The p21 levels have the potential to be a monitoring marker for ribociclib in breast cancer

The Evolving Pathways of the Efficacy of and Resistance to CDK4/6 Inhibitors in Breast Cancer

The approval of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) has remarkably improved the survival outcomes of patients with advanced hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC), becoming the new standard of care treatment in these patients. Despite the efficacy of this therapeutic combination, intrinsic and acquired resistance inevitably occurs and represents a major clinical challenge. Several mechanisms associated with resistance to CDK4/6i have been identified, including both cell cycle-related and cell cycle-nonspecific mechanisms. This review discusses new insights underlying the mechanisms of action of CDK4/6i, which are more far-reaching than initially thought, and the currently available evidence of the mechanisms of resistance to CDK4/6i in BC. Finally, it highlights possible treatment strategies to improve CDK4/6i efficacy, summarizing the most relevant clinical data on novel combination therapies involving CDK4/6i.

CRISPR screen identifies GATAD1 as a synthetic lethal target with CDK4/6 inhibitors in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer

Estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer represents approximately two-thirds of all breast cancers and has a sustained risk of late disease recurrence. Combining cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors with anti-estrogen therapies significantly improves ER+ advanced breast cancer clinical outcomes. Despite promising clinical outcomes, intrinsic or acquired resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors has limited their success. We used CRISPR to screen MCF-7 cells to explore the targets whose inhibition is synthetic lethal with CDK4/6 inhibitors in ER+ breast cancer cells. We found that GATA zinc finger domain containing 1 (GATAD1) is a new synthetic lethal target with CDK4/6 inhibitors in ER+ breast cancer cells. Mechanistically, GATAD1 promotes cell proliferation by transcriptionally inhibiting p21 in ER+ breast cancer cells. GATAD1 depletion decreased the phosphorylation of CDK2/4 and RB transcriptional corepressor 1 (RB1), inducing cell cycle arrest. P21 overexpression abolished the enhanced proliferation induced by GATAD1 overexpression. Our results identify GATAD1 as a therapeutic target in ER+ breast cancer, which is beneficial to provide a novel treatment strategy.

Molecular Mechanisms of Anti-Estrogen Therapy Resistance and Novel Targeted Therapies

Breast cancer (BC) is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in women, constituting one-third of all cancers in women, and it is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States. Anti-estrogen therapies, such as selective estrogen receptor modulators, significantly improve survival in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) BC patients, which represents about 70% of cases. However, about 60% of patients inevitably experience intrinsic or acquired resistance to anti-estrogen therapies, representing a major clinical problem that leads to relapse, metastasis, and patient deaths. The resistance mechanisms involve mutations of the direct targets of anti-estrogen therapies, compensatory survival pathways, as well as alterations in the expression of non-coding RNAs (e.g., microRNA) that regulate the activity of survival and signaling pathways. Although cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors have significantly improved survival, the efficacy of these therapies alone and in combination with anti-estrogen therapy for advanced ER+ BC, are not curative in advanced and metastatic disease. Therefore, understanding the molecular mechanisms causing treatment resistance is critical for developing highly effective therapies and improving patient survival. This review focuses on the key mechanisms that contribute to anti-estrogen therapy resistance and potential new treatment strategies alone and in combination with anti-estrogen drugs to improve the survival of BC patients.

Therapeutic potential of CDK4/6 inhibitors in renal cell carcinoma

The treatment of advanced and metastatic kidney cancer has entered a golden era with the addition of more therapeutic options, improved survival and new targeted therapies. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors, mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors and immune checkpoint blockade have all been shown to be promising strategies in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, little is known about the best therapeutic approach for individual patients with RCC and how to combat therapeutic resistance. Cancers, including RCC, rely on sustained replicative potential. The cyclin-dependent kinases CDK4 and CDK6 are involved in cell-cycle regulation with additional roles in metabolism, immunogenicity and antitumour immune response. Inhibitors of CDK4 and CDK6 are now commonly used as approved and investigative treatments in breast cancer, as well as several other tumours. Furthermore, CDK4/6 inhibitors have been shown to work synergistically with other kinase inhibitors, including mTOR inhibitors, as well as with immune checkpoint inhibitors in preclinical cancer models. The effect of CDK4/6 inhibitors in kidney cancer is relatively understudied compared with other cancers, but the preclinical studies available are promising. Collectively, growing evidence suggests that targeting CDK4 and CDK6 in kidney cancer, alone and in combination with current therapeutics including mTOR and immune checkpoint inhibitors, might have therapeutic benefit and should be further explored.

