A Randomized Controlled Trial of Psychological Intervention to Improve Satisfaction for Patients with Depression Undergoing TKA: A 2-Year Follow-up

Identifying who are unlikely to benefit from total knee arthroplasty using machine learning models

Identifying and preventing patients who are not likely to benefit long-term from total knee arthroplasty (TKA) would decrease healthcare expenditure significantly. We trained machine learning (ML) models (image-only, clinical-data only, and multimodal) among 5720 knee OA patients to predict postoperative dissatisfaction at 2 years. Dissatisfaction was defined as not achieving a minimal clinically important difference in postoperative Knee Society knee and function scores (KSS), Short Form-36 Health Survey [SF-36, divided into a physical component score (PCS) and mental component score (MCS)], and Oxford Knee Score (OKS). Compared to image-only models, both clinical-data only and multimodal models achieved superior performance at predicting dissatisfaction measured by AUC, clinical-data only model: KSS 0.888 (0.866-0.909), SF-PCS 0.836 (0.812-0.860), SF-MCS 0.833 (0.812-0.854), and OKS 0.806 (0.753-0.859); multimodal model: KSS 0.891 (0.870-0.911), SF-PCS 0.832 (0.808-0.857), SF-MCS 0.835 (0.811-0.856), and OKS 0.816 (0.768-0.863). Our findings highlighted that ML models using clinical or multimodal data were capable to predict post-TKA dissatisfaction.

Using Two Predictive Models to Capture Two Types of Poor Outcomes in Knee Arthroplasty: A Multisite Longitudinal Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

Poor outcome after knee arthroplasty (KA), a common major surgery worldwide, reportedly occurs in approximately 20% of patients. These patients demonstrate minimal improvement, at least moderate knee pain, and difficulty performing many routine daily activities. The purposes of our study were to comprehensively determine poor outcome risk after KA and to identify predictors of poor outcome.

METHODS

Data from 565 participants with KA in the Osteoarthritis Initiative and the Multicenter Osteoarthritis studies were used. Previously validated latent class analyses (LCAs) of good versus poor outcome trajectories of Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain and Disability were generated to describe minimal improvement and poor final outcome. The modified Escobar RAND appropriateness system was used to generate classifications of appropriate, inconclusive, and rarely appropriate. Multivariable prediction models included LCA-based good versus poor outcome, modified Escobar classifications, and evidence-driven preoperative prognostic variables.

RESULTS

Modified Escobar appropriateness classifications were nonsignificant predictors of WOMAC Pain good versus poor outcomes, indicating the methods provide independent outcome estimates. For WOMAC Pain and WOMAC Disability, approximately 34% and 45% of participants, respectively, had a high probability of either minimal improvement via "rarely appropriate" classifications or poor outcome via LCA. In multivariable prediction models, greater contralateral knee pain consistently predicted poor outcome (eg, odds ratio 1.21, 95% confidence interval 1.10-1.33).

CONCLUSION

Appropriateness criteria and LCA estimates provided combined poor outcome estimates that were approximately double the commonly reported poor outcome of 20%. Rates of poor outcome could be reduced if clinicians screened patients using appropriateness criteria and LCA predictors before surgery to optimize outcome.

Are Orthopaedic Clinical Trials Linguistically and Culturally Diverse? A Systematic Review

Purpose

Underrepresentation and misrepresentation of historically underrepresented populations in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) may have implications for the validity of research results and their application for diverse populations. To evaluate the representation of historically linguistically, racially, and ethnically underrepresented participants in orthopaedic randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and to assess the use of translated and culturally adapted patient reported outcome measures (PROMs).

Methods

Separate and comprehensive literature searches of PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases were performed to identify RCTs utilizing PROMs between the years 2012 - 2022 among the top five highest 5-year impact factor orthopaedic journals according to the 2021 Journal Citation Reports database. The primary outcomes of interest included reporting of linguistic, racial and ethnic demographic characteristics of trial participants and the utilization of translated PROMs. The methodological quality of each clinical trial was assessed using the Jadad Criteria.

Results

230 RCTs met inclusion criteria. The language of participants was reported in 14% of trials and in 17% of trials when searching both the published text and clinical trial registration information. In addition, race and/or ethnicity was reported in 11% of trials, and the use of translated PROMs was reported in 7% of trials. Among the six multinational studies, none reported the language of the study population nor the use of translated PROMs. Notably, four studies (2%) reported utilizing culturally adapted PROMs. The average Jadad score was 3.07.

Conclusion

Participant language, race, and ethnicity are infrequently reported in orthopaedic clinical trials, potentially limiting the application and interpretation of study results. Similarly, the linguistic and cultural adaptation of PROMs utilized are often not reported, which also limits interpretations of the validity and generalizability of orthopedic study results. Researchers and journals should promote standard reporting of demographic data and methods of PROM adaptation to ensure results are generalizable to diverse patient populations.

Level of Evidence

III.

