1
|
Algu K, Wales J, Anderson M, Omilabu M, Briggs T, Kurahashi AM. Naming racism as a root cause of inequities in palliative care research: a scoping review. BMC Palliat Care 2024; 23:143. [PMID: 38858646 PMCID: PMC11163751 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-024-01465-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Racial and ethnic inequities in palliative care are well-established. The way researchers design and interpret studies investigating race- and ethnicity-based disparities has future implications on the interventions aimed to reduce these inequities. If racism is not discussed when contextualizing findings, it is less likely to be addressed and inequities will persist. OBJECTIVE To summarize the characteristics of 12 years of academic literature that investigates race- or ethnicity-based disparities in palliative care access, outcomes and experiences, and determine the extent to which racism is discussed when interpreting findings. METHODS Following Arksey & O'Malley's methodology for scoping reviews, we searched bibliographic databases for primary, peer reviewed studies globally, in all languages, that collected race or ethnicity variables in a palliative care context (January 1, 2011 to October 17, 2023). We recorded study characteristics and categorized citations based on their research focus-whether race or ethnicity were examined as a major focus (analyzed as a primary independent variable or population of interest) or minor focus (analyzed as a secondary variable) of the research purpose, and the interpretation of findings-whether authors directly or indirectly discussed racism when contextualizing the study results. RESULTS We identified 3000 citations and included 181 in our review. Of these, most were from the United States (88.95%) and examined race or ethnicity as a major focus (71.27%). When interpreting findings, authors directly named racism in 7.18% of publications. They were more likely to use words closely associated with racism (20.44%) or describe systemic or individual factors (41.44%). Racism was directly named in 33.33% of articles published since 2021 versus 3.92% in the 10 years prior, suggesting it is becoming more common. CONCLUSION While the focus on race and ethnicity in palliative care research is increasing, there is room for improvement when acknowledging systemic factors - including racism - during data analysis. Researchers must be purposeful when investigating race and ethnicity, and identify how racism shapes palliative care access, outcomes and experiences of racially and ethnically minoritized patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kavita Algu
- Temmy Latner Centre for Palliative Care, 60 Murray Street, 4th Floor, Box 13, Toronto, ON, M5T3L9, Canada.
| | - Joshua Wales
- Temmy Latner Centre for Palliative Care, 60 Murray Street, 4th Floor, Box 13, Toronto, ON, M5T3L9, Canada
| | - Michael Anderson
- Waakebiness-Bryce Institute for Indigenous Health, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, 6th floor, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M7, Canada
| | - Mariam Omilabu
- Temmy Latner Centre for Palliative Care, 60 Murray Street, 4th Floor, Box 13, Toronto, ON, M5T3L9, Canada
| | - Thandi Briggs
- Home and Community Care Support Services Toronto Central, 250 Dundas St. W, Toronto, ON, M5T 2Z5, Canada
| | - Allison M Kurahashi
- Temmy Latner Centre for Palliative Care, 60 Murray Street, 4th Floor, Box 13, Toronto, ON, M5T3L9, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Potter AL, Xu NN, Senthil P, Srinivasan D, Lee H, Gazelle GS, Chelala L, Zheng W, Fintelmann FJ, Sequist LV, Donington J, Palmer JR, Yang CFJ. Pack-Year Smoking History: An Inadequate and Biased Measure to Determine Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:2026-2037. [PMID: 38537159 PMCID: PMC11191064 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Revised: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/03/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Pack-year smoking history is an imperfect and biased measure of cumulative tobacco exposure. The use of pack-year smoking history to determine lung cancer screening eligibility in the current US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guideline may unintentionally exclude many high-risk individuals, especially those from racial and ethnic minority groups. It is unclear whether using a smoking duration cutoff instead of a smoking pack-year cutoff would improve the selection of individuals for screening. METHODS We analyzed 49,703 individuals with a smoking history from the Southern Community Cohort Study (SCCS) and 22,126 individuals with a smoking history from the Black Women's Health Study (BWHS) to assess eligibility for screening under the USPSTF guideline versus a proposed guideline that replaces the ≥20-pack-year criterion with a ≥20-year smoking duration criterion. RESULTS Under the USPSTF guideline, only 57.6% of Black patients with lung cancer in the SCCS would have qualified for screening, whereas a significantly higher percentage of White patients with lung cancer (74.0%) would have qualified (P < .001). Under the proposed guideline, the percentage of Black and White patients with lung cancer who would have qualified for screening increased to 85.3% and 82.0%, respectively, eradicating the disparity in screening eligibility between the groups. In the BWHS, using a 20-year smoking duration cutoff instead of a 20-pack-year cutoff increased the percentage of Black women with lung cancer who would have qualified for screening from 42.5% to 63.8%. CONCLUSION Use of a 20-year smoking duration cutoff instead of a 20-pack-year cutoff greatly increases the proportion of patients with lung cancer who would qualify for screening and eliminates the racial disparity in screening eligibility between Black versus White individuals; smoking duration has the added benefit of being easier to calculate and being a more precise assessment of smoking exposure compared with pack-year smoking history.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra L. Potter
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Nuo N. Xu
- Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Priyanka Senthil
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Deepti Srinivasan
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Hang Lee
- Biostatistics Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - G. Scott Gazelle
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Lydia Chelala
- Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Wei Zheng
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Nashville, TN
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | | | - Lecia V. Sequist
- Mass General Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Jessica Donington
- Section of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Hospital, Chicago, IL
| | | | - Chi-Fu Jeffrey Yang
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Moghanaki D, Taylor J, Bryant AK, Vitzthum LK, Sebastian N, Gutman D, Burns A, Huang Z, Lewis JA, Spalluto LB, Williams CD, Sullivan DR, Slatore CG, Behera M, Stokes WA. Lung Cancer Survival Trends in the Veterans Health Administration. Clin Lung Cancer 2024; 25:225-232. [PMID: 38553325 PMCID: PMC11098707 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2024.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Revised: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Lung cancer survival is improving in the United States. We investigated whether there was a similar trend within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), the largest integrated healthcare system in the United States. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data from the Veterans Affairs Central Cancer Registry were analyzed for temporal survival trends using Kaplan-Meier estimates and linear regression. RESULTS A total number of 54,922 Veterans were identified with lung cancer diagnosed from 2010 to 2017. Histologies were classified as non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (64.2%), small cell lung cancer (SCLC) (12.9%), and 'other' (22.9%). The proportion with stage I increased from 18.1% to 30.4%, while stage IV decreased from 38.9% to 34.6% (both P < .001). The 3-year overall survival (OS) improved for stage I (58.6% to 68.4%, P < .001), stage II (35.5% to 48.4%, P < .001), stage III (18.7% to 29.4%, P < .001), and stage IV (3.4% to 7.8%, P < .001). For NSCLC, the median OS increased from 12 to 21 months (P < .001), and the 3-year OS increased from 24.1% to 38.3% (P < .001). For SCLC, the median OS remained unchanged (8 to 9 months, P = .10), while the 3-year OS increased from 9.1% to 12.3% (P = .014). Compared to White Veterans, Black Veterans with NSCLC had similar OS (P = .81), and those with SCLC had higher OS (P = .003). CONCLUSION Lung cancer survival is improving within the VHA. Compared to White Veterans, Black Veterans had similar or higher survival rates. The observed racial equity in outcomes within a geographically and socioeconomically diverse population warrants further investigation to better understand and replicate this achievement in other healthcare systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Drew Moghanaki
- Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Radiation Oncology Service, Los Angeles, CA; University of California Los Angeles Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA.
