Total Elbow Arthroplasty

Fatigue test evaluation of a customised humeral component for an instrumented total elbow prosthesis and strain validation study

The survival rate of total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is negatively impacted by the lack of available data on elbow biomechanics. This study developed a modified humeral component for TEA that is purposed to be instrumented to generate real-time 6 degrees of freedom (d.o.f) force and moment data during activities of daily living (ADL). The objectives are twofold: (1) to assess the safety of the modified humeral component under peak anticipated loads in fatigue, and (2) verify the strains measured under physiological loads with strains modelled using finite element analysis (FEA). Four modified titanium alloy humeral components were welded, and fatigue tested at 5 Hz for 5 million cycles under a compressive load of 700 N corresponding to moderate ADL. The strains were measured using triaxial 350 Ω rectangular rosette (45°) strain gauges bonded to three specific locations on the humeral component confirmed through an FE study. The four welded humeral components successfully withstood fatigue conditions and did not deform. The measured and modelled principal strains were confirmed to be highest at the external wall of the lateral cavity, with a percentage difference of <10 %.

Elbow Interposition Arthroplasty With Meniscal Allograft

Painful, end-stage elbow arthritis in young, active patients remains a challenging and unsolved problem. Lifetime weight-bearing restrictions make total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) an unrealistic and unsustainable option for most of these patients, and the alternatives for treating a failed TEA are limited and mostly unsatisfactory. Elbow interposition arthroplasty can provide good pain relief and reasonable restoration of motion while avoiding weight-bearing restrictions. However, resurfacing materials such as fascia, Achilles tendon, and skin are not durable and are likely torn or displaced. We propose using meniscus allograft as the interposition material, as it is strong, robust, and designed to resist high compressive and shearing loads. It can heal the native tissue, and the topological properties of an amphitheater-shaped meniscus wrapped in a semicircle anatomically simulates the native shape of the trochlea, conferring additional stability that abets concentric motion. We present a series of 5 patients who underwent meniscal allograft arthroplasty from 2021 to 2023 at a single institution. All patients had resurfacing with meniscus allographs with supplemental stabilization using a double internal joint stabilizer. All patients demonstrated improvement in pain and ulnohumeral range of motion. Our technique of meniscus allograft interposition arthroplasty demonstrates good short-term pain relief and functional improvement. Further follow-up is warranted to assess the longevity of the meniscus interposition. Level of Evidence: Level IV-treatment study.

Difference in daily tasks execution and elbow joint load: a comparison between patients after total elbow arthroplasty and healthy controls

Background

Overloading of the elbow joint is one of the mechanisms responsible for failure of total elbow arthroplasty (TEA). Different activities of daily living (ADL) affect joint loading. However, the alteration in task execution and its impact on joint loads after TEA are not well understood. This study investigates differences between TEA patients and healthy controls in task execution and associated joint loads during simulated ADL.

Methods

TEA patients (n = 7) and healthy controls (n = 18) performed 8 simulated ADL tasks. Using musculoskeletal modeling software (OpenSim), joint angles and moments were calculated and joint power was assessed. A mixed model statistical design was performed to determine group and tasks differences.

Results

TEA patients showed reduced flexion-extension (FE) range of motion (60.6° ± 25.6 vs. 44.9° ± 19.9, P = .003). Interaction effects between groups and tasks for joint load and peak power were observed. Particularly during rising from a chair, patients showed reduced FE moment (5.7 Nm vs. 14.5 Nm, P = .026), varus-valgus moment (6.0 Nm vs. 14.3 Nm, P = .036), and peak power (3.6 Watt vs. 20.1 Watt, P = .036) compared to healthy controls.

Conclusion

TEA patients differ from healthy controls in task execution of ADL tasks regarding the functional elbow FE angle over all 8 ADL tasks and in joint load and peak power for the more straining tasks. The power plots visualizes differences in movement strategy that are of interest for future research on possible training of TEA patients, or prosthesis design, aimed to improve ADL function and enhance prosthesis survival rates.

Postoperative Weightlifting Restrictions Following Elbow Arthroplasty: A Survey of Italian Society of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Members

Background: Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) has evolved over time from a salvage procedure to a successful treatment of end-stage primary and secondary arthritis. However, the aseptic loosening and the associated reduced survival rate are still concerning. Thus, TEA is typically contraindicated in young and active patients where high-demand activities would promote aseptic loosening. For this reason, postoperative weightlifting limitations are often suggested, yet there is no consensus. The aim of this survey was to collect and analyze the current practice concerning the weightlifting restrictions following elbow arthroplasties among members of the Italian Society of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery (Società Italiana Chirurgia Spalla e Gomito, SICSeG). Methods: An online survey on the lifting restrictions after elbow arthroplasties was submitted to all members of the SICSeG. Results: In total, 36 members of the Italian society completed the survey. Only five consultants (13.8%) have experience with all the implants analyzed, of whom only three have experience with more than 10 implants per year. Concerning the comprehensive number of elbow arthroplasties performed per year, most of the respondents (45.7%) reported fewer than five surgeries per year, whereas only two surgeons claimed more than 20 procedures. Of the 36 respondents, 32 (88.9%) reported lifelong lifting limitations after linked TEA. In detail, these lifting restrictions were 10 lb in 14 responders (38.9%) and 5 lb in 15 responders (41.7%) performing linked TEA. A lifelong lifting limitation gradually decreased after unlinked TEA and hemiarthroplasty (HA) being advised by 82.8% (24/36) and 64.5% (20/36), respectively. Conclusions: To increase implant longevity, most Italian surgeons advise lifting restrictions after TEA. More than 80% of the responders agreed with suggesting lifelong limitations, but a greater variability was found in the amount of weight to which the patients are restricted. Currently, the lack of consensus on the optimal weightlifting restrictions after elbow replacements emphasizes the need for more studies focusing on elbow joint loading during different activities of daily life to improve implant survival rates.

Vascularized Proximal Radius Bone Graft for a Massive Elbow Bone Defect: An Anatomic Study and Case Report

From an anatomic perspective, this paper delineates the proximal radial bone branches of the radial artery (RA). We also report the successful clinical use of a vascularized proximal radius bone graft (VPRBG), supplied by the RA, in a complex case involving a massive osseous elbow defect. In 10 latex-colored upper limbs from fresh human cadavers, RA branches were dissected under ×2.5 loupe magnification, noting all periosteal and osseous branches for the proximal radius. VPRBG length was measured. In the proximal forearm, the RA provides 10 (range: 7 to 14) periosteal and osseous branches to supply the area from the radial head to the proximal diaphysis. A 15 cm (11 to 17) vascularized bone graft can be harvested from the proximal radius, and RA dissection generates a 12 cm (9 to 15) pedicle with a wide arc of rotation, readily capable of reaching the distal part of the humerus. We used a 14 cm long VPRBG for elbow arthrodesis to fill a 12 cm defect, caused by a previous recalcitrant elbow infection in a 68-year-old man. The patient experienced no postoperative complications and successful consolidation was achieved 6 months postoperatively, with flap survival confirmed. After 2 years of follow-up, the contoured dorsal plate was removed, with no signs of infection. Final Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand and Mayo Wrist scores were 23 and 88, respectively. A VPRBG might be a safe and effective surgical option for massive osseous elbow defects, whenever elbow arthrodesis is planned, where it should be combined with a one-bone forearm technique.

Impact of the hospital frailty risk score on outcomes following primary total elbow arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) has demonstrated strong correlation with adverse outcomes in various joint replacement surgeries, yet its applicability in total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) remains unexplored. The purpose of this study is to assess the association between HFRS and postoperative complications following elective primary TEA.

METHODS

The Nationwide Readmissions Database was queried to identify patients undergoing primary TEA from 2016-2020. The HFRS was used to compare medical, surgical, and clinical outcomes of frail vs. nonfrail patients. Mean and relative costs, total hospital length of stay, and discharge disposition for frail and nonfrail patients were also compared.

RESULTS

We identified 2049 primary TEA in frail patients and 3693 in nonfrail patients. Frail patients had increased complication rates including acute respiratory failure (13.6% vs. 1.1%; P < .001), urinary tract infections (12.3% vs. 0.0%; P < .001), transfusions (3.9% vs. 1.1%; P < .001), pneumonia (1.1% vs. 0.2%; P < .001), acute respiratory distress syndrome (3.2% vs. 0.6%; P < .001), sepsis (0.7% vs. 0.1%; P < .001), and hardware failure (1.2% vs. 0.1%; P < .001). Frail patients also experienced higher rates of readmission (37% vs. 25%; P < .001) and death (1.7% vs. 0.2%; P < .001), while being less likely to undergo revision (6.5% vs. 17%; P < .001). Frail patients incurred higher health-care costs ($28,497 vs. $23,377; P < .001) and longer length of stay (5.3 days vs. 2.6 days; P < .001), with reduced likelihood of routine hospital stays (36% vs. 71%; P < .001) and increased utilization of short-term hospitalization (P < .001), care facilities (P < .001), and home health-care services (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

HFRS is a validated indicator of frailty and is strongly associated with increased rates of complications in patients undergoing elective primary TEA. These findings should be considered by orthopedic surgeons when assessing surgical candidacy and discussing treatment options in this at-risk patient population.

