1
|
Marson F, Pizzardi S, Alborghetti L, Vurro F, Lacavalla MA, Fiorino C, Spinelli AE. Real-time dose measurement in minibeam radiotherapy using radioluminescence imaging. Phys Med 2025; 130:104894. [PMID: 39799812 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.104894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2024] [Revised: 12/11/2024] [Accepted: 01/03/2025] [Indexed: 01/15/2025] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Minibeam radiotherapy (MBRT) uses small parallel beams of radiation to create a highly modulated dose pattern. The aim of this study is to develop an optical radioluminescence imaging (RLI) approach to perform real-time dose measurement for MBRT. METHODS MBRT was delivered using an image-guided small animal irradiator equipped with a custom collimator. Five slabs of plastic scintillators with a thicknesses of 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 10 mm were placed on top of a mouse phantom, to localize and measure the delivered dose. A thin radioluminescence film (Gd2O2S:Tb) was used to obtain the mini beam dose profile that was compared against GafChromic (GC) films measurements. The RLI signal was detected with a CMOS camera placed at 90 deg with respect to the beam axis. Monte Carlo (MC) simulations were also performed using TOPAS for comparison with the experimental results. RESULTS The measured peak to valley dose ratio (PVDR) obtained with RLI was 16.7 in line with GC films measurements. The differences between peak and valley dimension were less that 3% with respect to GC measurements. Using RLI performed with the scintillator slabs, it was possible to localize and measure in real-time MBRT delivery on the mouse phantom. CONCLUSIONS We proposed a novel method for MBRT dose localization and measurement in real-time based on RLI. The results we obtained are in good agreement with GC film measurements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Marson
- IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Experimental Imaging Center, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Pizzardi
- IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Experimental Imaging Center, Milan, Italy
| | - Lisa Alborghetti
- IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Experimental Imaging Center, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Vurro
- IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Experimental Imaging Center, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Claudio Fiorino
- IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Medical Physics Department, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonello E Spinelli
- IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Experimental Imaging Center, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Grams MP, Mateus CQ, Mashayekhi M, Mutter RW, Djonov V, Fazzari JM, Xiao H, Frechette KM, Wentworth AJ, Morris JM, Klebel B, Thull JC, Guenzel RM, Wismayer DJS, Lucien F, Park SS, Lester SC. Minibeam Radiation Therapy Treatment (MBRT): Commissioning and First Clinical Implementation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 120:1423-1434. [PMID: 39002850 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.06.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2024] [Revised: 06/22/2024] [Accepted: 06/29/2024] [Indexed: 07/15/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Minibeam radiation therapy (MBRT) is characterized by the delivery of submillimeter-wide regions of high "peak" and low "valley" doses throughout a tumor. Preclinical studies have long shown the promise of this technique, and we report here the first clinical implementation of MBRT. METHODS AND MATERIALS A clinical orthovoltage unit was commissioned for MBRT patient treatments using 3-, 4-, 5-, 8-, and 10-cm diameter cones. The 180 kVp output was spatially separated into minibeams using a tungsten collimator with 0.5 mm wide slits spaced 1.1 mm on center. Percentage depth dose (PDD) measurements were obtained using film dosimetry and plastic water for both peak and valley doses. PDDs were measured on the central axis for offsets of 0, 0.5, and 1 cm. The peak-to-valley ratio was calculated at each depth for all cones and offsets. To mitigate the effects of patient motion on delivered dose, patient-specific 3-dimensional-printed collimator holders were created. These conformed to the unique anatomy of each patient and affixed the tungsten collimator directly to the body. Two patients were treated with MBRT; both received 2 fractions. RESULTS Peak PDDs decreased gradually with depth. Valley PDDs initially increased slightly with depth, then decreased gradually beyond 2 cm. The peak-to-valley ratios were highest at the surface for smaller cone sizes and offsets. In vivo film dosimetry confirmed a distinct delineation of peak and valley doses in both patients treated with MBRT with no dose blurring. Both patients experienced prompt improvement in symptoms and tumor response. CONCLUSIONS We report commissioning results, treatment processes, and the first 2 patients treated with MBRT using a clinical orthovoltage unit. While demonstrating the feasibility of this approach is a crucial first step toward wider translation, clinical trials are needed to further establish safety and efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael P Grams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
| | | | | | - Robert W Mutter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | | | - Huaping Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | | | | | - Brandon Klebel
- Division of Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Jack C Thull
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | | | - Fabrice Lucien
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Division of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Sean S Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Scott C Lester
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bertho A, Ortiz R, Maurin M, Juchaux M, Gilbert C, Espenon J, Ramasamy G, Patriarca A, De Marzi L, Pouzoulet F, Prezado Y. Thoracic Proton Minibeam Radiation Therapy: Tissue Preservation and Survival Advantage Over Conventional Proton Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 120:579-592. [PMID: 38621606 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.04.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2024] [Revised: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 04/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/17/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) is an innovative radiation therapy approach that highly modulates the spatial dimension of the dose delivery using narrow, parallel, and submillimetric proton beamlets. pMBRT has proven its remarkable healthy tissue preservation in the brain and skin. This study assesses the potential advantages of pMBRT for thoracic irradiations compared with conventional radiation therapy in terms of normal tissue toxicity. The challenge here was the influence of respiratory motion on the typical peak and valley dose patterns of pMBRT and its potential biologic effect. METHODS AND MATERIALS The whole thorax of naïve C57BL/6 mice received one fraction of high dose (18 Gy) pMBRT or conventional proton therapy (CPT) without any respiratory control. The development of radiation-induced pulmonary fibrosis was longitudinally monitored using cone beam computed tomography. Anatomopathologic analysis was carried out at 9 months postirradiation and focused on the reaction of the lungs' parenchyma and the response of cell types involved in the development of radiation-induced fibrosis and lung regeneration as alveolar type II epithelial cells, club cells, and macrophages. RESULTS pMBRT has milder effects on survival, skin reactions, and lung fibrosis compared with CPT. The pMBRT-induced lung changes were more regional and less severe, with evidence of potential reactive proliferation of alveolar type II epithelial cells and less extensive depletion of club cells and macrophage invasion than the more damaging effects observed in CPT. CONCLUSIONS pMBRT appears suitable to treat moving targets, holding a significant ability to preserve healthy lung tissue, even without respiratory control or precise targeting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annaïg Bertho
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, INSERM U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France; Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, INSERM U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France
| | - Ramon Ortiz
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, INSERM U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France; Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, INSERM U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France
| | - Mathieu Maurin
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, INSERM U932, Paris, France
| | - Marjorie Juchaux
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, INSERM U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France; Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, INSERM U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France
| | - Cristèle Gilbert
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, INSERM U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France; Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, INSERM U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France
| | - Julie Espenon
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, INSERM U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France; Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, INSERM U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France
| | - Gabriel Ramasamy
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Département de Recherche Translationnelle, CurieCoreTech-Experimental Radiation therapy (RadeXp), Paris, France
| | - Annalisa Patriarca
- Centre de Protonthérapie d'Orsay, Radiation Oncology Department, Campus Universitaire, Institut Curie, PSL University, Orsay, France
| | - Ludovic De Marzi
- Centre de Protonthérapie d'Orsay, Radiation Oncology Department, Campus Universitaire, Institut Curie, PSL University, Orsay, France; Institut Curie, Campus Universitaire, PSL University, University Paris Saclay, INSERM, Orsay
| | - Frédéric Pouzoulet
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Département de Recherche Translationnelle, CurieCoreTech-Experimental Radiation therapy (RadeXp), Paris, France; Institut Curie, PSL University, Université Paris-Saclay, Inserm, Laboratoire de Recherche Translationnelle en Oncologie, Orsay, France
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, INSERM U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France; Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, INSERM U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lin Y, Li W, Wang A, Johnson D, Gan GN, Gao H. Comprehensive dosimetric commissioning of proton minibeam radiotherapy on a single gantry proton system. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1421869. [PMID: 39099699 PMCID: PMC11294745 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1421869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2024] [Accepted: 07/01/2024] [Indexed: 08/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) can deliver spatially fractionated dose distributions with submillimeter resolution. These dose distributions exhibit significant heterogeneity in both depth and lateral directions. Accurate characterization of pMBRT doses requires dosimetry devices with high spatial resolution and a wide dynamic range. Furthermore, the dependency of dosimetric measurements on Linear Energy Transfer (LET), as observed in conventional proton therapy, is also present in pMBRT depth dose measurements. Purpose This work demonstrates the process of performing comprehensive dosimetric measurements to characterize the pMBRT collimator on a clinical single-gantry proton machine, utilizing commercially available dosimetry devices. Methods The minibeam collimator is designed to be mounted on the clinical nozzle as a beam-modifying accessory. Three collimators, each with a slit opening of 0.4 mm, are thoroughly evaluated. The center-to-center (c-t-c) distances of the slits for these collimators are 2.8 mm, 3.2 mm, and 4.0 mm, respectively. High spatial resolution dosimetry devices are essential for PMBRT dose characterizations. To meet this requirement, two-dimensional (2D) dose measurement devices, Gafchromic films, are used to measure lateral profiles at various depths. Films are also used for depth dose profile measurements in solid water. Additionally, high-resolution point dose detectors, microDiamond, and Razor diode detectors are employed for lateral profile measurements at various depths. Percent depth dose (PDD) measurements of pMBRT in solid water, with various proton energies, collimators, and air gaps, are performed using Gafchromic films. The film's LET dependency for proton beams is corrected to ensure accurate pMBRT PDD measurements. The Monte Carlo simulation tool TOPAS is utilized to compare and validate all experimental measurements. Results At depths where LET is not a concern, film dose measurements were consistent with microDiamond and Razor diode point measurements. The point detectors need to be orientated with the thin side aligned to the incoming beam. Comparison of the lateral dose profiles extracted from TOPAS simulations, films, microDiamond, and Razor diode detectors shows a passing rate exceeding 98% in 1D gamma analysis at 3% 0.1 mm criteria.However, when the microDiamond detector is orientated to face the pMBRT beam, its spatial resolution may not be sufficient to capture the peak and valley dose accurately. Nevertheless, an accuracy within 2% can still be achieved when comparing the average dose. The PDD measurements show that the peak valley dose ratio (PVDR) of pMBRT can be altered at different depths with different air gaps using the same collimator or different collimators of different c-t-c distances. Conclusion Our study demonstrates that comprehensive dose measurements for pMBRT can be conducted using standard clinical dose measurement devices. These measurements are indispensable for guiding and ensuring accurate dose reporting in pre-clinical studies using the pMBRT technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuting Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Wangyao Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Aoxiang Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Daniel Johnson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Gregory N. Gan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Hao Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Prezado Y, Grams M, Jouglar E, Martínez-Rovira I, Ortiz R, Seco J, Chang S. Spatially fractionated radiation therapy: a critical review on current status of clinical and preclinical studies and knowledge gaps. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:10TR02. [PMID: 38648789 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad4192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
Spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) is a therapeutic approach with the potential to disrupt the classical paradigms of conventional radiation therapy. The high spatial dose modulation in SFRT activates distinct radiobiological mechanisms which lead to a remarkable increase in normal tissue tolerances. Several decades of clinical use and numerous preclinical experiments suggest that SFRT has the potential to increase the therapeutic index, especially in bulky and radioresistant tumors. To unleash the full potential of SFRT a deeper understanding of the underlying biology and its relationship with the complex dosimetry of SFRT is needed. This review provides a critical analysis of the field, discussing not only the main clinical and preclinical findings but also analyzing the main knowledge gaps in a holistic way.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yolanda Prezado
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, F-91400, Orsay, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, F-91400, Orsay, France
- New Approaches in Radiotherapy Lab, Center for Research in Molecular Medicine and Chronic Diseases (CIMUS), Instituto de investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, E-15706, Spain
- Oportunius Program, Galician Agency of Innovation (GAIN), Xunta de Galicia, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain
| | - Michael Grams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States of America
| | - Emmanuel Jouglar
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Department of Radiation Oncology, F-75005, Paris and Orsay Protontherapy Center, F-91400, Orsay, France
| | - Immaculada Martínez-Rovira
- Physics Department, Universitat Auto`noma de Barcelona, E-08193, Cerdanyola del Valle`s (Barcelona), Spain
| | - Ramon Ortiz
- University of California San Francisco, Department of Radiation Oncology, 1600 Divisadero Street, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States of America
| | - Joao Seco
- Division of Biomedical physics in Radiation Oncology, DKFZ-German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sha Chang
- Dept of Radiation Oncology and Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, United States of America
- Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolin State University, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Masilela TAM, Prezado Y. Monte Carlo study of the free radical yields in minibeam radiation therapy. Med Phys 2023; 50:5115-5134. [PMID: 37211907 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Revised: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/01/2023] [Indexed: 05/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minibeam radiation therapy (MBRT) is a novel technique which has been shown to widen the therapeutic window through significant normal tissue sparing. Despite the heterogeneous dose distributions, tumor control is still ensured. Nevertheless the exact radiobiological mechanisms responsible for MBRT efficacy are not fully understood. PURPOSE Reactive oxygen species (ROS) resulting from water radiolysis were investigated given their implications not only on targeted DNA damage, but also for their role in the immune response and non-targeted cell signalling effects: two potential drivers of MBRT efficacy. METHODS Monte Carlo simulations were performed using TOPAS-nBio to carry out the irradiation of a water phantom with beams of protons (pMBRT), photons (xMBRT), 4 He ions (HeMBRT), and 12 C ions (CMBRT). Primary yields at the end of the chemical stage were calculated in spheres of 20 μm diameter, located in the peaks and valleys at various depths up to the Bragg peak. The chemical stage was limited to 1 ns to approximate biological scavenging, and the yield of · OH, H2 O2 , ande aq - ${\rm e}^{-}_{\rm aq}$ was recorded. RESULTS Beyond 10 mm, there were no substantial differences in the primary yields between peaks and valleys of the pMBRT and HeMBRT modalities. For xMBRT, there was a lower primary yield of the radical species · OH ande aq - ${\rm e}^{-}_{\rm aq}$ at all depths in the valleys compared to the peaks, and a higher primary yield of H2 O2 . Compared to the peaks, the valleys of the CMBRT modality were subject to a higher · OH ande aq - ${\rm e}^{-}_{\rm aq}$ yield, and lower H2 O2 yield. This difference between peaks and valleys became more severe in depth. Near the Bragg peak, the increase in the primary yield of the valleys over the peaks was 6% and 4% for · OH ande aq - ${\rm e}^{-}_{\rm aq}$ respectively, while there was a decrease in the yield of H2 O2 by 16%. Given the similar ROS primary yields in the peaks and valleys of pMBRT and HeMBRT, the level of indirect DNA damage is expected to be directly proportional to the peak to valley dose ratio (PVDR). The difference in the primary yields implicates a lower level of indirect DNA damage in the valleys compared to the peaks than what would be suggested by the PVDR for xMBRT, and a higher level for CMBRT. CONCLUSIONS These results highlight the notion that depending on the particle chosen, one can expect different levels of ROS in the peaks and valley that goes beyond what would be expected by the macroscopic PVDR. The combination of MBRT with heavier ions is shown to be particularly interesting as the primary yield in the valleys progressively diverges from the level observed in the peaks as the LET increases. While differences in the reported · OH yields of this work implicated the indirect DNA damage, H2 O2 yields particularly implicate non-targeted cell signalling effects, and therefore this work provides a point of reference for future simulations in which the distribution of this species at more biologically relevant timescales could be investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thongchai A M Masilela
- Signalisation radiobiologie et cancer, Institut Curie, Université PSL, Orsay, France
- Signalisation radiobiologie et cancer, Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Orsay, France
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Signalisation radiobiologie et cancer, Institut Curie, Université PSL, Orsay, France
- Signalisation radiobiologie et cancer, Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bertho A, Iturri L, Brisebard E, Juchaux M, Gilbert C, Ortiz R, Sebrie C, Jourdain L, Lamirault C, Ramasamy G, Pouzoulet F, Prezado Y. Evaluation of the Role of the Immune System Response After Minibeam Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 115:426-439. [PMID: 35985455 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Revised: 07/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Minibeam radiation therapy (MBRT) is an innovative technique that uses a spatial dose modulation. The dose distribution consists of high doses (peaks) in the path of the minibeam and low doses (valleys). The underlying biological mechanism associated with MBRT efficacy remains currently unclear and thus we investigated the potential role of the immune system after treatment with MBRT. METHODS AND MATERIALS Rats bearing an orthotopic glioblastoma cell line were treated with 1 fraction of high dose conventional radiation therapy (30 Gy) or 1 fraction of the same mean dose in MBRT. Both immunocompetent (F344) and immunodeficient (Nude) rats were analyzed in survival studies. Systemic and intratumoral immune cell population changes were studied with flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry (IHC) 2 and 7 days after the irradiation. RESULTS The absence of response of Nude rats after MBRT suggested that T cells were key in the mode of action of MBRT. An inflammatory phenotype was observed in the blood 1 week after irradiation compared with conventional irradiation. Tumor immune cell analysis by flow cytometry showed a substantial infiltration of lymphocytes, specifically of CD8 T cells and B cells in both conventional and MBRT-treated animals. IHC revealed that MBRT induced a faster recruitment of CD8 and CD4 T cells. Animals that were cured by radiation therapy did not suffer tumor growth after reimplantation of tumoral cells, proving the long-term immunity response generated after a high dose of radiation. CONCLUSIONS Our findings show that MBRT can elicit a robust antitumor immune response in glioblastoma while avoiding the high toxicity of a high dose of conventional radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annaig Bertho
- CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Institut Curie, Université PSL, Orsay, France; CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France.