Treatment of Concurrent Depression and Its Effect on Outcomes After Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of Comparative Studies

PURPOSE

There is a growing body of evidence suggesting that patients with a diagnosis of depression suffer worse outcomes after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) procedures. It is unclear whether depression treatment is a modifiable risk factor that can be targeted to improve suboptimal outcomes. We conducted a systematic review to understand the role that various interventions have on outcomes of TJA in patients with diagnosed depression (PDDs).

METHODS

PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus, and EMBASE were searched systematically from inception until November 2022. Studies of PDDs who underwent TJA that compared any intervention/treatment of depression with a control group and reported pain, functional outcomes, depression scores, and/or revision rates after TJA were relevant for this review.

RESULTS

Ten relevant studies were included in the final systematic review, with a total of 33,501 patients included. Two studies reported lower revision rates for patients receiving selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor treatment and psychotherapy. Two studies showed no difference in functional outcomes for patients receiving pharmacologic treatment. One study reported improved functional outcomes for patients receiving cognitive behavioral therapy and another reported improved postoperative functional outcomes for patients receiving alprazolam.

CONCLUSION

Interventions targeted at PDDs may improve short-term pain and functional outcomes, and there may be an association between selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor use and implant survival. The current literature is limited and inconclusive, with important gaps in understanding regarding the optimization and treatment of this modifiable risk factor. Surgeons should consider depression treatment as a method to improve outcomes in this cohort.

Prevalence of Depressive Symptoms in Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Based on the Mode of Failure

Background

Complications following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) that necessitate revision cause considerable psychological distress and symptoms of depression, which are linked to poorer postoperative outcomes, increased complications, and increased healthcare utilization. We aimed to identify the prevalence of mental health disorders and symptoms preoperatively and postoperatively in patients undergoing aseptic revision TKA and to stratify these patients based on their mechanism of failure.

Methods

All patients undergoing aseptic revision TKA from 2008 to 2019 with a minimum 1-year follow-up were retrospectively reviewed at a single institution. Patients (n = 394) were grouped based on 7 failure modes previously described. Patients were considered to have depressive symptoms if their Veterans RAND-12 mental component score was below 42. Preoperative and postoperative Veterans RAND-12 mental component scores at the latest follow-up were evaluated.

Results

Overall comparative prevalence of preoperative to postoperative depressive symptoms was 23.4%-18.8%. By mode of failure are as follows: arthrofibrosis (25.8%-16.7%), aseptic loosening (25.3%-18.9%), extensor mechanism disruption (25%-50%), failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (8.6%-14.3%), instability (25.7%-17.1%), osteolysis or polyethylene wear (23.1%-23.1%), and patellar failure (11.8%-23.5%). There was no difference in depressive symptoms among failure modes preoperatively (P = .376) or at the latest postoperative follow-up (P = .175).

Conclusions

The prevalence of depressive symptoms in revision TKA patients appears to be independent of failure mode. Surgeon awareness and screening for depressive symptoms in this patient population preoperatively with referral for potential treatment may improve early postoperative outcomes.

Current evidence does not support the routine use of cognitive behavioural therapy in total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review

Background

There is a significant dissatisfaction rate in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and poor mental health in patients is increasingly recognized as a major contributor to dissatisfaction. The aim was to review the effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) in improving pain and functional outcomes of patients undergoing TKA and highlight important aspects that may be crucial for improvement.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted in adherence to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Studies were included if they were randomized control trials that included patients undergoing unilateral or bilateral TKA, with CBT as an intervention compared against usual care, and reported outcomes in pain, knee function and any psychological outcomes as measured.

Results

Eight RCTs were selected which included 683 participants. The timings of CBT delivery, profiles of therapists, and outcome measures reported varied across the studies. Overall, 3 studies reported significant improvement in pain outcomes, 3 studies reported significant improvement in functional outcomes and 5 studies reported significant improvements in psychological outcomes.

Conclusion

Current evidence does not support the efficacy of CBT as current literature is too heterogenous. Further studies with homogenous CBT methods are required to further ascertain the true relationship between CBT and postoperative outcomes of TKA. Future studies should consider the points set out in this review, such as the importance of revisiting CBTskills, providing individualized therapy, having a supervisory team to support the fidelity of interventions, and identifying which group of patients would best benefit from CBT.

Brief Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy is Associated with Faster Recovery in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Pilot Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether brief mindfulness-based cognitive behavioral therapy (MBCBT) could enhance the benefits of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in improving pain and pain-related disability. Specifically, to determine 1) whether patients who received MBCBT differed from matched controls who received treatment-as-usual with regard to postsurgical pain outcomes and 2) whether changes in pain catastrophizing, depression, or anxiety explained the potential effects of MBCBT on pain outcomes.

DESIGN

Pilot clinical trial.

SETTING

An academic teaching hospital serving a large urban and suburban catchment area surrounding the Boston, Massachusetts metropolitan region.

