Real-World Outcomes of Patients with Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Programmed Cell Death Protein 1 Inhibitors in the Year Following U.S. Regulatory Approval

The real-world treatment characteristic and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer: Data from a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and prognosis of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) remain unresolved issues. Here, we assessed the treatment characteristics and efficacy of ICIs in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using real-world data and evaluated the predictive value of factors, including programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, for the clinical outcome of ICIs in NSCLC.

METHODS

Analyzed data was collected from hospitalized patients in the West China Hospital of Sichuan University between January 2017 and March 2023. The Kaplan-Meier method was utilized for analyzing real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS), while Cox regression models was employed to access the correlation between the efficacy of immunotherapy and sociodemographic characteristics, disease information, and characteristics of ICI treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 545 patients were included in the retrospective study and characteristics of immunotherapy varied significantly among PD-L1 expression groups. The median rwPFS for the entire population was 9.76 months. Subgroup analyses revealed that patients with high PD-L1 expression, early TNM stage, first-line immunotherapy, EGFR wild-type and those who have not received radiotherapy and targeted therapy previously were more likely to have better rwPFS. Furthermore, multivariate Cox regression analyses identified PD-L1 expression, EGFR mutation status and previous radiotherapy as the most influential predictors of the response to ICI treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

This study presents the real-world experience of Chinese NSCLC patients undergoing ICI treatment, offering guidance for clinical decision-making based on various patient conditions, preferences, and indications for ICIs, through the evaluation of immunotherapy efficacy and predictors in NSCLC patients.

Immunosenescence and immunotherapy in older NSCLC patients

Nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) predominantly affects the elderly since its incidence and mortality rates skyrocket beyond the age of 65. The landscape of NSCLC treatment has been revolutionized by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), which have emerged after a long and mostly inactive period of conventional treatment protocols. However, there is limited data on the exact effects of these chemicals on older patients, whose care can be complicated by a variety of conditions. This highlights the need to understand the efficacy of emerging cancer medicines in older patients. In this study, we will review the data of ICIs from clinical trials that were relevant to older people with NSCLC and poor performance status. We will also discuss the role of immunosenescence in immunotherapy and biomarkers in predicting the efficacy of ICIs in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Differential treatment effect between younger and older adults for new cancer therapies in solid tumors supporting US Food and Drug Administration approval between 2010 and 2021

BACKGROUND

Over one half of cancer diagnoses occur in patients aged 65 and older. The authors quantified how treatment effects differ between older and younger patients in oncology registration trials.

METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective cohort study of registration trials supporting US Food and Drug Administration approval of cancer drugs (from January 2010 to December 2021). The primary outcome was differential treatment effect by age (younger than 65 years vs. 65 years or older) for progression-free survival and overall survival. Random effects meta-analysis and a pairwise comparison of outcomes by age group also were performed.

RESULTS

Among 263 trials that met the inclusion criteria, 120 trials with 153 end points and 83,152 patients presented age-specific outcome data. Among the included randomized patients, 38% were aged 65 years and older compared with an incidence proportion of 55% in data from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. Studies evaluating prostate cancer had the highest representation of patients aged 65 years or older (73%), whereas breast cancer studies had the lowest (20%). There were no changes in the proportion of patients aged 65 years or older over time (p = .86). Only 7% of end points showed a statistically significant interaction between outcome and age group. In a pooled analysis, there was an association between treatment effect and age for progression-free survival that approached but did not meet significance (hazard ratio, 0.95; p = .06), and there was no difference for overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.97; p = .79).

CONCLUSIONS

Older adults remain under-represented in oncology registration trials. Significant differences in outcomes by age group were uncommon in individual trials and pooled analyses. However, clinical trial participants differ from real-world patients older than 65 years, and increased enrollment and ongoing research into differential treatment effects by age are needed.

Survival outcomes of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer receiving chemotherapy or immunotherapy as first-line in a real-life setting

Treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) has been modified due to the development of immunotherapy. We assessed survival outcomes (overall [OS] and progression-free [rwPFS] survivals, time-to-next-treatment [TNT]) in mNSCLC patients after first-line immunotherapy and chemotherapy in real-life settings. Association between rwPFS and TNT, two candidate surrogate endpoints (SE), with OS was assessed. This retrospective multi-center study uses data from patients included in the Epidemio-Strategy Medico-Economic program with mNSCLC over 2015-2019. The impact of treatment on rwPFS/OS was evaluated with Cox models. Individual-level associations between SE and OS were estimated with an iterative multiple imputation approach and joint survival models. The population included 5294 patients (63 years median age). Median OS in immunotherapy group was 16.4 months (95%CI [14.1-NR]) and was higher than in chemotherapy group (11.6 months; 95%CI [11.0-12.2]). Improved OS was observed for the immunotherapy group after 3 months for subjects with performance status 0-1 (HR = 0.59; 95%CI [0.42-0.83], p < 0.01). The associations between rwPFS and TNT with OS were close ([Formula: see text]=0.57). Results emphasized a survival improvement with immunotherapy for patients in good health condition. There was moderate evidence of individual-level association between candidate SE and OS.

Analysis of real-world data to investigate evolving treatment sequencing patterns in advanced non-small cell lung cancers and their impact on survival

Background

Although optimal sequencing of systemic therapy in cancer care is critical to achieving maximal clinical benefit, there is a lack of analysis of treatment sequencing in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) in real-world settings.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study of 13,340 lung cancer patients within the Mount Sinai Health System (MSHS) was performed. Systemic therapy data of aNSCLC in 2,106 patients was the starting point in our analysis to investigate how treatment sequencing has evolved, the impact of sequencing patterns on clinical outcomes, and the effectiveness of 2nd line chemotherapy after patients progressed on immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapy as the 1st line of therapy (LOT).

Results

There is a significant shift to more ICI-based therapy and multiple lines of targeted therapy after 2015. We compared clinical outcomes of two patient populations with different treatment sequencing patterns, with the 1st group receiving chemotherapy as the 1st LOT followed by ICI-based treatment, and the 2nd group treated in the opposite order receiving a 1st line ICI-containing regimen followed by a 2nd line chemotherapy. No statistically significant difference in overall survival (OS) was observed between the two groups [group 2 vs. group 1, adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) =1.36, P=0.39]. We assessed the efficacy of the 2nd line chemotherapy in three patient populations given either 1st line ICI single agent, 1st line ICI-chemotherapy combination, or 1st line chemotherapy alone, there was no statistically significant difference in time-to-next treatment (TTNT) and in OS among the three patient groups.

Conclusions

Analysis of real-world data has shown two treatment sequencing patterns in aNSCLC, ICI followed by chemotherapy or chemotherapy followed by ICI, achieved similar clinical benefit. The chemotherapies routinely used following platinum doublet 1st LOT, is effective as the 2nd line option after ICI-chemotherapy combination in the 1st line setting.

Semiautomated Pipeline to Quantify Tumor Evolution From Real-World Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging

PURPOSE

A semiautomated pipeline for the collection and curation of free-text and imaging real-world data (RWD) was developed to quantify cancer treatment outcomes in large-scale retrospective real-world studies. The objectives of this article are to illustrate the challenges of RWD extraction, to demonstrate approaches for quality assurance, and to showcase the potential of RWD for precision oncology.

METHODS

We collected data from patients with advanced melanoma receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors at the Lausanne University Hospital. Cohort selection relied on semantically annotated electronic health records and was validated using process mining. The selected imaging examinations were segmented using an automatic commercial software prototype. A postprocessing algorithm enabled longitudinal lesion identification across imaging time points and consensus malignancy status prediction. Resulting data quality was evaluated against expert-annotated ground-truth and clinical outcomes obtained from radiology reports.

RESULTS

The cohort included 108 patients with melanoma and 465 imaging examinations (median, 3; range, 1-15 per patient). Process mining was used to assess clinical data quality and revealed the diversity of care pathways encountered in a real-world setting. Longitudinal postprocessing greatly improved the consistency of image-derived data compared with single time point segmentation results (classification precision increased from 53% to 86%). Image-derived progression-free survival resulting from postprocessing was comparable with the manually curated clinical reference (median survival of 286 v 336 days, P = .89).

