Immune-related adverse events with immune checkpoint inhibitors in thoracic malignancies: focusing on non-small cell lung cancer patients

Predictors of immune-related adverse events and outcomes in patients with NSCLC treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors

OBJECTIVE

To identify predictors of immune-related adverse events (IRAEs) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Assess associations between outcomes and the development of IRAEs.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of patients with NSCLC treated with ICIs between 2016 and 2020 in the Pulmonology Department of our hospital. Patients with and without IRAEs were compared. A logistic regression analysis was performed to determine predictors of IRAEs. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) curves were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the long-rank test was used to assess survival differences between groups. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional-hazards regression models were used to identify factors associated with PFS and OS. The value considered statistically significant was p≤0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 184 patients (77.7% men, mean age 66.9±9.5 years) treated with ICIs were analyzed. During follow-up, 49 (26.6%) patients developed IRAEs and 149 (81.0%) died. According to the multivariate logistic regression analysis, treatment with statins (OR:3.15; p = 0.007), previous systemic corticosteroid therapy (OR:3.99; p = 0.001), disease controlled as response to ICI (OR:5.93; p < 0.001) and higher hemoglobin values (OR:1.28; p = 0.040) were independent predictors for the development of IRAEs. Patients who developed IRAEs had significantly longer medians of PFS (41.0 vs 9.0 weeks, p < 0.001) and OS (89.0 vs 28.0 weeks; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated with statins, pre-ICI systemic corticosteroids, higher baseline hemoglobin value and controlled disease as initial response to ICI had a higher risk of developing IRAEs. The development of IRAEs was associated with better outcomes.

Lichenoid drug reaction after ipilimumab/nivolumab combination therapy: A case report

Nivolumab (PD-1 inhibitor) and ipilumumab (CTLA-4 inhibitor) are recently approved checkpoint inhibitors for treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Immune-related adverse events related to the usage of checkpoint inhibitors are growing with their popularity. We present the case of a patient in combination treatment of nivolumab and ipilimumab who developed a lichenoid drug reaction, notable because it worsened to a bullous lichenoid drug reaction. Treatment with prednisone and withdrawal of checkpoint inhibitors aided in clinical resolution. Initial presentation of a lichenoid reaction that progressed to a bullous, desquamated presentation indicates the possibility of the prodromal rash progressing to a Stevens-Johnson Syndrome-like dermatosis. When dermatologists are consulted for rashes developed during checkpoint-inhibitor therapy, they should be aware that early treatment may prevent progression to bullae formation and desquamation and develop their treatment plans with this in mind.

The relationships among symptom experience, family support, health literacy, and fear of progression in advanced lung cancer patients

AIMS

Fear of progression of cancer patients can affect their psychological well-being, while research on fear of progression of advanced lung cancer patients is limited. This study aimed to describe fear of progression among advanced lung cancer patients and explore the relationships among symptom experience, family support, health literacy, and fear of progression.

DESIGN

This study was a cross-sectional study.

METHODS

Convenience sampling was used to select advanced lung cancer patients from September 2021 to January 2022. The Chinese version of the Fear of Progression Questionnaire-Short Form, Lung Cancer Module of the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory, Family Support Questionnaire, and Health Literacy Scale for Patients with Chronic Disease were used to collect data. The structural equation modelling was used to analyse the relationships among symptom experience, family support, health literacy, and fear of progression.

RESULTS

Of 220 patients, 31.8% had dysfunctional fear of progression. Better symptom experience, higher family support, and higher health literacy were correlated directly with lower fear of progression. Higher health literacy was associated indirectly with lower fear of progression through the mediation of better symptom experience.

CONCLUSION

Fear of progression among advanced lung cancer patients needs attention. Strengthening symptom management, building a strong system of family support, and improving patients' health literacy may be effective strategies to reduce fear of progression.

IMPACT

The research aimed to increase our understanding of the relationships among symptom experience, family support, health literacy, and fear of progression. Fear of progression screening should be integrated into the healthcare trajectory of advanced lung cancer patients. The results emphasize that improving symptom management, family support, and health literacy is important to alleviate fear of progression. Further interventions are warranted to relieve fear of progression for advanced lung cancer patients.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No public or patient involvement.

Predicting response and toxicity to immune checkpoint inhibitors in lung cancer using antibodies to frameshift neoantigens

PURPOSE

To evaluate a new class of blood-based biomarkers, anti-frameshift peptide antibodies, for predicting both tumor responses and adverse immune events to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapies in advanced lung cancer patients.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Serum samples were obtained from 74 lung cancer patients prior to palliative PD-(L)1 therapies with subsequently recorded tumor responses and immune adverse events (irAEs). Pretreatment samples were assayed on microarrays of frameshift peptides (FSPs), representing ~ 375,000 variant peptides that tumor cells can be informatically predicted to produce from translated mRNA processing errors. Serum-antibodies specifically recognizing these ligands were measured. Binding activities preferentially associated with best-response and adverse-event outcomes were determined. These antibody bound FSPs were used in iterative resampling analyses to develop predictive models of tumor response and immune toxicity.

RESULTS

Lung cancer serum samples were classified based on predictive models of ICI treatment outcomes. Disease progression was predicted pretreatment with ~ 98% accuracy in the full cohort of all response categories, though ~ 30% of the samples were indeterminate. This model was built with a heterogeneous sample cohort from patients that (i) would show either clear response or stable outcomes, (ii) would be administered either single or combination therapies and (iii) were diagnosed with different lung cancer subtypes. Removing the stable disease, combination therapy or SCLC groups from model building increased the proportion of samples classified while performance remained high. Informatic analyses showed that several of the FSPs in the all-response model mapped to translations of variant mRNAs from the same genes. In the predictive model for treatment toxicities, binding to irAE-associated FSPs provided 90% accuracy pretreatment, with no indeterminates. Several of the classifying FSPs displayed sequence similarity to self-proteins.

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-FSP antibodies may serve as biomarkers for predicting ICI outcomes when tested against ligands corresponding to mRNA-error derived FSPs. Model performances suggest this approach might provide a single test to predict treatment response to ICI and identify patients at high risk for immunotherapy toxicities.

Predicting survival of NSCLC patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: Impact and timing of immune-related adverse events and prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy

Introduction

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) produce a broad spectrum of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) affecting various organ systems. While ICIs are established as a therapeutic option in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment, most patients receiving ICI relapse. Additionally, the role of ICIs on survival in patients receiving prior targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy has not been well-defined.

Objective

To investigate the impact of irAEs, the relative time of occurrence, and prior TKI therapy to predict clinical outcomes in NSCLC patients treated with ICIs.

Methods

A single center retrospective cohort study identified 354 adult patients with NSCLC receiving ICI therapy between 2014 and 2018. Survival analysis utilized overall survival (OS) and real-world progression free survival (rwPFS) outcomes. Model performance matrices for predicting 1-year OS and 6-month rwPFS using linear regression baseline, optimal, and machine learning modeling approaches.