SUBJECTS

Sample of 44 patients undergoing TKA. Patients who completed a brief MBCBT intervention (n = 22) were compared with age-, race-, and sex-matched controls who received treatment-as-usual (n = 22).

METHODS

The MBCBT intervention included four 60-minute sessions delivered by a pain psychologist in person and via telephone during the perioperative period. Participants were assessed at baseline and at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Compared with matched controls, patients who received MBCBT had lower pain severity and pain interference at 6 weeks after surgery. Group differences in outcomes were mediated by changes in pain catastrophizing but not by changes in depression or anxiety. The MBCBT group had similar reductions in pain severity and interference as the control group did at 3 and 6 months after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

This work offers evidence for a safe and flexibly delivered nonpharmacological treatment (MBCBT) to promote faster recovery from TKA and identifies change in pain catastrophizing as a mechanism by which this intervention could lead to enhanced pain-related outcomes.

Cathepsin S Upregulation Measured in the Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells Prior to Surgery Points to Postoperative Pain Development in Patients with Hip Osteoarthritis

Disability caused by hip osteoarthritis has increased due to population aging, obesity, and lifestyle behaviors. Joint failure after conservative therapies results in total hip replacement, which is considered to be one of the most successful interventions. However, some patients experience long-term postoperative pain. Presently, there are no reliable clinical biomarkers for the prognosis of postoperative pain prior to surgery. Molecular biomarkers can be considered as intrinsic indicators of pathological processes and as links between clinical status and disease pathology, while recent innovative and sensitive approaches such as RT-PCR have extended the prognostic value of clinical traits. In light of this, we examined the importance of cathepsin S and proinflammatory cytokine gene expression in peripheral blood in addition to the clinical traits of patients with end-stage hip osteoarthritis (HOA) to predict postoperative pain development prior to surgery. This study included 31 patients with radiographic Kellgren and Lawrence grade III-IV HOA who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA) and 26 healthy volunteers. Before surgery, a visual analog scale (VAS), DN4, PainDETECT, and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index scores were used for pain and function assessment. Three and six months post-surgery, VAS pain scores of 30 mm and higher were reported. The intracellular protein levels of cathepsin S were measured using ELISA. The expression of the cathepsin S, tumor necrosis factor α, interleukin-1β, and cyclooxygenase-2 genes in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) was assessed using quantitative real-time RT-PCR. Pain persisted in 12 (38.7%) patients after THA. Patients who developed postoperative pain demonstrated significantly higher cathepsin S gene expression in the PBMCs and higher rates of neuropathic pain based on the DN4 testing compared to the other HOA subjects that were examined. No significant differences in proinflammatory cytokine gene expression were noted in either patient cohort prior to THA. The development of postoperative pain in patients with hip osteoarthritis might be associated with disturbances in pain perception, while increased expression of cathepsin S in the peripheral blood prior to surgery may serve as its prognostic biomarker and could be used in clinical settings to improve medical service for patients with end-stage hip OA.

Depression and anxiety are associated with an increased risk of infection, revision, and reoperation following total hip or knee arthroplasty

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of depressive and anxiety disorders prior to total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and to assess their impact on the rates of any infection, revision, or reoperation. Between January 2000 and March 2019, 21,469 primary and revision arthroplasties (10,011 THAs; 11,458 TKAs), which were undertaken in 15,504 patients at a single academic medical centre, were identified from a 27-county linked electronic medical record (EMR) system. Depressive and anxiety disorders were identified by diagnoses in the EMR or by using a natural language processing program with subsequent validation from review of the medical records. Patients with mental health diagnoses other than anxiety or depression were excluded. Depressive and/or anxiety disorders were common before THA and TKA, with a prevalence of 30% in those who underwent primary THA, 33% in those who underwent revision THA, 32% in those who underwent primary TKA, and 35% in those who underwent revision TKA. The presence of depressive or anxiety disorders was associated with a significantly increased risk of any infection (primary THA, hazard ratio (HR) 1.5; revision THA, HR 1.9; primary TKA, HR 1.6; revision TKA, HR 1.8), revision (THA, HR 1.7; TKA, HR 1.6), re-revision (THA, HR 2.0; TKA, HR 1.6), and reoperation (primary THA, HR 1.6; revision THA, HR 2.2; primary TKA, HR 1.4; revision TKA, HR 1.9; p < 0.03 for all). Patients with preoperative depressive and/or anxiety disorders were significantly less likely to report "much better" joint function after primary THA (78% vs 87%) and primary TKA (86% vs 90%) compared with those without these disorders at two years postoperatively (p < 0.001 for all). The presence of depressive or anxiety disorders prior to primary or revision THA and TKA is common, and associated with a significantly higher risk of infection, revision, reoperation, and dissatisfaction. This topic deserves further study, and surgeons may consider mental health optimization to be of similar importance to preoperative variables such as diabetic control, prior to arthroplasty.

Relationships Between Preoperative Mental Health and Improvements in Patient-Reported Outcomes After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Poor preoperative mental health has been associated with worse outcomes after total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). To fully understand these relationships, we assessed post-THA and post-TKA improvements in patient-reported mental and joint health by preoperative mental health groups.