| | - Lorea Iturri
- CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Institut Curie, Université PSL, Orsay, France; CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France
| | | | - Marjorie Juchaux
- CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Institut Curie, Université PSL, Orsay, France; CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Cristèle Gilbert
- CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Institut Curie, Université PSL, Orsay, France; CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Ramon Ortiz
- CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Institut Curie, Université PSL, Orsay, France; CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Catherine Sebrie
- Service Hospitalier Frédéric Joliot, CEA, CNRS, Inserm, BIOMAPS Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Laurene Jourdain
- Service Hospitalier Frédéric Joliot, CEA, CNRS, Inserm, BIOMAPS Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Charlotte Lamirault
- Département de Recherche Translationnelle, CurieCoreTech-Experimental Radiotherapy (RadeXp), Institut Curie, PSL University, Paris, France
| | - Gabriel Ramasamy
- Département de Recherche Translationnelle, CurieCoreTech-Experimental Radiotherapy (RadeXp), Institut Curie, PSL University, Paris, France
| | - Frédéric Pouzoulet
- Département de Recherche Translationnelle, CurieCoreTech-Experimental Radiotherapy (RadeXp), Institut Curie, PSL University, Paris, France; Inserm U1288, Laboratoire de Recherche Translationnelle en Oncologie, Institut Curie, PSL University, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Institut Curie, Université PSL, Orsay, France; CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Schneider T, Malaise D, Pouzoulet F, Prezado Y. Orthovoltage X-ray Minibeam Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Ocular Tumours-An In Silico Evaluation. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15030679. [PMID: 36765637 PMCID: PMC9913874 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Revised: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Radiotherapeutic treatments of ocular tumors are often challenging because of nearby radiosensitive structures and the high doses required to treat radioresistant cancers such as uveal melanomas. Although increased local control rates can be obtained with advanced techniques such as proton therapy and stereotactic radiosurgery, these modalities are not always accessible to patients (due to high costs or low availability) and side effects in structures such as the lens, eyelids or anterior chamber remain an issue. Minibeam radiation therapy (MBRT) could represent a promising alternative in this regard. MBRT is an innovative new treatment approach where the irradiation field is composed of multiple sub-millimetric beamlets, spaced apart by a few millimetres. This creates a so-called spatial fractionation of the dose which, in small animal experiments, has been shown to increase normal tissue sparing while simultaneously providing high tumour control rates. Moreover, MBRT with orthovoltage X-rays could be easily implemented in widely available and comparably inexpensive irradiation platforms. (2) Methods: Monte Carlo simulations were performed using the TOPAS toolkit to evaluate orthovoltage X-ray MBRT as a potential alternative for treating ocular tumours. Dose distributions were simulated in CT images of a human head, considering six different irradiation configurations. (3) Results: The mean, peak and valley doses were assessed in a generic target region and in different organs at risk. The obtained doses were comparable to those reported in previous X-ray MBRT animal studies where good normal tissue sparing and tumour control (rat glioma models) were found. (4) Conclusions: A proof-of-concept study for the application of orthovoltage X-ray MBRT to ocular tumours was performed. The simulation results encourage the realisation of dedicated animal studies considering minibeam irradiations of the eye to specifically assess ocular and orbital toxicities as well as tumour response. If proven successful, orthovoltage X-ray minibeams could become a cost-effective treatment alternative, in particular for developing countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Schneider
- Institut Curie, Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France
- Correspondence:
| | - Denis Malaise
- Department of Ophthalmology, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France
- LITO, INSERM U1288, Institut Curie, PSL University, 91898 Orsay, France
| | - Frédéric Pouzoulet
- LITO, INSERM U1288, Institut Curie, PSL University, 91898 Orsay, France
- Département de Recherche Translationnelle, CurieCoreTech-Experimental Radiotherapy (RadeXp), Institut Curie, PSL University, 91400 Orsay, France
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Institut Curie, Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sotiropoulos M, Prezado Y. Radiation quality correction factors for improved dosimetry in preclinical minibeam radiotherapy. Med Phys 2022; 49:6716-6727. [PMID: 35904962 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2021] [Revised: 06/03/2022] [Accepted: 06/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In reference dosimetry, radiation quality correction factors are used in order to account for changes in the detector's response among different radiation qualities, improving dosimetric accuracy. PURPOSE Reference dosimetry radiation quality corrections factors for the PTW microDiamond were calculated for preclinical X-ray and proton minibeams, and their impact in dosimetric accuracy was evaluated. METHODS A formalism for the calculation of radiation quality correction factors for absolute dosimetry in minibeam fields was developed. Following our formalism, radiation quality correction factors were calculated for the PTW microDiamond detector, using the Monte Carlo method. Models of the detector, and X-ray and proton irradiation platform, were imported into the TOPAS Monte Carlo simulation toolkit. The radiation quality correction factors were calculated in the following scenarios: (i) reference dosimetry open field to minibeam center of the central peak, (ii) different positions at the minibeam profile (along the peaks and valleys direction) to the center of the central minibeam, and (iii) some representative depth positions. In addition, the radiation quality correction factors needed for the calculation of the peak-to-valley dose ratio at different depths were calculated. RESULTS An important overestimation of the dose (about 10%) was found in the case of the open to minibeam field for both X-rays and proton beams, when the correction factors were used. Smaller differences were observed in the other cases. CONCLUSIONS The usage of the PTW microDiamond detector requires radiation quality correction factors in order to be used in minibeam reference dosimetry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marios Sotiropoulos
- Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Institut Curie, Université PSL, Orsay, France
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Institut Curie, Université PSL, Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Schneider T, Fernandez-Palomo C, Bertho A, Fazzari J, Iturri L, Martin OA, Trappetti V, Djonov V, Prezado Y. Combining FLASH and spatially fractionated radiation therapy: The best of both worlds. Radiother Oncol 2022; 175:169-177. [PMID: 35952978 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2022] [Revised: 07/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
FLASH radiotherapy (FLASH-RT) and spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) are two new therapeutical strategies that use non-standard dose delivery methods to reduce normal tissue toxicity and increase the therapeutic index. Although likely based on different mechanisms, both FLASH-RT and SFRT have shown to elicit radiobiological effects that significantly differ from those induced by conventional radiotherapy. With the therapeutic potential having been established separately for each technique, the combination of FLASH-RT and SFRT could therefore represent a winning alliance. In this review, we discuss the state of the art, advantages and current limitations, potential synergies, and where a combination of these two techniques could be implemented today or in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Schneider
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France; Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France
| | | | - Annaïg Bertho
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France; Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France
| | - Jennifer Fazzari
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 2, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Lorea Iturri
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France; Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France
| | - Olga A Martin
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 2, 3012 Bern, Switzerland; Division of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
| | - Verdiana Trappetti
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 2, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Valentin Djonov
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 2, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France; Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Fernandez-Palomo C, Chang S, Prezado Y. Should Peak Dose Be Used to Prescribe Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy?-A Review of Preclinical Studies. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:3625. [PMID: 35892895 PMCID: PMC9330631 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14153625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2022] [Revised: 07/20/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Spatially fractionated radiotherapy (SFRT) is characterized by the coexistence of multiple hot and cold dose subregions throughout the treatment volume. In preclinical studies using single-fraction treatment, SFRT can achieve a significantly higher therapeutic index than conventional radiotherapy (RT). Published clinical studies of SFRT followed by RT have reported promising results for bulky tumors. Several clinical trials are currently underway to further explore the clinical benefits of SFRT. However, we lack the important understanding of the correlation between dosimetric parameters and treatment response that we have in RT. In this work, we reviewed and analyzed this important correlation from previous preclinical SFRT studies. We reviewed studies prior to 2022 that treated animal-bearing tumors with minibeam radiotherapy (MBRT) or microbeam radiotherapy (MRT). Eighteen studies met our selection criteria. Increased lifespan (ILS) relative to control was used as the treatment response. The preclinical SFRT dosimetric parameters analyzed were peak dose, valley dose, average dose, beam width, and beam spacing. We found that valley dose was the dosimetric parameter with the strongest correlation with ILS (p-value < 0.01). For studies using MRT, average dose and peak dose were also significantly correlated with ILS (p-value < 0.05). This first comprehensive review of preclinical SFRT studies shows that the valley dose (rather than the peak dose) correlates best with treatment outcome (ILS).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sha Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7512, USA
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France;
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ortiz R, De Marzi L, Prezado Y. Preclinical dosimetry in proton minibeam radiation therapy: robustness analysis and guidelines. Med Phys 2022; 49:5551-5561. [PMID: 35621386 PMCID: PMC9544651 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Revised: 05/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) is a new radiotherapy approach that has shown a significant increase in the therapeutic window in glioma‐bearing rats compared to conventional proton therapy. The dosimetry of pMBRT is challenging and error prone due to the submillimetric beamlet sizes used. The aim of this study was to perform a robustness analysis on the setup parameters utilized in current preclinical trials and provide guidelines for reproducible dosimetry. The results of this work are intended to guide upcoming implementations of pMBRT worldwide, as well as pave the way for future clinical implementations. Methods Monte Carlo simulations and experimental data were used to evaluate the impact of variations in setup parameters and uncertainties in collimator specifications on lateral pMBRT dose distributions. The value of each parameter was modified individually to evaluate their effect on dose distributions. Experimental dosimetry was performed by means of high‐resolution detectors, that is, radiochromic films, the IBA Razor and the Microdiamond detector. New guidelines were proposed to optimize the experimental setup in pMBRT studies and perform reproducible dosimetry. Results The sensitivity of dose distributions to uncertainties and variations in setup parameters was quantified. Quantities that define pMBRT lateral profiles (i.e., the peak‐to‐valley dose ratio [PVDR], peak and valley doses, and peak width) are significantly influenced by small‐scale fluctuations in several of those parameters. The setup implemented at the Orsay proton therapy center for pMBRT irradiation was optimized to increase PVDRs and peak symmetry. In addition, we proposed guidelines to perform accurate and reproducible dosimetry in preclinical studies. Conclusions This study revealed the importance of adopting guidelines and protocols tailored to the distinct dose delivery method and dose distributions in pMBRT. This new methodology leads to reproducible dosimetry, which is imperative in preclinical trials. The results and guidelines presented in this manuscript can ease the initiation of pMBRT investigations in other centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramon Ortiz
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, 91400, France.,Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, 91400, France
| | - Ludovic De Marzi
- Centre de Protonthérapie d'Orsay, Radiation Oncology Department, Campus Universitaire, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay, 91898, France.,Institut Curie, Campus Universitaire, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, INSERM LITO, Orsay, 91898, France
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, 91400, France.,Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, 91400, France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
AbstractSpatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) challenges some of the classical dogmas in conventional radiotherapy. The highly modulated spatial dose distributions in SFRT have been shown to lead, both in early clinical trials and in small animal experiments, to a significant increase in normal tissue dose tolerances. Tumour control effectiveness is maintained or even enhanced in some configurations as compared with conventional radiotherapy. SFRT seems to activate distinct radiobiological mechanisms, which have been postulated to involve bystander effects, microvascular alterations and/or immunomodulation. Currently, it is unclear which is the dosimetric parameter which correlates the most with both tumour control and normal tissue sparing in SFRT. Additional biological experiments aiming at parametrizing the relationship between the irradiation parameters (beam width, spacing, peak-to-valley dose ratio, peak and valley doses) and the radiobiology are needed. A sound knowledge of the interrelation between the physical parameters in SFRT and the biological response would expand its clinical use, with a higher level of homogenisation in the realisation of clinical trials. This manuscript reviews the state of the art of this promising therapeutic modality, the current radiobiological knowledge and elaborates on future perspectives.