CONCLUSION

We presented a general pipeline for the collection and curation of text- and image-based RWD, together with specific strategies to improve reliability. We showed that the resulting disease progression measures match reference clinical assessments at the cohort level, indicating that this strategy has the potential to unlock large amounts of actionable retrospective real-world evidence from clinical records.

Efficacy and Prognostic Factors of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in the Treatment of Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

OBJECTIVE

To discuss the efficacy and potential prognostic factors of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted to analyze the medical history of patients (n=111) confirmed with advanced NSCLC in the Affiliated Hospital of Putian University from 2018 to 2020. All enrolled patients with adenocarcinoma (n=69), squamous cell carcinoma (n=28), and other types of lung cancer (n=14) were treated with the programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1) inhibitors. They were divided into groups of PD-1 inhibitors, PD-1 inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy, and PD-1 inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy and angiogenesis inhibitors according to the treatment regimen. General clinical data of all patients were collected, and the Kaplan-Meier analysis was applied to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). In addition, univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to analyze prognostic factors associated with PFS and OS after treatment.

RESULTS

Of 111 patients with advanced NSCLC treated with ICIs, 6 were fully responsive, 33 were partially responsive, 55 were stable, and 17 were progressive. There was no significant difference in objective response rate between the 3 groups. In the subgroup analysis according to the lines of therapy, the objective response rate of patients receiving first-line treatment was 46.7%, which was significantly higher than that of other line treatment groups ( P =0.014). The results of multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that the history of hormone use (HR=1.593; P =0.033), second-line or further lines of therapy (HR=2.871; P <0.001), and high neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR; HR=1.498; P =0.045) were independent risk factors for PFS after immunotherapy for advanced NSCLC. And the history of hormone use (HR=1.518; P =0.015) and high NLR (HR=3.053; P =0.001) were as well the independent risk factors for OS after immunotherapy for advanced NSCLC.

CONCLUSION

ICIs therapy clearly had a greater survival benefit in patients who received first-line therapy, had no history of hormone use, and showed low NLR after initial treatment. ICIs can be an effective treatment for advanced NSCLC.

Investigation of racial differences in survival from non-small cell lung cancer with immunotherapy use: A Texas study

Background

The use of immunotherapy is associated with improved survival among patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) and has gained widespread use in its management. However, there is limited information on whether the survival benefits associated with immunotherapy differ among races and ethnicities.

Objective

This study aimed to investigate racial differences in survival amongst patients with NSCLC who received immunotherapy as the first-line treatment in Texas.

Methods

Patients with NSCLC who received immunotherapy between October 2015 to December 2018 were identified from the Texas Cancer Registry (TCR). Disease-specific survival was evaluated and compared among patients across racial/ethnic categories using the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, log-rank test, and a multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression model following an inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) propensity score analysis.

Results

A total of 1453 patients were included in the analysis. Median survival (in months) was longest among Asians (34, 95% CI: 15-Not Estimable), followed by African Americans (AAs) (23, 95% CI: 15-34), Hispanics (22, 95% CI: 16-26), and Whites (19, 95% CI: 17-22). The adjusted regression estimates had no statistically significant differences in survival among AAs (aHR = 0.97; 95% CI = 0.78-1.20; P =0.77) and Hispanics (aHR = 0.96; 95% CI = 0.77-1.19, P =0.73) when compared to White patients. Asians on the other hand, had 40% reduction in mortality risk compared to Whites (aHR = 0.60; 95% CI = 0.39-0.94, P = 0.03).

Conclusions

Our study indicated that African Americans and Hispanics do not have poorer survival compared to White patients when receiving immunotherapy as first-line treatment. Asians however had longer survival compared to Whites. Our findings suggest that existing racial disparity in NSCLC survival might be mitigated with the use of immunotherapy and should be considered in providing care to these minority groups.

Health outcomes and healthcare resource utilization among Veterans with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer treated with second-line chemotherapy versus immunotherapy

BACKGROUND

Until recently, multi-agent chemotherapy (CT) was the standard of care for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Clinical trials have confirmed benefits in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival with immunotherapy (IO) compared to CT. This study compares real-world treatment patterns and outcomes between CT and IO administrations in second-line (2L) settings for patients with stage IV NSCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included patients in the United States Department of Veterans Affairs healthcare system diagnosed with stage IV NSCLC during 2012-2017 and receiving IO or CT in the 2L. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and adverse events (AEs) were compared between treatment groups. Logistic regression was used to examine differences in baseline characteristics between groups, and inverse probability weighting multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression was used to analyze OS.

RESULTS

Among 4,609 Veterans who received first-line (1L) therapy for stage IV NSCLC, 96% received 1L CT alone. A total of 1,630 (35%) were administered 2L systemic therapy, with 695 (43%) receiving IO and 935 (57%) receiving CT. Median age was 67 years (IO group) and 65 years (CT group); most patients were male (97%) and white (76-77%). Patients administered 2L IO had a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index than those administered CT (p = 0.0002). 2L IO was associated with significantly longer OS compared with CT (hazard ratio 0.84, 95% CI 0.75-0.94). IO was more frequently prescribed during the study period (p < 0.0001). No difference in rate of hospitalizations was observed between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the proportion of advanced NSCLC patients receiving 2L systemic therapy is low. Among patients treated with 1L CT and without IO contraindications, 2L IO should be considered, as this supports potential benefit of IO for advanced NSCLC. The increasing availability and indications for IO will likely increase the administration of 2L therapy to NSCLC patients.

Transportability of Overall Survival Estimates From US to Canadian Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Implications for Regulatory and Health Technology Assessment

IMPORTANCE

The external validity of survival outcomes derived from clinical practice data from US patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is not known and is of potential importance because it may be used to support regulatory decision-making and health technology assessment outside of the US.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether overall survival (OS) estimates for a selected group of patients with advanced NSCLC from a large US clinical practice database are transportable to Canadian patients receiving the same systemic therapies.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This retrospective multicenter cohort study used transportability analysis to assess whether adjustment for pretreatment characteristics of eligible patient cohorts could reliably approximate OS estimated from US-based samples to Canadian populations. A total of 17 432 eligible adult patients who were diagnosed de novo with advanced NSCLC on or after January 1, 2011, were included in the analysis and followed up until September 30, 2020. Because data on race and ethnicity were available in the US database but not the Canadian database and because racial and ethnic distribution was likely to be similar between US and Canadian patients, these characteristics were not analyzed.

EXPOSURES

Initiation of platinum-doublet chemotherapy or pembrolizumab monotherapy as first-line systemic treatment for advanced NSCLC.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

OS measured from the time of initiation of the respective treatment regimen.

RESULTS

Among 17 432 eligible patients, 15 669 patients from the US and 1763 patients from Canada were included in the analysis. Of those, 11 863 patients (sample size-weighted estimates of mean [SD] age, 68.0 [9.3] years; 6606 [55.7%] male; 10 100 from the US and 1763 from Canada) were included in the subset of patients with complete data for baseline covariates. A total of 13 532 US patients received first-line chemotherapy, and 2137 received first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy. Of those, 8447 patients (62.4%) in the first-line chemotherapy group and 1653 patients (77.3%) in the first-line pembrolizumab group had complete data on baseline covariates for outcome model estimation. A total of 1476 Canadian patients who received first-line chemotherapy and 287 patients who received first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy were identified from the target population. After standardization to baseline patient covariates in the Canadian cohorts, transported OS estimates revealed a less than 5% mean absolute difference from the observed OS in the target population (0.56% over 60 months of follow-up in the first-line chemotherapy group and 4.54% over 30 months of follow-up in the first-line pembrolizumab group). Negative control analysis using a mismatched outcome model revealed a 6.64% discrepancy and an incompatible survival curve shape. The results were robust to assumptions of random missingness for baseline covariates, to unadjusted differences in baseline metastases and comorbidities, and to differences in the standard of care between the US and Canada related to administration of second-line anti-programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 immunotherapy for patients who initiated first-line chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The results of this cohort study suggest that, under specific circumstances, OS estimates from US clinical practice data can be adjusted using baseline clinical characteristics to closely approximate OS in selected groups of Canadian patients with advanced NSCLC. These results may have implications for regulatory decision-making and health technology assessment in target populations outside of the US.

