Quality of life measurement in bone metastases: A literature review

Impacts of radiation therapy on quality of life and pain relief in patients with bone metastases

Bone metastases (BM) are a common complication in advanced cancer patients, significantly contributing to morbidity and mortality due to their ability to cause pain, fractures, and spinal cord compression. Radiation therapy (RT) is vital in managing these complications by targeting metastatic lesions to ease pain, improve mobility, and reduce the risk of skeletal-related events such as fractures. Evidence supports the effectiveness of RT in pain relief, showing its ability to provide significant palliation and lessen the need for opioid painkillers, thereby enhancing the overall quality of life (QoL) for patients with BM. However, optimizing RT outcomes involves considerations such as the choice of radiation technique, dose fractionation schedules, and the integration of supportive care measures to mitigate treatment-related side effects like fatigue and skin reactions. These factors highlight the importance of personalized treatment planning tailored to individual patient needs and tumor characteristics. This mini-review aims to provide comprehensive insights into the multifaceted impacts of RT on pain management and QoL enhancement in BM patients, with implications for refining clinical practices and advancing patient care through the synthesis of findings from various studies.

Enhancing palliative care in vulnerable patients: Robot-assisted radiofrequency ablation for multiple spinal metastases - Technical insights and preliminary outcomes

Background

Radiofrequency thermal ablation (RFA) coupled with vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty offers a minimally invasive, safe, and efficacious approach to palliate polymetastatic spine disease, particularly in medically fragile individuals. However, the application of robotic assistance to RFA for spinal metastases remains unexplored. This study elucidates the technical viability of robot-assisted RFA combined with vertebroplasty in patients afflicted by multiple spinal metastases and presents preliminary outcomes. An illustrative case was also presented.

Materials and Methods

Ten patients aged over 65 years with multiple vertebral metastases were enrolled in this study. Preoperatively, patients exhibited a median Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score of 6 and a Median Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score of 58%. From February 2021 to April 2022, all patients underwent RFA, followed by vertebroplasty for spinal metastases. Surgical procedures were executed using the ExcelsiusGPS® robotic platform.

Results

Patients experienced substantial pain relief, with a median VAS score of 2.5 at 24 h postoperatively (Δ --3.5; P < 0.001) and a median VAS score of 2 at 1 month postoperatively (Δ -4; P < 0.001). All patients were discharged on the first postoperative day and continued their oncological treatments. In addition, the median ODI score at 1 month postoperatively was 34% (Δ --24%; P = 0.006), indicating an enhanced quality of life and a satisfactory impact on daily activities. No procedural or postoperative complications were documented.

Conclusions

This case series represents the inaugural successful application of robot-assisted RFA in conjunction with concurrent vertebroplasty/kyphoplasty. Our preliminary experience demonstrates that patients with oligo- and polymetastatic conditions can derive benefits from this minimally invasive intervention, characterized by rapid postoperative recovery and effective short- to medium-term pain management, without encountering complications.

Stereotactic Body and Conventional Radiotherapy for Painful Bone Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Importance

Conventional external beam radiotherapy (cEBRT) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) are commonly used treatment options for relieving metastatic bone pain. The effectiveness of SBRT compared with cEBRT in pain relief has been a subject of debate, and conflicting results have been reported.

Objective

To compare the effectiveness associated with SBRT vs cEBRT for relieving metastatic bone pain.

Data Sources

A structured search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases on June 5, 2023. Additionally, results were added from a new randomized clinical trial (RCT) and additional unpublished data from an already published RCT.

Study Selection

Comparative studies reporting pain response after SBRT vs cEBRT in patients with painful bone metastases.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Two independent reviewers extracted data from eligible studies. Data were extracted for the intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) populations. The study is reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Overall and complete pain response at 1, 3, and 6 months after radiotherapy, according to the study's definition. Relative risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs were calculated for each study. A random-effects model using a restricted maximum likelihood estimator was applied for meta-analysis.

