Chinese expert consensus on mediastinal lymph node dissection in esophagectomy for esophageal cancer (2017 edition)

Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes Between Near-Infrared Fluorescent Imaging-Guided Mediastinal Lymphadenectomy and Conventional Surgery for Esophageal Cancer

BACKGROUND

The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of using near-infrared fluorescent imaging (NIRF) imaging with indocyanine green as an intraoperative tool for achieving complete mediastinal lymph node (LN) resection.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between September 2019 and July 2021, patients with potential for esophagectomy due to middle and lower thoracic esophageal cancer were enrolled in this study. All patients were scheduled for NIRF-guided mediastinal lymphadenectomy during esophageal cancer surgery and were appropriately assigned to the NIRF group. Patients who underwent esophagectomy between September 2017 and September 2019 were assigned to the historical control group upon satisfying the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Surgical outcomes and the number of removed LNs were compared between the two groups using 1:1 propensity score matching.

RESULTS

Of 67 eligible patients, 59 patients were included in the NIRF group after postsurgical exclusions. The operative time was significantly shorter in the NIRF group than in the historical control group [180 (140-420) min versus 202 (137-338) min; P < 0.001]. The incidence of postoperative chylothorax and hoarseness were significantly lower in the NIRF group than in the historical control group (0% versus 10.2 %; P = 0.036, 3.4% versus 13.6%; P = 0.047). The number of dissected total LNs, mediastinal LNs, and negative LNs was significantly larger in the NIRF group than in the historical control group. The number of overall metastatic LNs and abdominal LNs was comparable between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

NIRF imaging can assist in the thorough and complete mediastinal LNs dissections without increasing complications in patients undergoing esophagectomy.

Camrelizumab, chemotherapy and apatinib in the neoadjuvant treatment of resectable oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a single-arm phase 2 trial

Background

In resectable oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), the efficacy of camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy and apatinib followed by minimally invasive oesophagectomy is not clear. We aimed to fill this knowledge gap.

Methods

This investigator-initiated, single-arm, prospective, phase 2 trial was performed at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, China. Patients (aged 18-75 years) who were histologically or cytologically diagnosed with ESCC were deemed suitable to participate in this trial. Patients received 2-3 cycles of neoadjuvant therapy with camrelizumab, nedaplatin, albumin paclitaxel, and apatinib; each cycle was repeated every 14 days. Surgery occurred 4-6 weeks after the last neoadjuvant treatment cycle. The primary outcome was the pathological complete response (PCR) rate of the tumour and lymph nodes. The changes in the peripheral blood immunoprofile among patients without PCR (ie, non-PCR [NPCR]) and with PCR were assessed by mass cytometry. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04666090.

Findings

42 patients were enrolled between November 23, 2020 and December 31, 2022. The disease control rate was 100.0% (95% CI, 91.6-100%), and the objective response rate was 83.3% (95% CI, 68.6-93.0%). Six (14.3%) patients experienced grade 3 adverse events. The most common were white blood cell count decrease (31.0%), alopecia (81.0%), asthenia (38.1%), and reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation (35.7%). 41 patients received minimally invasive oesophagectomy; all 41patients achieved R0 resection, and 18 (43.9%, 95% CI, 28.5-60.3%) patients achieved PCR. The median follow-up was 23 months and the 2-year survival rate was 85.9%. T-cell subsets in both the PCR and NPCR groups exhibited consistency in response to neoadjuvant therapy. In contrast, some of natural killer (NK) cells (NK-C03, NK-C11), B cells (B-C06) and monocytes (M-C05), exhibited significant differences between the PCR and NPCR groups before neoadjuvant therapy. M-C06 had a significant difference in the PCR group and NPCR group after neoadjuvant therapy. NK-C12 and B-C15 showed significant differences both before and after neoadjuvant therapy.

Interpretation

The application of camrelizumab, chemotherapy and apatinib in the neoadjuvant setting for locally advanced ESCC has shown promising antitumour activity and an acceptable safety profile in this single-arm study. In the neoadjuvant setting, NK cell, B cell, and monocyte subsets exhibited greater predictive power for immunotherapy responsiveness than T-cell subsets. Longer follow-up to assess survival outcomes and a phase 3 randomised trial are needed to further evaluate the proposed treatment.

Funding

The China Anti-Cancer Association and the "Leading Goose" Research and Development Project of Zhejiang Province.

Refining postoperative monitoring of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury in esophagectomy patients through transcutaneous laryngeal ultrasonography

BACKGROUND

Recurrent laryngeal nerve injury (RLNI) leading to vocal cord paralysis (VCP) is a significant complication following minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) with upper mediastinal lymphadenectomy. Transcutaneous laryngeal ultrasonography (TLUSG) has emerged as a non-invasive alternative to endoscopic examination for evaluating vocal cord function. Our study aimed to assess the diagnostic value of TLUSG in detecting RLNI by evaluating vocal cord movement after MIE.

METHODS

This retrospective study examined 96 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent MIE between January 2021 and December 2022, using both TLUSG and endoscopy.

RESULTS

VCP was observed in 36 out of 96 patients (37.5%). The incidence of RLNI was significantly higher on the left side than the right (29.2% vs. 5.2%, P < 0.001). Postoperative TLUSG showed a sensitivity and specificity of 88.5% (31/35) and 86.5% (45/52), respectively, with an AUC of 0.869 (P < 0.001, 95% CI 0.787-0.952). The percentage agreement between TLUSG and endoscopy in assessing VCP was 87.4% (κ = 0.743).

CONCLUSIONS

TLUSG is a highly effective screening tool for VCP, given its high sensitivity and specificity. This can potentially eliminate the need for unnecessary endoscopies in about 80% of patients who have undergone MIE.

