targeted anticancer tyrosine kinase inhibitors: a real-life study and proposed algorithm for proactive management

BACKGROUND

Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are widely used in cancer treatment and burdened by cardiovascular toxicity. The majority of data come from clinical trials, thus in selected populations. The aim of our study is to evaluate the cardiotoxicity profile of VEGFR-targeted TKIs and the impact of cardiovascular risk factors in a real-life population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this cohort, population-based study, patients treated with VEGFR-targeted TKIs, bevacizumab and trastuzumab between 2009 and 2014 were analyzed. A multi-source strategy for data retrieval through hospital, pharmaceutical and administrative databases of the Lombardy region, Italy, has been adopted. The primary endpoint was to determine the incidence and type of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) along with their temporal trend. The secondary endpoint was to define the impact of cardiovascular risk factors in the occurrence of MACEs.

RESULTS

A total of 829 patients were treated with VEGFR-targeted TKIs. Eighty-one MACEs occurred in the first year of follow-up [crude cumulative incidence (CCI): 9.79%] mainly consisting of arterial thrombotic events (ATEs, 31 events, CCI: 3.99%), followed by rhythm disorders (22 events, CCI: 2.66%), pulmonary embolisms and heart failures (13 events each, CCI: 1.57%). While the incidence of most MACEs showed a plateau after 6 months, ATEs kept increasing along the year of follow-up. Hypertension and dyslipidemia were associated with an increase in risk of ATEs [relative risk difference (RRD) +209.8% and +156.2%, respectively], while the presence of previous MACEs correlated with a higher risk of all MACEs in multivariate analysis (RRD 151.1%, 95% confidence interval 53.6% to 310.3%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

MACEs occur in a clinically significant proportion of patients treated with VEGFR-targeted TKIs, with ATEs being predominant, mainly associated with hypertension and dyslipidemia. A clinical algorithm for effective proactive management of these patients is warranted.

Blood microbiota diversity determines response of advanced colorectal cancer to chemotherapy combined with adoptive T cell immunotherapy

Human microbiota influence the response of malignancies to treatment with immune checkpoint blockade; however, their impact on other forms of immunotherapy is poorly understood. This study explored the effect of blood microbiota on clinical efficacy, represented by progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), of combined chemotherapy and adoptive cellular therapy (ACT) in advanced colon cancer patients. Plasma was collected from colorectal cancer patients (CRC) treated with either chemotherapy alone (oxaliplatin and capecitabine) (XELOX CT alone group, n = 19), or ACT with a mixed dendritic cell/cytokine-induced killer cell product (DC-CIK) + XELOX (ICT group, n = 20). Circulating microbiota analysis was performed by PCR amplification and next-generation sequencing of variable regions V3~V4 of bacterial 16S rRNA genes. The association of the blood microbial diversity with clinical response to the therapy as measured by RECIST1.1 and OS was evaluated. The baseline Chao index of blood microbial diversity predicted prolonged PFS and OS of DC/CIK immunotherapy. More diverse blood microbiota that included Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, and Enterococcus were identified among responders to DC/CIK compared with non-responders. The plasma bacterial DNA copy number is inversely correlated with the CD3-/CD16+/CD56+ NK cells in circulation and decreased following DC-CIK; however, the Chao index of plasma microbiota significantly increased after administration of the DC-CIK product and this subsequent change was correlated with the number of CD3-/CD16+/CD56+ and CD8+/CD28+ cells infused. The diversity of the blood microbiome is a promising predictive marker for clinical responses to chemotherapy combined with DC-CIK. Cellular immunotherapy can affect the plasma microbiota's diversity in a manner favorable to clinical responses.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases: A contemporary review of the literature

Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide, and up to 50% of patients with CRC develop colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). For these patients, surgical resection remains the only opportunity for cure and long-term survival. Over the past few decades, outcomes of patients with metastatic CRC have improved significantly due to advances in systemic therapy, as well as improvements in operative technique and perioperative care. Chemotherapy in the modern era of oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-containing regimens has been augmented by the introduction of targeted biologics and immunotherapeutic agents. The increasing efficacy of contemporary systemic therapies has led to an expansion in the proportion of patients eligible for curative-intent surgery. Consequently, the use of neoadjuvant strategies is becoming progressively more established. For patients with CRLM, the primary advantage of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) is the potential to down-stage metastatic disease in order to facilitate hepatic resection. On the other hand, the routine use of NCT for patients with resectable metastases remains controversial, especially given the potential risk of inducing chemotherapy-associated liver injury prior to hepatectomy. Current guidelines recommend upfront surgery in patients with initially resectable disease and low operative risk, reserving NCT for patients with borderline resectable or unresectable disease and high operative risk. Patients undergoing NCT require close monitoring for tumor response and conversion of CRLM to resectability. In light of the growing number of treatment options available to patients with metastatic CRC, it is generally agreed that these patients are best served at tertiary centers with an expert multidisciplinary team.

Efficacy and safety of chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab in Chinese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A prospective, multicenter, observational, non-interventional phase IV trial

OBJECTIVE

Bevacizumab has an important and evolving role in improving outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) worldwide and was approved in China in 2010. However, there are limited real-world data on the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy regimens combined with bevacizumab in Chinese patients with mCRC. This observational, phase IV trial study aimed to obtain more experience on the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy in Chinese mCRC patients.

METHODS

Between September 2013 and November 2016, patients with histologically confirmed mCRC were enrolled in a prospective, multicenter, observational, non-interventional phase IV trial at 26 centers across China. Eligible patients received different chemotherapeutic regimens combined with bevacizumab. The efficacy and safety data in the intention-to-treat study population were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 611 patients were included in the efficacy analysis. The median overall survival and median progression-free survival was 18.00 and 10.05 months, respectively. The objective response rate was 21.00% and disease control rate was 89.40%. In subgroup analyses, the survival differences were observed according to metastatic status, duration of treatment and elevation in blood pressure. A total of 613 patients were evaluable for safety assessments. And 569 (92.82%) patients reported at least one adverse event (AE), and 151 (24.63%) experienced grade 3 or higher AEs. The incidence of bevacizumab-associated AEs of special interest was reported in 31 (5.06%) patients with hypertension (n=12), abscesses and fistulae (n=7), bleeding (n=6), proteinuria (n=3), gastrointestinal perforation (n=2) and venous thrombotic events (n=1).

