Combination therapy in epilepsy: when and what to use

A quality of care assessment for women of childbearing potential with epilepsy in Bhutan: An observational study

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE

In lower-middle income countries such as Bhutan, the treatment gap for epilepsy is over 50% as compared to a treatment gap of less than 10% in high-income countries. We aim to analyze the quality of epilepsy care for women of childbearing potential in Bhutan using the Quality Indicators in Epilepsy Treatment (QUIET) tool, and to assess the usefulness of the tool's section for women with active epilepsy (WWE) in the Bhutanese setting.

METHODS

A prospective convenience cohort was enrolled in Thimphu, Paro, Punakha, and Wangdue, Kingdom of Bhutan, in 2022. Bhutanese women of childbearing potential at the time of enrollment (18-44 years old) were evaluated for the diagnosis of active epilepsy and underwent a structured survey-based interview with Bhutanese staff. Participants were surveyed on their epilepsy, pregnancy, and antiseizure medicine (ASM) histories. The clinical history and quality of epilepsy care of adult WWE were assessed using a section of the QUIET tool for women, an instrument originally developed by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs to analyze the quality of epilepsy care for American adults.

RESULTS

There were 82 Bhutanese WWE of childbearing potential, with mean age of 30.6 years at enrollment (range 18-44, standard deviation (SD) 6.6) and mean age of 20.3 years at epilepsy diagnosis (range 3-40, SD 8.0)). 39 % (n = 32) had a high school or above level of education, and 42 % (n = 34) were employed. 35 % (n = 29) reported a seizure within the prior week, and 88 % (n = 72) reported a seizure within the prior year. 49 % (n = 40) of participants experienced > 100 lifetime seizures. All but one participant took antiseizure medications (ASMs). At enrollment, participants presently took no (n = 1), one (n = 3), two (n = 37), three (n = 25), four (n = 11), or over five (n = 5) ASMs. The most common ASMs taken were levetiracetam (n = 40), phenytoin (n = 27), carbamazepine (n = 23), phenobarbital (n = 22), and sodium valproate (n = 20). 61 % of all WWE took folic acid. Of the 40 previously pregnant WWE, eight (20 %) took folic acid during any time of their pregnancy. 35 % (n = 29) used betel nut (doma, quid) and 53 % (n = 21) of pregnant WWE used betel nut during pregnancy.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on data about WWE participants' ASM, supplement, and substance use, our study identified the high use of first generation ASMs (including valproate), frequently in polytherapy, and betel nut use as treatment gaps in women of childbearing potential age with active epilepsy in Bhutan. To address these gaps for locations such as Bhutan, we propose modifications to the QUIET tool's "Chronic Epilepsy Care for Women" section.

Antiseizure adverse drug reaction and associated factors among epileptic patients at Jimma Medical Center: a prospective observational study

A growing body of evidence suggests that adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the healthcare system. Fifteen to twenty-five percent of patients with epilepsy discontinued antiseizure drugs (ASDs) within 6 months of therapy owing to intolerable adverse drug reactions. In Ethiopia, the prevalence of antiseizure adverse drug reactions and associated factors was not extensively conducted in advanced settings like Jimma Medical Centers. Hence, the objective of this study is to assess patterns of adverse drug reactions and associated factors among ambulatory epileptic patients at tertiary hospitals in Ethiopia. A hospital-based prospective observational study was spanned for 1 year. Two hundred ninety patients were consecutively recruited into the study from all epileptic patients attending the ambulatory clinic. Relevant data were collected through patient interviews and medical chart reviews. The causality assessment was done by using the Naranjo Probability Scale. Epi-Data manager version 4.6.0.4 was used for data entry and statistical analysis was performed by Statistical Package for Social Science version 25.0 (SPSS). Stepwise backward logistic regression analysis was done to identify factors that increase the risk of antiseizure adverse drug reactions. The mean (± SD) age of the participants were 29.91(± 11.26) years. The overall prevalence of ADR was 33.8% (95% CI 29.2-39.9%). A total of 110 adverse drug reactions were identified among 98 patients with an average of 1.12 per patient. ADRs were frequently reported with phenobarbital (52.04%) and phenytoin (34.70%). The commonly identified adverse drug reactions were epigastric pain (27.55%) and central nervous system drowsiness (23.46%). Comorbidity (AOR = 5.91, 95% CI (2.14-16.32), seizure-free period of fewer than 2 years (AOR = 1.94, 95% CI (1.18-3.19), and polytherapy (AOR = 1.35, 95% CI (1.80-2.26) were significantly associated with adverse drug reactions. This trial had a comparatively high percentage of adverse medication reactions. Adverse medication reactions were more common in patients with polytherapy, comorbidities, and seizure-free durations less than two years. Therefore, medical practitioners should advise patients who exhibit these traits on how to reduce or avoid bad drug responses or provide comfort in the event of small incidents.

Effectiveness analysis of three-drug combination therapies for refractory focal epilepsy

Selecting appropriate antiseizure medications (ASMs) for combination therapy in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) is a complex task that requires an empirical approach, especially in patients receiving polytherapy. We aimed to analyze the effectiveness of various three-drug combinations in a group of patients with DRE under real-world conditions. This single-center, longitudinal observational study investigated patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy who received three-drug regimens in the outpatient clinic of Tongji Hospital from September 2019 to December 2022. The effectiveness of each triple regimen was evaluated by the seizure-free rate and within-patient ratio of the seizure frequency (a seizure frequency ratio [SFR]<1 indicated superior efficacy). The independent t-test or Mann-Whitney U test was used for effectiveness analysis, and P values were adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons. A total of 511 triple trials comprising 76 different regimens were conducted among 323 enrolled patients. Among these triple regimens, lamotrigine (LTG)/valproic acid (VPA)/topiramate (TPM) was the most frequently prescribed (29.4%, n ​= ​95). At the last clinical visit, 14.9% (n ​= ​48) of patients achieved seizure freedom after receiving triple therapy. LTG/VPA/TPM and LTG/VPA/levetiracetam (LEV) exhibited the highest seizure-free rates at 17.9% and 12.8%, respectively. These two regimens also had significantly lower median SFRs of 0.48 (interquartile range [IQR], 0.17-0.85; adjusted P ​< ​0.001) and 0.63 (IQR, 0.21-1.04; adjusted P ​< ​0.01), respectively. LTG/VPA/perampanel (PER) was another promising regimen that showed marginal effectiveness (median SFR ​= ​0.67; adjusted P ​= ​0.053). LTG/VPA/phenobarbital had the highest incidence of regimen-specific side effects (40.0%, 4/10), while the incidence of side effects from LTG/VPA/LEV was minimal (5.1%, 2/39). In conclusion, LTG/VPA/TPM and LTG/VPA/LEV exhibited superior efficacy and good tolerability in treating patients with DRE. Our results provide preliminary insights into the selection of ASMs for three-drug combination therapies in this clinically challenging population.

Unveiling the potential of perampanel and pregabalin in addressing pentylenetetrazole-induced electrographic alterations and neurobehavioral anomalies

Chemical kindling is broadly used experimental model to investigate novel treatments on the process of epileptogenesis and coexisting behavioral comorbidities. The current study aimed to investigate the low dose perampanel (PER) (0.125 and 0.5 mg/kg) and pregabalin (PG) (15 mg/kg) as standalone treatments and in combination on kindling-induced seizure progression with concurrent electroencephalographic alterations. Mice were subjected to pentylenetetrazole (PTZ)-induced kindling followed by neurobehavioral assessment for anxiety-like activity and cognitive deficit through behavioral experiments. The monotherapy with PER at 0.5 mg/kg and PG at 15 mg/kg delayed the kindling process but PRP+PG yielded pronounced benefits and hindered the development of seizures of higher severity. PER+PG combination relieved the animals from anxiety-like behavior in various employed anxiogenic tests. Furthermore, the kindling-associated cognitive deficit was protected by PER+PG combination as increased alteration behavior, discrimination index and latencies to enter the dark zone were noted in y-maze, object recognition and passive avoidance tests, respectively while shorter escape latencies were noted in water maze. The brain samples of kindled mice had elevated malondialdehyde and reduced catalase, superoxide dismutase and glutathione peroxidase enzymes while treatment with PER and PG combination shielded the mice from heightened kindling-associated oxidative stress. Overall, the findings of the present study illustrate that concurrent administration of PER and PG effectively hindered the process of epileptogenesis by protecting neuronal excitability and brain oxidative stress. The results predict the dominance of PER and PG combination over monotherapy which might serve as an effective novel combination to combat drug resistance and behavioral disorders in epileptic patients.

