Augmentation of antimetastatic activity of interferon and tumor necrosis factor by heparin

Towards an emerging role for anticoagulants in cancer therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Anticoagulants, renowned for their role in preventing blood clot formation, have captivated researchers' attention for the exploitation of their potential to inhibit cancer in pre-clinical models.

Objectives

To undertake a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of anticoagulants in murine cancer research models. Further, to present a reference tool for anticoagulant therapeutic modalities relating to future animal pre-clinical models of cancer and their translation into the clinic.

Methods

Four databases were utilized including Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Web of science, and Scopus databases. We included studies relating to any cancer conducted in murine models that assessed the effect of traditional anticoagulants (heparin and its derivatives and warfarin) and newer oral anticoagulants on cancer.

Results

A total of 6,158 articles were identified in an initial multi-database search. A total of 157 records were finally included for data extraction. Studies on heparin species and warfarin demonstrated statistically significant results in favour of tumour growth and metastasis inhibition.

Conclusion

Our findings constitute a valuable reference guide for the application of anticoagulants in cancer research and explore the promising utilization of non-anticoagulants heparin in preclinical cancer research.

Systematic Review Registration

PROSPERO [CRD42024555603].

Anti-tumoral effects of low molecular weight heparins: A focus on the treatment of esophageal cancer

Esophageal cancer is one of the most prevalent types of cancer globally. With current treatment options, the survival is poor, and there are ongoing efforts to find new and more efficient therapeutic approaches. There are several reports on the anti-tumoral effects of low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH). We have assessed the possible survival benefits and underlying mechanisms of LMWHs in malignancies with a focus on esophageal cancer. We conclude that the effects of LMWHs on survival of cancer patients is probably due to a combination of direct anti-tumoral, anti-angiogenic, and immunomodulatory effects and indirect effects on the coagulation system.

Pleiotropic effects of heparins: does anticoagulant treatment increase survival in cancer patients?

The association between venous thromboembolism (VTE) and cancer has been recognized for more than 100 years. Numerous studies have been performed to investigate strategies to decrease VTE incidence and to establish whether treating VTE impacts cancer progression and overall survival. Accordingly, it is important to understand the role of the hemostatic system in tumorigenesis and progression, as there is abundant evidence associating it with cell survival and proliferation, tumor angiogenesis, invasion, and dissemination, and metastasis formation. In attempts to further the scientific evidence, several studies examine survival benefits in cancer patients treated with anticoagulant therapy, specifically treatment with vitamin K antagonists, unfractionated heparin, and low-molecular-weight heparin. Several studies and meta-analyses have been conducted with a special focus on brain tumors. However, no definitive conclusions have been obtained, and more well-designed clinical trials are needed.

Low molecular weight heparin and cancer survival: clinical trials and experimental mechanisms

INTRODUCTION

The relationship between cancer and thrombosis is complex, as the hemostatic system is inextricably linked to the mechanisms of cancer growth and metastasis. The coagulation system thus appears to be a site for oncogenic events and necessary for the survival and spread of malignant cells. Although several meta-analyses on the effectiveness of unfractionated heparin and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) have suggested a lower mortality risk in cancer patients receiving LMWH, this contention has not received general acceptance. In fact, there exist no sufficiently powered studies to date supporting the routine use of LMWH to improve cancer survival. Meanwhile, the molecular mechanism underlying the anti-neoplastic effect of LMWH which is independent of its anti-coagulant function is largely unexplored and is a topic of active investigation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this communication, we aimed to review comprehensively evidences from clinical trials, meta-analysis as well as experimental molecular research and to identify future research areas of importance so as to stimulate future research on the potential anti-tumor action of LMWH.

CONCLUSION

Although benefit of LMWH on cancer patients' survival is controversial depending on the tumor type, cancer stage as well as LMWH type, it appears to be associated with a reduction in VTE and increased bleeding is minor and controllable; thus, randomized controlled trials targeting the survival benefit of certain specific LWMH are needed and justified, and more in-depth experimental researches are imperative to elucidate the anti-tumor effect of anticoagulants.

The effect of therapeutic anticoagulation on overall survival in men receiving first-line docetaxel chemotherapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Anticoagulants have been postulated to possess antitumor activity, although clinical data supporting this claim are conflicting. No definitive data exist on the clinical impact of anticoagulation therapy in patients with prostate cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between therapeutic anticoagulant use and survival in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) receiving docetaxel chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 247 consecutive patients with mCRPC who received first-line docetaxel chemotherapy between 1998 and 2010 at a single institution. Among them, 29 patients (11.7 %) received therapeutic anticoagulation (low-molecular-weight heparin [LMWH] or warfarin) for the treatment of venous thromboembolism. Univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to investigate the effect of anticoagulant use on overall survival.

