SARS-CoV-2 Impact on Elective Orthopaedic Surgery: Implications for Post-Pandemic Recovery

Postponement of total knee arthroplasties due to pandemic causes significant deterioration on patients' preoperative knee and quality of life scores

Introduction

Elective surgeries were postponed during the COVID-19 pandemic to alleviate healthcare strains, affecting majority of elective orthopaedic surgeries such as total knee arthroplasties (TKAs). The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact on knee function and quality of life of patients who had their planned TKA postponed due to the pandemic.

Methods

This is a retrospective analysis of data collected in a tertiary hospital. Patients included were diagnosed with primary knee osteoarthritis and they were initially scheduled for primary TKA between January to April 2020 but surgery was postponed by at least 6 months from the initial operative date. 160 patients were included in this study (53 males and 107 females, mean age 68.0 ± 8.1). Patients were assessed prior to initial surgery date and assessed again, prior to the postponed surgery date. Clinical scores included Knee Society Function Score (KSFS), Knee Society Knee Score (KSKS), Oxford Knee scores (OKS) and Short-Form 36 Physical and Mental Component Scores. (SF36 PCS and MCS). Paired T-test was performed for parametric data whereas Wilcoxon signed-rank analysis was performed for non-parametric data.

Results

Comparing initial preoperative versus postponement preoperative scores, the cohort had significantly poorer KSKS (38.4 ± 15.4 and 36.5 ± 15.4, p = 0.034), SF36 PCS (34.3 ± 9.2 and 32.7 ± 8.6, p = 0.02) and OKS (34.9 ± 0.77 and 35.8 ± 8.6, p = 0.02) scores respectively.

Conclusion

The postponement of elective TKAs has resulted in a significant deterioration of knee scores and physical quality of live scores of patients in a short span of 6 months. Further studies can evaluate if there are repercussions on long term TKAs outcomes.

Level of evidence

Retrospective study, Level III.

Impact of COVID-19 on Spinal Diagnosis and Procedural Volume in the United States

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of a national database.

OBJECTIVES

COVID-19 resulted in the widespread shifting of hospital resources to handle surging COVID-19 cases resulting in the postponement of surgeries, including numerous spine procedures. This study aimed to quantify the impact that COVID-19 had on the number of treated spinal conditions and diagnoses during the pandemic.

METHODS

Using CPT and ICD-10 codes, TriNetX, a national database, was utilized to quantify spine procedures and diagnoses in patients >18 years of age. The period of March 2020-May 2021 was compared to a reference pre-pandemic period of March 2018-May 2019. Each time period was then stratified into four seasons of the year, and the mean average number of procedures per healthcare organization was compared.

RESULTS

In total, 524,394 patient encounters from 53 healthcare organizations were included in the analysis. There were significant decreases in spine procedures and diagnoses during March-May 2020 compared to pre-pandemic levels. Measurable differences were noted for spine procedures during the winter of 2020-2021, including a decrease in lumbar laminectomy and anterior cervical arthrodesis. Comparing the pandemic period to the pre-pandemic period showed significant reductions in most spine procedures and treated diagnoses; however, there was an increase in open repair of thoracic fractures during this period.

CONCLUSIONS

COVID-19 resulted in a widespread decrease in spinal diagnosis and treated conditions. An inverse relationship was observed between new COVID-19 cases and spine procedural volume. Recent increases in procedural volume from pre-pandemic levels are promising signs that the spine surgery community has narrowed the gap in unmet care produced by the pandemic.

Reasons and Risk Factors for Failed Same-Day Discharge After Total Joint Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

A shift toward same-day discharge (SDD) in primary elective total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) has created a need to optimize patient selection and improve same-day recovery pathways. The objectives of this study were (1) to identify our institution's most common causes for failed SDD, and (2) to evaluate risk factors associated with failed SDD.

METHODS

A retrospective review of SDD patients undergoing primary TKA or THA from January 2021 to September 2022 was conducted. Reasons for SDD failure were recorded and differences between successful and failed SDD cases were assessed via a multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

Overall, 85.3% (651 of 753) of patients included were successful SDDs. Failed SDD occurred in 16.8% (74 of 441) of TKA and 11.8% (38 of 322) of THA cases. Primary reasons included failure to clear physical therapy (33.0%, 37 of 112), postoperative hypotension (20.5%, 23 of 112), and urinary retention (16.9%, 19 of 112). Analysis revealed that overall failed SDD cases were more likely to have had prior opioid use and a longer surgical time. Failed TKA SDD cases were more likely to have had a longer surgical time and not have receive a preoperative nerve block, while failed THA SDD cases were more likely to be older.

CONCLUSIONS

The SDD selection criteria and pathways continue to evolve, with multiple factors contributing to failed SDD. Improving patient selection algorithms and optimizing post-operative pathways can enhance the ability to successfully choose SDD candidates.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Perspectives on the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Research: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Pediatric Otolaryngologists

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the perspectives of pediatric otolaryngologists on the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on their research.

METHODS

Two surveys were sent to members of the American Society of Pediatric Otolaryngology (ASPO) in 2019 and 2021 to assess research perspectives before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The surveys contained questions about research engagement, barriers, time allocation, and shifts in research focus.

RESULTS

The COVID-19 pandemic reshaped research within pediatric otolaryngology, with a mixed impact on the amount of time allocated to research endeavors. Almost half of respondents reported a change in research focus to COVID-19-related studies. Protected time and funding were significant pre-pandemic barriers, whereas reduced staff, collaboration opportunities, and enrollment limitations emerged as key pandemic-related obstacles. A personal commitment to research was most strongly correlated with time spent on this endeavor. During the pandemic, women were less likely to report an increase in research activity when compared to men, possibly due to a disproportionate burden of caregiving on women during school closures and stay-at-home orders.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the pandemic prompted both increases and decreases in research time allocation, depending on individual circumstances and priorities. Despite new challenges, pediatric otolaryngologists remain committed to research and have continued to remain productive.

COVID-19 and Spontaneous Resolution of Lumbar Disk Prolapse: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Patients Awaiting Microdiscectomy

BACKGROUND

 Between individual patients with lumbar disk prolapse (LDP), the natural course of disease is significantly variable. Spontaneous resolution is reported to occur in up to 70% of cases. However, we currently cannot predict for whom and when this will occur. Neurosurgical intervention is indicated for LDP patients with nontolerable pain after at least 8 to 12 weeks of conservative management, or significant neurologic deficit. Channeling essential resources in the National Health Service (NHS) to fight the COVID-19 pandemic led to the postponement of most elective operations, including microdiskectomy. This left many LDP patients previously considered to be surgical candidates with conservative-only options in the interim. To our knowledge, we are the first center to report the specific impact of the peri- and postpandemic period on waiting list times, delayed elective microdiskectomy, and the incidence of spontaneous LDP resolution.

METHODS

 Retrospective case series of a prospectively collected electronic departmental database identified LDP patients who would have been impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic at some point in their care pathway (March 2020-February 2022). Further information was obtained from electronic patient records.

RESULTS

 In total, 139 LDP patients were listed for elective microdiskectomy at the time of postponement of elective surgery. Over a third of LDP patients (n = 47, 33.8%), in shared decision with the responsible neurosurgeon, had their rescheduled microdiskectomy canceled due to clinical improvement (14.1%), radiologic regression (6.5%), or both (12.2%).

CONCLUSION

 Our single-center retrospective analysis revealed that for over a third of LDP patients, the prolonged postpandemic waiting list times for elective microdiskectomy resulted in their surgery not taking place either due to spontaneous clinical improvement or proven radiologic regression. Considering this, a prolonged conservative approach to LDP may be appropriate in some patients, allowing time for natural resolution, while avoiding perioperative risks.

[Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the care of major trauma patients: analysis from the TraumaRegister DGU®]

BACKGROUND

The treatment of major trauma patients requires intensive care capacity, which is a critical resource particularly during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze the impact on major trauma care considering the intensive care treatment of COVID-19 positive patients.

METHODS

Demographic, prehospital, and intensive care treatment data from the TraumaRegister DGU® of the German Trauma Society (DGU) in 2019 and 2020 were analyzed. Only major trauma patients from the state of Bavaria were included. Inpatient treatment data of COVID-19 patients in Bavaria in 2020 were obtained using IVENA eHealth.

RESULTS

In total, 8307 major trauma patients were treated in the state of Bavaria in the time period investigated. The number of patients in 2020 (n = 4032) compared to 2019 (n = 4275) was not significantly decreased (p = 0.4). Regarding COVID-19 case numbers, maximum values were reached in the months of April and December with more than 800 intensive care unit (ICU) patients per day. In the critical period (> 100 patients with COVID-19 on ICU), a prolonged rescue time was evident (64.8 ± 32.5 vs. 67.4 ± 30.6 min; p = 0.003). The length of stay and ICU treatment of major trauma patients were not negatively affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.

CONCLUSION

The intensive medical care of major trauma patients could be ensured during the high-incidence phases of the COVID-19 pandemic. The prolonged prehospital rescue times show possible optimization potential of the horizontal integration of prehospital and hospital.

Appointment wait times for surgical care in the Veterans Health Administration and Community Care Program

BACKGROUND

The Veterans Health Administration has been criticized for long wait times; however, studies indicate that Veterans Health Administration wait times are shorter than those for the Veterans Health Administration's Community Care Program. Previous studies have analyzed primary care wait times, but few have compared surgical specialties.

METHODS

Using a publicly available data set of veteran appointments compiled from the Veterans Health Administration's Corporate Data Warehouse, a nationally representative database containing 623,868 surgical consults from January 1 to June 30, 2021, mean differences in wait times between the Veterans Health Administration and the Community Care Program were calculated across surgical specialties.

