Anti-inflammatory therapies for pericardial diseases in the COVID-19 pandemic: safety and potentiality

Diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular manifestations of COVID-19: a narrative review

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) was the main pathogen in the COVID-19 pandemic. This viral infection has been associated with several respiratory and non-respiratory complications contributing to a higher mortality rate, especially in patients with underlying heart diseases worldwide. Once considered a respiratory tract disease, it is now well-known that COVID-19 patients may experience a wide range of cardiac manifestations. Because of its remarkable direct and indirect effects on the cardiovascular system, herein, we examined the published literature that studied the hypothetical mechanisms of injury, manifestations, and diagnostic modalities, including changes in molecular biomarkers with a predictive value in the prognostication of the disease, as well as emerging evidence regarding the long-term cardiac complications of the disease.

Colchicine and/or Naltrexone for Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients Not Requiring High Levels of Ventilatory Support (COLTREXONE): A Prospective, Randomized, Open-Label Trial

We assessed the efficacy and safety of colchicine and low-dose naltrexone (LDN), alone and in combination, in preventing progression to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. In this prospective, randomized, open-label trial, colchicine and LDN were compared to standard of care (SOC) in patients hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 not requiring high levels of ventilatory support. Patients were randomly assigned to colchicine alone, LDN alone, colchicine/LDN in combination, or SOC. The primary outcome was time to disease recovery. Secondary outcomes included total time hospitalized, study enrollment, level of care, oxygen support, and adverse events.  One-hundred and thirty-seven patients were randomized (Nc = 34, Nc+ldn = 33, Nldn = 35, Nsoc = 35). Eighty-four patients (61%) achieved disease recovery by day 5. There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients who experienced the primary efficacy outcome among those who received colchicine, LDN, or between the four study arms.Patients receiving colchicine had a shorter length of enrollment but not a significant reduction in the length of stay. Diarrhea was the most common adverse reaction. In adults hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 not requiring high-level ventilatory support, colchicine and LDN, alone and in combination, were not associated with significant reductions in progression to severe disease.

Prevalence, Risk Factors, Prognosis, and Management of Pericardial Effusion in COVID-19

Background: There is limited data in the literature about the clinical importance and prognosis of pericardial effusion (PE) in patients discharged after recovering from COVID-19, but large-scale studies have yet to be available. This study investigated the prevalence, risk factors, prognosis, late clinical outcomes, and management of PE in COVID-19. Materials and Methods: Between August 2020 and March 2021, 15,689 patients were followed up in our pandemic hospital due to COVID-19. Patients with positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test results and PE associated with COVID-19 in computed tomography (CT) were included in the study. The patients were divided into three groups according to PE size (mild, moderate, and large). Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) records, laboratory data, clinical outcomes, and medical treatments of patients discharged from the hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Results: According to the PE size (mild, moderate, large) of 256 patients with PE at admission or discharge, the mean age was 62.17 ± 16.34, 69.12 ± 12.52, and 72.44 ± 15.26, respectively. The mean follow-up period of the patients was 25.2 ± 5.12 months. Of the patients in the study population, 53.5% were in the mild group, 30.4% in the moderate group, and 16.1% in the large group. PE became chronic in a total of 178 (69.6%) patients at the end of the mean three months, and chronicity increased as PE size increased. Despite the different anti-inflammatory treatments for PE in the acute phase, similar chronicity was observed. In addition, as the PE size increased, the patients' frequency of hospitalization, complications, and mortality rates showed statistical significance between the groups. Conclusions: The clinical prognosis of patients presenting with PE was quite poor; as PE in size increased, cardiac and noncardiac events and mortality rates were significantly higher. Patients with large PE associated with COVID-19 at discharge should be monitored at close intervals due to the chronicity of PE and the increased risk of tamponade.

Rilonacept and Other Interleukin-1 Inhibitors in the Treatment of Recurrent Pericarditis

Pericarditis is the commonest form of pericardial disease. Unfortunately, despite optimal treatment, approximately 15-30% of patients with acute pericarditis have recurrence. Many of these patients are refractory to colchicine, and become corticosteroid-dependent. Recurrent pericarditis severely impairs quality of life, and is associated with significant morbidity. Inflammasome formation and overproduction of interleukin (IL)-1 have been found to drive the systemic inflammatory response in recurrent autoinflammatory pericarditis. Several IL-1 inhibitors have been evaluated for their usefulness as therapeutic options. Rilonacept is a dimeric fusion protein that functions as a soluble decoy receptor that binds to both IL-1α and IL-1β, thereby inhibiting the IL-1 pathway. It is safe and efficacious in the treatment of recurrent pericarditis in the RHAPSODY II and III trials. Anakinra is a recombinant IL-1 receptor antagonist that blocks the action of circulating IL-1α and IL-1β. It has also been shown to be safe and efficacious in the AIRTRIP and IRAP studies. Canakinumab is a selective human monoclonal antibody against IL-1β, and data on its use in recurrent pericarditis is scarce. Several questions regarding IL-1 inhibitor therapy, such as the duration of treatment and the recommended tapering protocols, as well as their use in special populations like pregnant or lactating women, remain unanswered and need to be addressed in future studies.

Management of acute pericarditis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Provide an update on current management and most recent evidence in the treatment of pediatric pericarditis.

RECENT FINDINGS

While treatment of acute pericarditis has not significantly changed over the last decade, management of recurrent acute pericarditis, with increased attention to autoinflammation as a causal mechanism, has evolved substantially. This includes clinical trial evidence that newer medications targeting interleukin-1 receptors are effective in recurrent forms of pericarditis. In addition, advanced imaging utilizing cardiac magnetic resonance has emerged as a particularly effective way to detect ongoing pericardial inflammation in support of more difficult-to-treat patients.

SUMMARY

Recent advances in acute and recurrent pericarditis management have allowed for a more tailored approach to the individual patient. Yet, unresolved questions require further research.

