1
|
Asmundo L, Ambrosini V, Mojtahed A, Fanti S, Ferrone C, Hesami M, Sertic M, Najmi Z, Furtado FS, Dhami RS, Anderson MA, Samir A, Sharma A, Campana D, Ursprung S, Nikolau K, Domachevsky L, Blake MA, Norris EC, Clark JW, Catalano OA. Imaging of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms; Principles of Treatment Strategies. What Referring Clinicians Want to Know. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2024; 48:628-639. [PMID: 38626751 DOI: 10.1097/rct.0000000000001619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/18/2024]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a diverse group of tumors that express neuroendocrine markers and primarily affect the lungs and digestive system. The incidence of NENs has increased over time due to advancements in imaging and diagnostic techniques. Effective management of NENs requires a multidisciplinary approach, considering factors such as tumor location, grade, stage, symptoms, and imaging findings. Treatment strategies vary depending on the specific subtype of NEN. In this review, we will focus on treatment strategies and therapies including the information relevant to clinicians in order to undertake optimal management and treatment decisions, the implications of different therapies on imaging, and how to ascertain their possible complications and treatment effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Amirkasra Mojtahed
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - Cristina Ferrone
- Department of Surgery, Cedar-Sinai Health System, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Mina Hesami
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Madeleine Sertic
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Zahra Najmi
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Felipe S Furtado
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Ranjodh S Dhami
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Mark A Anderson
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Anthony Samir
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Amita Sharma
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Davide Campana
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Stephan Ursprung
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Konstantin Nikolau
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Liran Domachevsky
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Michael A Blake
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Evan C Norris
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jeffrey W Clark
- Department of Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Onofrio A Catalano
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
van de Weijer T, Bemer F, de Vos-Geelen J, Hermans B, Mitea C, van der Pol JAJ, Lodewick T, Wildberger JE, Mottaghy FM. Altered biodistribution of [ 68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC during somatostatin analogue treatment. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2024; 51:2420-2427. [PMID: 38403723 PMCID: PMC11178651 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06659-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The need for an interval between the administration of long-acting Somatostatin Receptor Analogues (SSA) and the [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET has been questioned based on recent literature in the new EANM guidelines. Here an earlier studies showed that SSA injection immediately before SSTR PET had minimal effect on normal organ and tumor uptake (1). However, data are scarce and there are (small) differences between [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE and [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC binding affinity, and it remains unknown whether these findings can be directly translated to scans with [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC as well. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of SSA use on the biodistribution in a subsequent [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT and compare this intra-individually across several cycles of SSA treatments. METHODS Retrospectively, 35 patients with NENs were included. [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET at staging and after the 1st and 2nd cycle of SSA were included. SUVmean and SUVmax of blood, visceral organs, primary tumor and two metastases were determined. Also, the interval between SSA therapy and the PET scan was registered. RESULTS Treatment with SSA resulted in a significantly higher bloodpool activity and lower visceral tracer uptake. This effect was maintained after a 2nd cycle of SSA therapy. Furthermore, there was an inverse relationship between bloodpool tracer availability and visceral tracer binding and a positive correlation between bloodpool tracer availability and primary tumor tracer uptake. With an interval of up to 5 days, there was a significantly higher bloodpool activity than at longer intervals. CONCLUSION Absolute comparison of the SUV on [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET should be done with caution as the altered biodistribution of the tracer after SSA treatment should be taken into account. We recommend not to perform a scan within the first 5 days after the injection of lanreotide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T van de Weijer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, ENETS Center of Excellence, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), P. Debeylaan 25, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, 6229 HX, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM), University of Maastricht (UM), P. Debeylaan 25, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, 6229 HX, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - F Bemer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, ENETS Center of Excellence, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), P. Debeylaan 25, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, 6229 HX, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - J de Vos-Geelen
- Department of Medical Oncology, ENETS Center of Excellence, MUMC+, P. Debeylaan 25, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, 6229 HX, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- School for Oncology and Reproduction (GROW), UM, P. Debeylaan 25, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, 6229 HX, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - B Hermans
- Department of Medical Oncology, ENETS Center of Excellence, MUMC+, P. Debeylaan 25, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, 6229 HX, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- School for Oncology and Reproduction (GROW), UM, P. Debeylaan 25, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, 6229 HX, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - C Mitea
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, ENETS Center of Excellence, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), P. Debeylaan 25, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, 6229 HX, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- School for Oncology and Reproduction (GROW), UM, P. Debeylaan 25, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, 6229 HX, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - J A J van der Pol
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, ENETS Center of Excellence, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), P. Debeylaan 25, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, 6229 HX, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- School for Cardiovascular Diseases (CARIM), UM, P. Debeylaan 25, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, 6229 HX, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - T Lodewick
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, ENETS Center of Excellence, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), P. Debeylaan 25, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, 6229 HX, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - J E Wildberger
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, ENETS Center of Excellence, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), P. Debeylaan 25, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, 6229 HX, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- School for Cardiovascular Diseases (CARIM), UM, P. Debeylaan 25, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, 6229 HX, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - F M Mottaghy
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, ENETS Center of Excellence, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), P. Debeylaan 25, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, 6229 HX, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
- School for Oncology and Reproduction (GROW), UM, P. Debeylaan 25, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, 6229 HX, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Asmundo L, Rizzetto F, Blake M, Anderson M, Mojtahed A, Bradley W, Shenoy-Bhangle A, Fernandez-del Castillo C, Qadan M, Ferrone C, Clark J, Ambrosini V, Picchio M, Mapelli P, Evangelista L, Leithner D, Nikolaou K, Ursprung S, Fanti S, Vanzulli A, Catalano OA. Advancements in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Imaging and Future Frontiers. J Clin Med 2024; 13:3281. [PMID: 38892992 PMCID: PMC11172657 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13113281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2024] [Revised: 05/23/2024] [Accepted: 05/30/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a diverse group of tumors with varying clinical behaviors. Their incidence has risen due to increased awareness, improved diagnostics, and aging populations. The 2019 World Health Organization classification emphasizes integrating radiology and histopathology to characterize NENs and create personalized treatment plans. Imaging methods like CT, MRI, and PET/CT are crucial for detection, staging, treatment planning, and monitoring, but each of them poses different interpretative challenges and none are immune to pitfalls. Treatment options include surgery, targeted therapies, and chemotherapy, based on the tumor type, stage, and patient-specific factors. This review aims to provide insights into the latest developments and challenges in NEN imaging, diagnosis, and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Asmundo
- Postgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122 Milan, Italy;
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA; (M.B.); (M.A.); (A.M.); (W.B.); (A.S.-B.)