Optimizing treatment persistence in epilepsy: a comparative analysis of combined antiseizure medications with different mechanisms of action

Background

Combination therapy with antiseizure medications (ASMs) is a rational strategy if monotherapy cannot effectively control seizures, thereby aiming to improve tolerance and treatment persistence.

Objectives

To compare the efficacy of different ASM combinations among patients.

Design

Patients with epilepsy on monotherapy who had a second ASM added as concomitant two-drug therapy from January 2009 to May 2019 in the Chang Gung Research Database, Taiwan, were included in the analysis.

Methods

ASM combinations were compared based on their primary mechanism of action (MoA) which are as follows: gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor (G), sodium channel blocker (SC), synaptic vesicle protein 2A (SV2), calcium channel blocker (C), and multiple mechanisms (M). Treatment persistence was compared, and the predictors of persistence were analyzed.

Results

In total, 3033 patients were enrolled in this study. Combined ASMs with different MoAs had significantly longer treatment persistence than ASMs with similar MoAs, specifically SC and M combinations. Patients receiving combined ASMs with different MoAs were less likely to discontinue treatment [adjusted hazards ratio: 0.83 (95% CI: 0.75-0.93), p < 0.001]. Among all combinations, the SC + SV2 combination had the longest treatment persistence (mean ± SD: 912.7 ± 841.6 days). Meanwhile, patients receiving the G combination had a higher risk of treatment discontinuation than those receiving the SC + SV2 combination. Underlying malignancies were associated with an increased risk of treatment discontinuation across all MoA categories. Male patients receiving the SC, SV2, and M combinations were more likely to discontinue treatment than female patients. Moreover, patients with renal disease were more likely to discontinue treatment with the SV2 combinations.

Conclusion

ASM combinations with different MoAs had superior efficacy and tolerability to ASM combinations with similar MoAs, particularly SC and M combinations. In our cohort, factors associated with treatment discontinuation included underlying malignancy, male sex, and renal disease. These findings may provide valuable insights into the use of ASM combinations if monotherapy cannot adequately control seizures.

The Concurrent Use of Phenytoin and Levetiracetam for Seizure Prophylaxis in ICU Patients: The "Arrowhead Rationale"

The administration of multiple antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) is standard practice for neurological intensive care unit (ICU) patients who cannot obtain seizure control with monotherapy. Phenytoin and levetiracetam continue to be highly utilized AEDs for ICU patients due to their efficacy and relatively low cost. However, there is no randomized control trial to date that assesses the efficacy outcomes of the concurrent use of these two medications for ICU patients in convulsive or silent status epilepticus that combats the toxicity with increasing dosages of a single drug by itself. Here, we have analyzed several studies published over the past two decades to better understand whether the concomitant use of these two medications is more efficacious in treating unremitting seizures in ICU patients. Several factors influence which AED is a better fit for ICU patients due to the complexity of their clinical state. Risk for drug interactions, increased incidence of renal and hepatic impairment, and higher need for patient monitoring are daily barriers that determine AED use. After analysis of past research, while the efficacy of concurrent use of levetiracetam and phenytoin is still not fully clear, we offer the "Arrowhead Rationale" for such dual therapy in a subset of patients at our tertiary care trauma and stroke center in Southern California.

Animal Models of Drug-Resistant Epilepsy as Tools for Deciphering the Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacoresistance and Discovering More Effective Treatments

In the last 30 years, over 20 new anti-seizure medicines (ASMs) have been introduced into the market for the treatment of epilepsy using well-established preclinical seizure and epilepsy models. Despite this success, approximately 20-30% of patients with epilepsy have drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). The current approach to ASM discovery for DRE relies largely on drug testing in various preclinical model systems that display varying degrees of ASM drug resistance. In recent years, attempts have been made to include more etiologically relevant models in the preclinical evaluation of a new investigational drug. Such models have played an important role in advancing a greater understanding of DRE at a mechanistic level and for hypothesis testing as new experimental evidence becomes available. This review provides a critical discussion of the pharmacology of models of adult focal epilepsy that allow for the selection of ASM responders and nonresponders and those models that display a pharmacoresistance per se to two or more ASMs. In addition, the pharmacology of animal models of major genetic epilepsies is discussed. Importantly, in addition to testing chemical compounds, several of the models discussed here can be used to evaluate other potential therapies for epilepsy such as neurostimulation, dietary treatments, gene therapy, or cell transplantation. This review also discusses the challenges associated with identifying novel therapies in the absence of a greater understanding of the mechanisms that contribute to DRE. Finally, this review discusses the lessons learned from the profile of the recently approved highly efficacious and broad-spectrum ASM cenobamate.

Three men in a boat: The comparison of the combination therapy of botulinum toxin and greater occipital nerve block with bupivacaine, with botulinum toxin monotherapy in the management of chronic migraine

OBJECTIVE

This study compared the impact of the combination therapy of onabotulinum toxin A and greater occipital nerve block (GoNT-A) with onabotulinum toxin A monotherapy (BoNT-A) based on its efficacy and safety in relation to the quality of life of adult chronic migraine (CM) patients.

BACKGROUND

Prophylactic treatment of CM is still difficult and complex. Combination treatments do not have an evidence base yet.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 85 patients. For greater occipital nerve block (GONB), 4 ml of the solution prepared using 1 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine and 3 ml of saline on both sides were bilaterally applied to 30 patients. For BoNT-A treatment, a total of 155 units of onabotulinum toxin A (BOTOX®) was intramuscularly injected into 31 specific points around the head and neck in 27 patients. Both protocols were similarly applied to 28 patients for GoNT-A treatment. MIDAS and HIT-6 scores were evaluated to measure patients' quality of life three months after the treatment.

RESULTS

When MIDAS and HIT-6 score groups were statistically compared, both GONB and GoNT-A applications showed a statistically significant reduction compared to the BoNT-A application (p < 0.05). The decrease in the MIDAS and HIT-6 scores of GONB and GoNT-A applications did not show a statistical difference (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The combination of BoNT-A and GONB was superior to BoNT-A applied as monotherapy. Alternately, no significant difference was found between GONB therapy and combination therapy in all data. Combination treatments were well tolerated.

Lamotrigine induced priapism in children: case analysis and literature review

Lamotrigine is an antiepileptic drug that can be used to control many types of seizures as a single-agent or an add-on therapy in patients over 2 years of age. In addition to common adverse reactions, this current case report describes a paediatric male patient with a rare side-effect of persistent penile erectile due to lamotrigine. Previous studies have shown that it can improve sexual function in adult male patients. This patient suffered from refractory epilepsy and pneumonia. He had taken a variety of antiepileptic drugs for a long time and developed priapism after the dosage of lamotrigine had been increased. The priapism improved after drug withdrawal and sedation. Further research is needed to elucidate the mechanism of this rare side-effect.

Anti-seizure medications and quality of life in person with epilepsy

Objective

The goal of this study was to determine the effects of mono-, bi-, and polytherapy anti-seizure medications (ASMs) in terms of seizure reduction and quality of life (QOL) in persons with epilepsy (PWE).

Methods

A cross-sectional observational study was conducted. All PWE with age <75 years were recruited and further classified into two groups: responders and non-responders, based on the response of the ASMs to the treatments for reduced seizure frequency since the last one year. Other demographic and clinical data such as seizure frequency, type of seizures, age at onset of seizures, and information about ASMs with their daily doses were assessed for the descriptive analysis. The quality of life was assessed in randomly selected PWE (n = 100) using the quality of life in epilepsy inventory-31 (QOLIE-31) in adults.

Results

With a total of 486 PWE, the median age (years) was comparable in both groups. Out of these the non-responders group was found to be significantly higher (77.8%) than the responders group (22.2%). In the responders group, the percentage of PWE who were on monotherapy was significantly higher (51.85 %) than those who were on polytherapy (17.59%), whereas in the non-responders group, 21.16% of PWE were on monotherapy and 44.86% were on polytherapy. The duration of epilepsy was similar in both groups, but the average seizure frequency was significantly higher in the non-responders. In QOL assessments, 43% of PWE were observed in the responders group, whereas 57% of PWE were found in the non-responders group. The overall comparative QOL scores were also significantly higher (p < 0.0001) in the responders group as compared to the non-responders group.

