The effect of misoprostol on base-line and stimulated acid secretion and on gastrin and histamine release in the totally isolated, vascularly perfused rat stomach

ECL-cell histamine mobilization in conscious rats: effects of locally applied regulatory peptides, candidate neurotransmitters and inflammatory mediators

1. The ECL cells control gastric acid secretion by mobilizing histamine in response to circulating gastrin. In addition, the ECL cells are thought to operate under nervous control and to be influenced by local inflammatory processes. 2. The purpose of the present study was to monitor histamine mobilization from ECL cells in conscious rats in response to locally applied regulatory peptides, candidate neurotransmitters and inflammatory mediators. 3. Microdialysis probes were implanted in the submucosa of the acid-producing part of the rat stomach. Three days later, the agents to be tested were administered via the microdialysis probe and their effects on basal (48 h fast) and stimulated (intravenous infusion of gastrin-17, 3 nmol kg(-1) h(-1)) mobilization of ECL-cell histamine was monitored by continuous measurement of histamine in the perfusate (radioimmunoassay). 4. Locally administered gastrin-17 and sulfated cholecystokinin-8 mobilized histamine as did pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide-27, vasoactive intestinal peptide, peptide YY, met-enkephalin, endothelin and noradrenaline, adrenaline and isoprenaline. 5. While gastrin, sulfated-cholecystokinin-8, met-enkephalin and isoprenaline induced a sustained elevation of the submucosal histamine concentration, endothelin, peptide YY, pituitary adenylate cyclase activating peptide, vasoactive intestinal peptide, noradrenaline and adrenaline induced a transient elevation. 6. Calcitonin gene-related peptide, galanin, somatostatin and the prostanoid misoprostol inhibited gastrin-stimulated histamine mobilization. 7. The gut hormones neurotensin and secretin and the neuropeptides gastrin-releasing peptide, neuropeptide Y and substance P failed to affect ECL-cell histamine mobilization, while motilin and neuromedin U-25 had weak stimulatory effects. Also acetylcholine, carbachol, serotonin and the amino acid neurotransmitters aspartate, gamma-aminobutyric acid, glutamate and glycine were inactive or weakly active as was bradykinin. 8. In summary, a range of circulating hormones, local hormones, catecholamines, neuropeptides and inflammatory mediators participate in controlling the activity of rat stomach ECL cells in situ.

Isolated rat stomach ECL cells generate prostaglandin E(2) in response to interleukin-1 beta, tumor necrosis factor-alpha and bradykinin

The ECL cells control parietal cells by releasing histamine in their immediate vicinity. Gastrin and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide (PACAP) stimulate histamine secretion from isolated ECL cells, while somatostatin and galanin inhibit stimulated secretion. Prostaglandin E2 and related prostaglandins likewise suppress ECL-cell histamine secretion. Conceivably, that is how they inhibit acid secretion. In the present study, we examined if prostaglandin E2 can be generated by isolated ECL cells. Rat stomach ECL cells were purified (>90% purity) by counterflow elutriation and gradient centrifugation and cultured for 48 h. ECL cell stimulants (gastrin and PACAP) and inflammatory agents (interleukin-1 beta, tumor necrosis factor-alpha and bradykinin) were tested for their ability to induce prostaglandin E2 accumulation (24-h incubation), measured by radioimmunoassay. Gastrin and PACAP did not affect prostaglandin E2 accumulation but interleukin-1 beta (300 pg/ml), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (10 ng/ml) and bradykinin (1 microM) induced a 2- to 3-fold increase in the amount of prostaglandin E2 accumulated. While the combination of interleukin-1 beta and bradykinin induced a 9-fold increase, the combination interleukin-1 beta+tumor necrosis factor-alpha and bradykinin + tumor necrosis factor-alpha induced additive effects only. The combination of interleukin-1 beta + tumor necrosis factor-alpha + bradykinin did not induce a greater effect than interleukin-1 beta + bradykinin. The effect of interleukin-1 beta + bradykinin was abolished by adding 10 nM hydrocortisone (suppressing phospholipase A2 and cyclooxygenase) or 1 microM indomethacin (inhibiting cyclooxygenase). Incubating ECL cells in the presence of interleukin-1 beta+bradykinin for 24 h reduced their ability to secrete histamine in response to gastrin. The inhibitory effect was reversed by 1 microM indomethacin. Also, increasing the concentrations of hydrocortisone in the medium resulted in an enhanced gastrin-stimulated histamine secretion. Hence, the previously described acid-inhibiting effect of inflammatory agents may be explained by inhibition of ECL-cell histamine mobilization, consequent to enhanced formation of prostaglandin E2 by cells in the oxyntic mucosa, including the ECL cells themselves.