Results

There were 18 studies with 1685 patients included in the systematic review and 8 RCTs with 1090 patients were included in the meta-analysis. In 7 RCTs, overall pain response was defined according to the International Consensus on Palliative Radiotherapy Endpoints in clinical trials (ICPRE). The complete pain response was reported in 6 RCTs, all defined according to the ICPRE. The ITT meta-analyses showed that the overall pain response rates did not differ between cEBRT and SBRT at 1 (RR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.99-1.30), 3 (RR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.96-1.47), or 6 (RR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.96-1.54) months. However, SBRT was associated with a higher complete pain response at 1 (RR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.02-2.01), 3 (RR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.16-2.78), and 6 (RR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.24-4.91) months after radiotherapy. The PP meta-analyses showed comparable results.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, patients with painful bone metastases experienced similar overall pain response after SBRT compared with cEBRT. More patients had complete pain alleviation after SBRT, suggesting that selected subgroups will benefit from SBRT.

Quality of life issues in patients with bone metastases: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Bones are frequent sites of metastatic disease, observed in 30-75% of advanced cancer patients. Quality of life (QoL) is an important endpoint in studies evaluating the treatments of bone metastases (BM), and many patient-reported outcome tools are available. The primary objective of this systematic review was to compile a list of QoL issues relevant to BM and its interventions. The secondary objective was to identify common tools used to assess QoL in patients with BM, and the QoL issues they fail to address.

METHODS

A search was conducted on Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases between 1946 and 27 January 2023 with the keywords "bone metastases", "quality of life", and "patient reported outcomes". Specific QoL issues in original research studies and the QoL tools used were extracted.

RESULTS

The review identified the QoL issues most prevalent to BM in the literature. Physical and functional issues observed in patients included pain, interference with ambulation and daily activities, and fatigue. Psychological symptoms, such as helplessness, depression, and anxiety were also common. These issues interfered with patients' relationships and social activities. Items not mentioned in existing QoL tools were related to newer treatments of BM, such as pain flare, flu-like symptoms, and jaw pain due to osteonecrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review highlights that QoL issues for patients with BM have expanded over time due to advances in BM-directed treatments. If they are relevant, additional treatment-related QoL issues identified need to be validated prospectively by patients and added to current assessment tools.

Development of an evidence-based educational resource in oncology: 'Living safely with bone metastases'

Objective

To create an evidence-based patient education resource to better support cancer patients with bone metastases in carrying out safe movements during activities of daily living, to maintain their bone health and reduce the risk of fractures.

Methods

A quality improvement project was conducted in three phases: Development of the Resource, Preliminary Feedback and Revision, and French Canadian Translation.

Results

The educational resource Living Safely with Bone Metastases focuses on safe movement, activities of daily living, and exercise, organized within the sections Move with care, Stay safe in different environments and Follow an exercise program prescribed by a physiotherapist. Translation yielded a Canadian French version Vivre en toute sécurité avec des métastases osseuses.

Conclusion

Living Safely with Bone Metastases is an accessible online and paper resource for patients and healthcare professionals, in order to promote ongoing disease management of individuals with bone metastases.

Innovation

Cancer patients with bone metastases are at high risk of pathological fractures however resources on fracture prevention are lacking. Living Safely with Bone Metastases is an innovative health education resource that fills an important gap in oncology practice and has the potential to reduce the occurrence of fractures.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for a Sacral Metastasis Clarified by Diffusion-Weighted Whole-Body Imaging With Background Body Signal Suppression in a Patient With Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Diffusion-weighted whole-body imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS) is an emerging extended modality of diffusion-weighted imaging for screening malignant lesions in the body. A 70-year-old male was diagnosed with advanced-stage prostate adenocarcinoma with distant metastasis. After hormone therapy, the disease progressed to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels increased during androgen deprivation therapy with low serum testosterone levels. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) and technetium-99m methylene bone scintigraphy (BS) did not reveal obvious distant metastases; however, we were able to identify distant metastases by DWIBS. We herein report a case in which stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) was performed on target lesions detected by DWIBS and successfully suppressed disease progression.

Management of Spinal Bone Metastases With Radiofrequency Ablation, Vertebral Reinforcement and Transpedicular Fixation: A Retrospective Single-Center Case Series