Pediatric Pericarditis: Update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

While there have now been a variety of large reviews on adult pericarditis, this detailed review specifically focuses on the epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management of pediatric pericarditis. We have tried to highlight most pediatric studies conducted on this topic, with special inclusion of important adult studies that have shaped our understanding of and management for acute and recurrent pericarditis.

RECENT FINDINGS

We find that the etiology of pediatric pericarditis differs from adult patients with pericarditis and has evolved over the years. Also, with the current COVID-19 pandemic, it is important for pediatric clinicians to be aware of pericardial involvement both due to the infection and from vaccination. Oftentimes, pericarditis maybe the only cardiac involvement in children with COVID-19, and so caregivers should maintain a high index of suspicion when they encounter children with pericarditis.  Large-scale contemporary epidemiological data regarding incidence and prevalence of both acute and recurrent pericarditis is lacking in pediatrics, and future studies should focus on highlighting this important research gap. Most of the current management strategies for pediatric pericarditis are from experiences gathered from adult data. Pediatric multicenter trials are warranted to understand the best management strategy for those with acute and recurrent pericarditis.

CASE VIGNETTE

A 6-year-old child with a past history of pericarditis almost 2 months ago comes in with a 2-day history of chest pain and fever. Per mother, he stopped his steroids about 2 weeks ago, and for the last 2 days has had a temperature of 102F and has been complaining of sharp mid-sternal chest pain that gets worse when he lies down and is relieved when he sits up and leans forward. On examination, he is tachycardic (heart rate 160 bpm), with normal blood pressure for age. He appears to be in pain (5/10), and on auscultation has a pericardial friction rub. His lab studies are notable for elevated white blood cell count and inflammatory markers (CRP and ESR). His electrocardiogram reveals sinus tachycardia and diffuse ST-elevation in all precordial leads. His echocardiogram demonstrates normal biventricular function and a trace pericardial effusion. His cardiac MRI confirms recurrent pericarditis. He is started on indomethacin and colchicine. He has complete resolution of his symptoms by day 3 of admission and is discharged with close follow-up.

Efficacy and safety profile of corticosteroids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in COVID-19 management: A narrative review

Due to the fact that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is still prevalent, and current reports show that some parts of the world have seen increase in incidence, it is relevant that health professionals and scientists know about recent or novel trends, especially drug treatments. Additionally, the safety profiles of these drug treatments need to be documented and shared with the public. Some studies have demonstrated the clinical benefits of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and corticosteroids in COVID-19 treatment. On the contrary, others have also reported that NSAIDs and corticosteroids may worsen symptoms associated with COVID-19. While some researchers have suggested that corticosteroids may be helpful if used in the early stages of COVID-19, there are still some conflicting findings regarding the use of corticosteroids in certain viral infections. Our review suggests that methylprednisolone, dexamethasone, and ibuprofen have therapeutic potential in reducing mortality due to COVID-19 among hospitalized patients. This review also highlights the fact that the use of NSAIDs is not associated with adverse outcomes of COVID-19. In reality, evidence suggests that NSAIDs do not increase the risk of COVID-19 infections. Also, the literature reviewed suggests that corticosteroid treatment in COVID-19 was linked with a decrease in all-cause mortality and disease progression, without increase in adverse events when compared to no corticosteroid treatment.

Recurrent pericarditis after Covid-19

Patient with rheumatoid arthritis who has Covid-19 with recurrent pericaditis debut, differential diagnosis.

Colchicine for cardiovascular medicine: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Aim: Colchicine, a microtubule-disassembling (antitubulin) agent used for centuries for the treatment of gout and autoimmune diseases, is a drug of growing interest in the cardiovascular field. While in the last decades it has become cornerstone of pericarditis treatment, it has also emerged in the last few years as a promising drug in the management of coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation and heart failure. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy of colchicine in patients with cardiovascular diseases. Methods: Systematic search in electronic databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, BioMed Central, the Cochrane Collaboration Database of Randomized Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, EMBASE, Google Scholar) was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to February 2021. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed to assess the risk of cardiovascular events, defined according to clinical setting. Results: Among 15,569 pooled patients from 21 RCTs, colchicine was superior to placebo in the reduction of cardiovascular events. In the setting of pericardial diseases, it was associated with a lower risk of recurrent pericarditis (17 vs 34%, RR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.42-0.60, I² = 10%). In other studies assessing coronary artery disease patients, colchicine was associated with a reduced risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) such as myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiovascular death, coronary revascularisation and hospitalization (6.3 vs 9%, RR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.54-0.84, I² = 55). Among patients with atrial fibrillation, it was associated with lower rates of recurrence (20 vs 30%, RR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.58-0.81, I² = 0). In the single RCT on heart failure, colchicine was not associated with improved NYHA class. Conclusion: Colchicine is a valuable anti-inflammatory agent for the prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with inflammatory cardiac conditions such as pericardial diseases, coronary artery disease and atrial fibrillation.

Role of colchicine in the management of COVID-19 patients: A meta-analysis of cohort and randomized controlled trials

Background

Colchicine is well known drug for the treatment of acute gout. Recently, it has also been used in the management of COVID-19 patients.

Aim

The aim of current study is to find out the role of colchicine in COVID-19 patients.

Material & methods

The relevant studies were searched in PubMed/Medline, Google scholar and clinical trail.gov.com till inception and sorted based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The quality assessment of studies were done using Newcastle Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. The pooled estimate was calculated as odd ratio and pooled prevalence with 95% confidence interval. A random effect model was used and publication bias was assessed qualitatively by trim and fill method.

Results

Out of 38 studies, a total of 6 studies were found relevant for the analysis containing 1146 patients (705 males and 441 females). The pooled odd ratio was found to be 0.35 [0.23, 0.53] which indicate significance reduction of mortality in colchicine group as compared to non-colchicine group. The pooled prevalence of the patients treated with colchicine were found to be significant [0.11(0.03, 0.24)]. The heterogeneity among studies was also found to be low (I2 = 11%). However, funnel plot has indicated the involvement of publication bias [Egger: bias = 10.168291 (95% CI = 5.042044 to 15.294537) P = 0.0053].

