Islet cell autoimmunity in type I diabetic patients after HLA-mismatched pancreas transplantation

Allo Beta Cell transplantation: specific features, unanswered questions, and immunological challenge

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) presents a persistent medical challenge, demanding innovative strategies for sustained glycemic control and enhanced patient well-being. Beta cells are specialized cells in the pancreas that produce insulin, a hormone that regulates blood sugar levels. When beta cells are damaged or destroyed, insulin production decreases, which leads to T1D. Allo Beta Cell Transplantation has emerged as a promising therapeutic avenue, with the goal of reinstating glucose regulation and insulin production in T1D patients. However, the path to success in this approach is fraught with complex immunological hurdles that demand rigorous exploration and resolution for enduring therapeutic efficacy. This exploration focuses on the distinct immunological characteristics inherent to Allo Beta Cell Transplantation. An understanding of these unique challenges is pivotal for the development of effective therapeutic interventions. The critical role of glucose regulation and insulin in immune activation is emphasized, with an emphasis on the intricate interplay between beta cells and immune cells. The transplantation site, particularly the liver, is examined in depth, highlighting its relevance in the context of complex immunological issues. Scrutiny extends to recipient and donor matching, including the utilization of multiple islet donors, while also considering the potential risk of autoimmune recurrence. Moreover, unanswered questions and persistent gaps in knowledge within the field are identified. These include the absence of robust evidence supporting immunosuppression treatments, the need for reliable methods to assess rejection and treatment protocols, the lack of validated biomarkers for monitoring beta cell loss, and the imperative need for improved beta cell imaging techniques. In addition, attention is drawn to emerging directions and transformative strategies in the field. This encompasses alternative immunosuppressive regimens and calcineurin-free immunoprotocols, as well as a reevaluation of induction therapy and recipient preconditioning methods. Innovative approaches targeting autoimmune recurrence, such as CAR Tregs and TCR Tregs, are explored, along with the potential of stem stealth cells, tissue engineering, and encapsulation to overcome the risk of graft rejection. In summary, this review provides a comprehensive overview of the inherent immunological obstacles associated with Allo Beta Cell Transplantation. It offers valuable insights into emerging strategies and directions that hold great promise for advancing the field and ultimately improving outcomes for individuals living with diabetes.

Designing biomaterials for the modulation of allogeneic and autoimmune responses to cellular implants in Type 1 Diabetes

The effective suppression of adaptive immune responses is essential for the success of allogeneic cell therapies. In islet transplantation for Type 1 Diabetes, pre-existing autoimmunity provides an additional hurdle, as memory autoimmune T cells mediate both an autoantigen-specific attack on the donor beta cells and an alloantigen-specific attack on the donor graft cells. Immunosuppressive agents used for islet transplantation are generally successful in suppressing alloimmune responses, but dramatically hinder the widespread adoption of this therapeutic approach and fail to control memory T cell populations, which leaves the graft vulnerable to destruction. In this review, we highlight the capacity of biomaterials to provide local and nuanced instruction to suppress or alter immune pathways activated in response to an allogeneic islet transplant. Biomaterial immunoisolation is a common approach employed to block direct antigen recognition and downstream cell-mediated graft destruction; however, immunoisolation alone still permits shed donor antigens to escape into the host environment, resulting in indirect antigen recognition, immune cell activation, and the creation of a toxic graft site. Designing materials to decrease antigen escape, improve cell viability, and increase material compatibility are all approaches that can decrease the local release of antigen and danger signals into the implant microenvironment. Implant materials can be further enhanced through the local delivery of anti-inflammatory, suppressive, chemotactic, and/or tolerogenic agents, which serve to control both the innate and adaptive immune responses to the implant with a benefit of reduced systemic effects. Lessons learned from understanding how to manipulate allogeneic and autogenic immune responses to pancreatic islets can also be applied to other cell therapies to improve their efficacy and duration. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: This review explores key immunologic concepts and critical pathways mediating graft rejection in Type 1 Diabetes, which can instruct the future purposeful design of immunomodulatory biomaterials for cell therapy. A summary of immunological pathways initiated following cellular implantation, as well as current systemic immunomodulatory agents used, is provided. We then outline the potential of biomaterials to modulate these responses. The capacity of polymeric encapsulation to block some powerful rejection pathways is covered. We also highlight the role of cellular health and biocompatibility in mitigating immune responses. Finally, we review the use of bioactive materials to proactively modulate local immune responses, focusing on key concepts of anti-inflammatory, suppressive, and tolerogenic agents.