Spine is a frequent site of bone metastases, with a 8.5 months median survival time after diagnosis. In most cases treatment is only palliative. Several advanced techniques can ensure a better Quality of Life (QoL) and increase life expectancy. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) uses alternating current to produce local heating and necrosis of the spinal lesion, preserving the healthy bone. RFA is supported by vertebral reinforcement through kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty in order to stabilize the fracture with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) injection, restoring vertebral body height and reducing the weakness of healthy bone. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the efficacy and advantages of RFA plus vertebral reinforcement through PMMA vertebroplasty and fixation in patients affected by bone spinal metastases. We retrospectively analyzed 54 patients with thoraco-lumbar metastatic vertebral fractures admitted to our Unit between January 2014 and June 2020. Each patient underwent RFA followed by PMMA vertebroplasty and transpedicle fixation. We evaluated pain relief through the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score and PMMA vertebral filling based on the mean Saliou filling score. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test pain relief with statistical significance for p<0.05. A total of 54 patients (median age 63,44 years; range 34-86 years), with a total of 63 infiltrated vertebrae, were treated with RFA, PMMA vertebroplasty and transpedicular screw fixation; average operative time was 60.4 min (range 51–72). The preoperative average VAS score decreased significantly from 7.81 to 2.50 (p < 0.05) after 12 months. Based on Saliou filling score, filling was satisfactory (12–18) in 20 vertebrae (31,7%), mediocre (6–11) in 33 vertebrae (52,4%), inadequate (0–5) in 10 vertebrae (15,9%). A consistent PMMA filling of vertebral bodies was successfully achieved with significant pain relief. Concomitant RFA, PMMA vertebroplasty and pedicle screw fixation represent a safe and effective technique for the management of spinal metastases, improving clinical outcome and pain control.

Factors Affecting the Quality of Life of Patients with Painful Spinal Bone Metastases

This study examined changes in the quality of life (QOL), as well as the factors affecting QOL, among patients with painful spinal bone metastases without paralysis for 1 month after radiotherapy. Methods: This study included 79 participants (40 male and 39 female; median age, 65 (42–88) years) who had undergone radiotherapy for painful spinal bone metastases without paralysis. Patients’ age, sex, activities of daily living (Barthel index), pain, spinal instability (spinal instability neoplastic score [SINS]), and QOL (EORTC QLQ-C30) were investigated. Results: Having an unstable SINS score was a positive factor for global health status (p < 0.05). The improvement in activities of daily living and response to pain were positive factors for physical function (p < 0.05). A positive effect on emotional function was confirmed among female patients (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Engaging in rehabilitation along with radiotherapy leads to improvements in QOL for patients with spinal bone metastases.

Patient-reported assessment of outcome after surgery for bone metastases

Regardless of prognosis, surgery is often considered in metastatic bone disease (MBD) as a palliative procedure to improve function and quality of life. Traditional focus on objective outcomes such as mortality is inappropriate in this group, and there is a drive to assess outcomes via patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). This is an overview of current understanding of MBD outcomes and how this should influence future decision-making and research. The objectives of this review were to identify difficulties in measuring PROMs in the MBD patient population and explore alternatives to patientreported outcomes. We also provide an overview of current understanding of outcomes in MBD and how this should influence decision-making and direct research.

Communication in surgical decision-making while managing metastatic bone disease: matching patient expectations with surgical goals

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of research examining how surgical decision-making for metastatic bone disease (MBD) can be optimized to improve quality of life (QOL) and functional outcomes, while accurately aligning with patient goals and expectations. The objective of this study was to survey and interview patients with MBD and support persons (PS), physicians, and allied health care providers (HCP) with the goal of identifying (1) important surgical issues related to MBD management, (2) discordance in perioperative expectations, and (3) perceived measures of success in the surgical management of MBD.

METHODS

Utilizing a custom survey developed by HCP and patients with MBD, participants were asked to (1) identify important issues related to MBD management, (2) rank perceived measures of success, and (3) answer open-ended questions pertaining to the management of MBD.

RESULTS

From the survey, increased life expectancy, minimizing disease progression, removal of local tumour, timely surgery after diagnosis, increased length of hospitalization, and physiotherapy access were all identified as significant discordant goals between PS and physicians/HCP. Conversely, there was an agreement between physicians and HCP who considered improved QOL and functional outcomes as most important goals. Structured homogenous-group workshops identified the need for (1) improved discussions of prognosis, surgical options, expectations, timelines, and resources, (2) the use of a care team "quarterback", and (3) an increased use of multi-disciplinary treatment planning.

CONCLUSIONS

We feel this data highlights the importance of improved communication and coordination in treating patients with MBD. Further research evaluating how surgical techniques influence survival and disease progression in MBD is highly relevant and important to patients.