Survival benefit of combined immunotherapy and chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced unresectable esophageal cancer: an analysis based on the SEER database

Background

While simultaneous chemoradiotherapy remains the established therapeutic modality for patients afflicted with locally advanced esophageal cancer, the effectiveness of this radical approach falls short of the desired outcome. Numerous investigations have illuminated the prospect of enhancing therapeutic efficacy through the amalgamation of chemoradiotherapy and immunotherapeutic interventions. Consequently, we embarked on an examination to scrutinize the potential survival advantages conferred by the confluence of chemoradiotherapy and immunotherapy in relation to locally advanced unresectable esophageal carcinoma, drawing upon the extensive SEER database for our analysis.

Methods

We extracted clinicopathological attributes and survival statistics of patients afflicted with locally advanced unresectable esophageal carcinoma, diagnosed within the temporal span encompassing the years 2004-2014 and 2019-2020, from the extensive SEER database. To discern disparities in both overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) between the cohorts subjected to chemoradiotherapy combined with immunotherapy and chemoradiotherapy alone, we employed analytical tools such as Kaplan-Meier analysis, the Log-rank test, the Cox regression proportional risk model, and propensity-matched score (PSM) methodology.

Results

A total of 7,758 eligible patients were encompassed in this research, with 6,395 individuals having undergone chemoradiotherapy alone, while 1,363 patients received the combined treatment of chemoradiotherapy and immunotherapy. After 1:4 propensity score matching, 6,447 patients were successfully harmonized, yielding a well-balanced cohort. The Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated a substantial enhancement in OS (P = 0.0091) and CSS (P < 0.001) for the group subjected to chemoradiotherapy combined with immunotherapy as compared to chemoradiotherapy alone. Further multivariable analysis with PSM confirmed that chemoradiotherapy combined with immunotherapy benefits OS(HR=0.89, 95% CI 0.81-0.98) and CSS (HR=0.68, 95% CI 0.61-0.76). In addition, Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses of the matched patient groups unveiled several independent prognostic factors for OS and CSS, including sex, age, marital status, tumor location, tumor size, pathologic grade, SEER historic staging, and treatment modality. Among these factors, being female, married, and receiving chemoradiotherapy combined with immunotherapy emerged as independent protective factors, while age exceeding 75 years, non-superior segment tumor location, tumor size greater than 6 cm, Grade 3-4 pathology, and regional SEER historic staging were all found to be independent risk factors. The survival advantage of the chemoradiotherapy combined with the immunotherapy group over the chemoradiotherapy alone group was substantial.

Conclusions

This investigation furnishes compelling evidence that the integration of immunotherapy with chemoradiotherapy confers a noteworthy survival advantage when contrasted with conventional chemoradiotherapy for individuals grappling with locally advanced unresectable esophageal carcinoma.

Clinical value of station 4R node dissection in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Many controversies still exist concerning the optimal extent of lymphadenectomy during esophagectomy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The objective of this study was to explore the characteristics of 4R metastasis and evaluate the clinical value of 4R node dissection in ESCC.

METHODS

A total of 736 ESCC patients who underwent radical esophagectomy between 2005 and 2013 were retrospectively collected, among which 393 ones underwent 4R dissection. Propensity score matching (PSM) method was applied to reduce the effects of confounding variables between the 4R dissection and non-dissection groups to analyze overall survival.

RESULTS

Patients showed a low 4R metastasis rate of 5.1% (20/393) (5.2%, 5.8%, and 1.8% for upper, middle, and lower tumors, respectively). Correlation analyses identified that 4R metastasis was significantly associated with station 2R metastasis (p < 0.001) and pathologic tumor-node-metastasis (pTNM) stage (p < 0.001). All 4R metastases were observed in stages IIIB and IVA. Moreover, patients with station 4R dissection failed to achieve significantly improved overall survival compared with those without 4R dissection, regardless of tumor stage (overall: p = 0.696; stage 0-IIIA: p = 0.317; stage IIIB-IVA: p = 0.619).

CONCLUSION

4R metastasis is likely to be associated with more aggressive disease, and routine 4R node dissection might not be necessary for ESCC patients.

Diagnostic value of conventional endoscopic ultrasound for lymph node metastasis in upper gastrointestinal neoplasia: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Upper gastrointestinal neoplasia mainly includes esophageal cancer and gastric cancer, both of which have high morbidity and mortality. Lymph node metastasis (LNM), as the most common metastasis mode of both diseases, is an important factor affecting tumor stage, treatment strategy and clinical prognosis. As a new fusion technology, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is becoming increasingly used in the diagnosis and treatment of digestive system diseases, but its use in detecting LNM in clinical practice remains limited.

AIM

To evaluate the diagnostic value of conventional EUS for LNM in upper gastrointestinal neoplasia.

METHODS

Using the search mode of "MeSH + Entry Terms" and according to the predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria, we conducted a comprehensive search and screening of the PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases from January 1, 2000 to October 1, 2022. Study data were extracted according to the predetermined data extraction form. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool, and the results of the quality assessment were presented using Review Manager 5.3.5 software. Finally, Stata14.0 software was used for a series of statistical analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 22 studies were included in our study, including 2986 patients. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic score and diagnostic odds ratio of conventional EUS in the diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal neoplasia LNM were 0.62 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.50-0.73], 0.80 (95%CI: 0.73-0.86), 3.15 (95%CI: 2.46-4.03), 0.47 (95%CI: 0.36-0.61), 1.90 (95%CI: 1.51-2.29) and 6.67 (95%CI: 4.52-9.84), respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.80 (95%CI: 0.76-0.83). Sensitivity analysis indicated that the results of the meta-analysis were stable. There was considerable heterogeneity among the included studies, and the threshold effect was an important source of heterogeneity. Univariable meta-regression and subgroup analysis showed that tumor type, sample size and EUS diagnostic criteria were significant sources of heterogeneity in specificity (P < 0.05). No significant publication bias was found.

CONCLUSION

Conventional EUS has certain clinical value and can assist in the detection of LNM in upper gastrointestinal neoplasia, but it cannot be used as a confirmatory or exclusionary test.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: where are we and where are we going?

Oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a kind of malignant tumour with high invasiveness and a poor prognosis. Immunotherapy, especially immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), is a rapidly growing therapeutic method that activates and enhances anti-tumour immunity to treat patients with malignancy. Several clinical trials have confirmed the efficacy of ICIs in the treatment of ESCC. ICIs have been approved for the treatment of patients with ESCC. However, only a subset of patients can obtain excellent benefits from ICI therapy. In recent years, there has been a growing interest in exploring predictive biomarkers of immunotherapy response. In this review, we highlighted the predictive biomarkers for the prognosis of ESCC patients treated with ICIs and pointed out the existing problems and the direction of future research in this field.

Impact of Lymph Node Dissection on Survival After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: From the Results of NEOCRTEC5010, a Randomized Multicenter Study

OBJECTIVE

To clarify whether systemic LND influences the safety of surgery and the survival of patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Prognostic impact of systemic lymphadenectomy during surgery after nCRT for ESCC is still uncertain and requires clarification.

METHODS

This is a secondary analysis of NEOCRTEC5010 trial which compared nCRT followed by surgery versus surgery alone for locally advanced ESCC. Relationship between number of LND and perioperative, recurrence, and survival outcomes were analyzed in the nCRT group.

RESULTS

Three-year overall survival was significantly better in the nCRT group than the S group (75.2% vs 61.5%; P = 0.011). In the nCRT group, greater number of LND was associated with significantly better overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.358; P < 0.001) and disease-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.415; P = 0.001), but without any negative impact on postoperative complications. Less LND (<20 vs ≥20) was significantly associated with increased local recurrence (18.8% vs 5.2%, P = 0.004) and total recurrence rates (41.2% vs 25.8%, P = 0.027). Compared to patients with persistent nodal disease, significantly better survival was seen in patients with complete response and with LND ≥20, but not in those with LND <20.

CONCLUSIONS

Systemic LND does not increase surgical risks after nCRT in ESCC patients. And it is associated with better survival and local diseasecontrol. Therefore, systemic lymphadenectomy should still be considered as an integrated part of surgery after nCRT for ESCC.

Pre-immunotherapy radiotherapy enhanced the efficacy of multi-line sintilimab in unresectable advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Background

The use of immunotherapy for the treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is gradually increasing. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the efficacy and explored potential factors of prognosis in multi-line sintilimab for unresectable advanced ESCC.

Methods

All pathological specimens were available from our Department of Pathology. We performed PD-L1 immunohistochemical staining of surgical or puncture specimens from 133 patients. We evaluated the efficacy of multi-line sintilimab and found potential factors according to multivariate analysis. We assessed the relationship between radiotherapy and immunotherapy, and according to whether patients had received radiotherapy within 3 months prior to immunotherapy, we attempted to analyze differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

A total of 133 patients were enrolled in this retrospective study between January 2019 and December 2021. The median follow-up was 16.1 months. All patients were treated with at least two cycles of sintilimab. Of all patients, a total of 74 experienced disease progression, with a median progression-free survival of 9.0 months (95% CI 7.701-10.299). We found that pre-immunotherapy radiotherapy was a possible predictor that affected the prognosis of multi-line sintilimab and that 3 months was a significant cutoff. A total of 128 patients (96.2%) had received radiotherapy prior to immunotherapy. Of those patients, 89 (66.9%) had received radiation therapy within 3 months prior to immunotherapy. PFS was considerably longer in patients who were treated within 3 months of radiotherapy than in patients who did not receive radiation therapy within 3 months of radiation therapy prior to immunotherapy (median progression-free survival 10.0 months [95% CI 8.030-11.970] vs. 5.0 months [95% CI 2.755-7.245]). Among all patients, the median overall survival was 14.9 months (95% CI 12.558-17.242). Overall survival was significantly longer in patients who had previously received radiotherapy within 3 months prior to immunotherapy than in those who had not (median overall survival 15.3 months [95% CI 13.724-16.876] vs. 12.2 months [10.001-14.399].

Conclusion

Based on this retrospective study, sintilimab is a significant option for patients with unresectable advanced ESCC who have been previously treated, and pre-immunotherapy radiotherapy within 3 months enhanced the efficacy.

Thoracic para-aortic lymph node recurrence in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A propensity score-matching analysis

BACKGROUND

Thoracic para-aortic lymph node (TPLN) recurrence in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is rare and its impact on survival is unknown. We studied survival in patients with ESCC who developed TPLN recurrence.

AIM

To study the survival in patients with ESCC who developed TPLNs recurrence.

METHODS

Data were collected retrospectively for 219 patients who had undergone curative surgery for ESCC during January 2012 to November 2017 and who developed recurrences (36.29% of 604 patients who had undergone curative surgeries for ESCC). The patients were classified into positive (+) and negative (-) TPLN metastasis subgroups. We also investigated TPLN recurrence in 223 patients with ESCC following definitive chemoradiotherapy during 2012-2013. Following propensity score matching (PSM) and survival estimation, factors predictive of overall survival (OS) were explored using a Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Among the patients with confirmed recurrence, 18 were TPLN (+) and 13 developed synchronous distant metastases. Before PSM, TPLN (+) was associated with worse recurrence-free (P = 0.00049) and OS [vs TPLN (-); P = 0.0027], whereas only the intergroup difference in recurrence-free survival remained significant after PSM (P = 0.013). The Cox analysis yielded similar results. Among the patients who had received definitive chemoradiotherapy, 3 (1.35%) had preoperative TPLN enlargement and none had developed recurrences.

CONCLUSION

TPLN metastasis is rare but may be associated with poor survival.

Correlation between immune-related adverse events and treatment efficacy of anti-PD1 immunotherapy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are associated with improved treatment efficacy in certain types of cancer. In the present study, we assessed the association between irAEs and ICI efficacy. Patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who received ICI treatment were stratified into irAEs and non-irAE groups. The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were used to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of ICIs. Of the 78 ICI-treated ESCC patients, 39 developed irAEs. The median OS and PFS for all patients were 600 and 300 days, respectively. Median OS (P<0.001) and PFS (P<0.001) times of the patients with irAEs were longer than those in the non-irAE group. In addition, the DCR of the irAE group was higher than that of the non-irAE group (P=0.006). Univariate analysis indicated that the non-irAE group was associated with a relatively shorter OS [hazard ratio (HR)=3.687, 95% CI, 1.974-6.888, P<0.001] and PFS (HR=2.967, 95% CI, 1.691-5.204, P<0.001). The multifactorial analysis demonstrated that irAE status was an independent predictor of PFS (HR=3.564, 95% CI, 1.786-7.114, P<0.001) and OS (HR=3.288, 95% CI, 1.636-6.606, P=0.001). In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that irAEs could be used to predict improved treatment efficacy in patients with ESCC who received ICI therapy.