CONCLUSIONS

This observational phase IV trial broadens our experience and knowledge of bevacizumab in the Chinese population and provides a good indication of its overall efficacy and safety. Bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy offers clinical benefits to Chinese patients with mCRC and has an acceptable and manageable safety profile.

Real-world Safety of Bevacizumab with First-line Combination Chemotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Population-based Retrospective Cohort Studies in Three Canadian Provinces

AIMS

To examine the real-world safety of adding bevacizumab to first-line irinotecan-based chemotherapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients diagnosed with CRC in three Canadian provinces (Ontario, Saskatchewan and British Columbia) who received publicly funded bevacizumab and/or irinotecan from 2000 to 2016 were identified from cancer registries. Propensity score 1:1 matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were performed to contemporaneous and historical controls, adjusting for baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. Safety end points evaluated during first-line treatment plus 30 days included mortality within 30 days and all-cause-, chemotherapy- and bevacizumab-related hospitalisations. Chemotherapy- and bevacizumab-related visits were defined as hospitalisations for specific conditions commonly associated with chemotherapy (e.g. infections) or bevacizumab (e.g. arteriovenous thromboembolism) using most responsible diagnosis codes. In PSM and IPTW-weighted cohorts, we assessed event frequencies using odds ratios from logistic regressions and event rate ratios using negative binomial regression models. The results from each province and comparison were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS

We identified 16 250 mCRC patients who received first-line irinotecan-based treatment. In PSM cohorts, bevacizumab was associated with fewer deaths within 30 days of treatment compared with contemporaneous (pooled odds ratio = 0.62; 95% confidence interval 0.50-0.75) and historical controls (pooled odds ratio = 0.73; 95% confidence interval 0.58-0.93). Hospitalisations were more frequent among patients treated with bevacizumab compared with historical controls but similar to contemporaneous controls. As patients receiving bevacizumab were exposed to a longer average treatment duration, across their full treatment duration, patients receiving bevacizumab had significantly lower rates of hospitalisations (contemporaneous pooled rate ratio = 0.56; 95% confidence interval 0.47-0.67; historical pooled rate ratio = 0.73; 95% confidence interval 0.56-0.95). Similar trends were observed for chemotherapy- and bevacizumab-related hospitalisations and in IPTW-weighted cohorts.

DISCUSSION

We did not observe any increase in rates of hospitalisation or death within 30 days of treatment among mCRC patients treated with bevacizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone; these findings should be interpreted with caution due to the risk of residual confounding.

Management of Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma in Older Adults: Balancing Risks and Benefits of Novel Therapies

The prevalence of older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) will continue to increase with our aging population. Treatment of mCRC has changed significantly in the last few decades as we have learned how to personalize the treatment of mCRC to the biology of the tumor, utilizing new treatment approaches. With an ever-changing treatment paradigm, managing the population of older adults becomes paramount. This review highlights the pivotal clinical trials that defined the use of systemic therapy, immunotherapy and targeted therapies for mCRC, and how those are applied to the older patient population. In addition, we outline the tools for an in-depth assessment of an older adult in regards to treatment planning and management of therapy-related toxicities. A comprehensive geriatric assessment can assist in the selection of treatment for an older adult with mCRC. While frail older patients can frequently only tolerate single agents or modified regimens, fit older adults remain candidates for a wider range of treatment options. However, since all of these treatments are associated with possible toxicities, each patient's treatment must be personalized to the patient's goals and wishes through a shared decision-making process.

Association of Systemic or Intravitreal Antivascular Endothelial Growth Factor (Anti-VEGF) and Impaired Wound Healing in Pediatric Patients: Collagen to the Rescue

BACKGROUND

Bevacizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) that has been used as a systemic chemotherapy treatment of various malignancies in adults since 2000. It has been used for pediatric patients over the last decade. In addition, bevacizumab is used for neonatal intravitreal administration for retinopathy of prematurity, a major complication of preterm birth, characterized by incomplete and abnormal vascularization of the retina that can lead to retinal detachment and blindness without treatment.

CASES

The objective of this multiple case series is to report impaired wound healing seen in 3 adolescents and 1 premature neonate receiving bevacizumab and to propose collagen-based dermal template as a choice for the management of such wounds. The 3 adolescents were undergoing treatment of malignancies and developed wound healing complication within weeks of receiving anti-VEGF. The premature neonate experienced an extravasation and had a slow wound healing trajectory after receiving intravitreal administration of bevacizumab for retinopathy of prematurity. All wounds achieved closure following topical treatment with a collagen dermal template.

CONCLUSION

Use of bevacizumab is increasing in the pediatric population. Clinicians should be aware of compromised wound healing and higher likelihood of wound dehiscence after bevacizumab administration. We recommend waiting for at least 4 to 6 weeks between anti-VEGF administration (either systemic or vitreous) and elective surgical procedures, consistent with adult literature recommendations. If patient has an existing wound, we assert that bevacizumab should not be administered until that wound is healed. If wound healing is stalled, we recommend dermal template as a safe and effective accelerator of wound healing.

Optimal duration of therapy in the first line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: single center experience

Background / Aim. FOLFOX (5fluorouracil, folinic acid, oxaliplatin)/CapOx (capecitabine, oxaliplatin) plus bevacizumab and FOLFIRI (5 fluorouracil, folinic acid, irinotecan) plus bevacizumab are a standard treatment options for a first line treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC). The aim of this study was to compare overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the groups of patients with mCRC who were treated in the first line with FOLFIRI/bev versus FOLFOX/bev. At the same time, it was compared the safety profile in observed groups of patients and investigated optimal treatment duration and characteristics of patients who had the best treatment outcomes. Methods. In a retrospective-prospective study, patients with mCRC were treated with a chemotherapy protocols for the first line in combination with bevacizumab (FOLFOX/bev, respectively, FOLFIRI/bev). Treatment efficacy was evaluated on the basis of overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and the safety of treatment was evaluated by monitoring adverse drug reactions. Results. ORR was 70% in the FOLFIRI/bev group and 50% in the FOLFOX/bev group. Median PFS for FOLFIRI/bev (n = 30) and for FOLFOX/bev (n = 30) was 15.6 months and 12.1 months respectively (HR, 0.85; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47-1.53; P = 0.5591). Median OS for FOLFIRI/bev and for FOLFOX/bev was 24.7 months and 19.9 months respectively (HR, 0.67; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.37-1.23; P = 0.1552). In both patient groups, the patients who received more than 9 cycles of induction therapy had better treatment response in comparison with patients who received less than 9 cycles of therapy. In FOLFOX/bev group PFS was 16.9 versus 9.7 months and OS was 22.1 versus 17.6 months respectively. In FOLFIRI/bev group PFS was 9 months for patients who received less than 9 cycles of therapy versus 18.8 months for patients who received more than 9 cycles, OS was 18.0 versus 27.7 respectively. The adverse drug reactions grade 3 and 4 were 7% in the FOLFIRI/bev group versus 27% in the FOLFOX/bev group. Conclusion. Patients who received FOLFIRI/bev had better ORR (70 % versus 50 %), PFS (15.6 versus 12.1 months) and OS (24.7 versus 19.9 months). In both patient groups, better treatment response had the patients who received induction therapy for 4-6 months (more than 9 cycles of therapy).

