Evaluation of the efficacy and cost effectiveness of health education methods to increase medication adherence among adults with asthma

Prevalence of medication adherence among adult asthmatic patients in four African countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Non-adherence to medications has many deleterious effects including poor treatment outcomes, increased economic burden, increased morbidity, hospitalization rate, health care utilization, productivity loss, and mortality. Therefore, this review aimed to estimate the pooled prevalence of medication adherence among asthmatic adults in 4 African countries. Primary studies were extensively searched from databases such as PubMed, HINARI, Cochrane Library, CINHALand, Google Scholar, and Google search engines. After screening and assessing the quality of studies, data were extracted using a checklist. Heterogeneity was assessed using forest plot, Chocran's Q Test and I2. The random effects meta-analysis model was employed to pool the prevalence of medication adherence among adult asthmatic patients in Africa. Sub-group analysis and meta-regression were performed to identify the sources of heterogeneity. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots with Egger's test. A sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the influence of individual studies on the overall estimate. The review was performed among 16 studies of which 14 were cross-sectional with a total of 4019 participants. The pooled random effects prevalence of adherence to medications among adult patients with asthma in Africa was 39% (95% CI: 32, 47; p < 0.001) with a heterogeneity (I2 = 94.82, p < 0.001). The pooled prevalence of medication adherence among adult asthmatic patients in Africa is low. Researchers should conduct further multicenter longitudinal studies by using objective methods of adherence measurement.

Personalized Medication Adherence Management in Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Review of Effective Interventions and Development of a Practical Adherence Toolkit

BACKGROUND

The management of medication nonadherence of patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains challenging. Given the multitude of underlying causes, a personalized approach is required. The Test of Adherence to Inhalers (TAI) can identify reasons for nonadherence, but it does not provide guidance regarding how to act effectively after results.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a practical, evidence-based decision support toolkit for health care professionals managing adult patients with asthma and/or COPD, by matching TAI-identified adherence barriers to proven effective adherence-enhancing interventions.

METHODS

We performed a literature review in PubMed and Embase identifying interventions that enhanced medication adherence in adult patients with asthma and/or COPD. Randomized controlled trials published in English with full texts available were included. Effective interventions assessed by the Cochrane risk of bias tool were categorized, matched with specific TAI responses, and developed into a practical TAI Toolkit. The Toolkit was assessed for content and usability (System Usability Scale) by a multidisciplinary group of health care professionals.

RESULTS

In total, 40 randomized controlled trials were included in the review. Seven effective interventions categories were identified, informing the TAI Toolkit: reminders, educational interventions, motivational strategies, feedback on medication use, shared decision-making, simplifying the medication regimen, and multiple component interventions. Health care professionals rated the TAI Toolkit with a mean System Usability Scale score of 71.4 (range, 57.5-80.0).

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence can be improved using the different interventions that the TAI Toolkit helps select. The TAI Toolkit was well-received by health care professionals. Further research is required to test its validity, practicality, and effectiveness in practice.

A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of medicationadherence-enhancing intervention for asthma

Objective: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of medication adherence-improving interventions in patients with asthma.Data source: Search engines including PubMed, Scopus and EBSCOhost were used to locate relevant studies from the inception of the databases to 19 October 2018. Drummond's checklist was used to appraise the quality of the economic evaluation.Study selection: Economic studies evaluating the cost-effectiveness of medication adherence enhancing interventions for asthmatic patients were selected. Relevant information including study characteristics, quality assessment, health outcomes and costs of intervention were narratively summarized. The primary outcome of interest was cost-effectiveness (CE) values and the secondary outcomes were costs, medication adherence and clinical consequences.Results: Twenty studies including 11 randomized controlled trials, 6 comparative studies and 3 modeled studies using Markov models were included in the review. Among these, 15 studies evaluated an educational intervention with 13 showing cost-effectiveness in improving health outcomes. The CE of an internet-based intervention showed similar results between groups, while 3 studies of simplified drug regimens and adding a technology-based training program achieved the desirable cost-effectiveness outcome.Conclusion: Overall, our results would support that all of the identified medication adherence-enhancing interventions were cost-effective considering the increased adherence rate, improved clinical effectiveness and the reduced costs of asthma care. However, it was not possible to identify the most cost-effective intervention. More economic studies with sound methodological conduct will be needed to provide stronger evidence in deciding the best approach to improve medication adherence.

Effectiveness and success factors of educational inhaler technique interventions in asthma & COPD patients: a systematic review

With the current wealth of new inhalers available and insurance policy driven inhaler switching, the need for insights in optimal education on inhaler use is more evident than ever. We aimed to systematically review educational inhalation technique interventions, to assess their overall effectiveness, and identify main drivers of success. Medline, Embase and CINAHL databases were searched for randomised controlled trials on educational inhalation technique interventions. Inclusion eligibility, quality appraisal (Cochrane's risk of bias tool) and data extraction were performed by two independent reviewers. Regression analyses were performed to identify characteristics contributing to inhaler technique improvement. Thirty-seven of the 39 interventions included (95%) indicated statistically significant improvement of inhaler technique. However, average follow-up time was relatively short (5 months), 28% lacked clinical relevant endpoints and all lacked cost-effectiveness estimates. Poor initial technique, number of inhalation procedure steps, setting (outpatient clinics performing best), and time elapsed since intervention (all, p < 0.05), were shown to have an impact on effectiveness of the intervention, explaining up to 91% of the effectiveness variation. Other factors, such as disease (asthma vs. chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), education group size (individual vs. group training) and inhaler type (dry powder inhalers vs. pressurised metered dose inhalers) did not play a significant role. Notably, there was a trend (p = 0.06) towards interventions in adults being more effective than those in children and the intervention effect seemed to wane over time. In conclusion, educational interventions to improve inhaler technique are effective on the short-term. Periodical intervention reinforcement and longer follow-up studies, including clinical relevant endpoints and cost-effectiveness, are recommended.

Asthma Patient Education

Patient education is a very important aspect of the treatment of asthma. Success of therapy is highly dependent upon patients' knowledge of asthma and the correct use of their medications. Over the last decade the morbidity and mortality rates due to asthma have increased. Education of patients is necessary to reduce these rates. Pharmacists can play a major role in the education of patients. Pharmacists are readily available and see most patients frequently for refills. Regular use of anti-inflammatory medications, use of β2-agonists for rescue therapy, and prevention of exercise induced asthma, and correct inhaler technique should be stressed. Spacer devices and peak flow meters should be routinely recommended by pharmacists. Educational aids such as handouts, pamphlets, and video tapes are available from many different organizations that can help make education more time efficient. Asthma education is a rewarding service to offer asthma patients and helps to develop loyalty as well as overall better health care for patients.

Assessment of Proper Medication Inhaler Technique in Adult Patients

Background: Many medications used to manage pulmonary disease are delivered via unique inhalation devices. Proper technique in using these devices is required for effective medication delivery. Objective: To assess the degree of proper inhaler technique among adult patients. Methods: Patients using inhalers were identified and then interviewed by pharmacy personnel regarding inhaler use. Checklists were used to document the adherence to manufacturers’ directions for each respective inhaler, and data were then tabulated and assessed for the number and types of inhalers used, incorrectly performed steps in using the inhalers, as well as demographic information of patients. Results: Of the 129 patients that were interviewed, a total of 212 inhalers were used. Twenty-five percent of inhalers (/212) were used incorrectly, with the 3 most common errors being improper priming or lack of test sprays, lack of proper exhalation prior to inhaling the medication, and absence or improper cleaning of inhalers. Furthermore, less than 4% of patients reported being instructed by a pharmacist on proper inhaler use. Conclusion: Inhaler technique among adult patients is substandard and is a key area for pharmacists to become more proactive in educating patients.