RESULTS

In total, 49.6% of the surgical consults placed during the study period were for the Community Care Program. Across all surgical specialties, wait times were shorter in the Veterans Health Administration. Cardiothoracic surgery had the shortest mean wait times (23.1 days Veterans Health Administration; 30.0 days Community Care Program). The greatest difference in wait times was observed in plastic surgery, with Community Care Program appointments occurring 15.8 days later than Veterans Health Administration appointments on average.

CONCLUSION

Across all surgical specialties, the Veterans Health Administration had shorter wait times than the Community Care Program during the study period.

The Effect of an Intraoperative Real-Time Counter on Radiation Exposure Events During Operative Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures

PURPOSE

Occupational radiation exposure can have adverse health consequences for surgeons. The purpose of this study was to determine if utilization of an intraoperative, real-time radiograph counter results in decreased radiation exposure events (REEs) during open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of distal radius fractures (DRFs).

METHODS

We reviewed all cases of isolated ORIF DRFs performed at a single center from January 2021 to February 2023. All cases performed on or after January 1, 2022 used an intraoperative radiograph counter, referred to as a "shot-clock" (SC) group. Cases prior to this date were performed without a SC and served as a control group (NoSC group). Baseline demographics, fracture, and surgical characteristics were recorded. Final intraoperative radiographs were reviewed to record reduction parameters (radial inclination, volar tilt, and ulnar variance). REEs, fluoroscopy exposure times, and total radiation doses milligray (mGy) were compared between groups.

RESULTS

A total of 160 ORIF DRF cases were included in the NoSC group, and 135 were included in the SC group. The NoSC group had significantly more extra-articular fractures compared with the SC group. Reduction parameters after ORIF were similar between groups. The mean number of REEs decreased by 48% in the SC group. Cases performed with the SC group had significantly lower total radiation doses (0.8 vs 0.5 mGy) and radiation exposure times (41.9 vs 24.2 seconds). Mean operative times also decreased for the SC group (70 minutes) compared with that for the NoSC group (81 minutes).

CONCLUSIONS

A real-time intraoperative radiograph counter was associated with decreased REEs, exposure times, and total radiation doses during ORIF DRFs. Cases performed with a SC had significantly shorter operative times without compromising reduction quality. Using an intraoperative SC counter during cases requiring fluoroscopy may aid in decreasing radiation exposure, which serves as an occupational hazard for hand and upper-extremity surgeons.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic II.

The influence of COVID-19 epidemic on the number of orthopaedic surgeries in Japan

BACKGROUND

There is limited data on the impact of COVID-19 epidemic on the number of orthopaedic surgeries in Japan.

METHODS

We conducted a nationwide hospital survey asking for the monthly number of orthopaedic surgeries performed at each facility from January 2019 to June 2021. Those facilities that had performed at least 100 surgeries in 2019 were included for analyses. The facilities were further grouped by prefecture and by hospital characteristics. A brief health economic evaluation was also performed. Risk ratios were compared using univariate analyses with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Questionnaire was sent to 1988 hospitals with 1671 hospitals (84%) responding. The survey data indicated a total number of orthopaedic surgeries decreased in 2020 compared to 2019 (1,061,541 vs 1,119,955 P < 0.01), and also for the first six months of 2021 compared to the same period in 2019 (530,388 vs 550,378 P < 0.01). In 2020, over 50% of all facilities in nearly all of the prefectures saw a decline in surgical procedures. The risk of incurring more than a 25% decease in the number of surgeries was significantly higher in 2020 for class I designated medical institutions compared to those that were not designated for any types of infectious diseases among the institutions with a tertiary emergency medical center in 2020 (crude risk ratio 2.9: 95% CI 1.2-7.4, p = 0.02) and in 2021 (crude risk ratio 4.7: 95% CI 1 0.9-12.1, p < 0.01). The estimated total nationwide decrease of revenue were in the range of approximately ¥29.2 to ¥116.8 billion per year for orthopaedic surgeries alone.

CONCLUSION

There was a statistically significant decrease in the number of orthopaedic surgeries in Japan. The magnitude of the decline varied by prefectures and hospital characteristics, with the greater impact imposed on medical institutions with higher classification functions. The estimated immediate health economic impact was sizable.

The Differential Effect of COVID on Total Joint Arthroplasty Between Hospital and Ambulatory Surgery Centers/Hospital Outpatient Departments: A Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative Analysis

Background

Coronavirus disease (COVID) created unprecedented challenges, especially for high-volume elective subspecialties like total joint arthroplasty. Limited inpatient capacity and resource conservation led to new outpatient selection criteria and site of service changes. As a Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Quality Collaborative Initiative quality project, demographic changes, complications, and differential effects on inpatient vs outpatient centers pre- and post-COVID were analyzed.

Methods

The registry identified all total joint arthroplasty at hospitals and ASCs/HOPDs between 07/2019-12/2019 and 07/2020-12/2020. These intervals represented pre-COVID and post-COVID elective surgery shutdowns. Case volumes, demographics, and 90-day complications were compared.

Results

Comparing 2020 to 2019, hospital volumes decreased (-9% total hip arthroplasty [THA], -17% total knee arthroplasty [TKA]), and ambulatory surgery center (ASC)/hospital outpatient department (HOPD) increased (+84% THA, +125% TKA). Entering 2020, ASC/HOPD patients were older (P = .0031, P < .0001: THA, TKA), had more American Society of Anesthesiologists score 3-4 (P = .0105, P = .0021), fewer attended joint class (P < .0001, P < .0001), and more hips were women (P = .023). Hospital patients had higher preoperative pain scores (P = .0117, P < .0001; THA, TKA), less joint education attendance (P < .0001, P < .0001), younger TKAs (P = .0169), and more American Society of Anesthesiologists score 3-4 (0.0009). After propensity matching, there were no significant differences between site of service for 90-day fractures, deep vein thromboses or pulmonary embolisms, infection, or hip dislocations. Hospital THAs had higher readmissions (P = .0003) and TKAs had higher 30-day emergency department visits (P = .005). ASC/HOPD patients were prescribed higher oral morphine equivalents (P < .0001, P < .0001; THA, TKA).

Conclusions

COVID's elective surgery shutdown caused a dramatic site of service shift. Traditional preoperative education was negatively impacted, and older and sicker patients became outpatients. But short-term complications were not increased in ASCs/HOPDs. These site of service and associated patient demographic changes may be safely sustained.

Clinical outcomes of non-COVID-19 orthopaedic patients admitted during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multi-centre interrupted time series analysis across hospitals in six different countries

OBJECTIVES

To assess across seven hospitals from six different countries the extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic affected the volumes of orthopaedic hospital admissions and patient outcomes for non-COVID-19 patients admitted for orthopaedic care.

DESIGN

A multi-centre interrupted time series (ITS) analysis.

SETTING

Seven hospitals from six countries who collaborated within the Global Health Data@Work collaborative.

PARTICIPANTS

Non-COVID-19 patients admitted for orthopaedic care during the pre-pandemic (January/2018-February/2020) and COVID-19 pandemic (March/2020-June/2021) period. Admissions were categorised as: (1) acute admissions (lower limb fractures/neck of femur fractures/pathological fractures/joint dislocations/upper limb fractures); (2) subacute admissions (bone cancer); (3) elective admissions (osteoarthritis).

OUTCOME MEASURES

Monthly observed versus expected ratios (O/E) were calculated for in-hospital mortality, long (upper-decile) length-of-stay and hospital readmissions, with expected rates calculated based on case-mix. An ITS design was used to estimate the change in level and/or trend of the monthly O/E ratio by comparing the COVID-19 pandemic with the pre-pandemic period.

RESULTS

69 221 (pre-pandemic) and 22 940 (COVID-19 pandemic) non-COVID-19 orthopaedic patient admissions were included. Admission volumes were reduced during the COVID-19 pandemic for all admission categories (range: 33%-45%), with more complex patients treated as shown by higher percentages of patients admitted with ≥1 comorbidity (53.8% versus 49.8%, p<0.001). The COVID-19 pandemic was not associated with significant changes in patient outcomes for most diagnostic groups. Only for patients diagnosed with pathological fractures (pre-pandemic n=1671 and pandemic n=749), the COVID-19 pandemic was significantly associated with an immediate mortality reduction (level change of -77.7%, 95% CI -127.9% to -25.7%) and for lower limb fracture patients (pre-pandemic n=9898 and pandemic n=3307) with a significantly reduced trend in readmissions (trend change of -6.3% per month, 95% CI -11.0% to -1.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Acute, subacute, as well as elective orthopaedic hospital admissions volumes were reduced in all global participating hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic, while overall patient outcomes for most admitted non-COVID-19 patients remained the same despite the strain caused by the surge of COVID-19 patients.

