1
|
Porcaro AB, Bianchi A, Panunzio A, Gallina S, Serafin E, Tafuri A, Trabacchin N, Orlando R, Ornaghi PI, Mazzucato G, Vidiri S, D'Aietti D, Montanaro F, Brusa D, Patuzzo GM, Artoni F, Baielli A, Migliorini F, De Marco V, Veccia A, Brunelli M, Siracusano S, Cerruto MA, Antonelli A. Tumor upgrading among very favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: how can it impact the clinical course? Int Urol Nephrol 2024; 56:2597-2605. [PMID: 38553619 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-024-04019-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2023] [Accepted: 03/02/2024] [Indexed: 07/25/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE We sought to investigate predictors of unfavorable tumor upgrading in very favorable intermediate-risk (IR) prostate cancer (PCa) patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, in addition to evaluate how it may affect the risk of disease progression. METHODS A very favorable subset of IR PCa patients presenting with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) < 10 ng/mL, percentage of biopsy positive cores (BPC) < 50%, and either International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade group 1 and clinical stage T2b or ISUP grade group 2 and clinical stage T1c-2b was identified. Unfavorable pathology at radical prostatectomy was defined as the presence of ISUP grade group > 2 (unfavorable tumor upgrading), extracapsular extension (ECE), and seminal vesicle invasion (SVI). Disease progression was defined as the event of biochemical recurrence and/or local recurrence and/or distant metastases. Associations were evaluated by Cox regression and logistic regression analyses. RESULTS Overall, 210 patients were identified between January 2013 and October 2020. Unfavorable tumor upgrading was detected in 71 (33.8%) cases, and adverse tumor stage, including ECE or SVI in 18 (8.6%) and 11 (5.2%) patients, respectively. Median (interquartile range) follow-up was 38.5 (16-61) months. PCa progression occurred in 24 (11.4%) patients. Very favorable IR PCa patients with unfavorable tumor upgrading at final pathology showed a persistent risk of disease progression, which hold significance after adjustment for all factors (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 5.95, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.97-17.92, p = 0.002) of which PSA was an independent predictor (HR: 1.52, 95% CI 1.12-2.08, p = 0.008). Moreover, these subjects were more likely to belong to the biopsy ISUP grade group 2. CONCLUSIONS Very favorable IR PCa patients hiding unfavorable tumor upgrading were more likely to experience disease progression. Unfavorable tumor upgrading involved about one-third of cases and was less likely to occur in patients presenting with biopsy ISUP grade group 1. Tumor misclassification is an issue to discuss, when counseling this subset of patients for active surveillance because of the risk of delayed active treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Benito Porcaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy.
| | - Alberto Bianchi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Sebastian Gallina
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Emanuele Serafin
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Nicolò Trabacchin
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Rossella Orlando
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Paola Irene Ornaghi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Mazzucato
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Stefano Vidiri
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Damiano D'Aietti
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesca Montanaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Davide Brusa
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Giulia Marafioti Patuzzo
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Artoni
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Alberto Baielli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Filippo Migliorini
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Vincenzo De Marco
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Veccia
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Matteo Brunelli
- Department of Pathology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Salvatore Siracusano
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Maria Angela Cerruto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Porcaro AB, Orlando R, Panunzio A, Tafuri A, Baielli A, Artoni F, Montanaro F, Gallina S, Bianchi A, Mazzucato G, Serafin E, Veccia A, Boldini M, Treccani LP, Rizzetto R, Brunelli M, Migliorini F, Bertolo R, Cerruto MA, Antonelli A. The 2012 Briganti nomogram predicts disease progression in surgically treated intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients with favorable tumor grade group eventually associated with some adverse factors. J Robot Surg 2024; 18:134. [PMID: 38520651 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01886-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2023] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/25/2024]
Abstract
