Quantitative imaging of estrogen receptor expression in breast cancer with PET and 18F-fluoroestradiol

Can 18F-FES PET Improve the Evaluation of 18F-FDG PET in Patients With Metastatic Invasive Lobular Carcinoma?

PURPOSE

Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) exhibits a low affinity for 18F-FDG. The estrogen receptor (ER) is commonly expressed in ILCs, suggesting a potential benefit of targeting with the ER probe 18F-FES in this patient population. The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of 18F-FES imaging in patients with metastatic ILC and compare it with that of 18F-FDG.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 20 ILC patients who underwent concurrent 18F-FES and 18F-FDG PET/CT examinations in our center. 18F-FES and 18F-FDG imaging were analyzed to determine the total count of tracer-avid lesions in nonbone sites and their corresponding organ systems, assess the extent of anatomical regions involved in bone metastases, and measure the SUVmax values for both tracers.

RESULTS

Among 20 ILC patients, 65 nonbone lesions were found to be distributed in 13 patients, and 16 patients were diagnosed with bone metastasis, which was distributed in 54 skeletal anatomical regions. The detection rate of 18F-FDG in nonbone lesions was higher than that of 18F-FES (57 vs 37, P < 0.001). 18F-FES demonstrated a superior ability to detect nonbone lesions in 4 patients, whereas 18F-FDG was superior in 5 patients (P > 0.05). Among 9/16 patients with bone metastasis, 18F-FES demonstrated a significant advantage in the detection of bone lesions compared with 18F-FDG (P = 0.05). Furthermore, patients with only 18F-FES-positive lesions (12/12) were administered endocrine regimens, whereas patients lacking 18F-FES uptake (2/3) predominantly received chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

18F-FES is more effective than 18F-FDG in detecting bone metastasis in ILC, but it does not demonstrate a significant advantage in nonbone lesions. Additionally, the results of examination with 18F-FES have the potential to guide patient treatment plans.

Dynamic whole-body [18F]FES PET/CT increases lesion visibility in patients with metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Correct classification of estrogen receptor (ER) status is essential for prognosis and treatment planning in patients with breast cancer (BC). Therefore, it is recommended to sample tumor tissue from an accessible metastasis. However, ER expression can show intra- and intertumoral heterogeneity. 16α-[18F]fluoroestradiol ([18F]FES) Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) allows noninvasive whole-body (WB) identification of ER distribution and is usually performed as a single static image 60 min after radiotracer injection. Using dynamic whole-body (D-WB) PET imaging, we examine [18F]FES kinetics and explore whether Patlak parametric images ( K i ) are quantitative and improve lesion visibility.

RESULTS

This prospective study included eight patients with metastatic ER-positive BC scanned using a D-WB PET acquisition protocol. The kinetics of [18F]FES were best characterized by the irreversible two-tissue compartment model in tumor lesions and in the majority of organ tissues. K i values from Patlak parametric images correlated with K i values from the full kinetic analysis, r2 = 0.77, and with the semiquantitative mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean), r2 = 0.91. Furthermore, parametric K i images had the highest target-to-background ratio (TBR) in 162/164 metastatic lesions and the highest contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in 99/164 lesions compared to conventional SUV images. TBR was 2.45 (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.25-2.68) and CNR 1.17 (95% CI: 1.08-1.26) times higher in K i images compared to SUV images. These quantitative differences were seen as reduced background activity in the K i images.

CONCLUSION

[18F]FES uptake is best described by an irreversible two-tissue compartment model. D-WB [18F]FES PET/CT scans can be used for direct reconstruction of parametric K i images, with superior lesion visibility and K i values comparable to K i values found from full kinetic analyses. This may aid correct ER classification and treatment decisions. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04150731, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04150731.

Targeting the Oxytocin Receptor for Breast Cancer Management: A Niche for Peptide Tracers

Breast cancer is a leading cause of death in women, and its management highly depends on early disease diagnosis and monitoring. This remains challenging due to breast cancer's heterogeneity and a scarcity of specific biomarkers that could predict responses to therapy and enable personalized treatment. This Perspective describes the diagnostic landscape for breast cancer management, molecular strategies targeting receptors overexpressed in tumors, the theranostic potential of the oxytocin receptor (OTR) as an emerging breast cancer target, and the development of OTR-specific optical and nuclear tracers to study, visualize, and treat tumors. A special focus is on the chemistry and pharmacology underpinning OTR tracer development, preclinical in vitro and in vivo studies, challenges, and future directions. The use of peptide-based tracers targeting upregulated receptors in cancer is a highly promising strategy complementing current diagnostics and therapies and providing new opportunities to improve cancer management and patient survival.

Head-to-head comparison of 18F-FDG and 18F-FES PET/CT for initial staging of ER-positive breast cancer patients

PURPOSE

To compare the diagnostic performance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) and 18F-fluoroestradiol (18F-FES) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for initial staging of estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer.

METHODS

Twenty-eight patients with ER-positive breast cancer underwent 18F-FDG and 18F-FES PET/CT for initial staging. Diagnostic performance and concordance rates were analyzed for both radiotracers. Semiquantitative parameters of maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and tumor-to-normal ratio (T/N ratio) were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Factors potentially affecting the degree of radiotracer uptake were analyzed by multi-level linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

The overall diagnostic performance of 18F-FES was comparable to 18F-FDG, except for higher specificity and NPV, with sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of 87.56%, 100%, 100%, 35.14%, and 88.35%, respectively, for 18F-FES and 83.94%, 30.77%, 94.74%, 11.43%, and 95.37%, respectively, for 18F-FDG. Diagnostic performance of strong ER expression was better in 18F-FES but worse for 18F-FDG. There was a correlation of mucinous cell type and Allred score 7-8 with 18F-FES uptake, with correlation coefficients of 26.65 (19.28, 34.02), 5.90 (- 0.005, 11.81), and p-value of < 0.001, 0.05, respectively. Meanwhile, luminal B and Ki-67 were related to 18F-FDG uptake, with correlation coefficients of 2.76 (1.10, 0.20), 0.11 (0.01, 0.2), and p-value of 0.018, 0.025, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Diagnostic performance of 18F-FES is comparable to 18F-FDG, but better for strongly ER-positive breast cancer. Combination of 18F-FES and 18F-FDG would potentially overcome the limitations of each tracer with more accurate staging.

Prospective Pilot Study of 18F-Fluoroestradiol PET/CT in Patients With Invasive Lobular Carcinomas

BACKGROUND. PET/CT with 18F-fluoroestradiol (FES) (FDA-approved in 2020) depicts tissues expressing estrogen receptor (ER). Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is commonly ER positive. OBJECTIVE. The primary aim of this study was to assess the frequency with which sites of histologically proven ILC have abnormal uptake on FES PET/CT. METHODS. This prospective single-center pilot study, conducted from December 2020 to August 2021, enrolled patients with histologically confirmed ILC to undergo FES PET/CT; patients optionally underwent FDG PET/CT. Two nuclear radiologists assessed FES PET/CT and FDG PET/CT studies for abnormal uptake corresponding to known ILC sites at enrollment and for additional sites of abnormal uptake, resolving differences by consensus. The primary endpoint was percentage of known ILC sites showing abnormal FES uptake. The alternative to the null hypothesis was that more than 60% of sites would have abnormal FES uptake, exceeding the percentage of ILC with abnormal FDG uptake described in prior literature. A sample size of 24 biopsied lesions was preselected to provide 81% power for the alternative hypothesis (one-sided α = .10). Findings on FES PET/CT and FDG PET/CT were summarized for additional secondary endpoints. RESULTS. The final analysis included 17 patients (mean age, 59.1 ± 13.2 years) with 25 sites of histologically confirmed ILC at enrollment (22 breast lesions, two axillary lymph nodes, one distant metastasis). FES PET/CT showed abnormal uptake in 22 of 25 (88%) lesions, sufficient to reject the null hypothesis (p = .002). Thirteen patients underwent FDG PET/CT. Four of 23 (17%) sites of histologically confirmed ILC, including additional sites detected and confirmed after enrollment, were identified with FES PET/CT only, and 1 of 23 (4%) was identified only with FDG PET/CT (p = .18). FES PET/CT depicted additional lesions not detected with standard-of-care evaluation in 4 of 17 (24%) patients (two contralateral breast cancers and two metastatic axillary lymph nodes, all with subsequent histologic confirmation). Use of FES PET/CT resulted in changes in clinical stage with respect to standard-of-care evaluation in 3 of 17 (18%) patients. CONCLUSION. The primary endpoint of the trial was met. The frequency of abnormal FES uptake among sites of histologically known ILC was found to be to be significantly greater than 60%. CLINICAL IMPACT. This pilot study shows a potential role of FES PET/CT in evaluation of patients with ILC. TRIAL REGISTRATION. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04252859.