Collapse
|
14
|
Proton Minibeam Radiation Therapy and Arc Therapy: Proof of Concept of a Winning Alliance. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 14:cancers14010116. [PMID: 35008280 PMCID: PMC8749801 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14010116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2021] [Revised: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Normal tissue’s morbidity continues to limit the increase in the therapeutic index in radiation therapy. This study explores the potential advantages of combining proton arc therapy and proton minibeam radiation therapy, which have already individually shown a significant normal tissue’s sparing. This alliance aims to integrate the benefits of those techniques in a single approach. Abstract (1) Background: Proton Arc Therapy and Proton Minibeam Radiation Therapy are two novel therapeutic approaches with the potential to lower the normal tissue complication probability, widening the therapeutic window for radioresistant tumors. While the benefits of both modalities have been individually evaluated, their combination and its potential advantages are being assessed in this proof-of-concept study for the first time. (2) Methods: Monte Carlo simulations were employed to evaluate the dose and LET distributions in brain tumor irradiations. (3) Results: a net reduction in the dose to normal tissues (up to 90%), and the preservation of the spatial fractionation of the dose were achieved for all configurations evaluated. Additionally, Proton Minibeam Arc Therapy (pMBAT) reduces the volumes exposed to high-dose and high-LET values at expense of increased low-dose and intermediate-LET values. (4) Conclusions: pMBAT enhances the individual benefits of proton minibeams while keeping those of conventional proton arc therapy. These results might facilitate the path towards patients’ treatments since lower peak doses in normal tissues would be needed than in the case of a single array of proton minibeams.
Collapse
|
15
|
Prezado Y. Proton minibeam radiation therapy: a promising therapeutic approach for radioresistant tumors. C R Biol 2021; 344:409-420. [DOI: 10.5802/crbiol.71] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 12/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
16
|
Romano M, Bravin A, Mittone A, Eckhardt A, Barbone GE, Sancey L, Dinkel J, Bartzsch S, Ricke J, Alunni-Fabbroni M, Hirner-Eppeneder H, Karpov D, Giannini C, Bunk O, Bouchet A, Ruf V, Giese A, Coan P. A Multi-Scale and Multi-Technique Approach for the Characterization of the Effects of Spatially Fractionated X-ray Radiation Therapies in a Preclinical Model. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13194953. [PMID: 34638437 PMCID: PMC8507698 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13194953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2021] [Revised: 09/23/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to use a multi-technique approach to detect the effects of spatially fractionated X-ray Microbeam (MRT) and Minibeam Radiation Therapy (MB) and to compare them to seamless Broad Beam (BB) irradiation. Healthy- and Glioblastoma (GBM)-bearing male Fischer rats were irradiated in-vivo on the right brain hemisphere with MRT, MB and BB delivering three different doses for each irradiation geometry. Brains were analyzed post mortem by multi-scale X-ray Phase Contrast Imaging-Computed Tomography (XPCI-CT), histology, immunohistochemistry, X-ray Fluorescence (XRF), Small- and Wide-Angle X-ray Scattering (SAXS/WAXS). XPCI-CT discriminates with high sensitivity the effects of MRT, MB and BB irradiations on both healthy and GBM-bearing brains producing a first-time 3D visualization and morphological analysis of the radio-induced lesions, MRT and MB induced tissue ablations, the presence of hyperdense deposits within specific areas of the brain and tumor evolution or regression with respect to the evaluation made few days post-irradiation with an in-vivo magnetic resonance imaging session. Histology, immunohistochemistry, SAXS/WAXS and XRF allowed identification and classification of these deposits as hydroxyapatite crystals with the coexistence of Ca, P and Fe mineralization, and the multi-technique approach enabled the realization, for the first time, of the map of the differential radiosensitivity of the different brain areas treated with MRT and MB. 3D XPCI-CT datasets enabled also the quantification of tumor volumes and Ca/Fe deposits and their full-organ visualization. The multi-scale and multi-technique approach enabled a detailed visualization and classification in 3D of the radio-induced effects on brain tissues bringing new essential information towards the clinical implementation of the MRT and MB radiation therapy techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariele Romano
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Am Coulombwall 1, München, 85748 Garching, Germany; (M.R.); (A.E.); (G.E.B.)
| | - Alberto Bravin
- European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, 71 Avenue des Martyrs, 38000 Grenoble, France; (A.B.); (A.M.); (D.K.)
- Department of Physics, Faculty of Physics, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Mittone
- European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, 71 Avenue des Martyrs, 38000 Grenoble, France; (A.B.); (A.M.); (D.K.)
- CELLS-ALBA Synchrotron, 08290 Cerdanyola del Valles, Spain
| | - Alicia Eckhardt
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Am Coulombwall 1, München, 85748 Garching, Germany; (M.R.); (A.E.); (G.E.B.)
| | - Giacomo E. Barbone
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Am Coulombwall 1, München, 85748 Garching, Germany; (M.R.); (A.E.); (G.E.B.)
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, 81377 Munich, Germany; (J.D.); (J.R.); (M.A.-F.); (H.H.-E.)
| | - Lucie Sancey
- Centre de Recherche UGA/INSERM U1209/CNRS UMR5309, Institute for Advanced Biosciences, 38700 La Tronche, France;
| | - Julien Dinkel
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, 81377 Munich, Germany; (J.D.); (J.R.); (M.A.-F.); (H.H.-E.)
| | - Stefan Bartzsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, 81675 Munich, Germany;
- Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, 81377 Munich, Germany; (J.D.); (J.R.); (M.A.-F.); (H.H.-E.)
| | - Marianna Alunni-Fabbroni
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, 81377 Munich, Germany; (J.D.); (J.R.); (M.A.-F.); (H.H.-E.)
| | - Heidrun Hirner-Eppeneder
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, 81377 Munich, Germany; (J.D.); (J.R.); (M.A.-F.); (H.H.-E.)
| | - Dmitry Karpov
- European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, 71 Avenue des Martyrs, 38000 Grenoble, France; (A.B.); (A.M.); (D.K.)
- Swiss Light Source, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland;
| | - Cinzia Giannini
- Institute of Crystallography, National Research Council, 70126 Bari, Italy;
| | - Oliver Bunk
- Swiss Light Source, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland;
| | - Audrey Bouchet
- Inserm U1296 Unit “Radiation: Defense, Health Environment”, 69008 Lyon, France;
| | - Viktoria Ruf
- Center for Neuropathology and Prion Research, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, 81377 Munich, Germany; (V.R.); (A.G.)
| | - Armin Giese
- Center for Neuropathology and Prion Research, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, 81377 Munich, Germany; (V.R.); (A.G.)
| | - Paola Coan
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Am Coulombwall 1, München, 85748 Garching, Germany; (M.R.); (A.E.); (G.E.B.)
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, 81377 Munich, Germany; (J.D.); (J.R.); (M.A.-F.); (H.H.-E.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Mayerhofer M, Datzmann G, Degiovanni A, Dimov V, Dollinger G. Magnetically focused 70 MeV proton minibeams for preclinical experiments combining a tandem accelerator and a 3 GHz linear post-accelerator. Med Phys 2021; 48:2733-2749. [PMID: 33759211 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2020] [Revised: 02/28/2021] [Accepted: 03/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Radiotherapy plays an important role for the treatment of tumor diseases in two-thirds of all cases, but it is limited by side effects in the surrounding healthy tissue. Proton minibeam radiotherapy (pMBRT) is a promising option to widen the therapeutic window for tumor control at reduced side effects. An accelerator concept based on an existing tandem Van de Graaff accelerator and a linac enables the focusing of 70 MeV protons to form minibeams with a size of only 0.1 mm for a preclinical small animal irradiation facility, while avoiding the cost of an RFQ injector. METHODS The tandem accelerator provides a 16 MeV proton beam with a beam brightness of B = 4 nA mm 2 mrad 2 as averaged from 5 µs long pulses with a flat top current of 17 µA at 200 Hz repetition rate. Subsequently, the protons are accelerated to 70 MeV by a 3 GHz linear post-accelerator consisting of two Side Coupled Drift Tube Linac (SCDTL) structures and four Coupled Cavity Linac (CCL) structures [design: AVO-ADAM S.A (Geneva, Switzerland)]. A 3 GHz buncher and four magnetic quadrupole lenses are placed between the tandem and the post-accelerator to maximize the transmission through the linac. A quadrupole triplet situated downstream of the linac structure focuses the protons into an area of (0.1 × 0.1) mm2 . The beam dynamics of the facility is optimized using the particle optics code TRACE three-dimensional (3D). Proton transmission through the facility is elaborated using the particle tracking code TRAVEL. RESULTS A study about buncher amplitude and phase shift between buncher and linac is showing that 49% of all protons available from the tandem can be transported through the post-accelerator. A mean beam current up to 19 nA is expected within an area of (0.1 × 0.1) mm2 at the beam focus. CONCLUSION An extension of existing tandem accelerators by commercially available 3 GHz structures is able to deliver a proton minibeam that serves all requirements to obtain proton minibeams to perform preclinical minibeam irradiations as it would be the case for a complete commercial 3 GHz injector-RFQ-linac combination. Due to the modularity of the linac structure, the irradiation facility can be extended to clinically relevant proton energies up to or above 200 MeV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gerd Datzmann
- Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Germany
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Prezado Y, Hirayama R, Matsufuji N, Inaniwa T, Martínez-Rovira I, Seksek O, Bertho A, Koike S, Labiod D, Pouzoulet F, Polledo L, Warfving N, Liens A, Bergs J, Shimokawa T. A Potential Renewed Use of Very Heavy Ions for Therapy: Neon Minibeam Radiation Therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13061356. [PMID: 33802835 PMCID: PMC8002595 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13061356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2021] [Revised: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 03/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The treatment of hypoxic tumours continues to be one of the main challenges for radiation therapy. Minibeam radiation therapy (MBRT) shows a highly promising reduction of to-xicity in normal tissue, so that very heavy ions, such as Neon (Ne) or Argon (Ar), with extremely high LET, might become applicable to clinical situations. The high LET in the target would be unrivalled to overcome hypoxia, while MBRT might limit the side effects normally preventing the use of those heavy ions in a conventional radiotherapeutic setting. The work reported in this manuscript is the first experimental proof of the remarkable reduction of normal tissue (skin) toxicities after Ne MBRT irradiations as compared to conventional Ne irradiations. This result might allow for a renewed use of very heavy ions for cancer therapy. Abstract (1) Background: among all types of radiation, very heavy ions, such as Neon (Ne) or Argon (Ar), are the optimum candidates for hypoxic tumor treatments due to their reduced oxygen enhancement effect. However, their pioneering clinical use in the 1970s was halted due to severe side effects. The aim of this work was to provide a first proof that the combination of very heavy ions with minibeam radiation therapy leads to a minimization of toxicities and, thus, opening the door for a renewed use of heavy ions for therapy; (2) Methods: mouse legs were irradiated with either Ne MBRT or Ne broad beams at the same average dose. Skin toxicity was scored for a period of four weeks. Histopathology evaluations were carried out at the end of the study; (3) Results: a significant difference in toxicity was observed between the two irradiated groups. While severe da-mage, including necrosis, was observed in the broad beam group, only light to mild erythema was present in the MBRT group; (4) Conclusion: Ne MBRT is significantly better tolerated than conventional broad beam irradiations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yolanda Prezado
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France;
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France
- Correspondence:
| | - Ryochi Hirayama
- Department of Charged Particle Therapy Research, National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS), National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba 263-8555, Japan; (R.H.); (N.M.); (T.I.); (S.K.); (T.S.)
| | - Naruhiro Matsufuji
- Department of Charged Particle Therapy Research, National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS), National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba 263-8555, Japan; (R.H.); (N.M.); (T.I.); (S.K.); (T.S.)
