Molecular Investigations of Linezolid Resistance in Enterococci OptrA Variants from a Hospital in Shanghai

Genomic Characterization and Phylogenetic Analysis of Linezolid-Resistant Enterococcus from the Nostrils of Healthy Hosts Identifies Zoonotic Transmission

Linezolid resistance in Enterococcus spp. is increasingly considered critically important and a public health threat which mandates the need to understand their genomic contents and dissemination patterns. Here, we used whole-genome sequencing to characterize the resistome, virulome and mobile genetic elements of nine linezolid-resistant (LZDR) enterococci (seven optrA-E. faecalis, one poxtA-E. faecium and one optrA-E. casseliflavus) previously obtained from the nares of healthy dogs, pigs, pig farmers and tracheal samples of nestling storks in Spain. Also, the relatedness of the isolates with publicly available genomes was accessed by core-genome single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis. The optrA gene of the E. faecalis and E. casseliflavus isolates was located downstream of the fexA gene. The optrA gene in the E. casseliflavus isolate was carried in a plasmid (pURX4962), while those in the seven E. faecalis isolates were chromosomally located. The OptrA proteins were mostly variants of wild type (DP-2: Y176D/T481P; RDK: I104R/Y176D/E256K; DD-3: Y176D/G393D; and EDD: K3E/Y176D/G393D), except two that were wild type (one E. faecalis and one E. casseliflavus). The poxtA gene in the E. faecium isolate was found alone within its contig. The cfrD was upstream of ermB gene in the E. casseliflavus isolate and flanked by ISNCY and IS1216. All the LZDR enterococci carried plasmid rep genes (2-3) containing tetracycline, chloramphenicol and aminoglycoside resistance genes. All isolates except E. casseliflavus carried at least one intact prophage, of which E. faecalis-ST330 (X4957) from a pig carried the highest (n = 5). Tn6260 was associated with lnuG in E. faecalis-ST330 while Tn554 was with fexA in E. feaecalis-ST59 isolates. All except E. casseliflavus (n = 0) carried at least two metal resistance genes (MRGs), of which poxtA-carrying E. faecium-ST1739 isolate contained the most (arsA, copA, fief, ziaA, znuA, zosA, zupT, and zur). SNP-based analyses identified closely related optrA-E. faecalis isolates from a pig and a pig farmer on the same farm (SNP = 4). Moreover, optrA- carrying E. faecalis-ST32, -ST59, and -ST474 isolates from pigs were related to those previously described from humans (sick and healthy) and cattle in Spain, Belgium, and Switzerland (SNP range 43-86). These findings strongly suggest the transmission of LZDR-E. faecalis between a pig and a pig farmer and potential inter-country dissemination. These highlight the need to strengthen molecular surveillance of LZDR enterococci in all ecological niches and body parts to direct appropriate control strategies.

Genomic epidemiology reveals multiple mechanisms of linezolid resistance in clinical enterococci in China

BACKGROUND

Infections caused by linezolid-resistant enterococci (LRE) are clinically difficult to treat and threaten patient health. However, there is a lack of studies on long time-span LRE strains in China. For this reason, our study comprehensively revealed the resistance mechanisms of LRE strains collected in a Chinese tertiary care hospital from 2011 to 2022.

METHODS

Enterococcal strains were screened and verified after retrospective analysis of microbial data. Subsequently, 65 LRE strains (61 Enterococcus faecalis and 4 Enterococcus faecium, MIC ≥ 8 µg/ml), 1 linezolid-intermediate Enterococcus faecium (MIC = 4 µg/ml) and 1 linezolid-susceptible Enterococcus faecium (MIC = 1.5 µg/ml) were submitted for whole-genome sequencing (WGS) analysis and bioinformatics analysis.

RESULTS

The optrA gene was found to be the most common linezolid resistance mechanism in our study. We identified the wild-type OptrA and various OptrA variants in 98.5% of LRE strains (61 Enterococcus faecalis and 3 Enterococcus faecium). We also found one linezolid-resistant Enterococcus faecium strain carried both optrA and cfr(D) gene, while one linezolid-resistant Enterococcus faecium only harbored the poxtA gene. Most optrA genes (55/64) were located on plasmids, with impB-fexA-optrA, impB-fexA-optrA-erm(A), fexA-optrA-erm(A), and fexA-optrA segments. A minority of optrA genes (9/64) were found on chromosomes with the Tn6674-like platform. Besides, other possible linezolid resistance-associated mechanisms (mutations in the rplC and rplD genes) were also found in 26 enterococcal strains.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggested that multiple mechanisms of linezolid resistance exist among clinical LRE strains in China.