Interventions for enhancing medication adherence

BACKGROUND

People who are prescribed self administered medications typically take only about half their prescribed doses. Efforts to assist patients with adherence to medications might improve the benefits of prescribed medications.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of this review is to assess the effects of interventions intended to enhance patient adherence to prescribed medications for medical conditions, on both medication adherence and clinical outcomes.

SEARCH METHODS

We updated searches of The Cochrane Library, including CENTRAL (via http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/cochranelibrary/search/), MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO (all via Ovid), CINAHL (via EBSCO), and Sociological Abstracts (via ProQuest) on 11 January 2013 with no language restriction. We also reviewed bibliographies in articles on patient adherence, and contacted authors of relevant original and review articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included unconfounded RCTs of interventions to improve adherence with prescribed medications, measuring both medication adherence and clinical outcome, with at least 80% follow-up of each group studied and, for long-term treatments, at least six months follow-up for studies with positive findings at earlier time points.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted all data and a third author resolved disagreements. The studies differed widely according to medical condition, patient population, intervention, measures of adherence, and clinical outcomes. Pooling results according to one of these characteristics still leaves highly heterogeneous groups, and we could not justify meta-analysis. Instead, we conducted a qualitative analysis with a focus on the RCTs with the lowest risk of bias for study design and the primary clinical outcome.

MAIN RESULTS

The present update included 109 new RCTs published since the previous update in January 2007, bringing the total number of RCTs to 182; we found five RCTs from the previous update to be ineligible and excluded them. Studies were heterogeneous for patients, medical problems, treatment regimens, adherence interventions, and adherence and clinical outcome measurements, and most had high risk of bias. The main changes in comparison with the previous update include that we now: 1) report a lack of convincing evidence also specifically among the studies with the lowest risk of bias; 2) do not try to classify studies according to intervention type any more, due to the large heterogeneity; 3) make our database available for collaboration on sub-analyses, in acknowledgement of the need to make collective advancement in this difficult field of research. Of all 182 RCTs, 17 had the lowest risk of bias for study design features and their primary clinical outcome, 11 from the present update and six from the previous update. The RCTs at lowest risk of bias generally involved complex interventions with multiple components, trying to overcome barriers to adherence by means of tailored ongoing support from allied health professionals such as pharmacists, who often delivered intense education, counseling (including motivational interviewing or cognitive behavioral therapy by professionals) or daily treatment support (or both), and sometimes additional support from family or peers. Only five of these RCTs reported improvements in both adherence and clinical outcomes, and no common intervention characteristics were apparent. Even the most effective interventions did not lead to large improvements in adherence or clinical outcomes.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Across the body of evidence, effects were inconsistent from study to study, and only a minority of lowest risk of bias RCTs improved both adherence and clinical outcomes. Current methods of improving medication adherence for chronic health problems are mostly complex and not very effective, so that the full benefits of treatment cannot be realized. The research in this field needs advances, including improved design of feasible long-term interventions, objective adherence measures, and sufficient study power to detect improvements in patient-important clinical outcomes. By making our comprehensive database available for sharing we hope to contribute to achieving these advances.

Efficacy of brief motivational interviewing to improve adherence to inhaled corticosteroids among adult asthmatics: results from a randomized controlled pilot feasibility trial

PURPOSE

Daily adherence to inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) regimens is one of the most important factors linked to achieving optimal asthma control. Motivational interviewing (MI) is a client-centered communication style that focuses on enhancing intrinsic motivation to engage in appropriate self-management behaviors. MI has been shown to improve a variety of health behaviors including medication adherence in other disorders, but its efficacy for the improvement of ICS adherence in asthmatics has yet to be examined. This pilot "proof of concept" trial assessed the feasibility of MI to improve daily ICS adherence and asthma control levels in adult asthmatics.

METHODS

Fifty-four poorly controlled (Asthma Control Questionnaire [ACQ] score ≥1.5), highly nonadherent (filled <50% of ICS medication in the last year) adult asthmatics were recruited from the outpatient asthma clinic of a university-affiliated hospital. Participants underwent baseline assessments and were randomly assigned to MI (3×30 minutes sessions within a 6-week period, n=26) or a usual care (UC) control group (n=28). ICS adherence (% pharmacy refills) and asthma control (ACQ, Asthma Control Test [ACT]) were measured at 6 and 12 months postintervention. Mixed model repeated measure analyses for both intent-to-treat and per-protocol were used. Results were adjusted for a priori-defined covariates including baseline adherence. Patients in the MI group also reported their impressions of the intervention.

RESULTS

Six-month adjusted intent-to-treat analyses revealed a mean change in the percentage of ICS refills of 13% in the MI group vs 6% in the UC group (between group net improvement associated with MI =+6% [-12% to 24%]). Twelve-month analyses revealed a mean change in the percentage of ICS refills of 11% (MI group) vs 7% in the UC group (between group net improvement associated with MI =+3% [-11% to 18%]) representing an effect size (ES) of d=0.20 (medium). Six-month adjusted net improvement in ACQ and ACT scores between MI and control groups was -0.2 and +0.7, respectively, with improvements being even more pronounced at 12 months (ACQ =-0.5; ACT =+1.1; ES, d=0.12 and 0.18 [small], respectively). Interestingly, 6- and 12-month net improvements in asthma self-efficacy (which is specifically targeted by MI) improved by +0.4 and +0.4, respectively, with an ES of d=0.46 (marginally large). Patients in the MI group rated the intervention overwhelmingly positively in terms of usefulness, pertinence, feasibility, enjoyableness, and likelihood to change adherence behavior.

CONCLUSION

Results suggest that a brief (90 minutes) MI intervention that targets ICS adherence can produce clinically significant improvements in adherence behavior, asthma control levels, and asthma self-efficacy in poorly controlled nonadherent asthmatics at 6 months that are maintained for 1 year, and it is well accepted by patients. Future studies including larger sample sizes, modified intervention designs (eg, MI "booster" sessions), and assessments of the extent behavior changes translate into clinical improvements (eg, in asthma control and quality of life) are warranted.

Cost effectiveness of medication adherence-enhancing interventions: a systematic review of trial-based economic evaluations

BACKGROUND

In light of the pressure to reduce unnecessary healthcare expenditure in the current economic climate, a systematic review that assesses evidence of cost effectiveness of adherence-enhancing interventions would be timely.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to examine the cost effectiveness of adherence-enhancing interventions compared with care as usual in randomised controlled trials, and to assess the methodological quality of economic evaluations.

METHODS

MEDLINE, PsycInfo, EconLit and the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination databases were searched for randomised controlled trials reporting full economic evaluations of adherence-enhancing interventions (published up to June 2013). Information was collected on study characteristics, cost effectiveness of treatment alternatives, and methodological quality.

RESULTS

A total of 14 randomised controlled trials were included. The quality of economic evaluations and the risk of bias varied considerably between trials. Four studies showed incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) below the willingness-to-pay threshold. Few studies seemed to evaluate interventions that successfully changed adherence.

CONCLUSIONS

Only 14 randomised controlled trials examined the cost effectiveness of adherence interventions. Despite that some studies showe favourable ICERs, the overall quality of studies was modest and the economic perspectives applied were frequently narrow. To demonstrate that adherence interventions can be cost effective, we recommend that proven-effective adherence programmes are subjected to comprehensive economic evaluations.

Adherence: the goal to control asthma

Asthma management requires adequate adherence to many recommendations, including therapy, monitoring of asthma control, avoidance of environmental triggers, and attending follow-up appointments. Poor adherence is common in patients with asthma and is often associated with increased health care use, morbidity, and mortality. Many determinants of poor adherence have been identified and should be addressed, but there is no clear profile of the nonadherent patient. Interventions to improve adherence therefore demand tailoring to the individual by including patient-specific education, addressing patient fears and misconceptions, monitoring adherence, and developing a shared decision process.

