1
|
Wang Y, Dong L, Zhao H, Li L, Huang G, Xue W, Liu J, Chen R. The superior detection rate of total-body [ 68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT compared to short axial field-of-view [ 68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for early recurrent prostate cancer patients with PSA < 0.2 ng/mL after radical prostatectomy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2024; 51:2484-2494. [PMID: 38514483 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06674-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 03/03/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET imaging has been extensively utilized for the detection of biochemical recurrence (BCR) in prostate cancer. However, the detection rate declines to merely 10-40% when PSA levels are < 0.2 ng/mL employing short axial field-of-view (SAFOV) PET. Prior studies exhibited superior detection rates with total-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET compared to SAFOV [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET in BCR patients with PSA > 0.2 ng/mL. Nevertheless, the diagnostic utility of total-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET for BCR patients when PSA is < 0.2 ng/mL remains unclear. This study aimed to assess whether total-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT could improve the detection rate compared to SAFOV [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in BCR patients with PSA < 0.2 ng/mL. METHODS Eighty BCR patients with PSA < 0.2 ng/mL underwent total-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. These patients were matched by baseline qualities to another 80 patients who received SAFOV [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. The detection rates of total-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and SAFOV [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT were compared utilizing a chi-square test and stratified analysis. Image quality of total-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT and SAFOV [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT was assessed based on subjective scoring and objective parameters. The objective parameters measured were SUVmax, SUVmean, standard deviation (SD) of SUV, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of liver and gluteus maximus. RESULTS The image quality of total-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT was superior to that of SAFOV [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in both early and delayed scans. The detection rate of total-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT for BCR patients with PSA < 0.2 ng/mL was significantly higher than that of SAFOV [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT (73.75% vs. 43.75%, P < 0.001). Total-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT resulted in noteworthy modifications to the treatment regimen when contrasted with SAFOV [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. CONCLUSIONS In BCR patients with PSA < 0.2 ng/mL, total-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT not only demonstrated a significantly higher detection rate compared to SAFOV [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT but also led to significant alterations in treatment regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yining Wang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160 Pujian Road, Shanghai, 200127, China
| | - Liang Dong
- Department of Urology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Haitao Zhao
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160 Pujian Road, Shanghai, 200127, China
| | - Lianghua Li
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160 Pujian Road, Shanghai, 200127, China
| | - Gang Huang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160 Pujian Road, Shanghai, 200127, China
| | - Wei Xue
- Department of Urology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jianjun Liu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160 Pujian Road, Shanghai, 200127, China.
| | - Ruohua Chen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160 Pujian Road, Shanghai, 200127, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dullea A, O'Sullivan L, O'Brien KK, Carrigan M, Ahern S, McGarry M, Harrington P, Walsh KA, Smith SM, Ryan M. Diagnostic Accuracy of 18F-Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) PET/CT Radiotracers in Staging and Restaging of Patients With High-Risk Prostate Cancer or Biochemical Recurrence: An Overview of Reviews. Semin Nucl Med 2024:S0001-2998(24)00044-8. [PMID: 38906759 DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2024.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2024] [Accepted: 05/03/2024] [Indexed: 06/23/2024]
Abstract
The aim of this overview was to consolidate existing evidence syntheses and provide a comprehensive overview of the evidence for 18F-prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT in the staging of high-risk prostate cancer and restaging after biochemical recurrence. An overview of reviews was performed and reported in line with the preferred reporting items for overview of reviews (PRIOR) statement and synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) reporting guidelines. A comprehensive database and grey literature search were conducted up to July 18, 2023. Systematic reviews were assessed using the risk of bias in systematic reviews (ROBIS) tool. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluations (GRADE). 11 systematic reviews were identified; 10 were at high or unclear risk of bias. Evidence reported on a per-patient, per-lymph node, and per-lesion basis for sensitivity, specificity and overall accuracy was identified. There was a lack of data on dose, adverse events and evidence directly comparing 18F-PSMA PET/CT to other imaging modalities. Evidence with moderate to very low certainty indicated high sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 18F-PSMA PET/CT in patients with high-risk prostate cancer and biochemical recurrence. There was considerably lower certainty evidence and greater variability in effect estimates for outcomes for the combined intermediate/high-risk cohort. While evidence gaps remain for some outcomes, and most systematic reviews were at high or unclear risk of bias, the current evidence base is broadly supportive of 18F-PSMA PET/CT imaging in the staging and restaging of patients with high-risk prostate cancer and biochemical recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Dullea
- Discipline of Public Health & Primary Care, School of Medicine, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland; Health Technology Assessment Directorate, Health Information and Quality Authority, Cork, Ireland.
| | - Lydia O'Sullivan
- Health Technology Assessment Directorate, Health Information and Quality Authority, Cork, Ireland; Health Research Board-Trials Methodology Research Network, College of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Galway, County Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Kirsty K O'Brien
- Health Technology Assessment Directorate, Health Information and Quality Authority, Cork, Ireland
| | - Marie Carrigan
- Health Technology Assessment Directorate, Health Information and Quality Authority, Cork, Ireland
| | - Susan Ahern
- Health Technology Assessment Directorate, Health Information and Quality Authority, Cork, Ireland
| | - Maeve McGarry
- Health Technology Assessment Directorate, Health Information and Quality Authority, Cork, Ireland
| | - Patricia Harrington
- Health Technology Assessment Directorate, Health Information and Quality Authority, Cork, Ireland
| | - Kieran A Walsh
- Health Technology Assessment Directorate, Health Information and Quality Authority, Cork, Ireland; School of Pharmacy, University College Cork, County Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Susan M Smith
- Discipline of Public Health & Primary Care, School of Medicine, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Máirín Ryan
- Health Technology Assessment Directorate, Health Information and Quality Authority, Cork, Ireland; Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rizzo A, Morbelli S, Albano D, Fornarini G, Cioffi M, Laudicella R, Dondi F, Grimaldi S, Bertagna F, Racca M, Treglia G, Bauckneht M. The Homunculus of unspecific bone uptakes associated with PSMA-targeted tracers: a systematic review-based definition. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2024:10.1007/s00259-024-06797-5. [PMID: 38884773 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06797-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 06/05/2024] [Indexed: 06/18/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA)-targeted Positron Emission Tomography (PET) has revolutionised prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis and treatment, offering superior diagnostic accuracy over traditional methods and enabling theragnostic applications. However, a significant diagnostic challenge has emerged with identifying unspecific bone uptakes (UBUs), which could lead to over-staging and inappropriate treatment decisions if misinterpreted. This systematic review explores the phenomenon of UBUs in PCa patients undergoing PSMA-PET imaging. METHODS Studies assessing the prevalence, topographical distribution, and potential clinical implications of UBUs were selected according to the Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) method and evaluated with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool. RESULTS The percentage of PCa patients with UBUs on PSMA-PET scans ranged from 0 to 71.7%, depending on the radiopharmaceutical used, with [18F]PSMA-1007 showing the highest incidence. The ribs are the primary site of UBUs across all PSMA-targeted radiopharmaceuticals. The spine is the second most frequent UBU site for [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11, [18F]DCFPyL, [18F]rhPSMA-7, while the pelvic girdle represents the second most frequent site for [18F]PSMA-1007. The average maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) of UBUs varied from 3.4 to 7.7 and was generally lower than that of bone metastases. CONCLUSIONS Our findings underscore the need for heightened awareness and precise interpretation of UBUs to avoid potential over-staging and subsequent inappropriate treatment decisions. Considering the radiopharmaceutical used, PET-derived semiquantitative parameters, the topographical distribution of UBUs, and accurately evaluating the pre-test probability based on clinical and laboratory parameters may aid nuclear medicine physicians in interpreting PSMA-PET findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessio Rizzo
- Nuclear Medicine, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Turin, Italy
| | - Silvia Morbelli
- Nuclear Medicine, AOU Città Della Salute e Della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
- University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Domenico Albano
- Nuclear Medicine, ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
- Radiological Sciences and Public Health Department, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | | | | | - Riccardo Laudicella
- Nuclear Medicine, Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morpho-Functional Imaging, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Francesco Dondi
- Nuclear Medicine, ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
- Radiological Sciences and Public Health Department, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Serena Grimaldi
- Nuclear Medicine, AOU Città Della Salute e Della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Bertagna
- Nuclear Medicine, ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
- Radiological Sciences and Public Health Department, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Manuela Racca
- Nuclear Medicine, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Turin, Italy
| | - Giorgio Treglia
- Nuclear Medicine, Imaging Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland
- Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Matteo Bauckneht
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.
- Nuclear Medicine, Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genova, Genova, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Oldan JD, Almaguel F, Voter AF, Duran A, Gafita A, Pomper MG, Hope TA, Rowe SP. PSMA-Targeted Radiopharmaceuticals for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy. Cancer J 2024; 30:176-184. [PMID: 38753752 DOI: 10.1097/ppo.0000000000000718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/18/2024]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common noncutaneous malignancy in men. Until recent years, accurate imaging of men with newly diagnosed PCa, or recurrent or low-volume metastatic disease, was limited. Further, therapeutic options for men with advanced, metastatic, castration-resistant disease were increasingly limited as a result of increasing numbers of systemic therapies being combined in the upfront metastatic setting. The advent of urea-based, small-molecule inhibitors of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) has partially addressed those shortcomings in diagnosis and therapy of PCa. On the diagnostic side, there are multiple pivotal phase III trials with several different agents having demonstrated utility in the initial staging setting, with generally modest sensitivity but very high specificity for determining otherwise-occult pelvic nodal involvement. That latter statistic drives the utility of the scan by allowing imaging interpreters to read with very high sensitivity while maintaining a robust specificity. Other pivotal phase III trials have demonstrated high detection efficiency in patients with biochemical failure, with high positive predictive value at the lesion level, opening up possible new avenues of therapy such as metastasis-directed therapy. Beyond the diagnostic aspects of PSMA-targeted radiotracers, the same urea-based chemical scaffolds can be altered to deliver therapeutic isotopes to PCa cells that express PSMA. To date, one such agent, when combined with best standard-of-care therapy, has demonstrated an ability to improve overall survival, progression-free survival, and freedom from skeletal events relative to best standard-of-care therapy alone in men with metastatic, castration-resistant PCa who are post chemotherapy. Within the current milieu, there are a number of important future directions including the use of artificial intelligence to better leverage diagnostic findings, further medicinal chemistry refinements to the urea-based structure that may allow improved tumor targeting and decreased toxicities, and the incorporation of new radionuclides that may better balance efficacy with toxicities than those nuclides that are available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorge D Oldan
- From the Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Frankis Almaguel
- Department of Radiology, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA
| | - Andrew F Voter
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Alfonso Duran
- Department of Radiology, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA
| | - Andrei Gafita
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Martin G Pomper
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Thomas A Hope
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Steven P Rowe
- From the Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Luo L, Wang Z, Wang X, Gao J, Zheng A, Duan X. Fluorine-18 prostate-specific membrane antigen-1007-avid indeterminate bone lesions in prostate cancer: clinical and PET/CT features to predict outcomes and prognosis. Clin Radiol 2024; 79:346-353. [PMID: 38216370 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2023.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Revised: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/14/2024]
Abstract
AIM To determine clinical and fluorine-18 prostate-specific membrane antigen-1007 (18F-PSMA-1007) integrated positron-emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) features that could be used to interpret indeterminate bone lesions (IBLs) and assess the prognosis of prostate cancer (PCa) in patients with IBLs. MATERIALS AND METHODS Consecutive patients who underwent PSMA PET/CT were analysed retrospectively. IBLs were identified as benign or malignant based on follow-up imaging and clinical management. Lesion- and patient-based assessments were performed to define features predictive of bone lesion results and determine clinical risk. Patients' prognosis was analysed based on clinical characteristics, including prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP), respectively. RESULTS A total of 105 patients (mean age ± SD, 72.1 ± 8 years) were evaluated and 158 IBLs were identified. Fifty-three (33.5%), 36 (22.8%), and 69 (43.7%) IBLs were benign, malignant, and equivocal, respectively. Variables including location, maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax), and lymph node metastases (LNM) were related to the benignancy or malignancy of IBLs (p=0.046, p<0.001 and p<0.001, respectively). Regression analysis indicated that LNM, SUVmax, and location of IBLs could be predictors of lesion interpretation (p<0.001, p=0.002 and p=0.035). Patients with benign IBLs experienced the most considerable decreases in PSA and ALP levels. CONCLUSIONS LNM, SUVmax, and location may contribute to IBL interpretation. A rapid decrease in PSA and ALP levels might suggest a better prognosis for patients with benign IBLs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Luo
- PET/CT Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Z Wang
- PET/CT Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - X Wang
- PET/CT Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - J Gao
- PET/CT Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - A Zheng
- PET/CT Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - X Duan
- PET/CT Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Popescu CE, Zhang B, Sartoretti T, Spielhofer N, Skawran S, Heimer J, Messerli M, Sauter A, Huellner MW, Kaufmann PA, Burger IA, Maurer A. Evaluating the biodistribution for [ 68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and [ 18F]F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT with an inter- and intrapatient based analysis. EJNMMI Res 2024; 14:36. [PMID: 38578516 PMCID: PMC10997563 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-024-01097-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2024] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver uptake in [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET is used as an internal reference in addition to clinical parameters to select patients for [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy (RLT). Due to increased demand, [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 was replaced by [18F]F-PSMA-1007, a more lipophilic tracer with different biodistribution and splenic uptake was suggested as a new internal reference. We compared the intra-patient tracer distribution between [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and [18F]F-PSMA-1007. METHODS Fifty patients who underwent PET examinations in two centers with both [18F]F-PSMA-1007 and [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 within one year were included. Mean standardized uptake values (SUVmean) were obtained for liver, spleen, salivary glands, blood pool, and bone. Primary tumor, local recurrence, lymph node, bone or visceral metastasis were also assessed for intra- and inter-individual comparison. RESULTS Liver SUVmean was significantly higher with [18F]F-PSMA-1007 (11.7 ± 3.9) compared to [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 (5.4 ± 1.7, p < .05) as well as splenic SUVmean (11.2 ± 3.5 vs.8.1 ± 3.5, p < .05). The blood pool was comparable between the two scans. Malignant lesions did not show higher SUVmean on [18F]F-PSMA-1007. Intra-individual comparison of liver uptake between the two scans showed a linear association for liver uptake with SUVmean [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 = 0.33 x SUVmean [18F]F-PSMA-1007 + 1.52 (r = .78, p < .001). CONCLUSION Comparing biodistribution of [68Ga]Ga and [18F]F tracers, liver uptake on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET is the most robust internal reference value. Liver uptake of [18F]F-PSMA-1007 was significantly higher, but so was the splenic uptake. The strong intra-individual association of hepatic accumulation between the two scans may allow using of a conversion factor for [18F]F-PSMA-1007 as a basis for RLT selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina E Popescu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Baden, Baden, Switzerland
| | - Boya Zhang