Neurohormonal regulation of secretion from isolated rat stomach ECL cells: a critical reappraisal

ECL cells are endocrine/paracrine cells in the oxyntic mucosa. They produce, store and secrete histamine and chromogranin A-derived peptides such as pancreastatin. The regulation of ECL-cell secretion has been studied by several groups using purified ECL cells, isolated from rat stomachs. Reports from different laboratories often disagree. The purpose of the present study was to re-evaluate the discrepancies by studying histamine (or pancreastatin) secretion from standardized preparations of pure, well-functioning ECL cells. Cells from rat oxyntic mucosa were dispersed by pronase digestion, purified by repeated counter-flow elutriation and subjected to density gradient centrifugation. The final preparation consisted of more than 90% ECL cells (verified by histamine and/or histidine decarboxylase immunocytochemistry). They were maintained in primary culture for 48 h before they were exposed to candidate stimulants and inhibitors for 30 min after which the medium was collected for determination of mobilized histamine (or pancreastatin). Gastrin-17 and sulphated cholecystokinin octapeptide (CCK-8s) raised histamine secretion 4-fold, the EC(50) for both peptides being around 100 pM. The neuropeptide pituitary adenylate cyclase activating peptide (PACAP-27) (5-fold increase) and the related neuropeptides vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and peptide histidine isoleucine (PHI) (3-fold increase) mobilized histamine with similar potency (EC(50) ranging from 80 to 140 pM). Adrenaline, isoprenaline and terbutaline stimulated secretion by activating a beta2 receptor subtype, while acetylcholine and carbachol were without effect. Secretion experiments were invariably run in parallel with a gastrin standard curve. Somatostatin, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and the PGE1 congener misoprostol inhibited PACAP- and gastrin-stimulated secretion by more than 90%, with IC(50) values ranging from 90-720 (somatostatin) to 40-200 (misoprostol) pM. The neuropeptide galanin inhibited secretion by 60-70% with a potency similar to that of somatostatin. Proposed inhibitors such as peptide YY, neuropeptide Y and the cytokines interleukin 1-beta and tumor necrosis factor alpha induced at best a moderate inhibition of gastrin- or PACAP-stimulated secretion at high concentrations, while calcitonin gene-related peptide, pancreatic polypeptide and histamine itself were without effect. Inhibition of gastrin- or PACAP-stimulated secretion was routinely compared to a somatostatin standard curve. In conclusion, gastrin, PACAP, VIP/PHI and adrenaline stimulated secretion. Somatostatin and PGE2 were powerful inhibitors of both gastrin- and PACAP-stimulated secretion; although equally potent, galanin was less effective than somatostatin and PGE2.

Vasoactive intestinal polypeptide appears to be one of the mediators in misoprostol-enhanced small intestinal transit in rats

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Prostaglandin analogs have the pharmacologic effect of speeding up small intestinal transit (SIT). It remains unknown whether some gut peptides also mediate this enhancement. We studied the effect of misoprostol on rat SIT and looked at the role of vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) release during its action.

METHODS

A group of rats initially received oral misoprostol treatment of 1, 10, 50 and 100 microg/kg, respectively. By using orally fed charcoal as a motility marker, the SIT was assessed at 30 min following oral misoprostol treatment. Another group of rats received misoprostol as an intraperitoneal injection in similar doses to the group above. The small intestinal transit was computed for this group at 30 min following misoprostol injection via an instilled radiochromium motility marker that went through a previously placed intraduodenal catheter. The plasma VIP level was measured by using a radioimmunoassay kit.

RESULTS

Neither charcoal evaluated transit nor the plasma VIP level was influenced by the lower doses of oral misoprostol treatment (1 and 10 microg/kg), whereas other doses enhanced SIT and diminished the plasma VIP level (P< 0.01).The similar effects on radiochromium computed SIT (P< 0.01) and plasma VIP levels were obtained in tubed rats following misoprostol intraperitoneal treatment. The SIT results correlated negatively with plasma VIP levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Enhanced SIT and diminished VIP levels are found in rats following misoprostol treatment. It appears that inhibited VIP release is one of the mechanisms in misoprostol-enhanced SIT.