The development of a nomogram model for predicting left recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph node metastasis in esophageal cancer based on radiomics and clinical factors

Background

The lymph node dissection for esophageal cancer is controversial. Some prediction models of lymph node metastasis (LNM) use the short diameter of lymph nodes measured by computed tomography (CT) examination as a predictor, but the size of that for judging metastasis is still controversial. However, radiomics can extract some features in tumors that cannot be obtained by naked eyes, which may have a higher value in predicting LNM. In this study, a nomogram was developed based on radiomics and clinical factors to predict left recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph node (RLNN) metastasis in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

Methods

There were 350 patients included in this retrospective study. And the postoperative pathological results determined whether there was left RLNN metastasis. A univariate analysis was conducted of the clinical data. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression analysis was conducted to filter the radiomics features extracted from CT images. The multivariate logistic regression equation was used to construct a nomogram. The area under the curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the predictive ability. Due to the small sample size, we chose to perform internal validation after the model was established by 10-fold cross-validation, Harrell's concordance index (C-index), bootstrap validation and calibration.

Results

Ultimately, 3 indicators were screened out; that is, tumor location, surface volume ratio, and run-length non-uniformity. We then constructed the nomogram using these 3 indicators. The model had good accuracy and calibration performance. It has an AUC of 0.903 (95% confidence interval: 0.861-0.945), a sensitivity of 0.873, and a specificity of 0.756. Ten-fold cross-validation showed that the sensitivity and specificity of the training set were 88.08% and 75.81%, and the validation set had a sensitivity of 85.08% and a specificity of 75.49%. The Brier score was 0.074, and C-index was 0.904, which indicated good consistency between the actual and predicted results.

Conclusions

A nomogram constructed based on radiomics features and clinical factors can be used to predict the metastasis of left RLNN in patients with ESCC in a non-invasive way, which provided a reference for clinicians to formulate individualized lymph node dissection plans.

The Clinical Application Value of the Prognostic Nutritional Index for the Overall Survival Prognosis of Patients with Esophageal Cancer: A Robust Real-World Observational Study in China

Esophageal cancer is a kind of cancer with high morbidity and mortality, which is accompanied by a profound poor prognosis. A prognostic nutritional index, based on serum albumin levels and peripheral lymphocyte count, has been confirmed to be significantly associated with various cancers. This study was aimed at exploring the prognostic significance of PNI in the overall survival prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer. As a real-world study based on the big database, clinical data of 2661 patients with esophageal cancer were evaluated retrospectively, and the individuals were randomly divided into training and testing cohorts. In these two cohorts, patients are classified into a high-risk group (PNI < 49) and a low-risk group (PNI ≥ 49). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to analyze the independent risk factors for the prognosis of esophageal cancer patients by using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. In this study, whether in the training cohort or the testing cohort, according to the univariate analysis, gender, tumor size, tumor grade, T stage, N stage, M stage, TNM stage, and PNI were significantly correlated with overall survival. Furthermore, the multivariate analysis showed that gender, T stage, N stage, M stage, TNM stage, and PNI were independent prognostic risk factors for esophageal cancer. PNI can be regarded as an independent prognostic factor combined with gender, T stage, N stage, M stage, and TNM stage, and it might be a novel reliable biomarker for esophageal cancer.

Identification of Tumor Antigens and Immune Subtypes of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma for mRNA Vaccine Development

Purpose: The applicability of mRNA vaccines against esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains unclear. Here, we identified potential antigens for developing mRNA vaccines against ESCC and characterized immune subtypes to select appropriate patients for vaccination.

Methods: RNA-seq, genetic alteration data, and corresponding clinical information of ESCC patients were obtained from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. The RNA-seq data of normal esophageal tissue were obtained from the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) database. Potential tumor antigens were screened by analyzing differentially expressed and mutated genes and potential antigens with significant differences in prognosis were screened using the Kaplan-Meier method. The proportion of immune cell infiltration in the tumor microenvironment was estimated using CIBERSORT and MCPcounter, and the correlation of potential antigens with antigen-presenting cells and major histocompatibility complex class II was analyzed. Subsequently, immune subtypes were constructed using consensus clustering analysis and characterized by single-sample gene set enrichment analysis and weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA). The Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) database was used to analyze the drug sensitivity of different immune subtypes.

Results: Four overexpressed and mutated tumor antigens associated with antigen presentation and poor prognosis were identified in ESCC, including NLRC5, FCRL4, TMEM229B, and LCP2. By consensus clustering, we identified two immune-associated ESCC subtypes, immune subtype 1 (IS1) and immune subtype 2 (IS2); the prognosis of the two subtypes was statistically different. In addition, the two immune subtypes had distinctly different cellular, molecular, and clinical characteristics. IS1 patients have a distinct immune “hot” phenotype with strong immune tolerance, whereas patients with IS2 have an immune “cold” phenotype. Differential expression of immune checkpoints and immunogenic cell death modulators was observed between the different immune subtypes. Finally, we found that IS1 and IS2 patients showed different drug sensitivities to common anti-tumor drugs, possibly facilitating the development of individualized treatment regimens for patients.

Conclusion: NLRC5, LCP2, TMEM229B, and FCRL4 are potential antigens for ESCC mRNA vaccines, and such vaccines may be more suitable for IS2 patients. This study provides a theoretical basis for mRNA vaccines against ESCC, by identifying the critical characteristics to predict ESCC prognosis and select suitable patients for vaccination.

