Evaluation of Fracture Risk Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Receiving Different Oral Anticoagulants

Risks of incident major osteoporotic fractures following SARS-CoV-2 infection among older individuals: a population-based cohort study in Hong Kong

Population-based epidemiological studies on post-acute phase coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19)-related fractures in older adults are lacking. This study aims to examine the risk of incident major osteoporotic fractures following SARS-CoV-2 infection among individuals aged ≥50, compared to individuals without COVID-19. It was a retrospective, propensity-score matched, population-based cohort study of COVID-19 patients and non-COVID individuals identified from the electronic database of the Hong Kong Hospital Authority from January 2020 to March 2022. The primary outcome was a composite of major osteoporotic fractures (hip, clinical vertebral, and upper limb). COVID-19 patients were 1:1 matched to controls using propensity-score according to age, sex, vaccination status, medical comorbidities and baseline medications. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Cox proportional hazards regression models. A total of 429 459 COVID-19 patients were included, 1:1 matched to non-COVID individuals. Upon median follow-up of 11 months, COVID-19 patients had higher risks of major osteoporotic fractures (5.08 vs 3.95 per 1000 persons; HR 1.22 95%CI [1.15-1.31]), hip fractures (2.71 vs 1.94; 1.33 [1.22-1.46]), clinical vertebral fractures (0.42 vs 0.31; 1.29 [1.03-1.62]), and falls (13.83 vs 10.36; 1.28 [1.23-1.33]). Subgroup analyses revealed no significant interaction. In acute (within 30 days) and post-acute phases (beyond 30 days) following severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, we consistently observed a significant increase in fractures and falls risks. Our study demonstrated increased risk of major osteoporotic fractures after SARS-CoV-2 infection in both acute and post-acute phases in older adults, partly due to increased fall risk. Clinicians should be aware of musculoskeletal health of COVID-19 survivors.

Ticagrelor was associated with lower fracture risk than clopidogrel in the dual anti-platelet regimen among patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with percutaneous coronary intervention

PURPOSE

Patients with coronary artery disease have increased fracture risks. P2Y12 inhibitors may impact fracture risks. We compared the fracture risks associated with ticagrelor and clopidogrel in dual anti-platelet therapy (DAPT).

METHODS

We identified all adults who underwent first-ever percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) between 2010 and 2017 from a territory-wide PCI registry in Hong Kong. Following 1:1 propensity-score matching for baseline characteristics, patients were followed up till event occurrence, death, or 30 June 2022. Outcomes of interest were major osteoporotic fractures (MOF) identified by validated ICD-9-CM codes. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to compute the hazard ratio (HR) for MOF associated with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel use.

RESULTS

3018 ticagrelor users and 3018 clopidogrel users were identified after propensity-score matching (mean age: 61.4 years; 84.1% men). Upon median follow-up of 6.5 years, 59 ticagrelor users and 119 clopidogrel users sustained MOF (annualized fracture risks: 0.34% and 0.56%, respectively). Ticagrelor use was associated with lower risks of MOF (HR 0.60, 95%CI 0.44-0.83; p = 0.002). Consistent HRs were observed for fractures over vertebrae, hip and upper limbs. Subgroup analyses showed no interaction according to age, sex, presence of diabetes, presence of chronic kidney disease and prior fracture history.

CONCLUSION

Among adults who underwent first-ever PCI for ACS, ticagrelor use in the DAPT was associated with a lower risk of MOF compared with clopidogrel. Our results support the use of ticagrelor in the DAPT from the perspective of bone health.

SGLT2i reduces risk of developing HCC in patients with co-existing type 2 diabetes and hepatitis B infection: A territory-wide cohort study in Hong Kong

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) and chronic hepatitis B infection (CHB) are risk factors of HCC. Sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) inhibit HCC oncogenesis in preclinical studies. However, clinical studies are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of SGLT2i use on incident HCC using a territory-wide cohort of exclusively patients with co-existing T2D and CHB.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

