1
|
Clausen J, Boesen V, Gögenur I, Watt T. A Content Framework of a Novel Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Detecting Early Adverse Events After Major Abdominal Surgery. World J Surg 2023; 47:2676-2687. [PMID: 37610468 PMCID: PMC10545596 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-023-07143-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Systematic health monitoring with patient-reported outcome instruments may predict post-discharge complications after major surgery. The objective of this study was to conceptualize a novel patient-reported outcome instrument for detecting early adverse events within two weeks of discharge after major emergency abdominal surgery and colorectal cancer surgery. METHODS This study was conducted in two phases. (1) An exhaustive health concept pool was generated using systematic content analysis of existing patient-reported outcome measures (N = 31) and semi-structured interviews of readmitted patients (N = 49) and health professionals (N = 10). Concepts were categorized into three major domains: 'Symptoms,' 'functional status,' and 'general health perception.' We calculated the frequency of each health concept as the proportion of patients, who experienced the respective concept prior to readmission. (2) Colorectal cancer surgeons (N = 13) and emergency general surgeons (N = 12) rated the relevance of each health concept (1 = irrelevant, 5 = very relevant) in the context of detecting post-discharge adverse events. We selected concepts with either a high mean relevance score (≥ 4) or a combination of moderate mean relevance score and high patient-reported frequency (≥ 3 and ≥ 20% or ≥ 2.5 and ≥ 50%, respectively). RESULTS Content analysis of existing items with additions from patients and experts resulted in 58 health concepts, of which the majority were distinct symptoms (N = 40). The selection procedure resulted in 29 patient-reported health concepts relevant for detecting adverse events after discharge. CONCLUSION The outlined framework provides content validity for future patient-reported outcome instruments detecting adverse events in the early post-discharge period after major emergency abdominal surgery and colorectal cancer surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johan Clausen
- Center for Surgical Science, Surgical Department, Zealand's University Hospital, Lykkebaekvej 1, 4600, Koege, Denmark.
| | - Victor Boesen
- Department of Endocrinology, Gentofte and Herlev Hospital, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Ismail Gögenur
- Center for Surgical Science, Surgical Department, Zealand's University Hospital, Lykkebaekvej 1, 4600, Koege, Denmark
| | - Torquil Watt
- Department of Endocrinology, Gentofte and Herlev Hospital, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hjollund NHI, Larsen LP, de Thurah AL, Grove BE, Skuladottir H, Linnet H, Friis RB, Johnsen SP, May O, Jensen AL, Hansen TK, Taarnhøj GA, Tolstrup LK, Pappot H, Ivarsen P, Dørflinger L, Jessen A, Sørensen NT, Schougaard LMV, Team TA. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measurements in chronic and malignant diseases: ten years' experience with PRO-algorithm-based patient-clinician interaction (telePRO) in AmbuFlex. Qual Life Res 2023; 32:1053-1067. [PMID: 36639598 PMCID: PMC10063508 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-022-03322-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-reported Outcome (PRO) measures may be used as the basis for out-patient follow-up instead of fixed appointments. The patients attend follow-up from home by filling in questionnaires developed for that specific aim and patient group (telePRO). The questionnaires are handled in real time by a specific algorithm, which assigns an outcome color reflecting clinical need. The specific questionnaires and algorithms (named solutions) are constructed in a consensus process with clinicians. We aimed to describe AmbuFlex' telePRO solutions and the algorithm outcomes and variation between patient groups, and to discuss possible applications and challenges. METHODS TelePRO solutions with more than 100 processed questionnaires were included in the analysis. Data were retrieved together with data from national registers. Characteristics of patients, questionnaires and outcomes were tabulated for each solution. Graphs were constructed depicting the overall and within-patient distribution of algorithm outcomes for each solution. RESULTS From 2011 to 2021, 29 specific telePRO solutions were implemented within 24 different ICD-10 groups. A total of 42,015 patients were referred and answered 171,268 questionnaires. An existing applicable instrument with cut-off values was available for four solutions, whereas items were selected or developed ad hoc for the other solutions. Mean age ranged from 10.7 (Pain in children) to 73.3 years (chronic kidney disease). Mortality among referred patients varied between 0 (obesity, asthma, endometriosis and pain in children) and 528 per 1000 patient years (Lung cancer). There was substantial variation in algorithm outcome across patient groups while different solutions within the same patient group varied little. DISCUSSION TelePRO can be applied in diseases where PRO can reflect clinical status and needs. Questionnaires and algorithms should be adapted for the specific patient groups and clinical aims. When PRO is used as replacement for clinical contact, special carefulness should be observed with respect to patient safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niels Henrik I Hjollund
- AmbuFlex - Center for Patient-Reported Outcomes, Central Denmark Region, Gødstrup Hospital, Herning, Denmark.
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
| | - Louise Pape Larsen
- AmbuFlex - Center for Patient-Reported Outcomes, Central Denmark Region, Gødstrup Hospital, Herning, Denmark
| | | | - Birgith Engelst Grove
- AmbuFlex - Center for Patient-Reported Outcomes, Central Denmark Region, Gødstrup Hospital, Herning, Denmark
| | | | - Hanne Linnet
- Department of Oncology, Gødstrup Hospital, Herning, Denmark
| | | | - Søren Paaske Johnsen
- Danish Center for Clinical Health Services Research, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Ole May
- Department of Medicine, Gødstrup Hospital, Herning, Denmark
| | | | | | - Gry Assam Taarnhøj
- Department of Oncology, University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lærke Kjær Tolstrup
- Department of Oncology, University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Helle Pappot
- Department of Oncology, University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Per Ivarsen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Renal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Anne Jessen
- AmbuFlex - Center for Patient-Reported Outcomes, Central Denmark Region, Gødstrup Hospital, Herning, Denmark
| | - Nanna Toxvig Sørensen
- AmbuFlex - Center for Patient-Reported Outcomes, Central Denmark Region, Gødstrup Hospital, Herning, Denmark
| | - Liv Marit Valen Schougaard
- AmbuFlex - Center for Patient-Reported Outcomes, Central Denmark Region, Gødstrup Hospital, Herning, Denmark
| | - The AmbuFlex Team
- AmbuFlex - Center for Patient-Reported Outcomes, Central Denmark Region, Gødstrup Hospital, Herning, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tommel J, Evers AWM, van Hamersvelt HW, van Dijk S, Chavannes NH, Wirken L, Hilbrands LB, van Middendorp H. E-HEalth treatment in Long-term Dialysis (E-HELD): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluating personalized Internet-based cognitive-behavioral therapy in dialysis patients. Trials 2022; 23:477. [PMID: 35672832 PMCID: PMC9172166 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06392-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2022] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Kidney failure and dialysis treatment have a large impact on a patient’s life. Patients experience numerous, complex symptoms and usually have multiple comorbid conditions. Despite the multitude of problems, patients often have priorities for improvement of specific aspects of their functioning, which would be helpful for clinicians to become informed of. This highlights a clear need for patient-centered care in this particular patient group, with routine screening as a vital element to timely recognize symptoms and tailored treatment to match individual patients’ needs and priorities. By also providing feedback on patient’s screening results to the patient itself, the patient is empowered to actively take control in one’s mostly uncontrollable disease process. The current paper describes the study design of a multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of the “E-HEealth treatment in Long-term Dialysis” (E-HELD) intervention. This therapist-guided Internet-based cognitive-behavioral therapy (ICBT) intervention is focused on and personalized to the myriad of problems that dialysis patients experience and prioritize. Methods After a screening procedure on adjustment problems, 130 eligible dialysis patients will be randomized to care as usual or the E-HELD intervention. Patients will complete questionnaires on distress (primary outcome measure), several domains of functioning (e.g., physical, psychological, social), potential predictors and mediators of treatment success, and the cost-effectiveness of the intervention, at baseline, 6-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up. In addition, to take account of the personalized character of the intervention, the Personalized Priority and Progress Questionnaire (PPPQ) will be administered which is a personalized instrument to identify, prioritize, and monitor individual problems over time. Discussion The present study design will provide insight in the effectiveness of tailored ICBT in patients with kidney failure who are treated with dialysis. When proven effective, the screening procedure and the subsequent ICBT intervention could be implemented in routine care to detect, support, and treat patients struggling with adjustment problems. Trial registration NL63422.058.17 [Registry ID: METC-LDD] NL7160 [Netherlands Trial Register; registered on 16 July 2018]
Collapse
|
4
|
Kujala S, Hörhammer I. Health Care Professionals' Experiences of Web-Based Symptom Checkers for Triage: Cross-sectional Survey Study. J Med Internet Res 2022; 24:e33505. [PMID: 35511254 PMCID: PMC9121216 DOI: 10.2196/33505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2021] [Revised: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Web-based symptom checkers are promising tools that provide help to patients seeking guidance on health problems. Many health organizations have started using them to enhance triage. Patients use the symptom checker to report their symptoms online and submit the report to the health care center through the system. Health care professionals (registered nurse, practical nurse, general physician, physiotherapist, etc) receive patient inquiries with urgency rating, decide on actions to be taken, and communicate these to the patients. The success of the adoption, however, depends on whether the tools can efficiently support health care professionals’ workflow and achieve their support. Objective This study explores the factors influencing health care professionals’ support for a web-based symptom checker for triage. Methods Data were collected through a web-based survey of 639 health care professionals using either of the two most used web-based symptom checkers in the Finnish public primary care. Linear regression models were fitted to study the associations between the study variables and health care professionals’ support for the symptom checkers. In addition, the health care professionals’ comments collected via survey were qualitatively analyzed to elicit additional insights about the benefits and challenges of the clinical use of symptom checkers. Results Results show that the perceived beneficial influence of the symptom checkers on health care professionals’ work and the perceived usability of the tools were positively associated with professionals’ support. The perceived benefits to patients and organizational support for use were positively associated, and threat to professionals’ autonomy was negatively associated with health care professionals’ support. These associations were, however, not independent of other factors included in the models. The influences on professionals’ work were both positive and negative; the tools streamlined work by providing preliminary information on patients and reduced the number of phone calls, but they also created extra work as the professionals needed to call patients and ask clarifying questions. Managing time between the use of symptom checkers and other tasks was also challenging. Meanwhile, according to health care professionals’ experience, the symptom checkers benefited patients as they received help quickly with a lower threshold for care. Conclusions The efficient use of symptom checkers for triage requires usable solutions that support health care professionals’ work. High-quality information about the patients’ conditions and an efficient way of communicating with patients are needed. Using a new eHealth tool also requires that health organizations and teams reorganize their workflows and work distributions to support clinical processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sari Kujala
- Department of Computer Science, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland
| | - Iiris Hörhammer
- Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Velikova G, Absolom K, Hewison J, Holch P, Warrington L, Avery K, Richards H, Blazeby J, Dawkins B, Hulme C, Carter R, Glidewell L, Henry A, Franks K, Hall G, Davidson S, Henry K, Morris C, Conner M, McParland L, Walker K, Hudson E, Brown J. Electronic self-reporting of adverse events for patients undergoing cancer treatment: the eRAPID research programme including two RCTs. PROGRAMME GRANTS FOR APPLIED RESEARCH 2022. [DOI: 10.3310/fdde8516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Background
Cancer is treated using multiple modalities (e.g. surgery, radiotherapy and systemic therapies) and is frequently associated with adverse events that affect treatment delivery and quality of life. Regular adverse event reporting could improve care and safety through timely detection and management. Information technology provides a feasible monitoring model, but applied research is needed. This research programme developed and evaluated an electronic system, called eRAPID, for cancer patients to remotely self-report adverse events.
Objectives
The objectives were to address the following research questions: is it feasible to collect adverse event data from patients’ homes and in clinics during cancer treatment? Can eRAPID be implemented in different hospitals and treatment settings? Will oncology health-care professionals review eRAPID reports for decision-making? When added to usual care, will the eRAPID intervention (i.e. self-reporting with tailored advice) lead to clinical benefits (e.g. better adverse event control, improved patient safety and experiences)? Will eRAPID be cost-effective?
Design
Five mixed-methods work packages were conducted, incorporating co-design with patients and health-care professionals: work package 1 – development and implementation of the electronic platform across hospital centres; work package 2 – development of patient-reported adverse event items and advice (systematic and scoping reviews, patient interviews, Delphi exercise); work package 3 – mapping health-care professionals and care pathways; work package 4 – feasibility pilot studies to assess patient and clinician acceptability; and work package 5 – a single-centre randomised controlled trial of systemic treatment with a full health economic assessment.
Setting
The setting was three UK cancer centres (in Leeds, Manchester and Bristol).
Participants
The intervention was developed and evaluated with patients and clinicians. The systemic randomised controlled trial included 508 participants who were starting treatment for breast, colorectal or gynaecological cancer and 55 health-care professionals. The radiotherapy feasibility pilot recruited 167 patients undergoing treatment for pelvic cancers. The surgical feasibility pilot included 40 gastrointestinal cancer patients.
Intervention
eRAPID is an online system that allows patients to complete adverse event/symptom reports from home or hospital. The system provides immediate severity-graded advice based on clinical algorithms to guide self-management or hospital contact. Adverse event data are transferred to electronic patient records for review by clinical teams. Patients complete an online symptom report every week and whenever they experience symptoms.
Main outcome measures
In systemic treatment, the primary outcome was Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – General, Physical Well-Being score assessed at 6, 12 and 18 weeks (primary end point). Secondary outcomes included cost-effectiveness assessed through the comparison of health-care costs and quality-adjusted life-years. Patient self-efficacy was measured (using the Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Diseases 6-item Scale). The radiotherapy pilot studied feasibility (recruitment and attrition rates) and selection of outcome measures. The surgical pilot examined symptom report completeness, system actions, barriers to using eRAPID and technical performance.
Results
eRAPID was successfully developed and introduced across the treatments and centres. The systemic randomised controlled trial found no statistically significant effect of eRAPID on the primary end point at 18 weeks. There was a significant effect at 6 weeks (adjusted difference least square means 1.08, 95% confidence interval 0.12 to 2.05; p = 0.028) and 12 weeks (adjusted difference least square means 1.01, 95% confidence interval 0.05 to 1.98; p = 0.0395). No between-arm differences were found for admissions or calls/visits to acute oncology or chemotherapy delivery. Health economic analyses over 18 weeks indicated no statistically significant difference between the cost of the eRAPID information technology system and the cost of usual care (£12.28, 95% confidence interval –£1240.91 to £1167.69; p > 0.05). Mean differences were small, with eRAPID having a 55% probability of being cost-effective at the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence-recommended cost-effectiveness threshold of £20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. Patient self-efficacy was greater in the intervention arm (0.48, 95% confidence interval 0.13 to 0.83; p = 0.0073). Qualitative interviews indicated that many participants found eRAPID useful for support and guidance. Patient adherence to adverse-event symptom reporting was good (median compliance 72.2%). In the radiotherapy pilot, high levels of consent (73.2%) and low attrition rates (10%) were observed. Patient quality-of-life outcomes indicated a potential intervention benefit in chemoradiotherapy arms. In the surgical pilot, 40 out of 91 approached patients (44%) consented. Symptom report completion rates were high. Across the studies, clinician intervention engagement was varied. Both patient and staff feedback on the value of eRAPID was positive.
