New standards in hypertension and cardiovascular risk management: focus on telmisartan

A 3D in-vitro biomimicking Caco-2 intestinal permeability model-based assessment of physically modified telmisartan towards an alkalizer-free formulation development

Efficient telmisartan delivery for hypertension management requires the incorporation of meglumine and/or sodium hydroxide as an alkalizer in the formulation. Long-term use of powerful alkalis with formulation as part of chronic therapy can cause metabolic alkalosis, ulcers, diarrhea, and body pain. Here, we aimed to design a telmisartan formulation without alkalizers. Telmisartan properties were tailor-made by microfluidizer-based physical modification. After microfluidization, telmisartan nanosuspension was lyophilized to obtain telmisartan premix powder. The optimized telmisartan nanosuspension had an average particle size of 579.85 ± 32.14 nm. The lyophilized premix was characterized by FT-IR, DSC, and PXRD analysis to ensure its physicochemical characteristics. The solubility analysis of premix showed 2.2 times, 2.3 times, and 6 times solubility improvement in 0.1 N HCl, phosphate buffer pH 7.5, and pH 6.8 compared to pure telmisartan. A 3D in-vitro Caco-2 model was developed to compare apparent permeability of API and powder premix. It showed that the powder premix was more permeable than pure API. The tablet formulation prepared from the telmisartan premix showed a dissolution profile comparable to that of the marketed formulation. The technique present herein can be used as a platform technology for solubility and permeability improvement of similar classes of molecules.

Effects of telmisartan on metabolic syndrome components: a comprehensive review

Telmisartan is an antagonist of the angiotensin II receptor used in the management of hypertension (alone or in combination with other antihypertensive agents. It belongs to the drug class of angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs). Among drugs of this class, telmisartan shows particular pharmacologic properties, including a longer half-life than any other angiotensin II receptor blockers that bring higher and persistent antihypertensive activity. In hypertensive patients, telmisartan has superior efficacy than other antihypertensive drugs (losartan, valsartan, ramipril, atenolol, and perindopril) in controlling blood pressure, especially towards the end of the dosing interval. Telmisartan has a partial PPARγ-agonistic effect whilst does not have the safety concerns of full agonists of PPARγ receptors (thiazolidinediones). Moreover, telmisartan has an agonist activity on PPARα and PPARδ receptors and modulates the adipokine levels. Thus, telmisartan could be considered as a suitable alternative option, with multi-benefit for all components of metabolic syndrome including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, obesity, and hyperlipidemia. This review will highlight the role of telmisartan in metabolic syndrome and the main mechanisms of action of telmisartan are discussed and summarized. Many studies have demonstrated the useful properties of telmisartan in the prevention and improving of metabolic syndrome and this well-tolerated drug can be greatly proposed in the treatment of different components of metabolic syndrome. However, larger and long-duration studies are needed to confirm these findings in long-term observational studies and prospective trials and to determine the optimum dose of telmisartan in metabolic syndrome.

Telmisartan use and risk of dementia in type 2 diabetes patients with hypertension: A population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) may have protective effects against dementia occurrence in patients with hypertension (HTN). However, whether telmisartan, an ARB with peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPAR-γ)-modulating effects, has additional benefits compared to other ARBs remains unclear.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

Between 1997 and 2013, 2,166,944 type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients were identified from the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan. Patients with HTN using ARBs were included in the study. Patients with a history of stroke, traumatic brain injury, or dementia were excluded. Finally, 65,511 eligible patients were divided into 2 groups: the telmisartan group and the non-telmisartan ARB group. Propensity score matching (1:4) was used to balance the distribution of baseline characteristics and medications. The primary outcome was the diagnosis of dementia. The secondary outcomes included the diagnosis of Alzheimer disease and occurrence of symptomatic ischemic stroke (IS), any IS, and all-cause mortality. The risks between groups were compared using a Cox proportional hazard model. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. There were 2,280 and 9,120 patients in the telmisartan and non-telmisartan ARB groups, respectively. Patients in the telmisartan group had a lower risk of dementia diagnosis (telmisartan versus non-telmisartan ARBs: 2.19% versus 3.20%; HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.97; p = 0.030). They also had lower risk of dementia diagnosis with IS as a competing risk (subdistribution HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.95; p = 0.022) and with all-cause mortality as a competing risk (subdistribution HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.97; p = 0.029). In addition, the telmisartan users had a lower risk of any IS (6.84% versus 8.57%; HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.94; p = 0.008) during long-term follow-up. Study limitations included potential residual confounding by indication, interpretation of causal effects in an observational study, and bias caused by using diagnostic and medication codes to represent real clinical data.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study suggests that telmisartan use in hypertensive T2DM patients may be associated with a lower risk of dementia and any IS events in an East-Asian population.

