1
|
Keyaerts S, Godderis L, Vanden Abeele V, Daenen L. Identifying pain profiles in employees including work-related factors and pain perceptions: a cross-sectional study in Belgian companies. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e082804. [PMID: 39134443 PMCID: PMC11331899 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 07/26/2024] [Indexed: 08/21/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Studies usually investigate a limited number or a predefined combinations of risk factors for sickness absence in employees with pain. We examined frequently occurring combinations across a wide range of work-related factors and pain perceptions. DESIGN Cross-sectional study. SETTING Belgian companies that are under supervision of IDEWE, an external service for prevention and protection at work. PARTICIPANTS In total, 249 employees experiencing pain for at least 6 weeks were included and filled out an online survey. OUTCOMES Latent profile analysis was used to differentiate profiles of work-related factors (physical demands, workload, social support and autonomy) and pain perceptions (catastrophising, fear-avoidance beliefs and pain acceptance). Subsequently, profiles were compared on sociodemographics (age, gender, level of education, work arrangement, duration of complaints, multisite pain and sickness absence in the previous year) and predictors of sickness absence (behavioural intention and perceived behavioural control). RESULTS Four profiles were identified. Profile 1 (38.2%) had favourable scores and profile 4 (14.9%) unfavourable scores across all indicators. Profile 2 (33.3%) had relatively high physical demands, moderate autonomy levels and favourable scores on the other indicators. Profile 3 (13.7%) showed relatively low physical demands, moderate autonomy levels, but unfavourable scores on the other indicators. Predictors of profiles were age (OR 0.93 and 95% CI (0.89 to 0.98)), level of education (OR 0.28 and 95% CI (0.1 to 0.79)) and duration of sickness absence in the previous year (OR 2.29 and 95% CI (0.89 to 5.88)). Significant differences were observed in behavioural intention (χ2=8.92, p=0.030) and perceived behavioural control (χ2=12.37, p=0.006) across the four profiles. CONCLUSION This study highlights the significance of considering the interplay between work-related factors and pain perceptions in employees. Unfavourable scores on a single work factor might not translate into maladaptive pain perceptions or subsequent sickness absence, if mitigating factors are in place. Special attention must be devoted to employees dealing with unfavourable working conditions along with maladaptive pain perceptions. In this context, social support emerges as an important factor influencing sickness absence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stijn Keyaerts
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Knowledge Information and Research Center, Group Idewe, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Lode Godderis
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Knowledge Information and Research Center, Group Idewe, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Liesbeth Daenen
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Knowledge Information and Research Center, Group Idewe, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, VU Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ampiah PK, Hendrick P, Moffatt F, Ampiah JA. Barriers and facilitators to the delivery of a biopsychosocial education and exercise programme for patients with chronic low back pain in Ghana. A qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil 2024:1-11. [PMID: 38963089 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2374497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2024] [Indexed: 07/05/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Low back pain management has evolved with researchers advocating for a biopsychosocial management model. The biopsychosocial management model has been predominantly applied in high-income countries and underexplored in low- and middle-income countries including Ghana. This study aimed to explore the potential barriers and facilitators to patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) and physiotherapists engagement with a biopsychosocial intervention (exercise and patient education) as part of a feasibility study. MATERIAL AND METHODS This was a qualitative study embedded within a mixed-methods, sequential, feasibility study, in Ghana, applying semi-structured interviews. Two categories of participants involved in this study were, two trained physiotherapists, and six patients with CLBP, sampled within the feasibility study. RESULTS Regarding the barriers and facilitators to the delivery of the BPS intervention, five interlinked themes emerged from the thematic analysis. These were: structure and process of delivery; patients' expectations; patients' health beliefs, autonomy, and engagement; external influences and personal and professional characteristics of physiotherapists. CONCLUSION The themes that emerged from this study demonstrated many positive facilitators based on participants' improved understanding of LBP and the clarity and purpose of the biopsychosocial intervention. The results therefore demonstrate a potential to deliver the biopsychosocial intervention in a Ghanaian context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paapa Kwesi Ampiah
- Department of Health Sciences, College of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, UK
| | - Paul Hendrick
- Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences, School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, UK
| | - Fiona Moffatt
- Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences, School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