Transferable linezolid resistance genes (optrA and poxtA) in enterococci derived from livestock compost at Japanese farms

OBJECTIVES

Linezolid is a last-resort antimicrobial in human clinical settings to treat multidrug-resistant Gram-positive bacterial infections. Mobile linezolid resistance genes (optrA, poxtA, and cfr) have been detected in various sources worldwide. However, the presence of linezolid-not-susceptible bacteria and mobile linezolid resistance genes in Japan remains uncertain. Therefore, we clarified the existence of linezolid-not-susceptible bacteria and mobile linezolid resistance genes in farm environments in Japan.

METHODS

Enterococci isolates from faeces compost collected from 10 pig and 11 cattle farms in Japan in 2021 were tested for antimicrobial susceptibility and possession of mobile linezolid resistance genes. Whole-genome sequencing of optrA and/or poxtA genes positive-enterococci was performed.

RESULTS

Of 103 enterococci isolates, 12 from pig farm compost were not-susceptible (2 resistant and 10 intermediate) to linezolid. These 12 isolates carried mobile linezolid resistance genes on plasmids or chromosomes (5 optrA-positive Enterococcus faecalis, 6 poxtA-positive E. hirae or E. thailandicus, and 1 optrA- and poxtA-positive E. faecium). The genetic structures of optrA- and poxA-carrying plasmids were almost identical to those reported in other countries. These plasmids were capable of transferring among E. faecium and E. faecalis strains. The optrA- and poxtA-positive E. faecium belonged to ST324 (clade A2), a high-risk multidrug-resistant clone. The E. faecalis carrying optrA gene on its chromosome was identified as ST593.

CONCLUSIONS

Although linezolid is not used in livestock, linezolid-not-susceptible enterococci could be indirectly selected by frequently used antimicrobials, such as phenicols. Moreover, various enterococci species derived from livestock compost may serve as reservoirs of linezolid resistance genes carried on globally disseminated plasmids and multidrug-resistant high-risk clones.

Linezolid Resistance Genes and Mutations among Linezolid-Susceptible Enterococcus spp.-A Loose Cannon?

The National Reference Centre for Enterococci receives an increasing number of linezolid-resistant Enterococcus isolates. Linezolid (LIN) resistance is mediated by G2576T 23S rDNA gene mutations and/or acquisition of resistance genes (cfr, optrA, poxtA). There are anecdotal reports that those resistance traits may be present in phenotypically linezolid-susceptible isolates. We aimed to determine the prevalence of LIN resistance genes and mutations in enterococci with a LIN MIC of 4 mg/L in broth microdilution (EUCAST = susceptible) isolated from German hospital patients 2019-2021. LIN MICs were additionally determined by ETEST® and VITEK2. Selected strains were subjected to LIN selective pressure and growth was monitored with increasing antibiotic concentrations. We received 195 isolates (LIN MIC = 4 mg/L). In total, 78/195 (40%) isolates contained either a putative resistance gene, the G2576T mutation, or a combination thereof. Very major error was high for broth microdilution. The ability to predict phenotypic resistance from genotypic profile was highest for G2576T-mediated resistance. Selection experiments revealed that, in particular, E. faecium isolates with resistance gene mutations or poxtA rapidly adapt to MICs above the clinical breakpoint. In conclusion, LIN resistance genes and mutations can be observed in phenotypically linezolid-susceptible enterococci. Those isolates may rapidly develop resistance under LIN selective pressure potentially leading to treatment failure.