Results

Patients experiencing an irAE were found to have a significantly longer OS and rwPFS compared to patients who did not (median OS 25.1 vs. 11.1 months; hazard ratio [HR] 0.51, confidence interval [CI] 0.39- 0.68, P-value <0.001, median rwPFS 5.7 months vs. 2.3; HR 0.52, CI 0.41- 0.66, P-value <0.001, respectively). Patients who received TKI therapy before initiation of ICI experienced significantly shorter OS than patients without prior TKI therapy (median OS 7.6 months vs. 18.5 months; P-value < 0.01). After adjusting for other variables, irAEs and prior TKI therapy significantly impacted OS and rwPFS. Lastly, the performances of models implementing logistic regression and machine learning approaches were comparable in predicting 1-year OS and 6-month rwPFS.

Conclusion

The occurrence of irAEs, the timing of the events, and prior TKI therapy were significant predictors of survival in NSCLC patients on ICI therapy. Therefore, our study supports future prospective studies to investigate the impact of irAEs, and sequence of therapy on the survival of NSCLC patients taking ICIs.

Association between immune-mediated adverse events and efficacy in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with durvalumab and tremelimumab

PURPOSE

Immune-mediated adverse events (imAEs) may be associated with response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. We assessed the relationship between imAE development and efficacy in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with durvalumab (anti-programmed cell death ligand-1 [PD-L1]) alone or in combination with tremelimumab (anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4).

METHODS

The analysis used individual patient-level data from 307 and 310 patients in the monotherapy and combination arms of MYSTIC, respectively. We evaluated the association between treatment efficacy and development of imAEs using univariate and multivariate survival analyses. Using machine learning, we built a predictive model utilizing baseline clinical and laboratory features to identify patients at risk of developing imAEs and further evaluated patient survival based on a threshold index extracted from the model.

RESULTS

Patients who developed any grade of imAE had improved overall survival versus patients without (hazard ratio [HR] 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.41-0.62). imAE development was associated with improved overall survival (HR 0.54; 95% CI 0.44-0.66) in a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model considering patient demographic features and baseline characteristics. Higher odds of imAE development were observed (odds ratio 3.023; 95% CI: 1.56-5.83) in responders versus non-responders in patients treated with immunotherapy. Based on baseline characteristics, the random forest classification algorithm was used to formulate a predictive model to identify patients at increased risk of developing imAEs during treatment.

CONCLUSION

Post-hoc exploratory analysis found that the efficacy of immunotherapy was improved in patients who developed on-treatment imAEs. This was independent of severity of imAEs or the need for steroid treatment, which is important in allowing patients to remain on treatment and derive optimal clinical benefit. Further research is warranted to establish the correlation between incidence of imAEs and efficacy in this patient population.

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in hepatocellular carcinoma after PD-1 inhibitor therapy: two clinical cases

With the recent advances in immunotherapy, especially programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors, the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients has entered a new stage. However, few reports have focused on spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) after PD-1 inhibitor treatment of intermediate-to advanced-stage HCC. In this article, we report two clinical cases of SBP after successful PD-1 inhibitor therapy. The patient's condition was assessed as a complete response (CR) according to the mRECIST criteria. Based on these two cases, we found that patients with large or giant HCC who have large tumour diameter should be closely monitored for SBP after successful PD-1 inhibitor therapy, especially when the imaging shows the rapid development of marked necrosis and depression at the tumour site. Early and active treatment is necessary to reduce the suffering caused by SBP.

Peripheral absolute eosinophil count identifies the risk of serious immune-related adverse events in non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) have drawn a lot of attention lately as a result of the predominance of immunotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the clinical evidence for irAEs in real life is limited. In this paper, the occurrence of irAEs in Chinese NSCLC patients was examined, and possible risk factors for the emergence of severe irAEs were discovered.

Methods

Our retrospective investigation assessed the occurrence of adverse events (AEs) and prognosis of 213 patients who received immunotherapy for NSCLC. Using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models, the association between clinicopathological traits and the incidence of severe irAEs was investigated. To assess the prognostic impact of irAEs, survival data was analyzed.

Results

Among the 213 NSCLC patients, 122 (57.3%) had irAEs of any grade, and 38 (17.8%) had high-grade (grade 3-5) AEs. Baseline peripheral absolute eosinophil count (AEC) (HR 6.58, 95% CI: 1.5-28.8, P=0.012) was found to be an independent predictor of high-grade irAEs by multivariate analysis. The survival analysis revealed that patients with severe irAEs had worse OS (15.7 vs. 20.8 months, 95% CI: 11.6-19.8 vs. 16.0-25.5, P=0.026).

Conclusion

According to our findings, the peripheral absolute eosinophil count (AEC) is a reliable indicator of severe irAEs in NSCLC. Serious irAEs that occur in patients often reflect poor prognoses. In the future, high-grade irAEs should receive more attention.

Pancreatic injury following immune checkpoint inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Pancreatic injury (pancreatitis, amylase/lipase elevation) is a rare adverse event of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). With the high number of clinical studies on ICIs, the incidence and characteristics of associated pancreatic injury (PI) need to be reevaluated.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to assess the incidence of PI in cancer patients who received ICIs in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). PubMed, Embase, the ASCO, ESMO, and AACR conference proceedings before 1 April 2022, were investigated for relevant research.

Results: 50 RCTs involving 35,223 patients were included. The incidence of ICIs-PI was 2.22% (95% CI = 1.94%–2.53%). The incidence of PI was 3.76% (95% CI = 1.84–7.67%) when combining two ICIs, which was higher than single ICIs [2.25% (95% CI = 1.91–2.65%)]. The ICIs were ranked from high to low based on PI incidence: PD-L1 inhibitors 3.01% (95% CI = 1.86–4.87%), CTLA-4 inhibitors 2.92% (95% CI = 0.99–8.65%) and PD-1 Inhibitor 2% (95% CI = 1.67–2.39%). The ICI with the highest rate of PI was pembrolizumab 7.23.% (95% CI = 1.69–30.89%). In addition, the incidence of severe ICIs-PI was 2.08% (95% CI = 1.76–2.46%); and the incidence of severe PI was 2.32% (95% CI = 1.76–3.06%) when combining two ICIs, which was higher than single ICI [1.95% (95% CI = 1.58–2.41%)]. The ICIs were ranked from high to low according to the incidence of severe PI: PD-L1 inhibitors 3.1% (95% CI = 1.7–5.64%), CTLA-4 inhibitors 2.69% (95% CI = 0.76–9.49%), PD-1 inhibitors 1.80% (95% CI = 1.41–2.29%).

Conclusion: Treatment with multiple ICIs result in a higher incidence of PI compared to single ICIs, irrespective of the grade of pancreatic injury. The incidence of PI caused by PD-L1 inhibitors is higher than that of CTLA-4 inhibitors and PD-1 Inhibitor, and Pembrolizumab has the highest rate of ICIs-PI. Although the incidence of ICIs-PI is not high, they are usually severe (≥ grade 3 events).

Pembrolizumab-associated erythema nodosum in the treatment of metastatic melanoma

A 66-year-old woman receiving pembrolizumab for metastatic melanoma presented with tender red nodules on her shins and forearms. Biopsy was consistent with erythema nodosum (EN). The eruption responded to oral minocycline and potent topical steroids. Subsequent investigations detected bihilar lymphadenopathy, biopsied as granulomatous lymphadenitis, confirming the diagnosis of pembrolizumab-associated sarcoidosis. Pembrolizumab was stopped for two cycles and was restarted without recrudescence of EN or bihilar lymphadenopathy. Immunotherapy-associated sarcoidosis is a rare but recognized adverse event related to therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors. EN is an uncommon manifestation of immunotherapy-induced sarcoidosis. New-onset bihilar lymphadenopathy in the context of immunotherapy requires prompt histological evaluation to differentiate between immunotherapy-associated sarcoidosis and metastatic progression. We review the literature related to immunotherapy-associated EN.