de Andrés Ares J, Eldabe S, Helsen N, Baranidharan G, Barat JL, Bhaskar A, Cassini F, Gillner S, Kallewaard JW, Klessinger S, Mavrocordatos P, Occhigrossi F, Van Zundert J, Huygen F, Stoevelaar H. Radiofrequency for chronic lumbosacral and cervical pain: Results of a consensus study using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method. Pain Pract 2024. [PMID: 38597223 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/11/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the routine use of radiofrequency (RF) for the treatment of chronic pain in the lumbosacral and cervical region, there remains uncertainty on the most appropriate patient selection criteria. This study aimed to develop appropriateness criteria for RF in relation to relevant patient characteristics, considering RF ablation (RFA) for the treatment of chronic axial pain and pulsed RF (PRF) for the treatment of chronic radicular pain. METHODS The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method (RUAM) was used to explore the opinions of a multidisciplinary European panel on the appropriateness of RFA and PRF for a variety of clinical scenarios. Depending on the type of pain (axial or radicular), the expert panel rated the appropriateness of RFA and PRF for a total of 219 clinical scenarios. RESULTS For axial pain in the lumbosacral or cervical region, appropriateness of RFA was determined by the dominant pain trigger and location of tenderness on palpation with higher appropriateness scores if these variables were suggestive of the diagnosis of facet or sacroiliac joint pain. Although the opinions on the appropriateness of PRF for lumbosacral and cervical radicular pain were fairly dispersed, there was agreement that PRF is an appropriate option for well-selected patients with radicular pain due to herniated disc or foraminal stenosis, particularly in the absence of motor deficits. The panel outcomes were embedded in an educational e-health tool that also covers the psychosocial aspects of chronic pain, providing integrated recommendations on the appropriate use of (P)RF interventions for the treatment of chronic axial and radicular pain in the lumbosacral and cervical region. CONCLUSIONS A multidisciplinary European expert panel established patient-specific recommendations that may support the (pre)selection of patients with chronic axial and radicular pain in the lumbosacral and cervical region for either RFA or PRF (accessible via https://rftool.org). Future studies should validate these recommendations by determining their predictive value for the outcomes of (P)RF interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier de Andrés Ares
- Department of Anesthesiology-Pain Unit, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Sam Eldabe
- Department of Pain Medicine, The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Nicky Helsen
- Centre for Decision Analysis and Support, Ismar Healthcare, Lier, Belgium
| | | | - Jean-Luc Barat
- Service de Neurochirurgie, Hôpital privé Clairval - Ramsay santé, Marseille, France
| | - Arun Bhaskar
- Pain Management Centre, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Fabrizio Cassini
- SS. Antonio e Biagio e C. Arrigo Hospital, Allesandria, Piedmont, Italy
| | - Sebastian Gillner
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Jan Willem Kallewaard
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Management, Rijnstate Hospital, Velp, The Netherlands
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Treatment, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Jan Van Zundert
- Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine and Multidisciplinary Pain Center, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Huygen
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Herman Stoevelaar
- Centre for Decision Analysis and Support, Ismar Healthcare, Lier, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hubeishy MH, Rossen CB, Dannapfel P, Thomas K, Jensen TS, Maribo T, Rolving N. Developing a low back pain guideline implementation programme in collaboration with physiotherapists and chiropractors using the Behaviour Change Wheel: a theory-driven design study. Implement Sci Commun 2024; 5:33. [PMID: 38570830 PMCID: PMC10993475 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-024-00568-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 03/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low back pain is still the leading cause of disability and societal burden, with 619 million prevalent cases worldwide in 2020. Most countries produce clinical guidelines to support healthcare professionals in evidence-based care regarding low back pain. However, several studies have identified relatively poor uptake of guidelines. Tailored strategies to facilitate the implementation of guidelines have been argued to increase uptake. This study aimed to develop a contextually tailored implementation programme to enhance evidence-based low back pain care among Danish physiotherapists and chiropractors in primary care. METHODS A theory-driven implementation programme development study was conducted using the Behaviour Change Wheel, with high healthcare professional involvement. Data collection included four workshops with seven physiotherapists and six chiropractors from primary care clinics. The development process consisted of [1] establishing a theoretical frame, [2] involving participants, [3] understanding the behaviour, [4] designing the implementation programme, and [5] final implementation programme. RESULTS The target behaviours selected (guideline recommendations) for the implementation programme were (i) screening of psychosocial risk factors and (ii) offering patient education. The barriers and facilitators for the selected behaviours were described and linked to intervention functions and behavioural techniques. Finally, the implementation programme comprised five strategies: webinars, e-learning videos, communication exercises, peer learning, and group dialogue meetings. In addition, the programme consisted of implementation support: champions, a physical material folder, a weekly email reminder, a specially designed website and a visit from an implementation consultant. An essential element of the overall programme was that it was designed as a step-by-step implementation process consisting of 16 h of education and training distributed over 16 weeks. CONCLUSIONS A programme for implementing low back pain guideline recommendations was developed based on behaviour change theory and four co-design workshops involving healthcare professionals to overcome the contextually identified barriers. A theory-driven approach involving healthcare professionals was useful in identifying relevant target behaviours and tailoring the programme to consider contextual barriers and facilitators for implementation. The effectiveness of the final implementation programme will be evaluated in the project's next phase. TRIAL REGISTRATION Central Denmark Region, Registered November 11, 2021, act no. 1-16-02-93-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maja Husted Hubeishy
- Interdisciplinary Research Unit, Elective Surgery Centre, Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Hospital in Central Denmark Region, Falkevej 1-3, 8600, Silkeborg, Denmark.
- Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
- Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
| | - Camilla Blach Rossen
- Interdisciplinary Research Unit, Elective Surgery Centre, Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Hospital in Central Denmark Region, Falkevej 1-3, 8600, Silkeborg, Denmark
| | - Petra Dannapfel
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Kristin Thomas
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Tue Secher Jensen
- Diagnostic Centre - Imaging Section, Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Silkeborg, Denmark
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Thomas Maribo
- Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- DEFACTUM, Central Region Denmark, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Nanna Rolving
- Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gerdle B, Dragioti E, Rivano Fischer M, Ringqvist Å. Acceptance and Fear-Avoidance Mediate Outcomes of Interdisciplinary Pain Rehabilitation Programs at 12-Month Follow-Up: A Clinical Registry-Based Longitudinal Cohort Study from the Swedish Quality Registry for Pain Rehabilitation (SQRP). J Pain Res 2024; 17:83-105. [PMID: 38196970 PMCID: PMC10775695 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s438260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Factors that influence outcomes of interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation programs (IPRP) are poorly known. It is unclear how outcomes are influenced by pain intensity, psychological distress, and coping strategies. Aim This clinical registry-based longitudinal cohort study has three aims: 1) to determine the relative importance of pain intensity, psychological distress, acceptance, and fear-avoidance for changes in three outcomes of IPRP at 12-month follow-up; 2) to investigate whether the effects of pain intensity and psychological distress on the three outcomes are mediated via acceptance and fear-avoidance; and 3) to determine whether sex is a moderator. Methods This study uses Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) from specialist units reporting data (2008-2016) to the Swedish Quality Registry for Pain Rehabilitation (SQRP). Adult chronic pain patients (N = 1991) answered the PROMs (background, pain, psychological distress, coping, participation, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL)). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) was used to explore the aims. Results Changes in acceptance (β:0.424-0.553; all P<0.001) were the strongest predictor of the three outcomes (changes in life control, interference, and HRQoL) at 12-month follow-up. The next strongest predictor was baseline acceptance (β: 0.177-0.233; all P<0.001) and changes in fear-avoidance (β: -0.152- -0.186; all P<0.001). Baseline pain intensity and psychological distress showed weak positive associations. Their effects on the three outcomes were mediated via acceptance aspects. Sex was not a moderator. Discussion and Conclusion Acceptance aspects (baseline and changes) were important predictors of IPRP outcomes. Changes in fear-avoidance were also important although to a lesser degree. Some of the effects of pain intensity and psychological distress on outcomes were mediated via acceptance at baseline. Future PLS-SEM analysis of real-world IPRP should include more potential mediators (eg, catastrophizing and more facets of psychological flexibility and fear-avoidance) and the components of IPRP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Björn Gerdle
- Pain and Rehabilitation Centre, and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Elena Dragioti
- Pain and Rehabilitation Centre, and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Marcelo Rivano Fischer
- Department of Neurosurgery and Pain Rehabilitation, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Åsa Ringqvist
- Department of Neurosurgery and Pain Rehabilitation, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Javeed S, Benedict B, Yakdan S, Saleem S, Zhang JK, Botterbush K, Frumkin MR, Hardi A, Neuman B, Kelly MP, Steinmetz MP, Piccirillo JF, Goodin BR, Rodebaugh TL, Ray WZ, Greenberg JK. Implications of Preoperative Depression for Lumbar Spine Surgery Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2348565. [PMID: 38277149 PMCID: PMC10818221 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.48565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Comorbid depression is common among patients with degenerative lumbar spine disease. Although a well-researched topic, the evidence of the role of depression in spine surgery outcomes remains inconclusive. Objective To investigate the association between preoperative depression and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after lumbar spine surgery. Data Sources A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Embase, Scopus, PsychInfo, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov was performed from database inception to September 14, 2023. Study Selection Included studies involved adults undergoing lumbar spine surgery and compared PROMs in patients with vs those without depression. Studies evaluating the correlation between preoperative depression and disease severity were also included. Data Extraction and Synthesis All data were independently extracted by 2 authors and independently verified by a third author. Study quality was assessed using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to synthesize data, and I2 was used to assess heterogeneity. Metaregression was performed to identify factors explaining the heterogeneity. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was the standardized mean difference (SMD) of change from preoperative baseline to postoperative follow-up in PROMs of disability, pain, and physical function for patients with vs without depression. Secondary outcomes were preoperative and postoperative differences in absolute disease severity for these 2 patient populations. Results Of the 8459 articles identified, 44 were included in the analysis. These studies involved 21 452 patients with a mean (SD) age of 57 (8) years and included 11 747 females (55%). Among these studies, the median (range) follow-up duration was 12 (6-120) months. The pooled estimates of disability, pain, and physical function showed that patients with depression experienced a greater magnitude of improvement compared with patients without depression, but this difference was not significant (SMD, 0.04 [95% CI, -0.02 to 0.10]; I2 = 75%; P = .21). Nonetheless, patients with depression presented with worse preoperative disease severity in disability, pain, and physical function (SMD, -0.52 [95% CI, -0.62 to -0.41]; I2 = 89%; P < .001), which remained worse postoperatively (SMD, -0.52 [95% CI, -0.75 to -0.28]; I2 = 98%; P < .001). There was no significant correlation between depression severity and the primary outcome. A multivariable metaregression analysis suggested that age, sex (male to female ratio), percentage of comorbidities, and follow-up attrition were significant sources of variance. Conclusions and Relevance Results of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggested that, although patients with depression had worse disease severity both before and after surgery compared with patients without depression, they had significant potential for recovery in disability, pain, and physical function. Further investigations are needed to examine the association between spine-related disability and depression as well as the role of perioperative mental health treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saad Javeed
