Update on corticosteroids for diabetic macular edema

Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections in pregnancy and breastfeeding: a case series and systematic review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents may occasionally need to be considered for sight-threatening macular pathology in pregnant and breastfeeding women. This is controversial due to the dearth of data on systemic side effects for mother and child. We aimed to expand the evidence base to inform management.

METHODS

Retrospective case series of pregnant and breastfeeding women treated with intravitreal anti-VEGF injections at Oxford Eye Hospital between January 2015 and December 2022. In addition, we conducted a systematic review and combined eligible cases in a narrative synthesis.

RESULTS

We treated six pregnant women with anti-VEGF for diabetic macular oedema(DMO) (n = 5) or choroidal neovascularisation (CNV) (n = 1). Four received ranibizumab whilst two (not known to be pregnant) received aflibercept. Patients known to be pregnant underwent counselling by an obstetric physician. Five pregnancies resulted in live births. Combining our cases with those previously published, treatment of 41 pregnant women (42 pregnancies) are reported. Indications for treatment included CNV (n = 28/41,68%), DMO (n = 7/41,17%) and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (n = 6/41,15%). Bevacizumab (n = 22/41,54%) and ranibizumab (n = 17/41,41%) were given more frequently than aflibercept (n = 2/41,5%). Many (n = 16/41,40%) were unaware of their pregnancy when treated. Most pregnancies resulted in live births (n = 34/42,81%). First trimester miscarriages (n = 5/42,12%) and stillbirths (n = 3/42,7%) mostly occurred in women with significant risk factors.

CONCLUSION

Intravitreal anti-VEGF injections may not necessarily compromise obstetric outcomes, although clear associations cannot be drawn due to small numbers and confounders from high rates of first trimester miscarriages in general and inherently high-risk pregnancies. It may be worth considering routinely investigating pregnancy and breastfeeding status in women of childbearing age prior to each injection, as part of anti-VEGF treatment protocols.

Parallelism and non-parallelism in diabetic nephropathy and diabetic retinopathy

Diabetic nephropathy (DN) and diabetic retinopathy (DR), as microvascular complications of diabetes mellitus, are currently the leading causes of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and blindness, respectively, in the adult working population, and they are major public health problems with social and economic burdens. The parallelism between the two in the process of occurrence and development manifests in the high overlap of disease-causing risk factors and pathogenesis, high rates of comorbidity, mutually predictive effects, and partial concordance in the clinical use of medications. However, since the two organs, the eye and the kidney, have their unique internal environment and physiological processes, each with specific influencing molecules, and the target organs have non-parallelism due to different pathological changes and responses to various influencing factors, this article provides an overview of the parallelism and non-parallelism between DN and DR to further recognize the commonalities and differences between the two diseases and provide references for early diagnosis, clinical guidance on the use of medication, and the development of new drugs.

The additive effect of intravitreal dexamethasone combined with bevacizumab in refractory diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE

To evaluate the short-term structural and visual outcomes and side effects associated with intravitreal dexamethasone (IVD) combined with bevacizumab (IVB) in treating patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) and an inadequate response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents.

METHODS

In this prospective interventional case series, a total of 81 eyes of 81 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and refractory DME were included and assigned to one of two groups: I) those receiving three monthly intravitreal injections of combined bevacizumab and dexamethasone (IVB+IVD) and II) those receiving three monthly intravitreal injections of bevacizumab alone (IVB). The primary outcome was the inter-group difference in central macular thickness (CMT); secondary outcomes included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), baseline optical coherence tomography (OCT) biomarkers, and intraocular pressure (IOP) one month after the last injection.

RESULTS

Reduction in CMT and improvement in BCVA were significantly greater in the IVB+IVD group than the IVB group (109.88±156.25 vs. 43±113.67, respectively, P=0.03; and -0.13±0.23 vs. -0.01±0.17, respectively, P=0.008). Presence of neurosensory retinal detachment (NSD) (P<0.001) and complete inner segment/outer segment junction (IS-OS) disruption (P=0.049) on baseline OCT scans were associated with further CMT reductions in response to IVD. Conversely, identifiable epiretinal membrane (ERM) (P=0.002) and multiple hyperreflective foci (>20) (P=0.049) were associated with smaller reductions in CMT. Vitreomacular traction correlated with worse visual outcomes in the IVB+IVD group (P=0.003). The intergroup IOP difference was not clinically significant.

CONCLUSION

In patients with refractory DME, addition of IVD to the standard IVB regimen can improve visual and structural outcomes without increasing the risk of endophthalmitis, IOP rise, or intraocular inflammation. Patients with NSD are more likely to respond well to IVD. The presence of ERM may predict poor treatment response.

Update on current pharmacologic therapies for diabetic retinopathy

INTRODUCTION

Diabetic retinopathy is a major cause of visual loss worldwide. The most important clinical findings include diabetic macular edema (DME) and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR).

AREAS COVERED

PubMed was used for our literature review. Articles from 1995 to 2023 were included. Pharmacologic treatment of diabetic retinopathy generally involves the use of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy for DME and PDR. Corticosteroids remain important second-line therapies for patients with DME. Most emerging therapies focus on newly identified inflammatory mediators and biochemical signaling pathways involved in disease pathogenesis.

EXPERT OPINION

Emerging anti-VEGF modalities, integrin antagonists, and anti-inflammatory agents have the potential to improve outcomes with reduced treatment burdens.

Clinical application of optical coherence tomography angiography in diabetic macular edema

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is characterized by a retinal thickening or hard exudation deposition in the fundus microvasculature, capillary leakage, increased vascular permeability, extracellular fluid accumulation in the fovea of a foveal disc. Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) is a new item of fundus structure examination. OCTA is to reconstruct the retinal choroidal vascular structure from the continuous same cross-sectional views and blood flow signals obtained by optical scanning, thereby obtaining an image. It is very significant to evaluate, diagnose, treat and manage the disease.

Inflammation: The Link between Neural and Vascular Impairment in the Diabetic Retina and Therapeutic Implications

The etiology of diabetic retinopathy (DR) is complex, multifactorial and compromises all the elements of the retinal neurovascular unit (NVU). This diabetic complication has a chronic low-grade inflammatory component involving multiple inflammatory mediators and adhesion molecules. The diabetic milieu promotes reactive gliosis, pro-inflammatory cytokine production and leukocyte recruitment, which contribute to the disruption of the blood retinal barrier. The understanding and the continuous research of the mechanisms behind the strong inflammatory component of the disease allows the design of new therapeutic strategies to address this unmet medical need. In this context, the aim of this review article is to recapitulate the latest research on the role of inflammation in DR and to discuss the efficacy of currently administered anti-inflammatory treatments and those still under development.