Limitations
The randomised controlled trial methodology led to small numbers of patients simultaneously using the intervention, thus reducing overall clinician exposure to and engagement with eRAPID. Furthermore, staff saw patients across both arms, introducing a contamination bias and potentially reducing the intervention effect. The health economic results were limited by numbers of missing data (e.g. for use of resources and EuroQol-5 Dimensions).
Conclusions
This research provides evidence that online symptom monitoring with inbuilt patient advice is acceptable to patients and clinical teams. Evidence of patient benefit was found, particularly during the early phases of treatment and in relation to self-efficacy. The findings will help improve the intervention and guide future trial designs.
Future work
Definitive trials in radiotherapy and surgical settings are suggested. Future research during systemic treatments could study self-report online interventions to replace elements of traditional follow-up care in the curative setting. Further research during modern targeted treatments (e.g. immunotherapy and small-molecule oral therapy) and in metastatic disease is recommended.
Trial registration
The systemic randomised controlled trial is registered as ISRCTN88520246. The radiotherapy trial is registered as ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02747264.
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Programme Grants for Applied Research programme and will be published in full in Programme Grants for Applied Research; Vol. 10, No. 1. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Galina Velikova
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James’s, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Kate Absolom
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James’s, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Jenny Hewison
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Patricia Holch
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James’s, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Psychology Group, School of Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK
| | - Lorraine Warrington
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James’s, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Kerry Avery
- Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Hollie Richards
- Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Jane Blazeby
- Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Bryony Dawkins
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Claire Hulme
- Health Economics Group, Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Robert Carter
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James’s, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Liz Glidewell
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Ann Henry
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James’s, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Kevin Franks
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James’s, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Geoff Hall
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James’s, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Karen Henry
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Mark Conner
- School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Lucy McParland
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Katrina Walker
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Eleanor Hudson
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Julia Brown
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Seljelid B, Varsi C, Solberg Nes L, Øystese KA, Børøsund E. Feasibility of a Digital Patient–Provider Communication Intervention to Support Shared Decision Making in Chronic Health Care, InvolveMe: A Pilot Study (Preprint). JMIR Form Res 2021; 6:e34738. [PMID: 35389356 PMCID: PMC9030980 DOI: 10.2196/34738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2021] [Revised: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Enhanced communication with health care providers (HCPs) can improve symptom management and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) for patients with chronic health conditions. Access to appropriate communication venues is needed to improve communication, however. As such, digital communication interventions mediated by patient portals carry the potential to support patient-provider communication and interaction and through this, also facilitate shared decision-making (SDM). The InvolveMe intervention was designed to provide patients with the opportunity to communicate symptoms and informational needs prior to consultation via digital assessment, including prioritizing what is most important to discuss with their HCPs, as well as to interact with HCPs through secure messages between outpatient visits. Objective The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of the InvolveMe intervention by investigating acceptability, demand (ie, system use), and limited efficacy. Methods The study was designed as a single-arm, pre-post feasibility study combining quantitative and qualitative methods for data collection. Patients from an endocrine outpatient clinic were invited to use the InvolveMe intervention for 3 months, and HCPs administering InvolveMe were invited to participate in a focus group. Guided by descriptions of how to design feasibility studies by Bowen et al, feasibility was tested by exploring (1) acceptability, using data collected during recruitment from patient participants and nonparticipants (ie, declined to participate or did not meet study requirements), HCP experiences with recruitment, and the System Usability Scale (SUS); (2) demand via exploration of system use through extraction of system log data and HCP experiences with system use; and (3) limited efficacy testing, via exploration of potential effects from the Short-Form Health Survey (RAND 36), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and Health Literacy Questionnaire. Results Patient participants (N=23) were a median 54 (range 26-78) years old and primarily male (14/23, 61%). Nonparticipants (N=16) were a median 73 (range 55-80) years old and primarily male (12/16, 75%). The average SUS score was 72.2, indicating good system usability. Assessments were completed by 8 participants from home prior to outpatient visits. The assessments entailed various bodily symptoms and needs for information. Participants sent 17 secure messages related to patient administrative matters, symptoms, and challenges. Focus group participants (N=4) were all female and registered nurses. Data were analyzed in 2 predefined themes: Acceptability and Demand. Acceptability included the subthemes intervention attractiveness and intervention suitability. Demand included the subthemes elements of SDM and intervention challenges and opportunities. All patient participants completed outcome measures at baseline, and 19 (19/23, 83%) completed outcome measures at 3 months. These preliminary efficacy findings were mixed and inconclusive. Conclusions The study design provided findings from both patient and HCP perspectives and supported feasibility of the InvolveMe intervention. The investigation of acceptability and demand supported the potential for remote SDM mediated by patient portals using assessments and secure messages. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT NCT04218721; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04218721
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Berit Seljelid
- Department of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Cooperation, Patient Education and Equivalent Health Services, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Cecilie Varsi
- Department of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway
| | - Lise Solberg Nes
- Department of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Psychiatry & Psychology, College of Medicine & Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Kristin Astrid Øystese
- Section of Specialized Endocrinology, Department of Endocrinology, Morbid Obesity and Preventive Medicine, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Medical Biochemistry, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Elin Børøsund
- Department of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Nielsen AS, Appel CW, Larsen BF, Kayser L, Hanna L. Patient perspectives on digital patient reported outcomes in routine care of inflammatory bowel disease. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2021; 5:92. [PMID: 34533682 PMCID: PMC8448812 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-021-00366-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2021] [Accepted: 09/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Digital patient reported outcomes are used increasingly in daily care and treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Their purpose includes increased focus on patient wellbeing, reduction in avoidable follow-up consultations and increased patient self-management. However, implementation issues occur and studies indicate patients may have concerns, particularly regarding having fewer face-to-face consultations. This study aims to explore patients’ perspectives of use and non-use of digital patient reported outcomes and to understand the mechanisms underpinning patient reluctance to engage with this health technology. Results Sixteen patients with inflammatory bowel disease at a regional hospital in Denmark were interviewed about their experiences of, and perspectives on, digital patient reported outcomes. A certain level of eHealth literacy was found to be a fundamental condition for use, while other factors were barriers or facilitators for use of digital PROs. Patients’ main concerns were about potential consequences for their care and relationship with the clinic. Most patients in stable remission were satisfied with the hospital being a “life-line” if their symptoms worsened, and perceived digital patient reported outcomes to be an efficient tool to establish that “life-line”. Patients with severe symptoms and a high degree of emotional distress related to their disease valued the potential for digital patient reported outcomes to increase their clinicians’ focus on mental health and extra-intestinal symptoms. Conclusion This study found that if patients had sufficient digital literacy, they perceived digital patient reported outcomes to be a useful replacement for face-to-face consultations. However, they were concerned about digital patient reported outcomes’ effect on the patient–clinician relationship and its ability to detect worsening of symptoms. These concerns may be mitigated by good patient–clinician relationships, and the option for patients to maintain direct telephone contact with their gastroenterology specialist. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41687-021-00366-2. ‘Digital patient reported outcomes’ refer to systems by which health professionals collect health information from patients between consultations, mostly via self-completed online questionnaires. This approach aims to support treatment and disease management, and reduce avoidable face-to-face consultations between doctor and patient. However, patients may have concerns about using digital systems to communicate with their clinicians, particularly regarding having fewer face-to-face consultations. To find out more, we interviewed sixteen patients at an Inflammatory Bowel Disease outpatient clinic in Denmark, where digital Patient Reported Outcomes have been used since 2017. We found out that patients needed to have enough familiarity with technology to be able to use these online systems. Patients were worried about how this new way of communicating with the clinic affected their care and their relationship with their doctors and nurses. People with Inflammatory Bowel Disease can have long periods of time with very little disease activity, and in these stable periods, a lot of patients found that a digital Patient Reported Outcomes system was a good way to stay in touch with the clinic and keep reporting their symptoms online– as long as they still had the possibility of contacting the clinic by telephone if needed. During disease flare-ups, patients believed that digital patient reported outcomes’ could be used to give broader insight into their health situation, and trusted their clinicians to use their self-reported data to improve their care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amalie Søgaard Nielsen
- Section of Health Service Research, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1014, Copenhagen, Denmark. .,School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
| | - Charlotte W Appel
- Diagnostic Centre, University Research Clinic for Innovative Patient Pathways, Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Birgit Furstrand Larsen
- Diagnostic Centre, University Research Clinic for Innovative Patient Pathways, Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Lars Kayser
- Section of Health Service Research, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1014, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lisa Hanna
- School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
van Leeuwen LM, Pronk M, Merkus P, Goverts ST, Terwee CB, Kramer SE. Operationalization of the Brief ICF Core Set for Hearing Loss: An ICF-Based e-Intake Tool in Clinical Otology and Audiology Practice. Ear Hear 2021; 41:1533-1544. [PMID: 33136629 PMCID: PMC7722460 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000000867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2018] [Accepted: 01/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES According to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), functioning reflects the interplay between an individual's body structures and functions, activities, participation, environmental, and personal factors. To be useful in clinical practice, these concepts need to be operationalized into a practical and integral instrument. The Brief ICF Core Set for Hearing Loss (CSHL) provides a minimum standard for the assessment of functioning in adults with hearing loss. The objective of the present study was to operationalize the Brief CSHL into a digital intake tool that could be used in the otology-audiology practice for adults with ear and hearing problems as part of their intake assessment. DESIGN A three-step approach was followed: (1) Selecting and formulating questionnaire items and response formats, using the 27 categories of the Brief CSHL as a basis. Additional categories were selected based on relevant literature and clinical expertise. Items were selected from existing, commonly used disease-specific questionnaires, generic questionnaires, or the WHO's official descriptions of ICF categories. The response format was based on the existing item's response categories or on the ICF qualifiers. (2) Carrying out an expert survey and a pilot study (using the three-step test interview. Relevant stakeholders and patients were asked to comment on the relevance, comprehensiveness, and comprehensibility of the items. Results were discussed in the project group, and items were modified based on consensus. (3) Integration of the intake tool into a computer-based system for use in clinical routine. RESULTS The Brief CSHL was operationalized into 62 items, clustered into six domains: (1) general information, including reason for visit, sociodemographic, and medical background; (2) general body functions; (3) ear and hearing structures and functions; (4) activities and participation (A&P); (5) environmental factors (EF); and (6) personal factors (mastery and coping). Based on stakeholders' responses, the instructions of the items on A&P and EF were adapted. The three-step test interview showed that the tool had sufficient content validity but that some items on EF were redundant. Overall, the stakeholders and patients indicated that the intake tool was relevant and had a logical and clear structure. The tool was integrated in an online portal. CONCLUSIONS In the current study, an ICF-based e-intake tool was developed that aims to screen self-reported functioning problems in adults with an ear/hearing problem. The relevance, comprehensiveness, and comprehensibility of the originally proposed item list was supported, although the stakeholder and patient feedback resulted into some changes of the tool on item-level. Ultimately, the functioning information obtained with the tool could be used to promote patient-centered ear and hearing care taking a biopsychosocial perspective into account.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisette M. van Leeuwen
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ear & Hearing, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marieke Pronk
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ear & Hearing, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Paul Merkus
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ear & Hearing, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - S. Theo Goverts
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ear & Hearing, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Caroline B. Terwee
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Sophia E. Kramer
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ear & Hearing, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Öztürk ES, Kutlutürkan S. The Effect of the Mobile Application-Based Symptom Monitoring Process on the Symptom Control and Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Patients. Semin Oncol Nurs 2021; 37:151161. [PMID: 34088557 DOI: 10.1016/j.soncn.2021.151161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2021] [Revised: 03/25/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy experience many symptoms. This study set out to determine the effect of the mobile application-based symptom monitoring process on symptom control and quality of life in breast cancer patients. DATA SOURCES The research sample consisted of 57 patients who applied to an outpatient chemotherapy unit of a university hospital. The patients in the intervention group reported symptoms starting from the first day when they received chemotherapy with Msemptom and until the 15th day after chemotherapy. After evaluation of the daily symptom reports of the patients, the patients were instructed via text message to report symptoms as moderate, severe, or very severe symptoms. After the application, the median of the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS)-physical subscale score of the patients in the control group was found to be statistically significantly higher than in the intervention group (P = .028). It was also found that after application, the medians of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life (EORTC-QLQC30), symptom scale and nausea-vomiting score (P = .012), QLQ-BR23 Module sexual function (P = .024), and sexual pleasure subscale score (P = .026) were statistically significantly higher than patients in the intervention group. CONCLUSION The process of symptom monitoring with mobile applications is especially effective in controlling physical symptoms. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE It is recommended to expand mobile application-based symptom monitoring process in breast cancer patients and to support the patients in using this application-based process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elif Sözeri Öztürk