First World Consensus Conference on pancreas transplantation: Part II - recommendations

The First World Consensus Conference on Pancreas Transplantation provided 49 jury deliberations regarding the impact of pancreas transplantation on the treatment of diabetic patients, and 110 experts' recommendations for the practice of pancreas transplantation. The main message from this consensus conference is that both simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK) and pancreas transplantation alone can improve long-term patient survival, and all types of pancreas transplantation dramatically improve the quality of life of recipients. Pancreas transplantation may also improve the course of chronic complications of diabetes, depending on their severity. Therefore, the advantages of pancreas transplantation appear to clearly surpass potential disadvantages. Pancreas after kidney transplantation increases the risk of mortality only in the early period after transplantation, but is associated with improved life expectancy thereafter. Additionally, preemptive SPK, when compared to SPK performed in patients undergoing dialysis, appears to be associated with improved outcomes. Time on dialysis has negative prognostic implications in SPK recipients. Increased long-term survival, improvement in the course of diabetic complications, and amelioration of quality of life justify preferential allocation of kidney grafts to SPK recipients. Audience discussions and live voting are available online at the following URL address: http://mediaeventi.unipi.it/category/1st-world-consensus-conference-of-pancreas-transplantation/246.

Evaluating the Prognostic Value of Islet Autoantibody Monitoring in Islet Transplant Recipients with Long-Standing Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

(1) Background: The correlation between titers of islet autoantibodies (IAbs) and the loss of transplanted islets remains controversial. We sought to evaluate the prognostic utility of monitoring IAbs in diabetic patients after islet transplantation (ITx); (2) Methods: Twelve patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus and severe hypoglycemia underwent ITx. Serum concentration of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD), insulinoma antigen 2 (IA-2), and zinc transport 8 (ZnT8) autoantibodies was assessed before ITx and 0, 7, and 75 days and every 3 months post-operatively; (3) Results: IA-2A (IA-2 antibody) and ZnT8A (ZnT8 antibody) levels were not detectable before or after ITx in all patients (median follow-up of 53 months (range 24–61)). Prior to ITx, GAD antibody (GADA) was undetectable in 67% (8/12) of patients. Of those, 75% (6/8) converted to GADA+ after ITx. In 67% (4/6) of patients with GADA+ seroconversion, GADA level peaked within 3 months after ITx and subsequently declined. All patients with GADA+ seroconversion maintained long-term partial or complete islet function (insulin independence) after 1 or 2 ITx. There was no correlation between the presence of IAb-associated HLA haplotypes and the presence of IAbs before or after ITx; (4) Conclusions: There is no association between serum GADA trends and ITx outcomes. IA-2A and ZnT8A were not detectable in any of our patients before or after ITx.

Lessons from Human Islet Transplantation Inform Stem Cell-Based Approaches in the Treatment of Diabetes

Diabetes mellitus is characterized by the body's inability to control blood glucose levels within a physiological range due to loss and/or dysfunction of insulin producing beta cells. Progressive beta cell loss leads to hyperglycemia and if untreated can lead to severe complications and/or death. Treatments at this time are limited to pharmacologic therapies, including exogenous insulin or oral/injectable agents that improve insulin sensitivity or augment endogenous insulin secretion. Cell transplantation can restore physiologic endogenous insulin production and minimize hyper- and hypoglycemic excursions. Islet isolation procedures and management of transplant recipients have advanced over the last several decades; both tight glycemic control and insulin independence are achievable. Research has been conducted in isolating islets, monitoring islet function, and mitigating the immune response. However, this procedure is still only performed in a small minority of patients. One major barrier is the scarcity of human pancreatic islet donors, variation in donor pancreas quality, and variability in islet isolation success. Advances have been made in generation of glucose responsive human stem cell derived beta cells (sBCs) and islets from human pluripotent stem cells using directed differentiation. This is an emerging promising treatment for patients with diabetes because they could potentially serve as an unlimited source of functional, glucose-responsive beta cells. Challenges exist in their generation including long term survival of grafts, safety of transplantation, and protection from the immune response. This review focuses on the progress made in islet allo- and auto transplantation and how these advances may be extrapolated to the sBC context.

Impact of Pancreatic Autoantibodies in Pancreas Graft Survival After Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

In simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT), persistence or recurrence of pancreatic autoantibodies (PAs) has been associated with pancreas graft (PG) autoimmune-driven injury. Our aim was to analyze the impact of PAs on PG survival.

METHODS

Between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2017, we studied 139 patients with post-SPKT anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) autoantibody. Alloimmune (ALI) events were defined as PG rejection and/or de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSA). Hence, 3 groups were defined: patients without ALI events or anti-GAD (n = 42), those with ALI events (n = 14), or those only with autoimmune events (positive for anti-GAD and no ALI events; n = 83).