| | - Francesco Rizzetto
- Postgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122 Milan, Italy;
- Department of Radiology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore 3, 20162 Milan, Italy;
| | - Michael Blake
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA; (M.B.); (M.A.); (A.M.); (W.B.); (A.S.-B.)
| | - Mark Anderson
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA; (M.B.); (M.A.); (A.M.); (W.B.); (A.S.-B.)
| | - Amirkasra Mojtahed
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA; (M.B.); (M.A.); (A.M.); (W.B.); (A.S.-B.)
| | - William Bradley
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA; (M.B.); (M.A.); (A.M.); (W.B.); (A.S.-B.)
| | - Anuradha Shenoy-Bhangle
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA; (M.B.); (M.A.); (A.M.); (W.B.); (A.S.-B.)
| | - Carlos Fernandez-del Castillo
- Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA; (C.F.-d.C.); (M.Q.)
| | - Motaz Qadan
- Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA; (C.F.-d.C.); (M.Q.)
| | - Cristina Ferrone
- Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA;
| | - Jeffrey Clark
- Department of Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA;
| | - Valentina Ambrosini
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (V.A.); (S.F.)
- Nuclear Medicine, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
| | - Maria Picchio
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy; (M.P.); (P.M.)
| | - Paola Mapelli
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy; (M.P.); (P.M.)
| | - Laura Evangelista
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, Pieve Emanuele, 20072 Milan, Italy;
| | - Doris Leithner
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596 Frankfurt am Main, Germany;
| | - Konstantin Nikolaou
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Osianderstraße 5, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (K.N.); (S.U.)
| | - Stephan Ursprung
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Osianderstraße 5, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (K.N.); (S.U.)
| | - Stefano Fanti
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (V.A.); (S.F.)
- Nuclear Medicine, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
| | - Angelo Vanzulli
- Department of Radiology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore 3, 20162 Milan, Italy;
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università Degli Studi di Milano, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Onofrio Antonio Catalano
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA; (M.B.); (M.A.); (A.M.); (W.B.); (A.S.-B.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Weber M, Pettersson O, Seifert R, Schaarschmidt BM, Fendler WP, Rischpler C, Lahner H, Herrmann K, Sundin A. Changes in tumor-to-blood ratio as a prognostic marker for progression-free survival and overall survival in neuroendocrine tumor patients undergoing PRRT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2024; 51:841-851. [PMID: 37947848 PMCID: PMC10796732 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06502-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Historically, patient selection for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has been performed by virtue of somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS). In recent years, somatostatin receptor positron emission tomography (SSTR-PET) has gradually replaced SRS because of its improved diagnostic capacity, creating an unmet need for SSTR-PET-based selection criteria for PRRT. Tumor-to-blood ratio (TBR) measurements have shown high correlation with the net influx rate Ki, reflecting the tumor somatostatin receptor expression, to a higher degree than standardized uptake value (SUV) measurements. TBR may therefore predict treatment response to PRRT. In addition, changes in semiquantitative SSTR-PET parameters have been shown to predate morphological changes, making them a suitable metric for response assessment. METHODS The institutional database of the Department of Nuclear Medicine (University Hospital Essen) was searched for NET patients undergoing ≥ 2 PRRT cycles with available baseline and follow-up SSTR-PET. Two blinded independent readers reported the occurrence of new lesions quantified tumor uptake of up to nine lesions per patient using SUV and TBR. The association between baseline TBR and changes in uptake/occurrence of new lesions with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was tested by use of a Cox regression model and log-rank test. RESULTS Patients with baseline TBR in the 1st quartile had a shorter PFS (14.4 months) than those in the 3rd (23.7 months; p = 0.03) and 4th (24.1 months; p = 0.02) quartile. Similarly, these patients had significantly shorter OS (32.5 months) than those with baseline TBR in the 2nd (41.8 months; p = 0.03), 3rd (69.2 months; p < 0.01), and 4th (42.7 months; p = 0.03) quartile. Baseline to follow-up increases in TBR were independently associated with shorter PFS when accounting for prognostic markers, e.g., RECIST response (hazard ratio = 2.91 [95%CI = 1.54-5.50]; p = 0.01). This was confirmed with regard to OS (hazard ratio = 1.64 [95%CI = 1.03-2.62]; p = 0.04). Changes in SUVmean were not associated with PFS or OS. CONCLUSIONS Baseline TBR as well as changes in TBR were significantly associated with PFS and OS and may improve patient selection and morphological response assessment. Future trials need to assess the role of TBR for therapy monitoring also during PRRT and prospectively explore TBR as a predictive marker for patient selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Weber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
| | - Olof Pettersson
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Robert Seifert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - Benedikt M Schaarschmidt
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - Christoph Rischpler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - Harald Lahner
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Division of Laboratory Research, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - Anders Sundin
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
di Santo G, Santo G, Sviridenko A, Virgolini I. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy combinations for neuroendocrine tumours in ongoing clinical trials: status 2023. Theranostics 2024; 14:940-953. [PMID: 38250038 PMCID: PMC10797289 DOI: 10.7150/thno.91268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
A growing body of literature reports on the combined use of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with other anti-tumuor therapies in order to anticipate synergistic effects with perhaps increased safety issues. Combination treatments to enhance PRRT outcome are based on improved tumour perfusion, upregulation of somatostatin receptors (SSTR), radiosensitization with DNA damaging agents or targeted therapies. Several Phase 1 or 2 trials are currently recruiting patients in combined regimens. The combination of PRRT with cytotoxic chemotherapy, capecitabine and temozolomide (CAPTEM), seems to become clinically useful especially in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (pNETs) with acceptable safety profile. Neoadjuvant PRRT prior to surgery, PRRT combinations of intravenous and intraarterial routes of application, combinations of PRRT with differently radiolabelled (alpha, beta, Auger) SSTR-targeting agonists and antagonists, inhibitors of immune checkpoints (ICIs), poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP1i), tyrosine kinase (TKI), DNA-dependent protein kinase, ribonucleotide reductase or DNA methyltransferase (DMNT) are tested in currently ongoing clinical trials. The combination with [131I]I-MIBG in rare NETs (such as paraganglioma, pheochromocytoma) and new non-SSTR-targeting radioligands are used in the personalization process of treatment. The present review will provide an overview of the current status of ongoing PRRT combination treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianpaolo di Santo
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Giulia Santo
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, “Magna Graecia” University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Anna Sviridenko
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Irene Virgolini
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Low HC, Tay YS, Ong SYK, Tham WY, Yan SX. Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy Performed Shortly After Administration of Long-Acting Octreotide. Clin Nucl Med 2023; 48:1086-1088. [PMID: 37844418 DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000004906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT We present a case of a 68-year-old man with metastatic small bowel neuroendocrine tumor who underwent 4 cycles of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with 177 Lu-DOTATATE. For his first 3 cycles, therapy was performed approximately 4 weeks after his last dose of octreotide LAR. Because of miscommunication in scheduling, his fourth cycle was performed only 48 hours after his last full dose of octreotide LAR. Despite this, we found that the tumoral uptake was not reduced at all, which may add to the increasing evidence on the nonnecessity of stopping somatostatin analogs before peptide receptor radionuclide therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Han Chung Low