Conclusion

Our findings revealed that those PWE who were on monotherapy showed better reduction in seizure frequency and improved QOL in responder groups as compared to non-responder groups.

Medical Technology: A Systematic Review on Medical Devices Utilized for Epilepsy Prediction and Management

BACKGROUND

Epilepsy is a devastating neurological disorder that affects nearly 70 million people worldwide. Epilepsy causes uncontrollable, unprovoked and unpredictable seizures that reduce the quality of life of those afflicted, with 1-9 epileptic patient deaths per 1000 patients occurring annually due to sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP). Predicting the onset of seizures and managing them may help patients from harming themselves and may improve their well-being. For a long time, electroencephalography (EEG) devices have been the mainstay for seizure detection and monitoring. This systematic review aimed to elucidate and critically evaluate the latest advancements in medical devices, besides EEG, that have been proposed for the management and prediction of epileptic seizures. A literature search was performed on three databases, PubMed, Scopus and EMBASE.

METHODS

Following title/abstract screening by two independent reviewers, 27 articles were selected for critical analysis in this review.

RESULTS

These articles revealed ambulatory, non-invasive and wearable medical devices, such as the in-ear EEG devices; the accelerometer-based devices and the subcutaneous implanted EEG devices might be more acceptable than traditional EEG systems. In addition, extracerebral signalbased devices may be more efficient than EEG-based systems, especially when combined with an intervention trigger. Although further studies may still be required to improve and validate these proposed systems before commercialization, these findings may give hope to epileptic patients, particularly those with refractory epilepsy, to predict and manage their seizures.

CONCLUSION

The use of medical devices for epilepsy may improve patients' independence and quality of life and possibly prevent sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP).

Identification of Guaifenesin-Andrographolide as a Novel Combinatorial Drug Therapy for Epilepsy Using Network Virtual Screening and Experimental Validation

Combinatorial drug therapy has attracted substantial attention as an emerging strategy for the treatment of diseases with complex pathological mechanisms. We previously developed a potentially universal computational screening approach for combination drugs and used this approach to successfully identify some beneficial combinations for the treatment of heart failure. Herein, this screening approach was used to identify novel combination drugs for the treatment of epilepsy in an approved drug library. The combination of guaifenesin-andrographolide was first discovered as a promising therapy with synergistic anticonvulsant activities in maximal electroshock (MES)- and subcutaneous pentylenetetrazol (sc-PTZ)-induced epilepsy models in vivo. The studies of network analysis, fluorescence imaging, and N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA)-induced cytotoxicity further revealed that guaifenesin-andrographolide might synergistically affect NMDA receptors and then alleviate the pathogenesis of epilepsy. Therefore, we report that the combination of guaifenesin-andrographolide exerts effects against epilepsy through a novel synergistic mechanism and is thus a potential treatment for epilepsy, providing a promising mechanism for the design of novel combinatorial drug treatments against epilepsy.

Inhibition of TRPC3 channels by a novel pyrazole compound confers antiseizure effects

OBJECTIVE

As a key member of the transient receptor potential (TRP) superfamily, TRP canonical 3 (TRPC3) regulates calcium homeostasis and contributes to neuronal excitability. Ablation of TRPC3 lessens pilocarpine-induced seizures in mice, suggesting that TRPC3 inhibition might represent a novel antiseizure strategy. Among current TRPC3 inhibitors, pyrazole 3 (Pyr3) is most selective and potent. However, Pyr3 only provides limited benefits in pilocarpine-treated mice, likely due to its low metabolic stability and potential toxicity. We recently reported a modified pyrazole compound 20 (or JW-65) that has improved stability and safety. The objective of this study was to explore the effects of TRPC3 inhibition by our current lead compound JW-65 on seizure susceptibility.

METHODS

We first examined the pharmacokinetic properties including plasma half-life and brain to plasma ratio of JW-65 after systemic administration in mice. We then investigated the effects of TRPC3 inhibition by JW-65 on behavioral and electrographic seizures in mice treated with pilocarpine. To ensure our findings are not model specific, we assessed the susceptibility of JW-65-treated mice to pentylenetetrazole (PTZ)-induced seizures with phenytoin as a comparator.

RESULTS

JW-65 showed adequate half-life and brain penetration in mice, justifying its use for central nervous system conditions. Systemic treatment with JW-65 before pilocarpine injection in mice markedly impaired the initiation of behavioral seizures. This antiseizure action was recapitulated when JW-65 was administered after pilocarpine-induced behavioral seizures were well established and was confirmed by time-locked electroencephalographic monitoring and synchronized video. Moreover, JW-65-treated mice showed substantially decreased susceptibility to PTZ-induced seizures in a dose-dependent manner.

SIGNIFICANCE

These results suggest that pharmacological inhibition of the TRPC3 channels by our novel compound JW-65 might represent a new antiseizure strategy engaging a previously undrugged mechanism of action. Hence, this proof-of-concept study establishes TRPC3 as a novel feasible therapeutic target for the treatment of some forms of epilepsy.

Thymoquinone Potentiates the Effect of Phenytoin against Electroshock-Induced Convulsions in Rats by Reducing the Hyperactivation of m-TOR Pathway and Neuroinflammation: Evidence from In Vivo, In Vitro and Computational Studies

Epilepsy is a chronic neurodegenerative disease characterized by multiple seizures, hereto 35% of patients remain poor responders. Phenytoin (PHT; 20 and 40 mg/kg) and thymoquinone (THQ; 40 and 80 mg/kg) were given alone and as a low dose combination for 14 days (p.o), prior to challenge with maximal electroshock (MES; 180 mA, 220 V, 0.2 s). Apart from observing convulsions, hippocampal mTOR, IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α levels were measured. Hippocampal histomorphological analysis was also conducted. In vitro cell line studies and molecular docking studies were run in parallel. The results revealed the synergistic potential of the novel duo-drug combination regimen: PHT (20 mg/kg) and THQ (40 mg/kg) against MES-induced convulsions. MES amplified signaling through mTOR, and inflated the levels of proinflammatory markers (IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α), which was significantly averted (p < 0.001) with the said drug combination. The computational studies revealed that PHT and THQ cooperatively bind the active site on Akt (upstream target of m-TOR) and establish a good network of intermolecular interactions, which indicates the sequential inhibition of PI3K/Akt/m-TOR signaling with the combination. The combination also increased cell viability by 242.81% compared to 85.66% viability from the the toxic control. The results suggest that the PHT and THQ in combination possesses excellent anticonvulsant and neuroprotective effects.

Single-Target Versus Multi-Target Drugs Versus Combinations of Drugs With Multiple Targets: Preclinical and Clinical Evidence for the Treatment or Prevention of Epilepsy

Rationally designed multi-target drugs (also termed multimodal drugs, network therapeutics, or designed multiple ligands) have emerged as an attractive drug discovery paradigm in the last 10-20 years, as potential therapeutic solutions for diseases of complex etiology and diseases with significant drug-resistance problems. Such agents that modulate multiple targets simultaneously are developed with the aim of enhancing efficacy or improving safety relative to drugs that address only a single target or to combinations of single-target drugs. Although this strategy has been proposed for epilepsy therapy >25 years ago, to my knowledge, only one antiseizure medication (ASM), padsevonil, has been intentionally developed as a single molecular entity that could target two different mechanisms. This novel drug exhibited promising effects in numerous preclinical models of difficult-to-treat seizures. However, in a recent randomized placebo-controlled phase IIb add-on trial in treatment-resistant focal epilepsy patients, padsevonil did not separate from placebo in its primary endpoints. At about the same time, a novel ASM, cenobamate, exhibited efficacy in several randomized controlled trials in such patients that far surpassed the efficacy of any other of the newer ASMs. Yet, cenobamate was discovered purely by phenotype-based screening and its presumed dual mechanism of action was only described recently. In this review, I will survey the efficacy of single-target vs. multi-target drugs vs. combinations of drugs with multiple targets in the treatment and prevention of epilepsy. Most clinically approved ASMs already act at multiple targets, but it will be important to identify and validate new target combinations that are more effective in drug-resistant epilepsy and eventually may prevent the development or progression of epilepsy.