A Genomic Snapshot of Antibiotic-ResistantEnterococcus faecalis within Public Hospital Environments in South Africa

Enterococci are among the most common opportunistic hospital pathogens. This study used whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and bioinformatics to determine the antibiotic resistome, mobile genetic elements, clone and phylogenetic relationship of Enterococcus faecalis isolated from hospital environments in South Africa. This study was carried out from September to November 2017. Isolates were recovered from 11 frequently touched sites by patients and healthcare workers in different wards at 4 levels of healthcare (A, B, C, and D) in Durban, South Africa. Out of the 245 identified E. faecalis isolates, 38 isolates underwent whole-genome sequencing (WGS) on the Illumina MiSeq platform, following microbial identification and antibiotic susceptibility tests. The tet(M) (31/38, 82%) and erm(C) (16/38, 42%) genes were the most common antibiotic-resistant genes found in isolates originating from different hospital environments which corroborated with their antibiotic resistance phenotypes. The isolates harboured mobile genetic elements consisting of plasmids (n = 11) and prophages (n = 14) that were mostly clone-specific. Of note, a large number of insertion sequence (IS) families were found on the IS3 (55%), IS5 (42%), IS1595 (40%), and Tn3 transposons the most predominant. Microbial typing using WGS data revealed 15 clones with 6 major sequence types (ST) belonging to ST16 (n = 7), ST40 (n = 6), ST21 (n = 5), ST126 (n = 3), ST23 (n = 3), and ST386 (n = 3). Phylogenomic analysis showed that the major clones were mostly conserved within specific hospital environments. However, further metadata insights revealed the complex intraclonal spread of these E. faecalis major clones between the sampling sites within each specific hospital setting. The results of these genomic analyses will offer insights into antibiotic-resistantE. faecalis in hospital environments relevant to the design of optimal infection prevention strategies in hospital settings.

Evaluation of resazurin microplate method for rapid detection of vancomycin and linezolid resistance in Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium clinical isolates

BACKGROUND

Vancomycin and linezolid resistance among enterococci is an increasing problem due to a lack of alternative antibiotics. Early identification of vancomycin-resistant and linezolid-resistant strains can help prevent the spread of resistance to these antibiotics. Hence, early, rapid and accurate detection of vancomycin and linezolid resistance is critical.

OBJECTIVES

The resazurin microplate method (RMM) was developed for detecting vancomycin and linezolid susceptibility among Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) and Enterococcus faecium (E. faecium) clinical isolates, and its performance was further evaluated.

METHODS

A total of 209 non-duplicate clinical isolates and three strains from the faeces of domestic animals, including 142 E. faecalis (71 linezolid non-susceptible and 71 linezolid susceptible) and 70 E. faecium (23 vancomycin non-susceptible, 23 vancomycin susceptible, 12 linezolid non-susceptible and 12 linezolid susceptible), were tested using RMM.

RESULTS

The susceptibility of E. faecium to vancomycin was detected within 5 h, with high susceptibility (23/23) and specificity (23/23). The susceptibility of E. faecalis and E. faecium to linezolid was detected within 4 h, with specificities of 98.59% and 100% and susceptibilities of 94.37% and 58.33% for E. faecalis and E. faecium, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

RMM had a good positive predictive value for the detection of vancomycin-non-susceptible E. faecium and linezolid-non-susceptible E. faecalis. It thus has the potential to become an alternative method for the rapid screening of these resistant pathogens in clinical practice.

Oxazolidinones: mechanisms of resistance and mobile genetic elements involved

The oxazolidinones (linezolid and tedizolid) are last-resort antimicrobial agents used for the treatment of severe infections in humans caused by MDR Gram-positive bacteria. They bind to the peptidyl transferase centre of the bacterial ribosome inhibiting protein synthesis. Even if the majority of Gram-positive bacteria remain susceptible to oxazolidinones, resistant isolates have been reported worldwide. Apart from mutations, affecting mostly the 23S rDNA genes and selected ribosomal proteins, acquisition of resistance genes (cfr and cfr-like, optrA and poxtA), often associated with mobile genetic elements [such as non-conjugative and conjugative plasmids, transposons, integrative and conjugative elements (ICEs), prophages and translocatable units], plays a critical role in oxazolidinone resistance. In this review, we briefly summarize the current knowledge on oxazolidinone resistance mechanisms and provide an overview on the diversity of the mobile genetic elements carrying oxazolidinone resistance genes in Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.