Mid-term outcomes of elbow hemiarthroplasty using the triceps-on approach for comminuted distal humerus fractures

Background

There has been an increasing interest in elbow hemiarthroplasty to circumvent the problems with total elbow arthroplasty for comminuted distal humerus fractures in the elderly. The primary aim of the study is to assess the mid-term clinical and radiological outcomes of patients undergoing TEA and hemiarthroplasty for distal humerus fractures.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of data for patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty for distal humerus fractures (OTA- C3 Comminuted total articular fractures) was done. This is a non-randomized consecutive series from a single centre. A minimum follow-up of 3 years was required for inclusion. Patients with delayed/neglected presentation (>3 weeks), those needing total elbow arthroplasty and conservatively managed fractures needing delayed arthroplasty were excluded.

Results

A total of 12 patients were operated in the period between 2016 and 2021(mean follow-up-59.4 months). The mean age of the patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty was 68.4 years. The mean arc of flexion extension was 21-115°. The mean range of supination was 75° while pronation was 86° (p > 0.05). The mean QuickDASH score was 8.7. There were no cases of infection, dislocations, intra-operative fractures or revision surgery. Two patients had transient weakness in the ulnar nerve distribution that recovered on follow-up.Evidence of heterotrophic ossification was seen in 8 patients. None of the patients showed radiological evidence of loosening but trochlear cartilage wear was seen in 2 patients. None of the radiographs showed migration of the condyles. There were 5 cases where the medial condyle though approximated had not healed.

Conclusions

Elbow hemiarthroplasty provides predictably good clinical and radiological outcomes on mid-term follow-up. Longer follow-up is necessary to determine the survival of these prostheses in the long term.

Do Intramedullary Screws Provide Adequate Fixation for Humeral and Ulnar Components in Total Elbow Arthroplasty? A Cadaveric Analysis

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to determine the structural properties of the cadaver bone-screw interface for cementless intramedullary screw fixation in the context of total elbow arthroplasty.

METHODS

The intramedullary canals of seven humerus and seven ulna specimens from fresh-frozen cadavers were drilled using custom drill bits until the inner cortex was reached and then hand tapped for the corresponding thread size. Titanium screws were advanced into the tapped holes until securely seated. The bones were potted and then mounted on a uniaxial material testing machine. A tensile load was applied, and end-of-test elongation, failure load, energy absorbed, and stiffness were determined. End-of-test load and elongation were defined as the elongation and load experienced by the structure at 3,000 N or failure. Each specimen was inspected for evidence of pullout, loosening, or visible fractures.

RESULTS

The end-of-test load and elongation for the humerus specimens were 2721 ± 738 N and 3.0 ± 0.9 mm, respectively. The ulna specimens reached 92% of the humerus specimens' end-of-test load at 2,514 ± 678 N and 120% of their end-of-test elongation (3.6 ± 0.6 mm). The stiffness of the humerus specimens was 1,077 ± 336 N/mm, which was 1.3 times greater than the stiffness of the ulna specimens (790 ± 211 N/mm). Lastly, the energy absorbed by the humerus samples was 3.6 ± 1.6 J, which was 92% of the energy absorbed by the ulna samples at 3.9 ± 1.1 J. One humerus and three ulnas failed before the end-of-test load of 3,000 N. Two failures were caused by screw pullout and two by bone fracture.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrate that intramedullary screw fixation is successful in withstanding forces that are greater than required for osseointegration.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Uncemented fixation may be beneficial in elbow arthroplasty.

Description of a new surgical approach for elbow arthroplasty: Selective Triceps-On Medial Paraolecranon (STOMP) approach

Background

Surgical approaches for total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) are broadly divided into two groups; "triceps-off" and "triceps-on" approaches. Traditional "triceps-off" approaches provide excellent visualization for TEA; however, they carry a risk of triceps failure and require triceps protecting rehabilitation protocols. Triceps-on approaches have the advantage of preservation of triceps function yet present technical challenges for access to and preparation of the bony surfaces of the proximal ulna and radius. We present here the operative technique, indications, and initial outcomes of a novel Selective Triceps-On Medial Paraolecranon (STOMP) approach for TEA, which allows both preservation of the triceps function and excellent exposure to the proximal ulna with minimal risk to the ulnar nerve.

Methods

A two center, retrospective cohort study of all patients undergoing primary TEA, hemiarthroplasty, or revision elbow arthroplasties using the STOMP approach in the practice of the senior authors between 2010 and 2020 were reviewed. Patient data, including admission demographics and diagnoses were collated. Outcome measures were collected from patient charts.

Results

A total of 37 elbow arthroplasties in 35 patients were performed with the STOMP approach during the reviewed period, of which 27 patients (77%) were female. Thirty-two arthroplasties were primary cases (86%), and 5 (14%) were revision cases. The main indications leading to elbow arthroplasty was rheumatoid arthritis (n = 18, 49%) followed by primary or secondary elbow osteoarthritis (n = 9, 24%) and distal humeral fracture (n = 7, 19%). There were 7 postoperative complications (19%). Five patients (14%) developed elbow stiffness, one patient a postoperative olecranon fracture (n = 1, 3%) and one patient had an ulnar nerve injury with incomplete resolution but that did not warrant surgical treatment (n = 1, 3%). A reoperation was required in 3 patients (9%).

Conclusion

The STOMP approach is a safe approach for elbow arthroplasty surgery. It does not detach the triceps and we believe it offers improved exposure and safety compared to other triceps-on techniques. Furthermore, this approach allows excellent surgical access to the coronoid, olecranon, and ulnar canal with low midterm complications.

Total Elbow Arthroplasty for a Complex Proximal Radius and Ulna Fracture-A Case for Expanding Indications: A Case Report

CASE

We present a 79-year-old woman with a complex elbow fracture including a comminuted proximal ulna fracture, coronoid process fracture, and comminuted radial head fracture treated with primary total elbow arthroplasty (TEA). The patient completed an early therapy protocol and had complete healing. At 15 months postoperatively, she had full pronosupination and elbow arc of motion from 10 to 135° with no reported pain.

CONCLUSION

Primary treatment of unstable, complex fractures of the proximal ulna and radius with TEA has not been previously reported in the literature. This case reports suggests that indications for primary TEA for traumatic elbow injuries in the elderly could be expanded.

Elbow arthroplasty utilization in 2060: projections of primary and revision elbow arthroplasty in the United States in the next 40 years

BACKGROUND

In the past decade, the prevalence of end-stage inflammatory elbow arthritis has declined with consequential changes in indications and utilization of total elbow arthroplasty (TEA). Current literature lacks future projections for the utilization of TEA. The aim of this study is to review the trends in the utilization of TEA in the last 2 decades and determine the projections of utilization for TEA (primary and revision) through 2060.

METHODS

This analysis used the publicly available 2000-2019 data from the CMS Medicare Part-B National Summary. Procedure volumes including TEA, and revision TEA, were determined using Current Procedural Terminology codes and were uplifted to account for the growing number of Medicare eligible patients covered under Medicare Advantage. Using these volumes, log-linear, Poisson, negative binomial regression, and autoregressive integrated moving average models were applied to generate projections from 2020 to 2060. The Poisson model was chosen to display the data based on error analysis and prior literature.

RESULTS

The projected annual growth rates from 2020 to 2060 for primary and revision TEAs are 1.03% (95% confidence interval: 0.82%-1.25%) and 5.17% (95% confidence interval: 3.02%-6.97%), respectively. By 2060, the demand for primary TEA and revision TEA is projected to be 2084 procedures (95% forecast interval: 1995-2174) and 3161 procedures (95% forecast interval: 3052-3272), respectively. The procedure volume for revision TEA is estimated to outnumber primary TEA by year 2050.

CONCLUSION

The overall procedural volume of primary TEA and revision TEA continues to be low. Although it is estimated that the incidence of primary and revision TEAs will continue to increase in the next 40 years, the utilization trends only show a mild increase, which is 5 times higher for revision TEA than primary TEA.

Indications and outcomes of the Coonrad-Morrey total elbow arthroplasty: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The Coonrad-Morrey prosthesis (CMP) is a widely applied semi-constrained implant that effectively counteracts compression and thrust on the hinge. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the indications and outcomes of CMP across different aetiologies for which it was implanted.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Selected articles were reviewed to extract: population data, surgical indications, preoperative and postoperative clinical outcomes, survival rate, and complications.

RESULTS

A total of 873 TEAs were analysed. The majority of implants (74.8%) were in female, with a mean age of 62.8 years. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) was the most common indication (69.9%), followed by post-traumatic sequelae (PTS) (12.1%) and acute fractures (FR) (12.1%). Improvement in functional scores were registered with a mean postoperative flexion-extension of 99.0° and a mean pronation-supination of 137.7°. A mean rate of 29.5% (range, 13.3%-71.4%) complications occurred, mechanical failure (9.04%) being the most frequent.

CONCLUSION

CMP showed favourable medium- to long-term clinical outcomes for patients with RA and FR, especially when osteosynthesis is not deemed feasible in elderly patients with low joint workload. Although CMP offered restored range of motion and functional improvements, the implant's low overall survival rate and high complication rate require careful consideration, especially in assessing individual patient factors which are then necessary to determine the suitability of CMP as a therapeutic option.