A Role for Outpatient Total Joint Arthroplasty During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Outpatient total joint arthroplasty (TJA) gained favor during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our objective was to critically evaluate the safety and short-term outcomes of outpatient total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) throughout the pandemic compared with pre-pandemic given their increased use. This was a retrospective review of 941 patients who underwent elective, outpatient TKA and THA at a single institution. Patients were divided into two cohorts: pre-pandemic (N=611) and pandemic (N=330). Data points included demographics, comorbidities, failure of same calendar day discharge (SCDD), and 90-day readmissions and re-operations. The pandemic cohort was older (61.0 vs 59.0 years; P=.001) and had a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (2 vs 1; P=.004). There were no differences between the pandemic and pre-pandemic cohorts regarding SCDD failures (23.3% vs 21.9%; P=.623) and reoperations (4.2% vs 6.2%; P=.205). The pandemic cohort had a lower readmission rate (4.8% vs 8.2%; P=.056). Overall, patients who had failure of SCDD more commonly underwent TKA than THA (63.5% vs 36.5%; P<.001), were older (63.0 vs 58.5 years; P<.001), had a higher body mass index (30.8 vs 29.9 kg/m2; P=.006) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (2 vs 1; P<.001), had an American Society of Anesthesiologists class greater than 2 (51.2% vs 31.6%; P<.001), received physical therapy later postoperatively (4.15 vs 3.12 hours; P<.001), and had a history significant for myocardial infarction (P=.025), chronic kidney disease (P=.004), or diabetes (P=.003). This study supports broadening indications for outpatient TJA because we found a shift toward older patients with more comorbidities successfully undergoing the procedure. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(5):303-309.].

Elective Joint Arthroplasty Should be Delayed by One Month After COVID-19 Infection to Prevent Postoperative Complications

BACKGROUND

It remains unclear whether a history of recent COVID-19 infection affects the outcomes and risks of complications of total joint arthroplasty (TJA). The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of TJA in patients who have and have not had a recent COVID-19 infection.

METHODS

A large national database was queried for patients undergoing total hip and total knee arthroplasty. Patients who had a diagnosis of COVID-19 within 90-days preoperatively were matched to patients who did not have a history of COVID-19 based on age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and procedure. A total of 31,453 patients undergoing TJA were identified, of which 616 (2.0%) had a preoperative diagnosis of COVID-19. Of these, 281 COVID-19 positive patients were matched with 281 patients who did not have COVID-19. The 90-day complications were compared between patients who did and did not have a diagnosis of COVID-19 at 1, 2, and 3 months preoperatively. Multivariate analyses were used to further control for potential confounders.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis of the matched cohorts showed that COVID-19 infection within 1 month prior to TJA was associated with an increased rate of postoperative deep vein thrombosis (odds ratio [OR]: 6.50, 95% confidence interval: 1.48-28.45, P = .010) and venous thromboembolic events (odds ratio: 8.32, confidence interval: 2.12-34.84, P = .002). COVID-19 infection within 2 and 3 months prior to TJA did not significantly affect outcomes.

CONCLUSION

COVID-19 infection within 1 month prior to TJA significantly increases the risk of postoperative thromboembolic events; however, complication rates returned to baseline after that time point. Surgeons should consider delaying elective total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty until 1 month after a COVID-19 infection.

A reinforcement learning-based optimal control approach for managing an elective surgery backlog after pandemic disruption

Contagious disease pandemics, such as COVID-19, can cause hospitals around the world to delay nonemergent elective surgeries, which results in a large surgery backlog. To develop an operational solution for providing patients timely surgical care with limited health care resources, this study proposes a stochastic control process-based method that helps hospitals make operational recovery plans to clear their surgery backlog and restore surgical activity safely. The elective surgery backlog recovery process is modeled by a general discrete-time queueing network system, which is formulated by a Markov decision process. A scheduling optimization algorithm based on the piecewise decaying [Formula: see text]-greedy reinforcement learning algorithm is proposed to make dynamic daily surgery scheduling plans considering newly arrived patients, waiting time and clinical urgency. The proposed method is tested through a set of simulated dataset, and implemented on an elective surgery backlog that built up in one large general hospital in China after the outbreak of COVID-19. The results show that, compared with the current policy, the proposed method can effectively and rapidly clear the surgery backlog caused by a pandemic while ensuring that all patients receive timely surgical care. These results encourage the wider adoption of the proposed method to manage surgery scheduling during all phases of a public health crisis.

The COVID-19 Pandemic and Elective Spine Surgery-A Single Center Experience

Background and objective: The COVID-19 pandemic had a profound impact on medical practice worldwide. In this study, we aimed to investigate the trends of elective spine surgery in our department before and during the pandemic. Materials and methods: Total number of spine procedures due to disc herniation (DH) or spinal stenosis (SS) was collected during 2019-2021 in the Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Center Osijek, Croatia. In order to elucidate potential risk factors in the post-pandemic period, demographic data were collected for patients who underwent surgery during 2021. Results: In 2020, there was a 22.1% decrease in the number of surgeries compared to 2019 (205 vs. 263), but during 2021 we observed an increase of 36.1% compared to 2020 (279 vs. 205). The mean age of patients in 2021 was 53.14 years (53.14 ± 13.05) with body mass index of 28.31 kg/m2 (28.31 ± 4.89). There were 179 overweight patients (74%) and 103 smokers (42.6%). Although male and female patients were equally represented (121 each), there was a significant interaction of weight class and sex (p = 0.013). Patients younger than 65 were more likely to undergo surgery due to DH (p < 0.001), whereas older patients were more likely to suffer from SS (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The volume of elective spine surgeries decreased in the first year of the pandemic and increased the following year. Our results suggest that public health policies in the early pandemic period reduced elective surgical procedures, which was followed by a compensatory increase in the following period.

Challenges with patient management of osteoarthritis during the COVID-19 pandemic: review

Osteoarthritis is a growing public health concern, affecting millions of people worldwide. With progressively worsening joint function and pain, management of osteoarthritis is important to ensure high quality of life for patients. Treatment includes a combination of pharmacologic agents and non-pharmacologic methods such as exercise and physical therapy. However, if multiple treatments fail to improve symptoms, joint replacement surgery is the final course of action. When the new coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19), was declared a pandemic, all aspects of osteoarthritis treatment become affected. Due to increased public health measures, non-pharmacologic modalities and elective surgeries became limited in accessibility. Additionally, there were concerns about the interaction of current medications for osteoarthritis with the virus. As a result of limited options for treatment and quality of life of patients was negatively impacted, especially in those with severe osteoarthritis. Furthermore, a backlog of joint replacement surgeries was created which could take up to several months or years to address. In this review, we describe the impact COVID-19 had on osteoarthritis management as well as tactics to deal with the large caseload of surgeries as operative rooms begin to re-open for elective surgeries.

Effect of COVID-19 on the Burden and Profile of Orthopaedic Patients Admitted Post-Resumption of Routine Services in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Delhi

Purpose On resumption of routine services post-lockdown during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), we expected a backlog of orthopaedic patients who could not get appropriate and timely care and would now present with complications due to missed or delayed treatment. This study aimed to quantify the effect of COVID-19 on the burden and profile of orthopaedic patients admitted post-resumption of routine services. Materials and methods Data on all the patients admitted to the orthopaedic department were collected using an interviewer-administered schedule for a complete one-year period after the resumption of routine orthopaedic services in a tertiary care hospital in Delhi. For comparison of the burden of trauma patients with that during the pre-COVID-19 period, data were obtained from a similar study done on trauma patients in 2017 at the same institution. For patients with non-traumatic conditions, previous hospital records were used. Results A total of 1585 patients were admitted during the one-year period post-resumption of routine services following COVID-19 restrictions, which was 41% less than that compared to the corresponding pre-COVID-19 data. The proportion of patients from other neighbouring states showed a decline from 52% in the pre-COVID-19 period to 41.55% when healthcare services resumed during the COVID-19 period. Out of all admitted trauma patients in 2021, 12.7% presented with a missed or complication of treatment as compared to 3.1% in the pre-COVID period. Around half of them (52.5%) attributed their complications to a COVID-19-related lockdown. Conclusion There was a significant decline in the number of patients post-resumption of routine orthopaedic care services. Converting whole tertiary care teaching hospitals to COVID-19-dedicated hospitals must not be done as it leads to an increase in missed or complication of orthopaedic treatment.

Changes in Elective and Urgent Surgery Among TRICARE Beneficiaries During the COVID-19 Pandemic

BACKGROUND

COVID-19 is known to have altered the capacity to perform surgical procedures in numerous health care settings. The impact of this change within the direct and private-sector settings of the Military Health System has not been effectively explored, particularly as it pertains to disparities in surgical access and shifting of services between sectors. We sought to characterize how the COVID-19 pandemic influenced access to care for surgical procedures within the direct and private-sector settings of the Military Health System.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated claims for patients receiving urgent and elective surgical procedures in March-September 2017, 2019, and 2020. The pre-COVID period consisted of 2017 and 2019 and was compared to 2020. We adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics, medical comorbidities, and region of care using multivariable Poisson regression. Subanalyses considered the impact of race and sponsor rank as a proxy for socioeconomic status.

RESULTS

During the period of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was no significant difference in the adjusted rate of urgent surgical procedures in direct (risk ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.97-1.03) or private-sector (risk ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.97-1.02) care. This was also true for elective surgeries in both settings. No significant disparities were identified in any of the racial subgroups or proxies for socioeconomic status we considered in direct or private-sector care.

CONCLUSIONS

We found a similar performance of elective and urgent surgeries in both the private sector and direct care during the first 6 months of the COVID-19 pandemic. Importantly, no racial disparities were identified in either care setting.

The Careful Return of Sports Medicine Procedures in the United States During COVID-19: Comparison of Utilization, Patient Demographics, and Complications

OBJECTIVES

Sports medicine procedures encompass some of the highest-volume elective surgeries performed annually. Elective surgery was suspended because of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (COVID-19) pandemic; therefore, the purpose was to compare temporal trends in procedural volume, patient demographics, and postoperative complications of elective sports medicine procedures in 2019 and 2020.

METHODS

Using a multicenter, nationwide sample, a retrospective query of the 2019 to 2020 American College of Surgeon's National Surgery Quality Improvement Program database was conducted for all patients undergoing common elective sports medicine procedures. Temporal trends in utilization, demographics, and 30-day complications were compared pre-COVID (2019 and 2020Q1) with post-COVID (2020Q2-Q4). Linear regression was used to evaluate changes in procedural volume over time. A significance threshold of P < 0.05 was used.