- Department of Accelerator and Medical Physics, National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS), National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba 263-8555, Japan
| | - Taku Inaniwa
- Department of Charged Particle Therapy Research, National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS), National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba 263-8555, Japan; (R.H.); (N.M.); (T.I.); (S.K.); (T.S.)
- Department of Accelerator and Medical Physics, National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS), National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba 263-8555, Japan
| | - Immaculada Martínez-Rovira
- Ionizing Radiation Research Group, Physics Department, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), E-08193 Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain;
| | - Olivier Seksek
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, Université de Paris, IJCLab, Pole Santé, 91405 Orsay, France;
| | - Annaïg Bertho
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France;
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France
| | - Sachiko Koike
- Department of Charged Particle Therapy Research, National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS), National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba 263-8555, Japan; (R.H.); (N.M.); (T.I.); (S.K.); (T.S.)
- Department of Accelerator and Medical Physics, National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS), National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba 263-8555, Japan
| | - Dalila Labiod
- Experimental Radiotherapy Platform, Translational Research Department, Institut Curie, Université Paris Saclay, 91400 Orsay, France; (D.L.); (F.P.)
| | - Frederic Pouzoulet
- Experimental Radiotherapy Platform, Translational Research Department, Institut Curie, Université Paris Saclay, 91400 Orsay, France; (D.L.); (F.P.)
| | - Laura Polledo
- AnaPath Services GmbH, Hammerstrasse 49, 4410 Liestal, Switzerland; (L.P.); (N.W.); (A.L.)
| | - Nils Warfving
- AnaPath Services GmbH, Hammerstrasse 49, 4410 Liestal, Switzerland; (L.P.); (N.W.); (A.L.)
| | - Aléthéa Liens
- AnaPath Services GmbH, Hammerstrasse 49, 4410 Liestal, Switzerland; (L.P.); (N.W.); (A.L.)
| | - Judith Bergs
- Department of Radiology Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, CCM Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Takashi Shimokawa
- Department of Charged Particle Therapy Research, National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS), National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba 263-8555, Japan; (R.H.); (N.M.); (T.I.); (S.K.); (T.S.)
- Department of Accelerator and Medical Physics, National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS), National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba 263-8555, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lamirault C, Brisebard E, Patriarca A, Juchaux M, Crepin D, Labiod D, Pouzoulet F, Sebrie C, Jourdain L, Le Dudal M, Hardy D, De Marzi L, Dendale R, Jouvion G, Prezado Y. Spatially Modulated Proton Minibeams Results in the Same Increase of Lifespan as a Uniform Target Dose Coverage in F98-Glioma-Bearing Rats. Radiat Res 2021; 194:715-723. [PMID: 32991712 DOI: 10.1667/rade-19-00013.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2019] [Accepted: 08/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) is a new approach in proton radiotherapy, by which a significant increase in the therapeutic index has already been demonstrated in RG2 glioma-bearing rats. In the current study we investigated the response of other types of glioma (F98) and performed a comparative evaluation of tumor control effectiveness by pMBRT (with different levels of dose heterogeneity) versus conventional proton therapy. The results of our study showed an equivalent increase in the lifespan for all evaluated groups (conventional proton irradiation and pMBRT) and no significant differences in the histopathological analysis of the tumors or remaining brain tissue. The reduced long-term toxicity observed with pMBRT in previous evaluations at the same dose suggests a possible use of pMBRT to treat glioma with less side effects while ensuring the same tumor control achieved with standard proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Lamirault
- Laboratoire Imagerie et Modelisation pour la Neurobiologie et la Cancerologie, CNRS-Paris 7-Paris 11, Campus d'Orsay, France
| | - Elise Brisebard
- Department of Global Health, Experimental Neuropathology Unit, Institut Pasteur, 75015 Paris, France.,Laboratoire d'Histopathologie, VetAgro-Sup, Université de Lyon, Marcy l'Etoile, Lyon, France
| | - Annalisa Patriarca
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre de Protonthérapie d'Orsay, University Paris Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Marjorie Juchaux
- Laboratoire Imagerie et Modelisation pour la Neurobiologie et la Cancerologie, CNRS-Paris 7-Paris 11, Campus d'Orsay, France
| | - Delphine Crepin
- Laboratoire Imagerie et Modelisation pour la Neurobiologie et la Cancerologie, CNRS-Paris 7-Paris 11, Campus d'Orsay, France
| | - Dalila Labiod
- Experimental Radiotherapy Platform Institut Curie, University Paris Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Frederic Pouzoulet
- Experimental Radiotherapy Platform Institut Curie, University Paris Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Catherine Sebrie
- BioMaps, Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Inserm,Service Hospitalier Frédéric Joliot, 91401 Orsay, France
| | - Laurene Jourdain
- BioMaps, Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Inserm,Service Hospitalier Frédéric Joliot, 91401 Orsay, France
| | - Marine Le Dudal
- Department of Global Health, Experimental Neuropathology Unit, Institut Pasteur, 75015 Paris, France.,Histologie, Embryologie et Anatomie Pathologique, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, Université Paris-Est, Maisons-Alfort, France
| | - David Hardy
- Department of Global Health, Experimental Neuropathology Unit, Institut Pasteur, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Ludovic De Marzi
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre de Protonthérapie d'Orsay, University Paris Saclay, Orsay, France.,Institut Curie, University Paris Saclay, PSL Research University, Inserm U 1021-CNRS UMR 3347, Orsay, France
| | - Remi Dendale
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre de Protonthérapie d'Orsay, University Paris Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Gregory Jouvion
- Department of Global Health, Experimental Neuropathology Unit, Institut Pasteur, 75015 Paris, France.,Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Pathophysiology of Pediatric Genetic Diseases, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Armand-Trousseau, UF Génétique Moléculaire, Paris, France
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Institut Curie, University Paris Saclay, PSL Research University, Inserm U 1021-CNRS UMR 3347, Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Sotiropoulos M, Brisebard E, Le Dudal M, Jouvion G, Juchaux M, Crépin D, Sebrie C, Jourdain L, Labiod D, Lamirault C, Pouzoulet F, Prezado Y. X-rays minibeam radiation therapy at a conventional irradiator: Pilot evaluation in F98-glioma bearing rats and dose calculations in a human phantom. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2021; 27:44-49. [PMID: 33511291 PMCID: PMC7817429 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2021.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2020] [Revised: 01/04/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Minibeam radiation therapy (MBRT) is a type of spatial fractionated radiotherapy that uses submillimetric beams. This work reports on a pilot study on normal tissue response and the increase of the lifespan of glioma-bearing rats when irradiated with a tabletop x-ray system. Our results show a significant widening of the therapeutic window for brain tumours treated with MBRT: an important proportion of long-term survivals (60%) coupled with a significant reduction of toxicity when compared with conventional (broad beam) irradiations. In addition, the clinical translation of the minibeam treatment at a conventional irradiator is evaluated through a possible human head treatment plan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marios Sotiropoulos
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation radiobiologie et cancer, 91400 Orsay, France
| | - Elise Brisebard
- Institut Pasteur, Neuropathologie Expérimentale, 75015 Paris, France
- Laboratoire d’Histopathologie, VetAgro-Sup, Université de Lyon, Marcy l’Etoile, Lyon, France
| | - Marine Le Dudal
- Institut Pasteur, Neuropathologie Expérimentale, 75015 Paris, France
- Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d’Alfort, Biopôle, Unité d’Histologie, d’Embryologie et d’Anatomie Pathologique Université Paris-Est, Maisons-Alfort, France
| | - Gregory Jouvion
- Institut Pasteur, Neuropathologie Expérimentale, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Marjorie Juchaux
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation radiobiologie et cancer, 91400 Orsay, France
| | - Delphine Crépin
- Laboratoire de Physique des 2 Infinis Irène Joliot-Curie (IJCLab-UMR 9012), CNRS/Université Paris-Saclay/Université de Paris, Campus Universitaire, Orsay, France
| | - Catherine Sebrie
- BIOMAPS Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Inserm, Service Hospitalier Frédéric Joliot, 91401 ORSAY, France
| | - Laurene Jourdain
- BIOMAPS Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Inserm, Service Hospitalier Frédéric Joliot, 91401 ORSAY, France
| | - Dalila Labiod
- Translational Research Department, Experimental Radiotherapy Platform, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Charlotte Lamirault
- Translational Research Department, Experimental Radiotherapy Platform, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Frederic Pouzoulet
- Translational Research Department, Experimental Radiotherapy Platform, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation radiobiologie et cancer, 91400 Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Iacono D, Murphy EK, Avantsa SS, Perl DP, Day RM. Reduction of pTau and APP levels in mammalian brain after low-dose radiation. Sci Rep 2021; 11:2215. [PMID: 33500491 PMCID: PMC7838187 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-81602-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2020] [Accepted: 01/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Brain radiation can occur from treatment of brain tumors or accidental exposures. Brain radiation has been rarely considered, though, as a possible tool to alter protein levels involved in neurodegenerative disorders. We analyzed possible molecular and neuropathology changes of phosphorylated-Tau (pTau), all-Tau forms, β-tubulin, amyloid precursor protein (APP), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), ionized calcium binding adaptor molecule 1 (IBA-1), myelin basic protein (MBP), and GAP43 in Frontal Cortex (FC), Hippocampus (H) and Cerebellum (CRB) of swine brains following total-body low-dose radiation (1.79 Gy). Our data show that radiated-animals had lower levels of pTau in FC and H, APP in H and CRB, GAP43 in CRB, and higher level of GFAP in H versus sham-animals. These molecular changes were not accompanied by obvious neurohistological changes, except for astrogliosis in the H. These findings are novel, and might open new perspectives on brain radiation as a potential tool to interfere with the accumulation of specific proteins linked to the pathogenesis of various neurodegenerative disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diego Iacono
- DoD/USU Brain Tissue Repository and Neuropathology Core, Uniformed Services University (USU), Bethesda, MD, USA. .,Department of Neurology, F. Edward Hébert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University (USU), Bethesda, MD, USA. .,Department of Pathology, F. Edward Hébert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University (USU), Bethesda, MD, USA. .,The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine (HJF), 4301 Jones Bridge Road, A1036, Bethesda, MD, 20814-4799, USA. .,Complex Neurodegenerative Disorders, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NINDS, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| | - Erin K Murphy
- Department of Pathology, F. Edward Hébert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University (USU), Bethesda, MD, USA.,The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine (HJF), 4301 Jones Bridge Road, A1036, Bethesda, MD, 20814-4799, USA
| | - Soundarya S Avantsa
- DoD/USU Brain Tissue Repository and Neuropathology Core, Uniformed Services University (USU), Bethesda, MD, USA.,The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine (HJF), 4301 Jones Bridge Road, A1036, Bethesda, MD, 20814-4799, USA
| | - Daniel P Perl
- DoD/USU Brain Tissue Repository and Neuropathology Core, Uniformed Services University (USU), Bethesda, MD, USA.,Department of Pathology, F. Edward Hébert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University (USU), Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Regina M Day
- Department of Pharmacology and Molecular Therapeutics, Uniformed Services University (USU), Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Masson I, Dutreix M, Supiot S. [Innovation in radiotherapy in 2021]. Bull Cancer 2020; 108:42-49. [PMID: 33303195 DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2020.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2020] [Accepted: 10/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ingrid Masson
- Département de radiothérapie, Institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest René-Gauducheau, boulevard Jacques-Monod, 44805 Saint-Herblain, France
| | - Marie Dutreix
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS, Inserm, UMR 3347; Université Paris Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, 91405 Orsay, France
| | - Stéphane Supiot
- Département de radiothérapie, Institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest René-Gauducheau, boulevard Jacques-Monod, 44805 Saint-Herblain, France; Centre de Recherche en Cancéro-Immunologie Nantes/Angers (CRCINA, UMR 892 Inserm), Institut de Recherche en Santé de l'Université de Nantes, Nantes cedex 1, France.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Lamirault C, Doyère V, Juchaux M, Pouzoulet F, Labiod D, Dendale R, Patriarca A, Nauraye C, Le Dudal M, Jouvion G, Hardy D, Massioui NE, Prezado Y. Short and long-term evaluation of the impact of proton minibeam radiation therapy on motor, emotional and cognitive functions. Sci Rep 2020; 10:13511. [PMID: 32782370 PMCID: PMC7419511 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-70371-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2019] [Accepted: 07/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy (RT) is one of the most frequently used methods for cancer treatment. Despite remarkable advancements in RT techniquesthe treatment of radioresistant tumours (i.e. high-grade gliomas) is not yet satisfactory. Finding novel approaches less damaging for normal tissues is of utmost importance. This would make it possible to increase the dose applied to tumours, resulting in an improvement in the cure rate. Along this line, proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) is a novel strategy that allows the spatial modulation of the dose, leading to minimal damage to brain structures compared to a high dose (25 Gy in one fraction) of standard proton therapy (PT). The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether pMBRT also preserves important cerebral functions. Comprehensive longitudinal behavioural studies were performed in irradiated (peak dose of 57 Gy in one fraction) and control rats to evaluate the impact of pMBRT on motor function (motor coordination, muscular tonus, and locomotor activity), emotional function (anxiety, fear, motivation, and impulsivity), and cognitive function (learning, memory, temporal processing, and decision making). The evaluations, which were conducted over a period of 10 months, showed no significant motor or emotional dysfunction in pMBRT-irradiated rats compared with control animals. Concerning cognitive functions, similar performance was observed between the groups, although some slight learning delays might be present in some of the tests in the long term after irradiation. This study shows the minimal impact of pMBRT on the normal brain at the functional level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Lamirault
- Translational Research Department, Experimental Radiotherapy Platform, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay, France
| | - Valérie Doyère
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, Institut des Neurosciences Paris-Saclay, 91190, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Marjorie Juchaux
- Laboratoire de Physique des 2 Infinis Irène Joliot-Curie (IJCLab-UMR 9012), CNRS/Université Paris-Saclay/Université de Paris, Campus Universitaire, Orsay, France