Association Between Smoking History and Overall Survival in Patients Receiving Pembrolizumab for First-Line Treatment of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

IMPORTANCE

There is a need to tailor treatments to patients who are most likely to derive the greatest benefit from them to improve patient outcomes and enhance cost-effectiveness of cancer therapies.

OBJECTIVE

To compare overall survival (OS) between patients with a current or former history of smoking with patients who never smoked and initiated pembrolizumab monotherapy as first-line (1L) treatment for advanced non-small lung cancer (NSCLC).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This retrospective cohort study compared patients diagnosed with advanced NSCLC aged 18 or higher selected from a nationwide real-world database originating from more than 280 US cancer clinics. The study inclusion period was from January 1, 2011, to October 1, 2019.

EXPOSURES

Smoking status at the time of NSCLC diagnosis.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

OS measured from initiation of 1L pembrolizumab monotherapy.

RESULTS

In this retrospective cohort study, a total of 1166 patients (median [IQR] age, 72.9 [15.3] years; 581 [49.8%] men and 585 [50.2%] women) were assessed in the primary analysis, including 91 patients [7.8%] with no history of smoking (ie, never-smokers) and 1075 patients [92.2%] who currently or formerly smoked (ie, ever-smokers). Compared with ever-smokers, never-smokers were older (median age [IQR] of 78.2 [12.0] vs 72.7 [15.5] years), more likely to be female (61 [67.0%] vs 524 [48.7%]) and to have been diagnosed with nonsquamous tumor histology (70 [76.9%] vs 738 [68.7%]). After adjustment for baseline covariates, ever-smokers who initiated 1L pembrolizumab had significantly prolonged OS compared to never-smokers (median OS: 12.8 [10.9-14.6] vs 6.5 [3.3-13.8] months; hazard ratio (HR): 0.69 [95% CI, 0.50-0.95]). This trend was observed across all sensitivity analyses for the 1L pembrolizumab cohort, but not for initiators of 1L platinum chemotherapy, for which ever-smokers showed significantly shorter OS compared with never-smokers (HR, 1.2 [95% CI, 1.07-1.33]).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In patients with advanced NSCLC who received 1L pembrolizumab monotherapy in routine clinical practices in the US, patients who reported a current or former history of smoking at the time of diagnosis had consistently longer OS than never-smokers. This finding suggests that in never-smoking advanced NSCLC, 1L pembrolizumab monotherapy may not be the optimal therapy selection, and genomic testing for potential genomically matched therapies should be prioritized over pembrolizumab in never-smokers.

Real-World Data of Different Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in China

Background

Patients treated with immunotherapy in the real-world may have significantly different responses to those meeting inclusion criteria for random controlled clinical studies. There is a partial overlap in approved indications for the use of the different immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) currently available. A comprehensive assessment of the efficacy, safety and economic effects of various ICIs is a problem that clinicians need to address.

Methods

Analyzed real-world data was collected from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who were treated with ICIs from hospitalized patients in the Lung Cancer Center of Peking Union Medical College Hospital between 2018 and 2021. The objectives were to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different ICIs for the treatment of NSCLC in China and to investigate the factors affecting their curative effects.

Results

Overall, 351 patients were included in the retrospective study. The median PFS for the NSCLC patient cohort treated with medication regimens that included ICIs was 9.5 months, with an ORR of 47.3%. There were no significant discrepancies in efficacy and safety between the different ICIs administered. Factors that had the greatest impact on the efficacy of ICIs were the disease stage, ECOG-PS scores and treatment lines. Gender, age, smoking history, PD-L1 TPS expression, history of targeted therapy and irAEs all had a degree of influence on patient prognosis.

Conclusions

The study reports the experience of real-world usage of ICIs for the treatment of NSCLC patients in China. The results were generally consistent with those of clinical trials, while the efficacy and safety of different ICIs exhibited no statistically significant differences. Therefore, physicians can make a comprehensive choice based on the indications and cost of different ICIs and the preferences of patients.

Opportunities and challenges when using record linkage of routinely collected electronic health care data to evaluate outcomes of systemic anti-cancer treatment in clinical practice

The efficacy and safety of cancer medicines as reported from randomised clinical trials do not always translate into similar benefits in routine clinical practice; hence, post-marketing studies are a useful addition to the evidence base. With recent advances in digital infrastructure and the advent of electronically available health records, linkage of routinely collected data has emerged as a promising evaluation method for these studies. This paper discusses the opportunities and challenges when applying an electronic record linkage methodology with respect to systemic anti-cancer therapy by showcasing exemplar studies conducted over a three-year period in Scotland, and highlights some of the potential pitfalls spanning the entire breadth and depth of the research process. Our experiences as an interdisciplinary team indicate that there is scope to conduct large cohort studies to generate results from routine clinical practice within a reasonable time frame; however, close collaboration between researchers, data controllers and clinicians is required in order to obtain valid and meaningful results.

Real World Outcomes versus Clinical Trial Results of Durvalumab Maintenance in Veterans with Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Simple Summary

The standard of care for patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer is concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by maintenance durvalumab based on outcomes from the PACIFIC trial. The efficacy of this regimen in a real-world population has not been extensively studied. We found that the addition of durvalumab has significantly improved both progression-free and overall survival in veterans with stage III non-small cell lung cancer as compared to veterans who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone, but overall survival of veterans is reduced compared to patients in the PACIFIC trial. Additional studies will need to be performed to understand this efficacy-effectiveness gap.

Abstract

One year of durvalumab following concurrent chemoradiotherapy improves progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the real-world efficacy of durvalumab has not been determined. We conducted a multi-center observational cohort study across the Veterans Health Administration, including patients with stage III NSCLC who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy and durvalumab, compared to patients who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone. Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression approaches were used to identify factors associated with PFS and OS. We calculated a hazard ratio and efficacy-effectiveness factor to compare OS of veterans to the referenced clinical trial population. A total of 1006 patients with stage III NSCLC who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy and at least one dose of durvalumab from November 2017 to April 2021 were compared to 989 patients who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone from January 2015 to December 2016. Adjuvant durvalumab was associated with higher PFS (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.55–0.70, p < 0.001) and OS (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.50–0.66, p < 0.001). OS was shorter in veterans compared to PACIFIC (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.03–1.48, p = 0.02: EE gap 0.73). OS of veterans with stage III NSCLC treated with adjuvant durvalumab is improved compared to a modern comparator but is reduced compared to the PACIFIC population.

Characterizing the Shifting Real-World Treatment Landscape by PD-L1 Testing Status and Expression Level in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Contemporary real-world data on advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) treatment patterns across programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression levels and testing status are limited.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort was selected of adults newly diagnosed with aNSCLC between January 1, 2018, and July 31, 2021, who initiated first-line treatments, which were described by PD-L1 status and expression levels (≥ 50%, 1-49%, < 1%). Treatment received before and after PD-L1 test results were described for patients initiating first-line treatment before PD-L1 results. For patients who initiated chemotherapy alone before PD-L1 results, the probability of receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) after PD-L1 results was estimated by PD-L1 level and associated factors were explored.

RESULTS

Among 12,202 patients with aNSCLC initiating first-line treatment [54.7% male, mean (standard deviation) age 69.2 (9.4) years], the most common therapies were ICI-based regimens across PD-L1 levels, and chemotherapy alone among PD-L1-untested patients. Use of chemotherapy alone decreased between 2018 and 2019 and stabilized thereafter, accounting for 21-29% of first-line treatments across PD-L1 levels and 48% of untested patients in 2021. Of 1468 patients initiating first-line treatment before PD-L1 results, treatments remained unchanged in most patients after PD-L1 results. Among patients initiating chemotherapy alone before PD-L1 results, the probability of receiving ICIs within 45 days after test results was 40.5% [95% confidence interval (CI) 31.6-48.3%], 28.6% (95% CI 20.3-36.0%), and 22.9% (95% CI 16.9-28.4%) at PD-L1 ≥ 50%, 1-49%, and < 1%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

While ICI-based regimens accounted for most first-line treatments across PD-L1 levels, chemotherapy alone was initiated in > 20% of patients tested for PD-L1 and 48% of untested patients in 2021. Patients who initiated chemotherapy alone had a low probability of receiving ICIs after PD-L1 test results. These results highlight the need for understanding the role and timing of PD-L1 test results for informing treatment decisions for patients with aNSCLC.