Preoperative bevacizumab does not increase complications following cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Preoperative bevacizumab has been reported to increase postoperative complication risk following cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC). We sought to review our experience with preoperative bevacizumab in patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC for peritoneal surface malignancy.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of patients who received neoadjuvant systemic therapy with or without bevacizumab prior to CRS/HIPEC at a high-volume academic center from 2007-2018.

RESULTS

Of 499 patients, a total of 88 patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone (n = 34) or in combination with bevacizumab (n = 54) within 3 months prior to CRS/HIPEC. No differences existed in 60-day major morbidity (17.6 vs. 16.7%, p = 0.81) or 60-day mortality (0 vs. 0%) between the two cohorts, and neoadjuvant bevacizumab was not associated with increased odds of overall complications (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.35-2.09, p = 0.73) or major morbidity (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.24-3.00, p = 0.81). Stratifying patients by primary tumor origin and post-operative complications did not reveal any significant differences between the two treatment groups. In addition, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were similar in both cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative bevacizumab is not associated with increased morbidity or mortality following CRS/HIPEC. Neoadjuvant therapy employing this biologic agent is safe and should not be a deterrent for aggressive cytoreduction with curative intent.

Does the presence of an intact primary increase the risk of nonelective colorectal surgery in patients treated with bevacizumab?

AIM

In patients with incurable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), resection of the primary tumour is debated; however, patients with intact primaries may be at a higher risk of complications requiring surgery when receiving treatment with bevacizumab. Our aim was to estimate the risk of nonelective colorectal surgery in patients undergoing bevacizumab therapy for mCRC and evaluate the association between intact primary tumours and risk of nonelective surgery.

METHOD

We designed a population-based, retrospective cohort study using administrative and cancer registry data in Ontario, Canada. We included patients with mCRC who received bevacizumab from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2014. The primary outcome was nonelective colorectal surgery after initiation of bevacizumab. We determined the cumulative incidence of nonelective colorectal surgery among patients with previously resected and unresected primaries, accounting for the competing risk of death. We explored the relationship between previous resection of the primary and need for nonelective surgery using a cause-specific hazards model, controlling for patient, tumour and treatment factors.

RESULTS

We identified 1840 (32.7%) patients with intact primaries and 3784 (67.3%) patients with prior resection. The cumulative incidence of nonelective surgery 1 year after initiating bevacizumab for all patients was 3.9% (95% CI 3.4-4.5%). One-year cumulative incidence was higher in those with intact primaries than in those with resected primaries (6.1% vs 2.9%, P < 0.0001). After adjustment, an intact primary remained strongly associated with nonelective colorectal surgery (hazard ratio = 2.89, 95% CI 2.32-3.61; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Bevacizumab is associated with a low but meaningful risk for serious gastrointestinal complications, necessitating vigilance, particularly among patients with an intact primary tumour.

Precision Approaches in the Management of Colorectal Cancer: Current Evidence and Latest Advancements Towards Individualizing the Treatment

The genetic and molecular underpinnings of metastatic colorectal cancer have been studied for decades, and the applicability of these findings in clinical decision making continues to evolve. Advancements in translating molecular studies have provided a basis for tailoring chemotherapeutic regimens in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treatment, which have informed multiple practice guidelines. Various genetic and molecular pathways have been identified as clinically significant in the pathogenesis of metastatic colorectal cancer. These include rat sarcoma (RAS), epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR), vascular endothelial growth factor VEGF, microsatellite instability, mismatch repair, and v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog b1 (BRAF) with established clinical implications. RAS mutations and deficiencies in the mismatch repair pathway guide decisions regarding the administration of anti-EGFR-based therapies and immunotherapy, respectively. Furthermore, there are several emerging pathways and therapeutic modalities that have not entered mainstream use in mCRC treatment and are ripe for further investigation. The well-established data in the arena of targeted therapies provide evidence-based support for the use or avoidance of various therapeutic regimens in mCRC treatment, while the emerging pathways and platforms offer a glimpse into the future of transforming a precision approach into a personalized treatment.

Inferior mesenteric arteriovenous fistula during treatment with bevacizumab in colorectal cancer patient: A case report

BACKGROUND

Fistula formation is a severe adverse event related to antiangiogenetic agents such as bevacizumab and inferior mesenteric arteriovenous fistula (IMAVF) is a result of acquired factor, especially colon surgery. However, IMAVF occurs very rarely and there are few reports in patients during chemotherapy. We report a case of a patient who developed IMAVF during treatment with bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) after colon surgery.

CASE SUMMARY

An 81-year-old man was diagnosed with descending colon cancer and underwent left hemicolectomy without any complications. He was definitely diagnosed with high-risk stage 2 and received tegafur-uracil plus leucovorin as adjuvant chemotherapy. Three years and 6 mo after the operation, the cancer relapsed with peritoneal dissemination. The patient underwent CyberKnife radiosurgery targeting the recurrent tumor and received chemotherapy with S-1 plus bevacizumab. At 1 year after chemotherapy, he complained of severe diarrhea, which is suspected drug-induced colitis. As diarrhea worsened despite the termination of treatment, he underwent colonoscopy and computed tomography (CT) scans that revealed edematous change from sigmoid to rectosigmoid colon. CT scans also revealed an aneurysm adjacent to the inferior mesenteric vein and multidetector CT angiography showed the IMAVF. Elective angiography confirmed the diagnosis of an IMAVF and it was successfully treated by arterial embolization. The patient resumed chemotherapy with only S-1 6 mo after embolization.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians should keep in mind the probability of severe diarrhea arose from IMAVF in mCRC patients treated with bevacizumab.