The Application of 18F-FES PET in Clinical Cancer Care: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

[18F]fluoroestradiol (FES) can be used for the noninvasive visualization and quantification of tumor estrogen receptor (ER) expression and activity and was FDA-approved as a diagnostic agent in May 2022 for detecting ER-positive lesions in patients with recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. PET imaging was also used to detect ER-positive lesions and malignancy among patients with uterine, ovarian, and other ER-positive solid tumors. We conducted a systemic review of the studies on FES PET imaging used among patients with cancer not limited to breast cancer to better understand the application of FES PET imaging.

METHODS

PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases were used to perform a comprehensive and systematic search and were updated until August 15, 2022. Two authors independently reviewed the titles and abstracts of the retrieved articles by using the search algorithm and selected the articles based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. All statistical analyses were conducted using R statistical software.

RESULTS

Forty-three studies with 2352 patients were included in the qualitative synthesis, and 23 studies with 1388 patients were included in the quantitative analysis, which estimated the FES-positive detection rate. Thirty-two studies (77%) included breast cancer patients in 43 included studies. The FES SUVmean was higher in patients with endometrial cancer (3.4-5.3) than in those with breast cancer (2.05) and uterine sarcoma (1.1-2.6). The pooled detection rates of FES PET imaging were 0.80 for breast and 0.84 for ovarian cancer patients, both similar to that of 18F-FDG. The FES uptake threshold of 1.1 to 1.82 could detect 11.1% to 45% ER heterogeneity, but the threshold of FES uptake did not have consistent predictive ability for prognosis among patients with breast cancer, unlike uterine cancer. However, FES uptake can effectively predict and monitor treatment response, especially endocrine therapy such as estradiol, ER-blocking agents (fulvestrant and tamifoxen), and aromatase inhibitors (such as letrozole and Z-endoxifen).

CONCLUSIONS

[18F]fluoroestradiol PET is not only a convenient and accurate diagnostic imaging tool for detecting ER-expressing lesions in patients with breast and ovarian cancer but also among patients with uterine cancer. [18F]fluoroestradiol PET is a noninvasive predictive and monitoring tool for treatment response and prognosis.

Summary: Appropriate Use Criteria for Estrogen Receptor-Targeted PET Imaging with 16α-18F-Fluoro-17β-Fluoroestradiol

PET imaging with 16α-¹⁸F-fluoro-17β-fluoroestradiol (¹⁸F-FES), a radiolabeled form of estradiol, allows whole-body, noninvasive evaluation of estrogen receptor (ER). ¹⁸F-FES is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration as a diagnostic agent "for the detection of ER-positive lesions as an adjunct to biopsy in patients with recurrent or metastatic breast cancer." The Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI) convened an expert work group to comprehensively review the published literature for ¹⁸F-FES PET in patients with ER-positive breast cancer and to establish appropriate use criteria (AUC). The findings and discussions of the SNMMI ¹⁸F-FES work group, including example clinical scenarios, were published in full in 2022 and are available at https://www.snmmi.org/auc Of the clinical scenarios evaluated, the work group concluded that the most appropriate uses of ¹⁸F-FES PET are to assess ER functionality when endocrine therapy is considered either at initial diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer or after progression of disease on endocrine therapy, the ER status of lesions that are difficult or dangerous to biopsy, and the ER status of lesions when other tests are inconclusive. These AUC are intended to enable appropriate clinical use of ¹⁸F-FES PET, more efficient approval of FES use by payers, and promotion of investigation into areas requiring further research. This summary includes the rationale, methodology, and main findings of the work group and refers the reader to the complete AUC document.

18F-Fluoroestradiol: Current Applications and Future Directions

In the United States, breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in all women and the leading cause of cancer death in Black women. The breast cancer receptor profile, assessed with immunohistochemical staining of tissue samples, allows prediction of outcomes and direction of patient treatment. Approximately 80% of newly diagnosed breast cancers are hormone receptor (HR) positive, which is defined as estrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PR) positive. Patients with ER-positive disease can be treated with therapies targeting the ER; however, the assessment of ER expression with immunohistochemical staining of biopsy specimens has several limitations including sampling error, false-negative results, challenging or inaccessible biopsy sites, and the inability to synchronously and serially assess all metastatic sites to identify spatial and/or temporal ER heterogeneity. In May 2020, after decades of research, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the PET radiotracer fluorine 18 (¹⁸F) fluoroestradiol (FES) for clinical use in patients with ER-positive recurrent or metastatic breast cancer as an adjunct to biopsy. FES binds to the ER in the nucleus of ER-expressing cells, enabling whole-body in vivo assessment of ER expression. This article is focused on the approved uses of FES in the United States, including identification of a target lesion for confirmatory biopsy, in vivo assessment of biopsy-proven ER-positive disease, and evaluation of spatial and temporal ER heterogeneity. FES is an example of precision medicine that has been leveraged to optimize the care of patients with breast cancer. ^© RSNA, 2023 See the invited commentary by Fowler in this issue. Quiz questions for this article are available through the Online Learning Center.

State of the Art in 2022 PET/CT in Breast Cancer: A Review

Molecular imaging with positron emission tomography is a powerful and well-established tool in breast cancer management. In this review, we aim to address the current place of the main PET radiopharmaceuticals in breast cancer care and offer perspectives on potential future radiopharmaceutical and technological advancements. A special focus is given to the following: the role of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the clinical management of breast cancer patients, especially during staging; detection of recurrence and evaluation of treatment response; the role of 16α-¹⁸Ffluoro-17β-oestradiol positron emission tomography in oestrogen receptors positive breast cancer; the promising radiopharmaceuticals, such as ⁸⁹Zr-trastuzumab and ⁶⁸Ga- or ¹⁸F-labeled fibroblast activation protein inhibitor; and the application of artificial intelligence.

Novel applications of molecular imaging to guide breast cancer therapy

The goals of precision oncology are to provide targeted drug therapy based on each individual’s specific tumor biology, and to enable the prediction and early assessment of treatment response to allow treatment modification when necessary. Thus, precision oncology aims to maximize treatment success while minimizing the side effects of inadequate or suboptimal therapies. Molecular imaging, through noninvasive assessment of clinically relevant tumor biomarkers across the entire disease burden, has the potential to revolutionize clinical oncology, including breast oncology. In this article, we review breast cancer positron emission tomography (PET) imaging biomarkers for providing early response assessment and predicting treatment outcomes. For 2-¹⁸fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG), a marker of cellular glucose metabolism that is well established for staging multiple types of malignancies including breast cancer, we highlight novel applications for early response assessment. We then review current and future applications of novel PET biomarkers for imaging the steroid receptors, including the estrogen and progesterone receptors, the HER2 receptor, cellular proliferation, and amino acid metabolism.