The real-world safety of atezolizumab as second-line or later treatment in Japanese patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: a post-marketing surveillance study

BACKGROUND

We conducted a post-marketing surveillance study to evaluate the clinical tolerability and safety of atezolizumab in Japanese patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

This prospective, observational post-marketing cohort study was conducted in NSCLC patients who received atezolizumab 1200 mg every 3 weeks at 770 facilities in Japan between April 18, 2018, and March 31, 2020 (study number UMIN000031978). Case report forms were completed, recording patient characteristics, treatment details, adverse events, adverse drug reactions (ADRs), their severity, onset and outcomes. Follow-up was for 12 months or until atezolizumab discontinuation.

RESULTS

Overall, 2570 patients were included, median age was 69.0 years, and 69.9% were males. ADRs were reported in 29.1% of patients, most commonly pyrexia (4.2%). Grade ≥ 3 ADRs occurred in 9.7% of patients aged <75 and 9.7% of those aged ≥75 years. The incidence of Grade ≥ 3 ADRs was not affected by the number of lines of previous treatment or the presence or history of an autoimmune disorder. Immune-related ADRs of interest that occurred in >1% of patients were interstitial lung disease (ILD; 4.4%), endocrine disorder (4.3%), and hepatic dysfunction (2.8%). ILD was significantly more common in patients with a history of, or concurrent, ILD versus those without (P ≤ 0.001). Risk factors of Grade ≥ 3 ADRs were a history of, or concurrent, ILD. Grade 5 ADRs occurred in 35 patients, 11 of whom had concurrent ILD.

CONCLUSIONS

This large cohort study confirmed the clinical tolerability of atezolizumab in a real-world group of Japanese patients with NSCLC.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Induced Hepatotoxicity; Gastroenterologists' Perspectives

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have promising clinical activity and are essential medications for patients with several malignancies. However, by deranging the immune system, these novel agents could lead to immune-related adverse events (IRAEs). Hepatotoxicity with checkpoint inhibitors usually results in acute hepatitis or drug-induced liver injury. METHODS: This review article discusses the recent clinical evidence available regarding checkpoint inhibitor-induced hepatitis and reviews an approach to their diagnosis and management. CONCLUSION: ICIs have improved patients' outcomes with different forms of malignancy; however, ICIs-related liver damage is a clinically significant entity in these patients. All patients should be monitored carefully for IRAEs while undergoing treatment with ICIs.

Safety and efficacy of atezolizumab with obinutuzumab and bendamustine in previously untreated follicular lymphoma

Obinutuzumab (G) chemoimmunotherapy demonstrated improved progression-free survival (PFS) vs rituximab-based chemoimmunotherapy in patients with previously untreated follicular lymphoma (FL) in the GALLIUM trial. Atezolizumab (atezo) is a programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitor with a complementary mechanism of action to G by restoring cytotoxic T-cell function. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of atezo-G-bendamustine in patients with previously untreated FL in a phase Ib/II trial (#NCT02596971). A safety run-in phase was followed by an expansion phase with atezo-G-bendamustine induction and atezo-G maintenance for ≤24 months. Forty patients with previously untreated FL were enrolled and treated with atezo-G-bendamustine. The primary endpoint, complete response (CR) rate, assessed by an independent review committee (IRC; modified Lugano 2014 criteria) was 75.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 61.3% to 85.8%). Three-year investigator-assessed PFS and overall survival rates were 80.9% (95% CI, 63.9% to 90.5%) and 89.3% (95% CI, 73.9% to 95.9%), respectively. At baseline, 21/40 patients had circulating lymphoma-specific clonotypes and underwent repeat testing at end of induction; all were minimal residual disease negative (10-5 sensitivity), with 16 (76.2%) CRs, 3 (14.3%) partial responses, and 2 (9.5%) with stable disease (IRC assessed). Grade 5 (fatal) adverse events (AEs) were reported in 5 patients. The efficacy of atezo-G-bendamustine in previously untreated FL did not appear superior to G-bendamustine efficacy as seen in the GALLIUM trial, and the addition of atezo to G-bendamustine was associated with an increased risk of AEs. Particularly due to the unfavorable safety profile, this regimen cannot be recommended in patients with previously untreated FL. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02596971.

Review of Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)—Their Incidence, Management, Multiorgan irAEs, and Rechallenge

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of advanced malignancies, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). These agents have improved clinical outcomes and have become quite an attractive alternative alone or combined with other treatments. Although ICIs are tolerated better, they also lead to unique toxicities, termed immune-related adverse events (irAEs). A reconstituted immune system may lead to dysregulation in normal immune self-tolerance and cause inflammatory side effects (irAEs). Although any organ system can be affected, immune-related adverse events most commonly involve the gastrointestinal tract, endocrine glands, skin, and liver. They can occur anytime during the treatment course and rarely even after completion. Owen and colleagues showed that approximately 30% of patients with NSCLC treated with ICIs develop irAEs. Kichenadasse et al. conducted a thorough evaluation of multiorgan irAEs, which is of particular interest because information regarding these types of irAEs is currently sparse. It is important to delineate between infectious etiologies and symptom progression during the management of irAEs. Close consultation with disease-specific subspecialties is encouraged. Corticosteroids are the mainstay of treatment of most irAEs. Early intervention with corticosteroids is crucial in the general management of immune-mediated toxicity. Grade 1–2 irAEs can be closely monitored; hypothyroidism and other endocrine irAEs may be treated with hormone supplementation without the need for corticosteroid therapy. Moderate- to high-dose steroids and other additional immunosuppressants such as tocilizumab and cyclophosphamide might be required in severe, grade 3–4 cases. Recently, increasing research on irAEs after immunotherapy rechallenge has garnered much attention. Dolladille and colleagues assessed the safety in patients with cancer who resumed therapy with the same ICIs and found that rechallenge was associated with about 25–30% of the same irAEs experienced previously (4). However, such data should be carefully considered. Further pooled analyses may be required before we conclude about ICIs’ safety in rechallenge.

Safety of Tepotinib in Patients with MET Exon 14 Skipping NSCLC and Recommendations for Management

INTRODUCTION

The MET inhibitor tepotinib demonstrated durable clinical activity in patients with advanced MET exon 14 (METex14) skipping NSCLC. We report detailed analyses of adverse events of clinical interest (AECIs) in VISION, including edema, a class effect of MET inhibitors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Incidence, management, and time to first onset/resolution were analyzed for all-cause AECIs, according to composite categories (edema, hypoalbuminemia, creatinine increase, and ALT/AST increase) or individual preferred terms (pleural effusion, nausea, diarrhea, and vomiting), for patients with METex14 skipping NSCLC in the phase II VISION trial.

