Targets and reality: a comparison of health care indicators in the U.S. (Pittsburgh Epidemiology of Diabetes Complications Study) and Hungary (DiabCare Hungary)

Risk factors for the development of micro-vascular complications of type 2 diabetes in a single-centre cohort of patients

AIMS

In type 2 diabetes, we aimed at clarifying the role of glycated haemoglobin variability and other risk factors in the development of the main micro-vascular complications: peripheral neuropathy, nephropathy and retinopathy.

METHODS

In a single-centre cohort of 900 patients, glycated haemoglobin variability was evaluated as intra-individual standard deviation, adjusted standard deviation and coefficient of variation of serially measured glycated haemoglobin in the 2-year period before a randomly selected index visit. We devised four models considering different aspects of glycated haemoglobin evolution. Multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis was performed including the following covariates at the index visit: age, disease duration, body mass index, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, sex, smoking habit, hypertension, dyslipidemia, treatment with anti-diabetic drugs, occurrence of macro-vascular events and the presence of another micro-vascular complication.

RESULTS

Males with high mean glycated haemoglobin, long duration of diabetes, presence of macro-vascular events and retinopathy emerged at higher risk for peripheral neuropathy. Development of nephropathy was independently associated with higher glycated haemoglobin variability, older age, male sex, current smoking status, presence of retinopathy, of peripheral neuropathy and of hypertension. Higher mean glycated haemoglobin, younger age, longer duration of diabetes, reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate and the presence of peripheral neuropathy were significantly associated with increased incidence of retinopathy.

CONCLUSION

Glycated haemoglobin variability was associated with increased incidence of nephropathy, while mean glycated haemoglobin emerged as independent risk factor for the development of retinopathy and peripheral neuropathy. The presence of macro-vascular events was positively correlated with peripheral neuropathy. Finally, the occurrence of another micro-vascular complication was found to be a stronger risk factor for developing another micro-vascular complication than the mean or variability of glycated haemoglobin.

Comparable glycemic outcomes for pediatric type 1 diabetes patients in metropolitan and non-metropolitan regions of Western Australia: A population-based study

BACKGROUND

Pediatric patients diagnosed with type 1 diabetes (T1D) in Western Australia (WA) are managed by a single, specialist multidisciplinary diabetes service based at a central tertiary hospital in the capital city, Perth, which provides outreach care in regional centers.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the hypothesis that outcomes for a contemporary, population-based pediatric T1D cohort, managed by a single tertiary service are similar for metropolitan and non-metropolitan patients using this model of care. To confirm that the cohort is indeed population based, a secondary aim of the study was to determine the case ascertainment of the Western Australian Children's Diabetes Database (WACDD).

METHODS

Data for all T1D patients aged <18 years, who attended the diabetes clinics (metropolitan and non-metropolitan), at least once in 2014, were extracted from the WACDD and outcomes including HbA1c and severe hypoglycemia (SH) rates analyzed.

RESULTS

In 2014, a total of 1017 patients (492 females, 525 males) attended the diabetes clinics (54% metropolitan and 46% non-metropolitan). After adjusting for age, sex, diabetes duration, and insulin regimen, region of clinic was not a significant predictor of mean HbA1c or SH rate. The case ascertainment of the WACDD was estimated to be 99.9% complete for children diagnosed with T1D aged <15 years between 2002 and 2012.

CONCLUSIONS

This study reports similar glycemic outcomes for patients attending diabetes clinics in metropolitan and non-metropolitan areas of WA, suggesting that a model of care provided as outreach from a specialized diabetes service is effective in achieving equitable glycemic outcomes.

Trends in cardiovascular risk factor management in type 1 diabetes by sex

AIMS

DCCT showed that intensive type 1 diabetes management reduces complication incidence but did not focus on other cardiovascular disease risk factors, whose control in type 1 diabetes has not been well-studied. We assessed trends in cardiovascular risk factors in type 1 diabetes and attainment of concurrent American Diabetes Association (ADA) guidelines/recommendations (for HbA1c, blood pressure, LDL cholesterol, triglycerides) for complication prevention.

