Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction from a Single-center Experience in Tokyo

Multifaceted Impact of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic on ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI): A Literature Review of Incidence, Treatment Modalities, and Outcomes

The global repercussions of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) include substantial worldwide mortality and have brought to light existing gaps in healthcare systems. Particularly, diseases requiring time-sensitive treatment, such as ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), have faced significant challenges due to the impact and revelations of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare infrastructure. This review addresses the impact of the pandemic on STEMI, exploring incidence, treatment modalities, and clinical outcomes. Through a critical examination of existing literature, the intricate relationship between the pandemic and cardiovascular health, specifically STEMI, is elucidated. The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on the management of STEMI, with changes in hospitalization rates, treatment strategies, and the presentation of the disease posing significant challenges. The contradictory results of COVID-19 and post-vaccine myocardial infarction, as well as gender differences in reported cases, highlight the need for further research to clarify these relationships.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Long-Term Prognosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Japan

Background During the early phase of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, a global reduction in hospitalizations for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) was observed. Generally, patients experienced increased severity of AMI with delays in time from symptom onset to treatment during the pandemic. However, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on in-hospital mortality among patients with AMI remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the long-term prognosis of patients with AMI during the COVID-19 pandemic to that observed in the pre-pandemic period and to evaluate the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on the prognosis of patients with AMI. Methods We reviewed the data of patients admitted to our hospital for AMI treatment between April 1, 2018, and March 31, 2021. The time from admission to major adverse cardiac events (MACE), as well as the time from admission to all-cause death, were examined between the pandemic period (April 1, 2020, to March 31, 2021) and the pre-pandemic period (April 1, 2018, to March 31, 2020). Results Eighty patients were included in the study, and those admitted during the pandemic exhibited a higher likelihood of advanced age, lower levels of LDL-cholesterol, and a reduced prevalence of hypertension. The 2.5-year MACE-free survival and overall survival rates between the patients during the pre-pandemic and pandemic periods were not significantly different. Conclusion The long-term prognosis of patients with AMI during the COVID-19 pandemic remains unclear. In this study, we reported that the 2.5-year MACE-free survival and overall survival rates of the patients with AMI admitted during the COVID-19 pandemic were not significantly different from those during the pre-pandemic period. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the prognosis of patients with AMI appears to vary according to the study population.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on incidence and mortality of emergency cardiovascular diseases in Tokyo

BACKGROUND

The impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the incidence and in-hospital mortality of emergency cardiovascular disease (CVD) has not been clarified in Japan.

METHODS

We compared the number of admissions and in-hospital mortality for emergency CVD during the pandemic (from January to December 2020) with those of pre-pandemic periods (from January 2018 to December 2019), using quarterly data from the Tokyo Cardiovascular Care Unit Network. The incidence rate in 2020 is compared with the average incidence rate observed in the same quarter of 2018 and 2019 and is presented as an incidence rate ratio (IRR) with 95 % confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

The number of admissions for acute myocardial infarction during the pandemic was significantly lower than before the pandemic, with an IRR of 0.93 (95 % CI; 0.88-0.98). Similarly, the IRR for unstable angina was 0.78 (95 % CI; 0.72-0.83), for acute heart failure was 0.84 (95 % CI; 0.76-0.91), for acute aortic dissection was 0.88 (95 % CI; 0.78-0.98), and for ruptured aortic aneurysm was 0.75 (95 % CI; 0.62-0.88). In quarterly comparisons, the numbers of acute aortic diseases and emergency arrhythmia significantly decreased from July to September 2020, while those of other emergency CVDs significantly declined in the 2020 April-June period, which includes the first wave period in Japan. In-hospital mortality of emergency CVDs was unchanged from the pre-pandemic period, except for acute aortic dissection, which increased in odds ratio of 1.31 (95 % CI 1.10-1.57).

CONCLUSIONS

The COVID-19 pandemic significantly reduced the number of admissions for all emergency CVDs in all or part of the year. In-hospital mortality was unchanged from the pre-pandemic period, except for acute aortic dissection, which increased.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the hospitalizations, time course, presenting symptoms, and mid-term outcomes in patients with myocardial infarctions in a Japanese multi-center registry

To investigate the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on myocardial infarctions (MIs), consecutive MI patients were retrospectively reviewed in a multi-center registry. The patient characteristics and 180-day mortality for both ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions (STEMIs) and non-STEMIs (NSTEMIs) in the after-pandemic period (7 April 2020-6 April 2021) were compared to the pre-pandemic period (7 April 2019-6 April 2020). Inpatients with MIs, STEMIs, and NSTEMIs decreased by 9.5%, 12.5%, and 4.1% in the after-pandemic period. The type of the presenting symptoms (as classified as typical symptoms, atypical symptoms, and out-of-hospital cardiac arrests [OHCAs]) did not differ between the two time periods for both STEMIs and NSTEMIs, while the rate of OHCAs was numerically higher in the after-pandemic period for the STEMIs (12.1% vs. 8.0%, p = 0.30). The symptom-to-admission time (STAT) did not differ between the two time periods for both STEMIs and NSTEMIs, but the door-to-balloon time (DTBT) for STEMIs was significantly longer in the after-pandemic period (83.0 [67.0-100.7] min vs. 70.0 [59.0-88.7] min, p = 0.004). The 180-day mortality did not significantly differ between the two time periods for both STEMIs (15.9% vs. 11.4%, p = 0.14) and NSTEMIs (9.9% vs. 8.0%, p = 0.59). In conclusion, hospitalizations for MIs decreased after the COVID-19 pandemic. Although the DTBTs were significantly longer in the after-pandemic period, the mid-term outcomes for MIs were preserved.

Impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the diagnosis of neck and low back pain in outpatient practices in Germany

Little is known about how COVID-19 has impacted the diagnosis of neck and low back pain in outpatient practices in Germany. Thus, this study aimed to compare the number of new diagnoses of neck and low back pain in German general and orthopedic practices between 2020 and 2021 and 2019. This retrospective study included patients aged ≥ 18 years with at least one visit to one of 915 general and 145 orthopedic practices in Germany in March - December 2019 (N = 2,842,145), March - December 2020 (N = 2,810,179), or March - December 2021 (N = 3,214,419). The number of patients newly diagnosed with neck and low back pain per general and orthopedic practice was compared between March - December 2020 and March - December 2019, and between March - December 2021 and March - December 2019 using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Analyses were conducted in general and orthopedic practices separately and were also stratified by sex and age. There was a decrease in new diagnoses of neck and low back pain in general and orthopedic practices between 2020 and 2019, and between 2021 and 2019. This decrease reached statistical significance for neck pain in general practices in 2020 (-12.4 %) and 2021 (-6.1 %), and for low back pain in general practices in 2020 (-9.3 %). Similar findings were obtained in sex- and age-stratified analyses. The COVID-19 pandemic had a negative impact on the diagnosis of neck and low back pain in general and orthopedic practices in Germany. More data from other settings and countries are warranted to confirm or refute these results.

COVID's Impact on Non-communicable Diseases: What We Do Not Know May Hurt Us

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this review, we outline the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on non-communicable diseases around the world.

RECENT FINDINGS

The mechanisms of COVID-19's impact on non-communicable diseases are both direct and indirect. The direct mechanisms include direct vascular and myocardial injury as well as pancreatic injury increasing incidence of new-onset diabetes. Indirect effects of the pandemic on non-communicable disease include delayed presentation for acute illness including STEMI and the impact of social distancing and quarantine policies on socialization, mental health, physical activity, and the downstream health impacts of inactivity and deconditioning. International focus has been on disease variants, infection control and management, healthcare system, and resource utilization and infection incidence. However, the impact of this pandemic on non-communicable diseases has been largely overlooked but will manifest itself in the coming years to decades.

Cardiovascular considerations during the COVID-19 pandemic: A focused review for practice in Japan

The COVID-19 pandemic is continuing to have drastic consequences for patients, healthcare workers, and the health system. Its cardiovascular implications have been well described in previous studies, but original reports from Japan are sparse. Validating overseas findings in the Japanese clinical settings is crucial to improve local COVID-19 care and to clarify the pandemic's impacts in the country. This review of available literature demonstrates that in Japanese patients and clinical settings too, there is a close relationship between COVID-19 and the cardiovascular system including cardiovascular complications. On the contrary, secondary effects on cardiovascular practice including service disruptions, telemedicine, and epidemiological changes in Japan have been relatively small.

Comparison of door-to-balloon time and in-hospital outcomes in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction between before versus after COVID-19 pandemic

The situation around primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has dramatically changed since coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on clinical outcomes as well as door-to-balloon time (DTBT), which is known as one of the indicators of early reperfusion, has not been fully investigated in patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI). The purpose of this study was to compare DTBT and in-hospital outcomes in patients with STEMI between before versus after COVID-19 pandemic. The primary interest was DTBT and the incidence of in-hospital outcomes including in-hospital death. We included 330 patients with STEMI who underwent primary PCI, and divided them into the pre COVID-19 group (n = 209) and the post COVID-19 group (n = 121). DTBT was significantly longer in the post COVID-19 group than in the pre COVID-19 group (p < 0.001), whereas the incidence of in-hospital death was comparable between the 2 groups (p = 0.238). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, chest CT before primary PCI (OR 4.64, 95% CI 2.58-8.34, p < 0.001) was significantly associated with long DTBT, whereas chest CT before primary PCI (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.29-1.97, p = 0.570) was not associated with in-hospital death after controlling confounding factors. In conclusion, although DTBT was significantly longer after COVID-19 pandemic than before COVID-19 pandemic, in-hospital outcomes were comparable between before versus after COVID-19 pandemic. This study suggests the validity of the screening tests including chest CT for COVID-19 in patients with STEMI who undergo primary PCI.