RESULTS

Of 255 patients analyzed (median age: 72 years), edema, the most common AECI, was reported in 69.8% (grade 3, 9.4%; grade 4, 0%). Median time to first edema onset was 7.9 weeks (range: 0.1-58.3). Edema was manageable with supportive measures, dose reduction (18.8%), and/or treatment interruption (23.1%), and rarely prompted discontinuation (4.3%). Other AECIs were also manageable and predominantly mild/moderate: hypoalbuminemia, 23.9% (grade 3, 5.5%); pleural effusion, 13.3% (grade ≥ 3, 5.1%); creatinine increase, 25.9% (grade 3, 0.4%); nausea, 26.7% (grade 3, 0.8%), diarrhea, 26.3% (grade 3, 0.4%), vomiting 12.9% (grade 3, 1.2%), and ALT/AST increase, 12.2% (grade ≥ 3, 3.1%). GI AEs typically occurred early and resolved in the first weeks.

CONCLUSION

Tepotinib was well tolerated in the largest trial of a MET inhibitor in METex14 skipping NSCLC. The most frequent AEs were largely mild/moderate and manageable with supportive measures and/or dose reduction/interruption, and caused few withdrawals in this elderly population.

Immunotherapy in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer in a patient with Grave's disease: safety and biomarkers of response

Patients with cancer and pre-existing autoimmune diseases have been excluded from immunotherapy clinical trials. So, studying these patients who received immunotherapy is critical to increasing evidence of the treatment's safety and efficacy in this population. Furthermore, a complete and durable response to immunotherapy in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is rare. Therefore, it is imperative to study patients with a complete response in order to identify potential predictors of response to immunotherapy. In this case report, we highlight a 62-year-old man with a smoking history and Graves' disease who achieved a complete response with immunotherapy for metastatic NSCLC, with a long-lasting response and no immune-related adverse events. Male gender, high programmed death-ligand 1 expression, current smokers, epidermal growth factor receptor and anaplastic lymphoma kinase wild types could be biomarkers of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors presented at baseline. Caution should be exercised when interpreting this finding because it represents our patient.

A Novel Human Recombinant Lactoferrin Inhibits Lung Adenocarcinoma Cell Growth and Migration with No Cytotoxic Effect on Normal Human Epithelial Cells

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Despite the recent advances in cancer treatment, only a subset of patients responds to targeted and immune therapies, and many patients developing resistance after an initial response. Lactoferrin (Lf) is a natural glycoprotein with immunomodulatory and anticancer activities. We produced a novel recombinant human Lf (rhLf) that exhibits glycosylation profile compatible with the natural hLf for potential parenteral therapeutic applications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the anticancer effects of this novel rhLf in human lung adenocarcinoma cells and its mechanisms of action. The results showed a concentration-dependent inhibition of A549 cancer cell growth in response to rhLf. Treatment with 1 mg/ml of rhLf for 24 h and 72 h resulted in a significant inhibition of cancer cell growth by 32% and 25%, respectively. Moreover, rhLf increased fourfold the percentage of early and late apoptotic cells compared to the control. This effect was accompanied by increased levels of caspase-3 activity and cell cycle arrest at the S phase in rhLf-treated cancer cells. Furthermore, rhLf significantly attenuated A549 cell migration. Importantly, treatment of normal human bronchial epithelial (NHBE) cells with rhLf showed the cell viability and morphology comparable to the control. In contrast, chemotherapeutic etoposide induced cytotoxicity in NHBE cells and reduced the cell viability by 40%. These results demonstrate the selective anticancer effects of rhLf against lung adenocarcinoma cells without cytotoxicity on normal human cells. This study highlights a potential for clinical utility of this novel rhLf in patients with lung cancer.

Case Report: Nivolumab-Induced Autoimmune Pancreatitis

Nivolumab is an anti-programmed cell death protein 1 monoclonal antibody. While an effective treatment for a variety of tumors, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) can cause immune-related adverse events such as ICI-pancreatic injury (ICI-PI). Here we present a case of a 60-year-old man with metastatic acral melanoma treated with nivolumab and ipilimumab who developed ICI-PI. Changes in positron emission tomography images preceded symptom onset. However, this case is unique in that the patient presented with cholestatic liver disease. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography showed a dilated extrahepatic bile duct that resolved with steroid therapy, similar to the clinical course of autoimmune pancreatitis. ICI-PI has variable presentations including obstructive jaundice with a clinical course mimicking autoimmune pancreatitis and prompt awareness and treatment of ICI-PI is clinically significant given increasing use of ICIs.

Simultaneous targeting of TGF-β/PD-L1 synergizes with radiotherapy by reprogramming the tumor microenvironment to overcome immune evasion

Localized radiotherapy (RT) induces an immunogenic antitumor response that is in part counterbalanced by activation of immune evasive and tissue remodeling processes, e.g., via upregulation of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and transforming growth factor β (TGF-β). We report that a bifunctional fusion protein that simultaneously inhibits TGF-β and PD-L1, bintrafusp alfa (BA), effectively synergizes with radiotherapy, leading to superior survival in multiple therapy-resistant murine tumor models with poor immune infiltration. The BA + RT (BART) combination increases tumor-infiltrating leukocytes, reprograms the tumor microenvironment, and attenuates RT-induced fibrosis, leading to reconstitution of tumor immunity and regression of spontaneous lung metastases. Consistently, the beneficial effects of BART are in part reversed by depletion of cytotoxic CD8⁺ T cells. Intriguingly, targeting of the TGF-β trap to PD-L1⁺ endothelium and the M2/lipofibroblast-like cell compartment by BA attenuated late-stage RT-induced lung fibrosis. Together, the results suggest that the BART combination has the potential to eradicate therapy-resistant tumors while sparing normal tissue, further supporting its clinical translation.

Therapeutic and Prognostic Implications of Immune-Related Adverse Events in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Introduction

PD-(L)1 inhibitors have improved prognosis of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but can also cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs) that complicate management.

Methods

We analyzed NSCLC patients receiving PD-(L)1 inhibitors from 2012 to 2020 in a German academic center.

Results

IrAE showed comparable frequencies in stage IV (198/894 or 22%) vs. III (14/45 or 31%, p = 0.15), after anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy vs. chemoimmunotherapy (139/483 vs. 58/213, p = 0.75), and across treatment lines. In stage IV, irAE occurred after 3.1 months in median, affected multiple organs (median 2) in 27/894 patients and were associated with PD-L1 positivity (25 vs. 14%, p = 0.003), lower neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios (29 vs. 17%, p < 0.001 for NLR dichotomized at 5), better ECOG status (26 vs. 18% for 0 vs. 1, p = 0.004), but not related to age, sex, smoking and palliative radiotherapy. Two hundred thirty two irAEs occurred mostly in endocrine glands (4.9%), lungs (4.4%), the musculoskeletal system (4.2%), colon (4.1%), liver (3.7%), and skin (2.6%), while pneumonitis was most frequent with durvalumab following definitive chemoradiation (16% or 7/45, p < 0.01). IrAE severity was grade 1 in 11%, 2 in 41%, 3 in 36%, and 4 in 11% events, while two were lethal (<1%, myocarditis and pneumonitis). Therapy was suspended in 72%, while steroids were initiated in 66% and complemented by other immunosuppressants in 6%, with longest treatment duration for rheumatic events (mean >3 months), and average cumulative prednisone doses >700 mg for all organs, except for skin. Patients developing irAE had longer progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in multivariable 12/14-week landmark analyses including ECOG status, treatment line, treatment type, PD-L1 TPS, and NLR (median PFS 17 vs. 10 months, HR = 0.68, p = 0.009; median OS 37 vs. 15 months, HR = 0.40, p < 0.001), regardless of grade. OS was longest with skin (95% at 2 years) and shortest with pneumonitis, hepatitis, neurologic, and cardiologic irAE (38, 37, 28, and 0% at 2 years, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Approximately one-fourth of immunotherapy-treated NSCLC patients develop irAEs, most of which necessitate treatment suspension and steroids. Despite more frequent occurrence with PD-L1 positive tumors, lower NLR, and better ECOG PS, irAEs are independently associated with longer survival, especially when affecting the skin. Lethality is below 1%.