Anatomical study of the innervation of the posterior elbow joint capsule: implications for ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve block and radiofrequency ablation procedures

INTRODUCTION

Ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve block and radiofrequency ablation have been developed for pain management in various joints including the hip, knee and shoulder, but not the elbow. Precise three-dimensional (3D) localization of the articular branches and landmarks visible on ultrasound are needed. The objectives of this anatomical study were to determine the presence, course, frequency, landmarks and areas innervated by the articular branches supplying the posterior elbow joint.

METHODS

In 12 upper extremity specimens, articular branches to the posterior elbow joint were dissected from brachial plexus to termination. Origin, course, frequency, capsular distribution and landmarks were documented. Data were reconstructed into 3D models and a 3D frequency map to visualize spatial relationships between the articular branches, capsule and landmarks.

RESULTS

The superior part of the posterior capsule was innervated by the ulnar collateral nerve (92%) and lateral branch to triceps (100%). The lateral part was supplied by the nerve to anconeus (100%) and, when present, branch to extensor carpi ulnaris (58%). The medial part was supplied by the ulnar nerve through direct branches (92%) and branches to forearm flexors (100%). The medial and posterior antebrachial cutaneous nerves supplied the medial and lateral epicondylar areas, respectively (100%, 83%). Common landmarks included the epicondyles, olecranon, olecranon fossa, and margins of triceps.

CONCLUSIONS

The 3D data of the articular branches supplying the posterior elbow joint provide an anatomical basis for the development of peripheral nerve block and radiofrequency ablation protocols to treat elbow joint pain. Further anatomical and clinical studies are necessary to identify target sites and evaluate the proposed landmarks in vivo.

Biomechanical evaluation of the effect of varying humeral implant length in total elbow replacement: a finite element analysis

BACKGROUND

Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is increasingly used for expanding indications but complications like aseptic loosening and periprosthetic fractures persist. Our objective is to examine the biomechanical behavior of the total elbow implant in response to varying implant lengths by investigating the stresses and the stress shielding effect in the bone-implant assembly using finite element (FE) modeling.

METHODS

A fourth-generation synthetic humerus sawbone and its corresponding digital model were used in this study. Total elbow implants are laser scanned to obtain the 3D implant models. FE models of 2-mm cemented bone-prosthesis assemblies of different implant lengths were generated. While fixing the mid-humerus, a compressive load of 400 N was applied at the distal humerus at varying flexion angles of 60°, 90°, and 150° to represent activities of daily living. A validated intact model was used to compare the experimental and computational strains. The von Mises stress, a scalar quantity that represents the state of stress the object is in, was then evaluated and compared in all intact and implanted models.

RESULTS

Longer humeral implants demonstrated larger areas of reduced peak stress, despite similar maximum cortical stress locations and magnitude. Cortical bone stress was observed to be lower along the implant insertion length. Maximum implant stress was also consistently higher in the 8-in implant for all loading conditions. Significant stress shielding was observed in all implants, with maximum %Δ stress consistently falling within the 15%-20% region of humerus length from the distal end.

DISCUSSION

Longer implants displayed larger stress-shielding areas, emphasizing the potential for shorter prostheses to preserve more bone stock and limit stress shielding.

Short-term adverse event rates and risk factors following total elbow arthroplasty for fracture and arthropathy: a matched analysis of nationally representative data

BACKGROUND

Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is a mainstay treatment for elbow arthropathy and elbow fracture that can relieve pain and restore functional motion. The purpose of this study was to determine the role of surgical indication in the incidence of short-term adverse events and risk factors influencing complications in TEA to treat arthropathy compared to TEA for fracture. Matched cohorts were created to better isolate the impact of the surgical indication.

METHODS

The study identified patients within the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database that underwent TEA to treat arthropathy or fracture from 2010 to 2020. Matched cohorts were created to analyze the incidence of 30 day adverse events and risk factors for complications.

RESULTS

The study included 599 patients for analysis. The overall incidence of any adverse event was 9.7%. In matched cohorts of 218 patients, the fracture group experienced a higher incidence of overall adverse events (13.8% vs. 6.0% in the arthropathy group, p = 0.009) and postoperative transfusions (9.6% vs. 1.8% in the arthropathy group, p < 0.001). Logistic regression revealed an increased risk of any adverse event in the combined matched cohort with longer operative times (OR = 1.007, CI: 1.002-1.012, p = 0.006) and those undergoing fracture treatment (OR = 2.447, CI: 1.047-5.717, p = 0.039). Outpatient status was associated with a lower risk of adverse events in the combined matched cohort (OR = 0.207, CI: 0.058-0.739, p = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

Even when controlling for comorbidities, patients undergoing TEA for fracture have a greater likelihood of short-term complications, particularly requiring a blood transfusion. Treatment of a fracture and increased operative time were risk factors for all patients, while outpatient status was protective.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Cortical windows for implant and cement removal during revision total elbow arthroplasty

Background

Revision total elbow arthroplasty (rTEA) remains a technically challenging procedure with potential for substantial morbidity. Cases involving excessively long cement mantles, removal of well-fixed implants or infected revisions requiring complete cement removal introduce additional technical challenges. Our purpose was to describe the outcomes, results, and complications associated with the use of cortical windows in rTEA. In addition, we provide a technical description of the procedure.

Methods

rTEA cases utilizing a cortical window performed by two surgeons between 2019 and 2023 were reviewed. Baseline demographics and case characteristics were recorded. Preoperative and postoperative outcomes were compared, including range of motion, radiographic outcomes, surgical complications and patient-reported outcome measures.

Results

Seven rTEA cases involving either a humeral or ulnar cortical window were included with an average follow-up of 15 months. Indications for cortical windows included infection, periprosthetic humerus fracture and presumed aseptic loosening. Improvements were noted postoperatively for pain scores, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation elbow scores. Final flexion-extension and pronation-supination were 100° and 156°. One patient (14%) had a postoperative complication (failure of fixation of a periprosthetic humerus fracture). There were no cases of intraoperative iatrogenic fracture or nerve injury.

Conclusion

For rTEA cases during which a cortical window was performed, complications occurred infrequently in the short term. In these challenging procedures, cortical windows appear to provide a relatively safe and efficient means of removing excessively long cement mantles or well-fixed components.

Lifting limitations following elbow arthroplasty: A survey of British Elbow and Shoulder Society members

The primary aim of this survey was to capture current practice with regard to lifting limitations following elbow arthroplasty. An online survey was emailed to all members of the British Elbow and Shoulder Society. All consultant respondents who reported performing elbow arthroplasty were asked about their advice for post-operative lifting limitations. In total, 115 surveys were completed: 55 consultants reported performing linked total elbow arthroplasty, 18 reported performing unlinked total elbow arthroplasty and 44 reported performing distal humeral hemiarthroplasty. The majority of elbow consultants advise a lifelong lifting limitation following linked and unlinked total elbow arthroplasty (78% and 61% respectively). There was variation in the weight specified for lifelong lifting limitations, the median weight restriction in linked total elbow arthroplasty was 5 lb, and in unlinked total elbow arthroplasty was 10 lb (range 1-20 lb). In total, 13% of consultants performing linked total elbow arthroplasty and 33% of consultants performing unlinked total elbow arthroplasty do not advise any lifelong lifting limitations post-operatively. In a perceived attempt to prolong implant longevity, most surgeons recommend lifelong lifting limitations following total elbow arthroplasty. There is variation in the weight restriction advised by consultant elbow surgeons. Currently the optimal weight restriction to maximise implant longevity is not known and further work needs to be done to understand the true relationship between activity, loading and implant failure.

Long-term outcomes and trends in elbow arthroplasty with Coonrad-Morrey prosthesis: a retrospective study in large group of patients

PURPOSE

Total Elbow Arthroplasty (TEA) was first developed to treat severe rheumatoid arthritis, but its uses have grown to encompass end-stage osteoarthritis, post-traumatic arthritis, and distal humeral fractures. This study analyzes indications changes, long-term survival, complications, and post-operative functional results of the Coonrad-Morrey prostheses, enhancing the existing literature on this technique and substantial case history.

METHODS

We included 122 arthroplasties in 117 patients, 28 males and 89 females (mean age of 67 years) treated in our hospital between 2002 and 2016. Minimum follow-up was four years. We collect functional parameters of 48 patients (51 elbows), due to death of patients due to old age and loss at follow-up.

RESULTS

Survival rate at five years was 90%, 85% at 10 years and 83% at 15 years. The overall medium Mayo elbow score was 79.7 ± 18.3 with the highest result in osteoarthritis patients (p < 0.005); QuickDASH score was 33.1 ± 25.5 with the worse result in rheumatoid group. Average post-operative arc of motion (ROM) was 95°±27°. There were complications in 46 out of 122 cases (37.7%) and revision surgeries were performed in 12 of them (9.8%): seven aseptic loosening, four late septic loosening, one bushing wear. In 27 instances (22.1%) was reported ulnar nerve involvement.