- From the Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Singapore General Hospital
| | - Young Soon Tay
- From the Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Singapore General Hospital
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wang R, Guo L, Shen G. Letter to the editor regarding "The effect of long-acting somatostatin analogs on the uptake of [ 177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE". Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 51:180-182. [PMID: 37561142 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06375-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 07/29/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Rang Wang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Linlin Guo
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Guohua Shen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wang R, Guo L, Pan L, Tian R, Shen G. Effects of somatostatin analogs on uptake of radiolabeled somatostatin analogs on imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2023; 13:6814-6826. [PMID: 37869289 PMCID: PMC10585547 DOI: 10.21037/qims-23-477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023]
Abstract
Background The imaging of somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) plays a significant role in imaging neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). However, there has been no clear definition on whether it is necessary to withdraw somatostatin analogs (SSAs) before SSTRs imaging. We aimed to assess whether nonradioactive SSAs affect the uptake of radiolabeled SSAs on imaging for NETs patients. Methods The databases of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science (WoS) were searched until March 12, 2022 to identify eligible studies. Maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) in tumor and normal tissues were extracted, pooled, and compared before and after SSAs treatment. The change of tumor-to-background/liver ratio was also described. The quality of each study was assessed using the revised Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. Results A total of 9 articles involving 285 patients were included and 5 studies using Gallium-68-labeled [1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N,N',N'',N'''-tetraacetic acid]-D-Phe1-Tyr3-Thr8-octreotide (68Ga-DOTATATE) were used for pooled evaluation. We found a significantly decreased SUVmax in the liver (9.56±2.47 vs. 7.62±2.12, P=0.001) and spleen (25.74±7.14 vs. 20.39±6.07, P=0.006) after SSAs treatment whereas no significant differences were observed in the uptake of thyroid, adrenal, and pituitary gland. For either primary tumor sites or metastases, the SUVmax did not change significantly before and after SSAs treatment. The tumor-to-liver/background ratio increased following SSAs therapy. High heterogeneity was observed across the studies, mainly due to inherent diversity of study design, sample size, and scanning technique. Conclusions Based on current evidence, long-acting SSAs therapy before imaging has no effect on the uptake of radiolabeled SSAs at tumor primary sites and metastatic lesions, but results in a significant reduction of uptake in the liver and spleen. These findings may implicate the unnecessary discontinuation of SSAs before radiolabeled SSAs imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rang Wang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Linlin Guo
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Lili Pan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Rong Tian
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Guohua Shen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chahid Y, Chahid F, van de Garde E, Booij J, Verberne HJ, Hendrikse NH. CYP3A4 inhibitors do not influence [ 68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE uptake in liver tissue. EJNMMI Res 2023; 13:84. [PMID: 37736819 PMCID: PMC10516808 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-023-01034-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Youssef Chahid
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Faouzi Chahid
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ewoudt van de Garde
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Booij
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hein J Verberne
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - N Harry Hendrikse
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Chahid Y, Hashimi K, van de Garde EM, Klümpen HJ, Hendrikse NH, Booij J, Verberne HJ. The Influence of Long-Acting Somatostatin Analogs on 68 Ga-DOTATATE Uptake in Patients With Neuroendocrine Tumors. Clin Nucl Med 2023; 48:757-762. [PMID: 37486312 PMCID: PMC10417218 DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000004776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2023] [Revised: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE A high SUV max tumor-to-liver ratio (TLR) of 68 Ga-DOTATATE can be used to select patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). In addition, an SUV max TLR ≥ 8.1 is associated with increased progression-free survival in NET patients treated with somatostatin analogs (SSAs). To avoid a theoretical interaction, several guidelines recommend performing PET/CT just before the monthly administration of long-acting SSAs. We aimed to investigate the effect of SSA on the SUV max of 68 Ga-DOTATATE in patients with NET and to identify independent predictors for high SUV max TLR. PATIENTS AND METHODS For this retrospective study, 192 68 Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT scans of 165 patients without (n = 115) and with (n = 77) SSA (octreotide or lanreotide) in the 3 months before PET/CT were collected and reviewed. The effect of SSA on SUV max values was analyzed by a maximum likelihood mixed model. RESULTS Patients with SSA had a significantly higher median SUV max TLR than patients without SSA (4.7 [IQR], 3.1-7.7) versus 3.2 [IQR, 2.0-5.4]; P < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that SSA use was an independent predictor for SUV max TLR ≥ 8.1 (odds ratio, 2.91; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-6.72; P = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS Our data suggest that higher SSA concentrations do not have a negative effect on 68 Ga-DOTATATE uptake in tumor lesions. In addition, we found that only SSA use was associated with SUV max TLR ≥ 8.1. Our results are consistent with previously conducted studies and in line with the recently published guideline that suggests that the relatively recent use of SSA does not necessitate any delay in 68 Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Youssef Chahid
- From the Departments of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
- Clinical Pharmacy, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam
| | | | - Ewoudt M.W. van de Garde
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht
| | | | - N. Harry Hendrikse
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jan Booij
- From the Departments of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gålne A, Enqvist O, Sundlöv A, Valind K, Minarik D, Trägårdh E. AI-based quantification of whole-body tumour burden on somatostatin receptor PET/CT. Eur J Hybrid Imaging 2023; 7:14. [PMID: 37544941 PMCID: PMC10404578 DOI: 10.1186/s41824-023-00172-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Segmenting the whole-body somatostatin receptor-expressing tumour volume (SRETVwb) on positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) images is highly time-consuming but has shown value as an independent prognostic factor for survival. An automatic method to measure SRETVwb could improve disease status assessment and provide a tool for prognostication. This study aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI)-based method to detect and quantify SRETVwb and total lesion somatostatin receptor expression (TLSREwb) from [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC/TATE PET/CT images. METHODS A UNet3D convolutional neural network (CNN) was used to train an AI model with [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC/TATE PET/CT images, where all tumours were manually segmented with a semi-automatic method. The training set consisted of 148 patients, of which 108 had PET-positive tumours. The test group consisted of 30 patients, of which 25 had PET-positive tumours. Two physicians segmented tumours in the test group for comparison with the AI model. RESULTS There were good correlations between the segmented SRETVwb and TLSREwb by the AI model and the physicians, with Spearman rank correlation coefficients of r = 0.78 and r = 0.73, respectively, for SRETVwb and r = 0.83 and r = 0.81, respectively, for TLSREwb. The sensitivity on a lesion detection level was 80% and 79%, and the positive predictive value was 83% and 84% when comparing the AI model with the two physicians. CONCLUSION It was possible to develop an AI model to segment SRETVwb and TLSREwb with high performance. A fully automated method makes quantification of tumour burden achievable and has the potential to be more widely used when assessing PET/CT images.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anni Gålne
- Department of Medical Imaging and Physiology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
- Department of Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
- WCMM Wallenberg Centre for Molecular Medicine, Lund, Sweden.