Percutaneous reinforced osteoplasty for long bone metastases: a feasibility study

OBJECTIVE

While percutaneous osteoplasty is common for the treatment of vertebral fractures, low strength of fixation remains a major challenge for use in metastatic weight-bearing bones. With stent, wire, and cement augmentation, this study explores the feasibility of percutaneous reinforced osteoplasty for use in correcting long bone fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifteen explanted swine femora were randomly assigned into three groups. Group 1 (n = 5) was native (intact) bones without any intervention (control), group 2 (n = 5) received cementoplasty, and group 3 (n = 5) received stent and wire scaffolding ("rebar") in addition to cementoplasty. All treatment procedures were performed under fluoroscopic guidance. Mechanical strength of fracture fixation was quantified by peak load to failure, stiffness, work done to fracture, and fatigue testing with four-point bend test.

RESULTS

Percutaneous osteoplasty with or without reinforcement was successfully achieved in all specimens. The respective peak load at failure, flexural stiffness, and work done to fracture (mean ± SEM) for group 1 was 2245 ± 168 N, 14.77 ± 1.3 Nm/degree, and 4854 ± 541 Nmm; group 2 was 468 ± 81 N, 3.9 ± 0.5 Nm/degree, and 401 ± 56 Nmm; and group 3 was 594 ± 90 N, 4.42 ± 0.4 Nm/degree, and 522 ± 54 Nmm. The mean cyclic displacement for groups 1, 2, and 3 were 0.15, 0.58, and 0.48 mm, respectively, at 220-240 N loading.

CONCLUSIONS

While percutaneous reinforced osteoplasty with stent, wire, and cement augmentation resulted in improved mechanical strength in restored bones, it did not differ significantly from specimens that underwent exclusive cementoplasty. With the improvement of fracture strength, the concept may be applicable for prevention or treatment of pathological fractures.

Interleukin-7 Contributes to the Invasiveness of Prostate Cancer Cells by Promoting Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition

Precise mechanisms underlying interleukin-7 (IL-7)-mediated tumor invasion remain unclear. Thus, we investigated the role of IL-7 in tumor invasiveness using metastatic prostate cancer PC-3 cell line derivatives, and assessed the potential of IL-7 as a clinical target using a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor and an IL-7-blocking antibody. We found that IL-7 stimulated wound-healing migration and invasion of PC-3 cells, increased phosphorylation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 5, Akt, and extracellular signal-regulated kinase. On the other hand, a JAK inhibitor and an IL-7-blocking antibody decreased the invasiveness of PC-3 cells. IL-7 increased tumor sphere formation and expression of epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) markers. Importantly, lentiviral delivery of IL-7Rα to PC-3 cells significantly increased bone metastasis in an experimental murine metastasis model compared to controls. The gene expression profile of human prostate cancer cells from The Cancer Genome Atlas revealed that EMT pathways are strongly associated with prostate cancers that highly express both IL-7 and IL-7Rα. Collectively, these data suggest that IL-7 and/or IL-7Rα are promising targets of inhibiting tumor metastasis.

Treatment of osteolytic solitary painful osseous metastases with radiofrequency ablation or cryoablation: A retrospective study by propensity analysis

The present study aimed to measure the improvement in pain relief and quality of life in patients with osteolytic solitary painful bone metastasis treated by cryoablation (CA) or radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Fifty patients with solitary osteolytic painful bone metastases were retrospectively studied and selected by propensity analysis. Twenty-five patients underwent CA and the remaining twenty-five underwent RFA. Pain relief, in terms of complete response (CR), the number of patients requiring analgesia and the changes in self-rated quality of life (QoL) were measured following the two treatments. Thirty-two percent of patients treated by CA experienced a CR at 12 weeks versus 20% of patients treated by RFA. The rate of CR increased significantly with respect to baseline only in the group treated by CA. In both groups there was a significant change in the partial response with respect to baseline (36% in the CA group vs. 44% in the RFA group). The recurrence rate in the CA and RFA groups was 12% and 8%, respectively. The reduction in narcotic medication requirements with respect to baseline was only significant in the group treated by CA. A significant improvement in self-rated QoL was observed in both groups. The present study seems to suggest that CA only significantly improves the rate of CR and decreases the requirement of narcotic medications. Both CA and RFA led to an improvement in the self-rated QoL of patients after the treatments. However, the results of the present study should be considered as preliminary and to serve as a framework around which future trials may be designed.