Baseline cardiovascular risk assessment in cancer patients scheduled to receive cardiotoxic cancer therapies: a position statement and new risk assessment tools from the Cardio-Oncology Study Group of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology in collaboration with the International Cardio-Oncology Society

This position statement from the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology Cardio-Oncology Study Group in collaboration with the International Cardio-Oncology Society presents practical, easy-to-use and evidence-based risk stratification tools for oncologists, haemato-oncologists and cardiologists to use in their clinical practice to risk stratify oncology patients prior to receiving cancer therapies known to cause heart failure or other serious cardiovascular toxicities. Baseline risk stratification proformas are presented for oncology patients prior to receiving the following cancer therapies: anthracycline chemotherapy, HER2-targeted therapies such as trastuzumab, vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors, second and third generation multi-targeted kinase inhibitors for chronic myeloid leukaemia targeting BCR-ABL, multiple myeloma therapies (proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs), RAF and MEK inhibitors or androgen deprivation therapies. Applying these risk stratification proformas will allow clinicians to stratify cancer patients into low, medium, high and very high risk of cardiovascular complications prior to starting treatment, with the aim of improving personalised approaches to minimise the risk of cardiovascular toxicity from cancer therapies.

Effectiveness of Combining Bevacizumab With First-Line Chemotherapy Regimens for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Real-World Practice

BACKGROUND

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents have shown clinical benefits against metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) when combined with cytotoxic chemotherapeutic drugs. Because randomized controlled trials have restrictive enrollment criteria, and because the participants typically do not resemble actual patients, we here investigated the efficacy of bevacizumab as part of a combination therapy for mCRC in a Korean real-world practice setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 3748 patients with an initial diagnosis of mCRC or recurrent colorectal cancer with distant metastasis who received first-line chemotherapy in a tertiary cancer center. The primary study endpoint was overall survival. We used multivariate analysis using the Cox regression hazard model and propensity score matching (PSM) methods to adjust for any confounding clinicopathologic factors. Subgroup analysis was also performed for patients who did not receive local treatments for metastatic lesions before receipt of first-line chemotherapy.

RESULTS

In an initial crude analysis, patients who received first-line FOLFOX or FOLFIRI showed better survival outcomes if these regimens were combined with bevacizumab (median overall survival, 3.5 vs. 2.3 years; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-0.73; P < .001). However, Cox regression hazard model adjusted analysis using PSM methods revealed no significant survival differences between these groups (3.0 vs. 2.6 years; HR = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.79-1.07; P = .2612). We performed further survival analysis of 2814 patients with unresectable disease without metastasectomy who received metastatic radiofrequency ablation before chemotherapy. Cox regression and PSM analysis indicated that bevacizumab group showed better survival (HR = 0.82; 95% CI, 0.71-0.94; P = .005; and HR = 0.84; 95% CI, 0.71-0.99; P = .018).

CONCLUSION

The addition of bevacizumab to a first-line chemotherapeutic regimen provides survival benefits in a real-world setting for mCRC patients who cannot undergo curative-intent local treatment for metastatic lesions.

Cardiovascular toxicity induced by anti-VEGF/VEGFR agents: a special focus on definitions, diagnoses, mechanisms and management

INTRODUCTION

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a key target in cancer therapy. However, cardiovascular safety has been one of the most challenging aspects of anti-VEGF/VEGF receptor (VEGFR) agent development and therapy. While accurate diagnostic modalities for assessment of cardiac function have been developed over the past few decades, a lack of an optimal definition and precise mechanism still places a significant limit on the effective management of cardiovascular toxicity.

AREAS COVERED

Here, we report the cardiovascular toxicity profile associated with anti-VEGF/VEGFR agents and summarize the clinical diagnoses as well as management that are already performed in clinical practice or are currently being investigated. Furthermore, the review discusses the potential molecular toxicological mechanisms, which may provide strategies to prevent toxicity and drive drug discovery.

EXPERT OPINION

Cardiovascular toxicity associated with anti-VEGF/VEGFR agents has been a substantial risk for cancer treatment. To improve its management, the development of guidelines for prevention, monitoring and treatment of cardiovascular toxicity has become a hot topic. The summary of cardiovascular toxicity profile, mechanisms and management given in this review is not only significant for the optimal use of existing anti-VEGF/VEGFR agents to protect patients predisposed to cardiovascular toxicity but is also beneficial for drug development.

Efficacy and Safety of Bevacizumab Combined With First-Line Chemotherapy in Elderly (≥75 Years) Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Real-World Study

BACKGROUND

Although elderly patients are the first concerned by colorectal cancer (CRC), they are underrepresented in clinical trials. The real-world CASSIOPEE study was thus conducted in elderly patients treated for metastatic CRC (mCRC).

METHODS

This French prospective, multicenter, noninterventional study aimed to estimate 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and describe treatments, patient autonomy (Instrumental Activities of Daily Living; Balducci scale), and safety over 24 months, in patients older than 75 with mCRC, starting first-line bevacizumab plus chemotherapy (NCT01555762).

RESULTS

From 2012 to 2014, 402 patients were included (safety population: n = 383, efficacy population: n = 358). Patient characteristics were as follows: mean age, 81 ± 4 years (<80 years, 46%; 80-85 years, 44%; >85 years, 10%); men, 52%; colon primary tumor, 80%; main metastatic site, liver 66%; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance 0-1, 81%. Median PFS was 9.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.3-10.2). It was superior for patients ≤85 years (<80 years: 9.3 months; 80-85 years: 9.5 months) compared with patients >85 years (8.3 months). Median OS was 19.0 months (95% CI, 16.5-21.5) and decreased in the 2 oldest groups (20.6, 17.8, and 13.0 months). Autonomy assessments decreased over time leading to nonconclusive results. Twenty-six percent of patients experienced serious adverse events (SAEs): 7% bevacizumab-related SAEs, and 6% bevacizumab-targeted SAEs. Two fatal bevacizumab-related adverse events were reported (hemorrhagic stroke and intestinal ischemia).

CONCLUSIONS

This large French real-world study showed that medically fit older patients with mCRC could have a benefit/risk balance similar to that of younger patients when treated with first-line bevacizumab plus chemotherapy. Improvements in geriatric assessments are needed to better define this population.

Conversion Chemotherapy With a Modified FLOX Regimen for Borderline or Unresectable Liver Metastases From Colorectal Cancer: An Alternative for Limited-Resources Settings

PURPOSE

Conversion chemotherapy is often used for borderline or unresectable (B/U) liver metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC) with the aim of achieving resectability. Although intensive and costly regimens are often used, the best regimen in this scenario remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the outcomes of patients with B/U liver metastases from CRC treated with conversion chemotherapy with the modified fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (mFLOX) regimen followed by metastasectomy.

