1
|
Sullivan MH, Arguello AM, Barlow JD, Morrey ME, Rose PS, Sanchez-Sotelo J, Houdek MT. Comparison of reconstructive techniques for nonprimary malignancies in the proximal humerus. J Surg Oncol 2024. [PMID: 38837768 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2024] [Revised: 03/20/2024] [Accepted: 05/12/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoprostheses (EPC) are often utilized for reconstruction of the proximal humerus with either hemiarthroplasty (HA) or reverse arthroplasty (RA) constructs. RA constructs have improved outcomes in patients with primary lesions, but no studies have compared techniques in metastatic disease. The aim of this study is to compare functional outcomes and complications between HA and RA constructs in patients undergoing endoprosthetic reconstruction for proximal humerus metastases. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed our institutional arthroplasty database to identify 66 (56% male; 38 HA and 28 RA) patients with a proximal humerus reconstruction for a non-primary malignancy. The majority (88%) presented with pathologic fracture, and the most common diagnosis was renal cell carcinoma (48%). RESULTSS Patients with RA reconstructions had better postoperative forward elevation (74° vs. 32°, p < 0.01) and higher functional outcome scores. HA patients had more complications (odds ratio 13, p < 0.01), with instability being the most common complication. CONCLUSIONS Patients with nonprimary malignancies of the proximal humerus had improved functional outcomes and fewer complications after undergoing reconstruction with a reverse EPC compared to a HA EPC. Preference for reverse EPC should be given in patients with good prognosis and ability to complete postoperative rehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mikaela H Sullivan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Jonathan D Barlow
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Mark E Morrey
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Peter S Rose
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Matthew T Houdek
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Roth C, Weiss K. Palliative Care Needs of Patients with Musculoskeletal Malignancies. Curr Oncol Rep 2024:10.1007/s11912-024-01543-4. [PMID: 38789669 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-024-01543-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/03/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review aims to assess the literature regarding current treatment options for the palliative care of patients with advanced musculoskeletal malignancies whether primary or metastatic. RECENT FINDINGS The inclusion of specialized palliative care physicians, in conjunction with surgeons, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, interventional radiologists, and mental health professionals, results in better control of end-of-life symptoms in both children and adults with terminal musculoskeletal malignancies. The palliative care of patients with musculoskeletal malignancies requires a multi-disciplinary team and benefits from specialized palliative care physicians. The unique impacts of musculoskeletal malignancies on ambulation and independence creates additional mental and physical burdens on patients and care-takers alike. Palliative care should focus on preserving ambulatory function and patient independence, in addition to managing chronic pain and other end-of-life symptoms common to these malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clark Roth
- Division of Orthopedic Oncology, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The University of Pittsburgh, 3471 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Kurt Weiss
- Division of Orthopedic Oncology, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The University of Pittsburgh, 3471 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tam A, Scarpi E, Maltoni MC, Rossi R, Fairchild A, Dennis K, Vaska M, Kerba M. A Systematic Review of Prognostic Factors in Patients with Cancer Receiving Palliative Radiotherapy: Evidence-Based Recommendations. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1654. [PMID: 38730606 PMCID: PMC11083084 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16091654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2024] [Revised: 04/22/2024] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Prognostication in patients with cancer receiving palliative radiotherapy remains a challenge. To improve the process, we aim to identify prognostic factors in this population from the literature and offer evidence-based recommendations on prognostication in patients undergoing palliative radiotherapy for non-curable or advanced cancers. (2) Methods: A systematic review was performed on the medical literature from 2005 to 2023 to extract papers on the prognosis of palliative radiotherapy patients with advanced cancer. The initial selection was performed by at least two authors to determine study relevance to the target area. Studies were then classified based on type and evidence quality to determine final recommendations. (3) Results: The literature search returned 57 papers to be evaluated. Clinical and biological prognostic factors were identified from these papers to improve clinical decision making or construct prognostic models. Twenty prognostic models were identified for clinical use. There is moderate evidence supporting (i) evidence-based factors (patient, clinical, disease, and lab) in guiding decision making around palliative radiation; (ii) that certain biological factors are of importance; (iii) prognostication models in patients with advanced cancer; and that (iv) SBRT or re-irradiation use can be guided by predictions of survival by prognostic scores or clinicians. Patients with more favorable prognoses are generally better suited to SBRT or re-irradiation, and the use of prognostic models can aid in this decision making. (4) Conclusions: This evaluation has identified several factors or tools to aid in prognosis and clinical decision making. Future studies should aim to further validate these tools and factors in a clinical setting, including the leveraging of electronic medical records for data availability. To increase our understanding of how causal factors interact with palliative radiotherapy, future studies should also examine and include prediction of response to radiation as an outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Tam
- Cumming School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada;
| | - Emanuela Scarpi
- Unit of Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy;
| | - Marco Cesare Maltoni
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Romina Rossi
- Palliative Care Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy;
| | - Alysa Fairchild
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada;
| | - Kristopher Dennis
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital and the University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada
| | - Marcus Vaska
- Knowledge Resource Service, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada;
| | - Marc Kerba
- Cumming School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lee C, Tseng T, Chang R, Yen H, Chen Y, Chen Y, Wu C, Hu M, Yen M, Bongers M, Groot OQ, Lai C, Lin W. Psoas muscle area is an independent survival prognosticator in patients undergoing surgery for long-bone metastases. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e7072. [PMID: 38457220 PMCID: PMC10922028 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Revised: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Predictive analytics is gaining popularity as an aid to treatment planning for patients with bone metastases, whose expected survival should be considered. Decreased psoas muscle area (PMA), a morphometric indicator of suboptimal nutritional status, has been associated with mortality in various cancers, but never been integrated into current survival prediction algorithms (SPA) for patients with skeletal metastases. This study investigates whether decreased PMA predicts worse survival in patients with extremity metastases and whether incorporating PMA into three modern SPAs (PATHFx, SORG-NG, and SORG-MLA) improves their performance. METHODS One hundred eighty-five patients surgically treated for long-bone metastases between 2014 and 2019 were divided into three PMA tertiles (small, medium, and large) based on their psoas size on CT. Kaplan-Meier, multivariable regression, and Cox proportional hazards analyses were employed to compare survival between tertiles and examine factors associated with mortality. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess whether incorporating adjusted PMA values enhanced the three SPAs' discriminatory abilities. The clinical utility of incorporating PMA into these SPAs was evaluated by decision curve analysis (DCA). RESULTS Patients with small PMA had worse 90-day and 1-year survival after surgery (log-rank test p < 0.001). Patients in the large PMA group had a higher chance of surviving 90 days (odds ratio, OR, 3.72, p = 0.02) and 1 year than those in the small PMA group (OR 3.28, p = 0.004). All three SPAs had increased AUC after incorporation of adjusted PMA. DCA indicated increased net benefits at threshold probabilities >0.5 after the addition of adjusted PMA to these SPAs. CONCLUSIONS Decreased PMA on CT is associated with worse survival in surgically treated patients with extremity metastases, even after controlling for three contemporary SPAs. Physicians should consider the additional prognostic value of PMA on survival in patients undergoing consideration for operative management due to extremity metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chia‐Che Lee
- Graduate Institute of Biomedical Electronics and BioinformaticsNational Taiwan UniversityTaipeiTaiwan
- Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryNational Taiwan University HospitalTaipeiTaiwan
| | - Ting‐En Tseng
- Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryNational Taiwan University HospitalTaipeiTaiwan
| | - Ruey‐Feng Chang
- Graduate Institute of Biomedical Electronics and BioinformaticsNational Taiwan UniversityTaipeiTaiwan
| | - Hung‐Kuan Yen
- Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryNational Taiwan University HospitalTaipeiTaiwan
- Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryNational Taiwan University HospitalHsinchuTaiwan
- Department of Medical EducationNational Taiwan University HospitalHsinchuTaiwan
| | - Yu‐An Chen
- Department of Medical EducationNational Taiwan University HospitalTaipeiTaiwan
| | - Yu‐Yung Chen
- Department of Medical EducationNational Taiwan University HospitalTaipeiTaiwan
| | - Chih‐Horng Wu
- Department of Medical ImagingNational Taiwan University HospitalTaipeiTaiwan
| | - Ming‐Hsiao Hu
- Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryNational Taiwan University HospitalTaipeiTaiwan
| | - Mao‐Hsu Yen
- Department of Computer Science and EngineeringNational Taiwan Ocean UniversityKeelungTaiwan
| | - Michiel Bongers
- Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryMassachusetts General HospitalBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Olivier Q. Groot
- Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryMassachusetts General HospitalBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Department of OrthopaedicsUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Cheng‐Yo Lai
- Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryNational Taiwan University HospitalHsinchuTaiwan
| | - Wei‐Hsin Lin
- Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryNational Taiwan University HospitalTaipeiTaiwan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Stevenson J, Cool P, Ashford R. Poor adherence to national guidance in the management of patients with metastatic bone disease. Bone Joint J 2024; 106-B:6-8. [PMID: 38160679 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.106b1.bjj-2023-0979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(1):6–8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Stevenson
- Oncology Department, Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Aston Medical School, Aston University, Birmingham, UK
| | - Paul Cool
- Oncology Department, Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic and District Hospital NHS Trust, Oswestry, UK
- Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Robert Ashford
- Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
- Joint Reconstruction and Oncology, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
de Groot TM, Ramsey D, Groot OQ, Fourman M, Karhade AV, Twining PK, Berner EA, Fenn BP, Collins AK, Raskin K, Lozano S, Newman E, Ferrone M, Doornberg JN, Schwab JH. Does the SORG Machine-learning Algorithm for Extremity Metastases Generalize to a Contemporary Cohort of Patients? Temporal Validation From 2016 to 2020. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2023; 481:2419-2430. [PMID: 37229565 PMCID: PMC10642892 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000002698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Revised: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The ability to predict survival accurately in patients with osseous metastatic disease of the extremities is vital for patient counseling and guiding surgical intervention. We, the Skeletal Oncology Research Group (SORG), previously developed a machine-learning algorithm (MLA) based on data from 1999 to 2016 to predict 90-day and 1-year survival of surgically treated patients with extremity bone metastasis. As treatment regimens for oncology patients continue to evolve, this SORG MLA-driven probability calculator requires temporal reassessment of its accuracy. QUESTION/PURPOSE Does the SORG-MLA accurately predict 90-day and 1-year survival in patients who receive surgical treatment for a metastatic long-bone lesion in a more recent cohort of patients treated between 2016 and 2020? METHODS Between 2017 and 2021, we identified 674 patients 18 years and older through the ICD codes for secondary malignant neoplasm of bone and bone marrow and CPT codes for completed pathologic fractures or prophylactic treatment of an impending fracture. We excluded 40% (268 of 674) of patients, including 18% (118) who did not receive surgery; 11% (72) who had metastases in places other than the long bones of the extremities; 3% (23) who received treatment other than intramedullary nailing, endoprosthetic reconstruction, or dynamic hip screw; 3% (23) who underwent revision surgery, 3% (17) in whom there was no tumor, and 2% (15) who were lost to follow-up within 1 year. Temporal validation was performed using data on 406 patients treated surgically for bony metastatic disease of the extremities from 2016 to 2020 at the same two institutions where the MLA was developed. Variables used to predict survival in the SORG algorithm included perioperative laboratory values, tumor characteristics, and general demographics. To assess the models' discrimination, we computed the c-statistic, commonly referred to as the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve for binary classification. This value ranged from 0.5 (representing chance-level performance) to 1.0 (indicating excellent discrimination) Generally, an AUC of 0.75 is