Conclusion

Colchicine might be helpful in reduction of mortality in the management of COVID-19 patients. However, further studies are required to confirm its exact role.

Colchicina, perspectivas de un viejo amigo para la reumatología en la COVID-19: una revisión exploratoria

Introducción

La colchicina es ampliamente utilizada en enfermedades inflamatorias como la gota y la fiebre mediterránea familiar. Debido a su capacidad inmunomoduladora, podría tener un papel importante en el tratamiento de la COVID-19.

Objetivo

Explorar la evidencia médica publicada hasta el 28 de diciembre del 2020, acerca de la eficacia y la seguridad de la colchicina en el tratamiento de pacientes con infección confirmada por SARS-CoV-2.

Material y métodos

Revisión exploratoria de la literatura que incluyó PubMed y Scopus. Se tuvieron en cuenta registros de ensayos clínicos y publicaciones con datos empíricos (estudios observacionales y experimentales) en inglés y español.

Resultados

Se encontraron 33 ensayos clínicos y 6 publicaciones empíricas: estudios de cohorte prospectivos (n = 2) y retrospectiva (n = 2), ensayo clínico aleatorizado (n = 1) y estudio casos y controles (n = 1). La suma de los participantes en los ensayos es de 46.324 individuos, el 73% (24/33) de los estudios recluta a la población de estudio y el 51% (17/33) son fase 3.

Conclusiones

Un ensayo clínico respalda la disminución en marcadores inflamatorios pronósticos y el tiempo de estancia hospitalaria en la infección por SARS-CoV-2. Los ensayos clínicos en desarrollo ayudarán a esclarecer la eficacia y la seguridad de la colchicina para el manejo de pacientes con COVID-19.

Interleukin-1 Antagonists for the Treatment of Recurrent Pericarditis

Although most patients with acute pericarditis will recover, a minority will have recurrent, debilitating episodes. In these patients, refractory symptoms result in high morbidity, and typically require a prolonged duration of anti-inflammatory treatment. Initially, the efficacy of colchicine in both recurrent pericarditis and periodic fever syndromes suggested the central role of the inflammasome in pericarditis. Subsequently, the success of interleukin-1 antagonists in autoinflammatory diseases prompted further investigation in recurrent pericarditis. In current clinical practice, interleukin-1 antagonists include canakinumab, anakinra, and rilonacept. Both anakinra and rilonacept have demonstrated efficacy in randomized trials of patients with recurrent pericarditis. The aim of the current review is to explain the biological rationale for interleukin-1 antagonists in recurrent pericarditis, highlight supporting clinical evidence, and emphasizing future areas of investigation.

Recurrent Pericarditis: a Stubborn Opponent Meets New Treatments in 2022

Purpose of Review

Our goal in writing this review was to provide a comprehensive appraisal of current therapies for idiopathic recurrent pericarditis with a particular focus on the newest therapeutic agents. We sought to understand the role of the inflammasome in the pathophysiology of pericarditis and how it informs the use of interleukin-1 (IL-1)-directed therapies.

Recent Findings

The latest research on this topic has focused on the critical role of the NLRP3 (NACHT, leucine-rich repeat, and pyrin domain-containing protein) inflammasome. Very recently, components of the NLRP3 inflammasome were detected by immune staining in pericardial tissue from patients with recurrent idiopathic pericarditis. In a mouse model of pericarditis, anti-IL-1 agents anakinra and rilonacept reduced NLRP3 immunostaining. Subsequent study of these drugs in human subjects with idiopathic recurrent pericarditis demonstrated their efficacy.

Summary

Recurrent idiopathic pericarditis, while relatively rare, poses a continued treatment challenge and contributes to a diminished quality of life for those patients who are afflicted. Recent developments, including an animal model of the disease and the use of IL-1-directed therapies, represent an exciting leap forward in our understanding of treatment targets. These advances offer not only new tools in our fight against this disease, but also the promise of earlier intervention and attenuation of disease morbidity. As our experience with these new agents expands, we can address questions about the ideal timing of introduction of anti-IL-1 therapy and duration of therapy and better understand the potential side effect profile.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11886-022-01719-z.

Acute Pericarditis: Update

Purpose of Review

Since 2015, when ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of pericardial diseases were published, ongoing research has enhanced the current state of knowledge on acute pericarditis. This review is an update on the latest developments in this field.

Recent Findings

In recurrent acute pericarditis, autoinflammation has been included among causative mechanisms restricting the vague diagnoses of “idiopathic” pericarditis. Cardiac magnetic resonance that detects ongoing pericardial inflammation may guide treatment in difficult-to-treat patients. Development of risk scores may assist identification of patients at high risk for complicated pericarditis, who should be closely monitored and aggressively treated. Treatment with IL-1 inhibitors has been proven efficacious in recurrent forms with a good safety profile. Finally, acute pericarditis has recently attracted great interest as it has been reported among side effects post COVID-19 vaccination and may also complicate SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Summary

Recent advancements in acute pericarditis have contributed to a better understanding of the disease allowing a tailored to the individual patient approach. However, there are still unsolved questions that require further research.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11886-022-01710-8.

Acute pericarditis after COVID 19 in a peritoneal dialysis patient

COVID-19 is known to affect numerous organs which have ACE-2 receptors, lung being the most involved organ. Nevertheless, cardiac involvement is not uncommon and can occur through a variety of manifestations. The authors hereby report a case of pericarditis following SARS-CoV-2 infection. A 54-year-old man with end stage kidney disease under peritoneal dialysis presented with acute chest pain approximately 1 month after being diagnosed with COVID-19. Electrocardiogram revealed widespread ST segment elevation. The diagnosis of acute pericarditis secondary to the viral infection was made and the patient was treated accordingly. Etiology of acute pericarditis can be very varied, and, in many times, no cause is ascertained. In such circumstances, viral or immune mediated etiologies are assumed. In our case, since no cause was proven, pericarditis was assumed as secondary to the SARS-CoV-2 infection. This entity is probably underdiagnosed. In patients undergoing dialysis, uremic pericarditis is commonly the etiology. However, different causes must be taken into consideration, COVID-19 being one of them.