| | - Olof Enqvist
- Eigenvision AB, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Anna Sundlöv
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Kristian Valind
- Department of Medical Imaging and Physiology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- WCMM Wallenberg Centre for Molecular Medicine, Lund, Sweden
| | - David Minarik
- Department of Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- WCMM Wallenberg Centre for Molecular Medicine, Lund, Sweden
- Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Elin Trägårdh
- Department of Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- WCMM Wallenberg Centre for Molecular Medicine, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Medical Imaging and Physiology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ensign SF, Agarwal M, Klanderman M, Badawy M, Halfdanarson TR, Johnson DR, Sonbol MB, Kendi AT. Clinical utility of somatostatin receptor positron emission tomography imaging biomarkers for characterization of meningioma among incidental central nervous system lesions. Nucl Med Commun 2023; 44:663-670. [PMID: 37158225 DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000001706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Somatostatin receptor (SSTR) PET imaging is utilized with increasing frequency in the clinical management of neuroendocrine tumors. Incidental PET-avid CNS lesions are commonly noted and presumed to be meningiomas. However, SSTR PET lacks specificity for meningioma identification. This study aimed to clarify the role of SSTR-based imaging in the classification of incidental CNS lesions based on current clinical practice. METHODS Patients who underwent both Ga-68-DOTATATE PET and brain MRI and had an incidental CNS lesion identified with a radiographic prediction of meningioma via one (discordant prediction) or both (concordant prediction) imaging modalities were retrospectively analyzed. Imaging indication, semiquantitative measures, and clinical history were recorded. RESULTS Among 48 patients with a CNS lesion identified on both imaging modalities, most scans were performed for a history of neuroendocrine tumor (64.6%). Cases with concordant lesion-type prediction of meningioma between imaging modalities ( N = 24) displayed a significantly higher SUV max (median 7.9 vs. 4.0; P = 0.008) and Krenning score (median 3.0 vs. 2.0; P = 0.005) on Ga-68-DOTATATE PET compared with cases with a discordant prediction of meningioma ( N = 24). In cases with lower SUV max values, Ga-68-DOTATATE was more likely to discordantly predict meningioma without agreement by the corresponding MRI. Prior cranial radiation or use of somatostatin mimetics did not affect quantitative radiographic measures, and MRI-based tumor size was similar across groups. CONCLUSION Lesions with increased avidity may be more confidently predicted as meningioma in Ga-68-DOTATATE PET scans, whereas there is more discrepancy in prediction among low SUV cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Molly Klanderman
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | - Mohamed Badawy
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | | | - Derek R Johnson
- Department of Radiology
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Morland D, Laures N, Triumbari EKA, Perrier M, Imperiale A, Annunziata S, Rufini V. Impact of Cold Somatostatin Analog Administration on Somatostatin Receptor Imaging: A Systematic Review. Clin Nucl Med 2023; 48:467-473. [PMID: 37133509 PMCID: PMC10184815 DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000004670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The interactions between the administration of cold somatostatin analogs (cSAs) and their radiolabeled counterpart remain unclear, and discontinuation before imaging is still advised as a precaution. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the consequences of cSA administration on tumoral and surrounding healthy organs' uptake at somatostatin receptor (SSTR) imaging with SPECT or PET. METHODS After registration of the study on Prospero (CRD42022360260), an electronic search of PubMed and Scopus databases was performed. Inclusion criteria were as follows: human patients referred for SSTR imaging for oncological purposes; at least 1 examination performed either before cSA administration or after a long-enough withdrawal of cSA treatment; at least 1 examination was performed under cSA treatment. Included articles were independently appraised by 2 authors using the standardized protocol provided by the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. Discrepancies were solved by consensus. RESULTS A total of 12 articles were included, 4 using 111In-pentetreotide and 8 using 68Ga-DOTA peptides. Administration of cSAs consistently resulted in decreased spleen and liver uptake (from 6.9% to 80% for spleen, 10% to 60% for liver) and increased tumor-to-background or tumor-to-healthy organ ratios. After cSA treatment, tumor uptake alone was unchanged or moderately decreased. Similar results were noted whether patient was octreotide-naive. CONCLUSION Impairment in SSTR imaging quality after cSA administration has not been demonstrated. On the contrary, the administration of cSAs seems to improve the contrast between tumoral lesions and the surroundings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Morland
- From the Unità di Medicina Nucleare, GSTeP Radiofarmacia, TracerGLab, Dipartimento di Radiologia, Radioterapia ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Médecine Nucléaire, Institut Godinot
- CReSTIC, EA 3804
- Laboratoire de Biophysique, UFR de Médecine, Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne
| | - Nicolas Laures
- Hépato-Gastro-Entérologie et Cancérologie Digestive
- Unité de Médecine Ambulatoire—Cancérologie Hématologie, CHU de Reims, Reims
| | - Elizabeth Katherine Anna Triumbari
- From the Unità di Medicina Nucleare, GSTeP Radiofarmacia, TracerGLab, Dipartimento di Radiologia, Radioterapia ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Marine Perrier
- Hépato-Gastro-Entérologie et Cancérologie Digestive
- Unité de Médecine Ambulatoire—Cancérologie Hématologie, CHU de Reims, Reims
| | - Alessio Imperiale
- Médecine Nucléaire, Institut de Cancérologie de Strasbourg Europe, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Salvatore Annunziata
- From the Unità di Medicina Nucleare, GSTeP Radiofarmacia, TracerGLab, Dipartimento di Radiologia, Radioterapia ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Vittoria Rufini
- Unità di Medicina Nucleare, Dipartimento di Radiologia, Radioterapia ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS
- Istituto di Medicina Nucleare, Dipartimento di Radiologia, Radioterapia ed Ematologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