| | | | - Alex K Bryant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Lucas K Vitzthum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA; Office of Research and Development, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA
| | - Nikhil Sebastian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA; Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - David Gutman
- Department of Psychiatry, Atlanta Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Decatur, GA; Department of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Abigail Burns
- Foundation for Atlanta Veterans Education and Research, Decatur, GA
| | - Zhonglu Huang
- Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Jennifer A Lewis
- Education and Clinical Center (GRECC) and Medicine Service, Veterans Health Administration-Tennessee Valley Healthcare System Geriatric Research, Nashville, TN; Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Lucy B Spalluto
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN; Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), Veterans Health Administration-Tennessee Valley Health Care System Geriatric Research, Nashville, TN; Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Christina D Williams
- Cooperative Studies Program Epidemiology Center, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC; Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC; Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Donald R Sullivan
- Division of Pulmonary, Oregon Health and Science University, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Portland, OR; Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR; Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Oregon Health and Science University Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR
| | - Christopher G Slatore
- Division of Pulmonary, Oregon Health and Science University, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Portland, OR; Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR; Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR; Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR
| | | | - William A Stokes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA; Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zullig LL, Jazowski SA, Chawla N, Williams CD, Winski D, Slatore CG, Clary A, Rasmussen KM, Ticknor LM, Kelley MJ. Summary of Veterans Health Administration Cancer Data Sources. JOURNAL OF REGISTRY MANAGEMENT 2024; 51:21-28. [PMID: 38881982 PMCID: PMC11178113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/18/2024]
Abstract
Objectives The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) is a leader in generating transformational research across the cancer care continuum. Given the extensive body of cancer-related literature utilizing VHA data, our objectives are to: (1) describe the VHA data sources available for conducting cancer-related research, and (2) discuss examples of published cancer research using each data source. Methods We identified commonly used data sources within the VHA and reviewed previously published cancer-related research that utilized these data sources. In addition, we reviewed VHA clinical and health services research web pages and consulted with a multidisciplinary group of cancer researchers that included hematologist/oncologists, health services researchers, and epidemiologists. Results Commonly used VHA cancer data sources include the Veterans Affairs (VA) Cancer Registry System, the VA Central Cancer Registry (VACCR), the Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW)-Oncology Raw Domain (subset of data within the CDW), and the VA Cancer Care Cube (Cube). While no reference standard exists for cancer case ascertainment, the VACCR provides a systematic approach to ensure the complete capture of clinical history, cancer diagnosis, and treatment. Like many population-based cancer registries, a significant time lag exists due to constrained resources, which may make it best suited for historical epidemiologic studies. The CDW-Oncology Raw Domain and the Cube contain national information on incident cancers which may be useful for case ascertainment and prospective recruitment; however, additional resources may be needed for data cleaning. Conclusions The VHA has a wealth of data sources available for cancer-related research. It is imperative that researchers recognize the advantages and disadvantages of each data source to ensure their research questions are addressed appropriately.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leah L. Zullig
- Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Shelley A. Jazowski
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Neetu Chawla
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Christina D. Williams
- Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - David Winski
- Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Christopher G. Slatore
- VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon
- Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Alecia Clary
- Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | | | - Michael J. Kelley
- Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lennox L, Lambe K, Hindocha CN, Coronini-Cronberg S. What health inequalities exist in access to, outcomes from and experience of treatment for lung cancer? A scoping review. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e077610. [PMID: 37918927 PMCID: PMC10626811 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Lung cancer (LC) continues to be the leading cause of cancer-related deaths and while there have been significant improvements in overall survival, this gain is not equally distributed. To address health inequalities (HIs), it is vital to identify whether and where they exist. This paper reviews existing literature on what HIs impact LC care and where these manifest on the care pathway. DESIGN A systematic scoping review based on Arksey and O'Malley's five-stage framework. DATA SOURCES Multiple databases (EMBASE, HMIC, Medline, PsycINFO, PubMed) were used to retrieve articles. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Search limits were set to retrieve articles published between January 2012 and April 2022. Papers examining LC along with domains of HI were included. Two authors screened papers and independently assessed full texts. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS HIs were categorised according to: (a) HI domains: Protected Characteristics (PC); Socioeconomic and Deprivation Factors (SDF); Geographical Region (GR); Vulnerable or Socially Excluded Groups (VSG); and (b) where on the LC pathway (access to, outcomes from, experience of care) inequalities manifest. Data were extracted by two authors and collated in a spreadsheet for structured analysis and interpretation. RESULTS 41 papers were included. The most studied domain was PC (32/41), followed by SDF (19/41), GR (18/41) and VSG (13/41). Most studies investigated differences in access (31/41) or outcomes (27/41), with few (4/41) exploring experience inequalities. Evidence showed race, rural residence and being part of a VSG impacted the access to LC diagnosis, treatment and supportive care. Additionally, rural residence, older age or male sex negatively impacted survival and mortality. The relationship between outcomes and other factors (eg, race, deprivation) showed mixed results. CONCLUSIONS Findings offer an opportunity to reflect on the understanding of HIs in LC care and provide a platform to consider targeted efforts to improve equity of access, outcomes and experience for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Lennox
- Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Northwest London, London, UK
| | - Kate Lambe
- Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Chandni N Hindocha
- Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Northwest London, London, UK
| | - Sophie Coronini-Cronberg
- Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Northwest London, London, UK
- Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- West London NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
May L, Shows K, Nana-Sinkam P, Li H, Landry JW. Sex Differences in Lung Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3111. [PMID: 37370722 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15123111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Revised: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Sex disparities in the incidence and mortality of lung cancer have been observed since cancer statistics have been recorded. Social and economic differences contribute to sex disparities in lung cancer incidence and mortality, but evidence suggests that there are also underlying biological differences that contribute to the disparity. This review summarizes biological differences which could contribute to the sex disparity. Sex hormones and other biologically active molecules, tumor cell genetic differences, and differences in the immune system and its response to lung cancer are highlighted. How some of these differences contribute to disparities in the response to therapies, including cytotoxic, targeted, and immuno-therapies, is also discussed. We end the study with a discussion of our perceived future directions to identify the key biological differences which could contribute to sex disparities in lung cancer and how these differences could be therapeutically leveraged to personalize lung cancer treatment to the individual sexes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren May