Hot-Melt Extruded Amorphous Solid Dispersion for Solubility, Stability, and Bioavailability Enhancement of Telmisartan

Telmisartan (TEL, an antihypertensive drug) belongs to Class II of the Biopharmaceutical Classification System (BCS) because of its poor aqueous solubility. In this study, we enhanced the solubility, bioavailability, and stability of TEL through the fabrication of TEL-loaded pH-modulated solid dispersion (TEL pH_M-SD) using hot-melt extrusion (HME) technology. We prepared different TEL pH_M-SD formulations by varying the ratio of the drug (TEL, 10-60% w/w), the hydrophilic polymer (Soluplus^®, 30-90% w/w), and pH-modifier (sodium carbonate, 0-10% w/w). More so, the tablets prepared from an optimized formulation (F8) showed a strikingly improved in vitro dissolution profile (~30-fold) compared to the free drug tablets. The conversion of crystalline TEL to its amorphous state is observed through solid-state characterizations. During the stability study, F8 tablets had a better stability profile compared to the commercial product with F8, showing higher drug content, low moisture content, and negligible physical changes. Moreover, compared to the TEL powder, in vivo pharmacokinetic studies in rats showed superior pharmacokinetic parameters, with maximum serum concentration (C_max) and area under the drug concentration-time curve (AUC₀-_∞) of the TEL pH_M-SD formulation increasing by 6.61- and 5.37-fold, respectively. Collectively, the results from the current study showed that the inclusion of a hydrophilic polymer, pH modulator, and the amorphization of crystalline drugs in solid dispersion prepared by HME can be an effective strategy to improve the solubility and bioavailability of hydrophobic drugs without compromising the drug's physical stability.

Anti-Diabetic Effect of Telmisartan Through its Partial PPARγ-Agonistic Activity

Telmisartan is an angiotensin II receptor antagonist, which selectively inhibits the angiotensin II type 1 receptor. Thus, it is widely used for hypertension management. Nowadays, telmisartan's effect on peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) is gaining wider attention. PPARs are ligand-activated transcription factors that belong to the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily. Telmisartan is reported to have a partial PPARγ-agonistic effect while avoiding the safety concerns found with full PPARγ agonists (thiazolidinediones). Telmisartan could be an alternative treatment option, with dual benefit for diabetes mellitus (DM) and hypertension. This review summarizes the anti-diabetic activity of telmisartan via its partial PPARγ-agonistic activity.

Simultaneous Determination of Telmisartan and Pitavastatin Calcium in Intestinal Perfusate by HPLC: Application to Intestinal Absorption Interaction Study

BACKGROUND

Hypertension and hypercholesterolemia are two main physiological risk factors of cardiovascular disease, and commonly occur in combination. Multicompound combination therapy is rational for the treatment of concurrent hypertension and hypercholesterolemia, while telmisartan and pitavastatin calcium can be used as a potential drug combination.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this paper is to study the intestinal absorption and absorption interaction of telmisartan and pitavastatin calcium.

METHODS

An HPLC method was developed and validated to determine telmisartan and pitavastatin calcium in intestinal perfusate simultaneously. The in situ single-pass perfusion in rats was utilized to investigate the effects of concentrations, intestinal segment (duodenum, jejunum, ileum and colon) and co-administrated drugs on absorption.

RESULTS

The effective permeability coefficient and the absorption rate constant of telmisartan were higher in the duodenum as compared to other intestinal segments. However, the intestinal absorption of pitavastatin calcium was not segmental dependent. The effective permeability coefficient and absorption rate constant have no significant difference among three concentrations of telmisartan, pitavastatin calcium individually and their combination.

CONCLUSION

The results showed that telmisartan and pitavastatin calcium were transported passively, and telmisartan and pitavastatin calcium could be absorbed well in all intestinal segments. The intestinal absorption parameters revealed the absence of any intestinal absorption interaction when co-administered. Lay Summary: Co-administration of telmisartan and pitavastatin calcium can provide a potential therapeutic strategy for the treatment of concurrent hypertension and hypercholesterolemia. We are investigating the intestinal interaction of these two drugs in rats using the developed HPLC method and in situ single-pass perfusion technology. We will calculate some parameters after administrating two types of drugs either separately or together, which help reflect changes regarding intestinal absorption and penetration. Compared with telmisartan and pitavastatin calcium administrated separately, if parameters significantly change after co-administration, it proves the existence of the intestinal interactions. Moreover, the results might contribute to clinic drug monitoring.