considered high enough for use in clinical practice. To evaluate the agreement between predicted and observed outcomes, a calibration plot was used, and the calibration slope and intercept were calculated. Perfect calibration would result in a slope of 1 and intercept of 0. For overall performance, the Brier score and null-model Brier score were determined. The Brier score can range from 0 (representing perfect prediction) to 1 (indicating the poorest prediction). Proper interpretation of the Brier score necessitates a comparison with the null-model Brier score, which represents the score for an algorithm that predicts a probability equal to the population prevalence of the outcome for each patient. Finally, a decision curve analysis was conducted to compare the potential net benefit of the algorithm with other decision-support methods, such as treating all or none of the patients. Overall, 90-day and 1-year mortality were lower in the temporal validation cohort than in the development cohort (90 day: 23% versus 28%; p < 0.001, and 1 year: 51% versus 59%; p<0.001). RESULTS Overall survival of the patients in the validation cohort improved from 28% mortality at the 90-day timepoint in the cohort on which the model was trained to 23%, and 59% mortality at the 1-year timepoint to 51%. The AUC was 0.78 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.82) for 90-day survival and 0.75 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.79) for 1-year survival, indicating the model could distinguish the two outcomes reasonably. For the 90-day model, the calibration slope was 0.71 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.89), and the intercept was -0.66 (95% CI -0.94 to -0.39), suggesting the predicted risks were overly extreme, and that in general, the risk of the observed outcome was overestimated. For the 1-year model, the calibration slope was 0.73 (95% CI 0.56 to 0.91) and the intercept was -0.67 (95% CI -0.90 to -0.43). With respect to overall performance, the model's Brier scores for the 90-day and 1-year models were 0.16 and 0.22. These scores were higher than the Brier scores of internal validation of the development study (0.13 and 0.14) models, indicating the models' performance has declined over time. CONCLUSION The SORG MLA to predict survival after surgical treatment of extremity metastatic disease showed decreased performance on temporal validation. Moreover, in patients undergoing innovative immunotherapy, the possibility of mortality risk was overestimated in varying severity. Clinicians should be aware of this overestimation and discount the prediction of the SORG MLA according to their own experience with this patient population. Generally, these results show that temporal reassessment of these MLA-driven probability calculators is of paramount importance because the predictive performance may decline over time as treatment regimens evolve. The SORG-MLA is available as a freely accessible internet application at https://sorg-apps.shinyapps.io/extremitymetssurvival/ .Level of Evidence Level III, prognostic study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom M. de Groot
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Duncan Ramsey
- University of Texas RGV School of Medicine, Edinburg, TX, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Eric Newman
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hashimi M, Shah JA, Gass 4th HM, Webb AR, Kopriva JM, Oskouei SV. Pathologic Peri-Implant Proximal Femur Fracture: Takeaways from Our Experience. Case Rep Orthop 2023; 2023:3193937. [PMID: 38020060 PMCID: PMC10663088 DOI: 10.1155/2023/3193937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2022] [Revised: 07/09/2023] [Accepted: 10/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Pathologic fractures of the distal femur secondary to bone metastases are not as common as those in the proximal femur, and they are rarely reported on in the literature. Even in the absence of current metastatic lesions in the femoral neck, traditional orthopaedic teaching has stressed the importance of protecting the entire femur, while recent studies have shown that it may not be necessary to stabilize the entire femur in the event of future metastases. Thus, there is no consensus regarding optimal surgical treatment, making the choice of fixation often based on the experience of the surgeon. In this paper, we reported on a patient who presented with a pathologic fracture of the distal femur who was stabilized with a retrograde intramedullary nail and then subsequently suffered a pathologic fracture of the proximal femur. To our knowledge, there have been no cases reported on a peri-implant pathologic fracture proximal to a retrograde intramedullary nail in the setting of metastatic bone disease. We would like to share our experience on how to surgically manage this and discuss the literature around management of distal femoral bone metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mustafa Hashimi
- The University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
| | - Jason A. Shah
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA
| | - Henry M. Gass 4th
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA
| | - Alexander R. Webb
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA
| | - John M. Kopriva
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA
| | - Shervin V. Oskouei
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zhang J, Cai D, Hong S. Prevalence and prognosis of bone metastases in common solid cancers at initial diagnosis: a population-based study. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e069908. [PMID: 37865405 PMCID: PMC10603455 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/23/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Bone is one of the most common target sites for advanced tumours. The objective was to survey the prevalence and prognosis of bone metastases in 12 common solid malignant tumours. DESIGN A retrospective cohort study. METHODS A total of 1 425 332 patients with a primary cancer between 2010 and 2015 were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. We computed the prevalence and prognosis of bone metastases in each cancer and compared their survival in different stages. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox logistic regression were used to analyse survival and quantify the effect of bone metastases. RESULTS This study included 89 782 patients with bone metastases at diagnosis. Lung cancer had the highest prevalence (18.05%), followed by liver cancer (6.63%), nasopharyngeal carcinoma (6.33%) and renal cancer (5.45%). Breast cancer (32.1%), prostate cancer (25.9%), thyroid cancer (46.9%) and nasopharyngeal carcinoma (24.8%) with only bone metastases had a 5-year survival rate of over 20%. Compared with patients at the stage previous to metastasis, bone metastases significantly increased the risk of mortality and decreased survival, especially for those with prostate cancer (adjusted HR: 18.24). Other concomitant extraosseous metastases worsened patient survival. Bone was the most common site of metastasis for prostate cancer, while for colorectal cancer, multiorgan metastases were predominant. CONCLUSIONS This study provides the prevalence and prognosis of bone metastases at the initial diagnosis of common solid cancers. In addition, it demonstrates the impact of bone metastases on survival. These results can be used for early screening of metastases, clinical trial design and assessment of prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Zhang
- Department of Orthorpedic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, Guizhou, China
| | - Dongfeng Cai
- Department of Orthorpedic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, Guizhou, China
| | - Song Hong
- Department of Orthorpedic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, Guizhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Stevenson J, Cool P, Ashford R. Poor adherence to national guidance in the management of patients with metastatic bone disease. Bone Joint J 2023; 105-B:xxx. [PMID: 37846573 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.105b.bjj-2023-0979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Stevenson
- Oncology Department, Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Aston Medical School, Aston University, Birmingham, UK
| | - Paul Cool
- Oncology Department, Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic and District Hospital NHS Trust, Oswestry, UK
- Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Robert Ashford
- Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
- Joint Reconstruction and Oncology, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Makita K, Hamamoto Y, Kanzaki H, Nagasaki K, Takata N, Tsuruoka S, Uwatsu K, Kido T. Factors Affecting Survival and Local Control in Patients with Bone Metastases Treated with Radiotherapy. Med Sci (Basel) 2023; 11:medsci11010017. [PMID: 36810484 PMCID: PMC9944514 DOI: 10.3390/medsci11010017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Revised: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the expected prognosis and factors affecting local control (LC) of the bone metastatic sites treated with palliative external beam radiotherapy (RT). Between December 2010 and April 2019, 420 cases (male/female = 240/180; median age [range]: 66 [12-90] years) with predominantly osteolytic bone metastases received RT and were evaluated. LC was evaluated by follow-up computed tomography (CT) image. Median RT doses (BED10) were 39.0 Gy (range, 14.4-71.7 Gy). The 0.5-year overall survival and LC of RT sites were 71% and 84%, respectively. Local recurrence on CT images was observed in 19% (n = 80) of the RT sites, and the median recurrence time was 3.5 months (range, 1-106 months). In univariate analysis, abnormal laboratory data before RT (platelet count, serum albumin, total bilirubin, lactate dehydrogenase, or serum calcium level), high-risk primary tumor sites (colorectal, esophageal, hepatobiliary/pancreatic, renal/ureter, and non-epithelial cancers), no antineoplastic agents (ATs) administration after RT, and no bone modifying agents (BMAs) administration after RT were significantly unfavorable factors for both survival and LC of RT sites. Sex (male), performance status (≥3), and RT dose (BED10) (<39.0 Gy) were significantly unfavorable factors for only survival, and age (≥70 years) and bone cortex destruction were significantly unfavorable factors for only LC of RT sites. In multivariate analysis, only abnormal laboratory data before RT influenced both unfavorable survival and LC of RT sites. Performance status (≥3), no ATs administration after RT, RT dose (BED10) (<39.0 Gy), and sex (male) were significantly unfavorable factors for survival, and primary tumor sites and BMAs administration after RT were significantly unfavorable factors for LC of RT sites. In conclusion, laboratory data before RT was important factor both prognosis and LC of bone metastases treated with palliative RT. At least in patients with abnormal laboratory data before RT, palliative RT seemed to be focused on the only pain relief.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenji Makita
- Department of Radiology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, 454 Shitsukawa, Toon 791-0295, Ehime, Japan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Kou-160, Minami-Umenomoto-Machi, Matsuyama 791-0280, Ehime, Japan
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +81-89-960-5371; Fax: +81-89-960-5375
| | - Yasushi Hamamoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Kou-160, Minami-Umenomoto-Machi, Matsuyama 791-0280, Ehime, Japan
| | - Hiromitsu Kanzaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Kou-160, Minami-Umenomoto-Machi, Matsuyama 791-0280, Ehime, Japan
| | - Kei Nagasaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Kou-160, Minami-Umenomoto-Machi, Matsuyama 791-0280, Ehime, Japan
| | - Noriko Takata
- Department of Radiology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, 454 Shitsukawa, Toon 791-0295, Ehime, Japan
| | - Shintaro Tsuruoka
- Department of Radiology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, 454 Shitsukawa, Toon 791-0295, Ehime, Japan
| | - Kotaro Uwatsu
- Department of Radiology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, 454 Shitsukawa, Toon 791-0295, Ehime, Japan
| | - Teruhito Kido
- Department of Radiology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, 454 Shitsukawa, Toon 791-0295, Ehime, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Xiong F, Cao X, Shi X, Long Z, Liu Y, Lei M. A machine learning-Based model to predict early death among bone metastatic breast cancer patients: A large cohort of 16,189 patients. Front Cell Dev Biol 2022; 10:1059597. [PMID: 36568969 PMCID: PMC9768487 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2022.1059597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2022] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to develop a prediction model to categorize the risk of early death among breast cancer patients with bone metastases using machine learning models. Methods: This study examined 16,189 bone metastatic breast cancer patients between 2010 and 2019 from a large oncological database in the United States. The patients were divided into two groups at random in a 90:10 ratio. The majority of patients (n = 14,582, 90%) were served as the training group to train and optimize prediction models, whereas patients in the validation group (n = 1,607, 10%) were utilized to validate the prediction models. Four models were introduced in the study: the logistic regression model, gradient boosting tree model, decision tree model, and random forest model. Results: Early death accounted for 17.4% of all included patients. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that older age; a separated, divorced, or widowed marital status; nonmetropolitan counties; brain metastasis; liver metastasis; lung metastasis; and histologic type of unspecified neoplasms were significantly associated with more early death, whereas a lower grade, a positive estrogen receptor (ER) status, cancer-directed surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy were significantly the protective factors. For the purpose of developing prediction models, the 12 variables were used. Among all the four models, the gradient boosting tree had the greatest AUC [0.829, 95% confident interval (CI): 0.802-0.856], and the random forest (0.828, 95% CI: 0.801-0.855) and logistic regression (0.819, 95% CI: 0.791-0.847) models came in second and third, respectively. The discrimination slopes for the three models were 0.258, 0.223, and 0.240, respectively, and the corresponding accuracy rates were 0.801, 0.770, and 0.762, respectively. The Brier score of gradient boosting tree was the lowest (0.109), followed by the random forest (0.111) and logistic regression (0.112) models. Risk stratification showed that patients in the high-risk group (46.31%) had a greater six-fold chance of early death than those in the low-risk group (7.50%). Conclusion: The gradient boosting tree model demonstrates promising performance with favorable discrimination and calibration in the study, and this model can stratify the risk probability of early death among bone metastatic breast cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fan Xiong