To evaluate the prognostic potential of the 2012 Briganti nomogram for pelvic lymph node invasion on disease progression after surgery in intermediate-risk (IR) prostate cancer (PCa) patients with favorable tumor grade (International Society of Urological Pathology grade group 1 or 2), eventually associated with adverse clinical features as PSA between 10 and 20 ng/mL and/or clinical stage T2b. All IR PCa patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and eventually extended pelvic lymph node dissection at the Department of Urology of the Integrated University Hospital of Verona between 2013 and 2021, with the abovementioned features, and available follow-up were considered. The 2012 Briganti nomogram score was assessed both as a continuous and dichotomous variable, where a mean risk score of 4% was used a threshold. The independent predictor status of the nomogram score on disease progression defined as the occurrence of biochemical recurrence and/or metastatic progression was evaluated using the Cox regression analysis. Overall, 348 patients were enrolled in the study. Median (interquartile range) follow-up was 98 (83.5-112.4) months. At multivariable Cox regression analysis, PCa progression, which occurred in 65 (18.7%) cases, was independently predicted only by the 2012 Briganti nomogram score evaluated as a continuous variable, among all considered clinical features (HR 1.16; 95%CI 1.08-1.24; p < 0.001). In addition, patients presenting with a nomogram score ≥ 4% were more likely to experience disease progression even after adjustment for clinical (HR 2.22, 95%CI 1.02-4.79; p = 0.043) and pathological (HR 1.80; 95%CI 1.06-3.05; p = 0.031) factors. In the examined patient population, the 2012 Briganti nomogram predicted PCa progression after surgery. Accordingly, as the risk score increased, patients were more likely to progress, independently by the occurrence of adverse pathology in the surgical specimen. The 2012 Briganti nomogram score categorized according to the mean value allowed to identify prognostic subgroups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Benito Porcaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy.
| | - Rossella Orlando
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | | | | | - Alberto Baielli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Artoni
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesca Montanaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Sebastian Gallina
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Alberto Bianchi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Mazzucato
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Emanuele Serafin
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Veccia
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Michele Boldini
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Pierangelo Treccani
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Riccardo Rizzetto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Matteo Brunelli
- Department of Pathology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Filippo Migliorini
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Riccardo Bertolo
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Maria Angela Cerruto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Radical prostatectomy readmissions: Causes, risk factors, national rates, & costs. Urol Oncol 2023; 41:106.e1-106.e8. [PMID: 36402714 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.10.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Revised: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Readmissions have substantial clinical and financial impacts on the healthcare system. Radical prostatectomy (RP) is considered a standard treatment in the management of clinically localized prostate cancer. Yet, there is a paucity of research evaluating readmissions for RP in a national dataset. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with histologically confirmed prostate cancer managed with RP were identified within the 2016 to 2018 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Patient factors, facility factors, and surgical characteristics were evaluated for associations with readmission using univariable and multivariable analyses. RESULTS A total of 133,727 patients receiving RP were identified. Early (30-day) and late (31-90-day) readmission rates were 4.2% and 1.8% respectively. The most common cause of early readmission was postoperative digestive system complication (10%) and the most common cause of late readmission was septicemia (13%). On multivariable logistic regression, factors associated with both early and late readmission include nonroutine discharge at index (early: OR 1.877, 95% CI 1.667-2.113; late: OR 1.801, 95% CI 1.490-2.183), and circulatory system comorbidity (early: OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.082-1.538); late: OR 1.515, 95% CI 1.157-1.984). CONCLUSIONS Our findings regarding factors associated with readmission provide insight for RP counseling and may inform postoperative care pathways. Elucidation of readmission trends may allow the identification and proactive management of patients at higher risk for readmission.