Melatonin Pretreatment Protects Against Status epilepticus, Glutamate Transport, and Oxidative Stress Induced by Kainic Acid in Zebrafish

Status epilepticus (SE) develops from abnormal electrical discharges, resulting in neuronal damage. Current treatments include antiepileptic drugs. However, the most common drugs used to treat seizures may sometimes be ineffective and have many side effects. Melatonin is an endogenous physiological hormone that is considered an alternative treatment for neurological disorders because of its free radical scavenging property. Thus, this study aimed to determine the effects of melatonin pretreatment on SE by inducing glutamatergic hyperstimulation in zebrafish. Seizures were induced in zebrafish using kainic acid (KA), a glutamate analog, and the seizure intensity was recorded for 60 min. Melatonin treatment for 7 days showed a decrease in seizure intensity (28%), latency to reach score 5 (14 min), and duration of SE (29%). In addition, melatonin treatment attenuated glutamate transporter levels, which significantly decreased in the zebrafish brain after 12 h of KA-induced seizures. Melatonin treatment reduced the increase in oxidative stress by reactive oxygen species formation through thiobarbituric acid reactive substances and 2',7'-dichiorofluorescin, induced by KA-seizure. An imbalance of antioxidant enzyme activities such as superoxide dismutase and catalase was influenced by melatonin and KA-induced seizures. Our study indicates that melatonin promotes a neuroprotective response against the epileptic profile in zebrafish. These effects could be related to the modulation of glutamatergic neurotransmission, recovery of glutamate uptake, and oxidative stress parameters in the zebrafish brain.

Which treatment strategy in patients with epilepsy with focal seizures uncontrolled by the first anti-seizure medication?

There is no definite proven or accepted strategy in the management of patients with focal epilepsy uncontrolled by the first anti-seizure medication (ASM). Clinical studies failed to find a significant difference in efficacy or tolerability between alternative monotherapy and/or adjunctive therapy in these patients. A second ASM is often added, the efficacy of the combination is assessed, and the dose of the first drug can be gradually reduced and withdrawn. If seizures recur, the effective combination therapy can be reinstated. In this review, we discussed experimental and clinical data about the efficacy and tolerability of the most frequently used combinations of ASMs. Animal studies suggested that the most favorable combinations are those between ASMs with different or multiple mechanisms of action, whereas combining drugs with similar pharmacodynamic properties is often associated with additive or infra-additive efficacy and additive or synergistic toxicity. Clinical studies have shown that levetiracetam (LEV) can be favorably combined with the sodium channel blockers (SCBs) lacosamide (LCM) and lamotrigine (LTG). Lamotrigine is particularly effective when associated with valproate (VPA) and possibly with LEV and topiramate (TPM). Carbamazepine (CBZ) has negative pharmacokinetic interactions with several ASMs and should not be combined with other SCBs; it could be effectively and safely combined with gabapentin (GBP) and LEV. Valproic acid has enzyme inhibiting properties and can be cautiously used with SCBs; its combination with TPM or zonisamide (ZNS) may be associated with higher toxicity.

The Pharmacoresistant Epilepsy: An Overview on Existent and New Emerging Therapies

Epilepsy is one of the most common neurological chronic disorders, with an estimated prevalence of 0. 5 - 1%. Currently, treatment options for epilepsy are predominantly based on the administration of symptomatic therapy. Most patients are able to achieve seizure freedom by the first two appropriate drug trials. Thus, patients who cannot reach a satisfactory response after that are defined as pharmacoresistant. However, despite the availability of more than 20 antiseizure medications (ASMs), about one-third of epilepsies remain drug-resistant. The heterogeneity of seizures and epilepsies, the coexistence of comorbidities, and the broad spectrum of efficacy, safety, and tolerability related to the ASMs, make the management of these patients actually challenging. In this review, we analyze the most relevant clinical and pathogenetic issues related to drug-resistant epilepsy, and then we discuss the current evidence about the use of available ASMs and the alternative non-pharmacological approaches.

Evaluation of Factors Impacting the Efficacy of Single or Combination Therapies of Valproic Acid, Carbamazepine, and Oxcarbazepine: A Longitudinal Observation Study

Objective: This study aimed to determine the efficacy and clinical factors related to the pharmacodynamics of single or combination therapies of valproic acid (VPA), carbamazepine (CBZ), and oxcarbazepine (OXC), three commonly used anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) in China.

Methods: The study evaluated the records of 2027 outpatients in a Changsha hospital, located in China, from December 23, 2015 to October 28, 2019. The baseline seizure frequency was assessed during the first visit. AED efficacy was determined based on the reduction in seizures from baseline at the subsequent visits. Multivariable ordinal regression analysis was used to determine the association between the clinical factors (demographic characteristics, clinical features, and medication situation) and AED efficacy. For validation, the clinical efficacies of AEDs were compared as both single agents and in combinations. Differences in adverse effect (AEs) categories were analyzed by Chi-square between AED groups.

Results: Records of patients receiving VPA, CBZ, and OXC were evaluated. Serum concentrations of VPA and CBZ is significantly correlated with efficacy (OR 1.030 [1.024–1.037], p < 0 0.0001; OR 1.250 [1.146–1.63], p < 0.0001, respectively) and OXC efficacy correlated to the serum concentration of the metabolite 10,11-dihydro-10-hydroxy-carbazepine (monohydroxy derivative, MHD) serum concentrations (OR 1.060 [1.031–1.089], p < 0.0001). Significant differences existed between females and males in VPA efficacy (OR 1.318 [1.033–1.682], p = 0.027). After validation, VPA, in combination with OXC (OR 1.93 [1.38–2.70], p<0.001), or with VGB (Vigabatrin) (OR 2.36 [1.38–2.70], p = 0.002), showed significantly better efficacy than as a single agent. OXC efficacy was also affected by the duration of epilepsy (OR 0.965 [0.946–0.984], p < 0.001). Additionally, the efficacies of OXC and VPA were also affected by the seizure type. Seizure reduction improved significantly with an increasing number of pharmacists’ educations in the first three visits period. There were no differences in AEs incidence among these 3 AEDs except for Psychiatric (0.02) and nervous system disorders (0.0001).

Conclusion: Serum concentrations of VPA and CBZ may positively affect their efficacies, while OXC efficacies are correlated to MHD serum concentrations. The efficacy of VPA was higher in females compared to males. VPA-OXC and VPA-VGB combinations had higher efficacies compared to monotherapy. Besides, OXC efficacy is probably reducing by the duration of epilepsy. Additionally, VPA efficacy for focal or generalized seizures is superior to mixed-type seizures. OXC was more effective for focal seizures compared to mixed-type ones. Education provided by pharmacists improved the seizures to some extent, and there were no significant differences between most categories of adverse effects for the investigated AEDs.

Comparative 12-month retention rate, effectiveness and tolerability of perampanel when used as a first add-on or a late add-on treatment in patients with focal epilepsies: The COM-PER study

OBJECTIVES

To compare the 12-month retention rate, effectiveness and tolerability of perampanel (PER) as a first or late add-on treatment in adult patients with focal-onset seizures (FOS), including focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCS).

METHODS

This retrospective, observational, multicenter study was carried out in patients with FOS that received PER as a late add-on (n = 60), after failure of > 3 AEDs, and a group that received PER as a first add-on treatment (n = 21).

RESULTS

At 12 months, the retention (90.5 % vs. 48.3 %; p = 0.001), seizure-freedom (71.4 % vs. 13.3 %; p < 0.001) and responder (85.7 % vs. 28.3 %; p < 0.001) rates were significantly higher in the first add-on group compared with the late add-on group. In patients with FBTCS, the 12-month retention rate did not differ significantly between the first and late add-on groups (93.8 % vs. 66.7 %); however, seizure-freedom (81.2 % vs. 27.8 %; p = 0.002) and responder rate response (93.8 % vs. 44.4 %; p = 0.002) were significantly higher in the first add-on group. There were no significant differences in tolerability between the two groups, including in patients with FBTCS. Adverse events were reported in 54.3 % of patients (44/81), most were mild or moderate, with dizziness being the most frequent one.

CONCLUSION

Overall, retention rate and effectiveness at 12 months were significantly higher in patients taking PER as a first add-on than as a late add-on, and the tolerability of PER did not differ significantly between groups. PER demonstrated high effectiveness in patients with FBTCS, even as a late add-on treatment.

Pharmacological Activity of Pyrazole Derivatives as an Anticonvulsant for Benefit against Epilepsy

INTRODUCTION

Pediatric patients with epilepsy are prone to cognitive impairments during growth and long-term use of most antiepileptic drugs (AED). The affected children do not respond to conventional AED and may require novel drugs to manage the disease. Valproic acid, a first-line drug to treat epilepsy, is associated with serious side effects, which precludes its wider use. Thus, in the present study, we intended to develop novel substituted pyrazoles.