METHODS

Elective cases (367 THA, 462 TKA) were subgrouped by low (<25th percentile), middle (25th-74th), and high (≥75th) preoperative mental health, using Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores. In each subgroup, we assessed the relationship between preoperative MCS and 1-year postoperative change in mental and joint health. Pairwise comparisons and multivariable regression models were applied for THA and TKA separately.

RESULTS

Median postoperative mental health change was +14.0 points for the low-MCS THA group, +11.1 low-TKA, +2.0 middle-THA and TKA, -4.0 high-THA, and -4.9 high-TKA (between-group differences P < .001). All MCS groups had improved median joint health scores, without significant between-group differences. Preoperative mental health was negatively associated with mental health improvements in all groups (B = -0.94 - -0.68, P < .001-P = .01) but with improvements in joint health only in the low-THA group (B = -0.74, P = .02). Improvements in mental and joint health were positively associated for low and middle (B = 0.61-0.87, P < .001), but not for high-MCS groups, with this relationship differing for the low versus high group.

CONCLUSION

Patients who have low preoperative mental health experienced greater postoperative mental health improvement and similar joint health improvement compared to patients who have high preoperative mental health. Findings can guide subgroup-targeted surgical decision-making and preoperative counseling.

Anxiety and depression are associated with poor outcomes in open elbow arthrolysis

BACKGROUND

Open elbow arthrolysis (OEA) is an established treatment for posttraumatic elbow stiffness (PTES); however, its efficacy is debatable for some patients. Poor surgical outcomes have been associated with anxiety and depression in other orthopedic conditions, but no studies have examined this association in OEA. In this study, we aimed to determine whether a high preoperative anxiety and depression score is associated with a worse functional outcome in OEA for PTES.

METHODS

A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was carried out in patients undergoing OEA between April 2021 and March 2022. Mental state evaluated by Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), subjective elbow function valued by Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, objective elbow function valued by Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), pain score measured by visual analog scale (VAS) and the flexion-extension range of motion (ROM) of the affected elbow were collected before and after surgery in outpatient clinic follow-up at 3 months and 6 months. Patient satisfaction was only recorded 6 months postoperatively. All patients were divided into 2 groups based on the preoperative HADS score for analysis: Group A was the nonanxiety-depression group, and Group B was the anxiety-depression group.

RESULTS

A total of 49 patients were included. Both groups improved in DASH, MEPS and ROM at 3 months and at 6 months. The HADS score in Group B decreased significantly at 6 months, showing that the mental state of patients in Group B improved after surgery. Group A had a lower DASH at 3 months and 6 months, larger 6-month ROM and higher satisfaction rate than Group B. Comparing the differences between preoperative and postoperative measurements, Group A improved more in ROM at 6 months. There was no significant difference in other outcome measures between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

OEA is a safe and effective treatment for PTES, and can achieve good clinical outcomes in the short-term follow-up, regardless of whether the patients suffer from anxiety or depression. Patients with a HADS score ≥11 before OEA, however, have worse outcomes than those with a HADS score <11.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II; Retrospective Design; Prognosis Study.

Significant Analgesic Benefits of Perioperative Duloxetine in Patients Who Have Depressive Symptoms Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Major symptoms of depression are commonly observed in patients requiring total hip arthroplasty (THA), and this is associated with increased pain scores and opioid consumption. We aimed to investigate the analgesic effect of duloxetine in these high-risk patients.

METHODS

Among 263 patients scheduled for primary unilateral THA, 67 patients who scored at least 8 on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) were enrolled in this study. Patients were randomized to the duloxetine group (60 mg daily, from the day of surgery to postoperative day 6) or the placebo group. The postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) score during walking, the VAS score during hip flexion, and resting VAS score was measured. Postoperative morphine consumption, hip range of motion (ROM), Harris hip score (HHS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) function, postoperative length of stay (LOS), and adverse events were recorded.

RESULTS

The duloxetine group had significantly lower VAS scores during walking and hip flexion from postoperative day 3 to week 3 than the placebo group. With regard to the resting VAS score, duloxetine showed a better analgesic effect from postoperative day 3 to week 2 than placebo. Patients in the duloxetine group had less consumption of morphine. The duloxetine group exhibited better hip function scores, including ROM, HHS, and WOMAC function scores than the placebo group. No significant difference was observed in LOS or adverse events between groups.

CONCLUSION

Perioperative short-term duloxetine provides advantages in decreasing pain, reducing morphine consumption, and increasing hip function in THA patients who have depressive symptoms.

Preoperative mental distress is associated with poorer physical improvements after revision total hip arthroplasty

Aims

Despite the increasing prevalence of mental health disorders in revision arthroplasty patients, the impact of preoperative mental distress on functional outcomes after revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) remains unclear. Our study aims to investigate the impact of preoperative mental distress on functional outcomes after rTHA.