METHODS

Individuals with childhood-onset type 1 diabetes (n = 658; 49.4% women; baseline (1986-1988) median age 27 and duration 19 years) were followed biennially for up to 25 years, with surveys and/or examinations.

RESULTS

At the latest recorded follow-up, achievement of concurrent ADA recommendations increased for HbA1c (from 9.7 to 25.6%, p < .0001); was unchanged for blood pressure (from 89.7% to 87.4%, p = .36); and decreased for LDL cholesterol (from 62.3 to 39.7%, p < .0001). Adoption of intensive insulin therapy (from 5.9 to 64.4%, p < .0001) and hypercholesterolemia (from 67.3 to 78.9%, p = .0006) also increased. Overall, the proportion meeting all four recommendations was essentially unaltered (from 6.8% to 7.6%) (p = .69). Results were similar by gender.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the adoption of intensive insulin therapy and obtaining ADA HbA1c recommendations are increasing, overall cardiovascular risk factor compliance remains low and merits further intervention.

A cross-cultural study on perceived health-related quality of life in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated whether culture can affect self- and proxy-reports of perceived diabetes-specific health-related quality of life of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes when taking into account glycemic control, gender and age.

METHODS

A total of 416 patients aged between 8 and 18 years--84 (Greece), 135 (Hungary) and 197 (Kuwait)--and their parents completed the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 3.0. Diabetes Module.

RESULTS

Gender and age did not have any effect on perceived diabetes-specific health-related quality of life. Significant differences were detected among countries in self- and proxy-reports of diabetes-specific health-related quality of life when controlling for glycemic control. More specifically, Greek patients with type 1 diabetes and their parents reported significantly worse disease-specific health-related quality of life than their peers from Kuwait and Hungary. Moreover, culture affected the level of agreement between self- and proxy-reports with parents from Kuwait underestimating their children's diabetes-specific health-related quality of life.

CONCLUSION

The impact of culture on self- and proxy-reports of diabetes-specific health-related quality of life warrants further investigation, since it might suggest the need for differential psychosocial treatment.

DiabCare survey of diabetes management and complications in the Gulf countries

AIM

To describe the status of diabetes control and complications, and the quality of diabetes management in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and the United Arab Emirates, and to obtain an insight into the relationship between these factors.

METHODS

Patients with diabetes for>12 months were enrolled from specialist clinics and general hospitals. All available data from the patients' medical files including patient demographics; glycemic, lipid, and blood pressure status; diabetes-related complications; and diabetes management were recorded in data collection forms and analyzed.

RESULTS

Overall, 1290 patients with diabetes were enrolled with a mean (±standard deviation) age of 49.4 ± 12.3 years and duration of diabetes of 8.7 ± 5.9 years. Glycemic control was poor: Mean glycated hemoglobin A1c of 8.3 ± 2.0%, fasting and postprandial plasma glucose levels of 155.9 ± 57.1 mg/dL (8.7 ± 3.2 mmol/L), and 218.2 ± 87.4 mg/dL (12.1 ± 4.9 mmol/L), respectively. Diabetes-related complications such as neuropathy (34.9% of patients), background retinopathy (29.9%), and cataract (14.1%) were common. Cardiovascular complications were reported in <10% of patients, and microalbuminuria was detected in 34.4% of patients. Oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) monotherapy (43.3%) was the most common treatment, followed by insulin + OADs (39.3%) and insulin monotherapy (17.6%).

CONCLUSION

The status of diabetes care was found to be suboptimal. Further improvements in diabetes management are necessary to prevent or delay the development of diabetes-related complications.

Erectile response to type 5 phosphodiesterase inhibitor could be preserved with the addition of simvastatin to conventional insulin treatment in rat model of diabetes