The inflammasome as a therapeutic target for myopericardial diseases

Myopericardial diseases are relatively common in clinical practice although often neglected due to the limited availability of treatments and evidence to support management strategies. However in the past ten years, growing evidence has improved our knowledge of the pathophysiology of myopericardial diseases and first clinical trials have highlighted the importance of inflammation as therapeutic target developing first steps toward a personalized approach also in this field. The NLRP3 (NACHT, leucine-rich repeat, and pyrin domain-containing protein 3) inflammasome is a protein complex that functions as a platform for rapid induction of the inflammatory response to infection or sterile injury through pro-inflammatory cytokines, now recognized as a new important therapeutic target for myopericardial diseases. Colchicine is an old drug that acts as non-specific inhibitor of the inflammasome and could be a useful and inexpensive option in clinical practice and it is currently registered for pericarditis in some European countries (e.g., Italy, Austria). Anti-interleukin-1 (IL-1) agents (anakinra and rilonacept) appear to be a major advance in medical therapy of recurrent pericarditis and could be a therapeutic option also for myocarditis if confirmed in additional studies. In this review, we provide an update on the inflammasome as therapeutic target for myopericardial diseases, a significant advance in medical therapy for these diseases in the last five years.

A Case of Acute Pericarditis After COVID-19 Vaccination

A two-dose regimen of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccination confers 95% protection against COronaVIrus Disease 19 (COVID-19) and the safety profile is adequate. To the submission date, there were no reports in literature of acute pericarditis after BNT162b2 vaccination. However, pericarditis has been reported as a rare event associated with COVID-19 infection, which could be due to the pro-inflammatory effects of the spike protein. Recent evidence of post-vaccine myocarditis has been published. Herein we describe the case of a middle-aged healthy women who developed symptoms and signs of acute pericarditis 7-10 days after the second dose of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccination. Although a direct effect cannot be stated, it is important to report a potential adverse vaccine reaction effect that could be associated with the expression of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein induced from the mRNA of the vaccine.

Colchicine for COVID-19: targeting NLRP3 inflammasome to blunt hyperinflammation

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is capable of inducing the activation of NACHT, leucine-rich repeat, and pyrin domain-containing protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome, a macromolecular structure sensing the danger and amplifying the inflammatory response. The main product processed by NLRP3 inflammasome is interleukin (IL)-1β, responsible for the downstream production of IL-6, which has been recognized as an important mediator in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Since colchicine is an anti-inflammatory drug with the ability to block NLRP3 inflammasome oligomerization, this may prevent the release of active IL-1β and block the detrimental effects of downstream cytokines, i.e. IL-6. To date, few randomized clinical trials and many observational studies with colchicine have been conducted, showing interesting signals. As colchicine is a nonspecific inhibitor of the NLRP3 inflammasome, compounds specifically blocking this molecule might provide increased advantages in reducing the inflammatory burden and its related clinical manifestations. This may occur through a selective blockade of different steps preceding NLRP3 inflammasome oligomerization as well as through a reduced release of the main cytokines (IL-1β and IL-18). Since most evidence is based on observational studies, definitive conclusion cannot be drawn and additional studies are needed to confirm preliminary results and further dissect how colchicine and other NLRP3 inhibitors reduce the inflammatory burden and evaluate the timing and duration of treatment.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and Severe Pericardial Effusion: From Pathogenesis to Management: A Case Report Based Systematic Review

The Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-COV-2) created a global pandemic that continues to this day. In addition to pulmonary symptoms, the virus can have destructive effects on other organs, especially the heart. For example, large pericardial effusion has been observed as a critical and life-threatening finding in Coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) patients. In this case report based systematic review, we review the reports of moderate to severe pericardial effusion associated with tamponade physiology. Direct cardiomyocyte and pericardium invasion, inflammation and cytokine storms and oxidative stress due to acute respiratory distress syndrome, are the pathogenesis of this phenomenon. The results showed that the manifestations of this finding are variable. Pericardial effusion can be seen as a delayed complication, accompanied by myocarditis or pericarditis, isolated, or with acute respiratory distress syndrome. In most patients, emergency percutaneous pericardiocentesis was performed, and fluid analysis was often exudative in 3 pattern of hemorrhagic, serous, and serosanguinous. Medical treatment and follow-up are recommended, especially in cases of pericarditis.

COVID-19 presenting as acute pericarditis

COVID 19, caused by SARS-CoV-2, is a highly infectious disease, mainly affects the respiratory system. In this article, we have presented a case of COVID-19, who presented solely with pericarditis without myocarditis, without any respiratory symptoms. The diagnosis was made based on clinical, electrocardiographic, radiological and biological findings. He was treated successfully with aspirin and colchicine. Our case highlights an atypical presentation of COVID-19, which should be kept in mind in the present pandemic and to diagnose and isolate early to limit the spread of infection.

A Case of Acute Viral Pericarditis Complicated With Pericardial Effusion Induced by Third Dose of COVID Vaccination

COVID-19 vaccines were safe and efficacious in clinical trials. A two-dose regimen of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine confers no less than 95% protection against COVID-19 with an adequate safety profile. To date, no reports have been made in the literature regarding the onset of acute viral pericarditis after vaccination with the Pfizer BNT162b2 vaccine. But on the other hand, pericarditis is reported to occur in rare instances of COVID-19 infection, and this may be attributed to the pro-inflammatory effects of the spike protein. In this article, we describe the case of an elderly male patient with a known case of hypothyroidism who presented to our emergency department with fever, chills, and dry cough for ten days after the third dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. Although we cannot mention a direct effect, it is essential to note a potential adverse reaction to vaccine administration following the expression of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein-induced from the vaccine’s mRNA.