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Braeden Benedict
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Salim Yakdan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Samia Saleem
- Department of Musculoskeletal Research, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Justin K. Zhang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Kathleen Botterbush
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Madelyn R. Frumkin
- Department of Psychology and Brain Sciences, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Angela Hardi
- Becker Medical Library, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Brian Neuman
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Michael P. Kelly
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rady Children’s Hospital, University of California, San Diego, San Diego
| | | | - Jay F. Piccirillo
- Department of Otolaryngology, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Burel R. Goodin
- Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Thomas L. Rodebaugh
- Department of Psychology and Brain Sciences, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Wilson Z. Ray
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Jacob K. Greenberg
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Waardenburg S, de Meij N, van Kuijk SMJ, Van Zundert J, Brouwer BA. Expectations of treatment outcome in complex cases of patients with chronic pain: A study on the DATAPAIN cohort. Pain Pract 2024; 24:8-17. [PMID: 37477420 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Revised: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A better insight in how the biopsychosocial factors influence patient outcome(s) may provide information that helps selecting the optimal pain management for a specific group. METHODS Categorization was made in the prospective DATAPAIN registry, in which patients with pain severity (Numeric Rating Scale [NRS]: 7-10), depression or anxiety (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: > 10), and pain catastrophizing (Pain Catastrophizing Scale: > 31) were identified as complex cases. Patient outcomes; treatment satisfaction on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), pain relief (NRS), pain interference on the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and quality of life indicator General Perceived Health (GPH) were evaluated. Logistic regression analyzed if belonging to the complex cases showed modification in the outcome of the PGIC and GPH. Linear regression was observed if complex cases differed in average reduction in pain relief and interference compared to non-complex cases. RESULTS 1637 patients were included, of which 345 (21.08%) were considered complex cases. The changes in scores of pain relief and BPI active subscale were not significantly different between groups. The BPI affective subscale had a different change in score (-0.509; p: 0.002). The complex cases had an odds ratio (OR) of 0.59 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.36-0.77) on treatment satisfaction compared to non-complex cases, and an OR of 0.28 (95% CI: 0.11-0.56) on the GPH. CONCLUSION When treating patients with complex cases, desired treatment outcome(s) should be recognized by specialists and patients, as these may be less likely to occur.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Waardenburg
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Maastricht University Medical Centre MUMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre MUMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Nelleke de Meij
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Maastricht University Medical Centre MUMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sander M J van Kuijk
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre MUMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Van Zundert
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Maastricht University Medical Centre MUMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Anesthesiology and Multidisciplinary Pain Centre, Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg, Genk/Lanaken, Belgium
| | - Brigitte A Brouwer
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Maastricht University Medical Centre MUMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Shetty GM, Shah N, Arenja A. Occupation-based demographic, clinical, and psychological presentation of spine pain: A retrospective analysis of 71,727 patients from urban India. Work 2024; 78:181-193. [PMID: 38701124 DOI: 10.3233/wor-230551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although many studies have investigated the physical and ergonomic risks of spine pain in specific occupation groups, the literature is lacking on occupation-based clinical and psychological presentation in patients with spine pain. OBJECTIVE To analyze occupation-based variation in demographic, clinical, and psychological presentation in patients with spine pain. METHODS This retrospective study analyzed the clinical data of 71727 patients with spine pain visiting a chain of spine rehabilitation clinics. Demographic and clinical variables such as gender, age, affected site, symptom duration, clinical symptoms and presentation, pain intensity, disability, and STarT Back Screening Tool (SBT) risk were compared between 9 occupational groups. RESULTS The service and sales workers (44%) and students (43.5%) groups had the highest percentage of patients who presented with central spine pain; military personnel had the highest percentage of patients who presented with unilateral radicular pain (51.5%); and the retired or unemployed group had the highest percentage of patients who presented with severe myotomal loss (grade≤3) (6%). Homemakers had significantly higher pain intensity and disability (p < 0.001) and had the highest percentage of patients who presented with severe pain (47%), severe and crippled disability (59.5%), and medium to high risk (59%) with SBT when compared to other occupational groups. CONCLUSION Patients with spine pain showed variation in demographic, clinical, and psychological presentation based on their occupation. The findings of this study can be the basis for identifying risk factors for spine pain and helping plan preventive and treatment measures based on their occupation.
