Affinity for the P-glycoprotein efflux pump at the blood-brain barrier may explain the lack of CNS side-effects of modern antihistamines

Group II metabotropic glutamate receptor activation suppresses ATP currents in rat dorsal root ganglion neurons

P2X3 receptors and group II metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) have been found to be expressed in primary sensory neurons. P2X3 receptors participate in a variety of pain processes, while the activation of mGluRs has an analgesic effect. However, it's still unclear whether there is a link between them in pain. Herein, we reported that the group II mGluR activation inhibited the electrophysiological activity of P2X3 receptors in rat dorsal root ganglia (DRG) neurons. Group II mGluR agonist LY354740 concentration-dependently decreased P2X3 receptor-mediated and α,β-methylene-ATP (α,β-meATP)-evoked inward currents in DRG neurons. LY354740 significantly suppressed the maximum response of P2X3 receptor to α,β-meATP, but did not change their affinity. Inhibition of ATP currents by LY354740 was blocked by the group II mGluR antagonist LY341495, also prevented by the intracellular dialysis of either the G_i/o protein inhibitor pertussis toxin, the cAMP analog 8-Br-cAMP, or the protein kinase A (PKA) inhibitor H-89. Moreover, LY354740 decreased α,β-meATP-induced membrane potential depolarization and action potential bursts in DRG neurons. Finally, intraplantar injection of LY354740 also relieved α,β-meATP-induced spontaneous nociceptive behaviors and mechanical allodynia in rats by activating peripheral group Ⅱ mGluRs. These results indicated that peripheral group II mGluR activation inhibited the functional activity of P2X3 receptors via a G_i/o protein and cAMP/PKA signaling pathway in rat DRG neurons, which revealed a novel mechanism underlying analgesic effects of peripheral group II mGluRs. This article is part of the Special Issue on "Purinergic Signaling: 50 years".

Group II metabotropic glutamate receptor activation attenuates acid-sensing ion channel currents in rat primary sensory neurons

Acid-sensing ion channels (ASICs) play an important role in pain associated with tissue acidification. Peripheral inhibitory group II metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) have analgesic effects in a variety of pain conditions. Whether there is a link between ASICs and mGluRs in pain processes is still unclear. Herein, we show that the group II mGluR agonist LY354740 inhibited acid-evoked ASIC currents and action potentials in rat dorsal root ganglia neurons. LY354740 reduced the maximum current response to protons, but it did not change the sensitivity of ASICs to protons. LY354740 inhibited ASIC currents by activating group II mGluRs. We found that the inhibitory effect of LY354740 was blocked by intracellular application of the G_i/o protein inhibitor pertussis toxin and the cAMP analogue 8-Br-cAMP and mimicked by the protein kinase A (PKA) inhibitor H-89. LY354740 also inhibited ASIC3 currents in CHO cells coexpressing mGluR2 and ASIC3 but not in cells expressing ASIC3 alone. In addition, intraplantar injection of LY354740 dose-dependently alleviated acid-induced nociceptive behavior in rats through local group II mGluRs. Together, these results suggested that activation of peripheral group II mGluRs inhibited the functional activity of ASICs through a mechanism that depended on G_i/o proteins and the intracellular cAMP/PKA signaling pathway in rat dorsal root ganglia neurons. We propose that peripheral group II mGluRs are an important therapeutic target for ASIC-mediated pain.

Diphenhydramine: Time to Move on?

Diphenhydramine is one of the most widely available, longest-used antihistamine medications but has many side effects including sedation and risk of toxicity in overdose including cardiac toxicity. It is frequently inappropriately used when newer, more favorable antihistamine medications are available. Second-generation antihistamines are also widely available and affordable, with many of the same desired effects as diphenhydramine and fewer, if any, of the undesirable side effects. Because of the negative side effects and wide availability of alternative antihistamine medications, it is definitively time to move on from diphenhydramine.

Loratadine-associated cystoid macular edema: A case report

Purpose

To report the first known case of bilateral cystoid macular edema in a patient undergoing long-term loratadine treatment.

Observations

A 49-year-old Chinese woman who had been undergoing treatment with loratadine for the past 6 years presented with decreased visual acuity and bilateral cystoid macular edema (CME). Upon cessation of loratadine, macular edema partially resolved, and visual acuity markedly improved. Fundus autofluorescence (FAF), optical coherence tomography (OCT), and fluorescence fundus angiography (FFA) were used to document the severity of CME and its subsequent resolution after cessation of loratadine therapy.

Conclusions and Importance

Long-term use of loratadine might cause CME that partially resolves with discontinuation of the drug. The pathophysiology of drug-induced CME without leakage remains unclear. Dysfunction of histamine receptor1-expressed retinal neurons and the associated signal transduction, toxicity to Müller cells or RPE cells with subsequent intracellular fluid accumulation, and subclinical damage to the blood-retina barrier leading to leakage of extracellular fluid, have been proposed.

Pharmacogenomics for the efficacy and side effects of antihistamines

Antihistamines, especially H1 antihistamines, are widely used in the treatment of allergic diseases such as urticaria and allergic rhinitis, mainly for reversing elevated histamine and anti-allergic effects. Antihistamines are generally safe, but some patients experience adverse reactions, such as cardiotoxicity, central inhibition, and anticholinergic effects. There are also individual differences in antihistamine efficacy in clinical practice. The concept of individualized medicine has been deeply rooted in people's minds since it was put forward. Pharmacogenomics is the study of the role of inheritance in individual variations in drug response. In recent decades, pharmacogenomics has been developing rapidly, which provides new ideas for individualized medicine. Polymorphisms in the genes encoding metabolic enzymes, transporters, and target receptors have been shown to affect the efficacy of antihistamines. In addition, recent evidence suggests that gene polymorphisms influence urticaria susceptibility and antihistamine therapy. Here, we summarize current reports in this area, aiming to contribute to future research in antihistamines and clinical guidance for antihistamines use in individualized medicine.