- Department of Health Sciences and technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Sartoretti
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, CH-8091, Switzerland
| | - Noel Spielhofer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Baden, Baden, Switzerland
| | - Stephan Skawran
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, CH-8091, Switzerland
| | - Jakob Heimer
- Department of Mathematics, Seminar for Statistics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michael Messerli
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, CH-8091, Switzerland
| | - Alexander Sauter
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Baden, Baden, Switzerland
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Martin W Huellner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, CH-8091, Switzerland
| | - Philipp A Kaufmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, CH-8091, Switzerland
| | - Irene A Burger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Baden, Baden, Switzerland
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, CH-8091, Switzerland
| | - Alexander Maurer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, CH-8091, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gühne F, Schilder T, Seifert P, Kühnel C, Freesmeyer M. Dependence of Renal Uptake on Kidney Function in [ 68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Imaging. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:696. [PMID: 38611608 PMCID: PMC11012145 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14070696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2024] [Revised: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 03/24/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: PSMA ligand PET/CT is increasingly important for diagnostics of prostate cancer and other tumor diseases. In particular, the radiopharmaceutical [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 is widely used. Besides its tumor-specific binding, the uptake within the kidneys is dominant and seems to visualize the renal cortex specifically. Kidney diseases may alter the uptake of radiopharmaceuticals. Therefore, the correlation between renal uptake in PET/CT imaging and renal function should be investigated. (2) Methods: A group of 103 male patients were retrospectively evaluated for eGFR according to the CKD-EPI equation, tracer uptake intensity (SUVmax, SUVpeak, SUVmean), the molecular volume of the renal cortex, morphological kidney size, and total renal uptake. Manual and three different computer-assisted contouring methods (thresholds at 50% of SUVmax, 30% of SUVmax, and absolute SUV of 20) were used for measurements. Correlations between parameters were calculated using linear regression models. (3) Results: Renal SUVmax, SUVpeak, and SUVmean do not correlate with eGFR for manual or computer-assisted measurements. In contrast, molecular cortex volume shows a moderate correlation with eGFR (R2 = 0.231, p < 0.001), superior to morphological kidney size. A contouring threshold of 30% of SUVmax outperformed the other settings for renal cortex volume and total renal uptake. (4) Conclusions: Renal uptake of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 cannot predict eGFR, but the functional renal cortex can be quantified by PET/CT imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Martin Freesmeyer
- Clinic of Nuclear Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747 Jena, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Jia AY, Kiess AP, Li Q, Antonarakis ES. Radiotheranostics in advanced prostate cancer: Current and future directions. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2024; 27:11-21. [PMID: 37069330 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-023-00670-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2023] [Revised: 03/25/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2023]
Abstract
The discovery of small molecules that target the extracellular domain of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) has led to advancements in diagnostic imaging and the development of precision radiopharmaceutical therapies. In this review, we present the available existing data and highlight the key ongoing clinical evaluations of PSMA-based imaging in the management of primary, biochemically recurrent, and metastatic prostate cancer. We also discuss clinical studies that explore the use of PSMA-based radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) in metastatic prostate cancer and forthcoming trials that investigate PSMA RPT in earlier disease states. Multidisciplinary collaboration in clinical trial design and therapeutic administration is critical to the continued progress of this evolving radiotheranostics field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Y Jia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| | - Ana P Kiess
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Qiubai Li
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ali I, Rezk M, Hamouda D, Talaat O, Omar Y, Abdel Tawab M, Nasr I. Clinical value of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/MRI in primary staging of patients with intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer. Br J Radiol 2024; 97:622-631. [PMID: 38265254 PMCID: PMC11027301 DOI: 10.1093/bjr/tqae021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Revised: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 01/25/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the utility of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/MRI in initial staging of intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer (HRPCa). METHODS A total of 46 patients with pathologically verified intermediate and/or HRPCa who underwent 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/MRI with dedicated pelvic high-resolution multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) were included. RESULTS PET/MRI showed 100% sensitivity (SN), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy in detecting seminal vesicle (SV) and rectal invasion, versus 87.5%, 100%, 100% 93.8%, 95.7% and 50%, 100%,100%, 95.5%, and 95.7% for mpMRI respectively. However, PET/MRI had poor SN (40% and 0%) but high SP (94.4% and 100%) in detection of UB and neurovascular bundle (NV) invasion compared to 100% SN and SP for mpMRI. PET/MRI demonstrated stronger TNM staging agreement with the gold standard than mpMRI-WBMRI. It demonstrated concordance with T, N, and M stages in 40, 41, and 36 patients (k 0.84, 0.60, and 0.68, respectively) versus 29, 33, and 31 patients (k 0.54, 0.22, and 0.50) with accurate over all staging of 38/46 patients versus 30/46 patients (K 0.52 versus 0.22). CONCLUSION 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/MRI is a promising imaging modality with high diagnostic accuracy in staging intermediate- and HRPCa; it improves local tumour evaluation and provides precise TNM staging. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/MRI could have high diagnostic accuracy as shown in the current study for staging HRPCa patients that is crucial for treatment selection. We think that our study will contribute to the body of knowledge and improve the literature surrounding the clinical uses of integrated 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ismail Ali
- Radiology Department, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Faculty of medicine street, Zagazig, Sharkia, 44519, Egypt
| | - Mahmoud Rezk
- Radiology Department, National cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, 11796, Egypt
| | - Dalia Hamouda
- Medical Oncology Department, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, 44519, Egypt
| | - Omnia Talaat
- Radiation Oncology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, 11796, Egypt
| | - Yehia Omar
- Director of PET/MRI unit, Misr Radiology Cente, Cairo, 11766, Egypt
| | - Mohamed Abdel Tawab
- Radiology Department, Faculty of Human Medicine, Alazhar University, Cairo, 11651, Egypt
| | - Ibrahim Nasr
- Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine Department, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, 44519, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sood A, Kishan AU, Evans CP, Feng FY, Morgan TM, Murphy DG, Padhani AR, Pinto P, Van der Poel HG, Tilki D, Briganti A, Abdollah F. The Impact of Positron Emission Tomography Imaging and Tumor Molecular Profiling on Risk Stratification, Treatment Choice, and Oncological Outcomes of Patients with Primary or Relapsed Prostate Cancer: An International Collaborative Review of the Existing Literature. Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:27-43. [PMID: 37423774 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2023] [Revised: 05/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT The clinical introduction of next-generation imaging methods and molecular biomarkers ("radiogenomics") has revolutionized the field of prostate cancer (PCa). While the clinical validity of these tests has thoroughly been vetted, their clinical utility remains a matter of investigation. OBJECTIVE To systematically review the evidence to date on the impact of positron emission tomography (PET) imaging and tissue-based prognostic biomarkers, including Decipher, Prolaris, and Oncotype Dx, on the risk stratification, treatment choice, and oncological outcomes of men with newly diagnosed PCa or those with biochemical failure (BCF). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We performed a quantitative systematic review of the literature using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases (2010-2022) following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement guidelines. The validated Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 scoring system was used to assess the risk of bias. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS A total of 148 studies (130 on PET and 18 on biomarkers) were included. In the primary PCa setting, prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET imaging was not useful in improving T staging, moderately useful in improving N staging, but consistently useful in improving M staging in patients with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) unfavorable intermediate- to very-high-risk PCa. Its use led to a management change in 20-30% of patients. However, the effect of these treatment changes on survival outcomes was not clear. Similarly, biomarkers in the pretherapy primary PCa setting increased and decreased the risk, respectively, in 7-30% and 32-36% of NCCN low-risk and 31-65% and 4-15% of NCCN favorable intermediate-risk patients being considered for active surveillance. A change in management was noted in up to 65% of patients, with the change being in line with the molecular risk-based reclassification, but again, the impact of these changes on survival outcomes remained unclear. Notably, in the postsurgical primary PCa setting, biomarker-guided adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) was associated with improved oncological control: Δ↓ 2-yr BCF by 22% (level 2b). In the BCF setting, the data were more mature. PSMA PET was consistently useful in improving disease localization-Δ↑ detection for T, N, and M staging was 13-32%, 19-58%, and 9-29%, respectively. Between 29% and 73% of patients had a change in management. Most importantly, these management changes were associated with improved survival outcomes in three trials: Δ↑ 4-yr disease-free survival by 24.3%, Δ↑ 6-mo metastasis-free survival (MFS) by 46.7%, and Δ↑ androgen deprivation therapy-free survival by 8 mo in patients who received PET-concordant RT (level 1b-2b). Biomarker testing in these patients also appeared to be helpful in risk stratifying and guiding the use of early salvage RT (sRT) and concomitant hormonal therapy. Patients with high-genomic-risk scores benefitted from treatment intensification: Δ↑ 8-yr MFS by 20% with the use of early sRT and Δ↑ 12-yr MFS by 11.2% with the use of hormonal therapy alongside early sRT, while low-genomic-risk score patients did equally well with initial conservative management (level 3). CONCLUSIONS Both PSMA PET imaging and tumor molecular profiling provide actionable information in the management of men with primary PCa and those with BCF. Emerging data suggest that radiogenomics-guided treatments translate into direct survival benefits for patients, however, additional prospective data are awaited. PATIENT SUMMARY In this review, we evaluated the utility of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography and tumor molecular profiling in guiding the care of men with prostate cancer (PCa). We found that these tests augmented risk stratification, altered management, and improved cancer control in men with a new diagnosis of PCa or for those experiencing a relapse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akshay Sood
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Urology, The James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
| | - Amar U Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Christopher P Evans
- Department of Urologic Surgery, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Felix Y Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Todd M Morgan
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Declan G Murphy
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anwar R Padhani
- Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex, UK
| | - Peter Pinto
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Henk G Van der Poel
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Firas Abdollah
- Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Voter AF, Werner RA, Savas H, Gafita A, Ross AE, Gorin MA, Solnes LB, Pomper MG, Rowe SP, Sheikhbahaei S. A Practical Guide to the Pearls and Pitfalls of PSMA PET Imaging. Semin Nucl Med 2024; 54:119-131. [PMID: 37980186 DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2023.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2023] [Revised: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 11/01/2023] [Indexed: 11/20/2023]
Abstract
Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted PET agents have revolutionized the care of patients with prostate cancer, supplanting traditional methods of imaging prostate cancer, and improving the selection and delivery of therapies. This has led to a rapid expansion in both the number of PSMA PET scans performed and the imaging specialists required to interpret those scans. To aid those imagers and clinicians who are new to the interpretation of PSMA PET, this review provides an overview of the interpretation of PSMA PET/CT imaging and pearls for overcoming commonly encountered pitfalls. We discuss the physiologic distribution of the clinically available PSMA-targeted radiotracers, the commonly encountered patterns of prostate cancer spread, as well as the benign and malignant mimics of prostate cancer. Additionally, we review the standardized PSMA PET reporting systems and the role of PSMA in selecting appropriate patients for PSMA-targeted therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew F Voter
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Rudolf A Werner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Hatice Savas
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Andrei Gafita
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Ashley E Ross
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Michael A Gorin
- Milton and Carroll Petrie Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Lilja B Solnes
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Martin G Pomper
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Steven P Rowe
- Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
| | - Sara Sheikhbahaei
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mohseninia N, Zamani-Siahkali N, Harsini S, Divband G, Pirich C, Beheshti M. Bone Metastasis in Prostate Cancer: Bone Scan Versus PET Imaging. Semin Nucl Med 2024; 54:97-118. [PMID: 37596138 DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2023.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/20/2023]
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the second most common cause of malignancy among men, with bone metastasis being a significant source of morbidity and mortality in advanced cases. Detecting and treating bone metastasis at an early stage is crucial to improve the quality of life and survival of prostate cancer patients. This objective strongly relies on imaging studies. While CT and MRI have their specific utilities, they also possess certain drawbacks. Bone scintigraphy, although cost-effective and widely available, presents high false-positive rates. The emergence of PET/CT and PET/MRI, with their ability to overcome the limitations of standard imaging methods, offers promising alternatives for the detection of bone metastasis. Various radiotracers targeting cell division activity or cancer-specific membrane proteins, as well as bone seeking agents, have been developed and tested. The use of positron-emitting isotopes such as fluorine-18 and gallium-68 for labeling allows for a reduced radiation dose and unaffected biological properties. Furthermore, the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and radiomics techniques in medical imaging has shown significant advancements in reducing interobserver variability, improving accuracy, and saving time. This article provides an overview of the advantages and limitations of bone scan using SPECT and SPECT/CT and PET imaging methods with different radiopharmaceuticals and highlights recent developments in hybrid scanners, AI, and radiomics for the identification of prostate cancer bone metastasis using molecular imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nasibeh Mohseninia
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Nazanin Zamani-Siahkali
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Research center for Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Sara Harsini
- Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Christian Pirich
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Mohsen Beheshti
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Yang YY, Liu ZM, Peng RC. Diagnostic performance of 18F-labeled PSMA PET/CT in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Radiol 2023; 64:2791-2801. [PMID: 37545168 DOI: 10.1177/02841851231184210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND After initial treatment of prostate cancer, increases in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels commonly signify potential relapse or metastasis. 18F-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is considered a promising treatment due to its favorable physical properties. PURPOSE To investigate the diagnostic value of 18F-PSMA PET/CT for the recurrence and/or metastasis of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer (BRPca). MATERIAL AND METHODS A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases. Combined sensitivity and specificity values for the use of 18F-PSMA PET/CT in patients with BRPca were obtained. The quality of the studies was tested using the Diagnostic Accuracy Research Quality Assessment tool. Meta-analysis was performed using STATA 15 software, and heterogeneity was subsequently tested. RESULTS A total of 16 studies (1162 patients) were enrolled and had significant heterogeneity. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC values for 18F-PSMA PET/CT in the diagnosis of prostate recurrence and/or metastasis were 0.93 (0.89-0.95), 0.94 (0.85-0.98), and 0.96 (0,94-0.98), respectively. Meta-regression analyses showed that the sources of heterogeneity did not relate to ligands, study designs, or participants. The pooled sensitivity and specificity values of 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT were 0.90 (0.85-0.94) and 0.89 (0.85-0.93), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity values of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT were 0.89 (0.85-0.93) and 0.93 (0.70-0.99), respectively. The per-patient pooled sensitivity and specificity values were 0.92 (0.86-0.96) and 0.83 (0.41-0.97), respectively. The per-lesion pooled sensitivity and specificity values were 0.91 (0.86-0.94) and 0.91 (0.86-0.94), respectively. CONCLUSION According to our meta-analysis, 18F-PSMA PET/CT has the potential to be critical for the diagnosis of recurrence and/or metastasis in patients with BRPca.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan-Yuan Yang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medicine University, Beijing, PR China
| | - Zhi-Mou Liu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medicine University, Beijing, PR China
| | - Ru-Chen Peng