GRPr Theranostics: Current Status of Imaging and Therapy using GRPr Targeting Radiopharmaceuticals

Addressing molecular targets, that are overexpressed by various tumor entities, using radiolabeled molecules for a combined diagnostic and therapeutic (theranostic) approach is of increasing interest in oncology. The gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPr), which is part of the bombesin family, has shown to be overexpressed in a variety of tumors, therefore, serving as a promising target for those theranostic applications. A large amount of differently radiolabeled bombesin derivatives addressing the GRPr have been evaluated in the preclinical as well as clinical setting showing fast blood clearance and urinary excretion with selective GRPr-binding. Most of the available studies on GRPr-targeted imaging and therapy have evaluated the theranostic approach in prostate and breast cancer applying bombesin derivatives tagged with the predominantly used theranostic pair of ⁶⁸Ga/¹⁷⁷Lu which is the focus of this review.

PET-CT in Clinical Adult Oncology: II. Primary Thoracic and Breast Malignancies

Simple Summary

Positron emission tomography (PET), typically combined with computed tomography (CT), has become a critical advanced imaging technique in oncology. With PET-CT, a radioactive molecule (radiotracer) is injected in the bloodstream and localizes to sites of tumor because of specific cellular features of the tumor that accumulate the targeting radiotracer. The CT scan, performed at the same time, provides information to facilitate assessment of the amount of radioactivity from deep or dense structures, and to provide detailed anatomic information. PET-CT has a variety of applications in oncology, including staging, therapeutic response assessment, restaging, and surveillance. This series of six review articles provides an overview of the value, applications, and imaging and interpretive strategies of PET-CT in the more common adult malignancies. The second article in this series addresses the use of PET-CT in breast cancer and other primary thoracic malignancies.

Abstract

Positron emission tomography combined with x-ray computed tomography (PET-CT) is an advanced imaging modality with oncologic applications that include staging, therapy assessment, restaging, and surveillance. This six-part series of review articles provides practical information to providers and imaging professionals regarding the best use of PET-CT for the more common adult malignancies. The second article of this series addresses primary thoracic malignancy and breast cancer. For primary thoracic malignancy, the focus will be on lung cancer, malignant pleural mesothelioma, thymoma, and thymic carcinoma, with an emphasis on the use of FDG PET-CT. For breast cancer, the various histologic subtypes will be addressed, and will include ¹⁸F fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), recently Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved ¹⁸F-fluoroestradiol (FES), and ¹⁸F sodium fluoride (NaF). The pitfalls and nuances of PET-CT in breast and primary thoracic malignancies and the imaging features that distinguish between subcategories of these tumors are addressed. This review will serve as a resource for the appropriate roles and limitations of PET-CT in the clinical management of patients with breast and primary thoracic malignancies for healthcare professionals caring for adult patients with these cancers. It also serves as a practical guide for imaging providers, including radiologists, nuclear medicine physicians, and their trainees.

Use of Radionuclide-Based Imaging Methods in Breast Cancer

Breast cancer is one of the most commonly occurring cancers in women globally and is the primary cause of cancer mortality in females. Thus, early and effective breast cancer diagnosis is crucial for enhancing the survival rate. Current standard diagnostic techniques to assess the hormone receptor status in biopsies include immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization. However, in recent years, there has been an increase in research on noninvasive techniques for molecular imaging of hormone receptors. These methods offer many advantages over conventional imaging, as repeated measurements can be used to capture heterogeneous tumor expression throughout the body, as well as transformations in receptor status during disease progression. Thus, the noninvasive method, as an adjunct to conventional imaging, offers the potential to improve patient selection, optimize dose and schedule, and streamline the assessment of response.

Clinical Validity of 16α-[18F]Fluoro-17β-Estradiol Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography to Assess Estrogen Receptor Status in Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

Determining the estrogen receptor (ER) status is essential in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) management. Whole-body ER imaging with 16α-[¹⁸F]fluoro-17β-estradiol positron emission tomography ([¹⁸F]FES-PET) is increasingly used for this purpose. To establish the clinical validity of the [¹⁸F]FES-PET, we studied the diagnostic accuracy of qualitative and quantitative [¹⁸F]FES-PET assessment to predict ER expression by immunohistochemistry in a metastasis.

METHODS

In a prospective multicenter trial, 200 patients with newly diagnosed MBC underwent extensive workup including molecular imaging. For this subanalysis, ER expression in the biopsied metastasis was related to qualitative whole-body [¹⁸F]FES-PET evaluation and quantitative [¹⁸F]FES uptake in the corresponding metastasis. A review and meta-analysis regarding [¹⁸F]FES-PET diagnostic performance were performed.

RESULTS

Whole-body [¹⁸F]FES-PET assessment predicted ER expression in the biopsied metastasis with good accuracy: a sensitivity of 95% (95% CI, 89 to 97), a specificity of 80% (66 to 89), a positive predictive value (PPV) of 93% (87 to 96), and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 85% (72 to 92) in 181 of 200 evaluable patients. Quantitative [¹⁸F]FES uptake predicted ER immunohistochemistry in the corresponding metastasis with a sensitivity/specificity of 91%/69% and a PPV/NPV of 90%/71% in 156 of 200 evaluable patients. For bone metastases, PPV/NPV was 92%/81%. Meta-analysis with addition of our data has increased diagnostic performance and narrowed the 95% CIs compared with previous studies with a sensitivity/specificity of both 86% (81 to 90 and 73 to 93, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In this largest prospective series so far, we established the clinical validity of [¹⁸F]FES-PET to determine tumor ER status in MBC. In view of the high diagnostic accuracy of qualitatively assessed whole-body [¹⁸F]FES-PET, this noninvasive imaging modality can be considered a valid alternative to a biopsy of a metastasis to determine ER status in newly MBC (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01957332).

The Clinical Value of Breast Specific Gamma Imaging and Positron Imaging: An Update

In the management of patients with breast cancer (BC), a mammography contributed to screen an early-stage patient, to plan a therapy strategy, to evaluate a therapy outcome, to detect a recurrence, and to reduce a mortality. Currently, various imaging modalities, such as CT, MR, Ultrasound (US), SPECT/CT, PET/CT, PET/MR have been utilized for the management of BC patients. In order to overcome a limited spatial resolution and sensitivity of whole-body systems in nuclear medicine imaging, dedicated breast imaging modalities were developed. One is a gamma imaging system with single/dual head scintillation detectors or semiconductor detectors associated with light compression device for breast parenchyma. Radiopharmaceutical for the gamma imaging is ^99mTc-sestamibi. Another is a positron imaging system with opposite-type panel detectors and ring-shaped type detectors. Radiopharmaceutical for positron imaging is ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose. The breast-specific gamma and positron imaging systems were utilized mainly to detect small lesions less than 1 cm in diameter especially in patients with dense breast, to evaluate an effect of preoperative neo-adjuvant therapy, to plan surgical procedures (conservative-surgery vs mastectomy), and to detect a recurrence. By combining higher sensitivity and spatial resolution scanners with new radiopharmaceuticals, an information on molecular-level pathology of BC is increasingly available in an individual patient. This article reviewed clinical impact and future perspective of this field.