Efficacy and safety of ebastine dose escalation in chronic urticaria: A prospective study

The second-generation antihistamines at licensed doses are first-line treatment in urticaria and up-dosing is recommended as second-line treatment. To assess the efficacy and safety of escalated doses of ebastine in patients with chronic urticaria (CU), we designed this study. Recruited patients with CU were treated with increasing doses of ebstine. Treatment started at the daily dose of 10 mg. The symptom is assessed weekly, and if there is no significant improvement, the dose is increased from 10 mg to 20 mg, and if still no significant improvement, up to 40 mg. Pruritus, number, diameter, duration and frequency of wheals, and adverse reactions were assessed. One hundred and forty (76.50%) patients achieved marked effect with ebastine 10 mg/day, 27 (14.75%) patients with ebastine 20 mg/day and 13 (7.10%) patients with ebastine 40 mg/day, while 3(1.64%) patients did not get marked effect. There was no significant difference of effect between factitious urticaria, CSU, cholinergic urticaria and CSU with factitious urticaria in different dose (all p > 0.05). Common adverse reactions of ebstine treatment, included dry mouth, somnolence, tiredness and headache, were mild or moderate. There was no significant difference between the degree score of dry mouth with different doses of ebastine, and the same to somnolence, tiredness and headache (all p > 0.05). Doses escalation of ebastine should be effective in treatment of factitious urticaria, CSU and cholinergic urticaria with poorly treated by standard of double doses. Increasing ebastine dose did not increase the incidence of adverse reactions.

Lipid Cubic Systems for Sustained and Controlled Delivery of Antihistamine Drugs

Antihistamines are capable of blocking mediator responses in allergic reactions including allergic rhinitis and dermatological reactions. By incorporating various H1 receptor antagonists into a lipid cubic phase network, these active ingredients can be delivered locally over an extended period of time owing to the mucoadhesive nature of the system. Local delivery can avoid inducing unwanted side effects, often observed after systematic delivery. Lipid-based antihistamine delivery systems are shown here to exhibit prolonged release capabilities. In vitro drug dissolution studies investigated the extent and release rate of two model first-generation and two model second-generation H1 antagonist antihistamine drugs from two monoacyglycerol-derived lipid models. To optimize the formulation approach, the systems were characterized macroscopically and microscopically by small-angle X-ray scattering and polarized light to ascertain the mesophase accessed upon an incorporation of antihistamines of varying solubilities and size. The impact of encapsulating the antihistamine molecules on the degree of mucoadhesivity of the lipid cubic systems was investigated using multiparametric surface plasmon resonance. With the ultimate goal of developing therapies for the treatment of allergic reactions, the ability of the formulations to inhibit mediator release utilizing RBL-2H3 mast cells with the propensity to release histamine upon induction was explored, demonstrating no interference from the lipid excipient on the effectiveness of the antihistamine molecules.

Transfer of rhodamine-123 into the brain and cerebrospinal fluid of fetal, neonatal and adult rats

Background

Adenosine triphosphate binding cassette transporters such as P-glycoprotein (PGP) play an important role in drug pharmacokinetics by actively effluxing their substrates at barrier interfaces, including the blood-brain, blood-cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and placental barriers. For a molecule to access the brain during fetal stages it must bypass efflux transporters at both the placental barrier and brain barriers themselves. Following birth, placental protection is no longer present and brain barriers remain the major line of defense. Understanding developmental differences that exist in the transfer of PGP substrates into the brain is important for ensuring that medication regimes are safe and appropriate for all patients.

Methods

In the present study PGP substrate rhodamine-123 (R123) was injected intraperitoneally into E19 dams, postnatal (P4, P14) and adult rats. Naturally fluorescent properties of R123 were utilized to measure its concentration in blood-plasma, CSF and brain by spectrofluorimetry (Clariostar). Statistical differences in R123 transfer (concentration ratios between tissue and plasma ratios) were determined using Kruskal-Wallis tests with Dunn’s corrections.

Results

Following maternal injection the transfer of R123 across the E19 placenta from maternal blood to fetal blood was around 20 %. Of the R123 that reached fetal circulation 43 % transferred into brain and 38 % into CSF. The transfer of R123 from blood to brain and CSF was lower in postnatal pups and decreased with age (brain: 43 % at P4, 22 % at P14 and 9 % in adults; CSF: 8 % at P4, 8 % at P14 and 1 % in adults). Transfer from maternal blood across placental and brain barriers into fetal brain was approximately 9 %, similar to the transfer across adult blood-brain barriers (also 9 %). Following birth when placental protection was no longer present, transfer of R123 from blood into the newborn brain was significantly higher than into adult brain (3 fold, p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Administration of a PGP substrate to infant rats resulted in a higher transfer into the brain than equivalent doses at later stages of life or equivalent maternal doses during gestation. Toxicological testing of PGP substrate drugs should consider the possibility of these patient specific differences in safety analysis.

SLC and ABC Transporters: Expression, Localization, and Species Differences at the Blood-Brain and the Blood-Cerebrospinal Fluid Barriers

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) and the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier (BCSFB) separate the brain and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from the systemic circulation and represent a barrier to the uptake of both endogenous compounds and xenobiotics into the brain. For compounds whose passive diffusion is limited due to their ionization or hydrophilicity, membrane transporters can facilitate their uptake across the BBB or BCSFB. Members of the solute carrier (SLC) and ATP-binding case (ABC) families are present on these barriers. Differences exist in the localization and expression of transport proteins between the BBB and BCSFB, resulting in functional differences in transport properties. This review focuses on the expression, membrane localization, and different isoforms present at each barrier. Diseases that affect the central nervous system including brain tumors, HIV, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, and stroke affect the integrity and expression of transporters at the BBB and BCSFB and will be briefly reviewed.

Diphenhydramine as a selective probe to study H+-antiporter function at the blood-brain barrier: Application to [11C]diphenhydramine positron emission tomography imaging

Diphenhydramine, a sedative histamine H₁-receptor (H₁R) antagonist, was evaluated as a probe to measure drug/H⁺-antiporter function at the blood-brain barrier. In situ brain perfusion experiments in mice and rats showed that diphenhydramine transport at the blood-brain barrier was saturable, following Michaelis-Menten kinetics with a K_m = 2.99 mM and V_max = 179.5 nmol s^-1 g^-1. In the pharmacological plasma concentration range the carrier-mediated component accounted for 77% of diphenhydramine influx while passive diffusion accounted for only 23%. [¹⁴C]Diphenhydramine blood-brain barrier transport was proton and clonidine sensitive but was influenced by neither tetraethylammonium, a MATE1 (SLC47A1), and OCT/OCTN (SLC22A1-5) modulator, nor P-gp/Bcrp (ABCB_1a/1b/ABCG2) deficiency. Brain and plasma kinetics of [¹¹C]diphenhydramine were measured by positron emission tomography imaging in rats. [¹¹C]Diphenhydramine kinetics in different brain regions were not influenced by displacement with 1 mg kg^-1 unlabeled diphenhydramine, indicating the specificity of the brain positron emission tomography signal for blood-brain barrier transport activity over binding to any central nervous system target in vivo. [¹¹C]Diphenhydramine radiometabolites were not detected in the brain 15 min after injection, allowing for the reliable calculation of [¹¹C]diphenhydramine brain uptake clearance (Cl_up = 0.99 ± 0.18 mL min^-1cm^-3). Diphenhydramine is a selective and specific H⁺-antiporter substrate. [¹¹C]Diphenhydramine positron emission tomography imaging offers a reliable and noninvasive method to evaluate H⁺-antiporter function at the blood-brain barrier.