Collapse
|
4
|
Rocco B, Eissa A, Gaia G, Assumma S, Sarchi L, Bozzini G, Micali S, Calcagnile T, Sighinolfi MC. Pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate and bladder cancers. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2022; 74:680-694. [PMID: 36197698 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.22.04904-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Prostate cancer and bladder cancer accounts for approximately 13.5% and 3% of all male cancers and all newly diagnosed cancers (regardless sex), respectively. Thus, these cancers represent a major health and economic burden globally. The knowledge of lymph node status is an integral part of the management of any solid tumor. In the urological field, pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is of paramount importance in the diagnosis, management, and prognosis of prostate and bladder cancers. However, PLND may be associated with several comorbidities. In this narrative review, the most recent updates concerning the patterns and incidence of lymph node metastasis, the role of different imaging studies and nomograms in determining patients' eligibility for PLND, and the anatomical templates of PLND in urologic patients with bladder or prostate cancer will be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernardo Rocco
- Department of Urology, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Ahmed Eissa
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt -
| | - Giorgia Gaia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy
| | - Simone Assumma
- Department of Urology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Luca Sarchi
- Department of Urology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | | | - Salvatore Micali
- Department of Urology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Tommaso Calcagnile
- Department of Urology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Maria C Sighinolfi
- Department of Urology, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fiori C, Checcucci E, Stura I, Amparore D, De Cillis S, Piana A, Granato S, Volpi G, Sica M, Piramide F, Verri P, Manfredi M, De Luca S, Autorino R, Migliaretti G, Porpiglia F. Development of a novel nomogram to identify the candidate to extended pelvic lymph node dissection in patients who underwent mpMRI and target biopsy only. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2022:10.1038/s41391-022-00565-y. [PMID: 35750851 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-022-00565-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Revised: 05/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nowadays a tool able to predict the risk of lymph-node invasion (LNI) in patients underwent target biopsy (TB) only before radical prostatectomy (RP) is still lacking. Our aim is to develop a model based on mp-MRI and target biopsy (TB) alone able to predict the risk of LNI. METHODS We retrospectively extracted data of patients with preoperative positive mp-MRI and TB only who underwent RARP with ePLND from April 2014 to March 2020. A logistic regression model was performed to evaluate the impact of pre- and intra-operative factors on the risk of LNI. Model discrimination was assessed using an area under (AUC) the ROC curve. A nomogram, and its calibration plot, to predict the risk of LNI were generated based on the logistic model. A validation of the model was done using a similar cohort. RESULTS 461 patients were included, of which 52 (11.27) had LNI. After logistic regression analysis and multivariable model DRE, PI-RADS, seminal vesicle invasion, PSA and worst GS at I and II target lesions were significant predictors of LNI. The AUC was 0.74 [0.67-0.81] 95% CI. The calibration plot shows that our model is very close to the ideal one which is in the 95% CI. After the creation of a visual nomogram, the cut-off to discriminate between the risk or not of LNI was set with Youden index at 60 points that correspond to a risk of LNI of 7%. The model applied on a similar cohort shown a LH+ of 2.58 [2.17-2.98] 95% CI. CONCLUSIONS Our nomogram for patients undergoing MRI-TB only takes into account clinical stage, SVI at MRI, biopsy Gleason pattern and PSA and it is able to identify patients with risk of LNI when a score higher than 7% is achieved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristian Fiori
- Division of Urology, Department Of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Enrico Checcucci
- Division of Urology, Department Of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy. .,Department of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy.
| | - Ilaria Stura
- Department of Public Health and Pediatric Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Division of Urology, Department Of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Sabrina De Cillis
- Division of Urology, Department Of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Alberto Piana
- Division of Urology, Department Of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Stefano Granato
- Division of Urology, Department Of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Gabriele Volpi
- Division of Urology, Department Of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Michele Sica
- Division of Urology, Department Of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Federico Piramide
- Division of Urology, Department Of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Paolo Verri
- Division of Urology, Department Of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Matteo Manfredi
- Division of Urology, Department Of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Stefano De Luca
- Division of Urology, Department Of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Giuseppe Migliaretti
- Department of Public Health and Pediatric Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Division of Urology, Department Of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Marvaso G, Volpe S, Pepa M, Zaffaroni M, Corrao G, Augugliaro M, Nolè F, De Cobelli O, Jereczek-Fossa BA. Recent Advances in the Management of Hormone-Sensitive Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer. Cancer Manag Res 2022; 14:89-101. [PMID: 35023972 PMCID: PMC8747627 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s321136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
After primary treatment for prostate cancer with either radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy, a significant proportion of patients are at risk of developing metastases. In recent years, a deeper understanding of the underlying biology together with improved imaging techniques and the advent of new therapeutic options including metastases-directed therapies and new drugs have revolutionized the management of low-burden metastatic disease, also known as oligometastatic state. The purpose of this narrative review is to report the recent developments in the management of hormone-sensitive oligometastatic prostate cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Marvaso