Safety and Effectiveness of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Older Patients with Cancer: A Systematic Review of 48 Real-World Studies

BACKGROUND

Over recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have changed the clinical management and prognosis for most cancers. However, data on older patients in clinical trials are scarce.

OBJECTIVE

We performed a systematic review and pooled analysis of real-life studies to explore the efficacy and toxicity of ICIs in unselected older individuals in multiple tumor settings treated outside of clinical trials.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We searched articles, including prospective cohort studies, observational or retrospective series, or expanded access programs, published in English from 2010 to October 2020 in PubMed, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE. We excluded hematological malignancies.

RESULTS

Forty-eight studies met the predefined criteria and were eligible for inclusion in the systematic review. We included 5524 patients. The pooled median overall survival was 8.9 (95% CI 7.3-10.5) and 14.3 (95% CI 11.3-17) months for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC: n = 17 studies; 95% in pretreated setting) and melanoma, respectively (n = 3). Median progression-free survival was 3.2 (95% CI 2.7-3.8) and 7.9 (95% CI 6.05-9.78) months for NSCLC and melanoma cohorts. Pooled rates of Grade 1-5 hepatitis, pneumonitis, hypothyroidism, and diarrhea were 5.3% (95% CI 3.7-7.6), 6% (95% CI 3.8-9.4), 8.3% (95% CI 5.4-12.5) and 7.6% (95% CI 5.7-10), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that ICIs could be safely administered in older individuals with comparable survival outcomes with respect to younger individuals. Future studies should include some form of geriatric assessment to improve patient stratification.

Real-world Overall Survival Using Oncology Electronic Health Record Data: Friends of Cancer Research Pilot

In prior work, Friends of Cancer Research convened multiple data partners to establish standardized definitions for oncology real-world end points derived from electronic health records (EHRs) and claims data. Here, we assessed the performance of real-world overall survival (rwOS) from data sets sourced from EHRs by evaluating the ability of the end point to reflect expected differences from a previous randomized controlled trial across five data sources, after applying inclusion/exclusion criteria. The KEYNOTE-189 clinical trial protocol of platinum doublet chemotherapy (chemotherapy) vs. programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) in combination with platinum doublet chemotherapy (PD-1 combination) in first-line nonsquamous metastatic non-small cell lung cancer guided retrospective cohort selection. The Kaplan-Meier product limit estimator was used to calculate 12-month rwOS with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in each data source. Cox proportional hazards models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and associated 95% CIs, controlled for prognostic factors. Once the inclusion/exclusion criteria were applied, the five resulting data sets included 155 to 1,501 patients in the chemotherapy cohort and 36 to 405 patients in the PD-1 combination cohort. Twelve-month rwOS ranged from 45% to 58% in the chemotherapy cohort and 44% to 68% in the PD-1 combination cohort. The adjusted HR for death ranged from 0.80 (95% CI: 0.69, 0.93) to 1.15 (95% CI: 0.71, 1.85), controlling for age, gender, performance status, and smoking status. This study yielded insights regarding data capture, including ability of real-world data to precisely identify patient populations and the impact of criteria on end points. Sensitivity analyses could elucidate data set-specific factors that drive results.

Roadmap to 2030 for Drug Evaluation in Older Adults

Changes that accompany older age can alter the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and likelihood of adverse effects (AEs) of a drug. However, older adults, especially the oldest or those with multiple chronic health conditions, polypharmacy, or frailty, are often under-represented in clinical trials of new drugs. Deficits in the current conduct of clinical evaluation of drugs for older adults and potential steps to fill those knowledge gaps are presented in this communication. The most important step is to increase clinical trial enrollment of older adults who are representative of the target treatment population. Unnecessary eligibility criteria should be eliminated. Physical and financial barriers to participation should be removed. Incentives could be created for inclusion of older adults. Enrollment goals should be established based on intended treatment indications, prevalence of the condition, and feasibility. Relevant clinical pharmacology data need to be obtained early enough to guide dosing and reduce risk for participation of older adults. Relevant PK and PD data as well as patient-centered outcomes should be measured during trials. Trial data should be analyzed for differences in PK, PD, effectiveness, and safety arising from differences in age or from the presence of conditions common in older adults. Postmarket evaluations with real-world evidence and drug labeling updates throughout the product lifecycle reflecting new knowledge are also needed. A comprehensive plan is needed to ensure adequate evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of drugs in older adults.

The FDA Oncology Center of Excellence Scientific Collaborative: Charting a Course for Applied Regulatory Science Research in Oncology

The FDA Oncology Center of Excellence (OCE) is a leader within the agency in scientific outreach activities and regulatory science research. On the basis of analysis of scientific workshops, internal meetings, and publications, the OCE identified nine scientific priority areas and one cross-cutting area of high interest for collaboration with external researchers. This article describes the process for identifying these scientific interest areas and highlights funded and unfunded opportunities for external researchers to work with FDA staff on critical regulatory science challenges.

Real-world experience with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer : A retrospective Austrian multicenter study

OBJECTIVE

As real-world data regarding immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer are lacking for Austria, we conducted a retrospective study in six hospitals to present data from real-world practice.

METHODS

Patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer were stratified into two groups, either patients with first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy (cohort 1) or patients with second-line nivolumab, pembrolizumab or atezolizumab monotherapy (cohort 2). Primary outcome measures were objective response rate and overall survival. A matched-pair analysis was performed to compare overall survival to patients from the Tyrolean Lung Cancer Project as a historical control group.

RESULTS

In total, 89 patients were identified, 42 patients in cohort 1 and 47 patients in cohort 2. The objective response rates were 43.3% and 31.4%, respectively. The median overall survival was 17.0 months (95% CI 11.7-21.5 months) in cohort 1 and 18.7 months (95% CI 9.5-23.4 months) in cohort 2. Treatment-related adverse events grades 3 and 4 were reported in 11.2% of patients. The matched-pair analysis showed a median overall survival of 15.2 months (95% CI 7.6-20.4 months) for first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy compared to 9.8 months (95% CI 7.8-11.6 months) for the historical control (p = 0.43). In cohort 2, a median overall survival of 20.3 months (95% CI 6.9-26.2 months) for second-line immunotherapy compared to 5.4 months (95% CI 3.2-11.7 months) for the historical control (p = 0.18) was shown.

CONCLUSION

The results are comparable with other real-world studies and, when matched to historical controls, support the improvement in outcomes made possible by these agents.

Impact of Smoking History on Response to Immunotherapy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objectives

To evaluate the impact of smoking history on the clinical benefit of immunotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

Twenty-three randomized clinical trials and seven real-world studies were included in this meta-analysis. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) and odds ratios for the overall response rate (ORR) were extracted. A fixed-effects or random-effects model was applied to obtain pooled estimates.

Results

Data from 16 high-quality trials involving 10,643 NSCLC patients receiving either immunotherapy or chemotherapy/placebo enabled direct comparison of the survival impact of smoking. Anti-PD-1/PD-L1/CTLA-4 immunotherapy was found to significantly prolong OS and PFS as compared to chemotherapy/placebo in smokers (HR for OS, 0.76 [0.69-0.83], P<0.00001; HR for PFS, 0.65 [0.56-0.75], P<0.00001), and these trends were less or not significant in non-smokers (HR for OS, 0.91 [0.78-1.06], P=0.25; HR for PFS, 0.68 [0.45-1.03], P=0.07). Consistent results were obtained for the first-line or second/third-line use of immunotherapy and for non-squamous NSCLC patients only. Furthermore, the data from 7 trials and 7 real-world studies involving 4,777 patients receiving immunotherapy allowed direct comparison of therapeutic outcomes between smokers and non-smokers. Prolonged OS (HR 0.86 [0.75-0.99], P=0.04) and PFS (HR 0.69 [0.60-0.81], P<0.0001) and a higher response rate (ORR 1.20 [0.94-1.53], P=0.15) were observed in smokers compared to non-smokers receiving immunotherapy.

Conclusions

Immunotherapy was found to have a greater benefit in NSCLC patients with a smoking history than in those who had never smoked.