Combined intravitreal dexamethasone and bevacizumab injection for the treatment of persistent diabetic macular edema (DexaBe study): a phase I clinical study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to investigate the safety of combined intravitreal injection of dexamethasone aqueous-solution (IVD) and bevacizumab (IVB) in patients with refractory diabetic macular edema (DME) and its effect on intraocular pressure (IOP), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central subfield thickness (CSFT).

METHODS

This prospective study included 10 patients (10 eyes) with DME refractory to laser photocoagulation and/or anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy. A complete ophthalmological examination was performed at baseline, during the first week of treatment, and monthly through week 24. Therapy consisted of monthly injections of combined IVD and IVB "pro re nata" (PRN) if CST > 300 µm. We investigated the impact of the injections on intraocular pressure (IOP), cataract development, Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and central sub-foveal thickness (CSFT) measured by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT).

RESULTS

Eight patients (80%) completed 24 weeks of follow-up. Compared to baseline, mean IOP increased significantly (p < 0.05) and anti-glaucomatous eye drops were necessary for 50% of the patients, CSFT was significantly reduced at all follow-up visits (p < 0.05), although mean BCVA showed no significant improvement. One patient developed dense cataract progression and another showed vitreoretinal traction at week 24. No inflammation or endophthalmitis was observed.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of DME refractory to laser and/or anti-VEGF therapy with combined PRN IV dexamethasone aqueous solution and bevacizumab was associated with adverse effects related to the use of corticosteroids. However, there was a significant improvement in CSFT meantime best-correct visual acuity remained stable or improved in 50% of patients.

Management of Diabetic Macular Edema: Guidelines from the Emirates Society of Ophthalmology

In the United Arab Emirates, retinopathy has been shown to be present in 19% of the diabetic population, with diabetes identified in up to 40% of individuals aged over 55 years. Despite the prevalence of diabetic retinal diseases, there are no unified national guidelines on the management of diabetic macular edema (DME). These published guidelines are based on evidence taken from the literature and published trials of therapies, and consensus opinion of a representative expert panel with an interest in this condition, convened by the Emirates Society of Ophthalmology. The aim is to provide evidence-based, clinical guidance for the best management of different aspects of DME, with a special focus on vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy. Treatment should be initiated in patients with best-corrected visual acuity 20/30 or worse, and/or features of DME as seen on optical coherence tomography (OCT) with central retinal thickness (CRT) of at least 300 μm or in symptomatic patients with vision better than 20/25, and/or CRT less than 300 μm where there are OCT features consistent with center-involving macular edema. The treatment of DME is effective irrespective of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level, and treatment must not be denied or delayed in order to optimize systemic parameters. All ophthalmic treatment options should be discussed with the patient for better compliance and expectations. Non-center-involving DME can be initially observed until progression toward the center is documented. Macular laser no longer has a primary role in center-involving DME, and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy should be considered as first-line treatment for all patients, unless contraindicated. If anti-VEGF is contraindicated, a steroid dexamethasone implant can be considered for first-line treatment. Recommendations for the treatment of DME in special circumstances and in relapsing and refractory DME are also discussed.

Dexamethasone: Insights into Pharmacological Aspects, Therapeutic Mechanisms, and Delivery Systems

Dexamethasone (DEX) has been widely used to treat a variety of diseases, including autoimmune diseases, allergies, ocular disorders, cancer, and, more recently, COVID-19. However, DEX usage is often restricted in the clinic due to its poor water solubility. When administered through a systemic route, it can elicit severe side effects, such as hypertension, peptic ulcers, hyperglycemia, and hydro-electrolytic disorders. There is currently much interest in developing efficient DEX-loaded nanoformulations that ameliorate adverse disease effects inhibiting advancements in scientific research. Various nanoparticles have been developed to selectively deliver drugs without destroying healthy cells or organs in recent years. In the present review, we have summarized some of the most attractive applications of DEX-loaded delivery systems, including liposomes, polymers, hydrogels, nanofibers, silica, calcium phosphate, and hydroxyapatite. This review provides our readers with a broad spectrum of nanomedicine approaches to deliver DEX safely.

Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Retinopathy and Diabetic Macular Edema: A Pathophysiologic Perspective

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic macular edema (DME) are retinal complications of diabetes that can lead to loss of vision and impaired quality of life. The current gold standard therapies for treatment of DR and DME focus on advanced disease, are invasive, expensive, and can trigger adverse side-effects, necessitating the development of more effective, affordable, and accessible therapies that can target early stage disease. The pathogenesis and pathophysiology of DR is complex and multifactorial, involving the interplay between the effects of hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia, hypoxia, and production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the promotion of neurovascular dysfunction and immune cell polarization to a proinflammatory state. The pathophysiology of DR provides several therapeutic targets that have the potential to attenuate disease progression. Current novel DR and DME therapies under investigation include erythropoietin-derived peptides, inducers of antioxidant gene expression, activators of nitric oxide/cyclic GMP signaling pathways, and manipulation of arginase activity. This review aims to aid understanding of DR and DME pathophysiology and explore novel therapies that capitalize on our knowledge of these diabetic retinal complications.

Diabetic macular edema: Safe and effective treatment with intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (Taioftal)

Purpose

To suggest the safety and efficacy of preservative-free triamcinolone acetonide intravitreal injectable suspension (Taioftal) for the treatment of diabetic macular edema.

Methods

A prospective clinical study involved 49 patients (49 eyes), that were treated with Taioftal and followed-up for six months. Complete ophthalmic examination, including spectral domain optical coherence tomography, was performed at baseline, and at month 1, 3, 6 after the intravitreal injection. Accurate collection and analysis of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central foveal thickness (CFT), intraocular pressure (IOP), and adverse events (AEs) were carried out in order to evaluate visual function and macular morphology before and after treatment

Results

Median BCVA value chosen as comparing statistics was significantly improved at every follow-up time points (gain of 6 letters at month 1, 12 at month 3 –improvement up to 24% at month 3 with stabilization until month 6) compared to baseline, as certified by Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test (P<0.05). Median CFT significantly waned at each follow-up times (decrease of about 65 μm at month 1, 155 at month 3 –reduction up to 28% at month 3 keeping good outcome until month 6) compared to baseline (P<0.05). IOP elevation, with no severe increases, was the most common among spotted AEs (median of 23 mmHg at month 1, 20 at month 3).