Altered blood-brain barrier transport in neuro-inflammatory disorders

During neurodegenerative and neuroinflammatory disorders of the central nervous system (CNS), such as Alzheimer's disease (AD) and multiple sclerosis (MS), the protective function of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) may be severely impaired. The general neuro-inflammatory response, ranging from activation of glial cells to immune cell infiltration that is frequently associated with such brain diseases may underlie the loss of the integrity and function of the BBB. Consequentially, the delivery and disposition of drugs to the brain will be altered and may influence the treatment efficiency of such diseases. Altered BBB transport of drugs into the CNS during diseases may be the result of changes in both specific transport and non-specific transport pathways. Potential alterations in transport routes like adsorptive mediated endocytosis and receptor-mediated endocytosis may affect drug delivery to the brain. As such, drugs that normally are unable to traverse the BBB may reach their target in the diseased brain due to increased permeability. In contrast, the delivery of (targeted) drugs could be hampered during inflammatory conditions due to disturbed transport mechanisms. Therefore, the inventory of the neuro-inflammatory status of the neurovasculature (or recovery thereof) is of utmost importance in choosing and designing an adequate drug targeting strategy under disease conditions. Within this review we will briefly discuss how the function of the BBB can be affected during disease and how this may influence the delivery of drugs into the diseased CNS.

Brain histamine H1 receptor occupancy measured by PET after oral administration of levocetirizine, a non-sedating antihistamine

OBJECTIVE

Histamine H1 receptor (H1R) antagonists often have sedative side effects, which are caused by the blockade of the neural transmission of the histaminergic neurons. We examined the brain H1R occupancy (H1RO) and the subjective sleepiness of levocetirizine, a new second-generation antihistamine, comparing fexofenadine, another non-sedating antihistamine, as a negative active control.

METHODS

Eight healthy volunteers underwent positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with [(11)C]doxepin, a PET tracer that specifically binds to H1Rs, after a single oral administration of levocetirizine (5 mg), fexofenadine (60 mg) or placebo in a double-blind crossover study. Binding potential ratios and H1ROs in the cerebral cortices regions were calculated using placebo. Subjective sleepiness was assessed with the Line Analogue Rating Scale and the Stanford Sleepiness Scale.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the mean brain H1RO after levocetirizine administration (8.1%; 95% CI: -9.8 to 26.0%) and fexofenadine administration (-8.0%; 95% CI: -26.7 to 10.6%). Similarly, subjective sleepiness was not significantly different between the two antihistamines and placebo. Neither subjective sleepiness nor plasma concentrations was significantly correlated with the brain H1RO of the two antihistamines.

CONCLUSION

At therapeutic dose, levocetirizine does not bind significantly to the brain H1Rs and does not induce significant sedation.

Restricting CNS penetration of drugs to minimise adverse events: role of drug transporters

Some drug discovery approaches can benefit from restricting the access of compounds to the central nervous system (CNS) to minimise the risk of side-effects. Designing compounds that act as substrates for efflux transporters in the blood–brain barrier can achieve CNS restriction without significantly impairing absorption in the intestine. In vitro assays can be deployed to optimise a balance between passive permeability and active efflux via the ABC family transporters P-glycoprotein (P-gp, ABCB1) and Breast Cancer Resistance Protein (BCRP, ABCG2) whilst in vivo estimates of distribution of unbound concentrations of drug are needed to understand pharmacologically relevant exposure in peripheral and central compartments. This strategy can deliver significant CNS restriction whilst retaining good oral bioavailability, cell penetration and pharmacological activity. The possible risks of targeting P-gp and BCRP in orally delivered drugs are discussed.

The blood-brain barrier: an engineering perspective

It has been more than 100 years since Paul Ehrlich reported that various water-soluble dyes injected into the circulation did not enter the brain. Since Ehrlich's first experiments, only a small number of molecules, such as alcohol and caffeine have been found to cross the blood-brain barrier, and this selective permeability remains the major roadblock to treatment of many central nervous system diseases. At the same time, many central nervous system diseases are associated with disruption of the blood-brain barrier that can lead to changes in permeability, modulation of immune cell transport, and trafficking of pathogens into the brain. Therefore, advances in our understanding of the structure and function of the blood-brain barrier are key to developing effective treatments for a wide range of central nervous system diseases. Over the past 10 years it has become recognized that the blood-brain barrier is a complex, dynamic system that involves biomechanical and biochemical signaling between the vascular system and the brain. Here we reconstruct the structure, function, and transport properties of the blood-brain barrier from an engineering perspective. New insight into the physics of the blood-brain barrier could ultimately lead to clinical advances in the treatment of central nervous system diseases.

Improving the prediction of the brain disposition for orally administered drugs using BDDCS

In modeling blood-brain barrier (BBB) passage, in silico models have yielded ~80% prediction accuracy, and are currently used in early drug discovery. Being derived from molecular structural information only, these models do not take into account the biological factors responsible for the in vivo outcome. Passive permeability and P-glycoprotein (Pgp, ABCB1) efflux have been successfully recognized to impact xenobiotic extrusion from the brain, as Pgp is known to play a role in limiting the BBB penetration of oral drugs in humans. However, these two properties alone fail to explain the BBB penetration for a significant number of marketed central nervous system (CNS) agents. The Biopharmaceutics Drug Disposition Classification System (BDDCS) has proved useful in predicting drug disposition in the human body, particularly in the liver and intestine. Here we discuss the value of using BDDCS to improve BBB predictions of oral drugs. BDDCS class membership was integrated with in vitro Pgp efflux and in silico permeability data to create a simple 3-step classification tree that accurately predicted CNS disposition for more than 90% of 153 drugs in our data set. About 98% of BDDCS class 1 drugs were found to markedly distribute throughout the brain; this includes a number of BDDCS class 1 drugs shown to be Pgp substrates. This new perspective provides a further interpretation of how Pgp influences the sedative effects of H1-histamine receptor antagonists.