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Nursing Department, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Seljelid B, Varsi C, Solberg Nes L, Øystese KA, Børøsund E. A Digital Patient-Provider Communication Intervention (InvolveMe): Qualitative Study on the Implementation Preparation Based on Identified Facilitators and Barriers. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e22399. [PMID: 33830063 PMCID: PMC8294341 DOI: 10.2196/22399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2020] [Revised: 10/09/2020] [Accepted: 03/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Chronic health conditions are affecting an increasing number of individuals, who experience various symptoms that decrease their quality of life. Digital communication interventions that enable patients to report their symptoms have been shown to positively impact chronic disease management by improving access to care, patient-provider communication, clinical outcomes, and health-related quality of life. These interventions have the potential to prepare patients and health care providers (HCPs) before visits and improve patient-provider communication. Despite the recent rapid development and increasing number of digital communication interventions that have shown positive research results, barriers to realizing the benefits offered through these types of interventions still exist. Objective The aim of this study is to prepare for the implementation of a digital patient-provider communication intervention in the daily workflow at 2 outpatient clinics by identifying potential determinants of implementation using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to tailor the use of digital communication intervention to the intended context and identify key aspects for an implementation plan. Methods A combination of focus groups, workshops, and project steering committee meetings was conducted with HCPs (n=14) and patients (n=2) from 2 outpatient clinics at a university hospital. The CFIR was used to guide data collection and analysis. Transcripts, written minutes, and notes were analyzed and coded into 5 CFIR domains using thematic analysis. Results Data were examined and analyzed into 18 CFIR constructs relevant to the study purpose. On the basis of the identified determinants, important intervention tailoring includes adjustments to the digital features and adjustments to fit the clinical workflow and a decision to conduct a future pilot study. Furthermore, it was decided to provide the intervention to patients as early as possible in their disease trajectory, with tailored information about its use. Key aspects for the implementation plan encompassed maintaining the identified engagement and positive attitude, involving key stakeholders in the implementation process, and providing the needed support and training. Conclusions This study offers insight into the involvement of stakeholders in the tailoring and implementation planning of a digital communication intervention in clinical practice. Stakeholder involvement in the identification of implementation facilitators and barriers can contribute to the tailoring of digital communication interventions and how they are used and can also inform systematic and targeted implementation planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Berit Seljelid
- Department of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Cooperation, Patient Education and Equivalent Health Services, CEO's Staff, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Cecilie Varsi
- Department of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway
| | - Lise Solberg Nes
- Department of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Psychiatry & Psychology, College of Medicine & Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Kristin Astrid Øystese
- Section of Specialized Endocrinology, Department of Endocrinology, Morbid Obesity and Preventive Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Medical Biochemistry, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Elin Børøsund
- Department of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Seljelid B, Varsi C, Solberg Nes L, Stenehjem AE, Bollerslev J, Børøsund E. Content and system development of a digital patient-provider communication tool to support shared decision making in chronic health care: InvolveMe. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2020; 20:46. [PMID: 32131808 PMCID: PMC7057594 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-020-1065-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2019] [Accepted: 02/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Chronic conditions present major health problems, affecting an increasing number of individuals who experience a variety of symptoms that impact their health related quality of life. Digital tools can be of support in chronic conditions, potentially improving patient-provider communication, promoting shared decision making for treatment and care, and possibly even improving patient outcomes. This study aimed to develop a digital tool for patient-provider communication in chronic health care settings and describes the data collection and subsequent content and software development of the InvolveMe tool. InvolveMe will provide patients with the opportunity to report symptoms and preferences to their health care providers (HCP), and to use secure messaging to interact with the HCPs. Method The study employed a combination of interviews with patients with chronic conditions and focus groups with HCPs, examining experiences with chronic conditions and the potential use of a digital tool for support. Participants were recruited from two outpatient clinics at a university hospital. Data collected from interviews and focus groups were analysed using thematic analysis. Content and software development was informed by the data collection and by tool development workshops. Results Analyses from interviews with patients (n = 14) and focus groups with HCPs (n = 11) generated three main themes: 1) Making symptoms and challenges visible, 2) Mastering a new life, and 3) Digital opportunities for follow-up. Each main theme generated separate subthemes. Theme 1 and 2 gave input for content development of the symptom and needs assessment part of the tool, while theme 3 provided ideas for the software development of the InvolveMe tool. Tool development workshops with patients (n = 6) and HCPs (n = 6) supplemented the development. Conclusions A digital tool such as InvolveMe has the potential to support shared decision making for patients with chronic health conditions. Through integration with an existing patient portal such a tool can provide opportunities for meaningful interactions and communication between patients and HCP’s, particularly with regards to symptoms, needs and preferences for care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Berit Seljelid
- Department of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Cecilie Varsi
- Department of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Lise Solberg Nes
- Department of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Psychiatry & Psychology, College of Medicine & Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Aud-E Stenehjem
- Department of Nephrology, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jens Bollerslev
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Section of Specialized Endocrinology, Department of Endocrinology, Morbid Obesity and Preventive Medicine, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Elin Børøsund
- Department of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Schougaard LMV, Mejdahl CT, Christensen J, Lomborg K, Maindal HT, de Thurah A, Hjollund NH. Patient-initiated versus fixed-interval patient-reported outcome-based follow-up in outpatients with epilepsy: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2019; 3:61. [PMID: 31520247 PMCID: PMC6744536 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-019-0151-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2019] [Accepted: 08/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of patient-reported outcome (PRO) could potentially contribute to the reorganization of the health care system. AmbuFlex is a PRO system used in remote patient monitoring, in which questionnaires are sent to patients at fixed intervals. The PRO data are used by clinicians to decide whether patients need clinical attention. Better self-management and cost-saving follow-up activities may be achieved by letting patients initiate need of contact. We evaluated the effects of patient-initiated PRO-based outpatient follow-up on health care resource utilization, quality of care, and the patient perspective. METHODS We conducted a parallel two-arm pragmatic randomized controlled trial at the Department of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. Outpatients with epilepsy (≥ 15 years old), attending fixed-interval PRO-based follow-up with web-based questionnaires, were randomly assigned in a ratio of 0.55:0.45 to either 1) patient-initiated PRO-based follow-up (open access telePRO) or 2) fixed-interval PRO-based follow-up (standard telePRO). The primary outcome was the number of outpatient hospital contacts related to epilepsy retrieved from a regional registry. Hospitals admissions and emergency room visits were also assessed. Secondary self-reported outcomes including general health, well-being, health literacy, self-efficacy, number of seizures, side effects, confidence, safety, and satisfaction were retrieved from questionnaires. Data were analyzed by the intention-to-treat and per-protocol approaches. RESULTS Between January 2016 and July 2016, 593 patients were randomized to either open access telePRO (n = 346) or standard telePRO (n = 247). At 18 months, no statistically significant differences were found between the arms regarding number of telephone consultations or outpatient visits. Patients in the open access arm had a slightly lower, statistically significant number of emergency room visits than patients in the standard arm. Self-reported mental well-being in the open access arm was slightly, statistically significantly lower than in the standard arm. Other secondary outcomes did not differ statistically significantly between arms. CONCLUSION This study did not find, as hypothesized, less use of health care resources or improved patient self-management or satisfaction in the patient-initiated PRO-based initiative compared to fixed-interval PRO-based follow-up. Patient-initiated PRO-based follow-up may be used as an alternative to fixed-interval PRO-based follow-up in patients who prefer this approach, but there is insufficient evidence for recommending a system-wide shift to patient-initiated PRO-based follow-up. TRIAL REGISTRATION Registered 4 February 2016 with ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02673580 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liv Marit Valen Schougaard
- AmbuFlex/WestChronic, Occupational Medicine, University Research Clinic, Aarhus University, Gl. Landevej 61, DK-7400 Herning, Denmark
| | - Caroline Trillingsgaard Mejdahl
- AmbuFlex/WestChronic, Occupational Medicine, University Research Clinic, Aarhus University, Gl. Landevej 61, DK-7400 Herning, Denmark
| | - Jakob Christensen
- Department of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 165, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 82, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Kirsten Lomborg
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 82, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
| | | | - Annette de Thurah
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 82, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
- Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 59, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Niels Henrik Hjollund
- AmbuFlex/WestChronic, Occupational Medicine, University Research Clinic, Aarhus University, Gl. Landevej 61, DK-7400 Herning, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Olof Palmes Allé 43-45, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Grove BE, Ivarsen P, de Thurah A, Schougaard LM, Kyte D, Hjøllund NH. Remote follow-up using patient-reported outcome measures in patients with chronic kidney disease: the PROKID study - study protocol for a non-inferiority pragmatic randomised controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res 2019; 19:631. [PMID: 31484523 PMCID: PMC6727325 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-4461-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2019] [Accepted: 08/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Outpatient care is steadily changing from hospital consultations to other platforms, such as phone consultation and online virtual clinics. It is prudent to maintain quality of care with such initiatives. Currently, patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have frequent scheduled visits, but it may be possible to optimise the frequency of hospital consultations using information from patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires filled in at home (PRO-based follow-up). This approach may provide a more individually tailored follow-up based on actual needs for clinical attention. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the quality of care, use of resources and patient outcomes associated with PRO-based follow-up in patients with CKD. Methods This study is a pragmatic, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial in outpatients with CKD (Grove BE et al., Qual Life Res 27: S143, 2018). Newly referred patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of ≤40 ml/min 1.73m2 will be randomised to either:
PRO-based remote follow-up PRO-based telephone consultation Usual outpatient follow-up (control group)
In the two intervention groups, a diagnosis-specific PRO questionnaire completed by the patient at home will substitute for usual outpatient follow-up visits. The PRO questionnaire will in part be used as a screening tool to identify patients in need of outpatient contact and to identify focus areas. Responses from the questionnaire will be processed according to a disease-specific algorithm and assigned green, yellow or red status according to patients’ needs. The primary outcome will be loss of renal function evaluated by eGFR. Secondary outcomes are 1. Clinical outcomes, including initiation of acute dialyses, hospitalisation and mortality, 2. Utilisation of healthcare resources and 3. PRO measures, primarily quality of life (Euroqol EQ-5D) and illness perception (Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ). Discussion Benefits and possible drawbacks of the PRO-based follow-up will be evaluated. If PRO-based follow-up proves non-inferior to usual outpatient follow-up, a reorganisation of routine clinical practice in nephrology outpatient clinics may occur. Further, results may impact other patient groups with chronic conditions attending regular follow-up. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03847766 (Retrospectively registered on January 23, 2019).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Birgith Engelst Grove
- AmbuFlex/WestChronic, Occupational Medicine, University Research Clinic, Aarhus University, Herning, Denmark.
| | - Per Ivarsen
- Department of Nephrology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Annette de Thurah
- Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Liv Marit Schougaard
- AmbuFlex/WestChronic, Occupational Medicine, University Research Clinic, Aarhus University, Herning, Denmark
| | - Derek Kyte
- Health Research Methods, Centre for Patient-Reported Outcomes Research (CPROR), Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Niels Henrik Hjøllund
- AmbuFlex/WestChronic, Occupational Medicine, University Research Clinic, Aarhus University, Herning, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Krogstad H, Brunelli C, Sand K, Andersen E, Garresori H, Halvorsen T, Haukland EC, Jordal F, Kaasa S, Loge JH, Løhre ET, Raj SX, Hjermstad MJ. Development of EirV3: A Computer-Based Tool for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Cancer. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2019; 1:1-14. [PMID: 30657392 DOI: 10.1200/cci.17.00051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Immediate transfer of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for use in medical consultations is facilitated by electronic assessments. We aimed to describe the rationale and development of Eir version 3 (EirV3), a computer-based symptom assessment tool for cancer, with emphasis on content and user-friendliness. METHODS EirV3's specifications and content were developed through multiprofessional, stepwise, and iterative processes (from 2013 to 2016), with literature reviews on traditional and electronic assessment and classification methods, formative iterative usability tests with end-users, and assessment of patient preferences for paper versus electronic assessments. RESULTS EirV3 has the following two modules: Eir-Patient for PROMs registration on tablets and Eir-Doctor for presentation of PROMs in a user-friendly interface on computers. Eir-Patient starts with 19 common cancer symptoms followed by specific, in-depth questions for endorsed symptoms. The pain section includes a body map for pain location and intensity, whereas physical functioning, nutritional intake, and well-being are standard questions for all. Data are wirelessly transferred to Eir-Doctor. Symptoms with intensity scores ≥ 3 (on a 0 to 10 scale) are marked in red, with brighter colors corresponding to higher intensity, and supplemented with graphs displaying symptom development over time. Usability results showed that patients and health care providers found EirV3 to be intuitive, easy to use, and relevant. When comparing PROM assessments on paper versus tablets (n = 114), 19% of patients preferred paper, 41% preferred tablets, and 40% had no preference. Median intraclass correlation coefficient between paper and tablets (0.815) was excellent. CONCLUSION Iterative test rounds followed by continuous improvements led to a user-friendly, applicable symptom assessment tool, EirV3, developed for and by end-users. EirV3 is undergoing international testing of clinical and cross-cultural adaptability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hilde Krogstad
- Hilde Krogstad, Cinzia Brunelli, Kari Sand, Tarje Halvorsen, Stein Kaasa, Jon Håvard Loge, Erik Torbjørn Løhre, Sunil X. Raj, and Marianne Jensen Hjermstad, European Palliative Care Research Centre, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) and St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital; Hilde Krogstad, Tarje Halvorsen, Erik Torbjørn Løhre, and Sunil X. Raj, Cancer Clinic, St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital; Eivind Andersen, NTNU Technology Transfer AS, Trondheim; Stein Kaasa, Jon Håvard Loge, and Marianne Jensen Hjermstad, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo; Herish Garresori, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger; Ellinor C. Haukland, Nordland Hospital Trust, Bodø; Frode Jordal, Østfold Hospital Trust, Grålum, Norway; and Cinzia Brunelli, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Cinzia Brunelli
- Hilde Krogstad, Cinzia Brunelli, Kari Sand, Tarje Halvorsen, Stein Kaasa, Jon Håvard Loge, Erik Torbjørn Løhre, Sunil X. Raj, and Marianne Jensen Hjermstad, European Palliative Care Research Centre, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) and St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital; Hilde Krogstad, Tarje Halvorsen, Erik Torbjørn Løhre, and Sunil X. Raj, Cancer Clinic, St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital; Eivind Andersen, NTNU Technology Transfer AS, Trondheim; Stein Kaasa, Jon Håvard Loge, and Marianne Jensen Hjermstad, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo; Herish Garresori, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger; Ellinor C. Haukland, Nordland Hospital Trust, Bodø; Frode Jordal, Østfold Hospital Trust, Grålum, Norway; and Cinzia Brunelli, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Kari Sand
- Hilde Krogstad, Cinzia Brunelli, Kari Sand, Tarje Halvorsen, Stein Kaasa, Jon Håvard Loge, Erik Torbjørn Løhre, Sunil X. Raj, and Marianne Jensen Hjermstad, European Palliative Care Research Centre, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) and St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital; Hilde Krogstad, Tarje Halvorsen, Erik Torbjørn Løhre, and Sunil X. Raj, Cancer Clinic, St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital; Eivind Andersen, NTNU Technology Transfer AS, Trondheim; Stein Kaasa, Jon Håvard Loge, and Marianne Jensen Hjermstad, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo; Herish Garresori, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger; Ellinor C. Haukland, Nordland Hospital Trust, Bodø; Frode Jordal, Østfold Hospital Trust, Grålum, Norway; and Cinzia Brunelli, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Eivind Andersen