Cellular distribution of prostanoid EP receptors mRNA in the rat gastrointestinal tract

The inhibition of PGE(2) synthesis resulting from sustained NSAIDs therapy has been linked to gastrointestinal irritations and ulceration. The multiple physiological effects of PGE(2) in the gut are mediated through the activation of four receptors termed EP(1-4). The aim of the study was to determine the precise distribution of the four prostaglandin E(2) receptors in the rat stomach, small intestine, and colon. We used non-radioactive in situ hybridization techniques on paraffin-embedded tissue. Mucous cells of the stomach and goblet cells of the small intestine and colon were found to express mRNA for all four EP subtypes. A positive hybridization signal for EP(1), EP(3), and EP(4) was detected in the parietal cells of the stomach whereas the chief cells expressed low levels of EP(1) and EP(3). The EP(1) and EP(3) receptor mRNA could also be detected in the muscularis mucosa, longitudinal muscle and enteric ganglias of the stomach and small intestine. However, close examination of the enteric ganglias indicated that most of the positive labeling was localized to the glial cells, although some neurons did express EP(3). In conclusion, we have detailed the distribution of prostanoid EP receptors in the gut at the cellular level, giving new insights to the role of prostaglandins in gastrointestinal functions.

Endogenous prostaglandins are physiological regulators of endocrine cells in the gastroduodenal mucosa of the rat

BACKGROUND/AIM

To investigate whether endogenous prostaglandins participate in the regulation of the gastrointestinal endocrine cell system.

METHODS

Sprague-Dawley rats were treated with 1 mg/kg indomethacin subcutaneously or indomethacin subcutaneously and 500 microg/kg oral prostaglandin E2 or solvents for 2 months. Endocrine cells were visualized by using immunohistochemistry and by the Sevier-Munger silver stain on specimens from the gastroduodenal mucosa, and their total volume was estimated, using standard stereological methods. Plasma and gastrointestinal tissue concentrations of regulatory peptides were analyzed by radioimmunoassay.

RESULTS

Fundic mucosa. The total volume of cells stained with the Sevier-Munger silver stain (enterochromaffin-like) was increased by indomethacin, but reduced by the administration of prostaglandin E2 (P < 0.05 vs. indomethacin). Indomethacin increased the total volume of somatostatin-immunoreactive. Similarly, rats given indomethacin and prostaglandin E2 had higher values than controls. Indomethacin increased the tissue concentration of somatostatin in the gastric fundus whereas prostaglandin E2 prevented such changes (P < 0.05 vs. indomethacin). Antral mucosa. The total volume of serotonin-immunoreactive cells was reduced by indomethacin, but increased by prostaglandin E2 (P < 0.05 vs. controls and indomethacin, respectively). Duodenal mucosa. The total volume of somatostatin-immunoreactive cells was reduced in the rats given indomethacin and prostaglandin E2 (P < 0.05 vs. controls and indomethacin). Indomethacin reduced and simultaneous administration of prostaglandin E2 increased the total volume of CCK-immunoreactive cells (P < 0.05 vs. controls and indomethacin). Indomethacin reduced the total volume of serotonin-immunoreactive cells whereas the simultaneous administration of PGE2 comparatively increased their total volumes (P < 0.05 vs. indomethacin), although they were still lower than the control values. The total volume of GIP-immunoreactive cells was slightly increased in the rats given both indomethacin and indomethacin + prostaglandin E2. The tissue concentration of somatostatin in the duodenum was reduced in rats given indometacin and prostaglandin E2 (P < 0.05 vs. controls and indomethacin).

CONCLUSION

Endogenous prostaglandins, particularly prostaglandin E2, regulate CCK-, enterochromaffin-like-, somatostatin-, GIP- and enterochromaffin cells in the gastroduodenal mucosa of the rat.