Collapse
|
9
|
Moriki K, Ogihara H, Yoshikawa K, Kikuchi K, Endo R, Sato T. Effects of sleep quality on pain, cognitive factors, central sensitization, and quality of life in patients with chronic low back pain. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 2024; 37:119-125. [PMID: 37694349 DOI: 10.3233/bmr-220429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sleep quality in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) may affect quality of life (QoL), possibly due to worsening pain, central sensitization (CS), and cognitive factors. However, causal relationship among the factors has not been confirmed yet. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that sleep quality in patients with CLBP is attributable to pain, cognitive factors, and CS, and influences QoL, by structural covariance analysis. METHODS This is a cross-sectional study. Participants were recruited from six health care facilities and 101 patients with CLBP were included. Structural covariance analysis assessed the fit of data to the model using goodness of fit index (GFI), adjusted goodness of fit index (AGFI), comparative fit index (CFI), and mean squared approximation error (RMSEA). RESULTS The structural covariance analysis showed that the goodness-of-fit indices were high (GFI = 0.993, AGFI = 0.964, CFI = 1.00, RMSEA < 0.01). Sleep quality was not directly influenced by QoL but rather by CS and cognitive factors. CONCLUSION This study suggests that sleep quality in patients with CLBP is indirectly mediated through multiple pathways, including cognitive factors and CS, which may influence QoL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hirofumi Ogihara
- Division of Physical Therapy, Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Nagano University of Health and Medicine, Nagano, Japan
| | - Koji Yoshikawa
- Graduate school of Health Sciences, Hirosaki University School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Kenta Kikuchi
- Department of Physical Therapy, Iwate Rehabilitation College, Iwate, Japan
| | - Ryunosuke Endo
- Graduate school of Health Sciences, Hirosaki University School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Takaaki Sato
- Division of Physical Therapy, Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Nagano University of Health and Medicine, Nagano, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Polo-Ferrero L, Canchal-Crespo D, Sáez-Gutiérrez S, Dávila-Marcos A, Puente-González AS, Méndez-Sánchez R. Specific Neurodynamic Exercises on Pain and Disability in Old Women with Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 12:20. [PMID: 38200926 PMCID: PMC10779372 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12010020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Revised: 12/17/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Neurodynamic exercise is a specific type of exercise used as a neural treatment that focuses on restoring altered homeostasis in the neuroimmune system by mobilising the nervous system and other structures. A prospective, randomized clinical trial was performed to evaluate the effect of neurodynamic exercises on disability and neck pain in elderly women over four weeks. Participants were randomized into two groups: a neurodynamic (NM) group (n = 28) and a non-specific exercise (NSE) group (n = 28). Inclusion criteria were women over 65 years of age who subjectively admitted to having mechanical neck pain for more than six months. Results showed that specific neurodynamic exercises can improve pain and disability in older women with chronic mechanical neck pain. Improvements were observed in all variables (p < 0.05). Significant between-group differences in favour of the NM group were only found for neck pressure pain thresholds and both tibialis anterior muscles. Larger effect sizes were obtained in favour of the NM group, especially for pain, disability, neck extension and inclination and pressure pain thresholds. Neurodynamic exercises have been shown to be more clinically relevant in disability and neck pain in older women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luis Polo-Ferrero
- Department of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain; (L.P.-F.); (S.S.-G.); (A.D.-M.); (R.M.-S.)
- Institute of Biomedical Research of Salamanca (IBSAL), 37007 Salamanca, Spain
| | | | - Susana Sáez-Gutiérrez
- Department of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain; (L.P.-F.); (S.S.-G.); (A.D.-M.); (R.M.-S.)
- Institute of Biomedical Research of Salamanca (IBSAL), 37007 Salamanca, Spain
| | - Arturo Dávila-Marcos
- Department of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain; (L.P.-F.); (S.S.-G.); (A.D.-M.); (R.M.-S.)
| | - Ana Silvia Puente-González
- Department of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain; (L.P.-F.); (S.S.-G.); (A.D.-M.); (R.M.-S.)
- Institute of Biomedical Research of Salamanca (IBSAL), 37007 Salamanca, Spain
| | - Roberto Méndez-Sánchez
- Department of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain; (L.P.-F.); (S.S.-G.); (A.D.-M.); (R.M.-S.)