Real-World Outcomes for Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in the Veterans Affairs System

Increasingly broad patient groups are being treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in clinical practice, but few studies have assessed their usage and outcomes in large, comprehensive real-world cohorts. We identified patients who received ICIs in the Veterans Affairs (VA) health care system and described patient characteristics and survival outcomes across multiple indications.

Immune-related adverse events in cancer patients being treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

INTRODUCTION

With the increased use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), it is essential to improve our understanding of immune-related adverse events (irAE). To date, most studies describing irAE have been performed in clinical trial populations, which may not be an accurate description of irAE in real-world populations. Also, identification of patients at increased risk of irAE is needed as early recognition may improve irAE outcomes.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who received an ICI between January 2014 and October 2018 at a single institution (Tufts Medical Center). Each patient was followed for up to 12 months for the outcome of a physician-reported irAE. Kaplan-Meier curves were created for the time to development and resolution of initial irAE. A Cox proportional hazards model was created to evaluate whether the following variables were independent predictors of an initial irAE: age ≥65 years, female sex, non-Caucasian race, radiation in previous 6 months, current smoking status, melanoma, and combination ICI (ipilimumab and nivolumab).

RESULTS

Of 131 patients followed, 57 patients (43.5%) developed at least one irAE at a median of 250 days (95% confidence interval (CI) 132 days-not estimable). The most common irAE included dermatitis, thyroid dysfunction, and pneumonitis. Nearly two-thirds of patients with an irAE had ICI therapy withdrawn, and nearly 60% had immunosuppression initiated. In multivariable analysis, we found a significant association between irAE development and age ≥65 years hazard ratio (HR) 1.80, 95% CI (1.03-3.14) and current smoking status (HR 2.26, 95% CI 1.06-4.82).

DISCUSSION

We detected a high rate of irAE and that irAE and subsequent management can be clinically burdensome in this patient population. While further studies are needed to validate these findings, this study provides insights into the magnitude, time course, management of, and possible predictors of irAE in a real-world setting.

Real-world Evidence of Diagnostic Testing and Treatment Patterns in US Patients With Breast Cancer With Implications for Treatment Biomarkers From RNA Sequencing Data

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND

We performed a retrospective analysis of longitudinal real-world data (RWD) from patients with breast cancer to replicate results from clinical studies and demonstrate the feasibility of generating real-world evidence. We also assessed the value of transcriptome profiling as a complementary tool for determining molecular subtypes.

METHODS

De-identified, longitudinal data were analyzed after abstraction from records of patients with breast cancer in the United States (US) structured and stored in the Tempus database. Demographics, clinical characteristics, molecular subtype, treatment history, and survival outcomes were assessed according to strict qualitative criteria. RNA sequencing and clinical data were used to predict molecular subtypes and signaling pathway enrichment.

RESULTS

The clinical abstraction cohort (n = 4000) mirrored the demographics and clinical characteristics of patients with breast cancer in the US, indicating feasibility for RWE generation. Among patients who were human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+), 74.2% received anti-HER2 therapy, with ∼70% starting within 3 months of a positive test result. Most non-treated patients were early stage. In this RWD set, 31.7% of patients with HER2+ immunohistochemistry (IHC) had discordant fluorescence in situ hybridization results recorded. Among patients with multiple HER2 IHC results at diagnosis, 18.6% exhibited intra-test discordance. Through development of a whole-transcriptome model to predict IHC receptor status in the molecular sequenced cohort (n = 400), molecular subtypes were resolved for all patients (n = 36) with equivocal HER2 statuses from abstracted test results. Receptor-related signaling pathways were differentially enriched between clinical molecular subtypes.

CONCLUSIONS

RWD in the Tempus database mirrors the overall population of patients with breast cancer in the US. These results suggest that real-time, RWD analyses are feasible in a large, highly heterogeneous database. Furthermore, molecular data may aid deficiencies and discrepancies observed from breast cancer RWD.

Immunotherapy for Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Real-World Data from an Academic Central and Eastern European Center

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) recently became the standard treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we present the first results of a real-world observational study on the effectiveness of ICI monotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC treated at a single academic center in a Central and Eastern European (CEE) country.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Overall, 66 consecutive patients with advanced NSCLC treated with ICIs in everyday clinical practice, either with first-line pembrolizumab (26 patients) or second-line atezolizumab, nivolumab, or pembrolizumab (40 patients), from August 2015 to November 2018, were included. All data were retrieved from a hospital lung cancer registry, in which the data is collected prospectively.

RESULTS

Included patients had a median age of 64 years, most were male (55%), 6% were in performance status ≥2, and 18% had controlled central nervous system metastases at baseline. In first-line, the median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 9.3 months, while the median overall survival (mOS) was not reached. The 1-year overall survival (OS) was 62%. In second-line, the mPFS and mOS were 3.5 months and 9.9 months, respectively, with a 1-year OS of 35%. In the overall population, adverse events of any grade were recorded in 79% of patients and of severe grade (3-4) in 12% of patients.

CONCLUSION

The first real-world outcomes of NSCLC immunotherapy from a CEE country suggest comparable effectiveness to those observed in clinical trials and other real-world series, mainly coming from North America and Western European countries. Further data to inform on the real-world effectiveness of immunotherapy worldwide are needed.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Immunotherapy is a standard treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The real-world data on immunotherapy are still limited. This article presents the first data on the effectiveness of mono-immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients with advanced NSCLC treated at a single academic center in a Central and Eastern European country. The survival rates and toxicity are comparable to those achieved in randomized clinical trials and other real-world series, coming mainly from North American and Western European countries. There is a pressing need to gather further data on the effectiveness of immunotherapy in everyday practice worldwide.

Current Challenges in Access to Melanoma Care: A Multidisciplinary Perspective

A diagnosis of melanoma requires multidisciplinary specialized care across all stages of disease. Although many important advances have been made for the treatment of melanoma for local and advanced disease, barriers to optimal care remain for many patients who live in areas without ready access to the expertise of a specialized melanoma center. In this article, we review some of the recent advances in the treatment of melanoma and the persistent challenges around the world that prevent the delivery of the best standard of care to patients living in the community. With the therapeutic landscape continuing to evolve and newer more complex drug therapies soon to be approved, it is important to recognize the many challenges that patients face and attempt to identify tools and policies that will help to improve treatment outcomes for their melanoma.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in elderly patients treated for a lung cancer: a narrative review

This article is a review of the literature concerning efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the elderly population. In the past decade, immunotherapy deeply changed the treatment paradigm of lung cancer in particular in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC). Thus, ICIs have successively demonstrated a survival benefit as single agent in second line, and moved in first line as monotherapy for patients with high programmed death protein 1 (PD-L1) expression or in combination with chemotherapy regardless PD-L1 expression. If patients aged 70 years or older represent up to half of our patients in clinical routine, elderly population is significantly under-represented in clinical trials. This leads to a lack of knowledge concerning efficacy and safety of ICIs in a population of patients with frequent comorbidities, organs dysfunctions and a potential immune-senescence due to age. In this review, we described available data evaluating efficacy and safety of ICI either as monotherapy or in combination in elderly population treated for a lung cancer. These data derived from clinical trial evaluating ICIs in aNSCLC as single agent or in combination with chemotherapy or anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4). As monotherapy, older patients seem to derive the same benefit from ICIs than younger patients with no excess of toxicities. In combination with chemotherapy, real impact of ICIs in elderly population is still unclear. Results of dedicated studies evaluating ICIs as single agent or in combination in elderly patients are needed.

Analysis of Real-World Data to Investigate the Impact of Race and Ethnicity on Response to Programmed Cell Death-1 and Programmed Cell Death-Ligand 1 Inhibitors in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers

Background

Racial disparities among clinical trial participants present a challenge to assess whether trial results can be generalized into patients representing diverse races and ethnicities. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of race and ethnicity on treatment response in patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) treated with programmed cell death‐1 (PD‐1) or programmed cell death‐ligand 1 (PD‐L1) inhibitors through analysis of real‐world data (RWD).

Materials and Methods

A retrospective cohort study of 11,138 patients with lung cancer treated at hospitals within the Mount Sinai Health System was performed. Patients with confirmed aNSCLC who received anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1 treatment were analyzed for clinical outcomes. Our cohort included 249 patients with aNSCLC who began nivolumab, pembrolizumab, or atezolizumab treatment between November 2014 and December 2018. Time‐to‐treatment discontinuation (TTD) and overall survival (OS) were the analyzed clinical endpoints.