- ENETS Center of Excellence for the Diagnosis and Cure of Neuroendocrine Tumors, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Veerman CHAM, Siebinga H, de Vries-Huizing DMV, Tesselaar MET, Hendrikx JJMA, Stokkel MPM, Aalbersberg EA. The effect of long-acting somatostatin analogues on the uptake of [ 177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50:1434-1441. [PMID: 36598536 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-022-06094-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE According to IAEA/EANM/SNMMI guidelines, long-acting somatostatin analogues (LA-SSAs) should be discontinued 4-6 weeks prior to peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) to prevent somatostatin receptor saturation. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of continued use of long-acting SSAs during PRRT on the uptake of [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE on SPECT/CT. METHODS Consecutive patients with neuroendocrine tumours who were treated with PRRT receiving 7.4 GBq of [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE were included. Patients were divided into 3 groups: (1) control (LA-SSA stopped > 6 weeks prior to PRRT), or continued treatment with (2) long-acting octreotide < 6 weeks prior to PRRT, or (3) long-acting lanreotide < 6 weeks prior to PRRT. The uptake of [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE was quantified in healthy tissues (spleen, liver, kidneys, bone marrow) and tumour lesions on SPECT/CT performed 24 h after PRRT. A Mann-Whitney U test was used to determine differences in uptake between the long-acting octreotide and long-acting lanreotide groups compared to the control group. RESULTS Forty-two patients with 135 cycles of PRRT were included: 28 with lanreotide, 50 with octreotide, and 57 cycles without LA-SSAs. Uptake of [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE was significantly decreased in liver parenchyma in patients with lanreotide (p < 0.001) and in the spleen in patients with either octreotide or lanreotide (both p < 0.001). No differences were observed for uptake in kidneys, bone marrow, and blood pool. Uptake of [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE in tumours was the same in patients with lanreotide compared to the control (p = 0.862) and in patients with octreotide compared to the control (p = 0.201), independent of tumour location. CONCLUSION Long-acting octreotide and lanreotide do not interfere with the uptake of [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE in tumour lesions 24 h post-injection. Uptake in healthy liver parenchyma significantly decreases after lanreotide administration prior to PRRT, while uptake in healthy spleen tissue significantly decreases with both octreotide and lanreotide administration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chayenne H A M Veerman
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hinke Siebinga
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daphne M V de Vries-Huizing
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Margot E T Tesselaar
- Department of Medical and Gastrointestinal Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen J M A Hendrikx
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marcel P M Stokkel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Else A Aalbersberg
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hope TA, Allen-Auerbach M, Bodei L, Calais J, Dahlbom M, Dunnwald LK, Graham MM, Jacene HA, Heath CL, Mittra ES, Wright CL, Fendler WP, Herrmann K, Taïeb D, Kjaer A. SNMMI Procedure Standard/EANM Practice Guideline for SSTR PET: Imaging Neuroendocrine Tumors. J Nucl Med 2023; 64:204-210. [PMID: 36725249 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.264860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Revised: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas A Hope
- Department of Radiology, San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, California; .,Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Martin Allen-Auerbach
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Lisa Bodei
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York
| | - Jeremie Calais
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Magnus Dahlbom
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Lisa K Dunnwald
- Department of Radiology, Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Michael M Graham
- Department of Radiology, Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Heather A Jacene
- Department of Imaging, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Courtney Lawhn Heath
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Erik S Mittra
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Chadwick L Wright
- Wright Center of Innovation and Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - David Taïeb
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, La Timone University Hospital, CERIMED, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France; and
| | - Andreas Kjaer
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine & PET and Cluster for Molecular Imaging, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Rigshospitalet and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
A personal acquisition time regimen of 68Ga-DOTATATE total-body PET/CT in patients with neuroendocrine tumor (NET): a feasibility study. Cancer Imaging 2022; 22:78. [PMID: 36578034 PMCID: PMC9798642 DOI: 10.1186/s40644-022-00517-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The injection activity of tracer, acquisition time, patient-specific photon attenuation, and large body mass, can influence on image quality. Fixed acquisition time and body mass related injection activity in clinical practice results in a large difference in image quality. Thus, this study proposes a patient-specific acquisition time regimen of 68 Ga-DOTATATE total-body positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) to counteract the influence of body mass (BM, kg) on image quality, and acquire an acceptable and constant image of patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). METHODS The development cohort consisting of 19 consecutive patients with full activity (88.7-204.9 MBq, 2.0 ± 0.1 MBq/kg) was to establish the acquisition time regimen. The liver SNR (signal-to-noise ratio, SNRL) was normalized (SNRnorm) by the product of injected activity (MBq) and acquisition time (min). Fitting of SNRnorm against body mass (BM, kg) in linear correlation was performed. Subjective assessment of image quality was performed using a 5-point Likert scale to determine the acceptable threshold of SNRL, and an optimized acquisition regimen based on BM was proposed, and validated its feasibility through the validation cohort of 57 consecutive NET patients with half activity (66.9 ± 11.3 MBq, 1.0 ± 0.1 MBq/kg) and a fixed acquisition time regimen. RESULTS The linear correlation (R2 = 0.63) between SNRnorm and BM (kg) was SNRnorm = -0.01*BM + 1.50. The threshold SNRL of acceptable image quality was 11.2. The patient-specific variable acquisition time regimen was determined as: t (min) = 125.4/(injective activity)*(-0.01*BM + 1.50)2. Based on that proposed regimen, the average acquisition time for acceptable image quality in the validation cohort was 2.99 ± 0.91 min, ranging from 2.18 to 6.35 min, which was reduced by 36.50% ~ 78.20% compared with the fixed acquisition time of 10 min. Subjective evaluation showed that acceptable image quality could be obtained at 3.00 min in the validation group, with an average subjective score of 3.44 ± 0.53 (kappa = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.96 ~ 0.98). Bland-Altman analysis revealed good agreement between the proposed regimen and the fixed acquisition time cohort. CONCLUSION A patient-specific acquisition time regimen was proposed in NET patients in development cohort and validated its feasibility in patients with NETs in validation cohort by 68 Ga-DOTATATE total-body PET/CT imaging. Based on the proposed regimen, the homogenous image quality with optimal acquisition time was available independent of body mass.