- Department of Human and Molecular Genetics, VCU Institute of Molecular Medicine, Massey Cancer Center, VCU School of Medicine, Richmond, VA 23298, USA
| | - Kathryn Shows
- Department of Biology, Virginia State University, Petersburg, VA 23806, USA
| | - Patrick Nana-Sinkam
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary Disease and Critical Care Medicine, VCU School of Medicine, Richmond, VA 23298, USA
| | - Howard Li
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary Disease and Critical Care Medicine, VCU School of Medicine, Richmond, VA 23298, USA
| | - Joseph W Landry
- Department of Human and Molecular Genetics, VCU Institute of Molecular Medicine, Massey Cancer Center, VCU School of Medicine, Richmond, VA 23298, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhang Y, Mezzacappa C, Shen L, Ivatorov A, Petukhova-Greenstein A, Mehta R, Ciarleglio M, Deng Y, Levin W, Steinhardt S, Connery D, Pineau M, Onyiuke I, Taylor C, Rose MG, Taddei TH. Cancer tracking system improves timeliness of liver cancer care at a Veterans Hospital: A comparison of cohorts before and after implementation of an automated care coordination tool. PLOS DIGITAL HEALTH 2022; 1:e0000080. [PMID: 36812575 PMCID: PMC9931271 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 06/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) requires complex care coordination. Patient safety may be compromised with untimely follow-up of abnormal liver imaging. This study evaluated whether an electronic case-finding and tracking system improved timeliness of HCC care. METHODS An electronic medical record-linked abnormal imaging identification and tracking system was implemented at a Veterans Affairs Hospital. This system reviews all liver radiology reports, generates a queue of abnormal cases for review, and maintains a queue of cancer care events with due dates and automated reminders. This is a pre-/post-intervention cohort study to evaluate whether implementation of this tracking system reduced time between HCC diagnosis and treatment and time between first liver image suspicious for HCC, specialty care, diagnosis, and treatment at a Veterans Hospital. Patients diagnosed with HCC in the 37 months before tracking system implementation were compared to patients diagnosed with HCC in the 71 months after its implementation. Linear regression was used to calculate mean change in relevant intervals of care adjusted for age, race, ethnicity, BCLC stage, and indication for first suspicious image. RESULTS There were 60 patients pre-intervention and 127 post-intervention. In the post-intervention group, adjusted mean time from diagnosis to treatment was 36 days shorter (p = 0.007), time from imaging to diagnosis 51 days shorter (p = 0.21), and time from imaging to treatment 87 days shorter (p = 0.05). Patients whose imaging was performed for HCC screening had the greatest improvement in time from diagnosis to treatment (63 days, p = 0.02) and from first suspicious image to treatment (179 days, p = 0.03). The post-intervention group also had a greater proportion of HCC diagnosed at earlier BCLC stages (p<0.03). CONCLUSIONS The tracking system improved timeliness of HCC diagnosis and treatment and may be useful for improving HCC care delivery, including in health systems already implementing HCC screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yapei Zhang
- Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
- Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Catherine Mezzacappa
- Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
| | - Lin Shen
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Amanda Ivatorov
- Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
| | - Alexandra Petukhova-Greenstein
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
- Institute of Radiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rajni Mehta
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
| | - Maria Ciarleglio
- Yale Center for Analytical Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
| | - Yanhong Deng
- Yale Center for Analytical Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
| | - Woody Levin
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
| | - Steve Steinhardt
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
| | - Donna Connery
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
| | - Michael Pineau
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
| | - Ifeyinwa Onyiuke
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
| | - Caroline Taylor
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
| | - Michal G. Rose
- Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
| | - Tamar H. Taddei
- Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Alghanim F, Li KZ, An M, Verceles AC, Grier WR, Abbas H, Deepak J. Exploring the effects of racial and socioeconomic factors on timeliness of lung cancer diagnosis and treatment in Baltimore Veterans. Semin Oncol 2022; 49:S0093-7754(22)00055-0. [PMID: 35927100 DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2022.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Revised: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 07/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To characterize the effect of racial and socioeconomic factors on the timeliness of lung cancer diagnosis and treatment in a single-center Veterans Affair Medical Center (VAMC) pulmonary nodule clinic. METHODS We conducted a single-center retrospective review of all patients seen at the Baltimore VAMC pulmonary nodule clinic between 2013 and 2019 to identify key demographic factors, measures of neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage, cancer staging and histopathologic information, and time elapsed between diagnosis and treatment. We excluded patients with pulmonary nodules undergoing active surveillance, prior history of lung cancer, metastases of a different primary origin, insufficient followup, or who had received care outside the VHA system. RESULTS Median times to diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer were 28 and 73 days. There were no statistically significant differences in overall timeliness of diagnosis and treatment when stratified by race or measures of neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage. CONCLUSIONS The authors found no differences in timeliness of lung cancer care by race and socioeconomic status within the system. Despite general adherence to national standards in timeliness of care, there continues to be a need for improvements in the operational workflows to reduce time to diagnosis and treatment for all Veterans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fahid Alghanim
- Veterans Affairs Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore VA Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Kevin Z Li
- Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Max An
- Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Avelino C Verceles
- Veterans Affairs Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore VA Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - William R Grier
- Veterans Affairs Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore VA Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Hatoon Abbas
- Veterans Affairs Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore VA Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Janaki Deepak