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, People’s Hospital of Macheng City, Huanggang, China,Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xuyong Cao
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaolin Shi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Ze Long
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China,*Correspondence: Ze Long, ; Yaosheng Liu,
| | - Yaosheng Liu
- Senior Department of Orthopedics, The Fourth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China,Department of Orthopedic Surgery, National Clinical Research Center for Orthopedics, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation, Beijing, China,*Correspondence: Ze Long, ; Yaosheng Liu,
| | - Mingxing Lei
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, National Clinical Research Center for Orthopedics, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation, Beijing, China,Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hainan Hospital of PLA General Hospital, Sanya, China,Chinese PLA Medical School, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Rades D, Delikanli C, Schild SE, Kristiansen C, Tvilsted S, Janssen S. A New Survival Score for Patients ≥65 Years Assigned to Radiotherapy of Bone Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14194679. [PMID: 36230602 PMCID: PMC9563043 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14194679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2022] [Revised: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 09/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Survival scores are important for personalized treatment of bone metastases. Elderly patients are considered a separate group. Therefore, a specific score was developed for these patients. Elderly patients (≥65 years) irradiated for bone metastases were randomly assigned to the test (n = 174) or validation (n = 174) cohorts. Thirteen factors were retrospectively analyzed for survival. Factors showing significance (p < 0.05) or a trend (p < 0.06) in the multivariate analysis were used for the score. Based on 6-month survival rates, prognostic groups were formed. The score was compared to an existing tool developed in patients of any age. In the multivariate analysis, performance score, tumor type, and visceral metastases showed significance and gender was a trend. Three groups were designed (17, 18−25 and 27−28 points) with 6-month survival rates of 0%, 51%, and 100%. In the validation cohort, these rates were 9%, 55%, and 86%. Comparisons of prognostic groups between both cohorts did not reveal significant differences. In the test cohort, positive predictive values regarding death ≤6 and survival ≥6 months were 100% with the new score vs. 80% and 88% with the existing tool. The new score was more accurate demonstrating the importance of specific scores for elderly patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dirk Rades
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lubeck, 23562 Lubeck, Germany
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-451-500-45400
| | - Cansu Delikanli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lubeck, 23562 Lubeck, Germany
| | - Steven E. Schild
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ 85259, USA
| | - Charlotte Kristiansen
- Department of Oncology, Vejle Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, 7100 Vejle, Denmark
| | - Søren Tvilsted
- Research Department, Zealand University Hospital, 4600 Køge, Denmark
| | - Stefan Janssen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lubeck, 23562 Lubeck, Germany
- Medical Practice for Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, 30161 Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
HSIEH HC, LAI YH, LEE CC, YEN HK, TSENG TE, YANG JJ, LIN SY, HU MH, HOU CH, YANG RS, WEDIN R, FORSBERG JA, LIN WH. Can a Bayesian belief network for survival prediction in patients with extremity metastases (PATHFx) be externally validated in an Asian cohort of 356 surgically treated patients? Acta Orthop 2022; 93:721-731. [PMID: 36083697 PMCID: PMC9463636 DOI: 10.2340/17453674.2022.4545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Predicted survival may influence the treatment decision for patients with skeletal extremity metastasis, and PATHFx was designed to predict the likelihood of a patient dying in the next 24 months. However, the performance of prediction models could have ethnogeographical variations. We asked if PATHFx generalized well to our Taiwanese cohort consisting of 356 surgically treated patients with extremity metastasis. PATIENTS AND METHODS We included 356 patients who underwent surgery for skeletal extremity metastasis in a tertiary center in Taiwan between 2014 and 2019 to validate PATHFx's survival predictions at 6 different time points. Model performance was assessed by concordance index (c-index), calibration analysis, decision curve analysis (DCA), Brier score, and model consistency (MC). RESULTS The c-indexes for the 1-, 3-, 6-, 12-, 18-, and 24-month survival estimations were 0.71, 0.66, 0.65, 0.69, 0.68, and 0.67, respectively. The calibration analysis demonstrated positive calibration intercepts for survival predictions at all 6 timepoints, indicating PATHFx tended to underestimate the actual survival. The Brier scores for the 6 models were all less than their respective null model's. DCA demonstrated that only the 6-, 12-, 18-, and 24-month predictions appeared useful for clinical decision-making across a wide range of threshold probabilities. The MC was < 0.9 when the 6- and 12-month models were compared with the 12-month and 18-month models, respectively. INTERPRETATION In this Asian cohort, PATHFx's performance was not as encouraging as those of prior validation studies. Clinicians should be cognizant of the potential decline in validity of any tools designed using data outside their particular patient population. Developers of survival prediction tools such as PATHFx might refine their algorithms using data from diverse, contemporary patients that is more reflective of the world's population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hsiang-Chieh HSIEH
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Hsin-Chu branch, Hsin-Chu City, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Hsiang LAI
- Department of Medical Education, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Che LEE
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Hung-Kuan YEN
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Hsin-Chu branch, Hsin-Chu City, Taiwan,Department of Medical Education, National Taiwan University Hospital, Hsin-Chu branch, Hsin-Chu City, Taiwan
| | - Ting-En TSENG
- Department of Medical Education, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Jiun-Jen YANG
- Department of Medical Education, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Shin-Yiing LIN
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Hsiao HU
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Han HOU
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Rong-Sen YANG
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Rikard WEDIN
- Department of Trauma and Reparative Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, and Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jonathan A FORSBERG
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Wei-Hsin LIN
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Errani C. Treatment of Bone Metastasis. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:5195-5197. [PMID: 35892980 PMCID: PMC9331427 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29080411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The incidence of metastatic bone disease is increasing, as patients with cancer are living longer [...]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Costantino Errani
- III Clinica di Ortopedia e Traumatologia, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Smolle MA, Musser E, Bergovec M, Friesenbichler J, Wibmer CL, Leitner L, Sørensen MS, Petersen MM, Brcic I, Szkandera J, Scheipl S, Leithner A. Survival Prediction in Patients Treated Surgically for Metastases of the Appendicular Skeleton—An External Validation of 2013-SPRING Model. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14143521. [PMID: 35884582 PMCID: PMC9317784 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14143521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Revised: 06/27/2022] [Accepted: 07/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Bone tumour metastases are highly prevalent among cancer patients. In case these have to be treated surgically due to impending or pathological fracture, estimation of patients’ life expectancy is of importance in order to choose the best treatment option possible. In the current study, the 2013-SPRING model, developed to predict prognosis of surgically treated bone metastasis patients, was validated in an external patient cohort of 303 bone metastasis patients. AUC ROCs at all three endpoints assessed (i.e., survival at 3, 6 and 12 months following surgery for bone metastases) were all above 0.780. Furthermore, stratification into type of surgery (endoprosthesis (n = 162) vs. osteosynthesis (n = 141) and metastasis location (upper limb (n = 65) vs. lower limb (n = 238)) revealed a comparable predictive accuracy of the 2013-SPRING model, albeit slightly better performance in the osteosynthesis as compared with endoprosthesis subgroup, as well as upper limb in comparison to lower limb subgroup was observed. Abstract Introduction: The aim of this study was to externally validate the 2013-SPRING model, a survival prediction tool for patients treated surgically for bone metastases in a retrospective patient cohort from a single institution. Moreover, subgroup analyses on patients treated with (A) endoprostheses or (B) osteosynthesis, as well as (C) upper limb and (D) lower limb metastases, were performed. Methods: Altogether, 303 cancer patients (mean age: 67.6 ± 11.1 years; 140 males (46.2%)) with bone metastases to the extremities, treated surgically between March 2000 and June 2018 at a single tertiary sarcoma centre, were retrospectively included. Median follow-up amounted to 6.3 (interquartile range (IQR): 2.3–21.8) months, with all patients followed-up for at least one year or until death. The 2013-SPRING model was applied to assess the prognostication accuracy at 3, 6 and 12 months. Models were validated with area under the curve receiver operator characteristic (AUC ROC; the higher the better), as well as Brier score. Results: Of the 303 patients, 141 had been treated with osteosynthesis (46.5%), and the remaining 162 patients with endoprosthesis (53.5%). Sixty-five (21.5%) metastases were located in the upper limbs, and two hundred and thirty-eight (78.5%) in the lower limbs. Using the 2013-SPRING model for the entire cohort, the accuracy of risk of death prediction at 3, 6 and 12 months, determined by the AUC ROC, was 0.782 (95% CI: 0.729–0.843), 0.810 (95% CI: 0.763–0.858) and 0.802 (95% CI: 0.751–0.854), respectively. Corresponding Brier scores were 0.170, 0.178 and 0.169 at 3, 6 and 12 months. In the subgroup analyses, predictive accuracy of the 2013-SPRING model was likewise encouraging, albeit being slightly higher in the osteosynthesis subgroup as compared with the endoprosthesis subgroup, and also higher in the upper limb in comparison to the lower limb metastasis subgroup. Conclusions: The current validation study of the 2013-SPRING model shows that this model is clinically relevant to use in an external cohort, also after stratification for surgical procedure and metastasis location.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Anna Smolle
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria; (M.A.S.); (E.M.); (M.B.); (J.F.); (C.L.W.); (L.L.); (A.L.)
| | - Ewald Musser
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria; (M.A.S.); (E.M.); (M.B.); (J.F.); (C.L.W.); (L.L.); (A.L.)
| | - Marko Bergovec
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria; (M.A.S.); (E.M.); (M.B.); (J.F.); (C.L.W.); (L.L.); (A.L.)
| | - Joerg Friesenbichler
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria; (M.A.S.); (E.M.); (M.B.); (J.F.); (C.L.W.); (L.L.); (A.L.)
| | - Christine Linda Wibmer
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria; (M.A.S.); (E.M.); (M.B.); (J.F.); (C.L.W.); (L.L.); (A.L.)
| | - Lukas Leitner
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria; (M.A.S.); (E.M.); (M.B.); (J.F.); (C.L.W.); (L.L.); (A.L.)
| | - Michala Skovlund Sørensen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark;
| | - Michael Mørk Petersen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University Hospital of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark;
| | - Iva Brcic
- D&R Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria;
| | - Joanna Szkandera
- Division of Clinical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria;
| | - Susanne Scheipl
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria; (M.A.S.); (E.M.); (M.B.); (J.F.); (C.L.W.); (L.L.); (A.L.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +43-316-385-14807
| | - Andreas Leithner
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria; (M.A.S.); (E.M.); (M.B.); (J.F.); (C.L.W.); (L.L.); (A.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
The Prediction of Survival after Surgical Management of Bone Metastases of the Extremities—A Comparison of Prognostic Models. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:4703-4716. [PMID: 35877233 PMCID: PMC9320475 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29070373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Revised: 06/19/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Individualized survival prognostic models for symptomatic patients with appendicular metastatic bone disease are key to guiding clinical decision-making for the orthopedic surgeon. Several prognostic models have been developed in recent years; however, most orthopedic surgeons have not incorporated these models into routine practice. This is possibly due to uncertainty concerning their accuracy and the lack of comparison publications and recommendations. Our aim was to conduct a review and quality assessment of these models. A computerized literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE and PubMed up to February 2022 was done, using keywords: “Bone metastasis”, “survival”, “extremity” and “prognosis”. We evaluated each model’s performance, assessing the estimated discriminative power and calibration accuracy for the analyzed patients. We included 11 studies out of the 1779 citations initially retrieved. The 11 studies included seven different models for estimating survival. Among externally validated survival prediction scores, PATHFx 3.0, 2013-SPRING and potentially Optimodel were found to be the best models in terms of performance. Currently, it is still a challenge to recommend any of the models as the standard for predicting survival for these patients. However, some models show better performance status and other quality characteristics. We recommend future, large, multicenter, prospective studies to compare between PATHfx 3.0, SPRING 2013 and OptiModel using the same external validation dataset.