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medicine University, Beijing, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Heilinger J, Weindler J, Roth KS, Krapf P, Schomäcker K, Dietlein M, Drzezga A, Kobe C. Threshold for defining PSMA-positivity prior to 177Lu-PSMA therapy: a comparison of [ 68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and [ 18F]F-DCFPyL in metastatic prostate cancer. EJNMMI Res 2023; 13:83. [PMID: 37731097 PMCID: PMC10511392 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-023-01033-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2022, the American Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency approved [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (PLUVICTO™, Novartis AG, Basel, Switzerland) for radionuclide therapy with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligands in metastatic prostate cancer. Theranostics require appropriate patients to be identified by positron emission tomography (PET) prior to radionuclide therapy, usually employing [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11. Alternatively, several 18F-labelled PSMA-PET tracers are available and may increasingly replace 68Ga-labelled compounds, with respect to their image quality, availability and other practical advantages. However, alternative tracers may differ in uptake behaviour, and their comparability with regard to patient selection for [177Lu]Lu-PSMA therapy has not yet been established. Here, we analysed whether tumour-to-background ratios determined by PET using the 18F-labelled PSMA-specific radiopharmaceutical [18F]F-DCFPyL were comparable to those determined by PET using [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11. RESULTS No differences could be observed between [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11-PET and [18F]F-DCFPyL-PET regarding tumour-to-liver ratios or tumour-to-mediastinum ratios (e. g. tumour-to-liver ratios using maximum SUV of the tumour lesion for ultra-high definition reconstructed PET images with a median of 2.5 (0.6-9.0) on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11-PET vs. 2,0 (0.6-11.4) on [18F]F-DCFPyL-PET). However, significant differences were observed in terms of contrast-to-noise ratios, thereby demonstrating the better image quality obtained with [18F]F-DCFPyL-PET. CONCLUSIONS Our data showed that [18F]F-DCFPyl-PET and [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11-PET provide comparable tumour-to-liver and tumour-to-mediastinum ratios. Therefore, a tumour uptake of [18F]F-DCFPyL above the liver background, like using [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11, can be considered as equally suitable for defining PSMA-positivity by a semiquantitative assessment based on the liver background, e. g. prior to radioligand therapy with 177Lu-labelled PSMA ligands. In addition, our data suggest a tending advantage of [18F]F-DCFPyL in terms of lesion detectability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Heilinger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Jasmin Weindler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Katrin Sabine Roth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Philipp Krapf
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Nuclear Chemistry (INM-5), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Wilhelm-Johnen-Straße, 52428, Jülich, Germany
| | - Klaus Schomäcker
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Markus Dietlein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Alexander Drzezga
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Carsten Kobe
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Gillessen S, Bossi A, Davis ID, de Bono J, Fizazi K, James ND, Mottet N, Shore N, Small E, Smith M, Sweeney C, Tombal B, Antonarakis ES, Aparicio AM, Armstrong AJ, Attard G, Beer TM, Beltran H, Bjartell A, Blanchard P, Briganti A, Bristow RG, Bulbul M, Caffo O, Castellano D, Castro E, Cheng HH, Chi KN, Chowdhury S, Clarke CS, Clarke N, Daugaard G, De Santis M, Duran I, Eeles R, Efstathiou E, Efstathiou J, Ngozi Ekeke O, Evans CP, Fanti S, Feng FY, Fonteyne V, Fossati N, Frydenberg M, George D, Gleave M, Gravis G, Halabi S, Heinrich D, Herrmann K, Higano C, Hofman MS, Horvath LG, Hussain M, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Jones R, Kanesvaran R, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen PL, Khauli RB, Klotz L, Kramer G, Leibowitz R, Logothetis CJ, Mahal BA, Maluf F, Mateo J, Matheson D, Mehra N, Merseburger A, Morgans AK, Morris MJ, Mrabti H, Mukherji D, Murphy DG, Murthy V, Nguyen PL, Oh WK, Ost P, O'Sullivan JM, Padhani AR, Pezaro C, Poon DMC, Pritchard CC, Rabah DM, Rathkopf D, Reiter RE, Rubin MA, Ryan CJ, Saad F, Pablo Sade J, Sartor OA, Scher HI, Sharifi N, Skoneczna I, Soule H, Spratt DE, Srinivas S, Sternberg CN, Steuber T, Suzuki H, Sydes MR, Taplin ME, Tilki D, Türkeri L, Turco F, Uemura H, Uemura H, Ürün Y, Vale CL, van Oort I, Vapiwala N, Walz J, Yamoah K, Ye D, Yu EY, Zapatero A, Zilli T, Omlin A. Management of Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer. Part I: Intermediate-/High-risk and Locally Advanced Disease, Biochemical Relapse, and Side Effects of Hormonal Treatment: Report of the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2022. Eur Urol 2023; 83:267-293. [PMID: 36494221 PMCID: PMC7614721 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Innovations in imaging and molecular characterisation and the evolution of new therapies have improved outcomes in advanced prostate cancer. Nonetheless, we continue to lack high-level evidence on a variety of clinical topics that greatly impact daily practice. To supplement evidence-based guidelines, the 2022 Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC 2022) surveyed experts about key dilemmas in clinical management. OBJECTIVE To present consensus voting results for select questions from APCCC 2022. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Before the conference, a panel of 117 international prostate cancer experts used a modified Delphi process to develop 198 multiple-choice consensus questions on (1) intermediate- and high-risk and locally advanced prostate cancer, (2) biochemical recurrence after local treatment, (3) side effects from hormonal therapies, (4) metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, (5) nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, (6) metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, and (7) oligometastatic and oligoprogressive prostate cancer. Before the conference, these questions were administered via a web-based survey to the 105 physician panel members ("panellists") who directly engage in prostate cancer treatment decision-making. Herein, we present results for the 82 questions on topics 1-3. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement, with strong consensus defined as ≥90% agreement. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS The voting results reveal varying degrees of consensus, as is discussed in this article and shown in the detailed results in the Supplementary material. The findings reflect the opinions of an international panel of experts and did not incorporate a formal literature review and meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS These voting results by a panel of international experts in advanced prostate cancer can help physicians and patients navigate controversial areas of clinical management for which high-level evidence is scant or conflicting. The findings can also help funders and policymakers prioritise areas for future research. Diagnostic and treatment decisions should always be individualised based on patient and cancer characteristics (disease extent and location, treatment history, comorbidities, and patient preferences) and should incorporate current and emerging clinical evidence, therapeutic guidelines, and logistic and economic factors. Enrolment in clinical trials is always strongly encouraged. Importantly, APCCC 2022 once again identified important gaps (areas of nonconsensus) that merit evaluation in specifically designed trials. PATIENT SUMMARY The Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) provides a forum to discuss and debate current diagnostic and treatment options for patients with advanced prostate cancer. The conference aims to share the knowledge of international experts in prostate cancer with health care providers and patients worldwide. At each APCCC, a panel of physician experts vote in response to multiple-choice questions about their clinical opinions and approaches to managing advanced prostate cancer. This report presents voting results for the subset of questions pertaining to intermediate- and high-risk and locally advanced prostate cancer, biochemical relapse after definitive treatment, advanced (next-generation) imaging, and management of side effects caused by hormonal therapies. The results provide a practical guide to help clinicians and patients discuss treatment options as part of shared multidisciplinary decision-making. The findings may be especially useful when there is little or no high-level evidence to guide treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silke Gillessen
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland.
| | - Alberto Bossi
- Genitourinary Oncology, Prostate Brachytherapy Unit, Gustave Roussy, Paris, France
| | - Ian D Davis
- Monash University and Eastern Health, Victoria, Australia
| | - Johann de Bono
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - Karim Fizazi
- Institut Gustave Roussy, University of Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | | | | | - Neal Shore
- Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC, USA; Urology/Surgical Oncology, GenesisCare, Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
| | - Eric Small
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Mathew Smith
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Christopher Sweeney
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Ana M Aparicio
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Andrew J Armstrong
- Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Tomasz M Beer
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Himisha Beltran
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anders Bjartell
- Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Pierre Blanchard
- Département de Radiothérapie, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Rob G Bristow
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Christie NHS Trust and CRUK Manchester Institute and Cancer Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Muhammad Bulbul
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Orazio Caffo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy
| | - Daniel Castellano
- Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Elena Castro
- Institute of Biomedical Research in Málaga (IBIMA), Málaga, Spain
| | - Heather H Cheng
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Kim N Chi
- BC Cancer, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Caroline S Clarke
- Research Department of Primary Care & Population Health, Royal Free Campus, University College London, London, UK
| | - Noel Clarke
- The Christie and Salford Royal Hospitals, Manchester, UK
| | - Gedske Daugaard
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Maria De Santis
- Department of Urology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ignacio Duran
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla, IDIVAL, Santander, Cantabria, Spain
| | - Ros Eeles
- The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Jason Efstathiou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Onyeanunam Ngozi Ekeke
- Department of Surgery, University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Alakahia, Port Harcourt, Nigeria
| | | | - Stefano Fanti
- IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Felix Y Feng
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Valerie Fonteyne
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Nicola Fossati
- Department of Urology, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Civico USI - Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Mark Frydenberg
- Department of Surgery, Prostate Cancer Research Program, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Anatomy & Developmental Biology, Faculty of Nursing, Medicine & Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Daniel George
- Department of Medicine, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Surgery, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Martin Gleave
- Urological Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Gwenaelle Gravis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France
| | - Susan Halabi
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Daniel Heinrich
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Gjøvik, Norway
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Celestia Higano
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Michael S Hofman
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Lisa G Horvath
- Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, Australia; Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW, Australia; The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Maha Hussain
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Department of Radiotherapy, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Robert Jones
- School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Pirkko-Liisa Kellokumpu-Lehtinen
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tampere Cancer Center, Tampere, Finland; Research, Development and Innovation Center, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Raja B Khauli
- Department of Urology and the Naef K. Basile Cancer Institute (NKBCI), American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Laurence Klotz
- Division of Urology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Gero Kramer
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Raya Leibowitz
- Oncology Institute, Shamir Medical Center, Be'er Ya'akov, Israel; Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel
| | - Christopher J Logothetis
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; University of Athens Alexandra Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Brandon A Mahal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Sylvester Cancer Center, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Fernando Maluf
- Beneficiência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil; Departamento de Oncologia, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Joaquin Mateo
- Department of Medical Oncology and Prostate Cancer Translational Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO) and Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Matheson
- Faculty of Education, Health and Wellbeing, Walsall Campus, Walsall, UK
| | - Niven Mehra
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Axel Merseburger
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Luebeck, Germany
| | - Alicia K Morgans
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael J Morris
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hind Mrabti
- National Institute of Oncology, Mohamed V University, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Deborah Mukherji
- Clemenceau Medical Center, Dubai, United Arab Emirates; Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Declan G Murphy
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | | | - Paul L Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - William K Oh
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, The Tisch Cancer Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Antwerp, Belgium; Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Joe M O'Sullivan
- Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | - Anwar R Padhani
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre and Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Carmel Pezaro
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Darren M C Poon
- Comprehensive Oncology Centre, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Hong Kong; The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| | - Colin C Pritchard
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Danny M Rabah
- Cancer Research Chair and Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; Department of Urology, KFSHRC, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Dana Rathkopf
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Mark A Rubin
- Bern Center for Precision Medicine and Department for Biomedical Research, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Charles J Ryan
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Fred Saad
- Centre Hospitalier de Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | | | - Howard I Scher
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nima Sharifi
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA; Department of Cancer Biology, GU Malignancies Research Center, Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Iwona Skoneczna
- Rafal Masztak Grochowski Hospital, Maria Sklodowska Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Howard Soule
- Prostate Cancer Foundation, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | - Daniel E Spratt
- University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Sandy Srinivas
- Division of Medical Oncology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Cora N Sternberg
- Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Meyer Cancer Center, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Thomas Steuber
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Matthew R Sydes
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Mary-Ellen Taplin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Levent Türkeri
- Department of Urology, M.A. Aydınlar Acıbadem University, Altunizade Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Fabio Turco
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Hiroji Uemura
- Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Hirotsugu Uemura
- Department of Urology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yüksel Ürün
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey; Ankara University Cancer Research Institute, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Claire L Vale
- University College London, MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, UK
| | - Inge van Oort
- Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Neha Vapiwala
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jochen Walz
- Department of Urology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes Cancer Centre, Marseille, France
| | - Kosj Yamoah
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Dingwei Ye
- Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Evan Y Yu
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of Washington and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Almudena Zapatero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Health Research Institute, Madrid, Spain
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Radiation Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Aurelius Omlin
- Onkozentrum Zurich, University of Zurich and Tumorzentrum Hirslanden Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Multi-timepoint imaging with PSMA-targeted [ 18F]F-Florastamin PET/CT: lesion detection and comparison to conventional imaging. Ann Nucl Med 2023; 37:246-254. [PMID: 36857019 DOI: 10.1007/s12149-023-01823-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2022] [Accepted: 01/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aims of this study were to investigate the utility of [18F]F-Florastamin, a novel prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted PET radiotracer with facile radiochemistry, relative to the conventional imaging for the detection of sties of disease and evaluate the effect of multi-timepoint imaging with [18F]F-Florastamin PET on lesion detectability. METHODS Eight prostate cancer patients with known or suspected recurrence who underwent [18F]F-Florastamin PET/CT at 1-h and 2-h imaging time-points were included in this prospective pilot study. [18F]F-Florastamin PET images were interpreted visually and quantitatively at both time points and compared with CIM. RESULTS [18F]F-Florastamin PET was superior to CT in the detection of active osseous metastases and small-sized metastatic lymph nodes that do not fall under the anatomic imaging size criteria for metastasis. Multi-timepoint imaging showed a significant reduction in the blood pool, bone marrow and muscular uptake, and increase in liver uptake over time. There is a significant improvement in tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) at the 2-h imaging time-point (P = 0.04). The mean percentage change in TBR at 2-h was 21% (SD = 0.31). CONCLUSIONS [18F]F-Florastamin is a promising new radioligand for PSMA-targeted PET with suitable lesion detectability and high TBR at both time points.