- Veterans Affairs Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore VA Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mojtahedi Z, Koo JS, Yoo J, Kim P, Kang HT, Hwang J, Joo MK, Shen JJ. Palliative Care and Life-Sustaining/Local Procedures in Colorectal Cancer in the United States Hospitals: A Ten-Year Perspective. Cancer Manag Res 2021; 13:7569-7577. [PMID: 34629903 PMCID: PMC8496534 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s330448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Accepted: 09/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background In recent years, palliative care utilization has been increasing while life-sustaining/local procedures have been declining at the end of life. Palliative care utilization widely varies based on tumor type. Limited information is available on inpatient palliative care in colorectal cancer. Aims This study investigated inpatient palliative care utilization and its association with patient demographics, hospital charges, and procedures among colorectal cancer patients admitted to US hospitals between 2008 and 2017. Receipt of life-sustaining and local procedures and surgeries were also investigated during the ten years. Methods Data were extracted from the National inpatient sample (NIS) database containing de-identified information from each hospitalization. Codes V66.7 for ICD-9-CM or Z51.5 for ICD-10-CM were used to find palliative care utilization. Data were analyzed using generalized regression with adjustment for variations in predictors. The Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) was calculated for palliative care and procedures over time. Results Of the 487,027 colorectal cancer hospitalizations, only 6.04% utilized palliative care. This percentage significantly increased over time from 2.3% in 2008 to 9.3% in 2017 (P<0.0001). Palliative care utilization sizably decreased hospital charges by $18,010 per hospitalization (P<0.0001) and was positively associated with female gender, severe disease, and age over 80 years (P≤ 0.05). Palliative care utilization was inversely associated with using life-sustaining and local procedures and surgeries (P<0.0001). Life-sustaining procedures (intubation, infusion of concentrate nutrients, dialysis, and blood transfusion) and surgeries were decreased over time (P<0.001). Conclusions Palliative care utilization increased over time and was inversely associated with hospital charges and performing procedures among colorectal cancer patients. Our findings warrant further research and interventions to increase palliative care utilization in colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zahra Mojtahedi
- Department of Healthcare Administration and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, 89119, USA
| | - Ja Seol Koo
- Department of Healthcare Administration and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, 89119, USA.,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, South Korea
| | - Ji Yoo
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nevada Las Vegas School of Medicine, Las Vegas, NV, USA
| | - Pearl Kim
- Department of Healthcare Administration and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, 89119, USA
| | - Hee-Taik Kang
- Department of Family Medicine, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, South Korea
| | - Jinwook Hwang
- Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, South Korea
| | - Moon Kyung Joo
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jay J Shen
- Department of Healthcare Administration and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, 89119, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Johnson LA, Ellis C. Chemotherapy in the Last 30 Days and 14 Days of Life in African Americans With Lung Cancer. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2020; 38:927-931. [PMID: 33111544 DOI: 10.1177/1049909120969125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND African Americans with lung cancer are diagnosed at later stages and have high mortality rates. Chemotherapy is considered aggressive treatment near the end of life and prevents enrollment in hospice. OBJECTIVES This study explored chemotherapy in the last 30 and 14 days of life among African Americans with lung cancer. METHODS A retrospective chart review was used to gather sociodemographic and treatment data on persons newly diagnosed with lung cancer between January 1, 2016 and June 30, 2017. African Americans with a documented date of death were included. RESULTS The mean age (N=74) was 64.0 years, 58.1% were rural dwellers, and 59.5% had Medicare. Most had advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer (Stage IIIB, 18.8%; Stage IV, 46.4%). In this study, 17.6% received chemotherapy in the last 14 days of life and 27.0% received chemotherapy in the last 30 days of life. No significant associations between age, sex, residence (rural vs urban) and receipt of chemotherapy in the last 14 or 30 days of life were found. A significant association was found between type of insurance and chemotherapy in the last 14 or 30 days of life: Medicare was associated with chemotherapy in both last 14 days of life χ2(1) = 4.448, p = .035 and last 30 days of life χ2(1) = 4.773, p = .029. A binomial logistic regression using demographic factors, including insurance, was not significant. CONCLUSION Our results indicate a need for improvement in the number of individuals who receive chemotherapy in the final month of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lee Ann Johnson
- 3627University of Virginia School of Nursing, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Charles Ellis
- 3627East Carolina University Center for Health Disparities, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Guo Y, Bian J, Modave F, Li Q, George TJ, Prosperi M, Shenkman E. Assessing the effect of data integration on predictive ability of cancer survival models. Health Informatics J 2019; 26:8-20. [PMID: 30672356 DOI: 10.1177/1460458218824692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the United States. To improve cancer prognosis and survival rates, a better understanding of multi-level contributory factors associated with cancer survival is needed. However, prior research on cancer survival has primarily focused on factors from the individual level due to limited availability of integrated datasets. In this study, we sought to examine how data integration impacts the performance of cancer survival prediction models. We linked data from four different sources and evaluated the performance of Cox proportional hazard models for breast, lung, and colorectal cancers under three common data integration scenarios. We showed that adding additional contextual-level predictors to survival models through linking multiple datasets improved model fit and performance. We also showed that different representations of the same variable or concept have differential impacts on model performance. When building statistical models for cancer outcomes, it is important to consider cross-level predictor interactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Guo
- University of Florida, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wrightson WR, Gauhar U, Hendler F, Joiner T, Pendleton J. Centralized Lung Nodule Management at A Veterans Hospital Using A Multidisciplinary Lung Nodule Evaluation Team (LNET). ZHONGGUO FEI AI ZA ZHI = CHINESE JOURNAL OF LUNG CANCER 2018; 21:828-832. [PMID: 30454544 PMCID: PMC6247006 DOI: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2018.11.04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Lung nodules are frequently identified on imaging studies and can represent early lung cancers. We instituted the Lung Nodule Evaluation Team (LNET) to optimize management of these nodules by a lung specialist physician. All lung nodules identified by a radiologist prompted a direct consultation to this service. We report our initial experience with this process. Methods This is a retrospective review of patients with lung nodules at a single institution from 2008 to 2015. Since October 2014, lung nodules > 3 mm identified on computed tomography (CT) scanning of the chest generate an automatic consult to LNET from the radiology service. Demographic, nodule and follow up data was entered into a surveillance database and summarized. Results There were 1, 873 patients identified in the database. Of these, 900 patients were undergoing active surveillance. Consults increased from 5.5 to 93 per month after the start of the new consult program. Lung nodules were identified on 64% of chest CT scans. Prior to the direct radiology consult the average size of a nodule was 1.7 cm and 0.7 cm after. The overall time from initial nodule imaging to initiating a management plan by a thoracic specialist physician was 3.7 days. Conclusion Assessment of lung nodules by a specialist physician is important to ensure appropriate long term management and optimize utilization of diagnostic interventions. A direct radiology consult to a specialized team of chest physicians decreased the time in initiating a management plan, identified smaller nodules and may lead to a more judicious use of health care resources in the management of lung nodules.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Umar Gauhar
- Robley Rex Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Center, Louisville, Kentucky, USA
| | - Fred Hendler
- Robley Rex Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Center, Louisville, Kentucky, USA
| | - Teresa Joiner
- Robley Rex Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Center, Louisville, Kentucky, USA
| | - Jennifer Pendleton