Results

After a median follow‐up of 14.8 months, median TTD was 7.8 months (95% confidence interval, 5.4–not estimable [NE]) in 75 African American patients versus 4.6 (2.4–7.2) in 110 White patients (hazard ratio [HR], 0.63). Median OS was not reached (18.4–NE) in African American patients versus 11.6 months (9.7–NE) in White patients (HR, 0.58). Multivariable Cox regression conducted with potential confounders confirmed longer TTD (adjusted HR, 0.65) and OS (adjusted HR, 0.60) in African American versus White patients. Similar real‐world response rate (42.6% vs. 43.5%) and disease control rate (59.6% vs. 56.5%) were observed in the African American and White patient populations. Further investigation revealed the African American patient group had lower incidence (14.7%) of putative hyperprogressive diseases (HPD) upon anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1 treatment than the White patient group (24.5%).

Conclusion

Analysis of RWD showed longer TTD and OS in African American patients with aNSCLC treated with anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1 inhibitors. Lower incidence of putative HPD is a possible reason for the favorable outcomes in this patient population.

Implications for Practice

There is a significant underrepresentation of minority patients in randomized clinical trials, and this study demonstrates that real‐world data can be used to investigate the impact of race and ethnicity on treatment response. In retrospective analysis of patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer treated with programmed cell death‐1 or programmed cell death‐ligand 1 inhibitors, African American patients had significantly longer time‐to‐treatment discontinuation and longer overall survival. Analysis of real‐world data can yield clinical insights and establish a more complete picture of medical interventions in routine clinical practice.

Racial disparities in clinical trials affect whether trial results can be generalized for diverse patient populations. This article evaluates real‐world data to assess the impact of race and ethnicity on treatment response in patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer treated with PD‐1 or PD‐L1 inhibitors.

Outcomes of patients with non-small cell lung cancer and poor performance status treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors in the real-world setting

BACKGROUND

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are standard treatments for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients with poor performance status (PS) are underrepresented in clinical trials. We evaluate the efficacy and safety of ICIs in a real-world setting.

METHODS

We conducted a multi-institutional retrospective study to assess clinical outcomes of NSCLC treated with ICIs. We categorized pts within two groups (PS 0-1 vs 2) and assessed clinical outcomes and safety.

RESULTS

Two hundred and sixty nine patients were included, 44 patients (16.4%) had baseline PS 2 and 223 patients (82.9%) PS 0-1. The overall response rate (ORR) was 30.4%, median PFS was 7.26 months (95% CI 5.1-9.4), and median OS was 15.18 months (95% CI 9.5-20.9). Patients with a PS 2 were most likely to received ICIs in the second or later line (84.1% vs 64.6%; p = 0.01), had baseline steroids (21.4% vs 8.2%; p 0.010), lower response rate (16.7% vs 34.5%; p 0.02) and clinical benefit (35.7% vs 71%; p 0.000) compared to PS 0-1 pts. Moreover, PS ≥ 2 patients had shorter PFS, median 2.2 months (95% CI 1.3-3.1) compared to 9.9 months (95% CI 6.7-13.1] and shorter OS, 3.3 months (95% CI 2.6-4.2) versus 24.1 months (95% CI 16.1-32.1), respectively. PS was significantly associated with PFS and OS in multivariate analysis. As it was expected, immunotherapy was well tolerated with a safety profile comparable to the previous published data.

CONCLUSION

Based on these retrospective results, patients with poor baseline performance status seem to have poor clinical outcomes with ICIs in the real-world setting.

Real-World Outcomes of Patients With Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Anti-PD1 Therapy on the Basis of PD-L1 Results in EBUS-TBNA vs Histological Specimens

BACKGROUND

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) testing is feasible in most specimens acquired using endobronchial ultrasound-guided needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA).

RESEARCH QUESTION

Are the outcomes of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) on the basis of PD-L1 expression in EBUS-TBNA samples significantly different from those of patients who are treated on the basis of PD-L1 expression in histological samples?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Patients treated with pembrolizumab or nivolumab between June 2016 and 2019 were included. Patient characteristics, PD-L1 expression, line of treatment, response (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] criteria), and vital status (May 14, 2020) were recorded. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed, and hazard ratios (HR) estimated.

RESULTS

A total of 145 patients were treated with pembrolizumab or nivolumab on the basis of PD-L1 expression in EBUS-TBNA (31.7%) or histological (68.3%) samples. Most had metastatic disease, with a predominance of adenocarcinomas (64.1%). First-line pembrolizumab was administered to 61 patients with tumor proportion score ≥50% in EBUS-TBNA (n = 16) or histology samples (n = 45). Median OS and PFS of patients who received first-line pembrolizumab on the basis of PD-L1 results in EBUS-TBNA vs histology samples were not significantly different (OS 25.8 months vs not reached, respectively; HR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.34-1.95], P = .651). Similarly, the median OS and PFS of patients who received subsequent lines of treatment on the basis of PD-L1 results in EBUS-TBNA vs histological samples were not significantly different (including after adjustment for PD-L1 expression).

INTERPRETATION

These findings suggest that PD-L1 results in EBUS-TBNA samples can guide ICI therapy, with treatment outcomes being comparable to those of patients in whom PD-L1 expression was assessed in histological specimens.

Assessment of Outcomes Associated With the Use of Newly Approved Oncology Drugs in Medicare Beneficiaries

IMPORTANCE

A lack of generalizability of pivotal cancer clinical trial data to treatment of older adults with Medicare could affect therapeutic decision-making in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the differences in survival, duration of therapy, and treatment patterns between clinical trial patients and older adults with Medicare receiving cancer drugs for metastatic solid cancers in usual practice.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This retrospective cohort study, performed from May 1, 2018, to August 30, 2020, used the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program and Medicare database to examine sequential US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved cancer drug indications (2008-2013) for locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors to assess whether pivotal trials reflect the outcomes of Medicare patients with cancer treated in usual practice.

EXPOSURES

Treatment with FDA-approved cancer drugs for metastatic solid cancers in pivotal clinical trials and in the SEER-Medicare database.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Overall survival, duration of treatment, and dose reductions among trial participants and treated Medicare patients.

RESULTS

A total of 11 828 trial participants (mean age, 61.8 years; 6718 [56.8%] male; and 7605 [64.3%] White) and 9178 SEER-Medicare patients (mean age, 72.7 years; 4800 [52.3%] male; and 7437 [81.0% White]) were compared. Twenty-nine indications for 22 cancer drugs were included. Median overall survival among Medicare patients was shorter than among patients in the clinical trial intervention arm for 28 of 29 indications (median difference, -6.3 months; range, -28.7 to 2.7 months). Median duration of therapy among Medicare patients was shorter for 23 of the 27 indications with data available (median difference, -1.9 months; range, -12.4 to 1.4 months). For 9 indications, there was information available regarding dose reductions in the package insert or trial publication. In all but 1 instance, dose reductions or single prescriptions were more common in the Medicare population compared with dose reductions among the clinical trial patients; for example, in the Medicare patients, 600 of 1032 (58.1%) received dose reduction or a single prescription and 172 of 1032 (16.7%) received a single prescription vs 734 of 3416 (21.5%) in the trial intervention arm. The exception was afatinib for non-small cell lung cancer: 34 of 71 (47.9%) received dose reduction or a single prescription and 15 of 71 (21.1%) received a single prescription among the Medicare patients vs 120 of 230 (52.2%) receiving dose reductions among the trial intervention group.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort study, patients receiving Medicare who were treated with FDA-approved cancer drugs did not live as long as treated clinical trial participants and commonly received treatment modifications. This study suggests that cancer clinical data relevant to newly approved drugs lack generalizability to Medicare beneficiaries with cancer; therefore, these agents should be used with caution.

Overall Survival With Second-Line Pembrolizumab in Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Randomized Phase III Clinical Trial Versus Propensity-Adjusted Real-World Data

PURPOSE

To compare and characterize overall survival (OS) differences between clinical trial data from the KEYNOTE-010 trial and real-world data (RWD) from the Flatiron Health database in patients with programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1)-expressing advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received second-line pembrolizumab monotherapy.