Principles of Tracer Kinetic Analysis in Oncology, Part I: Principles and Overview of Methodology

Learning Objectives: On successful completion of this activity, participants should be able to describe (1) describe principles of PET tracer kinetic analysis for oncologic applications; (2) list methods used for PET kinetic analysis for oncology; and (3) discuss application of kinetic modeling for cancer-specific diagnostic needs.Financial Disclosure: This work was supported by KL2 TR001879, R01 CA211337, R01 CA113941, R33 CA225310, Komen SAC130060, R50 CA211270, and K01 DA040023. Dr. Pantel is a consultant or advisor for Progenics and Blue Earth Diagnostics and is a meeting participant or lecturer for Blue Earth Diagnostics. Dr. Mankoff is on the scientific advisory boards of GE Healthcare, Philips Healthcare, Reflexion, and ImaginAb and is the owner of Trevarx; his wife is the chief executive officer of Trevarx. The authors of this article have indicated no other relevant relationships that could be perceived as a real or apparent conflict of interest.CME Credit: SNMMI is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to sponsor continuing education for physicians. SNMMI designates each JNM continuing education article for a maximum of 2.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits. Physicians should claim only credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. For CE credit, SAM, and other credit types, participants can access this activity through the SNMMI website (http://www.snmmilearningcenter.org) through March 2025PET enables noninvasive imaging of regional in vivo cancer biology. By engineering a radiotracer to target specific biologic processes of relevance to cancer (e.g., cancer metabolism, blood flow, proliferation, and tumor receptor expression or ligand binding), PET can detect cancer spread, characterize the cancer phenotype, and assess its response to treatment. For example, imaging of glucose metabolism using the radiolabeled glucose analog ¹⁸F-FDG has widespread applications to all 3 of these tasks and plays an important role in cancer care. However, the current clinical practice of imaging at a single time point remote from tracer injection (i.e., static imaging) does not use all the information that PET cancer imaging can provide, especially to address questions beyond cancer detection. Reliance on tracer measures obtained only from static imaging may also lead to misleading results. In this 2-part continuing education paper, we describe the principles of tracer kinetic analysis for oncologic PET (part 1), followed by examples of specific implementations of kinetic analysis for cancer PET imaging that highlight the added benefits over static imaging (part 2). This review is designed to introduce nuclear medicine clinicians to basic concepts of kinetic analysis in oncologic imaging, with a goal of illustrating how kinetic analysis can augment our understanding of in vivo cancer biology, improve our approach to clinical decision making, and guide the interpretation of quantitative measures derived from static images.

18F-Fluoroestradiol Tumor Uptake Is Influenced by Structural Components in Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

Estrogen receptor (ER) is expressed in the majority of invasive breast cancer and is an important prognostic indicator. The tumor stroma also plays an important role in disease progression. This study evaluated the effect of stromal components on 16α-[18F]-fluoro-17β-estradiol (18F-FES) uptake in breast cancer and proposed a partial-volume correction method for 18F-FES PET based on histopathological analyses.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifteen patients with biopsy-confirmed breast cancer underwent preoperative 18F-FES PET. Estrogen receptor expression in biopsy specimens was assayed by immunohistochemistry, cellular components in surgical specimens were measured using hematoxylin-eosin staining, and nuclear components in surgical and biopsy specimens were measured using Azan-Mallory staining. The relationship between 18F-FES SUV of the primary tumor and histopathological findings including ER expression, the Allred score, ER-positive cellular component ratio, and ER-positive nuclear component ratio (NCR) was examined. The relationship between stroma-free 18F-FES SUV and ER expression was also examined.

RESULTS

18F-FES uptake was not significantly positively correlated with ER expression (r = 0.44, P = 0.10). 18F-FES uptake was significantly correlated with the Allred score, ER-positive cellular component ratio, and ER-positive NCR in surgical specimens (ρ = 0.60, P = 0.02; r = 0.55, P = 0.03; and r = 0.65, P = 0.01, respectively). 18F-FES uptake was predominantly correlated with ER-positive NCR in biopsy specimens (r = 0.84, P < 0.001). Stroma-free 18F-FES SUV was significantly correlated with ER expression (r = 0.78, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

18F-FES PET predominantly demonstrates the level of ER expression in breast cancer cell nucleus. Although tumor 18F-FES uptake is affected by the degree of stromal components, the partial volume effect on the uptake can be corrected by stroma-volume fraction in Azan-Mallory staining.

Radionuclide-Based Imaging of Breast Cancer: State of the Art

Simple Summary

Breast cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed malignant tumors, possessing high incidence and mortality rates that threaten women’s health. Thus, early and effective breast cancer diagnosis is crucial for enhancing the survival rate. Radionuclide molecular imaging displays its advantages for detecting breast cancer from a functional perspective. Noninvasive visualization of biological processes with radionuclide-labeled small metabolic compounds helps elucidate the metabolic state of breast cancer, while radionuclide-labeled ligands/antibodies for receptor-targeted radionuclide molecular imaging is sensitive and specific for visualization of the overexpressed molecular markers in breast cancer. This review focuses on the most recent developments of novel radiotracers as promising tools for early breast cancer diagnosis.

Abstract

Breast cancer is a malignant tumor that can affect women worldwide and endanger their health and wellbeing. Early detection of breast cancer can significantly improve the prognosis and survival rate of patients, but with traditional anatomical imagine methods, it is difficult to detect lesions before morphological changes occur. Radionuclide-based molecular imaging based on positron emission tomography (PET) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) displays its advantages for detecting breast cancer from a functional perspective. Radionuclide labeling of small metabolic compounds can be used for imaging biological processes, while radionuclide labeling of ligands/antibodies can be used for imaging receptors. Noninvasive visualization of biological processes helps elucidate the metabolic state of breast cancer, while receptor-targeted radionuclide molecular imaging is sensitive and specific for visualization of the overexpressed molecular markers in breast cancer, contributing to early diagnosis and better management of cancer patients. The rapid development of radionuclide probes aids the diagnosis of breast cancer in various aspects. These probes target metabolism, amino acid transporters, cell proliferation, hypoxia, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) and so on. This article provides an overview of the development of radionuclide molecular imaging techniques present in preclinical or clinical studies, which are used as tools for early breast cancer diagnosis.

Vorinostat (SAHA) and Breast Cancer: An Overview

Vorinostat (SAHA), an inhibitor of class I and II of histone deacetylases, is the first histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDI) approved for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma in 2006. HDIs are promising anticancer agents that inhibit the proliferation of many types of cancer cells including breast carcinoma (BC). BC is a heterogeneous disease with variable biological behavior, morphological features, and response to therapy. Although significant progress in the treatment of BC has been made, high toxicity to normal cells, serious side effects, and the occurrence of multi-drug resistance limit the effective therapy of BC patients. Therefore, new active agents which improve the effectiveness of currently used regimens are highly needed. This manuscript analyzes preclinical and clinical trials data of SAHA, applied individually or in combination with other anticancer agents, considering different histological subtypes of BC.

The clinical value of 18F-fluoroestradiol in assisting individualized treatment decision in dual primary malignancies

Background

For patients with previously diagnosed dual primary tumors, it is usually difficult to determine the diagnosis and treatment of stage IV recurrence. The study was to explore the influences of ¹⁸F-fluoroestradiol positron emission tomography/computed tomography (¹⁸F-FES PET/CT) in the diagnosis of estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer combined with other primary tumor with distant metastases.

Methods

Multidisciplinary team were organized to explore the definite clinical value of ¹⁸F-FES PET/CT in stage IV patients suffered from ER-positive breast cancer and another primary tumor synchronously or metachronously. Thirty-two female patients were retrospectively analyzed who underwent ¹⁸F-FES PET/CT scans in our center. Before and after reading ¹⁸F-FES reports, the team members from department of surgery, oncology and radiotherapy should make decisions of management strategy.

