Coronary artery vasculopathy in pediatric cardiac transplant patients: the therapeutic potential of immunomodulators

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy: A review

BACKGROUND

Heart transplantation has become the standard of care for pediatric patients with end-stage heart disease, and outcomes have consistently improved over the last few decades. CAV, however, remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in heart transplantation and is the leading cause of death beyond 3 years post-transplantation. We sought out to provide an in-depth overview of CAV in the pediatric heart transplant population.

METHODS

Database searches were conducted in both Medline and Embase on the topic of cardiac vasculopathy in pediatric heart transplant recipients. The search used five broad concept terms: heart transplant; pediatric; CAV; diagnosis, prognosis, and risk factors; and guidelines and reviews. References were captured if there was at least one term in each of the concepts. The search was limited to articles in the English language.

RESULTS

A total of 148 articles were identified via the literature search with further articles identified via review of references. Pediatric data regarding the etiology and development of CAV remain limited although knowledge about the immune and non-immune factors playing a role are increasing. CAV continues to be difficult to detect with many invasive and non-invasive methods available, yet their effectiveness in the detection of CAV remains suboptimal. There remains no proven medical intervention to treat or reverse established CAV disease, and CAV is associated with high rates of graft loss once detected. However, several medications are used in hopes of preventing, slowing progression, or modifying the outcomes.

CONCLUSION

This review provides a comprehensive overview of CAV, discusses its clinical presentation, risk factors, diagnostic tools used to identify CAV in the pediatric population, and highlights the current therapeutic options and the need for ongoing research.

The importance of cardiovascular disease in pediatric transplantation and its link to the kidneys

Cardiovascular disease is a frequent cause of morbidity and mortality in pediatric patients following solid organ transplant. CKD is also common in pediatric patients after a solid organ transplant, and the link between CKD and cardiovascular morbidity is strong. In this review, we examine potential etiologies to explain the risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in pediatric solid organ recipients and identify targets for improving outcomes.

Longitudinal Strain and Strain Rate Abnormalities Precede Invasive Diagnosis of Transplant Coronary Artery Vasculopathy in Pediatric Cardiac Transplant Patients

Transplant coronary artery vasculopathy (TCAV) is the primary cause of late graft loss in pediatric heart transplant recipients. TCAV is diagnosed using angiography or intravascular ultrasound; however, noninvasive methods remain elusive. We sought to define patterns of myocardial mechanics in patients with TCAV and to determine whether this can detect TCAV before invasive methods. In this retrospective study, we queried our heart transplant database to identify all recipients with TCAV since 2006 (n = 41). Echoes were reviewed from the last normal catheterization and at TCAV diagnosis, and from time-matched transplant controls (n = 33) without TCAV. Peak global circumferential and longitudinal strain and systolic and diastolic strain rate (SSR and DSR) of the left ventricle were derived using velocity vector imaging. T tests were used to compare both groups longitudinally and between groups at both time points. Longitudinal strain, SSR, and DSR were diminished in the TCAV group compared to the transplant control group at both time points. No differences were found across time points in either group. Retrospective modeling using a longitudinal strain cutoff of 15 % on echoes 2 years prior to TCAV diagnosis predicted development or exclusion of TCAV with sensitivity of 53 %, specificity of 89 % with an area under the curve of 0.8. Decreases in longitudinal strain measurements demonstrate that alterations in myocardial mechanics occur in patients with TCAV at least 2 years prior to invasive diagnosis. These early changes may be due to microvascular disease. This modality could aid in earlier treatment and intervention for this challenging problem .

Pediatric cardiac retransplant: differing patterns of primary graft failure by age at first transplant

OBJECTIVE

This study compared graft failure leading to retransplant in infants versus older children at initial heart transplant.

METHODS

Twenty-six retransplant recipients were compared by age at first transplant: infant group (<1 year) and pediatric group (≥1 year).

RESULTS

Early retransplant survival was 92%. Retransplant survivals at 1, 3, and 5 years were 83%, 74%, and 67%. There were 15 infant and 11 pediatric patients. First transplant ages were 0.4 ± 0.3 vs. 8.5 ± 5.7 years in infant and pediatric groups, respectively (P < .01). First graft rejection episodes were more common in pediatric group (4.8 ± 2.5 vs 3.1 ± 2.1, P = .032), and rejection rate was higher (1.5 ± 1.1 vs 0.4 ± 0.4, P = .0024). Median first graft survival was longer in infant group (10.7 years vs 3.9 years, P < .001). Recurrent cellular rejection was retransplant indication in 40% of infant group versus 91% of pediatric group (P < .05). Cardiac allograft vasculopathy was more prevalent in infant group (73% vs 20% in pediatric group, P = .032).

CONCLUSIONS

Infant heart transplant recipients had longer primary graft survival, fewer cellular rejection episodes, and higher incidence of cardiac allograft vasculopathy relative to older graft recipients requiring retransplant. Advantages in adaptive immunity in infant heart recipients confer improved primary graft survival, but longer graft life in these patients is limited by cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Older recipient first graft failure was rejection related, and shorter graft life probably limited development of cardiac allograft vasculopathy.