CONCLUSION

Coonrad-Morrey prosthesis has shown satisfactory clinical results in the treatment of a wide range of pathologies. The long-term implant survivorship was satisfactory, yet the occurrence of failures and complications cannot be overlooked, above all the ulnar nerve paresthesia. There was a good recovery in quality of life, pain-free with limited residual limb disability.

Accuracy of Implant Placement Based on Three-Dimensional Preoperative Planning in Total Elbow Arthroplasty

Background: Accurate implant placement in the optimal position is important to obtain favourable clinical outcomes and prevent complications in total joint arthroplasty. We aimed to assess the accuracy of implant placement based on three-dimensional (3D) preoperative planning for unlinked total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) and to clarify the effect of implant placement on clinical outcomes. Methods: This study included 20 patients (22 elbows, 17 with rheumatoid arthritis and 5 with osteoarthritis, with a mean follow-up period of 47 months) who underwent TEA with an unlinked-type implant after computed tomography (CT)-based 3D preoperative planning. Implant placement was planned preoperatively and several parameters were set to reflect it intraoperatively. TEA was performed based on the plan, and postoperative CT was conducted to evaluate differences in implant placement by comparing the preoperative plan and postoperative implant placement. Furthermore, we evaluated the relationship between implant placement differences and postoperative clinical outcomes, including range of motion, Visual Analogue Scale, Mayo Elbow Performance Score 1 year after surgery and complications at the last follow-up. Results: The mean absolute translation was within 2 mm, the mean absolute tilt was within 4°, the mean absolute rotation of the humeral component was within 4° and the mean absolute rotation of the ulnar component was 10.2° ± 6.8°. In the ulnar components, 15/22 (68%) cases were externally rotated, and the mean external rotation was 7.1° ± 10.2°. We defined the absolute ulnar component's rotational difference of more than 10° as a 'malrotation' group (n = 8) and 10° or less as a 'control' group (n = 14). We compared the clinical outcomes between both groups, however, no significant differences were observed in clinical outcomes and complications. Conclusions: We observed notable malrotation in the postoperative positioning of the ulnar component. Intraoperative support devices may be necessary to accurately reproduce the preoperative plan in the surgical field. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic).

A review of the New Zealand National Joint Registry to evaluate the survivorship and revision rates of Nexel and Coonrad-Morrey total elbow arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is an appropriate surgical treatment option for a variety of conditions ranging from inflammatory arthritis to trauma. Because of a high complication profile, implant companies have attempted to improve patient outcomes with evolving design mechanics and philosophy. However, the Nexel TEA prosthesis has been criticized for its unacceptably high revision rate by other research groups in the literature. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the survivorship and revision rates of the Nexel and Coonrad-Morrey TEA implant systems in New Zealand.

METHODS

Prospectively collected National Joint Registry data were used to compare the survival rates of these prostheses. Underlying diagnoses, reasons for revision, and patient demographics were all recorded. Statistical analysis included survival analysis using Kaplan-Meier curves and comparison between groups using independent t tests.

RESULTS

Over the 23-year study interval, the Nexel and Coonrad-Morrey prostheses showed similar survivorship and revision rates. The revision rates at 5 years were 7.3% for Nexel and 4.5% for the Coonrad-Morrey cohorts. The average time to revision for those who are revised was 3.13 ± 1.74 years in the Nexel group and 4.93 ± 4.13 years in the Coonrad-Morrey population.

CONCLUSION

Our study confirms a lower revision rate of the Nexel TEA compared to other studies in the literature. Additionally, the Nexel TEA implant performs comparably to its predecessor, the Coonrad-Morrey prosthesis in New Zealand. Although it is difficult to explain the discrepancy in results with the study by Morrey et al, future studies should focus on investigating postoperative radiographs and a deep analysis of the specific surgical technique used for this implant.

AO/OTA B and C articular fractures of the distal humerus: What are the boundaries between Total Elbow Arthroplasty and ORIF?

BACKGROUND

Nowadays, an increasing number of Total Elbow Arthroplasty (TEA) surgeries have been selected as the primary intervention for distal humerus joint fractures. TEA has demonstrated favorable outcomes in elderly osteoporotic patients and has been associated with fewer complications and reduced stiffness when compared to Open Reduction Internal Fixation (ORIF) surgeries. This retrospective cohort study aimed to analyze differences in terms of functional outcomes, complications, and reoperation rates of distal fractures of the humerus treated with ORIF and TEA.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

Closed intra-articular fractures of the distal humerus (AO/OTA type 13B and 13C); age greater than 50 years; clinical and radiological follow-up of at least 2 years. Patients were divided into two groups according to surgical treatments: ORIF and TEA. The following variables were obtained: age, sex, affected side, AO/OTA classification, follow-up time, approach, surgery duration, Range Of Motions, MEPI (Mayo Elbow Performance Index), QUICK DASH (Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand), post-operative VAS (Visual Analog Scale), satisfaction rate, complications and reoperation rates. Differences in data averages between the groups were assessed, and a correlation between age and other variables in each group was calculated.

RESULTS

83 subjects (26 men and 57 women) were eligible and selected for the study. Average age and follow-up time were 74.8 years (+-10.6) and 83.6 months (+-42.6). Group TEA consisted of 41 patients (37 female, 4 male), mean age of 78.8 (+-8.6) with follow-up time of 83,6 months (+-42.6). Group ORIF consisted of 42 subjects (20 female, 22 male), mean age of 71.1 (+-11.6) with follow-up time of 70,6 months (+-40,6) The cohorts didn't differ significantly with any variables calculated (p > 0.05) except for complication and reoperation rates, which were significantly lower in the TEA group. Age didn't have a correlation trend associated with the variables in either group assessed independently (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the study, may guide in choosing a surgical option for distal humerus fractures in the elderly by considering TEA an alternative that is comparable to ORIF, and in selected cases an alternative that overall provides greater assurance than ORIF.

Midterm follow-up of the Nexel total elbow arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Aseptic loosening is one of the most common complications of total elbow arthroplasty (TEA). Modern implants, such as the Nexel, have been designed in an attempt to decrease loosening. The present study aims to report implant survivorship, radiographic assessment of loosening and lucency, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients treated with the Nexel TEA at midterm follow-up.

METHODS

Consecutive series of adult patients underwent TEA using the Nexel by a single surgeon via standardized technique. Patients with minimum 3-year follow-up with radiographic and PROM data were included. Survivorship was defined by the absence of revision. Loosening was assessed via the Wrightington method by 3 independent fellowship-trained shoulder and elbow surgeons. Lucency was analyzed across individual radiographic zones on orthogonal radiographs. PROMs included the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (QuickDASH), Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation (PREE), and EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D).

RESULTS

Thirty-eight consecutive patients (22 female, 16 male) with a mean age of 67 years underwent TEA via a triceps-sparing isolated medial window approach. Mean follow-up was 5.5 years (range 3-9). Primary diagnoses were as follows: 19 osteoarthritis (OA), 9 rheumatoid arthritis (RA), 9 post-traumatic arthritis (PA), and 1 conversion of elbow arthrodesis. Overall survivorship was 97.4%, with 1 patient undergoing revision for infection. Loosening was found in 5.3% of elbows, averaged across 3 observers. Lucency was most pronounced at the level of the humeral condyles. PROMs demonstrated significant and clinically meaningful improvements in 76%, 92%, and 73% of patients for QuickDASH, PREE, and EQ-5D, respectively. No significant correlations were found between patient age, gender, loosening, lucency, and PROMs.

CONCLUSION

At midterm follow-up, the Nexel TEA demonstrated excellent overall survivorship and low rate of implant loosening. The single failure requiring revision for infection was conversion of a prior elbow arthrodesis. PROMs overall exhibited marked and consistent improvement from preoperative to final postoperative follow-up. Although promising, these results should be interpreted with some caution as long-term data regarding this prosthesis are still lacking.

Influence of Training Background on Elbow Arthroplasty Case Numbers: An Analysis of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Part II Oral Examination Case List Database

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to evaluate the influence of training background on the frequency and indications of elbow arthroplasty performed by early-career surgeons.

METHODS

A review of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Part II Oral Examination Case List database from 2010 to 2021 was completed. The number of cases performed by surgeons from each individual training background were calculated and compared with the total number of surgeons who completed each fellowship during the study period.

RESULTS

Hand surgeons performed the most elbow arthroplasty cases (132, 44%), but a higher percentage of shoulder/elbow surgeons performed elbow arthroplasty in comparison (15% vs. 7%). The mean number of TEA cases performed by shoulder/elbow surgeons was significantly higher than in other subspecialties (P < 0.01). However, when comparing only surgeons who performed elbow arthroplasty during the board collection period, there was no significant difference between training backgrounds (P = 0.20).

DISCUSSION

While hand surgeons performed the most elbow arthroplasty cases, a higher percentage of shoulder/elbow surgeons performed elbow arthroplasty during the study period. The high prevalence of distal humerus fracture as an indication for arthroplasty reflected a shift in indications and was not related to training background.

Incidence of and Risk Factors for Reoperation and Revision Following Total Elbow Arthroplasty with an Anatomic Convertible Prosthesis

BACKGROUND

Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) remains a valuable tool for treating inflammatory, degenerative, and traumatic elbow conditions. This study aimed to understand the incidence of and risk factors for reoperation following TEA at a high-volume center utilizing an implant with a convertible linkage and the potential for anatomic lateral column reconstruction.