Results

Totally, the multidisciplinary team completed the management decision-making of the 32 patients before and after ¹⁸F-FES PET/CT scans. 87.5% (n=28) of the patients were considered to benefit from ¹⁸F-FES reports for diagnosis and treatment decisions. Out of the 28 patients, 7 patients (7/32, 21.9%) were considered to definitely change the management strategies while 12 patients (12/32, 37.5%) was instructive to develop management plans after the scan. The other 9 patients were suggested reassuring decision-making process by ¹⁸F-FES PET/CT.

Conclusions

¹⁸F-FES PET/CT scans have clinical effects on diagnosis and treatment strategies of stage IV patients suffered from ER-positive breast cancer and another primary tumor.

Kinetic and Static Analysis of Poly-(Adenosine Diphosphate-Ribose) Polymerase-1-Targeted 18F-Fluorthanatrace PET Images of Ovarian Cancer

The poly-(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) family of proteins participates in numerous functions, most notably the DNA damage response. Cancer vulnerability to DNA damage has led to development of several PARP inhibitors (PARPi). This class of drugs has demonstrated therapeutic efficacy in ovarian, breast, and prostate cancers, but with variable response. Consequently, clinics need to select patients likely to benefit from these targeted therapies. In vivo imaging of ¹⁸F-fluorthanatrace uptake has been shown to correspond to PARP-1 expression in tissue. This study characterized the pharmacokinetics of ¹⁸F-fluorthanatrace and tested kinetic and static models to guide metric selection in future studies assessing ¹⁸F-fluorthanatrace as a biomarker of response to PARPi therapy. Methods: Fourteen prospectively enrolled ovarian cancer patients were injected with ¹⁸F-fluorthanatrace and imaged dynamically for 60 min after injection followed by up to 2 whole-body scans, with venous blood activity and metabolite measurements. SUV_max and SUV_peak were extracted from dynamic images and whole-body scans. Kinetic parameter estimates and SUVs were assessed for correlations with tissue PARP-1 immunofluorescence (n = 7). Simulations of population kinetic parameters enabled estimation of measurement bias and precision in parameter estimates. Results: ¹⁸F-fluorthanatrace blood clearance was variable, but labeled metabolite profiles were similar across patients, supporting use of a population parent fraction curve. The total distribution volume from a reversible 2-tissue-compartment model and Logan reference tissue distribution volume ratio (DVR) from the first hour of PET acquisition correlated with tumor PARP-1 expression by immunofluorescence (r = 0.76 and 0.83, respectively; P < 0.05). DVR bias and precision estimates were 6.4% and 29.1%, respectively. SUV_max and SUV_peak acquired from images with midpoints of 57.5, 110 ± 3, and 199 ± 4 min highly correlated with PARP-1 expression (mean ± SD, r ≥ 0.79; P < 0.05). Conclusion: Tumor SUV_max and SUV_peak at 55-60 min after injection and later and DVR from at least 60 min appear to be robust noninvasive measures of PARP-1 binding. ¹⁸F-fluorthanatrace uptake in ovarian cancer was best described by models of reversible binding. However, pharmacokinetic patterns of tracer uptake were somewhat variable, especially at later time points.

[18F]FDG and [18F]FES positron emission tomography for disease monitoring and assessment of anti-hormonal treatment eligibility in granulosa cell tumors of the ovary

Purpose: Adult granulosa cell tumors (AGCTs) of the ovary represent a rare malignancy in which timing and choice of treatment is a clinical challenge. This study investigates the value of FDG-PET/CT and FES-PET/CT in monitoring recurrent AGCTs and assessing eligibility for anti-hormonal treatment.

Materials and Methods: We evaluated 22 PET/CTs from recurrent AGCT patients to determine tumor FDG (n = 16) and FES (n = 6) uptake by qualitative and quantitative analysis. We included all consecutive patients from two tertiary hospitals between 2003-2020. Expression of ERα and ERβ and mitoses per 2 mm² were determined by immunohistochemistry and compared to FES and FDG uptake, respectively.

Results: Qualitative assessment showed low-to-moderate FDG uptake in most patients (14/16), and intense uptake in 2/16. One patient with intense tumor FDG uptake had a high mitotic rate (18 per 2 mm²) Two out of six patients showed FES uptake on PET/CT at qualitative analysis. Lesion-based quantitative assessment showed a mean SUV_max of 2.4 (± 0.9) on FDG-PET/CT and mean SUV_max of 1.7 (± 0.5) on FES-PET/CT. Within patients, expression of ERα and ERβ varied and did not seem to correspond with FES uptake. In one FES positive patient, tumor locations with FES uptake remained stable or decreased in size during anti-hormonal treatment, while all FES negative locations progressed.

Conclusions: This study shows that in AGCTs, FDG uptake is limited and therefore FDG-PET/CT is not advised. FES-PET/CT may be useful to non-invasively capture the estrogen receptor expression of separate tumor lesions and thus assess the potential eligibility for hormone treatment in AGCT patients.

High-dose tamoxifen in high-hormone-receptor-expressing advanced breast cancer patients: a phase II pilot study

Background

Tumor progression following endocrine therapy is considered to indicate resistance to endocrine drugs due to a variety of mechanisms. An insufficient dose of endocrine drugs is one of the causes for treatment failure in some patients with high hormone-receptor (HR)-expressing advanced breast cancer. This study aimed to explore the efficacy of high-dose tamoxifen (TAM) treatment in patients with advanced breast cancer with highly expressed HR.

Materials & methods

This was a single-arm, phase II pilot study that enrolled patients with advanced breast cancer with high HR expression (estrogen receptor ⩾60% and/or progesterone receptor ⩾60%) following routine endocrine therapy. All enrolled patients received a high-dose of TAM (100 mg/day) until disease progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), overall survival (OS), and safety. Exploratory endpoints included the predictive value of ¹⁶α-¹⁸F-¹⁷β-fluoroestradiol quantitative positron emission tomography/computed tomography (¹⁸F-FES PET/CT) for treatment efficacy.

Results

A total of 30 patients were enrolled between September 2017 and February 2019. The median PFS was 6 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.9-7.1] and the median OS was 15.6 months (95% CI 8.3-22.9). Five patients experienced a partial response (PR) and none experienced a complete response (CR), with an ORR of 16.7% and CBR of 33.3%. No severe adverse events were observed. Lesions with ¹⁸F-FES maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) ⩾4 had a significantly longer PFS [median 9.2 months, (95% CI 6.9-11.6)] compared with lesions with a ¹⁸F-FES SUVmax <4 [median 4.8 months, (95% CI 3.9-5.6); p = 0.022].

Conclusion

A high-dose of TAM is effective and safe for patients with advanced breast cancer with high HR expression. ¹⁸F-FES SUVmax values may predict the local clinical benefits of high-dose TAM .

Trial Registration

[ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT0304565].

Automated synthesis of the 16α-[18F]fluoroestradiol ([18F]FES): minimization of precursor amount and resulting benefits

The 16α-[18F]Fluoroestradiol ([18F]FES) is an established PET radiotracer for estrogen positive (ER+) breast cancer. Although the radiosynthesis is well-described, the majority of the published methods suffer from modest or irreproducible yields and time-intensive purification procedures. In view of the considerable clinical applications, development of a more efficient and faster synthesis of [18F]FES still remains a task of a significant practical importance. [18F]FES was produced by a direct nucleophilic radiofluorination of 3-O-methoxymethyl-16,17-O-sulfuryl-16-epiestriol (MMSE), followed by acidic hydrolysis using HCl/CH3CN. [18F]Fluoride retained on a QMA carb cartridge (46 mg) was eluted by solution of 1.2 mg of tetrabutylammonium tosylate (TBAOTs) in EtOH. After fluorination reaction (0.3 mg MMSE, 1 ml of CH3CN/100 °C, 5 min) [18F]FES was isolated by single-cartridge SPE purification using OASIS WAX 3cc, elution accomplished with aqueous ethanol of different concentrations. On а GE TRACERlab FX N Pro automated module [18F]FES (formulated in normal saline with 5% EtOH) was obtained in 33 ± 3% yield (n = 5, non-decay corrected) within 32 min. Reduction of precursor amount, exclusion of azeotropic drying step and simplification of purification make the suggested method readily adaptable to various automated synthesizers and offers significant cost decrease.

