Clinical Features and Outcomes of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Associated AKI: A Multicenter Study

Clinical outcomes after immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated acute kidney injury: a cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPi) have significantly improved survival for patients with advanced cancers. However, the occurrence of ICPi-associated acute kidney injury (AKI) and its clinical impact remains unclear. This study evaluates the effects of ICPi-associated AKI (ICPi-AKI) on mortality, kidney and cardiovascular outcomes in patients undergoing ICPi treatments.

DESIGN

This multicentre retrospective cohort study with propensity score matching to balance baseline characteristics. The International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision codes were used to identify individuals with cancer and treated with ICPi concurrently. Kaplan-Meier analyses coupled with log-rank tests were conducted to estimate the survival probabilities.

SETTING

Data were sourced from the TriNetX database spanning records from 25 March 2011 to 5 April 2024.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with cancer aged ≥18 years treated with ICPi with or without AKI occurrence.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and secondary outcomes included major adverse kidney events (MAKE), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), the composite of MAKE or MACE with death, and end-stage renal disease.

RESULTS

The study identified 926 patients with cancer who developed ICPi-AKI (mean age, 67.1±11.8 years; 57.4% men). The control group consisted of 48 147 patients treated with ICPi but did not develop AKI (mean age, 65.3±13.1 years; 53.7% men). After matching, the ICPi-AKI group exhibited a higher risk of all-cause mortality (HR=1.27; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.61), MAKE (HR=3.83; 95% CI 1.72 to 8.40), MACE (HR=1.35; 95% CI 1.03 to 1.75)) compared with the non-ICPi-AKI group. Subgroup analyses confirmed these findings across various patient's characteristics.

CONCLUSION

Individuals with ICPi-AKI are associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality, MAKE and MACE. Enhancing awareness and timely intervention for ICPi-AKI are crucial for improving prognosis and reducing complications among patients with cancer.

Pathological findings of immunotherapy-induced nephrotoxicity in a humanized immune system mouse model

While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment, they can elicit organ-related immune-related adverse events (irAEs) such as kidney injury. Here, our study evaluated the ability of a humanized immune system (HIS) tumor-bearing mouse model to investigate ICI-mediated kidney injury. Non-humanized (BRGS) and humanized (HIS-BRGS) mice were implanted with human breast cancer cells and treated with either nivolumab (anti-PD-1) or a combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4) for four weeks. Histopathological analysis revealed that HIS-BRGS mice treated with ICIs exhibited significant interstitial nephritis and vasculitis/periarteritis, consistent with kidney phenotypes observed in patients. Combination therapy resulted in more extensive kidney pathology than nivolumab alone and exhibited an accumulation of T helper cells in the affected areas. Importantly, our results suggest that HIS-BRGS mice can effectively recapitulate features of ICI-induced kidney injury observed in patients and can be used to study mechanisms and prevention strategies to limit irAEs.

[Acute kidney injury in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy-shared guidelines of FITC/SFNDT]

Cancer treatments have been dramatically modified by the introduction and the development of immunological checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). These treatments have many side effects, including acute kidney injury (AKI). Their combination with other treatments makes the diagnosis complex. To provide guidance to physicians treating these patients, the FITC and the SFNDT have developed a set of management guidelines covering pre-treatment assessment, diagnosis of the different types of damage observed, and management of acute interstitial nephritis secondary to ICI. Collaboration between oncologists and nephrologists is mandatory. The development of onconephrology is helping to improve knowledge and identify treatment pathways. The key elements of the diagnostic process are presented. The role of renal biopsy is discussed, as it appears to be underused in relation to the expected benefits. Renal biopsy allows ICI to be continued if AKI is not related to AKI. Treatment based on glucocorticoid therapy is recommended, with regimens depending on the severity of the disease and the renal response to glucocorticoid therapy. Alternative treatments for patients resistant to corticosteroids are discussed, but strong data are lacking. Rechallenge should be discussed since it seems to be associated with a good renal prognosis.

Urine proteomics defines an immune checkpoint-associated nephritis signature

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy is a cornerstone treatment for many cancers, but it can induce severe immunotoxicity, including acute interstitial nephritis (AIN). Currently, kidney biopsy is required to differentiate ICI-AIN from other causes of acute kidney injury (AKI). However, this invasive approach can lead to morbidity, delayed glucocorticoid treatment for patients with AIN, and unnecessarily prolonged suspension of ICI therapy in non-AIN patients. Delayed or incorrect diagnosis of ICI-AIN is particularly detrimental, as over 50% of patients are at risk of permanent renal damage. Thus, there is an urgent need for non-invasive biomarkers that can rapidly and accurately distinguish ICI-AIN from other causes of AKI.The urine and plasma proteome contain actively secreted proteins that provide real-time insights into dynamic physiological processes. However, identification of effective biomarkers of disease using established technologies such as proximity ligation assays (PLA) and bead-based immunoassays is challenging due to their limited sensitivity and loss of precision in multiplex analysis.To address this, we employed cutting-edge NUcleic acid Linked Immuno-Sandwich Assay (NULISA) technology to measure protein expression in urine and plasma samples from AKI patients undergoing ICI therapy. NULISA offers 10,000-fold greater precision than PLA, enabling quantification of over 200 inflammatory proteins with unprecedented precision. Our analysis revealed that urine was more sensitive and specific than plasma in distinguishing ICI-AIN from non-AIN cases. Pathway analyses highlighted the involvement of JAK-STAT and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) signaling in ICI-AIN pathogenesis. We identified several novel urine biomarkers, including IL-5, Fas, TNFSF4, CD274, IL-20, TNFSF15, TSLP, TREM1 and CCL1 while confirming previously reported markers such as CXCL9 and TNF-α. Using statistical and machine learning methods, we constructed a novel urine biomarker signature-IL-5+Fas-that achieved an area under the curve of 0.94 for diagnosing ICI-AIN.By leveraging high-sensitivity proteomics, we developed a non-invasive strategy for diagnosing ICI-AIN. This approach will enable earlier intervention to mitigate immunotoxicity, preservation of antitumor efficacy of ICI therapy in non-AIN patients, and safe rechallenge of ICI therapy in patients previously treated for ICI-AIN.

Diagnosis and management of immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated nephrotoxicity: a position statement from the American Society of Onco-nephrology

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of cancer and are now the backbone of therapy for several malignancies. However, ICIs can cause a spectrum of kidney immune-related adverse events including acute kidney injury (AKI), most commonly manifesting as acute interstitial nephritis (AIN), although glomerular disease and electrolyte disturbances have also been reported. In this position statement by the American Society of Onco-nephrology (ASON), we summarize the incidence and risk factors for ICI-AKI, pathophysiological mechanisms, and clinicopathologic features of ICI-AKI. We also discuss novel diagnostic approaches and promising biomarkers for ICI-AKI. From expert panel consensus, we provide clinical practice points for the initial assessment and diagnosis of ICI-AKI, management and immunosuppressive therapy, and consideration for rechallenge with ICI following AKI episodes. In addition, we explore ICI use in special populations, such as kidney transplant recipients, and propose key areas of focus for future research and clinical investigation.

Impact of steroid-sparing immunosuppressive agents on tumor outcome in the context of cancer immunotherapy with highlight on melanoma: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

Background

The impact of steroid-sparing immunosuppressive agents (SSIAs) for immune-related adverse events (irAEs) on tumor outcome is not well-known. This systematic review evaluates tumor outcomes for corticosteroid (CS) monotherapy versus CS with SSIA (CS-SSIA) for irAE treatment with a focus on melanoma.

Methods

Search was conducted through 1/5/23 using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Web of Science. We included case series, retrospective/prospective observational studies and interventional clinical trials. Individual-level data was analyzed using KM curves and Cox regression for overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). Time to SSIA was treated as a time-varying exposure using landmark analysis (landmark timepoint=3 months after irAE) to account for immortal time bias. For group-level data, meta-analysis compared the use of SSIA to No SSIA for irAEs.