Enhanced RhoA/Rho-kinase pathway plays anti-erectile role and is associated with reduced response to type 5 phosphodiesterase inhibitor (PDE5I) in diabetic animals. We tested whether adjunctive simvastatin to conventional insulin treatment would restore PDE5I-induced as well as basal erectile response in diabetic rat model of erectile dysfunction. Forty 8-week-old male Sprague-Dawley rats were equally divided into four groups, (n=10) i.e. the diabetic group (D), age-matched control (C), conventional insulin treatment (I) and adjunctive simvastatin to conventional insulin treatment (S). Following 10weeks of intraperitoneal injection of streptozotocin (STZ, 35mg/kg), the group I and S received insulin (10U NPH/day) for 4weeks. Concurrently, group S received simvastatin (20mg/kg/day). Following 14weeks of diabetes induction, basal and PDE5I (intravenous mirodenafil 1mg/kg)-elicited erectile response were assessed during cavernous nerve electrostimulation. Then, penile tissues were processed for molecular assessment. Although group I failed to restore basal and PDE5I-induced erectile response, group S showed normalized erectile responses. Furthermore, group I showed improvement of only eNOS-related pathway, whereas group S effectively controlled both eNOS-related and RhoA/Rho-kinase pathway. Conclusively, adjunctive use of simvastatin to conventional insulin treatment showed more effectiveness in restoring erectile responses of diabetic rats by controlling the RhoA/Rho-kinase pathway than conventional insulin treatment alone.

Prevalence and correlates of inadequate glycaemic control: results from a nationwide survey in 6,671 adults with diabetes in Brazil

Diabetes is a significant public health burden on the basis of its increased incidence, morbidity, and mortality. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of inadequate glycaemic control and its correlates in a large multicentre survey of Brazilian patients with diabetes. A cross-sectional study was conducted in a consecutive sample of patients aged 18 years or older with either type 1 or type 2 diabetes, attending health centres located in ten large cities in Brazil (response rate = 84%). Information about diabetes, current medications, complications, diet, and satisfaction with treatment were obtained by trained interviewers, using a standardized questionnaire. Glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) was measured by high-performance liquid chromatography in a central laboratory. Patients with HbA(1c) > or = 7 were considered to have inadequate glycaemic control. Overall 6,701 patients were surveyed, 979 (15%) with type 1 and 5,692 (85%) with type 2 diabetes. The prevalence of inadequate glycaemic control was 76%. Poor glycaemic control was more common in patients with type 1 diabetes (90%) than in those with type 2 (73%), P < 0.001. Characteristics significantly associated with improved glycaemic control included: fewer years of diabetes duration, multi professional care, participation in a diabetes health education program, and satisfaction with current diabetes treatment. Despite increased awareness of the benefits of tight glycaemic control, we found that few diabetic patients in Brazil met recommended glycaemic control targets. This may contribute to increased rates of diabetic complications, which may impact health care costs. Our data support the public health message of implementation of early, aggressive management of diabetes.

Specialty care use in US patients with chronic diseases

Despite efforts to eliminate health disparities, racial, ethnic, and geographic groups continue lag behind their counterparts in health outcomes in the United States. The purpose of this study is to determine variation in specialty care utilization by chronic disease status. Data were extracted from the Commonwealth Fund 2006 Health Care Quality Survey (n = 2475). A stratified minority sample design was employed to ensure a representative sample. Logistic regression was used in analyses to predict specialty care utilization in the sample. Poor perceived health, minority status, and lack of insurance was associated with reduced specialty care use and chronic disease diagnosis.

Impact of fear of insulin or fear of injection on treatment outcomes of patients with diabetes

OBJECTIVE

The adequate attainment and maintenance of good hemoglobin A1c control in diabetes are major challenges. Although insulin use as the mainstay of diabetes treatment has resulted in favorable treatment outcomes, poor adherence/compliance occurs due to factors such as fear of insulin or fear of injection. This study was undertaken to conduct a systematic review of the impact of fear of insulin/injection on the treatment outcomes of diabetes patients.

METHODS

A structured search of EMBASE, Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, and PsycINFO for the years 1990-2008 was conducted to identify published English-language articles addressing fear of insulin or fear of injection in diabetes. The following key words and their combinations were used in the search: diabetes, insulin, injection, fear, phobia, and psychological insulin resistance. Google Scholar website was used to search for any additional references. Manual searches on the references of retrieved articles were also performed to find additional studies.

RESULTS

Six studies were selected for in depth assessment. The treatment outcomes included hemoglobin A1c in two studies, complications of diabetes in two studies, general health and psychological comorbidities in two studies, and mortality in one study. Although the number of studies was limited, all identified adverse treatment outcomes in diabetes patients with fear of insulin or fear of injection. No studies with outcomes of resource utilizations or costs were identified.