Methods

Prospectively collected data of 84 rTHAs was extracted from a single institution's joint replacement registry. Preoperative Short Form-36 (SF-36) mental component summary (MCS) was used to dichotomize patients to those who were distressed (MCS <50) and non-distressed (MCS ≥50). Multivariable analysis was used to analyze the impact of preoperative mental distress on various outcomes such as the SF-36 physical component summary (PCS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Oxford Hip Score (OHS), patient satisfaction and expectation fulfilment at 6 months and 2 years postoperatively.

Results

Compared to non-distressed patients, patients with preoperative mental distress had poorer improvements in PCS (+11.4 vs + 16.9, p = 0.007) and lower rates of minimal clinically important difference (MCID) attainment (55.2% vs 73.0%, p = 0.026) at 2 years postoperatively. However, there were no significant differences in improvements for WOMAC and OHS (p > 0.05). Despite experiencing greater absolute improvements in MCS (+12.1 vs -2.1, p < 0.001) and higher MCID attainment rates (65.5% vs 24.3%, p = 0.005) at 2 years, preoperatively distressed patients had lower MCS levels compared to their non-distressed counterparts at all time points (p-value<0.05). There were no significant differences in patient satisfaction (p = 0.509) or expectation fulfilment (p-value = 0.342) at 2 years postoperatively.

Conclusion

Revision THA led to substantial mental health improvements in patients with preoperative mental distress. Despite this, preoperative mental distress was associated with poorer physical improvements after surgery.

Systematic review: preoperative psychological factors and total hip arthroplasty outcomes

Background

Total hip arthroplasties (THA) are cost-effective interventions for patients with osteoarthritis refractory to physical therapy or medical management. Most individuals report positive surgical outcomes with reduction in pain and improved joint function. Multiple recent studies demonstrated the influence of patient mental health on surgical success. We sought to determine the relationship between patient preoperative psychological factors and postoperative THA outcomes, specifically pain and function.

Methods

PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Reviews databases were queried using terms “(mental OR psychological OR psychiatric) AND (function OR trait OR state OR predictor OR health) AND (outcome OR success OR recovery OR response) AND total joint arthroplasty).” A total of 21 of 1,286 studies fulfilled inclusion criteria and were included in the review. All studies were analyzed using GRADE and Risk of Bias criteria.

Results

Overall, compared to cohorts with a normal psychological status, patients with higher objective measures of preoperative depression and anxiety reported increased postoperative pain, decreased functionality and greater complications following THA. Additionally, participants with lower self-efficacy or somatization were found to have worse functional outcomes.

Conclusions

Preoperative depression, anxiety and somatization may negatively impact patient reported postoperative pain, functionality and complications following THA. Surgeons should consider preoperative psychological status when counseling patients regarding expected surgical outcomes.

Level of evidence

3.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-022-03355-3.

Effects of psychological distress on the general health to self-reported pain and function outcome relationship in knee arthroplasty: A causal mediation study

Objectives

We examined two potential causal pathways that could be intervention targets to enhance knee arthroplasty outcomes. Data from a no-effect trial of persons with moderate to high pain catastrophizing were used to determined whether pain catastrophizing, depressive symptoms causally mediate the effect of preoperative general health on postoperative knee pain and functional difficulty.

Methods

We used natural-effects models to conduct causal mediation analyses using the preoperative dichotomized EQ-5D-5L general health measure as the exposure, 2-month postoperative pain catastrophizing, depressive symptoms, and localized knee pain as potential mediators, and 12-month dichotomized Western Ontario and McMaster's University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain and Function scores reflecting good versus poor outcome as the outcomes.

Results

Estimates of the indirect (mediating) effect suggested that pain catastrophizing mediated the effect of preoperative general health on 12-month WOMAC pain score by increasing odds of a good outcome by 8% (natural indirect effect odds ratio ​= ​1.08, 95% CI: 0.88, 1.29). The direction of mediating effects and their magnitude were similar for depressive symptoms; Sensitivity analyses suggested similar magnitudes and mediating effects to those reported for the main analyses.

Conclusions

Our findings suggested that pain catastrophizing and depressive symptoms have a mediating role on the effect of baseline general health on self-reported pain and function outcomes. These findings support the continued treatment of pain catastrophizing and depressive symptoms as viable targets for interventions to potentially enhance pain and function outcomes for patients with moderate to high levels of psychological distress prior to surgery.

Musculoskeletal Pain Management and Patient Mental Health and Well-being

Orthopaedic trauma patients have high rates of psychiatric disorders, which put them at risk for worse outcomes after injury and surgery, including worse pain. Mental health conditions, such as depression and anxiety, can affect the perception of pain. Pain can also exacerbate or contribute to the development of mental illness after injury. Interventions to address both mental health and pain among orthopaedic trauma patients are critical. Balancing safety and comfort amid a drug overdose epidemic is challenging, and many clinicians do not feel comfortable addressing mental health or have the resources necessary. We reviewed the literature on the complex relationship between pain and mental health and presented examples of scalable and accessible interventions that can be implemented to promote the health and recovery of our patients. Interventions described include screening for depression in the orthopaedic trauma clinic and the emergency department or inpatient setting during injury and using a comprehensive and evidence-based multimodal pain management regimen that blends pharmacologic alternatives to opioids and physical and cognitive strategies to manage pain.