RESULTS

A total of 48,803 patients underwent elective surgery in 2019 (n = 27,883) and 2020 (n = 20,920), a 25.0% decline. Procedural utilization declined by 42.5% in 2020Q2 and never returned to prepandemic baseline in 2020Q3-Q4. The percentage decline in case volume from 2019 to 2020Q2 was greatest for meniscectomy (47.6%), rotator cuff repair (42.7%), labral repair (41.6%), biceps tenodesis (41.3%), and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (38.5%). Total complication rates were similar in 2019 (1.31%) versus 2020 (1.51%; P = 0.072). The 30-day readmission (0.74% versus 0.67%; P = 0.374), reoperation (0.35% versus 0.35%; P = 0.963), and mortality (0.01% versus 0.01%; P = 0.657) rates were similar between calendar years.

CONCLUSIONS

Sports medicine procedures declined during the second quarter of 2020. Despite pandemic restrictions, patients who did undergo surgery did not experience increased complications. The present study may be used by surgeons, hospitals, and subspecialty societies to support the careful utilization of elective surgery during COVID-19.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, prognostic study.

Health Care Logistics Network Design and Analysis on Pandemic Outbreaks: Insights From COVID-19

Health care systems throughout the world are under pressure as a result of COVID-19. It is over two years since the first case was announced in China and health care providers are continuing to struggle with this fatal infectious disease in intensive care units and inpatient wards. Meanwhile, the burden of postponed routine medical procedures has become greater as the pandemic has progressed. We believe that establishing separate health care institutions for infected and non-infected patients would provide safer and better quality health care services. The aim of this study is to find the appropriate number and location of dedicated health care institutions which would only treat individuals infected by a pandemic during an outbreak. For this purpose, a decision-making framework including two multi-objective mixed-integer programming models is developed. At the strategic level, the locations of designated pandemic hospitals are optimized. At the tactical level, we determine the locations and operation durations of temporary isolation centers which treat mildly and moderately symptomatic patients. The developed framework provides assessments of the distance that infected patients travel, the routine medical services expected to be disrupted, two-way distances between new facilities (designated pandemic hospitals and isolation centers), and the infection risk in the population. To demonstrate the applicability of the suggested models, we perform a case study for the European side of Istanbul. In the base case, seven designated pandemic hospitals and four isolation centers are established. In sensitivity analyses, 23 cases are analyzed and compared to provide support to decision makers.

Quantifying the Impact of COVID-19 on Hand and Wrist Surgery Procedural Volume: A National Analysis of 381,046 Cases

Purpose

To quantify and describe the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on procedural volume trends in hand and wrist surgery from 2020 to early 2022 at multiple centers.

Methods

In this retrospective comparative study, a real-time, national, federated research database was used to identify patients of interest from 56 health care organizations across the United States. Patients were queried from March 1, 2018, to February 28, 2022. Current Procedural Terminology codes were chosen using the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's hand fellowship procedure requirements.

Results

Common hand and wrist surgeries exhibited substantial fluctuations in procedural volume per health care organization during the COVID-19 pandemic. Time periods with considerable procedural volume decreases corresponded with surges in increased COVID-19 caseloads and emergence of COVID-19 variants. Periods of procedural volume increase occurred in the summer of 2020 and immediately following distribution of the COVID-19 vaccine to the public. Fixation of metacarpal fracture, fixation of phalangeal fracture, tendon transfer, flexor tendon repair, and extensor tendon repair consistently showed decreased volumes over the study period. In contrast, ulnar nerve decompression was the only procedure to experience a statistically significant increase in volume over an entire year (2021, +19.2%, P < .001), as compared to before the pandemic.

Conclusions

Major milestones of the COVID-19 pandemic correlated with fluctuations in the number of hand and wrist procedures performed across the United States. Future studies should seek to evaluate the impact of patient backlogs and individual procedure fluctuations on financial impacts, patient outcomes, and orthopedic trainee experience.

Type of study/level of evidence

Economic/Decision Analysis IV.

An Investigation for Future Practice of Elective Hip and Knee Arthroplasties during COVID-19 in Romania

Background and Objectives: Elective arthroplasty in Romania has been severely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, and its effects are not quantified so far. The aim of this paper is to determine the impact of COVID-19 on arthroplasty interventions and how they varied in Romania. Materials and Methods: We performed a national retrospective analysis of patients who underwent primary and revision elective hip and knee interventions at the 120 orthopedic-traumatology hospitals in Romania that are registered in the National Endoprosthesis Registry from 1 January 2019 to 1 September 2022. First, we examined the monthly trend in the number of surgeries for seven categories of arthroplasties. We calculated the percentage change in the average number of cases per month and compared them with other types of interventions. We then examined the percentage change in the average monthly number of arthroplasty cases, relative to the number of COVID-19 cases reported nationwide, the influence of the pandemic on length of hospital stay, and the percentage of patients discharged at home who no longer follow recovery protocols. Finally, we calculated the impact of the pandemic on hospital revenues. Results: There was an abrupt decrease in the volume of primary interventions in hip and knee patients by up to 69.14% with a low degree of patient care, while the average duration of scheduled hospitalizations increased. We found a 1-2-day decrease in length of hospital stays for explored arthroplasties. We saw an increasing trend of home discharge, which was higher for primary interventions compared to revision interventions. The total hospital revenues were 50.96% lower in 2020 compared to 2019, and are currently increasing, with the 2022 estimate being 81.46%. Conclusions: The conclusion of this study is that the COVID-19 pandemic severely affected the volume of arthroplasty of the 120 hospitals in Romania, which also had unfavorable financial implications. We proposed the development of new procedures and alternative clinical solutions, as well as personalized home recovery programs, to be activated if necessary, for possible future outbreaks.

The Effect of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic on Elective Cervical Spine Surgery Utilization and Complications in the United States: A Nationwide Temporal Trends Analysis

OBJECTIVES

As a result of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, elective surgeries nationwide were suspended. The objective was to compare temporal trends in patient demographics, case volumes, and postoperative complications of patients undergoing elective cervical spine surgery from pre-COVID-19 (2019-2020 Q1) to post-COVID-19 (2020 Q2-Q4).

METHODS

The 2019 to 2020 American College of Surgeon's National Surgery Quality Improvement Program database was queried for common elective cervical spine surgeries. Patients pre-COVID-19 (2019-2020 Q1) were compared with those undergoing surgery during post-COVID-19 (2020 Q2-Q4) protocols. Procedural use, patient demographics, and complications were compared. Linear regression was used to evaluate case volume changes over time. P values less than 0.05 were significant.

RESULTS

In total, 31,013 patients underwent elective cervical spine surgery in 2019 (N = 16,316) and 2020 (N = 14,697); an overall 10% decline. Compared with the calendar year 2019 through 2020 Q1 mean, elective surgery volume decreased by 21.6% in 2020 Q2 and never returned to prepandemic baseline. The percentage decline in case volume from 2019 to 2020 Q1 to 2020 Q2 was greatest for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (23.3%), followed by cervical decompression (23.4%), posterior cervical fusion (15.0%), and cervical disc arthroplasty and vertebral corpectomy (13.7%). Patients undergoing surgery in 2020 Q2-Q4 had overall greater comorbidity burden (American Society of Anesthesiologists grade 3 and 4) (P < 0.001). From 2019-2020 Q1 versus 2020 Q2-Q4, there was a significant increase in total complication (5.5% vs. 6.8%, P < 0.001), reoperation (1.9% vs. 2.2%, P = 0.048), and mortality (0.25% vs. 0.37%, P = 0.049) rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Elective surgery declined drastically during the second quarter of 2020. Patients undergoing surgery during the pandemic had an overall greater comorbidity burden, resulting in increased total complication and mortality rates over the study period.

The Persistent Backlog of Knee and Shoulder Orthopedic Sport Surgery Case Volume Following the COVID-19 Pandemic

Objectives

As COVID-19 will not be the last pandemic, understanding our historical response allows us to predict and improve our current practices in preparation for the next pandemic. Following the removal of the elective surgery suspension at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, it is unclear whether sports medicine surgery volume has returned to pre-pandemic levels as well as whether the backlog from the original suspension was addressed. The purpose of this study to observe the monthly changes in volume and backlog of knee and shoulder sports surgery one year since the original suspension.

Methods

National all-payer data was utilized to identify patients undergoing knee and shoulder sports procedures from January 2017 to April 2021. Descriptive analysis was utilized to report the monthly changes in surgeries. A linear forecast analysis using historical data was utilized to determine the expected volume. This was compared to the observed case volume. The difference in expected and observed volume was utilized to calculate the estimated change in backlog.

Results

From March to May 2020, there was a persistent decrease in the observed shoulder and knee sports volume when compared to the expected volume. By June 2020, all knee and shoulder sports volume reached the expected volume. By April 2021, the estimated backlog for shoulder and knee procedures had increased by 49.8% (26,412 total cases) and 19.0% (26,412 total cases), respectively, with respect to the original calculated backlog from March to May 2020.

Conclusion

Within four months, the sudden decrease in volume for knee and shoulder sports procedures had returned to pre-pandemic levels; however, the original backlog in cases has continually increased one year following the suspension. Additionally, the backlog is significantly higher for knee when compared to shoulder surgeries.