The Effects of Telmisartan and Its Combinations on Office Blood Pressure: Results of Prospective Observational Study TAINA

Aim. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of telmisartan, used in monotherapy or in combination with hydrochlorothiazide or amlodipine, in real clinical practice in patients with diagnosed arterial hypertension who have not reached the target levels of blood pressure (BP).

Material and methods. The study was a non-intervention, prospective, multicenter, comparative, observational, epidemiological program, which was carried out in Russian medical institutions. The total patient population in which the prescribed therapy was administered included 1933 people (758 men and 1175 women, mean age 57.0-59.3 years). Participants were followed-up for 12 weeks. The change in office BP was evaluated on the 4th and 12th week.

Results. Significant (p<0.001 in all cases) change in office BP compared with the initial data were recorded in all study groups of therapy already at 4 weeks of treatment and became even more pronounced at 12 weeks. In the telmisartan monotherapy group, BP decreased from 155.7±10.7/92.2±7.6 mm Hg to 131.4±12.1/80.8±7.3 mm Hg at the end of the 4th week and to 125.3±7.6/78.2±6.1 mm Hg – at the end of the 12th week. Similarly, after treatment with the combination of telmisartan and hydrochlorothiazide, BP decreased from 162.7±12.6/94.3±7.9 mm Hg to 133.2±12.5/81.6±8.4 mmHg at the end of the 4th week and to 126.0±7.8/78.4±6.7 mm Hg – at the end of the 12th week. In telmisartan/amlodipine group, a decrease in BP also occurred, from 162.5±13.2/94.6±8.6 mm Hg to 132.8±14.5/81.3±7.5 mm Hg on the 4th week and to 125.4±8.7/78.4±5.6 mm Hg at the end of follow up (12 weeks). The proportion of patients who reached the target BP (<140/90 mm Hg) after treatment with telmisartan as monotherapy was 91.7%, after treatment with telmisartan+hydrochlorothiazide – 89.6%, after treatment with telmisartan+amlodipine – 92.8%. Throughout the program, prescribed therapy was well tolerated by patients. During the study, 47 adverse events (AEs) were recorded in 36 patients: 31 AEs with telmisartan monotherapy, 5 AEs with telmisartan/hydrochlorothiazide combination, and 11 AEs with telmisartan/amlodipine combination. Most of the AEs registered during the trial resolved by the end of the study, in four cases the date of AEs resolve is unknown, in two cases, at the time of completion of the study, AEs continued.

Conclusion. In the TAINA study a high antihypertensive efficacy and a comparable favorable safety and tolerability profile of telmisartan, used as monotherapy and in combination with hydrochlorothiazide or amlodipine was determined.

A Meta-analysis of antihypertensive effect of telmisartan versus candesartan in patients with essential hypertension

OBJECTIVE

The comparison of antihypertensive effects between telmisartan and candesartan in patients with essential hypertension has been investigated in several small studies. The results were not consistent. We performed this meta-analysis determining the antihypertensive effect of telmisartan versus candesartan in these patients.

METHODS

We searched Pubmed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central for all published studies comparing the antihypertensive effects between telmisartan and candesartan in patients with essential hypertension.

RESULTS

The antihypertensive effects were assessed in 302 patients included in 4 trials with a mean follow-up of 10 ± 4 weeks. There were no significant differences between telmisartan and candesartan in reduction of systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) in patients with essential hypertension (weighted mean differences (WMD) for SBP 1.98 mm Hg (95% confidence interval (CI), -0.53, 4.49), p > 0.05; WMD for DBP 0.26 mm Hg (95% CI, -1.65, 2.16), p > 0.05), respectively. In a sub-analysis including 2 randomized studies, there was not a significant difference for the reduction of SBP (WMD 0.90 (95% CI, -2.88, 4.68) mm Hg, p > 0.05) or DBP (WMD -0.80 (95% CI, -3.40, 1.81) mm Hg, p > 0.05) treated with telmisartan or candesartan.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis provides the evidence that the antihypertensive effects of telmisartan and candesartan are similar on SBP and DBP reduction in patients with essential hypertension, suggesting that strict designed randomized controlled trial would be helpful to compare antihypertensive effects of angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) and improve the choice of ARBs in antihypertensive therapy.