METHODS

We performed a single-center retrospective analysis of patients with B/U liver metastases from CRC treated with chemotherapy with the mFLOX regimen followed by surgery. B/U disease was defined as at least one of the following: more than four lesions, involvement of hepatic artery or portal vein, or involvement of biliary structure.

RESULTS

Fifty-four consecutive patients who met our criteria for B/U liver metastases were evaluated. Thirty-five patients (64%) had more than four liver lesions, 16 (29%) had key vascular structure involvement, and 16 (29%) had biliary involvement. After chemotherapy, all patients had surgery and 42 (77%) had R0 resection. After a median follow-up of 37.2 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 16.9 months and median overall survival (OS) was 68.3 months. R1-R2 resections were associated with worse PFS and OS compared with R0 resection (PFS: hazard ratio, 2.65; P = .007; OS: hazard ratio, 2.90; P = .014).

CONCLUSION

Treatment of B/U liver metastases from CRC with conversion chemotherapy using mFLOX regimen followed by surgical resection was associated with a high R0 resection rate and favorable survival outcomes. On the basis of our results, we consider mFLOX a low-cost option for conversion chemotherapy among other options that have been proposed.

Practice variation on hospital level in the systemic treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in The Netherlands: a population-based study

Introduction: Population-based data on the implementation of guidelines for cancer patients in daily practice are scarce, while practice variation may influence patient outcomes. Therefore, we evaluated treatment patterns and associated variables in the systemic treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in the Netherlands.Material and methods: We selected a random sample of adult mCRC patients diagnosed from 2008 to 2015 from the National Cancer Registry in 20 (4 academic, 8 teaching and 8 regional) Dutch hospitals. We examined the influence of patient, demographic and tumour characteristics on the odds of being treated with systemic therapy according to the current guideline and assessed its association with survival.Results: Our study population consisted of 2222 mCRC patients of whom 1307 patients received systemic therapy for mCRC. Practice variation was most obvious in the use of bevacizumab and anti-EGFR therapy in patients with (K)RAS wild-type tumours. Administration rates did not differ between hospital types but fluctuated between individual hospitals for bevacizumab (8-92%; p < .0001) and anti-EGFR therapy (10-75%; p = .05). Bevacizumab administration was inversely correlated to higher age (OR:0.2; 95%CI: 0.1-0.3) comorbidity (OR:0.6; 95%CI: 0.5-0.8) and the presence of metachronous metastases (OR:0.5; 95%CI: 0.3-0.7), but patient characteristics did not differ between hospitals with low or high bevacizumab administration rates. The hazard ratios for exposure to bevacizumab and anti-EGFR therapy were 0.8 (95%CI: 0.7-0.9) and 0.6 (95%CI: 0.5-0.8), respectively.Discussion: We identified significant inter-hospital variation in targeted therapy administration for mCRC patients, which may affect outcome. Age and comorbidity were inversely correlated with non-administration of bevacizumab but did not explain inter-hospital practice variation. Our data suggest that practice variation is based on individual strategy of hospitals rather than guideline recommendations or patient-driven decisions. Individual hospital strategies are an additional factor that may explain the observed differences between real-life data and results obtained from clinical trials.

Relationship Between the Gut Microbiome and Systemic Chemotherapy

The intestinal microbiome encodes vast metabolic potential, and multidisciplinary approaches are enabling a mechanistic understanding of how bacterial enzymes impact the metabolism of diverse pharmaceutical compounds, including chemotherapeutics. Microbiota alter the activity of many drugs and chemotherapeutics via direct and indirect mechanisms; some of these alterations result in changes to the drug's bioactivity and bioavailability, causing toxic gastrointestinal side effects. Gastrointestinal toxicity is one of the leading complications of systemic chemotherapy, with symptoms including nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and constipation. Patients undergo dose reductions or drug holidays to manage these adverse events, which can significantly harm prognosis, and can result in mortality. Selective and precise targeting of the gut microbiota may alleviate these toxicities. Understanding the composition and function of the microbiota may serve as a biomarker for prognosis, and predict treatment efficacy and potential adverse effects, thereby facilitating personalized medicine strategies for cancer patients.

Is there a role for specialized geriatric centers in treating geriatric cancer patients?

As the population with colorectal cancer ages, the tailored approach required to manage older patients becomes all the more important for all providers and institutions treating colorectal cancer to adopt and improve the outcomes and well-being of this important and increasingly prevalent population. Joint guidelines from the American College of Surgeons and American Geriatric Association should be followed. Older cancer patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery should be referred to centers with expertise in minimally invasive surgery. Likewise, older rectal cancer patients should be referred to centers with expertise in treating rectal cancer.

Incidental Use of Beta-Blockers Is Associated with Outcome of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated with Bevacizumab-Based Therapy: A Single-Institution Retrospective Analysis of 514 Patients

Background: Beta-adrenergic signalling plays an important role in several cancer-related processes, including angiogenesis. The impact of beta-blocker use on prognosis of cancer patients treated with antiangiogenic agents is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between the incidental use of beta-blockers and the outcomes of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with bevacizumab-based therapy. Methods: Clinical data from 514 mCRC patients treated with bevacizumab between 2005 and 2019 were analysed retrospectively. The association of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with the incidental use of beta-blockers and other common antihypertensive drugs was assessed. Results: The median PFS and OS for patients using beta-blockers was 11.40 (95% confidence interval (CI) 10.10–13.61) months and 26.8 (95% CI 22.2–32.2) months compared with 8.30 (95% CI 7.80–9.57) and 21.0 (95% CI 17.8–23.8) months for patients not using beta-blockers (p = 0.006 and p = 0.009, respectively). In the Cox multivariate analysis, the use of beta-blockers was a significant factor predicting both PFS (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.763 (95% CI 0.606–0.960), p = 0.021) and OS (HR = 0.730 (95% CI 0.560–0.951), p = 0.020). Conclusions: The results of the present retrospective study suggest that there is a significant association between the use of beta-blockers and favourable outcomes of mCRC patients treated with bevacizumab-based therapy.