LIMITATIONS

Most of the studies we reviewed had a cross-sectional design, where the findings primarily presented associations without firm determinations of the impact of fear of insulin/injection on the treatment outcomes of diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

Fear of insulin or fear of injection is associated with poor glycemic control, clinical complications, psychological comorbidities, poor general well-being and health status, and increased risk of mortality for diabetes patients.

Organization of a quality-assurance project in all Belgian multidisciplinary diabetes centres treating insulin-treated diabetes patients: 5 years' experience

AIMS

To describe the IQED, a quality-assurance system started in 2001 in Belgian hospital-based multidisciplinary diabetes centres, and its effects on the quality of care.

METHODS

The study was conducted through four data collections (in 2001, 2002, 2004 and 2006). Approximately 120 diabetes centres provided data on a systematic random sample of 10% of their adult diabetic patients on at least two daily insulin injections. Data on patient characteristics, glycaemic control, cardiovascular risk, diabetes complications, follow-up procedures and treatment were obtained. Local quality promotion was encouraged by returning comprehensive feedback (benchmarks) and during information meetings.

RESULTS

Nearly all diabetes centres (98-100%) participated. The pooled sample consisted of 9194 (32%) Type 1 and 19 828 (68%) Type 2 diabetes patients, with mean diabetes duration of 17 years and 14 years, prevalence of microvascular complications of 23% and 38% and prevalence of macrovascular complications of 9% and 26%, respectively. At the start, the quality of care was good in terms of risk-factor testing rates and moderate in terms of patients meeting goals for risk-factor management. At least 50% of the centres initiated quality-promoting initiatives. After 5 years, significant improvements were seen in risk-factor testing rates, apart from renal screening. Improvements in intermediate outcomes were less obvious, apart from an increase in patients reaching the targets for blood pressure and LDL cholesterol.

CONCLUSIONS

It is feasible to implement a continuous quality-improvement project on a nationwide scale, with improvements particularly in process indicators.

Control of diabetes and cardiovascular risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes in primary care. The gap between guidelines and reality in Spain

To evaluate the level and factors affecting control of diabetes and cardiovascular risk factors in type 2 diabetes (TYPE 2 DM) patients. Multicentre cross-sectional study: a sample of 430 primary care practices across Spain selected 1907 type 2 diabetic patients. The first five consecutive ambulatory patients with TYPE 2 DM were eligible for the inclusion into the survey. Patients were free of known cardiovascular disease (CVD). Control criteria were defined based on 2002 American Diabetes Association (ADA) clinical practice recommendations. A total of 1907 patients (51% women) aged 63 +/- 9 years. Smoking prevalence was 22.6%, 50.6% had levels of A1c < 7%. Mean blood pressure (BP) was 148 +/- 17/86 +/- 10 mmHg. Only 7.8% have achieved the target of BP < 130/80 mmHg. Among the 1180 patients (65%) treated for hypertension, this target was attained in only 4.4% of patients. A measurement for low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol was available in 1669 patients (88%). Only 5.9% of patients achieved the target of LDL < 100 mg/dl. Among the 638 patients (41.6%) on drug treatment for dyslipidaemia, this target was attained in only 5.6% of patients. Among type 2 diabetic patients in Spain the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors is high. Control of glycaemia, smoking, BP and LDL are far from optimal despite the widespread use of guidelines for the management of diabetes and CVD. The application of published recommendations needs to be reinforced.

Glycemic and risk factor control in type 1 diabetes: results from 13,612 patients in a national diabetes register

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to investigate the clinical characteristics of a large type 1 diabetic population and to evaluate the degree of fulfillment of recently updated treatment goals.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The Swedish National Diabetes Register was initiated in 1996 as a tool for quality assurance in diabetes care. A1C levels, treatment, and risk factors were analyzed in two cross-sectional samples of 9,424 patients in 1997 and 13,612 patients in 2004 and in a smaller longitudinal sample from 1997 to 2004.