The Effect of COVID-19 on Elective Total Knee Arthroplasty Utilization, Patient Comorbidity Burden, and Complications in the United States: A Nationwide Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the highest volume elective procedures done nationwide. Elective surgery was suspended because of the COVID-19 pandemic. The utilization trends, comparison of patient demographics, and postoperative outcomes in 2020 have yet to be evaluated substantially. We compared temporal trends in procedural volume, patient demographics, and postoperative complications of elective TKA in 2019 and 2020.

METHODS

Using a multicenter, nationwide representative sample, a retrospective query of the 2019 to 2020 American College of Surgeon's National Surgery Quality Improvement Program database was conducted for patients undergoing elective TKA. Temporal trends in utilization, demographics, and length of stay were compared pre-COVID-19 (2019 to 2020Q1) with post-COVID-19 (2020Q2 to Q4). Postoperative outcomes were compared by calendar year (2019 versus 2020). Linear regression was used to evaluate changes in procedural volume over time. A significance threshold of P < 0.05 was used.

RESULTS

A total of 121,415 patients underwent elective TKA in 2019 (N = 72,002) and 2020 (N = 49,413), a 31.4% decline. The proportion of hospital-defined "outpatient" TKAs in 2020 was significantly greater than that in 2019 (41.5% versus 25.5%; P < 0.001). Elective TKA utilization declined by 65.1% in 2020Q2 and never returned to prepandemic baseline in 2020Q3 to Q4. The average length of stay was shorter in 2020 (1.56 versus 1.87 days; P < 0.001). The proportion of same-day discharge increased each quarter from 2019Q1 to Q4 (6.2% to 8.6%) to 2020Q1 to Q4 (8.7% to 17.1%). Total complication rates were similar in 2019 (4.84%) versus 2020 (4.75%); P = 0.430. The 30-day mortality (0.08% versus 0.07%; P = 0.858), revision surgery (1.0% versus 1.0%; P = 0.940), and readmission (2.8% versus 2.6%; P = 0.053) rates were no different between 2019 and 2020.

CONCLUSION

Elective TKA declined during the second quarter of 2020. A large proportion of surgeries were transitioned to outpatient with rates of same-day discharge increasing over the study period, despite no change in complication, mortality, and readmission rates. Patient outcomes were not compromised despite pandemic restrictions for elective surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

What Does Postponement of Non-urgent Orthopedic Surgeries During the COVID-19 Pandemic Mean for Patients With Gonarthrosis in Turkey? A Qualitative Study

Objective During the COVID-19 pandemic, the surgical treatment of orthopedic diseases for elective surgical planning was suspended. This study aimed to evaluate patients' experiences with gonarthrosis regarding the postponement of non-urgent orthopedic surgeries during the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and Methods This phenomenological qualitative study was carried out with patients diagnosed with grade 3 or 4 gonarthrosis in the orthopedics and traumatology outpatient clinic of a hospital in western Turkey between February 2021 and March 2021. Interviews with patients were conducted face-to-face using the semi-structured interview guide focusing on patients' feelings, thoughts, and experiences. Each participant was interviewed once. Data collection was halted based on the saturation of data. Data from semi-structured interviews with patients were analyzed using Colaizzi's content analysis method. Results The analysis of the study data yielded three themes: "lack of knowledge", "desperation" and "lack of opportunity to cure the gonarthrosis disease". Four sub-themes were identified under these three categories. While "not knowing what to do" and "unconscious drug use" were the sub-themes of the theme of lack of knowledge, "hopelessness" and "economic difficulties" were the sub-themes of the theme of desperation. Conclusion It was determined that patients were helpless due to difficulties accessing health services for other diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic. They experienced severe fear because it was unclear how long this process would continue.

The combined effect of policy changes and the covid-19 pandemic on the same day discharge and complications following total hip arthroplasty: a nationwide analysis

Introduction

As a result of the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic in 2020, elective surgeries, including total joint arthroplasty (TJA), were suspended nationwide. Concurrent removal of total hip arthroplasty (THA) from the Medicare inpatient-only list posed challenges to the delivery of quality patient care with low payor cost. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare temporal trends in patient demographics, case volumes, length of stay, and complications following elective THA in the years 2019 to 2020 in the United States.

Methods

The 2019 to 2020 ACS-NSQIP database was queried for elective THA patients. Patients Pre-COVID (2019 and 2020Q1) were compared with post-COVID (2020Q2-Q4). THA utilization, demographics, 30-day complications, and length of stay (LOS) were compared between years. Linear regression evaluated changes in case volumes over time with significance threshold of P < 0.05.

Results

A total of 77,797 patients underwent elective THA in 2019 (n = 43,667) and 2020 (n = 34,130), resulting in a 24.5% decline. Outpatient THA increased in 2020 (35.6%) vs. 2019 (5.7%) (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the volume of cases in 2019Q1 through 2019Q4 (P = 0.984). Elective THA volumes declined by 68.8% in 2020Q2, returned to pre-pandemic baseline in 2020Q3, before leveling off at 81.5% of baseline in Q4. Average LOS was significantly shorter in 2020 (1.55 days) vs. 2019 (1.78 days) (P < 0.001) and the proportion of same day discharge (SDD) increased quarterly from 2019 to 2020. There was no significant difference in the total complication rates in 2019 (6.6%) vs. 2020 (6.6%) (P = 0.831).

Discussion

Elective THA precipitously declined during the second quarter of 2020. The combined effect of policy changes and the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a seven-fold increase in the number of surgeries performed in the outpatient setting in 2020. Rates of SDD doubled over the study period, despite no change in complication rates.

No time to waste; the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on hip, knee, and shoulder arthroplasty surgeries in the Netherlands and Denmark

AIMS

This study aimed to investigate the estimated change in primary and revision arthroplasty rate in the Netherlands and Denmark for hips, knees, and shoulders during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 (COVID-period). Additional points of focus included the comparison of patient characteristics and hospital type (2019 vs COVID-period), and the estimated loss of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and impact on waiting lists.

METHODS

All hip, knee, and shoulder arthroplasties (2014 to 2020) from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register, and hip and knee arthroplasties from the Danish Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Registries, were included. The expected number of arthroplasties per month in 2020 was estimated using Poisson regression, taking into account changes in age and sex distribution of the general Dutch/Danish population over time, calculating observed/expected (O/E) ratios. Country-specific proportions of patient characteristics and hospital type were calculated per indication category (osteoarthritis/other elective/acute). Waiting list outcomes including QALYs were estimated by modelling virtual waiting lists including 0%, 5% and 10% extra capacity.

RESULTS

During COVID-period, fewer arthroplasties were performed than expected (Netherlands: 20%; Denmark: 5%), with the lowest O/E in April. In the Netherlands, more acute indications were prioritized, resulting in more American Society of Anesthesiologists grade III to IV patients receiving surgery. In both countries, no other patient prioritization was present. Relatively more arthroplasties were performed in private hospitals. There were no clinically relevant differences in revision arthroplasties between pre-COVID and COVID-period. Estimated total health loss depending on extra capacity ranged from: 19,800 to 29,400 QALYs (Netherlands): 1,700 to 2,400 QALYs (Denmark). With no extra capacity it will take > 30 years to deplete the waiting lists.

CONCLUSION

The COVID-19 pandemic had an enormous negative effect on arthroplasty rates, but more in the Netherlands than Denmark. In the Netherlands, hip and shoulder patients with acute indications were prioritized. Private hospitals filled in part of the capacity gap. QALY loss due to postponed arthroplasty surgeries is considerable.Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(12):977-990.

One Year Later: The Lasting Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Elective Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (COVID-19) pandemic has continued to generate notable disruption in elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is any difference in patient characteristics, revenue, and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing THA and TKA after the start of the pandemic.

METHODS

We reviewed a consecutive series of 26,493 patients undergoing primary and revision THA and TKA by 48 surgeons in a single arthroplasty practice. We compared demographics, comorbidities, outcomes, and surgeon revenue from THA and TKA procedures from March 2020 to February 2021 with a prepandemic group undergoing a procedure from March 2019 to February 2020.

RESULTS

There was a 20% decline in the volume of all cases in the pandemic group ( 11,688 versus 14,664 , P < 0.001). The postpandemic cohort had shorter length of stay (1.58 versus 1.70 days, P = 0.007), had higher rates of home discharge (98% versus 91%, P < 0.001), and were more likely to have their procedure done at an outpatient facility (21% versus 7%, P < 0.001). Even among patients older than 65 years, more pandemic patients underwent a procedure as an outpatient (19% versus 7%, P < 0.001), with no difference in complications or readmissions. Total surgeon charges and payments declined by 17.6% and 16.3%, respectively, during the pandemic ( P = 0.010).

CONCLUSION

Although the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a notable reduction in surgical volume and revenue loss for our practice, we found a marked shift of arthroplasty patients to outpatient facilities with increased rates of home discharge without compromising patient safety.

Metrics and indicators used to assess health system resilience in response to shocks to health systems in high income countries-A systematic review

Health system resilience has never been more important than with the COVID-19 pandemic. There is need to identify feasible measures of resilience, potential strategies to build resilience and weaknesses of health systems experiencing shocks. The purpose of this systematic review is to examine how the resilience of health systems has been measured across various health system shocks. Following PRISMA guidelines, with double screening at each stage, the review identified 3175 studies of which 68 studies were finally included for analysis. Almost half (46%) were focused on COVID-19, followed by the economic crises, disasters and previous pandemics. Over 80% of studies included quantitative metrics. The most common WHO health system functions studied were resources and service delivery. In relation to the shock cycle, most studies reported metrics related to the management stage (79%) with the fewest addressing recovery and learning (22%). Common metrics related to staff headcount, staff wellbeing, bed number and type, impact on utilisation and quality, public and private health spending, access and coverage, and information systems. Limited progress has been made with developing standardised qualitative metrics particularly around governance. Quantitative metrics need to be analysed in relation to change and the impact of the shock. The review notes problems with measuring preparedness and the fact that few studies have really assessed the legacy or enduring impact of shocks.