Results

Of twenty-two publications with individual-level data, 147 patients with any cancer (57 CS, 90 CS-SSIA) and 65 with melanoma (18 CS, 47 CS-SSIA) underwent landmark analysis. Twenty-two publications underwent group-level evaluation and four were included in the meta-analysis. CS-SSIA versus CS showed higher risk of all-cause mortality and progression (HR 2.75, 95%CI: 1.44-5.27, p<0.01 and HR 1.75, 95%CI: 1.07-2.85, p=0.03, respectively). Melanoma showed worse OS and PFS for CS-SSIA versus CS (HR 5.68, 95%CI: 1.31-24.67, p=0.02 and HR 2.68, 95%CI: 1.12-6.40, p=0.03, respectively). In the meta-analysis of group-level data (n=2558), we found worse OS and PFS for CS-SSIA versus No SSIA (HR 1.58, 95%CI: 1.25; 2.01, p<0.01 and 1.70, 95%CI: 1.25-2.33, p<0.01). Tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors (TNFi) were the most common SSIA. In the melanoma cohort, TNFi had worse OS and PFS versus CS (HR 6.46, 95%CI: 1.43-29.19, p = 0.02 and HR 7.49, 95%CI: 2.29-24.48, p<0.01, respectively). TNFi versus Other SSIAs showed a trend toward worse OS and worse PFS (HR 6.96, 95%CI: 0.90-53.65, p=0.06 and HR 21.5, 95%CI: 2.63-175.8, p<0.01, respectively). Meta-analysis showed a concern for TNFi compared to Other SSIA (HR 1.56, 95%CI: 1.17-2.09, p<0.01 respectively).

Conclusions

While our results raise concern about the effects of CS-SSIA and TNFi for irAE therapy on tumor outcomes, prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to definitively assess the effect of SSIAs on tumor outcomes.

SUrvey of renal Biopsy registry database and Anticancer dRUg therapy in Japan (SUBARU-J study)

Background

Kidney complications associated with anticancer drug therapy have greatly increased recently. We aimed to investigate the real-world clinical outcomes of anticancer drug therapy-associated renal complications in Japan using the national kidney biopsy database, Japan Renal Biopsy Registry (J-RBR).

Methods

From 2018 to 2021, 449 cases from 49 facilities identified as 'drug-induced' histopathology in the J-RBR were screened, of which a total of 135 were confirmed as anticancer drug-related cases and included in the analysis. Overall survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by logrank test. The Cox regression model was used to evaluate the association between variables and deaths.

Results

The most common primary sites of malignancies were the lung (33.3%), followed by gastrointestinal (16.3%) and gynaecological (11.1%) cancers. Tubulointerstitial nephritis (TIN; 47.4%) and thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA; 35.6%) were the most frequent diagnoses. All immunoglobulin A nephropathy, minimal change disease and crescentic glomerulonephritis (CrGN) cases were immune checkpoint inhibitor related. All CrGN cases were anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody negative. Antibiotics were most frequently used concomitantly with anticancer drugs in TMA cases among subgroups (TMA versus others: 62.5 versus 27.5%; P < .001). Among TMA cases, the serum lactate dehydrogenase level tended to be higher in cytotoxic agent-associated TMA (CTx-TMA) than in other TMAs, but was not significant between groups (415.5 versus 219.0 U/l; P = .06). Overall survival was worse in CTx-TMA than in other TMAs (P = .007). The Cox model demonstrated proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use (hazard ratio 2.49, P = .001) as a significant prognostic factor, as well as the presence of metastasis and serum albumin level.

Conclusions

Our registry analysis highlighted various presentations of biopsy-proven kidney complications associated with anticancer drug therapy. Clinicians should be aware of worse outcomes associated with CTx-TMA and the prognostic role of PPI use.

PCCA variant rs16957301 is a novel AKI risk genotype-specific for patients who receive ICI treatment: Real-world evidence from all of us cohort

INTRODUCTION

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) enhance the immune system's ability to target and destroy cancer cells, but can also trigger immune-related adverse events (irAEs), such as acute kidney injury (ICI-AKI), complicating patient management. Limited knowledge of genetic predispositions to ICI-AKI highlights the need for genomic studies to improve therapeutic strategies.

OBJECTIVE

To identify genetic predispositions for ICI-AKI using large-scale real-world data.

METHODS

A systematic literature search led to 14 candidate variants related to irAEs. We performed a candidate variant association study with these variants using the All of Us cohort. An ICI-treated cohort and a general cohort were established to evaluate ICI-AKI risk. Logistic regression, adjusted for sex, evaluated the impact of each candidate genotype, separately for self-reported and ancestry-estimated race. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis assessed genetic effects on AKI-free survival.

RESULTS

The ICI cohort (n = 414) showed a one-year AKI incidence rate of 23.2 %, significantly higher than the general cohort (6.5 %, n = 213,282). The rs16957301 variant (chr13:100324308, T > C) in the PCCA gene was a significant risk genotype for ICI-AKI among self-reported White (Beta=0.93, CI: 0.32 - 1.54, ORs= 2.53, Bonferroni-corrected P-value=0.047) and ancestry estimated Europeans (Beta = 0.94, CI: 0.31 - 1.57, ORs= 2.56, Bonferroni-corrected P-value=0.044). Self-reported White with the rs16957301 risk genotypes (TC/CC) developed AKI significantly earlier (3.6 months) compared to the reference genotype (TT, 7.0 months, log-rank P = 0.04). Consistent results were found in ancestry-estimated Europeans. This variant did not present significant AKI risks in the general cohort (Beta: -0.008-0.035, FDR: 0.75-0.99).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that rs16957301 in PCCA may serve as an ICI-AKI risk marker in Caucasians. Further studies are needed to validate this association and explore risks in other populations.

Immune checkpoint inhibition of metastatic melanoma: achieving high efficacy in the face of high toxicity

INTRODUCTION

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have advanced the treatment of metastatic melanoma by blocking immune system down-regulators enhancing T-cell-mediated anti-tumor responses. However, many ICIs induce immune-related adverse effects (irAEs) that can impact many organ systems.

AREAS COVERED

Strategies used to manage irAEs include corticosteroids, anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) agents, other biological therapies, fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), and emerging regimens. In this review, we describe current evidence for the efficacy of ICIs, acute and chronic immune toxicities, and strategies to manage toxicities for patients treated with ICIs.

EXPERT OPINION

IrAE management will likely evolve by developing more tailored approaches to prevent toxicities, improving non-steroidal management strategies and tailoring the dose of steroids, and identifying biomarkers of severe toxicities.

Acute kidney injury in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a single-center retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated acute kidney injury (ICI-AKI) is the most common renal complication and has attracted increasing amounts of attention. However, studies on this topic in Chinese cancer patients are very limited. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective study on the incidence, risk factors, clinical features and renal recovery of ICI-AKI in all patients with malignancies treated with ICIs in Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University.

METHODS

In this single-center retrospective cohort study, the data of 904 patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) treatment were retrospectively analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify the predictors of ICI-AKI.

RESULTS

A total of 46 of 904 patients receiving ICIs developed ICI-AKI, and the incidence of ICI-AKI was 5.1%. Patients developed ICI-AKI at a median of 9 weeks (IQR 3-23) after ICIs initiation. A lower baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and use of antibiotics were associated with a higher risk of ICI-AKI. Renal recovery occurred in 17 patients (46%) at a median of 4 weeks (IQR 2-8) after ICI-AKI, including 16 (43%) with complete recovery and 1 (3%) with partial recovery. Of the 14 rechallenged patients, only one developed recurrent ICI-AKI.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with ICI-AKI were more likely to have impaired renal function at baseline and after treatment with antibiotics. Approximately half of the patients achieved renal recovery.

Clinicopathological Characteristics and Kidney Outcomes in Biopsy-Confirmed Acute Interstitial Nephritis

Introduction

Acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) is a significant cause of acute kidney injury, with varying etiologies and outcomes. This study aimed to examine the causes, clinical characteristics, management, and kidney outcomes in patients with biopsy-confirmed AIN.

Methods

A retrospective review was conducted on 166 patients diagnosed with AIN through kidney biopsy at Mayo Clinic between 2012 and 2023. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and pathological data were collected. The primary outcome was kidney function recovery within the first 6 months. Statistical analyses included univariable and multivariable logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and Cox proportional hazards modeling.

Results

Medications were the primary cause of AIN (67%), followed by autoimmune diseases (20%) and infections (6%). Within 6 months, 76% of patients achieved kidney recovery. Multivariable analysis indicated that moderate to severe interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA) and dialysis requirement were associated with nonrecovery, whereas a prebiopsy diagnosis of AIN was positively associated with kidney recovery. Drug-related AIN had higher recovery rates compared to all other causes (81% vs. 66%, P = 0.04), and moderate to severe IFTA and dialysis need remained significant predictors of decreased recovery. Steroid therapy, used in 81% of patients, did not significantly influence kidney recovery in the overall cohort or in drug-induced AIN.

Conclusion

This study provides insights into the characteristics and outcomes of biopsy-confirmed AIN. IFTA and dialysis requirement were significant factors associated with worse kidney outcomes. These findings may help inform clinical management and prognostication in patients with AIN.