- Institute of Biomedical Research of Salamanca (IBSAL), 37007 Salamanca, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hestbæk L, Schmidt AM, Hald MA, Rolving N. Guideline adherence and socioeconomic factors in Danish patients referred to secondary care for low back pain: a cross sectional study. BMC Public Health 2023; 23:1733. [PMID: 37674149 PMCID: PMC10481487 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-16633-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The pre-referral history of patients with low back pain referred to secondary care is poorly documented, and it is unclear whether it complies with clinical guideline recommendations; specifically, whether they have received appropriate treatment in primary care. This study describes the patient population referred to a spine clinic at a Danish hospital and investigates whether they have received an adequate course of treatment in primary care before referral. Furthermore, a possible association between primary care treatment and socioeconomic factors is estimated. METHODS We examined self-reported data from 1035 patients with low back pain of at least eight weeks duration referred to secondary care at a medical spine clinic using a cross-sectional design. As an approximation to national clinical guidelines, the definition of an adequate course of treatment in primary care was at least five visits to a physiotherapist or chiropractor prior to referral. RESULTS Patients were on average 53 years old, and 56% were women. The average Oswestry Disability Index score was 36, indicating a moderate level of disability. Nearly half of the patients reported pain for over a year, and 75% reported pain below knee level. Prior to referral, 33% of the patients had not received an adequate course of treatment in primary care. Based on multiple logistic regression with the three socioeconomic variables, age and sex in the model, those who were unemployed had an odds ratio of 2.35 (1.15-4.79) for not receiving appropriate treatment compared to employed patients. Similarly, the odds ratio for patients without vs. with health insurance was 1.71 (1.17-2.50). No significant association was observed with length of education. CONCLUSIONS Despite national clinical guidelines recommending management for low back pain in primary care, one third of the patients had not received an adequate course of treatment before referral to secondary care. Moreover, the high probability of not having received recommended treatment for patients who were unemployed or lacked health insurance indicates an economic obstacle to adequate care. Therefore, reconsidering the compensation structure for the treatment of back pain patients is imperative to mitigate health inequality within low back pain management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lise Hestbæk
- The Chiropractic Knowledge Hub, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark.
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark.
- Diagnostic Center, University Research Clinic for Innovative Patient Pathways, Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Falkevej 1-3, 8600, Silkeborg, Denmark.
| | - Anne Mette Schmidt
- Diagnostic Center, University Research Clinic for Innovative Patient Pathways, Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Falkevej 1-3, 8600, Silkeborg, Denmark
| | | | - Nanna Rolving
- Department of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens, Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark
- Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ampiah JA, Moffatt F, Diver C, Ampiah PK. A Qualitative Investigation of the Psychosocial Impact of Chronic Low Back Pain in Ghana. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e073538. [PMID: 37474173 PMCID: PMC10360413 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/22/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a global health concern associated with multidimensional/biopsychosocial levels of affectation in developed countries, with holistic management requiring consideration of these factors. There has been minimal research exploring the psychosocial impact of CLBP, and the factors influencing it, in African contexts, with none in Ghana. OBJECTIVES To explore the psychosocial impact of CLBP among patients with CLBP in Ghana. DESIGN Qualitative study using individual semistructured face-to-face interviews, underpinned by Straussian grounded theory principles and critical realist philosophy. PARTICIPANTS Thirty patients with CLBP attending physiotherapy at two hospitals in Ghana. RESULTS Five categories: loss of self and roles, emotional distress, fear, stigmatisation and marginalisation, financial burden, and social support and three mechanisms: acquired biomedical/mechanical beliefs from healthcare professionals (HCPs), sociocultural beliefs and the socioeconomic impact of CLBP were derived. CONCLUSION CLBP adversely affects multidimensional/biopsychosocial aspects of individuals experiencing CLBP in Ghana. This delineates the need for a biopsychosocial approach to care. There is the need for HCPs in Ghana to reassess current CLBP management strategies to address the influence of adverse HCPs biomedical inclinations on patients' psychosocial consequences. Population-based education strategies and consideration of formal support systems for persons with disabling CLBP may also be beneficial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josephine Ahenkorah Ampiah
- Division of Physiotherapy, Chiropractic and Sports Rehabilitation, London South Bank University, London, UK
- Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Fiona Moffatt
- Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Claire Diver
- Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Paapa Kwesi Ampiah
- Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Rambla C, Aragonès E, Pallejà-Millán M, Tomé-Pires C, López-Cortacans G, Sánchez-Rodríguez E, Miró J. Short and long-term predictors of pain severity and interference in primary care patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain and depression. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2023; 24:270. [PMID: 37020278 PMCID: PMC10074832 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06357-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 04/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic pain and depression are frequent comorbidities in primary care. Depression among other psychosocial factors play a role in the clinical course of chronic pain. OBJECTIVE To study the short and long-term predictive factors of severity and interference of chronic pain in primary care patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain and major depression. METHODS Longitudinal study of a cohort of 317 patients. The outcomes are severity and functional interference of pain (Brief Pain Inventory) measured at 3 and 12 months. We performed multivariate linear regression models to estimate the effects the explanatory baseline variables on the outcomes. RESULTS 83% participants were women; average age was 60.3 years (SD = 10.2). In multivariate models, baseline pain severity predicted pain severity at 3 months (β = 0.53; 95% CI = 0.37-0.68) and at 12 months (β = 0.48; 95% CI = 0.29-0.67). Also, pain > 2 years of evolution predicted long term pain severity (β = 0.91; CI95%=0.11-1.71). Baseline pain interference predicted interference at 3 and 12 months (β = 0.27; 95%CI = 0.11-0.43 and β = 0.21; 95%CI = 0.03-0.40, respectively). Baseline pain severity predicted interference at 3 and 12 months (β = 0.26; 95%CI = 0.10-0.42 and β = 0.20; 95%CI = 0.02-0.39, respectively). Pain > 2 years predicted greater severity and greater interference at 12 months (β = 0.91; CI95%=0.11-1.71, and β = 1.23; CI95%=0.41-2.04). Depression severity predicted more interference at 12 months (β = 0.58; CI95%=0.04-1.11). Occupational status as active worker predicted less interference throughout the follow-up (β=-0.74; CI95%=-1.36 to -0.13 and β=-0.96; CI95%=-1.71 to -0.21, at 3 and 12 months). Currently working also predicts less pain severity at 12 months (β=-0.77; CI95%=1.52 - 0.02). With regard to the psychological variables, pain catastrophizing predicted pain severity and interference at three months (β = 0.03; 95% CI = 0.00-0.05 and β = 0.03; 95% CI = 0.00-0.05), but not at long term. CONCLUSION In a sample of adults with chronic pain and depression, this primary care study has identified prognostic factors that independently predict the severity and functional interference of pain. If confirmed in new studies, these factors should be targeted for individualized interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02605278), registered 16/11/2015.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Concepció Rambla
- Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària (IDIAP) Jordi Gol, Barcelona, Spain
- Atenció Primària Camp de Tarragona, Institut Català de la Salut, Tarragona, Spain
| | - Enric Aragonès
- Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària (IDIAP) Jordi Gol, Barcelona, Spain.
- Atenció Primària Camp de Tarragona, Institut Català de la Salut, Tarragona, Spain.
- Centre d'Atenció Primària Constantí, Carrer dels Horts, 6, Constantí, 43120, Tarragona, Spain.
| | | | - Catarina Tomé-Pires
- Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària (IDIAP) Jordi Gol, Barcelona, Spain
- Psychology Research Center (CIP), Autonomous University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Germán López-Cortacans
- Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària (IDIAP) Jordi Gol, Barcelona, Spain
- Atenció Primària Camp de Tarragona, Institut Català de la Salut, Tarragona, Spain
| | - Elisabet Sánchez-Rodríguez
- Unit for the Study and Treatment of Pain - ALGOS, Research Center for Behavior Assessment (CRAMC), Department of Psychology, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Jordi Miró
- Unit for the Study and Treatment of Pain - ALGOS, Research Center for Behavior Assessment (CRAMC), Department of Psychology, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Catalonia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Samulowitz A, Haukenes I, Grimby-Ekman A, Bergman S, Hensing G. Psychosocial resources predict frequent pain differently for men and women: A prospective cohort study. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0283222. [PMID: 36930629 PMCID: PMC10022772 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/03/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Psychosocial resources, psychological and social factors like self-efficacy and social support have been suggested as important assets for individuals with chronic pain, but the importance of psychosocial resources for the development of pain is sparsely examined, especially sex and gender differences. The aim of this study was to investigate associations between psychosocial resources and sex on the development of frequent pain in a general population sample, and to deepen the knowledge about sex and gender patterns. METHODS A sample from the Swedish Health Assets Project, a longitudinal cohort study, included self-reported data from 2263 participants, 53% women, with no frequent pain at baseline. The outcome variable was frequent pain at 18-months follow-up. Psychosocial resources studied were general self-efficacy, instrumental and emotional social support. Log binomial regressions in a generalised linear model were used to calculate risk ratios (RRs), comparing all combinations of men with high psychosocial resources, men with low psychosocial resources, women with high psychosocial resources and women with low psychosocial resources. RESULTS Women with low psychosocial resources had higher risk of frequent pain at follow-up compared to men with high resources: general self-efficacy RR 1.82, instrumental social support RR 2.33 and emotional social support RR 1.94. Instrumental social support was the most important protective resource for women, emotional social support was the most important one for men. Results were discussed in terms of gender norms. CONCLUSIONS The psychosocial resources general self-efficacy, instrumental and emotional support predicted the risk of developing frequent pain differently among and between men and women in a general population sample. The results showed the importance of studying sex and gender differences in psychological and not least social predictors for pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anke Samulowitz
- School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Inger Haukenes
- Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Research Unit for General Practice, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Bergen, Norway
| | - Anna Grimby-Ekman