Collapse
|
17
|
Stenvall A, Gustafsson J, Larsson E, Roth D, Sundlöv A, Jönsson L, Hindorf C, Ohlsson T, Sjögreen Gleisner K. Relationships between uptake of [ 68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE and absorbed dose in [ 177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE therapy. EJNMMI Res 2022; 12:75. [PMID: 36534192 PMCID: PMC9763525 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-022-00947-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Somatostatin receptor 68Ga PET imaging is standard for evaluation of a patient's suitability for 177Lu peptide receptor radionuclide therapy of neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). The 68Ga PET serves to ensure sufficient somatostatin receptor expression, commonly evaluated qualitatively. The aim of this study is to investigate the quantitative relationships between uptake in 68Ga PET and absorbed doses in 177Lu therapy. METHOD Eighteen patients underwent [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET imaging within 20 weeks prior to their first cycle of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE. Absorbed doses for therapy were estimated for tumours, kidney, spleen, and normal liver parenchyma using a hybrid SPECT/CT-planar method. Gallium-68 activity concentrations were retrieved from PET images and also used to calculate SUVs and normalized SUVs, using blood and tissue for normalization. The 68Ga activity concentrations per injected activity, SUVs, and normalized SUVs were compared with 177Lu activity concentrations 1 d post-injection and 177Lu absorbed doses. For tumours, for which there was a variable number per patient, both inter- and intra-patient correlations were analysed. Furthermore, the prediction of 177Lu tumour absorbed doses based on a combination of tumour-specific 68Ga activity concentrations and group-based estimates of the effective half-lives for grade 1 and 2 NETs was explored. RESULTS For normal organs, only spleen showed a significant correlation between the 68Ga activity concentration and 177Lu absorbed dose (r = 0.6). For tumours, significant, but moderate, correlations were obtained, with respect to both inter-patient (r = 0.7) and intra-patient (r = 0.45) analyses. The correlations to absorbed doses did not improve when using 68Ga SUVs or normalized SUVs. The relationship between activity uptakes for 68Ga PET and 177Lu SPECT was stronger, with correlation coefficients r = 0.8 for both inter- and intra-patient analyses. The 177Lu absorbed dose to tumour could be predicted from the 68Ga activity concentrations with a 95% coverage interval of - 65% to 248%. CONCLUSIONS On a group level, a high uptake of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE is associated with high absorbed doses at 177Lu-DOTA-TATE therapy, but the relationship has a limited potential with respect to individual absorbed dose planning. Using SUV or SUV normalized to reference tissues do not improve correlations compared with using activity concentration per injected activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Stenvall
- grid.4514.40000 0001 0930 2361Medical Radiation Physics, Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden ,grid.411843.b0000 0004 0623 9987Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Johan Gustafsson
- grid.4514.40000 0001 0930 2361Medical Radiation Physics, Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Erik Larsson
- grid.411843.b0000 0004 0623 9987Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Daniel Roth
- grid.4514.40000 0001 0930 2361Medical Radiation Physics, Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Anna Sundlöv
- grid.4514.40000 0001 0930 2361Division of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Lena Jönsson
- grid.4514.40000 0001 0930 2361Medical Radiation Physics, Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden ,grid.411843.b0000 0004 0623 9987Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Cecilia Hindorf
- grid.4514.40000 0001 0930 2361Medical Radiation Physics, Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden ,grid.24381.3c0000 0000 9241 5705Department of Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Tomas Ohlsson
- grid.411843.b0000 0004 0623 9987Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Wong KK, Frey KA, Niedbala J, Kaza RK, Worden FP, Fitzpatrick KJ, Dewaraja YK. Differences in tumor-to-normal organ SUV ratios measured with 68 Ga-DOTATATE PET compared with 177 Lu-DOTATATE SPECT in patients with neuroendocrine tumors. Nucl Med Commun 2022; 43:892-900. [PMID: 35703269 PMCID: PMC9288505 DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000001592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Our goal is to quantitatively compare radiotracer biodistributions within tumors and major normal organs on pretherapy 68 Ga-DOTATATE PET to post-therapy 177 Lu-DOTATATE single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in patients receiving peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). METHODS PET/CT at ~ 60 min postinjection of Ga-68 DOTATATE and research 177 Lu-SPECT/CT imaging ~ at 4 h (SPECT1) and ~ 24 h (SPECT2) post-cycle#1 were available. Manual contours of lesions on baseline CT or MRI were applied to co-registered SPECT/CT and PET/CT followed by deep learning-based CT auto-segmentation of organs. Tumor-to-normal organ ratios (TNR) were calculated from standardized uptake values (SUV) mean and SUV peak for tumor, and SUV mean for non-tumoral liver (nliver), spleen and kidney. RESULTS There were 90 lesons in 24 patients with progressive metastatic neuroendocrine tumor. The correlation between PET and SPECT SUV TNRs were poor/moderate: PET versus SPECT1 R 2 = 0.19, 0.21, 0.29; PET versus SPECT2 R 2 = 0.06, 0.16, 0.33 for TNR nliver ,TNR spleen ,TNR kidney , respectively. Across all patients, the average value of the TNR measured on PET was significantly lower than on SPECT at both time points ( P < 0.001). Using SUV mean for tumor, average TNR values and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were PET: TNR nliver = 3.5 [CI: 3.0-3.9], TNR spleen = 1.3 [CI, 1.2-1.5], TNR kidney = 1.7 [CI: 1.6-1.9]; SPECT1: TNR nliver = 10 [CI: 8.2-11.7], TNR spleen = 2.9 [CI: 2.5-3.4], TNR kidney = 2.8 [CI: 2.3-3.3]; SPECT2: TNR nliver = 16.9 [CI: 14-19.9], TNR spleen = 3.6 [CI: 3-4.2], TNR kidney = 3.6 [CI: 3.0-4.2]. Comparison of PET and SPECT results in a sphere phantom study demonstrated that these differences are not attributed to imaging modality. CONCLUSIONS Differences in TNR exist for the theranostic pair, with significantly higher SUV TNR on 177 Lu SPECT compared with 68 Ga PET. We postulate this phenomenon is due to temporal differences in DOTATATE uptake and internalization in tumor as compared to normal organs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ka Kit Wong
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109
| | - Kirk A. Frey
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109
| | - Jeremy Niedbala
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109
| | - Ravi K. Kaza
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109
| | - Francis P. Worden
- Department of Endocrine Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109
| | - Kellen J. Fitzpatrick
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109
| | - Yuni K. Dewaraja
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Imaging of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Monitoring Treatment Response—AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2022; 218:767-780. [DOI: 10.2214/ajr.21.27159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
20
|
Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy Targeting the Somatostatin Receptor: Basic Principles, Clinical Applications and Optimization Strategies. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 14:cancers14010129. [PMID: 35008293 PMCID: PMC8749814 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14010129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2021] [Revised: 12/13/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a systemic treatment consisting of the administration of a tumor-targeting radiopharmaceutical into the circulation of a patient. The radiopharmaceutical will bind to a specific peptide receptor leading to tumor-specific binding and retention. This will subsequently cause lethal DNA damage to the tumor cell. The only target that is currently used in widespread clinical practice is the somatostatin receptor, which is overexpressed on a range of tumor cells, including neuroendocrine tumors and neural-crest derived tumors. Academia played an important role in the development of PRRT, which has led to heterogeneous literature over the last two decades, as no standard radiopharmaceutical or regimen has been available for a long time. This review focuses on the basic principles and clinical applications of PRRT, and discusses several PRRT-optimization strategies. Abstract Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) consists of the administration of a tumor-targeting radiopharmaceutical into the circulation of a patient. The radiopharmaceutical will bind to a specific peptide receptor leading to tumor-specific binding and retention. The only target that is currently used in clinical practice is the somatostatin receptor (SSTR), which is overexpressed on a range of tumor cells, including neuroendocrine tumors and neural-crest derived tumors. Academia played an important role in the development of PRRT, which has led to heterogeneous literature over the last two decades, as no standard radiopharmaceutical or regimen has been available for a long time. This review provides a summary of the treatment efficacy (e.g., response rates and symptom-relief), impact on patient outcome and toxicity profile of PRRT performed with different generations of SSTR-targeting radiopharmaceuticals, including the landmark randomized-controlled trial NETTER-1. In addition, multiple optimization strategies for PRRT are discussed, i.e., the dose–effect concept, dosimetry, combination therapies (i.e., tandem/duo PRRT, chemoPRRT, targeted molecular therapy, somatostatin analogues and radiosensitizers), new radiopharmaceuticals (i.e., SSTR-antagonists, Evans-blue containing vector molecules and alpha-emitters), administration route (intra-arterial versus intravenous) and response prediction via molecular testing or imaging. The evolution and continuous refinement of PRRT resulted in many lessons for the future development of radionuclide therapy aimed at other targets and tumor types.