RESULTS

Male sex was predominant (n = 72, 52%). Median age was 35 years (interquartile range: 31-39) and median follow-up was 6-7 years (interquartile range: 4.1-9.2). Regarding anti-GAD positivity post-SPKT (n = 90, 65%), no differences were observed concerning age, sex, anti-HLA antibodies, HLA mismatch number and de novo DSA. ALI events were present in 10% (n = 14). PG survival 15 years post-SPKT was better in patients without immune events (96%) followed by those with ALI (69%) and autoimmune events (63%) (P = .025). Anti-GAD was associated to higher annualized mean Hb1AC (P = .006) and lower mean C-peptide (P = .013). According to pre- and post-SPKT anti-GAD status, conversion from negative to positive was associated to worse (63%) 10-year PG survival (P = .044), compared to persistence of negative (100%) or positive anti-GAD (88%). Anti-islet cell and anti-insulin autoantibodies had no impact.

CONCLUSION

Anti-GAD presence post-SPKT was associated to higher pancreas disfunction and lower PG survival. De novo anti-GAD seems to offer a particular risk of PG failure.

Risk Factors for Type 1 Diabetes Recurrence in Immunosuppressed Recipients of Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplants

Patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) who are recipients of pancreas transplants are believed to rarely develop T1D recurrence in the allograft if effectively immunosuppressed. We evaluated a cohort of 223 recipients of simultaneous pancreas-kidney allografts for T1D recurrence and its risk factors. With long-term follow-up, recurrence was observed in approximately 7% of patients. Comparing the therapeutic regimens employed in this cohort over time, lack of induction therapy was associated with recurrence, but this occurs even with the current regimen, which includes induction; there was no influence of maintenance regimens. Longitudinal testing for T1D-associated autoantibodies identified autoantibody positivity, number of autoantibodies, and autoantibody conversion after transplantation as critical risk factors. Autoantibodies to the zinc transporter 8 had the strongest and closest temporal association with recurrence, which was not explained by genetically encoded amino acid sequence donor-recipient mismatches for this autoantigen. Genetic risk factors included the presence of the T1D-predisposing HLA-DR3/DR4 genotype in the recipient and donor-recipient sharing of HLA-DR alleles, especially HLA-DR3. Thus, T1D recurrence is not uncommon and is developing in patients treated with current immunosuppression. The risk factors identified in this study can be assessed in the transplant clinic to identify recurrent T1D and may lead to therapeutic advances.

Lessons From Pancreas Transplantation in Type 1 Diabetes: Recurrence of Islet Autoimmunity

Type 1 diabetes recurrence (T1DR) affecting pancreas transplants was first reported in recipients of living-related pancreas grafts from twins or HLA identical siblings; given HLA identity, recipients received no or minimal immunosuppression. This observation provided critical evidence that type 1 diabetes (T1D) is an autoimmune disease. However, T1DR is traditionally considered very rare in immunosuppressed recipients of pancreas grafts from organ donors, representing the majority of recipients, and immunological graft failures are ascribed to chronic rejection. We have been performing simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplants for over 25 years and find that 6-8 % of our recipients develop T1DR, with symptoms usually becoming manifest on extended follow-up. T1DR is typically characterized by (1) variable degree of insulitis and loss of insulin staining, on pancreas transplant biopsy (with most often absent), minimal to moderate and rarely severe pancreas, and/or kidney transplant rejection; (2) the conversion of T1D-associated autoantibodies (to the autoantigens GAD65, IA-2, and ZnT8), preceding hyperglycemia by a variable length of time; and (3) the presence of autoreactive T cells in the peripheral blood, pancreas transplant, and/or peripancreatic transplant lymph nodes. There is no therapeutic regimen that so far has controlled the progression of islet autoimmunity, even when additional immunosuppression was added to the ongoing chronic regimens; we hope that further studies and, in particular, in-depth analysis of pancreas transplant biopsies with recurrent diabetes will help identify more effective therapeutic approaches.

Autoimmune diabetes recurrence should be routinely monitored after pancreas transplantation

Autoimmune type 1 diabetes recurrence in pancreas grafts was first described 30 years ago, but it is not yet completely understood. In fact, the number of transplants affected and possibly lost due to this disease may be falsely low. There may be insufficient awareness to this entity by clinicians, leading to underdiagnosis. Some authors estimate that half of the immunological losses in pancreas transplantation are due to autoimmunity. Pancreas biopsy is the gold standard for the definitive diagnosis. However, as an invasive procedure, it is not the ideal approach to screen the disease. Pancreatic autoantibodies which may be detected early before graft dysfunction, when searched for, are probably the best initial tool to establish the diagnosis. The purpose of this review is to revisit the autoimmune aspects of type 1 diabetes and to analyse data about the identified autoantibodies, as serological markers of the disease. Therapeutic strategies used to control the disease, though with unsatisfactory results, are also addressed. In addition, the author’s own experience with the prospective monitoring of pancreatic autoantibodies after transplantation and its correlation with graft outcome will be discussed.