An omic and multidimensional spatial atlas from serial biopsies of an evolving metastatic breast cancer

Mechanisms of therapeutic resistance and vulnerability evolve in metastatic cancers as tumor cells and extrinsic microenvironmental influences change during treatment. To support the development of methods for identifying these mechanisms in individual people, here we present an omic and multidimensional spatial (OMS) atlas generated from four serial biopsies of an individual with metastatic breast cancer during 3.5 years of therapy. This resource links detailed, longitudinal clinical metadata that includes treatment times and doses, anatomic imaging, and blood-based response measurements to clinical and exploratory analyses, which includes comprehensive DNA, RNA, and protein profiles; images of multiplexed immunostaining; and 2- and 3-dimensional scanning electron micrographs. These data report aspects of heterogeneity and evolution of the cancer genome, signaling pathways, immune microenvironment, cellular composition and organization, and ultrastructure. We present illustrative examples of how integrative analyses of these data reveal potential mechanisms of response and resistance and suggest novel therapeutic vulnerabilities.

Protective role of cytoplasmic p21Cip1/Waf1 in apoptosis of CDK4/6 inhibitor-induced senescence in breast cancer cells

Inhibition of CDK4/6 slows the cell cycle and induces senescence in breast cancer cells. However, senescent cancer cells promote invasion and metastasis. Several drugs reportedly target senescent cells, including ABT‐263 (navitoclax). We examined the effects of the CDK4/6 inhibitor abemaciclib and ABT‐263 on two human breast cancer cell lines. The abemaciclib and ABT‐263 combination additively decreased the viability of MDA‐MB‐231 cells, but not MCF‐7 cells. Also, the combination therapy‐induced caspase‐dependent apoptosis in MDA‐MB‐231 cells. Combination therapy with abemaciclib and ABT‐737, an ABT‐263 analog, significantly suppressed the in vivo growth of MDA‐MB‐231 with transient body‐weight loss. Given that p16^Ink4a and p21^Cip1/Waf1 are key factors in senescence and that both cell lines were negative for p16, the role of p21 in apoptosis of treated breast cancer cells was investigated. Although abemaciclib increased the cytoplasmic p21 level in both cell lines as a hallmark of senescence, the abemaciclib and ABT‐263 combination decreased it only in MDA‐MB‐231 cells. This decrease of p21 expression was relieved by caspase inhibition, and p21 was colocalized with caspase‐3 in the cytoplasm of MDA‐MB‐231 cells. Alternatively, small interfering RNA‐mediated knockdown of p21 rendered caspase‐3‐negative MCF‐7 cells susceptible to abemaciclib and ABT‐263, as well as TNF‐related apoptosis‐inducing ligand. Furthermore, a clinical database analysis showed that p21^high breast cancer patients had a poorer prognosis compared to p21^low patients. These results suggest that cytoplasmic p21 plays a protective role in apoptosis of CDK4/6 inhibitor‐induced senescent breast cancer cells.

Molecular targeted drugs resistance impairs double-strand break repair and sensitizes ER-positive breast cancer to PARP inhibitors

BACKGROUND

There are various treatments for estrogen-positive breast cancer, mainly hormone therapy and molecular-targeted drugs. Acquiring resistance to these drugs is a major clinical problem. Additionally, little is known about the effect of drug resistance on the DNA repair mechanism. Poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors currently used for treating HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer with BRCA mutations have been shown to be effective in BRCA-deficient cells with impaired homologous recombination repair. Here, we investigated the effect of drug resistance acquisition on the DNA repair mechanism and the effect of PARP inhibitors on ER (estrogen receptor) -positive breast cancer.

METHODS

We investigated changes in the expression of DNA repair mechanism-related factors and repair ability of double-strand breaks (DSB) in various drug-resistant cell lines established in our laboratory. Additionally, PARP inhibitor susceptibility was investigated using olaparib.

RESULTS

DSB repairs in MCF-7 and hormone therapy-resistant model cells were normal, and these cells demonstrated low sensitivity to olaparib. The resistant cell lines against CDK4/6 inhibitors, fulvestrant and mTOR/PI3K inhibitors showed decreased DSB repair ability and high olaparib sensitivity. They showed low sensitivity to CDK4/6 inhibitors, a close link between acquiring resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors and hypersensitivity to olaparib.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests some cases of acquiring drug resistance impairs DSB repair ability and sensitizes ER-positive breast cancer to PARP inhibitors.