Conclusion

Intravitreal injection of preservative-free triamcinolone (Taioftal) is an effective, safe and inexpensive drug used to improve visual acuity and reduce central foveal thickness in eyes affected by diabetic macular edema during an average time of 6 months. Temporary, never severe, elevation of IOP is totally manageable with topical medications. No serious vision-threatening complications are related to the use of intravitreal triamcinolone injections.

IL-17A Damages the Blood-Retinal Barrier through Activating the Janus Kinase 1 Pathway

Blood-retinal barrier (BRB) dysfunction underlies macular oedema in many sight-threatening conditions, including diabetic macular oedema, neovascular age-related macular degeneration and uveoretinitis. Inflammation plays an important role in BRB dysfunction. This study aimed to understand the role of the inflammatory cytokine IL-17A in BRB dysfunction and the mechanism involved. Human retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cell line ARPE19 and murine brain endothelial line bEnd.3 were cultured on transwell membranes to model the outer BRB and inner BRB, respectively. IL-17A treatment (3 days in bEnd.3 cells and 6 days in ARPE19 cells) disrupted the distribution of claudin-5 in bEnd.3 cells and ZO-1 in ARPE19 cells, reduced the transepithelial/transendothelial electrical resistance (TEER) and increased permeability to FITC-tracers in vitro. Intravitreal (20 ng/1 μL/eye) or intravenous (20 ng/g) injection of recombinant IL-17A induced retinal albumin leakage within 48 h in C57BL/6J mice. Mechanistically, IL-17A induced Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) phosphorylation in bEnd.3 but not ARPE19 cells. Blocking JAK1 with Tofacitinib prevented IL-17A-mediated claudin-5 dysmorphia in bEnd.3 cells and reduced albumin leakage in IL-17A-treated mice. Our results suggest that IL-17A can damage the BRB through the activating the JAK1 signaling pathway, and targeting this pathway may be a novel approach to treat inflammation-induced macular oedema.

DEVELOPMENT OF PACHYCHOROID PIGMENT EPITHELIOPATHY AND TRANSFORMATION TO CENTRAL SEROUS CHORIORETINOPATHY AFTER INTRAVITREAL DEXAMETHASONE IMPLANTATION

PURPOSE

To report first case of sequential development of pachychoroid pigment epitheliopathy (PPE) and central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) after repeated intravitreal dexamethasone implantations for diabetic macular edema treatment.

METHODS

We present a case of a 54-year-old man having intravitreal dexamethasone implant for bilateral diabetic macular edema.

RESULTS

We observed development of pachychoroid pigment epitheliopathy, seen as a small pigment epithelial detachment on optical coherence tomography after a fourth dexamethasone implantation. A fifth implantation caused transformation of pachychoroid pigment epitheliopathy to central serous chorioretinopathy.

CONCLUSION

Consecutive administration of dexamethasone implants may have a cumulative effect on retinal pigment epithelium, Bruch membrane, and choroid.

Safety of intravitreal triamcinolone and its impact on optic nerve morphology in patients treated for diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE

To assess the impact of one intravitreal injection (IVT) of Triamcinolone Acetonide (TA) on intraocular pressure (IOP) and optic nerve structural parameters in patients treated for Diabetic Macular Edema (DME).

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients with DME that were naïve to intraocular steroids and underwent one IVT of TA of 4 mg/0.1 mL and age-matched controls with DME without criteria for IVT. Patients records were reviewed for IOP (at baseline and a month after IVT) and optic nerve parameters measured by optical coherence tomography (up to 6 months before and 6 months after IVT). Exclusion criteria included glaucoma and treatment with hypotensive agents.

RESULTS

Twenty-six eyes were included in the Control Group and 29 in the IVT Group, with a mean age of 65.10 ± 10.08 and 67.30 ± 4.71 years, respectively (p = 0.06). At baseline, IOP and optic nerve measurements were equivalent between groups (p > 0.05). One month after IVT, mean IOP measurements in IVT Group were higher than those of controls (17.84 ± 4.50 vs 11.59 ± 3.09 mmHg, p < 0.001). Ocular hypertension (OHT) developed in 17.24% of cases and reversed with topical medication. After one IVT, vertical cup/disc ratio was higher (0.57 ± 0.25 vs 0.60 ± 0.14, p = 0.04) and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness was globally lower (mean: 91.03 ± 4.25 vs 81.33 ± 19.10 µm, p = 0.001) in the IVT Group.

CONCLUSION

Our results confirmed that intravitreal TA results in IOP increase. This seems to negatively affect optic nerve morphology, even in patients without OHT or adequately treated with hypotensive agents.

ATP and Adenosine in the Retina and Retinal Diseases

Extracellular ATP and its ultimate degradation product adenosine are potent extracellular signaling molecules that elicit a variety of pathophysiological pathways in retina through the activation of P2 and P1 purinoceptors, respectively. Excessive build-up of extracellular ATP accelerates pathologic responses in retinal diseases, whereas accumulation of adenosine protects retinal cells against degeneration or inflammation. This mini-review focuses on the roles of ATP and adenosine in three types of blinding diseases including age-related macular degeneration (AMD), glaucoma, and diabetic retinopathy (DR). Several agonists and antagonists of ATP receptors and adenosine receptors (ARs) have been developed for the potential treatment of glaucoma, DR and AMD: antagonists of P2X7 receptor (P2X7R) (BBG, MRS2540) prevent ATP-induced neuronal apoptosis in glaucoma, DR, and AMD; A1 receptor (A1R) agonists (INO-8875) lower intraocular pressure in glaucoma; A2A receptor (A2AR) agonists (CGS21680) or antagonists (SCH58261, ZM241385) reduce neuroinflammation in glaucoma, DR, and AMD; A3 receptor (A3R) agonists (2-Cl-lB-MECA, MRS3558) protect retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) from apoptosis in glaucoma.

Optogenetic Modulation of Intraocular Pressure in a Glucocorticoid-Induced Ocular Hypertension Mouse Model

Purpose

Steroid-induced glaucoma is a common form of secondary open angle glaucoma characterized by ocular hypertension (elevated intraocular pressure [IOP]) in response to prolonged glucocorticoid exposure. Elevated IOP occurs with increased outflow resistance and altered trabecular meshwork (TM) function. Recently, we used an optogenetic approach in TM to regulate the 5-phosphatase, OCRL, which contributes to regulating PI(4,5)P2 levels. Here, we applied this system with the aim of reversing compromised outflow function in a steroid-induced ocular hypertension mouse model.