Collapse
|
17
|
Mahdal M, Pazourek L, Apostolopoulos V, Adámková Krákorová D, Staniczková Zambo I, Tomáš T. Outcomes of Intercalary Endoprostheses as a Treatment for Metastases in the Femoral and Humeral Diaphysis. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:3519-3530. [PMID: 35621674 PMCID: PMC9139707 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29050284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2022] [Revised: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to evaluate the implant survival, functional score and complications of intercalary endoprostheses implanted for metastatic involvement of the femoral and humeral diaphysis. METHODS The selected group covered patients with bone metastasis who were surgically treated with an intercalary endoprosthesis between 2012 and 2021. The functional outcome was evaluated with the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scoring system, and complications were evaluated by using the failure classification for prosthetics designed by Henderson. RESULTS The mean follow-up was 29.8 months. In our group of 25 patients with 27 intercalary endoprostheses (18 femurs, 9 humeri), there were 7 implant-related complications (25.9%), which were more common on the humerus (4 cases, 44.4%) than on the femur (3 cases, 16.7%). Only type II failure-aseptic loosening (5 cases, 18.5%)-and type III failure-structural failure (2 cases, 7.4%)-occurred. There was a significantly higher risk of aseptic loosening of the endoprosthesis in the humerus compared with that in the femur (odds ratio 13.79, 95% confidence interval 1.22-151.05, p = 0.0297). The overall cumulative implant survival was 92% 1 year after surgery and 72% 5 years after surgery. The average MSTS score was 82%. The MSTS score was significantly lower (p = 0.008) in the humerus (75.9%) than in the femur (84.8%). CONCLUSIONS The resection of bone metastases and replacement with intercalary endoprosthesis has excellent immediate functional results with an acceptable level of complications in prognostically favourable patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michal Mahdal
- First Department of Orthopedic Surgery, St. Anne’s University Hospital, 65691 Brno, Czech Republic; (M.M.); (L.P.); (V.A.)
- Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, 60177 Brno, Czech Republic;
| | - Lukáš Pazourek
- First Department of Orthopedic Surgery, St. Anne’s University Hospital, 65691 Brno, Czech Republic; (M.M.); (L.P.); (V.A.)
- Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, 60177 Brno, Czech Republic;
| | - Vasileios Apostolopoulos
- First Department of Orthopedic Surgery, St. Anne’s University Hospital, 65691 Brno, Czech Republic; (M.M.); (L.P.); (V.A.)
- Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, 60177 Brno, Czech Republic;
| | | | - Iva Staniczková Zambo
- Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, 60177 Brno, Czech Republic;
- First Pathology Department, St. Anne’s University Hospital, 65691 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Tomáš Tomáš
- First Department of Orthopedic Surgery, St. Anne’s University Hospital, 65691 Brno, Czech Republic; (M.M.); (L.P.); (V.A.)
- Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, 60177 Brno, Czech Republic;
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Body Composition Predictors of Adverse Postoperative Events in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Long Bone Metastases. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev 2022; 6:01979360-202203000-00010. [PMID: 35262530 PMCID: PMC8913089 DOI: 10.5435/jaaosglobal-d-22-00001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2021] [Accepted: 01/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Body composition assessed using opportunistic CT has been recently identified as a predictor of outcome in patients with cancer. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the cross-sectional area (CSA) and the attenuation of abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue, visceral adipose tissue (VAT), and paraspinous and abdominal muscles are the predictors of length of hospital stay, 30-day postoperative complications, and revision surgery in patients treated for long bone metastases.
Collapse
|
19
|
Groot OQ, Lans A, Twining PK, Bongers MER, Kapoor ND, Verlaan JJ, Newman ET, Raskin KA, Lozano-Calderon SA, Janssen SJ, Schwab JH. Clinical Outcome Differences in the Treatment of Impending Versus Completed Pathological Long-Bone Fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2022; 104:307-315. [PMID: 34851323 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.21.00711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The outcome differences following surgery for an impending versus a completed pathological fracture have not been clearly defined. The purpose of the present study was to assess differences in outcomes following the surgical treatment of impending versus completed pathological fractures in patients with long-bone metastases in terms of (1) 90-day and 1-year survival and (2) intraoperative blood loss, perioperative blood transfusion, anesthesia time, duration of hospitalization, 30-day postoperative systemic complications, and reoperations. METHODS We retrospectively performed a matched cohort study utilizing a database of 1,064 patients who had undergone operative treatment for 462 impending and 602 completed metastatic long-bone fractures. After matching on 22 variables, including primary tumor, visceral metastases, and surgical treatment, 270 impending pathological fractures were matched to 270 completed pathological fractures. The primary outcome was assessed with the Cox proportional hazard model. The secondary outcomes were assessed with the McNemar test and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS The 90-day survival rate did not differ between the groups (HR, 1.13 [95% CI, 0.81 to 1.56]; p = 0.48), but the 1-year survival rate was worse for completed pathological fractures (46% versus 38%) (HR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.02 to 1.61]; p = 0.03). With regard to secondary outcomes, completed pathological fractures were associated with higher intraoperative estimated blood loss (p = 0.03), a higher rate of perioperative blood transfusions (p = 0.01), longer anesthesia time (p = 0.04), and more reoperations (OR, 2.50 [95% CI, 1.92 to 7.86]; p = 0.03); no differences were found in terms of the rate of 30-day postoperative complications or the duration of hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS Patients undergoing surgery for impending pathological fractures had lower 1-year mortality rates and better secondary outcomes as compared with patients undergoing surgery for completed pathological fractures when accounting for 22 covariates through propensity matching. Patients with an impending pathological fracture appear to benefit from prophylactic stabilization as stabilizing a completed pathological fracture seems to be associated with increased mortality, blood loss, rate of blood transfusions, duration of surgery, and reoperation risk. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivier Q Groot
- Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Amanda Lans
- Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Peter K Twining
- Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Michiel E R Bongers
- Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Neal D Kapoor
- Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jorrit-Jan Verlaan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Erik T Newman
- Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kevin A Raskin
- Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Santiago A Lozano-Calderon
- Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Stein J Janssen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joseph H Schwab
- Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Tseng TE, Lee CC, Yen HK, Groot OQ, Hou CH, Lin SY, Bongers MER, Hu MH, Karhade AV, Ko JC, Lai YH, Yang JJ, Verlaan JJ, Yang RS, Schwab JH, Lin WH. International Validation of the SORG Machine-learning Algorithm for Predicting the Survival of Patients with Extremity Metastases Undergoing Surgical Treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2022; 480:367-378. [PMID: 34491920 PMCID: PMC8747677 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000001969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Skeletal Oncology Research Group machine-learning algorithms (SORG-MLAs) estimate 90-day and 1-year survival in patients with long-bone metastases undergoing surgical treatment and have demonstrated good discriminatory ability on internal validation. However, the performance of a prediction model could potentially vary by race or region, and the SORG-MLA must be externally validated in an Asian cohort. Furthermore, the authors of the original developmental study did not consider the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, a survival prognosticator repeatedly validated in other studies, in their algorithms because of missing data. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES (1) Is the SORG-MLA generalizable to Taiwanese patients for predicting 90-day and 1-year mortality? (2) Is the ECOG score an independent factor associated with 90-day and 1-year mortality while controlling for SORG-MLA predictions? METHODS All 356 patients who underwent surgery for long-bone metastases between 2014 and 2019 at one tertiary care center in Taiwan were included. Ninety-eight percent (349 of 356) of patients were of Han Chinese descent. The median (range) patient age was 61 years (25 to 95), 52% (184 of 356) were women, and the median BMI was 23 kg/m2 (13 to 39 kg/m2). The most common primary tumors were lung cancer (33% [116 of 356]) and breast cancer (16% [58 of 356]). Fifty-five percent (195 of 356) of patients presented with a complete pathologic fracture. Intramedullary nailing was the most commonly performed type of surgery (59% [210 of 356]), followed by plate screw fixation (23% [81 of 356]) and endoprosthetic reconstruction (18% [65 of 356]). Six patients were lost to follow-up within 90 days; 30 were lost to follow-up within 1 year. Eighty-five percent (301 of 356) of patients were followed until death or for at least 2 years. Survival was 82% (287 of 350) at 90 days and 49% (159 of 326) at 1 year. The model's performance metrics included discrimination (concordance index [c-index]), calibration (intercept and slope), and Brier score. In general, a c-index of 0.5 indicates random guess and a c-index of 0.8 denotes excellent discrimination. Calibration refers to the agreement between the predicted outcomes and the actual outcomes, with a perfect calibration having an intercept of 0 and a slope of 1. The Brier score of a prediction model must be compared with and ideally should be smaller than the score of the null model. A decision curve analysis was then performed for the 90-day and 1-year prediction models to evaluate their net benefit across a range of different threshold probabilities. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate whether the ECOG score was an independent prognosticator while controlling for the SORG-MLA's predictions. We did not perform retraining/recalibration because we were not trying to update the SORG-MLA algorithm in this study. RESULTS The SORG-MLA had good discriminatory ability at both timepoints, with a c-index of 0.80 (95% confidence interval 0.74 to 0.86) for 90-day survival prediction and a c-index of 0.84 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.89) for 1-year survival prediction. However, the calibration analysis showed that the SORG-MLAs tended to underestimate Taiwanese patients' survival (90-day survival prediction: calibration intercept 0.78 [95% CI 0.46 to 1.10], calibration slope 0.74 [95% CI 0.53 to 0.96]; 1-year survival prediction: calibration intercept 0.75 [95% CI 0.49 to 1.00], calibration slope 1.22 [95% CI 0.95 to 1.49]). The Brier score of the 90-day and 1-year SORG-MLA prediction models was lower than their respective null model (0.12 versus 0.16 for 90-day prediction; 0.16 versus 0.25 for 1-year prediction), indicating good overall performance of SORG-MLAs at these two timepoints. Decision curve analysis showed SORG-MLAs provided net benefits when threshold probabilities ranged from 0.40 to 0.95 for 90-day survival prediction and from 0.15 to 1.0 for 1-year prediction. The ECOG score was an independent factor associated with 90-day mortality (odds ratio 1.94 [95% CI 1.01 to 3.73]) but not 1-year mortality (OR 1.07 [95% CI 0.53 to 2.17]) after controlling for SORG-MLA predictions for 90-day and 1-year survival, respectively. CONCLUSION SORG-MLAs retained good discriminatory ability in Taiwanese patients with long-bone metastases, although their actual survival time was slightly underestimated. More international validation and incremental value studies that address factors such as the ECOG score are warranted to refine the algorithms, which can be freely accessed online at https://sorg-apps.shinyapps.io/extremitymetssurvival/. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, therapeutic study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ting-En Tseng
- Department of Medical Education, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Che Lee
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | | | - Olivier Q. Groot
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Chun-Han Hou
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Shin-Ying Lin
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Michiel E. R. Bongers
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ming-Hsiao Hu
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Aditya V. Karhade
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jia-Chi Ko
- Department of Medical Education, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Hsiang Lai
- Department of Medical Education, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Jing-Jen Yang
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Jorrit-Jan Verlaan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Joseph H. Schwab
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Wei-Hsin Lin
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Groot OQ, Bongers MER, Buckless CG, Twining PK, Kapoor ND, Janssen SJ, Schwab JH, Torriani M, Bredella MA. Body composition predictors of mortality in patients undergoing surgery for long bone metastases. J Surg Oncol 2022; 125:916-923. [PMID: 35023149 PMCID: PMC8917991 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Revised: 11/28/2021] [Accepted: 01/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Background and Objectives Body composition measurements using computed tomography (CT) may serve as imaging biomarkers of survival in patients with and without cancer. This study assesses whether body composition measurements obtained on abdominal CTs are independently associated with 90‐day and 1‐year mortality in patients with long‐bone metastases undergoing surgery. Methods This single institutional retrospective study included 212 patients who had undergone surgery for long‐bone metastases and had a CT of the abdomen within 90 days before surgery. Quantification of cross‐sectional areas (CSA) and CT attenuation of abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue, visceral adipose tissue, and paraspinous and abdominal muscles were performed at L4. Multivariate Cox proportional‐hazards analyses were performed. Results Sarcopenia was independently associated with 90‐day mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.87; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.11–3.16; p = 0.019) and 1‐year mortality (HR = 1.50; 95% CI = 1.02–2.19; p = 0.038) in multivariate analysis while controlling for clinical variables such as primary tumors, comorbidities, and chemotherapy. Abdominal fat CSAs and muscle attenuation were not associated with mortality. Conclusions The presence of sarcopenia assessed by CT is predictive of 90‐day and 1‐year mortality in patients undergoing surgery for long‐bone metastases. This body composition measurement can be used as novel imaging biomarker supplementing existing prognostic tools to optimize patient selection for surgery and improve shared decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivier Q Groot
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery-Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital-Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Michiel E R Bongers
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery-Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital-Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Colleen G Buckless
- Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Peter K Twining
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery-Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital-Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Neal D Kapoor
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery-Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital-Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Stein J Janssen
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam University Medical Center-University of Amsterdam Meibergdreef, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joseph H Schwab
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery-Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital-Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Martin Torriani
- Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Miriam A Bredella
- Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Comparison between different prognostic models to be used for metastatic bone disease on appendicular skeleton in a Chilean population. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY 2021; 31:1657-1662. [PMID: 34677661 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-021-03153-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2021] [Accepted: 10/13/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Several preoperation prognosis models used on the treatment of metastatic bone disease on appendicular skeleton have been devised. The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of different survival prognostic models on patients with metastatic bone disease in long bones in a Chilean population. METHODS This is a multicentric retrospective study. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 136 patients who were confirmed with metastatic bone disease of the appendicular skeleton and who were treated surgically from 2016 to 2019. The minimum follow-up time was 12 months. All patients were assessed using four appendicular metastatic bone disease scoring systems. A preoperative predicted survival time for all 136 patients was retrospectively calculated making use of the revised Katagiri, PathFx, Optimodel and IOR score model. RESULTS The PathFx model demonstrated an accuracy at predicting 3 (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.61) and 6-month (AUC = 0.65) survival time after surgical management. IOR score model demonstrated an accuracy at predicting 12-month survival time (AUC = 0.64). The survival rate reached the 44% in a year. The median survival time to death or last follow-up time was 14.9 months (SD ± 15). CONCLUSION PathFx score model demonstrated the highest accuracy at predicting a survival time of 3 and 6 months. IOR score model was the most accurate measure at predicting a survival time of 12-months. To our knowledge, this is the first study reporting a comparative analysis of metastatic bone disease with predicting models in a country located in Latin America. PathFx's and IOR score models are the ones to be used in the Chilean population as the predictive models in metastatic bone disease of the appendicular skeleton.