Depression Screening and Behavioral Health Integration in Musculoskeletal Trauma Care

OBJECTIVES

To report our experiences in implementing a behavioral health integration pathway, including a validated depression screening and referral to care.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

SETTING

Single surgeon's musculoskeletal trauma outpatient practice during calendar year 2019.

PATIENTS

All patients presenting to the practice during 2019 were included (n = 573).

INTERVENTION

We piloted the usage of Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-2 and PHQ-9 screening. An evidence-based, real-time treatment protocol embedded in the electronic health record was triggered when a patient screened positive for depression including an automated behavioral health integration pathway.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

The percentage of patients screened, the results of the PHQ screening, and the number of patients referred and enrolled in behavioral health programs were collected.

RESULTS

Of the 573 patients, 476 (83%) received the PHQ-2 screening, 80 (14%) had a current screening on file (within 1 year), and 17 (3.0%) were not screened. One hundred seventy-two patients (36%) had a PHQ-2 score of 2 or greater and completed the PHQ-9; of them, 60 (35% of patients screened with full PHQ-9, 13% of patients screened) screened positive for symptoms of moderate depression (PHQ-9 score ≥10), and 19 (4.0%) reported passive suicidal ideation (PHQ-9 item 9). Fifty of these patients were referred to behavioral health through the pathway, and 8 patients enrolled in the program. Ten patients were not referred because of a technical error that was quickly resolved. Patients reporting suicidal ideation were managed with psychiatric crisis resources including immediate virtual consult in the examination room.

CONCLUSIONS

This case series demonstrates the feasibility of screening patients for depressive symptoms and making necessary referrals to behavioral health in outpatient musculoskeletal trauma care. We identified 50 patients with depression and appropriately triaged them for further care in our community.

Perioperative mental health intervention bundle for older surgical patients: protocol for an intervention development and feasibility study

INTRODUCTION

The perioperative period is high risk for older adults. Depression and anxiety are common perioperative problems, frequently coexisting with cognitive impairment. Older patients with these conditions are more likely than younger patients to experience postoperative delirium, long hospital stays, poor quality of life and rehospitalisation. These experiences can, in turn, exacerbate anxiety and depressive symptoms. Despite these risks, little is known about how to treat perioperative anxiety and depression among older adults.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We designed a feasibility study of a perioperative mental health intervention bundle to improve perioperative mental health, specifically depression and anxiety. The overarching goals of this study are twofold: first, to adapt and refine an intervention bundle comprised of behavioural activation and medication optimisation to meet the needs of older adults within three surgical patient populations (ie, orthopaedic, oncological and cardiac); and second, to test the feasibility of study procedures and intervention bundle implementation. Quantitative data on clinical outcomes such as depression, anxiety, quality of life, delirium, falls, length of stay, hospitalisation and pain will be collected and tabulated for descriptive purposes. A hybrid inductive-deductive thematic approach will be employed to analyse qualitative feedback from key stakeholders.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study received approval from the Washington University Institutional Review Board. Results of this study will be presented in peer-reviewed journals, at professional conferences, and to our perioperative mental health advisory board.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05110690.

How Is the Probability of Reporting Various Levels of Pain 12 Months After Noncatastrophic Injuries Associated with the Level of Peritraumatic Distress?

BACKGROUND

Psychological factors have been shown to be consistent predictors of chronic pain in people with musculoskeletal injuries. However, few prognostic studies have considered multiple risk factors including peritraumatic distress. In addition, previous research has not considered that the associations between peritraumatic distress and pain levels can vary across pain outcomes.