Coronary flow reserve measurement detects transplant coronary artery disease in pediatric heart transplant patients

BACKGROUND

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) in patients who have undergone heart transplantation leads to graft dysfunction and is still the major concern for long-term survival. Evaluation of coronary flow velocity reserve (CFR) has been established for diagnosis of CAV. Systemic application of adenosine vs intracoronary testing for CFR has been validated in adults; however, its accuracy in pediatric patients has not yet been proven.

METHODS

CFR was prospectively measured in 33 clinically asymptomatic pediatric heart transplant recipients. CFR measurements were made in the left anterior descending (LAD) artery using a 0.014-inch Doppler FloWire (Cardiometrics). CFR was defined as the ratio of hyperemic (after adenosine injection) to basal (before adenosine) average peak velocity (APV). Adenosine (Adrekar) was administered by intracoronary (15 or 30 mug bolus) and systemic (0.1 mg/kg) injection in each patient. Epicardial CAV was evaluated in coronary angiograms (Stanford criteria) and microvasculopathy was diagnosed in endomyocardial biopsies (evidence of luminal stenosis) blinded to clinical data.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients were included in this study. Their median age (range) was 11.9 (1.4 to 17) years and median post-transplant time 4.3 (1 to 11.7) years. Seventeen of the 33 patients had epicardial CAV (mainly peripheral obliterations or B1 and B2 lesions) and microvascular CAV. Epicardial CAV only was found in 4 patients and microvasculopathy only was present in only 1 patient. CFR was significantly reduced in patients with epicardial CAV and microvasculopathy when compared with patients without any signs of CAV: 206 +/- 53 vs 276 +/- 39 (p < 0.001) for the systemic application and 213 +/- 50 vs 271 +/- 45 (p = 0.004) for the intracoronary application.

CONCLUSIONS

CFR and coronary vasoreactivity to adenosine are decreased in pediatric patients with CAV and correlate with histopathologic and angiographic evidence of microvascular disease. Measurement of CFR with intracoronary and systemic application of adenosine is comparable, while systemic application is necessary for non-invasive measurement of CFR in pediatric patients.

Cardiac retransplantation in children

To discuss the indications for and outcomes of cardiac retransplantation in childhood. The major challenge of pediatric heart transplantation is graft failure. The major causes of graft failure include coronary allograft vasculopathy and chronic rejection. Retransplantation may be considered in children or young adults who develop graft failure following pediatric heart transplantation. Retransplantation now accounts for 7% of all pediatric transplants. Recent studies have demonstrated that cardiac retransplantation has a poorer outcome than primary heart transplantation. However, the interval from primary transplant to retransplantation appears to impact significantly the success of retransplantation. When children undergo retransplantation for early graft failure, the survival is quite poor and the appropriateness of this strategy is questionable. However, children who undergo retransplantation many years after primary transplantation have outcomes that are similar to primary transplantation. The decision to pursue retransplantation depends on the severity of graft failure and recent data suggest that identification of mild graft dysfunction or coronary allograft vasculopathy does not imply impending graft failure. Novel therapies to extend the life of the primary graft and to stratify those at risk of severe graft dysfunction will improve the allocation of scarce organs for pediatric patients who might be candidates for cardiac retransplantation. Retransplantation can extend the lives of children who develop graft failure after primary transplantation. However, not all patients who develop graft dysfunction should necessarily be listed for retransplantation.

Initial data on basiliximab in critically ill children undergoing heart transplantation

BACKGROUND

More children are coming to heart transplantation on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), or inotropic support and/or with renal impairment. The use of basiliximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody against CD25 (interleukin 2 receptor alfa) has not been previously reported in critically ill pediatric heart transplant recipients. Basiliximab has potential advantages in the treatment of patients with renal impairment.

METHODS

Basiliximab was provided to 29 patients (median age 7.8 years; range 0.4-16 years) on ECMO, with renal impairment or receiving intravenous inotropes at transplantation. Children normally received 2 doses on Day 0 and Day 4 after transplantation. Calcineurin inhibitor was provided in low dose or withheld altogether in patients with renal impairment. Flow cytometry was used to monitor CD25.

RESULTS

At transplantation, 11 patients were prescribed cyclosporine; the remaining 18 received tacrolimus. All but 4 patients had subtherapeutic levels of calcineurin inhibitor in the first postoperative week. Excluding these 4, there were 19 patients who had more than 4 consecutive doses of calcineurin inhibitor canceled in the first week (median 8 doses; range 3-40 doses). A total of 71 surveillance biopsies were performed, and 4 episodes of severe acute rejection occurred in the first 6 months. In all but one child, the glomerular filtration rate had returned to, or improved on baseline measurement by 1 month after transplantation. Infections rates were low and acceptable. CD25 was undetectable at first assessment, and in all but 1 patient (on ECMO) for at least 2 to 3 weeks thereafter. There were no adverse effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Basiliximab was well tolerated in this group of very ill children. In children with pre- or postoperative renal dysfunction, where doses of calcineurin inhibitor were low or canceled, basiliximab was associated with a low incidence of rejection. Posttransplant ECMO may reduce the efficacy of basiliximab. These preliminary results are encouraging and now need confirmation in a large, randomized trial.