Mapping of Lymph Node Metastasis From Thoracic Esophageal Cancer: A Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVES

This retrospective study was designed to investigate the optimal extent of dissection for thoracic esophageal cancer (EC) based on the incidence of lymph node metastasis (LNM).

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 1014 patients with thoracic esophageal carcinoma who underwent esophagectomy at our institution between May 2018 and November 2020. Also, the location and rate of LNM in relation to the postoperative pathological results were retrieved. We separately counted the metastasis rates of routinely excised lymph node stations according to the Japan Esophageal Society (JES) staging system.

RESULTS

A total of 1666 consecutive patients were screened, and 1014 were enrolled. Generally, the rates of LNM in thoracic EC may be arranged in the descending order of station 7 > station 106recR > station 2 > station 106recL. Esophageal cancer in the middle and lower thoracic segment also had a high rate of LNM along bilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve. Stations 106tbL and 111 were the lowest frequent sites of metastasis with rate less than 5%; only the patients with clinically positive LNs need to dissect. The cT3-4, cN+, or G3 were independent risk factors for LNM and neoadjuvant therapy did not change the distribution of LNM for thoracic EC cases.

CONCLUSIONS

This study accurately identified the distribution of LNM for thoracic EC patients. Neoadjuvant therapy could not change the overall distribution of LNM in thoracic EC patients. However, whether LNs dissection at stations 106tbL and 111 is related to the survival of thoracic EC or not, needs a long follow-up time to verify.

Development and validation of a nomogram for prediction of cervical lymph node metastasis in middle and lower thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Background

Estimates of cervical lymph node (LN) metastasis in patients with middle and lower thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) are important. A nomogram is a useful tool for individualized prediction.

Methods

A total of 235 patients were enrolled in this study. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to screen for independent risk factors and construct a nomogram to predict the risk of cervical LN metastasis. The nomogram performance was assessed by discrimination, calibration, and clinical use.

Results

Totally, four independent predictors, including the maximum diameter of tumor, paraesophageal lymph node status, recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph node status, and the CT-reported cervical LN status, were enrolled in the nomogram. The AUC of the nomogram model in the training and validation dataset were 0.833 (95% CI 0.762–0.905), 0.808 (95% CI 0.696–0.920), respectively. The calibration curve demonstrated a strong consistency between nomogram and clinical findings in predicting cervical LN metastasis. Decision curve analysis demonstrated that the nomogram was clinically useful.

Conclusion

We developed a nomogram that could be conveniently used to predict the individualized risk of cervical LN metastasis in patients with middle and lower thoracic ESCC.

Prognostic Impact of Postoperative Lymph Node Metastases After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Esophagus: From the Results of NEOCRTEC5010, a Randomized Multicenter Study

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prognostic impact of pathologic lymph node (LN) status and investigate risk factors of recurrence in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients with pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

There are no large-scale prospective study data regarding ypN status and recurrence after pCR in ESCC patients receiving NCRT.

METHODS

The NEOCRTEC5010 trial was a prospective multicenter trial that compared the survival and safety of NCRT plus surgery (S) with S in patients with locally advanced ESCC. The relationships between survival and cN, pN, and ypN status were assessed. Potential prognostic factors in patients with ypN+ and pCR were identified.

RESULTS

A total of 389 ESCC patients (NCRT: 182; S: 207) were included. Patients with pN+ in the S group and ypN+ in the NCRT group had decreased overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) compared with pN0 and ypN0 patients, respectively. Partial response at the primary site [hazard ratio (HR), 2.09] and stable disease in the LNs (HR, 3.26) were independent risk factors for lower DFS, but not OS. For patients with pCR, the recurrence rate was 13.9%. Patients with distant LN metastasis had a median OS and DFS of 16.1 months and 14.4 months, respectively. Failure to achieve the median total dose of chemotherapy was a significant risk factor of recurrence and metastasis after pCR (HR, 44.27).

CONCLUSIONS

Persistent pathologic LN metastasis after NCRT is a strong poor prognostic factor in ESCC. Additionally, pCR does not guarantee a cure; patients with pCR should undergo an active strategy of surveillance and adjuvant therapy.

A Retrospective Study of 52 Patients With Primary Small Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus Treated With Radical Surgery

Background:

Primary small cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SCCE) is a rare and extremely fatal disease. We aim to evaluate the efficacy of radical surgery for resectable SCCE and to explore potential prognostic factors.

Methods:

We retrospectively reviewed 52 consecutive SCCE patients who underwent radical surgery from February 1993 to November 2014 at a single institution. The Kaplan-Meier estimator with log-rank test was used to assess overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and median survival time. Univariate and multivariable analyses were used to evaluate prognostic factors through Cox proportional hazard regression model.

Results:

Twenty-five (48.1%) patients were treated with surgery alone, whereas 27 (51.9%) patients underwent adjuvant therapy after surgery. The median OS time was 17.4 months (95% CI: 13.5-21.3). The median DFS time was 13.4 months (95% CI: 7.7-19.0). Patients whose tumors were located in the lower part of thoracic esophagus and the esophagogastric junction showed significantly better OS (27.0 vs. 13.2 months, P = 0.016) and DFS (27.0 vs. 11.3 months, P = 0.017) than those located in the upper and middle parts. Patients with N0 status experienced significantly better OS (21.4 vs. 11.6 months, P = 0.012) and DFS (21.4 vs. 8.6 months, P = 0.012) than those with N+ status. Patients whose tumor lengths were shorter than 5 cm had a better OS (17.4 vs. 5.7 months, P = 0.035) than those longer than 5 cm. Patients who underwent chemotherapy experienced a significantly improved OS (21.0 vs. 14.1 months, P = 0.032) compared to surgery alone. Multivariable analysis showed that lower tumor location, shorter tumor length, pN0 status and chemotherapy independently predicted better OS; lower tumor location and pN0 status independently predicted better DFS.

Conclusions:

Radical surgery in combination with chemotherapy has better outcomes than surgery alone for resectable SCCE. Higher tumor location, longer tumor length, lymph node metastasis and not undergoing chemotherapy independently predict worse prognoses.