Does immune checkpoint inhibitor increase the risks of poor outcomes in COVID-19-infected cancer patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The association between immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) and outcomes of cancer patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection has yet to be systematically evaluated. This meta-analysis aims to investigate the effects of ICI treatment on COVID-19 prognosis, including mortality, severity, and any other prognosis-related outcomes.

Methods

Eligible studies published up to 27 February 2021 were included and assessed for risk of bias using the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the pooled effect size along with its 95% confidence intervals. The quality of body evidence was evaluated using the modified Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework.

Results

Eleven studies involving a total of 2826 COVID-19-infected cancer patients were included in the systematic review. We discovered a moderate-to-high quality of evidence that ICI was not associated with a higher mortality risk, while the other outcomes yielded a very low-to-low-evidence quality. Although our findings indicated that ICI did not result in a higher risk of severity and hospitalization, further evidence is required to confirm our findings. In addition, we discovered that prior exposure to chemoimmunotherapy may be linked with a higher risk of COVID-19 severity (OR 8.19 [95% CI: 2.67–25.08]; I² = 0%), albeit with small sample size.

Conclusion

Our findings indicated that ICI treatment should not be adjourned nor terminated during the current pandemic. Rather, COVID-19 vigilance should be increased in such patients. Further studies with larger cohorts and higher quality of evidence are required to substantiate our findings.

Trial registration number

This project has been prospectively registered at PROSPERO (registration ID: CRD42020202142) on 4 August 2020.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00262-021-02990-9.

Impact of corticosteroid use on outcomes of non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Administration of corticosteroids to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI)-treated patients has raised concerns due to doubts about ICIs' efficacy under those conditions. Hence, we reviewed studies comparing overall and progression-free survival (OS and PFS) outcomes in patients with non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) treated with ICI and either with or without corticosteroids for any reason.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed Central, Cochrane library, EMBASE and MEDLINE databases from inception until February 2021 for relevant publications. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa scale to assess the quality of the identified studies. We used the published data to carry out a meta-analysis with a random-effects model and report pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

We included data from 14 studies with 5461 participants in the meta-analysis. Most studies were retrospective in nature and of low quality, and most of them were conducted in the USA and in European countries. Nivolumab is the most common ICI used in the included studies followed by pembrolizumab. We found that patients using corticosteroids had reduced OSs (pooled HR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.51-2.18) and PFSs (pooled HR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.41-2.04) than the patients not using corticosteroids. We identified significant heterogeneity and publication bias for both the outcomes. However, the sensitivity analysis revealed that the estimates were robust to the individual study effects.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that corticosteroids significantly reduce the OS and PFS of patients with NSCLC under ICI therapy. Hence, clinicians and oncologists should consider this information when prescribing corticosteroids for this target population.

Meta-analysis of immune-related adverse events in phase 3 clinical trials assessing immune checkpoint inhibitors for lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

The introduction in clinical practice of the immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) radically changed the treatment algorithm of lung cancers. To characterize the toxicity of ICIs (atezolizumab, durvalumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab) is important for personalizing treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of phase III randomized controlled trials assessing ICIs, from inception until April 23^rd, 2020. We extracted the data from the ICI arm of each trial for indirect comparisons to estimate relative risk for immune-related adverse events (irAEs), severe (grade ≥3) irAEs, drug discontinuation due to irAEs or toxic death.

RESULTS

Sixteen trials included a total of 6226 subjects randomized to the experimental immunotherapy arm. Immunotherapy was administered in monotherapy (8 trials), in combination with chemotherapy (6 trials) or other ICI (2 trials). Any grade irAEs and severe irAEs for ICI were 37.1% and 18.5%, respectively. Discontinuations due to any grade irAEs and severe irAEs were 13.8% and 9.2%, respectively; toxic deaths were 2.9% in the immunotherapy arm. Pooled data on any, severe and organ-specific irAEs showed that immunotherapy has a significantly lower risk of irAEs compared to immuno-chemotherapy, especially when analysis was restricted to monoimmunotherapy, like drug discontinuation and toxic death (all p < 0.05). Detailed comparisons between different ICIs provided treatment-related risk profiles for organ-specific irAEs.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings contribute to clarifying frequency and features of immune-related toxicities between different ICIs in lung cancer patients, including any grade irAEs, severe irAEs, drug discontinuation and toxic deaths, and may be useful to inform the selection of treatment.

Cancer neoantigens as potential targets for immunotherapy

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein-4 (CTLA-4) and programed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) or its ligand PD-L1 have increased the survival and cure rates for patients with many cancer types in various disease settings. However, only 10–40% of cancer patients benefited from these ICIs, of whom ~ 20% have treatment interruption or discontinuation due to immune-related adverse events that can be severe and even fatal. Current efforts in precision immunotherapy are focused on improving biomarker-based patient selection for currently available ICIs and exploring rationale combination and novel strategies to expand the benefit of immunotherapy to more cancer patients. Neoantigens arise from ~ 10% of the non-synonymous somatic mutations in cancer cells, are important targets of T cell-mediated anti-tumor immunity for individual patients. Advances in next generation sequencing technology and computational bioinformatics have enable the identification of genomic alterations, putative neoantigens, and gene expression profiling in individual tumors for personal oncology in a rapid and cost-effective way. Among the genomic biomarkers, defective mismatch DNA repair (dMMR), microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) and high tumor mutational burden (H-TMB) have received FDA approvals for selecting patients for ICI treatment. All these biomarkers measure high neoantigen load and tumor antigenicity, supporting the current development of neoantigen-based personalized cancer vaccines for patients with high TMB tumor. Several studies have shown neoantigen vaccines are feasible, safe and have promising clinical activity in patients with high TMB tumors in both metastatic and adjuvant settings. This review summarizes the emerging data and technologies for neoantigen-based personalized immunotherapy.

Colitis presenting 5 months after the final dose of anti-PD-1: long-term monitoring is warranted after adjuvant therapy

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been approved as adjuvant therapy. Adverse immune events occurred during the administration of treatment, and delayed immune-related events have low incidence. A 66-year-old man was treated for hypopharynx cancer in 2012. In 2019, he was treated for a new oropharynx cancer. After undergoing surgery and complete response, the patient received nivolumab as adjuvant treatment. 5 months after the last dose of nivolumab, he presented with grade III diarrhea and abdominal pain for 3 weeks. Rectoscopy showed infiltration of mucous by lymphocytes. Corticosteroid was started resulting in a rapid decrease in symptom severity. With the increasing immune checkpoint inhibitors in adjuvant therapy, strict surveillance and education of patient in remission is necessary.