Efficacy of interventions to improve adherence to inhaled corticosteroids in adult asthmatics: impact of using components of the chronic care model

BACKGROUND

Adherence to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) remains poor among asthmatics, yet little is known about the efficacy of interventions to improve adherence. Implementing the Chronic Care Model (CCM) components among patients with respiratory disorders has been associated with an improvement in outcomes, yet little is known about its effects on ICS adherence in asthmatics.

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a systematic review to assess the efficacy of interventions to improve ICS adherence among adult-asthmatics, and whether the use of CCM components (i.e., teaching self-management skills, providing decision support, delivery system design, and clinical information systems) resulted in greater ICS adherence.

METHODS

All English language articles testing the efficacy of an intervention including ICS medication on outcome from MEDLINE and PsychINFO databases through Aug-2010 were reviewed. Interventions were categorized based on the inclusion of CCM components. We standardized treatment effects to obtain effect-size's (ES's) and we combined the ES's of studies according to the number of CCM components included in their interventions.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies met inclusion criteria. Inclusion of a greater number of CCM components within interventions was associated with stronger effects on ICS adherence outcomes, with interventions featuring one, two, and four CCM components having medium (ES = 0.29; 95%CI, 0.16-0.42), large (0.53; 0.40-0.66), and very-large (0.83; 0.69-0.98) effects respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings provide support for using the CCM as a framework for the design and implementation of interventions to improve adherence among adult-asthmatics.

WITHDRAWN: Written individualised management plans for asthma in children and adults

BACKGROUND

Non-adherence to treatment advice is a common phenomenon in asthma and may account for a significant proportion of the morbidity. Comprehensive care that includes asthma education, a written self-management plan and regular review has been shown to improve asthma outcomes, but the contribution of these components has not been established.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether the provision of a written asthma self-management plan increases adherence and improves outcome.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We carried out a search on the Cochrane Airways Group trials register. There was no language restriction. The search of the databases used the following terms: action plan OR self OR self-care OR self-manag* OR educ* AND adher* OR comply OR compli*. We contacted authors of included studies for any unpublished or on-going studies and bibliographies of all included studies and reviews were searched for further studies. The most recent search was carried out in June 2004.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We only considered randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with asthma. Participants must have been assigned to receive an individualised written asthma management plan (symptom or peak flow based) about the actions required for regular asthma management and/or the actions to take in the event of an asthma exacerbation.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed study quality and abstracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

Seven trials met the inclusion criteria. The written management plans were either peak flow or symptom based, which were compared against each other or compared to no written management plan. Reported outcomes included: medication adherence, hospitalisation, emergency department visits, oral corticosteroid use, lung function, days lost from school/work, unscheduled doctor visits and respiratory tract infections. There was no consistent evidence that written plans produced better patient outcomes than no written plan. For some outcomes, there appeared to be an advantage of one type of plan over the other, but there was no consistency - one type of plan was not consistently more effective than another.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The available trials are too small and the results too few and inconsistent to form any firm conclusions as to the contribution of written self management plans in the known beneficial effects of a comprehensive asthma care programme.

Cost of non-persistence with oral bisphosphonates in post-menopausal osteoporosis treatment in France

BACKGROUND

During the last decade, oral bisphosphonates (BP) became the most widely prescribed pharmacologic class for post-menopausal osteoporosis. However, many surveys revealed the important issue of poor persistence with those drugs resulting in a failure of treatment to reduce fracture risk sufficiently. Using a published Markov model, this study analyses the economic impact of non-persistence with bisphosphonates in the context of the introduction of generics in France.

METHODS

Direct costs of vertebral, hip and wrist fracture were assessed and included in an existing 10-year Markov model developed to analyse consequences of non-persistence. Three alternatives of comparison were set: no treatment, real-world persistence, and ideal persistence. Simulated patients' characteristics matched those from a French observational study and the real-world adherence alternative employed persistence data from published database analysis. The risk of fracture of menopausal women and the risk reduction associated with the drugs were based on results reported in clinical trials. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated first between real-world adherence and no treatment alternatives, and second between ideal and real-world persistence alternatives. The cost of non-persistence was defined as the difference between total cost of ideal and real-world persistence alternatives.

RESULTS

Within fractured women population, mean costs of 10-year management of fracture were significantly different between the three alternatives with €7,239 (± €4,783), €6,711 (± €4,410) and €6,134 (± €3,945) in the no-treatment, the real-world and ideal persistence alternatives, respectively (p < 0.0001). Cost-effectiveness ratio for real-world treatment persistence compared with no-treatment alternative was found dominant and as well, alternative of ideal persistence dominated the former. Each ten percentage point of persistence gain amounted to €58 per patient, and extrapolation resulted in a global annual cost of non-persistence of over €30 million to the French health care system, with a substantial transfer from hospital to pharmacy budgets.

CONCLUSION

Within term, improving persistence with oral bisphosphonates should be economically dominant on levels currently known in real-world. Given this potential savings, ambitious adherence-enhancing interventions should be considered in osteoporotic patients.

Pharmacists solving problems in asthma management — experiences from a one-year intervention programme in Finland

Objective

To study the effect of an intervention provided by community pharmacists on detection and resolution of problems in asthma patients' self-management and to study patients' opinions about the perceived usefulness of the pharmacists' input.

Method

A one-year intervention study was conducted with scheduled visits and follow-ups at baseline, four, eight and 12 months. Study patients (n=28) acted as their own controls.

Setting

Four communities and community pharmacies in different parts of Finland.

Key findings

At study baseline, all patients had at least one documented problem, the most commonly reported being problems with medication, side effects, problems with inhalation devices and not using asthma medicines according to the physician's instructions. On average, patients had five “intervention” consultations with the pharmacist during the one-year study. After the intervention, half of the patients reported that their problems had been resolved. The most useful areas of advice were considered by the patients to be instructions about changing asthma medication according to asthma symptoms and management of asthma symptoms. Twenty-five of the 28 patients reported that they were satisfied with the education and counselling provided by pharmacists, a higher number than for physicians or nurses.

Conclusion

The findings from this small longitudinal study indicate that community pharmacists can improve asthma patients' treatment by consultations during which they identify and address problems in self-management of asthma.

Educational and behavioral interventions for asthma: who achieves which outcomes? A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

Randomized clinical trial (RCT) data reviewed for outcomes and processes associated with asthma educational and behavioral interventions provided by different types of health professionals.

METHODS

Cochrane Collaboration, MEDLINE, PUBMED, Google Scholar search from 1998 to 2009 identified 1650 articles regarding asthma educational and behavioral interventions resulting in 249 potential studies and following assessment produced a final sample of 50 RCTs.

RESULTS

Approaches, intended outcomes, and program providers vary greatly. No rationale provided in study reports for the selection of specific outcomes, program providers, or program components. Health care utilization and symptom control have been the most common outcomes assessed. Specific providers favor particular teaching approaches. Multidisciplinary teams have been the most frequent providers of asthma interventions. Physician-led interventions were most successful for outcomes related to the use of health care. Multidisciplinary teams were best in achieving symptom reduction and quality of life. Lay persons were best in achieving self-management/self-efficacy outcomes. Components most frequently employed in successful programs are skills to improve patient-clinician communication and education to enhance patient self-management. Fifty percent of interventions achieved reduction in the use of health care and one-third in symptom control. A combination approach including self-management and patient-clinician communication involving multidisciplinary team members may have the greatest effect on most outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The extent to which and how different providers achieve asthma outcomes through educational and behavioral interventions is emerging from recent studies. Health care use and symptom control are evolving as the gold standard for intervention outcomes. Development of self-management and clinician-patient communication skills are program components associated with success across outcomes and providers.