Quality by Design (QbD) approach to optimize the formulation of a bilayer combination tablet (Telmiduo®) manufactured via high shear wet granulation

A bilayer tablet, which consisted of telmisartan and amlodipine besylate, was formulated based on a Quality by Design (QbD) approach. The control and response factors were determined based on primary knowledge and the target values of the control tablet (Twynsta^®). A D-optimal mixture design was used to obtain the optimal formulations in terms of D-mannitol, crospovidone, and MCC for the telmisartan layer, and CCM-Na, PVP K25, and Prosolv for the amlodipine layer. The quantitative effects of the different formulation factors on the response factors were accurately predicted using the equations of best fit and a strong linearity was observed between the predicted and actual values of the response factors. The optimized bilayer tablet was obtained using a numeric optimization technique and was characterized compared with a control (Twynsta^®) by using various physical evaluations and in vivo pharmacokinetic parameters. The physical stability of Telmiduo^® was greater than that of Twynsta^® owing to the improvement of formulation factors. The in vivo pharmacokinetic parameters suggested that Telmiduo^® might have pharmaceutical equivalence and bioequivalence with Twynsta^®. Therefore, the bilayer tablet that consisted of telmisartan and amlodipine besylate could be produced using a more economical and simpler method than that used to produce Twynsta^®. Moreover, the suitability of QbD for effective product development in the pharmaceutical industry was shown.

Efficacy and tolerability of telmisartan plus amlodipine in asian patients not adequately controlled on either monotherapy or on low-dose combination therapy

Objective. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the telmisartan plus amlodipine (T/A) single-pill combination (SPC) in Asian patients with hypertension whose blood pressure (BP) was not adequately controlled on either monotherapy or on low-dose combination therapy. Patients and Methods. Data are presented from five Boehringer Ingelheim-sponsored phase 3, double-blind, 8-week, studies: two studies in nonresponders to amlodipine (data pooled for amlodipine), two studies on nonresponders to telmisartan (pooled data), and one on nonresponders to low-dose T/A SPC. Results. After 8 weeks' treatment, mean reductions from the reference baseline in diastolic BP (DBP; primary endpoint), systolic BP (SBP), and SBP, DBP goal, and response rates were higher with the T/A SPC than respective monotherapies. The T80/A5 SPC resulted in greater reductions in DBP and SBP, and higher DBP goal and response rate than the low-dose T40/A5 SPC. Peripheral edema incidence was low (amlodipine 0.5%, telmisartan 0.0%, and T/A SPC 0.7%). Discussion and Conclusion. In Asian patients whose BP is not adequately controlled with telmisartan or amlodipine monotherapy, T/A SPC treatment results in greater BP reduction, and higher DBP and SBP goal and response rates. The safety and tolerability of the T/A SPC are comparable to those of the respective monotherapies and consistent with those reported in previous studies.

An update on telmisartan/hydrochlorothiazide combinations for the management of hypertensive patients with additional cardiovascular risk factors

International hypertension guidelines endorse the use of combination therapy to achieve blood pressure control in the majority of patients. Angiotensin AT1 receptor blockers, in combination with diuretics, are among the preferred combinations, with telmisartan plus hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) being an effective and well-tolerated combination. This article provides an up-to-date review of the existing data on telmisartan/HCTZ combination for the management of hypertension in patients with additional cardiovascular risk factors, including reports emerging from a number of recent clinical trials and secondary analyses of older trials. The accumulated evidence from clinical trials demonstrates that telmisartan/HCTZ combinations are effective and well tolerated in patients with mild-to-severe hypertension, including subgroups of patients with cardiovascular risk factors such as advanced age, obesity, chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus and treatment-resistant hypertension.

Sustained blood pressure-lowering effect of aliskiren compared with telmisartan after a single missed dose