RESULTS

Mean A1C decreased from 8.2 +/- 1.3% in 1997 to 8.0 +/- 1.2% in 2004 (P < 0.001). The proportion of patients reaching A1C <7.0% increased from 17.4 to 21.2% in 2004. A slow but significant improvement in blood pressure levels was seen, but only 61.3% reached the blood pressure goal of <130/80 mmHg in 2004. Lipid control improved, and the use of lipid-lowering drugs increased. Among patients treated with lipid-lowering agents, 38% reached the goal of total cholesterol <4.5 mmol/l, and 48% reached the goal of LDL cholesterol <2.5 mmol/l. Successful long-term glycemic and blood pressure control were both independently predicted by low BMI and the absence of microalbuminuria in 1997.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large cohort of type 1 diabetic patients, there was a slow improvement in glycemic and risk factor control from 1997 to 2004, although the gap between the clinical results and current Swedish and American treatment goals is still unsatisfactory. It is crucial that additional measures be taken to improve risk factor control in type 1 diabetic patients.

An evaluation of patient preference for an alternative insulin delivery system compared to standard vial and syringe

BACKGROUND

Diabetes mellitus (DM) affects over 18.2 million Americans and diabetes-related medical costs exceed 132 billion dollars per year, totaling more than 12% of the United States healthcare budget. The Diabetes Control and Complications Clinical Trial demonstrated that intensive insulin therapy and the control of plasma glucose can significantly reduce the incidence of late diabetic complications and delay the progression of existing conditions in type 1 diabetes. Optimal glycemic control often requires intensive insulin therapy to maintain a hemoglobin A(1C) (A1C) of less than 7% as recommended by the American Diabetes Association. It is estimated that more than half of the approximately 7 million Americans using insulin do so with suboptimal treatment and while administering one or two insulin injections per day. Non-adherence may be a contributing factor in suboptimal treatment. For a variety of reasons, many patients diagnosed with diabetes and treated with insulin are non-adherent.

SCOPE

The primary objective of this study was to evaluate preference for an insulin delivery system comparing a disposable doser (InnoLet) to the standard vial/syringe. In a prospective, randomized, open-label, two-period, crossover study, 260 patients were enrolled (age > or = 18 years, with type 1 or 2 diabetes, and receiving NPH or regular or 70/30 insulin for at least 6-months). A total of 162 patients completed both treatment arms. Excluded were those unable to read/write English or administer their own injections, pregnant/lactating women, those using antipsychotics, and those with a history of alcohol abuse or cognitive impairment. Patients completed the eight-item Diabetes Fear of Self-Injection Questionnaire at baseline, week 12 and week 24. Items were rated on a 4-point Likert scale (1 = almost never; 4 = almost always) with a maximum fear score of 32. At week 24, patients completed a preference survey.

FINDINGS

Of the 162 patients completing both treatment arms, 89 (55.0%) were in the vial/syringe to disposable doser treatment arm, 50% were female and mean age was 60 +/- 11 years. Patients in both treatment arms displayed little significant differences in baseline characteristics. Patients reported significantly lower fear of self-injection after using the disposable doser compared to vial/syringe (mean +/- SEM: 9.5 +/- 0.2 vs. 11.2 +/- 0.4; p < 0.0001). Most patients (71.5%) indicated a preference for the disposable doser compared to the vial/syringe method (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The majority of patients preferred the disposable doser, and reported significantly less fear of self-injection using this delivery system. There are some potential limitations to consider. A randomization bias may have been present, patients who enrolled in this study were those who were actively seeking medical treatment for diabetes, insulin pens and cartridges are not available for all types of insulin regimens, pre-filled pens and cartridges may not be altered and, in general, alternative insulin delivery systems tend to be more costly than insulin sold in traditional vials. However, insulin may have greater patient acceptance and less psychological distress when administered via an alternative delivery system.