Cancer therapy in patients with reduced kidney function

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and cancer constitute two major public health burdens, and both are on the rise. Moreover, the number of patients affected simultaneously by both conditions is growing. The potential nephrotoxic effect of cancer therapies is particularly important for patients with CKD, as they are also affected by several comorbidities. Therefore, administering the right therapy at the right dose for patients with decreased kidney function can represent a daunting challenge. We review in detail the renal toxicities of anticancer therapies, i.e. conventional chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors and radioligand therapies, issue recommendations for patient monitoring along with guidance on when to withdraw treatment and suggest dosage guidelines for select agents in advanced stage CKD. Various electrolytes disturbances can occur as the result of the administration of anticancer agents in the patient with decreased kidney function. These patients are prone to developing hyponatremia, hyperkalemia and other metabolic abnormalities because of a decreased glomerular filtration rate. Therefore, all electrolytes, minerals and acid base status should be checked at baseline and before each administration of chemotherapeutic agents. Moreover, studies on patients on kidney replacement therapy are very limited and only single cases or small case series have been published. Therefore, clinical therapeutical decisions in cancer patients with decreased function should be made by multidisciplinary teams constituted of medical oncologists, nephrologists and other specialists. Onconephrology is an evolving and expanding subspecialty. It is crucial to consider anticancer drug treatment in these patients and offer them a chance to be treated effectively.

Novel Biomarkers and Imaging Tests for AKI Diagnosis in Patients with Cancer

The lack of non-invasive urine and blood-based biomarkers for the diagnosis of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients with cancer is an area of significant unmet clinical need. Traditional non-invasive diagnostic tools that are currently utilized in the clinic, such as creatinine and cystatin C-based eGFR measurements, urinalysis, urine sediment exam, urine protein quantification, and urine electrolyte measurement, lack the sensitivity and specificity to distinguish between the various underlying etiologies of AKI in patients with cancer. Imaging-based diagnostics can be helpful to rule out urinary obstruction, but also lack sensitivity and specificity to diagnose the etiology of AKI. Kidney biopsy is often required for definitive diagnosis. As our scientific understanding of the biological pathways that are dysregulated in AKI has advanced, there has been considerable interest in developing new biomarkers for AKI. For example, the diagnosis of acute interstitial nephritis (AIN), which can occur in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), promises to be revolutionized by the incorporation of urinary testing for inflammatory biomarkers such as C-X-C motif ligand 9 (CXCL9), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), and interleukin 9 (IL-9). In the case of cisplatin administration, biomarkers such as neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) and kidney injury molecule 1 (KIM-1) may improve prognostication, differentiating between persistent AKI resulting from acute tubular injury versus pre-renal azotemia. The development and validation of blood, urine and imaging biomarkers into widely utilized diagnostic tests will require a concerted effort, but could improve diagnosis, management and prognostication for a growing group of patients who are at high risk of developing AKI during the course of their illness.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors rechallenge in non-small cell lung cancer: Current evidence and future directions

Immunotherapy, remarkably immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has significantly altered the treatment landscape for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Despite their success, the discontinuation of ICIs therapy may occur due to factors such as prior treatment completion, disease progression during ICIs treatment, or immune-related adverse events (irAEs). As numerous studies highlight the dynamic nature of immune responses and the sustained benefits of ICIs, ICIs rechallenge has become an attractive and feasible option. However, the decision-making process for ICIs rechallenge in clinical settings is complicated by numerous uncertainties. This review systematically analyses existing clinical research evidence, classifying ICIs rechallenge into distinct clinical scenarios, exploring methods to overcome ICIs resistance in rechallenge instances, and identifying biomarkers to select patients likely to benefit from rechallenge. By integrating recent studies and new technologies, we offer crucial recommendations for future clinical trial design and provide a practical guideline to maximize the therapeutic benefits of immunotherapy for NSCLC patients.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated nephritis-treatment standard

Over the last 13 years, the use of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has grown remarkably, owing to their unprecedented anti-tumor efficacy in certain tumor groups. With increased use of ICIs, we are seeing immune-related adverse events (irAEs) more frequently. Renal irAEs, such as ICI-associated acute kidney injury (ICI-AKI), are reported in 2%-5% of patients treated with ICIs, with acute tubulointerstitial nephritis (ATIN) as the most common histopathologic lesion, though various forms of glomerulonephritis have also been reported. Modifiable risk factors for ICI-AKI include concurrent use of ATIN-associated drugs, like proton pump inhibitors, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and antibiotics, and dual ICI therapy with both Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte Associated Protein 4 (CTLA-4) and Programmed Cell Death Protein 1 and its ligand (PD1/PDL-1) blockade. Kidney biopsies remain the diagnostic modality of choice, though several promising non-invasive biomarkers, which have not yet been broadly clinically validated have emerged. The treatment of ICI-AKI involves holding ICIs, discontinuation of ATIN-associated drugs and initiation of immunosuppression with corticosteroids as first-line therapy. With prompt treatment initiation, most patients achieve full or partial renal recovery, allowing for re-challenge with ICI. However, a subset of patients will require additional steroid-sparing therapies for corticosteroid-dependent or refractory ICI-AKI. Here we review developments in our understanding of the pathophysiology of ICI-AKI, the approach to diagnosis (with a focus on the emergence of novel diagnostic tools), prognostic factors and the current evidence for establishing treatment standards for ICI-AKI. As the evidence base remains largely retrospective, we identify questions that would benefit from future prospective studies in the diagnosis, management and prognostication of ICI-AKI.

PD-1 immunology in the kidneys: a growing relationship

In recent years, knowledge regarding immune regulation has expanded rapidly, and major advancements have been made in immunotherapy for immune-associated disorders, particularly cancer. The programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) pathway is a cornerstone in immune regulation. It comprises PD-1 and its ligands mediating immune tolerance mechanisms and immune homeostasis. Accumulating evidence demonstrates that the PD-1 axis has a crucial immunosuppressive role in the tumor microenvironment and autoimmune diseases. PD-1 receptors and ligands on immune cells and renal parenchymal cells aid in maintaining immunological homeostasis in the kidneys. Here, we present a comprehensive review of PD-1 immunology in various kidney disorders, including renal cell carcinoma, glomerulonephritis, kidney transplantation, renal aging, and renal immune-related adverse events secondary to PD-1 immunotherapy.

Managing Select Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

The increased use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) across cancer programs has created the need for standardized monitoring and management of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Delayed recognition without appropriate treatment can have serious and life-threatening consequences. The management of irAEs presents a unique set of challenges that must be addressed at a multidisciplinary level. Although various national and international guidelines and working groups provide high-level recommendations for the management of irAEs, practical guidance is lacking. Furthermore, timely collaboration between specialists requires institutional protocols that enable the early recognition, assessment, and treatment of irAEs. Such protocols should be developed by institution specialists and include algorithms for all healthcare providers involved in the care of patients treated with ICIs. At William Osler Health System in Brampton, Ontario, practical step-by-step multidisciplinary treatment approaches with recommendations for the management of irAEs were developed in collaboration with experts across Canada. Here, we provide an in-depth description of the approaches, outlining baseline investigations prior to the initiation of ICIs, as well as the monitoring and management of irAEs based on symptoms, severity, and involved organ systems. We encourage other centres to adapt and modify our approaches according to their specific needs and requirements.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy for Kidney Transplant Recipients - A Review of Potential Complications and Management Strategies

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has enabled a paradigm shift in Oncology, with the treatment of metastatic cancer in certain tumor types becoming akin to the treatment of chronic disease. Kidney transplant recipients (KTR) are at increased risk of developing cancer compared to the general population. Historically, KTR were excluded from ICI clinical trials due to concern for allograft rejection and decreased anti-tumor efficacy. While early post-marketing data revealed an allograft rejection risk of 40%-50%, 2 recent small prospective trials have demonstrated lower rates of rejection of 0%-12%, suggesting that maintenance immunosuppression modification prior to ICI start modulates rejection risk. Moreover, objective response rates induced by ICI for the treatment of advanced or metastatic skin cancer, the most common malignancy in KTR, have been comparable to those achieved by immune intact patients. Non-invasive biomarkers may have a role in risk-stratifying patients before starting ICI, and monitoring for rejection, though allograft biopsy is required to confirm diagnosis. This clinically focused review summarizes current knowledge on complications of ICI use in KTR, including their mechanism, risk mitigation strategies, non-invasive biomarker use, approaches to treatment of rejection, and suggestions for future directions in research.

Nivolumab-associated IgA Nephropathy in a Child With Malignant Melanoma

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are humanized antibodies that inhibit downregulatory receptors on T cells, enhancing the antitumor activity of these cells. However, they have been associated with a wide range of systemic immune-related adverse events, including renal toxicities, among others. Most renal immune-related adverse events are acute interstitial nephritis causing acute kidney injury. Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors-associated glomerular diseases, including IgA nephropathy, have been reported in adults. Most of the adult cases with glomerular involvement had also concomitant acute interstitial nephritis and acute kidney injury. We present the first pediatric case of IgA nephropathy without acute kidney injury during nivolumab treatment.