Impact of an adherence intervention program on medication adherence barriers, asthma control, and productivity/daily activities in patients with asthma

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the impact of an asthma patient intervention program, with a focus on medication adherence on adherence barriers, asthma control, and productivity/daily activities.

METHODS

Patients ≥18 years old who were employed by a large Southeastern public school system, had ≥1 medical claim for asthma, and were taking ≥1 asthma medication were invited to participate in the study. The ASK-20, the Asthma Control Test (ACT), and a productivity questionnaire were administered before and after a 6-month period of intervention that involved the use of baseline ASK-20 results to create patient-specific reports on adherence barriers and talking points for care managers to use during the two outbound telephone calls addressing barriers identified. Patients also received three educational mailings. The ASK-20 is a brief, self-reported instrument developed to identify patient-specific barriers to medication adherence and to improve provider/patient communication about adherence.

RESULTS

Of 112 individuals who enrolled, 87 completed the program (77.7%). Participants' mean age was 48.2 years (SD = 10.5), and most were female (86.2%) and white (64.4%). The mean number of years with asthma was 17.5 (SD = 14.7); approximately one third (36.8%) of participants had had asthma for >20 years. The intervention was associated with a significant reduction in the number of adherence barriers (3.8 to 2.8; p = .0021) as well as improvement in asthma control as reflected in an increase in the percentage of participants with controlled asthma defined as having an ACT score > 19 (50.0% to 64.6%; p = .0285). Significant reductions in the mean number of days that housework or schoolwork was limited by asthma (p = .0059) and the mean number of days that family, social, or recreational activities were missed or limited because of asthma (p = .0185) were also observed. The majority of the participants (95%) rated the program as being good, very good, or excellent.

CONCLUSION

Programs incorporating a clinical assessment tool such as the ASK-20 for identifying a broad range of risk factors for nonadherence and for developing patient-specific intervention may reduce adherence barriers and improved disease control and ability to perform daily activities in patients with asthma.

Interventions for enhancing medication adherence

BACKGROUND

People who are prescribed self-administered medications typically take less than half the prescribed doses. Efforts to assist patients with adherence to medications might improve the benefits of prescribed medications, but also might increase their adverse effects.

OBJECTIVES

To update a review summarizing the results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of interventions to help patients follow prescriptions for medications for medical problems, including mental disorders but not addictions.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We updated searches of The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (IPA), PsycINFO (all via OVID) and Sociological Abstracts (via CSA) in January 2007 with no language restriction. We also reviewed bibliographies in articles on patient adherence and articles in our personal collections, and contacted authors of relevant original and review articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Articles were selected if they reported an unconfounded RCT of an intervention to improve adherence with prescribed medications, measuring both medication adherence and treatment outcome, with at least 80% follow-up of each group studied and, for long-term treatments, at least six months follow-up for studies with positive initial findings.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Study design features, interventions and controls, and results were extracted by one review author and confirmed by at least one other review author. We extracted adherence rates and their measures of variance for all methods of measuring adherence in each study, and all outcome rates and their measures of variance for each study group, as well as levels of statistical significance for differences between study groups, consulting authors and verifying or correcting analyses as needed. The studies differed widely according to medical condition, patient population, intervention, measures of adherence, and clinical outcomes. Therefore, we did not feel that quantitative analysis was scientifically justified; rather, we conducted a qualitative analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

For short-term treatments, four of ten interventions reported in nine RCTs showed an effect on both adherence and at least one clinical outcome, while one intervention reported in one RCT significantly improved patient adherence, but did not enhance the clinical outcome. For long-term treatments, 36 of 81 interventions reported in 69 RCTs were associated with improvements in adherence, but only 25 interventions led to improvement in at least one treatment outcome. Almost all of the interventions that were effective for long-term care were complex, including combinations of more convenient care, information, reminders, self-monitoring, reinforcement, counseling, family therapy, psychological therapy, crisis intervention, manual telephone follow-up, and supportive care. Even the most effective interventions did not lead to large improvements in adherence and treatment outcomes.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

For short-term treatments several quite simple interventions increased adherence and improved patient outcomes, but the effects were inconsistent from study to study with less than half of studies showing benefits. Current methods of improving adherence for chronic health problems are mostly complex and not very effective, so that the full benefits of treatment cannot be realized. High priority should be given to fundamental and applied research concerning innovations to assist patients to follow medication prescriptions for long-term medical disorders.

Interventions to enhance medication adherence

BACKGROUND

People who are prescribed self-administered medications typically take less than half the prescribed doses. Efforts to assist patients with adherence to medications might improve the benefits of prescribed medications, but also might increase their adverse effects.

OBJECTIVES

To update a review summarizing the results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of interventions to help patients follow prescriptions for medications for medical problems, including mental disorders but not addictions.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Computerized searches were updated to September 2004 without language restriction in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (IPA), PsycINFO and SOCIOFILE. We also reviewed bibliographies in articles on patient adherence and articles in our personal collections, and contacted authors of original and review articles on the topic.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Articles were selected if they reported an unconfounded RCT of an intervention to improve adherence with prescribed medications, measuring both medication adherence and treatment outcome, with at least 80% follow-up of each group studied and, for long-term treatments, at least six months follow-up for studies with positive initial findings.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Study design features, interventions and controls, and results were extracted by one reviewer and confirmed by at least one other reviewer. We extracted adherence rates and their measures of variance for all methods of measuring adherence in each study, and all outcome rates and their measures of variance for each study group, as well as levels of statistical significance for differences between study groups, consulting authors and verifying or correcting analyses as needed.

MAIN RESULTS

For short-term treatments, four of nine interventions reported in eight RCTs showed an effect on both adherence and at least one clinical outcome, while one intervention reported in one RCT significantly improved patient compliance, but did not enhance the clinical outcome. For long-term treatments, 26 of 58 interventions reported in 49 RCTs were associated with improvements in adherence, but only 18 interventions led to improvement in at least one treatment outcome. Almost all of the interventions that were effective for long-term care were complex, including combinations of more convenient care, information, reminders, self-monitoring, reinforcement, counseling, family therapy, psychological therapy, crisis intervention, manual telephone follow-up, and supportive care. Even the most effective interventions did not lead to large improvements in adherence and treatment outcomes. Six studies showed that telling patients about adverse effects of treatment did not affect their adherence.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Improving short-term adherence is relatively successful with a variety of simple interventions. Current methods of improving adherence for chronic health problems are mostly complex and not very effective, so that the full benefits of treatment cannot be realized. High priority should be given to fundamental and applied research concerning innovations to assist patients to follow medication prescriptions for long-term medical disorders.

Clinical practice guidelines: medical follow-up of patients with asthma--adults and adolescents

The follow-up of patients with asthma should focus on asthma control (disease course over a number of weeks).

Medication non-adherence in the elderly: how big is the problem?

Adherence to medication is one of the most intriguing and complex behaviours demonstrated by patients. Non-adherence to a therapeutic regimen may result in negative outcomes for patients and may be compounded in populations with multiple morbidities which require multiple drug therapy. Such a population is exemplified by the elderly. However, non-adherence may not be more prevalent in older patients and there is no consensus in the literature that age is a predictor of poor adherence. Indeed, older patients may deliberately choose not to adhere to medication (intentional non-adherence) to avoid adverse effects. Furthermore, many of the studies on adherence lack commonality in terms of how adherence is measured, the definition of an 'older' patient and the range of disease states which have been examined. Adherence may also be affected by access to medications which may be restricted by the use of formularies or insurance programmes. However, non-adherence may represent a greater risk in older people resulting in poor disease control which may be compounded with multiple morbidity and polypharmacy. A range of strategies have been implemented to try and improve adherence in this patient population. The use of forgiving drugs (those which have a prescribed dosage interval that is 50% or less the duration of drug action) may facilitate occasional lapses in drug-taking. Drug holidays (deliberate, supervised non-adherence for a fixed period of time) have been used in Parkinson's disease to reduce adverse effects. Once-daily scheduling of drug administration may offer a pragmatic approach to optimising drug therapy in some patients; this may be supplemented through the use of compliance aids. What is increasingly apparent, however, is that the role of the patient (irrespective of age) is critical in decision-making about medication, together with communication between patients and healthcare professionals. This has been articulated through the concept of concordance which has been described as a therapeutic alliance between the patient and healthcare professional. In addition, interventions employed to improve adherence must be multifaceted, and together with practical approaches (reducing unnecessary drugs and simplifying dosage regimens), the patient perspective must be considered. Good adherence should be seen as a means of achieving a satisfactory therapeutic result and not as an end in itself.