Methods

Elevated IOP was induced by chronic subconjunctival dexamethasone injections in wild-type C57Bl/6j mice. AAV2 viruses containing optogenetic modules of cryptochrome 2 (Cry2)-OCRL-5ptase and CIBN-GFP were injected into the anterior chamber. Four weeks after viral expression and dexamethasone exposure, IOP was measured by tonometer and outflow facility was measured by perfusion apparatus. Human TM cells were treated with dexamethasone, stimulated by light and treated with rhodamine-phalloidin to analyze actin structure.

Results

Dexamethasone treatment elevated IOP and decreased outflow facility in wild-type mice. Optogenetic constructs were expressed in the TM of mouse eyes. Light stimulation caused CRY2-OCRL-5ptase to translocate to plasma membrane (CIBN-CAAX-GFP) and cilia (CIBN-SSTR3-GFP) in TM cells, which rescued the IOP and outflow facility. In addition, aberrant actin structures formed by dexamethasone treatment were reduced by optogenetic stimulation in human TM cells in culture.

Conclusions

Subcellular targeting of inositol phosphatases to remove PIP2 represents a promising strategy to reverse defective TM function in steroid-induced ocular hypertension.

Translational Relevance

Targeted modulation of OCRL may be used to decrease steroid-induced elevated IOP.

Saudi Arabia Guidelines for diabetic macular edema: A consensus of the Saudi Retina Group

Diabetes mellitus (DM) and its complications are major public health burdens in Saudi Arabia. The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy (DR) is 19.7% and the prevalence of diabetic macular edema (DME) is 5.7% in Saudi Arabia. Diabetic macular edema is a vision-threatening complication of DR and a major cause of vision loss worldwide. Ocular treatments include retinal laser photocoagulation, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents, intravitreal corticosteroids, and vitreoretinal surgery when necessary. The present consensus was developed as a part of the Saudi Retina Group's efforts to generate Saudi guidelines and consensus for the management of DME, including recommendations for its diagnosis, treatment, and best practice. The experts' panel stipulates that the treatment algorithm should be categorized according to the presence of central macula involvement. In patients with no central macular involvement, laser photocoagulation is recommended as the first-line option. Patients with central macular involvement and no recent history of cardiovascular (CVS) or cerebrovascular disorders can be offered anti-VEGF agents as the first-line option. In the case of non-responders (defined as an improvement of <20% in optical coherence tomography or a gain of fewer than 5 letters in vision), switching to another anti-VEGF agent or steroids should be considered after 3 injections. Within the class of steroids, dexamethasone implants are recommended as the first choice. In patients with a recent history of CVS events, the use of anti-VEGF agents is not recommended, regardless of their lens status. The experts' panel recommends that a future study be conducted to provide a cut-off point for early switching to steroid implants in pseudo-phakic eyes.

Corticosteroids in ophthalmology: drug delivery innovations, pharmacology, clinical applications, and future perspectives

Corticosteroids remain the mainstay of the treatment for various ocular conditions affecting the ocular surface, anterior and posterior segments of the eye due to their anti-inflammatory, anti-oedematous, and anti-neovascularization properties. Prednisolone, prednisolone acetate, dexamethasone, triamcinolone acetonide, fluocinolone acetonide, and loteprednol etabonate are amongst the most widely used ophthalmic corticosteroids. Corticosteroids differ in their activity and potency in the eye due to their inherent pharmacological and pharmaceutical differences. Different routes and regimens are available for ocular administration of corticosteroids. Conventional topical application to the eye is the route of choice when targeting diseases affecting the ocular surface and anterior segment, while periocular, intravitreal, and suprachoroidal injections can be potentially effective for posterior segment diseases. Corticosteroid-induced intraocular pressure elevation and cataract formation remain the most significant local risks following topical as well as systemic corticosteroid administration. Invasive drug administration via intracameral, subconjunctival, and intravitreal injection can enhance ocular bioavailability and minimize dose and dosing frequency of administration, yet may exacerbate ocular side effects of corticosteroids. This review provides a critical appraisal of the ophthalmic uses of corticosteroid, routes of administration, drug delivery fundamentals and novel ocular implantable steroid delivery systems, factors influencing side effects, and future perspectives for ocular corticosteroid therapy.

Noninfectious endophthalmitis following intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide: clinical case and literature review

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature on noninfectious endophthalmitis (NIE) following intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA).

DESIGN

A literature review and case report.

PARTICIPANTS

Individuals who developed NIE after IVTA injection.

METHODS

A review of the literature was undertaken using Ovid MEDLINE and EMBASE databases, and articles available up to and including December 30, 2019, were included. A total of 518 articles were identified, of which 27 were selected. We also present an illustrative case report.

RESULTS

The incidence rate of NIE lies between 0.1% and 7.3% in most studies. Although the etiology of NIE is still the subject of investigation, proposed mechanisms include excipients and rheologic stress caused by small crystals. The time to presentation of NIE is often 1-3 days after IVTA injection, with symptoms of moderate to marked reduction in visual acuity along with signs of anterior chamber inflammatory reaction, hypopyon, and vitritis. Resolution occurs in 1-3 weeks in the majority of patients, and almost all return to their pre-injection visual acuity. Differences in the presentations of NIE, infectious endophthalmitis, and pseudo-endophthalmitis are discussed. We also present an illustrative case report of an 80-year-old woman who developed NIE after an IVTA injection for cystoid macular edema.

CONCLUSIONS

It is important to distinguish NIE from other forms of endophthalmitis because they have different natural histories and require different interventions and follow-up. NIE is rarely accompanied by significant pain or conjunctival erythema. Visual acuity is inconsistently affected and is therefore not a good criterion for identifying the type of presenting endophthalmitis.