Two acute kidney injury episodes after ICI therapy: a case report

A 74-year-old Japanese male with lung squamous cell carcinoma received his first dose of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs): ipilimumab and nivolumab. He developed acute kidney injury (AKI) and was admitted to our department. We diagnosed kidney immune-related adverse effects (irAE), and a kidney biopsy revealed acute tubulointerstitial nephritis. We started oral prednisolone (PSL) and his AKI immediately improved. The patient maintained stable findings after PSL was tapered off. However, seven months after the ICI administration, he developed rapid progressive glomerular nephritis and was admitted to our department again. The second kidney biopsy showed findings consistent with anti-glomerular basement membrane glomerulonephritis. Although the patient was treated with pulse methylprednisolone followed by oral PSL and plasma exchange, he became dependent on maintenance hemodialysis. To our knowledge, no case report has described two different types of biopsy-proven nephritis. In cases of suspected relapsing kidney irAEs, both a relapse of previous nephritis and the development of another type of nephritis should be considered.

Association between Proton Pump Inhibitors, Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors, and Acute Kidney Injury: A Nested Case-Control Study

Key Points

This is the first study to use a large database of patients with cancer to examine the association between the studied drugs and AKI. The use of either proton pump inhibitors or immune checkpoint inhibitors was associated with an increased risk of AKI. However, their additive interaction was not identified.

Background

An association between proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use and an increased risk of AKI has been confirmed. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of PPI use on the risk of AKI in patients with cancer who were administered immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), a class of drugs used in cancer treatment, and in those who were not.

Methods

We used a database provided by the Health, Clinic, and Education Information Evaluation Institute, which included demographic data, diagnoses, prescriptions, and laboratory results. We conducted a nested case–control study of 38,930 patients with cancer who were new PPI or ICI users and had no history of AKI before cohort entry. The odds ratio (OR) for AKI was estimated using conditional logistic regression models.

Results

During a mean follow-up of 8.3 months, 5870 cases of AKI were identified (incidence rate, 21.9/100 person-years). Compared with never or past PPI use without ICI use, the adjusted ORs of AKI for current PPI use without ICI use, past or never PPI use with prior ICI use, current PPI use with prior ICI use were 2.20 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.01 to 2.40), 1.72 (95% CI, 1.37 to 2.17), or 2.62 (95% CI, 1.75 to 3.93), respectively. The risk of AKI in patients treated with both PPIs and ICIs was not higher than the additional or multiplication of the risks in those who were treated with PPIs or ICIs alone.

Conclusions

This study reinforces the association between PPI and ICI use and the increased risk of AKI. Although the interaction between the two drug classes was not detected, these findings highlight the need for careful monitoring and evaluation of kidney function in patients treated with PPIs and ICIs.

The impact of VEGF signalling pathway inhibitors and/or immune checkpoint inhibitors on kidney function over time: a single centre retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Drugs targeting angiogenesis and immunotherapy have transformed outcomes in renal cancer but may contribute to progressive kidney disease.

METHODS

We linked healthcare databases in the West of Scotland (spanning 2010-2020) to identify adults with renal cancer who received one or both classes of drugs. Over two years following initiation, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) slope was modelled using linear mixed-effects models. Additional renal outcomes used competing risk regression considering the competing risk of death.

RESULTS

Amongst 357 adults (62.5% male; median age 63.0 years, IQI 55.0-71.0), there was no significant change in eGFR (annual eGFR change +1.03 mL/min/1.73 m²/year, 95%CI -1.64 to +3.70), nor in subgroups of patients who had nephrectomy, metastatic cancer or an eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m² prior to systemic therapy. A ≥ 40% decline in eGFR occurred in 82 people (23.0%) within one year of starting systemic therapy and was associated with pre-existing diabetes (subhazard ratio 1.89, 95%CI 1.05-3.41).

DISCUSSION

Anti-angiogenic and immune therapy had no substantial impact on the average change in eGFR but people with diabetes are at higher risk of clinically significant renal events. With appropriate monitoring, more widespread use of these agents in patients with renal impairment may be warranted.

Membranous translocation of murine double minute 2 promotes the increased renal tubular immunogenicity in ischemia-reperfusion-induced acute kidney injury

Kidneys from donors with prolonged warm and cold ischemia are prone to posttransplant T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) due to ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). However, the precise mechanisms still remain obscure. Renal tubular epithelial cells (TECs) are the main target during IRI. Meanwhile, we have previously reported that murine double minute 2 (MDM2) actively participates in TEC homeostasis during IRI. In this study, we established a murine model of renal IRI and a cell model of hypoxia-reoxygenation by culturing immortalized rat renal proximal tubule cells (NRK-52E) in a hypoxic environment for different time points followed by 24 h of reoxygenation and incubating NRK-52E cells in a chemical anoxia-recovery environment. We found that during renal IRI MDM2 expression increased on the membrane of TECs and aggregated mainly on the basolateral side. This process was accompanied by a reduction of a transmembrane protein, programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), a coinhibitory second signal for T cells in TECs. Using mutant plasmids of MDM2 to anchor MDM2 on the cell membrane or nuclei, we found that the upregulation of membrane MDM2 could promote the ubiquitination of PD-L1 and lead to its ubiquitination-proteasome degradation. Finally, we set up a coculture system of TECs and CD4+ T cells in vitro; our results revealed that the immunogenicity of TECs was enhanced during IRI. In conclusion, our findings suggest that the increased immunogenicity of TECs during IRI may be related to ubiquitinated degradation of PD-L1 by increased MDM2 on the cell membrane, which consequently results in T-cell activation and TCMR.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Ischemic acute kidney injury (AKI) donors can effectively shorten the waiting time for kidney transplantation but increase immune rejection, especially T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), the mechanism of which remains to be elucidated. Our study demonstrates that during ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI), the translocation of tubular murine double minute 2 leads to basolateral programmed death ligand 1 degradation, which ultimately results in the occurrence of TCMR, which may provide a new therapeutic strategy for preventing AKI donor-associated TCMR.

Urinary soluble PD-1 as a biomarker of checkpoint inhibitor-induced acute tubulointerstitial nephritis

Background

Acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) related to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI-AIN) has a not completely understood pathophysiology. Our objectives were to analyze possible biomarkers for the differentiation between acute tubular necrosis (ATN) and AIN, especially in cancer patients, and to study the participation of the immune checkpoint pathway in ICI-AIN.

Methods

We performed an observational study. We recruited patients with incident diagnosis of ICI-AIN (n = 19). We measured soluble PD-1 (sPD-1), sPD-L1, and sPD-L2 in serum and urine at diagnosis and compared to it patients with non-ICI-related AIN (non-ICI-AIN) (n = 18) and ATN (n = 21). The findings were validated in an independent cohort from another institution (n = 30). Also, we performed PD-L1 and PD-L2 immunostaining of kidney biopsies from patients with ICI-AIN and compared to patients with non-ICI-AIN.

Results

Urinary sPD-1 (usPD-1) was higher in patients with AIN compared to ATN (P = .03). Patients with AIN also showed higher serum sPD-1 (ssPD-1) than patients with ATN (P = .021). In cancer patients, usPD-1 <129.3 pg/ml had a 71.43% sensitivity and 94.44% specificity to differentiate ATN from ICI-AIN, with a likelihood ratio of 12.86. In the external validation cohort, the same cutoff showed a sensitivity of 80%. In kidney biopsies, patients with ICI-AIN showed higher density of PD-L1 positive tubules than patients with non-ICI-AIN (P = .02). The proportion of patients having >2.64/mm2 PD-L2 positive tubules was higher among patients with ICI-AIN compared to non-ICI-AIN (P = .034). There was a positive correlation (P = .009, r = 0.72) between usPD-1 and the number of PD-L1 positive tubules.

Conclusions

UsPD-1 and ssPD-1 are higher in AIN than ATN. Moreover, there was a strong correlation between usPD-1 and renal tubular PD-L1 expression. Our findings suggest a role of usPD-1 as non-invasive biomarker to differentiate ICI-AIN from ATN, especially in cancer patients, which has been confirmed in an external validation cohort.

Interleukin-7 Risk Allele, Lymphocyte Counts, and Autoantibodies for Prediction of Risk of Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients Receiving Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab Therapy for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (AB) therapy was the effective immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u-HCC). However, immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are common in patients receiving ICI therapies. Our research aimed to explore the risk factors for irAE development, with attention to interleukin-7 (IL-7) risk alleles, lymphocyte counts, and autoantibodies.