QUESTION/PURPOSE

To determine whether an easily measurable level of baseline distress is associated with pain levels 1 year after noncatastrophic traumatic injuries when the outcome to be assessed is not normally distributed.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study. The data were captured from two cohorts in London, Ontario, Canada, and Chicago, IL, USA. Participants were adults with acute noncatastrophic (that is, not treated with surgery or hospitalization) musculoskeletal injuries of any etiology with various injury locations (60% [145 of 241] spinal and 40% [96 of 241] peripheral) that presented to local urgent care centers. Other inclusion criteria included English/French speakers and having no other disorder that would affect their pain levels. In total, between the years 2015 and 2018, 241 participants were recruited based on the inclusion criteria. Ninety-three percent (225 of 241) of participants provided baseline data, and of these, 48% (109 of 225) were lost to follow-up in 1 year. Based on a complete case approach, this study included 116 participants who ranged in age from 18 to 66 years and 69% (80) of whom were women. The Traumatic Injuries Distress Scale (TIDS) was used to evaluate distress at baseline (within 4 weeks of injury). The TIDS is a validated, reliable 12-item risk prognosis screening tool that takes less than 3 minutes to complete with questions regarding uncontrolled pain, negative affect, and intrusion/hyperarousal. The minimum and maximum possible scores are 0 and 24, with higher scores indicating higher levels of distress. The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) was used to assess the pain level at baseline and again 12 months postinjury. To complete the NPRS, participants rate the severity of their pain on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating the worst pain imaginable. NPRS scores of 1 to 3 indicate mild pain, 4 to 6 indicate moderate pain and 7 or higher indicate severe pain. As a preliminary analysis, to assess whether the participants as a group experienced recovery, a paired samples t-test was used to compare NPRS scores at baseline and 12 months. In all, 52% (60 of 116) of participants reported no pain (NPRS = 0), and mean pain intensity scores improved from 4.8 ± 2.1 at baseline to 1.6 ± 1.6 at 12-month follow-up (p < 0.001). Quantile regression was used to describe the association between baseline distress and pain levels 1 year after the injury. This technique was used because it reveals the relationships at different quantiles of the pain outcome distribution.

RESULTS

The results indicate some people (52% [60 of 116]) recovered regardless of their baseline level of distress (30th quantile of the NPRS: β = 0). However, in those with persisting pain, higher levels of baseline distress are associated with greater levels of pain 12 months after the injury (50th quantile of the NPRS: β = 0.11; p = 0.01; 70th quantile of the NPRS: β = 0.27; p < 0.001; 90th quantile of the NPRS: β = 0.31; p = 0.01). According to this model, with a baseline TIDS score of 5, there is 10% probability that patients will report moderate or greater levels of pain (4 or higher of 10) 12 months later. This probability then increases as the TIDS score increases. For instance, at a score of 13 on the TIDS, the probability of a patient reporting moderate or higher levels of pain increases to 30%, and the probability of reporting severe pain (higher than 6 of 10) is 10%.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians and surgeons in orthopaedic settings can screen for the presence of peritraumatic distress using the TIDS, which is an easily administered tool that does not require extensive knowledge of psychology, and by using it they can identify those with higher levels of distress who are more likely to have persistent, long-term pain. A score of 4 or less indicates a low risk of persistent pain, a score between 5 and 12 (endpoints included) indicates moderate risk, and a score of 13 or higher indicates high risk. Future studies should investigate whether certain immediate interventions for peritraumatic distress in the aftermath of trauma can decrease the likelihood that a patient will develop chronic pain after injury. As an analysis technique, quantile regression is useful to assess complex associations in many orthopaedic settings in which a certain outcome is expected to occur in most patients leading to non-normally distributed data.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, therapeutic study.

The Impact of Psychological Health on Patient Recovery After Arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between psychological health and postoperative recovery and satisfaction in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA).

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled patients undergoing TJA from July 2019 to December 2020. A psychological evaluation was conducted according to the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Based on the preoperative HADS scores, we grouped the patients into two groups: the symptomatic group and the asymptomatic group. Data on the Harris Hip Score (HHS), Knee Society Knee Scoring System (KSS), Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12), Short Form-12 (SF-12), and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain in these two groups were collected preoperatively and postoperatively. Then, these data were analyzed by Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 19.

RESULTS

The final cohort consisted of 80 patients. Patients undergoing TJA had significantly decreased HADS and NRS scores and improved HHS, KSS, SF-12, and FJS-12 scores (all p < 0.001). Compared with the symptomatic group, the asymptomatic group showed better postoperative recovery (p < 0.05), especially after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) (p < 0.05). Good postoperative recovery positively impacted the patients' postoperative psychological state.

CONCLUSION

Finally, the psychological state can affect recovery after TJA, and successful TJA can help improve patients' psychological states, especially after TKA.

Depression in Osteoarthritis: Current Understanding

Depression, one of the most common comorbidities with osteoarthritis (OA), affects patient prognosis and quality of life. It also increases the overall burden of disease. This subgroup of patients has not been effectively managed in clinical settings. The study aimed to direct physicians' attention to the co-occurrence of depression and OA. Therefore, this review summarizes the relevant literature published over the past 10 years. The focus is on the prevalence of and risk factors for depression in OA, the effects of depression on OA development and treatment response, comorbidity mechanisms, screening, and non-pharmacological treatment. The research on the etiology of depression has been driven largely by epidemiological studies. Recent studies have shown that high levels of pain, poor levels of function, high numbers of OA sites, and slow gait might be associated with depression. However, the pathophysiology of OA and depression comorbidities remains unclear. In addition to immune inflammation and structural changes in the brain, which have been documented in brain imaging studies, psychosocial factors may also play a role. The evidence indicates that depression can be treated with early intervention; however, adjustments may need to be made for individuals with comorbid depression in OA. It is recommended that health care providers pay more attention to depressive symptoms in patients with OA. Clinicians should develop and implement an individualized and comprehensive treatment plan for patients based on a mental health assessment and in teams with other professionals to optimize treatment outcomes.