- Hilde Krogstad, Cinzia Brunelli, Kari Sand, Tarje Halvorsen, Stein Kaasa, Jon Håvard Loge, Erik Torbjørn Løhre, Sunil X. Raj, and Marianne Jensen Hjermstad, European Palliative Care Research Centre, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) and St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital; Hilde Krogstad, Tarje Halvorsen, Erik Torbjørn Løhre, and Sunil X. Raj, Cancer Clinic, St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital; Eivind Andersen, NTNU Technology Transfer AS, Trondheim; Stein Kaasa, Jon Håvard Loge, and Marianne Jensen Hjermstad, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo; Herish Garresori, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger; Ellinor C. Haukland, Nordland Hospital Trust, Bodø; Frode Jordal, Østfold Hospital Trust, Grålum, Norway; and Cinzia Brunelli, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Herish Garresori
- Hilde Krogstad, Cinzia Brunelli, Kari Sand, Tarje Halvorsen, Stein Kaasa, Jon Håvard Loge, Erik Torbjørn Løhre, Sunil X. Raj, and Marianne Jensen Hjermstad, European Palliative Care Research Centre, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) and St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital; Hilde Krogstad, Tarje Halvorsen, Erik Torbjørn Løhre, and Sunil X. Raj, Cancer Clinic, St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital; Eivind Andersen, NTNU Technology Transfer AS, Trondheim; Stein Kaasa, Jon Håvard Loge, and Marianne Jensen Hjermstad, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo; Herish Garresori, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger; Ellinor C. Haukland, Nordland Hospital Trust, Bodø; Frode Jordal, Østfold Hospital Trust, Grålum, Norway; and Cinzia Brunelli, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Tarje Halvorsen
- Hilde Krogstad, Cinzia Brunelli, Kari Sand, Tarje Halvorsen, Stein Kaasa, Jon Håvard Loge, Erik Torbjørn Løhre, Sunil X. Raj, and Marianne Jensen Hjermstad, European Palliative Care Research Centre, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) and St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital; Hilde Krogstad, Tarje Halvorsen, Erik Torbjørn Løhre, and Sunil X. Raj, Cancer Clinic, St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital; Eivind Andersen, NTNU Technology Transfer AS, Trondheim; Stein Kaasa, Jon Håvard Loge, and Marianne Jensen Hjermstad, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo; Herish Garresori, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger; Ellinor C. Haukland, Nordland Hospital Trust, Bodø; Frode Jordal, Østfold Hospital Trust, Grålum, Norway; and Cinzia Brunelli, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Ellinor C Haukland
- Hilde Krogstad, Cinzia Brunelli, Kari Sand, Tarje Halvorsen, Stein Kaasa, Jon Håvard Loge, Erik Torbjørn Løhre, Sunil X. Raj, and Marianne Jensen Hjermstad, European Palliative Care Research Centre, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) and St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital; Hilde Krogstad, Tarje Halvorsen, Erik Torbjørn Løhre, and Sunil X. Raj, Cancer Clinic, St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital; Eivind Andersen, NTNU Technology Transfer AS, Trondheim; Stein Kaasa, Jon Håvard Loge, and Marianne Jensen Hjermstad, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo; Herish Garresori, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger; Ellinor C. Haukland, Nordland Hospital Trust, Bodø; Frode Jordal, Østfold Hospital Trust, Grålum, Norway; and Cinzia Brunelli, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Frode Jordal
- Hilde Krogstad, Cinzia Brunelli, Kari Sand, Tarje Halvorsen, Stein Kaasa, Jon Håvard Loge, Erik Torbjørn Løhre, Sunil X. Raj, and Marianne Jensen Hjermstad, European Palliative Care Research Centre, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) and St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital; Hilde Krogstad, Tarje Halvorsen, Erik Torbjørn Løhre, and Sunil X. Raj, Cancer Clinic, St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital; Eivind Andersen, NTNU Technology Transfer AS, Trondheim; Stein Kaasa, Jon Håvard Loge, and Marianne Jensen Hjermstad, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo; Herish Garresori, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger; Ellinor C. Haukland, Nordland Hospital Trust, Bodø; Frode Jordal, Østfold Hospital Trust, Grålum, Norway; and Cinzia Brunelli, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Stein Kaasa
- Hilde Krogstad, Cinzia Brunelli, Kari Sand, Tarje Halvorsen, Stein Kaasa, Jon Håvard Loge, Erik Torbjørn Løhre, Sunil X. Raj, and Marianne Jensen Hjermstad, European Palliative Care Research Centre, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) and St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital; Hilde Krogstad, Tarje Halvorsen, Erik Torbjørn Løhre, and Sunil X. Raj, Cancer Clinic, St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital; Eivind Andersen, NTNU Technology Transfer AS, Trondheim; Stein Kaasa, Jon Håvard Loge, and Marianne Jensen Hjermstad, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo; Herish Garresori, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger; Ellinor C. Haukland, Nordland Hospital Trust, Bodø; Frode Jordal, Østfold Hospital Trust, Grålum, Norway; and Cinzia Brunelli, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Jon Håvard Loge
- Hilde Krogstad, Cinzia Brunelli, Kari Sand, Tarje Halvorsen, Stein Kaasa, Jon Håvard Loge, Erik Torbjørn Løhre, Sunil X. Raj, and Marianne Jensen Hjermstad, European Palliative Care Research Centre, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) and St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital; Hilde Krogstad, Tarje Halvorsen, Erik Torbjørn Løhre, and Sunil X. Raj, Cancer Clinic, St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital; Eivind Andersen, NTNU Technology Transfer AS, Trondheim; Stein Kaasa, Jon Håvard Loge, and Marianne Jensen Hjermstad, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo; Herish Garresori, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger; Ellinor C. Haukland, Nordland Hospital Trust, Bodø; Frode Jordal, Østfold Hospital Trust, Grålum, Norway; and Cinzia Brunelli, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Erik Torbjørn Løhre
- Hilde Krogstad, Cinzia Brunelli, Kari Sand, Tarje Halvorsen, Stein Kaasa, Jon Håvard Loge, Erik Torbjørn Løhre, Sunil X. Raj, and Marianne Jensen Hjermstad, European Palliative Care Research Centre, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) and St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital; Hilde Krogstad, Tarje Halvorsen, Erik Torbjørn Løhre, and Sunil X. Raj, Cancer Clinic, St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital; Eivind Andersen, NTNU Technology Transfer AS, Trondheim; Stein Kaasa, Jon Håvard Loge, and Marianne Jensen Hjermstad, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo; Herish Garresori, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger; Ellinor C. Haukland, Nordland Hospital Trust, Bodø; Frode Jordal, Østfold Hospital Trust, Grålum, Norway; and Cinzia Brunelli, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Sunil X Raj
- Hilde Krogstad, Cinzia Brunelli, Kari Sand, Tarje Halvorsen, Stein Kaasa, Jon Håvard Loge, Erik Torbjørn Løhre, Sunil X. Raj, and Marianne Jensen Hjermstad, European Palliative Care Research Centre, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) and St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital; Hilde Krogstad, Tarje Halvorsen, Erik Torbjørn Løhre, and Sunil X. Raj, Cancer Clinic, St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital; Eivind Andersen, NTNU Technology Transfer AS, Trondheim; Stein Kaasa, Jon Håvard Loge, and Marianne Jensen Hjermstad, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo; Herish Garresori, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger; Ellinor C. Haukland, Nordland Hospital Trust, Bodø; Frode Jordal, Østfold Hospital Trust, Grålum, Norway; and Cinzia Brunelli, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Marianne Jensen Hjermstad
- Hilde Krogstad, Cinzia Brunelli, Kari Sand, Tarje Halvorsen, Stein Kaasa, Jon Håvard Loge, Erik Torbjørn Løhre, Sunil X. Raj, and Marianne Jensen Hjermstad, European Palliative Care Research Centre, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) and St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital; Hilde Krogstad, Tarje Halvorsen, Erik Torbjørn Løhre, and Sunil X. Raj, Cancer Clinic, St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital; Eivind Andersen, NTNU Technology Transfer AS, Trondheim; Stein Kaasa, Jon Håvard Loge, and Marianne Jensen Hjermstad, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo; Herish Garresori, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger; Ellinor C. Haukland, Nordland Hospital Trust, Bodø; Frode Jordal, Østfold Hospital Trust, Grålum, Norway; and Cinzia Brunelli, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hjollund NHI, Valderas JM, Kyte D, Calvert MJ. Health Data Processes: A Framework for Analyzing and Discussing Efficient Use and Reuse of Health Data With a Focus on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21:e12412. [PMID: 31115347 PMCID: PMC6547770 DOI: 10.2196/12412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2018] [Revised: 03/02/2019] [Accepted: 03/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The collection and use of patient health data are central to any kind of activity in the health care system. These data may be produced during routine clinical processes or obtained directly from the patient using patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures. Although efficiency and other reasons justify data availability for a range of potentially relevant uses, these data are nearly always collected for a single specific purpose. The health care literature reflects this narrow scope, and there is limited literature on the joint use of health data for daily clinical use, clinical research, surveillance, and administrative purposes. The aim of this paper is to provide a framework for discussing the efficient use of health data with a specific focus on the role of PRO measures. PRO data may be used at an individual patient level to inform patient care or shared decision making and to tailor care to individual needs or group-level needs as a complement to health record data, such as that on mortality and readmission, in order to inform service delivery and measure the real-world effectiveness of treatment. PRO measures may be used either for their own sake, to provide valuable information from the patient perspective, or as a proxy for clinical data that would otherwise not be feasible to collect. We introduce a framework to analyze any health care activity that involves health data. The framework consists of four data processes (patient identification, data collection, data aggregation and data use), further structured into two dichotomous dimensions in each data process (level: group vs patient; timeframe: ad hoc vs systematic). This framework is used to analyze various health activities with respect to joint use of data, considering the technical, legal, organizational, and logistical challenges that characterize each data process. Finally, we propose a model for joint use of health data with data collected during follow-up as a base. Demands for health data will continue to increase, which will further add to the need for the concerted use and reuse of PRO data for parallel purposes. Repeated and uncoordinated PRO data collection for the same patient for different purposes results in misuse of resources for the patient and the health care system as well as reduced response rates owing to questionnaire fatigue. PRO data can be routinely collected both at the hospital (from inpatients as well as outpatients) and outside of hospital settings; in primary or social care settings; or in the patient’s home, provided the health informatics infrastructure is in place. In the future, clinical settings are likely to be a prominent source of PRO data; however, we are also likely to see increased remote collection of PRO data by patients in their own home (telePRO). Data collection for research and quality surveillance will have to adapt to this circumstance and adopt complementary data capture methods that take advantage of the utility of PRO data collected during daily clinical practice. The European Union’s regulation with respect to the protection of personal data—General Data Protection Regulation—imposes severe restrictions on the use of health data for parallel purposes, and steps should be taken to alleviate the consequences while still protecting personal data against misuse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niels Henrik Ingvar Hjollund
- Occupational Medicine, University Research Clinic, AmbuFlex/WestChronic, Aarhus University, Herning, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - José Maria Valderas
- University of Exeter Collaboration for Academic Primary Care, Health Services & Policy Research Group, National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (South West Peninsula), University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
| | - Derek Kyte
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom.,National Institute for Health Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre and National Institute for Health Research Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Melanie Jane Calvert
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom.,National Institute for Health Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre and National Institute for Health Research Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Avery KNL, Richards HS, Portal A, Reed T, Harding R, Carter R, Bamforth L, Absolom K, O'Connell Francischetto E, Velikova G, Blazeby JM. Developing a real-time electronic symptom monitoring system for patients after discharge following cancer-related surgery. BMC Cancer 2019; 19:463. [PMID: 31101017 PMCID: PMC6524308 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-5657-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2019] [Accepted: 04/30/2019] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Patients undergoing major cancer surgery frequently require post-acute care for complications and adverse effects. Enhanced recovery after surgery programmes mean that patients are increasingly discharged home earlier. Symptom/complication detection post-discharge is sub-optimal. Systematic patient monitoring post-discharge following surgery may be optimally achieved through routine electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) data capture. ePRO systems that employ clinical algorithms to guide management of patients and automatically alert clinicians of clinically-concerning symptoms can improve patient outcomes and decrease hospital admissions. ePRO systems that provide individually-tailored self-management advice and integrate live ePRO data into electronic health records (EHR) may also advance personalised health and patient-centred care. This study aims to develop a hospital EHR-integrated ePRO system to improve detection and management of complications post-discharge following cancer-related surgery. Methods The ePRO system was developed in two phases: (1) Development of a web-based ePRO symptom-report from validated European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaires, clinical opinion and patient interviews, followed by hospital EHR integration; (2) Development of clinical algorithms triggering symptom severity-dependent patient advice and clinician alerts from: (i) prospectively-collected patient-completed ePRO symptom-report data; (ii) stakeholder meetings; (iii) patient interviews. Patient advice was developed from: (i) clinician-patient telephone consultations and patient interviews; (ii) review of hospital patient information leaflets (PIL) and patient support websites. Results Phase 1, including interviews with 18 patients, identified 35 symptom-report items. In phase 2, 130/300 (43%) screened patients were eligible. 61 (47%) consented to participate and 59 (97%) provided 444 complete self-reports. Stakeholder meetings (9 clinicians, 1 patient/public representative) and patient interviews (n = 66) refined advice/alert accuracy. 15 telephone consultations, 7 patient interviews and review of 28 PILs and 3 patient support websites identified 4 themes to inform self-management advice. Comparisons between ePRO symptom-report data, telephone consultations and clinical events/outcomes (n = 27 patients) further refined clinical algorithms. Conclusions A hospital EHR-integrated ePRO system that alerts clinicians and provides patient self-management advice has been developed to improve the detection and management of problems and complications after discharge following surgery. An ongoing pilot study will inform a multicentre randomised trial to evaluate the effectiveness of the ePRO system compared to usual care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kerry N L Avery
- Medical Research Council ConDuCT-II Hub for Trials Methodology Research, National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
| | - Hollie S Richards
- Medical Research Council ConDuCT-II Hub for Trials Methodology Research, National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | - Amanda Portal
- Medical Research Council ConDuCT-II Hub for Trials Methodology Research, Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | - Trudy Reed
- Division of Surgery, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, BS2 8HW, UK
| | - Ruth Harding
- Division of Surgery, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, BS2 8HW, UK
| | - Robert Carter
- Section of Patient-Centred Outcomes Research, Patient Reported Outcomes Group, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, St James's Hospital, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Leon Bamforth
- Section of Patient-Centred Outcomes Research, Patient Reported Outcomes Group, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, St James's Hospital, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Kate Absolom
- Section of Patient-Centred Outcomes Research, Patient Reported Outcomes Group, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, St James's Hospital, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Elaine O'Connell Francischetto
- NIHR CLAHRC West Midlands Chronic Disease Theme, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Galina Velikova
- Section of Patient-Centred Outcomes Research, Patient Reported Outcomes Group, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, St James's Hospital, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Jane M Blazeby