Pharmacotherapeutic agents for the management of COVID-19 patients with preexisting cardiovascular disease

INTRODUCTION

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is the largest public health challenge of the twenty-first century. While COVID-19 primarily affects the respiratory system, manifesting as interstitial pneumonitis and severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), it also has implications for the cardiovascular system. Moreover, those admitted to hospital with severe COVID-19 are more likely to have cardiovascular comorbidities such as hypertension and diabetes mellitus. The underlying pathophysiology of why COVID-19 onset can further decline cardiac pathologies as well as trigger acute onset of new cardiac complications is not yet well understood.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, the authors extensively review literature focused on the current understanding and approaches of managing patients who have underlying cardiovascular diseases and concomitant COVID-19 infection. Furthermore, the authors explore the possible cardiovascular implications of the suggested COVID-19 therapeutic agents that are used to treat this lethal disease.

EXPERT OPINION

Current evidence is evolving around the many trialed pharmacotherapeutic considerations for the management of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients with cardiovascular disease. While we await such data, clinicians should advocate for careful consideration of all concomitant medications for those presenting with COVID-19 on a patient-by-patient basis.

Rilonacept for the treatment of recurrent pericarditis

INTRODUCTION

Recurrent pericarditis (RP) is a debilitating disease that has an underlying autoinflammatory pathophysiology mediated by cytokine interleukin (IL)-1. Rilonacept, a recombinant dimeric fusion protein that blocks IL-1α and IL-1β signaling has emerged as a valuable therapeutic option of RP. Rilonacept has been evaluated in Phase 2 and 3 clinic trials and was recently approved for RP treatment.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews available clinical trials assessing the efficacy and safety of rilonacept for the treatment of RP.

EXPERT OPINION

Findings from Rhapsody (Rilonacept inHibition of interleukin-1 Alpha and beta for recurrent Pericarditis: a pivotal Symptomatology and Outcomes stuDY) phase 2 and 3 trials suggest that rilonacept represents a promising new therapy for those patients with colchicine resistant or glucocorticoid-dependence disease. Treatment leads to rapid clinical response, with a median resolution of symptoms in 5 days, normalization of C-reactive protein (CRP) in a median of 7 days, and successful weaning from glucocorticoids. This novel therapy also reduces recurrence rates compared with placebo. Rilonacept has also demonstrated a good safety profile, with the most common adverse events including injection-site reactions and upper respiratory tract infections. This anti-IL 1 agent has emerged as an efficacious treatment for RP, with potential use for glucocorticoid-free regimens and as monotherapy. Future trials are needed to explore these treatment options and to clarify the appropriate therapy duration.

Pharmacologic treatment of acute and recurrent pericarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials

INTRODUCTION

Recurrence is the most frequent complication following acute pericarditis and may occur in 30% patients, rising to 50% in case of multiple recurrences, lack of colchicine treatment or use of glucocorticoids. Available treatments include aspirin or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), colchicine, glucocorticoids, immunosuppressive agents, immunoglobulins, anti-interleukin-1 (IL-1) agents.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aimed to assess the efficacy of pharmacological treatments for acute and recurrent pericarditis. Bibliographic databases were searched (PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library) using the terms "acute pericarditis" or "recurrent pericarditis" and "colchicine" or "NSAIDs" or "glucocorticoids" or "immunosuppressive agents" or "immunoglobulins" or "anti-IL1 agents." Random-effects meta-analysis was used to assess the risk of recurrent pericarditis. Publication bias was assessed using the Egger test, and meta-regression was performed to assess sources of heterogeneity.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Eleven RCTs assessed the efficacy of pharmacological treatments for acute and recurrent pericarditis (colchicine and anti-interleukin-1 agents). Colchicine, assessed in nine RCTs, was effective in the reduction of recurrent pericarditis, compared with standard treatment (17% vs .34%, RR=0.50; 95% CI 0.42-0.60, P<0.001), without any differences according to clinical setting (i.e. acute pericarditis, recurrent pericarditis, post-pericardiotomy syndrome; P=0.58). Anti-interleukin-1 agents (anakinra, rilonacept), assessed in two RCT, were effective in the reduction of recurrences, compared with placebo (10% vs.78%, RR=0.14; 95% CI 0.05-0.35, P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A correct pharmacological management of pericarditis is key to prevent recurrences. Colchicine is the mainstay of treatment in acute and recurrent pericarditis, while anti-IL1 agents are a valuable option in case of recurrent pericarditis refractory to conventional drugs.

How did COVID-19 affect medical and cardiology journals? A pandemic in literature

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The spreading speed of the COVID-19 pandemic forced the medical community to produce efforts in updating and sharing the evidence about this new disease, trying to preserve the accuracy of the data but at the same time avoiding the potentially harmful delay from discovery to implementation. The aim of our analysis was to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on medical literature in terms of proportion of COVID-19-related published papers and temporal patterns of publications within a sample of general/internal medicine and cardiology journals.

METHODS

We searched through PubMed scientific papers published from 1 January 2020 to 31 January 2021 about COVID-19 in ten major medical journals, of which five were in general/internal medicine and five in the cardiology field. We analyzed the proportion of COVID-19-related papers, and we examined temporal trends in the number of published papers.

RESULTS

Overall, the proportion of COVID-19-related papers was 18.5% (1986/10 756). This proportion was higher among the five selected general/internal medicine journals, compared with cardiology journals (23.8% vs 9.5%). The vast majority of papers were not original articles; in particular, in cardiology journals, there were 28% 'original articles', 17% 'review articles' and 55.1% 'miscellaneous', compared with 20.2%, 5.1% and 74.7% in general/internal medicine journals, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis highlights the big impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on international scientific literature. General and internal medicine journals were mainly involved, with cardiology journals only at a later time.