Clinical-Decision Criteria to Identify Recurrent Diabetic Macular Edema Patients Suitable for Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant Therapy (ILUVIEN®) and Follow-Up Considerations/Recommendations

Current management of diabetic macular edema (DME) predominantly involves treatment with short-acting intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (anti-VEGFs) and/or corticosteroids; however, short-acting therapies (lasting between 1 and 6 months) require frequent injections to maintain efficacy, meaning a considerable treatment burden for diabetic patients with multiple comorbidities. Continuous injections needed in some cases are an economic burden for patients/healthcare system, so real-life clinical practice tends to adopt a reactive approach, ie, watch and wait for worsening symptoms, which consequently increases the risk of undertreatment and edema recurrence. On March 7th 2019, a group of experts in retinal medicine and surgery held a roundtable meeting in Madrid, Spain to discuss how to (1) optimize clinical outcomes through earlier use of fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) implant (ILUVIEN^®) in patients with persistent or recurrent DME despite therapy; and, (2) to provide guidance to assist physicians in deciding which patients should be treated with ILUVIEN. In this regard, a 36-month follow-up consensus protocol is presented. In conclusion, patients that achieve a complete or partial anatomical, and preferably functional, response following one or two intravitreal dexamethasone implants, but with recurrence of edema after 3-4 months, are deemed by the authors most likely to benefit from ILUVIEN, and the switch to FAc implant should not be delayed more than 12 months after the initiation of at least the first dexamethasone implant.

Rebound Phenomenon after Intravitreal Injection of Triamcinolone Acetonide for Macular Edema

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this article was to report on a rebound phenomenon after intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) injection for macular edema secondary to diabetic retinopathy (DR) and central or branch retinal vein occlusion (CRVO/BRVO).

METHODS

The data were analyzed retrospectively. Complete ophthalmic examinations, including spectral domain optical coherence tomography, were performed before and 2 months after IVTA injection. The incidence of a rebound phenomenon was defined as an increase in central retinal thickness of >10% from baseline at 2 months after IVTA injection.

RESULTS

This retrospective study included 211 consecutive patients (268 eyes). One hundred ninety (71.2%), 39 (14.6%), and 39 (14.6%) eyes had macular edema (ME) due to DR, CRVO, and BRVO. In total, 9.7% of the eyes showed a rebound phenomenon (DR: 9.5%, CRVO: 5.2%, BRVO: 15.4%). The mean number of prior injections of vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor or corticosteroid agent was statistically significantly higher in the rebound group (6.8 vs. 5.3) than in the nonrebound group (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that 9.7% of the eyes with ME secondary to DR and RVO developed a rebound phenomenon following IVTA injection, limiting its therapeutic effect. We found an increased number of prior intravitreal pharmacotherapy to be a risk factor for a rebound phenomenon.

A New Approach for Diabetic Macular Edema Treatment: review of clinical practice results with 0.19 mg fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant including vitrectomized eyes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Fluocinolone acetonide is a synthetic fluorinated glucocorticoid. It has selective and potent agonist properties by binding to the cytosolic glucocorticoid receptor with high affinity; it is devoid of mineralocorticoid activity. Two extended-release (i.e. lasting up to 3 years) drug delivery systems containing fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) have been approved by the FDA for intravitreal use: Retisert ® (Bausch&Lomb, New Jersey, USA) and Iluvien ® (Alimera Sciences, Atlanta, USA). The former contains 0.59 mg of FAc, which is approved for the treatment of chronic noninfectious posterior segment uveitis. The latter contains a dose of 0.19 mg of FAc and is approved for the treatment of diabetic macular edema and here we review the results published in the clinical literature relating to its use in the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME).

RECENT FINDINGS

The 0.19 mg FAc implant (Iluvien®) is a new approved treatment approach for DME. It is a non-biodegradable implant that continuously releases a microdose of FAc into the vitreous cavity for up to three years. It is effective in chronic DME with the added value of decreasing the treatment burden of multiple intravitreal injections. Recently, clinical practice studies are reporting its efficacy and safety profile (intra-ocular pressure rise and cataract), as well as its use in clinical setting not included in clinical trial such as vitrectomized eyes.

SUMMARY

The FAc implant has demonstrated in clinical practice results that mirror the results of the clinical trials efficacy wise. Regarding its safety profile, cataract is a common complication, however, intra-ocular pressure rises may be lower than the ones reported in trials. The implant has shown effectiveness in vitrectomized eyes. An increasing evidence of real-world studies have supported utility of the implant in DME patients. It's extended-release format for up to 3 years benefits to the patient and carer as it means fewer injections and visits to the clinic.

[Clinical Decision Making for Treatment of Diabetic Macular Oedema with DEX Implant: a Consensus Paper]

BACKGROUND

Currently two intravitreally applied corticosteroids (dexamethasone and fluocinolone) are licensed in Germany for treatment of diabetic macular oedema (DME). The use of DEX implant for DME in daily clinical practice has not been defined in detail. Following a Delphi panel survey, a group of retina experts set out to come up with a consensus for use of the DEX implant in DME.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

International and national treatment recommendations were identified from the literature. A steering group generated a catalogue of 72 statements on the aetiology and pathogenesis of DME, therapy with DEX implant, use of DEX implant in patients previously treated with VEGF-inhibitors, use of DEX implant in combination therapy, safety of DME therapies as well as patients' burden of treatment. Twenty-two ophthalmologists from private practice and 6 hospital ophthalmologists participated in the Delphi panel via Survey Monkey. Consensus was reached if at least 75% of participants agreed or disagreed with a statement. Statements for which consensus was not reached were discussed once more during the expert consensus meeting and a vote was taken. Based on these results a treatment algorithm for foveal DME was proposed.

RESULTS

If a patient does not show sufficient response after 3 - 6 months of anti-VEGF treatment (visual acuity gain of < 5 ETDRS letters or reduction of central retinal thickness ≤ 20%), a switch to DEX implant should take place. DEX implant is also suitable in eyes with longer presentation of DME, showing e.g. massive lipid exudates. DEX implant is suitable as first-line therapy especially in pseudophakic patients, patients unwilling or able to comply with tight anti-VEGF injection intervals or patients with known vascular diseases. With fixed control visits every 4 - 8 weeks, use of DEX implant is flexible and individual. Decision parameters for repeated use should be visual acuity, retinal thickness and intraocular pressure. Treatment of both eyes on the same day should not take place.

CONCLUSION

The algorithm presented reflects survey as well as expert discussion results and may differ from recommendations issued by the German professional society. The consensus recommendations for the treatment of DME generated during the survey and meeting of retina experts are intended to guide use of DEX implant in daily practice.