METHODS

The molecules were tested for anticonvulsive activity in Swiss albino mice via maximal electroshock seizure and subcutaneous pentylenetetrazole assays. The most potent molecule among the class was further assayed for its effect on behavioral and CNS depressant activity. The effect of the most potent compounds was also analyzed on various indices of oxidative stress and inflammation in mice.

RESULTS

The designed compounds showed significant anticonvulsive activity in mice revealing 7h as the most potent anticonvulsive agent. The most potent anticonvulsant molecule 7h further showed no behavioral alteration and considerable CNS depressant activity. It also reduces the level of oxidative stress and inflammation in the mice.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated utility of pyrazole derivatives as anticonvulsants against epilepsy.

The Pharmacology and Clinical Efficacy of Antiseizure Medications: From Bromide Salts to Cenobamate and Beyond

Epilepsy is one of the most common and disabling chronic neurological disorders. Antiseizure medications (ASMs), previously referred to as anticonvulsant or antiepileptic drugs, are the mainstay of symptomatic epilepsy treatment. Epilepsy is a multifaceted complex disease and so is its treatment. Currently, about 30 ASMs are available for epilepsy therapy. Furthermore, several ASMs are approved therapies in nonepileptic conditions, including neuropathic pain, migraine, bipolar disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder. Because of this wide spectrum of therapeutic activity, ASMs are among the most often prescribed centrally active agents. Most ASMs act by modulation of voltage-gated ion channels; by enhancement of gamma aminobutyric acid-mediated inhibition; through interactions with elements of the synaptic release machinery; by blockade of ionotropic glutamate receptors; or by combinations of these mechanisms. Because of differences in their mechanisms of action, most ASMs do not suppress all types of seizures, so appropriate treatment choices are important. The goal of epilepsy therapy is the complete elimination of seizures; however, this is not achievable in about one-third of patients. Both in vivo and in vitro models of seizures and epilepsy are used to discover ASMs that are more effective in patients with continued drug-resistant seizures. Furthermore, therapies that are specific to epilepsy etiology are being developed. Currently, ~ 30 new compounds with diverse antiseizure mechanisms are in the preclinical or clinical drug development pipeline. Moreover, therapies with potential antiepileptogenic or disease-modifying effects are in preclinical and clinical development. Overall, the world of epilepsy therapy development is changing and evolving in many exciting and important ways. However, while new epilepsy therapies are developed, knowledge of the pharmacokinetics, antiseizure efficacy and spectrum, and adverse effect profiles of currently used ASMs is an essential component of treating epilepsy successfully and maintaining a high quality of life for every patient, particularly those receiving polypharmacy for drug-resistant seizures.

Polygonogram with isobolographic synergy for three-drug combinations of phenobarbital with second-generation antiepileptic drugs in the tonic-clonic seizure model in mice

Background

Combination therapy consisting of two or more antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) is usually prescribed for patients with refractory epilepsy. The drug–drug interactions, which may occur among currently available AEDs, are the principal criterion taken by physicians when prescribing the AED combination to the patients. Unfortunately, the number of possible three-drug combinations tremendously increases along with the clinical approval of novel AEDs.

Aim

To isobolographically characterize three-drug interactions of phenobarbital (PB) with lamotrigine (LTG), oxcarbazepine (OXC), pregabalin (PGB) and topiramate (TPM), the maximal electroshock-induced (MES) seizure model was used in male albino Swiss mice.

Materials and method

The MES-induced seizures in mice were generated by alternating current delivered via auricular electrodes. To classify interactions for 6 various three-drug combinations of AEDs (i.e., PB + TPM + PGB, PB + OXC + TPM, PB + LTG + TPM, PB + OXC + PGB, PB + LTG + PGB and PB + LTG + OXC), the type I isobolographic analysis was used. Total brain concentrations of PB were measured by fluorescent polarization immunoassay technique.

Results

The three-drug mixtures of PB + TPM + PGB, PB + OXC + TPM, PB + LTG + TPM, PB + OXC + PGB, PB + LTG + PGB and PB + LTG + OXC protected the male albino Swiss mice from MES-induced seizures. All the observed interactions in this seizure model were supra-additive (synergistic) (p < 0.001), except for the combination of PB + LTG + OXC, which was additive. It was unable to show the impact of the studied second-generation AEDs on total brain content of PB in mice.

Conclusions

The synergistic interactions among PB and LTG, OXC, PGB and TPM in the mouse MES model are worthy of being transferred to clinical trials, especially for the patients with drug resistant epilepsy, who would benefit these treatment options.

Study on the mechanism of high-frequency stimulation inhibiting low-Mg2+-induced epileptiform discharges in juvenile rat hippocampal slices

Study on the mechanism of high-frequency stimulation inhibiting low-Mg²⁺-induced epileptiform discharges in juvenile rat hippocampal slices High-frequency stimulation (HFS) has been demonstrated to be an effective treatment for inhibiting epilepsy in some clinical and laboratory studies. However, the mechanisms underlying the therapeutic effects of HFS are not yet fully understood. In our present study, epileptiform discharges (EDs) in acutely isolated hippocampal slices of male Sprague-Dawley (SD) juvenile rats induced by low-Mg²⁺ artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF), and electrical stimulation (square wave, 900 pulses, 50 % duty-cycle, 130 Hz) was performed on the CA3 using concentric bipolar electrodes. EDs of neurons in hippocampal were recorded by multi-electrode arrays (MEA). After stable EDs events had been recorded for at least 20 min, HFS was added, followed by 10 μmol/L gamma-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA_A) receptors blocker bicuculline (BIC). The results show that the HFS can increase the discharges frequency of inter-ictal discharges (IIDs) and decrease the duration of ictal discharges (IDs). However, the HFS had no effect on the slices with 10 μmol/L BIC. These results indicated that the GABA_A receptors are activated when HFS inhibited EDs, thereby achieving the inhibition of low-Mg²⁺-induced EDs in slices.

The patterns of response of 11 regimens for infantile spasms

Infantile spasms (ISs) is a devastating form of an early infantile epileptic encephalopathy. The patterns of response of multiple regimens, and the difference in response rates for the cases who receive first-line therapies on time versus those who receive them after non-first-line therapies are unknown. We performed a study involving 314 ISs cases aiming to investigate the patterns of response of 11 regimens, and the difference in response rates for the cases received first-line therapies as first two regimens versus those who received other drugs prior to first-line options. As a result, the efficacy of each regimen was: the foremost two regimens; 36.99%, third; 10.27%, fourth; 6.16%, fifth; 5.48%, and from the sixth regimen onwards, each additional regimen added ≤ 2% probability of seizure freedom. There was a statistically significant difference in seizure freedom rates between cases received first-line therapies as first or second regimen versus those who received them later. Our study revealed for the first time that in ISs cases, seizure freedom is likely to be observed within the first five regimens, and an early administration of first-line therapies is superior to non-first-line options. These results will aid in management of ISs cases.

Sub-additive (antagonistic) interaction of lacosamide with lamotrigine and valproate in the maximal electroshock-induced seizure model in mice: an isobolographic analysis

BACKGROUND

Launching polytherapy with two or three antiseizure drugs (ASDs) in patients with epilepsy is still problematic. The choice of ASDs to combine them together is usually based on clinicians' experience and it requires knowledge about mechanisms of action of the studied ASDs and their drug-drug interactions, whose nature may be favorable, neutral or unfavorable. To characterize three-drug interaction among lacosamide (LCM), lamotrigine (LTG) and valproate (VPA), the type I isobolographic analysis was used. The antiseizure effects of three-drug combination were analyzed in a model of maximal electroshock-induced seizures (MES) in albino Swiss mice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The seizure activity in mice was evoked by alternating current stimulation (25 mA, 500 V, 50 Hz, 0.2 s). Both, the type I isobolographic analysis and the test of parallelism of dose-response effects of the ASDs were used so as to properly classify interaction among three ASDs, administered in a fixed ratio combination of 1:1:1.

RESULTS

The three-drug mixture of LCM, LTG and VPA at the fixed ratio of 1:1:1 protected the experimental mice from MES-induced seizures; however, the reported interaction was sub-additive (antagonistic; p < 0.01) with isobolography.

CONCLUSION

The antagonistic pharmacodynamic interaction among LCM, LTG and VPA in the MES test in mice cannot be transferred to clinical settings and this unfavorable combination should not be recommended for patients with epilepsy.