Glycemic control in adult type 1 diabetes patients from a brazilian country city: comparison between a multidisciplinary and a routine endocrinological approach

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the metabolic control of a cohort of adult type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) patients assisted in a public Diabetes Center (DC) that follows the rules of a national diabetes society. METHODS: We compared for one year the metabolic control and the characteristics of 175 T1DM patients attended by a multidisciplinary team in a DC (test group) with 30 patients assisted only by endocrinologists at a public endocrinology outpatient center (control group). RESULTS: The test group presented a larger proportion of well-controlled patients (p= 0.002). The proportions (test x control group) were as follows: 51.4% x 16.7% in the subgroup with A1C < 7%; 21.7% x 36.7% in the subgroup with A1C between 7.1% and 8.0%; and 26.9% x 46.7% in the subgroup with A1C > 8%. Patients assisted in the DC presented a likelihood 4.38 times higher of reaching levels of A1C up to 7%. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the effectiveness of a DC and emphasizes the importance of education, adherence and multidisciplinarity as cornerstones for the treatment, showing that in developing countries it is possible to treat T1DM with satisfactory results.

Managing older adults with diabetes

PURPOSE

To review special considerations in the management of adults 65 years of age and older with diabetes mellitus (DM) with particular attention to initiation of insulin in the management of type 2 DM (DM2), Medicare eligibility for insulin pump therapy, and intensive insulin therapy in both type 1 DM (DM1) and DM2 in older adults.

DATA SOURCES

American Diabetes Association Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes, selected research articles, textbooks, and Internet sources.

CONCLUSIONS

American Diabetes Association, American Association of Diabetes Educators, and American Association of Clinical Endocrinologist acknowledge that no long-term studies have been conducted in older adults with DM. Furthermore, these groups as well as the American Geriatric Society conclude that a person's functional capacity and not age should determine the treatment modality most beneficial in each situation.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Management of diabetes in the older adult is a common clinical scenario for primary care providers (PCPs). Treatment strategies follow a continuum over time from lifestyle modification to intensive management. Intensive insulin therapy, through the use of either multiple daily injections or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion using insulin pumps, has demonstrated benefit in both DM1 and DM2; however, there is evidence that PCPs are reluctant to initiate insulin. Moreover, in the management of older adults with diabetes, evidence-based outcomes regarding intensive management are lacking. Further studies are needed.

Diabetic patients with prior specialist care have better glycaemic control than those with prior primary care

OBJECTIVE

To compare glycaemic control, as reflected in the A1c level, of diabetic patients with primary care vs. with specialist care.

METHODS

The study used administrative data from eastern Ontario, Canada, and a database containing the results of all A1c tests from this region between 1 September 1999 and 1 September 2000. To avoid referral bias, diabetic patients with an index specialist visit were selected and separated into those with exclusively primary care previously (n = 974) and those with prior specialist care (n = 3533). We compared A1c levels measured within 30 days of the index visit and hence attributable to the prior care. To control for confounding between the groups, both multiple linear regression and propensity score-based matching were used.

RESULTS

After controlling for confounders, patients with prior specialist care had significantly lower A1c levels (P < 0.0001). Other predictors of lower A1c included older age, shorter diabetes duration, rural residence and higher neighbourhood income. In propensity score-matched cohorts, the A1c level was 8.3 +/- 2.0% with prior primary care vs. 7.9 +/- 1.6% with prior specialist care (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Specialist care prior to the index visit was associated with a lower A1c level than prior primary care. This difference would result in reductions in diabetes complications for patients with ongoing specialist care.

Clinical inertia in response to inadequate glycemic control: do specialists differ from primary care physicians?

OBJECTIVE

Diabetic patients with inadequate glycemic control ought to have their management intensified. Failure to do so can be termed "clinical inertia." Because data suggest that specialist care results in better control than primary care, we evaluated whether specialists demonstrated less clinical inertia than primary care physicians.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Using administrative data, we studied all non-insulin-requiring diabetic patients in eastern Ontario aged 65 or older who had A1c results >8% between September 1999 and August 2000. Drug intensification was measured by comparing glucose-lowering drug regimens in 4-month blocks before and after the elevated A1c test and was defined as 1) the addition of a new oral drug, 2) a dose increase of an existing oral drug, or 3) the initiation of insulin. Propensity score-based matching was used to control for confounding between groups.

RESULTS

There were 591 patients with specialist care and 1,911 with exclusively primary care. In the matched cohorts, 45.1% of patients with specialist care versus 37.4% with primary care had drug intensification (P = 0.009). Most of this difference was attributed to specialists' more frequent initiation of insulin in response to elevated A1c.