The resiliency of elective total shoulder arthroplasty case volumes in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic: a nationwide temporal trends analysis

BACKGROUND

Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is one of the fastest growing procedures in terms of volume performed in hospitals in the United States. In 2020, elective surgery was suspended nationwide as a result of the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic, and the use trends in the wake of the pandemic have yet to be evaluated substantially. Nationwide case volume reduction for TSA is unknown; therefore, the aim of this study is to compare patient demographics, complications, and temporal trends in case volume of elective TSA in the calendar year 2019 (prepandemic) to 2020 in the United States.

METHODS

Using a multicenter, nationwide representative sample from 2019 to 2020, a retrospective query was conducted for all patients undergoing elective TSA. Patients undergoing surgery pre-COVID (2019 and 2020 Q1) were compared to those during COVID (2020 Q2-Q4). Temporal trends in case volumes were compared between time frames. TSA use, patient demographics, complications, and length of stay were compared between years. Linear regression was used to evaluate for changes in the case volume over the study period. A statistical significance threshold of P <.05 was used.

RESULTS

In total, 9667 patients underwent elective TSA in 2019 (n = 5342) and 2020 (n = 4325). The proportion of patients who underwent outpatient TSA in 2020 was significantly greater than the year prior (20.6% vs. 13.9%; P < .001). Overall, elective TSA case volume declined by 19.0% from 2019 to 2020. There was no significant difference in the volume of cases in 2019 Q1 (n = 1401) through 2020 Q1 (n = 1296) (P = .216). However, elective TSA volumes declined by 54.6% in 2020 Q2. Elective TSA case volumes recovered to prepandemic baseline in 2020 Q3 and 2020 Q4. The average length of stay was comparable in 2020 vs. 2019 (1.29 vs. 1.32 days; P = .371), with the proportion of same-day discharge increasing per quarter from 2019 to 2020 (from 11.8% to 26.8% of annual cases). There was no significant difference in the total complication rates in 2019 (4.6%) vs. 2020 (4.9%) (P = .441).

CONCLUSION

Using a nationwide sample, elective TSA precipitously declined during the second quarter of 2020. Patient demographics of those undergoing elective TSA in 2020 were similar in comorbidity burden. A large proportion of surgeries were transitioned to the outpatient setting, with rates of same-day discharge doubling over the study period despite no change in overall complication rates.

Same-Day Discharge Following Aseptic Revision and Conversion Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Single-Institution Experience

Background

With hospital inpatient capacity increasingly limited and primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA) rapidly transitioning to outpatient settings, the feasibility of outpatient aseptic revision and conversion TJA (rTJA) has been considered. Before the widespread adoption of outpatient rTJA, guidelines must be established to prevent patient harm. To this end, this study describes our initial experience with same-day-discharge (SDD) aseptic rTJA.

Methods

All aseptic rTJAs performed between May 8, 2015, and December 30, 2021, were retrospectively reviewed. Revision indications, patient selection criteria, and outcomes including SDD success rate, predischarge complications, all-cause emergency department visits, inpatient readmissions, and unplanned clinic encounters within 90 days of surgery were recorded.

Results

Thirty-five SDD aseptic rTJAs were performed. Conversion total hip arthroplasty (55.0%) and instability (27.3%) were the most common indications for hip revision. Instability (50%) and conversion total knee arthroplasty (20.8%) were most common for knee revision. SDD was achieved in 97% (34/35) of cases. One hip patient failed SDD due to persistent hypoxia requiring an overnight hospital stay and also underwent closed reduction for dislocation in the emergency department within 90 days of discharge. Two additional patients had unplanned clinic encounters within 90 days of the index procedure. There were no hospital readmissions or reoperations within 90 days.

Conclusions

Our initial experience suggests SDD aseptic rTJA can be safe and effective when modern perioperative outpatient protocols and surgical techniques are implemented. Future studies should further define patient selection criteria to optimize outcomes and minimize complications in this population.

Elective surgeries during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: Case burden and physician shortage concerns

The COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on several aspects of global healthcare systems, particularly surgical services. New guidelines, resource scarcity, and an ever-increasing demand for care have posed challenges to healthcare professionals, resulting in the cancellation of many surgeries, with short and long-term consequences for surgical care and patient outcomes. As the pandemic subsides and the healthcare system attempts to reestablish a sense of normalcy, surgical recommendations and advisories will shift. These changes, combined with a growing case backlog (postponed surgeries + regularly scheduled surgeries) and a physician shortage, can have serious consequences for physician health and, as a result, surgical care. Several initiatives are already being implemented by governments to ensure a smooth transition as surgeries resume. Newer and more efficient steps aimed at providing adequate surgical care while preventing physician burnout, on the other hand, necessitate a collaborative effort from governments, national medical boards, institutions, and healthcare professionals. This perspective aims to highlight alterations in surgical recommendations over the course of the pandemic and how these changes continue to influence surgical care and patient outcomes as the pandemic begins to soften its grip.

•

The COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on several aspects of surgical care.

•

New surgical recommendations amidst an ever-increasing demand for care pose, short and long-term consequences for surgical care and patient outcomes.

•

As the pandemic subsides, these changes, combined with a growing case backlog and a physician shortage, can have serious consequences for physician health and, as a result, surgical care.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on early clinical outcome after total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective comparative analysis

INTRODUCTION

To help combat the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic, elective inpatient procedures have been reduced. The authors hypothesized that a nationwide lockdown would negatively affect the postoperative outcome after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) due to reduced physiotherapy as well as restrictions in external facilities of physiotherapy and rehabilitation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, comparative study including 41 patients who had undergone primary TKA during the first lockdown of the COVID-19 pandemic from March 2020 to April 2020 and a comparable control group consisting of 47 patients with a minimum follow-up of 6 months before the COVID-19 pandemic from 2019. Relevant end points were the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, Knee Society Function Score (KSS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and range of motion (ROM).

RESULTS

The lockdown group had a significantly worse outcome compared to the control group 6 months after TKA regarding WOMAC (p = 0.001), KSS (p < 0.001), OKS (p < 0.001), and length of hospital stay (p < 0.001). We found no statistically significant difference between the groups in ROM (p = 0.132), KSFS (p = 0.933), VAS at rest (p = 0.9.22), and exercise (p = 0.304).

CONCLUSION

The COVID-19 pandemic negatively affected early clinical outcome parameters of elective primary TKA at 6 months of follow-up due to restrictions in postoperative care. We believe that standardized protocols for physiotherapy will improve clinical outcomes for TKA in the event of future lockdowns and underline the importance of appropriate postoperative care during this pandemic.

Neurosurgery Subspecialty Practice During a Pandemic: A Multicenter Analysis of Operative Practice in 7 U.S. Neurosurgery Departments During Coronavirus Disease 2019

OBJECTIVE

Changes to neurosurgical practices during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic have not been thoroughly analyzed. We report the effects of operative restrictions imposed under variable local COVID-19 infection rates and health care policies using a retrospective multicenter cohort study and highlight shifts in operative volumes and subspecialty practice.

METHODS

Seven academic neurosurgery departments' neurosurgical case logs were collected; procedures in April 2020 (COVID-19 surge) and April 2019 (historical control) were analyzed overall and by 6 subspecialties. Patient acuity, surgical scheduling policies, and local surge levels were assessed.

RESULTS

Operative volume during the COVID-19 surge decreased 58.5% from the previous year (602 vs. 1449, P = 0.001). COVID-19 infection rates within departments' counties correlated with decreased operative volume (r = 0.695, P = 0.04) and increased patient categorical acuity (P = 0.001). Spine procedure volume decreased by 63.9% (220 vs. 609, P = 0.002), for a significantly smaller proportion of overall practice during the COVID-19 surge (36.5%) versus the control period (42.0%) (P = 0.02). Vascular volume decreased by 39.5% (72 vs. 119, P = 0.01) but increased as a percentage of caseload (8.2% in 2019 vs. 12.0% in 2020, P = 0.04). Neuro-oncology procedure volume decreased by 45.5% (174 vs. 318, P = 0.04) but maintained a consistent proportion of all neurosurgeries (28.9% in 2020 vs. 21.9% in 2019, P = 0.09). Functional neurosurgery volume, which declined by 81.4% (41 vs. 220, P = 0.008), represented only 6.8% of cases during the pandemic versus 15.2% in 2019 (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Operative restrictions during the COVID-19 surge led to distinct shifts in neurosurgical practice, and local infective burden played a significant role in operative volume and patient acuity.