- Medical Research Council ConDuCT-II Hub for Trials Methodology Research, National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.,Division of Surgery, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, BS2 8HW, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Leviton A, Oppenheimer J, Chiujdea M, Antonetty A, Ojo OW, Garcia S, Weas S, Fleegler E, Chan E, Loddenkemper T. Characteristics of Future Models of Integrated Outpatient Care. Healthcare (Basel) 2019; 7:healthcare7020065. [PMID: 31035586 PMCID: PMC6627383 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare7020065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2019] [Revised: 04/23/2019] [Accepted: 04/24/2019] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Replacement of fee-for-service with capitation arrangements, forces physicians and institutions to minimize health care costs, while maintaining high-quality care. In this report we described how patients and their families (or caregivers) can work with members of the medical care team to achieve these twin goals of maintaining-and perhaps improving-high-quality care and minimizing costs. We described how increased self-management enables patients and their families/caregivers to provide electronic patient-reported outcomes (i.e., symptoms, events) (ePROs), as frequently as the patient or the medical care team consider appropriate. These capabilities also allow ongoing assessments of physiological measurements/phenomena (mHealth). Remote surveillance of these communications allows longer intervals between (fewer) patient visits to the medical-care team, when this is appropriate, or earlier interventions, when it is appropriate. Systems are now available that alert medical care providers to situations when interventions might be needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan Leviton
- Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology, Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | - Julia Oppenheimer
- Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology, Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | - Madeline Chiujdea
- Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology, Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | - Annalee Antonetty
- Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology, Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | - Oluwafemi William Ojo
- Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology, Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | - Stephanie Garcia
- Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology, Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | - Sarah Weas
- Division of Developmental Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | - Eric Fleegler
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | - Eugenia Chan
- Division of Developmental Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | - Tobias Loddenkemper
- Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology, Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Wang R, Kanani R, El Bardisi Y, Mistry N, Dos Santos J. Development of a Standardized Approach for the Assessment of Bowel and Bladder Dysfunction. Pediatr Qual Saf 2019; 4:e144. [PMID: 31321361 PMCID: PMC6494228 DOI: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2018] [Accepted: 01/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Bowel and bladder dysfunction (BBD) is a common pediatric condition that describes a constellation of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) associated with constipation. Many children with BBD have comorbid neuropsychiatric and psychosocial concerns that are not routinely assessed. The aim of quality improvement (QI) was to establish a comprehensive assessment for BBD by developing and evaluating (1) a standardized clinician assessment form and (2) parent-reported questionnaire. METHODS From July 2017 to April 2018, a prospective QI study was conducted in the BBD network. A standardized assessment form was developed based on literature review and expert opinions, with targeted sections for LUTS, constipation, and psychosocial history. Before clinic, families of children referred for BBD were given a questionnaire to clarify voiding, stooling, and dietary patterns. Physicians utilized the assessment form for new referrals. Afterward, both physicians and parents evaluated the assessment process anonymously. RESULTS A total of 15 physicians and 45 parents responded, with 67% of patients being between 4 and 10 years old and 51% male. Physicians responded that the assessment form reminded them to ask about specific LUTS (93%), constipation (87%), and psychosocial history (87%). Parents responded positively by agreeing that they felt included in care decisions (96%) and had questions answered appropriately (100%). Only 47% found the previsit package easy to complete. CONCLUSIONS In pediatric BBD consultations, a standardized assessment form can guide clinicians to efficiently gather a comprehensive history and screen for psychosocial risk factors. It can empower more pediatricians to evaluate BBD in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Wang
- From the Department of Pediatrics, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ronik Kanani
- Department of Pediatrics, North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Yara El Bardisi
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Niraj Mistry
- From the Department of Pediatrics, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Joana Dos Santos
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Urology, Department of Pediatrics, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Mejdahl CT, Schougaard LMV, Hjollund NH, Riiskjær E, Thorne S, Lomborg K. PRO-based follow-up as a means of self-management support - an interpretive description of the patient perspective. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2018; 2:38. [PMID: 30238083 PMCID: PMC6125260 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-018-0067-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2018] [Accepted: 08/20/2018] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is an increasing focus on the use of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures to improve the quality and effectiveness of health care. PRO-based follow-up is a new model of service delivery, where the patient's PRO measures are used as the very basis for outpatient follow-up. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to explore how patients with epilepsy experience the use of PRO-based follow-up in three outpatient clinics in the Central Denmark Region. We also sought to explain how these experiences relate to self-management. METHODS Interpretive description was the methodological approach. We conducted in-depth individual interviews with 29 patients referred to PRO-based follow-up, each of whom had completed at least two PRO questionnaires. Participants were sampled based on purposive and theoretical sampling. RESULTS PRO-based follow-up may support patients' self-management by a) increasing awareness of psychosocial problems, b) improving communication, c) increasing understanding of symptoms, d) facilitating change in health behavior and e) strengthening autonomy. Inhibitors for PRO measures as a means of self-management support were identified as a) feelings of rejection and disconnection, b) incomprehension of purpose of PRO-based follow-up, c) PRO measures being too standardized and negative and d) lack of confidence in own ability to assess PRO questionnaires. CONCLUSION The findings demonstrate broad variation in the influences of PRO measures on patient's self-management in life with epilepsy. Sense of ownership may explain this variation. We suggest supplementary clinical initiatives in order to enhance the benefits from PRO-based follow-up, particularly on how patients are allocated to this health care service.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Trillingsgaard Mejdahl
- Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 2, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark
- The Research Program in Patient Involvement, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, DK-8200 Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Liv Marit Valen Schougaard
- WestChronic, Occupational Medicine, University Research Clinic, Aarhus University, Herning, Gl Landevej 61, DK-7400 Herning, Denmark
| | - Niels Henrik Hjollund
- WestChronic, Occupational Medicine, University Research Clinic, Aarhus University, Herning, Gl Landevej 61, DK-7400 Herning, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Olof Palmes Allé 43-45. DK-8200 Aarhus N, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Erik Riiskjær
- DEFACTUM, Social & Health Services and Labour Market, Central Denmark Region, Olof Palmes Allé 15, DK-8200 Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Sally Thorne
- University of British Columbia School of Nursing, 2211 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 2B5 Canada
| | - Kirsten Lomborg
- The Research Program in Patient Involvement, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, DK-8200 Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 82, DK-8200 Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Grove BE, Schougaard LM, Hjollund NH, Ivarsen P. Self-rated health, quality of life and appetite as predictors of initiation of dialysis and mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease stages 4-5: a prospective cohort study. BMC Res Notes 2018; 11:371. [PMID: 29884242 PMCID: PMC5994035 DOI: 10.1186/s13104-018-3472-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2017] [Accepted: 06/04/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Patient-reported health status, including symptom burden, functional status and quality of life, are important measures of health in patients with chronic kidney disease. We aimed to investigate patient-reported outcomes (PRO) on self-rated health, appetite, quality of life and their associations with clinical outcomes. We conducted a prospective observational cohort study. Data was collected at baseline using a PRO questionnaire. The primary outcomes were initiation of dialysis, transplantation and mortality. Kaplan–Meier curves and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used. Results A total of 126 patients with chronic kidney disease with an eGFR of ≤ 25 mL/min/1.73 m2 were followed for a median of 321 (range 10–523) days. Poor appetite was associated with mortality (hazard ratio 20.9, 95% CI 3.7–129.8). Initiation of dialysis was associated with low self-rated health (hazard ratio 5.2, 95% CI 1.2–24.0). Mean decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate was − 0.9 mL/min/1.73 m2 (95% CI − 1.6 to − 0.2). Decline in self-rated health (p = 0.001) and appetite (p = 0.002) were correlated with reduction in renal function. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13104-018-3472-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Birgith Engelst Grove
- Department of Renal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital & AmbuFlex/WestChronic, Regional Hospital West Jutland, Gl.Landevej 61, 7400, Herning, Denmark.
| | - Liv Marit Schougaard
- AmbuFlex/WestChronic, Regional Hospital West Jutland, Gl.Landevej 61, 7400, Herning, Denmark
| | - Niels Henrik Hjollund
- AmbuFlex/WestChronic, Occupational Medicine, University Research Clinic, Health, Aarhus University, Gl. Landevej 61, 7400, Herning, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Per Ivarsen
- Department of Renal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Holch P, Pini S, Henry AM, Davidson S, Routledge J, Brown J, Absolom K, Gilbert A, Franks K, Hulme C, Morris C, Velikova G. eRAPID electronic patient self-Reporting of Adverse-events: Patient Information and aDvice: a pilot study protocol in pelvic radiotherapy. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2018; 4:110. [PMID: 29992040 PMCID: PMC5987546 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-018-0304-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2017] [Accepted: 05/25/2018] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Background An estimated 17,000 patients are treated annually in the UK with radical radiotherapy (RT) for pelvic cancer. New treatment approaches in RT have increased survivorship and changed the subjective toxicity profile for patients who experience acute and long-term pelvic-related adverse events (AE). Multi-disciplinary follow-up creates difficulty for monitoring and responding to these events during treatment and beyond. Originally developed for use in systemic oncology therapy eRAPID (electronic patient self-Reporting of Adverse-events: Patient Information and aDvice) is an online system for patients to report AEs from home. eRAPID enables patient data to be integrated into the electronic patient records for use in clinical practice, provides patient management advice for mild and moderate AE and advice to contact the hospital for severe AE. The system has now been developed for pelvic RT patients, and we aim to test the intervention in a pilot study with staff and patients to inform a future randomised controlled trial (RCT). Methods Eligible patients are those attending St James’s University hospital cancer centre and The Christie Hospital Manchester undergoing pelvic radiotherapy+/−chemotherapy/hormonotherapy for prostate, lower gastrointestinal and gynaecological cancers. A prospective 1:1 randomised (intervention or usual care) parallel group design with repeated measures and mixed methods will be employed. We aim to recruit 168 patients following recommendations for sample size estimates for pilot studies. Participants using eRAPID will report AE (at least weekly) from home weekly for 6 weeks and 6 weeks post-treatment (12-week total) then at 18 and 24 weeks. Hospital staff will review eRAPID reports and use information during consultations. Notifications will be sent to the relevant clinical team when severe symptoms are reported. We will measure patient-reported outcomes using validated questionnaires (Functional Assessment in Cancer Therapy Scale-General (FACT-G), European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30), process of care impact (hospital records of patient contacts and admissions) and economic variables (EQ5D-5L, patient use of resources)). Staff and patient experiences will be explored via semi-structured interviews. Discussion The objectives are to establish feasibility, recruitment, integrity of the system and attrition rates, determine effect sizes and aid selection of the primary outcome measure for a future RCT. We will also refine the intervention by exploring staff and patient views. The overall goal of this complex intervention is to improve the safe delivery of cancer treatments, enhance patient care and standardise documentation of AE within the clinical datasets. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02747264. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s40814-018-0304-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Holch
- 1Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Calverley Building, Room CL 815 City Campus, Leeds, LS1 9HE UK.,Section of Patient-Centred Outcomes Research, Patient Reported Outcomes Group, Leeds Institute of Cancer Studies and Pathology, University of Leeds, Bexley Wing, St James's Hospital, Beckett street, Leeds, LS9 7TF UK
| | - Simon Pini
- Section of Patient-Centred Outcomes Research, Patient Reported Outcomes Group, Leeds Institute of Cancer Studies and Pathology, University of Leeds, Bexley Wing, St James's Hospital, Beckett street, Leeds, LS9 7TF UK
| | - Ann M Henry
- Section of Patient-Centred Outcomes Research, Patient Reported Outcomes Group, Leeds Institute of Cancer Studies and Pathology, University of Leeds, Bexley Wing, St James's Hospital, Beckett street, Leeds, LS9 7TF UK.,3Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS trust, St James's Institute of Oncology, Bexley Wing, St James's Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF UK
| | - Susan Davidson
- 4The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, 550 Wilmslow Rd, Manchester, M20 4BX UK
| | - Jacki Routledge
- 4The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, 550 Wilmslow Rd, Manchester, M20 4BX UK
| | - Julia Brown
- 5Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9NL UK
| | - Kate Absolom
- Section of Patient-Centred Outcomes Research, Patient Reported Outcomes Group, Leeds Institute of Cancer Studies and Pathology, University of Leeds, Bexley Wing, St James's Hospital, Beckett street, Leeds, LS9 7TF UK
| | - Alexandra Gilbert
- Section of Patient-Centred Outcomes Research, Patient Reported Outcomes Group, Leeds Institute of Cancer Studies and Pathology, University of Leeds, Bexley Wing, St James's Hospital, Beckett street, Leeds, LS9 7TF UK.,3Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS trust, St James's Institute of Oncology, Bexley Wing, St James's Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF UK
| | - Kevin Franks
- 3Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS trust, St James's Institute of Oncology, Bexley Wing, St James's Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF UK
| | - Claire Hulme
- 6Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9NL UK
| | - Carolyn Morris
- Patient Reported Outcomes Group, Leeds Institute of Cancer Studies and Pathology, University of Leeds, Bexley Wing, St James's Hospital, Beckett street, Leeds, LS9 7TF UK.,8National Cancer Research Institute Consumer forum, Angel Building, 407 St John Street, London, EC1V 4AD UK
| | - Galina Velikova
- Section of Patient-Centred Outcomes Research, Patient Reported Outcomes Group, Leeds Institute of Cancer Studies and Pathology, University of Leeds, Bexley Wing, St James's Hospital, Beckett street, Leeds, LS9 7TF UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kjær ASHK, Rasmussen TA, Hjollund NH, Rodkjaer LO, Storgaard M. Patient-reported outcomes in daily clinical practise in HIV outpatient care. Int J Infect Dis 2018; 69:108-114. [PMID: 29476900 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2018.02.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2017] [Revised: 02/12/2018] [Accepted: 02/13/2018] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The use of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in outpatient care holds promise as a tool to enhance the quality of care. The management of chronic HIV infection is multidimensional, and clinical assessment includes broad screening to identify complications. With growing constraints on time and resources, the use of PROs may provide a much-needed tool to ensure optimal HIV care. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical implementation and use of a Web-based tool to collect PROs in a cohort of HIV-infected individuals. METHODS In December 2015, the PRO system AmbuFlex, a Web-based tool for self-reporting of clinical symptoms, was implemented in HIV outpatient care at Aarhus University Hospital. The HIV-specific questionnaire was designed to cover items in the European AIDS Clinical Society guidelines. Patients responded through a Web-based system from home. Based on an HIV-specific algorithm, responses were automatically assigned a green, yellow, or red colour code reflecting the severity of the symptom. HIV-related data from the electronic hospital management system were used to compare respondents and non-respondents. For cognitive and red symptoms, patient records were accessed to address whether PRO provided new information. Furthermore, it was sought to determine whether implementing PROs in clinical care can help focus the consultation on current needs. This was done by checking if a flagged symptom was assessed clinically at the following consultation. RESULTS Five hundred and five HIV patients were invited to participate and 277 (55%) accepted the invitation. Compared to respondents, non-respondents were significantly younger and more often female, born outside Denmark, newly diagnosed, and with a plasma viral load >50 copies/ml. Among the 262 correctly received PRO questionnaires, 104 (39%) had solely green colour-coded responses, whereas 59 (23%) had one or more red colour-coded responses. Of 69 red symptoms, 28 (41%) led to a specific clinical assessment. In many cases, PROs appeared to provide new information on cognitive (76%) and red-coded symptoms (42%). CONCLUSIONS The use of PROs identified several cases where physical or cognitive symptoms appeared to have been unnoticed. A substantial proportion of patients reported no symptoms requiring medical attention, suggesting a potential to individualize outpatient care and redistribute resource utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Niels Henrik Hjollund
- WestChronic, Department of Occupational Medicine, University Research Clinic, Aarhus University, Herning, Denmark; Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Merete Storgaard