Transporter-mediated Efflux Influences CNS Side Effects: ABCB1, from Antitarget to Target

We examined the relationship between sedation and orthostatic hypotension, two central side effects and ABCB1 transporter-mediated efflux for a set of 64 launched drugs that are documented as histamine H1 receptor antagonists. This relationship was placed in the context of passive diffusion (estimated using LogP, the octanol/water partition coefficient), receptor affinity, and the adjusted therapeutic daily dose, in order to account for side effect variability. Within this set, CNS permeability was not dependent on passive diffusion, as no significant differences were found for LogP and its pH-corrected equivalent, LogD(74). Sedation and orthostatic hypotension can be explained within the framework of ABCB1-mediated efflux and adjusted dose, while target potency has less influence. ABCB1, an antitarget for anti-cancer agents, acts in fact as a drug target for non-sedating antihistamines. An empirical set of rules, based on the incidence of these two side-effects, target affinity and dose was used to predict efflux effects for a number of drugs. Among them, azelastine and mizolastine are predicted to be effluxed via ABCB1-mediated transport, whereas aripiprazole, clozapine, cyproheptadine, iloperidone, olanzapine, and ziprasidone are likely to be non-effluxed.

Brain-penetrating 2-aminobenzimidazole H(1)-antihistamines for the treatment of insomnia

The benzimidazole core of the selective non-brain-penetrating H(1)-antihistamine mizolastine was used to identify a series of brain-penetrating H(1)-antihistamines for the potential treatment of insomnia. Using cassette PK studies, brain-penetrating H(1)-antihistamines were identified and in vivo efficacy was demonstrated in a rat EEG/EMG model. Further optimization focused on strategies to attenuate an identified hERG liability, leading to the discovery of 4i with a promising in vitro profile.

Opiate modulation of IL-1alpha, IL-2, and TNF-alpha transport across the blood-brain barrier

Interleukin-1alpha (IL-1alpha), interleukin-2 (IL-2), and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) are proinflammatory cytokines with potent neuromodulatory effects and are implicated in the etiology and pathogenesis of various psychological and neurological disorders. The findings that chronic morphine treatment alters both blood-brain barrier (BBB) function and cytokine production raises the possibility that morphine can also modulate cytokine transport across the BBB. Here, we found that acute morphine treatment (12 mg/kg i.p.) did not alter blood-to-brain transport of IL-1alpha, IL-2 or TNF-alpha. Whereas chronic morphine treatment (48 h after implantation of 75 mg morphine pellets) and withdrawal from morphine (10-15 min after an i.p. injection of 1mg/kg of naltroxone 48 h after implantation of 75 mg morphine pellets) did not alter blood-to-brain transport of IL-1alpha or TNF-alpha, both the chronic morphine treatment and withdrawal from morphine groups had increased blood-to-brain transport of IL-2. Typically, the permeability of the BBB to IL-2 is dominated by brain-to-blood efflux, with only limited blood-to-brain transport. Here, we found that chronic morphine and withdrawal from morphine did not alter brain-to-blood efflux, but induced a novel saturable blood-to-brain transport system. Whereas IL-1alpha, IL-2, and TNF-alpha are all proinflammatory cytokines, morphine exposure has individualized effects on their blood-to-brain transport.

The effects of fexofenadine at steady-state on sleep architecture: a study using polysomnography in healthy Korean volunteers

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effects of a first-generation antihistamine, chlorpheniramine, with those of the second-generation antihistamine, fexofenadine, at steady-state, on nocturnal sleep architecture in healthy Korean volunteers using polysomnography and the Multiple Sleep Latency Test. We evaluated whether a genetic polymorphism of multi-drug resistance 1 gene (MDR1) could produce variations in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters of fexofenadine.

DESIGN/METHODS

Ten healthy male volunteers received one capsule of fexofenadine 180 mg once each morning or chlorpheniramine 6 mg (2 mg in the morning and 4 mg after 12 h) for 3 days, in a single-site, randomized, double-blind, two-treatment, multiple-dosing, two-way crossover study, with a washout period of 7 days. Overnight polysomnography was measured on the second night of the treatment period. The Multiple Sleep Latency Test was carried out the next morning. Blood samples were taken for the assessment of fexofenadine pharmacokinetics and MDR1 genotyping on the third day.

RESULTS

Compared with baseline and fexofenadine, chlorpheniramine significantly increased the latency in rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, with no significant decrease in the percentage of REM sleep. No significant change in latency for REM sleep or percentage REM sleep after dosing with fexofenadine was observed. There was no significant change in the daytime sleepiness with fexofenadine and chlorpheniramine. The effects of MDR1 genotypes and haplotypes on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of fexofenadine were not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that fexofenadine and chlorpheniramine at steady-state have no significant effect on nocturnal sleep variables and daytime sleepiness, when compared to baseline.

Assessment of the First and Second Generation Antihistamines Brain Penetration and Role of P-Glycoprotein

PURPOSE

The sedating effect of first generation H(1)-antihistamines has been associated with their ability to penetrate the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and lack of efflux by P-glycoprotein (Pgp). Second generation H(1)-antihistamines are relatively free of sedation and their limited brain penetration has been suggested to arise from Pgp-mediated efflux. The objective of this work was to evaluate the role of Pgp in brain penetration of first and second generation antihistamines.

METHODS

Potential of antihistamines to be Pgp substrates was tested in vitro using Madin Darby canine kidney cells transfected with human Pgp. The role of Pgp in limiting brain penetration of antihistamines was tested by using the in situ brain perfusion technique.

RESULTS

Majority of antihistamines were Pgp substrates in vitro. Following in situ brain perfusion, the first generation antihistamines substantially penetrated into rat brain independently from Pgp function. The second generation antihistamines terfenadine and loratadine, achieved substantial brain penetration, which was further enhanced by Pgp inhibition by cyclosporin A (CSA). In contrast, fexofenadine and cetirizine, penetrated brain poorly regardless of CSA administration.

CONCLUSIONS

Antihistamines greatly differ in their ability to cross the BBB as well as in the role of Pgp in limiting their transport into the CNS in vivo.