Cost-effectiveness of adherence-enhancing interventions: a quality assessment of the evidence

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the current cost-effectiveness evidence on adherence-enhancing interventions (AEIs) was of sufficient quality to aid in decision-making regarding medication adherence policies.

DATA SOURCES

A computerized search of Embase, MEDLINE, Cinahl, Econlit, NHSEED, Psychlit, EPIC, and Cochrane databases (1980-April 2004) was performed. English-language human subject articles were identified using the key words compliance, adherence, concordance, patient assistance, therapeutic alliance, costs, economics, efficiency, resource use/utilization, cost-of-illness, cost-effectiveness, cost-minimization, cost-utility, and cost-benefit.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Studies that appeared to assess the cost-effectiveness of medication AEIs were included. Methodologic rigor was assessed using 15 minimum quality criteria.

DATA SYNTHESIS

We found 45 comparative studies in 43 publications. Asthma (14 studies) and psychiatric illness (12 studies) were most commonly investigated. In 33 studies, interventions were educational, 18 had multiple components, and 23 did not appear to be linked to proven reasons for nonadherence. Reporting of adherence and outcome results was often unclear. Cost data were poorer quality than outcome data, using average or estimated costs and omitting some cost elements. Nine studies carried out incremental economic analysis. No study met all quality criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

We were not able to make definitive conclusions about the cost-effectiveness of AEIs due to the heterogeneity of the studies found and incomplete reporting of results. Important policy decisions need to be made about nonadherence; however, they are currently being made in a vacuum of adequate information. AEIs must be based on reasons for nonadherence and be evaluated using accepted clinical and economic quality criteria.

Does disease management improve clinical and economic outcomes in patients with chronic diseases? A systematic review

PURPOSE

To assess the clinical and economic effects of disease management in patients with chronic diseases.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched for English-language articles from 1987 to 2001. Articles were included if they used a systematic approach to care and evaluated patients with chronic disease, reported objective measurements of the processes or outcomes of care, and employed acceptable experimental or quasi-experimental study designs as defined by the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Group.

RESULTS

Two reviewers evaluated 16,917 titles and identified 102 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Identified studies represented 11 chronic conditions: depression, diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, chronic pain, coronary artery disease, asthma, heart failure, back pain, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. Disease management programs for patients with depression had the highest percentage of comparisons (48% [41/86]) showing substantial improvements in patient care, whereas programs for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (9% [2/22]) or chronic pain (8% [1/12]) appeared to be the least effective. Of the outcomes more frequently studied, disease management appeared to improve patient satisfaction (71% [12/17]), patient adherence (47% [17/36]), and disease control (45% [33/74]) most commonly and cost-related outcomes least frequently (11% to 16%).

CONCLUSION

Disease management programs were associated with marked improvements in many different processes and outcomes of care. Few studies demonstrated a notable reduction in costs. Further research is needed to understand how disease management can most effectively improve the quality and cost of care for patients with chronic diseases.

Improving adherence and persistence: a review and assessment of interventions and description of steps toward a national adherence initiative

OBJECTIVES

To identify the effectiveness of adherence interventions reported in the literature, to identify interventions being conducted and/or sponsored by large chain pharmacies and pharmaceutical manufacturers, and to seek input from a panel of pharmacists who address adherence issues on a daily basis as to the steps that should be taken to advance a national initiative to increase awareness of the importance of and opportunities associated with medication adherence and persistence.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Effectiveness of the adherence interventions reported in the literature.

METHODS

First, a literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, CINAHL, and PsycINFO. Keywords were medication or drug and compliance or adherence or persistence and control group. Second, pharmaceutical manufacturers and chain pharmacies were surveyed. Third, an advisory panel reacted to the research findings and formulated a series of action steps that could support or be part of a national initiative to increase adherence.

RESULTS

Reported adherence-related interventions were grouped into five categories--adherence aids, refill or follow-up reminders, regimen simplification, written and oral education, and comprehensive management. Median adherence increases ranged from 6% to 25% for these categories. Interviews with 10 chain pharmacies revealed that adherence is an important issue. Most chains have some form of adherence program in place, but current initiatives are product-focused rather than patient-focused. Interviews with 15 manufacturers revealed that they currently use a variety of adherence interventions and want to partner with pharmacies to implement and assess the initiatives. The advisory panel developed a series of action items for implementing a national adherence initiative.

CONCLUSION

Comprehensive interventions can improve adherence and are mutually beneficial for patients, pharmacies, and manufacturers. Pharmacists must be able to assess patients' adherence, identify the reasons for nonadherence, and develop patient-specific interventions. Studies have shown that the most successful interventions have some follow-up component and address the underlying reason(s) for nonadherence. Pharmacies and pharmaceutical manufacturers have tried various adherence interventions, such as patient education and refill reminders. There is a growing sense that a national adherence initiative is needed to coordinate pharmacists' efforts to address this public health problem, and the American Pharmacists Association is well positioned to take a leadership role in such efforts.

Written individualised management plans for asthma in children and adults

BACKGROUND

Non-adherence to treatment advice is a common phenomenon in asthma and may account for a significant proportion of the morbidity. Comprehensive care that includes asthma education, a written self-management plan and regular review has been shown to improve asthma outcomes, but the contribution of these components has not been established.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether the provision of a written asthma self-management plan increases adherence and improves outcome.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We carried out a search on the Cochrane Airways Group trials register. There was no language restriction. The search of the databases used the following terms: action plan OR self OR self-care OR self-manag* OR educ* AND adher* OR comply OR compli*. We contacted authors of included studies for any unpublished or on-going studies and bibliographies of all included studies and reviews were searched for further studies. The most recent search was carried out in May 2003.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We only considered randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with asthma. Participants must have been assigned to receive an individualised written asthma management plan (symptom or peak flow based) about the actions required for regular asthma management and/or the actions to take in the event of an asthma exacerbation.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed study quality and abstracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

Seven trials met the inclusion criteria. The written management plans were either peak flow or symptom based, which were compared against each other or compared to no written management plan. Reported outcomes included: medication adherence, hospitalisation, emergency department visits, oral corticosteroid use, lung function, days lost from school/work, unscheduled doctor visits and respiratory tract infections. There was no consistent evidence that written plans produced better patient outcomes than no written plan. For some outcomes, there appeared to be an advantage of one type of plan over the other, but there was no consistency - one type of plan was not consistently more effective than another.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

The available trials are too small and the results too few and inconsistent to form any firm conclusions as to the contribution of written self management plans in the known beneficial effects of a comprehensive asthma care programme.

Measuring costs and consequences in economic evaluation in asthma

Formal economic evaluation is playing an increasingly important role in health-care decision-making. This is shown by the requirement to present economic data to support applications for public reimbursement for new pharmaceuticals in Australia and the provinces of Canada, and by the appraisal process initiated by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence in the U.K. This growing role of economic analysis applies as much to the field of asthma as anywhere. This paper provides a detailed review of applied economic studies in asthma. The review is used to explore a range of methodological issues in the field including the choice of perspective and maximand, whether to use disease-specific or generic measures of outcome and whether decision-makers should receive disaggregated cost and consequence data or results that focus on an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. It is concluded that, given the heterogeneity in decision-makers' objectives and constraints, economic studies should be planned and executed in such a way as to maximize flexibility in how results are presented.