The role of CDK4/6 inhibitors in early breast cancer

The use of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) has proven to be a successful strategy in the treatment of advanced hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer (BC), leading to a strong interest in their possible role in the treatment of early luminal BC. In this review we collect the most relevant and recent information on the use of CDK4/6i for the treatment of early BC in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. Specifically, we evaluate the results of the large phase 3 adjuvant trials recently released, which have yielded apparently divergent results. We also examine the relevance of biomarkers as response predictive factors for CDI4/6i, the combination between radiotherapy and CDK4/6i, and provide a critical discussion on the evidence that we have so far and future directions of the role of these drugs in the treatment of early BC.

The mechanisms involved in the resistance of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer cells to palbociclib are multiple and change over time

PURPOSE

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors are widely used for the treatment of advanced estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer. To develop a treatment strategy for cancers resistant to CDK4/6 inhibitors, here, we established palbociclib-resistant sublines and analyzed their resistance mechanisms.

METHODS

Palbociclib-resistant sublines were established from T47D and MCF7 cells. Sensitivity to other drugs was assessed via the WST assay. Altered expression/phosphorylation of proteins related to signal transduction and cell cycle regulation was examined using western blotting. Copy number alterations and mutations in the retinoblastoma (RB1) gene were also analyzed.

RESULTS

Although an increase in CDK6 and decrease in retinoblastoma protein (Rb) expression/phosphorylation were commonly observed in the resistant sublines, changes in other cell cycle-related proteins were heterogeneous. Upon extended exposure to palbociclib, the expression/phosphorylation of these proteins became altered, and the long-term removal of palbociclib did not restore the Rb expression/phosphorylation patterns. Consistently a copy number decrease, as well as RB1 mutations were detected. Moreover, although the resistant sublines exhibited cross-resistance to abemaciclib, their response to dinaciclib was the same as that of wild-type cells. Of note, the cell line exhibiting increased mTOR phosphorylation also showed a higher sensitivity to everolimus. However, the sensitivity to chemotherapeutic agents was unchanged in palbociclib-resistant sublines.

CONCLUSION

ER-positive breast cancer cells use multiple molecular mechanisms to survive in the presence of palbociclib, suggesting that targeting activated proteins may be an effective strategy to overcome resistance. Additionally, palbociclib monotherapy induces mutations and copy number alterations in the RB1 gene.

Clinical CDK4/6 inhibitors induce selective and immediate dissociation of p21 from cyclin D-CDK4 to inhibit CDK2

Since their discovery as drivers of proliferation, cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) have been considered therapeutic targets. Small molecule inhibitors of CDK4/6 are used and tested in clinical trials to treat multiple cancer types. Despite their clinical importance, little is known about how CDK4/6 inhibitors affect the stability of CDK4/6 complexes, which bind cyclins and inhibitory proteins such as p21. We develop an assay to monitor CDK complex stability inside the nucleus. Unexpectedly, treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors-palbociclib, ribociclib, or abemaciclib-immediately dissociates p21 selectively from CDK4 but not CDK6 complexes. This effect mediates indirect inhibition of CDK2 activity by p21 but not p27 redistribution. Our work shows that CDK4/6 inhibitors have two roles: non-catalytic inhibition of CDK2 via p21 displacement from CDK4 complexes, and catalytic inhibition of CDK4/6 independent of p21. By broadening the non-catalytic displacement to p27 and CDK6 containing complexes, next-generation CDK4/6 inhibitors may have improved efficacy and overcome resistance mechanisms.

Combined Luteolin and Indole-3-Carbinol Synergistically Constrains ERα-Positive Breast Cancer by Dual Inhibiting Estrogen Receptor Alpha and Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Pathway in Cultured Cells and Xenograft Mice

Simple Summary

Anti-cancer effects of bioactive compounds have been extensively investigated; however, the effective dosages of the bioactive compounds are too high to be obtained by oral intake. Our study aimed to assess if combined two bioactive compounds, luteolin (LUT) and indole-3-carbinol (I3C), at low dosages that LUT or I3C along has no significant effect, synergistically exerts anti-breast cancer. We confirmed that combined LUT and I3C synergistically suppressed estrogen receptor-alpha positive breast cancer in cultured cells and cells-derived xenograft mice. Our results also indicated two possible molecular pathways involving the synergistic effects of the combination of LUT and I3C. Our findings provide a practical approach to treat or prevent breast cancer by combining two bioactive compounds.