Effects of histamine H1 receptor antagonists on depressive-like behavior in diabetic mice

We previously reported that streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice showed depressive-like behavior in the tail suspension test. It is well known that the central histaminergic system regulates many physiological functions including emotional behaviors. In this study, we examined the role of the central histaminergic system in the diabetes-induced depressive-like behavior in the mouse tail suspension test. The histamine contents in the hypothalamus were significantly higher in diabetic mice than in non-diabetic mice. The histamine H(1) receptor antagonist chlorpheniramine (1-10 mg/kg, s.c.) dose-dependently and significantly reduced the duration of immobility in both non-diabetic and diabetic mice. In contrast, the selective histamine H(1) receptor antagonists epinastine (0.03-0.3 microg/mouse, i.c.v.) and cetirizine (0.01-0.1 microg/mouse, i.c.v.) dose-dependently and significantly suppressed the duration of immobility in diabetic mice, but not in non-diabetic mice. Spontaneous locomotor activity was not affected by histamine H(1) receptor antagonists in either non-diabetic or diabetic mice. In addition, the number and affinity of histamine H(1) receptors in the frontal cortex were not affected by diabetes. In conclusion, we suggest that the altered neuronal system mediated by the activation of histamine H(1) receptors is involved, at least in part, in the depressive-like behavior seen in diabetic mice.

Rat brain endothelial cell lines for the study of blood-brain barrier permeability and transport functions

(1) In vitro models of the BBB have been developed from cocultures between bovine, porcine, rodent or human brain capillary endothelial cells with rodent or human astrocytes. Since most in vivo BBB studies have been performed with small laboratory animals, especially rats, it is important to establish a rat brain endothelial (RBE) cell culture system that will allow correlations between in vitro and in vivo results. The present review will constitute a brief description of the best characterized RBE cell lines (RBE4, GP8/3.9, GPNT, RBEC1, TR-BBBs and rBCEC4 cell lines) and will summarize their recent and important contribution to our current knowledge of the BBB transport functions and permeability to blood-borne solutes, drugs, and cells. (2) In most cases, primary cultures of RBE cells were transduced with an immortalizing gene (SV40 or polyoma virus large T-antigen or adenovirus E1A), either by transfection of plasmid DNA or by infection using retroviral vectors. In one case however, the conditionally immortalized TR-BBB cell line was derived from primary cultures of brain endothelial cells of SV40-T-expressing transgenic rats. (3) All cell lines appear to have an endothelial morphology. The absence of foci formation would mean that the cells are not transformed. The endothelial origin is shown by the expression of Factor VIII-related antigen. Immortalized RBE cells express all the enzymes and transporters that are considered as specific for the blood-brain barrier endothelium, with similar characteristics to those expected from in vivo analyses, but at a significantly lower level. Some RBE cell lines are responsive to astroglial factors, such as RBE4 cells, rBEC4, and TR-BBB cells. None of the immortalized RBE cell lines appear to generate the necessary restrictive paracellular barrier properties that would allow to use them in transendothelial permeability screening. (4) RBE cell lines have been used to demonstrate that transporters such as organic cation transporter/carnitine transporter, serotonin transporter, and the ATA2 system A isoform are expressed in rat brain endothelium. When the transporter is shown to be expressed with the same properties in the immortalized RBE cells as in vivo, regulation studies may be initiated even if the transporter is down-regulated. Pharmacological applications have been proposed with well-characterized transporters such as monocarboxylic acid transporter-1, large neutral amino acid tansporter-1, nucleoside carrier systems, and P-glycoprotein. RBE cell monolayers have also been used to investigate the mechanism of the transendothelial transport of large molecules, such as immunoliposomes or nanoparticles, potentially useful as drug delivery vectors to the brain. (5) RBE4 and GP8 cell lines have been extensively used to demonstrate that intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) engagement in brain endothelial cells triggers multiple signal transduction pathways. Using functional assays, it was established that ICAM-1 signaling is intimately and actively involved in facilitating lymphocyte infiltration. (6) Several RBE cell lines have been described, which constitute tentative in vitro models of the rat BBB. The major limitation of these models generally appears to be due to their relatively high paracellular permeability to small molecules, thus limiting their use for permeability studies. The strategies developed for the production of these RBE cell lines will enable the characterization of still more efficient permeability models, as well as the immortalization of human brain endothelial cells.

Role of drug efflux transporters in the brain for drug disposition and treatment of brain diseases

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) serves as a protective mechanism for the brain by preventing entry of potentially harmful substances from free access to the central nervous system (CNS). Tight junctions present between the brain microvessel endothelial cells form a diffusion barrier, which selectively excludes most blood-borne substances from entering the brain. Astrocytic end-feet tightly ensheath the vessel wall and appear to be critical for the induction and maintenance of the barrier properties of the brain capillary endothelial cells. Because of these properties, the BBB only allows entry of lipophilic compounds with low molecular weights by passive diffusion. However, many lipophilic drugs show negligible brain uptake. They are substrates for drug efflux transporters such as P-glycoprotein (Pgp), multidrug resistance proteins (MRPs) or organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs) that are expressed at brain capillary endothelial cells and/or astrocytic end-feet and are key elements of the molecular machinery that confers the special permeability properties to the BBB. The combined action of these carrier systems results in rapid efflux of xenobiotics from the CNS. The objective of this review is to summarize transporter characteristics (cellular localization, specificity, regulation, and potential inhibition) for drug efflux transport systems identified in the BBB and blood-cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) barrier. A variety of experimental approaches available to ascertain or predict the impact of efflux transport on brain access of therapeutic drugs also are described and critically discussed. The potential impact of efflux transport on the pharmacodynamics of agents acting in the CNS is illustrated. Furthermore, the current knowledge about drug efflux transporters as a major determinant of multidrug resistance of brain diseases such as epilepsy is reviewed. Finally, we summarize strategies for modulating or by-passing drug efflux transporters at the BBB as novel therapeutic approaches to drug-resistant brain diseases.

Does inhibition of P-glycoprotein lead to drug–drug interactions?