Collapse
|
21
|
Jahn U, Ilan E, Velikyan I, Fröss-Baron K, Lubberink M, Sundin A. Receptor depletion and recovery in small-intestinal neuroendocrine tumors and normal tissues after administration of a single intravenous dose of octreotide measured by 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT. EJNMMI Res 2021; 11:118. [PMID: 34822040 PMCID: PMC8617112 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-021-00860-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low-grade neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are characterized by an abundance of somatostatin receptors (SSTR) that can be targeted with somatostatin analogs (SSA). When activated with a single dose of SSA, the receptor-ligand complex is internalized, and the receptor is by default recycled within 24 h. Ongoing medication with long-acting SSAs at 68Ga-DOTA-SSA-PET has been shown to increase the tumor-to-normal organ contrast. This study was performed to investigate the time-dependent extended effect (7 h) of a single intravenous dose of 400 µg short-acting octreotide on the tumor versus normal tissue uptake of 68Ga-DOTATOC. METHODS Patients with small-intestinal NETs received a single intravenous dose of 400 µg octreotide and underwent dynamic abdominal 68Ga-DOTATOC-PET/CT at three sessions (0, 3 and 6 h) plus static whole-body (WB) PET/CT (1, 4 and 7 h), starting each PET/CT session by administering 167 ± 21 MBq, 23.5 ± 4.2 µg (mean ± SD, n = 12) of 68Ga-DOTATOC. A previously acquired clinical whole-body 68Ga-DOTATOC scan was used as baseline. SUV and net uptake rate Ki were calculated in tumors, and SUV in healthy organs. RESULTS Tumor SUV decreased significantly from baseline to 1 h post-injection but subsequently increased over time and became similar to baseline at 4 h and 7 h. The tumor net uptake rate, Ki, similarly increased significantly over time and showed a linear correlation both with SUV and tumor-to-blood ratio. By contrast, the uptake in liver, spleen and pancreas remained significantly below baseline levels also at 7 h and the receptor turn-over in tumors thus exceeded that in the normal tissue, with restitution of tumor 68Ga-DOTATOC uptake mainly completed at 7 h. These results however differed depending on tumor size, with significant increases in Ki and SUV between the 1st and 2nd PET, in large tumors (≥ 4 mL) but not in small (> 1 to < 4 mL) tumors. CONCLUSION SSTR recycling is faster in small-intestinal NETs than in liver, spleen and pancreas. This opens the possibility to protect normal tissues during PRRT by administering a single dose of cold peptide hours before peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), and most likely additionally improve the availability and uptake of the therapeutic preparation in the tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulrika Jahn
- Radiology and Molecular Imaging, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. .,Uppsala University Hospital, 75185, Uppsala, Sweden.
| | - Ezgi Ilan
- Radiology and Molecular Imaging, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.,Uppsala University Hospital, 75185, Uppsala, Sweden.,Medical Physics, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Irina Velikyan
- Radiology and Molecular Imaging, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.,Uppsala University Hospital, 75185, Uppsala, Sweden.,Medical Imaging Centre, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Katarzyna Fröss-Baron
- Radiology and Molecular Imaging, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.,Uppsala University Hospital, 75185, Uppsala, Sweden.,Medical Imaging Centre, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Mark Lubberink
- Radiology and Molecular Imaging, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.,Uppsala University Hospital, 75185, Uppsala, Sweden.,Medical Physics, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Anders Sundin
- Radiology and Molecular Imaging, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.,Uppsala University Hospital, 75185, Uppsala, Sweden.,Medical Imaging Centre, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Geenen L, Nonnekens J, Konijnenberg M, Baatout S, De Jong M, Aerts A. Overcoming nephrotoxicity in peptide receptor radionuclide therapy using [ 177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE for the treatment of neuroendocrine tumours. Nucl Med Biol 2021; 102-103:1-11. [PMID: 34242948 DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2021.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2021] [Revised: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is used for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastasized somatostatin receptor type 2 (SSTR2)-expressing gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NETs). The radiolabelled somatostatin analogue [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE delivers its radiation dose to SSTR2-overexpressing tumour cells, resulting in selective cell killing during radioactive decay. While tumour control can be achieved in many patients, complete remissions remain rare, causing the majority of patients to relapse after a certain period of time. This raises the question whether the currently fixed treatment regime (4 × 7.4 GBq) leaves room for dose escalation as a means of improving therapy efficacy. The kidneys have shown to play an important role in defining a patient's tolerability to PRRT. As a consequence of the proximal tubular reabsorption of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE, via the endocytic megalin/cubilin receptor complex, the radionuclides are retained in the renal interstitium. This results in extended retention of radioactivity in the kidneys, generating a risk for the development of radiation nephropathy. In addition, a decreased kidney function has shown to be associated with a prolonged circulation of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE, causing increased irradiation to the bone marrow. This can on its turn lead to myelosuppression and haematological toxicity, owing to the marked radio sensitivity of the rapidly proliferating cells in the bone marrow. In contrast to external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), the exact absorbed dose limits for these critical organs (kidneys and bone marrow) in PRRT with [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE are still unclear. Better insights into these uncertainties, can help in optimizing PRRT to reach its maximum therapeutic potential, while avoiding severe adverse events, like nephropathy and hematologic toxicities. In this review we focus on the nephrotoxic effects of PRRT with [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE for the treatment of GEP-NETs. If the absorbed dose to the kidneys can be lowered, higher activities can be administered, enlarging the therapeutic window for PRRT. Therefore, we evaluated the renal protective potential of current and promising future strategies and discuss the importance of (renal) dosimetry in PRRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorain Geenen
- Radiobiology Unit, Interdisciplinary Biosciences, Institute for Environment, Health and Safety, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK CEN), Mol, Belgium; Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Julie Nonnekens
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Molecular Genetics, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Oncode Institute, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mark Konijnenberg
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud UMC, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Sarah Baatout
- Radiobiology Unit, Interdisciplinary Biosciences, Institute for Environment, Health and Safety, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK CEN), Mol, Belgium; Department of Molecular Biotechnology, Faculty of Bioengineering Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium.