Collapse
|
17
|
Chandekar KR, Singh H, Kumar R, Kumar S, Kakkar N, Mittal BR, Singh SK. Comparison of 18 F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT With 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for Initial Staging in Intermediate- and High-Risk Prostate Cancer. Clin Nucl Med 2023; 48:e1-e8. [PMID: 36240786 DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000004430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to compare 18 F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT with 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for initial staging in intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients. METHODS Forty treatment-naive, biopsy-proven, intermediate- or high-risk PCa patients were prospectively recruited. Each patient underwent PET/CT with 68 Ga-PSMA-11 and 18 F-PSMA-1007 (within 2 weeks). Assessment of both set of images included delineating number and characteristics of lesions, measurement of tracer uptake (SUV max ), miPSMA scoring, and PET-based stage categorization. RESULTS Intraprostatic lesions were detected in all patients by both tracers with concordant PET-based T stage. Median SUV max of the dominant PSMA-positive prostatic lesions was not significantly different with 18 F-PSMA-1007 and 68 Ga-PSMA-11 (19.9 vs 19.4, P = 0.127, n = 40). Prostatic miPSMA scores were similar in 31/40 (77.5%) patients with both tracers (weighted κ = 0.71). In 23/40 (57.5%) patients, regional lymph nodes (n = 171) were detected by both tracers. Few additional PET-positive regional lymph nodes (n = 3) were exclusively detected by 18 F-PSMA in 2 patients without altering PET-based N stage. Extraregional lymph nodes (n = 123 in 17/40 patients) and visceral metastatic lesions (n = 18 in 3/40 patients) were detected concordantly by both tracers. PET-positive marrow based and skeletal metastases (n = 71) were detected in 14/40 (35%) patients by both tracers. Few additional marrow and skeletal lesions (n = 7) were exclusively detected on 18 F-PSMA-1007 in 5/14 patients, potentially upstaging PET-based M stage in 2/5 patients. Both radiotracers showed excellent interreader agreement for region-wise detection of lesions. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that 18 F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT is comparable to 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in detecting primary and metastatic lesions of PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Nandita Kakkar
- Histopathology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kim SB, Song IH, Kim SY, Ko HY, Kil HS, Chi DY, Giesel FL, Kopka K, Hoepping A, Chun JH, Park HS, Yun M, Kim SE. Preclinical Evaluation of a Companion Diagnostic Radiopharmaceutical, [ 18F]PSMA-1007, in a Subcutaneous Prostate Cancer Xenograft Mouse Model. Mol Pharm 2022; 20:1050-1060. [PMID: 36583623 PMCID: PMC9906735 DOI: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.2c00788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Several radiolabeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted agents have been developed for detecting prostate cancer, using positron emission tomography imaging and targeted radionuclide therapy. Among them, [18F]PSMA-1007 has several advantages, including a comparatively long half-life, delayed renal excretion, and compatible structure with α-/β-particle emitter-labeled therapeutics. This study aimed to characterize the preclinical pharmacokinetics and internal radiation dosimetry of [18F]PSMA-1007, as well as its repeatability and specificity for target binding using prostate tumor-bearing mice. In PSMA-positive tumor-bearing mice, the kidney showed the greatest accumulation of [18F]PSMA-1007. The distribution in the tumor attained its peak concentration of 2.8%ID/g at 112 min after intravenous injection. The absorbed doses in the tumor and salivary glands were 0.079 ± 0.010 Gy/MBq and 0.036 ± 0.006 Gy/MBq, respectively. The variance of the net influx (Ki) of [18F]PSMA-1007 to the tumor was minimal between scans performed in the same animals (within-subject coefficient of variation = 7.57%). [18F]PSMA-1007 uptake in the tumor was specifically decreased by 32% in Ki after treatment with a PSMA inhibitor 2-(phosphonomethyl)-pentanedioic acid (2-PMPA). In the present study, we investigated the in vivo preclinical characteristics of [18F]PSMA-1007. Our data from [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/computed tomography (CT) studies in a subcutaneous prostate cancer xenograft mouse model supports clinical therapeutic strategies that use paired therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals (such as [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617), especially strategies with a quantitative radiation dose estimate for target lesions while minimizing radiation-induced toxicity to off-target tissues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Su Bin Kim
- Department
of Applied Bioengineering, Graduate School of Convergence Science
and Technology, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul08826, Korea,Department
of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University
College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 82 Gumi-ro, 173
Beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam13620, Korea
| | - In Ho Song
- Department
of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University
College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 82 Gumi-ro, 173
Beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam13620, Korea
| | - Seon Yoo Kim
- Department
of Nuclear Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul03722, Korea
| | - Hae Young Ko
- Department
of Nuclear Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul03722, Korea
| | - Hee Seup Kil
- Research
Institute of Radiopharmaceuticals, FutureChem
Co. Ltd, Seoul04793, Korea
| | - Dae Yoon Chi
- Research
Institute of Radiopharmaceuticals, FutureChem
Co. Ltd, Seoul04793, Korea
| | - Frederik L. Giesel
- Department
of Nuclear Medicine, Heinreich-Heine-University,
University Hospital Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf40225, Germany
| | - Klaus Kopka
- Institute
of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR) e.v., Bautzner Landstrasse 400, Dresden01328, Germany,Technische
Universität Dresden, Faculty of Chemistry and Food Chemistry,
School of Science, Dresden01069, Germany,National
Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Dresden, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Fetscherstraße 74, Dresden01307, Germany,German
Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden01307, Germany
| | - Alexander Hoepping
- Department
of Medicinal Chemistry, ABX Advanced Biochemical
Compounds GmbH, Radeberg1454, Germany
| | - Joong-Hyun Chun
- Department
of Nuclear Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul03722, Korea
| | - Hyun Soo Park
- Department
of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University
College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 82 Gumi-ro, 173
Beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam13620, Korea,Department
of Molecular Medicine and Biopharmaceutical Sciences, Graduate School
of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul
National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul08826, Korea,. Tel: +82-31-787-2936. Fax: +82-31-787-4018
| | - Mijin Yun
- Department
of Nuclear Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul03722, Korea,. Tel: +82-2-2228-6068. Fax: +82-2-2227-8354
| | - Sang Eun Kim
- Department
of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University
College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 82 Gumi-ro, 173
Beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam13620, Korea,Department
of Molecular Medicine and Biopharmaceutical Sciences, Graduate School
of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul
National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul08826, Korea,Advanced
Institutes of Convergence Technology, 145 Gwanggyo-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon16229, Korea,BIK Therapeutics Inc., 172 Dolma-ro, Bundang-gu, Seongnam13605, Korea,. Tel: +82-31-787-7671. Fax: +82-31-787-4018
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Saule L, Radzina M, Liepa M, Roznere L, Lioznovs A, Ratniece M, Mamis E, Vjaters E. Recurrent Prostate Cancer Diagnostics with 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT: A Systematic Review of the Current State. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12123176. [PMID: 36553183 PMCID: PMC9777208 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12123176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2022] [Revised: 12/09/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer is a cornerstone for further adequate therapy planning. Therefore, clinical practice and research still focuses on diagnostic tools that can detect prostate cancer in early recurrence when it is undetectable in conventional diagnostic imaging. 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT is a novel method to evaluate patients with biochemical recurrent PCa. The aim of this review was to evaluate the role of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in prostate cancer local recurrence, lymph node metastases and bone metastases detection. METHODS Original studies, reviews and five meta-analyses were included in this article. A total of 70 studies were retrieved, 31 were included in the study. RESULTS All patients described in the studies underwent 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT. The administered 18F-PSMA-1007 individual dose ranged from 159 ± 31 MBq to 363.93 ± 69.40 MBq. Results showed that 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT demonstrates a good detection rate in recurrent prostate cancer. CONCLUSIONS 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT appears to achieve reliable performance in detecting recurrent prostate cancer. The high detection rate of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in recurrent prostate cancer was confirmed, especially in local recurrence and small lymph nodes with non-specific characteristics on conventional diagnostic imaging methods. However, several authors emphasize some limitations for this tracer-for example, non-specific uptake in bone lesions that can mimic bone metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Saule
- Radiology Research Laboratory, Riga Stradins University, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia
- Diagnostic Radiology Institute, Paula Stradina Clinical University Hospital, LV-1002 Riga, Latvia
- Medical Faculty, University of Latvia, LV-1004 Riga, Latvia
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +371-26131556
| | - Maija Radzina
- Radiology Research Laboratory, Riga Stradins University, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia
- Diagnostic Radiology Institute, Paula Stradina Clinical University Hospital, LV-1002 Riga, Latvia
- Medical Faculty, University of Latvia, LV-1004 Riga, Latvia
| | - Mara Liepa
- Radiology Research Laboratory, Riga Stradins University, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia
- Diagnostic Radiology Institute, Paula Stradina Clinical University Hospital, LV-1002 Riga, Latvia
| | - Lilita Roznere
- Radiology Research Laboratory, Riga Stradins University, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia
| | - Andrejs Lioznovs
- Radiology Research Laboratory, Riga Stradins University, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia
- Diagnostic Radiology Institute, Paula Stradina Clinical University Hospital, LV-1002 Riga, Latvia
| | - Madara Ratniece
- Radiology Research Laboratory, Riga Stradins University, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia
| | - Edgars Mamis
- Radiology Research Laboratory, Riga Stradins University, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia
- Medical Faculty, University of Latvia, LV-1004 Riga, Latvia
| | - Egils Vjaters
- Medical Faculty, University of Latvia, LV-1004 Riga, Latvia
- Center of Urology, Paula Stradina Clinical University Hospital, LV-1002 Riga, Latvia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ren Y, Liu C, Liu T, Duan X, Zhang Q, Liu J, Wang P, Guo Q, Yang X, Du P, Zhu H, Yang Z. Preclinical evaluation and first in human study of Al 18F radiolabeled ODAP-urea-based PSMA targeting ligand for PET imaging of prostate cancer. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1030187. [PMID: 36338719 PMCID: PMC9633261 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1030187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/07/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to introduce a novel [18F]AlF-labeled ODAP-Urea-based Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) probe, named [18F]AlF-PSMA-137, which was derived from the successful modification of glutamate-like functional group. The preclinically physical and biological characteristics of the probe were analyzed. Polit clinical PET/CT translation was performed to analyze its feasibility in clinical diagnosis of prostate cancer. METHODS [18F]AlF-PSMA-137 was maturely labeled with the [18F]AlF2+ labeling technique. It was analyzed by radio-HPLC for radiochemical purity and stability analysis in vitro and in vivo. The PSMA specificity was investigated in PSMA-positive (LNCaP) and PSMA-negative (PC3) cells, and the binding affinity was evaluated in LNCaP cells. Micro-PET/CT imaging was performed in mice bearing LNCaP or PC3 tumors. Thirteen patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer were included for [18F]AlF-PSMA-137 PET/CT imaging. Physiologic biodistribution and tumor burden were semi-quantitatively evaluated and the radiation dosimetry of [18F]AlF-PSMA-137 was estimated. RESULTS The radiochemical yield of [18F]AlF-PSMA-137 was 54.2 ± 10.7% (n = 16) with the radiochemical purity over 99% and the specific activity of 26.36 ± 7.33 GBq/μmol. The binding affinity to PSMA was 2.11 ± 0.63 nM. [18F]AlF-PSMA-137 showed high cell/tumor uptake which can be specifically blocked by PSMA inhibitor. According to the biodistribution in patients, [18F]AlF-PSMA-137 was mainly accumulated in kidneys, lacrimal glands, parotid glands, submandibular glands and liver which was similar to the extensive Glu-Ureas based probes. A total of 81 lesions were detected in PET/CT imaging and over 91% of lesions increased between 1 h p.i. (SUVmean: 10.98 ± 18.12) and 2 h p.i. (SUVmean: 14.25 ± 21.28) (p < 0.001). Additionally, the probe showed intensive accumulation in lesions which provided excellent imaging contrast with the high tumor-to-muscle ratio of 15.57 ± 27.21 at 1 h p.i. and 25.42 ± 36.60 at 2 h p.i. (p < 0.001), respectively. The effective dose of [18F]AlF-PSMA-137 was estimated as 0.0119 ± 0.0009 mSv/MBq. CONCLUSION An ODAP-Urea-based PSMA probe [18F]AlF-PSMA-137 was successfully prepared with high specificity and binding affinity to PSMA. Micro-PET/CT imaging study demonstrated its feasibility for prostate cancer imaging. Pilot clinical study showed its potential for delay-imaging and prostate cancer detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ya’nan Ren
- Medical College, Guizhou University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education/Beijing, Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Radiopharmaceuticals, National Medical Products Administration, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Chen Liu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education/Beijing, Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Radiopharmaceuticals, National Medical Products Administration, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Teli Liu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education/Beijing, Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Radiopharmaceuticals, National Medical Products Administration, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaojiang Duan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Qian Zhang
- Medical College, Guizhou University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education/Beijing, Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Radiopharmaceuticals, National Medical Products Administration, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Jiayue Liu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education/Beijing, Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Radiopharmaceuticals, National Medical Products Administration, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Pei Wang
- Medical College, Guizhou University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education/Beijing, Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Radiopharmaceuticals, National Medical Products Administration, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Qian Guo
- Medical College, Guizhou University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education/Beijing, Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Radiopharmaceuticals, National Medical Products Administration, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Xing Yang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Peng Du
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of education/Beijing, Department of Urology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Hua Zhu
- Medical College, Guizhou University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education/Beijing, Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Radiopharmaceuticals, National Medical Products Administration, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Zhi Yang
- Medical College, Guizhou University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education/Beijing, Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Radiopharmaceuticals, National Medical Products Administration, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Preclinical comparative study of [ 18F]AlF-PSMA-11 and [ 18F]PSMA-1007 in varying PSMA expressing tumors. Sci Rep 2022; 12:15744. [PMID: 36130980 PMCID: PMC9492661 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-20060-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Accepted: 09/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
A wide variety of 18F-labeled PSMA-targeting PET radiotracers have been developed, including [18F]AlF-PSMA-11. As there is only limited data on the comparison with other 18F-labeled PSMA PET tracers, a comparative preclinical study between [18F]AlF-PSMA-11 and [18F]PSMA-1007 was conducted. Mice with varying PSMA expressing tumors (C4-2, 22Rv1 and PC-3, each n = 5) underwent two PET/CT scans with both [18F]AlF-PSMA-11 and [18F]PSMA-1007. Ten additional mice bearing C4-2 xenografts were subjected to ex vivo biodistribution with either [18F]AlF-PSMA-11 (n = 5) or [18F]PSMA-1007 (n = 5). Absolute SUVmean and SUVmax values were significantly higher for [18F]PSMA-1007 scans in both C4-2 tumors (p < 0.01) and 22Rv1 tumors (p < 0.01). In C4-2 xenograft bearing mice, the tumor-to-organ ratios did not significantly differ between [18F]AlF-PSMA-11 and [18F]PSMA-1007 for liver, muscle, blood and salivary glands (p > 0.05). However, in 22Rv1 xenograft bearing mice, all tumor-to-organ ratios were higher for [18F]AlF-PSMA-11 (p < 0.01). In healthy organs, [18F]PSMA-1007 uptake was higher in the liver, gallbladder, small intestines and glands. Biodistribution data confirmed the increased uptake in the heart, small intestines and liver with [18F]PSMA-1007. Absolute tumor uptake was higher with [18F]PSMA-1007 in all tumors. Tumor-to-organ ratios did not differ significantly in high PSMA expressing tumors, but were higher for [18F]AlF-PSMA-11 in low PSMA expressing tumors. Furthermore, [18F]PSMA-1007 showed higher uptake in healthy organs.