Outcomes of Patients with Early Onset Colorectal Cancer Treated in a UK Specialist Cancer Center

The incidence of early onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) is rapidly increasing, but there remains paucity of outcome data for young CRC patients. We reviewed the characteristics and outcomes of 241 adults, age <50, who were diagnosed with EOCRC between January 2009 and December 2014. Median age was 42, 56% were male, and 7% had hereditary etiology. Seventy percent had left-sided primaries. At diagnosis, 11%, 50%, and 39% had stage II, III, and IV CRC. Of the patients with stage II and III CRC who underwent curative surgery, 60% and 88% had adjuvant chemotherapy, with 5-year relapse free survival of 82% and 74% respectively. Of the 123 patients with metastatic (m) EOCRC, 93%, 63%, 33%, and 12% had 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th line systemic anticancer therapy (SACT) respectively. For first line SACT, 99% had doublet chemotherapy, with bevacizumab or an anti-EGFR antibody in 57%. Median overall survival (mOS) of mEOCRC patients was 20.1 months (95% C.I: 15.9–23.2). Younger age and signet cells were associated with shorter mOS, whereas more lines of SACT and curative metastasectomy with longer mOS. Metastatic EOCRC patients had poorer outcomes than expected, despite optimal multimodality treatment. This suggests an aggressive disease biology that warrants further research and therapy development.

Hepatic steatosis in patients undergoing resection of colorectal liver metastases: A target for prehabilitation? A narrative review

The prevalence of elevated intra-hepatic fat (IHF) is increasing in the Western world, either alone as hepatic steatosis (HS) or in conjunction with inflammation (steatohepatitis). These changes to the hepatic parenchyma are an independent risk factor for post-operative morbidity following liver resection for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). As elevated IHF and colorectal malignancy share similar risk factors for development it is unsurprisingly frequent in this cohort. In patients undergoing resection IHF may be elevated due to excess adiposity or its elevation may be induced by neoadjuvant chemotherapy, termed chemotherapy associated steatosis (CAS). Additionally, chemotherapy is implicated in the development of inflammation termed chemotherapy associated steatohepatitis (CASH). Following cessation of chemotherapy, patients awaiting resection have a 4-6 week washout period prior to resection that is a window for prehabilitation prior to surgery. In patients with NAFLD dietary and pharmacological interventions can reduce IHF within this timeframe but this approach to modifying IHF is untested in this population. In this review, the aetiology of CAS and CASH is reviewed with recommendations to identify those at risk. We also focus on the post-chemotherapy washout period, reviewing dietary interventions applied to the metabolic population and suggest this window may be used as an opportunity to optimise IHF with such a regime as part of a pre-operative prehabilitation programme to produce improved patient outcomes.

ACORN: Observational Study of Bevacizumab in Combination With First-Line Chemotherapy for Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in the UK

INTRODUCTION

Survival in metastatic colorectal cancer is worse than expected in the United Kingdom. Real-world data are needed to better understand UK-specific treatment practices that may explain this.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The Avastin ColORectal Non-interventional (ACORN) study is a multicenter, prospective, UK-based, observational, phase 4 study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01506167) that recruited patients with metastatic colorectal cancer scheduled to receive bevacizumab in combination with first-line chemotherapy as part of routine clinical practice. Primary end points included progression-free survival, overall survival (OS), serious adverse events (AEs), and grade 3 to 5 bevacizumab-related AEs.

RESULTS

A total of 714 patients were recruited between August 30, 2012, and February 4, 2014. Median follow-up was 16.4 months. Median first-line chemotherapy duration was 5.6 months, with capecitabine/oxaliplatin (265 [37.1%]) being the most common regimen. Median total chemotherapy duration was 8.1 months and did not vary by geographic location in the UK. Median progression-free survival (95% confidence interval) was 8.7 (8.2-9.1) months, and median OS was 17.8 (16.1-19.3) months. There was no significant difference in efficacy by chemotherapy regimen administered. Ninety-nine patients (13.9%) received bevacizumab after disease progression. The safety profile of bevacizumab was consistent with previous studies.

CONCLUSION

ACORN provided evidence that there were no clear differences observed in outcomes between bevacizumab with capecitabine-based chemotherapy and fluorouracil-based regimens, and confirmed the safety profile of bevacizumab in a real-world UK-based population. The lower-than-expected OS is likely due to the short total chemotherapy duration, less frequent use of bevacizumab after disease progression, and higher rates of in-situ primary tumors.

Expression of ERCC1 and TYMS in colorectal cancer patients and the predictive value of chemotherapy efficacy

The present study investigated the expression of excision repair cross-complementing gene 1 (ERCC1) and thymidylate synthase (TYMS) in patients with colorectal cancer and the predictive value of chemotherapy. Eighty patients with colorectal cancer chemotherapy admitted to Binzhou Medical University Hospital from June 2013 to June 2015 were randomly selected, and 80 cancer tissues and 68 adjacent tissues were taken for analysis. RT-qPCR was used to detect ERCC1 as well as the expression level of TYMS. The relationship of the expression level with the chemotherapy efficacy, clinical pathology and survival time in colorectal cancer patients receiving standard chemotherapy, was compared. The expression of ERCC1 and TYMS mRNA in cancer tissues was significantly higher than that in the adjacent tissues (P<0.05). There was no correlation between ERCC1 mRNA expression, TYMS mRNA and clinicopathological features of colorectal cancer (P>0.05). The predictive effect of ERCC1 on colorectal cancer chemotherapy was 0.919 (95% CI, 0.862–0.976), P<0.001. The AUC of TYMS for predicting the efficacy of chemotherapy on colon cancer was 0.831 (95% CI, 0.735–0.926), and both had higher predictive values. The expression levels of ERCC1 and TYMS mRNA in 80 patients with colorectal cancer were divided into the low and high expression groups. The 3-year survival rate of patients in the low expression group was significantly higher than that in the high expression group, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). ERCC1 and TYMS had a high predictive value for the efficacy of chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer, and patients with lower expression of ERCC1 and TYMS had improved 3-year survival rates than patients with higher expression. Therefore, for patients with colorectal cancer, ERCC1 and TYMS can be used as predictors of the efficacy of chemotherapy.

Bevacizumab+chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in elderly patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase II trial-PRODIGE 20 study results

Background

Metastatic colorectal cancer frequently occurs in elderly patients. Bevacizumab in combination with front line chemotherapy (CT) is a standard treatment but some concern raised about tolerance of bevacizumab for these patients. The purpose of PRODIGE 20 was to evaluate tolerance and efficacy of bevacizumab according to specific end points in this population.