METHODS

Clinical trial data were from the randomized phase II/III KEYNOTE-010 trial that enrolled patients from August 28, 2013, to February 27, 2015. At data cutoff for KEYNOTE-010, the median survival follow-up time for pembrolizumab patients was 11.2 months. RWD were from Flatiron Health advanced NSCLC database and included patients who initiated second-line pembrolizumab from January 26, 2015, to February 28, 2019. At data cutoff for Flatiron, the median survival follow-up time for pembrolizumab-treated patients was 6.1 months. Clinical trial data from KEYNOTE-010 and RWD from Flatiron were analyzed without adjustment, with propensity adjustment, and filtered per the main KEYNOTE-010 eligibility criteria (EC) of histologically/cytologically confirmed PD-L1-positive NSCLC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0/1, no prior therapy with docetaxel for NSCLC, and laboratory values indicative of adequate organ function in addition to prior line of therapy requirements.

RESULTS

Among 243 patients from KEYNOTE-010 and 782 from Flatiron, median age was 63 v 68 years, and 64% v 54% were male, respectively. OS data from KEYNOTE-010 and Flatiron were similar without any adjustment (n = 782; hazard ratio [HR], 0.96; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.15) and after both filtering and propensity adjustment (n = 221; HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.34).

CONCLUSION

Without any adjustment, as well as after applying similar EC and appropriate statistical methods, RWD demonstrated similar effectiveness for pembrolizumab in second-line NSCLC as observed in randomized clinical trials.

Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer initiating first-line treatment in the US community oncology setting: a real-world retrospective observational study

Purpose

Treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have evolved to include targeted and immuno-oncology therapies, which have demonstrated clinical benefits in clinical trials. However, few real-world studies have evaluated these treatments in the first-line setting.

Methods

Adult patients with advanced NSCLC who initiated first-line treatment with chemotherapy, targeted therapies (TT), or immuno-oncology–based regimens in the US Oncology Network (USON) between March 1, 2015, and August 1, 2018, were included and followed up through February 1, 2019. Data were sourced from structured fields of USON electronic health records. Patient and treatment characteristics were assessed descriptively, with Kaplan-Meier methods used to evaluate time-to-event outcomes, including time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) and overall survival (OS). Adjusted Cox regression analyses and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were performed to control for covariates that may have affected treatment selection and outcomes.

Results

Of 7746 patients, 75.6% received first-line systemic chemotherapy, 11.7% received immuno-oncology monotherapies, 8.5% received TT, and 4.2% received immuno-oncology combination regimens. Patients who received immuno-oncology monotherapies had the longest median TTD (3.5 months; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.8–4.2) and OS (19.9 months; 95% CI, 16.6–24.1). On the basis of multivariable Cox regression and IPTW, immuno-oncology monotherapy was associated with reduced risk of death and treatment discontinuation relative to other treatments.

Conclusion

These results suggest that real-world outcomes in this community oncology setting improved with the introduction of immuno-oncology therapies. However, clinical benefits are limited in certain subgroups and tend to be reduced compared with clinical trial observations.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00432-020-03414-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Estimated direct costs of non-small cell lung cancer by stage at diagnosis and disease management phase: A whole-disease model

Background

Non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the first cause of cancer‐related death among men and the second among women worldwide. It also poses an economic threat to the sustainability of healthcare services. This study estimated the direct costs of care for patients with NSCLC by stage at diagnosis, and management phase of pathway recommended in local and international guidelines.

Methods

Based on the most up‐to‐date guidelines, we developed a very detailed “whole‐disease” model listing the probabilities of all potentially necessary diagnostic and therapeutic actions involved in the management of each stage of NSCLC. We assigned a cost to each procedure, and obtained an estimate of the total and average per‐patient costs of each stage of the disease and phase of its management.

Results

The mean expected cost of a patient with NSCLC is 21,328 € (95% C.I. −20 897−22 322). This cost is 16 291 € in stage I, 19530 € in stage II, 21938 € in stage III, 22175 € in stage IV, and 28 711 € for a Pancoast tumor. In the early stages of the disease, the main cost is incurred by surgery, whereas in the more advanced stages radiotherapy, medical therapy, treatment for progressions, and supportive care become variously more important.

Conclusions

An estimation of the direct costs of care for NSCLC is fundamental in order to predict the burden of new oncological therapies and treatments on healthcare services, and thus orient the decisions of policy‐makers regarding the allocation of resources.

Key points

Significant findings of the study

The high costs of surgery make the early stages of the disease no less expensive than the advanced stages.

What this study adds

An estimation of the direct costs of care is fundamental in order to orient the decisions of policy‐makers regarding the allocation of resources.

Evolving use of real-world evidence in the regulatory process: a focus on immuno-oncology treatment and outcomes

In recent years, regulatory bodies have increasingly recognized the utility of real-world evidence (RWE) for supplementing and supporting clinical trial data in new drug applications. Nevertheless, the integration of RWE into established regulatory processes is complex and the generation of 'regulatory-grade' real-world data faces operational, methodological, data-related and policy-related challenges. In parallel with this evolving role for RWE, immuno-oncology therapies have emerged as leading cancer treatments and are expected to continue to play a central role in the future. In this article, we review the current literature on the use of RWE for regulatory submissions, with a focus on novel anticancer immunotherapies, and discuss the utility and current limitations of RWE in the context of drug development and regulatory approvals.

Strategies for Testing Intervention Matching Schemes in Cancer

Personalized medicine, or the tailoring of health interventions to an individual's nuanced and often unique genetic, biochemical, physiological, behavioral, and/or exposure profile, is seen by many as a biological necessity given the great heterogeneity of pathogenic processes underlying most diseases. However, testing and ultimately proving the benefit of strategies or algorithms connecting the mechanisms of action of specific interventions to patient pathophysiological profiles (referred to here as "intervention matching schemes" (IMS)) is complex for many reasons. We argue that IMS are likely to be pervasive, if not ubiquitous, in future health care, but raise important questions about their broad deployment and the contexts within which their utility can be proven. For example, one could question the need to, the efficiency associated with, and the reliability of, strategies for comparing competing or perhaps complementary IMS. We briefly summarize some of the more salient issues surrounding the vetting of IMS in cancer contexts and argue that IMS are at the foundation of many modern clinical trials and intervention strategies, such as basket, umbrella, and adaptive trials. In addition, IMS are at the heart of proposed "rapid learning systems" in hospitals, and implicit in cell replacement strategies, such as cytotoxic T-cell therapies targeting patient-specific neo-antigen profiles. We also consider the need for sensitivity to issues surrounding the deployment of IMS and comment on directions for future research.

Exploration of gene expression profiles and immune microenvironment between high and low tumor mutation burden groups in prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Tumor mutation burden (TMB) has been established as a biomarker for response to immune therapy and prognosis in various cancers. However, the association between TMB and prognosis of prostate cancer (PCa) remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the impact of TMB in biochemical recurrence (BCR) and the immune microenvironment in high and low TMB groups.

METHODS

Mutation data, gene expression, clinicopathological information were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Mutation types and TMB values were identified. All samples were divided into high and low TMB groups with median TMB value as the cutoff point. The BCR-free survival rates, Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and immune cells infiltrations in different TMB groups were identified.

RESULTS

The most common variant type and SNV were single nucleotide polymorphism and C > T. respectively. High TMB level was significantly associated with older age, positive lymph node, higher International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade, advanced stage and poor BCR-free survival. 132 DEGs were identified and involved in receptor ligand activity and hormone activity. High expression of six core genes UBE2C, PLK1, CDC20, BUB1, CDK1 and HJURP were associated with worse BCR-free survival. The analysis of immune cells infiltration revealed that the amount of activated CD4⁺ memory T cells was significantly different in high and low TMB groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study comprehensively described the summary of mutation and TMB related DEGs in PCa. TMB was associated with BCR-free survival and the infiltration of activated CD4⁺ memory T cells in the immune microenvironment.