Collapse
|
22
|
Tariq A, McCart Reed AE, Morton A, Porten S, Vela I, Williams ED, Yaxley JW, Black PC, Roberts MJ. Urothelial Carcinoma and Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen: Cellular, Imaging, and Prognostic Implications. Eur Urol Focus 2022; 8:1256-1269. [PMID: 34429271 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.07.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2021] [Revised: 07/17/2021] [Accepted: 07/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Staging, restaging, and surveillance of urothelial carcinoma (UC) is challenging due to suboptimal accuracy of standard of care imaging modalities. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) imaging may serve to improve characterisation of UC. OBJECTIVE To appraise available literature regarding cellular, imaging, and prognostic implications of PSMA for UC. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A systematic review was performed considering all available literature (including conference abstracts) published from 1990 to 2020 and reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines following registration in PROSPERO (CRD42020186744). All relevant texts relating to immunohistochemical analysis and PSMA-based imaging in UC were included and collated. Additionally, FOLH1 (gene encoding PSMA) expression according to The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database was analysed as well as according to consensus and TCGA molecular classification subtypes and subsequently compared with clinical outcomes. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS PSMA expression across UC tumour tissue was heterogeneous (0-100%) but appeared to decrease with increased grade and stage. The TCGA analysis demonstrated loss of FOLH1 expression with increasing T stage (p = 0.0180) and N stage (p = 0.0269), and reduced FOLH1 expression was associated with worse disease-free survival. PSMA expression in UC neovasculature was variable but mostly increased (44-100%). Eleven reports of PSMA-based imaging for UC were identified, reporting on 18 patients. PSMA positron emission tomography (PET) imaging was positive in 17 out of 18 patients. The included literature review data were limited by mostly low-quality, retrospective studies. CONCLUSIONS Tissue PSMA, or FOLH1 expression, may inversely be associated with pathological and survival outcomes in localised UC. PSMA PET imaging may improve detection of metastatic disease and response to systemic therapy due to PSMA expression in neovasculature. Available evidence is limited; thus, larger, prospective studies are required to confirm early results and define populations that benefit most. PATIENT SUMMARY In this systematic review, we assess the potential role of prostate-specific membrane antigen in urothelial cancer. We found that its utility is in expression of blood vessels surrounding metastasis. We conclude that it may be beneficial in detecting metastasis and response to systemic therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arsalan Tariq
- Department of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Amy E McCart Reed
- University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Andrew Morton
- Department of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Sima Porten
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Ian Vela
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Department of Urology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Australian Prostate Cancer Research Centre-Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; School of Biomedical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Elizabeth D Williams
- Australian Prostate Cancer Research Centre-Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; School of Biomedical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - John W Yaxley
- Department of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Peter C Black
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Matthew J Roberts
- Department of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Department of Urology, Redcliffe Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Clinical Applications of PSMA PET Examination in Patients with Prostate Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14153768. [PMID: 35954432 PMCID: PMC9367427 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14153768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2022] [Revised: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/31/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The prostate specific membrane antigens, abbreviated as PSMAs, are type II membrane proteins that are highly ex-pressed on the surface of malignant prostate tissue in prostate cancer (PCa), particularly in aggressive, andro-gen-deprived, metastatic, and hormone-refractory PCa. Today, radionuclides that bind to these PSMA peptides are widely available for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes to specifically image and target prostate tumor cells at molec-ular level. In this descriptive review, we aimed to emphasize the usefulness of PSMA positron emission tomography (PET) examination in the management of patients with various stages of PCa. In addition, we outlined the main pitfalls and limitations of this scan to avoid misinterpretation of the results and to improve the decision making process in rela-tion to the patient’s further treatment. We concluded that PSMA PET examination in primary PCa patients has an es-sential role in the high-risk group. It is the new imaging standard in patients with in biochemical recurrence PCa and plays an important role in treatment decision. Furthermore, PSMA PET scan is a gold standard for the evaluation of PSMA targeted therapies in patients having progress of the disease. Future prospective studies, particularly on the im-pact of PSMA PET on therapy stratification, may further strengthen the role of PSMA in the treatment of PCa patients. Abstract With the progressive aging of the population in industrially developed countries, as well as advances in diagnostic and biopsy techniques and improvements in patient awareness, the incidence of prostate cancer (PCa) is continuously increasing worldwide. Therefore, PCa is currently considered as the second leading cause of tumor-related death. Early detection of the tumor and its metastasis is essential, as the rate of disease recurrence is high and occurs in 27% to 53% of all patients who underwent curative therapy with radical prostatectomy or local radiotherapy. In this regard, the prostate specific membrane antigens, abbreviated as PSMAs, are type II membrane proteins that are highly expressed on the surface of malignant prostate tissue in PCa, particularly in aggressive, androgen-deprived, metastatic, and hormone-refractory PCa, and they are inversely associated with the androgen level. Up to 95% of adenocarcinomas of the prostate express PSMA receptors on their surface. Today, radionuclides that bind to these PSMA peptides are widely accepted for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes to specifically image and target prostate tumor cells at the molecular level, a process referred to as targeted theranostics. Numerous studies have demonstrated that the integration of these peptides into diagnostic and therapeutic procedures plays a critical role in the primary staging and treatment decisions of especially high-risk PCa, expands therapeutic options for patients with advanced stage of prostate tumor, and prolongs patients’ survival rate. In this review article, we intend to briefly spotlight the latest clinical utilization of the PSMA-targeted radioligand PET imaging modality in patients with different stages of PCa. Furthermore, limitations and pitfalls of this diagnostic technique are presented.
Collapse
|
24
|
Alberts I, Bütikofer L, Rominger A, Afshar-Oromieh A. A randomised, prospective and head-to-head comparison of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and [18F]PSMA-1007 for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer in PSMA-ligand PET/CT-Protocol design and rationale. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0270269. [PMID: 35853017 PMCID: PMC9295986 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background A number of radiopharmaceuticals are available for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer (rPC), but few comparative imaging trials have been performed comparing them. In particular, there are no prospective head-to-head comparisons of the recently introduced [18F]PSMA-1007 to the existing standard of care [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11. The purpose of this trial is to establish the non-inferiority of the new radiopharmaceutical in terms of the rate of PET-positive findings and to obtain an intra-individual comparison of accuracy and radiopharmaceutical kinetics. Methods In this cross-over trial we will randomise 100 individuals to receive either first a standard-of-care PET/CT using [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 followed by an additional [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT within 2 weeks, or vice-versa. Inclusion criteria include patients 18 years and older with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy, defined as two consecutive prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels > 0.2 ng/ml. Detection rate at the patient-based level is the primary end-point. Each scan will be interpreted by a panel of six independent and masked readers (three for [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and three for [18F]PSMA-1007) which consensus majority in cases of discrepancy. To confirm the PET-positivity rate at a patient based level, follow up at 6 months following the first scan will be performed to a composite standard of truth. Secondary endpoints shall include an intra-individual comparison of radiopharmaceutical-kinetics, per-region detection rate and positive predictive value. Discussion This is the first randomised prospective comparative imaging trial to compare the established [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 with [18F]PSMA-1007 and will determine whether the new radiopharmaceutical is non-inferior to the established standard-of-care in terms of patient-level detection rate. Clinical trial registration Registered with and approved by the regional ethics authority #2020–02903 (submitted 09.12.2020, approval 16.12.2021) and the regulatory authority SwissMedic 2020DR2103. Registered with ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT05079828 and additionally in a national language in the Swiss National Clinical Trials Portal (SNCTP).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian Alberts
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- * E-mail:
| | | | - Axel Rominger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Ali Afshar-Oromieh
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Liu X, Jiang T, Gao C, Liu H, Sun Y, Zou Q, Tang R, Zeng W. Detection rate of fluorine-18 prostate-specific membrane antigen-1007 PET/CT for prostate cancer in primary staging and biochemical recurrence with different serum PSA levels: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Oncol 2022; 12:911146. [PMID: 35936732 PMCID: PMC9353183 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.911146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the detection rate (DR) of fluoro-prostate-specific membrane antigen (18F-PSMA-1007) PET/CT in patients with different serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels in the setting of primary staging of prostate cancer (PCa) or biochemically recurring PCa. Methods A comprehensive electronic literature search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement. This study was registered in the PROSPERO database (registration number: CRD42022331595). We calculated the DR of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in PCa. Results The final analysis included 15 studies that described 1,022 patients and 2,034 lesions with 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in PCa. The DR of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in patients with PCa in primary staging ranged from 90% to 100%, with a pooled estimate of 94% (95% CI: 92%–96%). The DR of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in patients with PCa in BCR ranged from 47% to 100%, with a pooled estimate of 86% (95% CI: 76%–95%). The DRs of PSA levels >2.0, 1.1–2.0, 0.51–1.0, and ≤0.5 ng/ml detected by 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in a patient-based analysis were 97% (95% CI: 93%–99%), 95% (95% CI: 88%–99%), 79% (95% CI: 68%–88%), and 68% (95% CI: 58%–78%), respectively. Conclusion This meta-analysis concluded that 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT had a high application value for prostate cancer, including primary tumors and biochemical recurrence. The DR of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT was slightly higher in primary prostate tumors than in biochemical recurrence. Systematic Review Registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022331595.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xue Liu
- PET-CT Center, Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Tao Jiang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The First People’s Hospital of Huaihua City, Hunan, China
| | - CaiLiang Gao
- PET-CT Center, Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - HuiTing Liu
- PET-CT Center, Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Yu Sun
- PET-CT Center, Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Qiao Zou
- PET-CT Center, Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Rui Tang
- PET-CT Center, Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - WenBing Zeng
- PET-CT Center, Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital, Chongqing, China
- *Correspondence: WenBing Zeng,
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Wang Y, Galante JR, Haroon A, Wan S, Afaq A, Payne H, Bomanji J, Adeleke S, Kasivisvanathan V. The future of PSMA PET and WB MRI as next-generation imaging tools in prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol 2022; 19:475-493. [PMID: 35789204 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-022-00618-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Radiolabelled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-based PET-CT has been shown in numerous studies to be superior to conventional imaging in the detection of nodal or distant metastatic lesions. 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT is now recommended by many guidelines for the detection of biochemically relapsed disease after radical local therapy. PSMA radioligands can also function as radiotheranostics, and Lu-PSMA has been shown to be a potential new line of treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Whole-body (WB) MRI has been shown to have a high diagnostic performance in the detection and monitoring of metastatic bone disease. Prospective, randomized, multicentre studies comparing 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT and WB MRI for pelvic nodal and metastatic disease detection are yet to be performed. Challenges for interpretation of PSMA include tracer trapping in non-target tissues and also urinary excretion of tracers, which confounds image interpretation at the vesicoureteral junction. Additionally, studies have shown how long-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) affects PSMA expression and could, therefore, reduce tracer uptake and visibility of PSMA+ lesions. Furthermore, ADT of short duration might increase PSMA expression, leading to the PSMA flare phenomenon, which makes the accurate monitoring of treatment response to ADT with PSMA PET challenging. Scan duration, detection of incidentalomas and presence of metallic implants are some of the major challenges with WB MRI. Emerging data support the wider adoption of PSMA PET and WB MRI for diagnosis, staging, disease burden evaluation and response monitoring, although their relative roles in the standard-of-care management of patients are yet to be fully defined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yishen Wang
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. .,Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Romford, UK.
| | - Joao R Galante
- Department of Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Athar Haroon
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Simon Wan
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London, London, UK
| | - Asim Afaq
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Radiology, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Heather Payne
- Department of Oncology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | - Jamshed Bomanji
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sola Adeleke
- Department of Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Veeru Kasivisvanathan
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Mingels C, Bohn KP, Rominger A, Afshar-Oromieh A, Alberts I. Diagnostic accuracy of [ 18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT in biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2022; 49:2436-2444. [PMID: 35067735 PMCID: PMC9165245 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-022-05693-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2021] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
AIM Despite increasing use for the detection of biochemically recurrent prostate cancer (rPC), the diagnostic accuracy of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with [18F]PSMA-1007 remains only partially investigated. The aim of this study was to determine the sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for PC-local recurrence and metastases on a per region basis. MATERIALS AND METHODS One hundred seventy-seven consecutive patients undergoing [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT for rPC were retrospectively analysed. Six body regions were defined: prostate fossa, pelvic lymph nodes (LN), retroperitoneal LN, supradiaphragmatic LN, bones, and soft tissue. A region was counted positive if at least one PSMA-positive lesion suspicious for PC was observed. Confirmation of a true-positive PSMA-avid lesion was defined as positive by histopathology, fall in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (> 50%) after targeted therapy or confirmatory further CT, MRI, PET/CT, or bone scan imaging. Regions where additional imaging was able to confirm the absence of suspicious PC lesions or regions outside exclusively targeted RT with serum PSA decline (> 50%) were counted as true-negative regions. SE, SP, PPV, and NPV were calculated for all six regions. RESULTS The overall PET-positivity rate was 91%. Conclusive follow-up for affirmation or refutation of a PSMA-positive lesion was available for 81/152 patients on a per region basis. In this subgroup, overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 95% (CI: 0.90-0.98), 89% (CI: 0.83-0.93), 86% (0.80-0.90), and 96% (CI: 0.92-0.98), respectively. On a per region basis, PPV was 97% (CI: 0.83-0.99) for local recurrence, 93% (CI: 0.78-0.98) for pelvic LN, 87% (CI: 0.62-0.96) for retroperitoneal LN, 82% (CI: 0.52-0.95) for supradiaphragmatic LN, and 79% (0.65-0.89) for bone lesions. The number of solid organ metastases (n = 6) was too small for an accurate statistical analysis. CONCLUSION The known high PET-positivity rate of [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT in rPC was confirmed, with corresponding high (> 90%) sensitivity and NPV on a per region basis. However, overall PPV was limited (86%), particularly for bone lesions (79%), which are a potential diagnostic weaknesses when using this tracer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clemens Mingels
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstr. 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
| | - Karl Peter Bohn
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstr. 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Axel Rominger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstr. 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Ali Afshar-Oromieh
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstr. 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Ian Alberts
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstr. 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Liu Y, Zhang X, Liu J, Zhang J, Xu B. Prospective intraindividual comparison of 18F-PSMA-7Q and 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer. Nucl Med Commun 2022; 43:725-730. [PMID: 35560134 DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000001564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Fluorine 18 (18F)-2-(3-{1-Carboxy-5-[(6-[(18)F]fluoro-pyridine-3-carbonyl)-amino]-pentyl}-ureido)-pentanedioic acid (DCFPyL) is an early 18F-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) targeted PET tracer that has shown promise in the diagnostic workup of prostate cancer and was recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. 18F-PSMA-7Q is a novel 18F-labeled PSMA-ligand PET tracer designed and synthesized by our team. This study compared the tracer-specific positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) characteristics of 18F-PSMA-7Q with those of 18F-DCFPyL in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer. METHODS Ten patients received similar doses of 18F-DCFPyL and 18F-PSMA-7Q 48 h apart and were imaged 1 h after injection on the same PET/CT scanner. Normal-organ biodistribution and tumor uptake were quantified using maximum and mean standardized uptake values (SUVmax and SUVmean), and all lesions were assigned a molecular imaging PSMA (miPSMA) score based on Prostate Cancer Molecular Imaging Standardized Evaluation criteria. RESULTS Seventeen lesions were detected in the 10 patients by both 18F-DCFPyL and 18F-PSMA-7Q. No statistically significant difference was observed when comparing the SUVmax and SUVmean of 18F-DCFPyL and 18F-PSMA-7Q in the lesions and parotid gland. The κ value for the miPSMA scores of the lesions between the two tracers was 0.907, indicating excellent agreement. CONCLUSION 18F-PSMA-7Q can be used in clinical research as reliably as 18F-DCFPyL. The limited urinary excretion of 18F-PSMA-7Q may represent a potential advantage over 18F-DCFPyL for detection of lesions in the pelvis, which need to be verified by further studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yachao Liu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Song H, Guja KE, Iagaru A. PSMA theragnostics for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer. Transl Oncol 2022; 22:101438. [PMID: 35659674 PMCID: PMC9163091 DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2022.101438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Revised: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
PSMA targeted theragnostic agents have shown tremendous potential in detecting and treating metastatic prostate cancer. The PSMA small molecular inhibitor-based imaging agents achieve extraordinary tumor to background ratios and the PSMA small molecule therapeutic agents have shown impressive therapeutic index in mCRPC. The development and optimization of PSMA theragnostic agents provides invaluable information that may help guide development of future theragnostics for other solid tumors.