Patients and methods

Patients aged 75 years and over were randomly assigned to bevacizumab + CT (BEV) versus CT. LV5FU2, FOLFOX and FOLFIRI regimen were prescribed according to investigator’s choice. The composite co-primary end point, assessed 4 months after randomization, was based on efficacy (tumor control and absence of decrease of the Spitzer QoL index) and safety (absence of severe cardiovascular toxicities and unexpected hospitalization). For each arm, the treatment will be consider as inefficient if 20% or less of the patients met the efficacy criteria and not safe if 40% or less met the safety criteria.

Results

About 102 patients were randomized (51 BEV and 51 CT), median age was 80 years (range 75–91). Primary end point was met for efficacy in 50% and 58% and for safety in 61% and 71% of patients in BEV and CT, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 9.7 months in BEV and 7.8 months in CT. Median overall survival was 21.7 months in BEV and 19.8 months in CT. The 36-month overall survival rate was 27% in BEV and 10.1% in CT. Severe toxicities grade 3/4 were mainly non-hematologic toxicities (80.4% in BEV, 63.3% in CT).

Conclusion

Bevacizumab combined with CT was safe and efficient. Both arms met the primary safety and efficacy criteria.

Discontinuation of first-line bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer: the BEAWARE Italian Observational Study

AIMS

BEAWARE investigated the pattern of first-line bevacizumab early interruption in the Italian real-world setting of metastatic colorectal cancer.

METHODS

A total of 386 patients were followed for 15 months after first-line chemotherapy + bevacizumab start. The rate of bevacizumab interruption for progression or adverse drug reactions (ADRs) constituted the primary endpoint.

RESULTS

A total of 78.2% of patients interrupted bevacizumab: 56.6% for progression, 7.3% for ADRs, and 36.1% for other reasons. Median treatment duration was 6.7, 2.5, and 4.6 months, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 10.3 months; however, 35.8% of patients were not progressed and were thus censored at the data cutoff of 15 months, while 21.8% were still receiving bevacizumab. Patients discontinuing for progression/ADRs more frequently had metastases in >1 site (p = .0001), and a shorter median progression-free survival (6.9 vs 13.9 months, p < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In Italy, first-line bevacizumab is interrupted mainly for progression, only 7.3% due to adverse events, and about one third of cases for other reasons. In clinical practice, the attitude to treat until progression as per guidelines might be implemented. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01609075.

Survival Outcomes After Surgical Management of the Primary Tumor With and Without Radiotherapy for Metastatic Rectal Adenocarcinoma: A National Cancer Database (NCDB) Analysis

BACKGROUND

With advances in systemic therapies, the role of primary tumor resection may be of increased importance in patients with metastatic rectal cancer. The role of combining pelvic radiotherapy with surgical resection in the metastatic setting is unknown. We utilized the National Cancer Database to examine outcomes in patients with metastatic rectal adenocarcinoma with primary tumor resection with and without pelvic radiotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We queried the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2014 for patients with stage IV rectal adenocarcinoma receiving chemotherapy. We identified 4051 patients in that group that had primary tumor resection. Patients were then stratified by receipt of pelvic radiotherapy (yes = 1882; no = 2169) Univariable and multivariable analyses identified characteristics predictive of overall survival. Propensity-adjusted Cox proportional hazard ratios for survival were used to account for indication bias.

RESULTS

The median patient age was 63 years (range, 18-90 years) with a median follow-up of 32.3 months (range, 3.02-151.29 months). There were proportionately more patients with T3/T4 disease or N1 disease in the surgery plus radiotherapy arm. The median survival was 46.3 months versus 35.3 months in favor of addition of radiotherapy (P < .001). The 2- and 5-year overall survival was 68.4% and 24.8% for surgical resection alone compared with 77.2% and 39.6% for surgery + radiotherapy. On propensity-adjusted multivariable analysis, radiotherapy was associated with a statistically significant reduction in risk of death (hazard ratio, 0.722; 95% confidence interval, 0.0665-0.784).

CONCLUSION

This analysis indicates that in patients with metastatic rectal adenocarcinoma receiving chemotherapy, pelvic radiotherapy in addition to primary tumor resection may be of significant benefit.

Bevacizumab is associated with delayed anastomotic leak after low anterior resection with preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: a case report

Background

Bevacizumab is an anti-angiogenesis agent used to treat patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and is associated with a variety of complications. We present a patient with rectal cancer who developed a delayed anastomotic leak more than 5 years after undergoing low anterior resection.

Case report

A 78-year-old man with hematochezia was diagnosed with two synchronous rectal cancers 7 years prior to presentation. Preoperative chemo-radiotherapy was given followed by a very low anterior resection. During follow-up, multiple lymph node metastases developed, which were treated with chemotherapy. First-line chemotherapy, capecitabine, oxizaliplatin, and bevacizumab, was given over 3 years, and second-line chemotherapy, capecitabine, irinotecan, and bevacizumab, was administered over a 3-month period. After the last treatment, the patient presented with pneumaturia and fecaluria. Computed tomography scan revealed extraluminal air between the prostate and rectum, adjacent to the anastomotic site. Ulceration and fistula formation were observed on colonoscopy, and contrast radiography demonstrated a fistula at the anastomotic site. An anastomotic-urethral fistula was diagnosed and transverse colostomy was performed.

Conclusions

This patient highlights a rare late adverse event at the anastomotic site associated with bevacizumab treatment and preoperative chemo-radiotherapy. Signs and symptoms suggesting anastomotic complications should be thoroughly evaluated during bevacizumab treatment, even long after surgical resection.

Monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of non-hematological tumors: a safety review

Introduction: The introduction of monoclonal antibodies (moAbs) into clinical practice revolutionized the treatment strategies in several solid tumors. These agents differ from cytotoxic chemotherapy for their mechanism of action and toxicity. By targeting specific antigens present on healthy cells and modulating immune system activity, these biological drugs are able to generate a wide spectrum of peculiar adverse events that can negatively impact on patients' quality of life. Areas covered: In this review, the main side effects associated with the use of moAbs have been described to show their incidence and current management strategies, which may drive clinicians in their daily practice. Expert opinion: The majority of these drugs represents an example of successful innovation, since they are able to induce a significant improvement of patients' survival and quality of life without any increase in related side effects as compared to standard cancer treatments. For this reason, they have become new milestones in personalized therapy for different non-hematological malignancies. With the increasing use of moAbs in treatment regimens, it is strongly recommended that clinicians are knowledgeable about the side effects associated with these agents, their management and monitoring, to optimize the clinical treatment of cancer patients.