Pancreatic autoantibodies after pancreas-kidney transplantation - do they matter?

Type 1 diabetes recurrence has been documented in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants (SPKT), but this diagnosis may be underestimated. Antibody monitoring is the most simple, noninvasive, screening test for pancreas autoimmune activity. However, the impact of the positive autoimmune markers on pancreas graft function remains controversial. In our cohort of 105 SPKT, we studied the cases with positive pancreatic autoantibodies. They were immunosuppressed with antithymocyte globulin, tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and steroids. The persistence or reappearance of these autoantibodies after SPKT and factors associated with their evolution and with graft outcome were analyzed. Pancreatic autoantibodies were prospectively monitored. Serum samples were collected before transplantation and at least once per year thereafter. At the end of the follow-up (maximum 138 months), 43.8% of patients were positive (from pre-transplant or after recurrence) for at least one autoantibody - the positive group. Antiglutamic acid decarboxylase was the most prevalent (31.4%), followed by anti-insulin (8.6%) and anti-islet cell autoantibodies (3.8%). Bivariate analysis showed that the positive group had higher fasting glucose, higher glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), lower C-peptide levels, and a higher number of HLA-matches. Analyzing the sample divided into four groups according to pre-/post-transplant autoantibodies profile, the negative/positive group tended to present the higher HbA1c values. Multivariate analysis confirmed the significant association between pancreas autoimmunity and HbA1c and C-peptide levels. Positivity for these autoantibodies pre-transplantation did not influence pancreas survival. The unfavorable glycemic profile observed in the autoantibody-positive SPKT is a matter of concern, which deserves further attention.

Immune monitoring of islet and pancreas transplant recipients

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is an autoimmune disease in which the insulin-producing beta-cells are destroyed. Islet or pancreas transplantation can restore insulin secretion and are established therapies for subgroups of T1D patients. Long-term insulin-independence is, however, hampered by recurrent autoimmunity and rejection. Accurate monitoring of these immune events is therefore of critical relevance for the timely detection of deleterious immune responses. The identification of relevant immune biomarkers of allo- and autoreactivity has allowed a more accurate monitoring of disease progression and responses to therapy at early stages, allowing proper therapeutic intervention, and possibly improvements in the success rate of islet and pancreas transplantation. This review describes the tools established and validated to monitor immune correlates of auto- and alloreactivity that associate with clinical outcome and identifies challenges that current immunosuppression strategies trying to preserve islet graft function face.

Zinc transporter 8 autoantibodies increase the predictive value of islet autoantibodies for function loss of technically successful solitary pancreas transplant

BACKGROUND

Despite the success rate of solitary pancreas transplantation in type 1 diabetes with preserved kidney function has greatly improved in recent years, a residual proportion of failures persists.

METHODS

With the aim of investigating autoimmunity as an unrecognized cause of graft failure, we measured autoantibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase (GADA), insulinoma-associated protein 2 (IA-2A) and the recently discovered zinc transporter 8 antigen (ZnT8A) in 25 recipients of technically successful solitary pancreas transplantation.

RESULTS

The overall pancreas graft survival was 92%, 88%, and 80% at 2, 4, and 6 years, respectively. Fourteen patients (56%) had one or more autoantibodies before transplantation, with no effect on subsequent pancreas graft outcome. After transplantation, major autoantibody changes (serum conversion from negative to positive, spreading from one to multiple autoantibodies, or titer increase) were observed in 5 of 25 recipients: in four patients, the autoantibody change was followed by the loss of graft function (95% sensitivity, 80% positive predictive value), with a significantly lower graft survival compared with patients without autoantibodies (P<0.0001). The addition of ZnT8A to GADA and IA-2A increased the number of identified autoantibody changes from three to five of 25 recipients and the number of predicted graft function loss from two to four out of five graft losses.

CONCLUSIONS

Detection of major autoantibody changes after technically successful solitary pancreas transplantation is predictive of subsequent loss of graft function. ZnT8A in addition to GADA and IA-2A are a useful marker to be included in the screening panel of posttransplant immune monitoring.

Recurrence of autoimmunity following pancreas transplantation

Pancreas transplantation is a therapeutic option for patients with type 1 diabetes. Advances in immunosuppression have reduced immunologic failures, and these are usually categorized as chronic rejection. Yet studies in our cohort of pancreas transplant recipients identified several patients in whom chronic islet autoimmunity led to recurrent diabetes, despite immunosuppression that prevented rejection. Recurrent diabetes in our cohort is as frequent as chronic rejection, and thus is a significant cause of immunologic graft failure. Our studies demonstrated islet autoimmunity by the presence of autoantibodies and autoreactive T cells, which mediated ß-cell destruction in a transplantation model. Biopsy of the transplanted pancreas revealed variable degrees of ß-cell loss, with or without insulitis, in the absence of pancreas and kidney transplant rejection. Additional research is needed to better understand recurrent disease and to identify new treatment regimens that can suppress autoimmunity, as in our experience this is not effectively inhibited by conventional immunosuppression.