Long-term outcomes after intravitreal dexamethasone treatment in steroid responders

AIMS

Intravitreal steroid implants have emerged as an adjunctive therapy in diabetic macular edema (DME) in patients refractory to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents. However, the use of these agents in patients with a prior history of steroid-induced ocular hypertension is limited. The present study aimed to analyze long-term intraocular pressure (IOP) response to the dexamethasone implant in patients with DME and a history of steroid-induced increase in IOP.

METHODS

In a multicenter retrospective review, 17 eyes with DME and a history of steroid-induced increase in IOP to > 21 mmHg were treated with the dexamethasone implant and followed for 18 months. Patients with a history of vitrectomy of vitreoretinal interface pathology were excluded. The primary outcomes were the change in IOP and use of IOP-lowering agents.

RESULTS

Among the study population (17 eyes), there was no significant change in mean IOP from baseline through 18 months (15.9 ± 2.0-14.6 ± 2.8 mmHg; p = 0.18). The number of patients requiring IOP-lowering agents rose from 5 at baseline to 14 at 18 months (p = 0.0049). None of the study eyes required surgical treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Though dexamethasone does predictably lead to an increase in IOP, this adverse effect was effectively managed with topical treatment. The present study suggests that the intravitreal dexamethasone implant may be considered in patients with DME and a history of steroid-induced ocular hypertension who have exhausted first-line treatments.

Diabetes and Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery: Difficulties, Risks and Potential Complications

Diabetes mellitus is one of the most prevalent chronic diseases worldwide. Diabetic patients are at risk of developing cataract and present for surgery at an earlier age than non-diabetics. The aim of this study was to review the problems associated with cataract surgery in a diabetic patient. Corneal complications in diabetic patients include delayed wound healing, risk of developing epithelial defects or recurrent erosions due to the impairment of epithelial basement membranes and epithelial-stromal interactions. Diabetic patients present lower endothelial cell density and their endothelium is more susceptible to trauma associated with cataract surgery. A small pupil is common in diabetic patients making cataract surgery technically challenging. Finally diabetic patients have an increased risk for developing postoperative pseudophakic cystoid macular edema, posterior capsule opacification or endophthalmitis. In patients with pre-proliferative or proliferative diabetic retinopathy, diabetic macular edema or iris neovascularization adjunctive therapy such as an intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injection, can inhibit exacerbation related to cataract surgery.

Dexamethasone implant in the management of diabetic macular edema from clinician's perspective

The aim of this article is to provide an overview of characteristics and principles of use of dexamethasone implant in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). The condensed information about patient selection, dosing, and postinjection management is provided to make the clinician’s decisions easier in real-life practice. DME is a common complication of diabetes and the leading cause of visual loss in the working-age population. Inflammation plays an important role in the pathogenesis of DME. The breakdown of the blood–retinal barrier involves the expression of inflammatory cytokines and growth factors, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Steroids have proved to be effective in the treatment of DME by blocking the production of VEGF and other inflammatory cytokines, by inhibiting leukostasis, and by enhancing the barrier function of vascular endothelial cell tight junctions. Dexamethasone intravitreal implant has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of DME resistant to anti-VEGF therapy and in vitrectomized eyes. Data from clinical trials suggest that dexamethasone implant can be considered as first-line treatment in pseudophakic eyes. Dexamethasone implant is also the first-line therapy in patients not suited for anti-VEGF therapy, pregnant women, and patients unable to return for frequent monitoring. It has been shown that the maximum effect of dexamethasone implant on visual gain and retinal thickness occurs approximately 2 months after injection. Various treatment regimens are used in real-life situations, and reported reinjection intervals were usually <6 months. The number of retreatments needed decreased over time. Treatment algorithms should be personalized. Postinjection management and follow-up should consider potential adverse events such as intraocular pressure elevation and cataract.

Glucocorticoids exert differential effects on the endothelium in an in vitro model of the blood-retinal barrier

PURPOSE

Glucocorticoids (GCs) are used as treatment in diabetic macular oedema, a condition caused by blood-retinal barrier (BRB) disruption. The proposed mechanisms by which GCs reduce macular oedema are indirect anti-inflammatory effects and inhibition of VEGF production, but direct effects on the BRB endothelium may be equally important. Here, we investigated direct effects of GCs on the endothelium to understand the specific pathways of GC action, to enable development of novel therapeutics lacking the adverse side-effects of the presently used GCs.

METHODS

Primary bovine retinal endothelial cells (BRECs) were grown on Transwell inserts and treated with hydrocortisone (HC), dexamethasone (Dex) or triamcinolone acetonide (TA). Molecular barrier integrity of the BRB was determined by mRNA and protein expression, and barrier function was assessed using permeability assays. In addition, we investigated whether TA was able to prevent barrier disruption after stimulation with VEGF or cytokines.

RESULTS

Treatment of BRECs with GCs resulted in upregulation of tight junction mRNA (claudin-5, occludin, ZO-1) and protein (claudin-5 and ZO-1). In functional assays, only TA strengthened the barrier function by reducing endothelial permeability. Moreover, TA was able to prevent cytokine-induced permeability in human retinal endothelial cells and VEGF-induced expression of plasmalemma vesicle-associated protein (PLVAP), a key player in VEGF-induced retinal vascular leakage.

CONCLUSION

Glucocorticoids have differential effects in an experimental in vitro BRB model. TA is the most potent in improving barrier function, both at the molecular and functional levels, and TA prevents VEGF-induced expression of PLVAP.

In vivo measurement of trabecular meshwork stiffness in a corticosteroid-induced ocular hypertensive mouse model

Ocular corticosteroids are commonly used clinically. Unfortunately, their administration frequently leads to ocular hypertension, i.e., elevated intraocular pressure (IOP), which, in turn, can progress to a form of glaucoma known as steroid-induced glaucoma. The pathophysiology of this condition is poorly understood yet shares similarities with the most common form of glaucoma. Using nanotechnology, we created a mouse model of corticosteroid-induced ocular hypertension. This model functionally and morphologically resembles human ocular hypertension, having titratable, robust, and sustained IOPs caused by increased resistance to aqueous humor outflow. Using this model, we then interrogated the biomechanical properties of the trabecular meshwork (TM), including the inner wall of Schlemm's canal (SC), tissues known to strongly influence IOP and to be altered in other forms of glaucoma. Specifically, using spectral domain optical coherence tomography, we observed that SC in corticosteroid-treated mice was more resistant to collapse at elevated IOPs, reflecting increased TM stiffness determined by inverse finite element modeling. Our noninvasive approach to monitoring TM stiffness in vivo is applicable to other forms of glaucoma and has significant potential to monitor TM function and thus positively affect the clinical care of glaucoma, the leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide.

