Capnography-guided Endotracheal Intubation as an Alternative to Existing Intubation Methods in Rabbits

Development and evaluation of an anatomically designed and 3D printed device to enhance orotracheal intubation success in rabbits by inexperienced veterinarians

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether the use of a three-dimensional (3D) printed device enhances the success rate of orotracheal intubation in rabbits.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, crossover randomized controlled trial.

ANIMALS

A total of six mixed-breed rabbits.

METHODS

A device to guide the endotracheal tube was designed based on computed tomography images and then manufactured using 3D printing. Rabbits were randomly assigned for intubation by two inexperienced veterinarians using the blind (BLI), borescope- (BOR) or device- (DEV) guided techniques. Success rate, number of attempts, time to success, injury scores and propofol dose were recorded and compared. Significance was considered when p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Success rate was higher in DEV (58.3%) than in BLI (8.3%) (p < 0.023), but not different from that in BOR (41.6%). Total time until successful intubation was lower in DEV (45 ± 23 seconds) and BOR (85 ± 62 seconds) than in BLI (290 seconds; p < 0.006). Time for the successful attempt was lower for DEV (35 ± 10 seconds) and BOR (74 ± 43 seconds) than in BLI (290 seconds; p < 0.0001). The propofol dose required was lower for DEV (2.3 ± 1.2 mg kg-1) than for BLI (3.4 ± 1.6 mg kg-1) (p < 0.031), but not different from BOR (2.4 ± 0.9 mg kg-1). Number of attempts and oxygen desaturation events were not different among techniques (p < 0.051 and p < 0.326, respectively). Injury scores [median (range)] before and after attempts were different in BLI [0 versus 1 (0-3), p < 0.005] and BOR [0 (0-1) versus 1 (0-3), p < 0.002] but not in DEV [0 (0-2) versus 0 (0-3), p < 0.109].

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The device facilitated orotracheal intubation with a time similar to the borescope-guided technique but faster than the traditional blind technique.

A learning curve of a novel multimodal endotracheal intubation assistant device for novices in a simulated airway: a prospective manikin trial with cumulative sum method

BACKGROUND

Awake fiberoptic intubation is conventionally performed in anticipated difficult airways. However, obstruction by secretions and sputum makes it challenging for novices. A prototype of a novel multimodal endotracheal intubation assistant device (MEIAD) was developed for an indication of airway according to end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO₂) and image. At the tip, 4 sampling tubes collected ETCO₂ concentration. The airway direction is located according to an advanced algorithm based on 4 directions' concentrations. It assists awake intubation, especially with unclear view field. The objective was to analyze the learning curve of MEIAD for novices on a manikin by cumulative sum method (CUSUM) and evaluate the utility.

METHODS

A total of 16 novice residents with less than 2-year clinical experience were enrolled. After instruction, each individual exercised 40 insertions with MEIAD on a difficult airway simulation. Insertion success (defined as a visualization of the carina within 120 seconds), insertion time (the time from when the guiding scope entered the nasal cavity to the carina was visible), and self-confidence score (subjective score with a numerical rating scale from 0 to 10) were recorded. The acceptable and unacceptable failure rates of CUSUM were set as 15% and 30%, respectively. The exercises were divided into 2 phases (phase 1: 1-20, phase 2: 21-40) for further evaluation. All continuous data were expressed by median (IQR, interquartile ranges) and analyzed using Mann-Whitney test. All categorical variables were expressed as percentages and compared by the χ² test.

RESULTS

Among the 16 residents, 15 were able to cross the lower decision boundary in an average of 21.27±9.51 attempts using the novel device. The insertion time [24.0 (17.0-42.0) vs. 17.5 (14.0-28.0) seconds, P<0.001] and success rate (88.4% vs. 97.5%, P<0.001) were improved with increased experience. The confidence score was significantly improved from 2.5 (1.3-4.0) to 7.0 (7.0-8.0).

CONCLUSIONS

MEIAD showed a satisfactory learning curve and efficacy on the manikin for novices. However, as a small exploratory manikin trial, the results cannot be replicated in clinical practice. MEIAD is expected to be further improved and potential to be an alternative device for difficult airways.

Rabbit Sedation and Anesthesia

With the increasing frequency of rabbits as veterinary patients, the expectation for high-quality, intensive veterinary care, and resultantly an understanding of anesthesia has been increasing. Sedation and general anesthesia are commonly required for many routine and emergency procedures in rabbits, and this results in the need for a strong awareness of anesthetic principles, knowledge of limitations of anesthesia, and maintenance of high standards of anesthesia.