CONCLUSIONS

Fewer than one-half of patients with high A1c levels had intensification of their medications, regardless of specialty of their physician. Specialists were more aggressive with insulin initiation than primary care physicians, which may contribute to the lower A1c levels seen with specialist care. Interventions assisting patients and physicians to recognize and overcome clinical inertia should improve diabetes care in the population.

Hospital management of diabetes

The evidence continues to strengthen our understanding that improved glycemic control with the use of insulin therapy may significantly improve morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients with hyperglycemia, with or without a previous diagnosis of diabetes. However, many questions remain concerning the impact and relative contributions of blood glucose and insulin per se. Nevertheless, the publication of numerous and consistent studies have made it clear that the topic of glycemic management in the hospital requires a larger priority among clinicians caring for these patients. The recently published guidelines by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists are the first formal recommendations on this topic,but national guidelines for blood glucose levels cannot take into account all of the different challenges facing different hospitals. This suggests that each institution will require individualization of protocols even though the ultimate metabolic goals are identical. Furthermore, it is not realistic to expect those unfamiliar with diabetes therapy to appreciate all of the nuances and vagaries of insulin treatment. Like any medical treatment, a significant amount of time will need to be invested by the providers involved with the.care of these patients before a mastery of the therapy can be achieved. Nevertheless, because the rewards to our patients can be significant, we need to strive to improve the systems where we work. Individual clinicians with vast experience in diabetes care cannot be successful for the inpatient with diabetes unless the hospital has systems in place to effectively and efficiently facilitate the management of the metabolic needs of this population. The main challenge now is the safe and effective implementation of these guidelines in both small and large hospitals given the limited level of re-sources available in today's medical environment. Therefore, our single most important recommendation is to ensure that all clinicians involved in the management of these patients are in agreement about general philosophies of diabetes management. We would recommend that there are "champions" for each discipline: endocrinology, cardiology, anesthesiology, surgery, nursing,and pharmacy, all of which have developed hospital-specific guidelines for glycemic management. These recommendations can be slowly adapted, one unit at a time, until the entire hospital has transitioned to a more "diabetes-friendly" environment. The ultimate goal of well-controlled glycemia with minimal hypoglycemia should be possible for most hospitals, and we hope this review will assist clinicians in achieving this objective. We await additional outcome research with carefully controlled studies to confirm the value of these recommendations at different levels of glycemic control. We believe that we can already state with confidence that the preliminary evidence shows that, like outpatient diabetes management,metabolic control matters during acute illness.

Epidemiology of diabetic retinopathy and macular oedema: a systematic review

AIMS

To systematically review the literature on the prevalence and incidence of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and macular oedema (MO).

METHODS

A search of the bibliographic databases (Medline, Embase, CINAHL) was conducted up to October 2001. Selected relevant studies were scrutinized and included in the review.

RESULTS

A total of 359 studies were included. The studies were reported in nearly 100 different journals and in over 50 countries. The majority of the studies were US-based, with large studies such as the Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy dominating the literature. The studies were quite dated and highly heterogeneous in nature in terms of patient selection with variable inclusion criteria (age range, gender, diabetes duration and type, ethnicity, comorbidity, and DR status, assessment, and classification).

CONCLUSIONS

There are inconsistencies between epidemiological studies, and differences in study methods may contribute to conflicting reports of prevalence and incidence of DR and MO in diabetic populations. As new therapies for DR and its associated complications emerge, the need to capture and monitor new epidemiological data becomes increasingly important to be able to assess the impact and effectiveness of these therapies. Robust, longitudinal capture of patient data is, therefore, essential to evaluate the impact of current practice on the epidemiology of diabetic eye complications.

Telecare for patients with type 1 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control: a randomized controlled trial and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy of telecare (modem transmission of glucometer data and clinician feedback) to support intensive insulin therapy in patients with type 1 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Thirty-one patients with type 1 diabetes on intensive insulin therapy and with HbA1c >7.8% were randomized to telecare (glucometer transmission with feedback) or control (glucometer transmission without feedback) for 6 months. The primary end point was 6-month HbA1c. To place our findings in context, we pooled HbA1c change from baseline reported in randomized trials of telecare identified in a systematic review of the literature.