Poor adherence to antihypertensive drug treatment is common and is often associated with marked prolongations of the dosing interval. Hence, selecting a treatment that has the potential to provide a sustained blood pressure (BP)-lowering effect is important. The objective of this analysis is to compare the sustained efficacy of aliskiren with telmisartan after a single missed dose. This is part of a 12-week double-blind study conducted in patients with mild to moderate hypertension randomized to once-daily aliskiren 150 mg or telmisartan 40 mg for 2 weeks, force-titrated to double the doses for 10 weeks, followed by placebo for 1 week. The changes in BP from the end of active treatment (EOA) to 48 hours after treatment withdrawal (day 2) were analyzed. Demographic and baseline characteristics were comparable between the treatment groups. Aliskiren continued to show significantly greater reductions in mean sitting systolic BP (-0.7 vs +1.3 mm Hg; P<.05), 24-hour mean ambulatory systolic BP (-3.6 vs +2.6 mm Hg; P<.01), and 24-hour mean ambulatory diastolic BP (-3.7 vs +0.4 mm Hg; P<.01) compared with telmisartan from EOA to day 2, despite the similar BP reductions from randomization to EOA. In conclusion, aliskiren sustained the BP-lowering efficacy better than telmisartan after a single missed dose.

Changes of gene expressions in spontaneously hypertensive rat model after losartan treatment

Background and Objectives

The renin angiotensin system seems to play an important role in the development of cardiac and vascular hypertrophy in hypertension. The changes in pathology, and gene expressions of the angiotensin II receptor type 1A (ATIA) and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) were investigated in order to explore the effects of losartan in spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR) models.

Materials and Methods

Twelve week-old male Wistar rats were grouped as follows: control (C) group, hypertension (H) group, and losartan (L) group in which SHR was treated with losartan (10 mg/kg/day). Western blot and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction analysis regarding seven genes such as endothelin-1, ACE, ATIA, neutrophil cytosolic factor, brain natriuretic peptide, troponin I, endothelial nitric oxide synthase were performed.

Results

Systolic blood pressure was significantly decreased in the L group compared with the H group in weeks 3 and 5. ACE and ATIA proteins in the L group were lower than H group in week 5.

Conclusion

Losartan reduced blood pressure, cardiac hypertrophy and protein expressions of ACE and ATIA. Changes of protein expressions were more sensitive than changes in pathology. Further study is needed for the differing doses of losartan in SHR models.

Telmisartan 80 mg/hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg single-pill combination in the treatment of hypertension

INTRODUCTION

International guidelines emphasize the importance of blood pressure (BP) control to reduce cardiovascular risk. Telmisartan, an angiotensin II receptor blocker, provides large BP reductions and also prevents cardiovascular events in patients at high risk. The thiazide diuretic, hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ), has a complementary mode of action, and combination with telmisartan is an established and rational treatment option for patients uncontrolled on monotherapy. A single-pill combination (SPC) of telmisartan 80 mg with high-strength HCTZ 25 mg (T80/H25) is widely available.

AREA COVERED

Clinical data on T80/H25 SPC for the management of hypertension was identified via MEDLINE searches. T80/H25 SPC provides greater BP reductions and higher goal achievement rates in patients who cannot achieve BP goal with T80/HCTZ 12.5 mg SPC, and also as initial therapy compared with T80 monotherapy. T80/H25 also reduced BP significantly more than valsartan 160 mg/H25 combination, and demonstrated favorable tolerability in clinical trials.

EXPERT OPINION

Patients with hypertension often do not achieve BP goal, even when treated, leaving them at increased cardiovascular risk. In part this is due to poor adherence, which can be exacerbated by treatment side effects. High BP goal achievement with SPC T80/H25, with maintained tolerability, provides a treatment option for increasing BP control.

Metabolic effect of combined telmisartan and nifedipine CR therapy in patients with essential hypertension

BACKGROUND

In addition to exerting a blood pressure (BP)-lowering effect, telmisartan produces favorable metabolic effects via peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ activation. While a combination of telmisartan and a calcium channel blocker is often used to achieve a target BP level, the metabolic effects of this drug combination remain unclear. Therefore, this study evaluated the metabolic effects of telmisartan plus nifedipine controlled release (CR) therapy, in hypertensive patients without metabolic disease.

METHODS

Sixteen patients with essential hypertension, who had not undergone antihypertensive therapy in the previous 6 months, were studied. Patients were initiated on telmisartan (40 mg/day). If their office BP was not reduced to 140/90 mmHg after 6 weeks, nifedipine CR (20-40 mg per day) was added for 18 weeks. The other patients whose BP had achieved the target of 140/90 mmHg, continued only telmisartan.