METHODS

All patients undergoing primary TEA with the Latitude prosthesis (Stryker) from July 2001 to May 2020 were identified. Patient characteristics, the surgical indication, and implant characteristics were obtained. Additionally, the indications and timing were identified for reoperations. Postoperative radiographs were analyzed to assess cement quality, implant position, lateral column reconstruction, and distal humeral bone loss.

RESULTS

Two hundred and nineteen TEAs were performed in 206 patients; 162 (74.0%) were in female patients, the mean patient age was 61 years (range, 23 to 95 years), and the mean follow-up was 11.8 years (range, 2 to 21 years). The most common indication for surgery was sequelae of trauma (36%). Ninety elbows (41.1%) required 200 reoperations at a mean of 19.6 months. Forty TEAs (18.3%) required revision of nonmodular implants, with 14 (6.4%) undergoing definitive explantation. The 5 and 10-year survivorship was 86.1% and 79.7%, respectively. The most common of the reasons for revision was aseptic loosening (53.8%), and the most common cause for non-revision reoperation was infection (23%). Younger age and greater follow-up duration were associated with greater revision and reoperation risks. Aseptic ulnar loosening was associated with a short ulnar stem length and component linkage (30% of short linked ulnar stems loosened; p < 0.001). Aseptic humeral loosening was associated with less-than-adequate cement-mantle quality (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Extended follow-up of the Latitude prosthesis at a high-volume center demonstrates that TEA continues to be hampered by a high reoperation rate, primarily due to infection and aseptic loosening. Technical factors such as good cement-mantle quality, longer stem length, and unlinked implants may play a role in preventing aseptic loosening. Further work is required to optimize long-term outcomes following TEA through improved understanding of appropriate surgical indications, techniques, and implant utilization.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Update on elbow arthroplasties with emphasis on imaging

Elbow arthroplasty is increasing in popularity and can be used to treat many conditions, such as trauma, primary and secondary osteoarthritis, inflammatory arthritis, and osteonecrosis. Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is reserved for patients with severe symptoms refractory to more conservative management. In addition to TEA, hemi-arthroplasty, interposition arthroplasty, and resection arthroplasty also play roles in the management of elbow pain. There are specific indications for each type of arthroplasty. Postoperative complications may occur with elbow arthroplasties and may be surgery or hardware related. Imaging is important in both pre-operative planning as well as in post-surgical follow-up. This article reviews the different types of elbow arthroplasties, their indications, their normal postoperative imaging appearances, and imaging findings of potential complications.

Prognostic factors associated with failure of total elbow arthroplasty

Aims

The aims of this study were to identify and evaluate the current literature examining the prognostic factors which are associated with failure of total elbow arthroplasty (TEA).

Methods

Electronic literature searches were conducted using MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane. All studies reporting prognostic estimates for factors associated with the revision of a primary TEA were included. The risk of bias was assessed using the Quality In Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool, and the quality of evidence was assessed using the modified Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) framework. Due to low quality of the evidence and the heterogeneous nature of the studies, a narrative synthesis was used.

Results

A total of 19 studies met the inclusion criteria, investigating 28 possible prognostic factors. Most QUIPS domains (84%) were rated as moderate to high risk of bias. The quality of the evidence was low or very low for all prognostic factors. In low-quality evidence, prognostic factors with consistent associations with failure of TEA in more than one study were: the sequelae of trauma leading to TEA, either independently or combined with acute trauma, and male sex. Several other studies investigating sex reported no association. The evidence for other factors was of very low quality and mostly involved exploratory studies.

Conclusion

The current evidence investigating the prognostic factors associated with failure of TEA is of low or very low quality, and studies generally have a moderate to high risk of bias. Prognostic factors are subject to uncertainty, should be interpreted with caution, and are of little clinical value. Higher-quality evidence is required to determine robust prognostic factors for failure of TEA.

Rehabilitation after total or hemi elbow arthroplasty: a systematic review

Introduction

Total and hemi elbow arthroplasty (TEA/HEA) are relatively uncommon orthopedic procedures, but physiotherapists are involved in both pre- and postoperative treatment of people who undergo TEA/HEA. The purpose of this article is to summarize existing knowledge about the effects of rehabilitation versus standard care after total and hemi elbow arthroplasty (TEA/HEA).

Methods

A systematic literature review was conducted searching Ovid MEDLINE ®, SweMED+, Cochrane, Embase, AMED and PEDro. "The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" was followed.

Results

No one has studied the effects of rehabilitation after TEA/HEA. The aim of the only study included was to assess the safety and length of hospital stay (LOS) after omission of casting, start of early mobilization and implementation of functional discharge criteria. Results show that the non-casting cohort had a shorter mean LOS (5.4 days) than the index cohort (6.2 days). The cohort with functional discharge criteria had a shorter mean LOS (3.8 days) than the cohort without functional discharge (5.4 days).

Conclusion

Effects of rehabilitation components or programs after TEA/HEA are still unknown. It is important to focus on the lack of evidence in this field, and plan for more studies to come.

Long-term outcomes of Kudo type-5 unlinked surface-replacing total elbow arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis: a 15-year average follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) has been used for various conditions including rheumatoid arthritis (RA). While the Kudo TEA has been associated with favorable short-term outcomes, there is limited information on the longer term outcomes of this device. The aim of this study was to investigate the average 15-year outcome of Kudo type-5 TEA in patients with RA.

METHODS

For this retrospective cohort study, we reviewed 29 elbows in 28 patients (Larsen grade III, n = 8; IV, n = 19; V, n = 2) with RA who underwent Kudo type-5 TEA between 1999 and 2010. The patients were followed up for a mean of 15 (range: 10-21) years. We investigated the survival with setting revision/removal as the endpoints. The risk factors for revision/loosening were assessed.

RESULTS

There was a significant improvement in elbow flexion after Kudo TEA. Preoperative and postoperative Mayo Elbow Performance Score improved significantly from 60.3 to 94.7. Complications included intraoperative medial humeral epicondyle fracture (n = 2), postoperative dislocations (n = 4), deep infections (n = 1), and persistent ulnar nerve neuropathy (n = 1). Aseptic loosening was observed in 7 elbows (24.1%; humerus, n = 3; ulna, n = 3; both sides, n = 1). The causes of the 5 revisions were postoperative dislocation (n = 1), deep infection (n = 1), aseptic loosening of the humerus (n = 2), and aseptic loosening of the ulna (n = 1). All 5 elbows underwent revision of the ulnar component (n = 2) or the linked TEA (n = 3). The survival rate was 81% at 15 years after surgery with setting revision/removal as the endpoints. A deviation of ulnar component insertion angle of over 5° in any plane was associated with more revision compared to those with accurately placed implants.

CONCLUSION

The Kudo type-5 elbow showed good results for up to 15 years of follow-up. However, excessive deviation of insertion angle of the ulnar component (over 5°) was associated with more revision. Due to the small sample size, robust statistical analysis of risk factors for postoperative complications or revision could not be performed, and further research is warranted to resolve this limitation.

Valgus instability and related factors beyond 2 years following unlinked total elbow arthroplasty

HYPOTHESIS AND BACKGROUND

Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA), categorized into linked and unlinked types, is a commonly reported treatment for rheumatoid arthritis of the elbow. Although unlinked TEA preserves bone, it may result in instability. This study aimed to assess the outcomes of unlinked TEA in rheumatoid arthritis of the elbow beyond 2 years and to identify factors correlating with postoperative valgus instability of unlinked TEA.

METHODS

This study included patients who underwent TEA for rheumatoid arthritis of the elbow at our department between August 2009 and January 2017, with a follow-up period exceeding 2 years. Elbow joint range of motion (ROM) and clinical scores were evaluated preoperatively and at the final follow-up. Factors contributing to valgus instability, such as the Larsen grade, sex, age, side, preoperative ROM, postoperative ROM, implant placement, preoperative carrying angle, and the use of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs), were also assessed.

RESULTS

This study encompassed 26 elbows from 23 patients, with a mean patient age at surgery of 64.8 years and a mean follow-up duration of 92.4 months. Significant improvements were observed in the ROM (extension: from -31° preoperatively to -21° postoperatively [P = .02], flexion: from 116° to137° [P < .001]), Japanese Orthopaedic Association-Japan Elbow Society Elbow Function Score (from 45.9 to 86.3 points [P < .001]), and Mayo Elbow Performance Score (from 43.6 to 91.7 points [P < .001]). At the last follow-up, 2 elbows exhibited radiolucent lines around the humeral stem, whereas 7 had valgus instability. Factors correlated with valgus instability included total arc at the final follow-up, preoperative carrying angle, and the use of bDMARDs.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Unlinked TEA demonstrated favorable midterm outcomes for rheumatoid arthritis of the elbow, albeit with occasional valgus instability. Surgeons should consider preoperative carrying angle and bDMARD use, and exercise caution regarding intraoperative extensions.