Emerging Therapies for Recurrent Pericarditis: Interleukin-1 inhibitors

Recurrent pericarditis (RP) is a complex inflammatory disorder associated with adverse outcomes and poor quality of life. After the first episode of acute pericarditis, a non‐negligible group of patients will fail to achieve complete remission despite treatment and will be challenged by side effects from the chronic use of medications like corticosteroids. The cause of RP remains unknown in the majority of cases, mainly due to a gap in knowledge of its complex pathophysiology. Over the past 2 decades, the interleukin‐1 (IL‐1) pathway has been uncovered as a key element in the inflammatory cascade, allowing the development of pharmacological targets known as IL‐1 inhibitors. This group of medications has emerged as a treatment option for patients with RP colchicine‐resistance and steroid dependents. Currently, anakinra and rilonacept, have demonstrated beneficial impact in clinical outcomes with a reasonable safety profile in randomized clinical trials. There is still paucity of data regarding the use of canakinumab in the treatment of patients with RP. Although further studies are needed to refine therapeutic protocols and taper of concomitant therapies, IL‐1 inhibitors, continue to consolidate as part of the pharmacological armamentarium to manage this complex condition with potential use as monotherapy. The aim of this review is to highlight the role of IL‐1 pathway in RP and discuss the efficacy, safety, and clinical applicability of IL‐1 inhibitors in the treatment of RP based on current evidence.

Pericarditis after SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Another Pebble in the Mosaic of Long COVID?

With the emerging success of the COVID-19 vaccination programs, the incidence of acute COVID-19 will decrease. However, given the high number of people who contracted SARS-CoV-2 infection and recovered, we will be faced with a significant number of patients with persistent symptoms even months after their COVID-19 infection. In this setting, long COVID and its cardiovascular manifestations, including pericarditis, need to become a top priority for healthcare systems as a new chronic disease process. Concerning the relationship between COVID-19 and pericardial diseases, pericarditis appears to be common in the acute infection but rare in the postacute period, while small pericardial effusions may be relatively common in the postacute period of COVID-19. Here, we reported a series of 7 patients developing pericarditis after a median of 20 days from clinical and virological recovery from SARS-CoV-2 infection. We excluded specific identifiable causes of pericarditis, hence we speculate that these cases can be contextualized within the clinical spectrum of long COVID. All our patients were treated with a combination of colchicine and either ASA or NSAIDs, but four of them did not achieve a clinical response. When switched to glucocorticoids, these four patients recovered with no recurrence during drug tapering. Based on this observation and on the latency of pericarditis occurrence (a median of 20 days after a negative nasopharyngeal swab), could be suggested that post-COVID pericarditis may be linked to ongoing inflammation sustained by the persistence of viral nucleic acid without virus replication in the pericardium. Therefore, glucocorticoids may be a suitable treatment option in patients not responding or intolerant to conventional therapy and who require to counteract the pericardial inflammatory component rather than direct an acute viral injury to the pericardial tissue.

Percutaneous pericardiocentesis for pericardial effusion: predictors of mortality and outcomes

Pericardial effusion can dangerously precipitate patient's hemodynamic stability and requires prompt intervention in case of tamponade. We investigated potential predictors of in-hospital mortality, a composite outcome of in-hospital mortality, pericardiocentesis-related complications, and the need for emergency cardiac surgery and all-cause mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous pericardiocentesis. This is an observational, retrospective, single-center study on patients undergoing percutaneous pericardiocentesis (2010-2019). We enrolled 81 consecutive patients. Median age was 71.4 years (interquartile range [IQR] 58.1-78.1 years) and 51 (63%) were male. Most of the pericardiocentesis were performed in an urgency setting (76.5%) for cardiac tamponade (77.8%). The most common etiology was idiopathic (33.3%) followed by neoplastic (22.2%). In-hospital mortality was 14.8% while mortality during follow-up (mean 17.1 months) was 44.4%. Only hemodynamic instability (i.e., cardiogenic shock, hypotension refractory to fluid challenge therapy and inotropes) was associated with in-hospital mortality at the univariate analysis (odds ratio [OR] 7.2; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.76-29.4). Non-neoplastic/non-idiopathic etiology and hemodynamic instability were associated with the composite outcome of in-hospital mortality, need for emergency cardiac surgery, or pericardiocentesis-related complications (OR 5.75, 95% CI 1.65-20.01, and OR 5.81, 95% CI 2.11-15.97, respectively). Multivariate Cox regression analysis adjusted for possible confounding variables (age, coronary artery disease, and hemodynamic instability) showed that neoplastic etiology was independently associated with medium-term mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 4.05, 95% CI 1.45-11.36). In a real-world population treated with pericardiocentesis for pericardial effusion, in-hospital adverse outcomes and medium-term mortality are consistent, in particular for patients presenting with hemodynamic instability or neoplastic pericardial effusion.

Anti-interleukin-1 agents for pericarditis: a primer for cardiologists

Anti-interleukin (IL)-1 agents have been developed for the treatment of autoinflammatory and rheumatic conditions, where overproduction of IL-1 is an important pathophysiologic process. IL-1α and IL-1β are the most studied members of the IL-1 family of cytokines and have the strongest proinflammatory effects. A naturally occurring antagonist (IL-1Ra) mitigates their proinflammatory effects. Overproduction of both IL-1α (released by inflamed/damaged pericardial cells) and IL-1β (released by inflammatory cells) is now a well-recognized therapeutic target in patients with recurrent idiopathic pericarditis. Currently, there are three available anti-IL-1 agents: anakinra (recombinant human IL-1Ra), rilonacept (a soluble decoy receptor ‘trap’, binding both IL-1α and IL-1β), and canakinumab (human monoclonal anti-IL-1β antibody). For patients with corticosteroid-dependent and colchicine-resistant recurrent pericarditis with evidence of systemic inflammation, as evidenced by elevated C-reactive protein, the efficacy and safety of anakinra (2 mg/kg/day up to 100 mg/day subcutaneously usually for at least 6 months, then tapered) and rilonacept (320 mg subcutaneously for the first day followed by 160 mg subcutaneously weekly) have been clearly demonstrated in observational studies and randomized controlled clinical trials. Severe side effects are rare and discontinuation rates are very low (<4%). The most common reported side effect is injection site reactions (>50% of patients). In this article, we describe the historical and pathophysiological background and provide a comprehensive review of these agents, which appear to be the most significant advance in medical therapy of recurrent pericarditis in the last 5 years.