| | - Frederic Pouzoulet
- Translational Research Department, Experimental Radiotherapy Platform, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay, France
| | - Dalila Labiod
- Translational Research Department, Experimental Radiotherapy Platform, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay, France
| | - Remi Dendale
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre de Protonthérapie d'Orsay, 101, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, 91898, Orsay, France
| | - Annalisa Patriarca
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre de Protonthérapie d'Orsay, 101, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, 91898, Orsay, France
| | - Catherine Nauraye
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre de Protonthérapie d'Orsay, 101, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, 91898, Orsay, France
| | - Marine Le Dudal
- Institut Pasteur, Neuropathologie Expérimentale, 75015, Paris, France
- Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, Biopôle, Unité d'Histologie, d'Embryologie et d'Anatomie Pathologique, Université Paris-Est, Maisons-Alfort, France
| | - Grégory Jouvion
- Institut Pasteur, Neuropathologie Expérimentale, 75015, Paris, France
- Physiopathologie des Maladies Génétiques d'Expression Pédiatrique, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Armand-Trousseau, UF de Génétique Moléculaire, Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Paris, France
| | - David Hardy
- Institut Pasteur, Neuropathologie Expérimentale, 75015, Paris, France
| | - Nicole El Massioui
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, Institut des Neurosciences Paris-Saclay, 91190, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Institut Curie, Inserm U 1021-CNRS UMR 3347, University Paris Saclay, PSL Research University, Bat 110, Campus d'Orsay, Orsay, France.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Conventional dose rate spatially-fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) treatment response and its association with dosimetric parameters-A preclinical study in a Fischer 344 rat model. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0229053. [PMID: 32569277 PMCID: PMC7307781 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2020] [Accepted: 05/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To identify key dosimetric parameters that have close associations with tumor treatment response and body weight change in SFRT treatments with a large range of spatial-fractionation scale at dose rates of several Gy/min. Methods Six study arms using uniform tumor radiation, half-tumor radiation, 2mm beam array radiation, 0.3mm minibeam radiation, and an untreated arm were used. All treatments were delivered on a 320kV x-ray irradiator. Forty-two female Fischer 344 rats with fibrosarcoma tumor allografts were used. Dosimetric parameters studied are peak dose and width, valley dose and width, peak-to-valley-dose-ratio (PVDR), volumetric average dose, percentage volume directly irradiated, and tumor- and normal-tissue EUD. Animal survival, tumor volume change, and body weight change (indicative of treatment toxicity) are tested for association with the dosimetric parameters using linear regression and Cox Proportional Hazards models. Results The dosimetric parameters most closely associated with tumor response are tumor EUD (R2 = 0.7923, F-stat = 15.26*; z-test = -4.07***), valley (minimum) dose (R2 = 0.7636, F-stat = 12.92*; z-test = -4.338***), and percentage tumor directly irradiated (R2 = 0.7153, F-stat = 10.05*; z-test = -3.837***) per the linear regression and Cox Proportional Hazards models, respectively. Tumor response is linearly proportional to valley (minimum) doses and tumor EUD. Average dose (R2 = 0.2745, F-stat = 1.514 (no sig.); z-test = -2.811**) and peak dose (R2 = 0.04472, F-stat = 0.6874 (not sig.); z-test = -0.786 (not sig.)) show the weakest associations to tumor response. Only the uniform radiation arm did not gain body weight post-radiation, indicative of treatment toxicity; however, body weight change in general shows weak association with all dosimetric parameters except for valley (minimum) dose (R2 = 0.3814, F-stat = 13.56**), valley width (R2 = 0.2853, F-stat = 8.783**), and peak width (R2 = 0.2759, F-stat = 8.382**). Conclusions For a single-fraction SFRT at conventional dose rates, valley, not peak, dose is closely associated with tumor treatment response and thus should be used for treatment prescription. Tumor EUD, valley (minimum) dose, and percentage tumor directly irradiated are the top three dosimetric parameters that exhibited close associations with tumor response.
Collapse
|
25
|
Mazal A, Prezado Y, Ares C, de Marzi L, Patriarca A, Miralbell R, Favaudon V. FLASH and minibeams in radiation therapy: the effect of microstructures on time and space and their potential application to protontherapy. Br J Radiol 2020; 93:20190807. [PMID: 32003574 PMCID: PMC7066940 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
After years of lethargy, studies on two non-conventional microstructures in time and space of the beams used in radiation therapy are enjoying a huge revival. The first effect called “FLASH” is based on very high dose-rate irradiation (pulse amplitude ≥106 Gy/s), short beam-on times (≤100 ms) and large single doses (≥10 Gy) as experimental parameters established so far to give biological and potential clinical effects. The second effect relies on the use of arrays of minibeams (e.g., 0.5–1 mm, spaced 1–3.5 mm). Both approaches have been shown to protect healthy tissues as an endpoint that must be clearly specified and could be combined with each other (e.g., minibeams under FLASH conditions). FLASH depends on the presence of oxygen and could proceed from the chemistry of peroxyradicals and a reduced incidence on DNA and membrane damage. Minibeams action could be based on abscopal effects, cell signalling and/or migration of cells between “valleys and hills” present in the non-uniform irradiation field as well as faster repair of vascular damage. Both effects are expected to maintain intact the tumour control probability and might even preserve antitumoural immunological reactions. FLASH in vivo experiments involving Zebrafish, mice, pig and cats have been done with electron beams, while minibeams are an intermediate approach between X-GRID and synchrotron X-ray microbeams radiation. Both have an excellent rationale to converge and be applied with proton beams, combining focusing properties and high dose rates in the beam path of pencil beams, and the inherent advantage of a controlled limited range. A first treatment with electron FLASH (cutaneous lymphoma) has recently been achieved, but clinical trials have neither been presented for FLASH with protons, nor under the minibeam conditions. Better understanding of physical, chemical and biological mechanisms of both effects is essential to optimize the technical developments and devise clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- IMNC, University Paris-Sud and Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, Orsay, France
| | - Carme Ares
- Centro de Protonterapia Quironsalud, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ludovic de Marzi
- Institut Curie, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Centre de protonthérapie d'Orsay, Campus universitaire, bâtiment 101, Orsay 91898, France.,Institut Curie, Inserm U 1021-CNRS UMR 3347, Paris-Saclay and PSL Research Universities, Orsay, France
| | - Annalisa Patriarca
- Institut Curie, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Centre de protonthérapie d'Orsay, Campus universitaire, bâtiment 101, Orsay 91898, France
| | | | - Vincent Favaudon
- Institut Curie, Inserm U 1021-CNRS UMR 3347, Paris-Saclay and PSL Research Universities, Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Dos Santos M, Delorme R, Salmon R, Prezado Y. Minibeam radiation therapy: A micro- and nano-dosimetry Monte Carlo study. Med Phys 2020; 47:1379-1390. [PMID: 31900944 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2019] [Revised: 12/12/2019] [Accepted: 12/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Minibeam radiation therapy (MBRT) is an innovative strategy based on a distinct dose delivery method that is administered using a series of narrow (submillimetric) parallel beams. To shed light on the biological effects of MBRT irradiation, we explored the micro- and nanodosimetric characteristics of three promising MBRT modalities (photon, electron, and proton) using Monte Carlo (MC) calculations. METHODS Irradiation with proton (100 MeV), electron (300 MeV), and photon (effective energy of 69 keV) minibeams were simulated using Geant4 MC code and the Geant4-DNA extension, which allows the simulation of energy transfer points with nanometric accuracy. As the target of the simulations, cells containing spherical nuclei with or without a detailed description of the DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) geometry were placed at different depths in peak and valley regions in a water phantom. The energy deposition and number of events in the cell nuclei were recorded in the microdosimetry study, and the number of DNA breaks and their complexity were determined in the nanodosimetric study, where a multi-scale simulation approach was used for the latter. For DNA damage assessment, an adapted DBSCAN clustering algorithm was used. To compare the photon MBRT (xMBRT), electron MBRT (eMBRT), and proton MBRT (pMBRT) approaches, we considered the treatment of a brain tumor located at a depth of 75 mm. RESULTS Both mean energy deposition at micrometric scale and DNA damage in the "valley" cell nuclei were very low as compared with these parameters in the peak region at all depths for xMBRT and at depths of 0 to 30 mm and 0 to 50 mm for eMBRT and pMBRT, respectively. Only the charged minibeams were favorable for tumor control by producing similar effects in peak and valley cells after 70 mm. At the micrometer scale, the energy deposited per event pointed to a potential advantage of proton beams for tumor control, as more aggressive events could be expected at the end of their tracks. At the nanometer scale, all three MBRT modalities produced direct clustered DNA breaks, although the majority of damage (>93%) was composed of isolated single strand breaks. The pMBRT led to a significant increase in the proportion of clustered single strand breaks and double-strand breaks at the end of its range as compared to the entrance (7% at 75 mm vs 3% at 10 mm) in contrast to eMBRT and xMBRT. In the latter cases, the proportions of complex breaks remained constant, irrespective of the depth and region (peak or valley). CONCLUSIONS Enhanced normal tissue sparing can be expected with these three MBRT techniques. Among the three modalities, pMBRT offers an additional gain for radioresistant tumors, as it resulted in a higher number of complex DNA damage clusters in the tumor region. These results can aid understanding of the biological mechanisms of MBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Dos Santos
- Department of Radiobiology and regenerative medicine (SERAMED), Laboratory of Radiobiology of Accidental exposures (LRAcc), IRSN, F-92260, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - R Delorme
- Imagerie et Modélisation en Neurobiologie et Cancérologie (IMNC), CNRS, Univ Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, F-91400, Orsay, France.,Université de Paris, IMNC, F-91400, Orsay, France
| | - R Salmon
- Imagerie et Modélisation en Neurobiologie et Cancérologie (IMNC), CNRS, Univ Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, F-91400, Orsay, France.,Université de Paris, IMNC, F-91400, Orsay, France
| | - Y Prezado
- Imagerie et Modélisation en Neurobiologie et Cancérologie (IMNC), CNRS, Univ Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, F-91400, Orsay, France.,Université de Paris, IMNC, F-91400, Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Bartzsch S, Corde S, Crosbie JC, Day L, Donzelli M, Krisch M, Lerch M, Pellicioli P, Smyth LML, Tehei M. Technical advances in x-ray microbeam radiation therapy. Phys Med Biol 2020; 65:02TR01. [PMID: 31694009 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab5507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
In the last 25 years microbeam radiation therapy (MRT) has emerged as a promising alternative to conventional radiation therapy at large, third generation synchrotrons. In MRT, a multi-slit collimator modulates a kilovoltage x-ray beam on a micrometer scale, creating peak dose areas with unconventionally high doses of several hundred Grays separated by low dose valley regions, where the dose remains well below the tissue tolerance level. Pre-clinical evidence demonstrates that such beam geometries lead to substantially reduced damage to normal tissue at equal tumour control rates and hence drastically increase the therapeutic window. Although the mechanisms behind MRT are still to be elucidated, previous studies indicate that immune response, tumour microenvironment, and the microvasculature may play a crucial role. Beyond tumour therapy, MRT has also been suggested as a microsurgical tool in neurological disorders and as a primer for drug delivery. The physical properties of MRT demand innovative medical physics and engineering solutions for safe treatment delivery. This article reviews technical developments in MRT and discusses existing solutions for dosimetric validation, reliable treatment planning and safety. Instrumentation at synchrotron facilities, including beam production, collimators and patient positioning systems, is also discussed. Specific solutions reviewed in this article include: dosimetry techniques that can cope with high spatial resolution, low photon energies and extremely high dose rates of up to 15 000 Gy s-1, dose calculation algorithms-apart from pure Monte Carlo Simulations-to overcome the challenge of small voxel sizes and a wide dynamic dose-range, and the use of dose-enhancing nanoparticles to combat the limited penetrability of a kilovoltage energy spectrum. Finally, concepts for alternative compact microbeam sources are presented, such as inverse Compton scattering set-ups and carbon nanotube x-ray tubes, that may facilitate the transfer of MRT into a hospital-based clinical environment. Intensive research in recent years has resulted in practical solutions to most of the technical challenges in MRT. Treatment planning, dosimetry and patient safety systems at synchrotrons have matured to a point that first veterinary and clinical studies in MRT are within reach. Should these studies confirm the promising results of pre-clinical studies, the authors are confident that MRT will become an effective new radiotherapy option for certain patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Bartzsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany. Helmholtz Centre Munich, Institute for Radiation Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Minibeam radiation therapy at a conventional irradiator: Dose-calculation engine and first tumor-bearing animals irradiation. Phys Med 2020; 69:256-261. [PMID: 31918378 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.12.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2019] [Revised: 12/11/2019] [Accepted: 12/17/2019] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Minibeam radiation therapy (MBRT) is a novel therapeutic strategy, whose exploration was hindered due to its restriction to large synchrotrons. Our recent implementation of MBRT in a wide-spread small animal irradiator offers the possibility of performing systematic radiobiological studies. The aim of this research was to develop a set of dosimetric tools to reliably guide biological experiments in the irradiator. METHODS A Monte Carlo (Geant4)-based dose calculation engine was developed. It was then benchmarked against a series of dosimetric measurements performed with gafchromic films. Two voxelized rat phantoms (ROBY, computer tomography) were used to evaluate the treatment plan of F98 tumor-bearing rats. The response of a group of 7 animals receiving a unilateral irradiation of 58 Gy was compared to a group of non-irradiated controls. RESULTS The good agreement between calculations and the experimental data allowed the validation of the dose-calculation engine. The latter was first used to compare the dose distributions in computer tomography images of a rat's head and in a digital model of a rat's head (ROBY), obtaining a good general agreement. Finally, with respect to the in vivo experiment, the increase of mean survival time of the treated group with respect to the controls was modest but statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS The developed dosimetric tools were used to reliably guide the first MBRT treatments of intracranial glioma-bearing rats outside synchrotrons. The significant tumor response obtained with respect to the non-irradiated controls, despite the heterogenous dose coverage of the target, might indicate the participation of non-targeted effects.