The Impact of COVID-19 Restrictions and Changes in Guidelines on Adult Wrist Fracture Management

Background  The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic had an unprecedented impact on the healthcare service of the United Kingdom. This study aims to evaluate the effect on wrist fracture care as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, changes in British Orthopaedic Association Standards of Trauma and Orthopaedics wrist fracture management guidelines, and introduction of lockdown restrictions. Methods  This is a retrospective observational study with data collected using the Pathpoint eTrauma platform (Open Medical, United Kingdom). All adults (18 years + ) admitted with wrist fractures within the study phases to Manchester University National Health Service Foundation Trust were included. Each phase of the study period represents a change in lockdown restrictions, including lockdown 1, period of eased restrictions after lockdown 1, lockdown 2, and lockdown 3. These phases were then compared with a prepandemic period. A total of 608 referrals were included for analysis. Results  The number of referrals per week decreased from 9.94 prepandemic to as low as 8.12 during lockdown 2. Falls remained the most common mechanism of injury, followed by cycling that saw an increase by more than threefold from 2.42% prepandemic to 8.17% ( p  = 0.500) during lockdown 1 and 8.77% ( p  = 0.0164) during the easing of lockdown 1. Sports-related injuries and occupational injuries decreased throughout. Assaults and altercations, road traffic accidents, roller-skate, and skateboard-related injuries increased throughout. Surgical procedures per week decreased from 5.06 prepandemic to as low as 4.55 during lockdown 1. Procedure cancellations remained steady apart from an increase during lockdown 2. Referrals managed operatively increased from 50.9% prepandemic to 58.9% in lockdown 2, before dropping to 49.2% in lockdown 3. Mean time from presentation to surgery increased from 9.08 days prepandemic to 16.27 days in lockdown 1 but decreased to just below the prepandemic baseline thereafter. Conclusion  Overall, there was a decrease in the number of wrist fracture referrals and surgical procedures compared with before the pandemic. There was also an increased wait-time to surgery and an increased rate of cancellations. Statistical analyses fail to find significance in changes other than mechanisms of injury, which resulted from lockdown restrictions. Therefore, service provision, delivery, and efficiency not affected significantly by changes in guidelines and lockdown restrictions.

Institutional Surgical Response and Associated Volume Trends Throughout the COVID-19 Pandemic and Postvaccination Recovery Period

IMPORTANCE

The COVID-19 pandemic is associated with decreased surgical procedure volumes, but existing studies have not investigated this association beyond the end of 2020, analyzed changes during the post-vaccine release period, or quantified these changes by patient acuity.

OBJECTIVE

To quantify changes in the volume of surgical procedures at a 1017-bed academic quaternary care center from January 6, 2019, to December 31, 2021.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

In this cohort study, 129 596 surgical procedure volumes were retrospectively analyzed during 4 periods: pre-COVID-19 (January 6, 2019, to January 4, 2020), COVID-19 peak (March 15, 2020, to May 2, 2020), post-COVID-19 peak (May 3, 2020, to January 2, 2021), and post-vaccine release (January 3, 2021, to December 31, 2021). Surgery volumes were analyzed by subspecialty and case class (elective, emergent, nonurgent, urgent). Statistical analysis was by autoregressive integrated moving average modeling.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome of this study was the change in weekly surgical procedure volume across the 4 COVID-19 periods.

RESULTS

A total of 129 596 records of surgical procedures were reviewed. During the COVID-19 peak, overall weekly surgical procedure volumes (mean [SD] procedures per week, 406.00 [171.45]; 95% CI, 234.56-577.46) declined 44.6% from pre-COVID-19 levels (mean [SD] procedures per week, 732.37 [12.70]; 95% CI, 719.67-745.08; P < .001). This weekly volume decrease occurred across all surgical subspecialties. During the post-COVID peak period, overall weekly surgical volumes (mean [SD] procedures per week, 624.31 [142.45]; 95% CI, 481.85-766.76) recovered to only 85.8% of pre-COVID peak volumes (P < .001). This insufficient recovery was inconsistent across subspecialties and case classes. During the post-vaccine release period, although some subspecialties experienced recovery to pre-COVID-19 volumes, others continued to experience declines.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This quaternary care institution effectively responded to the pressures of the COVID-19 pandemic by substantially decreasing surgical procedure volumes during the peak of the pandemic. However, overall surgical procedure volumes did not fully recover to pre-COVID-19 levels well into 2021, with inconsistent recovery rates across subspecialties and case classes. These declines suggest that delays in surgical procedures may result in potentially higher morbidity rates in the future. The differential recovery rates across subspecialties may inform institutional focus for future operational recovery.

Cooled radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves provides 24-Month durability in the management of osteoarthritic knee pain: Outcomes from a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial

Objective

To assess long‐term outcomes of cooled radiofrequency ablation (CRFA) of genicular nerves for chronic knee pain due to osteoarthritis (OA).

Methods

A prospective, observational extension of a randomized, controlled trial was conducted on adults randomized to CRFA. Subjects were part of a 12‐month clinical trial comparing CRFA of genicular nerves to a single hyaluronic injection for treatment of chronic OA knee pain, who then agreed to visits at 18‐ and 24‐months post CRFA and had not undergone another knee procedure since. The subjects were evaluated for pain using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) function using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), subjective benefit using the Global Perceived Effect (GPE) scale, quality of life using the EuroQol‐5‐Dimensions‐5 Level (EQ‐5D‐5L) questionnaire, and safety.

Results

Of 57 subjects eligible, 36 enrolled; 32 completed the 18‐month visit with a mean NRS score of 2.4 and 22 (69%) reporting ≥50% reduction in pain from baseline (primary endpoint); 27 completed the 24‐month visit, with a mean NRS of 3.4 and 17 (63%) reporting ≥50% pain relief. Functional and quality of life improvements persisted similarly, with mean changes from baseline of 53.5% and 34.9% in WOMAC total scores, and 24.8% and 10.7% in EQ‐5D‐5L Index scores, at 18‐ and 24‐months, respectively. There were no identified safety concerns in this patient cohort.

Conclusion

In this subset of subjects, CRFA of genicular nerves provided durable pain relief, improved function, and improved quality of life extending to 24 months post procedure, with no significant safety concerns.

Impact of COVID-19 on gynecologic and obstetrical services at two large health systems

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted medical care in the US, leading to a significant drop in utilization of some types of health services. We sought to quantify how the pandemic influenced obstetrics and gynecology care at two large health care organizations.

Materials and methods

Comparing 2020 to 2019, we quantified changes to obstetrics and gynecology care at two large health care organizations in the United States, Allegheny Health Network (in western Pennsylvania) and Johns Hopkins University (in Maryland). The analysis considered the numbers of surgical encounters, in-person visits, and telemedicine visits. For each system, we quantified temporal changes in surgical volume, in-person and telemedicine visits, and financial impact related to professional fee revenues. We used segmented regression to evaluate longitudinal effects.

Results

At both institutions, the volume of care was similar in the first few months of 2020 compared to 2019 but dropped precipitously in March 2020. From April to June 2020, surgical volumes were 67% of the same period in 2019 at Allegheny Health and 48% of the same period in 2019 at Johns Hopkins. During that same interval, televisits accounted for approximately 21% of all ambulatory care at both institutions. Although surgical and ambulatory volumes recovered in the second half of 2020, annual surgical volumes in 2020 were significantly lower than 2019 at both institutions (p<0.05) and 2020 ambulatory volumes remained significantly lower at Johns Hopkins (p = .0006). Overall, revenues in 2020 were 91% of 2019 revenues for both institutions.

Conclusions

Obstetrical and gynecologic ambulatory visits and gynecologic surgeries were sharply reduced during the COVID-19 pandemic. Although care volumes returned to 2019 levels in late 2020, we observed an overall reduction in the volume of care provided and a 9% reduction in professional revenue for both institutions.

Digital medical history implementation to triage orthopaedic patients during COVID-19: Findings from a rapid cycle, semi-randomised A/B testing quality improvement project

INTRODUCTION

The COVID-19 pandemic severely impacted musculoskeletal care. To better triage the notable backlog of patients, we assessed whether a digital medical history (DMH), a summary of health information and concerns completed by the patient prior to a clinic visit, could be routinely collected and utilised.

METHODS

We analysed 640 patients using a rapid cycle, semi-randomised A/B testing approach. Four rapid cycles of different randomised interventions were conducted across five unique patient groups. Descriptive statistics were used to report DMH completion rates by cycle/patient group and intervention. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine whether age or anatomic injury location was associated DMH completion.

ETHICAL APPROVAL

N/A (Quality Improvement Project) RESULTS: Across all patients, the DMH completion rate was 48% (307/640). Phone calls were time consuming and resource intensive without an increased completion rate. The highest rate of DMH completion was among patients who were referred and called the clinic themselves (78% of patients [63 out of 81 patients]). Across all patients, increasing age (odds ratio [OR]: 0.985 (95% CI: 0.976-0.995), p = 0.002), patients with back concerns (OR: 0.395 (95% CI: 0.234-0.666), p = 0.001), and patients with non-specific/other musculoskeletal concerns (OR: 0.331 (95% CI: 0.176-0.623), p = 0.001) were associated with decreased odds of DMH completion.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

DMHs can be valuable in helping triage orthopaedic patients in resource-strapped settings, times of crisis, or as we transition towards value-based health care delivery. However, further work is needed to continue to increase the completion rate about 50%.

A medical ethics review of elective orthopaedic surgery management during the pandemic COVID-19 Era

Introduction

Methods

Result

Conclusion

•

Any cases with delays Actions can lead to unsatisfactory things and lead to complications.

•

Orthopaedic surgeons may question what preparation and recuperation would be like during pandemics. We are concerned about the patient's safety during the operation.

•

An ethical view regarding the doctor's obligation to prioritize personal safety or patient safety during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The impact of the COVID-19 associated shutdown on orthopedic patient care

BACKGROUND

Due to the surge of COVID-19 cases in the US in early March 2020, health care facilities temporarily suspended elective and non-urgent medical procedures such as joint replacement surgeries. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of the COVID-19 associated shutdown on orthopedic patient care at a specialized orthopedic hospital located at the epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

Patient volume of outpatient visits and joint replacement surgeries were analyzed and compared for 2019 and 2020. The volumes were further aligned with the timeline of governmental and institutional COVID-19 associated restrictions.