Recurrence of autoimmunity in pancreas transplant patients: research update

Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disorder leading to loss of pancreatic β-cells and insulin secretion, followed by insulin dependence. Islet and whole pancreas transplantation restore insulin secretion. Pancreas transplantation is often performed together with a kidney transplant in patients with end-stage renal disease. With improved immunosuppression, immunological failures of whole pancreas grafts have become less frequent and are usually categorized as chronic rejection. However, growing evidence indicates that chronic islet autoimmunity may eventually lead to recurrent diabetes, despite immunosuppression to prevent rejection. Thus, islet autoimmunity should be included in the diagnostic work-up of graft failure and ideally should be routinely assessed pretransplant and on follow-up in Type 1 diabetes recipients of pancreas and islet cell transplants. There is a need to develop new treatment regimens that can control autoimmunity, as this may not be effectively suppressed by conventional immunosuppression.

Recurrence of type 1 diabetes after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation, despite immunosuppression, is associated with autoantibodies and pathogenic autoreactive CD4 T-cells

OBJECTIVE

To investigate if recurrent autoimmunity explained hyperglycemia and C-peptide loss in three immunosuppressed simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplant recipients.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We monitored autoantibodies and autoreactive T-cells (using tetramers) and performed biopsy. The function of autoreactive T-cells was studied with in vitro and in vivo assays.

RESULTS

Autoantibodies were present pretransplant and persisted on follow-up in one patient. They appeared years after transplantation but before the development of hyperglycemia in the remaining patients. Pancreas transplant biopsies were taken within approximately 1 year from hyperglycemia recurrence and revealed beta-cell loss and insulitis. We studied autoreactive T-cells from the time of biopsy and repeatedly demonstrated their presence on further follow-up, together with autoantibodies. Treatment with T-cell-directed therapies (thymoglobulin and daclizumab, all patients), alone or with the addition of B-cell-directed therapy (rituximab, two patients), nonspecifically depleted T-cells and was associated with C-peptide secretion for >1 year. Autoreactive T-cells with the same autoantigen specificity and conserved T-cell receptor later reappeared with further C-peptide loss over the next 2 years. Purified autoreactive CD4 T-cells from two patients were cotransplanted with HLA-mismatched human islets into immunodeficient mice. Grafts showed beta-cell loss in mice receiving autoreactive T-cells but not control T-cells.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate the cardinal features of recurrent autoimmunity in three such patients, including the reappearance of CD4 T-cells capable of mediating beta-cell destruction. Markers of autoimmunity can help diagnose this underappreciated cause of graft loss. Immune monitoring during therapy showed that autoimmunity was not resolved by the immunosuppressive agents used.

Pancreas-kidney transplantation and the evolution of pancreatic autoantibodies

The recurrence or persistence of pancreatic autoantibodies after pancreas-kidney transplantation (PKT) is an intriguing finding. We prospectively analyzed 77 PKTs, searching for risk factors for the expression of these autoimmune markers and their impact on pancreas graft function. Among the 77 PKTs, 24.7% had 0 HLA matches, 20.8% displayed delayed graft function, and 14.3% had acute rejection episodes. Immunosuppression included antithymocyte globulin (ATG), tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and steroids. Sixty-five patients had both grafts functioning as a follow-up of more than 6 months. In 11 patients anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) positivity persists (n = 8) or has recurred (n = 3), 4 of whom show increasing titers. Two patients maintain positive islet cell antibodies (ICA) and anti-GAD antibodies. The 9 patients positive for ICA included 2 who were negative before PKT and 7 who remain positive. The "positive" group (22 patients with positive ICA and/or anti-GAD) did not differ from the global group of 65 functioning PKT in terms of acute rejection episodes, HLA match, and steroid withdrawal. Among the positive patients, there were 2 with borderline glucose levels; however, among the entire "positive" group, the mean fasting glucose, HbA1c, and C-peptide measurements were not significantly different, when compared with the other 65 PKTs. In conclusion, pancreatic autoantibodies may be persistently positive or recur after PKT, despite appropriate immunosuppression. Its impact on long-term pancreas graft survival is unknown. We could not identify risk factors for their expression. An extended follow-up with monitoring and search for other risk factors may be necessary to increase our knowledge in this field.