METHODS

Seventy-six patients receiving AB therapy for u-HCC were recruited. Single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping was done for the analysis of rs16906115 polymorphism near IL-7-expressing genes using 20 μL of stored buffy coat at baseline. The association between IL-7 risk alleles, lymphocyte counts, autoantibodies, and irAE development was investigated.

RESULTS

irAEs were found in 14 (18%) patients. The incidence of irAEs did not differ significantly between the groups showing IL-7 AG/AA and the GG group (p = 0.72). The incidence in the group with a lymphocyte count of 1,130/µL or more at baseline was higher than in that with a value below 1,130/µL (p = 0.0093). The group showing IL-7 AG/AA or lymphocyte count >1,130/μL had a higher irAE prevalence rate than the others (p = 0.019). IL-7 AG/AA or lymphocyte count >1,130/μL and positivity for autoantibodies at baseline were the prognostic factors for irAE development. irAE incidence could be stratified using a combination of IL-7 AG/AA or lymphocyte counts ≥1,130/µL and positive autoantibodies (p = 0.016).

CONCLUSION

Patients with IL-7 risk alleles, high lymphocyte counts, and autoantibodies at baseline may require careful monitoring for irAE development.

Multiorgan Toxicity from Dual Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy, Resulting in a Complete Response-A Case Report

Immunotherapy treatment with checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has led to a breakthrough in the treatment of oncological diseases. Despite its clinical effectiveness, this treatment differs from others, such as cytotoxic chemotherapy, in that it causes immune-related adverse events. This type of toxicity can affect any organ or organ system of the body. We present a literature review and a rare clinical case from our clinical practice, in which a patient with metastatic clear cell renal carcinoma was treated with a single dose of dual checkpoint blockade (cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-4 (CTLA-4) and programmed death-1 (PD-1)) and simultaneously diagnosed with colitis, hepatitis, and nephritis. After early immunosuppressive treatment with the glucocorticoids, complete organ function recovery was achieved. The follow-up revealed a sustained complete response lasting more than a year.

Chronic immune-related adverse events arising from immune checkpoint inhibitors: an update

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed cancer treatment, improving outcomes for many patients. However, toxicities termed immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are limitations of these revolutionary treatments. These irAEs may resolve with treatment or ICI cessation (acute) or persist many months beyond therapy cessation (chronic). Acute irAEs were the first to be recognized and are thus more well studied. However, chronic irAEs have been highlighted in recent years and are becoming a topic of more intensive investigation. These chronic irAEs have been noted to affect many different organ systems, including endocrine, rheumatologic, gastrointestinal, dermatologic, neurologic, and cardiovascular systems. In this review, we discuss current knowledge surrounding the frequency, time course, and risk factors associated with chronic irAEs affecting various organ systems, treatment approaches, and future directions.

The Road to Precision Medicine for Acute Kidney Injury

OBJECTIVES

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common form of organ dysfunction in the ICU. AKI is associated with adverse short- and long-term outcomes, including high mortality rates, which have not measurably improved over the past decade. This review summarizes the available literature examining the evidence of the need for precision medicine in AKI in critical illness, highlights the current evidence for heterogeneity in the field of AKI, discusses the progress made in advancing precision in AKI, and provides a roadmap for studying precision-guided care in AKI.

DATA SOURCES

Medical literature regarding topics relevant to precision medicine in AKI, including AKI definitions, epidemiology, and outcomes, novel AKI biomarkers, studies of electronic health records (EHRs), clinical trial design, and observational studies of kidney biopsies in patients with AKI.

STUDY SELECTION

English language observational studies, randomized clinical trials, reviews, professional society recommendations, and guidelines on areas related to precision medicine in AKI.

DATA EXTRACTION

Relevant study results, statements, and guidelines were qualitatively assessed and narratively synthesized.

DATA SYNTHESIS

We synthesized relevant study results, professional society recommendations, and guidelines in this discussion.

CONCLUSIONS

AKI is a syndrome that encompasses a wide range of underlying pathologies, and this heterogeneity has hindered the development of novel therapeutics for AKI. Wide-ranging efforts to improve precision in AKI have included the validation of novel biomarkers of AKI, leveraging EHRs for disease classification, and phenotyping of tubular secretory clearance. Ongoing efforts such as the Kidney Precision Medicine Project, identifying subphenotypes in AKI, and optimizing clinical trials and endpoints all have great promise in advancing precision medicine in AKI.

A case of biopsy-proven acute interstitial nephritis following atezolizumab-bevacizumab treatment of advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represented a significant breakthrough in cancer therapy. Recently, the combined use of atezolizumab and bevacizumab was approved as first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Exposure to a novel and diverse spectrum of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) has increased with the growing utilization of ICIs, however, a comprehensive understanding surrounding newer agents is still lacking. The incidence of kidney toxicities is rare but rising, often underreported due to the lack of confirmatory biopsies. Here, we present a rare case of biopsy-proven acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) following atezolizumab-bevacizumab treatment of advanced unresectable HCC.

CASE

An 84-year-old male with T4N0M0 hepatocellular carcinoma was admitted after cycle 5 of atezolizumab due to decreased urine output and dysuria with a serum creatine of 4.7 mg/dL compared to a baseline of 1.3 mg/dL. To confirm the diagnosis of possible intrinsic renal injury, an ultrasound-guided non-focal biopsy of the left kidney was performed, revealing AIN. Potential exacerbatory medications, such as proton-pump inhibitors, were discontinued. The patient was discharged on oral steroids with improvement in serum creatinine. Before completing the steroid taper, the patient developed pneumocystis pneumonia and eventually transitioned to hospice care.

CONCLUSION

This case highlights the valuable role renal biopsy can play in accurately capturing irAEs and guiding appropriate management in the setting of ICI-induced AKI. It also exemplifies important considerations for steroid treatment of irAEs in the setting of comorbidities, such as diabetes.

Bibliometric and visual analysis of immunisation associated with acute kidney injury from 2003 to 2023

Objective

This study aims to conduct a detailed bibliometric and visual analysis of acute kidney injury (AKI) and immune-related research conducted over the past two decades, focusing on identifying emerging trends and key areas of interest.

Methods

The Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) was utilised for the meticulous examination of various parameters including publication volume, authorship, geographic distribution, institutional contributions, journal sources, prevalent keywords and citation frequencies. Data were intricately visualised and interpreted using VOSviewer, CiteSpace and Excel 365 software.

Results

Analysis of the WoSCC database revealed 3,537 articles on AKI and immunisation, originating from 94 countries and regions, involving 3,552 institutions and authored by 18,243 individuals. Notably, the top five countries contributing to this field were the United States, China, Germany, Italy and the United Kingdom, with the United States leading with 35.76% of total publications. Among the 3,552 contributing institutions, those in the United States were predominant, with Harvard University leading with 134 papers and 3,906 citations. Key journals driving productivity included Frontiers in Immunology, Kidney International, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology and International Journal of Molecular Sciences, with Kidney International being the most cited, followed by Journal of the American Society of Nephrology and New England Journal of Medicine. Prominent authors in the field included Ronco Claudio, Okusa Mark D and Anders, Hans-Joachim. Co-citation clustering and timeline analysis highlighted recent research foci such as COVID-19, immune checkpoint inhibitors, regulated necrosis, cirrhosis and AKI. Keyword analysis identified "inflammation," "ischaemia-reperfusion injury," "sepsis," "covid-19," and "oxidative stress" as prevalent terms.

Conclusion

This study provides the first bibliometric analysis of AKI and immune research, offering a comprehensive overview of research hotspots and evolving trends within the field.

PCCA variant rs16957301 is a novel AKI risk genotype-specific for patients who receive ICI treatment: Real-world evidence from All of Us cohort

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) enhance the immune system's ability to target and destroy cancer cells by blocking inhibitory pathways. Despite their efficacy, these treatments can trigger immune-related adverse events (irAEs), such as acute kidney injury (ICI-AKI), complicating patient management. The genetic predispositions to ICI-AKI are not well understood, necessitating comprehensive genomic studies to identify risk factors and improve therapeutic strategies.

Objective

To identify genetic predispositions for ICI-AKI using large-scale real-world data.

Methods

A systematic literature search led to 14 candidate variants related to irAEs. We performed a candidate variant association study with these 14 variants using the All of Us cohort (AoU, v7, cutoff date: 7/1/2022). A cohort for cancer patients receiving ICI and a general cohort were established to evaluate ICI-AKI risk. Logistic regression, adjusted for sex, was used to evaluate the impact of each candidate genotype, separately for self-reported and ancestry-estimated race. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis assessed the genetic effects on AKI-free survival.