Update on Quantitative Imaging for Predicting and Assessing Response in Oncology

Molecular imaging has revolutionized clinical oncology by imaging-specific facets of cancer biology. Through noninvasive measurements of tumor physiology, targeted radiotracers can serve as biomarkers for disease characterization, prognosis, response assessment, and predicting long-term response/survival. In turn, these imaging biomarkers can be utilized to tailor therapeutic regimens to tumor biology. In this article, we review biomarker applications for response assessment and predicting long-term outcomes. ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), a measure of cellular glucose metabolism, is discussed in the context of lymphoma and breast and lung cancer. FDG has gained widespread clinical acceptance and has been integrated into the routine clinical care of several malignancies, most notably lymphoma. The novel radiotracers 16α-¹⁸F-fluoro-17β-estradiol and ¹⁸F-fluorothymidine are reviewed in application to the early prediction of response assessment of breast cancer. Through illustrative examples, we explore current and future applications of molecular imaging biomarkers in the advancement of precision medicine.

Quantifying PD-L1 Expression to Monitor Immune Checkpoint Therapy: Opportunities and Challenges

Simple Summary

Malignant cells hijack the regulatory roles of immune checkpoint proteins for immune evasion and survival. Therapeutics blocking those proteins can restore the balance of the immune system and lead to durable responses in cancer patients. Although a subset of patients derive benefit, there are few non-invasive technologies to guide and monitor those therapies to improve success rates. This is a review of the advancements in non-invasive methods for quantification of immune checkpoint protein programmed death ligand 1 expression, a biomarker detected by immunohistochemistry and widely used for guiding immune checkpoint therapy.

Abstract

Therapeutics targeting programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) protein and its receptor PD-1 are now dominant players in restoring anti-tumor immune responses. PD-L1 detection by immunohistochemistry (IHC) is emerging as a reproducible biomarker for guiding patient stratification for those therapies in some cancers. However, PD-L1 expression in the tumor microenvironment is highly complex. It is upregulated by aberrant genetic alterations, and is highly regulated at the transcriptional, posttranscriptional, and protein levels. Thus, PD-L1 IHC is inadequate to fully understand the relevance of PD-L1 levels in the whole body and their dynamics to improve therapeutic outcomes. Imaging technologies could potentially assist in meeting that need. Early clinical investigations show promising results in quantifying PD-L1 expression in the whole body by positron emission tomography (PET). Within this context, this review summarizes advancements in regulation of PD-L1 expression and imaging agents, and in PD-L1 PET for drug development, and discusses opportunities and challenges presented by these innovations for guiding immune checkpoint therapy (ICT).

Development of Radiotracers for Breast Cancer-The Tumor Microenvironment as an Emerging Target

Molecular imaging plays an increasingly important role in the diagnosis and treatment of different malignancies. Radiolabeled probes enable the visualization of the primary tumor as well as the metastases and have been also employed in targeted therapy and theranostic approaches. With breast cancer being the most common malignancy in women worldwide it is of special interest to develop novel targeted treatments. However, tumor microenvironment and escape mechanisms often limit their therapeutic potential. Addressing tumor stroma associated targets provides a promising option to inhibit tumor growth and angiogenesis and to disrupt tumor tissue architecture. This review describes recent developments on radiolabeled probes used in diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer especially in triple negative type with the focus on potential targets offered by the tumor microenvironment, like tumor associated macrophages, cancer associated fibroblasts, and endothelial cells.

Progress and Future Trends in PET/CT and PET/MRI Molecular Imaging Approaches for Breast Cancer

Breast cancer is a major disease with high morbidity and mortality in women worldwide. Increased use of imaging biomarkers has been shown to add more information with clinical utility in the detection and evaluation of breast cancer. To date, numerous studies related to PET-based imaging in breast cancer have been published. Here, we review available studies on the clinical utility of different PET-based molecular imaging methods in breast cancer diagnosis, staging, distant-metastasis detection, therapeutic and prognostic prediction, and evaluation of therapeutic responses. For primary breast cancer, PET/MRI performed similarly to MRI but better than PET/CT. PET/CT and PET/MRI both have higher sensitivity than MRI in the detection of axillary and extra-axillary nodal metastases. For distant metastases, PET/CT has better performance in the detection of lung metastasis, while PET/MRI performs better in the liver and bone. Additionally, PET/CT is superior in terms of monitoring local recurrence. The progress in novel radiotracers and PET radiomics presents opportunities to reclassify tumors by combining their fine anatomical features with molecular characteristics and develop a beneficial pathway from bench to bedside to predict the treatment response and prognosis of breast cancer. However, further investigation is still needed before application of these modalities in clinical practice. In conclusion, PET-based imaging is not suitable for early-stage breast cancer, but it adds value in identifying regional nodal disease and distant metastases as an adjuvant to standard diagnostic imaging. Recent advances in imaging techniques would further widen the comprehensive and convergent applications of PET approaches in the clinical management of breast cancer.

Evaluation of estrogen expression of breast cancer using 18F-FES PET CT-A novel technique

Estrogen receptor (ER) expression in breast cancer is routinely studied on immunohistochemistry (IHC) of tissue obtained from core biopsy or surgical specimen. Sampling error and heterogeneity of tumor may incorrectly label a breast tumor as ER negative, thus denying patient hormonal treatment. Molecular functional ER imaging can assess the in-vivo ER expression of primary tumor and metastases at sites inaccessible for biopsy and also track changes in expression over time. The aim was to study ER expression using 16α-¹⁸F-fluoro-17β-estradiol or ¹⁸F-fluoroestradiol (¹⁸F FES) positron emission tomography (PET) computed tomography (CT). Twenty-four biopsy-proven breast cancer patients consenting to participate in the study underwent FES PET CT. Standard uptake value (SUV_mean) of maximum of 7 lesions/patient was analyzed, and tumor-to-background ratio was calculated for each lesion. Visual interpretation score was calculated for lesion on FES PET and correlated with the Allred score on IHC of tumor tissue samples for ER expression. The diagnostic indices of FES PET CT were assessed taking IHC as “gold standard.” On FES PET CT, the mean SUV for ER+ tumors was 4.75, whereas the mean SUV for ER − tumors was 1.41. Using receiver operating characteristic curve, tumors with an SUV of ≥ 1.8 on FES PET could be considered as ER+. The overall accuracy of FES PET CT to detect ER expression was 91.66%, with two false negatives noted in this study. ¹⁸F-FES PET CT appears promising in evaluating ER expression in breast cancer. It is noninvasive and has potential to assess the in-vivo ER expression of the entire primary tumor and metastasis not amenable for biopsy.