RESULTS

Telmisartan reduced BP (174 ± 13/92 ± 10 to 143 ± 22/78 ± 11 mmHg; P < 0.01) at 6 weeks in 16 patients, but eight patients did not achieve target BP levels and required addition of nifedipine. Telmisartan also resulted in a reduction in the homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) (1.30 ± 0.65 to 1.10 ± 0.42; P < 0.05) at 6 weeks, but did not affect adiponectin or leptin levels. Addition of nifedipine (n = 8) resulted in a reduction in BP (158 ± 18/80 ± 13 to 131 ± 8/73 ± 13 mmHg; P < 0.01) at 18 weeks, but did not affect the HOMA-IR (1.10 ± 0.40 to 1.02 ± 0.56; ns). In patients who did not require addition of nifedipine (n = 8), BP levels remained nearly identical at 18 weeks (127 ± 13/73 ± 9 to 128 ± 13/68 ± 8 mmHg; ns), and HOMA-IR also remained nearly identical.

CONCLUSIONS

Telmisartan produced a favorable metabolic effect in hypertensive patients without preexisting metabolic disorders. Addition of nifedipine CR produced further BP-lowering effects, and resulted in maintenance of metabolic indices.

What is a preferred angiotensin II receptor blocker-based combination therapy for blood pressure control in hypertensive patients with diabetic and non-diabetic renal impairment?

Hypertension has a major associated risk for organ damage and mortality, which is further heightened in patients with prior cardiovascular (CV) events, comorbid diabetes mellitus, microalbuminuria and renal impairment. Given that most patients with hypertension require at least two antihypertensives to achieve blood pressure (BP) goals, identifying the most appropriate combination regimen based on individual risk factors and comorbidities is important for risk management. Single-pill combinations (SPCs) containing two or more antihypertensive agents with complementary mechanisms of action offer potential advantages over free-drug combinations, including simplification of treatment regimens, convenience and reduced costs. The improved adherence and convenience resulting from SPC use is recognised in updated hypertension guidelines. Despite a wide choice of SPCs for hypertension treatment, clinical evidence from direct head-to-head comparisons to guide selection for individual patients is lacking. However, in patients with evidence of renal disease or at greater risk of developing renal disease, such as those with diabetes mellitus, microalbuminura and high-normal BP or overt hypertension, guidelines recommend renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blocker-based combination therapy due to superior renoprotective effects compared with other antihypertensive classes. Furthermore, RAS inhibitors attenuate the oedema and renal hyperfiltration associated with calcium channel blocker (CCB) monotherapy, making them a good choice for combination therapy. The occurrence of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor-induced cough supports the use of angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) for RAS blockade rather than ACE inhibitors. In this regard, ARB-based SPCs are available in combination with the diuretic, hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) or the calcium CCB, amlodipine. Telmisartan, a long-acting ARB with preferential pharmacodynamic profile compared with several other ARBs, and the only ARB with an indication for the prevention of CV disease progression, is available in two SPC formulations, telmisartan/HCTZ and telmisartan/amlodipine. Clinical studies suggest that in CV high-risk patients and those with evidence of renal disease, the use of an ARB/CCB combination may be preferred to ARB/HCTZ combinations due to superior renoprotective and CV benefits and reduced metabolic side effects in patients with concomitant metabolic disorders. However, selection of the most appropriate antihypertensive combination should be dependent on careful review of the individual patient and appropriate consideration of drug pharmacology.

Telmisartan: just an antihypertensive agent? A literature review

INTRODUCTION

The modulation of the renin angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS) is an important pathway in managing high blood pressure, and its overexpression plays a key role in target end-organ damage. Telmisartan is an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) with unique pharmacologic properties, including the longest half-life among all ARBs; this leads to a significant and 24-h sustained reduction of blood pressure. Telmisartan has well-known antihypertensive properties, but there is also strong clinical evidence that it reduces left ventricular hypertrophy, arterial stiffness and the recurrence of atrial fibrillation, and confers renoprotection.

AREAS COVERED

This paper reviews telmisartan's pharmacological properties in terms of efficacy for hypertension control and, importantly, focuses on its new therapeutic indications and their clinical implications.

EXPERT OPINION

ONTARGET (ongoing telmisartan alone and in combination with ramipril global endpoint trial) demonstrated, that telmisartan confers cardiovascular protective effects similar to those of ramipril, but with a better tolerability. Moreover, recent investigations focused on the capability of telmisartan to modulate the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPAR-γ), an established target in the treatment of insulin resistance, diabetes and metabolic syndrome, whose activation is also correlated to anti-inflammatory and, finally, anti-atherosclerotic properties. Telmisartan shows peculiar features that go beyond blood pressure control. It presents promising and unique protective properties against target end-organ damage, potentially able to open a scenario of new therapeutic approaches to cardiovascular disease.