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefania Volpe
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Pepa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Mattia Zaffaroni
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Corrao
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Augugliaro
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Franco Nolè
- Medical Oncology Division of Urogenital & Head & Neck Tumors, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Ottavio De Cobelli
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Department of Urology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Puliatti S, Piazza P, Cacciamani GE, Gómez Rivas J, Taratkin M, Marenco JL, Rivero Belenchon I, Kowalewski KF, Checcucci E. Comment on: "Predictive factors for opioid-free management after robotic radical prostatectomy: the value of a single-port robotic platform". Minerva Urol Nephrol 2021; 73:677-679. [PMID: 34847651 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.21.04724-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Puliatti
- Department of Urology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.,Orsi Academy, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Pietro Piazza
- Orsi Academy, Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Urology, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Juan Gómez Rivas
- Department of Urology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mark Taratkin
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - José L Marenco
- Department of Urology, Valencian Institute of Oncology Foundation, Valencia, Spain
| | - Ines Rivero Belenchon
- Department of Urology and Nephrology, Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Seville, Spain
| | - Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski
- Department of Urology and Urological Surgery, Mannheim University Medical Center, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Enrico Checcucci
- Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy - .,Department of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Luzzago S, Piccinelli ML, Marvaso G, Laukhtina E, Miura N, Schuettfort VM, Mori K, Aydh A, Ferro M, Mistretta FA, Fusco N, Petralia G, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Shariat SF, Karakiewicz PI, de Cobelli O, Musi G. Active surveillance for prostate cancer: comparison between incidental tumors vs. tumors diagnosed at prostate biopsies. World J Urol 2021; 40:443-451. [PMID: 34687344 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03864-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To test discontinuation rates during Active Surveillance (AS) in patients diagnosed with incidental prostate cancers (IPCa) vs. tumors diagnosed at prostate biopsies (BxPCa). METHODS Retrospective single center analysis of 961 vs. 121 BxPCa vs. IPCa patients (2008-2020). Kaplan-Meier plots and multivariable Cox regression models tested four different outcomes: (1) any-cause discontinuation; (2) discontinuation due to ISUP GG upgrading; (3) biopsy discontinuation due to ISUP GG upgrading or > 3 positive cores; (4) biopsy discontinuation or suspicious extraprostatic extension at surveillance mpMRI. Then, multivariable logistic regression models tested rates of clinically significant PCa (csPCa) (ISUP GG ≥ 3 or pT ≥ 3a or pN1) after radical prostatectomy (RP). RESULTS Median time follow-up was 35 (19-64) months. IPCa patients were at lower risk of any-cause (3-year survival: 79.3 vs. 66%; HR: 0.5, p = 0.001) and biopsy/MRI AS discontinuation (3-year survival: 82.3 vs. 72.7%; HR: 0.5, p = 0.001), compared to BxPCa patients. Conversely, IPCa patients exhibited same rates of biopsy discontinuation and ISUP GG upgrading over time, relative to BxPCa. In multivariable logistic regression models, IPCa patients were associated with higher rates of csPCa at RP (OR: 1.4, p = 0.03), relative to their BxPCa counterparts. CONCLUSION AS represents a safe management strategy for IPCa. Compared to BxPCa, IPCa patients are less prone to experience any-cause and biopsy/MRI AS discontinuation. However, the two mentioned groups present similar rates of biopsy discontinuation and ISUP GG upgrading over time. In consequence, tailored AS protocols with scheduled repeated surveillance biopsies should be offered to all newly diagnosed IPCa patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Luzzago
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy. .,Department of Oncology and Haemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122, Milan, Italy.
| | - Mattia Luca Piccinelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy.,Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Marvaso
- Department of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.,Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Noriyoshi Miura
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Ehime, Japan
| | - Victor M Schuettfort
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Abdulmajeed Aydh
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, King Faisal Medical City, Abha, Saudi Arabia
| | - Matteo Ferro
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco A Mistretta
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Fusco
- Department of Pathology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Haemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Petralia
- Precision Imaging and Research Unit, Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Haemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara A Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Haemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.,Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Research Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.,Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.,Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.,Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.,Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria.,European Association of Urology Research Foundation, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Ottavio de Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Haemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Gennaro Musi
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Haemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Albisinni S, Diamand R, DE Nunzio C. The train has already left the station: analyzing the rise of PSMA PET/CT as new standard for staging high risk prostate cancer. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2020; 73:401-402. [PMID: 33016034 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.20.04051-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Albisinni
- Department of Urology, Erasme Hospital, University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium -
| | - Romain Diamand
- Department of Urology, Erasme Hospital, University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Cosimo DE Nunzio
- Department of Urology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|