18F-Fluoroestradiol PET Imaging in a Phase II Trial of Vorinostat to Restore Endocrine Sensitivity in ER+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer

Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACIs) may overcome endocrine resistance in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) metastatic breast cancer. We tested whether ¹⁸F-fluoroestradiol PET imaging would elucidate the pharmacodynamics of combination HDACIs and endocrine therapy. Methods: Patients with ER+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer with prior clinical benefit from endocrine therapy but later progression on aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy were given vorinostat (400 mg daily) sequentially or simultaneously with AI. ¹⁸F-fluoroestradiol PET and ¹⁸F-FDG PET scans were performed at baseline, week 2, and week 8. Results: Eight patients were treated sequentially, and then 15 simultaneously. Eight patients had stable disease at week 8, and 6 of these 8 patients had more than 6 mo of stable disease. Higher baseline ¹⁸F-fluoroestradiol uptake was associated with longer progression-free survival. ¹⁸F-fluoroestradiol uptake did not systematically increase with vorinostat exposure, indicating no change in regional ER estradiol binding, and ¹⁸F-FDG uptake did not show a significant decrease, as would have been expected with tumor regression. Conclusion: Simultaneous HDACIs and AI dosing in patients with cancer resistant to AI alone showed clinical benefit (6 or more months without progression) in 4 of 10 evaluable patients. Higher ¹⁸F-fluoroestradiol PET uptake identified patients likely to benefit from combination therapy, but vorinostat did not change ER expression at the level of detection of ¹⁸F-fluoroestradiol PET.

Current Landscape of Breast Cancer Imaging and Potential Quantitative Imaging Markers of Response in ER-Positive Breast Cancers Treated with Neoadjuvant Therapy

In recent years, neoadjuvant treatment trials have shown that breast cancer subtypes identified on the basis of genomic and/or molecular signatures exhibit different response rates and recurrence outcomes, with the implication that subtype-specific treatment approaches are needed. Estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancers present a unique set of challenges for determining optimal neoadjuvant treatment approaches. There is increased recognition that not all ER+ breast cancers benefit from chemotherapy, and that there may be a subset of ER+ breast cancers that can be treated effectively using endocrine therapies alone. With this uncertainty, there is a need to improve the assessment and to optimize the treatment of ER+ breast cancers. While pathology-based markers offer a snapshot of tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy, non-invasive imaging of the ER disease in response to treatment would provide broader insights into tumor heterogeneity, ER biology, and the timing of surrogate endpoint measurements. In this review, we provide an overview of the current landscape of breast imaging in neoadjuvant studies and highlight the technological advances in each imaging modality. We then further examine some potential imaging markers for neoadjuvant treatment response in ER+ breast cancers.

Comparison of diagnostic sensitivity of [18F]fluoroestradiol and [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for breast cancer recurrence in patients with a history of estrogen receptor-positive primary breast cancer

BACKGROUND

To compare the diagnostic sensitivity of [¹⁸F]fluoroestradiol ([¹⁸F]FES) and [¹⁸F]fluorodeoxyglucose ([¹⁸F]FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for breast cancer recurrence in patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive primary breast cancer.

METHODS

Our database of consecutive patients enrolled in a previous prospective cohort study to assess [¹⁸F]FES PET/CT was reviewed to identify eligible patients who had ER-positive primary breast cancer with suspected first recurrence at presentation and who underwent [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT. The sensitivity of qualitative [¹⁸F]FES and [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT interpretations was assessed, comparing them with histological diagnoses.

RESULTS

Of the 46 enrolled patients, 45 were confirmed as having recurrent breast cancer, while one was diagnosed with chronic granulomatous inflammation. Forty (89%) patients were ER-positive, four (9%) were ER-negative, and one (2%) patient did not undergo an ER assay. The sensitivity of [¹⁸F]FES PET/CT was 71.1% (32/45, 95% CI, 55.7-83.6), while that of [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT was 80.0% (36/45, 95% CI, 65.4-90.4) with a threshold of positive interpretation, and 93.3% (42/45, 95% CI, 81.7-98.6) when a threshold of equivocal was used. There was no significant difference in sensitivity between [¹⁸F]FES and [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT (P = 0.48) with a threshold of positive [¹⁸F]FDG uptake, but the sensitivity of [¹⁸F]FDG was significantly higher than [¹⁸F]FES (P = 0.013) with a threshold of equivocal [¹⁸F]FDG uptake. One patient with a benign lesion showed negative [¹⁸F]FES but positive [¹⁸F]FDG uptake.

CONCLUSIONS

The restaging of patients who had ER-positive primary breast cancer and present with recurrent disease may include [¹⁸F]FES PET/CT as an initial test when standard imaging studies are equivocal or suspicious.

Whole-Body Characterization of Estrogen Receptor Status in Metastatic Breast Cancer with 16α-18F-Fluoro-17β-Estradiol Positron Emission Tomography: Meta-Analysis and Recommendations for Integration into Clinical Applications

Estrogen receptor (ER) status by immunohistochemistry (IHC) of cancer tissue is currently used to direct endocrine therapy in breast cancer. Positron emission tomography (PET) with 16α-18F-fluoro-17β-estradiol (¹⁸ F-FES) noninvasively characterizes ER ligand-binding function of breast cancer lesions. Concordance of imaging and tissue assays should be established for ¹⁸ F-FES PET to be an alternative or complement to tissue biopsy for metastatic lesions. We conducted a meta-analysis of published results comparing ¹⁸ F-FES PET and tissue assays of ER status in patients with breast cancer. PubMed and EMBASE were searched for English-language manuscripts with at least 10 patients and low overall risk of bias. Thresholds for imaging and tissue classification could differ between studies but had to be clearly stated. We used hierarchical summary receiver-operating characteristic curve models for the meta-analysis. The primary analysis included 113 nonbreast lesions from 4 studies; an expanded analysis included 327 total lesions from 11 studies. Treating IHC results as the reference standard, sensitivity was 0.78 (95% confidence region 0.65-0.88) and specificity 0.98 (0.65-1.00) for the primary analysis of nonbreast lesions. In the expanded analysis including non-IHC tissue assays and all lesion sites, sensitivity was 0.81 (0.73-0.87) and specificity 0.86 (0.68-0.94). These results suggest that ¹⁸ F-FES PET is useful for characterization of ER status of metastatic breast cancer lesions. We also review current best practices for conducting ¹⁸ F-FES PET scans. This imaging assay has potential to improve clinically relevant outcomes for patients with (historically) ER-positive metastatic breast cancer, including those with brain metastases and/or lobular histology. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: 16α-18F-fluoro-17β-estradiol positron emission tomography (¹⁸ F-FES PET) imaging assesses estrogen receptor status in breast cancer in vivo. This work reviews the sensitivity and specificity of ¹⁸ F-FES PET in a meta-analysis with reference tissue assays and discusses best practices for use of the tracer as an imaging biomarker. ¹⁸ F-FES PET could enhance breast cancer diagnosis and staging as well as aid in therapy selection for patients with metastatic disease. Tissue sampling limitations, intrapatient heterogeneity, and temporal changes in molecular markers make it likely that ¹⁸ F-FES PET will complement existing assays when clinically available in the near future.

Impact of Using Uniform Attenuation Coefficients for Heterogeneously Dense Breasts in a Dedicated Breast PET/X-ray Scanner

We investigated PET image quantification when using a uniform attenuation coefficient (μ) for attenuation correction (AC) of anthropomorphic density phantoms derived from high-resolution breast CT scans. A breast PET system was modeled with perfect data corrections except for AC. Using uniform μ for AC resulted in quantitative errors roughly proportional to the difference between μ used in AC (μ _AC) and local μ, yielding approximately ± 5% bias, corresponding to the variation of μ for 511 keV photons in breast tissue. Global bias was lowest when uniform μ _AC was equal to the phantom mean μ (μ _mean). Local bias in 10-mm spheres increased as the sphere μ deviated from μ _mean, but remained only 2-3% when the μ _sphere was 6.5% higher than μ _mean. Bias varied linearly with and was roughly proportional to local μ mismatch. Minimizing local bias, e.g., in a small sphere, required the use of a uniform μ value between the local μ and the μ _mean. Thus, biases from using uniform-μ AC are low when local μ _sphere is close to μ _mean. As the μ _sphere increasingly differs from the phantom μ _mean, bias increases, and the optimal uniform μ is less predictable, having a value between μ _sphere and the phantom μ _mean.