- Robley Rex Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Center, Louisville, Kentucky, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Zullig LL, Goldstein KM, Sims KJ, Williams CD, Chang M, Provenzale D, Kelley MJ. Cancer Among Women Treated in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2018; 28:268-275. [PMID: 29920139 DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2018.6936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare system is a high-volume provider of cancer care. Women are the fastest growing patient population using VA healthcare services. Quantifying the types of cancers diagnosed among women in the VA is a critical step toward identifying needed healthcare resources for women Veterans with cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS We obtained data from the VA Central Cancer Registry for cancers newly diagnosed in calendar year 2010. Our analysis was limited to women diagnosed with invasive cancers (e.g., stages I-IV) between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2010, in the VA healthcare system. We evaluated frequency distributions of incident cancer diagnoses by primary anatomical site, race, and geographic region. For commonly occurring cancers, we reported distribution by stage. RESULTS We identified 1,330 women diagnosed with invasive cancer in the VA healthcare system in 2010. The most commonly diagnosed cancer among women Veterans was breast (30%), followed by cancers of the respiratory (16%), gastrointestinal (12%), and gynecological systems (12%). The most commonly diagnosed cancers were similar for white and minority women, except white women were significantly more likely to be diagnosed with respiratory cancers (p < 0.01) and minority women were significantly more likely to be diagnosed with gastrointestinal cancers (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS Understanding cancer incidence among women Veterans is important for healthcare resource planning. While cancer incidence among women using the VA healthcare system is similar to U.S civilian women, the geographic dispersion and small incidence relative to male cancers raise challenges for high quality, well-coordinated cancer care within the VA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leah L Zullig
- 1 Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care , Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina.,2 Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University Medical Center , Durham, North Carolina
| | - Karen M Goldstein
- 1 Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care , Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina.,3 Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University Medical Center , Durham, North Carolina
| | - Kellie J Sims
- 4 VA Cooperative Studies Program Epidemiology Center , Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Christina D Williams
- 4 VA Cooperative Studies Program Epidemiology Center , Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina.,5 Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University Medical Center , Durham, North Carolina
| | - Michael Chang
- 6 Radiation Oncology Service, Richmond Veterans Affairs Medical Center , Richmond, Virginia
| | - Dawn Provenzale
- 4 VA Cooperative Studies Program Epidemiology Center , Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina.,7 Division of Gastroenterology, Duke University Medical Center , Durham, North Carolina
| | - Michael J Kelley
- 5 Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University Medical Center , Durham, North Carolina.,8 Departments of Psychiatry and School of Nursing Duke University , Durham, North Carolina.,9 Department of Veterans Affairs, Specialty Care Services , Washington, District of Columbia.,10 Hematology-Oncology Service, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System , Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Peterson K, Anderson J, Boundy E, Ferguson L, McCleery E, Waldrip K. Mortality Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minority Groups in the Veterans Health Administration: An Evidence Review and Map. Am J Public Health 2018; 108:e1-e11. [PMID: 29412713 PMCID: PMC5803811 DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2017.304246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/11/2017] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Continued racial/ethnic health disparities were recently described as "the most serious and shameful health care issue of our time." Although the 2014 US Affordable Care Act-mandated national insurance coverage expansion has led to significant improvements in health care coverage and access, its effects on life expectancy are not yet known. The Veterans Health Administration (VHA), the largest US integrated health care system, has a sustained commitment to health equity that addresses all 3 stages of health disparities research: detection, understanding determinants, and reduction or elimination. Despite this, racial disparities still exist in the VHA across a wide range of clinical areas and service types. OBJECTIVES To inform the health equity research agenda, we synthesized evidence on racial/ethnic mortality disparities in the VHA. SEARCH METHODS Our research librarian searched MEDLINE and Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials from October 2006 through February 2017 using terms for racial groups and disparities. SELECTION CRITERIA We included studies if they compared mortality between any racial/ethnic minority and nonminority veteran groups or between different minority groups in the VHA (PROSPERO# CRD42015015974). We made study selection decisions on the basis of prespecified eligibility criteria. They were first made by 1 reviewer and checked by a second and disagreements were resolved by consensus (sequential review). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two reviewers sequentially abstracted data on prespecified population, outcome, setting, and study design characteristics. Two reviewers sequentially graded the strength of evidence using prespecified criteria on the basis of 5 key domains: study limitations (study design and internal validity), consistency, directness, precision of the evidence, and reporting biases. We synthesized the evidence qualitatively by grouping studies first by racial/ethnic minority group and then by clinical area. For areas with multiple studies in the same population and outcome, we pooled their reported hazard ratios (HRs) using random effects models (StatsDirect version 2.8.0; StatsDirect Ltd., Altrincham, England). We created an evidence map using a bubble plot format to represent the evidence base in 5 dimensions: odds ratio or HR of mortality for racial/ethnic minority group versus Whites, clinical area, strength of evidence, statistical significance, and racial group. MAIN RESULTS From 2840 citations, we included 25 studies. Studies were large (n ≥ 10 000) and involved nationally representative cohorts, and the majority were of fair quality. Most studies compared mortality between Black and White veterans and found similar or lower mortality for Black veterans. However, we found modest mortality disparities (HR or OR = 1.07, 1.52) for Black veterans with stage 4 chronic kidney disease, colon cancer, diabetes, HIV, rectal cancer, or stroke; for American Indian and Alaska Native veterans undergoing noncardiac major surgery; and for Hispanic veterans with HIV or traumatic brain injury (most low strength). AUTHOR'S CONCLUSIONS Although the VHA's equal access health care system has reduced many racial/ethnic mortality disparities present in the private sector, our review identified mortality disparities that have persisted mainly for Black veterans in several clinical areas. However, because most mortality disparities were supported by single studies with imprecise findings, we could not draw strong conclusions about this evidence. More disparities research is needed for American Indian and Alaska Native, Asian, and Hispanic veterans overall and for more of the largest life expectancy gaps. Public Health Implications. Because of the relatively high prevalence of diabetes in Black veterans, further research to better understand and reduce this mortality disparity may be prioritized as having the greatest potential impact. However, other mortality disparities affect thousands of veterans and cannot be ignored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim Peterson
- Kim Peterson, Johanna Anderson, Erin Boundy, Lauren Ferguson, Ellen McCleery, Kallie Waldrip, are with the Department of Veterans Affairs, VA Portland Health Care System, Evidence-Based Synthesis Program Coordinating Center, Portland, OR
| | - Johanna Anderson
- Kim Peterson, Johanna Anderson, Erin Boundy, Lauren Ferguson, Ellen McCleery, Kallie Waldrip, are with the Department of Veterans Affairs, VA Portland Health Care System, Evidence-Based Synthesis Program Coordinating Center, Portland, OR
| | - Erin Boundy
- Kim Peterson, Johanna Anderson, Erin Boundy, Lauren Ferguson, Ellen McCleery, Kallie Waldrip, are with the Department of Veterans Affairs, VA Portland Health Care System, Evidence-Based Synthesis Program Coordinating Center, Portland, OR
| | - Lauren Ferguson
- Kim Peterson, Johanna Anderson, Erin Boundy, Lauren Ferguson, Ellen McCleery, Kallie Waldrip, are with the Department of Veterans Affairs, VA Portland Health Care System, Evidence-Based Synthesis Program Coordinating Center, Portland, OR
| | - Ellen McCleery
- Kim Peterson, Johanna Anderson, Erin Boundy, Lauren Ferguson, Ellen McCleery, Kallie Waldrip, are with the Department of Veterans Affairs, VA Portland Health Care System, Evidence-Based Synthesis Program Coordinating Center, Portland, OR
| | - Kallie Waldrip