Porous silicon based intravitreal platform for dual-drug loading and controlled release towards synergistic therapy

The number of blind and low vision persons in the US is projected to increase to 5.68 million by 2020. The eye diseases causing loss of vision are life-long, chronic, and often need protracted presence of therapeutics at the disease site to keep the disease in remission. In addition, multiple pathologies participate in the disease process and a single therapy seems insufficient to bring the disease under control and prevent vision loss. This study demonstrates the use of porous silicon (pSi) particles sequentially loaded with daunorubicin (DNR) and dexamethasone (DEX) to create a synergistic intravitreally injectable dual-drug delivery system. DEX targets chronic inflammation while DNR inhibits excessive cell proliferation as well as suppresses hypoxia-inducible factor 1 to reduce scarring. This pSi-based delivery system releases therapeutic concentrations of DNR for 100 days and DEX for over 165 days after a single dose. This intravitreal dual-drug delivery system is also well tolerated after injection into the rabbit eye model, attested by ocular biomicroscopy, ocular tonometry, electroretinography, and histology. This novel dual-drug delivery system opens an attractive modality for combination therapy to manage refractory chorioretinal diseases and further preclinical studies are warranted to evaluate its efficacy.

Efficacy and safety of fluocinolone acetonide 0.025% otic solution in patients with otic eczema: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial

Objectives

To assess the efficacy and safety of fluocinolone acetonide 0.025% otic solution versus placebo in treating patients with otic eczema.

Methods

In this multicentre, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group phase 3 clinical trial, conducted at 12 Spanish centres between March 2012 and March 2013, patients received fluocinolone acetonide 0.025% or placebo otic solution twice daily for 7 days (days 1–7) with an 8-day follow-up (days 9–15). Outcome measures included change in itching from baseline (day 1) to study days 4–8 and 9–15, and change in otoscopic signs (erythema, oedema, and scaling) from baseline to the end of treatment (day 8) and end of follow-up (day 15).

Results

Patients treated with fluocinolone acetonide 0.025% (n = 66), as compared with placebo-treated patients (n = 69), showed significantly higher reductions in itching from baseline to study days 4–8 and 9–15, and in individual and global otoscopic signs from baseline to the end of treatment (day 8) and end of follow-up (day 15). Incidence and severity of adverse events was similar between the fluocinolone and placebo groups.

Conclusions

Fluocinolone acetonide 0.025% otic solution, administered twice daily for 7 days, is an effective and safe treatment for otic eczema.

Treatment outcomes and predicting factors for diabetic macular edema treated with ranibizumab - One-year real-life results in Taiwan

PURPOSE

To report the one-year outcomes of diabetic macular edema (DME) treated with ranibizumab under a real-life setting in Taiwan, and to identify the prognostic factors.

METHODS

Between July 2013 and January 2015, 119 eyes receiving intravitreal ranibizumab for DME were retrospectively recruited. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central foveal thickness (CFT) measured with optical coherence tomography were collected at baseline and at Month 3, 6, and 12. Linear regression was used to identify the predicting factors for changes in BCVA and CFT at Month 12.

RESULTS

The average number of ranibizumab given within one year was 4.36 ± 1.87. The BCVA (logMAR) improved from 0.74 ± 0.30 at baseline to 0.64 ± 0.37 at Month 12 (p = 0.002). A better improvement in BCVA at Month 3 was significantly correlated with a better visual improvement at Month 12 (p < 0.001). The existence of subretinal fluid at baseline (p = 0.02) and a greater reduction in CFT at Month 3 (p < 0.001) were both correlated with a greater reduction in CFT at Month 12. Previous subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide was associated with fewer additional IVR after Month 3 (odds ratio = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.14-0.89).

CONCLUSION

Compared with existing prospective studies, the one-year real-life data in Taiwan showed fewer ranibizumab injections for DME and a less prominent yet still significant visual improvement. Both visual and anatomical improvements at Month 3 were correlated with the level of improvements at Month 12. Previous subtenon steroid injection might reduce the need of additional ranibizumab injections.

Nanoparticle-Mediated Delivery of Neuroprotective Substances for the Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy

BACKGROUND

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a major complication of diabetes, characterized by extensive vascular pathology leading to vision loss. Neuronal suffering and death are also present in the diabetic retina as a result of different molecular mechanisms that are compromised or modified in response to high glucose. The aim of this paper is to highlight recent data indicating that neurodegeneration is likely to play a primary role in the development of DR and that strategies based on nanomedicine may be exploited to deliver neuroprotection to the retina.

METHODS

An extensive analysis of the publications dealing with the role of neuroprotection in DR and with nanoparticle-mediated drug delivery to the retina has been conducted using PubMed, with particular attention to the most recent papers.

RESULTS

There are important limitations related to possible systemic side effects of neuroprotective substances and to drug bioavailability in the retina such as, for instance, the amount of drug reaching the retina, the need of keeping to a minimum the number of administrations (especially, for example, in the case of intraocular injections) and the need of assuring a long-lasting, graded intraocular drug delivery. In recent years, a variety of investigations have been aimed at the exploitation of approaches of nanomedicine to enhance the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic activity of intraocularly delivered drugs. In particular, we provide some preliminary results that we have obtained about the feasibility of delivering magnetic nanoparticles functionalized with a neuroprotectant to mouse eyes through intraocular injections.

CONCLUSION

We propose that nanoparticles functionalized with neuroprotective substances may be used to protect the diabetic retina, thus causing an impact in the design of future pharmacologic treatments for DR.

Early Response to Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant Therapy in Diabetic Macular Edema May Predict Visual Outcome

PURPOSE

To determine whether early visual acuity response to intravitreal dexamethasone implant therapy in diabetic macular edema (DME) is associated with long-term outcome.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

METHODS

Multicenter (8 sites) retrospective review of medical records of eyes with DME treated with 0.7 mg intravitreal dexamethasone implant and minimum 18-month follow-up. One hundred and two eyes were included. Eyes with vitreoretinal interface abnormalities or that had undergone vitrectomy were excluded. Eyes were categorized into 3 groups based on change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 3 months (logMAR equivalence of <5-letter, 5-9-letter, or ≥10-letter gain). Visual acuity outcomes were determined for each early response group. The relationship between early (3-month) and overall change in BCVA was assessed using regression analysis.