Prostaglandins inhibit secretion of histamine and pancreastatin from isolated rat stomach ECL cells

1. The present study examines the effect of naturally occurring prostanoids and prostaglandin (PG) congeners on gastrin- and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide (PACAP)-evoked histamine and pancreastatin secretion from isolated rat stomach ECL cells. 2. ECL cells (75-85% purity) were isolated from rat stomach using pronase digestion followed by repeated counter-flow elutriation and cultured for 48 h before secretion experiments. The release of histamine and pancreastatin was determined by radioimmunoassay. 3. None of the PGs tested stimulated the release of either histamine or pancreastatin. 4. PGE1 and PGE2 inhibited both gastrin- and PACAP-evoked histamine and pancreastatin secretion (IC50 = 1-2 x 10(-10) M). Most other naturally occuring prostanoids and PG congeners had no or little inhibitory effect. The PGE analogues misoprostol and sulprostone were more potent (IC50 = 0.9 x 10(-11) M and 2 x 10(-11) M respectively) than PGE1 and PGE2. The rank order of potency was misoprostol > sulprostone > PGE1 = PGE2, suggesting the involvement of the so-called EP3 receptor. 5. The effects of PGs on the stomach ECL cells may be direct or indirect, for instance through the stimulated release of somatostatin from contaminating D cells (2-3%). However, the amount of somatostatin in the cell culture after 48 h was below the limit of detection, and somatostatin immunoneutralization did not prevent misoprostol from inhibiting secretion from the ECL cells. 6. The misoprostol-induced inhibition was reversed by pertussis toxin suggesting the involvement of G-protein subunits G alpha(0) and/or G alpha(i). 7. In view of the potency by which PGE1, PGE2, misoprostol and sulprostone inhibited the stimulated release of histamine and pancreastatin, we suggest that the ECL cells represent a primary target for prostaglandins acting via an EP3 receptor in the oxyntic mucosa. 8. The results suggest that the clinically useful effect of misoprostol as an anti-ulcer drug reflects its ability to inhibit stomach ECL-cell histamine secretion.

Deficient gastric lipase secretion in pancreatic insufficiency

BACKGROUND

Gastrin is an important stimulator of gastric lipase secretion in man. In advanced pancreatic insufficiency gastric lipases might compensate for the lack of pancreatic lipases, but the role of gastrin in such compensation remains to be evaluated. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of gastrin on the gastric lipase secretion in patients with pancreatic insufficiency.

METHODS

Eight patients with pancreatic insufficiency secondary to alcohol abuse were studied, and six healthy subjects volunteered as controls for the study. All volunteers received identical doses of intravenous gastrin-17 (10, 30, and 60 pmol/kg/h). The gastric content was measured, using a nasogastric tube for aspiration, and the amount and activity of gastric lipase output were determined. Plasma concentrations of gastrin, secretin, and cholecystokinin were measured by radioimmunoassays.

RESULTS

The increased plasma levels of gastrin were accompanied by a dose-dependent increase in the amount and activity of gastric lipase in controls, but in the patients the response was almost abolished.

CONCLUSIONS

Gastrin in postprandial concentrations does not influence the secretion of gastric lipase in patients with pancreatic insufficiency due to chronic pancreatitis.

Suppression of histidine decarboxylase activity in rat oxyntic mucosa by beraprost sodium, a prostacyclin analogue

Prostaglandins (PGs) affect various aspects of gastric functions. In the present study the orally administered PGI2 derivative beraprost sodium (TRK-100.1 micrograms per kg body weight) decreased oxyntic histidine decarboxylase activity without changing serum gastrin levels. Antral pH increased 4 hr after treatment. Beraprost also decreased the pentagastrin-induced histidine decarboxylase activity at the same dose. Serum levels of secretin, somatostatin and glucose, and oxyntic mucosal levels of histamine and somatostatin, showed no significant change after treatment with beraprost. These results suggest that the response of oxyntic histidine decarboxylase to gastrin is modified by one or more prostanoids including PGI2. This mechanism might play a role in gastric mucosal protection.