- Kim Peterson, Johanna Anderson, Erin Boundy, Lauren Ferguson, Ellen McCleery, Kallie Waldrip, are with the Department of Veterans Affairs, VA Portland Health Care System, Evidence-Based Synthesis Program Coordinating Center, Portland, OR
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kasymjanova G, Small D, Cohen V, Jagoe RT, Batist G, Sateren W, Ernst P, Pepe C, Sakr L, Agulnik J. Lung cancer care trajectory at a Canadian centre: an evaluation of how wait times affect clinical outcomes. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2017; 24:302-309. [PMID: 29089797 DOI: 10.3747/co.24.3611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lung cancer continues to be one of the most common cancers in Canada, with approximately 28,400 new cases diagnosed each year. Although timely care can contribute substantially to quality of life for patients, it remains unclear whether it also improves patient outcomes. In this work, we used a set of quality indicators that aim to describe the quality of care in lung cancer patients. We assessed adherence with existing guidelines for timeliness of lung cancer care and concordance with existing standards of treatment, and we examined the association between timeliness of care and lung cancer survival. METHODS Patients with lung cancer diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 were identified from the Pulmonary Division Lung Cancer Registry at our centre. RESULTS We demonstrated that the interdisciplinary pulmonary oncology service successfully treated most of its patients within the recommended wait times. However, there is still work to be done to decrease variation in wait time. Our results demonstrate a significant association between wait time and survival, supporting the need for clinicians to optimize the patient care trajectory. INTERPRETATION It would be helpful for Canadian clinicians treating patients with lung cancer to have wait time guidelines for all treatment modalities, together with standard definitions for all time intervals. Any reductions in wait times should be balanced against the need for thorough investigation before initiating treatment. We believe that our unique model of care leads to an acceleration of diagnostic steps. Avoiding any delay associated with referral to a medical oncologist for treatment could be an acceptable strategy with respect to reducing wait time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Kasymjanova
- Peter Brojde Lung Cancer Centre, Segal Cancer Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Rossy Cancer Network, and McGill University, Montreal, QC
| | - D Small
- Peter Brojde Lung Cancer Centre, Segal Cancer Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Rossy Cancer Network, and McGill University, Montreal, QC
| | - V Cohen
- Peter Brojde Lung Cancer Centre, Segal Cancer Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Rossy Cancer Network, and McGill University, Montreal, QC
| | - R T Jagoe
- Peter Brojde Lung Cancer Centre, Segal Cancer Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Rossy Cancer Network, and McGill University, Montreal, QC
| | - G Batist
- Peter Brojde Lung Cancer Centre, Segal Cancer Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Rossy Cancer Network, and McGill University, Montreal, QC
| | | | - P Ernst
- Peter Brojde Lung Cancer Centre, Segal Cancer Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Rossy Cancer Network, and McGill University, Montreal, QC
| | - C Pepe
- Peter Brojde Lung Cancer Centre, Segal Cancer Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Rossy Cancer Network, and McGill University, Montreal, QC
| | - L Sakr
- Peter Brojde Lung Cancer Centre, Segal Cancer Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Rossy Cancer Network, and McGill University, Montreal, QC
| | - J Agulnik
- Peter Brojde Lung Cancer Centre, Segal Cancer Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Rossy Cancer Network, and McGill University, Montreal, QC
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ahmed HZ, Liu Y, O'Connell K, Ahmed MZ, Cassidy RJ, Gillespie TW, Patel P, Pillai RN, Behera M, Steuer CE, Owonikoko TK, Ramalingam SS, Curran WJ, Higgins KA. Guideline-concordant Care Improves Overall Survival for Locally Advanced Non-Small-cell Lung Carcinoma Patients: A National Cancer Database Analysis. Clin Lung Cancer 2017; 18:706-718. [PMID: 28601387 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2017.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2017] [Accepted: 04/18/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current evidence-based guideline-concordant care (GCC) for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with good performance status is concurrent chemoradiation. In this study we evaluated factors associated with lack of GCC and its effects on overall survival (OS). PATIENTS AND METHODS Unresectable stage III NSCLC patients, diagnosed from 2005 to 2013 with a Charlson-Deyo score of 0, were identified from the National Cancer Database. Primary outcomes were receipt of GCC, defined as concurrent chemoradiation (thoracic radiotherapy, starting within 2 weeks of chemotherapy, to at least 60 Gy), and OS. Multivariable logistic regression modeling identified variables associated with non-GCC. Cox proportional hazard modeling was used to examine OS. RESULTS Twenty-three percent of patients (n = 10,476) received GCC. Uninsured patients were more likely to receive non-GCC (odds ratio [OR], 1.54; P < .001) compared with privately insured patients. Other groups with greater odds of receiving non-GCC included: patients treated in the western, southern, or northeastern United States (ORs, 1.39, 1.37, and 1.19, respectively; all Ps < .001) compared with the Midwest; adenocarcinoma histology (OR, 1.48; P < .001) compared with squamous cell carcinoma; and women (OR, 1.08; P = .002). Those who received non-GCC had higher death rates compared with those who received GCC (hazard ratio [HR], 1.42; P < .001). The uninsured (HR, 1.53; P < .001), patients treated in the western, southern, or northeastern United States (HRs, 1.56, 1.41, and 1.34, respectively; P < .001), adenocarcinomas (HR, 1.39; P < .001), and women (HR, 1.44; P < .001) also all had lower OS for non-GCC versus GCC. CONCLUSION Socioeconomic factors, including lack of insurance and geography, are associated with non-GCC. Patient- and disease-specific factors, including increasing adenocarcinoma histology and sex, are also associated with non-GCC. Non-GCC diminishes OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiba Z Ahmed
- Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA; Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA
| | - Yuan Liu
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Kelli O'Connell
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Maaz Z Ahmed
- Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Richard J Cassidy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Theresa W Gillespie
- Department of Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Pretesh Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Rathi N Pillai
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Madhusmita Behera
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Conor E Steuer
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Taofeek K Owonikoko
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Suresh S Ramalingam
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Walter J Curran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Kristin A Higgins
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Schabath MB, Cress D, Munoz-Antonia T. Racial and Ethnic Differences in the Epidemiology and Genomics of Lung Cancer. Cancer Control 2017; 23:338-346. [PMID: 27842323 DOI: 10.1177/107327481602300405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lung cancer is the most common cancer in the world. In addition to the geographical and sex-specific differences in the incidence, mortality, and survival rates of lung cancer, growing evidence suggests that racial and ethnic differences exist. METHODS We reviewed published data related to racial and ethnic differences in lung cancer. RESULTS Current knowledge and substantive findings related to racial and ethnic differences in lung cancer were summarized, focusing on incidence, mortality, survival, cigarette smoking, prevention and early detection, and genomics. Systems-level and health care professional-related issues likely to contribute to specific racial and ethnic health disparities were also reviewed to provide possible suggestions for future strategies to reduce the disproportionate burden of lung cancer. CONCLUSIONS Although lung carcinogenesis is a multifactorial process driven by exogenous exposures, genetic variations, and an accumulation of somatic genetic events, it appears to have racial and ethnic differences that in turn impact the observed epidemiological differences in rates of incidence, mortality, and survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew B Schabath
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