Patients with co-existing T2D and CHB between 2015 and 2020 were identified from the representative electronic database of the Hong Kong Hospital Authority. Patients with and without SGLT2i use were 1:1 matched by propensity score for their demographics, biochemistry results, liver-related characteristics, and background medications. Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to assess the association between SGLT2i use and incident HCC. A total of 2,000 patients with co-existing T2D and CHB (1,000 in each SGLT2i and non-SGLT2i group; 79.7% on anti-HBV therapy at baseline) were included after propensity-score matching. Over a follow-up of 3,704 person-years, the incidence rates of HCC were 1.39 and 2.52 cases per 100 person-year in SGLT2i and non-SGLT2i groups, respectively. SGLT2i use was associated with a significantly lower risk of incident HCC (HR 0.54, 95%CI: 0.33-0.88, p =0.013). The association remained similar regardless of sex, age, glycemic control, diabetes duration, presence of cirrhosis and hepatic steatosis, timing of anti-HBV therapy, and background antidiabetic agents including dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, insulin, or glitazones (all p interaction>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with co-existing T2D and CHB, SGLT2i use was associated with a lower risk of incident HCC.

Fracture risks associated with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes patients across eGFR and albuminuria categories: A population-based study in Hong Kong

AIMS

To evaluate major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) risk among type 2 diabetes patients treated with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) across eGFR and albuminuria categories.

METHODS

A population-based cohort of type 2 diabetes patients started on SGLT2i or dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) during 2007-2020 was identified from Hong Kong Hospital Authority database. One-to-one propensity score matching was applied to match each SGLT2i user with one DPP4i user. The primary outcomes were 180- and 365-day risks of MOF. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR).

RESULTS

A total of 28,696 patients (14,348 in each group) were included. Over 180-day follow-up, MOF occurred in 25 (0.17 %) SGLT2i users and 24 (0.17 %) DPP4i users (incidence of 4.07 and 3.63/1,000 person-years, respectively). At 365 days, MOF occurred in 43 (0.30 %) SGLT2i users and 44 (0.31 %) DPP4i users (incidence of 4.16 and 3.64/1,000 person-years, respectively). Risks of MOF were comparable between two groups at both 180 days (HR = 1.13, 95 %CI 0.65-1.98, P = 0.67) and 365 days (HR = 1.15, 95 %CI 0.75-1.75, P = 0.52). Subgroup analyses were consistent across age, sex, eGFR, albuminuria, or KDIGO categories.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study did not reveal a statistically significant increase in fracture risk with SGLT2i use compared with DPP4i among type 2 diabetes patients, across eGFR and albuminuria categories.

Epidemiology and outcomes of hyponatremia in patients with COVID-19-A territory-wide study in Hong Kong

Background

Hyponatremia is common in COVID-19, but its epidemiology and impact on clinical outcomes in relation to different variants, especially the Omicron variant, requires further clarification.

Methods

This was a territory-wide retrospective study to investigate the epidemiology and outcomes of COVID-19 patients with hyponatremia from January 1, 2020 to March 31, 2022 in Hong Kong. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality of patients with COVID-19 and hyponatremia at presentation. Secondary outcomes included rate of hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) hospitalization, overall duration of hospitalization, and duration of ICU hospitalization.

Results

A total of 53,415 COVID-19 patients were included for analysis, of which 14,545 (27.2%) had hyponatremia at presentation. 9813 (67.5%), 2821 (19.4%), and 1911 (13.1%) had mild (130 to <135 mmol/L), moderate (125 to <130 mmol/L), and severe hyponatremia (<125 mmol/L) at presentation respectively. Age, male sex, diabetes, active malignancy, white cell count, serum creatinine, hypoalbuminemia, C-reactive protein, and viral loads were independent predictors for hyponatremia in COVID-19 patients (P < 0.001, for all). Hyponatremic patients had increased 30-day mortality (9.7 vs. 5.7%, P < 0.001), prolonged hospitalization (11.9 ± 15.1 days vs. 11.5 ± 12.1 days, P < 0.001), and more ICU admissions (7.0% vs. 3.3%, P < 0.001). Patients diagnosed during the "fifth wave" Omicron BA.2 outbreak had 2.29-fold risk (95% CI 2.02-2.59, P < 0.001) of presenting with hyponatremia compared to other waves.

Conclusion

Hyponatremia is common among COVID-19 patients, and may serve as a prognostic indicator for unfavorable outcomes and increased healthcare utilization in the evolving COVID-19 outbreak.