Collapse
|
23
|
Skalitzky MK, Gulbrandsen TR, Groot OQ, Karhade AV, Verlaan JJ, Schwab JH, Miller BJ. The preoperative machine learning algorithm for extremity metastatic disease can predict 90-day and 1-year survival: An external validation study. J Surg Oncol 2021; 125:282-289. [PMID: 34608991 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Revised: 09/12/2021] [Accepted: 09/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prediction of survival is valuable to optimize treatment of metastatic long-bone disease. The Skeletal Oncology Research Group (SORG) machine-learning (ML) algorithm has been previously developed and internally validated. The purpose of this study was to determine if the SORG ML algorithm accurately predicts 90-day and 1-year survival in an external metastatic long-bone disease patient cohort. METHODS A retrospective review of 264 patients who underwent surgery for long-bone metastases between 2003 and 2019 was performed. Variables used in the stochastic gradient boosting SORG algorithm were age, sex, primary tumor type, visceral/brain metastases, systemic therapy, and 10 preoperative laboratory values. Model performance was calculated by discrimination, calibration, and overall performance. RESULTS The SORG ML algorithms retained good discriminative ability (area under the cure [AUC]: 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.76-0.88 for 90-day mortality and AUC: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.79-0.88 for 1-year mortality), calibration, overall performance, and decision curve analysis. CONCLUSION The previously developed ML algorithms demonstrated good performance in the current study, thereby providing external validation. The models were incorporated into an accessible application (https://sorg-apps.shinyapps.io/extremitymetssurvival/) that may be freely utilized by clinicians in helping predict survival for individual patients and assist in informative decision-making discussion before operative management of long bone metastatic lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Kate Skalitzky
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Trevor R Gulbrandsen
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Olivier Q Groot
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Aditya V Karhade
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jorrit-Jan Verlaan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Joseph H Schwab
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Benjamin J Miller
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Ignat P, Todor N, Ignat RM, Șuteu O. Prognostic Factors Influencing Survival and a Treatment Pattern Analysis of Conventional Palliative Radiotherapy for Patients with Bone Metastases. Curr Oncol 2021; 28:3876-3890. [PMID: 34677249 PMCID: PMC8534390 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28050331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2021] [Revised: 08/24/2021] [Accepted: 09/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment indication for bone metastases is influenced by patient prognosis. Single-fraction radiotherapy (SFRT) was proven equally effective as multiple fractionation regimens (MFRT) but continues to be underused. OBJECTIVE Primary objectives: (a) to identify prognostic factors for overall survival and (b) to analyze treatment patterns of palliative radiotherapy (proportion of SFRT indication and predictive factors of radiotherapy regimen) for bone metastases. METHODS 582 patients with bone metastases who underwent conventional radiotherapy between January 1st 2014-31 December 2017 were analyzed. The Cox proportional hazard model was used to identify predictors of overall survival. For the treatment pattern analysis, 677 radiotherapy courses were evaluated. The logistic regression model was used to identify potential predictors of radiotherapy regimen. RESULTS The 3-year overall survival was 15%. Prognostic factors associated with poor overall survival were multiple bone metastases [hazard ratio (HR = 5.4)], poor performance status (HR = 1.5) and brain metastases (HR = 1.37). SFRT prescription increased from 41% in 2017 to 51% in 2017. Predictors of SFRT prescription were a poor performance status [odds ratio (OR = 0.55)], lung (OR = 0.49) and urologic primaries (OR = 0.33) and the half-body lower site of irradiation (OR = 0.59). Spinal metastases were more likely to receive MFRT (OR = 2.09). CONCLUSIONS Based on the prognostic factors we identified, a selection protocol for patients candidates for palliative radiotherapy to bone metastases could be established, in order to further increase SFRT prescription in our institution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Ignat
- Faculty of Medicine, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; (P.I.); (O.Ș.)
- Prof. Dr. I. Chiricuță Oncology Institute, 400015 Cluj-Napoca, Romania;
| | - Nicolae Todor
- Prof. Dr. I. Chiricuță Oncology Institute, 400015 Cluj-Napoca, Romania;
| | - Radu-Mihai Ignat
- Faculty of Medicine, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; (P.I.); (O.Ș.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Ofelia Șuteu
- Faculty of Medicine, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; (P.I.); (O.Ș.)
- Prof. Dr. I. Chiricuță Oncology Institute, 400015 Cluj-Napoca, Romania;
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Zacharia B, Joy J, Subramaniam D, Pai PK. Factors Affecting Life Expectancy After Bone Metastasis in Adults — Results of a 5-year Prospective Study. Indian J Surg Oncol 2021; 12:759-769. [DOI: 10.1007/s13193-021-01426-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2020] [Accepted: 08/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
|
26
|
Tsukamoto S, Kido A, Tanaka Y, Facchini G, Peta G, Rossi G, Mavrogenis AF. Current Overview of Treatment for Metastatic Bone Disease. Curr Oncol 2021; 28:3347-3372. [PMID: 34590591 PMCID: PMC8482272 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28050290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2021] [Revised: 08/13/2021] [Accepted: 08/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The number of patients with bone metastasis increases as medical management and surgery improve the overall survival of patients with cancer. Bone metastasis can cause skeletal complications, including bone pain, pathological fractures, spinal cord or nerve root compression, and hypercalcemia. Before initiation of treatment for bone metastasis, it is important to exclude primary bone malignancy, which would require a completely different therapeutic approach. It is essential to select surgical methods considering the patient’s prognosis, quality of life, postoperative function, and risk of postoperative complications. Therefore, bone metastasis treatment requires a multidisciplinary team approach, including radiologists, oncologists, and orthopedic surgeons. Recently, many novel palliative treatment options have emerged for bone metastases, such as stereotactic body radiation therapy, radiopharmaceuticals, vertebroplasty, minimally invasive spine stabilization with percutaneous pedicle screws, acetabuloplasty, embolization, thermal ablation techniques, electrochemotherapy, and high-intensity focused ultrasound. These techniques are beneficial for patients who may not benefit from surgery or radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shinji Tsukamoto
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840, Shijo-cho, Kashihara 634-8521, Nara, Japan;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +81-744-22-3051
| | - Akira Kido
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Nara Medical University, 840, Shijo-cho, Kashihara 634-8521, Nara, Japan;
| | - Yasuhito Tanaka
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840, Shijo-cho, Kashihara 634-8521, Nara, Japan;
| | - Giancarlo Facchini
- Department of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Pupilli 1, 40136 Bologna, Italy; (G.F.); (G.P.); (G.R.)
| | - Giuliano Peta
- Department of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Pupilli 1, 40136 Bologna, Italy; (G.F.); (G.P.); (G.R.)
| | - Giuseppe Rossi
- Department of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Pupilli 1, 40136 Bologna, Italy; (G.F.); (G.P.); (G.R.)
| | - Andreas F. Mavrogenis
- First Department of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 41 Ventouri Street, 15562 Athens, Greece;
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Kruckeberg BM, Lee DR, Barlow JD, Morrey ME, Rose PS, Sanchez-Sotelo J, Houdek MT. Total elbow arthroplasty for tumors of the distal humerus and elbow. J Surg Oncol 2021; 124:1508-1514. [PMID: 34424539 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2021] [Revised: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 08/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The elbow is a rare location for primary and metastatic tumors in the upper extremity. The goal of reconstruction is to provide painless motion and stability for hand function. Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is commonly utilized, with either off-the-self components, modular segmental endoprosthesis, or allograft-prosthesis composites (APC). The purpose of this study was to analyze and compare commonly utilized elbow reconstructions and report outcomes of (1) patient function and (2) implant survival and complications. METHODS We reviewed 33 patients (18 females and 15 males) undergoing elbow arthroplasty for reconstruction of an underlying oncologic process including linked TEA (n = 22, 67%), APC (n = 9, 27%), and endoprosthesis (n = 2, 6%). The most common indication was metastatic disease (n = 17, 52%), with 24 patients (73%) presenting with a pathologic fracture. RESULTS Five-year implant survival was following elbow reconstruction was 88%. The mean most recent Mayo Elbow Performance Score and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score were 84 ± 18 and 78 ± 15%. Postoperative complications occurred in 15 elbows (45%), most commonly periprosthetic fracture (n = 5, 15%), leading to reoperation in six elbows (18%). CONCLUSION Although elbow arthroplasty is associated with a high incidence of complications, it provides a stable platform for upper extremity function in patients with oncologic processes of the elbow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dustin R Lee
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Jonathan D Barlow
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Mark E Morrey
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Peter S Rose
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Matthew T Houdek
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Downie S, Cherry J, Hall P, Stillie A, Moran M, Sudlow C, Simpson AHR. Metastatic bone disease: new quality performance indicator development. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2021:bmjspcare-2021-003025. [PMID: 34130998 DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-003025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2021] [Accepted: 05/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Patients with metastatic bone disease (MBD) should receive the same standard of care regardless of which centre they are treated in. The aim was to develop and test a set of quality performance indicators (QPIs) to evaluate care for patients with MBD referred to orthopaedics. METHODS QPIs were adapted from the literature and ranked on feasibility and necessity during a modified RAND/Delphi consensus process. They were then validated and field tested in a retrospective cohort of 108 patients using indicator-specific targets set during consensus. RESULTS 2568 articles including six guidelines were reviewed. 43 quality objectives were extracted and 40 proceeded to expert consensus. After two rounds, 18 QPIs for MBD care were generated, with the following generating the highest consensus: 'Patients with high fracture risk should receive urgent assessment' (combined mean 6.7/7, 95% CI 6.5 to 6.8) and 'preoperative workup should include full blood tests including group and save' (combined mean 6.7/7, 95% CI 6.5 to 6.9). In the pilot test, targets were met for 5/18 QPIs (mean 52%, standard deviation 22%). The median deviation from projected target was -14% (interquartile range -11% to -31%, range -74% to 11%). The highest scoring QPI was 'adults with fractures should have surgery within 7 days' (target 80%:actual 92%). CONCLUSIONS The published evidence and guidelines were adapted into a set of validated QPIs for MBD care which can be used to evaluate variation in care between centres. These QPIs should be correlated with outcome scores to determine whether they can act as predictors of outcome after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha Downie
- Trauma & Orthopaedics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Peter Hall
- University of Edinburgh Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | | | - Cathie Sudlow
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Sørensen MS, Colding-Rasmussen T, Horstmann PF, Hindsø K, Dehlendorff C, Johansen JS, Petersen MM. Pretreatment Plasma IL-6 and YKL-40 and Overall Survival after Surgery for Metastatic Bone Disease of the Extremities. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13112833. [PMID: 34200156 PMCID: PMC8201042 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13112833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Estimating postoperative survival in patients undergoing surgery for metastatic bone disease of the extremities is important in order to choose an implant that will outlive the patient. The present study suggests that plasma IL-6, reflecting the inflammatory state of the patient, is predictive for postoperative overall survival (OS). Abstract Background: Plasma IL-6 and YKL-40 are prognostic biomarkers for OS in patients with different types of solid tumors, but they have not been studied in patients before surgery of metastatic bone disease (MBD) of the extremities. The aim was to evaluate the prognostic value of plasma IL-6 and YKL-40 in patients undergoing surgery for MBD of the extremities. Patients and Methods: A prospective study included all patients undergoing surgery for MBD in the extremities at a tertiary referral center during the period 2014–2018. Preoperative blood samples from index surgery were included. IL-6 and YKL-40 concentrations in plasma were determined by commercial ELISA. A total of 232 patients (median age 66 years, IQR 58–74; female 51%) were included. Results: Cox regression analysis was performed to identify independent prognostic factors for OS. IL-6 correlated with YKL-40 (rho = 0.46, p < 0.01). In univariate analysis (log2 continuous variable) IL-6 (HR = 1.26, 95% CI 1.16–1.37), CRP (HR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.12–1.29) and YKL-40 (HR = 1.25, 95% CI 1.15–1.37) were associated with short OS. In multivariable analysis, adjusted for known risk factors for survival, only log2(IL-6) was independently associated with OS (HR = 1.24, 95% CI 1.08–1.43), whereas CRP and YKL-40 were not. Conclusion: High preoperative plasma IL-6 is an independent biomarker of short OS in patients undergoing surgery for MBD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michala Skovlund Sørensen
- Musculoskeletal Tumor Section, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark; (T.C.-R.); (P.F.H.); (M.M.P.)