Immune-related adverse events and immune checkpoint inhibitor tolerance on rechallenge in patients with irAEs: a single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Given the widespread use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), newer immune related adverse events (irAEs) have come to light, including flare-ups of preexisting autoimmune disorders (AIDs) and delayed immune-related events. We aimed to identify the frequency and severity of new IRAEs, including AID flares in cancer patients treated with ICIs at our institution. We also studied the tolerability of ICIs upon rechallenge in patients with irAEs and hospital admissions due to irAEs in a community setting in rural Maine.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review analysis of all patients with cancer who received anti-PDL1/PDL1 inhibitors nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, and durvalumab at our tertiary care center from November 2015 to March 2019. Demographic data, cancer type and stage, irAEs, hospital admissions due to irAEs, and drug treatment information was extracted.

RESULTS

We included 465 patients who received ICIs, 115 (out of 465 25%) developed new irAEs. Preexisting AID were identified in 47 (out of 465) (10%), AID flares were observed in 12 patients (25% of 47). 17 (out of 47 36%) were on immunosuppression for underlying AID, 5 (out of 17, 29%) developed flares. Overall, 148 (32% of 465) irAEs occurred, as some patients had multiple toxicities. Majority were treated for Lung cancer (63%), followed by melanoma and genitourinary cancers. Due to irAE severity, treatment was permanently discontinued in 15% (out of 465) patients. Hospital admissions due to irAEs were required for 34 patients (7.3% of 465). ICI rechallenge was performed in 27 patients (6% of 465), and majority tolerated well.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that ICIs were generally well tolerated and can be used safely even in patients with preexisting AIDs; it is encouraging to see majority tolerated rechallenge with ICIs well.

Immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: Update and new insights

BACKGROUND

The treatment of non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) has changed markedly in recent years as a result of two major treatment milestones: Targeted therapy and immunotherapy. Since 2015, immunotherapy has been changing the paradigm of NSCLC treatment in different settings and has contributed to improve the quality of life of these patients. The most widely used immunotherapy strategy in clinical practice is currently PD-1 and CTLA-4 immune checkpoint inhibition-based immunotherapy. Initial successful results came from an improvement in overall survival for pretreated patients, and immunotherapy subsequently moved to a first-line palliative setting as monotherapy, in combination with chemotherapy or as double-checkpoint inhibition. With regard to earlier stages, consolidation immunotherapy after chemoradiation has also changed the paradigm of unresectable NSCLC, with marked benefits in terms of disease-free and overall survival. During the last few years, efforts have focused on the introduction of immunotherapy in earlier stages as neoadjuvant treatment for potentially resectable tumors and in an adjuvant setting, with some very promising results.

AIM

In this manuscript, we provide both an agile and thorough review of the role of immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer, a critical analysis of the most important studies, current indications, the role of biomarkers, new insights, and future challenges.

RELEVANCE FOR PATIENTS

Immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer patients reaching better survival outcomes in first and second palliative setting and in unresectable stage III tumors. Next year's immunotherapy will also introduce in earlier stages. Through an extensive knowledge of the mechanisms of action and of immunotherapy-based studies, the best treatment alternative can be offered to patients, helping to improve their survival and cure rates.

Therapeutic and Systemic Adverse Events of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis for Clinical Management of NSCLC

Non-small-cell lung cancer takes up the majority of lung carcinoma-caused deaths. It is reported that targeting PD-1/PD-L1, a well-known immune evasion checkpoint, can eradicate tumor. Checkpoint inhibitors, such as monoclonal antibodies, are actively employed in cancer treatment. Thus, this review aimed to assess the therapeutic and toxic effects of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in treatment of NSCLC. So far, 6 monoclonal antibodies blocking PD-1/PD-L1 interaction are identified and used in clinical trials and randomized controlled trials for NSCLC therapy. These antibody-based therapies for NSCLC were collected by using search engine PubMed, and articles about the assessment of adverse events were collected by using Google search. Route of administration and dosage are critical parameters for efficient immunotherapy. Although antibodies can improve overall survival and are expected to be target-specific, they can cause systemic adverse effects in the host. Targeting certain biomarkers can limit the toxicity of adverse effects of the antibody-mediated therapy. Clinical experts with knowledge of adverse effects (AEs) of checkpoint inhibitors can help manage and reduce mortalities associated with antibody-based therapy of NSCLC.

Management of endocrine immune-related adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors: an updated review

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) belong to a new group of anticancer drugs targeting T-cell proteins involved in the activation of immune response toward malignancies. Their introduction into clinical practice was a milestone in modern cancer treatment. However, the significant advantage of ICIs over conventional chemotherapy in terms of therapeutic efficacy is accompanied by new challenges related to specific side effects. ICI-induced immune system activation could lead to the loss of self-tolerance, presenting as autoimmune inflammation and dysfunction of various tissues and organs. Thus, the typical side effects of ICIs include immune-related adverse events (irAEs), among which endocrine irAEs, affecting numerous endocrine glands, have been commonly recognized. This review aimed to outline the current knowledge regarding ICI-induced endocrine disorders from a clinical perspective. We present updated information on the incidence and clinical development of ICI-induced endocrinopathies, including the most frequent thyroiditis and hypophysitis, the rarely observed insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and primary adrenal insufficiency, and the recently described cases of hypoparathyroidism and lipodystrophy. Practical guidelines for monitoring, diagnosis, and treatment of ICI-related endocrine toxicities are also offered. Rising awareness of endocrine irAEs among oncologists, endocrinologists, and other health professionals caring for patients receiving ICIs could contribute to better safety and efficacy. As immunotherapy becomes widespread and approved for new types of malignancies, increased incidences of endocrine irAEs are expected in the future.

Immune-related adverse events on body CT in patients with small-cell lung cancer treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors

PURPOSE

Investigate the incidence and imaging characteristics of radiologically-evident immune-related adverse events (irAEs) on body CT in patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors.

METHODS

The study included 53 patients with relapsed/refractory SCLC (27 men, 26 women) treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors alone or in combination with CTLA-4 inhibition, who had baseline and at least one follow-up body CT during therapy. Body CT scans were reviewed to detect and characterize organ-specific irAEs including thyroiditis, pneumonitis, hepatitis, pancreatitis, enteritis, and colitis.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients (36 %) developed radiologically-evident irAEs. The median time from therapy initiation to irAE onset was 7.1 weeks. Pneumonitis and colitis were most common, noted in 9 patients (17 %) each. Seven colitis cases demonstrated pancolitis, and two cases showed segmental colitis associated with diverticulosis. The common radiographic patterns of pneumonitis were acute interstitial pneumonia (AIP)/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) pattern (n = 4) and cryptogenic organizing pneumonia (COP) pattern (n = 3). Other irAEs included thyroiditis (n = 3), enteritis (n = 2), hepatitis (n = 1), and pancreatitis (n = 1). Older age (p = 0.03) and prior radiotherapy to any organ (p = 0.03) was associated with overall irAEs. Prior chest radiotherapy was significantly associated with pneumonitis or thyroiditis (p = 0.0004).

CONCLUSION

Radiologically-evident irAEs were noted on body CT in 36 % of patients with SCLC treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors. Colitis and pneumonitis were most common. Prior chest radiotherapy was a predictor of the development of both pneumonitis and thyroiditis. Awareness of risk factors and CT findings of irAEs is important for early detection and accurate diagnosis of potentially serious immunotherapy toxicities.