Thoracoscopic radical esophagectomy combined with left inferior pulmonary ligament lymphadenectomy for esophageal carcinoma via the right thoracic approach: A single-center retrospective study of 30 cases

To evaluate the necessity, safety, and feasibility of left inferior pulmonary ligament lymphadenectomy during video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) radical esophagectomy via the right thoracic approach.Thirty patients (20 men, 10 women) with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) were recruited for this study. The patients' age ranged from 50 to 80 years, with an average age of 66.17 ± 7.47 years. After the patients underwent VATS radical esophagectomy and left inferior pulmonary ligament lymph node dissection (LIPLND) via the right thoracic approach, the operative outcomes included operative time, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, number of lymph nodes removed, and postoperative pathologic results were evaluated.There were no massive hemorrhages of the left inferior pulmonary vein during the operation. The operative time of LIPLND was 8.67 ± 2.04 minutes, and the length of postoperative hospital stay was 12.23 ± 2.36 days. The postoperative complications included 2 cases of left pneumothorax, 4 pulmonary infection cases, and no chylothorax. Moreover, 68 LIPLNs were dissected, 5 of which were positive, and the degree of metastasis was 7.4%. The postoperative pathologic results showed that 3 cases of LIPLNs were positive, with a metastasis rate of 10.0%. Among them, 2 cases were SCC of the lower thoracic esophagus, and 1 case was SCC of the middle thoracic esophagus, which involved the lower segment.Thoracoscopic esophagectomy combined with left inferior pulmonary ligament lymphadenectomy for esophageal carcinoma via the right thoracic approach will not increase the difficulty of operation, increase the incidence of postoperative complications or prolong the postoperative hospital stay, and can theoretically reduce tumor recurrence. Therefore, we believe that LIPLND is necessary, safe, and feasible and is worthy of clinical popularization and application.

Minimal invasive versus open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant treatments

Background

Although previous studies have discussed whether the minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is superior to open surgery, the data concerning esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients underwent neoadjuvant treatment followed by radical resection is limited. The purpose of our study was to compare the short- and long-term clinical outcomes of the two surgical approaches in treating ESCC patients.

Methods

Between January 2010 and December 2016, ESCC patients who had received neoadjuvant therapy and underwent Mckeown esophagectomy at our institute were eligible. The baseline characteristics, pathological data, short-and long-term outcomes of these patients were collected and compared based on the surgical approach.

Results

A total of 195 patients was included in the current study. Compared to patients underwent open surgery, patients underwent MIE had shorter operative time and less intraoperative bleeding (390 min vs 330 min, P = 0.001; 204 ml vs 167 ml, P = 0.021). In addition, the risk of anastomotic leakage was decreased in MIE group (20.0% vs 3.3%, P < 0.001), while the occurrence of other complications did not have statistical significance between two groups. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) was no difference in patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy between the two approaches. For the patients underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, OS was significantly better in the MIE group (log rank = 6.197; P = 0.013).

Conclusion

Minimally invasive Mckeown esophagectomy is safe and feasible for ESCC patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy. MIE approach presented better perioperative results than open esophagectomy. The effect of surgical approaches on survival was depending on the scheme of neoadjuvant treatment.

Comparison of Outcomes Between McKeown and Sweet Esophagectomy in the Elderly Patients for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes and long-term survival rates of the McKeown and Sweet procedures in patients with esophageal cancer younger than 70 years or older than 70 years. A total of 1432 consecutive patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who received surgery at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from January 2009 to October 2012 were analyzed. Propensity score matching was used to balance the clinical characteristics of the patients who underwent different surgical approaches, and 275 and 71 paired cases were matched among those younger and older than 70 years, respectively. The prognosis and postoperative outcomes were compared between the McKeown and the Sweet esophagectomy. For patients younger than 70 years, those who underwent the McKeown procedure had better overall survival (OS) than those in the Sweet group (log rank = 4.467; P = .035). However, no significant difference in disease-free survival and OS was observed between two approaches for the elderly patients (log rank = 1.562; P = .211 and log rank = 0.668; P = .414, respectively). Cox regression analysis revealed that McKeown approach was a positive prognostic factor compared to the Sweet approach for patients younger than 70 years in univariable analysis (HR = 0.790; 95% CI, 0.625-0.997; P = .047), whereas the surgical approach was not significantly related to the prognosis in the elderly patients. For patients older than 70 years, the occurrence of anastomotic fistula increased in those who underwent the McKeown procedure (23.9% vs 11.3%, P = .038, for the McKeown and Sweet esophagectomy, respectively). The McKeown approach increases the OS in younger patients with ESCC. However, for patients older than 70 years, the Sweet approach was proven to be an effective therapy, given the better perioperative outcomes and similar long-term survival compared with patients in the McKeown group.

Optimal preoperative neoadjuvant therapy for resectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is one of the most common malignancies worldwide, especially in East Asia. ESCC accounts for more than 90% of esophageal cancer. Currently, neoadjuvant therapy in combination with surgical resection is the mainstay of treatment. However, the overall survival rate of patients with locally advanced ESCC is not satisfactory even when treated following the standard treatment guidelines. With neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, chemotherapy, or emerging immunotherapy, continuous exploration of efficacy in relation to ESCC is expected to improve overall survival further. Here, we review and summarize current evidence for efficacy of preoperative therapy for locally advanced ESCC.

The efficacy and safety of simultaneous integrated dose reduction in clinical target volume with intensity-modulated radiotherapy for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Background

Compelling research to explore the effectiveness of simultaneous integrated dose reduction in clinical target volume (CTV) with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SIR-IMRT) for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) are limited. This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and treatment-related toxicity between SIR-IMRT and conventional IMRT (C-IMRT) in the treatment of ESCC.

Methods

From March 2010 to September 2016, the clinical data of 257 patients with ESCC who received definitive IMRT in the Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital were collected and retrospectively analyzed. Among these patients, 137 patients received C-IMRT with a prescribed dose of 60 Gy in 30 fractions for planning target volume (PTV), while 120 patients received SIR-IMRT with a prescribed dose of 60 Gy in 30 fractions for the planning gross tumor volume (PGTV) and a prescribed dose of 54 Gy in 30 fractions for PTV. All of the patients received definitive IMRT with elective nodal irradiation. Locoregional control, survival, treatment toxicity and dose to organs at risk (OAR) were compared between the groups.