Permeability-glycoprotein (Pgp) is a drug transporter responsible for the efflux of xenobiotics out of cells that influence the pharmacokinetics of numerous drugs. However, the role of this transporter in drug-drug interactions is still poorly studied even though a lot of P-glycoprotein substrates and P-glycoprotein inhibitors are identified among drugs of standard usage. On one hand, Pgp is distributed within a lot of organs and tissues implicated in the absorption or excretion of xenobiotics, and drug-drug interactions with this protein may increase the bioavailability of simultaneously administered active drugs. On the other hand, Pgp is linked to the integrity of blood-tissue barriers, such as the blood-brain barrier or placenta, and a partial blockage of Pgp could be responsible for a new drug distribution in the organism with possible increase of drug rates in organs behind these barriers. Therefore, concomitant administration of substrates and Pgp inhibitors would modify drug pharmacokinetics by increasing bioavailability and organ uptake, leading to more adverse drug reactions and toxicities. Consequently, the identification and comprehension of these drug-drug interactions remain important keys to risk assessment.

Effects of First- and Second-Generation Histamine-H1-Receptor Antagonists on the Pentobarbital-Induced Loss of the Righting Reflex in Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Mice

The second-generation histamine-H(1)-receptor antagonists, such as epinastine and cetirizine, are used as non-sedating antihistamines for treating allergic symptoms due to their poor ability to penetrate blood-brain barrier. Because it has been reported that the blood-brain barrier system is disturbed in diabetes, it is possible that second-generation histamine-H(1)-receptor antagonists may easily penetrate the blood-brain barrier and cause potent sedation in diabetics. In the present study, we investigated the effects of first-generation (diphenhydramine) and second-generation (epinastine and cetirizine) histamine-H(1)-receptor antagonists on the duration of pentobarbital-induced loss of the righting reflex (LORR) in non-diabetic and diabetic mice. Systemic treatment with diphenhydramine (3 - 30 mg/kg, s.c.), and intracerebroventricular treatment with epinastine (0.03 - 0.3 microg/mouse) and cetirizine (0.03 - 0.3 microg/mouse) dose-dependently and significantly increased the duration of pentobarbital-induced LORR in both non-diabetic and diabetic mice. Although systemic treatment with epinastine (3 - 30 mg/kg, s.c.) and cetirizine (3 - 30 mg/kg, s.c.) did not affect the duration of pentobarbital-induced LORR in non-diabetic mice, these treatments significantly prolonged it in diabetic mice. Our results suggest that the systemic administration of second-generation histamine-H(1)-receptor antagonists may produce a central nervous system depressant effect in diabetes.

Delivery of therapeutic agents to the central nervous system: the problems and the possibilities

The presence of a blood-brain barrier (BBB) and a blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier presents a huge challenge for effective delivery of therapeutics to the central nervous system (CNS). Many potential drugs, which are effective at their site of action, have failed and have been discarded during their development for clinical use due to a failure to deliver them in sufficient quantity to the CNS. In consequence, many diseases of the CNS are undertreated. In recent years, it has become clear that the blood-CNS barriers are not only anatomical barriers to the free movement of solutes between blood and brain but also transport and metabolic barriers. The cell association, sometimes called the neurovascular unit, constitutes the BBB and is now appreciated to be a complex group of interacting cells, which in combination induce the formation of a BBB. The various strategies available and under development for enhancing drug delivery to the CNS are reviewed.

Imidazole H3-antagonists: relationship between structure and ex vivo binding to rat brain H3-receptors

H3-antagonists possess promising pharmacological effects on awakening, learning and memory, but few data on their access to the central nervous system (CNS) have been reported so far. The purpose of this work was to investigate the relationships between structure and brain penetration of a series of H3-antagonists, using ex vivo binding experiments in rats. H3-antagonists belonging to different chemical classes but all having an imidazole ring, an alkyl spacer, a polar fragment and a lipophilic ending group, were selected among the numerous H3-antagonists recently described by us. Ex vivo binding studies were performed by inhibiting specific [3H]-(R)-alpha-methylhistamine ([3H]-RAMHA) binding to rat cerebral cortical membranes following H3-antagonist peripheral administration. Ionization constants and partition coefficients in n-octanol/water and 1,2-dichloroethane/water were determined by the potentiometric pH-metric method and were compared to the ex vivo binding potencies to analyse structure-property relationships (SPR). In the ex vivo assay, the H3-antagonists showed different potencies (pED50) not correlated to their in vitro H3-receptor binding affinities (pKi). Compound 4a, having a benzothiazol-2-yl-thioethyl chain, showed high ex vivo potency (ED50=1.35 mg kg(-1) i.p.) and a fast brain penetration, eliciting maximal displacement of [3H]-RAMHA already 5 min after i.v. or i.p. administration. Ex vivo binding assays of three compounds, following i.v. and i.p. administration, showed that the observed i.p. ex vivo potencies were not significantly affected by biotransformation. Within the set of compounds, those having a better ability to reach the CNS had a logDoct(7.4) in the range 2-3.5, and a DeltalogPoct-dce < 2. The combined use of two easily measurable physicochemical descriptors, namely logDoct(7.4) (apparent lipophilicity at pH 7.4) and DeltalogPoct-dce (a descriptor of H-bond donor capacity) allowed to model brain permeation of the majority of the compounds examined.

Classification analysis of P-glycoprotein substrate specificity

Prediction of P-glycoprotein substrate specificity (S(PGP)) can be viewed as a constituent part of a compound's "pharmaceutical profiling" in drug design. This task is difficult to achieve due to several factors that raised many contradictory opinions: (i) the disparity between the S(PGP) values obtained in different assays, (ii) the confusion between Pgp substrates and inhibitors, (iii) the confusion between lipophilicity and amphiphilicity of Pgp substrates, and (iv) the dilemma of describing class-specific relationships when Pgp has no binding sites of high ligand specificity. In this work, we compiled S(PGP) data for 1000 compounds. All data were represented in a binary format, assigning S(PGP) = 1 for substrates and S(PGP) = 0 for non-substrates. Each value was ranked according to the reliability of experimental assay. Two data sets were considered. Set 1 included 220 compounds with S(PGP) from polarized transport across MDR1 transfected cell monolayers. Set 2 included the entire list of 1000 compounds, with S(PGP) values of generally lower reliability. Both sets were analysed using a stepwise classification structure-activity relationship (C-SAR) method, leading to derivation of simple rules for crude estimation of S(PGP) values. The obtained rules are based on the following factors: (i) compound's size expressed through molar weight or volume, (ii) H-accepting given by the Abraham's beta (that can be crudely approximated by the sum of O and N atoms), and (iii) ionization given by the acid and base pKa values. Very roughly, S(PGP) can be estimated by the "rule of fours". Compounds with (N + O) > or = 8, MW > 400 and acid pKa > 4 are likely to be Pgp substrates, whereas compounds with (N + O) < or = 4, MW < 400 and base pKa < 8 are likely to be non-substrates. The obtained results support the view that Pgp functioning can be compared to a complex "mini-pharmacokinetic" system with fuzzy specificity. This system can be described by a probabilistic version of Abraham's solvation equation, suggesting a certain similarity between Pgp transport and chromatographic retention. The chromatographic model does not work in the case of "marginal" compounds with properties close to the "global" physicochemical cut-offs. In the latter case various class-specific rules must be considered. These can be associated with the "amphiphilicity" and "biological similarity" of compounds. The definition of class-specific effects entails construction of the knowledge base that can be very useful in ADME profiling of new drugs.