Options for self-management education for adults with asthma

BACKGROUND

Asthma education and self-management are key recommendations of asthma management guidelines because they improve health outcomes. There are several different modalities for the delivery of asthma self-management education.

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated programmes that: 1) Optimised asthma control through inhaled corticosteroid use by regular medical review or optimised asthma control by individualised written action plans 2) Used written self-management plans based on peak expiratory flow self-monitoring compared with symptom self-monitoring 3) Compared different options for the delivery of optimal self-management programmes.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group trials register and reference lists of articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials of asthma self-management education interventions in adults over 16 years of age with asthma.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Fifteen trials met the inclusion criteria. Trial quality was assessed and data were extracted independently by two reviewers. Study authors were contacted for confirmation.

MAIN RESULTS

1) Six studies compared optimal self-management allowing self-adjustment of medications according to an individualised written action plan to adjustment of medications by a doctor. These two styles of asthma management gave equivalent effects for hospitalisation, ER visits, unscheduled doctor visits and nocturnal asthma. 2) Self-management using a written action plan based on PEF was found to be equivalent to self-management using a symptoms based written action plan in the six studies which compared these interventions. 3) Three studies compared self-management options. In one, that provided optimal therapy but tested the omission of regular review, the latter was associated with more health centre visits and sickness days. In another, comparing high and low intensity education, the latter was associated with more unscheduled doctor visits. In a third, no difference in health care utilisation or lung function was reported between verbal instruction and written action plans.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Optimal self-management allowing for optimisation of asthma control by adjustment of medications may be conducted by either self-adjustment with the aid of a written action plan or by regular medical review. Individualised written action plans based on peak expiratory flow are equivalent to action plans based on symptoms. Reducing the intensity of self-management education or level of clinical review may reduce its effectiveness.

Insurance and quality of care for adults with acute asthma

OBJECTIVE

The relationship between health care insurance and quality of medical care remains incompletely studied. We sought to determine whether type of patient insurance is related to quality of care and subsequent outcomes for patients who arrive in the emergency department (ED) for acute asthma.

DESIGN

Using prospectively collected data from the Multicenter Airway Research Collaboration, we compared measures of quality of pre-ED care, acute severity, and short-term outcomes across 4 insurance categories: managed care, indemnity, Medicaid, and uninsured.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Emergency departments at 57 academic medical centers enrolled 1,019 adults with acute asthma.

RESULTS

Patients with managed care ranked first and uninsured patients ranked last on all 7 unadjusted quality measures. After controlling for covariates, uninsured patients had significantly lower quality of care than indemnity patients for 5 of 7 measures and had lower initial peak expiratory flow rates than indemnity insured patients. Patients with managed care insurance were more likely than indemnity-insured patients to identify a primary care physician and report using inhaled steroids in the month prior to arrival in the ED. Patients with Medicaid insurance were more likely than indemnity-insured patients to use the ED as their usual source of care for problems with asthma. We found no differences in patient outcomes among the insurance categories we studied.

CONCLUSIONS

Uninsured patients had consistently poorer quality of care and than insured patients. Despite differences in indicators of quality of care between types of insurance, we found no differences in short-term patient outcomes by type of insurance.

Randomized controlled economic evaluation of asthma self-management in primary health care

In this randomized controlled economic evaluation we compared guided asthma self-management with usual asthma care according to guidelines for Dutch family physicians. Nineteen family practices were randomized, and 193 adults with stable asthma (98 self-management, 95 usual care) were included and monitored for 2 years. We hypothesized that introducing self-management would not compromise asthma control and cost would be equal to or lower than in usual care. Patient-specific cost data were collected, preference-based utilities were assessed, and incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and successfully treated week gained was calculated. Self-management patients gained 0.039 QALY (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.003 to 0.075) and experienced 81 (95% CI, 78 to 84) successfully treated weeks in 2 years' time; the corresponding figures for usual care were 0.024 (95% CI, -0.022 to 0.071) and 75 (95% CI, 72 to 78). Total costs were 1,084 euros(95% CI, 938 to 1,228) for self-management and 1,097 euros (95% CI, 933 to 1,260) for usual care. Self-management patients consumed 1,680 (95% CI, 1,538 to 1,822) puffs of budesonide, usual care patients 1,897 (95% CI, 1,679 to 2,115). Mean productivity cost due to limited activity days was 213 euros lower among self-management patients. When all costs were included, self-management was cost-effective on all outcomes. The probability that self-management was cost-effective relative to usual care in terms of QALYs was 52%. We conclude that guided self-management is a safe and efficient alternative approach compared with asthma treatment usually provided in Dutch primary care.

Strengthening asthma education to enhance disease control

This article focuses on reducing the barriers to effectively applying what is known about asthma patient education. One barrier to effective asthma control in individuals and populations is failure to recognize the range of influences on patients trying to manage their disease, including actions of family, clinicians, friends and neighbors, work or school mates, and significant people and organizations in the wider social environment. Another deterrent is failing to assist patients in developing their self-regulation skills. Other barriers are the lack of attention to the patients' asthma management goals (as opposed to clinical objectives) and overlooking signs that indicate follow-up education is needed. Five actions taken by health-care professionals could significantly enhance the effectiveness of asthma education: (1) make messages to patients and core skills taught consistent with national asthma guidelines; (2) focus on developing the patient's ability to self-regulate; (3) develop comprehensive plans for treatment and education that assign clinicians to appropriate educative roles; (4) use clinician communication techniques demonstrated to enhance asthma management by patients; and (5) ensure that all providers of education are themselves trained to achieve actions 1 to 4.

Custo-efetividade de programa de educação para adultos asmáticos atendidos em hospital-escola de instituição pública

Introdução: A asma pouco controlada acarreta custo econômico substancial para o sistema de saúde, principalmente, decorrente de gastos diretos. Programas de educação podem levar à redução desses custos. Objetivo: Avaliar os custos econômicos diretos resultantes da implantação de um programa de educação para asmáticos quando comparado com o atendimento usual especializado. Método: Foram calculados, retrospectivamente, e comparados os custos diretos de um programa de educação e do atendimento usual ao asmático. As hospitalizações, visitas ao pronto-socorro e visitas ambulatoriais, em ambos os grupos, foram registradas durante o período da intervenção educacional. Os valores utilizados para o cálculo desses custos foram baseados nos dados disponíveis no banco de dados do Datasus de 1996. O custo total com medicação/paciente no grupo educação (E) e controle (C) foi baseado no consumo de medicação durante o mês anterior à ultima visita e estimado pelo guia farmacêutico de fevereiro de 1996. Os valores finais foram convertidos em US dólar. Resultados: O custo médio direto em US dólar por paciente (US$) dos grupos C e E e a diferença de custos (delta) entre os dois foram, respectivamente: para hospitalizações - US$183, US$0, delta = $183; visitas ao PS - US$14, US$ 5, delta = US$9; visitas ambulatoriais agendadas - US$10, US$24, delta = -US$14; medicações - US$124,3, US$195,6, delta = -US$71,3. O custo total foi de US$331 para o grupo C e US$224 para o grupo E, o que permitiu redução de gastos da ordem de US$107/paciente do grupo educação em relação ao controle. Conclusão: No grupo educação o custo total com medicamentos é superior ao observado no grupo controle, refletindo maior gasto com medicação de prevenção. Entretanto, a implantação do programa de educação leva a redução dos gastos com hospitalização e visitas ao PS, o que diminui os custos totais e torna o programa economicamente atrativo.

Asthma nurse practice improves outcomes and reduces costs in primary health care

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to elucidate the care of patients with asthma in primary health care from medical, patient self-management, health, quality of life, and health economic perspectives.