Results

Patients who received SIR-IMRT showed a similar locoregional failure rate compared to the C-IMRT group (27.5% versus 29.9%, P=0.668). The 1-, 2- and 3-year overall survival (OS) rates were 71.5%, 44.3%, 44.3% vs. 77.9%, 52.1%, 32.9% in the C-IMRT and SIR-IMRT groups, respectively (P=0.825). No significant differences were observed in PFS and LRRFS between the two groups (P=0.880 and P=0.216, respectively). The dose of lung V30 and the maximum dose of spinal cord in the C-IMRT group were significantly higher than those in the SIR-IMRT group (P=0.013, P=0.047). The incidence of acute radiation esophagitis was significantly lower in the SIR-IMRT group (P=0.046), although no statistical difference was observed in the incidence of acute severe adverse events between the two groups.

Conclusions

SIR-IMRT offers an effective and safe option for patients with unresectable ESCC who receive definitive RT. Further prospective and larger sample size studies are warranted to confirm our results.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a narrative review

Esophageal cancer (EC) has the seventh highest incidence and the sixth highest mortality rate of any type of cancer worldwide. In China, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) accounts for more than 95% of EC patients. The main treatment for EC patients is surgery and/or chemoradiotherapy (CRT). A large proportion of EC patients are already at an advanced stage of the disease by the time they are diagnosed. In these cases, CRT is left as the only treatment choice, and the treatment outcome is poor. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can improve clinical response and patient survival of patient with many types of tumors through reactivating antitumor immune response. The study of ICIs in ESCC is relative delayed compared with that in other solid tumors. Recent results from clinical trials have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of ICIs either alone or combined with chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy in ESCC patients. Accumulated evidences also have shown the improved treatment outcome was associated with PD-L1 expression, tumor DNA instability-induced tumor mutational burden (TMB), and drawing lymphocytes into the tumor. Based on these findings, ICIs combined with CRT or radiotherapy (RT) are the focus of ongoing studies. This review will summarize the recent progress in this field, especially the mechanism of ICIs used in ESCC, their clinical efficacy and toxicities, and potential biomarkers.

Clinical evaluation of right recurrent laryngeal nerve nodes in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Background

The accuracy of clinical N staging of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma is suboptimal. As an important station of lymph node metastasis, station C201 (right recurrent laryngeal nerve nodes) has rarely been evaluated alone. We aimed to explore an effective way to evaluate the right recurrent laryngeal nerve nodes in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 628 thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients who underwent radical resection without neoadjuvant therapy from two Chinese cancer centers. The diameter of the short axis of the largest right recurrent laryngeal nerve node (DC201) was measured on contrast-enhanced multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT). Right recurrent laryngeal nerve nodes were examined by postoperative pathologic results. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was generated to assess the diagnostic capabilities of DC201 to determine the right recurrent laryngeal nerve nodes status.

Results

ROC curve analysis revealed that the optimal cut-off point of DC201 was 6 mm, with an area under curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and Youden index of 0.896, 71.9%, 88.8%, and 0.607 respectively. When the cut-off point of DC201 was set to 10 mm, sensitivity, specificity and the Youden index were 14.1%, 99.6% and 0.137 respectively. Among 128 patients with right recurrent laryngeal nerve node metastasis, 71 and 108 patients had the largest right recurrent laryngeal nerve node located above the suprasternal notch level and in the tracheoesophageal groove respectively.

Conclusions

When DC201 ≥6.0 mm instead of DC201 ≥10 mm was used to dictate the right recurrent laryngeal nerve nodes metastasis, contrast-enhanced MSCT could evaluate the status of right recurrent laryngeal nerve nodes with high sensitivity and specificity. The largest right recurrent laryngeal nerve nodes were mainly located in the tracheoesophageal groove and/or above the suprasternal notch.

Results of a National Survey about Therapeutic Management in Esophageal Cancer

There are numerous controversial aspects in the perioperative and surgical management of patients with esophageal cancer. The aim of this study is to evaluate the differences between the hospitals of our country in the adjuvant and surgical treatment of these patients. We conducted a descriptive study of 56 surveys answered from February to April 2020, evaluating hospital characteristics, number of procedures, management of distal adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the middle third of the esophagus, type of anastomosis, use of nasogastric tube and drains, and clinical follow-up. The median number of annual esophagectomies per hospital was 10, and only 7.1% performed more than 20. In distal adenocarcinoma, 62.5% use preoperative chemoradiotherapy, an abdominal and transthoracic approach (57.1%), and an infracarinal lymphadenectomy (51.8%) or extended to right paratracheal lymph nodes (41.1%). In squamous cell carcinoma of the middle third of the esophagus, 89.3% use preoperative chemoradiotherapy, surgery in three fields (73.2%) and extended mediastinal lymphadenectomy (52%). Intrathoracic anastomosis is performed mechanically in 77.8% and cervical anastomosis preferably manually (71.4%). Pleural and abdominal drains are usually placed by 77.6% and 48.2%, respectively, while the nasogastric tube is normally used by 57.1%. A clinical pathway is followed by 57.1%, and 28.6% use a specific enhanced recovery after surgery protocol. Thus, in the management of esophageal cancer, there are some clear differences between hospitals in our country regarding adjuvant treatment, surgical approach, type of lymphadenectomy and anastomosis performed.

Identification of critical radioresistance genes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by whole-exome sequencing

Background

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is one of the most lethal cancer due to insufficient actionable molecules. Radiotherapy (RT) plays a vital role in the treatment of ESCC, while radioresistance is a significant challenge to RT and results in locoregional and distant failure.