The Predictive Value of Early Changes in 18 F-Fluoroestradiol Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography During Fulvestrant 500 mg Therapy in Patients with Estrogen Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate the predictive value of early changes in ¹⁸ F-fluoroestradiol (FES) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) during fulvestrant 500 mg therapy in patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive metastatic breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients underwent ¹⁸ F-FES PET/CT scans at both baseline (scan 1) and day 28 (scan 2). The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of all metastatic sites was determined in each scan, and the percentage reduction in SUVmax (ΔSUVmax) was calculated as [(SUVmax on scan 1-SUVmax on scan 2)/ SUVmax on scan 1] * 100%.

RESULTS

In total, 294 ¹⁸ F-FES-positive lesions from 36 patients were identified. The ¹⁸ F-FES SUVmax varied widely among lesions (median 5.7; range 1.8-32.4) and patients (median 5.1; range 2.5-13.2). After treatment, the median SUVmax among lesions and patients was 2.1 and 2.1, respectively. The ΔSUVmax ranged from -5.1% to 100%, with a median reduction of 61.3%. Using receiver operating characteristic analysis, the optimal cutoff point to discriminate patients who could derive clinical benefit from fulvestrant was determined to be 38.0%. Patients with a median ΔSUVmax ≥38.0% experienced significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) than those with ΔSUVmax <38.0% (28.0 months vs. 3.5 months, p = .003). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that ΔSUVmax ≥38.0% was an independent predictor of PFS benefit in patients receiving fulvestrant therapy.

CONCLUSION

Changes in SUVmax measured by serial imaging of ¹⁸ F-FES PET/CT could be used early to predict PFS benefit in patients receiving fulvestrant therapy.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of ¹⁸ F-fluoroestradiol (FES) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) in predicting response to fulvestrant 500 mg therapy in patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer. This study highlights the utility of FES PET/CT as a predictive factor to discriminate patients who might benefit from fulvestrant. Moreover, these findings showed that this molecular imaging technique might be a potential tool for physicians to make individualized treatment strategies.

Radiopharmaceuticals for Breast Cancer and Neuroendocrine Tumors: Two Examples of How Tissue Characterization May Influence the Choice of Therapy

Molecular medicine has gained clinical relevance for the detection and staging of oncological diseases, to guide therapy decision making and for therapy follow-up due to the availability of new highly sensitive hybrid imaging camera systems and the development of new tailored radiopharmaceuticals that target specific molecules. The knowledge of the expression of different receptors on the primary tumor and on metastases is important for both therapeutic and prognostic purposes and several approaches are available aiming to achieve personalized medicine in different oncological diseases. In this review, we describe the use of specific radiopharmaceuticals to image and predict therapy response in breast cancer and neuroendocrine tumors since they represent a paradigmatic example of the importance of tumoral characterization of hormonal receptors in order to plan a tailored treatment. The most attractive radiopharmaceuticals for breast cancer are 16α-[¹⁸F]-fluoro-17β-estradiol for PET assessment of the estrogen expression, radiolabeled monoclonal antibody trastuzumab to image the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, but also the imaging of androgen receptors with [¹⁸F]-fluorodihydrotestosterone.

Breast Cancer 18F-ISO-1 Uptake as a Marker of Proliferation Status

The σ₂ receptor is a potential in vivo target for measuring proliferative status in cancer. The feasibility of using N-(4-(6,7-dimethoxy-3,4-dihydroisoquinolin-2(1H)-yl)butyl)-2-(2-¹⁸F-fluoroethoxy)-5-methylbenzamide (¹⁸F-ISO-1) to image solid tumors in lymphoma, breast cancer, and head and neck cancer has been previously established. Here, we report the results of the first dedicated clinical trial of ¹⁸F-ISO-1 in women with primary breast cancer. Our study objective was to determine whether ¹⁸F-ISO-1 PET could provide an in vivo measure of tumor proliferative status, and we hypothesized that uptake would correlate with a tissue-based assay of proliferation, namely Ki-67 expression. Methods: Twenty-eight women with 29 primary invasive breast cancers were prospectively enrolled in a clinical trial (NCT02284919) between March 2015 and January 2017. Each received an injection of 278-527 MBq of ¹⁸F-ISO-1 and then underwent PET/CT imaging of the breasts 50-55 min later. In vivo uptake of ¹⁸F-ISO-1 was quantitated by SUV_max and distribution volume ratios and was compared with ex vivo immunohistochemistry for Ki-67. Wilcoxon rank-sum tests assessed uptake differences across Ki-67 thresholds, and Spearman correlation tested associations between uptake and Ki-67. Results: Tumor SUV_max (median, 2.0 g/mL; range, 1.3-3.3 g/mL), partial-volume-corrected SUV_max, and SUV ratios were tested against Ki-67. Tumors stratified into the high-Ki-67 (≥20%) group had SUV_max greater than the low-Ki-67 (<20%) group (P = 0.02). SUV_max exhibited a positive correlation with Ki-67 across all breast cancer subtypes (ρ = 0.46, P = 0.01, n = 29). Partial-volume-corrected SUV_max was positively correlated with Ki-67 for invasive ductal carcinoma (ρ = 0.51, P = 0.02, n = 21). Tumor-to-normal-tissue ratios and tumor distribution volume ratio did not correlate with Ki-67 (P > 0.05). Conclusion: ¹⁸F-ISO-1 uptake in breast cancer modestly correlates with an in vitro assay of proliferation.

Initial Studies with 11C-Vorozole PET Detect Overexpression of Intratumoral Aromatase in Breast Cancer

Aromatase inhibitors are the mainstay of hormonal therapy in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer, although the response rate is just over 50% and in vitro studies suggest that only two thirds of postmenopausal breast tumors overexpress aromatase. The goal of the present study was to validate and optimize PET with ¹¹C-vorozole for measuring aromatase expression in postmenopausal breast cancer in vivo. Methods: Ten newly diagnosed postmenopausal women with biopsy-confirmed breast cancer were administered ¹¹C-vorozole intravenously, and PET emission data were collected between 40 and 90 min after injection. Tracer injection and scanning were repeated 2 h after ingestion of 2.5 mg of letrozole. Mean and maximal SUVs and ratios to nontumor tissue in the contralateral breast were determined at baseline and after letrozole. Biopsy specimens from the same tumors were stained for aromatase using immunohistochemistry and evaluated for stain intensity and the percentage of immune-positive cells. Results: Seven of the 10 women (70%) demonstrated increased mean focal uptake of tracer (SUV ratio > 1.1) coinciding with the mammographic location of the lesion, whereas the other 3 women (30%) did not (SUV ratio ≤ 1.0). All patients with an SUV ratio above 1.1 had mean SUVs above 2.4, and there was no overlap (SUV ratio ≤ 1; SUV_mean, 0.8-1.8). The SUV ratio relative to breast around tumor was indistinguishable from the ratio to contralateral breast. Pretreatment with letrozole reduced tracer uptake in most subjects, although the percentage of blocking varied across and within tumors. Tumors with a high SUV in vivo also showed a high immunohistochemical staining intensity. Conclusion: PET with ¹¹C-vorozole is a useful technique for measuring aromatase expression in individual breast lesions, enabling noninvasive quantitative measurement of baseline and posttreatment aromatase availability in primary tumors and metastatic lesions.