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Griffiths FE, Armoiry X, Atherton H, Bryce C, Buckle A, Cave JAK, Court R, Hamilton K, Dliwayo TR, Dritsaki M, Elder P, Forjaz V, Fraser J, Goodwin R, Huxley C, Ignatowicz A, Karasouli E, Kim SW, Kimani P, Madan JJ, Matharu H, May M, Musumadi L, Paul M, Raut G, Sankaranarayanan S, Slowther AM, Sujan MA, Sutcliffe PA, Svahnstrom I, Taggart F, Uddin A, Verran A, Walker L, Sturt J. The role of digital communication in patient–clinician communication for NHS providers of specialist clinical services for young people [the Long-term conditions Young people Networked Communication (LYNC) study]: a mixed-methods study. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2018. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr06090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BackgroundYoung people (aged 16–24 years) with long-term health conditions tend to disengage from health services, resulting in poor health outcomes. They are prolific users of digital communications. Innovative UK NHS clinicians use digital communication with these young people. The NHS plans to use digital communication with patients more widely.ObjectivesTo explore how health-care engagement can be improved using digital clinical communication (DCC); understand effects, impacts, costs and necessary safeguards; and provide critical analysis of its use, monitoring and evaluation.DesignObservational mixed-methods case studies; systematic scoping literature reviews; assessment of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs); public and patient involvement; and consensus development through focus groups.SettingTwenty NHS specialist clinical teams from across England and Wales, providing care for 13 different long-term physical or mental health conditions.ParticipantsOne hundred and sixty-five young people aged 16–24 years living with a long-term health condition; 13 parents; 173 clinical team members; and 16 information governance specialists.InterventionsClinical teams and young people variously used mobile phone calls, text messages, e-mail and voice over internet protocol.Main outcome measuresEmpirical work – thematic and ethical analysis of qualitative data; annual direct costs; did not attend, accident and emergency attendance and hospital admission rates plus clinic-specific clinical outcomes. Scoping reviews–patient, health professional and service delivery outcomes and technical problems. PROMs: scale validity, relevance and credibility.Data sourcesObservation, interview, structured survey, routinely collected data, focus groups and peer-reviewed publications.ResultsDigital communication enables access for young people to the right clinician when it makes a difference for managing their health condition. This is valued as additional to traditional clinic appointments. This access challenges the nature and boundaries of therapeutic relationships, but can improve them, increase patient empowerment and enhance activation. Risks include increased dependence on clinicians, inadvertent disclosure of confidential information and communication failures, but clinicians and young people mitigate these risks. Workload increases and the main cost is staff time. Clinical teams had not evaluated the impact of their intervention and analysis of routinely collected data did not identify any impact. There are no currently used generic outcome measures, but the Patient Activation Measure and the Physicians’ Humanistic Behaviours Questionnaire are promising. Scoping reviews suggest DCC is acceptable to young people, but with no clear evidence of benefit except for mental health.LimitationsQualitative data were mostly from clinician enthusiasts. No interviews were achieved with young people who do not attend clinics. Clinicians struggled to estimate workload. Only eight full sets of routine data were available.ConclusionsTimely DCC is perceived as making a difference to health care and health outcomes for young people with long-term conditions, but this is not supported by evidence that measures health outcomes. Such communication is challenging and costly to provide, but valued by young people.Future workFuture development should distinguish digital communication replacing traditional clinic appointments and additional timely communication. Evaluation is needed that uses relevant generic outcomes.Study registrationTwo of the reviews in this study are registered as PROSPERO CRD42016035467 and CRD42016038792.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Xavier Armoiry
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Helen Atherton
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Carol Bryce
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Abigail Buckle
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | | | - Rachel Court
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Kathryn Hamilton
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Thandiwe R Dliwayo
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, King’s College London, London, UK
| | | | - Patrick Elder
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Vera Forjaz
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Joe Fraser
- Patient and public involvement representative, London, UK
| | - Richard Goodwin
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, King’s College London, London, UK
| | | | | | | | - Sung Wook Kim
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Peter Kimani
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Jason J Madan
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Harjit Matharu
- University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
| | - Mike May
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | | | - Moli Paul
- Coventry and Warwickshire Partnership Trust, Coventry, UK
| | - Gyanu Raut
- King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | | | - Mark A Sujan
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | | | | | | | - Ayesha Uddin
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Alice Verran
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Leigh Walker
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Jackie Sturt
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, King’s College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
van der Veer SN, Aresi G, Gair R. Incorporating patient-reported symptom assessments into routine care for people with chronic kidney disease. Clin Kidney J 2017; 10:783-787. [PMID: 29250324 PMCID: PMC5721341 DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfx106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2017] [Accepted: 08/24/2017] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
In this issue of Clinical Kidney Journal, Brown and colleagues show that symptom burden is high across all stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Still, management of symptoms in kidney patients leaves room for improvement, which may partly stem from symptoms being underreported. The use of patient-reported questionnaires may facilitate a more systematic approach to symptom assessment, but to date, the majority of these instruments have been used only in the context of research studies. In this editorial, we review how systematic patient-reported symptom assessments can be incorporated in CKD care. We show examples from an initiative in the UK where 14 renal units explored how to collect and use symptom burden assessments as part of their routine ways of working. We also discuss how to move from paper-based questionnaires towards digital collection of patient-reported symptom data. Lastly, we introduce wearable and smartphone sensors as novel methods for collecting information to support and enrich symptom assessments while minimizing data collection burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine N van der Veer
- Centre for Health Informatics, Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Health eResearch Centre, Farr Institute of Health Informatics Research, Manchester, UK
| | - Giovanni Aresi
- Centre for Health Informatics, Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Effects of web-based interventions on cancer patients’ symptoms: review of randomized trials. Support Care Cancer 2017; 26:337-351. [DOI: 10.1007/s00520-017-3882-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2016] [Accepted: 09/11/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
26
|
Griffiths F, Bryce C, Cave J, Dritsaki M, Fraser J, Hamilton K, Huxley C, Ignatowicz A, Kim SW, Kimani PK, Madan J, Slowther AM, Sujan M, Sturt J. Timely Digital Patient-Clinician Communication in Specialist Clinical Services for Young People: A Mixed-Methods Study (The LYNC Study). J Med Internet Res 2017; 19:e102. [PMID: 28396301 PMCID: PMC5404145 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.7154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2016] [Revised: 01/24/2017] [Accepted: 01/24/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Young people (aged 16-24 years) with long-term health conditions can disengage from health services, resulting in poor health outcomes, but clinicians in the UK National Health Service (NHS) are using digital communication to try to improve engagement. Evidence of effectiveness of this digital communication is equivocal. There are gaps in evidence as to how it might work, its cost, and ethical and safety issues. Objective Our objective was to understand how the use of digital communication between young people with long-term conditions and their NHS specialist clinicians changes engagement of the young people with their health care; and to identify costs and necessary safeguards. Methods We conducted mixed-methods case studies of 20 NHS specialist clinical teams from across England and Wales and their practice providing care for 13 different long-term physical or mental health conditions. We observed 79 clinical team members and interviewed 165 young people aged 16-24 years with a long-term health condition recruited via case study clinical teams, 173 clinical team members, and 16 information governance specialists from study NHS Trusts. We conducted a thematic analysis of how digital communication works, and analyzed ethics, safety and governance, and annual direct costs. Results Young people and their clinical teams variously used mobile phone calls, text messages, email, and voice over Internet protocol. Length of clinician use of digital communication varied from 1 to 13 years in 17 case studies, and was being considered in 3. Digital communication enables timely access for young people to the right clinician at the time when it can make a difference to how they manage their health condition. This is valued as an addition to traditional clinic appointments and can engage those otherwise disengaged, particularly at times of change for young people. It can enhance patient autonomy, empowerment and activation. It challenges the nature and boundaries of therapeutic relationships but can improve trust. The clinical teams studied had not themselves formally evaluated the impact of their intervention. Staff time is the main cost driver, but offsetting savings are likely elsewhere in the health service. Risks include increased dependence on clinicians, inadvertent disclosure of confidential information, and communication failures, which are mostly mitigated by young people and clinicians using common-sense approaches. Conclusions As NHS policy prompts more widespread use of digital communication to improve the health care experience, our findings suggest that benefit is most likely, and harms are mitigated, when digital communication is used with patients who already have a relationship of trust with the clinical team, and where there is identifiable need for patients to have flexible access, such as when transitioning between services, treatments, or lived context. Clinical teams need a proactive approach to ethics, governance, and patient safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frances Griffiths
- Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.,Centre for Health Policy, School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Carol Bryce
- Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - Jonathan Cave
- Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - Melina Dritsaki
- Oxford Clinical Trials Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Joseph Fraser
- Patient and Public Involvement, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - Kathryn Hamilton
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing and Midwidery, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Caroline Huxley
- Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - Agnieszka Ignatowicz
- Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - Sung Wook Kim
- Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - Peter K Kimani
- Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - Jason Madan
- Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - Anne-Marie Slowther
- Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - Mark Sujan
- Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - Jackie Sturt
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing and Midwidery, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Schougaard LMV, Mejdahl CT, Petersen KH, Jessen A, de Thurah A, Sidenius P, Lomborg K, Hjollund NH. Effect of patient-initiated versus fixed-interval telePRO-based outpatient follow-up: study protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled study. BMC Health Serv Res 2017; 17:83. [PMID: 28122609 PMCID: PMC5267418 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-017-2015-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2016] [Accepted: 01/13/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The traditional system of routine outpatient follow-up of chronic disease in secondary care may involve a waste of resources if patients are well. The use of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) could support more flexible, cost-saving follow-up activities. AmbuFlex is a PRO system used in outpatient follow-up in the Central Denmark Region. PRO questionnaires are sent to patients at fixed intervals. The clinicians use the PRO data to decide whether a patient needs a visit or not (standard telePRO). PRO may make patients become more involved in their own care pathway, which may improve their self-management. Better self-management may also be achieved by letting patients initiate contact. The aim of this study is to obtain data on the effects of patient-initiated follow-up (open access telePRO) on resource utilisation, quality of care, and the patient perspective. METHODS The study is a pragmatic, randomised, controlled trial in outpatients with epilepsy. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two follow-up activities: a) standard telePRO or b) open access telePRO. Inclusion criteria are age ≥ 15 years and previous referral to standard telePRO follow-up at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. Furthermore, patients must have answered the last questionnaire via the Internet. The number of contacts will be used as the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures include well-being (WHO-5 Well-Being Index), general health, number of seizures, treatment side effects, mortality, health literacy (Health Literacy Questionnaire), self-efficacy (General Self-Efficacy scale), patient activation, confidence, safety, and satisfaction. In addition, the patient perspective will be explored by qualitative methods. Data will be collected at baseline and 18 month after randomisation. Inclusion of patients in the study started in January 2016. Statistical analysis will be performed on an intention-to-treat and per-protocol basis. For qualitative data, the interpretive description strategy will be used. DISCUSSION The benefits and possible drawbacks of the PRO-based open access approach will be evaluated. The present study will provide important knowledge to guide future telePRO interventions in relation to effect on resource utilisation, quality of care, and the patient perspective. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02673580 (Registration date January 28, 2016).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Caroline Trillingsgaard Mejdahl
- The Research Programme in Patient involvement, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Anne Jessen
- AmbuFlex, Regional Hospital West Jutland, Herning, Denmark
| | - Annette de Thurah
- The Research Programme in Patient involvement, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Per Sidenius
- Department of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Kirsten Lomborg
- The Research Programme in Patient involvement, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Niels Henrik Hjollund
- AmbuFlex, Regional Hospital West Jutland, Herning, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Holch P, Henry AM, Davidson S, Gilbert A, Routledge J, Shearsmith L, Franks K, Ingleson E, Albutt A, Velikova G. Acute and Late Adverse Events Associated With Radical Radiation Therapy Prostate Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review of Clinician and Patient Toxicity Reporting in Randomized Controlled Trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2016; 97:495-510. [PMID: 28126299 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2016] [Revised: 10/24/2016] [Accepted: 11/08/2016] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This review aimed to determine the clinician and patient reported outcome (PRO) instruments currently usedin randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of radical radiation therapy for nonmetastatic prostate cancer to report acute and late adverse events (AEs), review the quality of methodology and PRO reporting, and report the prevalence of acute and late AEs. METHODS AND MATERIALS The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched between April and August 2014 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement. Identified reports were reviewed according to the PRO Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. In all, 1149 records were screened, and 21 articles were included in the final review. RESULTS We determined the acute and late AEs for 9040 patients enrolled in 15 different RCTs. Only clinician reported instruments were used to report acute AEs <3 months (eg, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group [RTOG] and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE]). For late clinician reporting, the Late Effects on Normal Tissues-Subjective, Objective, Management and Analytic scale and RTOG were used and were often augmented with additional items to provide comprehensive coverage of sexual functioning and anorectal symptoms. Some late AEs were reported (48% articles) using PROs (eg, ULCA-PCI [University of California, Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index], FACT-G and P [Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy General & Prostate Module], EORTC QLQC-30 + PR25 [European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire & Prostate Module]); however, a definitive "preferred" instrument was not evident. DISCUSSION Our findings are at odds with recent movements toward including patient voices in reporting of AEs and patient engagement in clinical research. We recommend including PRO to evaluate radical radiation therapy before, during, and after the treatment to fully capture patient experiences, and we support the development of predictive models for late effects based on the severity of early toxicity. CONCLUSION Patient reporting of acute and late AEs is underrepresented in radiation therapy trials. We recommend working toward a consistent approach to PRO assessment of radiation therapy-related AEs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Holch
- Psychology Group, School of Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK; Patient Reported Outcomes Group, Leeds Institute of Cancer Studies and Pathology, University of Leeds, St James's Hospital, Leeds, UK.