Treatment of Solitary Painful Osseous Metastases with Radiotherapy, Cryoablation or Combined Therapy: Propensity Matching Analysis in 175 Patients

PURPOSE

aim of this study was to identify outcomes in pain relief and quality of life in patients with a solitary painful osseous metastasis treated by radiotherapy, cryoablation or the combination using a propensity score matching study design.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

175 patients with painful bone metastases were included in the study. Twenty-five of them underwent a radiation course (20 Gy in five daily fractions) 15 days after the cryoablation. These subjects were retrospectively matched by propensity analysis with a group of subjects treated by radiotherapy (125 subjects) and with a group treated byCryoablation (25 subjects). The pain relief in terms of complete response, rate of subjects requiring analgesics after treatments and the changes in self-rated quality of life were measured. Informed consent was obtained from the subject and the study was approved by the local Ethical Committee.

RESULTS

An higher proportion of subjects treated by cryoablation (32%) or cryoablation followed by RT (72%;) experienced a complete response compared with patients treated by radiotherapy alone (11.2%). After Bonferroni correction strategy, the addition of radiotherapy to cryoablation significantly improved the rate of complete response compared with cryoablation alone (p = 0.011) and this paralleled with an improved self-rated quality of life. Seventeen subjects (13.6%) of patients in the radiotherapy group, 9 (36%) in the cryoablation group, and 19 (76)% in the cryoablation- radiotherapy group did not require narcotic medications.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of radiotherapy to cryoablation favorably impacts on perceived pain, with a favorable toxicity profile. However, our data should be interpreted with caution and could serve as a framework around which to design future trials.

Radiofrequency thermal ablation in painful myeloma of the clavicle

A 57-year-old male patient had myeloma. He had severe pain in the left clavicle that did not respond to radiotherapy; therefore, it was treated with radiofrequency thermal ablation (RFTA). Under fluoroscopic guidance, two RF needles at a distance of 1.5 cm from each other were inserted into the mass and conventional radiofrequency (90℃ and 60 seconds) at two different depths (1 cm apart) was applied. Then, 2 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine along with triamcinolone 40 mg was injected in each needle. The visual analogue pain score (VAS from 0 to 10) was decreased from 8 to 0. In the next 3 months of follow-up, the patient was very satisfied with the procedure and the mass gradually became smaller. There were no complications. This study shows that RFTA could be a useful method for pain management in painful osteolytic myeloma lesions in the clavicle.

Patient-reported outcome instruments used to assess pain and functioning in studies of bisphosphonate treatment for bone metastases

Purpose

When treating metastatic bone disease, relief of bone pain is often a key outcome. Because pain cannot be quantified with objective clinical measures, patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures are required to assess patients' subjective experience. The goal of the current review was to examine measures used to assess pain, as well as the impact of pain on functional status and health-related quality of life (HRQL), in trials of bisphosphonates for the treatment of bone metastases.

Methods

A literature search focused on articles published from January 1999 to April 2009.

Results

A total of 49 articles were located that used PROs to assess pain-related outcomes of bisphosphonate treatment for bone metastases. The Brief Pain Inventory was the most commonly used multi-item instrument. However, the most common approach for assessing pain was to administer a single-item scale such as a visual analog scale, numerical rating scale, or verbal rating scale. Of the 49 studies, 19 included a PRO assessing functional status or HRQL.

Conclusions

Although pain is an important outcome of trials examining treatment for bone metastases, the current review suggests that there is little consistency in PRO measurement across studies. Furthermore, presentation of measures often lacked clear description, information on measurement properties, citations, clarity regarding method of administration, and consistent instrument names. Recommendations are provided for instrument validation within the target population, assessment of content validity, use of PRO instruments recently developed for patients with bone metastases, clear description of instruments, and implementation of measures consistent with recommendations from instrument developers.

New Considerations in the Design of Clinical Trials for Bone Metastases

Palliative radiotherapy (RT) is prescribed to patients with bone metastases to alleviate symptoms and improve quality of life. The lack of consistent endpoints for such trials has made cross study comparison difficult and has led to contradictory conclusions. The International Bone Metastases Consensus Working Party was established to create a standard set of endpoints and recommendations for future clinical trials. Recommendations were included regarding eligibility criteria, pain assessments, follow-up assessments, timing, as well as radiation techniques. Suggestions were also made to facilitate the ease with which different studies could be compared as well as to encourage widespread consistency in certain aspects of trial design. Investigators conducting clinical trials in bone metastases should continue to adopt these recommendations to ensure consistent guidelines based on the most recent literature.