INFLUX AND EFFLUX TRANSPORT OF H1-ANTAGONIST EPINASTINE ACROSS THE BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER

We investigated influx and efflux transporters involved in blood-brain barrier transport of the nonsedative H1-antagonist epinastine. The basal-to-apical transport of [14C]epinastine was markedly higher than that in the opposite direction in LLC-GA5-COL150 cells stably transfected with human multidrug resistance (MDR)1 gene. The brain-to-plasma concentration ratio of [14C]epinastine in mdr1a/b(-/-) mice was 3.2 times higher than that in wild-type mice. The uptake of both [3H]mepyramine and [14C]epinastine into immortalized rat brain capillary endothelial cells (RBEC)1 showed temperature and concentration dependence. The kinetic parameters, K(m), V(max), and uptake clearance (V(max)/K(m)), of the initial uptake of [3H]mepyramine and [14C]epinastine by RBEC1 were 150 microM, 41.8 nmol/min/mg protein, and 279 microl/min/mg protein for mepyramine and 10.0 mM, 339 nmol/min/mg protein, and 33.9 microl/min/mg protein for epinastine, respectively. The uptake of [3H]mepyramine and [14C]epinastine by RBEC1 was inhibited by organic cations such as quinidine, amantadine, and verapamil, but not by other organic cations, tetraethyl ammonium, guanidine, and carnitine. Organic anions such as benzoic acid, estrone-3-sulfate, taurocholate, and neutral digoxin were not inhibitory. Furthermore, some cationic H1 antagonists (chlorpheniramine, cyproheptadine, ketotifen, and desloratadine) inhibited the [3H]mepyramine and [14C]epinastine uptake into RBEC1. In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that the combination of efficient efflux transport by P-glycoprotein and poor uptake by the influx transporter, which is identical with that responsible for the uptake of mepyramine, account for the low brain distribution of epinastine.

Central nervous system side effects of first- and second-generation antihistamines in school children with perennial allergic rhinitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparative study

OBJECTIVE

Allergic rhinitis is common and on the rise. Antihistamines are the mainstay of treatment and are the most commonly prescribed drugs in Singapore. Treatment-related sedation and its effect on cognition are a major concern. First- and second-generation antihistamines show varying degrees of sedation, but to date, objective studies in children are lacking. The objective of this study was to assess the sedating effect of cetirizine (second-generation antihistamine) and chlorpheniramine (first-generation antihistamine) compared with placebo using an objective neurophysiological test.

METHODS

This was a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, single-dose, 3-way crossover study. Twenty-four children aged 7 to 14 years with allergic rhinitis completed the study. All children were randomly allocated to medication sequences and received 3 different drugs on 3 different days, at least 1 week apart. The P300 event-related potential was used as an objective test of sedation. Subjective assessment was by a visual analog scale.

RESULTS

Chlorpheniramine and cetirizine increased P300 latency when compared with baseline. No significant increase was obtained with placebo. The significant increase in P300 latency was not accompanied by significant change in subjective somnolence as measured by the visual analog scale.

CONCLUSION

We have shown that cetirizine has sedative properties in children. The lack of correlation between P300 latency and the visual analog scale indicates that sedation induced by these drugs may not be subjectively noted.

P‐glycoprotein Influences the Brain Concentrations of Cetirizine (Zyrtec®), a Second‐Generation Non‐Sedating Antihistamine

Recent in vitro studies have suggested that P-glycoprotein (Pgp) and passive membrane permeability may influence the brain concentrations of non-sedating (second-generation) antihistamines. The purpose of this study was to determine the importance of Pgp-mediated efflux on the in vivo brain distribution of the non-sedating antihistamine cetirizine (Zyrtec), and the structurally related sedating (first-generation) antihistamine hydroxyzine (Atarax). In vitro MDR1-MDCKII monolayer efflux assays demonstrated that cetirizine was a Pgp substrate (B-->A/A-->B + GF120918 ratio = 5.47) with low/moderate passive permeability (PappB-->A = 56.5 nm/s). In vivo, the cetirizine brain-to-free plasma concentration ratios (0.367 to 4.30) were 2.3- to 8.7-fold higher in Pgp-deficient mice compared with wild-type mice. In contrast, hydroxyzine was not a Pgp substrate in vitro (B-->A/A-->B ratio = 0.86), had high passive permeability (PappB-->A + GF120918 = 296 nm/s), and had brain-to-free plasma concentration ratios >73 in both Pgp-deficient and wild-type mice. These studies demonstrate that Pgp-mediated efflux and passive permeability contribute to the low cetirizine brain concentrations in mice and that these properties account for the differences in the sedation side-effect profiles of cetirizine and hydroxyzine.

The role of drug transporters at the blood-brain barrier

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) is a dynamic interface between the blood and the brain. It eliminates (toxic) substances from the endothelial compartment and supplies the brain with nutrients and other (endogenous) compounds. It can be considered as an organ protecting the brain and regulating its homeostasis. Until now, many transport systems have been discovered that play an important role in maintaining BBB integrity and brain homeostasis. In this review, we focus on the role of carrier- and receptor-mediated transport systems (CMT, RMT) at the BBB. These include CMT systems, such as P-glycoprotein, multidrug-resistance proteins 1-7, nucleoside transporters, organic anion transporters, and large amino-acid transporters; RMT systems, such as the transferrin-1 and -2 receptors; and the scavenger receptors SB-AI and SB-BI.