DeSantis CE, Siegel RL, Sauer AG, Miller KD, Fedewa SA, Alcaraz KI, Jemal A. Cancer statistics for African Americans, 2016: Progress and opportunities in reducing racial disparities. CA Cancer J Clin 2016; 66:290-308. [PMID: 26910411 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 576] [Impact Index Per Article: 72.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
In this article, the American Cancer Society provides the estimated number of new cancer cases and deaths for blacks in the United States and the most recent data on cancer incidence, mortality, survival, screening, and risk factors for cancer. Incidence data are from the National Cancer Institute, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, and mortality data are from the National Center for Health Statistics. Approximately 189,910 new cases of cancer and 69,410 cancer deaths will occur among blacks in 2016. Although blacks continue to have higher cancer death rates than whites, the disparity has narrowed for all cancers combined in men and women and for lung and prostate cancers in men. In contrast, the racial gap in death rates has widened for breast cancer in women and remained level for colorectal cancer in men. The reduction in overall cancer death rates since the early 1990s translates to the avoidance of more than 300,000 deaths among blacks. In men, incidence rates from 2003 to 2012 decreased for all cancers combined (by 2.0% per year) as well as for the top 3 cancer sites (prostate, lung, and colorectal). In women, overall rates during the corresponding time period remained unchanged, reflecting increasing trends in breast cancer combined with decreasing trends in lung and colorectal cancer rates. Five-year relative survival is lower for blacks than whites for most cancers at each stage of diagnosis. The extent to which these disparities reflect unequal access to health care versus other factors remains an active area of research. Progress in reducing cancer death rates could be accelerated by ensuring equitable access to prevention, early detection, and high-quality treatment. CA Cancer J Clin 2016;66:290-308. © 2016 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carol E DeSantis
- Director, Breast and Gynecological Cancer Surveillance, Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Rebecca L Siegel
- Strategic Director, Surveillance Information Services, Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Ann Goding Sauer
- Epidemiologist, Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Kimberly D Miller
- Epidemiologist, Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Stacey A Fedewa
- Director, Risk Factor and Screening Surveillance, Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Kassandra I Alcaraz
- Strategic Director, Health Equities Research, Behavioral Research Center, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Ahmedin Jemal
- Vice President, Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Burgio KL, Williams BR, Dionne-Odom JN, Redden DT, Noh H, Goode PS, Kvale E, Bakitas M, Bailey FA. Racial Differences in Processes of Care at End of Life in VA Medical Centers: Planned Secondary Analysis of Data from the BEACON Trial. J Palliat Med 2016; 19:157-63. [PMID: 26840851 PMCID: PMC4939451 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2015.0311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/13/2015] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Racial differences exist for a number of health conditions, services, and outcomes, including end-of-life (EOL) care. OBJECTIVE The aim of the study was to examine differences in processes of care in the last 7 days of life between African American and white inpatients. METHODS Secondary analysis was conducted of data collected in the Best Practices for End-of-Life Care for Our Nation's Veterans (BEACON) trial (conducted 2005-2011). Subjects were 4891 inpatient decedents in six Veterans Administration Medical Centers. Data were abstracted from decedents' medical records. Multi-variable analyses were conducted to examine the relationship between race and each of 18 EOL processes of care controlling for patient characteristics, study site, year of death, and whether the observation was pre- or post-intervention. RESULTS The sample consisted of 1690 African American patients (34.6%) and 3201 white patients (65.4%). African Americans were less likely to have: do not resuscitate (DNR) orders (odds ratio [OR]: 0.67; p = 0.004), advance directives (OR: 0.71; p = 0.023), active opioid orders (OR: 0.64, p = 0.0008), opioid medications administered (OR: 0.61, p = 0.004), benzodiazepine orders (OR: 0.68, p < 0.0001), benzodiazepines administered (OR: 0.61, p < 0.0001), antipsychotics administered (OR: 0.73, p = 0.004), and steroids administered (OR: 0.76, p = 0.020). Racial differences were not found for other processes of care, including palliative care consultation, pastoral care, antipsychotic and steroid orders, and location of death. CONCLUSIONS Racial differences exist in some but not all aspects of EOL care. Further study is needed to understand the extent to which racial differences reflect different patient needs and preferences and whether interventions are needed to reduce disparities in patient/family education or access to quality EOL care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn L. Burgio
- Birmingham/Atlanta Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), Department of Veterans Affairs, Birmingham, Alabama, and Atlanta, Georgia
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Beverly R. Williams
- Birmingham/Atlanta Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), Department of Veterans Affairs, Birmingham, Alabama, and Atlanta, Georgia
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | | | - David T. Redden
- Birmingham/Atlanta Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), Department of Veterans Affairs, Birmingham, Alabama, and Atlanta, Georgia
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | | | - Patricia S. Goode
- Birmingham/Atlanta Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), Department of Veterans Affairs, Birmingham, Alabama, and Atlanta, Georgia
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Elizabeth Kvale
- Birmingham/Atlanta Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), Department of Veterans Affairs, Birmingham, Alabama, and Atlanta, Georgia
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Marie Bakitas
- Birmingham/Atlanta Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), Department of Veterans Affairs, Birmingham, Alabama, and Atlanta, Georgia
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
- School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - F. Amos Bailey
- Birmingham/Atlanta Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), Department of Veterans Affairs, Birmingham, Alabama, and Atlanta, Georgia
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Rhoads KF, Patel MI, Ma Y, Schmidt LA. Reply to M.H. Kanter et al. J Clin Oncol 2015. [PMID: 26215958 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.62.5640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Kim F Rhoads
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | | | - Yifei Ma
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Laura A Schmidt
- University of California, San Francisco Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Zhao S, Wu J, Zheng F, Tang Q, Yang L, Li L, Wu W, Hann SS. β-elemene inhibited expression of DNA methyltransferase 1 through activation of ERK1/2 and AMPKα signalling pathways in human lung cancer cells: the role of Sp1. J Cell Mol Med 2015; 19:630-41. [PMID: 25598321 PMCID: PMC4369819 DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.12476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2014] [Accepted: 10/02/2014] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
β-elemene, a compound derived from Rhizoma zedoariae, is a promising new plant-derived drug with broad-spectrum anticancer activity. However, the underlying mechanism by which this agent inhibits human lung cancer cell growth has not been well elucidated. In this study, we showed that β-elemene inhibits human non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) cell growth, and increased phosphorylation of ERK1/2, Akt and AMPKα. Moreover, β-elemene inhibited expression of DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1), which was not observed in the presence of the specific inhibitors of ERK (PD98059) or AMPK (compound C). Overexpression of DNMT1 reversed the effect of β-elemene on cell growth. Interestingly, metformin not only reversed the effect of β-elemene on phosphorylation of Akt but also strengthened the β-elemene-reduced DNMT1. In addition, β-elemene suppressed Sp1 protein expression, which was eliminated by either ERK1/2 or AMPK inhibitor. Conversely, overexpression of Sp1 antagonized the effect of β-elemene on DNMT1 protein expression and cell growth. Taken together, our results show that β-elemene inhibits NSCLC cell growth via ERK1/2- and AMPKα-mediated inhibition of transcription factor Sp1, followed by reduction in DNMT1 protein expression. Metformin augments the effect of β-elemene by blockade of Akt signalling and additively inhibition of DNMT1 protein expression. The reciprocal ERK1/2 and AMPKα signalling pathways contribute to the overall responses of β-elemene. This study reveals a potential novel mechanism by which β-elemene inhibits growth of NSCLC cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- ShunYu Zhao