The effectiveness of exercise therapy and education plus cognitive behavioral therapy, alone or in combination with total knee arthroplasty in patients with knee osteoarthritis - study protocol for the MultiKnee trial

Background

One in five patients report chronic pain following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and are considered non-improvers. Psychological interventions such as cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), combined with exercise therapy and education may contribute to reduced pain an improved function both for patients with OA or after TKA surgery, but the evidence for the effectiveness of such interventions is scarce. This randomized controlled trial with three arms will compare the clinical effectiveness of patient education and exercise therapy combined with internet-delivered CBT (iCBT), evaluated either as a non-surgical treatment choice or in combination with TKA, in comparison to usual treatment with TKA in patients with knee OA who are considered candidates for TKA surgery.

Methods

The study, conducted in three orthopaedic centers in Norway will include 282 patients between ages 18 and 80, eligible for TKA. Patients will be randomized to receive the exercise therapy + iCBT, either alone or in combination with TKA, or to a control group who will undergo conventional TKA and usual care physiotherapy following surgery. The exercise therapy will include 24 one hour sessions over 12 weeks led by a physiotherapist. The iCBT program will be delivered in ten modules. The physiotherapists will receive theoretical and practical training to advise and mentor the patients during the iCBT program. The primary outcome will be change from baseline to 12 months on the pain sub-scale from the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Secondary outcomes include the remaining 4 sub-scales from the KOOS (symptoms, function in daily living, function in sports and recreation, and knee-related quality of life), EQ-5D-5L, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, the 30-s sit-to-stand test, 40-m walking test and ActiGraph activity measures. A cost-utility analysis will be performed using QALYs derived from the EQ-5D-5L and registry data.

Discussion

This is the first randomized controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness of exercise therapy and iCBT with or without TKA, to optimize outcomes for TKA patients. Findings from this trial will contribute to evidence-based personalized treatment recommendations for a large proportion of OA patients who currently lack an effective treatment option.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03771430. Registered: Dec 11, 2018.

Development and internal validation of machine learning algorithms to predict patient satisfaction after total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Patient satisfaction is a unique and important measure of success after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Our study aimed to evaluate the use of machine learning (ML) algorithms to predict patient satisfaction after THA.

METHODS

Prospectively collected data of 1508 primary THAs performed between 2006 and 2018 were extracted from our joint replacement registry and split into training (80%) and test (20%) sets. Supervised ML algorithms (Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting, Support Vector Machines, Logistic LASSO) were developed with the training set, using patient demographics, comorbidities and preoperative patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) (Short Form-36 [SF-36], physical component summary [PCS] and mental component summary [MCS], Western Ontario and McMaster's Universities Osteoarthritis Index [WOMAC] and Oxford Hip Score [OHS]) to predict patient satisfaction at 2 years postoperatively. Predictive performance was evaluated using the independent test set.

RESULTS

Preoperative models demonstrated fair discriminative ability in predicting patient satisfaction, with the LASSO model achieving a maximum AUC of 0.76. Permutation importance revealed that the most important predictors of dissatisfaction were (1) patient's age, (2) preoperative WOMAC, (3) number of comorbidities, (4) preoperative MCS, (5) previous lumbar spine surgery, and (6) low BMI (< 18.5).

CONCLUSION

Machine learning algorithms demonstrated fair discriminative ability in predicting patient satisfaction after THA. We have identified modifiable and non-modifiable predictors of postoperative satisfaction which could enhance preoperative counselling and improve health optimization prior to THA.

Does psychological distress influence postoperative satisfaction and outcomes in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty? A prospective cohort study

Background

Preoperative psychological distress may be related to dissatisfaction and poorer outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the kind of psychological distress that could influence postoperative satisfaction and outcomes remains controversial. Few studies have examined these issues in Chinese cohorts. Thus, this study aimed to examine (1) the prevalence of preoperative psychological distress in patients undergoing TKA and (2) whether preoperative psychological distress influences patient satisfaction, early postoperative outcomes, and improvement of knee function after TKA.

Methods

We prospectively included 210 patients undergoing unilateral primary TKA between March 2017 and September 2017 at our institution. Preoperatively, patients completed the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scales and new Knee Society Scores (KSS) questionnaires. At 3 months and 1 year postoperatively, patients’ KSS and overall satisfaction were assessed. Stepwise multivariate linear regression models were used to assess the variables that influenced changes in each KSS item.

Results

Preoperatively, 89 (42.4%) patients experienced psychological distress. The satisfaction rate and postoperative KSS were not significantly different between patients with or without psychological distress; a higher preoperative score was shown to predict less KSS improvement. Patients with depression had fewer symptom score changes.

Conclusions

The prevalence of preoperative psychological distress was relatively high; thus, surgeons should consider the patient’s psychological state. Patients’ satisfaction was not influenced by psychological factors. Patients with depression and higher preoperative scores had lower symptom scores and KSS improvement, respectively.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04528-7.