RESULTS

In univariate analysis, anticoagulant use was associated with improved survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.61; P = .024). Median survival was 20.9 months in the anticoagulation group versus 17.1 months in the control group (P = .024). In multivariable analysis, anticoagulant use remained a significant predictor of survival after adjusting for other baseline prognostic factors (HR, 0.49; P = .023). When each anticoagulant was considered separately in the multivariable model, LMWH remained significantly prognostic for survival (HR, 0.48; P = .035), whereas warfarin use did not.

CONCLUSIONS

Anticoagulant use (LMWH in particular) is an independent predictor of improved survival in men with mCRPC receiving docetaxel. These data provide the impetus to further explore the antitumor properties of anticoagulants in patients with prostate cancer and warrant validation in prospective studies.

The antineoplastic effect of low-molecular-weight heparins - a literature review

There is some evidence for the antitumor effect of heparins, especially the low-molecular-weight ones. The authors discuss the potential mechanism of this antineoplastic effect and present results from several in vitro and in vivo experiments. The clinical trials concerning the impact of low-molecular-weight heparins on the tumor and on the patients' survival are described. The objective was to find out if heparins could be administered as an antitumor drug, independently of their anticoagulatory properties. The antitumor role of tissue factor, heparinase, chemokines, stromal proteins, cellular interactions as well as angiogenesis and immunology seems certain. The results of the available studies seem promising but large clinical trials are necessary in order to confirm the antineoplastic effect of the low-molecular-weight heparins and to approve them for standard anticancer treatment. It could be a breakthrough in modern oncology.

Impact of venous thromboembolism and anticoagulation on cancer and cancer survival

Changes in the hemostatic system and chronic hemostatic activation are frequently observed in patients with cancer, even in the absence of venous thromboembolism (VTE). VTE is a leading cause of death among patients with cancer and contributes to long-term mortality in patients with early as well as advanced-stage cancer. Mounting evidence suggests that components of the clotting cascade and associated vascular factors play an integral part in tumor progression, invasion, angiogenesis, and metastasis formation. Furthermore, there are intriguing in vitro and animal findings that anticoagulants, in particular the low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs), exert an antineoplastic effect through multiple mechanisms, including interference with tumor cell adhesion, invasion, metastasis formation, angiogenesis, and the immune system. Several relatively small randomized controlled clinical trials of anticoagulation as cancer therapy in patients without a VTE diagnosis have been completed. These comprise studies with LMWH, unfractionated heparin, and vitamin K antagonists, with overall encouraging but nonconclusive results and some limitations. Meta-analyses performed for the American Society of Clinical Oncology VTE Guidelines Committee and the Cochrane Collaboration suggest overall favorable effects of anticoagulation on survival of patients with cancer, mainly with LMWH. However, definitive clinical trials have been elusive and questions remain regarding the importance of tumor type and stage on treatment efficacy, the impact of fatal thromboembolic events, optimal anticoagulation therapy, and safety with differing chemotherapy regimens. Although the LMWHs and related agents hold promise for improving outcomes in patients with cancer, additional studies of their efficacy and safety in this setting are needed.

A meta-analysis and systematic review of the efficacy and safety of anticoagulants as cancer treatment: impact on survival and bleeding complications

BACKGROUND

Preclinical evidence suggests that anticoagulants, in particular the low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH), exert an antitumor effect, whereas clinical trials have reported conflicting results. The authors conducted a comprehensive, systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), to evaluate the impact of anticoagulants on survival and safety in cancer patients without venous thromboembolism.

METHODS

A comprehensive systematic literature review of RCTs was performed without language restrictions through May 2006 with subsequent updates to the end of 2006, including an exhaustive search of electronic databases, major conference proceedings, article references, and content experts. Two reviewers extracted data independently. Primary study outcomes were 1-year overall mortality and all bleeding complications. Major and fatal bleeding complications were secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

Across all 11 studies that were identified, anticoagulation significantly decreased 1-year overall mortality with a relative risk (RR) of 0.905 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.847-0.967; P = .003). The RR for mortality was 0.877 (95% CI, 0.789-0.975; P = .015) for LMWH, compared with an RR of 0.942 (95% CI, 0.854-1.040; P = .239) for warfarin, resulting in an absolute risk difference (ARD) of 8% for LMWH and an ARD of 3% for warfarin. Improved survival with anticoagulation may be dependent on tumor type. Major bleeding episodes occurred less frequently in patients who received LMWH (ARD, 1%) compared with patients who received warfarin (ARD, 11.5%; P < .0001). Overall, fatal bleeding occurred rarely (ARD, 0.32%; P = .542).