Collapse
|
29
|
Jelvehgaran P, Steinberg JD, Khmelinskii A, Borst G, Song JY, de Wit N, de Bruin DM, van Herk M. Evaluation of acute esophageal radiation-induced damage using magnetic resonance imaging: a feasibility study in mice. Radiat Oncol 2019; 14:188. [PMID: 31666092 PMCID: PMC6822441 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-019-1396-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2019] [Accepted: 10/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Thoracic and head and neck cancer radiation therapy (RT) can cause damage to nearby healthy organs such as the esophagus, causing acute radiation-induced esophageal damage (ARIED). A non-invasive method to detect and monitor ARIED can facilitate optimizing RT to avoid ARIED while improving local tumor control. Current clinical guidelines are limited to scoring the esophageal damage based on the symptoms of patients. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a non-invasive imaging modality that may potentially visualize radiation-induced organ damage. We investigated the feasibility of using T2-weighted MRI to detect and monitor ARIED using a two-phased study in mice. METHODS The first phase aimed to establish the optimal dose level at which ARIED is inducible and to determine the time points where ARIED is detectable. Twenty four mice received a single dose delivery of 20 and 40 Gy at proximal and distal spots of 10.0 mm (in diameter) on the esophagus. Mice underwent MRI and histopathology analysis with esophageal resection at two, three, and 4 weeks post-irradiation, or earlier in case mice had to be euthanized due to humane endpoints. In the second phase, 32 mice received a 40 Gy single dose and were studied at two, three, and 7 days post-irradiation. We detected ARIED as a change in signal intensity of the MRI images. We measured the width of the hyperintense area around the esophagus in all mice that underwent MRI prior to and after irradiation. We conducted a blind qualitative comparison between MRI findings and histopathology as the gold standard. RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS A dose of 40 Gy was needed to induce substantial ARIED. MRI detected ARIED as high signal intensity, visible from 2 days post-irradiation. Quantitative MRI analysis showed that the hyperintense area around the esophagus with severe ARIED was 1.41 mm wider than with no damage and MRI-only mice. The overall sensitivity and specificity were 56 and 43% respectively to detect any form of ARIED. However, in this study MRI correctly detected 100% of severe ARIED cases. Our two-phased preclinical study showed that MRI has the potential to detect ARIED as a change in signal intensity and width of enhancement around the esophagus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pouya Jelvehgaran
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Institute for Laser Life and Biophotonics Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jeffrey D. Steinberg
- Mouse Clinic for Cancer and Aging (MCCA) Imaging Unit, The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Artem Khmelinskii
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gerben Borst
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ji-Ying Song
- Department of Experimental Animal Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Niels de Wit
- Mouse Clinic for Cancer and Aging (MCCA) Imaging Unit, The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Daniel M. de Bruin
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marcel van Herk
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
De Marzi L, Nauraye C, Lansonneur P, Pouzoulet F, Patriarca A, Schneider T, Guardiola C, Mammar H, Dendale R, Prezado Y. Spatial fractionation of the dose in proton therapy: Proton minibeam radiation therapy. Cancer Radiother 2019; 23:677-681. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2019.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2019] [Accepted: 08/01/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
31
|
Schneider T, Patriarca A, Prezado Y. Improving the dose distributions in minibeam radiation therapy: Helium ions vs protons. Med Phys 2019; 46:3640-3648. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.13646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2019] [Revised: 05/27/2019] [Accepted: 05/27/2019] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Schneider
- IMNC‐UMR 8165 CNRS Paris 7 and Paris 11 Universities 15 rue Georges Clemenceau Orsay Cedex 91405France
| | - Annalisa Patriarca
- Institut Curie PSL Research University Centre de protonthrapie d’Orsay Campus universitaire btiment 101 Orsay 91898France
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- IMNC‐UMR 8165 CNRS Paris 7 and Paris 11 Universities 15 rue Georges Clemenceau Orsay Cedex 91405France
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Meyer J, Eley J, Schmid TE, Combs SE, Dendale R, Prezado Y. Spatially fractionated proton minibeams. Br J Radiol 2019; 92:20180466. [PMID: 30359081 PMCID: PMC6541186 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20180466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2018] [Revised: 10/11/2018] [Accepted: 10/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Extraordinary normal tissue response to highly spatially fractionated X-ray beams has been explored for over 25 years. More recently, alternative radiation sources have been developed and utilized with the aim to evoke comparable effects. These include protons, which lend themselves well for this endeavour due to their physical depth dose characteristics as well as corresponding variable biological effectiveness. This paper addresses the motivation for using protons to generate spatially fractionated beams and reviews the technological implementations and experimental results to date. This includes simulation and feasibility studies, collimation and beam characteristics, dosimetry and biological considerations as well as the results of in vivo and in vitro studies. Experimental results are emerging indicating an extraordinary normal tissue sparing effect analogous to what has been observed for synchrotron generated X-ray microbeams. The potential for translational research and feasibility of spatially modulated proton beams in clinical settings is discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juergen Meyer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - John Eley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | | | - Remi Dendale
- Institut Curie, Centre de Protonthérapie d’Orsay, Orsay, France
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Laboratoire d'Imagerie et Modélisation en Neurobiologie et Cancérologie (IMNC), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Universités Paris 11 and Paris 7, Campus d'Orsay, Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Prezado Y, Jouvion G, Patriarca A, Nauraye C, Guardiola C, Juchaux M, Lamirault C, Labiod D, Jourdain L, Sebrie C, Dendale R, Gonzalez W, Pouzoulet F. Proton minibeam radiation therapy widens the therapeutic index for high-grade gliomas. Sci Rep 2018; 8:16479. [PMID: 30405188 PMCID: PMC6220274 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-34796-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2018] [Accepted: 10/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) is a novel strategy which has already shown a remarkable reduction in neurotoxicity as to compared with standard proton therapy. Here we report on the first evaluation of tumor control effectiveness in glioma bearing rats with highly spatially modulated proton beams. Whole brains (excluding the olfactory bulb) of Fischer 344 rats were irradiated. Four groups of animals were considered: a control group (RG2 tumor bearing rats), a second group of RG2 tumor-bearing rats and a third group of normal rats that received pMBRT (70 Gy peak dose in one fraction) with very heterogeneous dose distributions, and a control group of normal rats. The tumor-bearing and normal animals were followed-up for 6 months and one year, respectively. pMBRT leads to a significant tumor control and tumor eradication in 22% of the cases. No substantial brain damage which confirms the widening of the therapeutic window for high-grade gliomas offered by pMBRT. Additionally, the fact that large areas of the brain can be irradiated with pMBRT without significant side effects, would allow facing the infiltrative nature of gliomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yolanda Prezado
- Laboratoire d'Imagerie et Modélisation en Neurobiologie et Cancérologie (IMNC), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Universités Paris 11 and Paris 7, Campus d'Orsay, 91405, Orsay, France.
| | - Gregory Jouvion
- Institut Pasteur, Neuropathologie Expérimentale, Institut Pasteur, 28 Rue du Docteur Roux, 75015, Paris, France
| | - Annalisa Patriarca
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Centre de Protonthérapie d'Orsay, 101, F-91898, Orsay, France
| | - Catherine Nauraye
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Centre de Protonthérapie d'Orsay, 101, F-91898, Orsay, France
| | - Consuelo Guardiola
- Laboratoire d'Imagerie et Modélisation en Neurobiologie et Cancérologie (IMNC), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Universités Paris 11 and Paris 7, Campus d'Orsay, 91405, Orsay, France
| | - Marjorie Juchaux
- Laboratoire d'Imagerie et Modélisation en Neurobiologie et Cancérologie (IMNC), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Universités Paris 11 and Paris 7, Campus d'Orsay, 91405, Orsay, France
| | - Charlotte Lamirault
- Laboratoire d'Imagerie et Modélisation en Neurobiologie et Cancérologie (IMNC), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Universités Paris 11 and Paris 7, Campus d'Orsay, 91405, Orsay, France
| | - Dalila Labiod
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Translational Research Department, Experimental Radiotherapy Platform, Orsay, France
- Paris Sud University, Paris -Saclay University, 91405, Orsay, France
| | - Laurene Jourdain
- IR4M, UMR8081, Université Paris Sud, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, 91405, Orsay, France
| | - Catherine Sebrie
- IR4M, UMR8081, Université Paris Sud, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, 91405, Orsay, France
| | - Remi Dendale
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Centre de Protonthérapie d'Orsay, 101, F-91898, Orsay, France
| | - Wilfredo Gonzalez
- Laboratoire d'Imagerie et Modélisation en Neurobiologie et Cancérologie (IMNC), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Universités Paris 11 and Paris 7, Campus d'Orsay, 91405, Orsay, France
| | - Frederic Pouzoulet
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Translational Research Department, Experimental Radiotherapy Platform, Orsay, France
- Paris Sud University, Paris -Saclay University, 91405, Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Guardiola C, Prezado Y, Roulin C, Bergs JW. Effect of X-ray minibeam radiation therapy on clonogenic survival of glioma cells. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2018; 13:7-13. [PMID: 30211325 PMCID: PMC6134191 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2018.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2018] [Revised: 07/26/2018] [Accepted: 07/31/2018] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
The goal is to compare, in vitro, the efficiency of minibeam radiotherapy (MBRT) and standard RT in inducing clonogenic cell death in glioma cell lines. With this aim, we report on the first in vitro study performed in an X-ray Small Animal Radiation Research Platform (SARRP) modified for minibeam irradiations. F98 rat and U87 human glioma cells were irradiated with either an array of minibeams (MB) or with conventional homogeneous beams (broad beam, BB). A specially designed multislit collimator was used to generate the minibeams with a with of a center-to-center distance of 1465 (±10) μm, and a PVDR value of 12.4 (±2.3) measured at 1 cm depth in a water phantom. Cells were either replated for clonogenic assay directly (immediate plating, IP) or 24 h after irradiation (delayed plating, DP) to assess the effect of potentially lethal damage repair (PLDR) on cell survival. Our hypothesis is that with MBRT, a similar level of clonogenic cell death can be reached compared to standard RT, when using equal mean radiation doses. To prove this, we performed dose escalations to determine the minimum integrated dose needed to reach a similar level of clonogenic cell death for both treatments. We show that this minimum dose can vary per cell line: in F98 cells a dose of 19 Gy was needed to obtain similar levels of clonogenic survival, whereas in U87 cells there was still a slightly increased survival with MB compared to BB 19 Gy treatment. The results suggest also an impairment of DNA damage repair in F98 cells as there is no difference in clonogenic cell survival between immediately and delayed plated cells for each dose and irradiation mode. For U87 cells, a small IP-DP effect was observed in the case of BB irradiation up to a dose of 17 Gy. However, at 19 Gy BB, as well as for the complete dose range of MB irradiation, U87 cells did not show a difference in clonogenic survival between IP and DP. We therefore speculate that MBRT might influence PLDR. The current results show that X-ray MBRT is a promising method for treatment of gliomas: future preclinical and clinical studies should aim at reaching a minimum radiation (valley) dose for effective eradication of gliomas with increased sparing of normal tissues compared to standard RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Consuelo Guardiola
- IMNC-UMR 8165, CNRS Paris-Saclay University, 15 rue Georges Clemenceau, 91406 Orsay cedex, France
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- IMNC-UMR 8165, CNRS Paris-Saclay University, 15 rue Georges Clemenceau, 91406 Orsay cedex, France
| | - Christophe Roulin
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Translational Research Department, Experimental Radiotherapy Platform, Orsay, France
| | - Judith W.J. Bergs
- IMNC-UMR 8165, CNRS Paris-Saclay University, 15 rue Georges Clemenceau, 91406 Orsay cedex, France
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