Clinical Relevance of P-Glycoprotein in Drug Therapy

The drug efflux transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is known to confer multidrug resistance in cancer chemotherapy. The P-gp is highly expressed in many types of tumor cells, as well as many normal tissues, including the apical surface of intestinal epithelial cells, and the luminal surface of capillary endothelial cells in the brain. Because of its expression and localization, it has been suggested that P-gp plays an important role in cancer chemotherapy, intestinal absorption, and brain uptake. This review addresses the significance of the role of P-gp in cancer chemotherapy, drug absorption, and brain uptake. Based on the clinical and animal studies with P-gp modulators, it has become apparent that the role of P-gp in multidrug resistance is far less important compared to other biological factors. Although P-gp is highly expressed in both intestinal epithelial cells and endothelial cells of brain capillaries and functions as an efflux transporter in both organs, the magnitude of P-gp's impact on intestinal absorption and brain uptake of drugs is quantitatively very different. From animal and clinical studies, it is evident that P-gp plays a very important role in CNS penetration of drugs, whereas the effect of P-gp on drug absorption is not as important as generally believed.

Mechanisms of anticancer drug resistance

Chemotherapy agents are extremely important in the treatment of liquid malignancies, such as lymphoma, myeloma, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. In addition, chemotherapy agents have proven effective in the adjuvant treatment of solid tumors, such as osteosarcoma, hemangiosarcoma, transitional cell carcinoma, and others. Unfortunately, chemotherapy resistance in these situations is the most significant cause of treatment failure. Therefore, the ability to predict, treat, or circumvent resistance is extremely likely to improve clinical outcomes. This article has reviewed the most widely investigated forms of chemotherapy resistance, such as reduced drug accumulation, increased DNA damage repair, decreased apoptosis, and others; however, new mechanisms are being found at an alarming pace. In addition, investigations to date have routinely centered on single-cell mechanisms of drug resistance, and cancer is truly a three dimensional disease. The elucidation of mechanisms surrounding (1) how tumors interact with their normal microenvironment, (2) how tumors interact in a three-dimensional environment, and (3) a better understanding of basic tumor physiology and biology may supersede in importance those previously elucidated single-cell mechanisms of chemoresistance.

P-glycoprotein limits the brain penetration of nonsedating but not sedating H1-antagonists

The present study evaluates the impact of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) on plasma-brain disposition and transepithelial transport of sedating versus nonsedating H1-antagonists using multidrug-resistant (mdr) gene 1a and 1b (mdr1a/b) knockout (KO) mice and human MDR1-transfected Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells. Three nonsedating (cetirizine, loratadine, and desloratadine) and three sedating (diphenhydramine, hydroxyzine, and triprolidine) H1-antagonists were tested. Each compound was administered to KO and wild-type (WT) mice intravenously at 5 mg/kg. Plasma and brain drug concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis. Mean pharmacokinetic parameters (CL, V(ss), and t(1/2)) were obtained using WinNonlin. In addition, certirizine, desloratadine, diphenhydramine, and triprolidine (2 microM) were tested as substrates for MDR1 using MDR1-MDCK cells. The bidirectional apparent permeability was determined by measuring the amount of compound at the receiving side at 5 h. The brain-to-plasma area under the curve (AUC) ratio was 4-, 2-, and >14-fold higher in KO compared with WT mice for cetirizine, loratadine, and desloratadine, respectively. In contrast, the brain-to-plasma AUC ratio between KO and WT was comparable for hydroxyzine, diphenhydramine, and triprolidine. Likewise, the efflux ratio between basolateral to apical and apical to basolateral was 4.6- and 6.6-fold higher in MDR1-MDCK than the parental MDCK for certirizine and desloratadine, respectively, whereas it was approximately 1 for diphenhydramine and triprolidine. Our results demonstrate that sedating H1-antagonists hydroxyzine, diphenhydramine, and triprolidine are not P-gp substrates. In contrast, nonsedating H1-antagonists cetirizine, loratadine, and desloratadine are P-gp substrates. Affinity for P-gp at BBB may explain the lack of central nervous system side effects of modern H1-antagonists.

Drug efflux transporters in the CNS

The central nervous system (CNS) contains important cellular barriers that maintain homeostasis by protecting the brain from circulating toxins and through the elimination of toxic metabolites generated in the brain. The barriers that limit the concentration of toxins and xenobiotics in the interstitial fluids of the CNS are the capillary endothelial cells of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and the epithelial cells of the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier (BCSFB). Both of these barriers have cellular tight junctions and express transport systems which serve to actively transport nutrients into the brain, and actively efflux toxic metabolites and xenobiotics out of the brain. This review will focus on the expression and function of selected drug efflux transporters in these two barriers, specifically the multidrug resistance transporter, p-glycoprotein, and various organic anion transporters, such as multidrug resistance-associated proteins, organic anion transporter polypeptides, and organic anion transporters. These transport systems are increasingly recognized as important determinants of drug distribution to, and elimination from, different compartments of the CNS. Consequences of drug efflux transporters in barriers of the CNS include limiting the distribution of substrates that are beneficial to treat CNS diseases, and increasing the possibility of drug-drug interactions that may lead to untoward toxicities. Therefore, the study of these transporters is important in examining the various determinants of drug delivery to the CNS.

In vivo evidence for a lack of central effect of ebastine, an antihistaminic agent, in rats: a microdialysis study

The effects of ebastine and its active metabolite carebastine on brain dopamine uptake and the accessibility to brain were compared with those for a classical antihistaminic agent chlorpheniramine by using the microdialysis technique. Both carebastine and chlorpheniramine potently inhibited brain [(3)H]dopamine uptake and increased the extracellular concentration of dopamine in the striatum after local perfusion via microdialysis probes, although systemic injection of ebastine but not chlorpheniramine did not change the dopamine level. These findings suggest that neither ebastine nor carebastine affects central dopamine metabolism because of a limited access to brain, in spite of having a potent inhibitory action on neuronal dopamine uptake.

Transporter-mediated Drug Interactions

Since 1994, researchers have isolated various genes encoding transporter proteins involved in drug uptake into and efflux from tissues that play key roles in the absorption, distribution and secretion of drugs in animals and humans. The pharmacokinetic characteristics of drugs that are substrates for these transporters are expected to be influenced by coadministered drugs that work as inhibitors or enhancers of the transporter function. This review deals with recent progress in molecular and functional research on drug transporters, and then with transporter-mediated drug interactions in absorption and secretion from the intestine, secretion from the kidney and liver, and transport across the blood-brain barrier in humans. Although the participation of the particular transporters in observed drug-drug interactions can be difficult to confirm in humans, this review focuses mainly on pharmacokinetic interactions of clinically important drugs.