V-Gel® Guided Endotracheal Intubation in Rabbits

Background: General anesthesia in rabbits is associated with higher morbidity and mortality relative to other mammalian species commonly anesthetized. Unique challenges related to endotracheal intubation (ETI) in rabbits contribute to this risk. Objective: To improve the safety of ETI in rabbits, we developed two new ETI methods using a supraglottic airway device (v-gel^®) to facilitate ETI and compared them to traditional "blind" technique. We hypothesized that relative to blind ETI, v-gel^® guided ETI provides more successful placement of the endotracheal tube (ETT) in a shorter time. Outcomes included number of intubation attempts, time for achievement of ETI, endoscopic findings, and serial arterial blood gas (ABG) analysis. Study Design: Prospective, randomized, and crossover study. Methods: Ten female, New Zealand White rabbits aged 1-2 years old, weighing 4.3 ± 0.4 kg, were anesthetized four times. Each time, ETI was performed with one of the following techniques: Method 1: v-gel^® guided, polypropylene catheter facilitated, intubation using a cuffed ETT; Method 2: v-gel^® guided intubation using an uncuffed ETT directly inserted through the device airway channel; Method 3 and 4: Blind intubation with uncuffed or cuffed ETT. Upper airway endoscopy was performed before intubation attempts and after extubation. Serial ABG analysis was performed during the peri-intubation process. Results: V-gel^® guided techniques allowed successful ETI on the initial attempt for 9/10 subjects using Method 1 and 10/10 using Method 2. Relative to the v-gel^® guided techniques, the blind techniques required more intubation attempts. A median of 2 attempts (range 1-4, p < 0.007) were required for the uncuffed ETT, and a median of 4 (range 1-4, p < 0.001) attempts were performed for the cuffed ETT. The time to perform successful ETI was positively correlated with the number of attempts (ρ = 0.82), while successful ETI was negatively correlated with number of attempts (ρ = -0.82). Endoscopic findings showed mild to moderate laryngeal trauma. In the absence of oxygen supplementation, ABG analysis demonstrated low PaO₂, while PaCO₂ remained consistent. Conclusions: Facilitated ETI using the v-gel^® guided techniques allows for the rapid establishment of a secure airway to provide ventilatory support for rabbits undergoing general anesthesia.

3D Printed Biomimetic Rabbit Airway Simulation Model for Nasotracheal Intubation Training

Rabbit inhalation anesthesia by endotracheal intubation involves a higher risk among small animals owing to several anatomical and physiological features, which is pathognomonic to this species of lagomorphs. Rabbit-specific airway devices have been designed to prevent misguided intubation attempts. However, it is believed that expert anesthetic training could be a boon in limiting the aftermaths of this procedure. Our research is aimed to develop a novel biomimetic 3D printed rabbit airway model with representative biomechanical material behavior and radiodensity. Imaging data were collected for two sacrificed rabbit heads using micro-computed tomography (μCT) and micro-magnetic resonance imaging for the first head and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for the second head. Imaging-based life-size musculoskeletal airway models were printed using polyjet technology with a combination of hard and soft materials in replicates of three. The models were evaluated quantitatively for dimensional accuracy and radiodensity and qualitatively using digital microscopy and endoscopy for technical, tactic, and visual realism. The results displayed that simulation models printed with polyjet technology have an overall surface representation of 93% for μCT-based images and 97% for CBCT-based images within a range of 0.0-2.5 mm, with μCT showing a more detailed reproduction of the nasotracheal anatomy. Dimensional discrepancies can be caused due to inadequate support material removal and due to the limited reconstruction of microstructures from the imaging on the 3D printed model. The model showed a significant difference in radiodensities in hard and soft tissue regions. Endoscopic evaluation provided good visual and tactile feedback, comparable to the real animal. Overall, the model, being a practical low-cost simulator, comprehensively accelerates the learning curve of veterinary nasotracheal intubation and paves the way for 3D simulation-based image-guided interventional procedures.

Comparison of blind intubation and a smartphone-based endoscope-assisted intubation in rabbits

OBJECTIVE

To compare between blind and smartphone-based endoscope-assisted techniques for endotracheal intubation in rabbits.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective clinical study.

ANIMALS

A total of 34 rabbits.

METHODS

Rabbits were assigned to four groups: intubation by a veterinary anesthesiologist (VA) or an exotic pet medicine specialist (EPS) using blind or endoscope-assisted techniques. Propofol dose, number of attempts until successful intubation, total time for intubation, duration of the successful attempt and occurrence of lingual cyanosis/laryngeal lesions were recorded. Data were analyzed by t test, Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney U test or chi-square test. Pearson correlation for body weight was performed.

RESULTS

The success rate of blind intubation was 88.9% and 77.8% for VA and EPS, respectively. Propofol dose, total and median number of attempts, total time for intubation and duration of the successful attempt were 3.1 (0-6.2) mg kg^-1, 19, 2 (1-5), 79 ± 65 and 30 ± 20 seconds for VA and 1.5 (0-4.5) mg kg^-1, 24, 3 (1-5), 136 ± 92 and 38 ± 16 seconds for EPS. The success rate of endoscope-assisted intubation was 87.5% for both operators. Propofol dose, total and median number of attempts, total time for intubation and duration of the successful attempt were 2.5 (1.3-7.4) mg kg^-1, 22, 3 (1-5), 170 (65-368) and 46 (22-150) seconds for VA and 3.2 (0-6) mg kg^-1, 11, 1 (1-4), 56 (27-432) and 55 (26-79) seconds for EPS. VA performed blind intubation more quickly, propofol dose was lower and cyanosis was less frequent than in the endoscope-assisted group.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Both techniques were reliable for rabbit endotracheal intubation. Best results were achieved when the operator was experienced in the technique. The smartphone-based endoscope is a useful aid for rabbit intubation.