De Marzi L, Patriarca A, Nauraye C, Hierso E, Dendale R, Guardiola C, Prezado Y. Implementation of planar proton minibeam radiation therapy using a pencil beam scanning system: A proof of concept study. Med Phys 2018; 45:5305-5316. [PMID: 30311639 DOI: 10.1002/mp.13209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2018] [Revised: 07/26/2018] [Accepted: 09/02/2018] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) is an innovative approach that combines the advantages of minibeam radiation therapy with the more precise ballistics of protons to further reduce the side effects of radiation. One of the main challenges of this approach is the generation of very narrow proton pencil beams with an adequate dose-rate to treat patients within a reasonable treatment time (several minutes) in existing clinical facilities. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility of implementing pMBRT by combining the pencil beam scanning (PBS) technique with the use of multislit collimators. This proof of concept study of pMBRT with a clinical system is intended to guide upcoming biological experiments. METHODS Monte Carlo simulations (TOPAS v3.1.p2) were used to design a suitable multislit collimator to implement planar pMBRT for conventional pencil beam scanning settings. Dose distributions (depth-dose curves, lateral profiles, Peak-to-Valley Dose Ratio (PVDR) and dose-rates) for different proton beam energies were assessed by means of Monte Carlo simulations and experimental measurements in a water tank using commercial ionization chambers and a new p-type silicon diode, the IBA RAZOR. An analytical intensity-modulated dose calculation algorithm designed to optimize the weight of individual Bragg peaks composing the field was also developed and validated. RESULTS Proton minibeams were then obtained using a brass multislit collimator with five slits measuring 2 cm × 400 μm in width with a center-to-center distance of 4 mm. The measured and calculated dose distributions (depth-dose curves and lateral profiles) showed a good agreement. Spread-out Bragg peaks (SOBP) and homogeneous dose distributions around the target were obtained by means of intensity modulation of Bragg peaks, while maintaining spatial fractionation at shallow depths. Mean dose-rates of 0.12 and 0.09 Gy/s were obtained for one iso-energy layer and a SOBP conditions in the presence of multislit collimator. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates the feasibility of implementing pMBRT on a PBS system. It also confirms the reliability of RAZOR detector for pMBRT dosimetry. This newly developed experimental methodology will support the design of future preclinical research with pMBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ludovic De Marzi
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Centre de protonthérapie d'Orsay, Campus universitaire, bâtiment 101, Orsay, 91898, France
| | - Annalisa Patriarca
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Centre de protonthérapie d'Orsay, Campus universitaire, bâtiment 101, Orsay, 91898, France
| | - Catherine Nauraye
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Centre de protonthérapie d'Orsay, Campus universitaire, bâtiment 101, Orsay, 91898, France
| | - Eric Hierso
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Centre de protonthérapie d'Orsay, Campus universitaire, bâtiment 101, Orsay, 91898, France
| | - Rémi Dendale
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Centre de protonthérapie d'Orsay, Campus universitaire, bâtiment 101, Orsay, 91898, France
| | - Consuelo Guardiola
- IMNC-UMR 8165, CNRS, Paris 7 and Paris 11 Universities, 15 rue Georges Clemenceau, Orsay Cedex, 91405, France
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- IMNC-UMR 8165, CNRS, Paris 7 and Paris 11 Universities, 15 rue Georges Clemenceau, Orsay Cedex, 91405, France
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Esplen NM, Chergui L, Johnstone CD, Bazalova-Carter M. Monte Carlo optimization of a microbeam collimator design for use on the small animal radiation research platform (SARRP). ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018; 63:175004. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aad7e2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|
37
|
Gonzalez W, Peucelle C, Martinez-Rovira I, Prezado Y. [P128] Spatial fractionation of the dose in charged particle therapy: Dosimetry evaluations. Phys Med 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.06.438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
|
38
|
[OA187] Transfer of minibeam radiation therapy into a cost-effective equipment: A proof of concept. Phys Med 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.06.259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
|
39
|
Manchado de Sola F, Vilches M, Prezado Y, Lallena AM. Impact of cardiosynchronous brain pulsations on Monte Carlo calculated doses for synchrotron micro‐ and minibeam radiation therapy. Med Phys 2018; 45:3379-3390. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.12973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2017] [Revised: 04/02/2018] [Accepted: 05/05/2018] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco Manchado de Sola
- Servicio de Radiofísica y Protección Radiológica Hospital Juan Ramón Jiménez Ronda Exterior Norte, s/n E‐21005Huelva Spain
| | - Manuel Vilches
- Servicio de Radiofísica y Protección Radiológica Centro Médico de Asturias/IMOMA Avda. Richard Grandío, s/n E‐33193Oviedo Spain
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Laboratoire Imagerie et Modélisation en Neurobiologie et Cancérologie CNRS 5 rue Georges Clemenceau F‐91406Orsay Cedex France
| | - Antonio M. Lallena
- Departamento de Física Atómica, Molecular y Nuclear Universidad de Granada E‐18071Granada Spain
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
González W, Prezado Y. Spatial fractionation of the dose in heavy ions therapy: An optimization study. Med Phys 2018; 45:2620-2627. [PMID: 29633284 DOI: 10.1002/mp.12902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2018] [Revised: 03/07/2018] [Accepted: 03/21/2018] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The alliance of charged particle therapy and the spatial fractionation of the dose, as in minibeam or Grid therapy, is an innovative strategy to improve the therapeutic index in the treatment of radioresistant tumors. The aim of this work was to assess the optimum irradiation configuration in heavy ion spatially fractionated radiotherapy (SFRT) in terms of ion species, beam width, center-to-center distances, and linear energy transfer (LET), information that could be used to guide the design of the future biological experiments. The nuclear fragmentation leading to peak and valley regions composed of different secondary particles, creates the need for a more complete dosimetric description that the classical one in SFRT. METHODS Monte Carlo simulations (GATE 6.2) were performed to evaluate the dose distributions for different ions, beam widths, and spacings. We have also assessed the 3D-maps of dose-averaged LET and proposed a new parameter, the peak-to-valley-LET ratio, to offer a more thorough physical evaluation of the technique. RESULTS Our results show that beam widths larger than 400 μm are needed in order to keep a ratio between the dose in the entrance and the dose in the target of the same order as in conventional irradiations. A large ctc distance (3500 μm) would favor tissue sparing since it provides higher PVDR, it leads to a reduced contribution of the heavier nuclear fragments and a LET value in the valleys a factor 2 lower than the LET in the ctc leading to homogeneous distributions in the target. CONCLUSIONS Heavy ions MBRT provide advantageous dose distributions. Thanks to the reduced lateral scattering, the use of submillimetric beams still allows to keep a ratio between the dose in the entrance and the dose in the target of the same order as in conventional irradiations. Large ctc distances (3500 μm) should be preferred since they lead to valley doses composed of lighter nuclear fragments resulting in a much reduced dose-averaged LET values in normal tissue, favoring its preservation. Among the different ions species evaluated, Ne stands out as the one leading to the best balance between high PVDR and PVLR in normal tissues and high LET values (close to 100 keV/μm) and a favorable oxygen enhancement ratio in the target region.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W González
- IMNC-UMR 8165, CNRS, Paris 7 and Paris 11 Universities, 15 rue Georges Clemenceau, 91406, Orsay Cedex, France
| | - Y Prezado
- IMNC-UMR 8165, CNRS, Paris 7 and Paris 11 Universities, 15 rue Georges Clemenceau, 91406, Orsay Cedex, France
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Prezado Y, Dos Santos M, Gonzalez W, Jouvion G, Guardiola C, Heinrich S, Labiod D, Juchaux M, Jourdain L, Sebrie C, Pouzoulet F. Transfer of Minibeam Radiation Therapy into a cost-effective equipment for radiobiological studies: a proof of concept. Sci Rep 2017; 7:17295. [PMID: 29229965 PMCID: PMC5725561 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-17543-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2017] [Accepted: 11/23/2017] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Minibeam radiation therapy (MBRT) is an innovative synchrotron radiotherapy technique able to shift the normal tissue complication probability curves to significantly higher doses. However, its exploration was hindered due to the limited and expensive beamtime at synchrotrons. The aim of this work was to develop a cost-effective equipment to perform systematic radiobiological studies in view of MBRT. Tumor control for various tumor entities will be addressable as well as studies to unravel the distinct biological mechanisms involved in normal and tumor tissues responses when applying MBRT. With that aim, a series of modifications of a small animal irradiator were performed to make it suitable for MBRT experiments. In addition, the brains of two groups of rats were irradiated. Half of the animals received a standard irradiation, the other half, MBRT. The animals were followed-up for 6.5 months. Substantial brain damage was observed in the group receiving standard RT, in contrast to the MBRT group, where no significant lesions were observed. This work proves the feasibility of the transfer of MBRT outside synchrotron sources towards a small animal irradiator.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Prezado
- Laboratoire d'Imagerie et Modélisation en Neurobiologie et Cancérologie (IMNC), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Universités Paris 11 and Paris 7, Campus d'Orsay, 91405, Orsay, France.
| | - M Dos Santos
- Laboratoire d'Imagerie et Modélisation en Neurobiologie et Cancérologie (IMNC), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Universités Paris 11 and Paris 7, Campus d'Orsay, 91405, Orsay, France
| | - W Gonzalez
- Laboratoire d'Imagerie et Modélisation en Neurobiologie et Cancérologie (IMNC), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Universités Paris 11 and Paris 7, Campus d'Orsay, 91405, Orsay, France
| | - G Jouvion
- Histopathologie Humaine et Modèles Animaux, Institut Pasteur, 28 Rue du Docteur Roux, 75015, Paris, France
| | - C Guardiola
- Laboratoire d'Imagerie et Modélisation en Neurobiologie et Cancérologie (IMNC), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Universités Paris 11 and Paris 7, Campus d'Orsay, 91405, Orsay, France
| | - S Heinrich
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Translational Research Department, Experimental Radiotherapy Platform, Orsay, France
- Paris Sud University, Paris -Saclay University, 91405, Orsay, France
| | - D Labiod
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Translational Research Department, Experimental Radiotherapy Platform, Orsay, France
- Paris Sud University, Paris -Saclay University, 91405, Orsay, France
| | - M Juchaux
- Laboratoire d'Imagerie et Modélisation en Neurobiologie et Cancérologie (IMNC), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Universités Paris 11 and Paris 7, Campus d'Orsay, 91405, Orsay, France
| | - L Jourdain
- Imagerie par Résonance Magnétique Médicale et Multi-modalités (IR4M-UMR8081), Université Paris Sud, 91405, Orsay, France
| | - C Sebrie
- Imagerie par Résonance Magnétique Médicale et Multi-modalités (IR4M-UMR8081), Université Paris Sud, 91405, Orsay, France
| | - F Pouzoulet
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Translational Research Department, Experimental Radiotherapy Platform, Orsay, France
- Paris Sud University, Paris -Saclay University, 91405, Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Bazyar S, Inscoe CR, O’Brian ET, Zhou O, Lee YZ. Minibeam radiotherapy with small animal irradiators; in vitro and in vivo feasibility studies. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2017; 62:8924-8942. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa926b] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
|
43
|
Prezado Y, Jouvion G, Hardy D, Patriarca A, Nauraye C, Bergs J, González W, Guardiola C, Juchaux M, Labiod D, Dendale R, Jourdain L, Sebrie C, Pouzoulet F. Proton minibeam radiation therapy spares normal rat brain: Long-Term Clinical, Radiological and Histopathological Analysis. Sci Rep 2017; 7:14403. [PMID: 29089533 PMCID: PMC5663851 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-14786-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2017] [Accepted: 10/16/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) is a novel strategy for minimizing normal tissue damage resulting from radiotherapy treatments. This strategy partners the inherent advantages of protons for radiotherapy with the gain in normal tissue preservation observed upon irradiation with narrow, spatially fractionated beams. In this study, whole brains (excluding the olfactory bulb) of Fischer 344 rats (n = 16) were irradiated at the Orsay Proton Therapy Center. Half of the animals received standard proton irradiation, while the other half were irradiated with pMBRT at the same average dose (25 Gy in one fraction). The animals were followed-up for 6 months. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study using a 7-T small-animal MRI scanner was performed along with a histological analysis. Rats treated with conventional proton irradiation exhibited severe moist desquamation, permanent epilation and substantial brain damage. In contrast, rats in the pMBRT group exhibited no skin damage, reversible epilation and significantly reduced brain damage; some brain damage was observed in only one out of the eight irradiated rats. These results demonstrate that pMBRT leads to an increase in normal tissue resistance. This net gain in normal tissue sparing can lead to the efficient treatment of very radio-resistant tumours, which are currently mostly treated palliatively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yolanda Prezado
- Laboratoire d'Imagerie et Modélisation en Neurobiologie et Cancérologie (IMNC), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS); Universités Paris 11 and Paris 7, Campus d'Orsay, 91405, Orsay, France.