| | - Marion De Jong
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - An Aerts
- Radiobiology Unit, Interdisciplinary Biosciences, Institute for Environment, Health and Safety, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK CEN), Mol, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Lodge MA, Solnes LB, Chaudhry MA, Wahl RL. Prospective Within-Patient Assessment of the Impact of an Unlabeled Octreotide Pre-dose on the Biodistribution and Tumor Uptake of 68Ga DOTATOC as Assessed by Dynamic Whole-body PET in Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors: Implications for Diagnosis and Therapy. Mol Imaging Biol 2021; 23:766-774. [PMID: 33829361 DOI: 10.1007/s11307-021-01600-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Revised: 03/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP NETs) are often associated with high expression of somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) which allows for PET/CT imaging with radiolabeled somatostatin analogs such as 68Ga-DOTATOC. The interplay between 68Ga-DOTATOC and the synthetic somatostatin analogs commonly used to manage patient symptoms may lead to competition between the labelled and unlabeled peptides for receptor binding sites and current product labelling recommends patients be taken off somatostatin analogs before imaging. In this study, we prospectively investigated in human patients the effect of a pre-dose of octreotide, a short-acting somatostatin analog, on the distribution of 68Ga-DOTATOC in GEP NETs and normal organs. PROCEDURE Research participants with GEP NETs were studied on two occasions using dynamic whole-body 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT. The two imaging studies were performed within 21 days of each other, using an identical acquisition protocol except for the administration of 50 μg of short-acting octreotide (pre-dose) immediately before the second PET/CT. Paired t-tests were used to compare tracer uptake with and without octreotide, for tumor and various normal organs. RESULTS Seven participants with a mean age of 53 ± 10 years were studied. Octreotide pre-dosing decreased radiotracer uptake in the normal liver and spleen by 25 % (p = 0.04) and 47 % (p = 0.05) respectively but did not significantly change uptake in tumor (p = 0.53), red marrow (p = 0.12), kidneys (p =0.57), or pituitary gland (p = 0.27). CONCLUSIONS Our data indicate SSTR imaging can be improved with a pre-dose of unlabeled octreotide given just prior to injection of the radiotracer. These data suggest there may be no need to discontinue somatostatin analog therapy prior to PET/CT with 68Ga-DOTATOC, allowing for a simpler, less disruptive patient protocol. This approach warrants further study in a variety of settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin A Lodge
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
| | - Lilja B Solnes
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Muhammad A Chaudhry
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Richard L Wahl
- The Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Minczeles NS, Hofland J, de Herder WW, Brabander T. Strategies Towards Improving Clinical Outcomes of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy. Curr Oncol Rep 2021; 23:46. [PMID: 33721105 PMCID: PMC7960621 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-021-01037-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with [177Lu-DOTA0,Tyr3] octreotate is an effective and safe second- or third-line treatment option for patients with low-grade advanced gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN). In this review, we will focus on possible extensions of the current use of PRRT and on new approaches which could further improve its treatment efficacy and safety. RECENT FINDINGS Promising results were published regarding PRRT in other NENs, including lung NENs or high-grade NENs, and applying PRRT as neoadjuvant or salvage therapy. Furthermore, a diversity of strategic approaches, including dosimetry, somatostatin receptor antagonists, somatostatin receptor upregulation, radiosensitization, different radionuclides, albumin binding, alternative renal protection, and liver-directed therapy in combination with PRRT, have the potential to improve the outcome of PRRT. Also, novel biomarkers are presented that could predict response to PRRT. Multiple preclinical and early clinical studies have shown encouraging potential to advance the clinical outcome of PRRT in NEN patients. However, at this moment, most of these strategies have not yet reached the clinical setting of randomized phase III trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N S Minczeles
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, Erasmus MC and Erasmus MC Cancer Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- ENETS Center of Excellence Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Hofland
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, Erasmus MC and Erasmus MC Cancer Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- ENETS Center of Excellence Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - W W de Herder
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, Erasmus MC and Erasmus MC Cancer Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- ENETS Center of Excellence Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - T Brabander
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
- ENETS Center of Excellence Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Sundlöv A, Sjögreen-Gleisner K. Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy - Prospects for Personalised Treatment. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2020; 33:92-97. [PMID: 33189510 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2020.10.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2020] [Revised: 10/03/2020] [Accepted: 10/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy is a type of molecular radiotherapy that has been used in the treatment of patients with neuroendocrine tumours for over two decades. It is not until recently, however, that it has achieved regulatory approval. The currently approved treatment regimen is a one-size-fits-all scheme, i.e. all patients receive a fixed activity of the radiopharmaceutical (177Lu-DOTATATE) and a fixed number of treatment cycles. Several research groups around the world have studied different approaches of further improving on the results of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, with many promising retrospective and prospective clinical studies having been published over the years. In this overview, we summarise some of the most promising strategies identified so far.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Sundlöv
- Department of Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; Department of Medical Radiation Physics, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
| | - K Sjögreen-Gleisner
- Department of Medical Radiation Physics, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Biodistribution and first clinical results of 18F-SiFAlin-TATE PET: a novel 18F-labeled somatostatin analog for imaging of neuroendocrine tumors. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2019; 47:870-880. [DOI: 10.1007/s00259-019-04501-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2019] [Accepted: 08/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|