CONCLUSIONS

Anticoagulants, particularly LMWH, significantly improved overall survival in cancer patients without venous thrombosis while increasing the risk for bleeding complications. However, given the limitations of available data, the use of anticoagulants as antineoplastic therapy cannot be recommended until additional RCTs confirm these results.

Anticoagulant drugs increase natural killer cell activity in lung cancer

BACKGROUND

In preclinical studies in animal models and in initial clinical trials, anticoagulation drugs have been shown to be effective in the prevention and treatment of haematogenous metastasis, and in the prolongation of survival in animal models. However, only a few studies have been performed on the direct influence of anticoagulation drugs on the immune system.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of warfarin, unfractioned heparin, low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs), and acetylsalicylic acid anticoagulants on the functional activity of natural killer (NK) cells.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Cytotoxic activity in patients with early, operable stages of non-small-cell lung cancer was compared with healthy volunteers. Cytotoxic studies were also carried out in tumor-bearing animals.

RESULTS

Lung-cancer patients were characterized by significantly lower NK cell cytotoxicity (7.07 +/- 3.15) than healthy donors (44.12 +/- 10.62, P < 0.001). NK cell activation was found in both in vitro experiments using peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from healthy donors and ex vivo in lung carcinoma patients after treatment with unfractionated heparin and fraxiparine. Similarly, potentiation of NK cell activity in Lewis lung carcinoma-bearing mice was found after therapy with unfractionated heparin. NK cell activity is lower in lung cancer patients than in normal subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

NK cell activation was increased by LMWHs. Other anticoagulants augment the effector function of NK cells in cancer patients and in an animal model of lung cancer. This is a novel effect of these compounds, which were thought previously to exert their effect only via their anticoagulant properties.

Antitumor and antimetastatic effect of warfarin and heparins

Experimental and clinical studies have shown an anticancer effect of anticoagulant drugs. The aim of this study is to review the mechanisms by which the common types of anticoagulants influence the primary tumor and metastatic processes of solid tumors. The review evaluates the interference of unfractionated heparin (UFH), low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and warfarin on the growth of primary tumors and on the development of metastases. The first part of the review evaluates the effect on the growth and development of primary tumors. Attention is paid to the interference with proliferation of cancer cells, tumor angiogenesis and to the interference with the immune system. The second part of the review describes the metastatic process and the effect of anticoagulants on the cell motility and cancer cell adhesion. The third part refers to the outcomes of clinical studies with anticoagulant treatment in patients with cancer. The problem of thromboembolic disease in patients with advanced cancer is also mentioned. The anticoagulants are more effective in inhibition of stages of the metastatic cascade than in the influence on primary tumors. They can interfere with tumor angiogenesis, immunity system, cancer cell motility and adhesion. The first clinical trials showed an effect on the development of primary tumors and survival of patients namely with lung cancer.

Antimetastatic effect of tinzaparin, a low-molecular-weight heparin

The importance of coagulation activation in cancer patients is suggested by the clinical finding of hypercoagulability, experimental enhancement of metastasis and angiogenesis by coagulation factors such as tissue factor (TF) and thrombin and the possible antitumor effects of anticoagulant agents. Tinzaparin is a low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) with a relatively high molecular weight distribution and high sulfate to carboxylate ratio. In addition to its ability to inhibit thrombin and factor Xa, tinzaparin is particularly effective at releasing endothelial tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI), the natural inhibitor of both procoagulant and non-coagulant effects of TF. The present study was undertaken to investigate the effect of tinzaparin on lung metastasis using a B16 melanoma model in experimental mice. Tinzaparin's anticoagulant effect in mice and its ability to release TFPI from human endothelial cells at various time points were demonstrated. Subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of tinzaparin (10 mg kg-1) 4 h before intravenous administration of melanoma cells (2.0 x 105) markedly (89%) reduced lung tumor formation (3 +/- 2) compared with controls (31 +/- 23; P < 0.001). In a second group of animals, tinzaparin (10 mg kg-1, s.c.) administered daily for 14 days following the initial (pretumor cell) dose, before assessment of lung seeding, reduced tumor formation by 96% (P < 0.001). No bleeding problems were observed in any of the tinzaparin-treated animals, despite a 4-fold prolongation of the whole blood clotting time after a single s.c. dose of tinzaparin (10 mg kg-1). Administration of tumor cells (2 x 106) caused a rapid and significant fall in platelet count 15 min after injection (a sensitive marker of intravascular coagulation) in controls (939 +/- 37 vs. 498 +/- 94 x 106 mL-1, P < 0.01), but this was prevented by tinzaparin treatment (921 +/- 104 x 106 mL-1). These data provide further experimental evidence to support the potential for LMWH as antimetastatic agents.