Prevention and management of hyperglycemia after pancreas transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pancreas transplantation is considered the optimal therapy for patients with insulin-dependent diabetes. Successful pancreas transplantation achieves euglycemia and allows freedom from insulin therapy. Long-term allograft success may be limited by the development of impaired glucose metabolism. The objectives of the present review are to summarize the possible reasons for endocrine pancreatic dysfunction and to focus on its prevention and management and emphasize the role of immunosuppression.

RECENT FINDINGS

The diabetogenic effects of current immunosuppressive agents have been well established. Regimens without corticosteroids and calcineurin-inhibitor minimization or avoidance have been promoted. Recent studies have revisited the pathogenesis of type I and type II diabetes and demonstrated common pathways, including apoptosis induction, for the exhaustion and destruction of the pancreatic islets.

SUMMARY

The immunosuppressive regimens in pancreatic transplantation should be designed and appropriately modified according to the graft immunological and metabolic conditions. New molecules that are able to preserve islet function and maintain optimal insulin secretion should be considered for pancreas transplant recipients.

T-Cell Assays to Determine Disease Activity and Clinical Efficacy of Immune Therapy in Type 1 Diabetes

Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus results from a T cell-mediated autoimmune destruction of the pancreatic beta cells in genetically predisposed individuals. Therapies directed against T cells have been demonstrated to halt the disease process and prevent recurrent beta-cell destruction after islet transplantation. Less is known about the nature and function of these T cells, the cause of the loss of tolerance to islet autoantigens, why the immune system apparently fails to suppress autoreactivity, and whether (or which) autoantigen(s) are critically involved in the initiation or progression of disease. Autoreactive T cells have proven to be valuable targets to study pathogenic or diabetes-related processes. Measuring T-cell autoreactivity also provided critical information to determine the fate of islet allografts transplanted to type 1 diabetic patients. Furthermore, these studies have provided proof of operational immunologic tolerance to islet allografts as well as valuable information to improve and customize immunosuppressive therapy. Currently, technologies to detect T-cell auto- and alloreactivity in type 1 diabetic recipients of islet allografts are applied to monitor islet allograft survival in relation with various immunosuppressive therapies and to guide tapering of these therapies after successful restoration of insulin production. Although it is generally appreciated that studies on cellular auto- and alloimmunity are hampered by the complex nature of such immune responses and the required technical and physical skills, it has been a worthwhile quest to unravel the role of T cells in the pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes and islet allograft destruction.

Pancreas transplantation: indications and consequences

Pancreas transplantation continues to evolve as a strategy in the management of diabetes mellitus. The first combined pancreas-kidney transplant was reported in 1967, but pancreas transplant now represents a number of procedures, each with different indications, risks, benefits, and outcomes. This review will summarize these procedures, including their risks and outcomes in comparison to kidney transplantation alone, and how or if they affect the consequences of diabetes: hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, and microvascular and macrovascular complications. In addition, the new risks introduced by immunosuppression will be reviewed, including infections, cancer, osteoporosis, reproductive function, and the impact of immunosuppression medications on blood pressure, lipids, and glucose tolerance. It is imperative that an endocrinologist remain involved in the care of the pancreas transplant recipient, even when glucose is normal, because of the myriad of issues encountered post transplant, including ongoing management of diabetic complications, prevention of bone loss, and screening for failure of the pancreas graft with reinstitution of treatment when indicated. Although long-term patient and graft survival have improved greatly after pancreas transplant, a multidisciplinary team is needed to maximize long-term quality, as well as quantity, of life for the pancreas transplant recipient.

Autoantibody response to islet transplantation in type 1 diabetes

Islet allotransplantation into patients with autoimmune type 1 diabetes represents a reexposure to autoantigen. Here, measurement of antibodies to GAD and IA-2 autoantigens before and after islet transplantation in 36 patients (33 receiving islet plus kidney grafts with cyclosporin and steroid-based immunosuppression, and 3 receiving solitary islet transplants with mycophenolate but cyclosporin-free immunosuppression) demonstrated marked rises in GAD antibodies within 7 days posttransplantation in 5 patients (3 receiving islet after kidney transplants, and 2 receiving solitary islet transplants) and within 30 days in the third patient receiving solitary islet transplantation. GAD antibodies were of the IgG1 subclass, against major autoantigenic epitopes, and in cases of islet after kidney transplants, the responses were short-lived and not accompanied by HLA antibodies. Two of these patients had subsequent marked rises of IA-2 antibodies, and an additional patient had a marked rise in IgM-GAD antibodies 3 years after transplantation. Insulin independence was not achieved in patients with autoantibody elevations and was significantly less frequent in these patients. These data are consistent with a reactivation of autoimmunity that may be dependent on immunosuppression therapy and is associated with impaired graft function.