Treatment of post-traumatic complete bony ankylosed elbow using total arthroplasty and hernia patch - A case report

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

The elbow is one of the most mobile joints, and its movement is very important. Bony ankylosed elbow is an uncommon condition leading to complete loss of activity of elbow, and then lead to severe disability and limitation in activities of daily living.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 63-year-old woman sustained comminuted fracture of left distal humerus. She underwent open reduction and internal fixation by plates. After the plates were removed in 2016，stiffness developed.The elbow was stable but fixed at 90°，there was no vascular injury or deficit in sensory and motor function of the ulnar nerve. She hopes to eliminate pain and restore normal mobility compatible with ADL.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

Complete bony ankylosis of the elbow joint may be caused by trauma, rheumatic disease, burns, congenital stiffness and other conditions. Even with the compensation of shoulder and wrist, it will still have a great impact on upper limb function. Whether to treat mainly depends on whether the patient has the require to improve the functionality and return to daily activities. Treatment methods are very limited, including interposition arthroplasty and TEA. Defect of soft tissue appeared was seen in our case, Hernia Patch was innovatively applied to reconstruct the defect of soft tissue and maintain continuity of elbow extension mechanism.

CONCLUSION

Patients with post-traumatic elbow joint ankylosis were suffered from severe bony abnormalities, but also soft tissue contracture or defects due to multiple operations and trauma. We present a case of complete bony ankylosed elbow treated with total elbow arthroplasty and Hernia Patch.

Failure of the linkage mechanism in a semi-constrained total elbow arthroplasty is a rare and unpredictable event: a review of seven cases

PURPOSE

Linked component of total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) consisted of bushing and locking pins. Failure of linked components is a rare complication of TEA. This study aims to investigate the mechanism and consequence of failure of the linkage mechanism in TEA surgeries.

METHODS

Between 2010 and 2021, five patients received revision operation due to linked component failure. Besides, two patients underwent primary operation at another institute were also analyzed due to failure of the linkage mechanism.

RESULTS

All seven patients underwent primary TEA and mean age for primary TEA was 48 (range, 27-62). Two patients had TEA for post-traumatic arthritis, three patients for rheumatoid arthritis, and two patients for comminuted distal humerus fracture. The average time between primary TEA and revision TEA for linked component failure was 13.6 years. Three bushing wear and four locking pin dissociation were diagnosed according to pre-operative radiography. Elbow pain and swelling are the most common clinical symptoms. Severe osteolysis, periprosthetic fracture, and stem loosening were noted in three bushing wear cases. In four dissociation of locking pin cases, breakage of male locking pin phalanges was demonstrated in two patients. For revision procedures, both the locking pins and bushings were replaced. No patients in the study required additional surgery after the revision operation for linked component failure.

CONCLUSION

Osteolysis, component loosening, periprosthetic fracture may be expected after linked component failure. Patients should be regularly followed up from short-term to long-term with radiography. Early diagnosis and intervention with linked component exchange can prevent extensive revision surgery.

Elbow joint loads during simulated activities of daily living: implications for formulating recommendations after total elbow arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Overloading of the elbow joint prosthesis following total elbow arthroplasty can lead to implant failure. Joint moments during daily activities are not well contextualized for a prosthesis's failure limits, and the effect of the current postoperative instruction on elbow joint loading is unclear. This study investigates the difference in elbow joint moments between simulated daily tasks and between flexion-extension, pronation-supination, and varus-valgus movement directions. Additionally, the effect of the current postoperative instruction on elbow joint load is examined.

METHODS

Nine healthy participants (age 45.8 ± 17 years, 3 males) performed 8 tasks; driving a car, opening a door, rising from a chair, lifting, sliding, combing hair, drinking, emptying cup, without and with the instruction "not lifting more than 1 kg." Upper limb kinematics and hand contact forces were measured. Elbow joint angles and net moments were analyzed using inverse dynamic analysis, where the net moments are estimated from movement data and external forces.

RESULTS

Peak elbow joint moments differed significantly between tasks (P < .01) and movement directions (P < .01). The most and least demanding tasks were, rising from a chair (13.4 Nm extension, 5.0 Nm supination, and 15.2 Nm valgus) and sliding (4.3 Nm flexion, 1.7 Nm supination, and 2.6 Nm varus). Net moments were significantly reduced after instruction only in the chair task (P < .01).

CONCLUSION

This study analyzed elbow joint moments in different directions during daily tasks. The outcomes question whether postoperative instruction can lead to decreasing elbow loads. Future research might focus on reducing elbow loads in the flexion-extension and varus-valgus directions.

The management of elbow trauma from a historical perspective

The origins of contemporary orthopedics can be traced all the way back to antiquity. Despite the absence of modern imaging techniques, a few bright minds were able to lay the groundwork for understanding these fractures. This historical review will cover the process behind the various treatments for elbow fractures, such as splinting and casting, mobilization, amputation, fracture fixation, arthroplasty, and arthroscopy.

The 5-Item Modified Frailty Index for Risk Stratification of Patients Undergoing Total Elbow Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Frailty, quantified using the 5-item modified frailty index (mFI-5), has been shown to predict adverse outcomes in orthopaedic surgery. The utility in total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) patients is unclear. We evaluated if increasing frailty would correlate with worse postoperative outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective assessment of patients in the American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program undergoing primary TEA was performed. The mFI-5 was calculated by assigning 1 point for each comorbidity (diabetes, hypertension, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and functionally dependent health status). Poisson regression was used to evaluate mFI-5 scores on complications, length of stay (LOS), and adverse discharge. A significance threshold was at P < .05.

RESULTS

In total, 609 patients were included; 34.5% (n = 210) were not frail (mFI = 0), 44.0% (n = 268) were slightly frail (mFI = 1), and 21.5% (n = 131) were frail (mFI ≥ 2). As mFI score increased from 0 to ≥ 2, the following rates increased: any complication (9.0%-19.8%), major complication (11.0%-20.6%), cardiac complication (0.0%-2.3%), hematologic complication (3.3%-9.2%), adverse discharge (2.9%-22.9%), and LOS from 2.08 to 3.97 days (all P < .048). Following adjustment, Poisson regression demonstrated patients with a mFI ≥ 2 had increased risk of major complication (risk ratio [RR]: 2.13; P = .029), any complication (RR: 2.49; P = .032), Clavien-Dindo IV complication (RR: 5.53; P = .041), and adverse discharge (RR: 5.72; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty is not only associated with longer hospitalizations, but more major complications and non-home discharge. The mFI-5 is a useful risk stratification that may assist in decision-making for TEA.

Outcomes After Acute Versus Delayed Total Elbow Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Distal Humerus Fractures

Purpose

Compare outcomes of acute versus delayed total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) following distal humerus fractures (DHF).

Methods

This retrospective study included 39 patients who underwent primary TEA with semiconstrained implants for DHF, either within 4 weeks of their injury or after failing initial open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) or nonsurgical management, between June 1, 2003 and February 1, 2018 with minimum 1-year follow-up. Our outcome measures included QuickDASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) score, complications, reoperations, and range of motion (ROM). Demographics, clinical variables, and outcomes were compared using the Student's t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Fisher's exact test as appropriate. Kaplan-Meier curves for mortality, implant survivorship, and reoperation were created.

Results

Our patients were categorized into acute TEA (n = 22), ORIF to TEA (n = 10), and nonsurgical to TEA (n = 7) treatment groups. Additional analysis was performed comparing acute to delayed TEA, which combined data from failed ORIF and nonsurgical cohorts. The median follow-up, average age, and median Charlson comorbility index were similar between groups. The most common fracture pattern was AO13C. At median follow-up of 5.8 years, QuickDASH differed between cohorts: mean of 31 (SD 19) in acute TEA and 52 (SD 27) in delayed TEA, which further subdivided to 44.2 (SD 25) in failed ORIF and 76 (SD 23) in failed nonsurgical management. Poorer QuickDASH scores at final follow-up were associated with delayed TEA, initial nonsurgical management, and depression. Surgical complications were associated with delayed TEA. Higher Charlson comorbidity index was associated with death. No variables were associated significantly with ROM, revision, or reoperation.

Conclusion

Comminuted DHFs are difficult to treat in the elderly with high rates of complication and poor function after surgery. Our study suggests TEA performed acutely result in satisfactory outcomes and should be a consideration for patients at high risk of failing ORIF or nonsurgical management.

Type of Study/Level of Evidence

Therapeutic, III.

Prognostic factors associated with failure of total elbow replacement: a protocol for a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Total elbow replacement (TER) has higher failure rates requiring revision surgery compared with the replacement of other joints. Understanding the factors associated with failure is essential for informed decision-making between patients and clinicians, and for reducing the failure rate. This review aims to identify, describe and appraise the literature examining prognostic factors for failure of TER.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This systematic review will be conducted and reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols guidelines. Electronic literature searches will be conducted using Medline, EMBASE, PubMed and Cochrane. The search strategy will be broad, including a combination of subject headings (MESH) and free text search. This search will be supplemented with a screening of reference lists of the included studies and relevant reviews. Two independent reviewers will screen all search results in two stages (title and abstract, and full text) based on the Population, Index prognostic factor, Comparator prognostic factor, Outcome, Time and Setting criteria. The types of evidence included will be randomised trials, non-randomised trials, prospective and retrospective cohort studies, registry studies and case-control studies. If the literature lacks enough studies, then case series with 50 or more TERs will be considered for inclusion. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment for included studies will be performed by two independent reviewers using the Checklist for Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies for Prognostic Factors and Quality In Prognostic Studies tools.Meta-analyses of prognostic estimates for each factor will be undertaken for studies that are deemed to be sufficiently robust and comparable. Several challenges are likely to arise due to heterogeneity between studies, therefore, subgroup and sensitivity analyses will be performed to account for the differences between studies. Heterogeneity will be assessed using Q and I2 statistics. If I2>40% then pooled estimates will not be reported. When quantitative synthesis is not possible, a narrative synthesis will be undertaken. The quality of the evidence for each prognostic factor will be assessed using the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation tool.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42023384756.