RESULTS

The annual surgery volume was reduced by 20.2% in 2020 and did not make up for the reduction experienced during the shutdown. The total number of patient visits decreased by 25.5% and new patient visits remained 25% lower at the end of 2020. Patient care and surgery volume recovered with declining SARS-CoV-2-cases but did not return to levels prior to the shutdown. During the second quarter of 2020, 28.5% of all patient visits were telehealth appointments. By the end of the year it dropped to 7.6%. There was a shift towards patient appointments at outpatient satellite offices.

CONCLUSION

Orthopedic providers faced a substantial disruption in outpatient and surgical volume. Telemedicine appointments were crucial for maintaining follow-up patient care and will be an important sector in future patient care. There has been a major push to utilize satellite offices outside the city center.

Trends in Lower Extremity Injuries Presenting to Emergency Departments During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Background

During the emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic, there were substantial changes in U.S. emergency department (ED) volumes and acuity of patient presentation compared with more recent years. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to characterize the incidence of specific lower extremity (LE) injuries presenting to U.S. EDs during the COVID-19 pandemic and to analyze trends across age groups and rates of hospital admission compared with previous years.

Methods

The National Electronic Injury Surveillance System database was queried to identify patients who presented to U.S. EDs for a LE orthopedic injury between 2016 and 2020.

Results

These queries returned 252,656 cases, representing a total estimate of 9,740,514 injuries presenting to EDs across the United States. The mean incidence of LE orthopedic injuries was 596.8 injuries per 100,000 person-years (95% confidence interval [CI] 594.9–598.7), with the greatest annual decrease in incidence occurring between 2019 and 2020 (24.96%). The largest number of estimated hospital admissions occurred in 2020, with a total 181,671 admissions (95% CI 178,032–185,311), a 25.74% increase from the average number of admissions between 2016 and 2019.

Conclusion

The COVID-19 pandemic has placed immense stress on both emergency medical services and hospital systems around the United States. While there were decreased rates of ED utilization for LE orthopedic complaints during the first year of the pandemic, there was a concomitant increase in both the number and proportion of these injuries admitted to the hospital from the ED. This places an additional burden on already stressed emergency medicine services and overall hospital systems that could slow down the management of medical emergencies.

Implementation and Postoperative Management of Continuous Adductor Canal Catheters for Total Knee Arthroplasty to Reduce Surgical Backlog Related to the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Acute Pain Service Nursing Perspective and Educational Resource

PURPOSE

In response to the surgical backlog created by the COVID-19 pandemic and to spare valuable hospital resources, we developed and implemented a continuous adductor canal catheter (CACC) program for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients. CACC's offer superior analgesia, decrease opioid use, and increase patient satisfaction while simultaneously promoting a decreased length of hospital stay and even same day discharges. The implementation of analgesia protocols using continuous peripheral nerve catheters and isometric pumps has been described for other surgical procedures and populations; however, the role of the Acute Pain Service Nurse (APS RN) in the implementation of such a program has not been described.

DESIGN

An best practice initiative for TKA patients receiving CACC was developed and implemented for patients recovering both in the hospital and at home.

METHODS

We describe the development and implementation of a CACC program for TKA patients in response to the surgical backlog created by the COVID-19 pandemic from the perspective of the APS RN. We provide a detailed narrative description of our postoperative assessment and experience, and offer practical insights for the postoperative care of these patients. We share the educational resources and assessment tools we developed to ensure consistent, safe, and effective clinical management of CACC patients in the hospital and at home.

FINDINGS

CACCs via elastomeric pumps have been shown to offer significant advances to pain control following TKA, decrease opioid use, enable earlier discharge, and improve patient satisfaction, all of which we observed unequivocally in our patients. In our experience, implementation of a daily telephone follow up by an APS RN for discharged TKA patients with a CACC was crucial for patient safety, patient satisfaction, and reducing emergency phone calls and emergency room visits.

CONCLUSIONS

We anticipate this description will provide an invaluable educational resource for other Acute Pain Service programs as similar outpatient peripheral nerve catheter programs are developed in response to the pandemic.

Surgical wait times and socioeconomic status in a public healthcare system: a retrospective analysis

Background

One aim of publicly-funded health care systems is to provide equitable access to care irrespective of ability to pay. At the same time, differences in socioeconomic status (SES) are associated with health outcomes and access to care, including waiting times for surgery. In public systems where both high- and low-SES patients use the same resources, low-SES patients may be adversely impacted in surgical waiting times. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a publicly-funded health system can provide equitable access to surgical care across socioeconomic status.

Methods

Patient-level records were obtained from a comprehensive provincially-administered surgical wait time database, encompassing years 2006–2015 and 98% of Ontario hospitals. Patient SES was determined by linking postal code with the Material and Social Deprivation Index. Surgical waiting times (time in days between decision to treat and surgery) accounted for patient-initiated delays in treatment, and regression analysis considered age, SES, rurality, sex, priority level for surgical urgency (assigned by surgeons), surgical subspecialty, number of visits, and procedure year.

Results

For the 4,253,305 surgical episodes, the mean wait time was 62.3 (SD 75.4) days. Repeated measures least squares regression analysis showed the least deprived SES quintile waited 3 days longer than the most deprived quintile. Wait times dropped in the initial study period but then increased. The proportion of procedures exceeding wait time access targets remained low at 11–13%.

Conclusions

The least deprived SES quintile waited the longest, although the absolute difference was small. This study demonstrates that publicly-funded healthcare systems can provide equitable access to surgical care across SES.

The Effect of COVID-19 on Cardiac Surgical Volume and its Associated Costs

The COVID-19 pandemic significantly affected health care and in particular surgical volume. However, no data surrounding lost hospital revenue due to decreased cardiac surgical volume have been reported. The National Inpatient Sample database was used with decreases in cardiac surgery at a single center to generate a national estimate of decreased cardiac operative volume. Hospital charges and provided charge to cost ratios were used to create estimates of lost hospital revenue, adjusted for 2020 dollars. The COVID period was defined as January to May of 2020. A Gompertz function was used to model cardiac volume growth to pre-COVID levels. Single center cardiac case demographics were internally compared during January to May for 2019 and 2020 to create an estimate of volume reduction due to COVID. The maximum decrease in cardiac surgical volume was 28.3%. Cumulative case volume and hospital revenue loss during the COVID months as well as the recovery period totaled over 35 thousand cases and 2.5 billion dollars. Institutionally, patients during COVID months were younger, more frequently undergoing a CABG procedure, and had a longer length of stay. The pandemic caused a significant decrease in cardiac surgical volume and a subsequent decrease in hospital revenue. This data can be used to address the accumulated surgical backlog and programmatic changes for future occurrences.

The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic upon Non-Elective Admissions and Surgery at a Safety-Net Hospital

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Results

Conclusions

Evolving perceptions regarding receiving orthopaedic care during the Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: a follow-up survey

As the Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic evolves, it is critical to understand how patients' feelings and perceptions have changed. The aim of this study was to understand current feelings and concerns about seeking and receiving orthopaedic care 9 mo into the global pandemic.

METHODS

Utilizing a survey developed to evaluate the attitudes and beliefs from healthcare respondents about receiving care during the COVID-19 pandemic, an updated and revised version, evaluating changes in perception of respondents 9 mo into the pandemic, was distributed to a group of panelists by email.

RESULTS

Out of 1200 individuals, 197 (16%) completed the survey. A majority of respondents reported high level of comfort in the immediate or near-term receiving care in an orthopaedic clinic, urgent care clinic specifically for orthopaedics, or in an emergency room. Six percent of respondents reported a delay in seeking orthopaedic care despite COVID-19 concerns that occurred between studies. Respondents reported their primary reason for delaying care was because of concerns for risk of COVID-19 exposure from other patients (83%). More than 75% of respondents stated they are "extremely" or "very" likely to get the COVID-19 vaccine when it becomes available to the public. Respondents had a generally negative outlook on pandemic efforts locally to globally.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite dismal overall perceptions regarding the outlook of the pandemic; consumers are becoming increasingly comfortable obtaining orthopaedic care. The ability of healthcare providers and practices to adherence to safety protocols will remain essential to maintaining consumer trust and confidence.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Factors Driving Rapid Adoption of Telemedicine in an Academic Orthopedic Surgery Department

Introduction: With the COVID-19 epidemic ever-expanding, nonemergent access to health care resources has been reduced to decrease the exposure for patients and health care providers. Alternatives to in-office outpatient medical evaluations are necessary. We aimed to analyze how quickly orthopedic surgery providers at a large academic institution adopted telemedicine, and identify any factors that were associated with earlier or "faster" telemedicine adoption. Methods: We analyzed the telemedicine activity of 39 providers within the Department of Orthopedic Surgery between March 16, 2020, and May 30, 2020, and constructed logistic regression models to identify characteristics with significant association to earlier or faster telemedicine adoption. Results: No significant predictors of percentage of visits conducted via telemedicine were found. However, increased experience and practice at multiple locations was associated with slower telemedicine adoption time, while Professor level academic rank was associated with a faster time to achieving 10% of pre-COVID visit volumes via telemedicine. Higher pre-COVID visit volumes were also significantly associated with faster telemedicine adoption. Demographic factors, including, age, gender, practice locations, academic degrees, pediatric specialty, and use of physician assistants/nurse practitioners, were not found to have significant associations with telemedicine use. Conclusions: These results indicate that telemedicine has an important role to play within academic orthopedic surgery practices, with a wide and diverse range of orthopedic surgery providers choosing to utilize it during the COVID-19 pandemic. Given the rapid expansion and urgency driving the adoption of telemedicine, these results illustrate the importance of considering provider-side characteristics in ensuring that providers are well equipped to utilize telemedicine.