Factors influencing Islet of Langerhans graft function and monitoring

Transplantation of islet of Langerhans represents a viable therapeutic option for insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Dramatic progress has been recently reported with the introduction of a glucocorticoid-free immunosuppressive regimen that improved success rate, namely, insulin independence for 1 year or more, from 8% to 100%. The fate of islet grafts is determined by many concurrent phenomena, some of which are common to organ grafts (i.e. rejection), while others are unique to nonvascularized cell transplants, including transplant cell mass and viability, as well as nonspecific inflammation at the site of implant. Moreover, islet grafts lack clinical markers of early rejection, making it difficult to recognize imminent rejection and to implement intervention with graft-saving immunosuppressive regimens. In the present review, we will address the problems influencing islet graft success and the monitoring of islet cell graft function.

[Pancreas and kidney transplantation: long-term metabolic results]

STUDY AIM

Pancreas and kidney transplantation (PKTx) is indicated in uremic patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). The aim of this study was to determine its long-term effect on metabolic control in order to establish the real efficacy of this treatment in diabetic patients.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Among a total experience of 191 pancreas and kidney transplantations, a metabolic control was performed in 80 patients who underwent PKTx in our center, with both grafts functioning for more than one year. Immunological markers of diabetes mellitus were also evaluated (ICA and GADab) in 50 patients.

RESULTS

Basal glycemia and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels throughout follow-up were within the normal range. Hyperinsulinemia was present throughout follow-up till the fourth year. The oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was normal in 82.5% of the patients beyond one year after the graft. Over time, no differences were detected on basal glucose and insulin levels and areas under the curve (AUC) of glycemia and insulinemia. During the evolution, no differences were found in the fasting insulin resistance index (FIRI), in spite of increasing body weight. ICA were + in 2 patients before graft and + in 7 after graft (14%). GADab were + in 10 patients before graft and + in 11 after graft (22%).

CONCLUSION

Pancreas and kidney transplantation provides without any insulin treatment and diet long-term normalization of glycemic control, assessed by HbA1c and OGTT, despite the existence of sustained hyperinsulinemia. Our results strongly suggest that pancreas and kidney transplantation is the most efficient treatment for uremic patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus from a metabolic point of view.

Human islet transplantation: lessons from 13 autologous and 13 allogeneic transplantations

BACKGROUND

A series of 13 islet autotransplantations and 13 islet allotransplantations performed between 1992 and 1999 at the University Hospital of Geneva are presented. Factors affecting the outcome are analyzed.

METHODS

Islet autotransplantation has been performed in seven patients with chronic pancreatitis and in six patients with benign tumors undergoing extensive pancreatectomy. Islet allografts were performed in C-peptide-negative patients simultaneously or after a kidney or lung transplantation. Each recipient received islets from one to four donors. Panel-reactive antibodies were monitored by microlymphocytotoxicity test.

RESULTS

Eleven of 13 patients who underwent autotransplantation maintained insulin independence for 6 months to 5 years. Two years after autologous islet transplantation, five of nine patients were insulin independent with an glycosylated hemoglobin of 5.9%. Three late islet failures occurred in patients with chronic pancreatitis. Islet yield was significantly lower in patients with chronic pancreatitis than in patients with benign tumors (2044 equivalent islet number/gram resected pancreas versus 5184 equivalent islet number/gram; P=0.037). In islet allotransplantation, no early graft loss was found. All 13 patients who underwent allotransplantation had basal C-peptide levels above 0.3 nmol/L for 3 months to 5 years. Mean glycosylated hemoglobin decreased from 9.1% before transplantation to 5.5% at month 3. Insulin independence was achieved in two type I diabetic patients. In four of six patients with graft failure, the graft had induced panel-reactive antibodies.

CONCLUSIONS

In islet autotransplantation, the reduced number of islets that can be isolated from fibrotic pancreata may be the major limiting factor. In islet allotransplantation, early graft function can now be consistently achieved. Islet allografts seem to be highly immunogenic, and chronic islet failure cannot be prevented consistently by conventional immunosuppression.

Serological markers of recurrent beta cell destruction in diabetic patients undergoing pancreatic transplantation

BACKGROUND

Besides alloimmunity to transplanted pancreatic tissue, recurrent autoimmune beta cell destruction is an additional limitation to successful clinical pancreatic allografts in type 1 diabetic patients.