Treatment of epilepsy in adults: Expert opinion in South Korea

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to gather the expert opinions of Korean epileptologists regarding the treatment of adult patients with epilepsy.

METHODS

A total of 42 neurologists who specialized in epilepsy were surveyed. They completed an online questionnaire describing multiple patient scenarios. Using these scenarios, they evaluated treatment strategies and gave their preference for specific antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) used to treat genetically mediated generalized epilepsy and focal epilepsy.

RESULTS

Initial AED monotherapy, followed by a second form of alternative monotherapy or an add-on combination therapy, was the preferred treatment strategy. The experts reached consensus for 87.2% of the items. The most commonly selected AEDs for the initial monotherapy for patients with generalized epilepsy were levetiracetam or valproate. For those with focal epilepsy, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, or lamotrigine were the most popular selections. Ethosuximide was the treatment of choice only for patients with generalized epilepsy with prominent absence seizures. Levetiracetam was preferred as an add-on therapy for both generalized and focal epilepsy. For special populations of patients, such as elderly adults or those with comorbid diseases, levetiracetam or lamotrigine was selected as the treatment of choice.

CONCLUSION

Most of the survey results were in accordance with the US expert opinion survey published in 2016. This survey can assist clinicians in making clinical decisions when treating individual adult patients with epilepsy.

Pharmacodynamic interactions of antiepileptic drugs: From bench to clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Approximately 50% of patients do not achieve seizure control with antiepileptic drug (AED) monotherapy, and polytherapy, with more than one AED, is often required. To date, no evidence-based criteria on how to combine AEDs exist.

OBJECTIVE

This narrative review aimed to provide critical findings of the available literature about the role of pharmacodynamic AEDs' interactions in patients whose epilepsies were treated with polytherapy.

METHODS

Electronic databases, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE) and Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE), were systematically searched to identify relevant studies on pharmacodynamic AEDs' interactions in patients with epilepsy.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Most data on AED combinations are coming from animal models and preclinical studies. Combining AEDs with different mechanisms of actions seems to have greater effectiveness and lower risk of adverse event development. Conversely, the combination of AEDs may cause pharmacodynamic synergistic effects that may result in not only increased efficacy but also more adverse effects. Despite some AED associations that have been proven to be effective in specific epilepsy/seizure type (e.g., phenobarbital+/phenytoin for tonic seizures and ethosiximide + valproate for absences; lamotrigine + valproate for various epilepsy/seizure types), no clear and definitive evidence exists about AED combinations in humans. Examples of pharmacodynamic interactions that possibly explain the synergistic effects on efficacy or adverse effects include the combination between vigabatrin or pregabalin and sodium channel blockers (supra-additive antiseizure effect) and lacosamide combined with other sodium channel blockers (infra-additive antiseizure effect and neurotoxicity synergistic). The pharmacodynamic lamotrigine-valproate interaction is also supported by synergistic adverse events. Therefore, well-designed double-blind prospective studies recruiting a sufficient number of patients possibly with a crossover design and carefully ascertain the role of pharmacokinetic interactions and variations of AEDs' levels in the blood are needed.

Mechanisms of action of currently used antiseizure drugs

Antiseizure drugs (ASDs) prevent the occurrence of seizures; there is no evidence that they have disease-modifying properties. In the more than 160 years that orally administered ASDs have been available for epilepsy therapy, most agents entering clinical practice were either discovered serendipitously or with the use of animal seizure models. The ASDs originating from these approaches act on brain excitability mechanisms to interfere with the generation and spread of epileptic hyperexcitability, but they do not address the specific defects that are pathogenic in the epilepsies for which they are prescribed, which in most cases are not well understood. There are four broad classes of such ASD mechanisms: (1) modulation of voltage-gated sodium channels (e.g. phenytoin, carbamazepine, lamotrigine), voltage-gated calcium channels (e.g. ethosuximide), and voltage-gated potassium channels [e.g. retigabine (ezogabine)]; (2) enhancement of GABA-mediated inhibitory neurotransmission (e.g. benzodiazepines, tiagabine, vigabatrin); (3) attenuation of glutamate-mediated excitatory neurotransmission (e.g. perampanel); and (4) modulation of neurotransmitter release via a presynaptic action (e.g. levetiracetam, brivaracetam, gabapentin, pregabalin). In the past two decades there has been great progress in identifying the pathophysiological mechanisms of many genetic epilepsies. Given this new understanding, attempts are being made to engineer specific small molecule, antisense and gene therapies that functionally reverse or structurally correct pathogenic defects in epilepsy syndromes. In the near future, these new therapies will begin a paradigm shift in the treatment of some rare genetic epilepsy syndromes, but targeted therapies will remain elusive for the vast majority of epilepsies until their causes are identified. This article is part of the special issue entitled 'New Epilepsy Therapies for the 21st Century - From Antiseizure Drugs to Prevention, Modification and Cure of Epilepsy'.

The role of polytherapy in the management of epilepsy: suggestions for rational antiepileptic drug selection

Introduction: Antiepileptic polytherapy may be indicated in patients experiencing drug-resistant epilepsy. To date, there are no evidence-based criteria on how to combine different antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) together, in order to obtain the best therapeutic response.Areas covered: This paper reviews the available data about the various associations of AEDs in patients undergoing polytherapy, focusing on the most effective and well-tolerated polytherapies. Moreover, some controversial aspects of this topic are addressed.Expert opinion: Nowadays, there are no guidelines on polytherapy in patients with epilepsy; thus, the management of pharmacoresistant epilepsy is still uncertain, except for valproate/lamotrigine combination, which seems to be the only one recommended. Data regarding mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, tolerability, and, more importantly, the analysis of the valuable clinical studies of drug combinations can help physicians to choose the best and most effective AED association for each patient.

Isobolographic Analysis of Antiseizure Activity of the GABA Type A Receptor-Modulating Synthetic Neurosteroids Brexanolone and Ganaxolone with Tiagabine and Midazolam

Epilepsy is often treated with a combination of antiepileptic drugs. Although neurosteroids are potent anticonvulsants, little is known about their combination potential for the treatment of refractory epilepsy. Here, we investigated the combination efficacy of neurosteroids allopregnanolone (AP, brexanolone) and ganaxolone (GX) with the GABA-reuptake inhibitor tiagabine (TG) or the benzodiazepine midazolam (MDZ) on tonic inhibition in dentate gyrus granule cells and seizure protection in the hippocampus kindling and 6-Hz seizure models. Isobolographic analysis indicated that combinations of GX and TG or AP and TG at three standard ratios (1:1, 3:1, and 1:3) displayed significant synergism in augmenting tonic inhibition. In pharmacological studies, GX, AP, and TG produced dose-dependent antiseizure effects in mice (ED₅₀ = 1.46, 4.20, and 0.20 mg/kg, respectively). The combination of GX and TG at the fixed ratio of 1:1 exerted the greatest combination index (CI = 0.53), indicating strong synergistic interaction in seizure protection. In addition, combination regimens of AP and TG showed robust synergism for seizure protection (CI = 0.4). Finally, combination regimens of GX and MDZ elicited synergistic (CI = 0.6) responses for seizure protection. These results demonstrate striking synergism of neurosteroids and TG combination for seizure protection, likely because of their effects at extrasynaptic GABA type A (GABA-A) receptors from TG-induced elevation in GABA levels. Superadditive antiseizure activity of neurosteroid-MDZ combinations may stem from their actions at both synaptic and extrasynaptic GABA-A receptors. Together, these findings provide a potential mechanistic basis for combination potential of neurosteroids with TG or benzodiazepines for the management of refractory epilepsy, status epilepticus, and seizure disorders. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This paper investigates for the first time the potential synergistic interactions between two neurosteroids with anticonvulsant properties, allopregnanolone (brexanolone) and the very similar synthetic analog, ganaxolone, and two conventional antiepileptic drugs active at GABA type A receptors: the GABA-reuptake inhibitor tiagabine and a benzodiazepine, midazolam. The results demonstrate a synergistic protective effect of neurosteroid-tiagabine combinations, as well as neurosteroid-midazolam regimens in seizure models.

Treatment Outcomes in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Epilepsy Treated With Established and New Antiepileptic Drugs: A 30-Year Longitudinal Cohort Study

Importance

A study published in 2000 showed that more than one-third of adults with epilepsy have inadequate control of seizures with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). This study evaluates overall treatment outcomes in light of the introduction of more than 1 dozen new AEDs in the past 2 decades.