METHODS

Asthma nurse practice (ANP), an alternative asthma self-management strategy, was compared with traditional asthma care in primary health care in southern Sweden regarding medical history, lifestyle, self-management, symptoms caused by asthma, effects on sick leave, state of health, quality of life and health care costs. The first part of the investigation comprised a retrospective study of a randomly selected sample of patient records of asthmatics (n=152). The second part, lasting 3 months, was prospective and included consecutive patients visits (n=347).

RESULTS

The ANP approach showed better results in most of the evaluated outcomes such as asthma quality documentation and self-management and the number of asthma symptoms was significantly lower. From a health economic perspective the results were encouraging with respect to ANP.

CONCLUSION

This alternative asthma strategy, ANP, improved asthma care in primary health care and resulted in economic advantages in the health care sector. However the result may only be generalized to other practices working with asthma nurses in the same way.

A review of the literature on the economics of noncompliance. Room for methodological improvement

Therapeutic noncompliance is a major issue in health care, having important negative consequences for clinical outcome as well as for health-care costs. This paper reviews the literature on the economics of therapeutic noncompliance, identifies methodological shortcomings and formulates recommendations for future economic research in this area. Medication noncompliance was explored more extensively, as the majority of articles dealt exclusively with this aspect of therapy. Eighteen studies were assessed according to their definition and measurement of medication noncompliance, study design, and identification and valuation of costs and outcomes. Very diverse designs and often invalid methods for calculating costs were found. Medication noncompliance is often ill-defined and measured in an inaccurate way. The economic consequences of therapeutic noncompliance have rarely been investigated according to the standard principles of good economic evaluation. Six studies examined both costs and consequences of noncompliance in a cost-outcome description or a cost-benefits, cost-effectiveness or cost-utility analysis. Eight studies dealt with the economic value of compliance-enhancing interventions. In general, studies on the economic consequences of noncompliance lack methodological rigour and fail to meet qualitative standards. There is a clear need for more and better research on the impact of noncompliance, on the cost-effectiveness of interventions and the potential of compliance-enhancing interventions to improve patient outcomes and/or reduce health-care costs.

Written individualised management plans for asthma in children and adults

BACKGROUND

Non-adherence to treatment advice is a common phenomenon in asthma and may account for a significant proportion of the morbidity. Comprehensive care that includes asthma education, written self-management plan and regular review has been shown to improve asthma outcomes, but the contribution of these components has not been established.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether the provision of a written asthma self-management plan increases adherence and improves outcome.

SEARCH STRATEGY

A search was carried out on the Cochrane Airways Group trials register. There was no language restriction. The search of the databases used the following terms: action plan OR self OR self-care OR self-manag* OR educ* AND adher* OR comply OR compli*. Authors of included studies were contacted for any unpublished or on-going studies and bibliographies of all included studies and reviews were searched for further studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Only randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with asthma were considered. Participants must have been assigned to receive an individualised written asthma management plan (symptom or peak flow based) about the actions required for regular asthma management and/or the actions to take in the event of an asthma exacerbation.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Study quality was assessed and data abstracted by two reviewers independently.

MAIN RESULTS

Six trials met the inclusion criteria. The written management plans were either peak flow or symptom based, which were compared against each other or compared to no written management plan. Reported outcomes included: hospitalisation, emergency department visits, oral corticosteroid use, lung function, days lost from school/work, unscheduled doctor visits and respiratory tract infections. There was no consistent evidence that written plans produced better patient outcomes than no written plan. For some outcomes, there appeared to an advantage of one type of plan over the other, but there was no consistency - one type of plan was not consistently more effective than another.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

The available trials are too small and the results too inconsistent to form any firm conclusions as to the contribution of written self management plans in the known beneficial effects of a comprehensive asthma care programmes.

Optimising drug utilisation in long term care

Providing quality long term care for the elderly while containing costs is presenting major challenges for governments and policy makers. Although international variability exists with respect to the number of medications and other factors influencing suboptimal pharmacotherapy, suboptimal pharmacotherapy among elderly persons is common. This international problem requires a creative and multifaceted approach to improve and rationalise prescribing. We outline the non-regulatory efforts and regulatory means to approaching this problem. The recent introduction of a prospective payment system for long-term care in the US has underscored the importance of a regulatory approach to counter-balance the cost containment efforts which bundle the cost of medications into a prospectively set per diem rate. An examination of how US regulatory bodies are considering improving prescribing is provided. Considering the case of coronary heart disease, we provide data regarding the performance of a quality indicator aimed at stimulating quality prescribing for this medical condition. Although the use of regulatory approaches can improve prescribing, it is also recognised that a more holistic approach involving multidisciplinary teams and greater focus on the patient is the ultimate aspiration. This is particularly the case with the elderly in whom appropriate drug therapy can have a major impact on outcomes. A major cultural shift in the way society views and treats the elderly may be required in order to produce dramatic improvements in long term care for older people.

Insurance and quality of care for children with acute asthma

BACKGROUND

Increasing attention has been paid to the role of insurance in determining quality and outcomes of care. Pressures to reduce health costs and to improve quality have prompted attempts by managed care organizations to decrease the use of the emergency department (ED) for acute asthma, but performance comparisons between insurance types remain rare.

METHODS

We used prospective data from the Multicenter Airway Research Collaboration on 965 children with acute asthma presenting to 36 EDs. We compared measures of quality of pre-ED care, acute severity, and short-term outcomes (length of stay, percent relapse, and percent with ongoing symptoms) across 4 different insurance categories: managed care, indemnity, Medicaid, and uninsured. We used multivariate regression to control for differences in education, estimated income, race/ethnicity, and chronic asthma severity and acute asthma characteristics.

RESULTS

Children with managed care and indemnity had similar demographic and asthma characteristics, but these children differed significantly from Medicaid and uninsured patients. Managed care and indemnity insured children had similar ratings on all 7 quality measures, with Medicaid and uninsured children ranking significantly lower on most measures, including (1) percent with primary care provider (PCP) (P <.001), (2) percent using ED as usual site of asthma care (P <.001), (3) percent using ED for prescriptions (P <.001), (4) percent with a ratio of >1 of ED visits to acute office visits within the past year (P =.003), and (5) percent visiting their PCP within the week prior to ED visit (P <.001). Children with managed care were more acutely ill than were indemnity, Medicaid, or uninsured children on presentation to the ED (pulmonary index of 4.6, 4.0, 4.2, and 3.9, respectively, P =.007). There were no significant differences in length of hospital stay, relapse, and ongoing exacerbation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate similar quality of care, greater severity of acute asthma, and no worse outcomes for children with managed care compared to children with indemnity insurance. We found uninsured children to have consistently poorer quality of care than insured patients.

Rethinking practitioner roles in chronic illness: the specialist, primary care physician, and the practice nurse

In this article, we describe an evidence-based stepped care approach to improving the care of chronic illness in organized health care systems. We review the common principles that have been found to improve the management and outcomes of patients with major depression, asthma, diabetes, and congestive heart failure. These population-based methods to improve care of chronic illness require reorganizing the roles of specialists, primary care physicians, and nurses.

Health economics of asthma and rhinitis. II. Assessing the value of interventions

Health care providers and payers are being asked to weigh data on the economic impact of new interventions along with clinical evidence when making decisions about the care of patients. The notion of incorporating formal health economic assessments into clinical and resource decisions is a difficult concept for many in the health care sector. However, it is the reality in today's environment. To effectively participate in these ongoing discussions, clinicians and other decision makers must be able to understand and critically assess the evidence on economic impact of medical interventions. This second of 2 articles describes the elements of comparative economic evaluations, reviewing the published literature on asthma and rhinitis in an attempt to critically appraise the studies from the perspective of one who might use data for decision making. Unfortunately, the quality of the economic evidence in these two disease states is not extensive. Until better economic analyses are conducted and made available, the allocation of resources for asthma and allergic rhinitis will continue to primarily rely on expert opinion rather than evidence-based literature.