Promotion of experimental liver metastasis by tumor necrosis factor

Models for experimental metastasis were established to investigate the influence of rmTNF on tumor-colony formation in the liver. Highly metastatic lymphoma tumor cells were either injected i.v. or inoculated s.c. to form spontaneous metastases. In both systems, administration of rmTNF to the animals led to significant enhancement of the number of liver metastases in comparison with control groups. The number of metastatic tumor-cell colonies at an early stage of metastasis was increased, as well as the number of surface metastases in a late stage. Consequently, TNF-treated animals revealed a higher mortality. The optimal time for TNF to exert this metastasis-enhancing effect was found to be 7 days after tumor inoculation. In vitro adhesion of the lymphoma tumor cells to a mouse endothelioma cell line was strongly inhibited by monoclonal antibodies interfering with the interaction of VCAM-1 with VLA-4. These results support and extend earlier results with a fibrosarcoma lung colonization model. In addition, they show that stimulation of the immune system in tumor-bearing hosts activates tumor-promoting pathways, in addition to having possible beneficial effects.

Folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil as adjuvant chemotherapy in colon cancer

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Colon cancer is one of the major health problems in industrialized countries, and its incidence appears to be increasing. Surgical resectability is the most important prognostic determinant, although despite apparently curative surgery, recurrent tumors are common. Metastatic disease cannot be cured, and thus, there is a need for better adjuvant therapies.

METHODS

Two hundred and thirty-nine patients with surgically resected colon cancer in Dukes' stage B2 or C were randomly assigned to chemotherapy or observation alone to determine whether adjuvant chemotherapy could effectively reduce the rate of cancer recurrence. One hundred and twenty-one patients in stage B2 and 118 patients in stage C were enrolled in the study. Adjuvant treatment consisted of folinic acid 200 mg/m2, intravenously, plus 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m2, intravenously, on days 1-5 every 4 weeks for 12 cycles.

RESULTS

In stage B2, no significant difference between the adjuvant arm and the observation arm was noted. In stage C, adjuvant chemotherapy produced an advantage over observation in terms of a reduction in cancer recurrence rate with prolongation of a disease-free interval (P = 0.0016) and an improvement in overall survival (P = 0.0025).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that folinic acid plus 5-fluorouracil adjuvant chemotherapy is effective in patients with surgically resected Dukes' stage C colon carcinoma.

Enhancement of experimental metastasis by tumor necrosis factor

The influence of endogenous and exogenous tumor necrosis factor (TNF) on metastasis was investigated in an experimental fibrosarcoma metastasis model. A single intraperitoneal injection of recombinant human (rh) TNF or recombinant mouse (rm) TNF into mice 5 h before intravenous inoculation of methylcholanthrene-induced fibrosarcoma cells (CFS1) induced a significant enhancement of the number of metastases in the lung. Dose responses of rmTNF and rhTNF demonstrated a stronger metastasis-augmenting effect by rmTNF compared with rhTNF. This effect was time dependent, as administration of rmTNF 5 h before or 1 h but not 24 h after tumor cell inoculation caused an increase of tumor cell colony formation on the lung surface, suggesting an influence of TNF on the vascular adhesion and diapedesis of tumor cells. Since tumor-bearing mice showed an enhanced ability to produce TNF after endotoxin injection compared to control mice, tumor-bearing mice were treated with anti-mTNF antibodies. Neutralization of endogenous tumor-induced TNF led to a significant decrease of the number of pulmonary metastases. Histological analysis of micrometastases in the lung on day 5 by silver staining of proteins associated with nucleolar organizer regions revealed more metastatic foci and augmented proliferative activity of the tumor cells after rmTNF pretreatment of mice. However, no direct effect of rmTNF on the proliferation rate of tumor cells was seen in vitro. These findings suggest that low doses of endogenous TNF or administered TNF during cytokine therapy might enhance the metastatic potential of circulating tumor cells.

Randomised controlled trial of adjuvant chemotherapy by portal-vein perfusion after curative resection for colorectal adenocarcinoma

About half the patients treated with curative resection for colorectal cancer do not survive long-term. Adjuvant chemotherapy given during and after surgery may prevent hepatic metastases and improve patient survival. In patients with colorectal cancer, we have done a multicentre, randomised controlled trial comparing five-year survival after intraportal infusion of fluorouracil (1 g per day) plus heparin (10,000 U per day) (130 patients) or heparin alone (123) during curative resection and for 7 days thereafter, or after resection alone (145). There was no reduction in liver metastasis or increased overall survival advantage in either active-treatment arm of the study. However, patients who had stage III, Dukes' C (lymph-node-positive) tumours resected and were treated with fluorouracil plus heparin had a significant (p less than 0.03) survival advantage of about 16% compared with surgery-only controls. Further study of intraportal infusion of chemotherapeutic agent as adjuvant treatment to surgery in patients with colorectal cancer appears worthwhile.