Role of prostaglandins and histamine in hyperemic response to superficial and deep gastric mucosal injury and H+ back-diffusion in cats

This study was undertaken to examine the role of prostaglandins and histamine in the hyperemic response to gastric mucosal damage followed by H+ back-diffusion. Cat stomachs were exposed to 2 mol/liter NaCl for 10 min followed by luminal perfusion at pH 1. Hypertonic saline caused extensive (microscopic) damage to the surface epithelium, increased gastric mucosal blood flow, and increased release of histamine, PGE2, and 6-keto PGF1 alpha (prostacyclin) into portal venous blood. The effect of indomethacin and histamine blockers (H1 + H2) on the hyperemic response to acid back-diffusion was related to the depth of the mucosal injury and the region of the stomach. In the corpus, indomethacin enhanced mucosal injury. In areas with superficial damage, the hyperemia was inhibited by indomethacin and antihistamines and eliminated by the combination of both. In corpus areas with indomethacin-induced deep lesions, the blood flow was very high, and this hyperemia was partly inhibited by antihistamines. In the antrum the hyperemic response was reduced by antihistamines. Indomethacin increased the release of histamine into portal venous blood (baseline recordings) and reduced basal gastric mucosal blood flow.

Dual inhibitory mechanism of secretin action on acid secretion in totally isolated, vascularly perfused rat stomach

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Secretin is an inhibitory hormone of gastric acid secretion. However, its inhibitory mechanism has not been well understood. Possible roles of both somatostatin and prostaglandins were investigated.

METHODS

Totally isolated rat stomachs were vascularly perfused with Krebs-Ringer buffer containing 50 mumol/L isobutyl methylxanthine at 1.4 mL.min-1. Gastric lumen was perfused with 0.15 mol/L NaCl at 1.0 min.min-1. Effect of secretin in three different doses given intra-arterially on basal acid secretion and acid secretion stimulated by pentagastrin was studied. To determine roles of somatostatin and prostaglandins in the secretin-induced inhibition, an antisomatostatin serum and indomethacin were tested, and both somatostatin and prostaglandin E2 concentrations in portal venous effluent were determined by radioimmunoassay.

RESULTS

Both basal- and pentagastrin-stimulated acid secretion were significantly inhibited by secretin. The inhibition was completely reversed by either indomethacin or antisomatostatin serum. Secretin significantly increased concentrations of both somatostatin and prostaglandin E2. Although indomethacin blocked the increase in prostaglandin E2, secretin-induced increase in prostaglandin E2 was not affected by antisomatostatin serum or was indomethacin influenced by somatostatin level. Finally, the inhibition by somatostatin of acid secretion was not affected by indomethacin.

CONCLUSIONS

The inhibition of gastric acid secretion by secretin in rats is mediated by simultaneous releases of both somatostatin and prostaglandin E2, which independently inhibit gastric acid secretion.

The enterochromaffin-like (ECL) cell. Physiological and pathophysiological role

Histamine has a central role in the regulation of gastric acid secretion. This histamine is produced by and released from the enterochromaffin-like (ECL) cell which accordingly has a key-regulatory role in the oxyntic mucosa. Gastrin and the vagal nerves stimulate the formation and release of histamine from the ECL cell. Moreover, gastrin and the vagal nerves also stimulate the proliferation of the ECL cell. An increased ECL cell density may partly explain the increased acid secretion in patients with duodenal ulcer, particularly in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. The reduced potency of histamine-2 blockers in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome is probably due to increased histamine release by an elevated ECL cell mass. Prolonged and profound hypergastrinemia may lead to ECLomas. Moreover, a proportion of diffuse gastric carcinomas may originate from ECL cells.

Misoprostol--a logical therapeutic approach to gastroduodenal mucosal injury induced by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs?

Misoprostol is a synthetic analogue of naturally occurring prostaglandin E1. The basis of the damaging actions of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on the gastrointestinal (GI) tract is believed to be a consequence of two events: a direct damaging action on mucosal integrity and depletion of endogenous mucosal prostaglandins (PGs). Due to the latter effect, and because current evidence indicates that PGs play an important role in maintaining the integrity of the GI tract, misoprostol has been developed as a logical therapy to prevent and heal gastric and duodenal damage caused by NSAIDs. The purpose of this review is to consider the need for such a therapy, to describe its pharmaceutical development, to review its pharmacology and to review its efficacy compared with other available agents.