| | - Ann M Henry
- Patient Reported Outcomes Group, Leeds Institute of Cancer Studies and Pathology, University of Leeds, St James's Hospital, Leeds, UK; Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James's Institute of Oncology, St James's Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Alexandra Gilbert
- Patient Reported Outcomes Group, Leeds Institute of Cancer Studies and Pathology, University of Leeds, St James's Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Leanne Shearsmith
- Patient Reported Outcomes Group, Leeds Institute of Cancer Studies and Pathology, University of Leeds, St James's Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Kevin Franks
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James's Institute of Oncology, St James's Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Emma Ingleson
- Patient Reported Outcomes Group, Leeds Institute of Cancer Studies and Pathology, University of Leeds, St James's Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Abigail Albutt
- Patient Reported Outcomes Group, Leeds Institute of Cancer Studies and Pathology, University of Leeds, St James's Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Galina Velikova
- Patient Reported Outcomes Group, Leeds Institute of Cancer Studies and Pathology, University of Leeds, St James's Hospital, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Kapadia MZ, Joachim KC, Balasingham C, Cohen E, Mahant S, Nelson K, Maguire JL, Guttmann A, Offringa M. A Core Outcome Set for Children With Feeding Tubes and Neurologic Impairment: A Systematic Review. Pediatrics 2016; 138:peds.2015-3967. [PMID: 27365302 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2015-3967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/27/2016] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT Uncertainty exists about the impacts of feeding tubes on neurologically impaired children. Core outcome sets (COS) standardize outcome selection, definition, measurement, and reporting. OBJECTIVE To synthesize an evidence base of qualitative data on all outcomes selected and/or reported for neurologically impaired children 0 to 18 years living with gastrostomy/gastrojejunostomy tubes. DATA SOURCES Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Register databases searched from inception to March 2014. STUDY SELECTION Articles examining health outcomes of neurologically impaired children living with feeding tubes. DATA EXTRACTION Outcomes were extracted and assigned to modified Outcome Measures in Rheumatology 2.0 Filter core areas; death, life impact, resource use, pathophysiological manifestations, growth and development. RESULTS We identified 120 unique outcomes with substantial heterogeneity in definition, measurement, and frequency of selection and/or reporting: "pathophysiological manifestation" outcomes (n = 83) in 79% of articles; "growth and development" outcomes (n = 13) in 55% of articles; "death" outcomes (n = 3) and "life impact" outcomes (n = 17) in 39% and 37% of articles, respectively; "resource use" outcomes (n = 4) in 14%. Weight (50%), gastroesophageal reflux (35%), and site infection (25%) were the most frequently reported outcomes. LIMITATIONS We were unable to investigate effect size of outcomes because quantitative data were not collected. CONCLUSIONS The paucity of outcomes assessed for life impact, resource use and death hinders meaningful evidence synthesis. A COS could help overcome the current wide heterogeneity in selection and definition. These results will form the basis of a consensus process to produce a final COS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mufiza Z Kapadia
- Toronto Outcomes Research in Child Health (TORCH), Child Health Evaluative Sciences,
| | - Kariym C Joachim
- Toronto Outcomes Research in Child Health (TORCH), Child Health Evaluative Sciences
| | - Chrinna Balasingham
- Toronto Outcomes Research in Child Health (TORCH), Child Health Evaluative Sciences
| | - Eyal Cohen
- Division of Paediatric Medicine, Paediatrics Outcomes Research Team, and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, and Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; and
| | - Sanjay Mahant
- Division of Paediatric Medicine, Paediatrics Outcomes Research Team, and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, and CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; and
| | - Katherine Nelson
- Division of Paediatric Medicine, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, and Paediatric Advanced Care Team, Department of Paediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jonathon L Maguire
- Division of Paediatric Medicine, Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, and Department of Paediatrics, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Astrid Guttmann
- Division of Paediatric Medicine, Paediatrics Outcomes Research Team, and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, and Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Martin Offringa
- Toronto Outcomes Research in Child Health (TORCH), Child Health Evaluative Sciences
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Schougaard LMV, Larsen LP, Jessen A, Sidenius P, Dorflinger L, de Thurah A, Hjollund NH. AmbuFlex: tele-patient-reported outcomes (telePRO) as the basis for follow-up in chronic and malignant diseases. Qual Life Res 2016; 25:525-34. [PMID: 26790427 PMCID: PMC4759231 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-015-1207-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 90] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/06/2015] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE A tele-patient-reported outcome (telePRO) model includes outpatients' reports of symptoms and health status from home before or instead of visiting the outpatient clinic. In the generic PRO system, AmbuFlex, telePRO is used to decide whether a patient needs an outpatient visit and is thus a tool for better symptom assessment, more patient-centred care, and more efficient use of resources. Specific PROs are developed for each patient group. In this paper we describe our experiences with large-scale implementations of telePRO as the basis for follow-up in chronic and malignant diseases using the generic PRO system AmbuFlex. METHODS The AmbuFlex concept consists of three generic elements: PRO data collection, PRO-based automated decision algorithm, and PRO-based graphical overview for clinical decision support. Experiences were described with respect to these elements. RESULTS By December 2015, AmbuFlex was implemented in nine diagnostic groups in Denmark. A total of 13,135 outpatients from 15 clinics have been individually referred. From epilepsy clinics, about 70 % of all their outpatients were referred. The response rates for the initial questionnaire were 81-98 %. Of 8256 telePRO-based contacts from epilepsy outpatients, up to 48 % were handled without other contact than the PRO assessment. Clinicians as well as patients reported high satisfaction with the system. CONCLUSION The results indicate that telePRO is feasible and may be recommended as the platform for follow-up in several patient groups with chronic and malignant diseases and with many consecutive outpatient contacts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Anne Jessen
- AmbuFlex/WestChronic, Regional Hospital West Jutland, Herning, Denmark
| | - Per Sidenius
- Department of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Annette de Thurah
- Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Niels Henrik Hjollund
- AmbuFlex/WestChronic, Regional Hospital West Jutland, Herning, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Boele FW, van Uden-Kraan CF, Hilverda K, Reijneveld JC, Cleijne W, Klein M, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM. Attitudes and preferences toward monitoring symptoms, distress, and quality of life in glioma patients and their informal caregivers. Support Care Cancer 2016; 24:3011-22. [PMID: 26879825 PMCID: PMC4877415 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-016-3112-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2015] [Accepted: 01/27/2016] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Glioma patients and their informal caregivers face many challenges in living with the disease and its disease-specific consequences. To better meet their needs, a system to monitor symptoms, distress, and quality of life could prove useful. We explored glioma patients' and caregivers' attitudes and preferences toward monitoring in general and specifically toward paper-and-pencil and computerized (eHealth) options. METHODS In total, 15 patients and 15 informal caregivers participated in individual, semi-structured interviews. Interviews were transcribed smooth verbatim and coded by two researchers independently. RESULTS Advantages of monitoring generated by participants include increased awareness of problems and their flow over time, and facilitating supportive care provision. Disadvantages include investment of time and mastering the discipline to monitor frequently. Patients reported more disadvantages of monitoring, including practical and disease-specific impediments, while caregivers mentioned more advantages. Preferences for specific methods mentioned to monitor are highly personal but most prefer to have an option for face-to-face contact to discuss results of monitoring with health care professionals even in computerized instruments. CONCLUSIONS Informal caregivers view a monitoring system more favorably than glioma patients. In developing an efficient monitoring system to help glioma patients and caregivers find their way to supportive care, a computerized instrument with the added opportunity to contact a health care professional seems to be the best option to advise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florien W Boele
- Department of Medical Psychology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Cornelia F van Uden-Kraan
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081, Amsterdam, HZ, Netherlands.,Clinical Psychology, VU University, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Karen Hilverda
- Department of Medical Psychology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jaap C Reijneveld
- Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007, Amsterdam, MB, Netherlands
| | - Wilmy Cleijne
- Department of Medical Psychology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Martin Klein
- Department of Medical Psychology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081, Amsterdam, HZ, Netherlands. .,Clinical Psychology, VU University, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Strasser F, Blum D, von Moos R, Cathomas R, Ribi K, Aebi S, Betticher D, Hayoz S, Klingbiel D, Brauchli P, Haefner M, Mauri S, Kaasa S, Koeberle D. The effect of real-time electronic monitoring of patient-reported symptoms and clinical syndromes in outpatient workflow of medical oncologists: E-MOSAIC, a multicenter cluster-randomized phase III study (SAKK 95/06). Ann Oncol 2015; 27:324-32. [PMID: 26646758 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2015] [Accepted: 11/16/2015] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with advanced, incurable cancer receiving anticancer treatment often experience multidimensional symptoms. We hypothesize that real-time monitoring of both symptoms and clinical syndromes will improve symptom management by oncologists and patient outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this prospective multicenter cluster-randomized phase-III trial, patients with incurable, symptomatic, solid tumors, who received new outpatient chemotherapy with palliative intention, were eligible. Immediately before the weekly oncologists' visit, patients completed the palm-based E-MOSAIC assessment (Edmonton-Symptom-Assessment-Scale, ≤3 additional symptoms, estimated nutritional intake, body weight change, Karnofsky Performance Status, medications for pain, fatigue, nutrition). A cumulative, longitudinal monitoring sheet (LoMoS) was printed immediately. Eligible experienced oncologists were defined as one cluster each and randomized to receive the immediate print-out LoMoS (intervention) or not (control). Primary analysis limited to patients having uninterrupted (>4/6 visits with same oncologist) patient-oncologist sequences was a mixed model for the difference in patients global quality of life (G-QoL; items 29/30 of EORTC-QlQ-c30) between baseline (BL) and week 6. Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis included all eligible patients. RESULTS In 8 centers, 82 oncologists treated 264 patients (median 66 years; overall survival intervention 6.3, control 5.4 months) with various tumors. The between-arm difference in G-QoL of 102 uninterrupted patients (intervention: 55; control: 47) was 6.8 (P = 0.11) in favor of the intervention; in a sensitivity analysis (oncologists treating ≥2 patients; 50, 39), it was 9.0 (P = 0.07). ITT analysis revealed improvement in symptoms (difference last study visit-BL: intervention -5.4 versus control 2.1, P = 0.003) and favored the intervention for communication and coping. More patients with high symptom load received immediate symptom management (chart review, nurse-patient interview) by oncologists getting the LoMoS. CONCLUSION Monitoring of patient symptoms, clinical syndromes and their management clearly reduced patients' symptoms, but not QoL. Our results encourage the implementation of real-time monitoring in the routine workflow of oncologist with a computer solution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Strasser
- Oncological Palliative Medicine, Clinic Oncology/Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine and Palliative Center, Cantonal Hospital St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland
| | - D Blum
- Oncological Palliative Medicine, Clinic Oncology/Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine and Palliative Center, Cantonal Hospital St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland European Palliative Research Centre, NTNU, and St Olavs University Hospital Trondheim, Trondheim, Norway
| | - R von Moos
- Department of Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Chur, Chur
| | - R Cathomas
- Department of Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Chur, Chur
| | | | - S Aebi
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Bern, Bern
| | - D Betticher
- Department of Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Fribourg, Fribourg
| | - S Hayoz
- SAKK Coordinating Center, Bern
| | | | | | | | - S Mauri
- Department of Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Lugano, Lugano
| | - S Kaasa
- European Palliative Research Centre, NTNU, and St Olavs University Hospital Trondheim, Trondheim, Norway
| | - D Koeberle
- Clinic Oncology/Hematology, Cantonal Hospital St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
McCahon D, Baker JM, Murray ET, Fitzmaurice DA. Assessing the utility of an online registry for patients monitoring their own warfarin therapy. J Clin Pathol 2015; 69:331-6. [PMID: 26519487 DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2015-203168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2015] [Accepted: 09/21/2015] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To evaluate the utility of an online self-report registry for patient self-monitoring and self-management (PSM) of warfarin therapy. METHODS A prospective observational study of UK-based patients undertaking PSM and recording their international normalised ratio (INR) data via an online registry. Consenting participants recorded INR test dates, results and warfarin dosages using the online registry for a period of 12 months. Participants reported demographic data, disease characteristics and treatment-related adverse events and provided feedback via a survey. Data accuracy was assessed through comparison of INR results recorded online with results stored on 19 INR testing devices. Percentage time spent within therapeutic time in range (TTR) was also examined. RESULTS Eighty-seven per cent (39/45) completed the study period. Age ranged from 26 to 83 years, 44% had undertaken PSM for >5 years. Sixty-six per cent (25/38) reported that the registry was easy to navigate and use. Forty-two participants contributed a total of 1669 INR results. Agreement between self-reported INR results and source INR data was high (99%). Mean TTR was 76% (SD 18.58) with 83% having >60% TTR. CONCLUSIONS Findings suggest that an online PSM registry is feasible, accurate and acceptable to patients. These findings require confirmation in a larger cohort of PSM patients. An online self-report registry could provide a valuable resource for gathering real world evidence of clinical effectiveness and safety of these developing models of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah McCahon
- Department of Primary Care Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jennifer M Baker
- Department of Primary Care Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Ellen T Murray
- Department of Primary Care Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - David A Fitzmaurice
- Department of Primary Care Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Griffiths FE, Atherton H, Barker JR, Cave JAK, Dennick K, Dowdall P, Fraser J, Huxley C, Kim SW, Madan JJ, Matharu H, Musumadi L, Palmer TM, Paul M, Sankaranarayanan S, Slowther AM, Sujan MA, Sutcliffe PA, Sturt J. Improving health outcomes for young people with long term conditions: The role of digital communication in current and future patient-clinician communication for NHS providers of specialist clinical services for young people - LYNC study protocol. Digit Health 2015; 1:2055207615593698. [PMID: 29942543 PMCID: PMC5999058 DOI: 10.1177/2055207615593698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Young people living with long term conditions are vulnerable to health service disengagement. This endangers their long term health. Studies report requests for digital forms of communication - email, text, social media - with their health care team. Digital clinical communication is troublesome for the UK NHS. AIM In this article we aim to present the research protocol for evaluating the impacts and outcomes of digital clinical communications for young people living with long term conditions and provide critical analysis of their use, monitoring and evaluation by NHS providers (LYNC study: Long term conditions, Young people, Networked Communications). METHODS The research involves: (a) patient and public involvement activities with 16-24 year olds with and without long term health conditions; (b) six literature reviews; (c) case studies - the main empirical part of the study - and (d) synthesis and a consensus meeting. Case studies use a mixed methods design. Interviews and non-participant observation of practitioners and patients communicating in up to 20 specialist clinical settings will be combined with data, aggregated at the case level (non-identifiable patient data) on a range of clinical outcomes meaningful within the case and across cases. We will describe the use of digital clinical communication from the perspective of patients, clinical staff, support staff and managers, interviewing up to 15 young people and 15 staff per case study. Outcome data includes emergency admissions, A&E attendance and DNA (did not attend) rates. Case studies will be analysed to understand impacts of digital clinical communication on patient health outcomes, health care costs and consumption, ethics and patient safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Helen Atherton
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care
Health Sciences, University of Oxford, UK
| | | | | | - Kathryn Dennick
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing
and Midwifery, King’s College London, UK
| | | | - Joe Fraser
- Patient and Public Involvement (PPI)
representative, UK
| | | | | | | | - Harjit Matharu
- University Hospitals Coventry and
Warwickshire NHS Trust, UK
| | | | - Tom M Palmer
- Warwick Medical School, University of
Warwick, UK
| | - Moli Paul
- Warwick Medical School, University of
Warwick, UK
| | | | | | - Mark A Sujan
- Warwick Medical School, University of
Warwick, UK
| | | | - Jackie Sturt
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing
and Midwifery, King’s College London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Steele Gray C, Miller D, Kuluski K, Cott C. Tying eHealth Tools to Patient Needs: Exploring the Use of eHealth for Community-Dwelling Patients With Complex Chronic Disease and Disability. JMIR Res Protoc 2014; 3:e67. [PMID: 25428028 PMCID: PMC4260075 DOI: 10.2196/resprot.3500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2014] [Revised: 09/30/2014] [Accepted: 10/19/2014] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health policy makers have recently shifted attention towards examining high users of health care, in particular patients with complex chronic disease and disability (CCDD) characterized as having multimorbidities and care needs that require ongoing use of services. The adoption of eHealth technologies may be a key strategy in supporting and providing care for these patients; however, these technologies need to address the specific needs of patients with CCDD. This paper describes the first phase of a multiphased patient-centered research project aimed at developing eHealth technology for patients with CCDD. OBJECTIVE As part of the development of new eHealth technologies to support patients with CCDD in primary care settings, we sought to determine the perceived needs of these patients with respect to (1) the kinds of health and health service issues that are important to them, (2) the information that should be collected and how it could be collected in order to help meet their needs, and (3) their views on the challenges/barriers to using eHealth mobile apps to collect the information. METHODS Focus groups were conducted with community-dwelling patients with CCDD and caregivers. An interpretive description research design was used to identify the perceived needs of participants and the information sharing and eHealth technologies that could support those needs. Analysis was conducted concurrently with data collection. Coding of transcripts from four focus groups was conducted by 3 authors. QSR NVivo 10 software was used to manage coding. RESULTS There were 14 total participants in the focus groups. The average age of participants was 64.4 years; 9 participants were female, and 11 were born in Canada. Participants identified a need for open two-way communication and dialogue between themselves and their providers, and better information sharing between providers in order to support continuity and coordination of care. Access issues were mainly around wait times for appointments, challenges with transportation, and costs. A visual depiction of these perceived needs and their relation to each other is included as part of the discussion, which will be used to guide development of our eHealth technologies. Participants recognized the potential for eHealth technologies to support and improve their care but also expressed common concerns regarding their adoption. Specifically, they mentioned privacy and data security, accessibility, the loss of necessary visits, increased social isolation, provider burden, downloading responsibility onto patients for care management, entry errors, training requirements, and potentially confusing interfaces. CONCLUSIONS From the perspective of our participants, there is a significant potential for eHealth tools to support patients with CCDD in community and primary care settings, but we need to be wary of the potential downfalls of adopting eHealth technologies and pay special attention to patient-identified needs and concerns. eHealth tools that support ongoing patient-provider interaction, patient self-management (such as telemonitoring), and provider-provider interactions (through electronic health record integration) could be of most benefit to patients similar to those in our study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolyn Steele Gray
- Bridgepoint Collaboratory for Research and Innovation, Bridgepoint Active Healthcare, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
van Bragt S, van den Bemt L, Kievits R, Merkus P, van Weel C, Schermer T. PELICAN: a cluster-randomized controlled trial in Dutch general practices to assess a self-management support intervention based on individual goals for children with asthma. J Asthma 2014; 52:211-9. [PMID: 25166455 DOI: 10.3109/02770903.2014.952439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Insufficient asthma management leads to impaired health-related quality of life (HRQL). The aim of this study is to assess whether individualized self-management (ISM) support will improve HRQL in children with asthma compared to enhanced usual care (EUC) in Dutch general practices. METHODS A cluster-randomized controlled trial with 9-month follow-up. ISM is a nurse-led intervention that is optimized to the needs of children, leading to a written action plan. Power calculation demanded inclusion of 170 children (aged 6-11 years) diagnosed with asthma and active medication use. RESULTS Outcomes were HRQL of the child (Paediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire, PAQLQ-s) and several secondary outcomes. Data of 29 children (mean age 8.6 years, SD 1.7) were analyzed; ISM (n = 15) or EUC (n = 14). Logistic regression analysis (minimal clinical important difference; MCID ≥ 0.5) and descriptive analyses were performed. Despite high PAQLQ-s score at baseline (median ISM 6.35, EUC 6.02), a substantial number of subjects from both groups showed MCID of HRQL (ISM 33%, EUC 57%). Treatment differences on HRQL were not significant (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.08, 1.69). Secondary outcomes did not show significant differences either, with exception of PAQLQ-s symptoms domain score in favor of EUC. CONCLUSION Due to recruitment problems and underpowered analyses, no firm conclusions on the effectiveness of ISM support for childhood asthma in primary care could be drawn. Still, this study can be considered a valuable pilot study and in the future, there might be better capacity in general practices to commit to such treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie van Bragt
- Department of Primary and Community Care , Radboudumc, Nijmegen , The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND As traditional methods have become increasingly difficult, the Internet offers a mechanism for conducting survey research quickly and efficiently. However, the validity of this research depends on the ability of respondents to accurately report health status. We used a large Internet-based inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) cohort to validate self-reported IBD against physician reports. METHODS Between June 22, 2012, and April 01, 2013, all participants of CCFA Partners (n = 6681) were invited to participate, and 450 were selected by random stratified sampling. We sent physicians a survey to confirm IBD diagnosis and characteristics. We used descriptive statistics to compare data. RESULTS A total of 4423 participants (66%) indicated interest. Of 450 selected, 261 (58%) consented, and physician reports were obtained for 184 (71%). Physicians confirmed IBD status in 178 (97%) and type in 171 (97% of confirmed). The matching between patient and physician reports for Crohn's disease (CD) was 82% for disease location, 89% for the presence of perianal disease, and 46% for disease behavior. For ulcerative colitis (UC), disease location matched 54% of the time. Physician reports confirmed the status of ever having bowel surgery for 97% of CD and 94% for UC and confirmed current pouch or ostomy in 84% of CD and 81% of UC. CONCLUSIONS Self-reported IBD in CCFA Partners is highly accurate, and participants are willing to release medical records for research. Self-reported phenotypic characteristics were less valid. The validity of IBD diagnoses among the participants of CCFA Partners supports the use of this cohort for patient-centered outcome research.
Collapse
|
38
|
Morrison D, Wyke S, Agur K, Cameron EJ, Docking RI, Mackenzie AM, McConnachie A, Raghuvir V, Thomson NC, Mair FS. Digital asthma self-management interventions: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2014; 16:e51. [PMID: 24550161 PMCID: PMC3958674 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.2814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 117] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2013] [Revised: 11/18/2013] [Accepted: 12/12/2013] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many people with asthma tolerate symptoms and lifestyle limitations unnecessarily by not utilizing proven therapies. Better support for self-management is known to improve asthma control, and increasingly the Internet and other digital media are being used to deliver that support. OBJECTIVE Our goal was to summarize current knowledge, evidenced through existing systematic reviews, of the effectiveness and implementation of digital self-management support for adults and children with asthma and to examine what features help or hinder the use of these programs. METHODS A comprehensive search strategy combined 3 facets of search terms: (1) online technology, (2) asthma, and (3) self-management/behavior change/patient experience. We undertook searches of 14 databases, and reference and citation searching. We included qualitative and quantitative systematic reviews about online or computerized interventions facilitating self-management. Title, abstract, full paper screening, and quality appraisal were performed by two researchers independently. Data extraction was undertaken using standardized forms. RESULTS A total of 3810 unique papers were identified. Twenty-nine systematic reviews met inclusion criteria: the majority were from the United States (n=12), the rest from United Kingdom (n=6), Canada (n=3), Portugal (n=2), and Australia, France, Spain, Norway, Taiwan, and Greece (1 each). Only 10 systematic reviews fulfilled pre-determined quality standards, describing 19 clinical trials. Interventions were heterogeneous: duration of interventions ranging from single use, to 24-hour access for 12 months, and incorporating varying degrees of health professional involvement. Dropout rates ranged from 5-23%. Four RCTs were aimed at adults (overall range 3-65 years). Participants were inadequately described: socioeconomic status 0/19, ethnicity 6/19, and gender 15/19. No qualitative systematic reviews were included. Meta-analysis was not attempted due to heterogeneity and inadequate information provision within reviews. There was no evidence of harm from digital interventions. All RCTs that examined knowledge (n=2) and activity limitation (n=2) showed improvement in the intervention group. Digital interventions improved markers of self care (5/6), quality of life (4/7), and medication use (2/3). Effects on symptoms (6/12) and school absences (2/4) were equivocal, with no evidence of overall benefits on lung function (2/6), or health service use (2/15). No specific data on economic analyses were provided. Intervention descriptions were generally brief making it impossible to identify which specific "ingredients" of interventions contribute most to improving outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Digital self-management interventions show promise, with evidence of beneficial effects on some outcomes. There is no evidence about utility in those over 65 years and no information about socioeconomic status of participants, making understanding the "reach" of such interventions difficult. Digital interventions are poorly described within reviews, with insufficient information about barriers and facilitators to their uptake and utilization. To address these gaps, a detailed quantitative systematic review of digital asthma interventions and an examination of the primary qualitative literature are warranted, as well as greater emphasis on economic analysis within trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah Morrison
- General Practice & Primary Care, Institute of Health & Wellbeing, College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Hjollund NHI, Larsen LP, Biering K, Johnsen SP, Riiskjær E, Schougaard LM. Use of Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures at Group and Patient Levels: Experiences From the Generic Integrated PRO System, WestChronic. Interact J Med Res 2014; 3:e5. [PMID: 24518281 PMCID: PMC3936283 DOI: 10.2196/ijmr.2885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2013] [Revised: 11/22/2013] [Accepted: 01/18/2014] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures may be used at a group level for research and quality improvement and at the individual patient level to support clinical decision making and ensure efficient use of resources. The challenges involved in implementing PRO measures are mostly the same regardless of aims and diagnostic groups and include logistic feasibility, high response rates, robustness, and ability to adapt to the needs of patient groups and settings. If generic PRO systems can adapt to specific needs, advanced technology can be shared between medical specialties and for different aims. Objective We describe methodological, organizational, and practical experiences with a generic PRO system, WestChronic, which is in use among a range of diagnostic groups and for a range of purposes. Methods The WestChronic system supports PRO data collection, with integration of Web and paper PRO questionnaires (mixed-mode) and automated procedures that enable adherence to implementation-specific schedules for the collection of PRO. For analysis, we divided functionalities into four elements: basic PRO data collection and logistics, PRO-based clinical decision support, PRO-based automated decision algorithms, and other forms of communication. While the first element is ubiquitous, the others are optional and only applicable at a patient level. Methodological and organizational experiences were described according to each element. Results WestChronic has, to date, been implemented in 22 PRO projects within 18 diagnostic groups, including cardiology, neurology, rheumatology, nephrology, orthopedic surgery, gynecology, oncology, and psychiatry. The aims of the individual projects included epidemiological research, quality improvement, hospital evaluation, clinical decision support, efficient use of outpatient clinic resources, and screening for side effects and comorbidity. In total 30,174 patients have been included, and 59,232 PRO assessments have been collected using 92 different PRO questionnaires. Response rates of up to 93% were achieved for first-round questionnaires and up to 99% during follow-up. For 6 diagnostic groups, PRO data were displayed graphically to the clinician to facilitate flagging of important symptoms and decision support, and in 5 diagnostic groups PRO data were used for automatic algorithm-based decisions. Conclusions WestChronic has allowed the implementation of all proposed protocol for data collection and processing. The system has achieved high response rates, and longitudinal attrition is limited. The relevance of the questions, the mixed-mode principle, and automated procedures has contributed to the high response rates. Furthermore, development and implementation of a number of approaches and methods for clinical use of PRO has been possible without challenging the generic property. Generic multipurpose PRO systems may enable sharing of automated and efficient logistics, optimal response rates, and other advanced options for PRO data collection and processing, while still allowing adaptation to specific aims and patient groups.
Collapse
|
40
|
Johansen MA, Henriksen E, Horsch A, Schuster T, Berntsen GKR. Electronic symptom reporting between patient and provider for improved health care service quality: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. part 1: state of the art. J Med Internet Res 2012; 14:e118. [PMID: 23032300 PMCID: PMC3510721 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.2214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2012] [Revised: 07/11/2012] [Accepted: 07/12/2012] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Over the last two decades, the number of studies on electronic symptom reporting has increased greatly. However, the field is very heterogeneous: the choices of patient groups, health service innovations, and research targets seem to involve a broad range of foci. To move the field forward, it is necessary to build on work that has been done and direct further research to the areas holding most promise. Therefore, we conducted a comprehensive review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focusing on electronic communication between patient and provider to improve health care service quality, presented in two parts. Part 2 investigates the methodological quality and effects of the RCTs, and demonstrates some promising benefits of electronic symptom reporting. OBJECTIVE To give a comprehensive overview of the most mature part of this emerging field regarding (1) patient groups, (2) health service innovations, and (3) research targets relevant to electronic symptom reporting. METHODS We searched Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and IEEE Xplore for original studies presented in English-language articles published from 1990 to November 2011. Inclusion criteria were RCTs of interventions where patients or parents reported health information electronically to the health care system for health care purposes and were given feedback. RESULTS Of 642 records identified, we included 32 articles representing 29 studies. The included articles were published from 2002, with 24 published during the last 5 years. The following five patient groups were represented: respiratory and lung diseases (12 studies), cancer (6), psychiatry (6), cardiovascular (3), and diabetes (1). In addition to these, 1 study had a mix of three groups. All included studies, except 1, focused on long-term conditions. We identified four categories of health service innovations: consultation support (7 studies), monitoring with clinician support (12), self-management with clinician support (9), and therapy (1). Most of the research (21/29, 72%) was conducted within four combinations: consultation support innovation in the cancer group (5/29, 17%), monitoring innovation in the respiratory and lung diseases group (8/29, 28%), and self-management innovations in psychiatry (4/29, 14%) and in the respiratory and lung diseases group (4/29, 14%). Research targets in the consultation support studies focused on increased patient centeredness, while monitoring and self-management mainly aimed at documenting health benefits. All except 1 study aiming for reduced health care costs were in the monitoring group. CONCLUSION RCT-based research on electronic symptom reporting has developed enormously since 2002. Research including additional patient groups or new combinations of patient groups with the four identified health service innovations can be expected in the near future. We suggest that developing a generic model (not diagnosis specific) for electronic patient symptom reporting for long-term conditions may benefit the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Alise Johansen
- Norwegian Centre for Integrated Care and Telemedicine, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|