RESULTS

In the study population (102 eyes), <5-letter, 5- to 9-letter, and ≥10-letter BCVA improvements were seen in 44.1%, 18.6%, and 37.3% of eyes, respectively, at 3 months. Among suboptimal (<5-letter) responders at 3 months, 6.7% showed ≥10-letter gains at study conclusion compared to 29% in the robust (≥10-letter) early response group (P = .009). Change in BCVA at 3 months showed significant positive correlation with overall change in BCVA (coefficient = 0.44, P = .002).

CONCLUSIONS

A similar proportion of eyes demonstrated suboptimal (<5-letter) and robust (≥10-letter) early response to treatment at 3 months. Eyes with a robust early response demonstrated ≥10-letter long-term gain in BCVA at a significantly higher rate compared to those with poor early response. Early treatment response directly correlated with overall change in BCVA.

Pentablock copolymer dexamethasone nanoformulations elevate MYOC: in vitro liberation, activity and safety in human trabecular meshwork cells

AIM

The aim of this study is to examine the elevation of MYOC in long-term treatment of human trabecular meshwork (HTM) cells using dexamethasone (DEX) encapsulated pentablock (PB) copolymer-based nanoparticles (NPs) (DEX-PB-NPs).

MATERIALS & METHODS

PB copolymers and DEX-PB-NPs were synthesized and characterized using nuclear magnetic resonance, gel permeation chromatography, and X-ray diffraction analyses. MYOC levels secreted from HTM cells were measured by western blot (WB) analysis.

RESULTS

DEX-PB-NPs were formulated in the size range of 109 ± 3.77 nm (n = 3). A long term DEX release from the NPs was observed over three months. Cell viability and cytotoxicity were not affected up to 12 weeks of treatment with PB-copolymer or DEX-PB-NPs. WB data from five HTM cell strains showed that MYOC levels increased by 5.2 ± 1.3, 7.4 ± 4.3, and 2.8 ± 1.1-fold in the presence of DEX-PB-NPs compared with 9.2 ± 3.8, 2.2 ± 0.5, and 1.5 ± 0.3-fold at 4, 8 and 12 weeks in control-DEX treatment group, respectively (n = 5). Based on the decline in MYOC levels after withdrawal of DEX from control wells, DEX-PB-NPs released the DEX for at least 10 weeks.

CONCLUSION

The treatment of HTM cells using DEX-PB-NPs were analyzed in this study. The in vitro cell-based system developed here is a valuable tool for determining the safety and effects of steroids released from polymeric NPs.

Inadvertent steroid injection into the crystalline lens

Intravitreal triamcinolone is administered for a wide number of vitreoretinal conditions. Several complications including cataract formation, raised intraocular pressure, and endophthalmitis have been reported following intravitreal injections. We report a rare case wherein triamcinolone was inadvertently injected directly into the crystalline lens. A 41-year-old male presented to us with a history of intravitreal injection of triamcinolone in the left eye 2 weeks earlier. Slit lamp examination revealed a needle tract in the crystalline lens with steroid granules dispersed throughout the lens core. Such a complication is extremely rare with only three cases reported previously.

Fluocinolone Acetonide Intravitreal Implant 0.19 mg (ILUVIEN®): A Review in Diabetic Macular Edema

Fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant 0.19 mg (ILUVIEN^®) is a nonbiodegradable, injectable, corticosteroid implant that is approved in several countries, including the USA, for the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME). ILUVIEN^® releases fluocinolone acetonide at an initial rate of 0.25 µg/day (average rate 0.2 µg/day) and lasts 36 months. In the two pooled pivotal FAME trials in patients with DME previously treated with macular laser photocoagulation, fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant 0.2 µg/day was significantly more effective than sham injection with respect to the proportion of patients with an improvement from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity of ≥15 letters at 24 months (primary endpoint). This therapeutic effect was maintained at 36 months. The implant also significantly decreased foveal thickness at 24 months. FAME study results are broadly supported by real-world studies in patients with chronic DME considered insufficiently responsive to available therapies. Consistent with corticosteroid class-specific adverse events, cataract and elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) were the most common adverse events with the fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant. Raised IOP was treated with medications in most patients, with <5% requiring incisional IOP-lowering surgery. In the USA, fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant should be used only in patients who have been previously treated with a course of corticosteroids and did not have a clinically significant increase in IOP. Available data indicate that fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant 0.19 mg is a useful option for the treatment of DME in these patients.

INTRAVITREAL DEXAMETHASONE (OZURDEX) IMPLANT FOR RADIATION MACULOPATHY SECONDARY TO STEREOTACTIC RADIOTHERAPY FOR POSTERIOR UVEAL MELANOMA

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of 0.7 mg intravitreal dexamethasone implant in the treatment of radiation maculopathy after stereotactic radiotherapy for posterior uveal melanoma.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of seven eyes of seven consecutive patients was performed. Extracted data included age, sex, initial and follow-up visual acuities and central macular thickness values, intraocular pressure, follow-up time, number of implants, and time elapsed from radiotherapy to implantation. Main outcome measures were visual acuity and central macular thickness. Glaucoma, cataract formation, or systemic side effects, if any, were recorded.

RESULTS

Female to male ratio was 4:3. Mean age was 49.9 ± 17.0 (range: 27-73). Initial mean visual acuity was 20.4 ± 12.5 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters and initial central macular thickness measured 514.1 ± 135.1 μm on spectral domain optical coherence tomography. All patients except one showed improvement in visual acuity and a mean improvement of 7.4 ± 6.2 letters was observed in the whole group (range: 0-16). The mean reduction in central macular thickness was 226.7 ± 157.0 μm after a mean 9.1 ± 3.4 months of follow-up. On average, implantation of intravitreal dexamethasone was performed 35.2 ± 16.5 months after radiotherapy. Four patients were treatment naive and three had previous intravitreal bevacizumab injections with limited response. Ozurdex reimplantations were performed in four patients and the mean number of injections was 1.7 ± 0.8. Mean time to reimplantation was 5.0 ± 2.12 months. Only one patient developed posterior subcapsular cataract and all patients had intraocular pressures within normal limits. No systemic side effects were observed.

CONCLUSION

In our experience, intravitreal implantation of 0.7 mg dexamethasone is an anatomically, and to a lesser extent functionally effective procedure for radiation maculopathy after stereotactic radiotherapy for posterior uveal melanoma.