Results

The ICI cohort (n=414) showed a one-year AKI incidence rate of 23.2%, significantly higher than the general cohort (6.5%, n=213,282). The rs16957301 variant (chr13:100324308, T>C) in the PCCA gene was a significant risk genotype for ICI-AKI among self-reported Caucasians (Beta=0.93, Bonferroni-corrected P-value=0.047) and ancestry estimated Caucasians (Beta = 0.94, Bonferroni-corrected P-value=0.044). Self-reported Caucasians with the rs16957301 risk genotypes (TC/CC) developed AKI significantly earlier (3.6 months) compared to the reference genotype (TT, 7.0 months, log-rank P=0.04). Consistent results were found in ancestry-estimated Caucasians. This variant did not present significant AKI risks in the general cohort (Beta: -0.008-0.035, FDR: 0.75-0.99).

Conclusion

Real-world evidence from the All of Us cohort suggests that, in Caucasians, PCCA variant rs16957301 is a novel AKI risk genotype specific to ICI treatment. Additional studies are warranted to validate rs16957301 as risk marker for AKI in Caucasian patients treated with ICIs and to assess its risk in other ancestral populations.

Clinicopathological features of kidney injury in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPi) combined with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICPi) combined with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy has increasingly become a promising strategy in various malignancies. However, the combination might be associated with increased risk of nephrotoxicity.

METHODS

We retrospectively recruited patients who suffered kidney injury and received renal biopsy after anti-VEGF/ICPi mono- or combination therapy and divided them into three groups: anti-VEGF monotherapy, ICPi monotherapy and combination therapy. Clinical and histopathological features of three groups were analysed. All patients were followed-up for 3 months after biopsy, with or without glucocorticoid treatment, and renal outcome were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 46 patients were enrolled. Eighteen patients received anti-VEGF monotherapy, 12 received ICPi monotherapy and 16 received combined treatment of anti-VEGF and ICPi. Proteinuria level of anti-VEGF group, ICPi group and combination group were 4.07±3.17 g/day, 0.60±0.61 g/day and 2.05±2.50 g/day, respectively (p=0.002). The peak serum creatinine level of combination group (1.75±0.77 mg/dL) was also in between ICPi group (2.79±0.90 mg/dL) and anti-VEGF group (1.34±0.60 mg/dL) (p<0.001). Multiple histopathological patterns involving glomerulus, tubulointerstitium and vessel existed in the majority of cases in combination group (68.8%). Renal complete and partial recovery rate of combination therapy were also in between monotherapy (57.1% vs 40.0% in anti-VEGF group, 100.0% in ICPi group, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Kidney injury in patients treated with combination therapy of ICPi and anti-VEGF shows hybrid pathological patterns and intermediate clinical features compared with monotherapy. Cohorts with larger sample and better design, as well as basic research, are needed to elucidate the mechanism of 'protection' effect of combination anti-cancer therapy to renal function.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors and renal toxicity

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the management of a broad spectrum of cancers as metastatic melanoma, non-small lung cancer or renal cell carcinoma. These humanized monoclonal antibodies target immune-regulatory receptors expressed on T lymphocytes, antigen presenting cells and tumor cells and induce an immunological anti-tumor response. If on the one hand these molecules have led to considerable improvement in survival outcomes, on the other hand these therapies can be associated with immune-related adverse effects (irAEs). While these side effects have become well known, the best diagnostic and therapeutic approaches are still under investigation. The authors discuss pathophysiology, clinical presentation and histological features of ICIs renal toxicity. Furthermore, we focus on kidney transplant (KT) recipients, including the therapeutic adaptation approach to immunosuppression and the risk of rejection.

Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting the occurrence of renal dysfunction after treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitor: a retrospective case-control study

PURPOSE

The administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may lead to renal adverse events, notably including renal dysfunction. To early predict the probability of renal dysfunction after ICIs therapy, a retrospective case-control study was conducted.

METHODS

Clinical information on ICIs-treated patients was collected. Multivariable logistic regression was applied to identify risk factors for renal dysfunction after ICIs treatment. Moreover, a nomogram model was developed and validated internally.

RESULTS

A total of 442 patients were included, among which 35 (7.9%) experienced renal dysfunction after ICIs treatment. Lower baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (OR 0.941; 95% CI 0.917 to 0.966; p<0.001), concurrent exposure of platinum(OR 4.014; 95% CI 1.557 to 10.346; p=0.004), comorbidities of hypertension (OR 3.478; 95% CI 1.600 to 7.562; p=0.002) and infection (OR 5.402; 95% CI 1.544 to 18.904; p=0.008) were found to be independent associated with renal dysfunction after ICIs treatment. To develop a predictive nomogram for the occurrence of renal dysfunction after ICIs treatment, the included cases were divided into training and validation groups in a ratio of 7:3 randomly. The above four independent risk factors were included in the model. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of the predictiive model were 0.822 (0.723-0.922) and 0.815 (0.699-0.930) in the training and validation groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower baseline eGFR, platinum exposure, comorbidities of hypertension and infection were predictors of renal dysfunction in ICIs-treated patients with cancer. A nomogram was developed to predict the probability of renal dysfunction after ICIs treatment, which might be operable and valuable in clinical practice.

Cancer drugs and acute kidney injury: new therapies and new challenges

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cancer therapies continue to evolve at a rapid pace and although novel treatments, including immunotherapies and targeted therapies have allowed for substantial improvements in cancer survival, they carry associated risks of acute kidney injury (AKI). We aim to summarize the existing literature on AKI associated with the spectrum of systemic cancer treatments, including conventional chemotherapies, newer immunotherapies, and the growing number of targeted cancer therapies, which may be associated with both AKI and 'pseudo-AKI'.

RECENT FINDINGS

Conventional cytotoxic chemotherapies (e.g. cisplatin and other platinum-based agents, methotrexate, pemetrexed, ifosfamide, etc.) with well recognized nephrotoxicities (predominantly tubulointerstitial injury) remain in widespread use. Immunotherapies (e.g., immune checkpoint inhibitors and CAR-T therapies) may be associated with kidney immune-related adverse events, most often acute interstitial nephritis, and rarely, glomerular disease. Recently, multiple targeted cancer therapies have been associated with reduced renal tubular secretion of creatinine, causing elevations in serum creatinine and apparent 'pseudo-AKI'. To complicate matters further, these agents have had biopsy-proven, 'true' kidney injury attributed to them in numerous case reports.

SUMMARY

Clinicians in nephrology and oncology must be aware of the various potential kidney risks with these agents and recognize those with clinically meaningful impact on both cancer and kidney outcomes.

Pembrolizumab-induced nephrotoxicity in a patient with breast cancer

The introduction of immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment and improved outcomes of multiple types of cancer. Although breast cancer is a less immune-responsive tumor type, the incorporation of pembrolizumab into chemotherapy regimens in the neoadjuvant and first-line metastatic setting for the triple-negative disease has improved outcomes. However, the use of this type of treatment is associated with a spectrum of adverse events. Although rarely affected, kidneys can be a target for immunotherapy, leading to irreversible injury if not recognized and addressed early. A 52-year-old woman presented with clinical stage II right breast cancer diagnosed at an outside facility. Neoadjuvant docetaxel/carboplatin/pembrolizumab every 3 weeks was started. Given the partial response on MRI after the 4th cycle, treatment was switched to doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide. However, pembrolizumab was held in cycle 2 due to the rash and then resumed in cycle 3 after the resolution of symptoms. Elevated creatinine was noted 3 weeks after the last dose of pembrolizumab without improvement despite adequate fluid resuscitation. Diagnostic workup was unremarkable except for pyuria and minimal albuminuria on urinalysis. In the absence of other risk factors and the temporal relationship between pembrolizumab administration and the onset of acute kidney injury (AKI), immune-related nephrotoxicity was the underlying diagnosis. After initiation of corticosteroids, creatinine decreased back to baseline without the need for kidney biopsy. An addendum to the original pathology report from the outside facility surfaced 5 months after starting treatment, revealing that the second breast lesion had a Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) test performed that was positive. Given this fact, therapy was changed to two cycles of neoadjuvant paclitaxel/carboplatin/trastuzumab/pertuzumab, with approximately 8 weeks between the last pembrolizumab dose and the first dose of trastuzumab. Thereafter, she underwent a right breast mastectomy which showed residual invasive carcinoma with negative margins and lymph nodes. She completed 1 year of trastuzumab. Immune-related AKI is a rare, but potentially serious complication associated with an increase in mortality. Further research is needed in the development and early detection. There is promising research in the development of noninvasive biomarkers which has the added benefit of identifying patients who can be re-challenged with immunotherapy.