- Laboratory of Tumor Biology, The second Clinical Medical Collage, University of Guangzhou Traditional Chinese MedicineGuangdong Province, China
| | - Jingjing Wu
- Laboratory of Tumor Biology, The second Clinical Medical Collage, University of Guangzhou Traditional Chinese MedicineGuangdong Province, China
| | - Fang Zheng
- Laboratory of Tumor Biology, The second Clinical Medical Collage, University of Guangzhou Traditional Chinese MedicineGuangdong Province, China
| | - Qing Tang
- Laboratory of Tumor Biology, The second Clinical Medical Collage, University of Guangzhou Traditional Chinese MedicineGuangdong Province, China
| | - LiJun Yang
- Laboratory of Tumor Biology, The second Clinical Medical Collage, University of Guangzhou Traditional Chinese MedicineGuangdong Province, China
| | - Liuning Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, The second Clinical Medical Collage, University of Guangzhou Traditional Chinese MedicineGuangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - WanYin Wu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, The second Clinical Medical Collage, University of Guangzhou Traditional Chinese MedicineGuangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Swei Sunny Hann
- Laboratory of Tumor Biology, The second Clinical Medical Collage, University of Guangzhou Traditional Chinese MedicineGuangdong Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Clinicopathologic Features and Survival Outcomes in Asian Pacific Islanders Residing in the United States: A SEER Analysis. J Cancer Epidemiol 2015; 2015:269304. [PMID: 25685148 PMCID: PMC4312650 DOI: 10.1155/2015/269304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2014] [Revised: 11/27/2014] [Accepted: 11/27/2014] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background. The objective of our study was to ascertain racial/ethnic disparities in Asian/Pacific Islanders (API) for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) clinicopathologic features and survival outcomes based on various tumor characteristics and treatment modalities. Method. SEER database identified invasive NSCLC cases from 2004 to 2010. Variables included American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage 7, tumor grade, tumor size, histology, age, marital status, radiation, surgery, and reason for no surgery. The Kruskall-Wallis test and the Z test were used to examine differences between races/ethnicities and the referent, non-Hispanic white (NHW). Multivariate Cox proportional analyses were used to establish the weight of the prognostic significance contributing to disease-specific survival (DSS) in each AJCC stage. Result. Improved DSS was seen in API across stage I (HR: 0.78), stage II (HR: 0.79), and stage IV (HR: 0.86), respectively, compared to the referent NHW (P < 0.01). Prognosis was improved by being married, being female gender, AIS histology, and birth outside the US (P < 0.01). Conclusion. We have demonstrated improved survival among API in early stage and stage IV NSCLC. Further research is necessary to clarify the role of lifestyle and tumor biology for these differences.
Collapse
|
23
|
Zullig LL, Williams CD, Fortune-Britt AG. Lung and colorectal cancer treatment and outcomes in the Veterans Affairs health care system. Cancer Manag Res 2015; 7:19-35. [PMID: 25609998 PMCID: PMC4298347 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s75463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Lung cancer (LC) and colorectal cancer (CRC) are the second- and third-most commonly diagnosed cancers in the Veterans Affairs (VA) health care system. While many studies have evaluated the treatment quality and outcomes of various aspects of VA LC and CRC care, there are no known reviews synthesizing this information across studies. The purpose of this literature review was to describe LC and CRC treatment (ie, surgical and nonsurgical) and outcomes (eg, mortality, psychosocial, and other) in the VA health care system as reported in the existing peer-reviewed scientific literature. We identified potential articles through a search of published literature using the PubMed electronic database. Our search strategy identified articles containing Medical Subject Headings terms and keywords addressing veterans or veterans' health and LC and/or CRC. We limited articles to those published in the previous 11 years (January 1, 2003 through December 31, 2013). A total of 230 articles were retrieved through the search. After applying the selection criteria, we included 74 studies (34 LC, 47 CRC, and seven both LC and CRC). VA provides a full array of treatments, often with better outcomes than other health care systems. More work is needed to assess patient-reported outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leah L Zullig
- Center for Health Services Research and Development in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA ; Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Christina D Williams
- Medical Service, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA ; Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Alice G Fortune-Britt
- Center for Health Services Research and Development in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA ; Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Coughlin SS, Matthews-Juarez P, Juarez PD, Melton CE, King M. Opportunities to address lung cancer disparities among African Americans. Cancer Med 2014; 3:1467-76. [PMID: 25220156 PMCID: PMC4298372 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2014] [Revised: 07/14/2014] [Accepted: 07/22/2014] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Race and socioeconomic status are well known to influence lung cancer incidence and mortality patterns in the U.S. Lung cancer incidence and mortality rates are higher among blacks than whites. In this article we review opportunities to address disparities in lung cancer incidence, mortality, and survivorship among African Americans. First, we summarize recent advances in the early detection and treatment of lung cancer. Then we consider black-white disparities in lung cancer treatment including factors that may contribute to such disparities; the literature on smoking cessation interventions for patients with or without a lung cancer diagnosis; and the important roles played by cultural competency, patient trust in their physician, and health literacy in addressing lung cancer disparities, including the need for culturally competent lung cancer patient navigators. Intervention efforts should focus on providing appropriate quality treatment for lung cancer and educating African Americans about the value of having these treatments in order to reduce these disparities. Culturally competent, patient navigation programs are needed that support lung cancer patients, especially socioeconomically disadvantaged patients, from the point of diagnosis to the initiation and completion of treatment, including cancer staging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven S Coughlin
- Research Center on Health Disparities, Equity, and the Exposome, University of Tennessee College of MedicineMemphis, Tennessee
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science CenterMemphis, Tennessee
- Steven Coughlin, Adjunct Professor of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, c/o 62 N. Main Street, no. 510, Memphis, TN 38103. Tel: (404) 983-2524; E-mail:
| | - Patricia Matthews-Juarez
- Research Center on Health Disparities, Equity, and the Exposome, University of Tennessee College of MedicineMemphis, Tennessee
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science CenterMemphis, Tennessee
| | - Paul D Juarez
- Research Center on Health Disparities, Equity, and the Exposome, University of Tennessee College of MedicineMemphis, Tennessee
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science CenterMemphis, Tennessee
| | - Courtnee E Melton
- Research Center on Health Disparities, Equity, and the Exposome, University of Tennessee College of MedicineMemphis, Tennessee
| | - Mario King
- Research Center on Health Disparities, Equity, and the Exposome, University of Tennessee College of MedicineMemphis, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Adrien J, Bertolus C, Gambotti L, Mallet A, Baujat B. Why are head and neck squamous cell carcinoma diagnosed so late? Influence of health care disparities and socio-economic factors. Oral Oncol 2014; 50:90-7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2013.10.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2013] [Revised: 10/07/2013] [Accepted: 10/12/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|