Enterococcus Virulence and Resistant Traits Associated with Its Permanence in the Hospital Environment

Enterococcus are opportunistic pathogens that have been gaining importance in the clinical setting, especially in terms of hospital-acquired infections. This problem has mainly been associated with the fact that these bacteria are able to present intrinsic and extrinsic resistance to different classes of antibiotics, with a great deal of importance being attributed to vancomycin-resistant enterococci. However, other aspects, such as the expression of different virulence factors including biofilm-forming ability, and its capacity of trading genetic information, makes this bacterial genus more capable of surviving harsh environmental conditions. All these characteristics, associated with some reports of decreased susceptibility to some biocides, all described in this literary review, allow enterococci to present a longer survival ability in the hospital environment, consequently giving them more opportunities to disseminate in these settings and be responsible for difficult-to-treat infections.

Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Enterococcus Isolates from Cattle and Pigs in Portugal: Linezolid Resistance Genes optrA and poxtA

Enterococci are part of the commensal gut microbiota of mammals, with Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium being the most clinically relevant species. This study assesses the prevalence and diversity of enterococcal species in cattle (n = 201) and pig (n = 249) cecal samples collected in 2017. Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of E. faecium (n = 48) and E. faecalis (n = 84) were assessed by agar and microdilution methods. Resistance genes were screened through PCR and nine strains were analyzed by Whole Genome Sequencing. A wide range of enterococci species was found colonizing the intestines of pigs and cattle. Overall, the prevalence of resistance to critically important antibiotics was low (except for erythromycin), and no glycopeptide-resistant isolates were identified. Two daptomycin-resistant E. faecalis ST58 and ST93 were found. Linezolid-resistant strains of E. faecalis (n = 3) and E. faecium (n = 1) were detected. Moreover, oxazolidinone resistance determinants optrA (n = 8) and poxtA (n = 2) were found in E. faecalis (ST16, ST58, ST207, ST474, ST1178) and E. faecium (ST22, ST2138). Multiple variants of optrA were found in different genetic contexts, either in the chromosome or plasmids. We highlight the importance of animals as reservoirs of resistance genes to critically important antibiotics.

Emergence of optrA-Mediated Linezolid Resistance in Enterococcus faecium: A Molecular Investigation in a Tertiary Hospital of Southwest China from 2014-2018

Purpose

To investigate the potential mechanism and molecular characteristics of linezolid-non-sensitive Enterococcus faecium from a tertiary hospital in southwest China and characterize the relevant plasmids.

Patients and Methods

Linezolid-non-sensitive Enterococcus faecium (LNSEFM) isolates collected from January 2014 to December 2018 were screened for resistant genes 23s rRNA, rplC, rplD, rplV, optrA, cfr, poxtA, by PCR. Molecular epidemiological analysis was performed by multilocus sequence typing (MLST). The optrA-and-poxtA co-harboring strain EFM_7150 was subjected to the whole genome sequencing (WGS) by Illumina HiSeq and Oxford Nanopore MinION.

Results

A total of 15 LNSEFM with linezolid MICs ranging from 4 to 16 mg/L were identified. About 66.7% (10/15) of isolates were linezolid-resistant. About 46.7% (7/15) of strains were positive for optrA. Two types of optrA variants (P and EYDNDM) were identified. About 13.3% (2/15) of isolates had poxtA. 1 harbored a L22 protein alteration (Ser77Thr). One isolate coharbored optrA (EYDNDM variant) and poxtA. There was no mutation in the gene that encoded the ribosomal protein L3/L4 or the domain V of 23S rRNA. No cfr gene was detected. Based on WGS data, optrA was associated with Tn558 inserted to radC gene and poxtA was flanked by IS1216E.

Conclusion

OptrA is primary mechanism in linezolid-resistant Enterococcus faecium. This is the first report ofoptrA variants P and EYDNDM identified in Enterococcus faecium and optrA-and-poxtA co-harboring Enterococcus faecium clinically in southwest China. Besides, Tn558 and IS1216Es may play an important role in the dissemination of optrA and poxtA, respectively. The findings revealed the potential threat to nosocomial infection by optrA and coexistence of optrA and poxtA in Enterococcus faecium. Thus, clinical surveillance of linezolid-resistant Enterococcus is urgently needed.