Abstract

The high concentrations of individual phytochemicals in vitro studies cannot be physiologically achieved in humans. Our solution for this concentration gap between in vitro and human studies is to combine two or more phytochemicals. We screened 12 phytochemicals by pairwise combining two compounds at a low level to select combinations exerting the synergistic inhibitory effect of breast cancer cell proliferation. A novel combination of luteolin at 30 μM (LUT30) and indole-3-carbinol 40 μM (I3C40) identified that this combination (L30I40) synergistically constrains ERα⁺ breast cancer cell (MCF7 and T47D) proliferation only, but not triple-negative breast cancer cells. At the same time, the individual LUT30 and I3C40 do not have this anti-proliferative effect in ERα⁺ breast cancer cells. Moreover, this combination L30I40 does not have toxicity on endothelial cells compared to the current commercial drugs. Similarly, the combination of LUT and I3C (LUT10 mg + I3C10 mg/kg/day) (IP injection) synergistically suppresses tumor growth in MCF7 cells-derived xenograft mice, but the individual LUT (10 mg/kg/day) and I3C (20 mg/kg/day) do not show an inhibitory effect. This combination synergistically downregulates two major therapeutic targets ERα and cyclin dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6/retinoblastoma (Rb) pathway, both in cultured cells and xenograft tumors. These results provide a solid foundation that a combination of LUT and I3C may be a practical approach to treat ERα⁺ breast cancer cells after clinical trials.

Cancer as an infectious disease: A different treatment alternative using a combination of tigecycline and pyrvinium pamoate - An example of breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Tigecycline is an antibiotic that well tolerated for treating complicated infections. It has received attention as an anti-cancer agent and expected to solve two major obstacles, sides effects that accompany chemotherapy and drug resistance, in the breast cancer treatment. However, previous studies reported that the levels in the blood are typically low of tigecycline, so higher doses are needed to treat cancer, that may increase the risk of side effects. To achieve better anti-cancer effects for tigecycline, we need to find a novel adjunct agent.

METHODS

In this study, we used different concentration of pyrvinium pamoate combined with tigecycline to treat cell. And assess the effect of two drugs in inhibit cell proliferation, induce cell autophagy, or increase cell apoptosis to evaluate the consequent of combined therapy.

RESULTS

We observed that after the combined therapy, the cell cycle arrest at G1/s phase, the level of p21 increased, but decreased the levels of CDK2. Others, two drugs via different mechanisms to inhibit cancer cell proliferation and with selective cytotoxic to different cell lines. That could enhance the effect of breast cancer treatment.

CONCLUSION

Combining low dose of tigecycline use with pyrvinium pamoate is a novel approach for breast cancer treatment. Appropriate combined therapy in breast cancer is recommended to improve outcomes. Other problems like drug resistance occur in patients or the microbes surrounding breast tissues would confer susceptibility to cancers then influence the effectiveness of treatment, which could be improved through combined therapy.

Mechanisms of resistance to cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors

Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors have emerged in the treatment of metastatic hormone receptor (HR)-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer. However, most patients will eventually present disease progression, highlighting the inevitable resistance of cancer cells to CDK4/6 inhibition. Several studies have suggested that resistance mechanisms involve aberrations of the molecules that regulate the cell cycle, and the re-wiring of the cell to escape CDK4/6 dependence and turn to alternative pathways. Loss of retinoblastoma function, overexpression of CDK 6, upregulation of cyclin E, overexpression of CDK 7, and dysregulation of several signaling pathways, notably the PI3/AKT/mTOR pathway, have been implicated in the development of resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors. Overlap with endocrine resistance mechanisms might be possible. Combinational therapeutic strategies should be explored in order to prevent resistance and optimize the management of patients after progression under CDK 4/6 inhibition.

Resistance to cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors confers cross-resistance to other CDK inhibitors but not to chemotherapeutic agents in breast cancer cells

Background

Combined endocrine therapy with a cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitor has been indicated to improve not only progression-free survival, but also overall survival in patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. However, resistance to this combination therapy inevitably develops. How to manage this resistant breast cancer is one of the most important clinical issues. To investigate the mechanisms of action responsible for resistance, we developed breast cancer cells resistant to CDK4/6 inhibitors, and analyzed their biological characteristics and sensitivity to different anticancer agents.