- Correspondence: or
| | - Thomas Colding-Rasmussen
- Musculoskeletal Tumor Section, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark; (T.C.-R.); (P.F.H.); (M.M.P.)
| | - Peter Frederik Horstmann
- Musculoskeletal Tumor Section, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark; (T.C.-R.); (P.F.H.); (M.M.P.)
| | - Klaus Hindsø
- Pediatric Section, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark;
| | - Christian Dehlendorff
- Statistics and Data Analysis Danish Cancer Society Research Center, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark;
| | - Julia Sidenius Johansen
- Department of Medicine, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, 2730 Herlev, Denmark;
- Department of Oncology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, 2730 Herlev, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2730 Herlev, Denmark
| | - Michael Mørk Petersen
- Musculoskeletal Tumor Section, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark; (T.C.-R.); (P.F.H.); (M.M.P.)
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2730 Herlev, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Sørensen MS, Petersen MM. Surgical Treatment of Metastatic Bone Disease-When Decisions at End-of-Life Really Makes the Difference. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13112581. [PMID: 34070329 PMCID: PMC8197483 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13112581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Revised: 05/18/2021] [Accepted: 05/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Michala Skovlund Sørensen
- Musculoskeletal Tumor Section, Department of Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Inge Lehmanns Vej 6, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
- Correspondence: (M.S.S.); (M.M.P.)
| | - Michael Mørk Petersen
- Musculoskeletal Tumor Section, Department of Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Inge Lehmanns Vej 6, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK-2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark
- Correspondence: (M.S.S.); (M.M.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
|
32
|
C-reactive protein and tumour diagnosis predict survival in patients treated surgically for long bone metastases. INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS 2021; 45:1337-1346. [PMID: 33392682 DOI: 10.1007/s00264-020-04921-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Surgical options for long bone metastases include intramedullary nail fixation or prosthetic reconstruction. Patients with a short life expectancy may benefit from less invasive surgery such as intramedullary nail fixation, while patients with a long life expectancy could be treated with more invasive surgery such as prosthetic reconstruction. The purpose of our study was to analyze the survival of patients treated surgically for long bone metastases, determining the prognostic factors affecting survival and analyzing the surgical complications and reoperation rates. Based on our results, we developed a prognostic score that helps to choose the best treatment for these patients. In addition, we compared the performance of our prognostic score with other previous prognostic models. METHOD We investigated prospectively potential clinical and laboratory prognostic factors in 159 patients with metastatic bone disease who underwent surgery with intramedullary nail fixation or prosthetic reconstruction. Clinical data were collected, recording the following data: age and sex of patients, primary tumour and time of diagnosis, number (single or multiple) and presentation (synchronous or metachronous) of bone metastases, presence of visceral metastases. The following laboratory data were analyzed: hemoglobin, leukocyte counts, lymphocyte counts, platelets count, alkaline phosphatase, and C-reactive protein. RESULTS Our study showed that pathological C-reactive protein and primary tumour diagnosis were significant negative independent prognostic factors at 12-month survival. Based on our results, we created a score using C-reactive protein and primary tumour diagnosis, creating three different prognostic groups: (A) good prognosis primary tumour and physiological CRP with probability of survival at 12 months of 88.9 [80.1-98.5]; (B) bad prognosis primary tumour and physiological CRP or good prognosis primary tumour and pathological CRP with a probability of survival at 12 months of 56.7 [45.4-70.7]; (C) bad prognosis primary tumour and pathological CRP with a probability of survival at 12 months of 12.5 [5.0-28.3]. Using ROC multiple analysis, our score (AUC = 0.816) was the most accurate in predicting a 12-month survival compared to previous prognostic models. DISCUSSION Patients treated surgically for long bone metastases with a life expectancy over 12 months should be treated with more durable reconstruction, while patients with a life expectancy less than 12 months should be treated with less invasive surgery. The diagnosis of primary cancer and C-reactive protein are two very simple data which every orthopaedic surgeon in any community hospital can easily rely on for any decision-making in the surgical treatment of a complex patient as with a patient with skeletal metastases. CONCLUSION Our prognostic score based on only two simple variables (C-reactive protein and primary tumour diagnosis) was able to predict the 12-month survival of patients treated surgically for long bone metastases and could be helpful in choosing the best treatment for these patients.
Collapse
|
33
|
Rades D, Haus R, Janssen S, Schild SE. Interval Between Cancer Diagnosis and Radiotherapy - An Independent Prognostic Factor of Survival in Patients Irradiated for Bone Metastases from Kidney Cancer. In Vivo 2020; 34:767-770. [PMID: 32111782 DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2019] [Revised: 11/19/2019] [Accepted: 11/25/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM Cancer patients with metastatic disease require personalized treatment regimens. This study was performed to identify prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) following irradiation of bone metastases from kidney cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Data of 29 patients irradiated for bone metastases from kidney cancer were retrospectively evaluated. Ten factors were analyzed, including age, gender, performance score, interval from diagnosis of kidney cancer until radiotherapy for bone metastases, visceral metastases, other bone metastases, metastatic sites, number of irradiated sites, surgery of irradiated sites and systemic treatment prior to radiotherapy. RESULTS Using univariate analyses, a longer interval from diagnosis of kidney cancer radiotherapy was associated with better OS (p=0.012). Using Cox regression analysis, this factor remained significant (risk ratio=3.54, p=0.012). CONCLUSION The interval from diagnosis of kidney cancer until radiotherapy is an independent prognostic factor associated with OS following irradiation of bone metastases from kidney cancer. This type of data can help personalize radiation programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dirk Rades
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Rapha Haus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Stefan Janssen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.,Medical Practice for Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Hannover, Germany
| | - Steven E Schild
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Houdek MT, Bukowski BR, Athey AG, Elhassan BT, Barlow JD, Morrey ME, Rose PS, Wagner ER, Sanchez-Sotelo J. Comparison of reconstructive techniques following oncologic intraarticular resection of proximal humerus. J Surg Oncol 2020; 123:133-140. [PMID: 33095924 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Revised: 09/23/2020] [Accepted: 10/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The proximal humerus is a common site of primary and metastatic disease in the upper extremity. Historically, the goal of a hemiarthroplasty reconstruction was to provide a stable platform for hand and elbow function, with limited shoulder function. Techniques utilizing a reverse endoprosthesis (endoprosthetic replacement [EPR]) and allograft-prosthetic composite (APC) have been developed; however, there is a paucity of comparative studies. METHODS A total of 83 (42 females, 41 males) patients undergoing an intraarticular resection of the humerus were reviewed. Reconstructions included 30 reverse and 53 hemiarthroplasty; including hemiarthroplasty EPR (n = 36) and APC (n = 17), and reverse EPR (n = 20) and APC (n = 10). RESULTS Reverse reconstructions had improved forward elevation (85° vs. 44°, p < .001) and external rotation (30° vs. 21°; p < .001) versus a hemiarthroplasty. Reverse reconstructions had improved American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores (65 vs. 57; p = .01) and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society 93 scores (72 vs. 63; p < .001) versus hemiarthroplasty. Subluxation of the reconstruction was a common (n = 23, 27%), only occurring in hemiarthroplasty patients (EPR [n = 13, 36%] and APC [n = 10, 59%]). CONCLUSION The current series highlights the improved functional outcome in patients undergoing reconstruction with a reverse arthroplasty compared to the traditional hemiarthroplasty. Currently reverse shoulder arthroplasty (APC or EPR) is our preferred methods of reconstruction in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew T Houdek
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Brandon R Bukowski
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Alexander G Athey
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Bassem T Elhassan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Jonathan D Barlow
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Mark E Morrey
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Peter S Rose
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Eric R Wagner
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Spine and Non-spine Bone Metastases - Current Controversies and Future Direction. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2020; 32:728-744. [PMID: 32747153 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2020.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2020] [Revised: 05/21/2020] [Accepted: 07/10/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Bone is a common site of metastases in advanced cancers. The main symptom is pain, which increases morbidity and reduces quality of life. The treatment of bone metastases needs a multidisciplinary approach, with the main aim of relieving pain and improving quality of life. Apart from systemic anticancer therapy (hormonal therapy, chemotherapy or immunotherapy), there are several therapeutic options available to achieve palliation, including analgesics, surgery, local radiotherapy, bone-seeking radioisotopes and bone-modifying agents. Long-term use of non-steroidal analgesics and opiates is associated with significant side-effects, and tachyphylaxis. Radiotherapy is effective mainly in localised disease sites. Bone-targeting radionuclides are useful in patients with multiple metastatic lesions. Bone-modifying agents are beneficial in reducing skeletal-related events. This overview focuses on the role of surgery, including minimally invasive treatments, conventional radiotherapy in spinal and non-spinal bone metastases, bone-targeting radionuclides and bone-modifying agents in achieving palliation. We present the clinical data and their associated toxicity. Recent advances are also discussed.