Revision Arthroplasty in the Challenging Elbow

Compared with hip and knee arthroplasty, total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) has a higher complication rate and lower survivorship. Modern TEA implants most commonly require revision due to implant loosening, infection, and periprosthetic fracture. Concerns with revision TEA include handling of the soft tissues and possible necessity of flap coverage, triceps management, preservation of bone stock, and management of concurrent infection or fracture. In this review, we will discuss preoperative evaluation of the failed elbow arthroplasty, surgical approaches, techniques for revision, outcomes, and complications following revision total elbow arthroplasty.

Outcomes of Revision Unlinked Total Elbow Arthroplasty for Rheumatoid Elbow

Background: Although unlinked total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is a treatment option for end-stage rheumatoid arthritis (RA) of the elbow, its long-term outcomes were inferior. Moreover, revision TEA could be technically challenging. The unlinked TEA procedure comprises the ease of implant removal at revision and advantage of bone preservation. This study evaluated the clinical outcomes in patients who underwent revision TEA using primary unlinked TEA for rheumatoid elbows. It also aimed to determine whether selecting the unlinked prosthesis for the primary TEA would make revision more accessible and successful. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data of 13 consecutive patients (14 elbows) who underwent revision TEAs for implant failure due to different aetiologies, excluding septic loosening. Three different unlinked TEA implants were used: the Kudo type-5 with all-polyethylene (AP) ulnar component, Kudo type-5 with metal-backed (MB) ulnar component and K-Now TEA. We evaluated the patients' pre- and postoperative outcomes, including the range of motion, pain score and Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI). Results: Among the 14 elbows, 11 were revised using the Kudo type-5 ulnar component (nine and two with AP and MB ulnar component, respectively), and three using the K-Now. We found that each model of TEA had different tendencies to indication for revision surgery. Three more resulted in further failure. The clinical outcomes were assessed in the 11 surviving elbows. Eight of the 11 elbows showed no pain at the final follow-up. However, the remaining three showed only mild pain. The MEPI revealed that seven cases were excellent, two were good and two were fair. Conclusions: The mode of implant failure was largely dependent on the implant design. Furthermore, partial revision with the same implant design was sufficient in managing implant failure in the early phase. However, conversion from unlinked to linked design could be recommended in patients with progressive failure or instability. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic).

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Total Elbow Arthroplasty Using a Semi-constrained Prosthesis with a Triceps-preserving Approach over a Minimum Follow-up Period of 4 Years

OBJECTIVE

Complications related to triceps after total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) have become a major surgical concern. The triceps-preserving approach has the advantage of not disturbing the insertion of triceps but is disadvantaged by the reduced exposure of the elbow joint. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical and radiological outcomes of TEA with a triceps-preserving approach and to compare the outcomes of TEA to treat arthropathy with that of TEA to treat acute distal humerus fracture.

METHODS

From January 2010 to December 2018, 23 patients undergoing primary TEAs were retrospectively reviewed with a mean follow-up time of 92.6 months (range, 52-136 months). Each TEA was performed using the triceps-preserving approach with a semi-constrained Coonrad-Morrey prosthesis. Patient demographics, range of motion (ROM), pain visual analogue scale (VAS), and triceps strength (Medical Research Council [MRC] scale) were compared before and after surgery. The Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, radiographic outcome, and complications were evaluated at follow-up.

RESULTS

In total, seven males and 16 females were included in this study, with a mean age of 66.1 years (range:46-85 years). By the last follow-up, pain had been significantly relieved in all patients. The average MEPS in the arthropathy group and fracture group were 90.8 ± 10.3 points (range: 68-98 points) and 91.7 ± 0.4 (range: 76-100 points), respectively. The average DASH of the arthropathy group and fracture group was 37.3 ± 18.8 points (range: 18-52 points) and 38.4 ± 20.1 (range: 16-60 points). At the last follow-up after surgery, the mean flexion arcs in the arthropathy group and fracture group were 100.4° ± 24.1° and 97.8° ± 28.1°, respectively. The mean pro-supination arcs in the arthropathy group and fracture group were 142.4° ± 15.2° and 139.2° ± 17.5°, respectively. There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes between the two groups (P ≥ 0.05). Triceps strength was normal (MRC grade V) in 15 elbows and good in eight elbows. None of the cases experienced weakness of the triceps strength, infection, periprosthetic fractures, or prosthesis breakage.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical and radiographical outcomes of TEA with the triceps-preserving approach were satisfactory in patients with distal humerus fracture, osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis.

Distal Humeral Replacement in Patients with Primary Bone Sarcoma: The Functional Outcome and Return to Sports

Distal humeral replacement (DHR) is a limb-salvage option for the endoprosthetic reconstruction of bone defects following the resection of a primary bone sarcoma. As primary bone sarcomas are only occasionally located around the distal humerus, there is a paucity of information regarding postoperative function, and patients' resumption of sporting activities. With advances in diagnostics and in surgical and oncological treatment leading to an increased patient life expectancy and higher quality of life, patients' functional outcome and return to sports activities are of increasing interest. Between 1997 and 2021, a total of 24 patients underwent DHR with a single-design modular implant at a tertiary sarcoma center. A total of 14 patients who died of their disease were excluded, leaving a study cohort of 10 patients, with a median age of 30 years on the day of surgery (IQR 20-37). At the last follow-up, after a median of 230 months (IQR 165-262), the median MSTS was 19 (IQR 13-24), the median TESS was 79 (IQR 66-87), the median SEV was 38% (IQR 24-53), the median TS was 6 (IQR 4-7), and the median WAS was 3 (IQR 1-8). Among the variables of gender, surgery on the dominant extremity, intraoperative nerve resection, extra-articular tumor resection, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and revision surgeries, none were associated with a better/lower functional outcome score or return to sports activities. However, a higher level of sports performance prior to diagnosis (WAS > 10) was associated with a higher level of sports performance postoperatively (p = 0.044).

A Soft-Tissue Landmark to Assess Humeral Component Rotation in Total Elbow Arthroplasty

HYPOTHESIS

Assessing the rotational alignment of the humeral component during total elbow arthroplasty is dependent upon bony landmarks that can be absent or altered in cases of distal humerus fractures, revision arthroplasty, severe bone loss, or deformity. We hypothesize that the intermuscular septum can be used as a reliable soft-tissue landmark to set the rotation of the humeral component intra-operatively when previously described bony landmarks are not reliable or present.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-eight unpaired cadaveric human subjects (mean age and standard deviation 63 ± 12 years; 24 males, 24 females) underwent computed tomography (CT) scans. The geometric centers of the trochlea and capitellum were assessed, and the line through these two points was set as the flexion-extension axis (FEA) of the elbow. The intermuscular septum axis (IMSA) was drawn proximal to the olecranon fossa and at least 4 cm proximal to the most distal point of the articular surface, where the posterior humeral cortex was flat. The angles between the FEA and IMSA were calculated and compared using a two-tailed t-test. Regression analysis was used to assess the inter- and intra-observer reliability of the IMSA.

RESULTS

The IMSA was externally rotated 10.3° ± 2.8 compared to the FEA (p < 0.001 and confidence interval (CI) of 2.8 with α set to 0.01). The inter- and intra-observer reliability of the IMSA was high, with an R-value of 0.91 and 0.97, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The intermuscular septum can be used as a soft-tissue landmark to set humeral component rotation and is 10.3° externally rotated with respect to the FEA of the ulnohumeral joint.

Intraoperative modification of total elbow arthroplasty implants

BACKGROUND

Modification of total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) implants may be necessary in selected patients with substantial anatomic bone deformity or those undergoing revision surgery. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence and consequences of implant modifications during TEA at our institution. We hypothesized that TEA implant modification would be more common in revisions than in primary replacements, and that it would not be associated with worse clinical outcomes or increased rates of radiographic or surgical complications directly related to the implant modification.

METHODS

Elbows that had undergone TEA by any of 3 surgeons at our institution with use of intraoperative implant modification between January 1992 and October 2019 were retrospectively reviewed for the type of modification and complications. Complications were classified as definitely related, probably related, possibly related, or nonrelated to the implant's modification according to the consensus review by the 3 senior surgeons. A survey was sent out to surgeons outside of our institution to investigate whether intraoperative modification to TEA implants is a common clinical practice.