Methods

HR-positive, HER2-negative MCF-7 and KPL-1 breast cancer cells were cultivated in palbociclib (PAL) or abemaciclib (ABE)-added culture medium for over 5 months, and we successfully developed PAL- or ABE-resistant cells. The effects of PAL or ABE on the cell growth, basal RB expression, RB phosphorylation, cell cycle and cell senescence were compared between resistant and parental cells. Effects of the other CDK4/6 inhibitor, different chemotherapeutic agents and estrogen on the cell growth were also examined. The expression levels of cyclin D1, CDK2, CDK4, CDK6, cyclin E1 and estrogen receptor (ER)-ɑ were measured using RT-PCR.

Results

Long-term exposure to up to 200 nM PAL or ABE resulted in the development of PAL- or ABE-resistant MCF-7 or KPL-1 breast cancer cells. Basal expression levels of RB in both resistant cells were down-regulated. Inhibitory effects of either PAL or ABE on RB phosphorylation were reduced in both resistant cells. Accordingly, G1-S cell cycle retardation and cell senescence induced by either inhibitor were also attenuated in both resistant cells. Both resistant cells were cross-resistant to the other CDK4/6 inhibitor but almost as equally sensitive to different chemotherapeutic agents (5-fluorouracil, gemcitabine, paclitaxel, docetaxel, doxorubicin and eribulin) as the parental cells. The mRNA expression level of CDK6 significantly increased in the resistant MCF-7 cells and that of Rb1 significantly decreased in the resistant KPL-1 cells. Although both resistant cells were less sensitive to estrogen than the parental cells, the expression levels of ER-ɑ did not significantly change in either.

Conclusions

Our study suggests that acquired resistance to PAL or ABE confers cross-resistance to the other CDK4/6 inhibitor but not to chemotherapeutic agents in HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer cells. Down-regulation of basal RB expression and normalized RB phosphorylation reduced by CDK4/6 inhibitors may be responsible for the attenuated anti-cell growth effects of the inhibitors.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s12282-020-01150-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Therapy after cyclin-dependent kinase inhibition in metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: Resistance mechanisms and novel treatment strategies

Endocrine therapy has been the standard of care for patients with metastatic hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer since the 1970s, improving survival while avoiding the toxicities associated with cytotoxic chemotherapy. However, all HR-positive tumors ultimately develop resistance to endocrine therapy. Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors have more recently become an important component of the management of this breast cancer subtype, significantly delaying time to the disease progression and improving survival when combined with endocrine therapy. However, as with endocrine therapy alone, treatment resistance remains a universal phenomenon. As more women receive CDK4/6 inhibitors as part of their treatment, the management of de novo and acquired resistance to combined CDK4/CDK6 inhibitor plus endocrine therapy regimens has emerged as an important clinical challenge. Several resistance mechanisms have been described, including alterations in the CDK4/6/cyclin D complex or its major effector retinoblastoma protein (pRb), bypass signaling through other cyclin/CDK complexes and activation of upstream signaling pathways, in particular the PI3K/mTOR pathway, but robust biomarkers to predict resistance remain elusive, and the role for continuing CDK4/6 inhibitors after progression remains under investigation. Novel strategies being evaluated in clinical trials include the continuation of CDK4/6 inhibitors through progression, as well as triplet therapy combinations with PI3K inhibitors or immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Decreased ER dependency after acquired resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors represent a significant advancement in the treatment of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer. However, mechanisms of alterations after acquired resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors and the optimal treatment options are still not established.

METHODS

Abemaciclib-resistant cell lines were established from the models of estrogen deprivation-resistant cell lines which retained ER expression and activated ER function derived from MCF-7 breast cancer cell lines. Ribocilib-resistant cell lines were established in the same method as previously reported.

RESULTS

Both abemaciclib- and ribociclib-resistant cell lines showed decreased ER expression. ER transcriptional activity was maintained in these cell lines; however, the sensitivity to 4-hydroxytamoxifen and fulvestrant was almost completely lost. These cell lines did not exhibit any ERα gene mutation. Abemaciclib-resistant cell lines demonstrated low sensitivity to other CDK4/6 inhibitors; sensitivities to PI3K inhibitor, mTOR inhibitor, and chemotherapeutic drugs were maintained.

CONCLUSIONS

Dependence on ER signaling appears to decrease after the development of acquired resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors. Further, CDK4/6 inhibitor-resistant cells acquired cross-resistance to other CDK4/6 inhibitors, PI3K/Akt/mTOR inhibitor therapy and chemotherapeutic drugs might serve as optimal treatment options for such breast cancers.