Recommendations for detection, prioritization, and treatment of thoracic oncology patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: the THOCOoP cooperative group

The world currently faces a pandemic due to SARS-CoV-2. Relevant information has emerged regarding the higher risk of poor outcomes in lung cancer patients. As such, lung cancer patients must be prioritized in terms of prevention, detection and treatment. On May 7th, 45 experts in thoracic cancers from 11 different countries were invited to participate. A core panel of experts regarding thoracic oncology care amidst the pandemic gathered virtually, and a total of 60 initial recommendations were drafted based on available evidence, 2 questions were deleted due to conflicting evidence. By May 16th, 44 experts had agreed to participate, and voted on each of the 58 recommendation using a Delphi panel on a live voting event. Consensus was reached regarding the recommendations (>66 % strongly agree/agree) for 56 questions. Strong consensus (>80 % strongly agree/agree) was reached for 44 questions. Patients with lung cancer represent a particularly vulnerable population during this time. Special care must be taken to maintain treatment while avoiding exposure.

PD-L1 in Systemic Immunity: Unraveling Its Contribution to PD-1/PD-L1 Blockade Immunotherapy

The use of monoclonal antibodies targeting PD-1/PD-L1 axis completely changed anticancer treatment strategies. However, despite the significant improvement in overall survival and progression-free survival of patients undergoing these immunotherapy treatments, the only clinically accepted biomarker with some prediction capabilities for the outcome of the treatment is PD-L1 expression in tumor biopsies. Nevertheless, even when having PD-L1-positive tumors, numerous patients do not respond to these treatments. Considering the high cost of these therapies and the risk of immune-related adverse events during therapy, it is necessary to identify additional biomarkers that would facilitate stratifying patients in potential responders and non-responders before the start of immunotherapies. Here, we review the utility of PD-L1 expression not only in tumor cells but in immune system cells and their influence on the antitumor activity of immune cell subsets.

Are anti-PD1 and anti-PD-L1 alike? The non-small-cell lung cancer paradigm

Anti-PD1 and anti-PD-L1 agents may have intrinsic and clinically relevant differences in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. By reviewing currently available indirect evidence on these agents for NSCLC treatment, highlighting possible inter- and intra-class dissimilarities, anti-PD1 agents showed a higher response rate and a better outcome when combined with chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of patients with squamous and PD-L1 low advanced NSCLC, as compared to anti-PD-L1 agents. Conversely, anti-PD-L1 agents were responsible for less severe adverse events (AEs), particularly, immunerelated AEs. These differences could be explained by their different specific properties. Considering possible differences between anti-PD1 and anti-PD-L1 agents could be clinically relevant for treatment tailoring and inspiring new investigational approaches.

Are there any ethnic differences in the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors for treatment of lung cancer?

Immunotherapy, especially immune checkpoint inhibitors, has revolutionized the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. However, data on ethnic differences in response to these treatments are still lacking. We reviewed the currently available clinical data on immune checkpoint inhibitors and analyzed the ethnic difference in terms of treatment efficacies and side effects. Despite different epidemiology, genetic susceptibility and molecular profiles, Asian lung cancer patients demonstrated comparable outcomes to Western patients in terms of response rates and survival benefits. The incidence of immune-related adverse events has been reported with a higher incidence in Japanese patients, but was not consistent across other Asian patient populations, and warrants further investigation.

Anti-programmed cell death-1 and anti-programmed cell death ligand-1 immune-related liver diseases: from clinical pivotal studies to real-life experience

INTRODUCTION

Monoclonal antibodies directed against programmed cell death-1 (anti-PD-1) and its ligand (anti-PD-L1) showed a significant efficacy among different immunogenic metastatic tumors such as melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Between immune-related adverse events (irAEs) dependent on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPIs), immune-related liver diseases are uncommon and a definitive diagnosis is not always feasible.

AREAS COVERED

We revised data from phase II/III clinical trials and real-world retrospective analyses on liver-related adverse events induced by anti-PD-1 (nivolumab/pembrolizumab) and anti-PD-L1 (atezolizumab) in advanced cancer populations (melanoma, NSCLC and RCC). Furthermore, we described clinical-pathological patterns of immune-related liver diseases in real-life.

EXPERT OPINION

Use of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 led to a paradigm shift in the management of patients with melanoma, NSCLC and RCC. IrAEs can occur potentially in any tissue, leading to discontinuation of ICPIs, at least in a small proportion of these patients, and to a negative impact on their prognosis. Hepatobiliary immune-related adverse events are underestimated due to inappropriate monitoring. Development of novel diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for cancer patients receiving ICPIs as well as the identification of predictive biomarkers of liver injury could allow a better patients' selection and improve clinical outcomes of immune-related liver diseases.

Nanotherapeutics for Immuno-Oncology: A Crossroad for New Paradigms

With the rapid increase in the use of nanotechnology and immunotherapy for cancer management in the recent past, there are great implications for using nanotechnology in immuno-oncology. However, to deliver clinical success, the scientific and clinical rationale must be critically evaluated when applying nanotechnology to immuno-oncology challenges. This opinion article distinguishes between designing nanotherapeutics for immunotherapy and the past focus on the placement of chemotherapy agents in nanoparticles. We believe the integration of nanotechnology with cancer immunotherapy for nano-immunotherapeutics provides unique opportunities for both fields, paving the way for entirely new therapeutic paradigms. As a particular focus in our article, we envision the necessities and challenges of nanotechnology in the development of in situ cancer vaccines, immune checkpoint inhibitors, adoptive cell transfer, and bispecific antibody therapy.

Pembrolizumab-associated nephrotic syndrome recovered from transient hemodialysis in a patient with lung cancer

A 70-year-old man diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma was referred to our department for an evaluation of acute onset of nephrotic syndrome with acute kidney injury (AKI) after the 7th course of pembrolizumab treatment. Renal biopsy could not be performed, because he needed anticoagulation therapy for venous thrombosis. Pembrolizumab was discontinued, and prednisolone was started. Hemodialysis was also started, because oliguria was not resolved, and dyspnea due to pulmonary congestion appeared even with the high dose of diuretics. Hemodialysis was successfully withdrawn within 5-week duration because of renal function recovery and increase of urine volume. Complete remission was achieved 4 months after initiating prednisolone. He has never experienced hemodialysis again and remains remission of nephrotic syndrome even the dose of prednisolone was tapered for 8 months. Renal pathology in the current case was uncertain. However, minimal change disease seemed to be a plausible cause of nephrotic syndrome with AKI because of a good response to steroid therapy and acute onset of nephrotic syndrome. In addition, renal pathology in all of the reported cases of pembrolizumab-associated nephrotic syndrome with AKI was minimal change disease. Our case shows for the first time that renal function could be reversible with prednisolone in pembrolizumab-associated nephrotic syndrome with severe AKI even after progression of renal failure which needs dialysis.

Endocrine adverse events related to immune-oncology agents: retrospective experience of a single institution

Background

Immune-oncology agents (IOA) represent a turning point in the treatment of several solid tumors (ST). Although their toxicity compares favorably with other treatments, IOA associate immune-related adverse events (IR-AE), among which endocrine-related AE stand out. We retrospectively evaluated the occurrence of endocrine (E) IR-AE in a cohort of patients with several ST treated with IOA. In addition, we assessed the correlation between likelihood of survival and the occurrence of IR-AE.