Association of Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 Expression Status With Receipt of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

IMPORTANCE

Initial approval for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was limited to patients with high levels of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. However, in the period after approval, it is not known how new evidence supporting efficacy of these treatments in patients with low or negative PD-L1 expression was incorporated into real-world practice.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between PD-L1 testing and first-line ICI use.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This retrospective cohort study (January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2018) used a deidentified nationwide electronic health record-derived database reflecting real-world care at more than 280 US community and academic cancer clinics (approximately 800 sites of care). Patients included those with advanced NSCLC without other identifiable variations diagnosed in the period after the US Food and Drug Administration's initial first-line approval of ICIs for patients with high PD-L1 expression (≥50%).

EXPOSURE

First-line ICI treatment.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Patterns of PD-L1 testing and first-line ICI treatment among all patients and patients stratified by tumor histologic type (squamous vs nonsquamous).

RESULTS

A total of 45 631 patients (mean [SD] age, 68.4 [9.6] years; 21 614 [47.4%] female) with advanced NSCLC were included in the study. PD-L1 testing increased from 468 (7.2%) in 2015 to 4202 (73.2%) in 2018. Within a subset of 7785 patients receiving first-line treatment in the period after first-line approval of pembrolizumab, those who received PD-L1 testing had a greater odds of receiving an ICI (odds ratio, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.89-2.36). Among patients with high PD-L1 expression (≥50%), 1541 (83.5%) received first-line ICI treatment; 776 patients (40.3%) with low PD-L1 expression (1%-49%) and 348 (32.3%) with negative PD-L1 expression (0%) also received ICIs. In addition, 755 untested patients (32.8%) were treated with a first-line ICI. The proportion of patients who received ICIs without PD-L1 testing increased during the study period (59 [17%] in quarter 4 of 2016 to 141 [53.8%] in quarter 4 of 2018).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this study, use of first-line ICI treatment increased among patients with advanced NSCLC with negative, low, or untested PD-L1 expression status in 2016 through 2018. These findings suggest that national practice was rapidly responsive to new clinical evidence rather than adhering to regulatory guidance in place at the time.

Real-world efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Pembrolizumab, a humanized immunoglobulin monoclonal antibody directed against the programmed cell death 1 receptor, demonstrated robust efficacy and a manageable safety profile across multiple tumor types in clinical trials.

AIM

To investigate the efficacy and safety of first-line pembrolizumab for patients with non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) in clinical practice.

METHODS

In this observational monocentric retrospective study, 38 patients with PD-L1 >50% were enrolled between November 2017 and November 2018.

RESULTS

The global median overall survival was 11.08 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.98-not reached) and the global median progression-free survival was 6 months (95% CI, 3-not reached). In the univariate analysis, clinical performance status score and the development of immune-related adverse events were the only 2 clinical factors significantly correlated with overall survival.

CONCLUSION

The results of the present study suggest that pembrolizumab seems less effective in the real-life population than in the pivotal clinical trials in patients with NSCLC but remains an effective treatment option for patients with NSCLC. Longer follow-up is needed.

Real world data in the era of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs): Increasing evidence and future applications in lung cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting programmed death 1 (PD-1) and PD-ligand 1 (PD-L1) quickly subverted the standard of treatment in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), where they were first introduced in all comers previously treated advanced/metastatic NSCLC patients and subsequently in the first line of PD-L1 selected cases of metastatic and locally advanced disease. Treatment algorithm is an evolving landscape, where the introduction of front-line ICIs, with or without chemotherapy, unavoidably influences the following treatment lines. In this context, medical oncologists are currently facing many unclear issues, which have been not clarified so far by available data. Effectiveness and safety in special populations underrepresented in clinical trials - such as elderly, poor PS, hepatitis or human immunodeficiency virus-affected patients - are only a part of the unexplored side of ICIs in the real world. Indeed, pivotal randomized clinical trials (RCTs) often lack of external validity because eligibility criteria exclude some patient subgroups commonly treated in real-world clinical practice. Similarly, cost-effectiveness and sustainability of these innovative agents are important issues to be considered in the real-world. Though affected by several limitations, real-world evidence (RWE) studies allow to collect data regarding overall treated patients in clinical practice according to local authority regulations, overcoming the intrinsic limits of RCTs. The present review focuses on RWE about ICIs in lung cancer treatment, with particular reference to special patient populations, and discusses potential application of real-world data in a potential innovative drug development model.

Examining the Use of Real-World Evidence in the Regulatory Process

The 21st Century Cures Act passed by the United States Congress mandates the US Food and Drug Administration to develop guidance to evaluate the use of real-world evidence (RWE) to support the regulatory process. RWE has generated important medical discoveries, especially in areas where traditional clinical trials would be unethical or infeasible. However, RWE suffers from several issues that hinder its ability to provide proof of treatment efficacy at a level comparable to randomized controlled trials. In this review article, we summarized the advantages and limitations of RWE, identified the key opportunities for RWE, and pointed the way forward to maximize the potential of RWE for regulatory purposes.

Pembrolizumab for Previously Treated, PD-L1-expressing Advanced NSCLC: Real-world Time on Treatment and Overall Survival

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been rapidly adopted for therapy of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) based on clinical trial findings. Our aim was to examine outcomes in United States oncology practice settings for patients prescribed pembrolizumab monotherapy for previously treated, programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1)-expressing aNSCLC, thus clinically similar to patients in the KEYNOTE-010 trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective observational study used a nationally representative database to identify adult patients with histologically confirmed aNSCLC and PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥ 1% previously treated with platinum-containing chemotherapy (and appropriate tyrosine kinase inhibitor if nonsquamous aNSCLC with EGFR/ALK genomic tumor aberration). Eligible patients initiated pembrolizumab monotherapy from January 1, 2016, to November 29, 2018; data cutoff was May 31, 2019. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate real-world time on treatment (rwToT) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

The 349 eligible patients included 199 (57%) men; the median age was 68 years (range, 37-84 years); 70 (25%) of 278 patients with known performance status had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score ≥ 2. The median patient follow-up was 8.1 months (range, 1 day to 39.2 months). The median rwToT was 4.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.7-5.8 months) overall and 5.8 months (95% CI, 4.2-6.6 months) for the TPS ≥ 50% cohort (n = 218). The median OS was 13.8 months (95% CI, 11.0-16.5 months) and 16.5 months (95% CI, 13.7-22.0 months) overall and for TPS ≥ 50%, respectively; 12-month survival rates were 54% and 60%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Patients treated at oncology practices with pembrolizumab monotherapy for previously treated PD-L1-expressing aNSCLC experienced rwToT and OS similar to treatment duration and OS in phase III clinical trial settings.

Patterns of care for older patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer in the immunotherapy era

BACKGROUND

Historically, older patients with advanced lung cancer have often received no systemic treatment. Immunotherapy has improved outcomes in clinical trials, but its dissemination and implementation at the population level is not well-understood.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) diagnosed age 66 or older from 2012 to 2015 was conducted using SEER-Medicare. Treatment patterns within one year of diagnosis were ascertained. Outcomes included delivery of (a) any systemic therapy; (b) any second-line infusional therapy, following first-line infusional therapy; and (c) any second-line immunotherapy, following first-line infusional therapy. Trends in care patterns associated with second-line immunotherapy approvals in 2015 were assessed using generalized additive models. Sociodemographic and clinical predictors of treatment were explored using logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among 10 303 patients, 5173 (50.2%) received first-line systemic therapy, with little change between the years 2012 (47.5%) and 2015 (50.3%). Among 3943 patients completing first-line infusional therapy, the proportion starting second-line infusional treatment remained stable from 2012 (30.5%) through 2014 (32.9%), before increasing in 2015 (42.4%) concurrent with second-line immunotherapy approvals. Factors associated with decreased utilization of any therapy included age, black race, Medicaid eligibility, residence in a high-poverty area, nonadenocarcinoma histology, and comorbidity; factors associated with increased utilization of any therapy included Asian race and Hispanic ethnicity. Among patients who received first-line infusional therapy, factors associated with decreased utilization of second-line infusional therapy included age, Medicaid eligibility, nonadenocarcinoma histology, and comorbidity; Asian race was associated with increased utilization of second-line infusional therapy.

CONCLUSION

United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals of immunotherapy for the second-line treatment of advanced NSCLC in 2015 were associated with increased rates of any second-line treatment, but disparities based on social determinants of health persisted.