- School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Stefan Bergman
- School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Spenshult Research and Development Centre, Halmstad, Sweden
| | - Gunnel Hensing
- School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Rintala A, Rantalainen R, Kaksonen A, Luomajoki H, Kauranen K. mHealth Apps for Low Back Pain Self-management: Scoping Review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2022; 10:e39682. [PMID: 36018713 PMCID: PMC9463614 DOI: 10.2196/39682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2022] [Revised: 07/04/2022] [Accepted: 07/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The role of self-management in health promotion, as well as prevention and rehabilitation, is increasing through the use of mobile health (mHealth) apps. Such mHealth apps are also increasingly being used for self-management of low back pain (LBP), but their effectiveness has not been sufficiently explored. Objective The aim of this scoping review was to provide an overview of the literature on self-management mHealth apps and their effects on the levels of pain and disability in people with LBP. Methods We applied the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) methodology, including a priori research questions. A literature search was conducted in 2 databases (PubMed and PEDro) for studies published between January 1, 2015, and June 17, 2021. Interventional, cohort, or case series studies with an interventional period were included if the mHealth app included built-in self-management content, the app was used for self-management for people with LBP, and the study reported outcomes regarding pain and disability in people with LBP. Results In total, 7 studies were selected for the review with overall 2307 persons with LBP, of whom 1328 (57.56%) were women. Among the studies (5/7, 71%) that reported the type of pain, 85% (390/459) of the participants were experiencing chronic LBP. A total of 5 different mHealth apps were identified, of which 4 contributed to a statistically significant reduction in LBP and clinically meaningful changes. Of the 7 studies, 4 (57%) used 4 different assessments for disability, of which 3 (75%) showed statistically significant improvements in the level of functional ability of participants in the experimental groups using an mHealth app with built-in self-management content for LBP. Conclusions This scoping review supports the conclusion that people with LBP may benefit from mHealth apps that provide self-management content. However, the generalizability of the findings is limited because of heterogeneity in the pain characterization of the included participants and the intervention durations. More high-quality studies with longer follow-up periods to investigate personalized mHealth approaches are recommended for LBP self-management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aki Rintala
- Faculty of Social Services and Health Care, LAB University of Applied Sciences, Lahti, Finland
| | - Roy Rantalainen
- Faculty of Social Services and Health Care, LAB University of Applied Sciences, Lahti, Finland
| | - Anu Kaksonen
- Faculty of Social Services and Health Care, LAB University of Applied Sciences, Lahti, Finland
| | - Hannu Luomajoki
- Department of Health, Zürich University of Applied Sciences ZHAW, Institute for Physiotherapy, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Kari Kauranen
- Faculty of Social Services and Health Care, LAB University of Applied Sciences, Lappeenranta, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Pagé MG, Tousignant-Laflamme Y, Dorais M, Beaudry H, Fernet M. Characteristics of Persons Seeking Care for Moderate to Severe Pain Due to Chronic Low Back Pain and Osteoarthritis: A Cross-Sectional Study. J Pain Res 2022; 15:1125-1139. [PMID: 35469249 PMCID: PMC9034864 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s360314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Accepted: 03/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To assess the associations between pain severity or physical (pQoL) and mental (mQoL) health-related quality of life and disability status or health-care utilization among persons living with moderate/severe pain due to chronic low back pain (CLBP) or osteoarthritis (OA), who received treatments in Quebec’s tertiary care pain centers. Materials and Methods This retrospective study was carried out using the Quebec Pain Registry (Canada) from 2008 to 2014 and contains data on persons referred to tertiary pain management clinics. Participants were selected if they were diagnosed with CLBP (N = 2663) or OA (N = 139) of more than 3 months duration and of pain intensity ≥5 on the Numeric Rating Scale (0–10) and completed baseline questionnaires. Results Less than 5% of persons were hospitalized in the 6 months before their first visit at the pain clinic, and 11.9% and 18.9% of persons with OA and CLBP, respectively, had a pain-related emergency room (ER) visit. Less than 1/5 and more than 1/4 of persons with OA and CLBP were receiving disability benefits, respectively. Persons with CLBP who had visited the ER, those on disability and those receiving disability benefits, reported higher levels of pain severity, interference, and lower levels of mQoL (and pQoL for those on disability or receiving benefits) compared to those who did not consult the ER, those not on disability or not receiving disability benefits, respectively (all p < 0.05). For OA, disability status was the only variable associated with pain interference and QoL (all p < 0.05). Conclusion Pain severity, pain interference and mQoL were associated with health-care utilization and disability status in persons with CLBP. These results were globally not found among persons with OA, which might be due to smaller sample size or unique characteristics of this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Gabrielle Pagé
- Research Center, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Correspondence: M Gabrielle Pagé, Research Center, Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, S01-122, St-Antoine Tower, 850 St-Denis, Montreal, QC, H2X 0A9, Canada, Tel +1 514-890-8000, ext. 31601, Email
| | | | - Marc Dorais
- StatSciences Inc., Notre-Dame-de-l’Ile-Perrot, QC, Canada
| | | | - Mireille Fernet
- Medical Affairs Division, Pfizer Canada, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|