Methods

We collected data on clinical and molecular characteristics, efficacy and AE of 260 patients with ST treated with IOA from 2013 to 2017. We excluded patients with prior conditions or treatments potentially affecting thyroid test results.

Results

Lung cancer was the most prevalent diagnosis (70.2%). EIR-AE appeared in 18.1% of patients (total of 38 EIR-AE) and consisted of hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, pituitary disorders and type 1 diabetes mellitus in 60.5%, 21.1%, 15.8% and 2.6% of patients, respectively. EIR-AE were associated mainly to nivolumab, nivolumab plus ipilimumab (41.2% and 26.5%) and appeared after a median of 4.2 cycles of treatment. Specific therapy was required in 65.8% patients. There were significant differences in both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients who experienced EIR-AE compared to those who did not [PFS: 56.7 (NC–NC) vs. 27.7 (14.3–41.3) months, P=0.008; OS: NC (NC–NC) vs. 31.4 (20.7–42.1) months, P=0.001].

Conclusions

The incidence of EIR-AE in our study is similar to other series. Patients who develop EIR-AE might have a better prognosis compared to those who do not experience them.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors and type 1 diabetes mellitus: a case report and systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To better define the rare adverse event (AE) of diabetes mellitus associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

DESIGN AND METHODS

We report the case of a lung cancer patient with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and autoimmune thyroiditis during pembrolizumab treatment. We provide a systematic review of all published cases (PubMed/Web of Science/Cochrane, through November 2018) of autoimmune diabetes mellitus related to blockade of the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4)-, programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) receptor or its ligand (PD-L1) or combination (ICI) therapy.

RESULTS

Our literature search identified 90 patient cases (our case excluded). Most patients were treated with anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 as monotherapy (79%) or in combination with CTLA-4 blockade (15%). On average, diabetes mellitus was diagnosed after 4.5 cycles; earlier for combination ICI at 2.7 cycles. Early-onset diabetes mellitus (after one or two cycles) was observed during all treatment regimens. Diabetic ketoacidosis was present in 71%, while elevated lipase levels were detected in 52% (13/25). Islet autoantibodies were positive in 53% of patients with a predominance of glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies. Susceptible HLA genotypes were present in 65% (mostly DR4). Thyroid dysfunction was the most frequent other endocrine AE at 24% incidence in this patient population.

CONCLUSION

ICI-related diabetes mellitus is a rare but often life-threatening metabolic urgency of which health-care professionals and patients should be aware. Close monitoring of blood glucose and prompt endocrine investigation in case of hyperglycemia is advisable. Predisposing factors such as HLA genotype might explain why some individuals are at risk.

Delayed immune-related events (DIRE) after discontinuation of immunotherapy: diagnostic hazard of autoimmunity at a distance

BACKGROUND

The risk of delayed autoimmunity occurring months or years after discontinuation of immunotherapy is frequently asserted in the literature. However, specific cases were rarely described until 2018, when a wave of reports surfaced. With expanding I-O indications in the adjuvant/neoadjuvant curative setting, growing numbers of patients will receive limited courses of immunotherapy before entering routine surveillance. In this context, under-recognition of DIRE could pose a growing clinical hazard.

METHODS

The aim of this study was to characterize DIRE through identification of existing reports of delayed post-treatment irAE in cancer patients treated with immunotherapy. We performed a PubMed literature review from 2008 through 2018 to determine the median data safety reporting window from existing I-O clinical trials, which we then applied to define the DIRE cutoff, and collated all qualifying reports over the same time span. DIRE was defined as new immune-related adverse events (irAE) manifesting ≥90 days after discontinuation of immunotherapy.

RESULTS

Median duration of I-O clinical trials data safety reporting was 90 days (82% ≤ 90 days). DIRE cutoff was thus set as ≥90 days post-immunotherapy. We identified 23 qualifying cases; 21 by literature review and 2 from our institution. Median off-treatment interval to DIRE was 6 months (range: 3 to 28). Median cumulative immunotherapy exposure was 4 doses (range: 3 to 42). Involvement included endocrine, neurologic, GI, pulmonary, cardiac, rheumatologic and dermatologic irAE.

CONCLUSIONS

As immunotherapy indications expand into the curative setting, often with brief exposure and potentially sequenced with multimodality treatments, it will be necessary to recognize an emerging diagnostic complex, which we have termed delayed immune-related events (DIRE). Clinical vigilance has the potential to reduce morbidity from diagnostic delay, as irAE are generally manageable with prompt initiation of treatment - or from misdiagnosis - as misattribution can lead to unnecessary or harmful interventions as we describe. DIRE should therefore figure prominently in the differential diagnosis of patients presenting with illnesses of unclear etiology, irrespective of intervening treatments or interval post-immunotherapy, both of which can confound diagnosis. Increased recognition will rest on delineation of DIRE as a clinical diagnostic entity.

Prognostic Implications of PD-L1 Expression in Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Immunohistochemistry and Pooled Analysis of Transcriptomic Data

PURPOSE

Conflicting data have been reported on the prognostic value of PD-L1 protein and gene expression in breast cancer.Experimental Design: Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science Core Collection were searched, and data were extracted independently by two researchers. Outcomes included pooled PD-L1 protein positivity in tumor cells, immune cells, or both, per subtype and per antibody used, and its prognostic value for disease-free and overall survival. A pooled gene expression analysis of 39 publicly available transcriptomic datasets was also performed.

RESULTS

Of the initial 4,184 entries, 38 retrospective studies fulfilled the predefined inclusion criteria. The overall pooled PD-L1 protein positivity rate was 24% (95% CI, 15%-33%) in tumor cells and 33% (95% CI, 14%- 56%) in immune cells. PD-L1 protein expression in tumor cells was prognostic for shorter overall survival (HR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.07-2.46; P = 0.02); there was significant heterogeneity (I² = 80%, P _{heterogeneity} < 0.001). In addition, higher PD-L1 gene expression predicted better survival in multivariate analysis in the entire population (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.74-0.90; P < 0.001 for OS) and in basal-like tumors (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.52-0.80; P < 0.001 for OS; P _interaction 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

The largest to our knowledge meta-analysis on the subject informs on PD-L1 protein positivity rates and its prognostic value in breast cancer. Standardization is needed prior to routine implementation. PD-L1 gene expression is a promising prognostic factor, especially in basal-like breast cancer. Discrepant prognostic information might be related to PD-L1 gene expression in the stroma.

Radiation myelitis after durvalumab administration following chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: an illustrative case report and review of the literature

A 69-year-old man with stage IIIB lung adenocarcinoma received durvalumab following chemoradiotherapy. The prescribed dose was 50 Gy in 2 Gy fractions, and the maximum spinal cord dose was 40 Gy. After three cycles of durvalumab, he experienced bladder and rectal disturbance, muscle weakness in the lower limbs, and sensory loss in the lower body. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed T2 signal hyperintensity involving the thoracic spinal cord. As the thoracic spinal cord with T2 signal hyperintensity matched with the irradiated site, the patient was diagnosed with radiation myelitis. This case report shows the clinical and radiographic features of a case of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer that demonstrated radiation myelitis following durvalumab administration. The time of onset was very early and the influence of durvalumab was suspected as the cause of myelitis.