Colchicine efficacy and safety for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases

The emerging role of colchicine in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases is a strong demand for a comprehensive understanding of its efficacy and safety. This meta-analysis and systematic review aimed to study the efficacy in the reduction of adverse cardiovascular outcomes (CO), and the risk of colchicine-related adverse events (CRAEs). Fourteen thousand and nine eighty three patients from 22 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included, 9 in patients with coronary artery disease-CAD, 9 in patients with pericarditis, 4 in patients with atrial fibrillation-AF or heart failure. Colchicine was efficacious in the reduction of adverse CO across different settings: pericardial diseases (reduced risk of recurrent pericarditis, 17.6% vs. 35%, RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.41-0.61), CAD (reduced risk of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stroke,coronary revascularization or hospitalization, 6.1% vs. 8.5%, RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.64-0.83), AF (reduced risk of arrhythmia recurrence, 14.2% vs. 22.7%, RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.44-0.88). Colchicine was associated with increased risk of gastrointestinal CRAEs (11.2% vs. 8.8%, RR 1.87, 95% CI 1.41-2.47) and drug discontinuation (5.4% vs. 3.7%, RR 1.58, 95% CI 1.25-1.99). In both cases, the risk was proportional to the daily dose or duration of treatment, possibly due to early drug discontinuation or tolerance. Other CRAEs (muscle-related, liver,hematologic,cutaneous, infections) were not increased by colchicine, as long as all-cause death (2.2% vs. 1.9%, RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.79-1.54) or non-cardiovascular death (1.5% vs. 1%, RR 1.43, 95% CI 0.93-2.19). Colchicine is efficacious and safe for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. The risk of gastrointestinal CRAEs and drug discontinuation is not significant if colchicine is used at lower doses (0.5 mg daily) or for longer periods of time (> 6 months).

Pericarditis in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review

AIMS

We performed a systematic review to summarize the clinical features, diagnostic methods, treatment, and outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients with pericarditis.

METHODS

We searched electronic databases from inception to 17 December 2020. Studies that reported clinical data on patients with COVID-19 and pericarditis were included. Descriptive statistics were used for categorical and continuous variables [mean ± standard deviation or median (interquartile range)]. As an exploratory analysis, differences between patients with acute pericarditis and myopericarditis were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 33 studies (32 case reports and 1 case series) involving 34 patients were included. The mean age was 51.6 ± 19.5 years and 62% of patients were men. Sixty-two percentage of patients were diagnosed with myopericarditis. The most frequent electrocardiographic pattern (56%) was diffuse ST-elevation and PR depression. Pericardial effusion and cardiac tamponade were reported in 76 and 35% of cases, respectively. The median values of C-reactive protein [77 mg/dl (12-177)] and white blood cells [12 335 cells/μl (5625-16 500)] were above the normal range. Thirty-eight percent and 53% of patients were treated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and colchicine, respectively. These drugs were more frequently used in patients with acute pericarditis compared with myopericarditis. The in-hospital mortality was 6% without a significant difference between both groups.

CONCLUSION

Our review shows that COVID-19 patients with pericarditis had similar clinical features to other viral cardiotropic infections. However, NSAIDs and colchicine were used in half or less of the cases. Overall, the short-term prognosis was good across groups.

Recurrent Pericarditis After Covid-19

Patient with rheumatoid arthritis who has Covid-19 with recurrent pericaditis debut, differential diagnosis.

The Role of Rilonacept in Recurrent Pericarditis

Recurrent pericarditis is associated with significant morbidity and adverse impact on quality of life. Contemporary studies have emphasized the key role of autoinflammatory pathways in its pathophysiology, mainly through the activation of inflammasomes and the production of interleukin (IL)-1α and IL-1β. The IL-1 pathway has emerged as a promising target for the treatment of these patients. A novel IL-1 inhibitor, rilonacept, functions as an IL-1 trap binding to the circulating IL-1α and IL-1β mitigating their inflammatory response. Recently, the RHAPSODY phase III clinical trial evaluated the use of rilonacept in patients with recurrent pericarditis, who were refractory to colchicine, or steroid-dependent. Rilonacept significantly reduced symptoms, inflammatory markers and recurrent episodes, and increased successful withdrawal of steroids. The safety profile of the medication is favourable and well tolerated by patients, with local injection site reaction being the most common side effect described. These results have shifted the paradigm of the understanding of the disease and promise to become part of the armamentarium of medications for the standard of care of these patients, with potential use as monotherapy. The changing landscape of therapeutics and pathophysiology warrants increased recognition and understanding from the international cardiology community about this novel drug and its implication in managing these complex patients.The objective of this review is to describe the bio-action of rilonacept in the treatment of recurrent pericarditis.

Pericardial Diseases in COVID19: a Contemporary Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID19) involves the heart, including pericardium. This article reviews the possible pathophysiological mechanisms in pericardial involvement in COVID19 and pericardial manifestations of COVID19. It also summarizes the patients with pericarditis secondary to COVID19 and outlines the contemporary treatment strategies in this patient population.

RECENT FINDINGS

A high degree of suspicion is required to identify the pericardial involvement in COVID19 patients. It is proposed that an underlying hyperinflammatory reaction in COVID19 leads to pericardial inflammation. Acute pericarditis with or without myocardial involvement is diagnosed on clinical presentation, serum inflammatory markers, electrocardiogram, and echocardiogram. Multimodality imaging may also have an additional diagnostic value. Patients are usually managed medically, but some patients develop a life-threatening pericardial tamponade necessitating pericardial drainage. Pericardial involvement is an important clinical manifestation of COVID19 requiring a proper workup. Timely diagnosis and a specific management plan based on the presentation and concomitant organ involvement usually lead to a complete recovery.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-associated constrictive pericarditis

This report documents a rare case of COVID-19-associated constrictive pericarditis (CP) in the setting of a recent COVID-19 infection. A 55-year-old man with a history of hypertension and gout presented with acute hypoxic respiratory failure and was diagnosed with COVID-19 pneumonia with progression to acute respiratory distress syndrome. His hospital course was complicated by a large pericardial effusion; an emergent bedside transthoracic echocardiography was concerning for cardiac tamponade, so pericardiocentesis was performed. A workup with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging showed changes consistent with a diagnosis of CP. Viral and idiopathic aetiologies are the most common cause of CP in the developed world, with COVID-19 now a proposed predisposing viral illness. The virus induces systemic inflammation and pericardial changes that can lead to CP physiology. Imaging modalities including echocardiogram and cardiac magnetic resonance play an integral role in confirming the diagnosis.