Methods

Radioresistance is a complex involving confounding factors, and its genetic mechanism is challenging to study. Postoperative recurrence after RT is more likely to be due to genetic causes than recurrence in unoperated patients. Therefore, two independent cohorts of ESCC patients who had received postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) and had opposite prognoses were set up, and whole-exome sequencing (WES) technology was applied. We compared the differences in the mutant spectra between the two groups.

Results

The mutation rate was slightly higher in the relapsed group than in the stable group [average mutation rate, 1.15 vs. 0.73 mutations per megabyte (Mb)], while the mutation types and proportions in the two groups were not significantly different. In particular, three mutated genes (TTN, MUC19, and NPIPA5) and two copy number alterations (CNAs) (1q amplification and 14q deletion) were identified to be associated with poor RT prognosis, while MUC4 was a favorable factor.

Conclusions

These radioresistance biomarkers may supply insight into predicting the radioresponse. Further, these findings offer the first data on the mutational landscape of ESCC radioresistance.

Multiple primary malignancies for squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus

Background

Patients with esophageal cancer (EC) frequently have multiple primary cancers. We conducted the present study to assess the risk of multiple primary malignancies for patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (AC) of the esophagus and to investigate the influence of multiple primary tumors on the prognosis of EC patients.

Methods

Using the data of 44,091 EC patients from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database, we calculated the standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) for overall multiple primary cancers and cancers at particular sites among EC survivors. The SIRs of esophageal SCC and AC patients were compared using Poisson regression. The Kaplan-Meier (KM) method was used for survival analysis.

Results

Multiple primary cancer risk was significantly increased among both esophageal SCC and AC survivors (SIR: 2.28 and 1.57, respectively; P<0.001). Among SCC patients, the highest SIRs were found in the oral cavity and pharynx (SIR: 16.54), esophagus (SIR: 10.02), and larynx (SIR: 10.34). Also, the highest SIRs following AC cases were observed in the esophagus (SIR: 8.81), stomach (SIR: 9.29), and small intestine (SIR: 4.95). SIRs for the oral cavity and pharynx, lung, and larynx were significantly higher among SCC survivors than AC survivors (all P<0.05). KM analysis revealed no significant difference of overall survival (OS) for multiple primary cancers, including those of the esophagus, stomach, oral cavity and pharynx, and lung among EC patients (log rank =2.04; P=0.564), except for prostate cancer (log rank =96.65; P<0.001).

Conclusions

Multiple primary malignancy risk differed by the histological type of esophageal SSC and AC survivor. However, no significant relationship between survival and the multiple primary cancer sites, except for prostate cancer, was observed.

Prognostic significance and role of thoracic lymph node metastasis based on Chinese expert consensus in esophageal cancer

Background

The Chinese expert consensus on thoracic lymph node (LN) dissection in radical esophagectomy (Chinese Criteria, 2017 edition) was newly promoted. This study examined the prognostic significance and role of thoracic LN metastasis based on the Chinese Criteria for esophageal cancer.

Methods

Data of patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who underwent curative esophagectomy in the West China Hospital from May 2005 to May 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients' prognosis and clinicopathological features were compared to determine the role of Chinese Criteria and their relationship with Union for International Cancer Control (UICC)/American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th TNM staging.

Results

Overall, 2,285 qualified patients were divided into the no (n=1,148), skip (n=156), local (n=665), and mediastinal (n=316) metastasis groups according to the Chinese Criteria. Significant prognostic differences occurred among the four groups in all the thoracic and lower mediastinal ESCC patients (both P<0.001). The Chinese Criteria grouping was an independent prognostic factor for all thoracic [P<0.001; hazard ratio (HR) =1.261, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.103-1.441], upper (P<0.001; HR =1.391, 95% CI: 1.264-1.530), lower mediastinal thoracic ESCC patients (P<0.001; HR =1.312, 95% CI: 1.257-1.370) and all thoracic ESCC after adjuvant therapy (P<0.001; HR =1.303, 95% CI: 1.221-1.390). Significant prognostic differences among Chinese Criteria groups occurred with N1 (P=0.014) and N2 (P=0.018) stages only. Significant differences in survival among N stages were found in local (P<0.001) and mediastinal (P=0.009) metastasis groups.

Conclusions

Our study was the first to report the Chinese Criteria in measuring the degree of thoracic LN metastasis. Similar to N-stage, the Chinese Criteria were confirmed as an independent prognostic factor for thoracic ESCC. Further confirmation of our findings is warranted.

Current status and future direction of lymph node dissection in radical surgery for esophageal cancer

Surgical resection is the main treatment for esophageal cancer. Lymph node dissection is an essential part of radical surgery for esophageal cancer. However, the extent of dissection, numbers of lymph nodes, and sentinel lymph nodes in lymphadenectomy are still under debate. However, a clinical practice consensus has gradually formed despite this dispute.

Adjuvant radiotherapy, chemotherapy or surgery alone for high-risk histological node negative esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Protocol for a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial

Histologically node negative esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (pN0 ESCC) after radical resection still carries a significant risk of recurrence, especially in high‐risk patients. Our previous study showed that the risk of recurrence was associated with tumor location and cell differentiation, as well as the presence of lymphovascular invasion. Most recurrence occurs within two years after surgery. There is still a lack of knowledge on the risks or potential benefits of postoperative adjuvant therapies for high‐risk pN0 ESCC patients. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of adjuvant therapies after radical surgery in high‐risk patients with pN0 ESCC. This study is a multicenter, prospective, controlled randomized trial, which will compare the differences between either adjuvant chemotherapy or adjuvant radiotherapy and surgery alone for high‐risk pN0 ESCC. Patients in group A will receive three cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel and cisplatin, patients in group B will receive adjuvant radiotherapy with intensity‐modulated radiation of 50 Gy, and patients in group C (the control) will receive surgery alone. The primary endpoint is three‐year disease‐free survival. Secondary endpoints include toxicity of adjuvant therapies and five‐year overall survival. One hundred and sixty‐two patients in each group are required and a total of 486 patients will finally be enrolled into the study. This will be the first randomized trial to investigate the necessity or potential benefit of postoperative adjuvant therapies for high‐risk pN0 ESCC patients.