How to deal with renal toxicities from immune-based combination treatments in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. A nephrological consultation for Oncologists

We are witnessing a revolution in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Indeed, several immune-based combinations (ICI [immune checkpoint inhibitor] + ICI, or ICI + antiangiogenic agents) have been approved as first-line therapy for mRCC after demonstrating superior efficacy over the previous standard. Despite all the improvements made, safety remains a critical issue, adverse events (AEs) being the main reason for drug discontinuations or dose reductions, ultimately resulting in an increased risk of losing efficacy. Thus, a good understanding of the AEs associated with the use of immune-based combinations, their prevention, and management, are key in order to maximize therapeutic effectiveness. Among these AEs, renal ones are relatively frequent, but always difficult to be diagnosed, not to take into account that it is often difficult to determine which drug is to blame for such toxicities. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a common finding in patients with RCC, either as a pre-existing condition and/or as a consequence of cancer and its treatment; furthermore, CKD, especially in advanced stages and in patients undergoing dialysis, may influence the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics properties of anticancer agents. Finally, managing cancer therapy in kidney transplanted patients is another challenge. In this review, we discuss the therapy management of immune-based combinations in patients with CKD, on dialysis, or transplanted, as well as their renal toxicities, with a focus on their prevention, detection and practical management, taking into account the crucial role of the consulting nephrologist within the multidisciplinary care of these patients.

Proton pump inhibitors and the risk of acute kidney injury in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors: A Danish population-based cohort study

Previous studies have suggested that the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) more than doubles the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, this association may be confounded. Therefore, we conducted a register-based cohort study to examine the risk of AKI in users and nonusers of PPIs among cancer patients treated with ICIs in Denmark from 2011 through 2021 while accounting for a comprehensive range of potential confounders. PPI use was determined based on redeemed prescriptions of PPIs before ICI initiation. We identified laboratory-recorded AKI events within the first year after ICI initiation. We estimated the risks and hazard ratios (HRs) of AKI while accounting for a comprehensive range of confounders (including comorbidities and comedication) by propensity score weighting. Furthermore, we performed an additional per-protocol analysis while accounting for informative censoring by weighting. We identified 10 200 cancer patients including 2749 (27%) users, 6214 (61%) nonusers, and 1237 (12%) former users of PPIs. PPI users had an increased risk of AKI compared to nonusers (1-year risk, 24.7% vs 19.9%; HR, 1.42 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.29-1.56]); however, this association attenuated when accounting for confounders (weighted 1-year risk, 24.2% vs 23.8%; weighted HR, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.93-1.21]). In the per-protocol analysis, the crude HR was 1.86 (95% CI, 1.63-2.12), while the weighted HR was 1.24 (95% CI, 1.03-1.49). Thus, the association between PPI use and AKI could largely be explained by confounding, suggesting that previous studies may have overestimated the association.

Single and combination immunotherapy with chemotherapy and the risk of AKI in patients with solid cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Acute kidney injury (AKI) has emerged as an important toxicity among patients with advanced cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. The aim of this study was to describe the incidence, risk factors and mortality of AKI in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors alone or in combination with another form of immunotherapy or chemotherapy.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

We included all patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors alone or in combination with another form of immunotherapy or chemotherapy at AC Camargo Cancer Center from January 2015 to December 2019. AKI was defined as a ≥ 1.5 fold increase in creatinine from baseline within 12 months of immune checkpoint inhibitor initiation. We assessed the association between baseline demographics, comorbidities, medications and risk of AKI using a competing risk model, considering death as a competing event.

RESULTS

We included 614 patients in the analysis. The mean age was 58.4 ± 13.5 years, and the mean baseline creatinine was 0.8 ± 0.18 mg/dL. AKI occurred in 144 (23.5%) of the patients. The most frequent AKI etiologies were multifactorial (10.1%), hemodynamic (8.8%) and possibly immunotherapy-related (3.6%). The likelihood of AKI was greater in patients with genitourinary cancer (sHR 2.47 95% CI 1.34-4.55 p < 0.01), with a prior AKI history (sHR 2.1 95% CI 1.30-3.39 p < 0.01) and taking antibiotics (sHR 2.85 95% CI 1.54-5.27 p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, genitourinary cancer, previous AKI and antibiotics use were associated with a higher likelihood of developing AKI.

Immunohistochemical Evaluation of Renal Biopsy with Anti-PD1 and p53 to Solve the Dilemma between Platinum- and Pembrolizumab-Induced AKI: Case Report and Review

Introduction: The combination therapy of platinum and pembrolizumab looks like a promising treatment in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. However, both platinum-based chemotherapy and pembrolizumab can lead to AKI. AKI can occur due to acute tubular necrosis or interstitial nephritis. It is essential to identify the drug responsible for renal damage. For this purpose, we used new immunohistochemistry markers (p53 and anti-PD1 analysis). Case Description: A 77-year-old female patient with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer received the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab and platinum-based chemotherapy carboplatin. The patient, after 60 days, experienced AKI. A kidney biopsy was performed, and two new immunohistochemical techniques for p53 (experimental markers of ATN from platinum) and anti-PDL1 (experimental markers of PD-1 inhibitors nephritis) were employed. Renal biopsies revealed severe tubular damage. No infiltration was detected, and the immunohistochemical assessment of PDL-1 was negative. The expression of p53 was positive. The renal biopsy suggested platinum-induced acute tubular necrosis. After discontinuing steroids and reducing carboplatin, the patient continued with pembrolizumab, and their renal function returned to normal within two months. Discussion: Combining checkpoint inhibitors and platinum-based therapies may result in AKI. The standard method of examining kidney tissue may not provide sufficient information about the effects of these drugs on the kidneys. To address this issue, we recommend incorporating an assessment of the analysis of the expression of PDL1 and p53. This personalized approach will help identify the best treatment option for the patient while ensuring the best possible cancer treatment plan.

Interpretable machine learning-based individual analysis of acute kidney injury in immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a critical complication of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Since the etiology of AKI in patients undergoing cancer therapy varies, clarifying underlying causes in individual cases is critical for optimal cancer treatment. Although it is essential to individually analyze immune checkpoint inhibitor-treated patients for underlying pathologies for each AKI episode, these analyses have not been realized. Herein, we aimed to individually clarify the underlying causes of AKI in immune checkpoint inhibitor-treated patients using a new clustering approach with Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP).

METHODS

We developed a gradient-boosting decision tree-based machine learning model continuously predicting AKI within 7 days, using the medical records of 616 immune checkpoint inhibitor-treated patients. The temporal changes in individual predictive reasoning in AKI prediction models represented the key features contributing to each AKI prediction and clustered AKI patients based on the features with high predictive contribution quantified in time series by SHAP. We searched for common clinical backgrounds of AKI patients in each cluster, compared with annotation by three nephrologists.

RESULTS

One hundred and twelve patients (18.2%) had at least one AKI episode. They were clustered per the key feature, and their SHAP value patterns, and the nephrologists assessed the clusters' clinical relevance. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that the area under the curve was 0.880. Patients with AKI were categorized into four clusters with significant prognostic differences (p = 0.010). The leading causes of AKI for each cluster, such as hypovolemia, drug-related, and cancer cachexia, were all clinically interpretable, which conventional approaches cannot obtain.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that the clustering method of individual predictive reasoning in machine learning models can be applied to infer clinically critical factors for developing each episode of AKI among patients with multiple AKI risk factors, such as immune checkpoint inhibitor-treated patients.

Association of Proton Pump Inhibitor Use and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Mediated Acute Kidney Injury: A Meta-Analysis and a Review of Related Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment. However, they pose the risk of immune-related adverse events, including ICI-mediated acute kidney injury (ICI-AKI). Recent studies have implicated proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) as potential contributors to ICI-AKI development. This meta-analysis examines the association between PPI use and ICI-AKI, exploring a potential modifiable risk factor in ICI therapy while also reviewing the possible outcomes of ICI-AKI.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies, assessing the risk of ICI-AKI in cancer patients concurrently using PPIs and potential outcomes. Odds ratios (ORs) were pooled using random-effects models. Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate heterogeneity and potential biases.

RESULTS

A total of 14 studies involving 12,694 patients were included. In total, we analyzed 639 patients with all-cause AKI and 779 patients with ICI-AKI. The pooled OR for the overall incidence of AKI from all-causes was 1.57 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-2.40) among patients on PPIs. Specifically, the risk of ICI-AKI associated with PPI use was significantly higher, with a pooled OR of 1.84 (95% CI 1.16-2.90). This indicates approximately 84% higher likelihood of developing ICI-AKI with concurrent use of PPIs. Additionally, among patients with ICI-AKI, 67% had complete or partial recovery of renal function, 32% progressed to chronic kidney disease (CKD), and about 36% died during a follow-up period of at least 3 months.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis highlights the importance of cautious PPI prescription in cancer patients undergoing ICI therapy. Clinicians are advised to evaluate the risks and benefits of PPI use and consider alternative therapies when feasible.