Cardiac retransplantation in childhood: Analysis of data from the United Network for Organ Sharing

OBJECTIVE

For children in whom graft failure develops after cardiac transplantation, retransplantation is often considered. Although some centers have reported equivalent results for retransplantation as for primary transplantation, this strategy remains controversial. We sought to examine outcomes after retransplantation in children and to identify risk factors for mortality.

METHODS

United Network for Organ Sharing records of heart transplantation for subjects younger than 18 years from 1987 to 2004 were reviewed. Indications for retransplantation and patient characteristics were evaluated. Analysis was performed with proportional hazards regression, controlling for other potential risk factors.

RESULTS

Among the 4227 pediatric heart transplants, there were 219 retransplants. The most common indication for retransplantation was coronary allograft vasculopathy (51%). The mean interval from initial heart transplant to retransplantation was 4.7 +/- 3.8 years. Forty-two retransplants (19%) were performed within 180 days of primary transplantation. Survivals at 1, 5, and 10 years after retransplantation were 79%, 53%, and 44%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, retransplantation was associated with significantly higher mortality than primary transplantation (odds ratio 1.67, 95% confidence interval 1.32-2.12, P < .001). Patients who underwent retransplantation within 180 days of primary transplantation had a significantly lower 1-year survival than did other retransplant recipients (53% vs 86%, respectively, P < .02). Subjects who required mechanical ventilation before retransplantation also had poorer survival (P < .03).

CONCLUSION

Survival after cardiac retransplantation in children is inferior to that after primary transplantation. Although results are acceptable, the impact of retransplantation on the availability of donor hearts requires further consideration.

Neointimal Inflammation and Adventitial Angiogenesis Correlate With Severity of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy in Pediatric Recipients

BACKGROUND

Chronic inflammation and angiogenesis have been implicated in the pathogenesis of both cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) and age-related vasculopathy. Because concurrent atherosclerosis does not complicate assessment of CAV in children, we sought to characterize the spectrum of coronary lesions in this population and determine whether inflammatory infiltrates and angiogenesis correlate with severity of CAV.

METHODS

In 18 pediatric heart specimens CAV was graded 1 to 4 (none to severe). Each case was assigned to either: Group I, no inflammation; Group II, perivascular inflammation; or Group III, perivascular and neointimal inflammation. Inflammatory infiltrates were immunophenotyped using anti-CD3, anti-CD20 and HAM 56. Angiogenesis was assessed by determining microvascular density (MVD) in 5 high-power fields (HPFs) per section.

RESULTS

CAV was evident in 94% of cases, and inflammation in 61%. Cases with neointimal inflammation had significantly more severe CAV compared with cases without inflammation (2.7 +/- 0.16 vs 1.9 +/- 0.2, p = 0.002). MVD was significantly higher in both inflammation groups (Groups II and III) compared with Group I (4.1 +/- 0.5 per HPF and 5.9 +/- 0.5 vs 3.1 +/- 0.7, p = 0.018 and p = 0.002) and correlated with the degree of CAV (p = 0.007). The perivascular infiltrates (Group II, n = 5) contained lymphocytes, macrophages and plasma cells, and 67% of neointimal infiltrates (Group III, n = 6) also contained eosinophils.

CONCLUSIONS

CAV in children is more common than previously reported. Our data indicate that CAV is often associated with inflammation and that adventitial angiogenesis correlated with the severity of CAV.

Transplantation immunology 2003: simplified approach

Transplantation has been performed clinically for four decades and has become the standard of care for end-stage organ failure. Understanding of the immunobiology of transplantation has made tremendous advances, but knowledge still lags behind the clinical use. As a result, nonspecific immunosuppression remains the standard therapy. This article presents an overview of current knowledge of the immunobiology of solid organ transplantation, with emphasis on T-cell activation (antigen presentation, CoS) and cellular allograft (transplantation) immunity. The molecular events of T-cell activation, with some emphasis on the sites of action of modern immunosuppression, are reviewed. A simplified approach to understanding the immunobiology and strategy of maintenance immunosuppression is discussed. Key early and late steps in T-cell activation and the sites of action of immunosuppressive agents are reviewed. The required cellular interactions for the alloresponse and the targets of biologic agents used in transplants are reviewed. Special considerations for the immunology in neonates, infants, and children as recipients are provided. Understanding the immunobiology of transplantation is key to making decisions about children with transplants, developing better protocols, and creating tolerance in the future.