There has been tremendous growth in the development of theragnostics for personalized cancer diagnosis and treatment over the past two decades. In prostate cancer, the new generation of prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) small molecular inhibitor-based imaging agents achieve extraordinary tumor to background ratios and allow their therapeutic counterparts to deliver effective tumor doses while minimizing normal tissue toxicity. The PSMA targeted small molecule positron emission tomography (PET) agents 18F-DCFPyL (2-(3-{1-carboxy-5-((6-(18)F-fluoro-pyridine-3-carbonyl)-amino)-pentyl}-ureido)-pentanedioic acid) and Gallium-68 (68Ga)-PSMA-11 have been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for newly diagnosed high risk prostate cancer patients and for patients with biochemical recurrence. More recently, the Phase III VISION trial showed that Lutetium-177 (177Lu)-PSMA-617 treatment increases progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with heavily pre-treated advanced PSMA-positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Here, we review the PSMA targeted theragnostic pairs under clinical investigation for detection and treatment of metastatic prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong Song
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Stanford University and Hospital, 300 Pasteur Dr H2200, Stanford 94305, United States
| | - Kip E Guja
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Stanford University and Hospital, 300 Pasteur Dr H2200, Stanford 94305, United States
| | - Andrei Iagaru
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Stanford University and Hospital, 300 Pasteur Dr H2200, Stanford 94305, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Liu W, Loblaw A, Laidley D, Fakir H, Mendez L, Davidson M, Kassam Z, Lee TY, Ward A, Thiessen J, Bayani J, Conyngham J, Bailey L, Andrews JD, Bauman G. Imaging Biomarkers in Prostate Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: A Review and Clinical Trial Protocol. Front Oncol 2022; 12:863848. [PMID: 35494042 PMCID: PMC9043802 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.863848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Advances in imaging have changed prostate radiotherapy through improved biochemical control from focal boost and improved detection of recurrence. These advances are reviewed in the context of prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and the ARGOS/CLIMBER trial protocol. ARGOS/CLIMBER will evaluate 1) the safety and feasibility of SBRT with focal boost guided by multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and 18F-PSMA-1007 PET and 2) imaging and laboratory biomarkers for response to SBRT. To date, response to prostate SBRT is most commonly evaluated using the Phoenix Criteria for biochemical failure. The drawbacks of this approach include lack of lesion identification, a high false-positive rate, and delay in identifying treatment failure. Patients in ARGOS/CLIMBER will receive dynamic 18F-PSMA-1007 PET and mpMRI prior to SBRT for treatment planning and at 6 and 24 months after SBRT to assess response. Imaging findings will be correlated with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and biopsy results, with the goal of early, non-invasive, and accurate identification of treatment failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Liu
- Department of Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre and Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Andrew Loblaw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Center, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - David Laidley
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, St. Joseph's Health Centre and Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Hatim Fakir
- Department of Oncology and Department of Medical Biophysics, London Health Sciences Centre and Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Lucas Mendez
- Department of Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre and Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Melanie Davidson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Center, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Zahra Kassam
- Department of Medical Imaging, St. Joseph's Health Care and Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Ting-Yim Lee
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University and Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada
| | - Aaron Ward
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University and Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada
| | - Jonathan Thiessen
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University and Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada
| | - Jane Bayani
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research and Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Laura Bailey
- Clinical Research Unit, London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON, Canada
| | - Joseph D Andrews
- Clinical Research Unit, London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON, Canada
| | - Glenn Bauman
- Department of Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre and Western University, London, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Head-to-Head Comparison of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and 99mTc-MDP Bone Scintigraphy for the Detection of Bone Metastases in Patients With Prostate Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2022; 219:386-395. [PMID: 35441529 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.21.27323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Background: Bone scintigraphy (BS) using 99mTc-MDP remains the recommended imaging modality for the detection of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer (PCa). However, PET/CT using prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligands is increasingly recognized for evaluating disease extent in patients with PCa, including as a possible standalone test in high-risk patients. Objective: To compare the diagnostic performance of 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT and 99mTc-MDP BS for the detection of bone metastases in patients with PCa. Evidence Acquisition: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched through October 2021 for studies reporting a head-to-head comparison of 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT and 99mTc-MDP BS for the detection of bone metastases in patients with PCa. Only studies with a well-defined reference standard (including various combinations of imaging and/or clinical follow-up) were included. Pooled diagnostic performance was calculated using bivariate random-effects model, and AUC was derived for each test from hierarchical summary ROC analysis. The two tests' complementary roles in identifying bone metastases in patients in whom the other test was negative were summarized. Evidence Synthesis: Six studies with 546 patients were included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 98% (95% CI: 94%-99%) and 97% (95% CI: 91%-99%) for 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT versus 83% (95% CI: 69%-91%) and 68% (95% CI: 41%-87%) for 99mTc-MDP BS. The AUC was 0.99 (95% CI: 0.96-1.00) for 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.81-0.87) for 99mTc-MDP BS. In 408 patients from five included studies, 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT correctly identified bone metastases in 43 (22.3%) of 193 patients with negative 99mTc-MDP BS results, whereas 99mTc-MDP BS correctly identified bone metastases in 4 (1.9%) of 210 patients with negative 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT results. Conclusion: On a per-patient basis, 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT has superior diagnostic performance than 99mTc-MDP BS for the detection of prostate cancer bone metastases. Furthermore, 99mTc-MDP BS offers limited additional information in patients with negative 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT results. Clinical impact: According to current evidence, 99mTc-MDP BS is highly unlikely to be additive to 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in identifying bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer.
Collapse
|
32
|
Lengana T, Lawal I, Janse Van Rensburg C, Mokoala K, Moshokoa E, Mazibuko S, Van de Wiele C, Maes A, Vorster M, Sathekge MM. The Diagnostic Performance of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in Prostate Cancer Patients with Early Recurrence after Definitive Therapy with a PSA <10 ng/ml. Nuklearmedizin 2022; 61:120-129. [PMID: 35421900 DOI: 10.1055/a-1759-1603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
AIM The prostate bed is one of the common sites of early recurrence of prostate cancer. The currently used PSMA ligands (68Ga-PSMA-11 and 99mTc-PSMA) undergo early urinary clearance resulting in interfering physiological activity within and surrounding the prostate. This can result in sites of cancer recurrence being obscured. 18F-PSMA-1007 has an advantage of delayed urinary clearance thus the prostate region is reviewed without any interfering physiological activity. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic performance of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in patients with early biochemical recurrence after definitive therapy. METHODS Forty-six Prostate cancer (mean age 66.7±7.5, range 48-87 years) presenting with biochemical recurrence (median PSA 1.6ng/ml, range 0.1-10.0) underwent non-contrast-enhanced 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT. PET/CT findings were evaluated qualitatively and semiquantitatively (SUVmax) and compared to the results of histology, Gleason grade, and conventional imaging. RESULTS Twenty-four of the 46 (52.2%) patients demonstrated a site of recurrence on 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT. Oligometastatic disease was detected in 15 (32.6%) of these patients. Of these 10 (37.5%) demonstrated intra-prostatic recurrence, lymph node disease was noted in 11 (45.8%) whilst two patients demonstrated skeletal metastases. The detection rates for PSA levels 0-<0.5, 0.5-<1, 1-2, >2 were 31.3%, 33.3%, 55.6% and 72.2% respectively. 7 (29.2%) of the positive patients had been described as negative or equivocal on conventional imaging. An optimal PSA cut-off level of 1.3ng/ml was found. CONCLUSION 18F-PSMA-1007 demonstrated good diagnostic performance detecting sites of recurrence. Its ability to detect sites of recurrence in the setting of early biochemical recurrence will have a significant impact on patient management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thabo Lengana
- Nuclear Medicine, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Ismaheel Lawal
- Nuclear Medicine, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Charl Janse Van Rensburg
- Biostatistics Unit, Pretoria MRC, South African Medical Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Kgomotso Mokoala
- Nuclear Medicine, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | | | | | - Christophe Van de Wiele
- Nuclear Medicine, Universiteit Gent Faculteit Geneeskunde en Gezondheidswetenschappen, Gent, Belgium
| | - Alex Maes
- Department Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Leuven, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Mariza Vorster
- Nuclear Medicine, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Comparison of [ 18F]PSMA-1007 with [ 68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in Restaging of Prostate Cancer Patients with PSA Relapse. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14061479. [PMID: 35326629 PMCID: PMC8946234 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14061479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of [18F]PSMA-1007 positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) (18F-PSMA) and [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT (68Ga-PSMA) by identifying prostate-specific antigen (PSA) threshold levels for optimal detecting recurrent prostate cancer (PC) and to compare both methods. Retrospectively, the study included 264 patients. The performances of 18F-PSMA and 68Ga-PSMA in relation to the pre-scan PSA were assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. 18F-PSMA showed PC-lesions in 87.5% (112/128 patients), while 68Ga-PSMA identified them in 88.9% (121/136). For 18F-PSMA biochemical recurrent (BCR) patients treated with radical prostatectomy (78/128, patient group: F-RP), a PSA of 1.08 ng/mL was found to be the optimal cut-off level for predicting positive and negative scans (AUC = 0.821; 95%, CI: 0.710−0.932), while for prostatectomized 68Ga-PSMA BCR-patients (89/136, patient group: Ga-RP), the cut-off was 1.84 ng/mL (AUC = 0.588; 95%, CI: 0.410−0.766). In patients with PSA < 1.08 ng/mL (F-RP) 76.3% and <1.84 ng/mL (Ga-RP) 78.6% scans were positive, whereas patients with PSA ≥ 1.08 ng/mL (F-RP) or 1.84 ng/mL (Ga-RP) had positive scan results in 100% and 91.5% (p < 0.001/p = 0.085). The identified PSA thresholds for PSMA-mappable PC lesions in BCR-patients (RP) showed a better separation for 18F-PSMA with regard to the distinguishing of positive and negative PC-lesions compared to 68Ga-PSMA. However, the two PSMA PET/CT tracers gave similar overall findings.
Collapse
|
34
|
Diagnostic value of integrated 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/MRI Compared with that of Biparametric MRI for the detection of Prostate Cancer. Prostate Int 2022; 10:108-116. [PMID: 35510079 PMCID: PMC9052074 DOI: 10.1016/j.prnil.2022.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2022] [Revised: 03/09/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Materials and methods Results Conclusion
Collapse
|
35
|
Evangelista L, Maurer T, van der Poel H, Alongi F, Kunikowska J, Laudicella R, Fanti S, Hofman MS. [68Ga]Ga-PSMA Versus [18F]PSMA Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in the Staging of Primary and Recurrent Prostate Cancer. A Systematic Review of the Literature. Eur Urol Oncol 2022; 5:273-282. [DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2022.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Revised: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 03/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|
36
|
Bodar YJL, Veerman H, Meijer D, de Bie K, van Leeuwen PJ, Donswijk ML, van Moorselaar RJ, Hendrikse NH, Boellaard R, Oprea-Lager DE, Vis AN. Standardised Uptake Values as Determined on PSMA PET/CT is associated with Oncological Outcomes in Prostate Cancer Patients. BJU Int 2022; 129:768-776. [PMID: 35166426 PMCID: PMC9315142 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2021] [Revised: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Objectives To investigate the association between intraprostatic, intratumoral maximum standardised uptake values (SUVmax) on prostate‐specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) prior to robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and pathology outcomes, including pathological International Society of Urological Pathology score (pISUP) and lymph node (LN) status (pN0/pN1). Patients and Methods A bi‐centric, secondary analysis of two previous, prospective cohort studies was performed in 318 patients with biopsy confirmed PCa and who were scheduled for RARP. Before surgery, patients received a PSMA PET/CT with either 68Ga‐PSMA‐11 (59% of the patients) or 18F‐PSMA (DCFPyL; 41%) as radiotracer. PET/CT images were analysed both visually and semi‐quantitatively by measuring the SUVmax of the most intense suspect lesion in the prostate. The association between the SUVmax of the primary tumour and pre‐ and postoperative variables was analysed. Results The SUVmax was associated with clinical and biopsy preoperative variables, as well as with pISUP score and pathological tumour stage. Patients with a pISUP of ≤2 showed significantly lower SUVmax compared to patients with a pISUP of >2 for both tracers (SUVmax18F‐PSMA: median 5.1 vs 9.6, P = 0.002; SUVmax68Ga‐PSMA‐11: 6.6 vs 8.6, P = 0.003). Moreover, patients with pN1 had significantly higher median SUVmax than those with pN0/pNx for both tracers (SUVmax18F‐PSMA: 7.9 vs 12.3, P = 0.04; SUVmax68Ga‐PSMA‐11: 7.6 vs 12.0, P < 0.001). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, the intraprostatic SUVmax was an independent predictor of pN1 for both 68Ga‐PSMA‐11 (per doubling: odds ratio [OR] 1.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.27–3.01)) and 18F‐PSMA (per doubling: OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.06–3.03). Conclusion Intraprostatic, intratumoral PSMA intensity on PET/CT, as semi‐quantitatively expressed by SUVmax, may be a valuable innovative biomarker in patients with localised PCa, as it is highly associated with known conventional prognostic factors, such as pISUP and LN status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yves J L Bodar
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU University, Department of Urology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU University, Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Prostate Cancer Network The Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hans Veerman
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU University, Department of Urology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Prostate Cancer Network The Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Urology, Prostate Cancer Network The Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dennie Meijer
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU University, Department of Urology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU University, Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Prostate Cancer Network The Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Katelijne de Bie
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU University, Department of Urology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pim J van Leeuwen
- Prostate Cancer Network The Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Urology, Prostate Cancer Network The Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten L Donswijk
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Urology, Prostate Cancer Network The Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - N Harry Hendrikse
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU University, Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU University, Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daniela E Oprea-Lager
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU University, Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - André N Vis
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU University, Department of Urology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Prostate Cancer Network The Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Cegla P, Wojewódzka M, Gorczewska I, Chalewska W, Łapińska G, Ochman P, Sackiewicz A, Dedecjus M. Identification of the Optimal Cut-Off Value of PSA for Assessing Severity of Disease in [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Study in Prostate Cancer Patients after Radical Prostatectomy. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12020349. [PMID: 35204440 PMCID: PMC8871181 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12020349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2021] [Revised: 01/22/2022] [Accepted: 01/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study was to identify the optimal cut-off value of prostate specific antigen (PSA) to assess the extent of the disease in [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT study in patients after radical prostatectomy. Materials and Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed on a group of 215 patients who underwent a [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT examination because of suspected recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Patients were divided into four groups: 1, no active lesions suggesting recurrence (n = 92); 2, suspected isolated local recurrence (n = 19); 3, oligometastatic disease (n = 82); and 4, polymetastatic disease (n = 22). Results: In group 1, the mean PSA level was 0.962 ng/mL (median: 0.376; min: 0.004; max: 25 ng/mL); in group 2, it was 4.970 ng/mL (median 1.320; min: 0.003; max: 40.350 ng/mL); in group 3, it was 2.802 ng/mL (median: 1.270; min: 0.020; max: 59.670 ng/mL); and in group 4, it was 4.997 ng/mL (median: 3.795; min: 0.007; max 21.110 ng/mL). Statistically significant differences were shown in PSA levels when comparing groups 1 and 2 (p = 0.0025) and groups 3 and 4 (p = 0.0474). The PSA cut-off point for discriminating groups 1 and 2 was 0.831 (sensitivity: 0.684; specificity: 0.772; area under the curve (AUC): 0.775), and for groups 3 and 4, it was 2.51 (sensitivity: 0.682; specificity: 0.780; AUC: 0.720). Conclusions: Our preliminary data suggested that the PSA level has an essential influence on determining the extent of disease in a [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT study in patients after radical prostatectomy. Identification of the optimal cut-off values for the oligo- and polymetastatic diseases might be helpful in stratifying these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paulina Cegla
- Department of Endocrine Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (M.W.); (W.C.); (G.Ł.); (P.O.); (A.S.); (M.D.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Marta Wojewódzka
- Department of Endocrine Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (M.W.); (W.C.); (G.Ł.); (P.O.); (A.S.); (M.D.)