METHODS

We studied the prevalence of autoantibodies to glutamate decarboxylase (GAD) 65 and tyrosine phosphatase (IA-2) in 68 C-peptide-negative diabetic patients receiving pancreatic allografts. Sera from patients were obtained immediately before grafting. A second blood sample was analyzed at the time of graft failure in patients who returned to hyperglycemia and during the same follow-up period in those who experienced a functional pancreatic allograft. Patients were classified according to clinical outcome into chronic graft failure (group A, n=20), acute graft failure and/or arterial thrombosis (n=7), or functional pancreatic graft (group C, n=41). Sera from patients were screened for the presence of specific autoantibodies using an islet cell autoantibody assay, a combi-GAD and IA-2 test, and individual GAD and IA-2 assays.

RESULTS

Patients from group A had significantly higher combi-test values than patients from group C (13+/-16 vs. 4.5+/-12 units, P<0.02) and higher anti-GAD65 antibody (Ab) levels (0.19+/-0.3 vs. 0.04+/-0.13 units, P<0.01) immediately before grafting. After graft failure in group A, both anti-GAD65 and anti-IA-2 Ab levels increased from baseline, but only the increase in anti-IA-2 Ab levels reached statistical significance (0.28+/-0.12 vs. 15+/-34, P=0.03). When compared with group C, patients from group A had higher anti-GAD65 Abs (0.29+/-0.35 vs. 0.05+/-0.16, P<0.001) after graft failure. Interestingly, the number of double-Ab-positive patients rose from 5% to 35% in group A, whereas it remained at 5% in group C. In pancreatic transplants with bladder drainage, the presence of anti-GAD65 and/or anti-IA2 Abs was not associated with a reduction in urinary amylase levels. This suggests that a loss of endocrine function was not associated with exocrine failure in patients from group A.

CONCLUSIONS

We can conclude from the present study that peripheral autoimmune markers are useful in diabetic patients receiving pancreatic allografts.

Absence of toxicity associated with adenoviral-mediated transfer of the beta-galactosidase reporter gene to neonatal rat islets in vitro

Transfer of genes with potential therapeutic utility to the pancreatic islets of Langerhans may enhance graft survival after islet transplantation. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal conditions for adenoviral-mediated gene transfer to the islets of Langerhans in the absence of vector-induced toxicity. Neonatal rat islets were transduced in groups of 25 with an adenoviral vector encoding beta-galactosidase (AdbetaGal) at doses of MOI 0, 10, 100 and 1000 pfu per islet cell. All experiments were performed in triplicate. Efficiency of gene transfer was determined by gross inspection and estimation of the percentage of beta-galactosidase positive cells after islet dispersion at 1, 4, 7 and 10 days post-transduction. Islet toxicity was assessed by measuring accumulated insulin levels at each time-point and by assessing static incubation insulin release at 3 and 10 days. Efficient dose-dependent gene transfer to the islets was documented at 1, 4, 7 and 10 days post-transduction. Transgene expression was relatively stable for the duration of the experiment. Insulin accumulation did not differ between transduced and non-transduced islets at each timepoint. Likewise, the insulin secretory response to glucose, obtained by dividing the insulin response to high glucose incubation by the insulin response to low glucose incubation was similar in transduced and non-transduced islets at 3 and 10 days at all doses studied. In summary, adenoviral-mediated transduction of islets results in dose dependent efficient gene transfer with relatively stable transgene expression in the absence of toxicity. This technology may be useful in the study of islet biology and also in the future in gene therapy approaches to the treatment of diabetes mellitus.

Recurrence of immunological markers for type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus in immunosuppressed patients after pancreas transplantation

BACKGROUND

Type 1 (insulin dependent) diabetes mellitus (IDDM) is an autoimmune disease in which autoantibodies against islet cells develop concomitantly with or even preceding diagnosis. Because the recurrence of diabetes can be the cause of graft failure in patients with pancreas transplantation, we studied the possible recurrence of IDDM immunomarkers after transplantation.

METHODS

The following determinations were performed every 1-2 years after transplantation in 50 immunosuppressed IDDM patients with simultaneous kidney and pancreas transplantation (bladder drainage of exocrine secretion): islet cell antibodies (ICA) by direct immunofluorescence, antibodies against glutamic acid decarboxylase (GADab) by radiobinding assay, and the oral glucose tolerance test. The mean follow-up was 4.1+/-6.3 (range 1 to 9 years).

RESULTS

GADab were detected in 11 patients after transplantation, 10 of whom had been positive beforehand. ICA reappearance after transplantation was detected in seven patients (14%). The presence of ICA was related to GADab positivity (P=0.001) and HLA DR3 patients (P=0.04), but not with pancreatitis and rejection episodes, immunosuppression induction therapy, or donor HLA haplotype. During follow-up, an abnormal oral glucose tolerance test was more frequent in ICA-positive patients (P=0.02), with no differences in metabolic control or insulin secretion.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that GADab persist and ICA reappear despite immunosuppressive therapy in patients with functioning pancreas transplants. The relevance and the risk that this implies for IDDM development should be determined.