Comparison of Anti-Microbic and Anti-Biofilm Activity Among Tedizolid and Radezolid Against Linezolid-Resistant Enterococcus faecalis Isolates

Background

The emergence and spread of linezolid-resistant Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) have emerged as a serious threat to human health globally. Therefore, this study aims to compare the anti-microbic as well as the anti-biofilm activity of linezolid, tedizolid, and radezolid against linezolid-resistant E. faecalis.

Methods

A total of 2128 E. faecalis isolates were assessed from the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University from 2011 to 2019. Antibiotic sensitivity was evaluated using the micro broth dilution method. Oxazolidinone-resistant chromosomal and plasmid-borne genes such as cfr, cfr(A), cfr(B), cfr(C), cfr(D), optrA, and poxtA were detected by PCR and then sequenced to detect the presence of mutations in the domain V of the 23S rRNA and the ribosomal proteins L3, L4, and L22. Conjugation experiments were conducted using the broth method. The inhibition and eradication of biofilm were evaluated through crystal violet staining, whereas the efflux pump activities were detected by agar dilution.

Results

Out of 2128 isolated E. faecalis, 71 (3.34%) were linezolid-resistant isolates in which the MICs of tedizolid and radezolid ranged from 1 to 4 μg/mL and 0.5–1 μg/mL, respectively. The MIC₅₀/MIC₉₀ of tedizolid and radezolid were 4 and 8-fold lower than the linezolid, respectively. Out of 71 resistant isolates, 57 (80.28%) carried optrA, 1 (1.41%) carried cfr, 4 (5.63%) carried optrA and cfr, and 6 (8.45%) carried optrA and cfr(D), with no mutations of 23S rRNA gene and ribosomal proteins L3, L4, and L22. Besides, the transfer rate of the optrA, cfr, and cfr(D) was 17.91%, 0% and 0%, respectively. Radezolid showed more effectiveness in eradicating biofilm (8 × MIC). However, tedizolid was more effective than radezolid and linezolid in inhibiting the biofilm formation (1/4 MIC, 1/8MIC, and 1/16MIC). Additionally, in combination with CCCP, the MICs of radezolid in all linezolid-resistant isolates decreased ≥4-fold.

Conclusion

Radezolid showed greater antimicrobial activity than tedizolid and linezolid against linezolid-resistant E. faecalis. However, both tedizolid and radezolid showed differential activity on biofilm inhibition, eradication, and efflux pump compared to linezolid. Thus, our study might bring important clinical value in the application of these drugs for resistant pathogenic strains.

Mobile Oxazolidinone Resistance Genes in Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Bacteria

Seven mobile oxazolidinone resistance genes, including cfr, cfr(B), cfr(C), cfr(D), cfr(E), optrA, and poxtA, have been identified to date. The cfr genes code for 23S rRNA methylases, which confer a multiresistance phenotype that includes resistance to phenicols, lincosamides, oxazolidinones, pleuromutilins, and streptogramin A compounds. The optrA and poxtA genes code for ABC-F proteins that protect the bacterial ribosomes from the inhibitory effects of oxazolidinones. The optrA gene confers resistance to oxazolidinones and phenicols, while the poxtA gene confers elevated MICs or resistance to oxazolidinones, phenicols, and tetracycline. These oxazolidinone resistance genes are most frequently found on plasmids, but they are also located on transposons, integrative and conjugative elements (ICEs), genomic islands, and prophages. In these mobile genetic elements (MGEs), insertion sequences (IS) most often flanked the cfr, optrA, and poxtA genes and were able to generate translocatable units (TUs) that comprise the oxazolidinone resistance genes and occasionally also other genes. MGEs and TUs play an important role in the dissemination of oxazolidinone resistance genes across strain, species, and genus boundaries. Most frequently, these MGEs also harbor genes that mediate resistance not only to antimicrobial agents of other classes, but also to metals and biocides. Direct selection pressure by the use of antimicrobial agents to which the oxazolidinone resistance genes confer resistance, but also indirect selection pressure by the use of antimicrobial agents, metals, or biocides (the respective resistance genes against which are colocated on cfr-, optrA-, or poxtA-carrying MGEs) may play a role in the coselection and persistence of oxazolidinone resistance genes.