A Comparison of Operational Definitions for Mild Cognitive Impairment

Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Symptoms: Two Sides of the Same Coin?

Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) are increasingly being recognized as clinical markers for incipient dementia in Alzheimer's disease (AD dementia). NPS may reinforce cognitive impairment or decline and vice versa. Although NPS are frequent already in mild cognitive impairment, their mechanisms are poorly understood. It is unclear if they share biological mechanisms with cognitive symptoms and how they are associated to structural brain changes, but evidence suggests associations of NPS to cerebral atrophy. An additional NPS dimension in AD dementia concepts might add valuable information to detect patients at risk for AD dementia.

Relevance of Minor Neuropsychological Deficits in Patients With Subjective Cognitive Decline

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To determine the relevance of minor neuropsychological deficits (MNPD) in patients with subjective cognitive decline (SCD) with regard to CSF levels of Alzheimer disease (AD) biomarkers, cognitive decline, and clinical progression to mild cognitive impairment (MCI).

METHODS

This study included patients with clinical SCD and SCD-free, healthy control (HC) participants with available baseline CSF and/or longitudinal cognitive data from the observational DZNE Longitudinal Cognitive Impairment and Dementia study. We defined MNPD as a performance of at least 0.5SD below the mean on a demographically adjusted total score derived from the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease neuropsychological assessment battery. We compared SCD patients with MNPD and those without MNPD with regard to CSF amyloid-β (Aβ)42/Aβ40, phosphorylated tau (p-tau181), total tau and Aβ42/p-tau181 levels, longitudinal cognitive composite trajectories, and risk of clinical progression to incident MCI (follow-up M ± SD: 40.6 ± 23.7 months). In addition, we explored group differences between SCD and HC in those without MNPD.

RESULTS

In our sample (N = 672, mean age: 70.7 ± 5.9 years, 50% female), SCD patients with MNPD (n = 55, 12.5% of SCD group) showed significantly more abnormal CSF biomarker levels, increased cognitive decline, and a higher risk of progression to incident MCI (HR: 4.07, 95% CI 2.46-6.74) compared with SCD patients without MNPD (n = 384). MNPD had a positive predictive value of 57.0% (95% CI 38.5-75.4) and a negative predictive value of 86.0% (95% CI 81.9-90.1) for the progression of SCD to MCI within 3 years. SCD patients without MNPD showed increased cognitive decline and a higher risk of incident MCI compared with HC participants without MNPD (n = 215; HR: 4.09, 95% CI 2.07-8.09), while AD biomarker levels did not differ significantly between these groups.

DISCUSSION

Our results suggest that MNPD are a risk factor for AD-related clinical progression in cognitively normal patients seeking medical counseling because of SCD. As such, the assessment of MNPD could be useful for individual clinical prediction and for AD risk stratification in clinical trials. However, SCD remains a risk factor for future cognitive decline even in the absence of MNPD.

Antihypertensive therapy is associated with improved visuospatial, executive, attention, abstraction, memory, and recall scores on the montreal cognitive assessment in geriatric hypertensive patients

Background

The prevalence of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) has increased over the past few decades. However, it can potentially be reversed if detected early. Early detection of MCI using the sensitive Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) might prove to be an important cog in the wheel in identifying and slowing down this morbid pandemic in hypertensive persons.

Objectives

To study the association of antihypertensive agents on cognitive scores and prevalence of MCI using the MoCA.

Materials and methods

This is a single-center, controlled, observational, cross-sectional study in a tertiary care teaching hospital in India. Cognitive assessment was done using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. Data on MoCA scores were comprehensively analyzed.

Results

A total of N = 210 patients (n = 105 the in study and control groups) were included in the study. The median (IQR) MoCA score (out of 30 points) in patients taking antihypertensives was 26 (25 - 27), while it was 24 (22 - 25) in the control group. There was no difference in MoCA scores between patients taking lipophilic or hydrophilic antihypertensives. Similarly, there was no difference in MoCA scores between patients taking different drug regimens.

Conclusion

Anti-hypertensive therapy and lower blood pressure had a statistically significant positive association with visuospatial, executive, attention, abstraction, memory, and recall MoCA scores. Patients on antihypertensive therapy also had a lower prevalence of MCI. MoCA scores were similar in patients on either lipophilic or hydrophilic drugs and were similar between patients on different antihypertensive drug classes.