Practical evaluation of asthma exacerbation self-management in children and adolescents

The objective of this study was to describe asthma exacerbation self-management in children and adolescents. We used a cross-sectional study population enrolled in the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) in Bordeaux. Subjects answered an additional questionnaire on utilization of health services, self-evaluation of usual asthma exacerbation severity and home management of asthma exacerbation. Criteria used for selecting patients were both having asthma confirmed by a physician and having had suffered from symptoms during the past year. Children and adolescents attended similar health services for managing their asthma but compliance to anti-asthmatic treatment was better in children than in adolescents. Among the children 4.8% had asthma and 6.2% of adolescents had asthma, as diagnosed by a doctor. Of the children, 72.3% and of the adolescents 54.7% had less than one asthma attack per month. In cases of mild asthma exacerbation, 38.7% of adolescents and 9.3% of children waited until the end of exacerbation without taking any medication. The proportion of children not receiving any treatment was lower when symptoms were more severe but this was not the case in adolescents. Although most of the patients used were taking beta2-agonist, we found that 21-43% of children or adolescents did not receive appropriate medication in the event of asthma exacerbation. These results demonstrate that (i) asthma exacerbation self-management is related to self-assessed severity of symptoms and that (ii) a large proportion of asthmatic children in the community, and particularly adolescents, do not therefore receive appropriate treatment in the event of asthma exacerbation.

Asthma education in the Emergency Department. On behalf of the MARC Investigators

STUDY OBJECTIVE

We surveyed emergency department-based asthma researchers to study the presence of formal asthma education programs (AEPs), and examined data from prospective cohort studies to compare sites with and without AEPs.

METHODS

We contacted site investigators in the Multicenter Airway Research Collaboration (MARC) in July 1998 by mail, fax, or telephone. Main outcomes were the percentage of sites using AEPs and the percentage of AEPs using each of 7 "key" teaching items in national guidelines. MARC data provided site and patient characteristics.

RESULTS

All 77 site investigators (100%) responded to the survey. Using a scale from 1 to 5 (mean+/-SD), respondents identified instruction in proper inhaler technique (4.8+/-0.5), "spacer" use (4.3+/-0.7), recognition of asthma triggers (4.3+/-0.8), and rationale for medications (4. 6+/-0.6) as priorities for teaching. Twelve sites (16%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 8% to 26%) had AEPs; most (8) were at pediatric sites. Patients presenting to sites with AEPs were younger (22+/-16 years versus 25+/-15 years, P <.001), more likely to be uninsured (26% versus 23%, P <.001), and less likely to be taking inhaled corticosteroids (30% versus 37%, P <.001). AEP sites uniformly stressed "key" items, except for "written action plan" (50% of sites) and "peak flow diary" (33% of sites).

CONCLUSION

Although asthma researchers agree that patient education is very important, few EDs involved in asthma research use AEPs. Sites with AEPs appear to serve patients at higher risk of poor asthma outcomes. Further study is needed to address the effectiveness of AEPs in the ED.

Noncompliance with asthma therapy--are there solutions?

Compliance with medication is essential if treatment is to be effective. Noncompliance can include underuse, overuse, and erratic use of medication; underuse being the most frequently reviewed. Generally estimated to be around 10%-46%, noncompliance with asthma therapy is a serious problem and studies have shown that compliance with the mainstay of asthma treatment, inhaled corticosteroids, is low. Oral therapy offers better compliance with treatment, with many patients preferring tablets to inhalers. Different ways to monitor compliance include monitoring prescriptions, counting tablets, measuring levels of medication in blood or urine, and measuring canister weight, although none are fully effective. Contributing factors to noncompliance with treatment include side effects, lifestyle, social and economic factors, method of drug delivery, and dosing. The consequences of these include increased symptoms and asthma exacerbations, both of which can lead to increased morbidity. To improve compliance, causal factors need to be addressed; there is a need to educate patients and those who support them about the disease and the importance of following the physician's recommendations. Various self-management programs have also been established to improve patient compliance at a relatively low cost. Difficulties with treatment may be addressed by simplifying the treatment regimen using oral therapy. A relatively new class of oral agents, the leukotriene modifiers, is being increasingly used in clinical practice.

Self-management education and regular practitioner review for adults with asthma

BACKGROUND

A key component of many asthma management guidelines is the recommendation for patient education and regular medical review. A number of controlled trials have been conducted to measure the effectiveness of asthma education programmes. These programmes improve patient knowledge, but their impact on health outcomes is less well established. This review was conducted to examine the strength of evidence supporting Step 6 of the Australian Asthma Management Plan: "Educate and Review Regularly"; to test whether health outcomes are influenced by education and self-management programmes.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to assess the effects of asthma self-management programmes, when coupled with regular health practitioner review, on health outcomes in adults with asthma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group trials register and reference lists of articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials of self-management education in adults over 16 years of age with asthma.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Trial quality was assessed and data were extracted independently by two reviewers. Study authors were contacted for confirmation.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-five trials were included. Self-management education was compared with usual care in 22 studies. Self-management education reduced hospitalisations (odds ratio 0.57, 95% confidence interval 0.38 to 0.88); emergency room visits (odds ratio 0.71, 95% confidence interval (0.57 to 0.90); unscheduled visits to the doctor (odds ratio 0.57, 95% confidence interval 0.40 to 0.82); days off work or school (odds ratio 0.55, 95% confidence interval 0.38 to 0. 79); and nocturnal asthma (odds ratio 0.53, 95% confidence interval 0.39 to 0.72). Measures of lung function were little changed. Self-management programmes that involved a written action plan showed a greater reduction in hospitalisation than those that did not (odds ratio 0.35, 95% confidence interval 0.18 to 0.68). People who managed their asthma by self-adjustment of their medications using an individualised written plan had better lung function than those whose medications were adjusted by a doctor.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Training in asthma self-management which involves self-monitoring by either peak expiratory flow or symptoms, coupled with regular medical review and a written action plan appears to improve health outcomes for adults with asthma. Training programmes which enable people to adjust their medication using a written action plan appear to be more effective than other forms of asthma self-management.

Limited (information only) patient education programs for adults with asthma

BACKGROUND

A key component of many asthma management guidelines is the recommendation for patient education and regular medical review. A number of controlled trials have been conducted to measure the effectiveness of asthma education programmes. These programmes improve patient knowledge, but their impact on health outcomes is less well established. At its simplest level, education is limited to the transfer of information about asthma, its causes and its treatment. This review focused on the effects of limited asthma education.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to assess the effects of limited (i.e. information only) asthma education on health outcomes in adults with asthma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group trials register and reference lists of articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and controlled trials of individual asthma education involving information transfer only in adults over 16 years of age.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Trial quality was assessed and data were extracted independently by two reviewers. Study authors were contacted for missing information.

MAIN RESULTS

Eleven trials were included. They were of variable quality. Limited asthma education did not reduce hospitalisation for asthma (weighted mean difference -0.03 average hospitalisations per person per year, 95% confidence interval -0.09 to 0.03). There was no effect on doctor visits, lung function and medication use. The effects on asthma symptoms were variable. There was no reduction in days lost from normal activity, but perceived asthma symptoms did improve after limited asthma education (odds ratio 0.40, 95% confidence interval 0.18 to 0.86). In one study, limited asthma education was associated with reduced emergency department visits (weighted mean difference -2.76 average visits per person per year, 95% confidence interval -4.34 to 1.18).

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Use of limited asthma education as it has been practiced does not appear to improve health outcomes in adults with asthma. However the use of information in the emergency department may be effective, but this needs to be confirmed.