Pericarditis as the Main Clinical Manifestation of COVID-19 in Adolescents

Children and adolescents with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection usually have a milder illness, lower mortality rates and may manifest different clinical entities compared with adults. Acute effusive pericarditis is a rare clinical manifestation in patients with COVID-19, especially among those without concurrent pulmonary disease or myocardial injury. We present 2 cases of acute pericarditis, in the absence of initial respiratory or other symptoms, in adolescents with COVID-19.

Recurrent pericarditis: an update on diagnosis and management

Recurrent pericarditis is a true challenge for clinicians, especially when the patient becomes unresponsive or not tolerant to conventional treatments. An accurate diagnosis of recurrent pericarditis, possibly supported by advanced imaging tools, is critical to provide timely and appropriate treatment of symptoms and prevention of further episodes. The incessant research on the inflammatory pathways underlying cardiovascular diseases, led recently to the assessment of anti interleukin-1 agents in the setting of recurrent pericarditis. This review will focus on the diagnostic assessment of recurrent pericarditis, along with the most modern therapeutic advances in this field. Bibliographic databases were searched (MEDLINE/PubMed, BioMed Central, the Cochrane Collaboration Database of Randomized Trials, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, EMBASE, Google Scholar) using the terms "recurrent pericarditis" AND "diagnosis" OR "treatment" OR "IL-1" OR "inflammation".

Recurrent pericarditis: an update on diagnosis and management

Acute pericarditis is a disease of the pericardium characterized by inflammation. Around 16-38% of patients develop recurrent events after the first episode. Recurrent pericarditis (RP) seems to be caused by a pathologic immune response. An inadequate treatment in terms of drug choice, dose, duration of therapy or tapering, has been shown to increase the risk of recurrences. Symptoms, physical signs and electrocardiographic signs are usually less severe during a recurrent event as compared to the first episode, thus favoring imaging as a tool to confirm the diagnosis of RP. Cardiac magnetic resonance is becoming the technique of choice because of its ability to detect active pericardial inflammation. Inflammatory biomarkers can be used to assess the risk of recurrences and to guide the tapering of treatments. First-line treatment is based on non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and colchicine. NSAIDs are useful for pain control, and colchicine has shown to reduce the risk of further recurrences. Glucocorticoids are often used as second-line drugs, but they are associated with a high rate of recurrent events. Interleukin-1 inhibitors, such as anakinra and rilonacept, significantly reduce the risk of recurrences in patients with RP while on treatment.

Acute pericarditis revealing COVID-19 infection: Case report

The COVID-19 is a global pandemic that is now responsible for more than 2 million deaths around the world. Its clinical manifestations are well known such as fever, fatigue and other respiratory signs like severe cough, dyspnea. Cardiac involvement, however, is less recognized and often underestimated and could be the only manifestation of COVID-19. Case presentation: We report a case of pericarditis as the primary presentation of COVID-19 among a young, healthy individual with no medical background, in the absence of the conventional respiratory signs. The diagnosis was based on a set of clinical, biological, radiological and electrocardiographic findings. In this case, the treatment was based on the use of Colchicine in addition to COVID-19 treatment. The outcome was favorable; noticing regression of symptoms and disappearance of pericardial effusion within two weeks. Clinical discussion: Acute pericarditis has been widely described in literature as probable complication of COVID-19, yet only few articles have reported it as a primary manifestation of COVID-19. Conclusion: Chest pain could be the only presenting symptom of COVID-19 among young, healthy individuals.To that end, clinicians should recognize cardiac involvement of COVID-19 and act accordingly to isolate patients and further limit the spread of the disease.

•

The covid-19 is a global pandemic that is responsible for millions of deaths.

•

Cardiovascular involvement in COVID-19 is less recognized and described.

•

Acute pericarditis as the primary manifestation of COVID-19 is rare.

•

Colchicine is the main treatment of pericarditis related to COVID-19.

‘Dry’ Pericarditis with Rapid Progression to Tamponade as a Feature of COVID-19

Pericardial inflammation is a recognised feature of coronavirus disease (COVID-19). The authors herein present the case of a female with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection who developed a large and life-threatening pericardial effusion over a few days following the onset of pericarditis, despite prompt commencement of treatment. This was successfully drained, and she was discharged in stable condition on oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and colchicine.At 6-week follow-up she had made a full recovery, and repeat echocardiography demonstrated no recurrence of effusion or evidence of constrictive physiology.

Myocarditis and Pericarditis in Patients with COVID-19

COVID-19 has been associated with a variety of cardiac manifestations. Myocarditis and pericarditis have been reported as one of the many cardiac manifestations in association with COVID-19. We describe below three cases of myocarditis, pericarditis with associated pericardial effusion and myopericarditis, respectively, in the setting of COVID-19. Although these entities may occur in isolation, they often occur in association to varying degrees. It could either be the initial diagnosis at the time of presentation or it could occur later in the course of COVID-19 infection. Pericarditis may occasionally be associated with significant pericardial effusion and tamponade requiring therapeutic pericardiocentesis. The assessment of pericardial effusion has been found to be exudative and is usually negative for SARS-CoV-2. Treatment of pericarditis with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, colchicine, and corticosteroids has proven to be safe in COVID-19. Myocarditis may present with severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction and cardiogenic shock requiring inotropes and mechanical circulatory support.