Collapse
|
36
|
Rades D, Haus R, Janssen S, Schild SE. An easy-to-use scoring system to estimate the survival of patients irradiated for bone metastases from lung cancer. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2020; 9:1067-1073. [PMID: 32953485 PMCID: PMC7481577 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-19-642] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
Background The remaining lifespan of patients with metastatic lung cancer should be considered when designing a personalized treatment program. To facilitate the estimation survival in lung cancer patients with bone metastases, a specific scoring system was created. Methods One-hundred-and-fifty-three patients receiving fractionated radiotherapy for bone metastases without spinal cord compression from lung cancer were included in this retrospective study. Age, gender, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score, histology, interval from lung cancer diagnosis until irradiation of bone metastases, visceral metastases, additional bone metastases, type and number of irradiated sites, pathological fracture, upfront surgery and previous systemic treatment were evaluated for potential associations with survival. Those factors that were significant (P<0.05) or showed a trend (P≤0.10) on multivariate analysis were used to create the scoring system. Results On multivariate analysis, ECOG performance score was significant (risk ratio: 2.77, P<0.001), and age showed a trend (risk ratio: 1.34, P=0.10). The following scoring points were assigned: age ≤65 years =1 point, age ≥66 years =0 points, ECOG performance score of 0–1 =1 point, and ECOG performance score of ≥2 =0 points. Three prognostic groups were obtained: 0 points (n=38), 1 point (n=71) and 2 points (n=44). Six-month survival rates were 21%, 41% and 75%, 12-month survival rates 7%, 27% and 56% (P<0.001). Conclusions This scoring system can help estimate the remaining lifespan of lung cancer patients to be irradiated for bone metastases and will contribute to the personalization of their treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dirk Rades
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Rapha Haus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Stefan Janssen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Steven E Schild
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Ehne J, Tsagozis P. Current concepts in the surgical treatment of skeletal metastases. World J Orthop 2020; 11:319-327. [PMID: 32908816 PMCID: PMC7441493 DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v11.i7.319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2020] [Revised: 05/20/2020] [Accepted: 05/30/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Symptomatic metastatic bone disease affects a large proportion of patients with malignant tumours and significantly impairs patients’ quality of life. There are still controversies regarding both surgical indications and methods, mainly because of the relatively few high-quality studies in this field. Generally, prosthetic reconstruction has been shown to result in fewer implant failures and should be preferred in patients with a good prognosis. Survival estimation tools should be used as part of preoperative planning. Adjuvant treatment, which relies on radiotherapy and inhibition of osteoclast function may also offer symptomatic relief and prevent implant failure. In this review we discuss the epidemiology, indications for surgery, preoperative planning, surgical techniques and adjuvant treatment of metastatic bone disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Ehne
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna 171 76, Sweden
| | - Panagiotis Tsagozis
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna 171 76, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Development and Internal Validation of Machine Learning Algorithms for Preoperative Survival Prediction of Extremity Metastatic Disease. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2020; 478:322-333. [PMID: 31651589 PMCID: PMC7438151 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000000997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A preoperative estimation of survival is critical for deciding on the operative management of metastatic bone disease of the extremities. Several tools have been developed for this purpose, but there is room for improvement. Machine learning is an increasingly popular and flexible method of prediction model building based on a data set. It raises some skepticism, however, because of the complex structure of these models. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES The purposes of this study were (1) to develop machine learning algorithms for 90-day and 1-year survival in patients who received surgical treatment for a bone metastasis of the extremity, and (2) to use these algorithms to identify those clinical factors (demographic, treatment related, or surgical) that are most closely associated with survival after surgery in these patients. METHODS All 1090 patients who underwent surgical treatment for a long-bone metastasis at two institutions between 1999 and 2017 were included in this retrospective study. The median age of the patients in the cohort was 63 years (interquartile range [IQR] 54 to 72 years), 56% of patients (610 of 1090) were female, and the median BMI was 27 kg/m (IQR 23 to 30 kg/m). The most affected location was the femur (70%), followed by the humerus (22%). The most common primary tumors were breast (24%) and lung (23%). Intramedullary nailing was the most commonly performed type of surgery (58%), followed by endoprosthetic reconstruction (22%), and plate screw fixation (14%). Missing data were imputed using the missForest methods. Features were selected by random forest algorithms, and five different models were developed on the training set (80% of the data): stochastic gradient boosting, random forest, support vector machine, neural network, and penalized logistic regression. These models were chosen as a result of their classification capability in binary datasets. Model performance was assessed on both the training set and the validation set (20% of the data) by discrimination, calibration, and overall performance. RESULTS We found no differences among the five models for discrimination, with an area under the curve ranging from 0.86 to 0.87. All models were well calibrated, with intercepts ranging from -0.03 to 0.08 and slopes ranging from 1.03 to 1.12. Brier scores ranged from 0.13 to 0.14. The stochastic gradient boosting model was chosen to be deployed as freely available web-based application and explanations on both a global and an individual level were provided. For 90-day survival, the three most important factors associated with poorer survivorship were lower albumin level, higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and rapid growth primary tumor. For 1-year survival, the three most important factors associated with poorer survivorship were lower albumin level, rapid growth primary tumor, and lower hemoglobin level. CONCLUSIONS Although the final models must be externally validated, the algorithms showed good performance on internal validation. The final models have been incorporated into a freely accessible web application that can be found at https://sorg-apps.shinyapps.io/extremitymetssurvival/. Pending external validation, clinicians may use this tool to predict survival for their individual patients to help in shared treatment decision making. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, therapeutic study.
Collapse
|
39
|
Abstract
Aims The early mortality in patients with hip fractures from bony metastases is unknown. The objectives of this study were to quantify 30- and 90-day mortality in patients with proximal femoral metastases, and to create a mortality prediction tool based on biomarkers associated with early death. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients referred to the orthopaedic department at a UK trauma centre with a proximal femoral metastasis (PFM) over a seven-year period (2010 to 2016). The study group were compared to a matched control group of non-metastatic hip fractures. Minimum follow-up was one year. Results There was a 90-day mortality of 46% in patients with metastatic hip fractures versus 12% in controls (89/195 and 24/192, respectively; p < 0.001). Mean time to surgery was longer in symptomatic metastases versus complete fractures (9.5 days (SD 19.8) and 3.4 days (SD 11.4), respectively; p < 0.05). Albumin, urea, and corrected calcium were all independent predictors of early mortality and were used to generate a simple tool for predicting 90-day mortality, titled the Metastatic Early Prognostic (MEP) score. An MEP score of 0 was associated with the lowest risk of death at 30 days (14%, 3/21), 90 days (19%, 4/21), and one year (62%, 13/21). MEP scores of 3/4 were associated with the highest risk of death at 30 days (56%, 5/9), 90 days (100%, 9/9), and one year (100%, 9/9). Neither age nor primary cancer diagnosis was an independent predictor of mortality at 30 and 90 days. Conclusion This score could be used to predict early mortality and guide perioperative counselling. The delay to surgery identifies a potential window to intervene and correct these abnormalities with the aim of improving survival. Cite this article: Bone Joint J. 2020;102-B(1):72–81
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha Downie
- NHS Tayside, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK
| | - Florence Y. Lai
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Judith Joss
- NHS Tayside, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK
| | - Douglas Adamson
- NHS Tayside, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Rades D, Haus R, Schild SE, Janssen S. Prognostic factors and a new scoring system for survival of patients irradiated for bone metastases. BMC Cancer 2019; 19:1156. [PMID: 31779595 PMCID: PMC6883567 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-6385-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2019] [Accepted: 11/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Personalized therapy for bone metastases should consider the patients’ remaining lifespan. Estimation of survival can be facilitated with scoring tools. A new tool was developed, specifically designed to estimate 12-month survival. Methods In 445 patients irradiated for bone metastases, radiotherapy regimen plus 13 factors (age, gender, Karnofsky performance score (KPS), primary tumor type, interval between cancer diagnosis and RT of bone metastases, visceral metastases, other (non-irradiated) bone metastases, sites of bone metastases, number of irradiated sites, pathological fracture, fractionation of RT, pre-RT surgery, pre-RT administration of bisphosphonates/denosumab, pre-RT systemic anticancer treatment) were retrospectively analyzed for survival. Factors achieving significance (p < 0.05) or borderline significance (p < 0.055) on multivariate analysis were used for the scoring system. Twelve-month survival rates were divided by 10 (factor scores); factor scores were summed for each patient (patient scores). Results On multivariate analysis, survival was significantly associated with KPS (hazard ratio (HR) 1.91, p < 0.001) and primary tumor type (HR 1.12, p < 0.001); age achieved borderline significance (HR 1.14, p = 0.054). These factors were used for the scoring tool. Patient scores ranged from 8 to 17 points. Three groups were designated: 8–9 (A), 10–14 (B) and 15–17 (C) points. Twelve-month survival rates were 9, 38 and 72% (p < 0.001); median survival times were 3, 8 and 24 months. Conclusions This new tool developed for patients irradiated for bone metastases at any site without spinal cord compression allows one to predict the survival of these patients and can aid physicians when assigning the treatment to individual patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dirk Rades
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23538, Lübeck, Germany.
| | - Rapha Haus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23538, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Steven E Schild
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Stefan Janssen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23538, Lübeck, Germany.,Medical Practice for Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
van der Wal CWPG, Eggermont F, Fiocco M, Kroon HM, Ayu O, Slot A, Snyers A, Rozema T, Verdonschot NJJ, Dijkstra PDS, Tanck E, van der Linden YM. Axial cortical involvement of metastatic lesions to identify impending femoral fractures; a clinical validation study. Radiother Oncol 2019; 144:59-64. [PMID: 31733489 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2019] [Revised: 10/11/2019] [Accepted: 10/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Patients with advanced cancer may develop painful bone metastases, potentially resulting in pathological fractures. Adequate fracture risk assessment is of key importance to prevent fracturing and maintain mobility. This study aims to validate the clinical reliability of axial cortical involvement with a 30 mm threshold on conventional radiographs to assess fracture risk in femoral bone metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS All patients with bone metastases who received radiotherapy for pain included in two multicentre prospective studies were selected. Conventional radiographs obtained at a maximum of two months prior to radiotherapy were collected. Three experts independently measured lesions and scored radiographic characteristics. Sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated. RESULTS Hundred patients were included with a median follow-up of 23.0 months (95%CI: 10.6-35.5). Two fractures occurred in lesions with axial cortical involvement <30 mm, and 12 in lesions ≥30 mm. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of axial cortical involvement for predicting femoral fractures were 86%, 50%, 20% and 96%, respectively. Patients with lesions ≥30 mm had a 5.3 times higher fracture risk than patients with smaller lesions. CONCLUSION Our validation study confirmed the use of 30 mm axial cortical involvement to assess fracture risk in femoral bone metastases. Until a more accurate and practically feasible method has been developed, this clinical parameter remains an easy method to assess femoral fracture risk to aid patients and clinicians to choose the optimal individual treatment modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C W P G van der Wal
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands.