RESULTS

A total of 106 implant components were modified during 94 of 731 TEA procedures (13%) in 84 of 560 patients. Implant modifications were performed in 60 of 285 revision cases (21%) compared with 34 of 446 (8%) primary cases (P < .0001). These included shortening the stem in 40 (44%), bending the stem in 16 (15%), notching the stem in 16 (15%), tapering the stem in 9 (9%), and a combination of 2 or more of these modifications in 19 implants (17%). Among the 55 index surgeries available for complication analysis, 40 complications occurred in 28 index surgeries (11 primary and 17 revisions; 25 patients), making the overall complication rate 51%. Of these 40 complications, 23 were considered independent of any implant modification. Of the remaining 17 complications, 9 were considered nonrelated to the implant modification, 6 were possibly related, and 2 were probably related to the implant modification. Therefore, the complication rate possibly related or probably related to implant modification was 15% (8 of 55). No complication was classified as definitely related to the implant modification. No implant breakage or malfunction occurred after any modification. A total of 442 survey responses were received representing 29 countries, of which 144 surgeons (39%) performed modification to implants during TEA procedures.

DISCUSSION

This study confirmed our hypothesis that modification of TEA implants is not uncommon at our institution, particularly in revision arthroplasty. Surgeons should keep in mind that complications possibly related or probably related to implant modification were at minimum 15% and could have been as high as 30% if the patients lost to follow-up had all had complications. Implant modification may be necessary in some cases but should be exercised with thoughtful consideration and caution.

Total elbow arthroplasty with tricep turn-down flap in an old unreduced elbow dislocation: A case report

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

The treatment preference for neglected elbow dislocation is by open reduction and lengthening the tricep muscle. If the dislocation is not reduced for more than 6 months, degenerative resorption would have occurred. We did total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) with a tricep turn-down flap for the management in this case. The use of a tricep flap for tricep shortening after unreduced elbow dislocation has been reported in previous publications but none used a turn-down flap.

CASE PRESENTATION

An 82-year-old woman came to the orthopedic outpatient clinic with pain and discomfort on her right elbow. The arm affected by the injury was her dominant hand, restricting her from farming and leisure activities. Exploration findings confirmed the presence of a dislocated elbow with associated soft tissue complications. The cartilage was degeneratively destructed, and the tricep muscle was retracted.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

In our case, tricep shortening was managed with elongation using a turn-down flap. The lack of soft tissue layers and thin fibrous fascias results in tension-vulnerable TEA surgical wounds. This is caused by the insufficient coverage of the joint, which leads to wound complications. Previous studies of turn-down flap procedures showed good flap survival and functional outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Tricep turn-down flap could be an option for tricep lengthening procedures in unreduced neglected elbow joint dislocation.

Implant survival of total elbow arthroplasty: analysis of 514 cases from the Dutch Arthroplasty Registry

The aim of this study is to report the implant survival and factors associated with revision of total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) using data from the Dutch national registry. All TEAs recorded in the Dutch national registry between 2014 and 2020 were included. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis, and a logistic regression model was used to assess the factors associated with revision. A total of 514 TEAs were included, of which 35 were revised. The five-year implant survival was 91%. Male sex, a higher BMI, and previous surgery to the same elbow showed a statistically significant association with revision (p < 0.036). Of the 35 revised implants, ten (29%) underwent a second revision. This study reports a five-year implant survival of TEA of 91%. Patient factors associated with revision are defined and can be used to optimize informed consent and shared decision-making. There was a high rate of secondary revisions.

Elbow Arthritis

Elbow arthritis is an uncommon condition that can cause debilitating pain, stiffness, or instability. The most common etiologies include rheumatoid arthritis, posttraumatic arthritis, and primary osteoarthritis. Treatment begins with nonsurgical modalities, including activity modification, anti-inflammatories, hand therapy, and corticosteroids. Operative intervention may be considered once nonsurgical management has failed. Surgical treatment depends on the underlying etiology, chief complaint, patient age, and functional demand. Advances in technology, especially arthroscopic techniques, have expanded the treatment options available to surgeons. The goals of treatment include pain relief and restoration of functional range of motion. The purpose of this article is to review the pertinent soft tissue and osseous anatomy, discuss the etiologies, review the principles of diagnosis and evaluation, and finally, study the treatment options for elbow arthritis.

Revision surgery for periprosthetic elbow infection: eradication rate, complications, and functional outcomes-a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the outcomes of revision surgery after periprosthetic elbow infection (PEI).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Eighteen studies with 332 PEI that underwent revision surgery were included. Demographics, laboratory and microbiological data, types of implants, surgical techniques with complications and reoperations, eradication rates, and clinical and functional outcomes were reported.

RESULTS

Staphylococcus aureus was the most common microorganism (40%). Pre-operatively, the mean white blood cell count was 8400 ± 4000 per microliter; the mean C-reactive protein level was 41.6 ± 66.9 mg/dl, and the mean erythrocyte sedimentation rate was 45 ± 66.9 mm/h. The Coonrad-Morrey total elbow prosthesis represented 41.2% of the infected implant, and it also represented the most common system used for the PEI revision surgery. Two-stage revision and debridement and implant retention (DAIR) were the most common procedures performed for PEI, and, on the whole, they represented 35.7 and 32.7%, respectively. The eradication rate was 76% with 2-stage, 71% with resection arthroplasty (RA), 66.7% with 1-stage, 57.7% with DAIR, and 40% with arthrodesis (EA). DAIR showed a significantly lower eradication rate than 2-stage (P = 0.003). The mean postoperative Mayo Elbow Performance Score was significantly higher in patients who underwent DAIR, and 2-stage compared with RA (P < 0.001 for all). Postoperative flexion-extension ROM was significantly higher in patients who underwent DAIR compared with 1-stage, 2-stage, and RA (P < 0.001 for all). Moreover, 1-stage and 2-stage showed a significantly greater postoperative flexion-extension ROM compared with RA (P < 0.001 for all). Reoperations occurred in 40% of patients after EA, 33.3% after 1-stage, 26.9% after DAIR and RA, and 24.1% after 2-stage. Conversion to amputation occurred in 2.2% of patients after RA and 1% after DAIR.

CONCLUSIONS

Two-stage revision and DAIR are the most common procedures used to manage PEI; however, the former procedure showed a significantly higher eradication rate. Resection arthroplasty showed a high eradication rate, but postoperative lower clinical and functional outcomes limit the indications for this technique. One-stage procedure showed a limited role in the current practice of PEI treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Elbow joint biomechanics during ADL focusing on total elbow arthroplasty - a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Overloading is hypothesized to be one of the failure mechanisms following total elbow arthroplasty (TEA). It is unclear whether the current post-operative loading instruction is compliant with reported failure mechanisms. Aim is therefore to evaluate the elbow joint load during activities of daily living (ADL) and compare these loads with reported failure limits from retrieval and finite element studies.

METHODS

A scoping review of studies until 23 November 2021 investigating elbow joint load during ADL were identified by searching PubMed/Medline and Web of Science. Studies were eligible when: (1) reporting on the elbow joint load in native elbows or elbows with an elbow arthroplasty in adults; (2) full-text article was available.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight studies with a total of 256 participants were included. Methodological quality was low in 3, moderate in 22 and high in 3 studies. Studies were categorized as 1) close to the body and 2) further away from the body. Tasks were then subdivided into: 1) cyclic flexion/extension, 2) push-up, 3) reaching, 4) self-care, 5) work. Mean flexion-extension joint load was 17 Nm, mean varus-valgus joint load 9 Nm, mean pronation-supination joint load 8 Nm and mean bone-on-bone contact force 337 N.

CONCLUSION

The results of our scoping review give a first overview of the current knowledge on elbow joint loads during ADL. Surprisingly, the current literature is not sufficient to formulate a postoperative instruction for elbow joint loading, which is compliant with failure limits of the prosthesis. In addition, our current instruction does not appear to be evidence-based. Our recommendations offer a starting point to assist clinicians in providing informed decisions about post-operative instructions for their patients.

Outcome of unlinked total elbow arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis in patients younger than 50 years old

AIMS

There are concerns regarding complications and longevity of total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) in young patients, and the few previous publications are mainly limited to reports on linked elbow devices. We investigated the clinical outcome of unlinked TEA for patients aged less than 50 years with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 26 elbows of 21 patients with RA who were aged less than 50 years who underwent primary TEA with an unlinked elbow prosthesis. The mean patient age was 46 years (35 to 49), and the mean follow-up period was 13.6 years (6 to 27). Outcome measures included pain, range of motion, Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), radiological evaluation for radiolucent line and loosening, complications, and revision surgery with or without implant removal.

RESULTS

The mean MEPS significantly improved from 47 (15 to 70) points preoperatively to 95 (70 to 100) points at final follow-up (p < 0.001). Complications were noted in six elbows (23%) in six patients, and of these, four with an ulnar neuropathy and one elbow with postoperative traumatic fracture required additional surgeries. There was no revision with implant removal, and there was no radiological evidence of loosening around the components. With any revision surgery as the endpoint, the survival rates up to 25 years were 78.1% (95% confidence interval 52.8 to 90.6) as determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis.

CONCLUSION

The clinical outcome of primary unlinked TEA for young patients with RA was satisfactory and comparable with that for elderly patients. A favourable survival rate without implant removal might support the use of unlinked devices for young patients with this disease entity, with a caution of a relatively high complication rate regarding ulnar neuropathy.Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IVCite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(1):19-26.