Metastatic Melanoma Treatment in Special Populations

ABSTRACT

This review outlines the most up-to-date metastatic melanoma treatment recommendations and relevant risks for patients with solid organ transplants, patients with renal dysfunction, and patients with preexisting autoimmune conditions. These specific treatment populations were excluded from the original clinical trials, which studied immune checkpoint inhibitors and BRAF/MEK inhibitors in the advanced melanoma setting. We have synthesized the current body of literature, mainly case series and retrospective analyses, to reflect the evidence for the treatment of these special patient populations at present.

Cohort study on immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated acute kidney injury: Incidence, risk factors, and management strategies

INTRODUCTION

Case studies and retrospective chart reviews of health system data have demonstrated an increased risk of nephrotoxicity in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors compared to clinical trials. This study investigated the frequency, causes, and risk factors for acute kidney injury in a real-world, rural setting.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who received at least one dose of a checkpoint inhibitor at a rural health system from May 2013 to February 2020 and who received at least one dose of a checkpoint inhibitor. Electronic and manual chart review helped to determine the incidence of, risk factors for, and renal outcomes and management strategies of checkpoint inhibitor-related acute kidney injury. Multivariable Fine and Gray subdistribution hazard models were used to assess the impact of patient characteristics on the incidence of sustained acute kidney injury and checkpoint inhibitor-induced acute kidney injury.

RESULTS

After exclusion criteria, 906 patients who received at least one dose of a checkpoint inhibitor at Marshfield Clinic Health System during the study period were included. The incidence of acute kidney injury of any duration and due to any cause was 36.1%, while sustained acute kidney injury occurred in 28.7% of patients. Checkpoint inhibitor-related acute kidney injury was thought to have occurred in 2.7% of patients. Baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate < 60 was the sole predictor of checkpoint inhibitors-related acute kidney injury. Most patients with suspected checkpoint inhibitor-related acute kidney injury were managed with corticosteroids, and 62.5% experienced complete renal recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

Ours is the first retrospective cohort study to test whether baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score and checkpoint inhibitor place in therapy were associated with checkpoint inhibitor-related acute kidney injury, and neither of these data points were found to be predictive. Even after expanding the parameters and methodologies of our study as compared to other retrospective cohort studies, we found only three baseline characteristics to be predictive of sustained acute kidney injury: Baseline eGFR, loop diuretic, and spironolactone use. For checkpoint inhibitor-related baseline, eGFR alone was predictive.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors and acute kidney injury

As a new type of anti-tumor immunotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved the prognosis of multiple malignancies. However, renal complications are becoming more frequent. Nephrotoxicity often manifests as acute kidney injury (AKI), and the most common histopathological type is acute tubulointerstitial nephritis (ATIN). Based on previous studies of the incidence and potential risk factors for nephrotoxicity, in this review, we describe the mechanism of AKI after ICIs treatment, summarize the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of AKI, and discuss the diagnosis and management of immune checkpoint inhibitors-associated acute kidney injury (ICI-AKI). In addition, we review the current status of ICIs rechallenge and the therapeutic strategies of ICIs applied in kidney transplant recipients. Finally, we emphasize the importance of collaboration between nephrologists and oncologists to guide the treatment of ICIs and the management of renal complications.

Achilles' Heel of currently approved immune checkpoint inhibitors: immune related adverse events

Immunotherapy has revolutionized the cancer treatment landscape by opening up novel avenues for intervention. As the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has exponentially increased, so have immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The mechanism of irAEs may involve the direct damage caused by monoclonal antibodies and a sequence of immune responses triggered by T cell activation. Common side effects include dermatologic toxicity, endocrine toxicity, gastrointestinal toxicity, and hepatic toxicity. While relatively rare, neurotoxicity, cardiotoxicity, and pulmonary toxicity can be fatal. These toxicities pose a clinical dilemma regarding treatment discontinuation since they can result in severe complications and necessitate frequent hospitalization. Vigilant monitoring of irAEs is vital in clinical practice, and the principal therapeutic strategy entails the administration of oral or intravenous glucocorticoids (GSCs). It may be necessary to temporarily or permanently discontinue the use of ICIs in severe cases. Given that irAEs can impact multiple organs and require diverse treatment approaches, the involvement of a multidisciplinary team of experts is imperative. This review aims to comprehensively examine the pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, incidence, and treatment options for various irAEs.

Nephrotic syndrome with acute kidney injury due to combination therapy of immune checkpoint inhibitors: a case report and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have focused on immune checkpoint inhibitors. Renal complications associated with the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors are uncommon compared with other immune-related adverse events. Acute interstitial nephritis accounts for most of these renal complications, with nephrotic syndrome quite rare. We herein report a case of nephrotic syndrome associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors that was more severe than that in previous cases. By comparing this case with previous reports, the possible reasons for the particular severity of this case are discussed.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 75-year-old man developed nephrotic syndrome with acute kidney injury after the first combination therapy of nivolumab and ipilimumab for malignant pleural mesothelioma. The results of a kidney biopsy indicated minimal change disease with mild atherosclerosis, acute interstitial nephritis, and fusion of nearly all podocyte foot processes. Nivolumab and ipilimumab therapy were stopped, and treatment with corticosteroids was initiated. We investigated previously reported cases of nephrotic syndrome using immune checkpoint inhibitors. Seventeen cases of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related nephrotic syndrome, including ours, have been reported. Two of the 17 patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor-related nephrotic syndrome required hemodialysis treatment for acute kidney injury. Unlike many previously reported cases, the present patient was administered two different immune checkpoint inhibitors, which may be one of the reasons for the development of severe nephrotic syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to previously reported risk factors, immune checkpoint inhibitor combination therapy can exacerbate nephrotic syndrome compared to immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy.

Small-vessel vasculitis leading to severe acute kidney injury after ipilimumab: a case report

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are effective monoclonal antibodies used in cancer treatment, particularly in metastatic melanoma. They target proteins responsible for cancer cells evading the immune system. However, their use can lead to immune-related adverse events, with the skin and gastrointestinal tract being commonly affected. Kidney involvement is rarer, with interstitial nephritis being the most common manifestation. In a unique case, kidney biopsy-proven small-vessel vasculitis with arteriolar immune deposition was observed following ipilimumab administration.

Nephrological Detrimental Impacts Resulting From Novel Immunotherapy Drugs Used in the Treatment of Cancer: A Systematic Review

The most recent advancements in cancer therapy center on efficiently and conveniently enhancing a patient's natural immune system. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are antibodies that target cytotoxic thymus (T) lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) and its receptor. They function by stimulating T-cell activity against malignancies. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are a distinct class of inflammatory side effects that are specific to a given organ. Antineoplastic medications can impact any part of the kidney, leading to the development of proteinuria, hypertension, electrolyte abnormalities, glomerulonephritis, and both acute and chronic interstitial nephritis. We reviewed the scientific literature regarding kidney problems that can arise from chemotherapy and immunotherapy for neoplasms, such as various cancers, melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, and colorectal cancer. We discussed the pathophysiology, associated risk factors, management, and safety measures for patients experiencing acute renal injury after a new immunotherapy medication treatment. Antineoplastic drugs have the potential to damage the renal tubules, glomeruli, parenchyma, and blood vessels, among other kidney tissues. This can result in a broad spectrum of complications, spanning from a rise in serum creatinine levels without symptoms to the development of acute kidney injury (AKI). The research examined a range of risk factors associated with acute kidney injury (AKI). These factors encompassed age, gender, preexisting medical conditions (such as diabetes, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease), and the medications that patients were taking at the beginning of the study, which included non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, allopurinol, diuretics, corticosteroids, and proton pump inhibitors. The data suggests that patients who were receiving baseline treatment with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) or corticosteroids had a higher risk of mortality. This study serves as an illustration of the effective management of acute kidney injury and proteinuria linked to novel immunotherapy drugs like pembrolizumab. The approach involved the use of corticosteroids tailored to the patient's condition. Furthermore, it references the recommendations outlined in the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Prompt recognition and effective management of these side effects are essential to optimizing outcomes for patients undergoing immunotherapy. Our results were refined and focused by utilizing Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) keywords in our search strategy. The MeSH keywords used were "renal side effects" OR "immunotherapy" OR "cancer treatment." The studies reviewed encompassed a total of 48,529 participants among the 21 studies examined.