| | - Izabela Gorczewska
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 44-102 Gliwice, Poland;
| | - Wioletta Chalewska
- Department of Endocrine Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (M.W.); (W.C.); (G.Ł.); (P.O.); (A.S.); (M.D.)
| | - Grażyna Łapińska
- Department of Endocrine Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (M.W.); (W.C.); (G.Ł.); (P.O.); (A.S.); (M.D.)
| | - Paweł Ochman
- Department of Endocrine Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (M.W.); (W.C.); (G.Ł.); (P.O.); (A.S.); (M.D.)
| | - Agata Sackiewicz
- Department of Endocrine Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (M.W.); (W.C.); (G.Ł.); (P.O.); (A.S.); (M.D.)
| | - Marek Dedecjus
- Department of Endocrine Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (M.W.); (W.C.); (G.Ł.); (P.O.); (A.S.); (M.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Ong JS, Hofman MS. PET imaging of prostate cancer. Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-822960-6.00111-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
|
39
|
Widjaja L, Derlin T, Ross TL, Bengel FM, Werner RA. Pretherapeutic estimated glomerular filtration rate predicts development of chronic kidney disease in patients receiving PSMA-targeted radioligand therapy. Prostate 2022; 82:86-96. [PMID: 34633090 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Revised: 09/03/2021] [Accepted: 09/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioligand therapy (RLT) may be associated with renal toxicity. We aimed to identify predictive parameters for the development of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) undergoing RLT. METHODS In 46 mCRPC patients scheduled for Lu-177-PSMA-RLT, pretherapeutic estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR [ml/min/1.73 m2 ]), Tc-99m-mercaptoacetyltriglycine (Tc-99m-MAG3) clearance and baseline Ga-68-PSMA-ligand positron emission tomography (PET)-derived renal cortical uptake and PSMA-tumor volume (TV) were determined. We tested the predictive capability of these parameters and clinical risk factors for the occurrence of CKD (defined as CTCAE vers. 5.0 grade 2 or higher) during follow-up. RESULTS After 4 ± 3 cycles of RLT average eGFR declined from 76 ± 17 to 72 ± 20 ml/min/1.73 m2 (p = 0.003). Increased estimated renal radiation dose (eRRD) was significantly associated with renal functional decline (p = 0.008). During follow-up, 16/46 (30.4%) developed CKD grade 2 (no grade 3 or higher). In receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, pretherapeutic eGFR was highly accurate in identifying the occurrence of CKD vs no CKD with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.945 (p < 0.001; best threshold, 77 ml/min/1.73 m2 ), followed by Tc-99m-MAG3-derived tubular extraction rate (TER; AUC, 0.831, p < 0.001; best threshold, 200 ml/min/1.73 m2 ). Renal PET signal (p = 0.751) and PSMA-TV (p = 0.942), however, were not predictive. Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed adverse renal outcome for patients with lower eGFR (p = 0.001) and lower scintigraphy-derived TER (p = 0.009), with pretherapeutic eGFR emerging as the sole predictive parameter in multivariate analysis (p = 0.007). CONCLUSION Serious adverse renal events are not a frequent phenomenon after PSMA-targeted RLT. However, in patients developing moderate CKD after RLT, pretherapeutic eGFR is an independent predictor for renal impairment during follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liam Widjaja
- Department of Nuclear Medicine Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Thorsten Derlin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Tobias L Ross
- Department of Nuclear Medicine Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Frank M Bengel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Rudolf A Werner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Gühne F, Radke S, Winkens T, Kühnel C, Greiser J, Seifert P, Drescher R, Freesmeyer M. Differences in Distribution and Detection Rate of the [ 68Ga]Ga-PSMA Ligands PSMA-617, -I&T and -11-Inter-Individual Comparison in Patients with Biochemical Relapse of Prostate Cancer. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2021; 15:ph15010009. [PMID: 35056066 PMCID: PMC8779232 DOI: 10.3390/ph15010009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2021] [Revised: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
The biochemical relapse of prostate cancer is diagnostically challenging but of high clinical impact for subsequent patient treatment. PET/CT with radiolabeled PSMA ligands outperforms conventional diagnostic methods in the detection of tumor recurrence. Several radiopharmaceuticals were and are available for use. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the routinely applied [68Ga]Ga-PSMA ligands PSMA-617, -I&T and -11 (HBED-CC) differ in physiological and pathological distribution, or in tumor detection rate. A retrospective evaluation of 190 patients (39 patients received PSMA-617, 68 patients PSMA-I&T and 83 patients PSMA-11) showed significant differences in tracer accumulation within all organs examined. The low retention within the compartments blood pool, bone and muscle tissue is a theoretical advantage of PSMA-11. Evaluation of tumor lesion uptake and detection rate did not reveal superiority of one of the three radiopharmaceuticals, neither in the whole population, nor in particularly challenging subgroups like patients with very low PSA levels. We conclude that all three [68Ga]Ga-PSMA ligands are equally feasible in this clinically important scenario, and may replace each other in case of unavailability or production restrictions.
Collapse
|
41
|
18F-PSMA-1007 PET in Biochemical Recurrent Prostate Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis. CONTRAST MEDIA & MOLECULAR IMAGING 2021; 2021:3502389. [PMID: 35002568 PMCID: PMC8710160 DOI: 10.1155/2021/3502389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2021] [Revised: 10/05/2021] [Accepted: 12/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Background Prostate-specific membrane antigen- (PSMA-) targeted agents labeled with fluorine-18 (18F) have recently become available to evaluate patients with biochemical recurrent prostate cancer (BRPCa) by using positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) or positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis about the detection rate (DR) of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT or PET/MRI in BRPCa patients. Methods A comprehensive computer literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases for studies published through 17 May 2021 was carried out using the following search algorithm: “PSMA” AND “1007”. Only studies providing data on the DR of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT or PET/MRI in BRPCa were included. A random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled DR on a per scan basis. Results Fifteen articles (853 patients) were selected and included in the systematic review, and ten were included in the quantitative analysis. Most of the studies reported a good DR of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT or PET/MRI in BRPCa including also patients with low prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSA) values. The DR of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT or PET/MRI was dependent on PSA serum values. The pooled DR was 81.3% (95% confidence interval: 74.6–88%) with statistical heterogeneity. A significant reporting bias (publication bias) was not detected. Conclusions 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT or PET/MRI showed a good DR in BRPCa patients in line with other PSMA-targeted agents. The DR of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT or PET/MRI is influenced by serum PSA values. These findings should be confirmed by prospective multicentric trials.
Collapse
|
42
|
Arnfield EG, Thomas PA, Roberts MJ, Pelecanos AM, Ramsay SC, Lin CY, Latter MJ, Garcia PL, Pattison DA. Clinical insignificance of [ 18F]PSMA-1007 avid non-specific bone lesions: a retrospective evaluation. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021; 48:4495-4507. [PMID: 34136957 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05456-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE [18F]PSMA-1007 offers advantages of low urinary tracer excretion and theoretical improved spatial resolution for imaging prostate cancer. However, non-specific bone lesions (NSBLs), defined as mild to moderate focal bone uptake without a typical morphological correlate on CT, are a common finding on [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical outcomes of patients with [18F]PSMA-1007 avid NSBLs, to determine whether patients with NSBLs represent a higher risk clinical cohort, and to determine whether SUVmax can be used as a classifier of bone metastasis. METHODS A retrospective audit of 214 men with prostate cancer was performed to investigate the clinical outcomes of [18F]PSMA-1007 avid NSBLs according to defined criteria. We also compared the serum PSA, Gleason score, and uptake time of patients with [18F]PSMA-1007 avid NSBLs to patients without [18F]PSMA-1007 avid bone lesions. Finally, we analysed an SUVmax threshold to identify bone metastases using ROC curve analysis. RESULTS Ninety-four of 214 patients (43.9%) demonstrated at least one NSBL. No [18F]PSMA-1007 avid NSBLs met criteria for a likely malignant or definitely malignant lesion after a median 15.8-month follow-up interval (11.9% definitely benign, 50.3% likely benign, and 37.7% equivocal). There were no statistically significant differences in serum PSA, Gleason score, and uptake time between patients with [18F]PSMA-1007 avid NSBLs and those without [18F]PSMA-1007 avid bone lesions. All NSBLs with adequate follow-up had SUVmax ≤ 11.1. The value of the highest SUVmax distinguished between NSBLs and definite prostate cancer bone metastases, whereby an SUVmax threshold of ≥ 7.2 maximized the Youden's index. CONCLUSION [18F]PSMA-1007 avid NSBLs rarely represent prostate cancer bone metastases. When identified in the absence of definite metastatic disease elsewhere, it is appropriate to classify those with SUVmax < 7.2 as likely benign. NSBLs with SUVmax 7.2-11.1 may be classified as equivocal or metastatic, with patient clinical risk factors, scan appearance, and potential management implications used to guide interpretation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evyn G Arnfield
- Department of Nuclear Medicine & Specialised PET Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
| | - Paul A Thomas
- Department of Nuclear Medicine & Specialised PET Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Matthew J Roberts
- Department of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
- Department of Urology, Redcliffe Hospital, Redcliffe, Australia
- Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Anita M Pelecanos
- Statistics Unit, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Stuart C Ramsay
- Department of Nuclear Medicine & Specialised PET Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
- School of Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia
| | - Charles Y Lin
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Melissa J Latter
- Department of Nuclear Medicine & Specialised PET Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Peter L Garcia
- Department of Nuclear Medicine & Specialised PET Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - David A Pattison
- Department of Nuclear Medicine & Specialised PET Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Cheng X, Ma L. Enzymatic synthesis of fluorinated compounds. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2021; 105:8033-8058. [PMID: 34625820 PMCID: PMC8500828 DOI: 10.1007/s00253-021-11608-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Revised: 09/16/2021] [Accepted: 09/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Fluorinated compounds are widely used in the fields of molecular imaging, pharmaceuticals, and materials. Fluorinated natural products in nature are rare, and the introduction of fluorine atoms into organic compound molecules can give these compounds new functions and make them have better performance. Therefore, the synthesis of fluorides has attracted more and more attention from biologists and chemists. Even so, achieving selective fluorination is still a huge challenge under mild conditions. In this review, the research progress of enzymatic synthesis of fluorinated compounds is summarized since 2015, including cytochrome P450 enzymes, aldolases, fluoroacetyl coenzyme A thioesterases, lipases, transaminases, reductive aminases, purine nucleoside phosphorylases, polyketide synthases, fluoroacetate dehalogenases, tyrosine phenol-lyases, glycosidases, fluorinases, and multienzyme system. Of all enzyme-catalyzed synthesis methods, the direct formation of the C-F bond by fluorinase is the most effective and promising method. The structure and catalytic mechanism of fluorinase are introduced to understand fluorobiochemistry. Furthermore, the distribution, applications, and future development trends of fluorinated compounds are also outlined. Hopefully, this review will help researchers to understand the significance of enzymatic methods for the synthesis of fluorinated compounds and find or create excellent fluoride synthase in future research.Key points• Fluorinated compounds are distributed in plants and microorganisms, and are used in imaging, medicine, materials science.• Enzyme catalysis is essential for the synthesis of fluorinated compounds.• The loop structure of fluorinase is the key to forming the C-F bond.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinkuan Cheng
- State Key Laboratory of Food Nutrition and Safety, Key Laboratory of Industrial Microbiology, Ministry of Education, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Industry Microbiology, National and Local United Engineering Laboratory of Metabolic Control Fermentation Technology, College of Biotechnology, Tianjin University of Science & Technology, No. 29, Thirteenth Street, Binhai New District, Tianjin, 300457, China
| | - Long Ma
- State Key Laboratory of Food Nutrition and Safety, Key Laboratory of Industrial Microbiology, Ministry of Education, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Industry Microbiology, National and Local United Engineering Laboratory of Metabolic Control Fermentation Technology, College of Biotechnology, Tianjin University of Science & Technology, No. 29, Thirteenth Street, Binhai New District, Tianjin, 300457, China.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Hoberück S, Löck S, Borkowetz A, Sommer U, Winzer R, Zöphel K, Fedders D, Michler E, Kotzerke J, Kopka K, Hölscher T, Braune A. Intraindividual comparison of [ 68 Ga]-Ga-PSMA-11 and [ 18F]-F-PSMA-1007 in prostate cancer patients: a retrospective single-center analysis. EJNMMI Res 2021; 11:109. [PMID: 34665337 PMCID: PMC8526666 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-021-00845-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The analysis aimed to compare the radiotracers [68Ga]-Ga-PSMA-11 and [18F]-F-PSMA-1007 intraindividually in terms of malignant lesions, mi(molecular-imaging)TNM staging and presumable unspecific lesions retrospectively as used in routine clinical practice. METHODS A retrospective analysis of 46 prostate cancer patients (median age: 71 years) who underwent consecutive [68Ga]-Ga-PSMA-11- and [18F]-F-PSMA-1007-PET/CT or PET/MRI within a mean of 12 ± 8.0 days was performed. MiTNM staging was performed in both studies by two nuclear medicine physicians who were blinded to the results of the other tracer. After intradisciplinary and interdisciplinary consensus with two radiologists was reached, differences in both malignant and presumable nonspecific tracer accumulation were analyzed. RESULTS Differences in terms of miTNM stages in both studies occurred in nine of the 46 patients (19.6%). The miT stages differed in five patients (10.9%), the miN stages differed in three patients (6.5%), and different miM stages occurred only in one patient who was upstaged in [18F]-F-PSMA-1007 PET. Concordant miTNM stages were obtained in 37 patients (80.4%). There was no significant difference between [18F]-F-PSMA-1007 and [68Ga]-Ga-PSMA-11 in the SUVmax locally (31.5 vs. 32.7; p = 0.658), in lymph node metastases (28.9 vs. 24.9; p = 0.30) or in bone metastases (22.9 vs. 27.6; p = 0.286). In [18F]-F-PSMA-1007 PET, more patients featured presumable unspecific uptake in the lymph nodes (52.2% vs. 28.3%; p: < 0.001), bones (71.7% vs. 23.9%; p < 0.001) and ganglia (71.7% vs. 43.5%; p < 0.001). Probable unspecific, exclusively [18F]-F-PSMA-1007-positive lesions mainly occurred in the ribs (58.7%), axillary lymph nodes (39.1%) and cervical ganglia (28.3%). CONCLUSION In terms of miTNM staging, both tracers appeared widely exchangeable, as no tracer relevantly outperformed the other. The differences between the two tracers were far more common in presumable unspecific lesions than in malignant spots. A routinely performed two-tracer study could not be shown to be superior. Since it seems at least challenging for most nuclear medicine departments to provide both [18F]-F-PSMA-1007 and [68Ga]-Ga-PSMA-11, it appears reasonable to choose the PSMA radiotracer depending on local availability with attention to the greater occurrence of nonspecific bone findings with [18F]-F-PSMA-1007.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Hoberück
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany. .,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Helios Klinikum Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany.