| | - F Eggermont
- Orthopedic Research Laboratory, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - M Fiocco
- Medical Statistics Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands; Mathematical Institute, Leiden University, The Netherlands
| | - H M Kroon
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - O Ayu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - A Slot
- Department of Radiotherapy, Radiotherapy Institute Friesland, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - A Snyers
- Department of Radiotherapy, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - T Rozema
- Department of Radiotherapy, Bernard Verbeeten Institute, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - N J J Verdonschot
- Orthopedic Research Laboratory, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Laboratory of Biomechanical Engineering, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - P D S Dijkstra
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - E Tanck
- Orthopedic Research Laboratory, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Y M van der Linden
- Department of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Varady NH, Ameen BT, Hayden BL, Yeung CM, Schwab PE, Chen AF. Short-Term Morbidity and Mortality After Hemiarthroplasty and Total Hip Arthroplasty for Pathologic Proximal Femur Fractures. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34:2698-2703. [PMID: 31279601 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.06.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2019] [Revised: 05/29/2019] [Accepted: 06/10/2019] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND As oncology patients have increasing life expectancies, total hip arthroplasty (THA) may become an important treatment option for pathologic proximal femur fractures (PPFFs). Although THA and hemiarthroplasty (HA) have been compared for native hip fracture treatment, no data on short-term morbidity and mortality are available in the pathologic setting. The purpose of this study is to compare short-term morbidity and mortality of HA vs THA for PPFFs. METHODS The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried from 2007 to 2017 for patients with PPFFs treated with HA or THA. Propensity-adjusted logistic regressions were implemented to compare 30-day morbidity and mortality between procedures. Backwards stepwise regression was then used to determine independent predictors of treatment with HA compared to THA. RESULTS In adjusted analysis, THA was associated with longer operative times (120.3 ± 5.6 vs 98.7 ± 4.9 minutes, P < .001); however, there were no differences between THA and HA with regard to 30-day rates of major complications (P = .3), minor complications (P = .77), reoperations (P = .99), readmissions (P = .35), or deaths (P = .63). Older age (P < .001), dependent functional status (P = .02), and the presence of disseminated cancer (P = .049) were predictive of undergoing HA compared to THA. CONCLUSION As patients with metastatic cancer continue to live longer with their disease, the durability of surgical reconstruction to treat PPFFs is becoming increasingly important. This study demonstrated no significant differences in 30-day complications between PPFF patients treated with THA or HA after controlling for underlying confounders. These results suggest that THA can be utilized to treat certain patients with PPFFs, and future work is warranted to examine long-term functional outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan H Varady
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Bishoy T Ameen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Brett L Hayden
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Caleb M Yeung
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Pierre-Emmanuel Schwab
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Antonia F Chen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Meares C, Badran A, Dewar D. Prediction of survival after surgical management of femoral metastatic bone disease - A comparison of prognostic models. J Bone Oncol 2019; 15:100225. [PMID: 30847272 PMCID: PMC6389683 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbo.2019.100225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2018] [Revised: 02/12/2019] [Accepted: 02/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Operative fixation for femoral metastatic bone disease is based on the principles of reducing pain and restoring function. Recent literature has proposed a number of prognostic models for appendicular metastatic bone disease. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of proposed soring systems in the setting of femoral metastatic bone disease in order to provide surgeons with information to determine the most appropriate scoring system in this setting. Methods A retrospective cohort analysis of patients who underwent surgical management of femoral metastatic bone disease at a single institution were included. A pre-operative predicted survival for all 114 patients was retrospectively calculated utilising the revised Katagiri model, PathFx model, SSG score, Janssen nomogram, OPTModel and SPRING 13 nomogram. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression proportional hazard models were constructed to assess the role of prognostic variables in the patient group. Area under the receiver characteristics and Brier scores were calculated for each prognostic model from comparison of predicted survival and actual survival of patients to quantify the accuracy of each model. Results For the femoral metastatic bone disease patients treated with surgical fixation, multivariate analysis demonstrated a number of pre-operative factors associated with survival in femoral metastatic bone disease, consistent with established literature. The OPTIModel demonstrated the highest accuracy at predicting 12-month (Area Under the Curve [AUC] = 0.79) and 24-month (AUC = 0.77) survival after surgical management. PathFx model was the most accurate at predicting 3-month survival (AUC = 0.70) and 6-month (AUC = 0.70) survival. The PathFx model was successfully externally validated in the femoral patient dataset for all time periods. Conclusions Among six prognostic models assessed in the setting of femoral metastatic bone disease, the present study observed the most accurate model for 3-month, 6-month, 12-month and 24-month survival. The results of this study may be utilised by the treating surgical team to determine the most accurate model for the required time period and therefore improve decision-making in the care of patients with femoral metastatic bone disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles Meares
- The Bone and Joint Institute, Royal Newcastle Centre and John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, Australia
| | | | - David Dewar
- The Bone and Joint Institute, Royal Newcastle Centre and John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, Australia.,School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
|
45
|
Willeumier JJ, van der Wal CWPG, Schoones JW, van der Wal RJ, Dijkstra PDS. Pathologic fractures of the distal femur: Current concepts and treatment options. J Surg Oncol 2018; 118:883-890. [PMID: 30328621 DOI: 10.1002/jso.25218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2018] [Accepted: 08/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Pathologic fractures of the distal femur caused by bone metastases are not as common as those in the proximal femur but provide great difficulty to adequately treat. This systematic review shows that insufficient literature exists to draw clinically relevant conclusions for essential questions, such as "what factors indicate an endoprosthetic reconstruction for distal femur pathologic fractures?" Due to paucity of literature in the systematic review, a current concepts review (including treatment flowchart), based on instructional reviews and experience, was also performed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie J Willeumier
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - C W P Gerco van der Wal
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jan W Schoones
- Walaeus Library, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Robert J van der Wal
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - P D Sander Dijkstra
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Willeumier JJ, van de Sande MAJ, van der Wal RJP, Dijkstra PDS. Trends in the surgical treatment of pathological fractures of the long bones. Bone Joint J 2018; 100-B:1392-1398. [DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.100b10.bjj-2018-0239.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Aims The aim of this study was to assess the current trends in the estimation of survival and the preferred forms of treatment of pathological fractures among national and international general and oncological orthopaedic surgeons, and to explore whether improvements in the management of these patients could be identified in this way. Materials and Methods All members of the Dutch Orthopaedic Society (DOS) and the European Musculoskeletal Oncology Society (EMSOS) were invited to complete a web-based questionnaire containing 12 cases. Results A total of 96 of 948 members of the DOS (10.1%; groups 1 and 2) and 33 of 182 members of the EMSOS (18%; group 3) replied. The estimation of survival was accurate by more than 50% of all three groups, if the expected survival was short (< 3 months) or long (> 12 months). General orthopaedic surgeons preferred using an intramedullary nail for fractures of the humerus and femur, irrespective of the expected survival or the origin of primary tumour or the location of the fracture. Oncological orthopaedic surgeons recommended prosthetic reconstruction in patients with a long expected survival. Conclusion Identifying patients who require centralized care, as opposed to those who can be adequately treated in a regional centre, can improve the management of patients with pathological fractures. This differentiation should be based on the expected survival, the type and extent of the tumour, and the location of the fracture. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:1392–8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. J. Willeumier
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - M. A. J. van de Sande
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - R. J. P. van der Wal
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - P. D. S. Dijkstra
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Prognostic and risk factors in patients with metastatic bone disease of an upper extremity. J Bone Oncol 2018; 13:71-75. [PMID: 30591860 PMCID: PMC6303409 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbo.2018.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2018] [Revised: 09/15/2018] [Accepted: 09/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of this study was to evaluate survival of metastatic bone disease of an upper extremity, and to identify the prognostic factors that influence survival. Methods Patients with metastatic bone disease of an upper extremity between 2008 and 2015 were reviewed from the database of a tertiary university hospital. Results Of 102 patients, 48 males and 54 females with a median age of 61 (range, 28–82 years), the humerus (64.7%), clavicle (13.7%), and scapula (12.7%) were the common sites for bone metastasis of an upper extremity. Fifty-nine (57.8%) presented with pathologic fracture. No history of cancer was found in 76.5% of patients. The mean onset of metastatic bone disease after the first diagnosis of primary cancer was 4.74 ± 14.07 months (range, 0–84 months). Lung (31.4%) was the most common primary cancer followed by liver (14.7%), breast (12.7%), thyroid (7.8%), and renal (3.9%). Eighty-two cases (80.39%) died from the disease such that the median survival was 4.08 months (95% CI 2.57–6.17). The significant risk factors were the type of primary tumor (P < 0.001, HR = 4.44; 95% CI, 1.99–9.90) and ECOG performance status (P = 0.021, HR = 2.11, 95% CI 1.12–3.99). Conclusions Patients with metastatic bone disease of an upper extremity have a limited life expectancy. The type of primary tumor and ECOG performance status were the important prognostic factors that influenced overall survival. Our data help in the management of patients, families, and doctors, so as to avoid over- or under-treatment.
Collapse
|
48
|
Willeumier JJ, Kaynak M, van der Zwaal P, Meylaerts SAG, Mathijssen NMC, Jutte PC, Tsagozis P, Wedin R, van de Sande MAJ, Fiocco M, Dijkstra PDS. What Factors Are Associated With Implant Breakage and Revision After Intramedullary Nailing for Femoral Metastases? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2018; 476:1823-1833. [PMID: 30566108 PMCID: PMC6259794 DOI: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Actual and impending pathologic fractures of the femur are commonly treated with intramedullary nails because they provide immediate stabilization with a minimally invasive procedure and enable direct weightbearing. However, complications and revision surgery are prevalent, and despite common use, there is limited evidence identifying those factors that are associated with complications. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES Among patients treated with intramedullary nailing for femoral metastases, we asked the following questions: (1) What is the cumulative incidence of local complications? (2) What is the cumulative incidence of implant breakage and what factors are associated with implant breakage? (3) What is the cumulative incidence of revision surgery and what factors are associated with revision surgery? METHODS Between January 2000 and December 2015, 245 patients in five centers were treated with intramedullary nails for actual and impending pathologic fractures of the femur caused by bone metastases. During that period, the general indications for intramedullary nailing of femoral metastases were impending fractures of the trochanter region and shaft and actual fractures of the trochanter region if sufficient bone stock remained; nails were used for lesions of the femoral shaft if they were large or if multiple lesions were present. Of those treated with intramedullary nails, 51% (117) were actual fractures and 49% (111) were impending fractures. A total of 60% (128) of this group were women; the mean age was 65 years (range, 29-93 years). After radiologic followup (at 4-8 weeks) with the orthopaedic surgeon, because of the palliative nature of these treatments, subsequent in-person followup was performed by the primary care provider on an as-needed basis (that is, as desired by the patient, without any scheduled visits with the orthopaedic surgeon) throughout each patient's remaining lifetime. However, there was close collaboration between the primary care providers and the orthopaedic team such that orthopaedic complications would be reported. A total of 67% (142 of 212) of the patients died before 1 year, and followup ranged from 0.1 to 175 months (mean, 14.4 months). Competing risk models were used to estimate the cumulative incidence of local complications (including persisting pain, tumor progression, and implant breakage), implant breakage separately, and revision surgery (defined as any reoperation involving the implant other than débridement with implant retention for infection). A cause-specific multivariate Cox regression model was used to estimate the association of factors (fracture type/preoperative radiotherapy and fracture type/use of cement) with implant breakage and revision, respectively. RESULTS Local complications occurred in 12% (28 of 228) of the patients and 6-month cumulative incidence was 8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.7-11.9). Implant breakage occurred in 8% (18 of 228) of the patients and 6-month cumulative incidence was 4% (95% CI, 1.4-6.5). Independent factors associated with increased risk of implant breakage were an actual (as opposed to impending) fracture (cause-specific hazard ratio [HR_cs], 3.61; 95% CI, 1.23-10.53, p = 0.019) and previous radiotherapy (HR_cs, 2.97; 95% CI, 1.13-7.82, p = 0.027). Revisions occurred in 5% (12 of 228) of the patients and 6-month cumulative incidence was 2.2% (95% CI, 0.3-4.1). The presence of an actual fracture was independently associated with a higher risk of revision (HR_cs, 4.17; 95% CI, 0.08-0.82, p = 0.022), and use of cement was independently associated with a lower risk of revision (HR_cs, 0.25; 95% CI, 1.20-14.53, p = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS The cumulative incidence of local complications, implant breakage, and revisions is low, mostly as a result of the short survival of patients. Based on these results, surgeons should consider use of cement in patients with intramedullary nails with actual fractures and closer followup of patients after actual fractures and preoperative radiotherapy. Future, prospective studies should further analyze the effects of adjuvant therapies and surgery-related factors on the risk of implant breakage and revisions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, therapeutic study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie J Willeumier
- J. J. Willeumier, M. Kaynak, M. A. J. van de Sande, P. D. S. Dijkstra, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands P. van der Zwaal, S.A.G. Meylaerts, Department of Surgery, Haaglanden Medisch Centrum, The Hague, The Netherlands N. M. C. Mathijssen, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, The Netherlands P. C. Jutte, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands P. Tsagozis, R. Wedin, Section of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden M. Fiocco, Mathematical Institute, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands; and the Department of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
CORR Insights®: External Validation and Optimization of the SPRING Model for Prediction of Survival After Surgical Treatment of Bone Metastases of the Extremities. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2018; 476:1600-1602. [PMID: 29757764 PMCID: PMC6259732 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000000345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
|