| | - Gregory Jouvion
- Institut Pasteur, Histopathologie Humaine et Modèles Animaux, Institut Pasteur, 28 Rue du Docteur Roux, 75015, Paris, France
| | - David Hardy
- Institut Pasteur, Histopathologie Humaine et Modèles Animaux, Institut Pasteur, 28 Rue du Docteur Roux, 75015, Paris, France
| | - Annalisa Patriarca
- Institut Curie - Centre de Protonthérapie d'Orsay, Campus Universitaire, Bât. 101, Orsay, 91898, France
| | - Catherine Nauraye
- Institut Curie - Centre de Protonthérapie d'Orsay, Campus Universitaire, Bât. 101, Orsay, 91898, France
| | - Judith Bergs
- Laboratoire d'Imagerie et Modélisation en Neurobiologie et Cancérologie (IMNC), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS); Universités Paris 11 and Paris 7, Campus d'Orsay, 91405, Orsay, France
| | - Wilfredo González
- Laboratoire d'Imagerie et Modélisation en Neurobiologie et Cancérologie (IMNC), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS); Universités Paris 11 and Paris 7, Campus d'Orsay, 91405, Orsay, France
| | - Consuelo Guardiola
- Laboratoire d'Imagerie et Modélisation en Neurobiologie et Cancérologie (IMNC), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS); Universités Paris 11 and Paris 7, Campus d'Orsay, 91405, Orsay, France
| | - Marjorie Juchaux
- Laboratoire d'Imagerie et Modélisation en Neurobiologie et Cancérologie (IMNC), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS); Universités Paris 11 and Paris 7, Campus d'Orsay, 91405, Orsay, France
| | - Dalila Labiod
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Translational Research Department, Experimental Radiotherapy Platform, Orsay, France
- Paris Sud University, Paris -Saclay University, 91405, Orsay, France
| | - Remi Dendale
- Institut Curie - Centre de Protonthérapie d'Orsay, Campus Universitaire, Bât. 101, Orsay, 91898, France
| | - Laurène Jourdain
- Imagerie par Résonance Magnétique Médicale et Multi-modalités (IR4M-UMR8081), Université Paris Sud, 91405, Orsay, France
| | - Catherine Sebrie
- Imagerie par Résonance Magnétique Médicale et Multi-modalités (IR4M-UMR8081), Université Paris Sud, 91405, Orsay, France
| | - Frederic Pouzoulet
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Translational Research Department, Experimental Radiotherapy Platform, Orsay, France
- Paris Sud University, Paris -Saclay University, 91405, Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
González W, Guardiola C, Peucelle C, Martínez-Rovira I, Prezado Y. Abstract ID: 80 Charged particles grid and minibeam radiation therapy: Monte Carlo dosimetry evaluations. Phys Med 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.09.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
|
45
|
Martínez-Rovira I, González W, Brons S, Prezado Y. Carbon and oxygen minibeam radiation therapy: An experimental dosimetric evaluation. Med Phys 2017; 44:4223-4229. [PMID: 28556241 DOI: 10.1002/mp.12383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2016] [Revised: 05/03/2017] [Accepted: 05/21/2017] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To perform dosimetric characterization of a minibeam collimator in both carbon and oxygen ion beams to guide optimal setup geometry and irradiation for future radiobiological studies. METHODS Carbon and oxygen minibeams were generated using a prototype tungsten multislit collimator presenting line apertures 700 μm wide, which are spaced 3500 μm centre-to-centre distance apart. Several radiation beam spots generated the desired field size of 15 × 15 mm2 and production of a 50 mm long spread out Bragg peak (SOBP) centered at 80 mm depth in water. Dose evaluations were performed with two different detectors: a PTW microDiamond® single crystal diamond detector and radiochromic films (EBT3). Peak-to-valley dose ratio (PVDR) values, output factors (OF), penumbras, and full width at half maximum (FWHM) were measured. RESULTS Measured lateral dose profiles exhibited spatial fractionation of dose at depth in a water phantom in the expected form of peaks and valleys for both carbon and oxygen radiation fields. The diamond detector and radiochromic film provided measurements of PVDR in good agreement. PVDR values at shallow depth were about 60 and decreased to about 10 at 80 mm depth in water. OF in the center of the SOBP was about 0.4; this value is larger than the corresponding one in proton minibeam radiation therapy measured using a comparable collimator due to a reduced lateral scattering for carbon and oxygen minibeams. CONCLUSIONS Carbon and oxygen minibeams may be produced by a mechanical collimator. PVDR values and output factors measured in this first study of these minibeam radiation types indicate there is potential for their therapeutic use. Optimization of minibeam collimator design and the number and size of focal spots for irradiation are advocated to improve PDVR values and dose distributions for each specific applied use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Immaculada Martínez-Rovira
- Laboratoire d'Imagerie et Modélisation en Neurobiologie et Cancérologie (IMNC), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Campus universitaire, Bât. 440, 1er étage - 15 rue Georges Clemenceau, 91406, Orsay Cedex, France.,Ionizing Radiation Research Group (GRRI), Physics Department, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Campus UAB, Avinguda de l'Eix Central, Edicifi C, Cerdanyola del Vallès, 08193, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Wilfredo González
- Laboratoire d'Imagerie et Modélisation en Neurobiologie et Cancérologie (IMNC), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Campus universitaire, Bât. 440, 1er étage - 15 rue Georges Clemenceau, 91406, Orsay Cedex, France
| | - Stephan Brons
- Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Clinic, Im Neuenheimer Feld 672, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Laboratoire d'Imagerie et Modélisation en Neurobiologie et Cancérologie (IMNC), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Campus universitaire, Bât. 440, 1er étage - 15 rue Georges Clemenceau, 91406, Orsay Cedex, France
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Guardiola C, Peucelle C, Prezado Y. Optimization of the mechanical collimation for minibeam generation in proton minibeam radiation therapy. Med Phys 2017; 44:1470-1478. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.12131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2016] [Revised: 01/17/2017] [Accepted: 01/17/2017] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Consuelo Guardiola
- IMNC-UMR 8165; CNRS; Paris 7 and Paris 11 Universities; 15 rue Georges Clemenceau Orsay Cedex 91405 France
| | - Cécile Peucelle
- IMNC-UMR 8165; CNRS; Paris 7 and Paris 11 Universities; 15 rue Georges Clemenceau Orsay Cedex 91405 France
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- IMNC-UMR 8165; CNRS; Paris 7 and Paris 11 Universities; 15 rue Georges Clemenceau Orsay Cedex 91405 France
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
González W, Peucelle C, Prezado Y. Theoretical dosimetric evaluation of carbon and oxygen minibeam radiation therapy. Med Phys 2017; 44:1921-1929. [PMID: 28236644 DOI: 10.1002/mp.12175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2016] [Revised: 02/17/2017] [Accepted: 02/17/2017] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Charged particles have several advantages over x-ray radiations, both in terms of physics and radiobiology. The combination of these advantages with those of minibeam radiation therapy (MBRT) could help enhancing the therapeutic index for some cancers with poor prognosis. Among the different ions explored for therapy, carbon ions are considered to provide the optimum physical and biological characteristics. Oxygen could be advantageous due to a reduced oxygen enhancement ratio along with a still moderate biological entrance dose. The aforementioned reasons justified an in-depth evaluation of the dosimetric features of carbon and oxygen minibeam radiation therapy to establish the interest of further explorations of this avenue. MATERIALS AND METHODS The GATE/Geant4 6.2 Monte Carlo simulation platform was employed to simulate arrays of rectangular carbon and oxygen minibeams (600 μm × 2 cm) at a water phantom entrance. They were assumed to be generated by means of a magnetic focusing. The irradiations were performed with a 2-cm-long spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) centered at 7-cm-depth. Several center-to-center (c-t-c) distances were considered. Peak and valley doses, as well as peak-to-valley dose ratio (PVDR) and the relative contribution of nuclear fragments and electromagnetic processes were assessed. In addition, the type and proportion of the secondary nuclear fragments were evaluated in both peak and valley regions. RESULTS Carbon and oxygen MBRT lead to very similar dose distributions. No significant advantage of oxygen over carbon ions was observed from physical point of view. Favorable dosimetric features were observed for both ions. Thanks to the reduced lateral scattering, the standard shape of the depth dose curves (in the peaks) is maintained even for submillimetric beam sizes. When a narrow c-t-c is considered (910-980 μm), a (quasi) homogenization of the dose can be obtained at the target, while a spatial fractionation of the dose is maintained in the proximal normal tissues with low PVDR. In contrast when a larger c-t-c is used (3500 μm) extremely high PVDR (≥ 50) are obtained in normal tissues, corresponding to very low valley doses. This suggests that carbon and oxygen MBRT might lead to a significant reduction of normal tissue complication probability. The main participant to the valley doses are secondary nuclear products at all depths. Among them the highest yield in normal tissues corresponds to the lightest fragments, neutrons and protons. Heavier fragments are dominant in the valleys only at the target position, which might favor tumor control. CONCLUSIONS The computed dose distributions suggest that a spatial fractionation of the dose combined to the use of submillimetric field sizes might allow profiting from the high efficiency of carbon and oxygen ions for the treatment of radioresistant tumors, while preserving normal tissues. Only biological experiments could confirm the shifting of the normal tissue complication probability curves. The authors' results support the further exploration of this avenue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wilfredo González
- IMNC-UMR 8165, CNRS; Paris 11 Universities, 15 rue Georges Clemenceau, 91406, Orsay Cedex, France
| | - Cécile Peucelle
- IMNC-UMR 8165, CNRS; Paris 11 Universities, 15 rue Georges Clemenceau, 91406, Orsay Cedex, France
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- IMNC-UMR 8165, CNRS; Paris 11 Universities, 15 rue Georges Clemenceau, 91406, Orsay Cedex, France
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Davis W, Crewson C, Alexander A, Kundapur V, Cranmer-Sargison G. Dosimetric characterization of an accessory mounted mini-beam collimator across clinically beam matched medical linear accelerators. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2017. [DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/aa586d] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|
49
|
Fu ZZ, Li K, Peng Y, Zheng Y, Cao LY, Zhang YJ, Sun YM. Efficacy and toxicity of different concurrent chemoradiotherapy regimens in the treatment of advanced cervical cancer: A network meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017; 96:e5853. [PMID: 28079819 PMCID: PMC5266181 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000005853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and toxicity of different concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) regimens in the treatment of advanced cervical cancer (CC) by adopting a network meta-analysis. METHODS We searched PubMed and Cochrane Library from the inception of these databases to September 2016, and all cohort studies (CSs) related to different CCRT regimens in the treatment of CC were included. A network analysis was adopted to compare the combination of direct and indirect evidence, to analyze the odds ratio (OR), and to draw a surface under the cumulative ranking curve of the efficacy and toxicity of different CCRT regimens for CC. Cluster analyses were used to group each category based on similar treatment regimens. RESULTS Nineteen CSs were enrolled in this network meta-analysis, including 12 CCRT regimens (radiotherapy [RT], CCRT [cisplatin], CCRT [vinorelbine], CCRT [paclitaxel], CCRT [hydroxyurea], CCRT [cisplatin + FU], CCRT [cisplatin + gemcitabine], CCRT [cisplatin + docetaxel], CCRT [cisplatin + paclitaxel], CCRT [cisplatin + amifostine], CCRT [cisplatin + FU + hydroxyurea], and CCRT [cisplatin + vincristine + bleomycin]). The results of the network meta-analysis showed that regarding efficacy, the overall response rate of CCRT (cisplatin + docetaxel) was higher than RT, and the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of CCRT (cisplatin + FU + hydroxyurea) was relatively higher than CCRT (hydroxyurea). As for toxicity, CCRT (cisplatin) had a lower incidence of leukopenia than CCRT (hydroxyurea), CCRT (cisplatin + FU) and CCRT (cisplatin + paclitaxel), and the incidences of diarrhea and vomiting in CCRT (cisplatin) were lower than those in CCRT (cisplatin + gemcitabine). Additionally, the cluster analysis showed that CCRT (cisplatin) had relatively lower incidences of both hematotoxicity and gastrointestinal toxicity, and CCRT (paclitaxel) had lower gastrointestinal toxicity than other regimens. CONCLUSION Our study demonstrated that CCRT (cisplatin + docetaxel) might be the best choice of CCRT regimens in the treatment of CC, and the 5-year OS rate of CCRT (cisplatin + FU + hydroxyurea) might be the highest among these different regimens. CCRT (cisplatin) might have the lowest toxicity among all the CCRT regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhan-Zhao Fu
- Department of Radiotherapy, the First Hospital of Qinhuangdao
| | | | - Yong Peng
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Yanshan University
| | | | - Li-Yan Cao
- Department of Radiotherapy, the First Hospital of Qinhuangdao
| | - Yun-Jie Zhang
- Department of Radiotherapy, the First Hospital of Qinhuangdao
| | - Yong-Mei Sun
- Department of Gynaecology, the First Hospital of Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao, P.R. China.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Brönnimann D, Bouchet A, Schneider C, Potez M, Serduc R, Bräuer-Krisch E, Graber W, von Gunten S, Laissue JA, Djonov V. Synchrotron microbeam irradiation induces neutrophil infiltration, thrombocyte attachment and selective vascular damage in vivo. Sci Rep 2016; 6:33601. [PMID: 27640676 PMCID: PMC5027521 DOI: 10.1038/srep33601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2016] [Accepted: 08/25/2016] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Our goal was the visualizing the vascular damage and acute inflammatory response to micro- and minibeam irradiation in vivo. Microbeam (MRT) and minibeam radiation therapies (MBRT) are tumor treatment approaches of potential clinical relevance, both consisting of parallel X-ray beams and allowing the delivery of thousands of Grays within tumors. We compared the effects of microbeams (25–100 μm wide) and minibeams (200–800 μm wide) on vasculature, inflammation and surrounding tissue changes during zebrafish caudal fin regeneration in vivo. Microbeam irradiation triggered an acute inflammatory response restricted to the regenerating tissue. Six hours post irradiation (6 hpi), it was infiltrated by neutrophils and fli1a+ thrombocytes adhered to the cell wall locally in the beam path. The mature tissue was not affected by microbeam irradiation. In contrast, minibeam irradiation efficiently damaged the immature tissue at 6 hpi and damaged both the mature and immature tissue at 48 hpi. We demonstrate that vascular damage, inflammatory processes and cellular toxicity depend on the beam width and the stage of tissue maturation. Minibeam irradiation did not differentiate between mature and immature tissue. In contrast, all irradiation-induced effects of the microbeams were restricted to the rapidly growing immature tissue, indicating that microbeam irradiation could be a promising tumor treatment tool.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Brönnimann
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 2, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Audrey Bouchet
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 2, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Christoph Schneider
- Institute of Pharmacology, University of Bern, Inselspital INO-F, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Marine Potez
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 2, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Raphaël Serduc
- Université Grenoble Alpes, EA-Rayonnement Synchrotron et Recherche Medicale, ESRF, ID17 F-38043 Grenoble, France
| | - Elke Bräuer-Krisch
- Biomedical Beamline, European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, BP220, F38043 Grenoble, France
| | - Werner Graber
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 2, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Stephan von Gunten
- Institute of Pharmacology, University of Bern, Inselspital INO-F, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Jean Albert Laissue
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 2, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Valentin Djonov
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 2, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|