RESULTS

Compared with the control group, telecare patients had a significantly lower 6-month HbA1c (8.2 vs. 7.8%, P = 0.03, after accounting for HbA1c at baseline) and a nonsignificant fourfold greater chance of achieving 6-month HbA1c < or =7% (29 vs. 7%; risk difference 21.9%, 95% CI -4.7 to 50.5). Nurses spent 50 more min/patient giving feedback on the phone with telecare patients than with control patients. Meta-analysis of seven randomized trials of adult patients with type 1 diabetes found a 0.4% difference (95% CI 0-0.8) in HbA1c mean change from baseline between the telecare and control groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Telecare is associated with small effects on glycemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes on intensive insulin therapy but with inadequate glycemic control.

Influence of health care providers on the development of diabetes complications: long-term follow-up from the Pittsburgh Epidemiology of Diabetes Complications Study

OBJECTIVE

To quantify total diabetes care received (generalist or specialist) from diagnosis onward and its association with the incidence of diabetes complications in a representative cohort of patients with type 1 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A total of 429 subjects from the Pittsburgh Epidemiology of Diabetes Complications Study, a prospective follow-up study of childhood-onset type 1 diabetic subjects first seen between 1986 and 1988 (mean age 28 years, mean duration 19 years), followed biennially for up to 10 years were studied. Specialist care was defined as care received from a board-certified endocrinologist, diabetologist, or diabetes clinic and quantified as the percent of diabetes duration spent in specialist care.

RESULTS

There was a significant trend for a higher incidence of neuropathy, overt nephropathy, and coronary artery disease with lower use of specialist care. Multivariate analyses controlling for diabetes duration, demographic characteristics, health care practices, and physiological risk factors demonstrated that higher past use of specialist care was found to be significantly protective against the development of overt nephropathy (risk ratio 0.43, 95% CI 0.21-0.88) and neuropathy (0.54, 0.35-0.83) and weakly protective against coronary artery disease (0.65, 0.37-1.1).

CONCLUSIONS

A higher proportion of diabetes duration spent in specialist care may result in delayed development of certain diabetes complications independent of other risk factors. This study thus supports the concept that the benefits of specialist care should be available to all patients with type 1 diabetes.

The Diabcare-Asia 1998 study--outcomes on control and complications in type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients

The aim of this study was to describe the glycaemic and metabolic control and diabetes-related complications in type 1 and type 2 Asian patients.

METHODS

Data of diabetes patients from 230 diabetes centres in 12 Asian regions were collected on a retrospective-prospective basis through review of medical records, interview and laboratory assessments. Analysis of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) was carried out in central laboratories appointed by Bio-Rad. The data collection case record forms were scanned electronically.

RESULTS

22177 patients with valid data made up the analysis population. Among patents with type 1 and type 2 diabetes, there was a higher proportion of women than men (53% vs. 47% for type 1 patients and 56% vs. 44% for type 2 diabetes). Hypertension (61%) and overweight (40% with BMI > or = 25 kg/m2 were common in type 2 patients. Dyslipidaemia was also present in at least half of both types of patients. Control of glycaemia (mean HbA,1c and fasting blood glucose [FBG]) was poor in type 1 (9.9 +/- 2.5%; 10.2 +/- 5.2 mmol/l) and type 2 patients (8.5 +/- 2.0%; 8.9 +/- 3.4 mmol/l). Glycaemia in the majority of both types of patients fell short of those stipulated by various guidelines. In type 2 patients, glycaemia deteriorated (HbA1c > 7.5%, FBG > or = 7.0 mmol/l) with duration of diabetes > 7 years. Both types of diabetes appear to share a similar high prevalence of complications of cataract, retinopathy and neuropathy, although the prevalence of cataract (27%) and neuropathy (35%) was higher in type 2 diabetes. Screening for microalbuminuria was not common.

CONCLUSIONS

The Inadequate metabolic and hypertension control, especially in type 2 patients, needs to be addressed.