Objective

To assess long-term treatment outcome in patients with newly diagnosed and treated epilepsy.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This longitudinal observational cohort study was conducted at the Epilepsy Unit of the Western Infirmary in Glasgow, Scotland. A total of 1795 individuals who were newly treated for epilepsy with AEDs between July 1, 1982, and October 31, 2012, were included in this analysis. All patients were followed up for a minimum of 2 years (until October 31, 2014) or until death, whichever came sooner. Data analysis was completed between March 2015 and May 2016.

Exposures

Treatment with antiepileptic drugs for patients newly diagnosed with epilepsy.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Seizure control was assessed at the end of the study period. Probability of achieving 1-year seizure freedom was estimated for each AED regimen prescribed. Multivariable models assessed the associations between risk factors and AED treatment outcome after adjustments were made for demographic and clinical characteristics.

Results

Of the 1795 included patients, 964 (53.7%) were male; the median age was 33 years (range, 9-93 years). At the end of the study period, 1144 patients (63.7%) had been seizure free for the previous year or longer. Among those achieving 1-year seizure freedom, 993 (86.8%) were taking monotherapy and 1028 (89.9%) had achieved seizure control with the first or second AED regimens. Of the total patient pool, 906 (50.5%) remained seizure free for 1 year or longer with the initial AED. If this AED failed, the second and third regimens provided an additional 11.6% and 4.4% likelihoods of seizure freedom, respectively. Only 2.12% of patients attained optimal seizure control with subsequent AEDs. Epilepsy that was not successfully controlled with the first AED had 1.73 times greater odds of not responding to treatment for each subsequent medication regimen (odds ratio, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.56-1.91; P < .001).

Conclusions and Relevance

Despite the availability of many new AEDs with differing mechanisms of action, overall outcomes in newly diagnosed epilepsy have not improved. Most patients who attain control do so with the first or second AED. The probability of achieving seizure freedom diminishes substantially with each subsequent AED regimen tried. More than one-third of patients experience epilepsy that remains uncontrolled.

Clinical opinion: Earlier employment of polytherapy in sequential pharmacotherapy of epilepsy

Modern pharmacotherapy for epilepsy consists of orderly, sequential drug trials, in which antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are chosen under the concept of individual patient-oriented (or - tailored) pharmacotherapy. Although monotherapy has been established as the preferred mode of AEDs therapy in both newly diagnosed and drug resistant epilepsies, there are still lack of evidence to favor either monotherapy or polytherapy in epilepsy, which has generated continuing controversies on the preferred mode of pharmacotherapy. However, each mode of pharmacotherapy may have both advantages and disadvantages, which are different and variable related to individual case scenario. We conducted a brief comparative overview between monotherapy and polytherapy to provide clues for earlier employment of polytherapy in each steps of sequential drug trials. Previous claims about the advantages of monotherapy over polytherapy are not supported but gradually losing its ground by the introduction of a large number of drugs carrying pharmacological advantages for combination therapy. Current evidence stresses the importance of combining drugs having synergistic interactions for better outcome of polytherapy, which has not been considered in previous clinical investigations comparing monotherapy and polytherapy. It is likely that a significant improvement in the outcome of current AEDs therapy is feasible by earlier employment of polytherapy as well as identification of combination drug regimens carrying synergistic interactions. At present, lamotrigine(LTG) and valproate(VPA) combination regimen is the only well documented synergistic regimen, but there are a long-list of candidate regimens requiring future trials in appropriate designs.

Brivaracetam efficacy and safety in focal epilepsy

Introduction: Brivaracetam (BRV) is an analog of levetiracetam (LEV) with 15-30 times greater affinity to SV2A and greater brain permeability than LEV. These properties have stimulated interest in its clinical trial data and post-marketing experience. Areas covered: The authors provide a background on epilepsy and its treatment, discuss the racetam family of antiepileptic drugs to which BRV belongs, and then discuss BRV properties and its efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of epilepsy. Expert opinion: While preclinical data suggest a broad spectrum of efficacy, BRV is only approved for focal epilepsy. The recommended starting dose is 100 mg per day, but in the absence of urgency, it may be prudent to start at 50 mg per day, considered the lowest effective dose. There was no added benefit when BRV was used adjunctively with LEV in clinical trials. However, post-marketing data suggest that some patients may experience improved seizure control when switching from LEV. Behavioral adverse effects seemed less common than with LEV, and most patients switched to BRV after experiencing behavioral adverse effects on LEV reported improvement. Prior or anticipated intolerability to LEV is the strongest indication for BRV in clinical practice.

Effect of newer anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) on the cognitive status in pentylenetetrazol induced seizures in a zebrafish model

Epilepsy is marked by seizures that are a manifestation of excessive brain activity and is symptomatically treatable by anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs). Unfortunately, the older AEDs have many side effects, with cognitive impairment being a major side effect that affects the daily lives of people with epilepsy. Thus, this study aimed to determine if newer AEDs (Zonisamide, Levetiracetam, Perampanel, Lamotrigine and Valproic Acid) also cause cognitive impairment, using a zebrafish model. Acute seizures were induced in zebrafish using pentylenetetrazol (PTZ) and cognitive function was assessed using the T-maze test of learning and memory. Neurotransmitter and gene expression levels related to epilepsy as well as learning and memory were also studied to provide a better understanding of the underlying processes. Ultimately, impaired cognitive function was seen in AED treated zebrafish, regardless of whether seizures were induced. A highly significant decrease in γ-Aminobutyric Acid (GABA) and glutamate levels was also discovered, although acetylcholine levels were more variable. The gene expression levels of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF), Neuropeptide Y (NPY) and Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate (CAMP) Responsive Element Binding Protein 1 (CREB-1) were not found to be significantly different in AED treated zebrafish. Based on the experimental results, a decrease in brain glutamate levels due to AED treatment appears to be at least one of the major factors behind the observed cognitive impairment in the treated zebrafish.

New derivative of 1,2,4-triazole-3-thione (TP427) potentiates the anticonvulsant action of valproate, but not that of carbamazepine, phenytoin or phenobarbital in the mouse tonic-clonic seizure model

BACKGROUND

To assess the effects of 5-(3-chlorobenzyl)-4-hexyl-2,4-dihydro-3H-1,2,4-triazole-3-thione (TP427) on the protective anticonvulsant action of four classical antiepileptic drugs (carbamazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin and valproate) in the tonic-clonic seizure model in mice, an isobolographic transformation of data was used.

METHODS

Electrically-induced tonic-clonic seizures were experimentally evoked in adult male albino Swiss mice. The anticonvulsant effects of TP427, when used singly, were determined by the calculation of the threshold increasing the dose by 20% (TID₂₀ value). The influence of TP427 on the anticonvulsant potency of four various classical antiepileptic drugs was determined with a subthreshold method. Types of interactions between drugs were determined using the isobolographic transformation of data. Additionally, total brain antiepileptic drug concentrations were measured.

RESULTS

TP427, when administered separately, significantly increased the threshold for electroconvulsions. The experimentally determined TID₂₀ value for TP427 was 11.71 mg/kg. Moreover, TP427 (10 mg/kg) significantly increased the anticonvulsant activity of valproate (p <  0.01), but not that of carbamazepine, phenobarbital or phenytoin in the mouse tonic-clonic seizure model. Isobolographic transformation of data confirmed that the interaction between TP427 and valproate was synergistic. Pharmacokinetic study revealed that TP427 increased total brain valproate concentrations, and had no impact on total brain concentrations of carbamazepine, phenobarbital or phenytoin in mice.

CONCLUSION

The synergistic interaction between TP427 and valproate in the mouse tonic-clonic seizure model might occur favorable for epilepsy patients in future. The combinations of TP427 with carbamazepine, phenobarbital and phenytoin were additive in the mouse tonic-clonic seizure model and also deserves clinical attention.

Comparative effectiveness of add-on therapy with newer-generation antiepileptic drugs in Bulgarian patients with refractory epilepsy

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study is to perform an open, prospective study on various aspects of comparative effectiveness of newer-generation antiepileptic drugs as add-on therapy in Bulgarian patients with drug-resistant epilepsy.