| | - Steffen Löck
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Angelika Borkowetz
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Ulrich Sommer
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Robert Winzer
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Klaus Zöphel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Dieter Fedders
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Enrico Michler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jörg Kotzerke
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Klaus Kopka
- Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Faculty of Chemistry and Food Chemistry, School of Science, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Tobias Hölscher
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Anja Braune
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Pattison DA, Debowski M, Gulhane B, Arnfield EG, Pelecanos AM, Garcia PL, Latter MJ, Lin CY, Roberts MJ, Ramsay SC, Thomas PA. Prospective intra-individual blinded comparison of [ 18F]PSMA-1007 and [ 68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging in patients with confirmed prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021; 49:763-776. [PMID: 34383089 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05520-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION [18F]PSMA-1007 has potential advantages over [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11, although limited prospective data evaluating diagnostic performance exist. The aims of this study are to describe the concordance of [18FPSMA-1007 and [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 for TNM with the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) prognostic stage and assess differences in tracer uptake. METHODS Fifty men (mean age 71.8) were imaged with [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and [18F]PSMA-1007 < 4 weeks apart. Images were independently reported according to TNM by two experienced nuclear medicine specialists blinded to the other scan and prior imaging. Discordant results were resolved by a third independent nuclear medicine specialist. Quantitative analysis of lesion uptake and physiologic tissue for each tracer was performed by one experienced reader. RESULTS Scan indications were initial staging (n = 12), biochemical recurrence (n = 27) and metastatic disease evaluation (n = 11). Most patients had ISUP grade group 3 or higher. Median PSA value was 2.7 ng/ml (IQR 0.7-12.0), and a minority of patients (28%) were currently treated with androgen deprivation therapy. [18F]PSMA-1007 uptake was significantly higher than [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 in local recurrence, nodal and distant metastases and most physiologic sites (including bone) except for urinary bladder which was significantly lower. [18F]PSMA-1007 upstaged local prostate staging in 5/17 patients, local recurrence in 3/33 patients, regional nodal disease in 3/50 patients and 1 distant metastasis (bladder). [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 upstaged regional nodal disease in 1/50 patients and distant metastasis in one patient (right adrenal). Overall AJCC prognostic stage was concordant in 46/50 (92%) patients, with two patients upstaged for both [18F]PSMA-1007 and [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11. [18F]PSMA-1007 had more equivocal results (one regional node; six equivocal bone lesions, one of which was subsequently confirmed metastatic) than [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 (one equivocal local recurrence). CONCLUSION Overall AJCC prognostic stage was similar (92%) between [18F]PSMA-1007 and [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11. [18F]PSMA-1007 demonstrates higher uptake within involved nodes and distant metastases and most physiologic sites except urinary bladder which aided [18F]PSMA-1007 local staging of the prostate primary/local recurrence and regional nodal disease adjacent ureters. However, [18F]PSMA-1007 liver uptake obscured a solitary right adrenal metastasis, and more equivocal bone lesions were identified. Trial registration The study was registered with Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12618000665235) on 24 April 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David A Pattison
- Department of Nuclear Medicine & Specialised PET Services, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, 2006, Australia. .,School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
| | - Maciej Debowski
- Department of Medical Imaging, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Brook Gulhane
- Department of Medical Imaging, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Evyn G Arnfield
- Department of Nuclear Medicine & Specialised PET Services, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, 2006, Australia
| | - Anita M Pelecanos
- Statistics Unit, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Peter L Garcia
- Department of Nuclear Medicine & Specialised PET Services, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, 2006, Australia
| | - Melissa J Latter
- Department of Nuclear Medicine & Specialised PET Services, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, 2006, Australia.,School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Charles Y Lin
- School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Matthew J Roberts
- Department of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.,Department of Urology, Redcliffe Hospital, Redcliffe, Australia.,Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Stuart C Ramsay
- Department of Nuclear Medicine & Specialised PET Services, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, 2006, Australia.,School of Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia
| | - Paul A Thomas
- Department of Nuclear Medicine & Specialised PET Services, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, 2006, Australia.,School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Dietlein F, Kobe C, Munoz Vazquez S, Fischer T, Endepols H, Hohberg M, Reifegerst M, Neumaier B, Schomaecker K, Drzezga AE, Dietlein M. An 89Zr-labeled PSMA tracer for PET/CT imaging of prostate cancer patients. J Nucl Med 2021; 63:573-583. [PMID: 34326129 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2021] [Revised: 06/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The short half-life of existing prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) tracers limits their time for internalization into tumor cells after injection, which is an essential prerequisite for robust detection of tumor lesions with low PSMA expression on PET/CT scans. Due to its longer half-life, the 89Zr-labeled ligand 89Zr-PSMA-Df allows acquisition of PET scans up to 6 days after injection, thereby overcoming the above limitation. We investigated whether 89Zr-PSMA-Df allowed more sensitive detection of weak PSMA-positive prostate cancer lesions. Methods: We selected 14 prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence who exhibited no PSMA-positive lesions on a PET scan acquired with existing PSMA tracers (68Ga-PSMA-11, 18F-JK-PSMA-7). Within 5 weeks after the negative scan, we performed a second PSMA-PET scan using 89Zr-PSMA-Df (117±16 MBq, PET acquisition within 6 days of injection). Results: 89Zr-PSMA-Df detected 15 PSMA-positive lesions in 8/14 patients, who had a PET-negative reading of their initial PET scans with existing tracers. In these 8 patients, the new scans revealed localized recurrence of disease (3/8), metastases in lymph nodes (3/8), or lesions at distant sites (2/8). Based on these results, patients received lesion-targeted radiotherapies (5/8), androgen deprivation therapies (2/8), or no therapy (1/8). The plausibility of 14/15 lesions was supported by histology, clinical follow-up after radiotherapy or subsequent imaging. Furthermore, comparison of the 15 89Zr-PSMA-Df-positive lesions with their correlates on the original PET scan revealed that established tracers exhibited mild accumulation in 7/15 lesions but contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) were too low for robust detection of these lesions (CNR 2.4±3.7 for established tracers vs. 10.2±8.5 for 89Zr-PSMA-Df, P = 0.0014). The SUVmax of the 15 89Zr-PSMA-Df-positive lesions (11.5±5.8) was significantly higher than the SUVmax on the original PET scans (4.7±2.8, P = 0.0001). Kidneys were the most exposed organ with doses of 3.3±0.7 mGy/MBq. The effective dose was 0.15±0.04 mSv/MBq. Conclusion: In patients with weak PSMA expression, a longer period of time might be needed for ligand internalization than that offered by existing PSMA tracers to make lesions visible on PET/CT scans. Hence, 89Zr-PSMA-Df might be of significant benefit to patients in whom the search for weak PSMA-positive lesions is challenging. Radiation exposure should be weighed against the potential benefit of metastasis-directed therapy or salvage radiotherapy, which we initiated in 36% (5/14) of our patients based on their 89Zr-PSMA-Df PET scans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Dietlein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Germany
| | - Carsten Kobe
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Thomas Fischer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Germany
| | - Heike Endepols
- Institute of Radiochemistry and Experimental Molecular Imaging, University Hospital of Cologne, Germany
| | - Melanie Hohberg
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Bernd Neumaier
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine INM-5, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Germany
| | - Klaus Schomaecker
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Markus Dietlein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Prospective comparison of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT, whole-body MRI and CT in primary nodal staging of unfavorable intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021; 48:2670-2671. [PMID: 33944959 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05369-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
48
|
Ahmadi Bidakhvidi N, Laenen A, Jentjens S, Deroose CM, Van Laere K, De Wever L, Mai C, Berghen C, De Meerleer G, Haustermans K, Joniau S, Everaerts W, Goffin K. Parameters predicting [ 18F]PSMA-1007 scan positivity and type and number of detected lesions in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. EJNMMI Res 2021; 11:41. [PMID: 33929626 PMCID: PMC8087750 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-021-00783-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2021] [Accepted: 04/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Detection of the site of recurrence using PSMA-PET/CT is important to guide treatment in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer (PCa). The aim of this study was to evaluate the positivity rate of [18F]PSMA-1007-PET/CT in patients with biochemically recurrent PCa and identify parameters that predict scan positivity as well as the type and number of detected lesions. This monocentric retrospective study included 137 PCa patients with biochemical recurrence who underwent one or more [18F]PSMA-1007-PET/CT scans between August 2018 and June 2019. PET-positive malignant lesions were classified as local recurrence, lymph node (LN), bone or soft tissue lesions. The association between biochemical/paraclinical parameters, as PSA value, PSA doubling time, PSA velocity, Gleason score (GS) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), and scan positivity as well as type and number of detected lesions was evaluated using logistic regression analysis (binary outcomes) and Poisson models (count-type outcomes). RESULTS We included 175 [18F]PSMA-1007-PET/CT scans after radical prostatectomy (78%), external beam radiation therapy (8.8%), ADT (7.3%), brachytherapy (5.1%) and high intensity focused ultrasound (0.7%) as primary treatment (median PSA value 1.6 ng/ml). Positivity rate was 80%. PSA value and PSA velocity were significant predictors of scan positivity as well as of the presence of bone and soft tissue lesions and number of bone, LN and soft tissue lesions, both in uni- and/or multivariable analysis. Multivariable analysis also showed prior ADT as predictor of bone and soft tissue lesions, GS as predictor of the number of bone lesions and ongoing ADT as predictor of the number of LN lesions. CONCLUSION [18F]PSMA-1007-PET/CT showed a high positivity rate in patients with biochemically recurrent PCa. PSA value and PSA velocity were significant predictors of scan positivity as well as of the presence and number of bone and soft tissue lesions and the number of LN lesions. Our findings can guide clinicians in optimal patient selection for [18F]PSMA-1007-PET/CT and support further research leading to the development of a prediction nomogram.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Annouschka Laenen
- Interuniversity Institute for Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sander Jentjens
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Christophe M Deroose
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.,Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Koen Van Laere
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.,Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Liesbeth De Wever
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Cindy Mai
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Charlien Berghen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gert De Meerleer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.,Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Karin Haustermans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.,Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Steven Joniau
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.,Urogenital, Abdominal and Plastic Surgery, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Wouter Everaerts
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.,Urogenital, Abdominal and Plastic Surgery, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Karolien Goffin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.,Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Zhang X, Wu Y, Zeng Q, Xie T, Yao S, Zhang J, Cui M. Synthesis, Preclinical Evaluation, and First-in-Human PET Study of Quinoline-Containing PSMA Tracers with Decreased Renal Excretion. J Med Chem 2021; 64:4179-4195. [PMID: 33783213 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c00117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
The prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is considered to be an excellent theranostic target of prostate cancer (PCa). In this study, three 18F-labeled PSMA tracers with a more lipophilic quinoline functional spacer were designed, synthesized, and evaluated based on the Glu-Ureido-Lys binding motif. The effect of structure-related lipophilic difference on distribution and excretion of these tracers in vitro and in vivo (cells, rodent, primate, and human) was investigated by comparing with [18F]DCFPyL. There is no significant correlation between the renal elimination and the lipophilicity of the tracers in all species. However, the higher the lipophilicity of tracer, the higher the radioactivity accumulation in the liver of primate and human, and the less radioactivity is to excrete to the bladder with urine. The screened tracer [18F]8c, with a Ki value of 4.58 nM, displayed notable low bladder retention and demonstrated good imaging properties in patients with PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaojun Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Radiopharmaceuticals, Ministry of Education, College of Chemistry, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Yitian Wu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Qi Zeng
- Key Laboratory of Radiopharmaceuticals, Ministry of Education, College of Chemistry, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
| | - Tianxin Xie
- Key Laboratory of Radiopharmaceuticals, Ministry of Education, College of Chemistry, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
| | - Shulin Yao
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Jinming Zhang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Mengchao Cui
- Key Laboratory of Radiopharmaceuticals, Ministry of Education, College of Chemistry, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
- Center for Advanced Materials Research, Advanced Institute of Natural Sciences, Beijing Normal University at Zhuhai, Zhuhai 519087, China
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Katzschmann I, Marx H, Kopka K, Hennrich U. Development and Validation of a GMP-Compliant High-Pressure Liquid Chromatography Method for the Determination of the Chemical and Radiochemical Purity of [ 18F]PSMA-1007, a PET Tracer for the Imaging of Prostate Cancer. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2021; 14:ph14030188. [PMID: 33669095 PMCID: PMC7996543 DOI: 10.3390/ph14030188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2021] [Revised: 02/11/2021] [Accepted: 02/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
For the PET imaging of prostate cancer, radiotracers targeting the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) are nowadays used in clinical practice. [18F]PSMA-1007, a radiopharmaceutical labeled with fluorine-18, has excellent properties for the detection of prostate cancer. Essential for the human use of a radiotracer is its production and quality control under GMP-compliance. For this purpose, all analytical methods have to be validated. [18F]PSMA-1007 is easily radiosynthesized in a one-step procedure and isolated using solid phase extraction (SPE) cartridges followed by formulation of a buffered injection solution and for the determination of its chemical and radiochemical purity a robust, fast and reliable quality control method using radio-HPLC is necessary. After development and optimizations overcoming problems in reproducibility, the here described radio-HPLC method fulfills all acceptance criteria—for e.g., specificity, linearity, and accuracy—and is therefore well suited for the routine quality control of [18F]PSMA-1007 before release of the radiopharmaceutical. Recently a European Pharmacopeia monograph for [18F]PSMA-1007 was published suggesting a different radio-HPLC method for the determination of its chemical and radiochemical purity. Since the here described method has certain advantages, not least of all easier technical implementation, it can be an attractive alternative to the monograph method. The here described method was successfully validated on several radio-HPLC systems in our lab and used for the analysis of more than 60 batches of [18F]PSMA-1007. Using this method, the chemical and radiochemical purity of [18F]PSMA-1007 can routinely be evaluated assuring patient safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ines Katzschmann
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division of Radiology, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (I.K.); (H.M.)
| | - Heike Marx
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division of Radiology, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (I.K.); (H.M.)
| | - Klaus Kopka
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;
- Helmholz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Bautzner Landstraße 400, 01328 Dresden, Germany
- Faculty of Chemistry and Food Chemistry, Technische Universität Dresden, Mommsenstraße 4, 01062 Dresden, Germany
| | - Ute Hennrich
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division of Radiology, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (I.K.); (H.M.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|