Aspects of the regulation of gastric histamine release

Histamine is found in large amounts in the gastric mucosa and plays an essential role in the regulation of acid secretion. It is thought to stimulate acid secretion directly after being released by the other two major secretagogues (gastrin and acetylcholine) (the mediator hypothesis) or to potentiate the action of the other two secretagogues (the interaction hypothesis). Recent studies with isolated, vascularly perfused rat stomach have shown that gastrin in physiologic concentrations elicits a release of histamine sufficient to explain its acid-stimulatory effect. Vagal nerve stimulation, on the other hand, only gives a faint histamine release, indicating that the vagal acid stimulation is mainly mediated by a direct stimulation of the parietal cell. Furthermore, the gastrin-stimulated histamine release seems to be mediated by a calcium-dependent mechanism. Somatostatin inhibits gastrin-stimulated histamine release via a paracrine mechanism, and a prostaglandin E1 analogue (misoprostol) has been shown to be a potent inhibitor of base-line and gastrin-stimulated histamine release. These studies show that the modulation of histamine release may be a central regulatory mechanism of gastric acid secretion. Although these studies have been done in rats, there are indications that these results are of a general nature nd valid for other species as well.

Misoprostol: discovery, development, and clinical applications

Misoprostol is a synthetic 15-deoxy-16-hydroxy-16-methyl analog of PGE1, and the first prostaglandin to be registered for the treatment of peptic ulcer disease. Misoprostol is a safe and well-tolerated drug that exerts potent gastric antisecretory effects and mucosal protective actions on the gastric and duodenal mucosa. In a dosage of 800 micrograms daily in two or four divided doses, misoprostol produced rates of complete ulcer healing in both gastric and duodenal ulcer patients significantly superior to placebo and comparable to H2 receptor antagonists. The major adverse effect is diarrhea in about 10% of patients, but this is usually mild and self-limiting. Misoprostol possesses uterotonic activity and should not be used in pregnant women or those who wish to become pregnant. Misoprostol effectively heals and prevents NSAID-induced gastropathy, a therapeutic need previously unserved. Due to its mucosal protective properties, misoprostol may have advantages over antisecretory drugs in the compromised patient who is a chronic smoker or alcohol user, in refractory duodenal ulcer patients, in recurrent ulcer, and in emergency use for acute upper GI bleeding. Misoprostol's tissue-protective effects may also extend to other therapeutic areas.

Histamine release in the isolated vascularly perfused stomach of the rat: regulation by autoreceptors

1. In the isolated vascularly-perfused stomach of the rat, gastrin 1-17 (520 pmol 1(-1)) increased acid output from basal values of 13.7 +/- 2.7 to 92.5 +/- 11.4 mumol h-1 and venous histamine output from 10.1 +/- 2.3 to 54.7 +/- 7.9 nmol h-1 (mean +/- s.e.mean). 2. The H1 receptor agonist 2-methylhistamine (10 mumol 1(-1)) increased acid output to 21.6 +/- 2.9 mumol h-1 (P less than 0.05) and reduced basal histamine output to 4.0 +/- 0.8 nmol h-1 (P less than 0.05). Gastrin-stimulated acid secretion and vascular histamine output was not significantly affected by 2-methylhistamine (10 mumol 1(-1)). 3. The H2 receptor agonist, impromidine, dose-dependently increased basal acid secretion, reaching a maximal value of 145.5 +/- 11.7 mumol h-1 with impromidine (10 mumol 1(-1)), and maximal gastrin-stimulated acid secretion to 167.4 +/- 15.1 mumol h-1 with impromidine (10 mumol 1(-1)). Impromidine dose-dependently inhibited basal and gastrin-stimulated vascular histamine output. 4. The H3 receptor agonist R-a-methylhistamine, (1 and 10 mumol 1(-1)) minimally increased basal acid secretion. R-a-methylhistamine (10 mumol 1(-1)) did not significantly affect maximal gastrin-stimulated acid secretion. Basal and gastrin-stimulated vascular histamine outputs decreased to 4.0 +/- 0.8 (P less than 0.05) and 24.7 +/- 4.7 nmol h-1 (P = 0.05) with R-a-methylhistamine (10 mumol 1(-1)). 5. The H2 receptor antagonist ranitidine (2 mumol 1(-1)) did not inhibit basal acid secretion, but acid outputs with gastrin and all histamine agonists were reduced. Ranitidine did not affect histamine release in the basal state, with gastrin or with any histamine agonist tested. 6 We conclude that gastric histamine release in the rat is regulated via a histamine H2 receptor sensitive to the histamine agonists tested, but not to ranitidine. It is unlikely that the inhibition of histamine release is secondary to increased gastric acidity.