METHODS

The study was performed with the participation of 1259 patients with epilepsy who attended the Clinic of Neurology at the University Hospital in Plovdiv, Bulgaria for regular visits and completed diaries about seizure frequency, severity, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Oxcarbazepine was used in 82 patients, topiramate in 120 patients, lamotrigine in 73 patients, levetiracetam in 135 patients, pregabalin in 47 patients, tiagabine in 43 patients, gabapentin in 18 patients, lacosamide in 12 patients, and retigabine in 6 patients. During the first 24 months of study, improvement of seizure severity and frequency was most frequent in patients on treatment with pregabalin and levetiracetam and rarest in those on treatment with oxcarbazepine. The retention rate of patients on pregabalin and tiagabine was significantly lower compared to the retention rate of patients on most of the other antiepileptic drugs. The frequency of adverse events was higher in patients on treatment with tiagabine and pregabalin.

CONCLUSION

Despite some similar characteristics of newer-generation antiepileptic drugs' effectiveness, levetiracetam stands out with better dynamic improvement of seizure severity and frequency and satisfactory tolerability; typical for pregabalin is a very good dynamic improvement of seizure severity and frequency mainly in patients with focal seizures, but a lower tolerability, and the main advantage of oxcarbazepine is a good tolerability, efficacy, however, is less satisfactory.

Paediatric antiepileptic polytherapy: systematic review of efficacy and neurobehavioural effects and a tertiary centre experience

AIM

This paper presents the prevalence of antiepileptic polytherapy at a single tertiary institution and systematically reviews the evidence base for its efficacy and neurobehavioural safety in children.

METHOD

Prevalence of antiepileptic polypharmacy was determined from pharmacy dispensing records at a paediatric tertiary hospital and neurobehavioural comorbidities quantified through casenote review; comparison is made with studies evaluating the neurobehavioural safety of antiepileptic polytherapy, identified via systematic literature review.

RESULTS

Amongst 262 patients at the hospital, 117 (44.7%) were prescribed polytherapy; with patients having an intellectual disability statistically more likely to be prescribed polytherapy than those without (70.5% vs 40.6%; p < 0.0001). Systematic review identified no trials addressing the efficacy or neurobehavioural outcomes of polytherapy as a primary outcome. Several observational studies identified associations between polytherapy and neurobehavioural adverse outcomes such as anxiety and behavioural disturbance. Observational studies also suggest that a reduction in polytherapy load is generally not associated with worsening seizure control.

CONCLUSION

Whilst antiepileptic polytherapy is common practice within paediatric epilepsy cohorts attending tertiary care institutions, evidence is lacking to support its efficacy. There are significant practical difficulties to undertaking randomised controlled trials within this population. Nonetheless, clinicians must consider that adverse neurobehavioural consequences of polytherapy might outweigh benefits to seizure control.

Combination of phenobarbital with phenytoin and pregabalin produces synergy in the mouse tonic-clonic seizure model: An isobolographic analysis

AIMS

Despite many antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are available to treat epilepsy, there is still about 30% of epilepsy patients inadequately treated with these AEDs. For these patients, polytherapy with two or three AEDs to fully control their seizure attacks is recommended. Unfortunately, polytherapy is always associated with drug interactions, whose nature may be beneficial, neutral or unfavorable. To determine a type of interaction for the combination of three AEDs (i.e., phenobarbital [PB], phenytoin [PHT] and pregabalin [PGB]) at the fixed-ratio of 1:1:1, we used a model of tonic-clonic seizures in male albino Swiss mice.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

Tonic-clonic seizures in mice were evoked by a current (sine-wave, 25 mA, 500 V, 0.2 s stimulus duration) delivered via auricular electrodes. The anticonvulsant effects of the three-drug combination (PB, PHT and PGB) in terms of suppression of tonic-clonic seizures in mice were assessed with type I isobolographic analysis. Potential acute side effects for the mixture of PB, PHT and PGB along with total brain concentrations of the AEDs were determined to confirm pharmacodynamic nature of observed interaction.

RESULTS

The three-drug combination of PB, PHT and PGB (at the fixed-ratio of 1:1:1) exerted synergistic interaction (at P < 0.01) in the mouse model of tonic-clonic seizures. The combination of PB, PHT and PGB did not produce any side effects in experimental animals, when measuring long-term memory, muscular strength and motor coordination. The measurement of total brain concentrations of PB, PHT and PGB was conducted to confirm that none of the three AEDs significantly influenced total brain concentrations (pharmacokinetic profiles) of the other co-administered AEDs in mice.

CONCLUSIONS

The synergistic pharmacodynamic interaction for the combination of PB, PHT and PGB observed in this preclinical study can be translated into clinical settings and this favorable AED combination is worthy of being recommended to some patients with refractory epilepsy.

Antiepileptic drugs in critically ill patients

BACKGROUND

The incidence of seizures in intensive care units ranges from 3.3% to 34%. It is therefore often necessary to initiate or continue anticonvulsant drugs in this setting. When a new anticonvulsant is initiated, drug factors, such as onset of action and side effects, and patient factors, such as age, renal, and hepatic function, should be taken into account. It is important to note that the altered physiology of critically ill patients as well as pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions such as renal replacement therapy, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and target temperature management may lead to therapeutic failure or toxicity. This may be even more challenging with the availability of newer antiepileptics where the evidence for their use in critically ill patients is limited.

MAIN BODY

This article reviews the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antiepileptics as well as application of these principles when dosing antiepileptics and monitoring serum levels in critically ill patients. The selection of the most appropriate anticonvulsant to treat seizure and status epileptics as well as the prophylactic use of these agents in this setting are also discussed. Drug-drug interactions and the effect of nonpharmacological interventions such as renal replacement therapy, plasma exchange, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation on anticonvulsant removal are also included.

CONCLUSION

Optimal management of antiepileptic drugs in the intensive care unit is challenging given altered physiology, polypharmacy, and nonpharmacological interventions, and requires a multidisciplinary approach where appropriate and timely assessment, diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring plans are in place.

Adverse effects & drug load of antiepileptic drugs in patients with epilepsy: Monotherapy versus polytherapy

Background & objectives:

Although the need for a combination of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in the treatment of epilepsy is well justified, but an associated increase in adverse effects (AEs) lends a restriction to polytherapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate AEs and drug load (prescribed daily dose/defined daily doses) of AEDs in patients with epilepsy (PWE).

Methods:

Consecutive PWEs attending Epilepsy clinic in a tertiary care hospital in New Delhi, India, were enrolled in the study. Demographic variables, such as age, gender, diagnosis, age at onset of seizures, frequency of seizures, use of all AEDs and adverse event profile (AEP) score were noted. Routine laboratory tests including lipid profile, fasting blood glucose, haematological parameters and liver and kidney function tests were done.

Results:

A total of 697 consecutive patients were included in this study. Of them, 64.4 per cent were male; mean age was 29.6 ± 10.6 yr. Generalized seizures and focal seizures were recorded in n=386 (55.4%) and n=311 (44.6%), respectively. Monotherapy and polytherapy with two and greater than or equal to three AEDs were prescribed in 264 (37.9%), 243 (34.9%) and 190 (27.2%) patients, respectively. The average AED load, duration of treatment as well as AEP score were found to be significantly higher in combination of greater than or equal to three AEDs as compared to both monotherapy and combination of two AEDs, whereas no significant difference was observed between monotherapy and combination of two AEDs. Patients on monotherapy were in good control of seizures as compared to polytherapy. There was no significant change in biochemical parameters between the groups.

Interpretation & conclusions:

Polytherapy with combination of greater than or equal to three AEDs was associated with higher AEs and lower seizure control as compared to both monotherapy and combination of two AEDs. AEs did not correlate with AED load, seizure type, gender and age of the patients but were associated with both numbers of AEDs as well as seizure frequency in PWE.

New prospects of mesenchymal stem cells for ameliorating temporal lobe epilepsy

Temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) is present in 30% of epileptic patients and does not respond to conventional treatments. Bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) induce endogenous neural stem cells, inhibit neurodegeneration, and promote brain self-repair mechanisms. The present study addresses the feasibility of BMSCs transplantation against pilocarpine-induced TLE experimentally. BMSCs were injected either intravenously (IV) or in hippocampus bilaterally (IC). Increased cell count of BMSCs was achieved via IC route. BMSCs treatment ameliorated the pilocarpine-induced neurochemical and histological changes, retained amino acid neurotransmitters to the normal level, downregulated the immunoreactivity to insulin growth factor-1 receptor, synaptophysin, and caspase-3 and reduced oxidative insult and inflammatory markers detected in epileptic model. It is worth noting that BMSCs IC-administered showed more pronounced effects than those administered via IV route. BMSCs transplantation presents a promise for TLE treatment that has to be elucidated clinically.