Kras-mutation influences outcomes for palliative primary tumor resection in advanced colorectal cancer-a Turkish Oncology Group study

PURPOSE

We aimed to investigate the prognostic effect of primary tumor resection (PTR) prior to bevacizumab-based treatments in unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

METHODS

We retrospectively collected 341 mCRC cases with unresectable metastases at diagnosis. PTR was performed in 210 cases (the surgery group) and the other patients (n = 131) were followed without PTR (the no-surgery group). All the patients were treated with bevacizumab combined chemotherapy regimens.

RESULTS

The median progression free survival (PFS) of the surgery group was 10.4 months (95% CI: 8.9-11.9), which was significantly better than that of the no-surgery group (7.6 months, 95% CI: 6.4-8.8, P=0.000). The median overall survival (OS) of the surgery group was longer than that of the no-surgery group (27.4 months vs. 18.3 months, respectively, P=0.000). The median PFS and OS of the surgery group were 10.4 months and 28.2 months, which were significantly longer than that of the no-surgery group in Kras-mutant patients (7.8 months and 18.3 months; P=0.004, P=0.028, respectively). There was no difference in terms of PFS and OS between the surgery and the no-surgery groups in Kras-wild type patients.

CONCLUSION

Palliative PTR may improve the survival outcomes for unresectable mCRC patients. PTR may be preferred, particularly in Kras-mutant patients.

Effectiveness of First-Line Bevacizumab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The Observational Cohort Study GRETA

BACKGROUND

Scant real-world data exist on the clinical outcomes associated with the use of bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy (B+CT) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The primary objective of the GRETA cohort study was to compare the overall survival (OS) of patients with mCRC treated with first-line B+CT versus chemotherapy (CT) alone, in an Italian clinical practice setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Incident patients with mCRC were identified during the period 2010-2012 from five population-based cancer registries in Italy. Cases were linked to regional health care utilization databases to obtain the entire spectrum of health services provided to each patient. Patients starting a first-line treatment with B+CT or CT alone within 90 days from the diagnosis were included in the study cohort. A propensity score (PS) method was applied to account for residual confounding.

RESULTS

Of 480 patients with mCRC included in the study cohort, 21.0 received first-line B+CT, and 79.0% received CT. Patients receiving B+CT were younger (p < .001) and underwent surgery more frequently (p = .001). The median OS was 22.5 and 14.6 months for B+CT and CT, respectively (p = .011). The corresponding hazard ratios adjusted by multivariate modeling and PS matched analysis were 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62-1.08) and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.56-1.33), respectively. Similar results were observed after subgrouping by age and surgery.

CONCLUSION

In this Italian real-world setting of unselected mCRC, the OS of patients treated with B+CT was consistent with previous observational and patient-registry studies. However, definitive evidence of an improvement in OS cannot be drawn.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Bevacizumab is a well-established first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. However, there is scarce evidence in the literature about its effectiveness in clinical practice. Evaluating this topic should be of interest for both clinicians and regulatory agencies. In this study, the median overall survival of the bevacizumab cohort was strikingly coherent with that reported in large observational series of unselected patients, thus suggesting a consistent and reproducible effect of the drug in clinical practice. Although consistent results were observed both in the overall population and in age and surgery subgroups, the present study did not offer definitive evidence of an improvement in OS.

Risk Factors and Adequate Management for Complications of Bevacizumab Treatment Requiring Surgical Intervention in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Bevacizumab (BV) has been approved for treating colorectal cancer since 2004. Although BV use may lead to adverse effects, few studies have reported incidences requiring surgical intervention. We aimed to identify the risk factors and adequate interventions for complications requiring surgical intervention after BV treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with BV in our institute from January 2009 to December 2016. The baseline patient characteristics were used to evaluate the potential risk factors for complications requiring surgery.

RESULTS

Of the 1008 patients recruited for this study, 60 (5.9%) experienced complications necessitating surgery after BV therapy. Gastrointestinal perforation was the most frequently observed complication, occurring in 36 patients (3.5%), and diverting colostomy was the most commonly performed intervention (22 patients, 36.6%). Multivariate analysis helped identify poor differentiation, signet ring cell carcinoma, stent insertion status, rectal location of the primary tumor, and intact primary tumor status as the risk factors. Survival time remained unchanged regardless of a complication that required surgery.

CONCLUSION

Careful monitoring during BV treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer is essential for patients who have a predisposition to complications that may require surgery. After detection, adequate and timely surgical management is imperative for ensuring patient survival.

A Population-Based Study of Complications After Colorectal Surgery in Patients Who Have Received Bevacizumab

BACKGROUND

Patients receiving Bevacizumab, a vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor used to treat metastatic colorectal cancer, may be at greater risk of complications after colorectal surgery because of impaired healing.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to describe population-based rates of complications of colorectal surgery after Bevacizumab treatment and evaluate the relationship between time since last treatment and risk of complications.

DESIGN

This was a population-based retrospective cohort study using administrative and cancer registry data.

SETTINGS

The study was conducted in Ontario, Canada.

PATIENTS

Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving Bevacizumab between January 2008 and December 2011 were followed for a year after treatment or until death.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Administrative data were used to identify patients who underwent colorectal surgery after initiation of Bevacizumab and to determine whether they experienced a complicated postoperative course. The relationship between time since last Bevacizumab treatment (≤28 d, 29 d to 3 mo, and >3 mo) and risk of postoperative complications was evaluated using logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of the 2759 patients who received Bevacizumab for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, 265 underwent a colorectal procedure after exposure. The majority had a bowel resection or repair with no stoma (47.5%) and had emergency surgery (61.1%). Overall, 96 (36.2%) had a complicated postoperative course, including 20.4% readmission, 12.5% wound complications, and 7.9% mortality rate within 30 days of surgery. Adjusted multivariate analysis showed no difference in the likelihood of a complicated postoperative course among patients undergoing surgery within 28 days of receiving their last Bevacizumab dose compared with 29 days to 3 months (OR = 1.23 (95% CI, 0.53-2.84), or 3 to 12 months (OR = 0.98 (95% CI, 0.46-2.09) after receiving Bevacizumab.

LIMITATIONS

Reliance on administrative data to measure complications limited the scope of this study.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer requiring colorectal surgery after exposure to Bevacizumab experience substantial morbidity and mortality. The risk of complications is not detectably associated with time since exposure. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A474.